13.07.2015 Views

Supporting ICT Diffusion in Australian Construction Organisations ...

Supporting ICT Diffusion in Australian Construction Organisations ...

Supporting ICT Diffusion in Australian Construction Organisations ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Implementer (L1) 1 1 1Project/Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g manager (L2) 4 1 1Site eng<strong>in</strong>eer (L3) 1 3 2Foreman (L4) 1 1 1Total 8 7 6We mapped the social networks that formed the l<strong>in</strong>kages and illustrate therelationships of people cooperat<strong>in</strong>g to solve problems and help each other to betterknow how to use <strong>ICT</strong> applications, <strong>in</strong> this case groupware applications. It is beyondthe scope of this paper to fully report on each contractors’ form of COP so we havetaken one them to illustrate the po<strong>in</strong>t.This company has received several awards relat<strong>in</strong>g to construction <strong>in</strong>novation. Thecompany has strong policy support for improvement of construction productivity andsafety. At the time of this study, their commitment to us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>ICT</strong> was project-byprojectbased. They briefed project participants to provide them with an understand<strong>in</strong>gof benefits of us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>ICT</strong>. After obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g commitment for <strong>ICT</strong> use from CSC projectmanagers and other ma<strong>in</strong> project participants (such as client, design consultants), theimplementer would provide tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g for project participants and expected CSC users.COP(3)COP(1)InstitutionNetworkSite Eng<strong>in</strong>eer (L3)Foreman (L4)Implementer (L1)Project SiteManager (L2)COP(2)Site Adm<strong>in</strong>istrator (L3)FormalAd hocComb<strong>in</strong>e= GatekeepersFigure 1: Case study C’s community of practiceAn external project web service developed the <strong>ICT</strong> application. The implementer alsohad a role <strong>in</strong> facilitat<strong>in</strong>g customisation of the <strong>ICT</strong> application to suit the company’swork processes and provided strong support for diffusion of <strong>ICT</strong> with<strong>in</strong> CSC andother project participants. The strength of COP(1) <strong>in</strong> Figure 1 (Peansupap et al. 2003)is ma<strong>in</strong>ly dependent upon the implementer who had the knowledge and background ofboth the construction and computer context. He started his own communities byprovid<strong>in</strong>g tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g on how to use the application for his teams and ma<strong>in</strong> projectparticipants.In addition to COP(1), the implementer, <strong>in</strong>teracts <strong>in</strong> COP(2) a COP of colleagues.Several COP(2) existed for collegial help and they have a positive <strong>in</strong>fluence on noviceeng<strong>in</strong>eers who did not receive any tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g sessions to develop skills and be able toT:\CRC\CRCCI\CRC CI\Research Program\PROJECTS\2001\2001-004-A\ResearchDeliverables\Journal Articles\2001-004-A AIQS Build<strong>in</strong>g Economist Magaz<strong>in</strong>e 2(20040617).doc 3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!