July 1, 2013 Regular Mtg - City of Anoka

City Council - Regular MeetingMonday, July 1, 2013 - 7:00 p.m.Council Chambers1. CALL TO ORDER2. ROLL CALL3. COUNCIL MINUTES3.1 Minutes of May 28, 2013 Worksession.Minutes of June 17, 2013 Regular Mtg.Minutes of June 24, 2013 Worksession.(meeting will be cablecast)4. OPEN FORUM *The open forum is an opportunity for the public to address the City Councilconcerning items not listed on the agenda. Please raise your hand to be recognized by the Mayor ormember officiating the meeting. Approach the podium and state your full name and address for therecord. Rules of Conduct as listed in the public folder provided at the entrance of the CouncilChambers must be adhered to.5. PUBLIC HEARING(S)5.1 Housing Improvement Area Assessment.RES/Adopting Housing Improvement Assessment.6. CONSENT AGENDA6.1 Verified Bills.6.2 Revising & Setting Council Calendars.6.3 Recommend Approval of a State issued LG220 Gambling Permit for Zion Lutheran Church.6.4 Approve the issuance of a Tobacco License for Anoka Gas Stop Inc., 703 E River Rd.7. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS7.1 Planning Commission:7.1.A ORD/Rezoning to B-1 Highway Business; 3201 & 3215 Round Lk Blvd. (2 nd reading)8. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATION9. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS9.1 RES/Housing Improvement Area Assessment. (acted upon after public hearing)9.2 RES/LG214 Premise Permit for Pull-tabs at MacGillycuddy’s; St. Paul Midway Lions ClubFoundation.9.3 RES/River Front Park Project; Accept Bids & Award a Construction Contract.9.4 RES/Castle Field Project - Phase II; Order Project, Waive Public Improvement Hearing &Authorize Preparation of Plans & Specs.

Anoka City Council Regular Meeting – July 1, 20139.5 RES/Mississippi River Trail Project; Approve Plans & Specifications, Set a bid date, andAuthorize Advertisement for Bids.9.6 RES/Boat Slips on the Upper Rum River; Approve Lease Fees. (BY MOTION NOT RES)9.7 RES/Commencement of Renewal Proceedings Under the Federal Cable Act.9.8 RES/Approving one additional handicap parking space on the north side on Jackson St (200block)9.9 RES/Recommended Approval of an LG230 Off-Site Gambling Permit; Anoka Area HockeyAssociation10. UNFINISHED BUSINESS11. NEW BUSINESS11.1 Approval of Capital Improvement Plan (CIP).11.2 Approval of Equipment Replacement Plan (ERP).12. UPDATES & REPORTS12.1 Tentative Agendas.ADJOURNMENT

COUNCIL MEMO FORMMeeting Date July 1, 2013Agenda Section Council MinutesItem Description Various City Council Meeting MinutesSubmitted ByAmy Oehlers, City Clerk3.1BACKGROUND INFORMATIONIncluded in your packet are minutes (s) of previous Council meetings, worksessions, special meetings, etc.Minutes must be approved by the City Council and are kept permanently in the official City Council MinuteBook.FINANCIAL IMPACTNone.COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTEDApproval of minutes.3 of 360

May 28, 2013 (Worksession)Page 1 of 181. CALL TO ORDERWORKSESSION OF THE ANOKA CITY COUNCILANOKA CITY HALLCITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION ROOMMAY 28, 2013Mayor Pro Tem Anderson called the worksession meeting to order at 5:00 p.m.2. ROLL CALLPresent at roll call: Mayor Rice (arrived at 5:40 p.m.), Councilmembers Anderson,Schmidt, and Weaver.Absent: Councilmember Freeburg.Staff present: City Manager Tim Cruikshank; Director of Public Services/City EngineerGreg Lee; Finance Director Lori Yager; Planning Director Carolyn Braun; EconomicDevelopment Coordinator/Planner Erik Thorvig; Associate Planner Crystal Pauman;Electric Utility Director Dan Voss; Golf Course Director Greg Norland; and RecordingSecretary Cathy Sorensen.3. COUNCIL BUSINESS and/or DISCUSSION ITEMS3.1 Discussion; Streetlights.Electric Utility Director Dan Voss stated that at the January 28th work session,Council directed staff to install a new type of LED fixture in the Oakwood Drive,Levee-Rice Street test areas. The fixtures purchased in 2010 for the test areas hada color temperature of 5,000K (blue hue) and a lighting distribution pattern type IIwhich is used in a parking lot and caused the light to shine all around the pole.Residents in the test areas disliked the LED lights very much. Many peoplecomplained that the bluish light given off is cold and unwelcoming and that thelight was very bright. The light spills into their living room and bedrooms andcurtains/shades don’t seem to shut out the light.At the January 28th work session Council reviewed a LED fixture that had a colortemperature of 3,000K and a lighting distribution pattern type III which is the typeof light pattern used on residential streets that direct the majority of light towardthe street and less to the houses.Electric staff removed the existing 100 watt, high pressure sodium, 2,500K, nolight distribution pattern fixture and installed a new Holophane, 40 watt, 3,000K,type III lighting pattern LED fixture during the week of May 6th at the followinglocations:4 of 360

May 28, 2013 (Worksession)Page 2 of 18• Four fixtures between 1401 and 1317 Oakwood Drive• One fixture at the intersection of 3rd Avenue and Oakwood Drive• One fixture at the 3rd Avenue cul-de-sac in front of 1185 3rd Avenue• One fixture at 1707 Levee Avenue• One fixture at the Rice Street BeachStaff is still waiting for delivery of six Hadco, 40 watt, 3,000K, type III lightingpattern LED fixtures to install in the 2013 street renewal area.Councilmember Schmidt confirmed that the additional lights from a differentmanufacturer are 3,000K and Hadco type at Greenhaven Golf Course, addingthere is no functional difference in type just the manufacturer.City Manager Tim Cruikshank said the reason this is on the agenda is that thereare a number of lights installed in certain neighborhoods and some neighborswanted to share their feedback on the lighting choices.Jan Blair, Anoka, asked what type of light was placed on Second Avenue. Mr.Voss said back to 100W HP sodium.Mr. Cruikshank suggested that Council is hearing from neighbors independently.Councilmember Weaver asked if the neighbors were consulted. Mr. Cruikshanksaid staff had contacted them and expected them to attend.Councilmember Weaver asked that staff confirm with the neighborhood beforefinal action but said the fixtures do not seem as bad as previously thought,although they are not an acorn style. Mr. Voss said the Hadco type does have theacorn style and that those will be the ones likely chosen.Councilmember Schmidt said the two lights at Rice Lake Beach have a verydifferent pattern of 360 degrees, which takes some getting used to due to theshield. Mr. Voss agreed, stating the original lights ones on Rice Street had globeswithout prisms and that the Halofane lights have more direct light. He said theHadco style has the same type of prisms.Councilmember Schmidt said these lights are far less obtrusive then the first LEDlights due to the design and KV. He said it will be interesting to see the Hadcolights for comparison.3.2 Discussion; Sewer Back-up.Director of Public Services/City Engineer Greg Lee stated that on March 8, 2013,a sanitary sewer backup incident occurred on Oakwood Lane between 3rd and 4thAvenue. Staff shared Sewer Callout Reports from both from Bill Bendiske, UtilityEmployee and Pete Klingenberg Utility Supervisor and a summary of the seven5 of 360

May 28, 2013 (Worksession)Page 3 of 18(7) properties that were impacted by this backup and the cost each propertyincurred by the initial cleanup performed by Service Master.At the April 22, 2013 Worksession, the City Council discussed Sanitary SewerIncident Actions Steps and Policies. Mark Lenz of Bearence Insurance, anInsurance Broker working with the League of Minnesota Cities, was in attendanceat the Worksession and provided information and consultation on insurance as itrelates to sewer backup and other such incidents.One of the action steps developed at the April 22nd Worksession was to enhanceour public communications by informing property owners about sewer backups.This would include what not to dispose of in the sewer systems and insuranceoptions that address sewer backups and other such incidences.The City has provided such information in the past, including a Water UtilityNotice that was included in every utility bill in April 2007. However, in light ofthe Oakwood sewer backup incident, Public Services will be embarking on apublic informational campaign.On May 5th the City mailed out a Sanitary Sewer Disposal Letter and MPCAmedical waste disposal brochure to the property owners “upstream“ from theOakwood sewer backup area; a total of 308 properties. We are using the Leagueof Minnesota Cities templates to develop several sewer Public InformationDocuments to be disseminated over the next few weeks, including:• City News Letter Article• Brochure• Resident Letter• Utility Bill Stuffer• WebsiteThe City newsletter has been developed and submitted for publishing as part ofthe summer edition of City View News Letter (June-September). Staff iscurrently developing a brochure, resident letter, utility bill stuffer, and an articlefor our website based on the League of Minnesota Cities templates. Thesedocuments will address not only what NOT to dispose of in the sanitary sewer,but will include information regarding insurance and how to protect their propertyfrom sewer backups.Other steps the Public Services Department is taking to address sewer backupsonce an incident has occurred and steps to prevent reoccurrence of such incidentsinclude:• Develop an “Emergency Information Brochure” – this brochure will be handedout to all property owners involved in either a sewer backup or a failure of theirsewer or water service. It will include such information as; responsibilities for allparties involved, contact information of licensed contractors.6 of 360

May 28, 2013 (Worksession)Page 4 of 18• Continue to add problem areas to the City’s existing “Increased Inspection AreaProgram”• Explore the feasibility of including low flow alarms at key lift stations on thesystem• Explore the feasibility of adding more high liquid level alarms to key manholes.Mr. Cruikshank stated the reason this was being discussed again was because ofcomments made by staff regarding possible reimbursement and how we can makethis right.Councilmember Weaver said that Mr. Patula was the only attendee at the April 22work session, and that this seemed almost a non-issue so he was glad that othersattended the Council meeting to share their concerns. He said if he had knownabout staff’s inference to reimbursement they may have been a different outcome.He said someone misspoke who was not authorized to speak about reimbursementcosts, adding that liability and responsibility are two different things.Councilmember Schmidt said that information as inadvertently allowed that ledcitizens to believe that some type of positive response would be received from theCity regarding clean up by ServiceMaster. He said the residents relied on Citystaff and hoped that this will not set a precedent. He said we need to be moreprepared in situations such as these.Mr. Cruikshank said staff at times will say things that are not accurate but if thereis no impact it is one thing but when actions are different based on staff inputthere can be an impact such as now.Councilmember Schmidt said this is the appropriate action to respond but addedhe doesn’t want to stifle staff so much that they don’t respond because sometimesthey have to act fast.Mr. Cruikshank said staff wants to help and has good intentions, and while theymay have overstepped in this instance but/for an acknowledgement we wouldn’tbe recommending reimbursing the ServiceMaster costs. He said the League ofMinnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT) said City is not liable for this back-up,adding we won’t be paying for these types of costs in the future if deemed notresponsible because this is just a gesture.Finance Director Lori Yager shared an email from Mark Lenz of the LMCITstating that with regard to this particular incident this action would have nobearing on the adjustment of claims in the future, meaning we won’t be penalizedfor future claims. Mr. Lenz suggested that staff work with the City Attorneywhen finalizing the cleanup reimbursements.Mr. Cruikshank said staff will finalize the reimbursements and bring back to aCity Council meeting.7 of 360

May 28, 2013 (Worksession)Page 5 of 18Councilmember Weaver said seven homeowners were affected through thisincident and said that residents should consider adding an insurance rider on theirhomeowners’ policy for situations such as this. He said this has been a learningexperience for everyone.Council consensus was to reimburse for ServiceMaster/clean-up costs thatresulted from this sewer back-up incident.David Hawkins, 412 Oakwood, said they were instructed by staff on the processon what was needed in order to be reimbursed for cleanup which they followed.He said he understands other issues were involved but said he had concerns aboutthis part of the process.John Engen, 401 Oakwood, said he was not made aware of the April 22 meetingotherwise he would have attended along with many others.Mayor Pro Tem Anderson asked how we notified the public about this meeting.Mr. Patula said he was notified through the newspaper.Mr. Engen said staff was busy being City Hall and forgot about being Anokaresidents. He said this is a place we want to live and it seemed like Anoka failedus, the Council specifically. He asked who made determination that City is notliable. He said we have no idea where the blockage was and asked if it wasactually material that shut off flowage of sewer or the action of the jetter. Mr.Engen asked to see the pipes because we have heard that the City is not liable,which could be what the City wanted us to hear. He said a jetter pushes 400gallons of water per minute through the system and it is possible that waterintroduced into the system was the cause instead.Mr. Lee explained how the jetter works, adding it was done downstream of theblockage. Mr. Engen said he wanted to know where the blockage was so he canunderstand how this happened.Mr. Lee said he will have the Utility Supervisor meet with Mr. Engen on site toreview this with him. Mr. Engen said he was told by Councilmember Freeburgbefore that this would happen but it never did.Mayor Pro Tem Anderson thanked Mr. Engen for his comments.Mr. Cruikshank noted that Councilmember Freeburg has worked hard and is veryconcerned about this issue. Mr. Engen said that may be the case but he did notget that impression. He said he would like the information to satisfy his questionon responsibility of this issue.8 of 360

May 28, 2013 (Worksession)Page 6 of 18Kevin Grabinske, 424 Oakwood, thanked the City for the letter regarding thissituation as it covered a lot of information. He noted that he would have liked toreceive it earlier though.Councilmember Schmidt inquired about the action plan of informing residents ofpotential situations such as this again. Mr. Cruikshank shared a copy ofinformation sent to residents in 2007 but said it is good to share this informationover and over.Mr. Lee said their goal is to increase the public information piece about what notto put down a sewer, insurance riders, etc. He said they did a direct mailing to the308 property owners upstream of this incident and placed an article in the Citynewsletter and with the June utility bills. Mr. Lee said they will continue toeducate the public over the next several months, including posting information onthe City’s website.Ms. Engen, 401 Oakwood, said if needles caused this backup why weren’t thepolice notified to potentially identify illegal action. Mr. Cruikshank saidunfortunately we cannot identify the source of the blockage.Mr. Hawkins said he felt the source could be determined fairly easily.Ms. Engen said if someone is using needles for medical reasons they usuallyknow how to properly dispose of them. She said her neighbor, Ms. Young, paidthe claim because of concerns of placing a lien on house and that this was verycost prohibitive to her.Mr. Grabinske asked if the public was notified when the City’s rider endorsementwas removed from the policy. Ms. Yager said the City never had the riderendorsement as it is very expensive.Mr. Cruikshank agreed, stating he would be surprised if many cities carry thatrider due to its prohibitive cost.3.3 Discussion; Cottages 2, 3 and 4.Economic Development Coordinator/Planner Erik Thorvig stated the ACCRRHScampus has been discussed and that on April 1, 2013 the City Council passed aresolution requesting Anoka County to consider alternatives to demolition of thecottages. A tour of the cottages took place on April 15, 2013. The City iscurrently marketing 6.96 acres of city owned land west of 4th Avenue and south ofthe ACCRRHS campus for high or medium density residential development.Because the land is adjacent to the campus, there could be a scenario where aprivate developer purchases Anoka County land and includes preservation andreuse of the three cottages into a development scenario. This scenario wouldrequire participation by Anoka County as the current land owner and the State of9 of 360

May 28, 2013 (Worksession)Page 7 of 18Minnesota who has reverting rights on the cottages if they are not used by apublic entity.The redevelopment area could be as large at 15.7 acres. The area is regulated by a300’ easement along the Rum River which defines the west development line.The purpose of this item is for general discussion and exploration. Financialdetails, etc. have not been taken into consideration at this time.Councilmember Anderson said he was pleased to hear about this idea, adding oneof his concerns is the City and Planning Commission will need to review forcontemporaneous uses for all cottages so they are compatible. He said he knowsthis will also be the County’s concern.Barb Thurston, Daughters of the Revolution (DAR), asked if the three cottageswith another development would preclude the entire area from being on theNational Register.Todd McMahon, Anoka Historical Society, said he is not a registered historianbut that Mike Coop from the State’s office was asked this question and believedthat may not have an impact.Ms. Thurston shared that they held a presentation on Fisher House at their lastDAR meeting, which is similar to a Ronald McDonald House for veterans. Shesaid with the light rail location and the VA in Ramsey this could be an option forthese cottages.Mr. Thorvig said staff has had a conversation regarding a similar use but notedaccessibility in these buildings could be an issue.Councilmember Weaver said they have addressed that with cottages to the eastwith elevator access.Mr. Cruikshank said staff is not saying it is not possible just another challenge.He said they are trying to think creatively about possibilities as this is riverproperty that could be developed. He noted that Representative Abeler mayattend the meeting later and is on board with an idea and will help work with theState, Department of Administration, and Human Services, all of whom arereceptive to ideas. Mr. Cruikshank said this is not necessarily a solution but is ahope but we have to have the County on board as well. He said they will wantother thoughts but private development in some way could go a long way.Councilmember Weaver asked if the County has listed these cottages on theNational Register yet. Mr. McMahon said the County Attorney’s Office islooking at the impacts first.10 of 360

May 28, 2013 (Worksession)Page 8 of 18Councilmember Weaver said the listing should open the cottages up for additionalfunding options.Mr. McMahon said Legacy Funds could have been one option but is not becausethey are not on the National Register, adding there have been too many requests.Councilmember Weaver asked how we can continue to encourage the County inthis effort. Mr. Cruikshank said political support will be needed to push theNational Register.Councilmember Schmidt said an interested party like the Historical Society couldnominate the property for Register. Mr. McMahon said a publicly-ownedbuilding could be nominated by anyone but actually is only a process and that thegrant writing could be put on hold if the owner doesn’t wish to have it listed. Hesaid the action allows for the work to be done but the process begins only once anobjection is removed.Councilmember Schmidt asked if prior buy-in from the County could be handedto the Society. Mr. McMahon shared that the Society would be willing to helpwith the process for the County but that they were concerned about impacts.Representative Jim Abeler said the cottages are a liability to the County but thatthey can’t get rid of them because they received them as a block so a portionwould be returned to the State for use or sold for fair market value. He saidtherefore the County has to have them all along with their liability. He shared acreative plan adding some other buildings and parking that would allow for theCounty to get rid of their liability and create a nice, unique development.Representative Abeler suggested an RFI process with the Heritage PreservationCommission’s (HPC) involvement but if no developer is interested then it will bedifficult. He said the City should push as hard within reason, adding thatstructurally the buildings are sound but the roofs are in poor condition. He saidthis would be a unique project with some exemptions given but would be wortharguing for.Mayor Rice said he liked the idea of moving development across the courtyard,adding other buildings are in need of repair too. Mayor Rice shared pushing fordeveloper interest as compatibility has been a concern all along but that thismakes sense as it would be a good buffer for the area.Mr. Thorvig said they have seven acres listed with many contacts so we can passthis information to agent on a bigger idea to see what people are thinking.Representative Abeler said he would be careful about selling the seven acres asthis should be the bait. He said the County needs a place to have their functionsso this could work.11 of 360

May 28, 2013 (Worksession)Page 9 of 18Councilmember Schmidt asked if we have any accounting for how much is in theseven acres. Ms. Yager said there is $900,000 left including the seven acres onthe other side, which she anticipates being $700,000 or $1.8 million now.Councilmember Schmidt said he is not sure if he can balance $1.8 million fortrade but if we’ve recouped most of the costs it could be considered.Mr. Cruikshank said everyone would have to buy in for this to work.Ms. Yager said she believes the County paid for the small strip in between so theydo have an interest in this concept.Council consensus was to keep working with the real estate agents and possiblycreate a Request for Information for development of this site.Mayor Rice said the Volunteers of America (VOA) may be an interested partneras this is a state of the art facility and they could want more because they have alot invested.Mr. Thorvig said staff has not spoken with the VOA regarding this possibility butwill.3.4 Discussion; Carpenter’s Hall.Councilmember Weaver stated that he will be abstaining from this discussion.Mr. Thorvig stated that last July the City purchased the property at 1534 S. FerryStreet (formally the Carpenter’s Hall) for $265,500. Since then the City has gonethrough a planning process for the S. Ferry Street corridor. Plans generally showredevelopment of the site with a building of similar size (4,632 sf.) with upgradedparking lot.Staff believes there are three options for the future of the site:Demolish the building and sell the property for redevelopment. Generally the sitewould accommodate a retail, office, or restaurant type use in a 5,000-6,000 sf.building. The site is 22,154 sf. and would sell for $177,232 if sold at $8/sf.Demolition would likely cost around $15,000. The City could consider arestrictive covenant on the property to control future uses.Lease the building. Last fall staff did receive an inquiry from a propertymanagement company looking to use the building for their main office howeverthis didn’t work out. The building needs some work to make it functional. Suchthings include technology upgrades, cleaning, and general maintenance. Generallythe interior layout also makes leasing the building more difficult than typical. If12 of 360

May 28, 2013 (Worksession)Page 10 of 18leased, the property would be subject to taxes, which for 2013 are $9,666. Thiscost would be factored into the lease rate.Sell the property and building as-is. The property could be sold as-is for a similarprice to what the city purchased it for. The City could consider a restrictivecovenant on the property to control future uses. Current tax value for the propertyis $252,900.Councilmember Anderson said the open areas impress him and could be turnedinto a very nice restaurant, although he is troubled by the traffic. He said thiscould be addressed though most likely. He said he would like to see the City lookfor a buyer or tenant and make use of the amenities of a modern look andproximity to Ferry Street.Councilmember Schmidt said he is not responsive to renting as it puts uscompeting with our own taxpayers. He said he would prefer restrictive covenantsand then removing the pieces worthy of reclaiming such as the wood beams. Hesaid this is not an attractive building and that he is in favor of trying to decidewhat can’t happen on the site and then selling the land after demolition of thebuilding.Councilmember Anderson agreed that demolition is an option if the property can’tbe sold. He said he appreciated the comments on rental too so we should look atdisposal.Councilmember Schmidt asked what we don’t want to see on this site. Ms. Braunsaid the Planning Commission is working on a new riverfront zoning district thatwill help us identify what types of uses should be allowed. She said the Councilmay want to be more restrictive with covenants but that rental is likely not usefulin this corridor.HRA Commissioner Elvig said they are trying to beautify Anoka and since this isnot an attractive building a future tenant will likely want the building demolished.Councilmember Schmidt said there are similar concerns at this site as theCottages but noted this building is historic. He said there will likely be asbestosremediation and ADA compliancy, which seems to be a lot of work.PAB Commissioner Bonthius asked if there is anything we can do to improvetraffic. Mayor Rice said the signal was a great compromise and greater thannecessary for the current use.Mr. Lee shared how the signal was obtained, stating it is likely set to maximumallowable cars per day of 44,000 for appropriate traffic flow. He said more couldbe done at the side streets but not much more because there is nothing on mainroad.13 of 360

May 28, 2013 (Worksession)Page 11 of 18Mr. Thorvig said the redevelopment standpoint for this area along with the eastside of Ferry Street will be included in the TIF District so there will be somelimited pods and upgrades in use to get more TIF, so this is really more of aredevelopment site. He added the property has been identified as substandard.Councilmember Anderson said he was confused because we can’t solve the trafficproblem just as the new owner won’t be able to solve it either.Mayor Rice said some businesses believe that heavy traffic pattern will help butthat he has his reservations.Councilmember Anderson said crossing at Ferry Street and Main Street is muchdifferent, adding we have made quite an investment in our park in this area aswell.Councilmember Schmidt noted the Sihloh House will be included in thisredevelopment area and that he looks forward to the Planning Commission’sinput.Council consensus was the building was in poor condition and since no one willreally want it the building should be demolished and offered as a building site.Mr. Cruikshank said staff agrees with Council that there is not a lot of potential inthe building.Councilmember Anderson said the traffic is bad here so we have to solve theaccess problem to make this valuable property in this area.Mayor Rice said it is a challenging road with the curves.Mr. Thorvig said staff will work to sell the wooden beams inside to recoup somecosts.Mayor Rice said if we sell we’ll have to compromise a lot for the price we need.Mr. Thorvig said we could start at $7/square foot and see what happens.Mr. Cruikshank asked if the land would be more valuable with the buildingremoved. Mr. Thorvig said we should keep the building for now but market it asland only because the building has some value.Mayor Rice said the City paid $252,900 for the property and that he suggestedbuying it for $150,000. He said there should be some interest in the property,although the building could be reused by a developer.Councilmember Schmidt asked about the expected completion for the newordinance. Ms. Braun said the Planning Commission is almost complete so it willlikely be before Council in July.14 of 360

May 28, 2013 (Worksession)Page 12 of 18Mayor Rice said the building could be demolished whenever they chose but thatthey don’t want to sell it until the ordinance is in place.Mr. Thorvig said staff will research beam pricing for resale.Representative Abeler complimented the Council on their great discussionprocess, adding he would like to invite the new Traffic Commissioner to a futurework session.3.5 Discussion; 1632 South Ferry Street.Ms. Braun stated the City acquired the property at 1632 South Ferry Street inearly April. As part of the planning process for the South Ferry Street corridor,staff is now seeking your input on several items related to this property.Use of the PropertyStaff was planning to market this property for single family use, consistent withits long-term us. Over the past month or so, however, staff has been approachedby individuals interested in using the property for other uses. As you may recall,staff provided you with a request to consider the site as a base of operations for atrolley service. We have also been approached about the potential for leasing thesite for use as a tearoom/restaurant.At this point, staff needs input from the Council about your desires for use of theproperty. The Planning Commission has been working on a draft for a new zoningdistrict for the east side of the South Ferry Street Corridor, from Main Street southto the Mississippi River. (See attached) If the Council prefers a single family use,staff would (1) put the property on the market and (2) revise the proposed zoningordinance accordingly. If the Council is interested in alternative uses, staff wouldsuggest that we prepare and advertise a Request for Proposals for use of theproperty.Technical IssuesPrior to a sale or lease of the property, there are a number of technical issues thatneed to be addressed. The Woodbury House currently has access by way of aneasement across the property to the south owned by the Weaver Brothers. Theowners of the neighboring property are willing to donate a portion of theirproperty to provide a dedicated access to the 1632 property. Through the planningprocess for South Ferry Street, it has been suggested that most of the twonortherly parcels on the 1632 site be separated from the house site. The northerlylots are restricted from development by a viewshed easement. It is intended thatthis area remain public and serve as green space.In response to the land division issues, the City hired Hakanson Anderson toprepare a draft plat. The proposed plat creates 3 new separate parcels. Lot 3 is theprivate property to be retained by the Weaver Brothers. Lot 2 is land 1,447 square15 of 360

May 28, 2013 (Worksession)Page 13 of 18feet in size to be donated to the City and is platted to be combined with theWoodbury House property. Lot 1 is the property north of the Woodbury Houseand is designated open space in the draft South Ferry Riverfront Districtordinance. The plat also establishes several easements. The proposed subdivisionincludes an ingress/egress/trail easement over the existing bituminous drivewaythat runs east and west between the Woodbury House and Ferry Street to providefuture access to Lot 1. There is also a trail easement over the east portion of Lot 2for construction of a future trail along the concrete and stone path. The exactlocation of a trail can be determined when the trail is ready to be constructed.There is also a “triangular” easement over the pumphouse and stairway on Lot 3.A 20-foot wide utility easement is also shown over the existing overhead powerline. There is an existing sewer and water pipe near the garage by the WoodburyHouse; an easement is proposed over these lines to provide utility access to theLot 3 which is private property owned by the Weaver Brothers. The proposed platwill require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council.Request from the Heritage Preservation CommissionThe Heritage Preservation Commission has requested that the City Council allowthem to include the Woodbury House in the Heritage Home and Garden Tour onJuly 14th. As you are aware, the interior is in need of updating. The Council couldallow tours of the house and grounds or perhaps just a tour of the grounds, inparticular the walking path and historic elements on the site.Council is asked to discuss and provide direction on the following:1. Next steps for the property – direct staff to market the property for singlefamily use or develop a request for proposals for an alternative use of theproperty.2. Provide general comments on the draft preliminary plat.3. Provide direction on the HPC’s request to have the Woodbury House on theHome Tour.Associate Planner Crystal Pauman gave an overview of the technical issues withthe preliminary plat.Mayor Rice asked if the lot line between Cottages 1 and 2 was new. Ms. Braunsaid for the two lots on the end that would be replatted the line was drawn northof the driveway so adding this cleans up some legal description.Mayor Rice referred to the trail easement along the river that runs along the lotline along Cottages 2 and 3.Councilmember Weaver said we’ve allowed them to put an easement there toallow exit from the trail.16 of 360

May 28, 2013 (Worksession)Page 14 of 18Ms. Braun noted that this is a blanket easement so there is no need to definewhere the trail will actually be.Councilmember Schmidt asked if this is subject to a view shed easement becausethat changes the perspective on what can be placed on the plat. Ms. Braun said itis subject to view shed easement because it is needed to function with the house.She said no structures would impede the view.Ms. Braun said we anticipated placing this on the market as a single family homebut have been approached with other concept ideas such as Randy Bromley for atrolley and Tim and Liz Koch from the Mad Hatter Tea Room.Ms. Koch shared history regarding the house, stating it was sold then andrepurchased two years ago. She shared a proposal to relocate the Mad Hatter TeaRoom to this location as they are in need of more space for an expanded kitchen,seating, and menu, including brunch. She said they want to offer an upscalerestaurant and bistro with wine and craft beer. Ms. Koch said they have beenlooking outside of Anoka but that this is not their preference as they want toexpand and want here. She said the trails would be a great amenity to the TeaRoom as they could offer a picnic basket option for hiking.Councilmember Schmidt shared how people come from all over the metro area toshop in Anoka. He asked if the Kochs are considering purchasing or renting. Ms.Koch said they could review some options but would prefer to lease with theintent to purchase in five-years.Mr. Cruikshank asked if they intend to make the leasehold improvements. Ms.Koch said they intend to do a majority of the work but will need to work with theCity, adding they can do the kitchen improvements.Councilmember Anderson asked about the WAC/SAC implications. Ms. Braunsaid she is not sure but that there would be additional amounts of WAC/SAC dueto the restaurant seating.Councilmember Anderson said he has often thought of the Woodbury House as apotential restaurant setting. Ms. Koch agreed, stating the Mad Hatter would allowfor availability during day and evening dining. She said while she is not sure thatAnoka can support fine dining seven days this would offer a good mix. Sheadded that they envision homemade food and not steak.Councilmember Anderson said traffic will be an issue. Ms. Koch said their hoursof operation would be little later so they would miss the morning rush hour,although evenings could be a problem for early dining.Ms. Braun said staff needs Council direction if they are interested in uses otherthan single family. She said if so they could draw up an RFP for similar uses for17 of 360

May 28, 2013 (Worksession)Page 15 of 18Council consideration and delay placing the property on the market while youexplore options such as this or Mr. Bromley’s idea.Mr. Cruikshank said uses are already established so the property could be placedon the market now. Ms. Braun noted this proposal is a lease option so moreconsideration is needed.Councilmember Anderson said he would be interested in pursuing some type oflease arrangement.Councilmember Schmidt said we should define what we don’t want there so thereshould be no particular problem for either a sale or lease. He noted the propertyneeds a lot of work and hopes the Kochs understands that.Ms. Koch said they would like to get the community involved somehow to helpwith landscape, flooring, and other aspects, allowing them the opportunity toadvertise for efforts through placards.Mr. Koch said he does construction work and believes this is a strong structure,adding the electrical has been updated and that the site should be very workable.Councilmember Weaver said the site contains upsized water and sewer lines toaccommodate a commercial use already so the infrastructure is in place for otheruses.HRA Commissioner Elvig said Councilmember Freeburg had attended an HRAmeeting offering his help to clean up the yard. Mr. Cruikshank saidCouncilmember Freeburg has done some cleanup already.Mayor Rice said this is the most historic building in Anoka, adding it is charmingwith dramatic history so a public use would be good. He said it is a shame that itmay not be a single family home but is noteworthy and deserves reuse.Ms. Koch said because we bring in so much destination traffic that having this asa gateway to the City would be great.Peg Flaig, Home and Garden Tour, said the home needs work but would bebreathtaking for the upcoming Home and Garden tour. She said her group may beinterested to help with the home.Mr. McMahon said there is much interest in this house and would do well for theCity.Ms. Braun said there has been a suggestion of selling tickets for this portion of thetour as there is a lot of interest in this property.18 of 360

May 28, 2013 (Worksession)Page 16 of 18Councilmember Schmidt said he would favor full access to the grounds and askedhow many tickets are sold each year for the tour. Mr. McMahon said they sell250-300 tickets each year but noted they can’t provide insurance as it is too costprohibitive so they ask homeowners to be liable. He said they have volunteers ateach site to help direct traffic and ensure a presence, adding they have never hadan incident.Councilmember Schmidt said he is concerned about too much traffic in the homefor safety and liability concerns.Mayor Rice suggested a higher price ticket be implemented in order to limitaccess.Councilmember Anderson suggested allowing entry to the porch area only.Ms. Flaig suggested access to the main floor only and not the back area orbasement.Ms. Thurston said the house would be a big draw and that we shouldn’t ask forfunding.Councilmember Weaver said they seem to have a direction so hopefully they canadvertise this property by July.Ms. Thurston said we need to know if the home can be included on the tour sothey can advertise.Mr. Cruikshank said the City will have inspector review the general areas andsuggest areas to rope off in order to have the home included on the tour.Councilmember Schmidt said maybe others will come forward and this willamplify our efforts of other uses instead of a single family home. He asked if theHeritage Preservation Commission had an opinion on commercial uses for thishome. Ms. Thurston said this had not been discussed.HRA Commissioner Elvig said her concern about the Mad Hatter moving fromthe downtown area is that people won’t shop as much. Ms. Koch said theydistribute a Rediscover Anoka shopping guide to their patrons so she doesn’t seethis occurring, adding they will also have maps and signage towards downtown.She said most people coming to their restaurant are there to shop anyway.3.6 Discussion; Capital Improvement Plan (CIP).Ms. Yager said the City Council is asked to review the five-year CapitalImprovement Plan prior to adoption.19 of 360

May 28, 2013 (Worksession)Page 17 of 18Councilmember Schmidt asked what is being done now with regard to some ofthe proposed items. Ms. Yager said the Enterprise Substation 115kV underbuildwill be included in 2014 and the new Garfield Substation will be included in 2014and 2015.Mr. Lee said the front entrance at Greenhaven will be done in 2014 and combinedwith the lower entrance too because the scope had changed.Councilmember Schmidt asked where we can find the money to do more pavingprojects. Mr. Cruikshank said staff had reviewed options for accelerating theprogram into Slabtown and is now estimating $1.6-$1.8 million but is suggestingdoing the project in one year rather than over three years similar to the 2012project. He said staff is recommending starting Slabtown in 2015.Councilmember Weaver said they have been doing street renewal projects butdoing mill and overlay too and he doesn’t want to lose that aspect of the programfor even one year.Mr. Cruikshank said we were able to do full depth reclamations and Slabtown isbased on financial aspects, adding we are able to do two street renewal projects in2015. He said we are fully committed through 2014 though because so manyprojects were done in 2014.Councilmember Weaver asked where the funds go if budgeted items are delayed.Ms. Yager said delayed items are just eventually used for the intended project.Mayor Rice said moving the substation to the new location cost much more thananticipated, adding our roads are in tough condition and will worsen by 2015.Mr. Cruikshank said we had so many projects that we are trying to catch up. Hesaid the south and north loop road was moved up and Greenhaven, Kings Island,and Phase II of Castle Field were not planned for 2013. He said they haven’t lostsight of the roads improvements needed but that they need to catch up first.Mayor Rice said he clearly recalled losing $1.2 million from electric to buy thewire needed to move the substation out and that it now sounds like you want totake money from Electric to build roads.Councilmember Weaver said if there’s a way to do even one street project itwould be in our best interest.Councilmember Schmidt inquired about purchasing 500 Greenhaven Road. Ms.Yager said we are doing that now with internal borrowing and if not we will haveto do bonds instead as there are only a limited amount of funds available.Mr. Cruikshank said Council has made it clear that they want more road projects.20 of 360

May 28, 2013 (Worksession)Page 18 of 18Mayor Rice agreed that Slabtown and a few others areas are in much need of roadimprovements.Council consensus was to postpone discussion of Item 3.6 to the June 24, 2013,work session.3.7 Discussion; Equipment Replacement Plan (ERP).Council consensus was to postpone discussion of Item 3.7 to the June 24, 2013,work session.4. OTHER BUSINESS4.1 Staff Update.None.5. COUNCILMEMBERS COMMENTSNone.6. ADJOURNMENTCouncilmember Anderson, made a motion to adjourn the Regular Worksession meeting.Councilmember Weaver, seconded the motion.Vote taken. All ayes. Motion carried.Time of adjournment: 7:42 p.m.Submitted by: Cathy Sorensen, TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.Approval Attestation:Amy T. Oehlers, City Clerk21 of 360

June 17, 2013 (Regular)Page 1 of 321. CALL TO ORDERREGULAR MEETING OF THE ANOKA CITY COUNCILANOKA CITY HALLCITY COUNCIL CHAMBERSJUNE 17, 2013Mayor Pro Tem Anderson called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m., followed by thePledge of Allegiance.2. ROLL CALLPresent at roll call: Mayor Rice (arrived at 7:07 p.m.), Councilmembers Anderson,Freeburg, Schmidt, and Weaver.Staff present: City Manager Tim Cruikshank; Associate Planner Crystal Paumen;Finance Director Lori Yager; Director of Public Services/City Engineer Greg Lee; CityPlanner/Economic Development Coordinator Erik Thorvig; Community DevelopmentDirector Robert Kirchner; and Recording Secretary Cathy Sorensen.Absent at roll call: None.3. COUNCIL MINUTES3.1 Minutes of June 3, 2013 Regular Meeting.4. OPEN FORUMMotion by Councilmember Weaver, seconded by Councilmember Weaver, towaive the reading and approve the June 3, 2013 Regular Meeting minutes.Vote taken. All ayes, Councilmember Freeburg abstained. Motion carried.4.1 CliftonLarsonAllen LLP 2012 Annual Audit.Craig Popenhagen, CliftonLarsonAllen LLP, presented the 2012 Annual Auditresults, highlighting the City’s strong financial standing and reporting.Councilmember Freeburg inquired about the new requirement of showing PERAliability. Mr. Popenhagen stated the standard requires recording liability forMinnesota’s share of the PERA pension obligation, adding this has received muchattention due to PERA being underfunded.Councilmember Freeburg asked if this will result in the taxpayers paying more.Mr. Popenhagen said not necessarily, as the standard is being implemented to22 of 360

June 17, 2013 (Regular)Page 2 of 32reflect the necessary figures. He said this will not change how this is funded buthow it is recorded.City Manager Tim Cruikshank said the PERA liability has always been there butGASB is just making cities report it differently.Mr. Popenhagen agreed, stating this is just another extension of accrualaccounting. He complimented the City on receiving the Certificate ofAchievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting for the 31 st year.Councilmember Schmidt said the financial report is very lengthy so would like todefer acceptance of the report to allow for further study.Finance Director Lori Yager said City Charter states that the report must bepresented to Council prior to June 30.Councilmember Schmidt said the report can then be reviewed further at a laterdate. He stated that regarding PERA all entities are going to have met thisreporting requirement and asked if there is also an accounting for Fire. Ms. Yagersaid this requirement will apply to both Police/Fire and PERA.Mayor Rice said the rule is not reflective of any increase in liability just a separatelisting of the liability. Mr. Popenhagen agreed, stating the bond rating agencieshave pushed for this requirement.Councilmember Weaver noted assets of the City exceeded liabilities by $122million, with $35 million unrestricted net in accordance. He said the City’s netposition increased by 8.1% or $9 million, which reflects a very frugal financialstanding.Pat Walker, Anoka, asked if the future debt service increase in 2017 has to dowith the pension accounting. Mr. Popenhagen said this is a scheduled debtservice payment.Councilmember Schmidt asked if the debt service included the parking ramp.Mayor Rice said we plan into the future for capital and street reconstructionprojects and that these payments are scheduled to increase.Ms. Yager said the principal payments increase in 2017 in all bond issues and atsame time interest goes down, adding we are trying to pay these off in areasonable amount of time.Mr. Walker said if the City is showing net gains we should be able to improve afew more roads. Ms. Yager said the $9 million increase is primarilyinfrastructure, which is listed as an asset.23 of 360

June 17, 2013 (Regular)Page 3 of 32Mr. Cruikshank said this Council has doubled street reconstruction projects overthe last 4-5 years, adding regarding debt we are not planning on issuing more debtjust the interest payments.Councilmember Weaver said infrastructure formulas make up our credit rating sowe are doing well.Councilmember Schmidt added the debt graph would be running contra to whatwe are paying.4.2 Teresa Hentges, 719 Polk Street and Nicole Moses, 721 Polk Street, referred tothe Great River Energy (GRE) 115kv voltage line project that is being constructedthrough their backyards. They shared that they have worked with therepresentatives regarding buy out of the easement and believe GRE can only takea 25-foot easement through their property but that they are proposing a 50-footeasement which is too much as it will go through their homes. They shared thatthere is a front yard easement already in place for sidewalks on Polk Street andthat they are concerned with their property values, removing trees that block theview of Highway 10, and all the existing lines that will go on new poles that willaffect more than half of their backyards. They stated they are concerned aboutexposure to lines, magnetic fields, and noise and that GRE’s representatives willnot meet with them to discuss these concerns.Ms. Moses stated that with the addition of this power line it will limit mortgagelender options should they wish to sell their home in the future because the line isconsidered a hazard. She said GRE wants to take the full 50 feet on the otherside.Councilmember Freeburg said he understands their frustration, adding he assumeddetails were being worked out.Mr. Cruikshank said we are working with GRE on City matters regarding thisproject but not private property owners. He said staff will contact GRE to seewhat can be done.Councilmember Freeburg inquired about their proposed compensation. Ms.Hentges said GRE is offering them $7,000 and $5,000 respectively, adding that10 feet of the line is going to go across their properties which is not a good thing.She said GRE does not want to have to buy them out.Councilmember Freeburg said their compensation should be more than $5,000because of the limitations of future mortgage options of only cash or conventionalmortgages will affect them greatly as property owners.Mr. Cruikshank said staff will get more information and help act as mediatory inthis situation.24 of 360

June 17, 2013 (Regular)Page 4 of 32Councilmember Schmidt said he had encouraged Ms. Hentges and Ms. Moses toattend and share their concerns because once GRE went to the Public UtilityCommission it removed any action from the City. He stated the City will assist inany way we can though to help find a solution to their concerns.Mr. Walker said he had followed some of this project but did not realize itimpacted so many residential properties. He said when Highway 10 camethrough it devastated many property owners and said he will research what can bedone through the HRA, as these are problem areas and could be considered forpossible redevelopment.Mayor Rice said he does not like seeing a taking for only half, as they seem to beleaving them both with usable property.Councilmember Schmidt noted GRE is not taking property just requesting aneasement, although the end result is not good.5. PUBLIC HEARING(S)5.1 Public Hearing – Adoption of Modification to the Development Program forMunicipal Development District No. 1 and the Proposed Modification of theSouth Ferry Tax Increment District.RES/Adoption of Modification to the Development Program for MunicipalDevelopment District No. 1 and the Proposed Modification of the South FerryTax Increment District.RESOLUTIONElimination of Three (3) Parcels from the South Ferry Street TIF DistrictRESOLUTIONCity Planner/Economic Development Coordinator Erik Thorvig stated that priorto considering the modification to the South Ferry Street TIF District, the CityCouncil must first hold a public hearing to hear testimony. He shared a resolutionrelating to the modification of the City Council Tax Increment Financing (TIF)Development Program and modification to the plan for the South Ferry Street TIFDistrict.Mr. Thorvig shared that the South Ferry Street TIF District was originallycertified in July 2008. The South Ferry Street project area extends five blocksfrom the Main/Ferry intersection southerly to the municipal boundary at theMississippi River Bridge. This corridor parallels the Rum River and terminatesnear its confluence with the Mississippi River. It consists of a mix of usesincluding older single-family homes, high-density residential apartments,commercial and public uses. These uses are significantly impacted by high and25 of 360

June 17, 2013 (Regular)Page 5 of 32ever increasing traffic volumes on this street, which serves as US Highway 169.Highway access to these properties is limited and problematical. As a result someproperties have changed uses and have also suffered from deferred maintenanceand deterioration.The goals of the TIF District are as follows:1.) Improve access to properties.2.) Improve police and fire protection access to serve these properties.3.) Upgrade public improvements where needed.4.) Enhance the south gateway at the Mississippi Bridge via development andentry identification.5.) Redefine land use more consistent with a high traffic volume street.6.) Facilitate rehabilitation or redevelopment of private properties.7.) Take advantage of residential and commercial development opportunitiesalong the Rum and Mississippi Rivers.8.) Enhance and reinvest in three properties on the National Register of HistoricPlaces (Kline Sanitarium, Woodbury House, and Eastman Amphitheatre).Activities may include property acquisition, building demolition, environmentalassessment and cleanup, site preparation and construction of publicimprovements.Mr. Thorvig said the District was modified on December 20, 2010 to include anadditional 5 parcels at the northwest corner of Benton Street and Ferry Street andadjacent and internal rights-of-way in order to facilitate the construction ofmultifamily, senior housing units and/or office condos. The District is beingmodified to include 23 parcels on the east side of Ferry Street generally fromMain Street north to the Mississippi River south in order to facilitateredevelopment for high-density housing and commercial uses. This modificationis a result of a S. Ferry Street corridor study that was started in 2012 to analyzeland use, transportation, historic preservation, and public facilities along thecorridor.Mr. Thorvig stated the modification provides for increased tax incrementrevenues in the district based on projected development within the modificationarea. He shared the budget based on the modification, stating that generally thenumbers within the budget can change without approval provided the overall totaldoes not increase. He said the total project and interest costs will be $12,130,000.Mayor Rice opened the public hearing at 7:38 p.m.As no one appeared, Mayor Rice closed the public hearing at 7:38 p.m.NOTE: By motion from Councilmember Schmidt, which was seconded byCouncilmember Anderson, and by a unanimous vote of the Council, agenda item 9.2was moved up on the agenda and acted upon at this point. Councilmember Weaverabstained.26 of 360

June 17, 2013 (Regular)Page 6 of 32Motion by Councilmember Schmidt, seconded by Councilmember Anderson, toadopt a resolution approving the elimination of three (3) parcels from the SouthFerry Street District.Upon a roll call vote: Mayor Rice, Councilmembers Anderson, Freeburg, andSchmidt, voted in favor. Councilmember Weaver abstained. Motion carried.NOTE: By motion from Councilmember Anderson, which was seconded byCouncilmember Freeburg, and by a unanimous vote of the Council, agenda item 9.1was moved up on the agenda and acted upon at this point. Councilmember Weaverabstained.Motion by Councilmember Freeburg, seconded by Councilmember Schmidt, toadopt a resolution adopting a modification to the Development Program forMunicipal Development District No. 1 and the proposed modification of theSouth Ferry Tax Increment District.Upon a roll call vote: Mayor Rice, Councilmembers Anderson, Freeburg, andSchmidt, voted in favor. Councilmember Weaver abstained. Motion carried.5.2 Public Hearing – Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program Update (SWPPP)Director of Public Services/City Engineer Greg Lee stated that one of therequirements of the City’s National Pollution Discharge Elimination System(NPDES) permit is that an annual meeting must be held to update the CityCouncil and to allow the public to make oral and/or written comments on theadequacy of the City’s Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP).Although it is not required, this meeting has been advertised in the City’s officialnewspaper and after a presentation by City staff, the City Council should ask forany public questions or comments.Mr. Lee stated our land and water resources ultimately depend on the replenishingwaters of annual precipitation. In an unaltered situation this precipitation islargely absorbed into the ground. This leaves soil, for the most part, in place andgives bacteria and other mechanisms an opportunity to break down materialsdeposited on the land. However, when this precipitation falls on impervioussurfaces such as streets, parking lots or rooftops this slow process is shortcircuited.Under these circumstances stormwater becomes more of a fire hosethan a drip percolator. Large quantities of sediment, along with the oils, chemicalsand litter of human activity, are swept into nearby water bodies, contributing witheach rainfall to the degradation of water quality within those lakes, streams andwetlands.Mr. Lee stated the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency’s (MPCA) StormwaterProgram is designed to reduce the pollution and damage caused by stormwater27 of 360

June 17, 2013 (Regular)Page 7 of 32runoff. Mandated by Congress under the Clean Water Act, the National PollutantDischarge Elimination System (NPDES) Stormwater Program is a comprehensivenational program for addressing polluted stormwater runoff. Minnesota regulatesthe disposal of stormwater through State Disposal System (SDS) permits. TheMPCA issues combined NPDES/SDS permits for construction sites, industrialfacilities and municipal separate storm sewer systems (MS4s). As of March2003Anoka, along with over 200 similarly classed entities, began operating underits own stormwater discharge permit.Mr. Lee shared highlights and upcoming challenges for the City, as well asprovisions of the permit that require that over its 5-year life we address thefollowing minimum control measures:• Public Education & Outreach• Public Involvement & Participation• Illicit discharge detection & elimination• Construction site stormwater controls• Post construction stormwater management for new development &redevelopment• Pollution prevention/good housekeeping for municipal operationsMayor Rice said stormwater pollution prevention is a very big task and that manyhours go into protecting our waters.Mayor Rice opened the public hearing at 7:45 p.m.Mr. Cruikshank noted cities will need to incorporate the new rules as well andthat we will be having worksession to further discuss this topic.Mr. Lee said the rules go into effect August 1 and will be more stringent withregard to monitoring.Councilmember Freeburg asked when enough is enough, as we cannot keepmoving the standard without increased costs.Mayor Rice said that with the street renewal program (SRP) we constructstormwater structures by Kings Island and others and that they have to beimproved, as they are inferior.Mr. Cruikshank said this is really a rhetorical question, as cities are not allowedan opinion because these are mandates, such as the requirement of more raingardens.Councilmember Freeburg said decreasing salt usage during the winter will helpwith water quality.28 of 360

June 17, 2013 (Regular)Page 8 of 32Mr. Cruikshank agreed, stating it is a balancing act.Councilmember Weaver said that anyone who uses any river will attest that theyare much cleaner as in years past and that these mandates make a difference,although he agreed that the standards do change often.Councilmember Anderson said the standard needs to change to address newchallenges such as the invasive Asian carp.Councilmember Schmidt shared the importance of not placing grass clippings inthe street as all the fertilizer goes into the water.Mayor Rice agreed, adding there are many ways for proper disposal of grassclippings such as placing it back on the lawn.As no one appeared, Mayor Rice closed the public hearing at 7:51 p.m.6. CONSENT AGENDAMotion by Councilmember Weaver, seconded by Councilmember Freeburg, to approveConsent Agenda 6.1 through 6.8.Councilmember Weaver noted that the Council had discussed Item 6.6 at an earliermeeting and that this action calls for setting a public hearing. He asked for moreinformation on the change order outlined in Item 6.7.Mr. Lee said the original insurance coverage for the Anoka Station Parking FacilityImprovement Project included a $1million Primary General Liability and $3 millionUmbrella policy, for a total amount of $4 million in coverage. He said the MetropolitanCouncil had requested that amount be raised to $25 million, however the cost of thisadditional coverage would cost $15,000 to $20,000. Sheehy Construction, the generalcontractor for the Anoka Station Parking Facility Improvement Project, agreed toincrease insurance coverage to $11 million - $1million for a Primary General Liabilitypolicy ($2M Aggregate) and $10 million for an Umbrella policy, at no additional cost tothe City.6.1 Approved Verified Bills.6.2 Revising and Setting Council Calendars.6.3 Issuance of Massage Therapist License; Bernadette Lindberg at Anoka Massage& Pain Therapy.6.4 Issuance of Massage Therapist License; Elisabeth Turner at Anoka Massage &Pain Therapy.29 of 360

June 17, 2013 (Regular)Page 9 of 326.5 Issuance of Massage Therapist License; Katie Joslyn at Anoka Massage & PainTherapy.6.6 Setting Public Hearing for Assessment on Housing Improvement Project.6.7 Change Order No. 1; CRTV Project.6.8 Recommended Approval of an LG220 Gambling Permit; HydrocephalusAssociation at Mississippi River Park.Mayor Rice highlighted some of July’s activities and events, including the first game atCastle Field, 4 th of July fireworks, ice cream social, and Riverfest.Vote taken. All ayes. Motion carried.7. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMITTEES7.1. Parks and Recreation Board – Semi-Annual Report.Steve Nelson, Parks and Recreation Commission Chair, shared the semi-annualreport for the Commission. He highlighted 2013 park projects such as Phase I ofCastle Field, sharing that Phase II will occur this fall.Councilmember Anderson asked for more information on the NorthwoodsLeague. Chair Nelson shared that the Northwoods League consists of collegestudents who play competitively to further their skills and be considered byscouts. He noted there are leagues all over, including St. Cloud, Thunder Bay,Alexandria and many others.Councilmember Freeburg explained that these leagues great for communities asthey bring people in and help businesses as well as expands baseball.Chair Nelson reviewed the Elm Street Park playground installation this fall,including the Riverfront Park trail with overlook and historical stories. Heexplained the bid process and completion for October. He shared projects for theaquatic center refurbishing, Enloe baseball field batting cages, benches, and otherimprovements. Chair Nelson thanked ARAA’s $10,000 contributions, thenhighlighted Kings Island, Mississippi River Trail construction, channel restorationthis fall, and Anoka Nature Preserve, including the buckthorn removal andwoodland restoration.Mr. Lee noted there will be a controlled burn in this area in 2014 to help assistwith woodland restoration.Chair Nelson shared information on wildlife management and hunting, includingwaterfowl hunting zone and archery deer hunting. He shared the bike trailimprovements and State health Improvement Program grant (SHIP) for signage.30 of 360

June 17, 2013 (Regular)Page 10 of 32Councilmember Weaver referred to the great ads in Explore Minnesota andTCGateway regarding Kings Island and linkage to the Mississippi River Trail andregional trail. Chair Nelson said they have been working on these trails for manyyears and while they still have a lot of trail to go they will continue.Councilmember Weaver asked if the Board has looked at ways for bicyclists toget to the ballfield as there are not many sidewalks. Chair Nelson said they havehad those conversations about getting a paved trail by the library closer to thefield and high school. He said it would be nice to have as a gateway to thecommunity but noted the cost is $25/linear foot.Councilmember Freeburg inquired about the biking industry’s encouragement ofsafety rules and abiding by the same the traffic laws as motorists. Chair Nelsonexplained that bicyclists have to obey street signs and while many do not,motorists have to yield to them no matter what. He said he is not sure of any pushfor safety among bicycle retailers but said there are groups who do.Chair Nelson outlined planning priorities including the West Rum River Trailalignment, dog park, athletic field use review, Riverfront Park, Kings Island,Anoka Nature Preserve Trail Head, and Anoka Station. He said not everyone’sneeds will be met but the planning process works well with the HeritagePreservation Commission (HPC), Planning Commission and others forassessment and branding. He said we knew where we wanted to go and includedthese goals in the Comprehensive Plan, which allowed for a process to besuccessful on improving the quality of life in Anoka.Mayor Rice shared the Council’s thanks to Chair Nelson and the entireCommission for their great work.Councilmember Weaver said it is phenomenal to see the scope and number ofprojects the Commission is working on.Chair Nelson referred to the proposed golf course project and disappointment thatit did not happen, stating if a process had been in place it could have worked. Hesaid while the process took us on a different course there are many other thingswe can be proud of.Councilmember Freeburg said the USGA’s preserving of wildlife is important,adding animals proliferate on courses.Mayor Rice said the importance of this planning resulted in us paying attention tothe bigger picture.Chair Nelson complimented the Council on the City’s website, stating having theCouncil’s goals easily available has helped the Commission keep them focused.31 of 360

June 17, 2013 (Regular)Page 11 of 32Councilmember Weaver referred to a recent bicyclist in the area towing a trailerwith a kayak, stating it is interesting how recreation has expanded in the area.7.2. Heritage Preservation Commission.7.2.A. RES/Appeal of Exterior Materials in the Historic Downtown Core District,231 E. Main Street, Wayne MelocheRESOLUTIONAssociate Planner Crystal Paumen stated Wayne Meloche, owner of thebuilding at 231 E. Main Street, has submitted an appeal of exteriormaterials. The code allows for an owner to appeal and request review bythe Heritage Preservation Commission and Planning Commission whomay recommend modifications to the requirements of the HistoricDowntown Core District and the City Council may approve suchmodifications upon determining that the proposed architectural design orexterior façade material(s) meets all of the following conditions:1) The proposed design or material is consistent with the purposes of theregulations of the Historic Downtown Core District.2) The proposed design or material would enhance the architecturalappearance of the building, and would be equal or superior to designs ormaterials permitted in the Historic Downtown Core District.3) The proposed design or material would be in harmony with thecharacter of adjacent buildings and the surrounding district.Ms. Paumen shared that the property is located in the Historic DowntownCore District. The property owner had removed 60 lineal feet of stuccothat was on the east side of the building because it had failed and wasfalling off. The owner had wanted to replace the damaged stucco with newstucco, but the City Code requires that if 50% or more of the facade isremoved for any reason, the entire facade must comply with the exteriormaterial requirements. The entire east wall is 79 lineal feet, resulting in76% removed.The applicant is proposing to cover the entire east wall, which is concreteblock and stucco with an acrylic like coating called “Dryvit," a popularEIFS brand. Specifically, the applicant proposes a Dryvit Custom BrickSystem. Stucco or Exterior Finish Insulation System (EFIS) is notpermitted in the Historic Downtown Core District and therefore theproperty owner has requested an appeal. The permitted materials in theHistoric Downtown Core District are brick, stone, decorative masonry, orother similar materials on building façades that can be viewed from apublic street.The Planning Commission reviewed the application on June 4, 2013 andrecommended to deny the request 4-2 based on the proposed material is32 of 360

June 17, 2013 (Regular)Page 12 of 32not equal or superior to the design or materials permitted in the district.The Heritage Preservation Commission held a public hearing on June 11,2013 and recommended to deny the request 5-2. The HeritagePreservation Commission discussed the proposed material and suggestedthe applicant consider using as brick or stone veneer to accommodate thenarrow working space between the building and the property line.Wayne Meloche thanked the Council for hearing appeal and for Ms.Paumen for her assistance in this matter. He apologized for not being ableto answer all the questions for the Planning Commission. He introducedScott Swanson, Vice President of Signature Studios, stating his firm hadcompleted the Peterson Shoes building. He explained the benefits of theproposed material but noted he mistakenly wanted it to have a brick lookand shared a sample. Mr. Meloche said brick seemed to be the problem asit was on a plane without the bricks, although he thought they would looknice. He said they could even do different colors of bricks as he wants tohave the cement blocks covered with something thin. Mr. Meloche saidhe believed this is a good and durable product.Councilmember Anderson inquired about the thickness of the material.Mr. Meloche referred to a former bakery next to his former hardwarestore, which was extremely close in proximity that had the original stucco,which is a lot line concern.Councilmember Weaver said there are many buildings that are not blockwalls but are several courses of brick. He said this wall looks like theouter layer of brick was removed as may have had issues before and waspieced together with pavers. Mr. Meloche said this was done prior to histaking ownership.Councilmember Weaver said this area is very exposed.Councilmember Freeburg said a survey is needed to define the exactproperty line to make sure there is enough room for improvements. Ms.Paumen said this was suggested by the HPC, stating they know the two 2buildings are close but they do not know by how much. She said if theDry-vit is not approved they should get survey.Councilmember Weaver said there already exists wainscot of tight brickso other avenues could be explored. He said you would just be filling inthe void of removed material and that this is just a façade of paver blocks.Councilmember Schmidt referred to the Isringhausen building inSpringfield Illinois that contains product that looks just like brick and thathe did not see the difference.33 of 360

June 17, 2013 (Regular)Page 13 of 32Mayor Rice agreed this is a beautiful product but said it is not brick and isnot the same quality. He said this is the point of our ordinance.Councilmember Weaver agreed, stating others have renovated buildingsand replaced with real brick. He said the Planning Commission said itbest that once it is allowed we will have a fake historical town. He saidwhile he wants to see the project he will follow the HPC and PlanningCommission recommendations.Councilmember Freeburg referred to a project with Sandy Peterson thatincluded material 12 feet off the ground and was not subject to salt andtraffic. He said if this product is nicked or dinged it will look bad.Motion by Councilmember Anderson, seconded by CouncilmemberFreeburg, to adopt a resolution follow the recommendations of theHeritage Preservation Commission and Planning Commission and denythe appeal of exterior materials at 231 E. Main Street.Upon a roll call vote: Mayor Rice, Councilmembers Anderson, Freeburg,Schmidt, and Weaver voted in favor. Motion carried.7.3. Planning Commission.7.3.A. RES/Comprehensive Plan Land Use Amendment; 3201 and 3215 RoundLake Boulevard.RESOLUTIONMs. Paumen stated the City has received an application for aComprehensive Plan Land Use Map Amendment. The 1.3-acre piece ofland is categorized as Limited Commercial on the 2030 ComprehensivePlan Land Use map. The current development proposal includes a 4,025square foot car wash building and 2,100 square foot retail building. A2030 Comprehensive Plan amendment is required to change the land usedesignation in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan from Limited Commercial toGeneral Commercial to be consistent with the proposed use and B-1Highway Business zoning classification. State Statute requires a City’sComprehensive Plan to be consistent with the zoning map.The GC – General Commercial category in the comprehensive Plan isdesigned to accommodate a wide range of auto-oriented services such assit-down restaurants, convenience restaurants, hotels, retail uses,combined warehouse/retail uses, office uses, automotive sales, service andgas, and specialized service businesses that are convenient to the motorist.Based on the information provided, the proposed land use classification isconsistent with the 2030 Comprehensive Plans criteria for land use andeconomic development goals and implementation.34 of 360

June 17, 2013 (Regular)Page 14 of 32The Planning Commission held a public hearing for this item on June 4,2013 and recommended approval of the proposed amendment.Councilmember Weaver said this request will likely be approved but notedthere are some residents that are not pleased with this development andmore discussion will follow.Councilmember Schmidt said it is a difficult lot to utilize with the trafficand access so while he looks forward to hearing more from the oppositionthis could be the best use for this site.Councilmember Weaver agreed but said there may be some changesneeded in the site plan to address these concerns and make it morepalatable. He said this request resulted from two single-family homesbeing in disrepair and then the market decreasing so it is good to see someinterest in this property. He said it is important to make sure the applicantis a good neighbor to the residents to the west.Brad Dunn, applicant, said he has been working with the neighbors fromtownhome association to the west and believes he is being a goodneighbor. He said their operation will be hard to see from the homes asthere will be two layers of fence and landscaping of junipers with nowindows to the back. He said the structure will not be tall and that asound study has been conducted. Mr. Dunn said they had significantsupport at the Planning Commission meeting and that they will continue towork and listen to the concerns. He said the only difference made was inthe amount of trees on the north side for screening.Motion by Councilmember Weaver, seconded by CouncilmemberSchmidt, to adopt a resolution amending the 2030 General Land Use Mapto change the land use for land legally described below from LimitedCommercial to General Commercial to allow for the construction of a carwash and retail building.Upon a roll call vote: Mayor Rice, Councilmembers Anderson, Freeburg,Schmidt, and Weaver voted in favor. Motion carried.7.3.B. ORD/Rezoning to B-1 Highway Business; 3201 and 3215 Round LakeBoulevard.(1 st Reading)Ms. Paumen stated the applicant has requested an official zoning mapamendment to approximately 1.3 acres of property located at 3201 and3215 Round Lake Boulevard. The property is currently zoned B-4 LimitedBusiness. The rezoning request would change the zoning to B-1 Highway35 of 360

June 17, 2013 (Regular)Page 15 of 32Business. The property has been zoned as commercial since 1999. Thisland is currently vacant. Two single family homes were once located onthe lots, but have been demolished. A site plan with variances wasapproved for these two properties in 1999 and again in 2007, but thedevelopment did not occur for unknown reasons. The current developmentproposal includes a 4,025 square foot car wash building and 2,100 squarefoot retail building. The main difference between the B-1 and B-4 districtsis that automobile service is not a permitted use in the B-4 district.The site is located along Round Lake Boulevard. Traffic counts on RoundLake Boulevard according to 2008 MnDOT data are 37,500 trips per day.Other locations where B-1 zoning is located include East River Road andHighway 10, and farther north on Round Lake Boulevard, which havesimilar high counts of traffic. The proposed zoning district will permituses that will serve the local neighborhood, the community and the 37,500daily traffic tips that occur. Given the traffic counts, its current B-4Limited Business zoning district or even a residential zoning district is notthe highest and best use of the property adjacent to Round LakeBoulevard. Any use located on this site is required to obtain a conditionaluse permit because it is adjacent to residential.Ordinance regulations and review procedures have been put in place tomitigate adverse impacts on adjacent properties, which have beenaddressed in the site plan. The Planning Commission held a publichearing for this item on June 4th, 2013 and unanimously recommendedapproval of the amendment. The Planning Commission recommended thatif the initiation of construction is not started within one year and the siteplan approval expires, the property should be rezoned to B-4 LimitedBusiness.Mayor Rice said the zoning difference in B-1 and B-4 is compatible withsurrounding uses, such as a busy street, and is more restrictive in B-1. Ms.Paumen said the zoning does not include automobile uses as other zoningdesignations.Motion by Councilmember Anderson, seconded by CouncilmemberFreeburg, to hold first reading of an ordinance rezoning to B-1 HighwayBusiness; 3201 and 3215 Round Lake Boulevard.Councilmember Schmidt inquired about the difference with regard to aconditional use permit and if one would be required. Ms. Paumen saidbecause this site is adjacent to residential both would require CUPs.Pat Worth Peterson, 3226 16 th Avenue, said she is concerned that therequest is being approved because of the Comprehensive Plan approvalalready. Mayor Rice said the Comp Plan does not change their plan butthe zoning would for use of the property.36 of 360

June 17, 2013 (Regular)Page 16 of 32Valerie McNamara, 13284 Vintage Street, Coon Rapids, said the reason itwas zoned from B-4 to B-1 will decrease the value to her home, result inextra traffic for a car wash, and impact drive time, views, noise to thebackyards with car doors slamming. She said B-4 would be restricted toauto use.Mayor Rice said the difference between B-4 and B-1 would not have anyimpact on the value of the property as they both involve retail uses.Ms. McNamara said this action would affect her a lot due to the nature ofthe business and hours of operation.Ms. Peterson said her home is 20 feet from the lot line and is close towhere the north right-in/right-out will be. She noted how the Countywants handle the access points but said her real concern is that theapplicant is doing the double fence on the north end and is trying toaccommodate the 20-40 Black spruce trees instead. Ms. Peterson said sheis disappointed to see this changed as the enjoyment of her home will beaffected with tremendous noise. She said a car wash is an intrusive use inher backyard and while she understands wanting the land developed shewould prefer office or retail. Ms. Peterson said if the applicant hascustomers entering right-in and turning left it will cause accidents. Shereferred to the projected hours of 7:00 a.m. being too early and that fear ofrezoning will result in a car mechanic operation potentially. She said shewould prefer to see more south exiting and referred to the berm in thewest. Ms. Peterson said she would prefer more coverage in the north witha berm and trees on top, adding the existing trees will be removed and is25 feet from her bedroom window so the lights will affect her. Shesuggested using the south entrance for exiting too as it will help with thenoise levels and safety accesses.Councilmember Schmidt requested to see a circulation map. Ms. Paumenshared the site plan that outlined both access points, stating the northaccess is a full access and the southern one would be a right-in/right-out.Upon a roll call vote: Mayor Rice, Councilmembers Anderson, andFreeburg voted in favor. Councilmembers Schmidt and Weaver votednay. Motion carried.7.3.C. RES/Site Plan, Conditional Use Permit, Variance; 3201 and 3215 RoundLake Boulevard.RESOLUTIONMs. Paumen stated the City has received an application for a site plan,conditional use permit and variance for the property located at 3201 &37 of 360

June 17, 2013 (Regular)Page 17 of 323215 Round Lake Boulevard. The development proposal includes a 1-story 2,100 square foot retail building on Parcel A (northern building);4,025 square foot car wash building on Parcel B (southern building). TheDeveloper has an operator for the car wash and does not have a tenant forthe retail building, but is marketing it for a small fast food restaurant (i.e.,coffee, sandwich, yogurt, etc.)Site PlanThe buildings will consist of precast walls with color stucco accents andcanvas awnings. The retail building is 20 feet at the highest point, which isviewed from the west elevation to accentuate the retail entrance; most ofthe building is 14 feet tall. The car wash is 20 feet tall at the north andsouth ends of the building with the remaining height of 14 feet.The site will have two accesses off of Round Lake Boulevard/CountyRoad 9, which has been reviewed and approved by Anoka CountyHighway Department. The property is screened and landscaped withdeciduous and evergreen trees, ornamental trees, shrubs, and perennials asshown on the landscape plan. An amended landscaping plan showingmore Spruce trees on the north side of the property has been submitted perthe request of the Planning Commission. The applicant has provided theCity with a summary report for car wash noise control. Based on therecommendations of the engineering group ESI Engineering, thedeveloper will be installing perforated acoustical panels on the interiorwest and south walls of the car wash drying room, and the exterior barrierwall, which extends 14 feet beyond the building footprint. The car washbuilding has an additional 500 square feet added to the south side of thebuilding to contain most of the blower noise within the enclosed building.The car wash and retail facility hours of operations will be within thehours allowed by Code, 7am to 10pm, as a condition of approvalrecommended by the Planning Commission.Conditional Use PermitAnoka City Code requires any structure constructed in a B-1 HighwayBusiness adjacent to a residential district to obtain a Conditional UsePermit. The reason for this is to control activity on a site that is adjacent toresidential property. The conditional use permit requirements have beenanalyzed in the site plan review and the proposal meets all therequirements with the conditions of approval outlined in proposedresolution.VarianceA variance request has been made to reduce the west side yard setbackfrom 30 feet to 22 feet and the south side yard setback form 30 feet to 24feet. The site is 150 feet wide at the north property line and 140 feet at thesouth property line creating a long and narrow site to develop. The intent38 of 360

June 17, 2013 (Regular)Page 18 of 32of the maximum setbacks in the B-1 district is to apply appropriatesetbacks between residential and commercial buildings that are permittedto a maximum height of 40 feet. The Planning Commission finds thevariance to be reasonable and meets the findings as outlined in the CityCode and Planning Commission staff report.The Planning Commission held a public hearing for this item on June 4,2013 and recommended approval of the proposal. The PlanningCommission discussed in detail the proposed landscaping plan and viewsfrom the adjacent townhomes. Ambient noise from Round Lake Boulevardwas a concern from the public, however, most felt that the developmentwould be an improvement to buffer and absorb some of the noise currentlyattributed to the high traffic volumes on Round Lake Boulevard.Councilmember Weaver asked for clarification on fencing and screening.Mr. Dunn said the second fence was never going to be on the entireproperty as his intent was to replace the west line fence with thetownhome association’s as the north line was just replaced. He said thefence was going to be a staggered pattern and will replace the entire westside with another fence on the south side. Mr. Dunn stated that he had nointention of removing the larger trees by the Association as they willcomplement the existing Black Hills spruce, although he intends toremove the lilacs. He said he is amenable to making this project the bestpossible on the north side, adding that his building cannot be seen from thewest side. Mr. Dunn noted the sound in the yards will be no louder as italready is because the decks are on the south side and the north sidealready has over 80 decibels of noise due to the traffic. He said they willinclude proper acoustic insulation to help block the sound as well as takingdirection from the last Planning Commission meeting by adding moretrees.Mayor Rice verified that the existing trees on the northwest corner willremain. Mr. Dunn said he had agreed to replace the fence, noting there isnot much elevation of berm on the north end and that additional treescould be added. He said there could be some drainage issues and that theycould have rain gardens in the north corner, adding there are no windowson the back side of the carwash.Mayor Rice inquired about the hours of operation. Mr. Dunn said theirhours will be from 7:00 a.m. – 10:00 p.m., which is the maximum timeallowed for operation.Mayor Rice asked about the space on the northwest corner and noted thatspruce trees need enough sunlight. Mr. Dunn said they had not proposedall spruce trees but just needed more coverage. He said that most of thelandscape on the north side can remain and that they can prune the trees on39 of 360

June 17, 2013 (Regular)Page 19 of 32the south to give enough light for the spruces, adding that as larger treesdie the spruce will grow and become a nicer screen. He said he believesthat for this reason these are the correct type of tree for the area.Councilmember Weaver referred to the neighbor’s concerns aboutlighting. Mr. Dunn said he does not believe there will be any lightingconcerns as the 18-foot high light is designed not to exceed the boundarylines and will have a shield.Councilmember Weaver inquired about the gaps in fencing and that thereis none on the north. Mr. Dunn said they will replace the existing fence onthe west side with a continual fence and that the second fence will consistof a 12-foot fence and 12-foot junipers to be more decorative and set uphigher on the west side.Councilmember Weaver inquired about the proposed signage. Ms.Paumen said the signage will be six feet tall and focused on Round LakeBoulevard.Councilmember Schmidt referred to the modification on the south end ofthe building to enclose the blower. Ryan Scout, ESI Engineering, said thisaspect was already in the design to have a barrier wall of 14 feet wide tocompletely block the blower along with perforated acoustic panels.Mr. Dunn said they also looked at the vacuum noise. Mr. Scout said thenortheast side and the parking areas up to the building will not have adirect line of noise. He said during noise testing of other car washes thenoise levels never exceeded a daytime use of between L50 60 dba and L1065 dba. He noted that these levels will only occur during hours ofoperation and not overnight.Councilmember Schmidt noted that current traffic levels are 80 dba. Mr.Scout said that in certain areas that is correct, adding that they made themeasurement by Round Lake Boulevard and that it was 60 with theAndover traffic side being worse. He said they have mitigated the noiseso as to not exceed the ordinance.Mayor Rice inquired how an additional two decibels of sound will affectthe noise levels. Mr. Scout explained that while it will add to the level it isactually the individual frequencies that add. He said the noise level willnot increase but you will hear two different things.Mr. Cruikshank asked if the applicant had established a baselinemeasurement. Mr. Dunn said they set a not to exceed decibels range andthat they will not use blowers that exceed the recommended levels. He40 of 360

June 17, 2013 (Regular)Page 20 of 32said they are trying to be a friendly neighbor and have seen some satisfiedresponses from some of the neighbors.Mayor Rice said the two sound makers are the vacuums and the blowersand asked if they are being directed out the door. Mr. Scout said if thesound was coming straight out it would be louder but vacuums arehemispherical and the blowers will send more noise toward the Andoverside 100 feet away because the noise is reflecting off another surface.Mayor Rice said there are several hours of each day that does not matchthe sound of the road. Mr. Scout said we measured during the leastamount of noise from the traffic so the result is that this will be probablyquieter than other times of day.Mayor Rice noted the lighting can be directed to not spill over intoneighboring houses.Ms. Peterson said she is concerned about the lights and asked if customerswill be allowed to drive into the north entrance and exit. Mayor Rice saidthis is a County decision and that the driver will most likely do the rightin/right-out,adding the left turn will be more difficult so drivers mostlikely will not do it.Ms. Peterson asked if the applicant will not be doubling the fence on thenorth end due to the spruce trees. Mayor Rice said no that due to the plansit will be a privacy fence.Councilmember Schmidt said the applicant will retain as many existingtrees as possible. Ms. Peterson noted these are not very healthy trees.Councilmember Freeburg said the trees may become healthier oncepruned. Mr. Scout said the area contains Boxelder trees and others but doprovide screening so they will likely keep them and add to them with thespruce trees. He agreed that corrective pruning may help a little.Councilmember Freeburg said he visits the Mr. Car Wash location on EastRiver Road and that their operation doesn’t seem loud, adding Mr. Dunn’swill likely be technologically better.Councilmember Schmidt said the outside vacuums will have a building inbetween. Mr. Dunn said there are vacuums on the front but not right nextto property line, which will help with the noise concerns.Mr. Scout said they had measured sound at another car wash and placedthose figures into the calculations to meet the criteria.41 of 360

June 17, 2013 (Regular)Page 21 of 32Councilmember Weaver said they are approving the site plan but notedthere is still second reading of the ordinance and if other questions arise hewill have a difficult time approving this project. Mr. Thorvig said this isthe standard procedure for approving ordinances, adding this will be amoot point if the concerns are contingent.Mayor Rice said if the rezoning is not approved this project will nothappen anyway.Motion by Councilmember Freeburg, seconded by CouncilmemberSchmidt, to approve the site plan, conditional use permit and variances for3201 and 3215 Round Lake Boulevard.Ms. Paumen noted the approval should be based on Conditions 1-17.Councilmember Schmidt said the approval is also based on rezoningapproval.Councilmember Weaver thanked Ms. Peterson for her comments and forthe hard work of the applicant being sensitive to neighborhood. He saidhe is confident the owner would be open to more suggestions as well.Mayor Rice said any development changes the nature of the neighborhoodbut said something is needed in this area.Upon a roll call vote: Mayor Rice, Councilmembers Anderson, Freeburg,Schmidt, and Weaver voted in favor. Motion carried.7.3.D. ORD/Repealing Ordinance No. 2012-1506 and Rescinding Moratorium onDriveways.(2 nd Reading)ORDINANCEMr. Cruikshank stated that at the last Council meeting, the Council held asecond reading and adopted amendments related to driveways in severalsections of the City code. As such, the moratorium is no longer neededbecause the work under the moratorium has been completed.A first reading to rescind the moratorium under Ordinance No. 2012-1506was held on June 3, 2013. There have been no changes to the proposedordinance rescinding the moratorium since that time.Motion by Councilmember Weaver, seconded by CouncilmemberAnderson, to hold second reading and adopt an ordinance RepealingOrdinance No. 2012-1506 and Rescinding Moratorium on Driveways.Upon a roll call vote: Mayor Rice, Councilmembers Anderson, Freeburg,Schmidt, and Weaver voted in favor. Motion carried.42 of 360

June 17, 2013 (Regular)Page 22 of 328. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONNone.9. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS9.1 RES/Adoption of Modification to the Development Program for MunicipalDevelopment District No. 1 and the Proposed Modification of the South FerryTax Increment District.ACTED UPON AFTER PUBLIC HEARING9.2 RES/Elimination of Three (3) Parcels from the South Ferry Street TIF District.ACTED UPON AFTER PUBLIC HEARING9.3 RES/Granting Temporary Easement to Austin Grove, LLC.RESOLUTIONCouncilmember Weaver noted that this is final Community Development DirectorRobert Kirchner’s final Council meeting and thanked him for his contributions.He said the City will miss his expertise and contributions.Community Development Director Robert Kirchner stated that pursuant to theMemorandum of Understanding with Austin Grove LLC and Alliant TechsystemsInc., the City agreed to provide a temporary easement for use of a portion ofOutlot C needed for a fenced yard for truck maneuvering and docking. The CityCouncil acted on this matter on July 18, 2011. Subsequently, Austin Grovesubstantially re-wrote the easement but without changing the essential content.Therefore, staff is bringing this back for your additional action. The easement issubject to termination one year from the date of this agreement or by mutualagreement or if and when Alliant Techsystems Inc. purchases the Austin GroveLLC property and requests a building permit for construction of an addition ontothe existing building and concurrently completes a property exchange with theCity which provides for a public street to be constructed around the north end ofthe expanded building, whichever comes first. The one-year termination sets adeadline for completion of a development agreement that presumably wouldextend the timeframe forward but still tied to the expansion and road location andconstruction.Councilmember Freeburg asked what this will affect. Mr. Kirchner said this willnot trigger anything in Greenhaven but the interest of the parties there anticipatedthe developer would trigger the exchange that they will need the road behind thebuilding for the truck docking. He said we both have an interest for a routearound the building and this will provide for a new connection point at Thurston.Mr. Kirchner said we need to maintain connection with the existing point ofThurston so these cross easements won’t require road connections, adding the43 of 360

June 17, 2013 (Regular)Page 23 of 32development agreement won’t either but will provide for a public way around thebuilding only. He said these two easements take care of what we have been doingfor two years already.Mayor Rice said when ATK was looking and negotiating I was disappointed thatthis easement would go away as it would be nice to use these sites when Enivadivided the property. He said that although we were happy to sacrifice theroadway we wanted them to stay in Anoka so could their uses be served by thoseother sites. Mr. Kirchner said in a competitive situation the feasibility of theremote building was not great.Jim Pursuant, Federal Cartridge, asked if we expand on the site will that removethe road on City property. He said the expansion does not have to go over thatproperty, adding two years ago we chose a place and we have used the buildingsince. He said how we can use it is not a solid plan so the possibility that thiswould stay City property is good. He noted they may need some realignment butthat at this point they have no plans to expand the building.Mayor Rice said he is pleased to hear that as this could be beautiful campus typesetting. Mr. Pursuant said if we need expansion the buildings would be connectedas the transfer of materials would be too costly. He said that is what drove the useof this facility. He noted the warehouse is pretty empty now due to the currentmarket.Councilmember Schmidt confirmed that Item 9.3 refers to only Outlot C.Motion by Councilmember Weaver, seconded by Councilmember Schmidt, toadopt a resolution authorizing temporary easement agreement for a portion ofOutlot C, Eniva Addition with Austin Grove LLC.Upon a roll call vote: Mayor Rice, Councilmembers Freeburg, Schmidt, andWeaver voted in favor. Motion carried.9.4 RES/Accepting Right of Entry and Temporary Easement from Austin Grove,LLC.RESOLUTIONMr. Kirchner stated this is the companion right of entry and easement grantingaccess to the loop road around the ATK Inc. facility. He said access is granted to“the City and its employees and contractors and others directly associated with theCity”. It may be terminated by the completion of the property exchange asoutlined in the Memorandum of Understanding or by mutual agreement.Councilmember Weaver said this agreement is vague because Condition 5 couldbe open to interpretation and be difficult for the general public if closed. He saidEniva placed a cable across the road and created havoc and that traffic moving on44 of 360

June 17, 2013 (Regular)Page 24 of 32Highway 10 at that time at night is not out of the industrial park and if Highway10 is blocked the backage road becomes very important.Mayor Rice said he felt there is no misinterpretation as the agreement says Enivacan close the road if they choose. Mayor Rice said barriers are fine but that hedoes not want to see road close.Councilmember Schmidt said there have been discussions about connecting thegolf course with the industrial park and this would be the only hope for that.Councilmember Weaver said there have been discussions years ago about OutlotC and parkway road connecting to Jacob Lane and that they need clarification.Mayor Rice said this does not have to be settled right now because we still ownthe right-of-way. He said the City wants this firm to be successful and that wewill honor the agreements now and allows easements for the road.Mr. Kirchner said there are no rights to trespass as we own Outlot C. He saidneither of us have a right to do what we are doing but this agreement will allowfor that, adding there is a one-year limit and that we will get the developer towork out an agreement for this exchange. He said this is a broader and more openagreement and that it is a good thing we did not have it in place before becausewe need to get it on record the existing practice and then finalize the developmentagreement because we cannot deliver a public access to this area.Mr. Cruikshank suggested amending Condition 5 if the Council has an objection.Mayor Rice said we are allowing this and should expect Austin to be the goodneighbor that they are, adding if they want to change we can discontinue theagreement or build a road so Condition 5 is not a concern.Councilmember Weaver said he is not comfortable with Condition 5 at all andwhile he has a great admiration of Federal Cartridge we do not know AustinGrove.Mr. Cruikshank asked if this is a liability issue. Mr. Kirchner said it is a liabilityand maintenance issue but noted it will not be covered in this agreement anyway.He said this refers to encouraging travel, maintenance, and tree trimming alongthe area.Councilmember Weaver said the cable happened because it was allowed.Mr. Pursuant said they can only make a recommendation because they are not theowner but that he does not see a change in terms of barriers or chains with signingthe agreement. He said they have concerns so the road is posted as privateproperty because at rush hour it is used as a City street and should not be becauseit is unimproved, non-striped, and has no shoulder. He said their recommendation45 of 360

June 17, 2013 (Regular)Page 25 of 32is not to open it up for public use because of liability issues and when discussedwith their attorney if use is condoned and there is an accident there could be aproblem as it is not designed as a public street. He noted the City Attorney hasreviewed the language on the easement and this agreement was a result.Councilmember Weaver asked if it is their intent to close the road. Mr. Pursuantsaid no, their concern is security issues, adding he will not recommend closingeither, adding the easement does not change the road use.Mayor Rice confirmed that they will continue to post this as private property eventhough people do drive on it.Councilmember Weaver inquired about the orange cones placed in the area. Mr.Pursuant said the cones were not placed by them but noted the City did plow andtrim the area.Mr. Cruikshank said this is because the City wants the road open for emergencyaccess for emergency vehicles so minimal maintenance is conducted.Councilmember Weaver said he will support this based on Mr. Pursuant’s intentbut said he still had some concerns.Motion by Councilmember Schmidt, seconded by Councilmember Freeburg, toadopt a resolution accepting right of entry and temporary easement from AustinGrove LLC.Upon a roll call vote: Mayor Rice, Councilmembers Freeburg, Schmidt, andWeaver voted in favor. Motion carried.9.5 RES/CSAH 116/41 st Avenue Extension Road Intersection; Approve FeasibilityLetter Report, Waive Public Improvement Hearing, Order Project and AuthorizePreparation of Plans and Specifications (includes South 41 st Avenue ExtensionRoad).RESOLUTIONMr. Lee stated that in 2007, Anoka County applied for and received FederalFunds under the Surface Transportation Program (STP) for the expansion ofCounty Road 116 (Bunker Lake Boulevard); from County Road 7 (7th Avenue) to38th Avenue. This project included the reconstruction of this segment of CountyRoad 116 in the cities of Anoka and Andover to a four-lane divided roadway,construction of a separate pedestrian / bicycle trail along the north side andreconstruction of the intersection at 7th Avenue; which will include a new trafficsignal, center medians, and channelization. Since this project would restrictexisting and future accesses, the cities of Anoka and Andover initiated a trafficstudy to demonstrate the need for accesses onto the County system and todetermine where and what type they should be. Given that there is the46 of 360

June 17, 2013 (Regular)Page 26 of 32undeveloped property at all four quadrants of the Bunker Lake Boulevard/7thAvenue intersection, the study determined future traffic volumes and patternsutilizing the zoning of these undeveloped properties.Mr. Lee shared that on October 17, 2011the City Council adopted a resolutionapproving a Joint Powers Agreement for the reconstruction of County State AidHighway 116 (Bunker Lake Boulevard) from 7th Avenue to 38th Avenue. TheJoint Powers Agreement also established the location of future intersections alongCSAH 116 and CSAH 7. He said that in March the City received two proposals todevelopment the property north of CSAH 116 just west of the Anoka CountLibrary. In May of 2013, the City Council adopted an ordinance to sell thisproperty to Landmark Development of Anoka LLC.Mr. Lee said the proposed improvements include construction of the south looproad (41st Avenue) and the signalized intersection of this road with County StateAid Highway 116 (Bunker Lake Boulevard). The estimated project cost, based onthe letter report, is $1,400,000. Funding would be derived from two generalsources, the developer of Rum River Shores would contribute $253,000, and theremaining funds would be derived from other City sources including the City’sStreet Renewal Fund. Mr. Lee shared the project schedule, stating the projectshould be complete by August 29, 2014.Schmidt questioned the timing of this request. Mr. Cruikshank said this is notapproved by the developer yet and if the development does not happen we willnot proceed.Mr. Lee said if this request is approved it will bring us to a point but no awardwill be made unless a developer agreement is approved in July.Councilmember Weaver said the schedule is bids will be open in August so wewill have firm answers by then. Mr. Cruikshank said that is correct, adding thatMr. Lee is being proactive assuming this will tie with the County project.Councilmember Weaver asked if this action should be subject to development.Mr. Lee said there is no risk to the City other than costs of creating plans andspecs and that given that the intersection has to be at that location it won’t changeanything. He said they are trying to get the plans quickly so they can be tied withthe County project, similar to the East Main Street project.Mayor Rice said whether this or another developer begins the signal will be hereno matter what. Mr. Lee agreed, stating nothing will occur until August 19.Mr. Cruikshank confirmed that there is no risk to the City but that this is just atiming issue along with the south side loop road timing.47 of 360

June 17, 2013 (Regular)Page 27 of 32Mr. Lee said the intersection with Bunker Lake Boulevard would happen at thesame time and that the south loop road will be done in the spring of 2014, and ifthe north side develops it ties right in.Mr. Cruikshank asked how the high school traffic will connect onto 41 st Avenue.Mr. Lee noted how the traffic will connect on a map, noting one road will goaway. He added that they will create a parking lot at the intersection of 6 thAvenue and Bunker Lake Boulevard too as they will need an area for a backwashpond.Motion by Councilmember Freeburg, seconded by Councilmember Anderson, toadopt a resolution accepting the feasibility letter report, ordering the project,waiving the public improvement hearing, and authorizing the preparation of plansand specifications for the CSAH 116/41st Avenue Extension road and intersectionproject.Upon a roll call vote: Mayor Rice, Councilmembers Freeburg, Schmidt, andWeaver voted in favor. Motion carried.10. UNFINISHED BUSINESSNone.11. NEW BUSINESS11.1 Revision to Policy #2002-02; Public Purpose Expenditure Policy.Mr. Cruikshank shared the proposed amendments to the Public ExpenditurePolicy, which the Council adopted in 2002. He said the amendments relate to thesection on “Recognition/Retirement Events/Purchases”. He said financial impactswill vary each year based on the amount of events, retirements, departures, etc.The cost of events will be included in the annual budget.Councilmember Weaver explained the name of the Mayors Ice Cream Social hasbeen changed so the policy should be updated.Mr. Walker said the 2002 policy was not available online for review.Councilmember Weaver noted the amendments were not available online either.Motion by Councilmember Freeburg, seconded by Councilmember Anderson, toapprove the revision to Policy #2002-02, Public Purpose Expenditure Policy, ascorrected.Vote taken. All ayes. Motion carried.11.2 Special Events License; Boutique Des Saisons.48 of 360

June 17, 2013 (Regular)Page 28 of 32Mr. Cruikshank stated Char Heck, owner of Boutique Des Saisons, has submittedan application for a Special Events License for a “Rock & Shop” on Sunday, June30, 2013 – from 10:00 a.m. – 7:00 p.m. The request includes the closing of 2 ndAvenue North from Main Street to Jackson Street. The purpose of the event is tobring people into the Anoka downtown area and will include bands playing on thestreet throughout the day. There will be no cost to attend the event and it is opento the public.Mr. Cruikshank shared that Police Chief Johanson & Street Supervisor JonHolmes met with the applicant, Ms. Heck to discuss the event. Public Serviceswill provide the barricades and do the proper signage for the road closure. PoliceChief Johanson advised that there is no need for additional security for this event.The event will not require any further assistance from the City.There have been no concerns or objections expressed by staff regarding thisevent. Per City ordinance, staff contacted ABLA to review this request. ABLAexpressed no objections and suggested that the applicant contact the neighboringbusinesses to obtain their support. Ms. Heck has advised City staff that shecontacted the businesses on 2nd Ave which neighbor her business and they weresupportive of the event. Ms. Heck plans for this to be an annual event. Ms. Heckhas provided the required Certificate of Insurance for the event.Councilmember Schmidt said he will not support this license unless there is alater time for the music as he believed it is too early.Motion by Councilmember Schmidt, seconded by Councilmember Anderson, toapprove the Special Event license and road closure with the condition that musicbegin at 12 noon.Vote taken. All ayes. Councilmember Weaver abstained. Motion carried.11.3 Accept Central Business District Parking Study.Mr. Kirchner stated that during the past year staff and interns have conductednumerous parking surveys in the Central Business District (CBD) to determinethe existing parking patterns and parking supply/demand conditions. This reportsummarizes the findings of these surveys and provides some recommendations foraddressing parking needs in the future. He said the document and relateddatabases provide a format to monitor parking changes in the CBD over timethrough updated surveys.As the study indicates, there is no parking shortage in the CBD at this time.However, certain demand factors are worth tracking including weekday parking atthe County Government Center and Sandburg Education Center and weekendparking in the vicinity of the bar/restaurants on Jackson Street. Concerning the49 of 360

June 17, 2013 (Regular)Page 29 of 32reuse of Sandburg, related parking demand is emerging and will be a factor infuture redevelopment in the South Central Business District currently under study.Councilmember Schmidt said the report contains some short-termrecommendations and while he is not sure who will follow up there arerecommendations regarding lighting on the school and City lots on the south sideof Monroe, review of permit fees, and the Wells Fargo drive-in lot so hecautioned that we don’t let the document die.Councilmember Weaver said the Historic Rum River District (HRRD) and otherscontinue to develop cautiously and when parking is full downtown and lots areoverflowing onto the streets to the feed mill future staff and Council will havemore in-depth discussions.Councilmember Anderson inquired about the proposed parking in Map 4, addinghe is concerned about the lack of handicapped parking. Mr. Kirchner said thisarea is existing parking and is correct for on street parking.Councilmember Schmidt said this exposes some underutilization too such as inthe Walker ramp.Councilmember Weaver said this occurs because the parking is hidden.Councilmember Freeburg said this area is perceived as private parking.Councilmember Weaver said it is because of the older design for larger trucks.Mr. Kirchner noted that there is not much demand on that side and that this usedto be contract parking.Councilmember Weaver said that since this is Mr. Kirchner’s last meeting heshould share some of his thoughts from the last 35 years.Mr. Kirchner said it has been a pleasure working with this Council because oftheir businesslike approach and camaraderie as well as the Mayor’s approach toleadership. He shared that he has worked with seven Mayors and 15 otherCouncilmembers, which is actually very few for over the 35 years he has beenhere. He said they have accomplished a lot by being stable and staying on task.Councilmember Weaver asked Mr. Kirchner to share about some of Anoka’sbiggest developments. Mr. Kirchner shared some thoughts and history onEnterprise Park and its impact that is still yet to be fully measured; diversificationof Divesco from 3 to 70 manufacturers and the tax base and jobs that werecreated; the ripple effect as revenues helped make Riverspointe happen that set apattern and tone for upper end housing in Anoka; the revenue that rolled to theproperty north of City Hall and is still building out today as well as parks such asPen Point and the downtown ramps. He said all of these projects created a50 of 360

June 17, 2013 (Regular)Page 30 of 32tremendous financial impact and improved the quality of life. He shared hisappreciation for the three good City Managers that he has worked with and wholed the staff well and that he is looking forward to seeing many former co-workersnext week.Mr. Cruikshank said there will be a farewell event for Mr. Kirchner on June 27 at3:00 p.m. at City Hall.Councilmember Freeburg shared that he had met Mr. Kirchner through his fatherand the businesses on the river when a grand development plan was shared,adding the area is now finally redeveloped.Councilmember Weaver referred to how long Riverspointe took and how it finallyfit with the VOA being completed.Mr. Kirchner said stable Councils help with patience, adding he was neverinvolved in an adversarial eminent domain, which is amazing considering over 40properties were in a flood plain. He said this is a credit to the philosophy overtime of the Councils.Motion by Councilmember Freeburg, seconded by Councilmember Weaver, toaccept the Central Business District Parking Study.Mr. Walker asked why the City issues 500 citations each month downtown if wehave plenty of parking. Councilmember Freeburg said the citations are issues topeople who visit the courthouse.Mr. Walker said Anoka is the County seat and that we should try to accommodatethem instead of issuing violations. He noted no other ordinance is violated asmuch.Mayor Rice said there is ample parking for more than 2-3 hours and to havesuccess they have to have a plan. He said if you need eight hours there are areasto park.Mr. Cruikshank said he believes the reason is that the fine is too small and thatpeople are willing to pay that fine in order to park.Mr. Walker referred to Section 74-522 with the exception of the B-3 CentralBusiness District. He shared maps of exception areas in Anoka, including thoseexcused from the parking regulations and absorbed by the taxpayer. He referredto page 12 of the study and how 83-percent is owned and maintained by taxpayersso this exception area of 105 properties. He said we do not give the courthouse anexception because they are funded by taxpayers and have the capacity to provideparking. Mr. Walker said Red Stone Pizza and the law offices on 4 th and 5 thAvenues are included but have an enormous amount of parking so when these51 of 360

June 17, 2013 (Regular)Page 31 of 32areas are removed the result is that the majority if for very few owners. He notedthat 75-percent of these properties are owned by three property owners do noteven operate businesses in Anoka but are rental landlords; the Weavers, Jensens,and Beckers each have 25-percent while the remaining 25-percent is everyoneelse. Mr. Walker said Anoka is subsidizing these three property investors and thatwe have plenty of capacity so this is “good old boy” politics.Mayor Rice said this is a problem that Mr. Walker identified but that he feels theproblem is around the County courthouse and that Mr. Walker has not includedthem in his calculations. He asked if he compared ours with other cities withdowntown areas and zero lot lines. Mr. Walker said he did not as his concern isAnoka.Councilmember Schmidt said he has no concerns because the entire area wasburned down in 1883. Mr. Walker said he is not referring to the standards in 1883but the standards of today.Councilmember Schmidt said Anoka was built in 1883 for horse and buggies andthat people like the old downtown area and that they do not want to tear downbuildings for parking.Mr. Walker said he is not proposing that but is pointing out that we have plenty ofparking.Councilmember Freeburg asked if businesses should buy parking land to rent.Mr. Walker said the Council set a precedent for the Leones for leasing space fordumpsters so we should rent spots to leaders to help alleviate parking pressures.He said there is a self-regulating feature to parking and if you do not provideparking you should not have the business. He said it is not fair to subsidizeparking and leave street parking for customers.Mayor Rice said this is Mr. Walker’s opinion and that there are others, and whilehe does not necessarily object he would suggest policy changes and review onhow businesses contribute to this too as we need to make fair comparisons.Mr. Walker said the rules should apply to everyone.Mr. Cruikshank said we already give the downtown businesses the opportunity tocontribute to the system through having employees purchase parking permits.Mr. Walker said the code provides for parking for both the employee and thecustomer.Mr. Cruikshank said their discussion with Mr. Leone was due to the lease and ifhe had not signed the lease we would have placed the signs and towed.Mr. Walker said this is because the taxpayers are funding 1,100 stalls.52 of 360

June 17, 2013 (Regular)Page 32 of 32Councilmember Freeburg suggested that Mr. Walker look at his tax bill. Mr.Walker said the Council is supposed to represent us.Councilmember Schmidt asked if Mr. Walker pays taxes in Anoka. Mr. Walkersaid his home was foreclosed on but that he currently rents in Anoka. Mr. Walkerthanked the Council for their comments.Vote taken. All ayes. Motion carried.12. UPDATES AND REPORTS12.1 Tentative Agenda(s).The Council reviewed the tentative agendas of the upcoming Council meetings.12.2 Staff and Council Input.Councilmember Anderson said that Jim Nielson, Anoka, had shared with himsome parking concerns during a recent golf event at Greenhaven Golf Course.Mr. Cruikshank said these concerns will be addressed and a recommendation toamend the ordinance will be presented to accommodate these types of situations.Councilmember Schmidt highlighted the many events during the month of July,including Castle Field’s first game, fireworks, and Riverfest.13. ADJOURNMENTCouncilmember Freeburg, made a motion to adjourn the Regular Council meeting.Councilmember Anderson, seconded the motion.Vote taken. All ayes. Motion carried.Time of adjournment: 11:10 p.m.Submitted by: Cathy Sorensen, TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.Approval Attestation:Amy T. Oehlers, City Clerk53 of 360

June 24, 2013 (Worksession)Page 1 of 111. CALL TO ORDERWORKSESSION OF THE ANOKA CITY COUNCILANOKA CITY HALLCITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION ROOMJUNE 24, 2013Mayor Pro Tem Anderson called the worksession meeting to order at 5:05 p.m.2. ROLL CALLPresent at roll call: Mayor Rice (arrived at 5:25 p.m.), Councilmembers Anderson,Freeburg, Schmidt, and Weaver.Staff present: City Manager Tim Cruikshank; Director of Public Services/City EngineerGreg Lee; Finance Director Lori Yager; Planning Director Carolyn Braun; CommunityDevelopment Director Robert Kirchner; Economic Development Manager Erik Thorvig;Housing Manager Darin Berger; Greenhaven Golf Manager Larry Norland; ElectricUtility Director Dan Voss; and Recording Secretary Amanda Staple.3. COUNCIL BUSINESS and/or DISCUSSION ITEMS3.1 Discussion; RFP 1632 S. Ferry Street.Mayor Pro Tem Anderson explained that this is a worksession and while theCouncil will listen to presentations there will be no formal decision made at thismeeting.Planning Director Carolyn Braun stated that at the last Council worksession, theCouncil discussed the disposition of the city-owned property at 1632 South FerryStreet. The outcome of that discussion was to direct staff to prepare a Request forProposal for nonresidential uses of the parcel as a way to explore alternative usesof the site. The property can also be used as it has been used in the past - for asingle-family residential property. If an acceptable non-residential use is notidentified, the Council also has the option to sell it for that purpose.Concurrently, the Planning Commission has been developing language for a newzoning district along the east side of South Ferry Street, from Main Street to theMississippi River. The currently proposed language recognizes the potential fornon-residential uses of the property.Staff shared a draft of the Request for Proposal (RFP) to 1632 South Ferry Street,also known as the Woodbury House property, noting that technical items that willbe included in the RFP appendix were not included in the packet.54 of 360

June 24, 2013 (Worksession)Page 2 of 11Councilmember Schmidt stated that he believed the RFP to be robust and shouldfoster additional questions from interested parties.Councilmember Weaver stated that while he will abstain from the discussion, hedid review the RFP and believed it to be complete. He was pleased to see thenumber of people in attendance at the meeting tonight and stated the more interestin the property the better it would be.Councilmember Freeburg questioned if a sign for sale or lease could be placed onthe property because of the high amount of passing traffic. He questioned if abroker should be hired to list and market the property.Councilmember Schmidt stated that he would like to see the complete packageready before that occurs to determine if a broker would be interested.Mayor Pro Tem Anderson welcomed comments from the public.Leah Johnson, 201 Jackson Street, addressed the Council and stated that while theCity has places to celebrate casual events the City is missing a place for a moreupscale or formal event. She stated that she has been working on her idea formore than two years and when she proposed the idea to outside investors she hasbeen denied because investors believe that the idea of upscale dining would notsucceed in Anoka. She commented that perhaps this would be the opportunity forthe City to assist in proving these people wrong. She referenced the cosmeticimprovements the City has invested in recently and believed that this would bethe time to add an upscale dining option as well, rather than watching thosedollars leave the City when customers take their business outside of Anoka. Shestated that this is a well-known house and this is a great opportunity to thinkoutside of the box. She referenced the parking situation and noted that the Citycurrently owns the Carpenters’ Hall and could convert that into a parking area,advising that she would offer valet parking. She advised of outside events, suchas weddings, that could occur on the property. She noted that her menu wouldincorporate 50 percent resident submitted recipes that the head chef would put hisown twist on it.Mayor Rice arrived at 5:25 p.m.Steve Johnson, 201 Jackson Street, believed that this would be a good opportunityto utilize this property. He provided financial information on their proposal andbelieved that the City would make their money back within 18 months. He notedsimilar ideas in other communities and believed that this would be moresuccessful because of the river location.Kara Geist, Andover resident, stated that she and her husband often come toAnoka for their entertainment as well as walks along the river. She stated that thistheme comes up a lot, as to a nice place to eat in Anoka. She noted that there are55 of 360

June 24, 2013 (Worksession)Page 3 of 11more young people coming out from Minneapolis and they would love to seevariety in the types of dining experiences. She referenced Two Scoops and thelarge volume of business they bring in, even with many other options provided inthe area. She stated that she would support this idea.City Manager Tim Cruikshank stated that the Council will certainly hear morepresentations in the future but explained that the item tonight is simply in regardto the draft RFP document.Owner of Fine Living, stated that he and his wife brought this business intoAnoka as an opportunity to bring an elevate taste into the City. He stated that thiselevated taste is not supported in Anoka because the majority of downtown iscomposed of occasional thrift shops. He stated that while his business was openseven days a week, many of the other stores were not. He stated that they havemoved their business to Stillwater and while they hated to leave Anoka, that typeof business was not supported in the City.Councilmember Freeburg stated that he has heard that from other business ownersas well, that the lack of open businesses has hurt other stores because of the lackof foot traffic.Owner of Fine Living referenced a program they came across in Duluth where theCity worked with business owners and let people submit ideas, with the offer ofone-year free rent for the winning ideas.Mr. Cruikshank stated that while there are things the City can do to market theproperty and plan for the City, there are limitations to what the government role inbusiness should be.Liz Cook, Mad Hatter, stated that she was running reports in preparation for theRFP and advised that her business has had customers from 220 zip codes in thepast year, noting that only accounts for 23 percent of her business.Mayor Rice stated that those valuable ideas should be shared with ABLA and theChamber of Commerce.Councilmember Anderson stated that he polled some of the residents in his areaand found that there is support for a fine dining restaurant at that location. Hereviewed the task of the Council for tonight and believed that the RFP shouldmove forward as it is; he also commended Ms. Braun for her work.Council consensus was to direct Planning Director Braun to proceed with theRFP.3.2 Discussion; TIF Districts Spreadsheet.56 of 360

June 24, 2013 (Worksession)Page 4 of 11Economic Development Manager Erik Thorvig stated that there are currentlyseven TIF districts in the City of Anoka. The districts are:City Council HRAThurston Corridor (Enterprise Park District)Historic Rum River DistrictSouth Ferry StreetCommuter Rail Transit VillageGreens of AnokaRiverspointe/Walker PlazaCentral Business DistrictMr. Thorvig shared an update to a spreadsheet the City Council first reviewed atthe December 10, 2012 worksession. In general the spreadsheet shows projectedrevenue based on current development in each district. The revenue amountincreases if additional development were to occur. The expenses show existingloans/debt, administrative charges, existing projects that have been funded, andprojects/acquisitions that could be funded. The red line indicates the budgetbased on revenues. Anything below the red line cannot be funded unless revenueis increased through new development or land (assets) is sold that was originallypurchased with funds from the district.Staff would like to discuss the following:• Relationships between districts (City Council Enterprise Park and HRRDDistricts; HRA Riverspointe District and City Council S. Ferry Street District).• Projected expenses in the CRTV and Greens of Anoka Districts.• General regulations related to the post-1990 TIF Districts.Finance Director Lori Yager provided additional information in regard to therelationships between the different districts, including funds that are committed topaying back the ramp and the electric fund.Councilmember Schmidt confirmed that the funds would be used to repay theelectric and to pay off the debt on the ramp.Ms. Yager stated that the ramp has a high interest rate and the focus has been torepay that debt, otherwise the ramp would have been refinanced in the past.Mr. Cruikshank stated that staff has made some assumptions and proposals, verycautiously.Councilmember Schmidt confirmed that this is simply a proposal.Ms. Yager confirmed that this is a very cautious approach to ensuring that theramp is paid off in full.57 of 360

June 24, 2013 (Worksession)Page 5 of 11Mr. Cruikshank stated that this is very cautious but it will also afford the Citywith the ability to move ahead with development at their selection rather thanbeing in the position where the City must let in whatever development simplybecause they need the funds.Economic Development Director Robert Kirchner explained that this proposalwould be a method to link the old and new districts, noting that those new fundscould then be used with more flexibility.Mr. Thorvig explained the relationship between the HRA Riverspointe Districtand the City Council South Ferry Street District.Mr. Cruikshank stated that staff would propose that the HRA work with the CityCouncil to improve the South Ferry Street Corridor.Housing Coordinator Berger referenced the two properties owned by the HRAand provided additional information. He stated that while the HRA has a longtermplan for the area he hoped to work with the Council.Councilmember Freeburg stated that if there are not motivated sellers, there is nota lot of improvement that could be done in that area.Mr. Cruikshank questioned if staff should continue to work with the propertyowners and wanted to ensure that there was dedicated funding if thoseopportunities present themselves.Councilmember Freeburg stated that there is community support to improve thatarea.Mayor Rice stated that he would like to see the area improved but wanted toensure that the City did not lose a lot of funds in the process. He recognized thatwhen the City purchases property they often end up paying more than what theycould/should because of desire.Mr. Thorvig clarified that all the numbers listed are reasonable numbers in orderto provide a more accurate picture.Pat Walker stated that personally he would not support the HRA selling 1900Ferry Street to build a high rise. He referenced the Ferry and Benton corner anddid not believe that the fourth corner was necessary for redevelopment. He statedthat one option would be to list the property and request RFPs to determine if thefourth property would be needed. He questioned what working together wouldmean as he wanted to ensure that it did not simply mean that the HRA would belosing money.58 of 360

June 24, 2013 (Worksession)Page 6 of 11Mr. Cruikshank stated that perhaps providing a history of working togetherbetween the Council and the HRA would mean.Mr. Kirchner provided a history of the TIF districts beginning in 1988. He statedthat at a point the HRA was unable to continue with their funds and noted that theCity Council stepped in at that time and funded the development at a cost of$5,000,000 to $6,000,000. He confirmed that there was never a repayment to theCouncil from the HRA. He stated that the Council also funded the scatteredproperty program. He stated that the Council has financed quite a bit of the HRAactivity and it is only because of that that the HRA has the ability to generateincome. He stated that in the past this was never structured as a loan but believedin the future some of these should be tracked.Merrywayne Elvig stated that her only concern in getting involved would be theavailable area that could be picked up and the type of activity that could occur inthat area.Mr. Cruikshank stated that in some of those areas there would not be developmentbut noted that there are a few areas that could be redeveloped.Mr. Thorvig identified the pods where redevelopment could occur andacknowledged that there is that strip of land that would not be redeveloped.Councilmember Freeburg questioned what would be in place to ensure that atreatment facility could not show up in another area once Riverplace sells out ormoves.Ms. Braun stated that it would need to be within an allowed zoning district butwas unsure offhand where that would be. She stated that the City could reviewthe ordinance to determine where the best location would be. She stated thatRiverplace is willing to work with the City but they want to relocate.Mr. Cruikshank stated that the City simply wants to find the right place for thatbusiness.Mr. Berger stated that the HRA has had some discussion in rehabilitating secondstory locations but noted that not too many have come forward.Mr. Kirchner stated that there are areas within the district where new constructioncould occur. He stated that this district could also be involved with rehabilitationand signage as well.Ms. Yager stated that additional funds, development, would need to occur in orderfor that to happen.59 of 360

June 24, 2013 (Worksession)Page 7 of 11Mr. Kirchner identified areas where new development could occur and noted thatsome of the areas could be used in more than one way with surface parking andsomething built above.Mr. Thorvig discussed the CRTV and Greens of Anoka districts and referencedprojected expenses and redevelopment areas.Councilmember Weaver referenced the Greens of Anoka and noted that there arenewly foreclosed homes. He questioned if those homes should and could beconsidered qualifying homes.Ms. Braun stated that the district would have to be expanded to include thoseproperties.Councilmember Schmidt confirmed that 25 percent of those funds could be usedoutside the district.Mr. Thorvig identified the district boundaries. He stated that with additional timeand analysis the district could be expanded. He stated that staff is alsoinvestigating the ability of a South Central Business District, but noted that wouldmost likely become an HRA District because of their hand in the area. He statedthat this document is fluid and can be amended as necessary.Councilmember Freeburg referenced the old Health Partners site and asked for anupdate.Mr. Berger stated that the clinic is planning to relocate to the new site inSeptember and advised that the HRA is also attempting to acquire the GoodrichPharmacy site.Mr. Cruikshank stated that this document consolidates a lot of complicatedthoughts and mechanisms in one fluid plan. He confirmed that while the HRAexpresses support for the ideas they would also like more time to discuss theideas. He noted that the Council and staff will need to know that. He stated thatthe investment in this plan is massive and advised that this is a road plan forredevelopment.Councilmember Weaver commended staff for a magnificent document butbelieved the most important piece of information came from the history providedby Mr. Kirchner on how the City and HRA got to where they are now. He statedthat when he was on the HRA the budget was miniscule and the relationshipbetween the HRA and the Council helped to bring the HRA to where they arenow. He believed that relationship should continue in the future.Mr. Cruikshank stated that not to be presumptuous but staff will continue downthis path unless they hear differently.60 of 360

June 24, 2013 (Worksession)Page 8 of 11Mr. Berger stated that he is going to propose a joint worksession in the near futurebetween the Council and HRA.Mayor Rice stated that the HRA and Council share common goals and hebelieved that to be important. He suggested that the HRA meet and discusswhether these are commons goals, as this is a big commitment on both sides. Hestated that if these are commons goals, the two groups can work together andshare funds.Pat Walker questioned what the Council would like to see as a part of thedemolition of the existing Riverway site, whether the building is removed andsurface parking is left or whether the whole site is demolished.Councilmember Freeburg stated that he would like to see the building demolishedand the parking remain at this point.Councilmember Schmidt explained that while the Council is committed to certainitems on the document, such as the repayment of the ramp debt, other items arefluid and can be modified.Mr. Cruikshank agreed that the red line on the document identifies priorities.Ms. Braun stated that there has been a fair amount of staff time spent developingthis document.Mr. Kirchner provided additional input on his history with the TIF districts andadvised that even he is still continuing to learn. He stated that there is a benefit tohaving a large portfolio of ideas so that the City can jump on opportunities whenwilling sellers arise, noting that in all the time he has been with the City he hasnever been involved in an adversarial imminent domain.Councilmember Freeburg stated that in his experience he has never had adeveloper or applicant come before the Council and speak negatively of the staff,noting that he has only heard positive comments about how cooperative staff hasbeen.Dave Bonthius stated that a citizen of Anoka it is comforting to see the positiverelationship between staff and the City Council.Council consensus was to direct staff to continue to work with property ownersand the HRA.3.3 Discussion; Capital Improvement Plan.61 of 360

June 24, 2013 (Worksession)Page 9 of 11Finance Director Lori Yager shared that annually the Council and staff review thefive-year capital improvement plan prior to adoption. She shared a draft copy ofthe Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) with financial projections.Council is asked to discuss the plan and provide input for changes, additions anddeletions.Councilmember Weaver referenced the expenditures for 2014 related to theCommuter Rail Transit Village and believed the $50,000 for the lagoon dockagewas ahead of its time and believed it would be better spent on the alternatives forthe shovel ready trail. He noted that the area west of Fourth Avenue needs to berevisited and provided additional information noting that the trail could be movedto add an additional three acres to the developable area. He believed that therecould be a better conceptual plan for that area. He stated that was his onlyconcern for 2014, to use the $50,000 for alternatives on the trail project.Mr. Cruikshank agreed with Councilmember Weaver that the $50,000 is ahead ofits time and should be removed from that line item. He stated that in regard toCouncilmember Weaver’s suggestion, the shovel ready project is underfundedand would remain underfunded even with the additional $50,000. He questionedif the Council would like to go full scale on the trail and go into the hole but notedthat the money would need to be paid back at some time.Councilmember Freeburg stated that the trail will be just fine and he did not thinkadditional funds need to be spent on the trail.Mayor Rice stated that this trail is very expensive and the previous year there wasdiscussion with the low park budget. He believed it was important to make theparks department whole and did not believe that the budget should be cut anymore. He also believed that these were important additions to the trail and wouldmake a difference in the project. He stated that this project is a showpiece andhas to be developed in order to create the atmosphere for development. He notedthat people use this and will use it more. He believed that the additions should beincluded with the trail but also believed that the parks should be made whole.Ms. Yager advised of a transfer proposed in the 2014 budget that would comefrom the general fund to make the parks budget whole again, in addition to atransfer from the liquor store to the parks budget.Mayor Rice left the meeting at 7:06 p.m.Mr. Cruikshank referenced this trail project to the Greenhaven parking lot projectand questioned if these additions were the absolute right thing to do for thatproject.62 of 360

June 24, 2013 (Worksession)Page 10 of 11Director of Public Services/City Engineer Greg Lee discussed the alternatives forthe trail project. He referenced the line items for the Anoka Nature Reserve andthe funds earmarked for that area and provided additional information on howmaterial could be reused to create the trails.Councilmember Weaver questioned why playground equipment would be neededfor that area when the neighborhood will build its own amenities in that area. Hebelieved that the focus should remain on the trails.Mr. Lee noted that the playground equipment that would be used in that areawould not be typical and would be nature based play equipment placed near thetrailhead.Mr. Cruikshank questioned if the Council desired to fund the other alternates forthe trail and whether play equipment should be included at the reserve.Council consensus was to delay the play equipment and fund the three alternatesfor the trail project.Ms. Yager continued to review the proposed CIP items, identifying specific items.Mr. Lee provided additional information on a specific line item, explaining that itis a placeholder for infrastructure improvement when development arises. Healso provided additional information on the updates to the street project. He alsonoted that the item regarding Greenhaven Road was actually mislabeled and is forthe façade. He obtained Council consensus on the desired option for the upperentrance and noted that the cost saving for that option could be put into the lowerentrance.Mr. Cruikshank stated that all of the items for the Anoka Dam should be strickenand listed together under the reconstruction of the Anoka Dam.Ms. Yager continued to review the proposed CIP items and staff providedadditional clarification when necessary.3.4 Discussion; Equipment Replacement Plan.Finance Director Lori Yager shared that annually the Council and staff review thefive-year equipment replacement plan prior to adoption. She shared a draft copyof the Equipment Replacement Plan (ERP) with financial projections. She notedthat these items will be reviewed more in detail when staff presents the 2014budget discussion.4. OTHER BUSINESS4.1 Staff Update.63 of 360

June 24, 2013 (Worksession)Page 11 of 11No comments made.5. COUNCILMEMBERS COMMENTSNo comments made.6. ADJOURNMENTMayor Rice adjourned the Worksession meeting.Time of adjournment: 8:00 p.m.Submitted by: Amanda Staple, TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.Approval Attestation:Amy T. Oehlers, City Clerk64 of 360

COUNCIL MEMO FORMMeeting Date July 1, 2013Agenda Section Public Hearing(s) & Ordinances/ResolutionsItem Description Hearing – Housing Improvement Area Assessment.RES/Adopting Housing Improvement Assessment.Submitted ByDarin Berger, Housing Manager5.1 &9.1BACKGROUND INFORMATIONThe ordinance establishing the housing improvement area was adopted by Council on May 6 th , 2013. Understate law, the owners of the residential units then had 45 days in which to file objections to that ordinance. Ifobjections had been received from the owners of 45% or more of the residential units the ordinance would havebeen void.After the 45 day period had passed with the City receiving no objections, the Rivers Edge TownhomesAssociation with the assistance of the City’s Public Services Department has obtained a quote. The City canproceed with the next step of the process, the imposition of the fee through assessment. The cost of theimprovements amounts to an estimated $50,000 after engineering fees. These improvements include installationof the wear course bituminous layer of the private roadway serving the Rivers Edge Townhomes and wouldinclude related necessary and incidental improvements to the curb and manhole elevations as needed in order tofinish the improvements to industry standard and comply with all building codes.In accordance with the ordinance establishing the area, the costs are proposed to be spread equally among the 32residential units in the Rivers Edge Townhomes Housing Improvement Area and the fees are to be spread over aperiod of 10 years. The proposed interest rate is 0%. The amount of the fee to be levied against each of the unitsis proposed to be $1562.50.The fees will be collected annually along with taxes although they may be paid in full at any time.Like the ordinance, State law provides that a resolution imposing the fee may be vetoed within 45 days after itsadoption by the owners of 45% or more of the housing units. For this reason, the City should not take the risk ofstarting the project until those 45 days have elapsed, or until the owners of at least 15 of the units havecommitted in writing not to object to the fee.The statutes require that before a resolution imposing the improvement fees can be adopted, the Association mustsubmit a financial plan demonstrating that future maintenance and capital improvements in the area can beaccomplished by the Association. Such a plan has been presented and reviewed by the City's Finance Director.The plan indicates that through increases in monthly assessments and proper scheduling the Association shouldbe able to maintain the existing improvements as well as make future capital improvements that may be needed.FINANCIAL IMPACTThe estimated cost of these improvements is $40-50,000. This amount will be repaid to the city in incrementsover a 10 year period at an interest rate of 0%.COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTEDApprove the resolution imposing improvement fees in the Rivers Edge Townhomes Housing ImprovementArea and providing for the collection of those fees through assessment.65 of 360

2015 First Avenue, Anoka, MN 55303Phone: (763) 576-2700 Website: www.ci.anoka.mn.usCITY OF ANOKA, MINNESOTARESOLUTIONRES-2013-XXA RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE IMPOSITION OF ASSESSEMENTS AGAINSTPROPERTIES LOCATED IN THE HOUSING IMPROVEMENT AREA(RIVERS EDGE TOWNHOMES)WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute §428A.11 provides a mechanism for municipalities to assisthomeowner associations and the owners of housing units within an association, in paying thecosts of housing improvements made to the common elements of the development; andWHEREAS, at their meeting on April 1, 2013, through the adoption of Resolution # RES-2013-31, the Anoka City Council called for a public hearing regarding the establishment of aHousing Improvement area; andWHEREAS, a public hearing was held on May 6, 2013; afterwhich, at the close of the publichearing, the City Council adopted Ordinance # ORD-2013-1529, which established a HousingImprovement Area and approved the proposed or improved fee for improvement to be made inthe designated area (Rivers Edge Townhomes); andWHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §428A.14 & 15, the City may approve the actualimprovement fees and collection process, after a public hearing; andWHEREAS, City Council held this public at 7:00 p.m. on July 1, 2013, in the CouncilChambers of the Anoka City Hall, located at 2015 First Ave, Anoka, Minnesota; andWHEREAS, effected property owners located within the Housing Improvement Area (RiversEdge Townhomes) were provided notice of the hearing as per Minnesota Statute 428A.14; andWHEREAS, the City received no objections to the assessment of fees for improvements, andWHEREAS, a quote for the cost of improvements was obtained by the City and the estimatedimprovement costs will not exceed $50,000.NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Anoka City Council hereby approves theHousing Improvement Area Assessment, not to exceed $50,000, which is detailed on a perparcelbasis as described in the attached Exhibit A.BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the assessment will be for a period of ten (10) years, at a 0%interest rate, commencing with the taxes payable in 2014.66 of 360

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the assessment will go into effect forty-five (45) days afterthe approval of this resolution, unless a petition is received by the City, signed by 45% of theproperty owners in the Housing Improvement Area, requesting that the forty-five (45) days bewaived and that the improvement work and assessment process commence immediately.Adopted by the Anoka City Council this the 1 st day of July 2013.ATTEST:______________________________Amy T. Oehlers, City Clerk________________________________Phil Rice, Mayor67 of 360

Property List and Assessment DataCity of Anoka, Year 2013 Housing Improvement Area AssessmentPID PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNER TAX PAYER Total Assmnt023125110027 3045 CUTTERS GROVE AVE PENDROY LAURA PENDROY LAURA $1,562.50023125110020 3057 CUTTERS GROVE AVE STUDEBAKER CLAIRE STUDEBAKER CLAIRE $1,562.50023125110021 3055 CUTTERS GROVE AVE MARTINSON JANET MARTINSON JANET $1,562.50023125110022 3053 CUTTERS GROVE AVE DEASON JILL DEASON JILL $1,562.50023125110029 3035 CUTTERS GROVE AVE WALTON WADE WALTON WADE $1,562.50023125110028 3037 CUTTERS GROVE AVE BOISJOLIE HOLLY BOISJOLIE HOLLY $1,562.50023125110032 3001 CUTTERS GROVE AVE SYDMAK, LLC SYDMAK, LLC $1,562.50023125120019 3009 CUTTERS GROVE AVE DESORMEY RAINA DESORMEY RAINA $1,562.50023125110024 3039 CUTTERS GROVE AVE SOHNS ROBERT SOHNS ROBERT $1,562.50023125120024 3015 CUTTERS GROVE AVE RODENBERG LORI RODENBERG LORI $1,562.50023125110033 3003 CUTTERS GROVE AVE SYDMAK, LLC SYDMAK, LLC $1,562.50023125120022 3019 CUTTERS GROVE AVE HIGGINS MATTHEW HIGGINS MATTHEW $1,562.50023125110026 3043 CUTTERS GROVE AVE ORCUTT JAMES ORCUTT JAMES $1,562.50023125110030 3033 CUTTERS GROVE AVE HBI HOLDINGS LLC HBI HOLDINGS LLC $1,562.50023125120015 3063 CUTTERS GROVE AVE MCHENRY PATRICK MCHENRY PATRICK $1,562.50023125120017 3067 CUTTERS GROVE AVE OSTLEY JOSIAH OSTLEY JOSIAH $1,562.50023125120016 3065 CUTTERS GROVE AVE BJERKEBEK CATHERINE BJERKEBEK CATHERINE $1,562.50023125120012 3027 CUTTERS GROVE AVE PETERSON SPENCER PETERSON SPENCER $1,562.50023125110019 3059 CUTTERS GROVE AVE JOST KAREN JOST KAREN $1,562.50023125120023 3017 CUTTERS GROVE AVE TWISS ROBERT TWISS ROBERT $1,562.50023125120020 3011 CUTTERS GROVE AVE REKKEDAL BRAD REKKEDAL BRAD $1,562.00023125110023 3051 CUTTERS GROVE AVE OSVAR IOAN OSVAR IOAN $1,562.50023125110034 3005 CUTTERS GROVE AVE SYDMAK, LLC SYDMAK, LLC $1,562.50023125120014 3061 CUTTERS GROVE AVE ANDERSON MICHELLE ANDERSON MICHELLE $1,562.50023125120010 3023 CUTTERS GROVE AVE TAYLOR BRYAN TAYLOR BRYAN $1,562.50023125120021 3013 CUTTERS GROVE AVE BOON BARBARA BOON BARBARA $1,562.50023125120011 3025 CUTTERS GROVE AVE OLSON SHIRLEY OLSON SHIRLEY $1,562.5023125120009 3021 CUTTERS GROVE AVE JAIN PROPERTIES LLC JAIN PROPERTIES LLC $1,562.50023125110031 3031 CUTTERS GROVE AVE FERNHOLZ DANIEL FERNHOLZ DANIEL $1,562.50023125110025 3041 CUTTERS GROVE AVE HANK RICHARD HANK RICHARD $1,562.50023125120018 3007 CUTTERS GROVE AVE SYDMAK, LLC SYDMAK, LLC $1,562.50023125120013 3029 CUTTERS GROVE AVE JAIN PROPERTIES LLC JAIN PROPERTIES LLC $1,562.50TOTAL ASSESSMENT $50,000.0068 of 360Updated on 1/16/2007

COUNCIL MEMO FORMMeeting Date July 1, 2013Agenda Section Consent AgendaItem Description Verified BillsSubmitted ByLori Yager, Finance Director6.1CONSENT AGENDAConsent agenda contains several separate items which are acted upon by the Council in one motion.Upon request, any Consent Agenda item may be removed, and if necessary, placed somewhere elseon the agenda or on a future agenda for Council discussion & action.BACKGROUND INFORMATIONEach Council meeting the City Council is presented with two lists of bills. One list has been paid prior to themeeting to take advantage of discounts and to prevent late fees. The other list is for payments which areprepared to be paid. City Council ratification of the prepaid bills and approval of the bills to be paid is required.If you have questions about a particular bill, please call me at 576-2771.FINANCIAL IMPACTWill vary from meeting to meeting.COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTEDApproval of the Consent Agenda will mean ratification and approval of the Bill List(s).69 of 360

70 of 360

71 of 360

72 of 360

73 of 360

74 of 360

75 of 360

76 of 360

77 of 360

78 of 360

79 of 360

80 of 360

81 of 360

82 of 360

83 of 360

84 of 360

85 of 360

86 of 360

87 of 360

88 of 360

89 of 360

90 of 360

91 of 360

92 of 360

93 of 360

94 of 360

COUNCIL MEMO FORMMeeting Date July 1, 2013Agenda Section Consent AgendaItem Description Monthly Council CalendarsSubmitted ByAmy Oehlers, City Clerk6.2CONSENT AGENDAConsent agenda contains several separate items which are acted upon by the Council in one motion.Upon request, any Consent Agenda item may be removed, and if necessary, placed somewhere elseon the agenda or on a future agenda for Council discussion & action.BACKGROUND INFORMATIONAttached are the proposed meeting calendars/schedule(s).FINANCIAL IMPACTNone.COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTEDApproval of the Consent Agenda will mean approval of the City Council Calendars/Schedule(s), as may beamended from time to time.95 of 360

ANOKA CITY COUNCIL CALENDARJULY 2013Monday 01 Regular Meeting/City Council City Hall Council Chambers 7:00 p.m.Wednesday 03* Castle Field Ribbon Cutting Castle Field 6:00 p.m.Wednesday 03* Anoka Fireworks Display Castle Field DuskThursday 04 Annual City Ice Cream Social George Green Park Noon until goneThursday 04 4 th of July City Offices Closed all daySaturday 13 Riverfest Downtown Anoka All DayMonday 15 Regular Meeting/City Council City Hall Council Chambers 7:00 p.m.Monday 22 Worksession/City Council Council Worksession Room 5:00 p.m.Monday 29 Worksession/City Council Council Workession Room 5:00 p.m.THIS CALENDAR IS POSTED IN ORDER TO COMPLY WITH THE OPEN MEETING LAW, WHICH INDICATES A MEETING MUSTBE POSTED WHEN A MAJORITY OF COUNCILMEMBERS WILL OR MAY BE IN ATTENDANCE. NO OFFICIAL BUSINESS OFNON-REGULAR OR NON-SPECIAL MEETINGS WILL BE CONDUCTED AND NO RECORD OF THOSE EVENT WILL BE KEPT.*ASTERIK DATES ARE OPTIONAL MEETINGS FOR THE CITY COUNCIL AND QUORUMS MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT.96 of 360

ANOKA CITY COUNCIL CALENDARAUGUST 2013Monday 05 Annual Budget Presentation City Hall Council Chambers 6:00 p.m.Monday 05 Regular Meeting/City Council City Hall Council Chambers 7:00 p.m.Monday 12 Budget Worksession City Dock 5:00 p.m.Monday 19 Budget Worksession Council Worksession Room 5:00 p.m.Monday 19 Regular Meeting/City Council City Hall Council Chambers 7:00 p.m.Monday 26 Budget Worksession Council Worksession Room 5:00 p.m.THIS CALENDAR IS POSTED IN ORDER TO COMPLY WITH THE OPEN MEETING LAW, WHICH INDICATES A MEETING MUSTBE POSTED WHEN A MAJORITY OF COUNCILMEMBERS WILL OR MAY BE IN ATTENDANCE. NO OFFICIAL BUSINESS OFNON-REGULAR OR NON-SPECIAL MEETINGS WILL BE CONDUCTED AND NO RECORD OF THOSE EVENT WILL BE KEPT.*ASTERIK DATES ARE OPTIONAL MEETINGS FOR THE CITY COUNCIL AND QUORUMS MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT.97 of 360

COUNCIL MEMO FORMMeeting Date July 1, 2013Agenda Section Consent AgendaItem Description Recommended approval of an LG220 Permit for Zion LutheranChurchSubmitted ByAmy Oehlers, City Clerk6.3CONSENT AGENDAConsent agenda contains several separate items which are acted upon by the Council in one motion.Upon request, any Consent Agenda item may be removed, and if necessary, placed somewhere elseon the agenda or on a future agenda for Council discussion & action.BACKGROUND INFORMATION:An application has been submitted by Zion Lutheran Church for a State issued LG220 Gambling Exempt Permitto allow them to conduct a raffle at their annual “Super Sale” event on September 28, 2013.This is a State issued license, but requires the approval of the municipality in which the event will take place.Staff has reviewed the application and no concerns or objections have been expressed.FINANCIAL IMPACT:The City does not charge a fee for this review.COUNCIL REQUESTED ACTION:Approval of the Consent Agenda will mean the City will recommend approval of this gambling permit to theState of Minnesota.98 of 360

COUNCIL MEMO FORMMeeting Date July 1, 2013Agenda Section Consent AgendaItem Description Approve the Issuance of a Tobacco License for Anoka Gas Stop, Inc.,703 E River RdSubmitted ByAmy Oehlers, City Clerk6.4CONSENT AGENDAConsent agenda contains several separate items which are acted upon by the Council in one motion.Upon request, any Consent Agenda item may be removed, and if necessary, placed somewhere elseon the agenda or on a future agenda for Council discussion & action.BACKGROUND INFORMATION:PDQ located at 703 E River Rd is currently under a transfer of ownership. The new owner, Soumal Saaden ofEgan, dba; Anoka Gas Stop Inc., has submitted an application for a license to sell Tobacco & Tobacco RelatedProducts.Staff has reviewed the application and conducted the necessary background investigation. There were noconcerns or objections expressed.The issuance of this license, after Council approval, will occur once the transfer of ownership is completed.FINANCIAL IMPACT:Cost of a tobacco license is $250 per year. Since this is a new application a $25.00 investigation fee was alsocharged.COUNCIL REQUESTED ACTION:Approval of the Consent Agenda will mean the approval of this license, to be issued after the transfer ofownership is completed.99 of 360

COUNCIL MEMO FORMMeeting Date July 1, 2013Agenda Section Planning CommissionItem Description ORD/Rezoning to B-1 Highway Business; 3201 & 3215 Round Lk Blvd.(2 nd reading)Submitted ByCrystal Paumen, AICP, Associate Planner7.1.ABACKGROUND INFORMATION:On June 17, 2013, the City Council approved a comprehensive plan amendment, 1 st reading of a rezoning siteplan review, conditional use permit, and variance for construction of a new 4,025 square foot car wash buildingand 2,100 square foot retail building at 3201 & 3215 Round Lake Boulevard. A rezoning from B-4 LimitedCommercial to B-1 Highway Commercial is needed to develop the site and construct a car wash. Because arezoning is an ordinance amendment to the official zoning map, two readings are required.The Planning Commission help a public hearing on this item on June 4, 2013 and recommended approval of therezoning along with the other items that were approved by the City Council on June 17, 2017.The Planning Commission considered the comments of the residents who spoke for and against the proposalduring its public hearing on June 4 th . The Planning Commission discussed in detail the proposed landscapingplan, lighting, screening, noise, and views from the adjacent townhomes. Ambient noise from Round LakeBoulevard was a concern from the public, however, most felt that the development would be an improvement tobuffer and absorb some of the noise currently attributed to the high traffic volumes on Round Lake Boulevard.An amended landscaping plan showing more Spruce trees on the north side of the property was submitted perthe request of the Planning Commission and was approved as part of the site plan approval by the City Councilon June 17, 2013.Included is the ordinance, map showing the rezoning area, and staff report.FINANCIAL IMPACT:COUNCIL REQUESTED ACTION:Approve the second reading of an ordinance rezoning property from B-4 to B-1.100 of 360

2015 First Avenue, Anoka, MN 55303Phone: (763) 576-2700 Website: www.ci.anoka.mn.usCITY OF ANOKA, MINNESOTAORDINANCEORD-2013-XXXXAN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 74, ARTICLE III, SECTION 74-62 OF THE ANOKACITY CODE REGARDING THE CITY OF ANOKA ZONING MAP.The Council of the City of Anoka ordains:SECTION 1. This ordinance applies to the subject property legally described as follows:Parcel AThat part of the North 225 feet of the South 390 feet of the East 200 feet of theSoutheast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 32, Township 32, Range24, Anoka County, Minnesota, described as follows:Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Southeast Quarter of the SouthwestQuarter, thence North 89 degrees 39 minutes 20 seconds West assumed bearingalong the South line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter a distanceof 60.00 feet to the West line of ANOKA COUNTY RIGHT-OF-WAY PLATNO. 47; thence North 02 degrees 04 minutes 09 seconds East along said west linea distance of 189.56 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described;thence continuing along said west line North 02 degree 04 minutes 09 secondsEast a distance of 150.00 feet; thence North 89 degrees 23 minutes 58 secondsWest a distance of 96.00 feet; thence South 34 degrees 02 minutes 18 secondsWest a distance of 16.72 feet; thence South 00 degrees 36 minutes 02 West adistance of 136.00 feet; thence South 89 degrees 23 minutes 58 seconds East adistance 101.37 feet to the point of beginning.Parcel BThe South 165 feet of the East 200 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the SouthwestQuarter of Section 32, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota.ANDThe North 225 feet of the South 390 feet of the East 200 feet of the SoutheastQuarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 32, Township 32, Range 24, AnokaCounty, Minnesota described as follows:101 of 360

Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Southwest Quarter of the SouthwestQuarter, thence North 89 degrees 39 minutes 20 seconds West assume bearingalong the south line of said Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter adistance of 60.00 feet to the West line of ANOKA COUNT HIGHWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY PLAT NO. 47; thence North 02 degrees 04 minutes 09 seconds Eastalong Said west line a distance of 189.56 feet to the point of beginning of the landto be described; thence continuing along said west line North 02 degrees 04minutes 09 seconds East a distance of 150 feet; thence North 89 degrees 23minutes 58 seconds West a distance of 96.00 feet; thence South 34 degrees 02minutes 18 seconds West a distance of 6.72 feet; thence South 00 degrees 36minutes 02 West a distance of 136.00 feet; thence South 89 degrees 23 minutes 58seconds East a distance of 191.37 feet to the point of beginning.SECTION 2. The City Council finds in support of rezoning the property described in SECTION1 of this ordinance.SECTION 3. The subject property legally described in SECTION 1 shall hereafter have thezoning classification of B-1 Highway Business District apply to it.SECTION 4. The Zoning Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to record saidamendments to the Official Zoning MapSECTION 5. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effective upon passage and seven daysafter publication._____________________________Phil Rice, Mayor_____________________________Amy T. Oehlers, City ClerkIntroduced:Adopted:Published:Effective:RiceFreeburgSchmidtWeaverAndersonAye Nay Abstain Absent102 of 360

Site LocationAnokaAndover16th Avenue32153201Coon RapidsRound Lake Boulevard.103 of 360

WestChaseReedFranklinStateRiverThirdSixthAldrichNinthNinthTenthCity of AnokaZoning MapBunker LakeForty FirstFortiethSt. FrancisLegendLundHighway 10B-1 Highway BusinessCutters GrovePorterThurstonCuttersYohoB-2 Shopping Center BusinessB-3 Central BusinessB-4 Limited BusinessB-5 Regional BusinessM-1 Light IndustrialM-2 General IndustrialSensitive DevelopmentMain Street Mixed UseMcKinleyYellowstoneWestPorterIndustryParkParkmontGarfieldVerndaleServiceFairoakCressyEuclidCressyAnoka County Rum River Human ServicesOakCemetaryLundForrestShastaServiceJacobChurchWesternFremontTransit Oriented Development - Residential EmphasisTransit Oriented Development - Employee EmphasisR-F Rural FarmR-1 Single Family ResidentialR-2 One and Two Family ResidentialR-3 Medium and High Density ResidentialR-4 High Density ResidentialR-5 Flex ResidentialR-6 Manufactured HomePlanned Residential Development - 1Planned Residential Development - 2Planned Residential Development - 3Planned Residential Development - 4Planned Industrial Development - 1FairoakShawWeaverLoganKennedyShawTower PondParkLeveeMineral PondQuarryGreenhavenCutterBeanRiceDouglasGreenGreenhavenMainBentonRiceSt. FrancisXkimoStateMississippi RiverMineral PondPlacerStateWilsonMcCannSt. FrancisCoolidgeWingfieldClayCalhounBranchBranchGarfieldWingfieldFerryRum RiverMartinPleasantFerryGrayFirstSecondBaileyMcKinleyFerryFerryFrontMapleRum RiverOakwoodMapleGolfJacksonMonroeSecondWaterFourthPleasantVanBurenThirdMadisonJeffersonAdamsWashingtonMillPolkGolfCrossMilitaryStreetFifthFifthFifthJacksonOakwoodGrantSixthJohnsonTaylorSchoolAdamsPierceSixthTylerVanBurenWashingtonRiverNorthSixthJeffersonPolkHarrisonSeventhGarfieldRandallSchoolJacksonBirchRiverBuchananSeventhKingsRiverElmBryantHullSpragueBob EhlandMainJeffersonMonroeCrossMadisonBrisbinEighthSouthviewFeet0 750 1,500 3,000 4,500 6,000FifthWestwoodEighthEighthQueensEastwoodEighthThirty EighthEighthCarlLincolnEighth 1/2NinthThirty EighthRidgeBryantCharlotteAdamsSunnyWashingtonEighthRiverNorwoodNinthPineNinthNinthNinthBlackoaksNinthNinthHighway 10SouthColfaxJeffersonTenthTenthNorthEleventhMainBlackoaks12th12th13thOakviewNorwood14thCleveland14thRoosevelt15th16thSource: Anoka County GISMap Created By: Erik ThorvigEFFECTIVE: March 29, 2013NOTE: Certain properties mayfall within environmental overlaydistricts that are not shown on the104 of 360Official Zoning Map.

COUNCIL MEMO FORMMeeting Date July 1, 2013Agenda Section Ordinances & ResolutionsItem Description RES/LG214 Premise Permit for Pull-tabs at MacGillycuddy’s; St. PaulMidway Lions Club FoundationSubmitted ByAmy Oehlers, City Clerk9.2BACKGROUNDThe City has received a request from St. Paul Midway Lions Club Foundation, requesting that they be allowed toobtain a Premise Permit to operate gambling at MacGillycuddy’s, 2016 First Avenue. A premise permit allows anorganization to sell pull tabs, tipboards, etc. The Minnesota Gambling Control Board is the entity that actuallygrants Premise Permits; however, MN GCB requires that the municipality in which the gambling takes placeprovide a recommendation or comment on the issuance of a premise permit.A few years back, the Anoka City Council discussed “out of City” organizations that want to obtain a premisepermit in Anoka. The Council chose to amend the City ordinance so that our local gambling organizations andnon-profits are given the first option on operating gambling.The priority set by the City Council for granting approval of a premise permit application and its location shall beas follows:1. First priority given to organizations whose main office location is within the corporate limits of the City ofAnoka.2. Second priority given to organizations whose main office location is located within the Anoka AreaChamber of Commerce limits and whose main office location is within a City that allows an Anoka basedorganization to hold a premise permit within their corporate limits, and who is eligible to be granted awaiver from the eligibility requirements by the Anoka City Council.3. Third priority is given to all other organizations that are eligible to be granted by waiver from the eligibilityrequirements by the Anoka City Council.A letter was sent to our existing local premise permit holders and non-profits advising them of the application andopportunity to provide gambling at the above location. They were instructed that if they were interested inpursuing offering gambling at this location, that they must contact our office no later than June 25, 2013. No localorganization expressed an interest to our office.FINANCIAL IMPACTThere is no financial impact related to the adoption of the resolution. However, the local area does receivedonations from the premise permit holders that operate in our City. That amount varies on how much they grossin their pull tab sales.Section 14-192.Expenditures For Lawful Purposes.During any year that an eligible organization is licensed to conduct gambling events, not less than fifty percent(50%) of its lawful purpose expenditures will be for lawful purposes conducted or located within the trade area. Areport of the expenditures for lawful purposes within the trade area shall be provided to the City each month afterthe date of the adoption of this requirement. Additional reports may be required as determined by the City.COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:Adopt the resolution.105 of 360

2015 First Avenue, Anoka, MN 55303-Phone: (763) 576-2700 Website: www.ci.anoka.mn.usCITY OF ANOKA, MINNESOTARESOLUTIONRES-2013RESOLUTION RECOMENDING THE ISSUANCE OF A STATE ISSUED LG214GAMBLING LICENSE & PREMISE PERMIT FORST. PAUL MIDWAY LIONS CLUB FOUNDATION,AT MACGILLYCUDDY’S OF ANOKA, 2016 FRIST AVENUE, ANOKA, MINNESOTAWHEREAS, the applicant, St. Paul Midway Lions Club Foundation has requested approvalof the issuance of a State issued Gambling License & Premise Permit to allow theirorganization to operate charitable gambling, which may include: pull-tabs, tipboards,paddlewheels and raffles; andWHEREAS, the location in which they wish to operate such activity is MacGillycuddy’s ofAnoka, 2016 First Avenue, Anoka, Minnesota.NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Anoka City Council does herebyrecommend to the State of Minnesota, the issuance of the Gambling License & Premise Permitfor St. Paul Midway Lions Club Foundation, to operate charitable gambling activities, asdescribed above, at MacGillycuddy’s of Anoka, 2016 First Avenue, located in the City ofAnoka, Anoka County, Minnesota.Adopted by the Anoka City Council this 1 st day of July 2013.ATTEST:______________________________Amy T. Oehlers, City Clerk_____________________________Phil Rice, Mayor106 of 360

COUNCIL MEMO FORMMeeting Date July 1, 2013Agenda Section Ordinances & ResolutionsItem Description RES/River Front Park Project; Accept Bids & Award a ConstructionContractSubmitted ByGreg Lee, Public Services Director9.3BACKGROUND INFORMATIONOn May 6, 2013, the City Council adopted a resolution approving the plans and specifications, setting a biddate, and authorizing the advertisement for bids for the River Front Park Project.Bids for this project were received at 11:00 A.M. CDT on Thursday, June 13, 2013 at City Hall.A total of four (4) bids were received.A summary of the Base Bid is as follows:Contractor Base Bid Base Bid plus 3 AddAlternatesCustom Builders Incorporated $983,312.46 $1,129,652.96Rachel Contracting $1,170,489.34 $1,363,741.09Sunram Construction Incorporated $1,298,948.80 $1,489,959.90W. Gohman Construction Company $1,186,753.86 $1,400,392.61Engineer’s Estimate $1,048,300.00 $1,179,300.00A complete bid tabulation for the River Front Park Project is attached.DISCUSSIONThe base bid for the River Front Park Project includes:• New Concrete Trailway – 0.25 miles• Retaining Walls• Extensive Landscaping• Elaborate Rain Garden System with granite Benches• Rum River Overlook with Granite Seat Wall Bench Perimeter• Mill Ruin Overlook off of 2nd Avenue• Monument / Trail Bumpout Features (4)• Historical Interpretive Signage107 of 360

The low bidder, was Custom Builders Incorporated, with a low base bid of $983,512.46. The engineersestimate for the base bid was $1,048,300. Attached is the bid summary.The bidding package also included three bid alternates that could be added to the project. The alternates willneed to be selected in order (i.e. must select Alternate 1 before Alternate 2 or 3).Alternate 1): Additional Rum River Overlook Deck $125,587.50Alternate 2): Log Benches for said Overlook $ 3,120.00Alternate 3): Kiosk / Signage Monument to be located in River Plaza $ 17,633.00$146,340.50Project Schedule - Should the City Council award this contract, the contractor will start construction on July15, 2013; after Riverfest. The project will be substantially complete on December 11, 2013; prior to the LightUp the Night Parade and Halloween Bonfire.FINANCIAL IMPACTBased on the bid provided by Custom Builders Incorporated, and assuming all Add Alternates are selected tobe included in the project, the total project cost; including professional and technical services, project testingand inspections, and other administration costs is $1,539,274.96.Project Estimated CostThe current estimated project cost is as follows:ImprovementEstimated CostConstruction $1,129,652.96Administrative and Engineering Costs $ 409,622.00Total Estimated Project Cost $1,539,274.96Project FundingThe proposed financing plan for the project is as follows:Funding SourceAmountFederal Transportation Enhancement Grant $760,000.00Park Capital Improvement Funds $779,274.96Total Funding $1,539,274.96COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTEDIt is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution awarding a construction contract to CustomBuilders Incorporated in the amount of $1,129,652.96 for the River Front Park Project; including base bid andthe 3 add alternates.108 of 360

2015 First Avenue, Anoka, MN 55303Phone: (763) 576-2700 Website: www.ci.anoka.mn.usCITY OF ANOKA, MINNESOTARESOLUTIONRES-2013-XXRESOLUTION AWARDING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTFOR THE RIVER FRONT PARK PROJECTWHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the River Front Park Project bids werereceived, opened, and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were receivedcomplying with the advertisement:Base BidBase Bid + AddAlternatesCustom Builders Incorporated $983,312.46 $1,129,652.96Rachel Contracting $1,170,489.34 $1,363,741.09Sunram Construction Incorporated $1,298,948.80 $1,489,959.90W. Gohman Construction Company $1,186,753.86 $1,400,392.61AND WHERAS, it appears that Custom Builders Incorporated is the lowest responsible bidder,NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Anoka,Minnesota:1. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract withCustom Builders Incorporated n the amount of $1,129,652.96 for the base bid plus thethree (3) add alternates associated with the River Front Park Project according to theplans and specifications therefore approved by the City Council and on file in the officeof the City Engineer.2. The City Clerk or designee is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to allbidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidderand the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed.Adopted by the Anoka City Council this the 1 st day of July 2013.ATTEST:____________________________Amy T. Oehlers, City Clerk_____________________________Phil Rice, Mayor109 of 360

110 of 360

111 of 360

112 of 360

113 of 360

114 of 360

COUNCIL MEMO FORMMeeting Date July 1, 2013Agenda Section Ordinances & ResolutionsItem Description RES/Castle Field Project – Phase II; Order Project, Waive PublicImprovement Hearing & Authorize Preparation of Plans &SpecificationsSubmitted ByGreg Lee, Public Services Director9.4BACKGROUND INFORMATIONOn May 7, 2012 the City Council adopted a resolution awarding a construction contract to Ebert Constructionthe Castle Field Project – Phase I construction.DISCUSSIONWith Phase I construction nearly completed, it is time to initiate Phase II should the City Council wish toproceed with completing this project. Phase II construction is defined as the building elements mainly locatedunder the bleachers (concessions, restroom, storage…) it also includes the Entrance Gate. Phase III will be thedevelopment of the remainder of the site including the entrance area, plaza area, and connection trailways.Phase III may also include Northwood League expansions. It is anticipated Phase III will occur in 2014 –perhaps the fall of 2014; post baseball season.Feasibility Letter Report – To plan for and determine the cost of Phase II construction, the consulting firm,Anderson-Johnson Associates Incorporated was directed to update the feasibility letter report that waspreviously completed for Castle Field. This updated report outlined the improvements and associated costs ofPhase II and Phase III construction. Based upon this analysis the project is felt to be feasible and beneficial tothe City. A copy of the feasibility letter report dated June 25, 2013 is attached for the Council's review.The estimated project cost for Phase II construction, based on the letter report, is $427,130. Funding would bederived from two general sources; the Park Capital Fund, and donation.Order the Project – Should the Council wish to proceed with this project, the next step in the publicimprovement process is to order the project.Waive the Public Improvement Hearing – Since this project is proposed to be financed without assessingbenefiting properties, as per State Statute 429, the City Council may waive the Public Improvement Hearingfor this project.Authorize Plans and Specifications – The next step in the engineering process is to order the preparation ofplans and specifications for the project.115 of 360

PROJECT SCHEDULEShould this proposed project proceed, the following is a tentative schedule:Council Accepts Feasibility Report and Authorizes July 1, 2013Preparation of Plans and SpecificationsCouncil Approves Plans and Specifications, Sets Bid Date, July 15, 2013and Authorizes Advertisement for BidsBids Opened August 9, 2013Council Accepts Bids and Awards Construction Contract August 19, 2013and AuthorizesConstruction Begins September 3, 2013Construction Complete March 14, 2014FINANCIAL IMPACTAs previously stated, the estimated total cost of Phase II construction is $427,130. It should also be noted that,should this project be implemented, there would be ongoing annual maintenance costs.COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTEDIt is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution accepting the feasibility letter report, ordering theproject, waiving the public improvement hearing, and authorizing the preparation of plans and specificationsfor the Castle Field Project – Phase II Construction.116 of 360

2015 First Avenue, Anoka, MN 55303Phone: (763) 576-2700 Website: www.ci.anoka.mn.usCITY OF ANOKA, MINNESOTARESOLUTIONRES-2013-XXACCEPTING THE FEASIBILITY LETTER REPORT, ORDERING THE PROJECT,WAIVING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT HEARING, AND AUTHORIZING THEPREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONSFOR THE CASTLE FIELD PROJECT – PHASE II CONSTRUCTIONWHEREAS, on May 7, 2012 the City Council adopted a resolution awarding a constructioncontract to Ebert Construction the Castle Field Project – Phase I construction; andWHEREAS, Phase I construction nearly completed, it is time to initiate Phase II should the CityCouncil wish to proceed with completing this project; andWHEREAS, to plan for and determine the cost of Phase II construction, the consulting firm,Anderson-Johnson Associates Incorporated was directed to update the feasibility letter reportthat was previously completed for Castle Field; andWHEREAS, said updated report has been submitted the for the City Council’s review; andWHEREAS, should the Council wish to proceed with this project, the next step in the publicimprovement process is to order the project; andWHEREAS, since this project is proposed to be financed without assessing benefiting properties,as per State Statute 429, the City Council may waive the Public Improvement Hearing for thisproject; andWHEREAS, should the Council wish to proceed, the next step in the engineering process is toorder the preparation of plans and specifications.NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Anoka, AnokaCounty, Minnesota as follows:1. The feasibility letter report for the Castle Field Project – Phase II Construction, whichwas prepared, is hereby accepted.2. Said improvements are hereby ordered and shall hereafter be known and referred to as theCastle Field Project – Phase II Construction. Said ordering of the improvements shall bevalid for a period of eighteen (18) months from the date of adoption of this resolution.117 of 360

3. The Public Improvement Hearing for this project is waived.4. The preparation of plans and specifications of said project is authorized.Adopted this by the Anoka City Council this the 1 st day of July 2013.ATTEST:______________________________Amy T. Oehlers, City Clerk____________________________Phil Rice, Mayor118 of 360

June 25, 2013Mr. Greg Lee, Public Services DirectorCity of Anoka2015 First AvenueAnoka, MN 55303Re:Proposal for Professional ServicesCastle FieldDear Mr. Lee:Now that the construction of Castle Field is substantially complete - the bleachers are ready forspectators, the dugouts are waiting for players and coaches, and the grass is growing so it will beready for games (albeit limited) in just a couple weeks - we’re ready to continue with thecompletion of the building under the bleachers and the plaza/ walkways.With that, and as requested, we are pleased to provide this fee proposal for design services for thesubsequent phases of Castle Field . We have also included a partial set of site and architecturaldrawings of the building (attached) for your review and to serve as a basis for this proposal.Phase 2 - Concessions/ Restrooms/ Storage Building under the Grandstand & EntranceMonumentAs you may recall, much of the design work for the building and entrance monument wasaccomplished last year in order to facilitate te construction of the bleachers and site. The footingsand foundation of the building were completed by Ebert. The water and sanitary services werebrought to a point where they are inside the building envelope. Now the building is ready for theabove-grade work: the exterior and interior walls, electrical, plumbing and mechanical services,roof and floor slab, furnishings, fixtures and hardware, painting, floor and wall treatments,counter tops and toilets.We understand the schedule for Phase 2 construction is tentatively planned for City Councilapproval of plans and specifications on July 15th with the contractor starting construction in mid-August. You’ve also mentioned that we will discuss how the possibility of expansion to supportthe Northwood League will affect the plans.For the preparation (and completion) of the Phase 2 Bid Documents and for Construction-relatedServices (same as Phase 1: observation, meetings, submittal review, etc), we propose a lumpsum fee of $34,500.119 of 360

Phase 3 - Entrance Plaza, Trails and LandscapingAs you know, the master plan for Castle Field Facility includes a grand entrance to directspectators from the parking lot to the grandstand and concession building, a trail to link thebaseball field to Anoka High School, and banners, lighting and landscaping to further accentuateand beautify the athletic complex. The Phase 1 work was completed to support these (Phase 3)improvements.We understand the City anticipates the Phase 3 will occur in 2014, perhaps in the Fall of 2014following the baseball season.For the preparation of the Phase 3 Bid Documents and for Construction-related Services, wepropose a lump sum fee of $8,000.Northwood League ExpansionBased on previous discussions, we are familiar with the possibility that Castle Field may need tobe expanded and modified to support a Northwood League expansion baseball team. CastleField will more than likely need to be expanded to include additional bleacher seating,concessions, rest rooms, storage facilities, parking, ticketing, spectator gathering spaces, andrelated amenities. In order to take into account the possibility of these expansion needs in Phases2 and 3, we can meet with the City and invoice on a “time-and-materials” basis. We haveincluded a Fee Schedule summarizing billing and reimbursable rates.Greg, we trust the above information is clear and concise. As mentioned, much of the designwork for the Phase 2 building has been accomplished, so we will invoice for a large portion ofthe (proposed) fee within the coming weeks.Respectfully Submitted,Anderson-Johnson Associates, Inc.Jay Pomeroy, LLAProject ManagerAttachments120 of 360

CONSTRUCTION STAGING1 : SITE, FIELD, PARKING LOTCONSTRUCTION, BLEACHERS &PRESS BOX, DUGOUTS1110706/25/13JRPJRP2 : BUILDINGS & ENTRANCE GATECONSTRUCTION3 : PLAZA & TRAIL CONSTRUCTION-- STAGING PLAN --COST ESTIMATES - SEE NEXT SHEETSPROJECT ESTIMATE (TOTAL): $ 2,350,605.00NEW CASTLE FIELDCITY OF ANOKAANOKA, MINNESOTA0 20 40X121 of 360

CASTLE FIELD BASEBALL FACILITY -CITY OF ANOKAJune 25, 2013Stage 2: Building & Entrance Gate ConstructionITEM Description Total Cost CommentsA GENERAL1 Mobilization/G.C. $ 12,000 3.5% of Construction Cost2 Staking $ 1,000 By each subcontractor$13,000.00ITEM Description Total Cost CommentsB BUILDINGS/ STRUCTURES1 Entrance Gate $ 45,000 Sunken Block Dugouts w/ storage2 Concession/ Toilets/ Storage $ 325,000 10'x100' block building$370,000.00Subtotal: $383,000.00Contingency (2%): $7,660.00Testing, Survey, Fees: $2,000.00Consultant (Engineer/ Arch) Fees (est. ~9%): $34,470.00Total Opinion of ProbableProject Cost : $427,130.00Page 1122 of 360

CASTLE FIELD BASEBALL FACILITY -CITY OF ANOKAJune 25, 2013Stage 3: Plaza & Trail ConstructionITEM Description Total Cost CommentsA GENERAL1 Mobilization/G.C. $ 5,000 3.5% of Construction Cost2 Staking $ 1,000 By each subcontractor$6,000.00ITEM Description Total Cost CommentsB PAVING1 Medium Duty Pavement $ - See "Site-Field-Parking Lot"2 Light Duty Pavement $ 7,000 2" asphalt + 6" base agg. (Trail)3 Concrete Sidewalk $ 47,000 5" depth concrete4 Concrete Curb and Gutter $ - See "Site-Field-Parking Lot"5 Signage $ - See "Site-Field-Parking Lot"$54,000.00ITEM Description Total Cost CommentsC MISC IMPROVEMENTS1 Flagpoles $ 15,000 Three (1) 35' ht.$15,000.00ITEM Description Total Cost CommentsD LIGHTING1 Electric Service $ - See "Site-Field-Parking Lot"2 Plaza, Walk Lighting $ 30,000 Decorative gooseneck poles, bollards$30,000.00ITEM Description Total Cost CommentsE IRRIGATION1 Service Connection/ Box $ - See "Site-Field-Parking Lot"2 Plaza Irrigation $ 8,000 Plaza, planters, along trail3 Ball Field $ - See "Site-Field-Parking Lot"$8,000.00ITEM Description Total Cost CommentsF LANDSCAPING1 Sod $ - See "Site-Field-Parking Lot"2 Seed $ 3,000 A portion also in "Plaza-Trails"3 Erosion Blanket $ - LD fabric at erodible areas4 Plaza Landscaping $ 10,000 Shrubs, Edging, Mulch5 Trees $ 8,000 2.5" deciduous / 8' evergreen (avg)$21,000.00Subtotal: $134,000.00Contingency (3.5%): $4,020.00Testing, Survey, Fees: $1,000.00Consultant (Engineer/ Arch) Fees (est. ~6%): $8,040.00Total Opinion of ProbableProject Cost : $147,060.00Page 1123 of 360

COUNCIL MEMO FORMMeeting Date July 1, 2013Agenda Section Ordinances & ResolutionsItem Description RES/Mississippi River Trail Project; Approve Plans & Specifications,Set a bid date and Authorize Ad for BidsSubmitted ByGreg Lee, Public Services Director9.5BACKGROUND INFORMATIONIn 2009, the cities of Anoka and Ramsey were awarded a Federal Transportation Enhancement Grant in theAmount of $380,204 (which is now $440,300) for the construction of the Mississippi River Trail fromMississippi Community Park in Anoka to Mississippi West Regional Park in Ramsey.This project involves the construction of bituminous trails in the Cities of Anoka and Ramsey, includingconstruction of a bituminous trail across King’s Island located within the Mississippi National River andRecreation Area. The proposed trail will provide a much needed connection along the Mississippi RiverRegional Trail between Anoka's Mississippi River Community Park and the Mississippi West Regional Park inRamsey. The trail will also provide a continuous pedestrian and bicycle route east and west along the TrunkHighway 10 and Trunk Highway 169 corridors between the cities of Anoka and Ramsey. The project is locatedon the north and east side of the Mississippi River approximately 4 miles upstream of the Ferry Street (TH 169)Bridge. Restoration of a historic oxbow region of the river is also being proposed in the King’s Island area. Thetrail will include two single span pedestrian bridges that will allow river flows to enter/exit the oxbow andfloodplain area. The structures are lateral to main channel flow and are designed to accommodatemaintenance vehicle traffic.The trail will consist of 6 inches of class 5 aggregate material and 3 inches of bituminous material. Because ofthe shallow construction, dewatering is not anticipated for this project. Excavated materials that are deemedunsuitable for fill material or restoration material will be hauled off site. There will be a net reduction inmaterial below the 100-Year floodplain to help mitigate floodplain impacts. The allowable construction areawill be limited to aid in minimizing wetland impacts.The City has selected Bolton & Menk Inc. as the consulting engineering firm for this project.DISCUSSIONOrder the Project – Should the Council wish to proceed with this project, the next step in the publicimprovement process is to order the project.Plans and Specifications – Plans and specifications for this project have been prepared. These documents areavailable for public inspection in the office of the Public Services Department and are available to the CityCouncil upon request.Attached is a schematic version of the current plan overall plans for this project.124 of 360

Advertise for Bids – As per state statute, with an estimated contract amount in excess of $100,000,publication must be made at least three weeks before the last day to submit bids. The advertisement must bepublished at least once in the official newspaper and at least once in either a trade paper or a newspaper thatis published in a first class city. Given this, Staff seeks authorization to advertise for bids.Bid Date – An August 6, 2013, 10:00 A.M. CDT bid date will provide ample time to provide the requirednotification to contractors as per state statute.Project Estimated CostThe current estimated project cost is as follows:ImprovementEstimated CostConstruction $ 946,40010% Contingency $ 94,600Subtotal $1,041,00032% Administrative and Engineering Costs $ 333,100Total Estimated Project Cost $1,374,100Project FundingThe proposed financing plan for the project is as follows:Funding SourceAmountFederal Transportation Enhancement Grant $ 440,000Anoka County $ 340,000City of Anoka $ 324,700City of Ramsey $ 269,100Total Funding $1,374,100Project Schedule – Should this project proceed, the following is a tentative schedule:Approve Plans and Specifications, Set a Bid Date, andAuthorize Advertisement for BidsCity of Anoka Council Approves JPARamsey City Council - Approves Plans and Specs, approvesJPAAnoka County Board - Approves JPABid OpeningJuly 1, 2013July 15, 2013July 23, 2013July 2013August 6, 2013125 of 360

Award Construction Contract August 19, 2013Ramsey City Council - Approves BidsConstruction BeginsConstruction Substantially CompleteAugust 13, 2013September 3, 2013September 30, 2014Acceptance and Final Payment June 30, 2015FINANCIAL IMPACTThere are no cost associated with approving plans and specifications and setting a bid date. Advertising forbids will cost approximately $400.COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTEDIt is recommended the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the plans and specifications,setting a bid date, and authorizing the advertisement for bids for the Mississippi River trail Project.126 of 360

2015 First Avenue, Anoka, MN 55303Phone: (763) 576-2700 Website: www.ci.anoka.mn.usCITY OF ANOKA, MINNESOTARESOLUTIONRES-2013-XXRESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONSSETTING A BID DATE AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDSFOR THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRAIL PROJECTWHEREAS, the Cities of Anoka and Ramsey have obtained Federal TransportationEnhancement (TE) grant funding to assist in the construction of the Mississippi River TrailProject; andWHEREAS, the City has selected Bolton & Menk Inc. as the consulting engineering firm forthis project; andWHEREAS, Bolton & Menk Inc. has prepared plans and specifications for the MississippiRiver Trail Project; andWHEREAS, the total estimated project cost is $1,374,100 based on the plans and specifications;andWHEREAS, should the Council wish to proceed with this project, the next step in the publicimprovement process is to order the project; andWHEREAS, as per state statute, with an estimated contract amount in excess of $100,000,publication must be made at least three weeks before the last day to submit bids; andWHEREAS, an August 6, 2013, 10:00 A.M.CDT bid date will provide ample time to providethe required notification to contractors as per state statute.NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITYOF ANOKA, MINNESOTA:1. Said improvements are hereby ordered and shall hereafter be known and referred to as theMississippi River Trail Project. Said ordering of the improvements shall be valid for aperiod of eighteen (18) months from the date of adoption of this resolution.2. Plans and specifications have been created, a copy of which is available for publicinspection in the office of the Public Services Department, are made a part hereof arehereby approved.127 of 360

3. A date to receive bids for said improvements is hereby established as until August 6,2013 at 10:00 A.M. CDT.4. The City Clerk or designee shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the ABCNewspapers, the official paper, and the Finance and Commerce Incorporated Publication,an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approvedplans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published for twenty-one (21) days,shall specify the work to be done, shall state that the bids will be opened and that theresponsibility of the bidders will be considered by the council at 7:00 p.m. on August 19,2013 in the council chambers. Any bidder whose responsibility is questioned during theconsideration of the bid will be given the opportunity to address the Council on the issueof responsibility. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk andaccompanied by a bid bond or certified check payable to the Clerk for five percent of theamount of such bid.Adopted by the Anoka City Council this the 1 st day of July 2013.ATTEST:____________________________Amy T. Oehlers, City Clerk_____________________________Phil Rice, Mayor128 of 360

129 of 360

130 of 360

131 of 360

COUNCIL MEMO FORMMeeting Date July 1, 2013Agenda Section Ordinances & ResolutionsItem Description RES/Approving Boat Slips on the Upper Rum River; Lease/FeesSubmitted ByGreg Lee, Public Services Director9.6BACKGROUND INFORMATIONOn May 7, 2012 the City Council adopted a motion to approve the Boat Slip Rental Policy and the Boat SlipLease Agreement Terms and Conditions.In May of 2012, the City created a new public docking system and six (6) boat slips at the 2 nd Avenue boatlanding. See attached picture.When these slips were created, the lease fee was established at $1,800 per slip per full season. Currently all six(6) slips are leased.The current Capital Improvement Program, and proposed 2014 Budget, include adding a new dock and slipsystems just north of the dam at Freeburg’s Landing. There is also the possibility that a dock and slip systemcould be placed just north of the CSAH 116 (Bunker Lake Boulevard) Bridge on the east side of the upper RumRiver. The current proposal is that these dock and slips systems would be configured identically to the 2 ndAvenue system.To maximize the possible use of these slips in 2014, it is important to start advertizing their availability now;during the peak of this year’s boating season. To do so, a fee for leasing slips north of the dam needs to beestablished. After a financial analysis, staff is recommending that a this fee be established at $800 per slip perfull season. If the dock sections that make up the slips need to be removed and stored off site during thewinter months, the lease fee should be increase to $1,000 per slip to cover these additional costs.On June 18, 2013, the Park Board made a recommendation to establish boat slip lease fee to be $800 per slipper year for slip north of the dam on the upper Rum River and $1,000 per slip if the dock sections are removedand stored off site during the winter months.FINANCIAL IMPACTThere is no cost to establish boat slip lease fees. The cost of the public dock and slip system is estimated to be$40,000 and will be included in the proposed 2014 Budget.COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTEDIt is recommended that City Council adopt a motion to establish boat slip lease fees for slips on the upper RumRiver.132 of 360

133 of 360

COUNCIL MEMO FORMMeeting Date July 1, 2013Agenda Section Ordinances & ResolutionsItem Description RES/Commencement of Renewal Proceedings Under the FederalCable ActSubmitted ByAmy Oehlers, City Clerk9.7BACKGROUND INFORMATIONThis resolution is to authorize the official commencement of the renewal proceedings for the cable franchiseagreement.Effective on March 6, 2001, the City approved, by ordinance, the cable television franchise agreement. Thatagreement is set to expire on March 6, 2016, unless sooner terminated or extended.On March 28, 2013 Comcast sent a letter to the member cities that invoked the franchise renewal proceduresset forth in federal law.Adopting this resolution will reaffirm the Cable Commissions authority under the Joint Powers Agreement tocommence the franchise renewal ascertainment and past performance proceedings in accordance with theFederal Cable Act. It further authorizes the Commission to conduct the renewal proceedings and anynegotiations with Comcast on behalf of the member cities. The City will retain final authority to approve andenact any initial or renewal franchise. Renewal of the franchise would be conducted by the City, through theadoption of an ordinance, at a future date.The Commission has six months to conduct this renewal process.FINANCIAL IMPACTThere is no financial impact related to the adoption of this resolution.COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTEDRequest that the Council approve the resolution.134 of 360

2015 First Avenue, Anoka, MN 55303Phone: (763) 576-2700 Website: www.ci.anoka.mn.usCITY OF ANOKA, MINNESOTARESOLUTIONRES-2013-XXA RESOLUTION CONCERNING THECOMMENCEMENT OF RENEWAL PROCEEDINGSUNDER THE FEDERAL CABLE ACTWHEREAS, the City of Anoka, Minnesota (“City”) enacted an ordinance (#ORD-2000-1096)granting a cable television franchise (collectively, the “Franchise”) which became effective on orabout March 6, 2001, authorizing the provision of cable television service within the territoriallimits of the City; andWHEREAS, as a result of several transfers of the Franchise, Comcast of Minnesota, Inc.(“Comcast”) currently holds the Franchise; andWHEREAS, the City is a member of the Quad Cities Cable Communications Commission(“Commission”), a municipal joint powers entity organized under Minnesota Statutes § 471.59,as amended, pursuant to an agreement among the member cities (the “Joint Powers Agreement);and;WHEREAS, the Commission administers and enforces the cable franchises issued by Andover,Anoka, Champlin and Ramsey, and provides community programming and certain other serviceson behalf of these member cities, and;WHEREAS, the Commission is responsible for processing initial cable franchising requests andfranchise renewal requests on behalf of the member cities, and for making recommendations tothe member cities; andWHEREAS, the Commission’s member cities, including the City, retain final authority toapprove and enact any initial or renewal franchise(s), and;WHEREAS, the Franchise is scheduled to expire on or about March 6, 2016, unless soonerterminated or extended, and;WHEREAS, by letter dated March 28, 2013 from Comcast to the City, Comcast invoked thefranchise renewal procedures set forth in applicable federal law, and;WHEREAS, Section 626(a)(1) of the Cable Commissions Policy Act of 1984, as amended (the“Cable Act”), 47 U.S.C. § 546(A)(1), provides that if a written renewal request is submitted by acable operator during the 6-month period from 36 to 30 months before franchise expiration, the135 of 360

franchising authority shall, within six months of such request, commence a proceeding toidentify the future cable-related community needs and interests, and to review the performanceof the cable operator during the franchise term; andWHEREAS, the City wishes to comply with the Cable Act and commence the required renewalproceedings while permitting the Commission to pursue the informal renewal processcontemplated by Section 656(h) of the Cable Act, 47 U.S.C. § 546(H), and;WHEREAS, the Joint Powers Agreement authorizes the Commission to conduct renewalproceedings and any negotiations with Comcast on the City’s behalf, and;WHEREAS, the City wishes to reaffirm the Commission’s authority to process renewal of theFranchise in accordance with the Cable Act, Minnesota law and the Franchise, and manage andconduct franchise renewal proceedings and negotiations on its behalf, and;WHEREAS, the City recognizes that, in conducting renewal proceedings, the Commission maycollect and analyze information from Comcast, the City, and the public and other interestedparties.NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OFANOKA, MINNESOTA, THAT:Section 1. The City reaffirms the Commission’s authority under the Joint PowersAgreement to commence franchise renewal ascertainment and past performance proceedings inaccordance with the Cable Act.Section 2. The Commission is authorized to utilize, at its discretion, the formal orinformal renewal processes and the Commission may initiate either process without furtheraction or approval by the City.Section 3. The Commission may provide the public an opportunity to participate inthe Franchise renewal proceedings.Section 4. The Commission is authorized to gather such information as may bedeemed appropriate, and to take such further steps as may be needed or desired to ensure thatidentified cable-related needs and interests of the City, Commission, and the public are satisfiedin any renewal franchise as provided by applicable law. The Commission may require thatComcast submit such information as may be deemed appropriate in connection with the renewalprocess to the maximum extent permitted by the Franchise and applicable laws and regulations.Section 5. The City reserves all of its rights, remedies and defenses with respect todetermining whether or not to renew the Franchise. The Mayor, City Council members and Cityemployees shall avoid stating a position on the renewal of the Franchise or Franchise renewalrelatedissues until the Commission makes formal written recommendation to the City.136 of 360

Section 6. The Commission shall keep the City fully appraised of the status andprogress of the formal and informal renewal processes, as appropriate.Section 7.This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon adoption.Adopted by the Anoka City Council this the 1 st day of July 2013.ATTEST:________________________________Amy T. Oehlers, City Clerk_______________________________Phil Rice, Mayor137 of 360

COUNCIL MEMO FORMMeeting Date July 1, 2013Agenda Section Ordinances & ResolutionsItem Description RES/Approving the addition of one new handicap parking space onthe north side on Jackson St (200 block)Submitted ByPhil Johanson, Police Chief9.8BACKGROUND INFORMATIONThe Parking Advisory Board (PAB) is recommending one additional handicapped parking space be installed onthe north side of Jackson St.(200 block) between the two driveways that enter the city owned parking lot betweenSerum’s and Courtside restaurants. There is currently only one two-hour parking space between these twodriveways.This resolution would also rescind the council action from May 6, 2013 to add a handicapped parking space tothe city owned parking lot between Billy’s and Beer Belly’s restaurants. Public Services Director Greg Lee advisesthat adding one handicapped parking space in the city owned Billy’s lot would require losing two regular parkingstalls due to the twelve foot required width of a handicapped parking stall.This recommendation to city council passed by a unanimous vote of the PAB.FINANCIAL IMPACTThe cost for Public Works Department staff to install one “Handicapped Parking” sign on Jackson St.COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTEDApprove resolution for adding one handicapped parking stall to the north side of Jackson St. (200 block).138 of 360

2015 First Avenue, Anoka, MN 55303-Phone: (763) 576-2700 Website: www.ci.anoka.mn.usCITY OF ANOKA, MINNESOTARESOLUTIONRES-2013-RESOLUTION APPROVING ONE ADDITIONAL HANDICAP PARKING SPACE ONNORTH SIDE OF JACKSON ST. (200 BLOCK) BETWEEN THE DRIVEWAYS INTOTHE CITY OWNED PARKING LOT BETWEEN SERUM’S AND COURTSIDE.WHEREAS, at their meeting on June 19, 2013, the Anoka Parking Advisory Board discussedinstalling an additional handicap parking space on the north side on Jackson St. (200 block) between thedriveways into the city owned parking lot between Serum’s and Courtside.WHEREAS, this would rescind the council’s previous decision on May 6, 2013 (Res. 2013-42)to add one handicap parking space in the city owned Billy’s parking lot.WHEREAS, one handicap parking space will be added to the 200 block of Jackson St. instead of inthe nearby city owned (Billy’s) parking lot.WHEREAS, the Anoka Parking Advisory Board recommends to the City Council that the additionalhandicap parking space be installed on the 200 block of Jackson St.NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Anoka City Council does hereby approve theinstallation of a handicap parking space as described above and as recommended by the Anoka ParkingAdvisory Board.Adopted by the Anoka City Council this 1 st day of July 2013.ATTEST:______________________________Amy T. Oehlers, City Clerk_____________________________Phil Rice, Mayor139 of 360

140 of 360

141 of 360

COUNCIL MEMO FORMMeeting Date July 1, 2013Agenda Section Ordinances & ResolutionsItem Description RES/Recommended Approval of an LG230 Off-Site Gambling Permit;Anoka Area Hockey AssociationSubmitted ByAmy Oehlers, City Clerk9.9BACKGROUND INFORMATION:An application has been submitted by Anoka Area Hockey Association for them to conduct a raffle at theAnoka Area Ice Arena on December 12, 2013.The LG230 Off-Site Gambling Permit is issued by the State of Minnesota, but requires the approval of themunicipality in which the event will take place.In the past this permit application would have been acted upon under the Consent Agenda. However, recentlythe State of Minnesota amended their application form to require that the applicant include, with their permitapplication to the State, a City adopted Resolution or copies of the meeting minutes in which the permit wasacted upon by the City.Since our meeting minutes do not get approved until the following regularly scheduled Council meeting, I haveplaced this item on the agenda as a resolution, so that the approval process will be quicker for the applicant.Staff has reviewed the application and no concerns or objections have been expressed.FINANCIAL IMPACT:The City does not charge a fee for our review.COUNCIL REQUESTED ACTION:Request that the Council approve the resolution which recommends to the Minnesota State Gambling ControlBoard, that the LG230 permit be issued to Anoka Area Hockey Association.142 of 360

COUNCIL MEMO FORMMeeting Date July 1, 2013Agenda Section New BusinessItem Description Approval of Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)Submitted ByLori Yager, Finance Director11.1BACKGROUND INFORMATIONThe final copy of the 2014 – 2018 five-year capital improvement plan for the City of Anoka has been provided.Council and staff reviewed this document in detail at the work session on Monday, June 24, 2013. A fewchanges were recommended and have been implemented into the final plan.The document is a planning document, which will be reviewed annually. The first year of the document,(2014), will be implemented into the 2014 budget process.Adoption of this document provides an essential tool for long range financial planning and management.FINANCIAL IMPACTPlan changes to 2014:Combined Anoka Dam Modification with Anoka Dam light improvements and moved lighting to 2016.PR 06-41 reduced Anoka Nature Preserve project by ($25,000) – pg 72PR 09-48 move Anoka Station park & green spaces out to 2016 – pg 105See document detailsCOUNCIL ACTION REQUESTEDAdopt the City of Anoka “2014 – 2018 Capital Improvement Plan” through motion.143 of 360

City of AnokaCapital Improvement Plan2014-2018144 of 360

This page intentionally left blank145 of 360

CITY OF ANOKA, MINNESOTACAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN2014 - 2018TABLE OF CONTENTSProjects by Department 2Projects by Funding Sources 5Projects by Year 9Proposed Future Projects 12Summary of Impacts on Major Funding Sources 15PageProject Descriptions with financial projections2014Aquatic Center 23Buildings 28Cemetery 32Community Development 37Electric 45Engineering 53Greenhaven Golf 63Liquor Store 66Parks and Recreation 69Water 812015 852016 1002017 1082018 122146 of 360

This page intentionally left blank147 of 360

FIVE YEAR SUMMARY1 148 of 360

City of Anoka, MinnesotaCapital Improvement Plan2014 2018thruPROJECTS BY DEPARTMENTDepartment Project# PriorityAquatic Center2014 2015 2016 2017 2018TotalAquatic Center Replaster Pool Bottom PR06-43 2 10,000 20,000 20,000 10,00060,000Caulk Pool Deck Seams PR09-05 3 10,00010,000New Feature - Climbing Wall PR14-02 3 50,00050,000Aquatic Center Total70,000 20,000 20,000 10,000120,000BuildingsRelocate Generator at City Hall BM-CH-003 3120,000120,000Senior Center - Cold Roof BM-SC-001 3 65,00065,000Buildings Total65,000 120,000185,000CemeteryColumbarium CEM14-01 2 50,00050,000Cemetery signage PR-12-03 3 10,00010,000Forest Hill Cemetery-Storage Building RepairsPWBM-MB-004 n/a 14,00014,000Cemetery Total74,00074,000Community DevelopmentNCBD phase III CD-08-3 30 00South Ferry Street CD-09-06 2 1,220,0001,220,000Commuter Rail Transit Village CD-10-01 30 500,000 500,0001,000,000Greens of Anoka property acquisitions CD13-01 2 2,680,000 930,000 650,000 4,260,000Community Development Total3,900,000 1,430,000 500,000 0 650,0006,480,000Electric UtilityUpgrade Enterprise Sub to 115 KV EU12-01 2 1,125,0001,125,000115kv underbuild EU13-03 2 300,000300,0002nd Avenue - Rebuild Circuit 341 for RottlandConvert primary OH to UGRebuild UG secondary wiresNew Garfield 115 KV SubstationConstruct three circuits from Garfield SubstationEU14-01 n/a100,000100,000EU14-02 n/a 200,000 400,000 800,0001,400,000EU14-03 n/a 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 2,500,000EU15-02 n/a 425,000 2,300,0002,725,000EU15-03 n/a 400,000 1,000,0001,400,000Electric Utility Total2,950,000 4,300,000 1,300,000 500,000 500,0009,550,000EngineeringCRTV Development EN-09-02 3 200,000 200,000 150,000 150,000700,000East River Road Reconstruction EN-12-02 3600,000600,0002014 Street Renewal Project EN-13-01 3 1,349,0001,349,000Green Haven Road Improvement Project EN-13-07 3 400,000400,000CSAH 116 / 41st Avenue Intersection EN-13-08 2 276,000276,0002015 Street Renewal EN-14-01 31,029,5001,029,500Hwy 47 and Bunker Left turn EN-14-02 3 200,000200,0002 149 of 360

Department Project# Priority2014 2015 2016 2017 2018Total41st Avenue Roadway Extension Project EN-14-04 2 845,500845,500Slabtown Street Renewal Project EN-14-05 31,174,000 1,174,0002,348,000Garfield Street Extension EN-14-06 3290,000290,0002016 Street Renewal EN-15-01 31,578,1001,578,1002017 Street Renewal EN-16-01 31,357,9001,357,900Rum River Dam Modification Project EN-16-02 2 250,000 200,000 6,120,0006,570,000CSAH 14 / 9th Avenue Project EN-17-01 4350,000350,0002018 Street Renewal EN-17-03 31,794,000 1,794,000Engineering Total3,520,500 3,203,500 9,022,100 2,147,900 1,794,00019,688,000Greenhaven Golf CourseADA Compliant Door Openers-GreenhavenBM-004 n/a72,00072,000Greenhaven - Repaint Clubhouse Exterior BM-GH-004 560,00060,000New Partitions in Banquet Rooms GC14-02 598,00098,000Remodel Main Floor Bathrooms GC14-03 589,00089,000Move Food & Beverage Office to Main Level GC14-04 5 57,00057,000Replace Carpet on Main Floor GC14-05 565,00065,000New Furniture GC14-06 462,00062,000Extend & Improve Deck Overlooking 9th Green GC14-08 471,50071,500Paint & Refinish Exterior of Building GC14-09 560,00060,000Cart Path GC14-21 437,600 23,40061,000Greenhaven Golf Course Total57,000 154,000 134,000 229,100 121,400695,500Liquor StoresBlacktop west storeLQ08-01 n/a20,00020,000East River Road Liquor Store - Roof LQ10-01 2 80,00080,000Liquor Stores Total80,000 20,000100,000Parks and RecreationTrunk Highway 10 Trail Connection to West Main StPR05-03 n/a220,000220,000Riverfront Park - HRRD Construction PR06-26 2 275,000 1,431,000 1,890,000 3,596,0004th Avenue Rum River Trail Bridge - Coating PR06-36 3 10,000 80,00090,000Anoka Nature Preserve Park Development PR06-41 3 182,000 200,000382,000Anoka Station Parks and Greenspaces PR06-48 450,000 150,000 150,000 350,000Rum River Trail LightingPR09-10 n/a60,00060,000Castle Field Relocation Project PR09-21 2 145,000145,000Emerald Ash Borer, Removal of Trees PR09-23 1100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 400,000Rum River Trail Connection-4th Ave. & Pleasant St. PR10-01 3 10,000 191,300201,300Peninsula Point Overlook deck replacement PR11-07 2 15,00015,000John Ward Park Drainage Enhancement Project PR12-01 467,50067,500Trailway Enhancement Project PR12-02 3300,000300,000Athletic Field Improvements PR14 - 02 3 25,00025,000Anoka Enterprise Park Trail connectionPark Shelter/Building MaintenancePR14-01 n/a50,00050,000PR14-03 n/a50,00050,000Stone House Restoration Project PR16-01 310,000 350,000360,000Parks and Recreation Total662,000 491,300 1,020,000 1,998,500 2,140,0006,311,800Sanitary Utlity7th Av / STH47 Trunk Sanitary Sewer Capacity Proj SW-009 32,000,000 2,000,000Sanitary Utlity Total2,000,0002,000,000Streets3 150 of 360

Department Project# Priority2014 2015 2016 2017 2018TotalStreet Surface Improvement Project (SSIP) ST 12-01 21,000,000 1,000,000 2,000,000Central Business District (CBD) Mill & Overlay ST 13-02 3750,000750,000Streets Total1,750,000 1,000,0002,750,000Water UtilityPlant Exterior Repairs at Wells 4&5 WU-004 340,00040,000Well Inspection and Repair WU-008 3 50,00050,000Automate Wellhouse #5 WU-018 2450,000450,000Bi-annual Water ConservationAutomatic Backwash Well House #3WU-022 n/a 12,000 12,00024,000WU-023 n/a400,000400,000Wellhouse 6 & 8 Treatment Plant Expansion Project WU-024 31,200,0001,200,000Well No. 1 Building Restoration Project WU-026 4200,000200,000Water Utility Total62,000 1,690,000 412,000 200,0002,364,000GRAND TOTAL 11,440,500 11,288,800 12,428,100 6,955,500 8,205,400 50,318,3004 151 of 360

City of Anoka, MinnesotaCapital Improvement Plan2014 2018thruPROJECTS BY FUNDING SOURCESource Project# Priority 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018TotalAquatic fundAquatic Center Replaster Pool Bottom PR06-43 2 10,000 20,000 20,000 10,00060,000New Feature - Climbing Wall PR14-02 3 50,00050,000Aquatic fund Total60,000 20,000 20,000 10,000110,000Capital Improvement fundADA Compliant Door Openers-GreenhavenBM-004 n/a72,00072,000Relocate Generator at City Hall BM-CH-003 360,00060,000Greenhaven - Repaint Clubhouse Exterior BM-GH-004 560,00060,000Senior Center - Cold Roof BM-SC-001 3 65,00065,000Garfield Street Extension EN-14-06 3290,000290,000New Partitions in Banquet Rooms GC14-02 598,00098,000Remodel Main Floor Bathrooms GC14-03 589,00089,000Move Food & Beverage Office to Main Level GC14-04 5 57,00057,000Replace Carpet on Main Floor GC14-05 565,00065,000New Furniture GC14-06 462,00062,000Extend & Improve Deck Overlooking 9th Green GC14-08 471,50071,500Paint & Refinish Exterior of Building GC14-09 560,00060,000Capital Improvement fund Total122,000 154,000 134,000 541,500 98,0001,049,500Cemetary fundColumbarium CEM14-01 2 50,00050,000Cemetery signage PR-12-03 3 10,00010,000Forest Hill Cemetery-Storage Building RepairsPWBM-MB-004 n/a 14,00014,000Cemetary fund Total74,00074,000ElectricRum River Dam Modification Project EN-16-02 2120,000120,000Upgrade Enterprise Sub to 115 KV EU12-01 2 1,125,0001,125,000115kv underbuild EU13-03 2 300,000300,0002nd Avenue - Rebuild Circuit 341 for RottlandConvert primary OH to UGRebuild UG secondary wiresNew Garfield 115 KV SubstationConstruct three circuits from Garfield SubstationEU14-01 n/a100,000100,000EU14-02 n/a 200,000 400,000 800,0001,400,000EU14-03 n/a 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 2,500,000EU15-02 n/a 425,000 2,300,0002,725,000EU15-03 n/a 400,000 1,000,0001,400,000Electric Total2,950,000 4,300,000 1,420,000 500,000 500,0009,670,000General FundGreens of Anoka property acquisitions CD13-01 2650,000 650,0005 152 of 360

Source Project# Priority 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018TotalEast River Road Reconstruction EN-12-02 3100,000100,0004th Avenue Rum River Trail Bridge - Coating PR06-36 3 10,00010,000Caulk Pool Deck Seams PR09-05 3 10,00010,000Emerald Ash Borer, Removal of Trees PR09-23 1100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 400,000Peninsula Point Overlook deck replacement PR11-07 2 15,00015,000Athletic Field Improvements PR14 - 02 3 25,00025,000Park Shelter/Building MaintenancePR14-03 n/a50,00050,000Central Business District (CBD) Mill & Overlay ST 13-02 3100,000100,000General Fund Total60,000 250,000 100,000 200,000 750,0001,360,000General Obligation BondsRiverfront Park - HRRD Construction PR06-26 2993,000 1,507,000 2,500,000General Obligation Bonds Total993,000 1,507,0002,500,000Golf FundGreen Haven Road Improvement Project EN-13-07 3 400,000400,000Cart Path GC14-21 437,600 23,40061,000Golf Fund Total400,000 37,600 23,400461,000GrantsHwy 47 and Bunker Left turn EN-14-02 3 180,000180,000Rum River Dam Modification Project EN-16-02 2 250,000 6,000,0006,250,000Trunk Highway 10 Trail Connection to West Main StPR05-03 n/a176,000176,000Riverfront Park - HRRD Construction PR06-26 2233,000 233,0004th Avenue Rum River Trail Bridge - Coating PR06-36 380,00080,000Rum River Trail Connection-4th Ave. & Pleasant St. PR10-01 3100,000100,000Stone House Restoration Project PR16-01 3350,000350,000Grants Total430,000 180,000 6,526,000 233,0007,369,000Housing and Redevelopment FundsSouth Ferry Street CD-09-06 2 620,000620,000Housing and Redevelopment Funds Total620,000620,000Liquor fundBlacktop west storeLQ08-01 n/a20,00020,000East River Road Liquor Store - Roof LQ10-01 2 80,00080,000Liquor fund Total80,000 20,000100,000Municipal State AidCSAH 14 / 9th Avenue Project EN-17-01 4350,000350,000Central Business District (CBD) Mill & Overlay ST 13-02 300Municipal State Aid Total350,000350,000Outside SourcesRiverfront Park - HRRD Construction PR06-26 2150,000 150,0006 153 of 360

Source Project# Priority 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018TotalAnoka Nature Preserve Park Development PR06-41 3100,000100,000Castle Field Relocation Project PR09-21 2 135,000135,000Outside Sources Total135,000 100,000 150,000385,000Park Capital Improvement fundTrunk Highway 10 Trail Connection to West Main StPR05-03 n/a44,00044,000Riverfront Park - HRRD Construction PR06-26 2438,000438,000Castle Field Relocation Project PR09-21 2 10,00010,000Trailway Enhancement Project PR12-02 3300,000300,000Anoka Enterprise Park Trail connectionPR14-01 n/a50,00050,000Stone House Restoration Project PR16-01 310,00010,000Park Capital Improvement fund Total10,000 10,000 344,000 488,000852,000Park Dedication fundRiverfront Park - HRRD Construction PR06-26 2 275,000275,000Anoka Nature Preserve Park Development PR06-41 3 182,000 100,000282,000Anoka Station Parks and Greenspaces PR06-48 450,000 150,000 150,000 350,000Rum River Trail LightingPR09-10 n/a60,00060,000Rum River Trail Connection-4th Ave. & Pleasant St. PR10-01 3 10,000 91,300101,300Park Dedication fund Total467,000 151,300 50,000 250,000 150,0001,068,300Sanitary Sewer FundEast River Road Reconstruction EN-12-02 3150,000150,0002014 Street Renewal Project EN-13-01 3 178,200178,2002015 Street Renewal EN-14-01 3130,600130,600Slabtown Street Renewal Project EN-14-05 3108,000 108,000216,0002016 Street Renewal EN-15-01 3221,800221,8002017 Street Renewal EN-16-01 3177,200177,2002018 Street Renewal EN-17-03 3310,000 310,0007th Av / STH47 Trunk Sanitary Sewer Capacity Proj SW-009 32,000,000 2,000,000Sanitary Sewer Fund Total178,200 388,600 329,800 177,200 2,310,0003,383,800Special AssessmentsEast River Road Reconstruction EN-12-02 3150,000150,0002014 Street Renewal Project EN-13-01 3 377,000377,0002015 Street Renewal EN-14-01 3319,000319,0002016 Street Renewal EN-15-01 3359,600359,6002017 Street Renewal EN-16-01 3388,600388,6002018 Street Renewal EN-17-03 3448,500 448,500Special Assessments Total377,000 469,000 359,600 388,600 448,5002,042,700Stormwater Utility FundEast River Road Reconstruction EN-12-02 350,00050,0002014 Street Renewal Project EN-13-01 3 187,450187,4502015 Street Renewal EN-14-01 3136,850136,850Slabtown Street Renewal Project EN-14-05 3330,000 330,000660,0002016 Street Renewal EN-15-01 3241,024241,0242017 Street Renewal EN-16-01 3191,347191,3477 154 of 360

Source Project# Priority 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018TotalRum River Dam Modification Project EN-16-02 2200,000200,0002018 Street Renewal EN-17-03 3310,000 310,000John Ward Park Drainage Enhancement Project PR12-01 467,50067,500Stormwater Utility Fund Total187,450 716,850 571,024 258,847 310,0002,044,171Street Renewal Fund2014 Street Renewal Project EN-13-01 3 431,950431,950CSAH 116 / 41st Avenue Intersection EN-13-08 2 276,000276,0002015 Street Renewal EN-14-01 3315,350315,350Hwy 47 and Bunker Left turn EN-14-02 3 20,00020,00041st Avenue Roadway Extension Project EN-14-04 2 845,500845,500Slabtown Street Renewal Project EN-14-05 3569,000 569,0001,138,0002016 Street Renewal EN-15-01 3538,176538,1762017 Street Renewal EN-16-01 3427,253427,2532018 Street Renewal EN-17-03 3525,000 525,000Street Surface Improvement Project (SSIP) ST 12-01 21,000,000 1,000,000 2,000,000Central Business District (CBD) Mill & Overlay ST 13-02 3650,000650,000Street Renewal Fund Total1,573,450 884,350 1,107,176 2,077,253 1,525,0007,167,229Tax Increment FundsNCBD phase III CD-08-3 30 00South Ferry Street CD-09-06 2 600,000600,000Commuter Rail Transit Village CD-10-01 30 500,000 500,0001,000,000Greens of Anoka property acquisitions CD13-01 2 2,680,000 930,0003,610,000CRTV Development EN-09-02 3 200,000 200,000 150,000 150,000700,000Tax Increment Funds Total3,480,000 1,630,000 650,000 150,0005,910,000Water FundRelocate Generator at City Hall BM-CH-003 360,00060,000East River Road Reconstruction EN-12-02 3150,000150,0002014 Street Renewal Project EN-13-01 3 174,400174,4002015 Street Renewal EN-14-01 3127,700127,700Slabtown Street Renewal Project EN-14-05 3167,000 167,000334,0002016 Street Renewal EN-15-01 3217,500217,5002017 Street Renewal EN-16-01 3173,500173,5002018 Street Renewal EN-17-03 3200,500 200,500Plant Exterior Repairs at Wells 4&5 WU-004 340,00040,000Well Inspection and Repair WU-008 3 50,00050,000Automate Wellhouse #5 WU-018 2450,000450,000Bi-annual Water ConservationAutomatic Backwash Well House #3WU-022 n/a 12,000 12,00024,000WU-023 n/a400,000400,000Wellhouse 6 & 8 Treatment Plant Expansion Project WU-024 31,200,0001,200,000Well No. 1 Building Restoration Project WU-026 4200,000200,000Water Fund Total236,400 2,134,700 796,500 433,500 200,5003,801,600GRAND TOTAL11,440,500 11,288,800 12,428,100 6,955,500 8,205,40050,318,3008 155 of 360

City of Anoka, MinnesotaCapital Improvement Plan2014 2018 thruPROJECTS BY YEARProject Name Department Project # Priority Project Cost2014Aquatic Center Replaster Pool Bottom Aquatic CenterPR06-432 10,000Caulk Pool Deck Seams Aquatic CenterPR09-053 10,000New Feature - Climbing Wall Aquatic CenterPR14-023 50,000Senior Center - Cold Roof BuildingsBM-SC-0013 65,000Columbarium CemeteryCEM14-012 50,000Cemetery signage CemeteryPR-12-033 10,000Forest Hill Cemetery-Storage Building Repairs CemeteryPWBM-MB-004n/a 14,000South Ferry Street Community DevelopmentCD-09-062 1,220,000Commuter Rail Transit Village Community DevelopmentCD-10-013 0Greens of Anoka property acquisitions Community DevelopmentCD13-012 2,680,000Upgrade Enterprise Sub to 115 KV Electric UtilityEU12-012 1,125,000115kv underbuild Electric UtilityEU13-032 300,000Convert primary OH to UG Electric UtilityEU14-02n/a 200,000Rebuild UG secondary wires Electric UtilityEU14-03n/a 500,000New Garfield 115 KV Substation Electric UtilityEU15-02n/a 425,000Construct three circuits from Garfield Substation Electric UtilityEU15-03n/a 400,000CRTV Development EngineeringEN-09-023 200,0002014 Street Renewal Project EngineeringEN-13-013 1,349,000Green Haven Road Improvement Project EngineeringEN-13-073 400,000CSAH 116 / 41st Avenue Intersection EngineeringEN-13-082 276,000Hwy 47 and Bunker Left turn EngineeringEN-14-023 200,00041st Avenue Roadway Extension Project EngineeringEN-14-042 845,500Rum River Dam Modification Project EngineeringEN-16-022 250,000Move Food & Beverage Office to Main Level Greenhaven Golf CourseGC14-045 57,000East River Road Liquor Store - Roof Liquor StoresLQ10-012 80,000Riverfront Park - HRRD Construction Parks and RecreationPR06-262 275,0004th Avenue Rum River Trail Bridge - Coating Parks and RecreationPR06-363 10,000Anoka Nature Preserve Park Development Parks and RecreationPR06-413 182,000Castle Field Relocation Project Parks and RecreationPR09-212 145,000Rum River Trail Connection-4th Ave. & Pleasant St. Parks and RecreationPR10-013 10,000Peninsula Point Overlook deck replacement Parks and RecreationPR11-072 15,000Athletic Field Improvements Parks and RecreationPR14 - 023 25,000Well Inspection and Repair Water UtilityWU-0083 50,000Bi-annual Water Conservation Water UtilityWU-022n/a 12,000Total for 201411,440,5002015Aquatic Center Replaster Pool Bottom Aquatic CenterPR06-432 20,000Commuter Rail Transit Village Community DevelopmentCD-10-013 500,000Greens of Anoka property acquisitions Community DevelopmentCD13-012 930,0002nd Avenue - Rebuild Circuit 341 for Rottland Electric UtilityEU14-01n/a 100,000Convert primary OH to UG Electric UtilityEU14-02n/a 400,000Rebuild UG secondary wires Electric UtilityEU14-03n/a 500,000New Garfield 115 KV Substation Electric UtilityEU15-02n/a 2,300,0009 156 of 360

Project Name Department Project # Priority Project CostConstruct three circuits from Garfield Substation Electric UtilityEU15-03n/a 1,000,000CRTV Development EngineeringEN-09-023 200,000East River Road Reconstruction EngineeringEN-12-023 600,0002015 Street Renewal EngineeringEN-14-013 1,029,500Slabtown Street Renewal Project EngineeringEN-14-053 1,174,000Rum River Dam Modification Project EngineeringEN-16-022 200,000Remodel Main Floor Bathrooms Greenhaven Golf CourseGC14-035 89,000Replace Carpet on Main Floor Greenhaven Golf CourseGC14-055 65,0004th Avenue Rum River Trail Bridge - Coating Parks and RecreationPR06-363 80,000Rum River Trail Lighting Parks and RecreationPR09-10n/a 60,000Emerald Ash Borer, Removal of Trees Parks and RecreationPR09-231 100,000Rum River Trail Connection-4th Ave. & Pleasant St. Parks and RecreationPR10-013 191,300Park Shelter/Building Maintenance Parks and RecreationPR14-03n/a 50,000Stone House Restoration Project Parks and RecreationPR16-013 10,000Plant Exterior Repairs at Wells 4&5 Water UtilityWU-0043 40,000Automate Wellhouse #5 Water UtilityWU-0182 450,000Wellhouse 6 & 8 Treatment Plant Expansion Project Water UtilityWU-0243 1,200,000Total for 201511,288,8002016Aquatic Center Replaster Pool Bottom Aquatic CenterPR06-432 20,000NCBD phase III Community DevelopmentCD-08-33 0Commuter Rail Transit Village Community DevelopmentCD-10-013 500,000Convert primary OH to UG Electric UtilityEU14-02n/a 800,000Rebuild UG secondary wires Electric UtilityEU14-03n/a 500,000CRTV Development EngineeringEN-09-023 150,000Slabtown Street Renewal Project EngineeringEN-14-053 1,174,0002016 Street Renewal EngineeringEN-15-013 1,578,100Rum River Dam Modification Project EngineeringEN-16-022 6,120,000ADA Compliant Door Openers-Greenhaven Greenhaven Golf CourseBM-004n/a 72,000New Furniture Greenhaven Golf CourseGC14-064 62,000Blacktop west store Liquor StoresLQ08-01n/a 20,000Trunk Highway 10 Trail Connection to West Main St Parks and RecreationPR05-03n/a 220,000Anoka Station Parks and Greenspaces Parks and RecreationPR06-484 50,000Emerald Ash Borer, Removal of Trees Parks and RecreationPR09-231 100,000Trailway Enhancement Project Parks and RecreationPR12-023 300,000Stone House Restoration Project Parks and RecreationPR16-013 350,000Bi-annual Water Conservation Water UtilityWU-022n/a 12,000Automatic Backwash Well House #3 Water UtilityWU-023n/a 400,000Total for 201612,428,1002017Aquatic Center Replaster Pool Bottom Aquatic CenterPR06-432 10,000Relocate Generator at City Hall BuildingsBM-CH-0033 120,000NCBD phase III Community DevelopmentCD-08-33 0Rebuild UG secondary wires Electric UtilityEU14-03n/a 500,000CRTV Development EngineeringEN-09-023 150,000Garfield Street Extension EngineeringEN-14-063 290,0002017 Street Renewal EngineeringEN-16-013 1,357,900CSAH 14 / 9th Avenue Project EngineeringEN-17-014 350,000Greenhaven - Repaint Clubhouse Exterior Greenhaven Golf CourseBM-GH-0045 60,000Extend & Improve Deck Overlooking 9th Green Greenhaven Golf CourseGC14-084 71,500Paint & Refinish Exterior of Building Greenhaven Golf CourseGC14-095 60,000Cart Path Greenhaven Golf CourseGC14-214 37,600Riverfront Park - HRRD Construction Parks and RecreationPR06-262 1,431,00010 157 of 360

Project Name Department Project # Priority Project CostAnoka Nature Preserve Park Development Parks and RecreationPR06-413 200,000Anoka Station Parks and Greenspaces Parks and RecreationPR06-484 150,000Emerald Ash Borer, Removal of Trees Parks and RecreationPR09-231 100,000John Ward Park Drainage Enhancement Project Parks and RecreationPR12-014 67,500Anoka Enterprise Park Trail connection Parks and RecreationPR14-01n/a 50,000Street Surface Improvement Project (SSIP) StreetsST 12-012 1,000,000Central Business District (CBD) Mill & Overlay StreetsST 13-023 750,000Well No. 1 Building Restoration Project Water UtilityWU-0264 200,000Total for 20176,955,5002018Greens of Anoka property acquisitions Community DevelopmentCD13-012 650,000Rebuild UG secondary wires Electric UtilityEU14-03n/a 500,0002018 Street Renewal EngineeringEN-17-033 1,794,000New Partitions in Banquet Rooms Greenhaven Golf CourseGC14-025 98,000Cart Path Greenhaven Golf CourseGC14-214 23,400Riverfront Park - HRRD Construction Parks and RecreationPR06-262 1,890,000Anoka Station Parks and Greenspaces Parks and RecreationPR06-484 150,000Emerald Ash Borer, Removal of Trees Parks and RecreationPR09-231 100,0007th Av / STH47 Trunk Sanitary Sewer Capacity Proj Sanitary UtlitySW-0093 2,000,000Street Surface Improvement Project (SSIP) StreetsST 12-012 1,000,000Total for 20188,205,400GRAND TOTAL 50,318,30011 158 of 360

PROPOSED EXPENDITURESFOR FUTURE PROJECTS12 159 of 360

City of Anoka, MinnesotaCapital Improvement Plan2019 2023 thruPROJECTS BY YEARProject Name Department Project # Priority Project Cost2019Public Service & Electric Buildign Relocation BuildingsBM-PW-0115 9,000,000City Hall-Main Building Reroofing BuildingsPWBM-CH-011n/a 200,000City Hall Rehabilitation Project BuildingsPWBM-PW-0103 1,330,000Feeder Circuit Electric UtilityEU19-01n/a 350,00043rd Avenue Loop Road and Intersection EngineeringEN-17-025 213,000Riverfront Park - HRRD Construction Parks and RecreationPR06-262 870,000Seal coating Park Trails Parks and RecreationPR06-353 125,000Anoka Nature Preserve Park Development Parks and RecreationPR06-413 120,000Anoka Enterprise Park Trail connection Parks and RecreationPR14-01n/a 50,000Kings Island Improvements Parks and RecreationPR14-043 170,000Main Street Bridge Coating Project Parks and RecreationST- 15-014 200,000Street Surface Improvement Project (SSIP) StreetsST 12-012 1,000,000Thurston Avenue Street Reclamation StreetsST 15-032 650,000Treatment Plants & Well Houses-Security Water UtilityPWW-0014 18,000New Well & Treatment Plant # 9 Water UtilityWU-0015 4,500,000Total for 201918,796,0002020Public Works - Shop Heaters BuildingsBM-PW-0064 25,000Bunker/Thurston Redevelopment Community DevelopmentCD-08-24 25,000NCBD phase III Community DevelopmentCD-08-33 25,0003rd and Jackson redevelopment Community DevelopmentCD-08-53 25,00043rd Avenue Loop Road and Intersection EngineeringEN-17-025 852,000Greenhaven - Third Level Expansion Greenhaven Golf CourseBM-GH-0165 450,000Riverfront Park - HRRD Construction Parks and RecreationPR06-262 624,000Rum River Pedestrian Bridge - repaint Parks and RecreationPR06-313 150,000CR 116 Pedestrian Bridge - repaint Parks and RecreationPR06-324 150,000Reconstruction of Park Buildings Parks and RecreationPR06-445 250,000Lights for Gray Ghost Soccer Fields Parks and RecreationPR09-074 210,000Kings Island Improvements Parks and RecreationPR14-043 150,000John Ward Bathroom Reconstruction Parks and RecreationPR20 - 013 250,000Street Surface Improvement Project (SSIP) StreetsST 12-012 1,000,000Install backwash wells 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 Water UtilityWU-0205 600,000Total for 20204,786,0002021Street Surface Improvement Project (SSIP) StreetsST 12-012 1,000,000Peninsula Point Park Pedestrian Bridge StreetsST 15-023 5,000,000Install backwash wells 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 Water UtilityWU-0205 600,000Total for 20216,600,0002022Street Surface Improvement Project (SSIP) StreetsST 12-012 1,000,00013 160 of 360

Project Name Department Project # Priority Project CostInstall backwash wells 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 Water UtilityWU-0205 600,000Total for 20221,600,000GRAND TOTAL 31,782,00014 161 of 360

IMPACTS OF PROJECTS ONFUNDING SOURCES15 162 of 360

SUMMARY OF IMPACTS ON FUNDING SOURCESAQUATIC CAPITAL FUNDThe aquatic capital fund has a working capital fund balance of $249,000. The funds areto be used to make improvements to the Anoka Aquatic Center. Over the last five yearsthe city has invested $239,000 in equipment and improvements to the aquatic center. In2013 we will spend an additional $72,000 on pool and parking improvements. The 2013capital improvement plan calls for another $71,000 of improvements at the aquaticcenter. This will bring the balance of available funds down to about $117,000. The onlysources of revenues for this fund are interest earnings and a parking lease. There willneed to be other sources of revenue for continued future improvements. Customer feesdo not cover operating costs at the aquatic center, so the costs of operations are supportedby general fund revenues.BUILDING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUNDThe capital improvement fund has a negative fund balance because of the remainingunsold property purchased in 2004 in preparation of redevelopment of the commuter railtransit village. Staff believes this property could be sold by 2014 eliminating thenegative balance. Once the remaining parcels are sold, funds will be available forinvesting in city buildings. Electric fund transfers of $125,000 a year help pay forimmediate needs and will continue to support future building improvements. There arethree items as high priority for spending in 2014, they include fixing the roof at theSenior Center, completing the entrance improvements at Greenhaven and moving thebanquet office to the main level in Greenhaven. There are other Greenhaven buildingimprovements scheduled out in the near future. The potential new public servicesbuilding and improvements to City Hall could require a bond issue as the source offunding.ELECTRIC FUNDThe electric fund has unrestricted net assets of $15,500,000. Over $3 million of this isborrowed internally to the Tax Increment fund and the Capital Improvement fund to payfor land purchases and redevelopment. Another $3,000,000 is current outstandingreceivables. The electric fund transferred $600,000 to the general fund and $500,000 togolf in 2013. In 2014 and beyond annual transfers to other funds will be about $1.5million. The largest portion of these transfers ($1 million) is to help pay for necessarystreet improvements throughout the city. Electric is anticipating large capital outlayexpenditures for infrastructure improvements in 2014 thru 2020. Strategic rateadjustments will help pay for those necessary infrastructure improvements along withcovering operating costs and transfers. With the existing cash balance in electric, the citymay borrow funds internally to pay for infrastructure or other improvements. Theseinternal loans are beneficial for the entire city as they allow borrowing without the highcost of issuing debt. The internal loans also benefit the electric fund because the earnings16 163 of 360

on an internal loan are at a higher rate of return than is currently achievable thruinvestments. The loans are typically 15 to 20 years in length.GENERAL FUND RESERVES/CURRENT REVENUESGeneral fund reserves continue to be at a very healthy balance of 69% of currentoperating expenditures. This is above the recommended level of reserves in the generalfund of about 40%. The council has budgeted to use ($1,005,000) of its’ fund balance in2013. General fund capital project items will need to be included in the overall budgetprocess and levy decisions. Included in this document are some items for earlyconsideration.GOLF FUNDGreenhaven has negative unrestricted net assets of ($166,045) at the end of 2012. Toaddress this the council budgeted to transfer $500,000 from electric in 2013 and anadditional $750,000 from the general fund for the parking lot improvements. Thecatering contract reduced funds available to pay the debt service incurred for theimprovements to the clubhouse. Golf reserves have been used to pay the debt. In 2014,staff is recommending reclassification of clubhouse revenues and expenses to the generalfund as a community center net expense. Even with this reclassification, Greenhavenwill need to rely on a debt service levy to pay for the debt in 2016 and beyond.PARK CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUNDThe park capital improvement fund sources are derived from a multitude of sources. Theprimary source is from transfers from other funds including liquor store and general fund.Grants and bond proceeds are considered necessary in the future to provide fundingsources for desired park projects. Over the last 5 years the city has invested over $3million in a variety of park improvement projects including the new Castle Field. That isequivalent to $660,000 a year on park improvements. In 2013, improvements include thecompletion of Castle Field, Kings Island channel restoration and Mississippi Parktrailway system. This is an additional $1.7 million in park improvements. In 2014, tocomplete the Mississippi park trailways, another $550,000 will need to be transferredfrom the liquor and general funds. The liquor store will continue to transfer about$150,000 a year into the park capital fund but desired projects add up to much more thanthe balance available. If Riverfront park is to be completed in 2017, the city will need toconsider how to fund the completion of this project. Future funding for park capitalprojects will need to be determined.PARK DEDICATION FUNDAt the end of 2012 this fund had a working capital balance of $146,000. This fund isprojected to have a negative fund balance in 2013, as a result of the River Front ParkTrail system of $1.7 million. The city will receive a grant for $760,000 in 2013 to help17 164 of 360

cover the costs of the trail. Other sources of revenue for this fund include park dedicationfees, proceeds from the sale of Lot 1 in the historic rum river district and interestearnings. A transfer from the general fund of $500,000 will be necessary to correct thenegative fund balance and provide some funding for future projects. Funding for Parkdedication improvement projects will depend on future development and dedication feescollected.PARKING FUNDThe parking fund has a fund balance of just over $1 million as of 2012. It is projected touse ($93,000) a year to cover operating and capital expenses over the next 6 years. In thefuture, finance will be proposing a 5% increase in permit rates and an increase in parkingfines from $11 to $15 to help cover costs of this fund.SANITARY SEWER FUNDIn 2010, the city increased the sanitary sewer rates to pay for current and futureinfrastructure and operating needs. In 2018, staff is projected to incur capitalexpenditures of about $2,000,000 for a lift station. As a result of increased infrastructureimprovements and capital expenditures, a rate increase is currently projected for 2014.STORM SEWER FUNDThe city increased the storm water utility fee in 2013, which was sufficient enough tocover costs into the near future. Projected costs from this fund continue to increase as aresult of street renewal projects. The next projected rate increase is projected to be 2016.This fund pays for the city’s storm sewer system improvements.STREET RENEWAL FUNDThe city’s Street Renewal fund has been put to good use over the past several years.Investments in street projects alone total almost $16 million in the last 5 years alone. Thecity continues to invest in its’ street renewal program with an anticipated additional $17million invested over the next 5 years in streets including the water, sewer and stormwater infrastructure investments. City Council is committed to improving streetconditions throughout the city at an aggressive pace. To accomplish this task $1 millionis being transferred annually from the electric fund to offset the costs of additional streetrenewal and street surface improvement projects (SSIP). The SSIP extends the life of theexisting streets while improving the look and drivability of the roads. The street renewalfund continues to generate revenues from a franchise fee and property assessments. Thelast increase in the property assessment rate occurred in 2006. City Council shouldconsider an increase in the property assessment rate to keep up with the increased costs ofinfrastructure replacement.18 165 of 360

TAX INCREMENT FUNDSThe city currently has five tax increment districts established for redevelopment. TheHRA has two tax increment districts established for redevelopment.The city’s oldest district is the Enterprise Park TIF district. This district will bedecertified on December 31, 2015 and after that point will no longer receive tax revenuesas a source of income. Some remaining funds and revenues yet to be collected will beutilized in 2015 to help extinguish the existing debt in the Historic Rum River District(HRRD) which was issued to build the ramp on 2 nd Avenue North. As a result ofpostponed development, the HRRD will not generate enough tax revenues to pay thedebt. There may also be an internal loan with Electric which with some additionaldevelopment in the HRRD, will be paid back in the future. With the sale of property, theEnterprise Park TIF district could have some funding available for future projects.The HRRD will exist for the next 19 years and the funds will be used to pay for theinternal loan from electric for the parking ramp debt. With successful developmentwithin the next couple of years, there could be funding available in the future to pay aportion of the funding from the Enterprise Park TIF, allowing that district to continue toexist past decertification, without tax revenues.The Commuter Rail Transit Village (CRTV) will utilize TIF revenues to pay for theinternal loan from electric for the new Anoka Station ramp, located at the NorthstarCommuter Rail Station. With further development in the CRTV, there will then be fundsavailable to purchase blighted properties, provide for cleanup of properties or improveinfrastructure. This district could exist until 2038.The South Ferry District will utilize TIF revenues to redevelop that district in the nearfuture. Future development commitments will enable this district to accomplish goals ofthe City Council and its’ constituents to beautify the gateway to the city. This districtcould exist until 2034.The Greens of Anoka District will utilize TIF revenues to implement the Greens ofAnoka plan. There are existing future revenues available for a commitment ofredevelopment in this area. This district could exist until 2039.The HRA TIF district funds can be utilized city wide on scattered site redevelopment orto assist in a particular redevelopment project area. The oldest HRA TIF district will bedecertified on December 31, 2017, however the Central Business TIF district willcontinue to payback a loan for fire suppression improvements, thereby extending thedistrict existence.19 166 of 360

WATER FUNDThe water fund has some major capital improvement projects within the next ten years toimprove water distribution and storage. Water utility rates were increased in 2011. Thenext rate increase is projected to be 2015. In 2015, Well #1 is anticipated to needrehabilitation. This is projected to cost about $1.2 million. In 2001 a revenue bond wasissued to cover water infrastructure costs. This bond was refunded in 2009 to reducecosts. The refunded debt will be paid off in 2017. At that time the water fund cash flowwill greatly improve. If a new well is required in the future, water revenue bonds mayneed to be issued to fund that type of improvement.20 167 of 360

PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS21 168 of 360

22 169 of 360

AQUATIC CENTER23 170 of 360

24 171 of 360

25 172 of 360

26 173 of 360

27 174 of 360

BUILDINGS28 175 of 360

29 176 of 360

30 177 of 360

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUNDWorking Capital Beg YrSourcesInterestMiscellaneousLand SalesTax RevenueBond IssueTransfers InTotal SourcesUsesBuildingspolice HVACCity hall tuck pointCity hall office paintingsenior roofGreenhaven entranceGreenhaven office move to mainGreenhaven bathroomsGreenhaven carpetGreenhaven doorsGreenhaven furnitureGreenhaven DeckGreenhaven Exterior bldgGreenhaven partitionsGreenhaven 3rd level expansionnew Public services bldgcity hall rehabcity hall roofBond PrincipalBond InterestTransfer OutTotal UsesNet Source/(Use)Working Capital Year End2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018(46,311) (163,084) 346,016 322,206 1,218,844 946,7213,000 3,000 5,190 5,639 24,377 23,668903,100 900,000125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,0003,000 1,031,100 130,190 1,030,639 149,377 148,66810,000 30,00044,77335,00030,00065,000400,00057,00089,00065,00072,00062,00071,50060,00098,000290,000119,773 522,000 154,000 134,000 421,500 128,000(116,773) 509,100 (23,810) 896,639 (272,123) 20,668(163,084) 346,016 322,206 1,218,844 946,721 967,389Working Capital Balance 12/31/2019 $1,486,11131 178 of 360

CEMETERY32 179 of 360

33 180 of 360

34 181 of 360

35 182 of 360

36 183 of 360

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT37 184 of 360

38 185 of 360

Capital Improvement PlanCity of Anoka, MinnesotaProject #CD13-012014 2018 thruDepartmentContactUseful LifeProject Name Greens of Anoka property acquisitionsCategory UnassignedTypeCommunity DevelopmentDevelopmentUpdate flagPriority2 Very ImportantDescriptionAcquire, demo and prepare properties for redevelopmentTotal Project Cost: $4,260,000500 greenhaven road540 greenhaven roadConnexus Energy communications towerJustificationAllow redevelopment according to greens of anoka planExpendituresLand AcquisitionTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total2,680,000 930,000 650,000 4,260,0002,680,000 930,000 650,000 4,260,000Funding SourcesGeneral FundTax Increment FundsTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total650,000650,0002,680,000 930,0003,610,0002,680,000 930,000 650,000 4,260,00039 186 of 360

40 187 of 360

TAX INCREMENT 485 FUNDTIF distribution, H8, M3 - Fund 485ENTERPRISE PARK(No new buildings in HRRD before 12-31-2015)Beginning Cash BalanceWorking Capital Beginning YearRevenues and other sourcesTIF RevenuesState Aids - Market Value CreditIntergovernmental grantsCharges for servicesOther revenuesInterest EarningsElectric loanStreet Improvement loanTotal RevenuesExpenditures and other usesDebt Service TransfersInterest expensesPrincipal payment - ElectricPrincipal payment - Street Impr.AdministrationCRTV ProjectHRRD project expensePierce Street projectBurger KingVineyardProject expensesThurston parkway roadTotal ExpensesChange in available fundsland held for resaleWorking Capital Ending Balance2012 2013 2014 2015 20162,484,148 2,876,560 3,803,074 5,076,512 163,089(1,103,178) (349,816) 1,073,802 2,761,020 (51)2,420,193 2,178,174 2,156,392 2,167,174 086,19212,103 35,957 57,046 7,4032,432,296 2,300,323 2,213,438 2,174,577 0550,000 400,000 400,000 4,840,000122,413 102,896 86,220 56,648577,587 497,104 413,780 2,152,35262,734 43,809 40,000 39,000661,778282,009 330,0002,256,521 1,373,809 940,000 7,088,000 0175,775 926,514 1,273,438 (4,913,423) 0(349,816) 1,073,802 2,761,020 (51) (51)41 188 of 360

TAX INCREMENT 486 FUNDTIF distribution U1 - City North CentHISTORIC RUM RIVER DISTRI(No new buildings in HRRD before 12-31-2015)(includes debt service)2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018Working Capital Beginning YearRevenues and other sourcesBond ProceedsGrantsTIF RevenuesState Aids - Market Value CreditTransfer from Enterprise ParkTransfer from ElectricInterest EarningsLand salesTotal SourcesExpenditures and other usesParking rampStreet improvementsProperty preparationAdministrationBond interest paymentBond principal payment 2006AInternal Electric LoanInternal InterestTransfersTotal UsesChange in available funds342,852 400,490 465,945 29,836 34,504 41,31999,894 100,893 101,902 102,921 103,950 104,990400,000 400,000 4,840,0001,950,0005,143 7,009 6,989 746 863 1,240505,037 507,902 6,898,891 103,667 104,813 106,229650 650 650 650 650 65004,707 4,754 4,801 4,849 4,898 4,947317,043 312,043 154,771125,000 125,000 7,335,00035,000 35,000 35,00058,500 57,450 56,400447,399 442,446 7,335,000 98,999 97,998 96,99757,638 65,455 (436,109) 4,668 6,815 9,233Working Capital Ending Balance400,490 465,945 29,836 34,504 41,319 50,552Working Capital Balance 12/31/2019 57,11242 189 of 360

TAX INCREMENT 487 FUNDTIF distribution V4 - Fund 487 - SouSOUTH FERRY DISTRICTWorking Capital Beginning YearRevenues and other sourcesTIF RevenuesTransfer from Enterprise ParkInterest EarningsTotal SourcesExpenditures and other usesProject expensesAdministrationTransfersTotal UsesChange in available funds2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 20185,835 5,785 5,798 7,546 9,404 11,3493,408 3,442 5,163 5,214 5,267 5,31988 116 130 189 259 3403,495 3,558 5,293 5,403 5,525 5,6600 0 0 0 0 03,545 3,545 3,545 3,545 3,580 3,5803,545 3,545 3,545 3,545 3,580 3,580(50) 13 1,748 1,858 1,945 2,079Working Capital Ending Balance5,785 5,798 7,546 9,404 11,349 13,428Working Capital Balance 12/31/2018 15,65743 190 of 360

TAX INCREMENT 840 FUNDHRA REDEVELOPMENT DIST.Beginning Cash BalanceWorking Capital Beginning YearRevenuesTIF RevenuesMarket value creditFederal GrantPayback from 845Property salesloan proceedsInterest EarningsTotal RevenuesExpendituresScattered housingRedevelopment projectsInternal loan paybackInterest expenseProject administrationTotal ExpendituresChange in available fundsWorking Capital Ending Balance2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018121,877 179,146 (121,689) (68,659) (7,233) (132,952)261,018 318,287 17,452 70,482 131,908 6,189286,441 279,280 279,280 280,676 282,7814,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000330,000650,0001,828 3,135622,269 936,415 283,280 284,676 286,781 4,000100,000 150,000450,000 1,200,000200,000 200,000 250,00022,750 15,750 8,750 015,000 14,500 14,500 14,500 12,500565,000 1,237,250 230,250 223,250 412,500 057,269 (300,835) 53,030 61,426 (125,719) 4,000318,287 17,452 70,482 131,908 6,189 10,189Working Capital Balance 12/31/2018 10,1892013 to 2017 - $400,000 on scattered housing ??2013 to 2017 - $1,500,000 on redevelopment ??2013 to 2017 - $64,500 on administration ??TAX INCREMENT 845 FUNDCBDBeginning Cash BalanceWorking Capital Beginning YearRevenuesTIF RevenuesInterest EarningsTotal RevenuesExpendituresProjectsProject administrationloan paymentTotal ExpendituresChange in available fundsWorking Capital Ending Balance2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 20186,945 6,787 6,644 6,515 6,385 6,3115,670 5,512 5,369 5,240 5,110 5,0365,305 5,305 5,305 5,305 5,332 5,35887 102 116 130 176 1895,392 5,407 5,421 5,435 5,507 5,54801,550 1,550 1,550 1,566 1,581 1,5974,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,0005,550 5,550 5,550 5,566 5,581 5,597(158) (143) (129) (130) (74) (49)5,512 5,369 5,240 5,110 5,036 4,986Working Capital Balance 12/31/2018 4,94644 191 of 360

ELECTRIC45 192 of 360

46 193 of 360

47 194 of 360

48 195 of 360

49 196 of 360

50 197 of 360

51 198 of 360

52 199 of 360

ENGINEERING53 200 of 360

54 201 of 360

55 202 of 360

56 203 of 360

57 204 of 360

58 205 of 360

Capital Improvement PlanCity of Anoka, MinnesotaProject #EN-14-042014 2018 thruDepartmentContactUseful LifeEngineeringPublic Services Director30 yearsProject Name 41st Avenue Roadway Extension ProjectCategory ConstructionTypeDevelopmentUpdate flagPriority2 Very ImportantDescriptionConstruct 41st Avenue - from 40th Lane to CSAH 116 (Bunker Lake Boulevard)Total Project Cost: $1,023,500JustificationProvide access from CSAH 116 to the south west quadrant of CSAH 116 and 7th Avenue.Access to the High School, Castle Field and the Anoka Ice ArenaPrior178,000ExpendituresConstruction2014 2015 2016 2017 2018845,500Total845,500TotalTotal845,500 845,500Prior178,000Funding SourcesStreet Renewal Fund2014 2015 2016 2017 2018845,500Total845,500TotalTotal845,500 845,50059 206 of 360

Capital Improvement PlanCity of Anoka, MinnesotaProject #EN-16-022014 2018 thruDepartmentContactUseful LifeEngineeringPublic Services Director25 yearsProject Name Rum River Dam Modification ProjectCategory ImprovementTypeImprovementUpdate flagPriority2 Very ImportantDescriptionModify the dam to make it resistant to the migration of invasive aquatic species such as the Asian Carp. This may include changing the operations /configuration of the gate, mechanical flash boards (pool elevation control), maintenance platform across the dam.The modification may include developing the capability of producing hydroelectric power from the dam.Develop and Install a new dam lighting system using LED lightsTotal Project Cost: $6,580,000JustificationTo serve as redundant system to the Coon Rapids Dam on the Mississippi River and to protect the fisheries of the Milacs Lake basin.City Beautification Project.This lighting project wil compliment the Main Sttreet Bridge Lightign Porject implemented in 2012.PriorTotal10,000ExpendituresPlanning/Design/EngineeringConstructionTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total250,000 200,000 10,000460,0006,110,0006,110,000250,000 200,000 6,120,000 6,570,000PriorTotal10,000Funding SourcesElectricGrantsStormwater Utility Fund2014 2015 2016 2017 2018120,000250,000 6,000,000200,000Total120,0006,250,000200,000Total250,000 200,000 6,120,000 6,570,00060 207 of 360

STREET RENEWAL FUNDWorking Capital Beg YrSourcesProperty taxesSpecial Assessment RevenuesFranchise feesIntergovernmentalInterestMicellaneousTransfers InTotal SourcesUsesStreet ProjectsWaterSewerStorm SewerElectricParkingPark CapitalTotal UsesNet Source/(Use)Working Capital Year End3.00%increase2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018883,412 697,014 536,334 1,351,568 1,651,378 1,077,110399,908 425,610 416,012 402,581 415,158 410,812358,877 358,877 358,877 358,877 358,877 358,877363,369 456,6944,417 8,045 23,652 33,028 24,235440,000 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,5001,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,0001,203,202 1,786,987 1,785,434 1,787,610 2,172,932 2,253,1182,510,600 2,560,266 2,393,500 2,792,100 3,357,900 2,794,000(472,000) (174,400) (444,700) (384,500) (173,500) (200,500)(409,000) (178,200) (388,600) (329,800) (177,200) (310,000)(240,000) (260,000) (590,000) (590,000) (260,000) (260,000)1,389,600 1,947,666 970,200 1,487,800 2,747,200 2,023,500(186,398) (160,679) 815,234 299,810 (574,268) 229,618697,014 536,334 1,351,568 1,651,378 1,077,110 1,306,729Franchise implemented in 2004Working Capital Balance 12/31/2019 $1,471,65761 208 of 360

STORM SEWER FUNDWorking Capital Beg. YearOperating RevenuesInterestInternal borrowTotal SourcesOperation ExpenseStreet Renewal ProgramMCES ProjectDam Improvements/reservesEast River RoadTurnbacksJohn Ward Park drainageSlabtownOther ProjectsTotal UsesChange in available fundsWorking Capital Ending Year11.32% 10.17%2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018125,920 80,294 228,320 (203,037) (336,027) (208,376)527,284 527,284 527,284 580,906 580,906 580,9061,574 1,004 3,425528,858 528,287 530,708 580,906 580,906 580,906118,484 120,261 122,065 123,896 125,755 127,641297,000 260,000 260,000 260,000 260,000 260,000200,00050,000119,00067,500330,000 330,00040,000574,484 380,261 962,065 713,896 453,255 387,641(45,626) 148,026 (431,357) (132,990) 127,651 193,26580,294 228,320 (203,037) (336,027) (208,376) (15,112)Working Capital Balance 12/31/2019 $ 150,861Rate History (per month)2003 $1.75 per month2008 $2.25 per month2009 $2.45 per month2010 $2.65 per month2013 $2.95 per month2016 $3.25 per month62 209 of 360

GREENHAVEN GOLF63 210 of 360

Capital Improvement PlanCity of Anoka, MinnesotaProject #GC14-042014 2018 thruDepartmentContactUseful LifeGreenhaven Golf CourseGolf Course Mananger30 yearsProject Name Move Food & Beverage Office to Main LevelCategory ImprovementTypeImprovementUpdate flagPriority5 Future ConsiderationDescriptionTotal Project Cost: $57,000The food & beverage offices are split and are located in the lower level with the F&B GM located in the far back of the basement. We will moveand combine them to the current coat room to allow better access for customers and better access to the kitchen for the office staff. We would usethe space vacated by the F&B offices and accommodate a small fitness area with a few machines, weights, and an area for workout classes inconjunction with the Anoka Senior Center and potentially the Andover YMCA.JustificationDuring events and meetings, the office staff will retreat to their offices to tend to work and the customers will have to walk a long way to see that aneed is attended to. By moving their offices to the main level we put them near their customers and that should improve the service before, during,and after events. It will make the F&B GM more accessible at all times. As our golfers age if we are able to show them how to stay healthier andmore fit they can play more golf and play longer.ExpendituresMaintenanceTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total57,00057,00057,000 57,000Funding SourcesCapital Improvement fundTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total57,00057,00057,000 57,00064 211 of 360

65 212 of 360

LIQUOR STORE66 213 of 360

67 214 of 360

68 215 of 360

PARK AND RECREATION69 216 of 360

Capital Improvement PlanCity of Anoka, MinnesotaProject #PR06-262014 2018 thruDepartmentContactUseful LifeParks and RecreationPublic Works DirectorProject Name Riverfront Park - HRRD ConstructionCategory ConstructionTypeDevelopmentUpdate flagxPriority2 Very ImportantDescriptionDevelop the area north of City Hall into a park. Elements of this park will include a trailway connection through the park, plaza for civicgatherings, grand entrance / staircase, an amphitheater for City events, Memorial Court, historical interpretation area, fountains, open passivespace, dockage, and with restrooms.Park Dedication fees: estimated 191 units @ $2543/unit = $485,000.Approximate Timeline ImprovementsSouth entrance staircase in 2012 as part of the East Main ProjectTrail and associated amenities, overall grading, and North Dockage in 2013north end trail connection through the mill ruin area in 2014Grand stair case/s, weir Plaza, City Hall Terrace, Memorial Court, Mill Ruin Area in 2015Building Site / Second Avenue amenities, Amphitheater and pavilion structure in 2016JustificationTotal Project Cost: $6,247,000Construction of Riverfront Park is part of the Master Plan for the North Central Business District and incorporates the Riverfront Park Plaza,cultural center and major historic elements throughout the river promenade and historic Rum River regional park.Prior1,157,000TotalExpendituresPlanning/Design/EngineeringConstructionTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total55,000 286,000 140,000481,000220,000 1,145,000 1,750,000 3,115,000275,000 1,431,000 1,890,000 3,596,000Future1,494,000TotalPrior1,157,000TotalFunding SourcesGeneral Obligation BondsGrantsOutside SourcesPark Capital Improvement fundPark Dedication fund2014 2015 2016 2017 2018993,000 1,507,000233,000150,000438,000275,000Total2,500,000233,000150,000438,000275,000Future1,494,000TotalTotal275,000 1,431,000 1,890,000 3,596,00070 217 of 360

71 218 of 360

Capital Improvement PlanCity of Anoka, MinnesotaProject #PR06-412014 2018 thruDepartmentContactUseful LifeParks and RecreationPublic Services Director30 yearsProject Name Anoka Nature Preserve Park DevelopmentCategory Maintenance - ParksTypeImprovementUpdate flagxPriority3 ImportantDescriptionTotal Project Cost: $502,000Design and development of passive recreation opportunities within the 200 acres of the conservation easement area of the Anoka Nature Preserve.Develop a trailhead with parking, restroom facilities, and picnic shelter. Improvements within the Nature Preserve may include trial surfaceimprovements and possible dockage.JustificationDesign and development of passive picturesque areas that could include trails, picnic areas, picnic shelters, rest rooms, and parking areas.ExpendituresPlanning/Design/EngineeringConstructionTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total20,00020,000162,000 200,000362,000182,000 200,000 382,000FutureTotal120,000Funding SourcesOutside SourcesPark Dedication fundTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total100,000100,000182,000 100,000282,000182,000 200,000 382,000FutureTotal120,00072 219 of 360

Capital Improvement PlanCity of Anoka, MinnesotaProject #PR09-212014 2018 thruDepartmentContactUseful LifeParks and RecreationPublic Services Director50 yearsProject Name Castle Field Relocation ProjectCategory ConstructionTypeDevelopmentUpdate flagxPriority2 Very ImportantDescriptionTotal Project Cost: $2,245,000Relocate Castle Field to a site include near the high school just south of the Ice Arena. In addition to the field itself, costs would include aconcession building, grandstand/bleachers, dugouts, parking lot, lighting and restroom facilities.Phase I (2012 Construction) : All element to create a playable field- Field, lighting, grandstand/bleachers, dugouts, parking lot.Phase II (2013 Construction): Building under the bleachers(concessions, storage and restroom facilities), plaza area, entrance monument.JustificationThe Castel Field Committee selected thuis as the relocation of Castle Field to the schooll site as the most cost effective and beneficial approach toupgrading Castle Field.Prior2,100,000TotalExpendituresPlanning/Design/EngineeringConstructionTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total10,00010,000135,000135,000145,000 145,000Prior2,100,000TotalFunding SourcesOutside SourcesPark Capital Improvement fundTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total135,000135,00010,00010,000145,000 145,00073 220 of 360

74 221 of 360

75 222 of 360

76 223 of 360

PROPOSED REVENUES & EXPENDITURESGeneral Fund BudgetCurrent RevenuesCURRENT PROPERTY TAXFRANCHISE FEESLICENSE, PERMITSINTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUECHARGES FOR CURRENT SERVICESFINES & FORFEITURESINVESTMENT EARNINGSOTHER REVENUESCOMMUNITY CENTER REVENUETRANSFERS INTOTAL REVENUESCurrent ExpensesSALARIES AND EMPLOYEE BENEFITSMATERIALS AND SUPPLIESPROFESSIONAL SERVICESMAINTENANCECAPITAL OUTLAYCOMMUNITY CENTERSPECIAL USESTOTAL EXPENDITURESOther Financing UsesPARK DEDICATIONPARK CAPITAL FUNDSTREET RENEWAL FUNDGOLF FUNDEQUIPMENT FUNDTOTAL FINANCING USESTOTAL EXPENDITURES & USESCHANGE IN FUND BALANCETotal Fund BalanceReserved for FireNet fund Balance% unreserved fund balance to expenditures2013 2014 2015 2016BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET$ 5,465,105 $ 5,495,105 $ 5,687,225 $ 6,141,725925,000 930,000 930,000 930,000281,400 320,000 260,000 335,0001,288,095 1,769,420 1,770,420 1,770,420828,550 928,695 865,345 918,645115,700 116,700 117,700 118,70060,115 52,500 61,250 70,00035,000 50,000 50,000 50,00074,500 76,365 78,275700,000 460,000 550,000 370,0009,698,965 10,196,920 10,368,305 10,782,7656,570,475 6,761,165 6,903,715 7,118,665385,480 335,480 340,510 345,6201,161,045 1,227,655 1,246,070 1,264,7601,422,825 1,444,165 1,465,830 1,487,815339,040 153,000 136,000 159,000146,135 148,325 150,55075,100 121,200 121,200 131,2009,953,965 10,188,800 10,361,650 10,657,610500,000250,000750,000500,000750,000 750,000 500,00010,703,965 10,938,800 10,861,650 10,657,610(1,005,000) (741,880) (493,345) 125,155$ 5,116,487 4,833,392 4,340,047 4,465,202651,239 769,239 724,239 864,2394,465,248 4,064,153 3,615,808 3,600,96353.21% 48.87% 43.07% 43.15%77 224 of 360

PARK DEDICATIONWorking Capital Beg YrSourcesInterestDedication feesIntergovernmentalDonationsSale of propertyTransfer inTotal SourcesUsesC.I.P. ProjectsRiver Front Parkrum river trail connectionrum river trail lightingCRTV parkhenry hammer trailnature preserveTotal UsesNet Source/(Use)Working Capital Year End2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018146,444 (313,476) 155,716 26,504 154,117 131,949464 1,54125,430 366,192 55,946 127,150 76,290 127,150760,000 145,000 100,000100,000116,142500,000785,430 1,011,192 272,088 127,614 177,831 127,1501,245,350 275,00010,000 191,30060,00050,000 150,000 150,000207,000 200,0001,245,350 542,000 401,300 0 200,000 150,000(459,920) 469,192 (129,213) 127,614 (22,169) (22,850)(313,476) 155,716 26,504 154,117 131,949 109,099Working Capital Balance 12/31/2019 $164,52178 225 of 360

PARK CAPITAL IMPRVWorking Capital Beg YrSourcesInterestDonationsIntergovernmentalIntergovernmentalIntergovernmentalProperty SalesBond IssueTransfer inTransfer in from waterTransfer in from sewerTotal SourcesUsesC.I.P. ProjectsRiver Front ParkStone Househwy 10 trailriver bridge paintingcastle fieldpark equip.sunny acreskings island channel restor.kings island bridge onto islandpenn point parkingtrailways - bikesmississippi park trailwayssoccer field lightsCross country ski equip (ski-do)Golf pedestrian trail to AEPTotal UsesNet Source/(Use)Working Capital Year End2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018(15,942) 48,103 198,704 253,655 286,830 1,011,331601 2,981 4,439 5,737 22,755400,000 150,0001,090,000 187,000 233,00080,000 176,000100,000 350,000400,0002,500,000300,000 550,000 21,970 183,737 174,764 164,3101,790,000 550,601 204,950 901,176 2,680,501 970,0658,955 25,000 60,000 3,000 25,000 50,0001,431,000 1,890,00010,000 350,000215,00080,000394,00025,0004,000250,00052,00018,000 300,000974,000 400,000500,0001,725,955 400,000 150,000 868,000 1,956,000 1,940,00064,045 150,601 54,950 33,176 724,501 (969,935)48,103 198,704 253,655 286,830 1,011,331 41,397Working Capital Balance 12/31/2019 ($1,699)79 226 of 360

WATER80 227 of 360

81 228 of 360

82 229 of 360

WATER FUNDWorking Capital Beginning YearOperating RevenuesOtherInterestTransfer InBond IssuanceTotal SourcesPersonal ServicesSuppliesProfessional ServicesMaintenanceOther ExpenseTransfer OutCapital OutlayCapital ImprovementsPrincipal Bond paymentTotal UsesChange in available fundsOther changesWorking Capital Ending Year9.00% 9.80%2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 20181,497,807 1,580,130 1,712,471 1,435,294 1,222,431 1,590,7591,740,964 1,740,964 1,860,166 1,860,166 1,860,166 2,001,645231,000 355,500 155,000 148,500 165,000 # 125,00018,723 23,702 21,406 25,118 24,449 35,7922,570,0001,990,687 2,120,166 2,036,572 2,033,784 2,049,615 4,732,438415,707 426,099 434,621 443,314 452,180 461,223109,867 117,064 119,406 121,794 124,230 126,714356,063 361,404 368,632 376,005 383,525 391,19571,808 73,244 74,709 76,203 77,727 79,28227,919 23,613 18,681 12,831 3,625300,000 400,000220,000 257,000 148,000 207,000 110,000 100,000502,000 224,400 934,700 784,500 530,000 4,450,500200,000 205,000 210,000 215,000 225,0001,903,364 1,987,825 2,308,749 2,236,647 1,906,287 6,008,91587,323 132,341 (272,177) (202,863) 143,328 (1,276,478)(5,000) (5,000) (5,000) (10,000) 225,0001,580,130 1,712,471 1,435,294 1,222,431 1,590,759 314,281Working Capital Balance 12/31/2019 $ 496,041Rate History1999 - $.92/1,000 gals. or $.69/100 cu ft2001 - $.98/1,000 gals or $.73/100 cu ft2002 - $1.02/1,000 gals. or $.76/100 cu f2003 - $1.07/1,000 gals. or $.80/100 cu f2004 - $1.12/1,000 gals. or $.84/100 cu f2006 - $1.23/1,000 gals or $.92/100 cu ft2008 - $1.36/1,000 gals or $1.02/100 cu2009 - $1.50/1,000 gals or $1.12/100 cu2011 - $1.64/1,000 gals or $1.22/100 cu2018 - $1.79/1,000 gals or $1.34/100 cu83 230 of 360

84 231 of 360

85 232 of 360

86 233 of 360

87 234 of 360

88 235 of 360

Capital Improvement PlanCity of Anoka, MinnesotaProject #EN-14-052014 2018 thruDepartmentContactUseful LifeEngineeringPublic Services Director30 yearsProject Name Slabtown Street Renewal ProjectCategory Street ReconstructionTypeStreet RenewalUpdate flagPriority3 ImportantDescriptionComplete reconstruction of the following City streets:Total Project Cost: $2,348,000Martin St (State to Ferry)Pleasant St (State to Ferry)Branch Av (Martin St to Hwy 10)Wingfield Av (Greenhaven to Hwy 10)State Av (Greenhaven to Hwy 10)JustificationTotal length = 6700 ft.Streets and underground utilities are in poor condition and are in need of reconstructionExpendituresConstructionTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total1,174,000 1,174,0002,348,0001,174,000 1,174,000 2,348,000Funding SourcesSanitary Sewer FundStormwater Utility FundStreet Renewal FundWater FundTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total108,000 108,000216,000330,000 330,000660,000569,000 569,0001,138,000167,000 167,000334,0001,174,000 1,174,000 2,348,00089 236 of 360

90 237 of 360

91 238 of 360

92 239 of 360

93 240 of 360

94 241 of 360

95 242 of 360

96 243 of 360

97 244 of 360

98 245 of 360

99 246 of 360

100 247 of 360

101 248 of 360

102 249 of 360

103 250 of 360

104 251 of 360

Capital Improvement PlanCity of Anoka, MinnesotaProject #PR06-482014 2018 thruDepartmentContactUseful LifeParks and RecreationPublic Services Director30 yearsProject Name Anoka Station Parks and GreenspacesCategory Maintenance - ParksTypeDevelopmentUpdate flagxPriority4 Less ImportantDescriptionTotal Project Cost: $350,000Designs, development and construction of park areas and public green spaces. Possible trail connection from Transit Village to downtown.Complete Rum River Trail -make connection between 4th Avenue Rum River bridge and Anoka Station regional pond.Assumes: 670 new residential units and Park Dedication fees of $2543/unit = $1,700,000.Assume: Development will occur evenly over a 10 year period starting in 2012.JustificationPark improvement needed for commuter rail transit villageExpendituresConstructionTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total50,000 150,000 150,000350,00050,000 150,000 150,000 350,000Funding SourcesPark Dedication fundTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total50,000 150,000 150,000350,00050,000 150,000 150,000 350,000105 252 of 360

106 253 of 360

107 254 of 360

108 255 of 360

109 256 of 360

Capital Improvement PlanCity of Anoka, MinnesotaProject #EN-14-062014 2018 thruDepartmentContactUseful LifeEngineeringPublic Services Director30 yearsProject Name Garfield Street ExtensionCategory Street ConstructionTypeDevelopmentUpdate flagPriority3 ImportantDescriptionTotal Project Cost: $290,000Extend Garfield Street approx. 900ft in association with the Public Works / Electric shop site at 7th and Garfield. Also reclaim / repave existingGarfield from 6th to 7th Ave.JustificationStreet extension needed to facilitate efficent transit of of PW & Electric vehicles to downtown and the city's west side.ExpendituresConstructionTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total290,000290,000290,000 290,000Funding SourcesCapital Improvement fundTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total290,000290,000290,000 290,000110 257 of 360

111 258 of 360

112 259 of 360

113 260 of 360

114 261 of 360

115 262 of 360

116 263 of 360

117 264 of 360

118 265 of 360

Capital Improvement PlanCity of Anoka, MinnesotaProject # ST 12-012014 2018 thruDepartmentContactUseful LifeStreetsPublic Services Director20 yearsProject Name Street Surface Improvement Project (SSIP)Category Maintenance - Public WorksTypeMaintenanceUpdate flagPriority2 Very ImportantDescriptionTotal Project Cost: $7,000,000Complete reclamation and repaving of selected streets, including minor curb repair, regarding, and drainage corrections. Each annual projectwould include approximately 2 miles, or about 3%, of local roadway.This on-going program should not be confused with the Street Renewal Program (SRP). SRP projects involve complete infrastructurereplacement, whereas SSIPs are intended to provide serviceable streets until an SRP project can occur.Funding for these projects are intended to be derived from surpluses in the Electric Utility fund. In years where funds are available, selected streetswill be submitted to Council for approval.JustificationGreenhaven entrance needs improvements and correction.Street Surfacing has exceeded its useful life & requires rejuvenation.Prior1,000,000ExpendituresMaintenance2014 2015 2016 2017 20181,000,000 1,000,000Total2,000,000Future4,000,000TotalTotal1,000,000 1,000,000 2,000,000TotalPrior1,000,000Funding SourcesStreet Renewal Fund2014 2015 2016 2017 20181,000,000 1,000,000Total2,000,000Future4,000,000TotalTotal1,000,000 1,000,000 2,000,000Total119 266 of 360

120 267 of 360

121 268 of 360

122 269 of 360

123 270 of 360

124 271 of 360

SEWER FUNDWorking Capital Beginning YearOperating RevenuesOtherInterestTransfer InTotal Sources8.70% 8.40%2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018975,362 952,571 1,616,183 1,364,005 1,237,090 1,535,8152,105,557 2,257,812 2,257,812 2,257,812 2,417,606 2,417,60658,300 121,000 22,000 11,000 22,000 121,00012,192 14,289 28,283 27,280 27,835 30,716300,000 400,0002,176,049 2,693,100 2,308,095 2,296,092 2,467,440 2,969,322Personal ServicesSuppliesProfessional ServicesMaintenanceDisposal ChargesTransfer OutCapital OutlayCapital ImprovementsPrincipal/Internal loan paymentTotal UsesChange in available fundsAccounting adjustmentWorking Capital Ending Year402,682 412,749 421,004 429,424 438,012 446,77231,064 31,685 32,319 32,966 33,625 34,29782,187 83,420 84,254 85,097 85,948 86,80734,177 35,032 35,907 36,805 37,725 38,6681,254,530 1,288,402 1,323,189 1,358,915 1,395,606 1,433,287125,000 150,000 100,000394,200 178,200 538,600 329,800 177,800 2,310,0002,198,840 2,029,488 2,560,273 2,423,006 2,168,716 4,449,832(22,791) 663,612 (252,178) (126,914) 298,725 (1,480,510)952,571 1,616,183 1,364,005 1,237,090 1,535,815 55,305Working Capital balance 12/31/2019 328,699Rate History1999 - $2.37/1,000 gals. or $1.77/100 cu ft2004 - $2.46/1,000 gals. or $1.84/100 cu ft2005 - $2.59/1,000 gals or $1.94/100 cu ft2007 - $2.84/1,000 gals or $2.13/100 cu ft2010 - $3.06/1,000 gals or $2.29/100 cu ft2014 - $3.30/1,000 gals or $2.47/100 cu ft125 272 of 360

126 273 of 360

COUNCIL MEMO FORMMeeting Date July 1, 2013Agenda Section New BusinessItem Description Approval of Equipment Replacement Plan (ERP)Submitted ByLori Yager, Finance Director11.2BACKGROUND INFORMATIONThe final copy of the 2014 – 2018 five-year equipment replacement plan for the City of Anoka has beenprovided. Council and staff reviewed this document in detail at the work session on Monday, June 24, 2013.There was one change since the meeting on the 24 th which is the inclusion of replacing network switches. Theadditional dollar amount for 2014 is $6,200 from the data processing internal service fund.The document is a planning document, which will be reviewed annually. The first year of the document,(2014), will be implemented into the 2014 budget process.Adoption of this document provides an essential tool for long range financial planning and management.FINANCIAL IMPACTSee document detailsCOUNCIL ACTION REQUESTEDAdopt the City of Anoka “2014 – 2018 Equipment Replacement Plan” through motion.274 of 360

City of AnokaEquipment Replacement Plan2014-2018275 of 360

276 of 360

CITY OF ANOKA, MINNESOTAEQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PLAN2014 - 2018TABLE OF CONTENTSIntroduction and purpose 1Highlights of the 2014 proposed purchases 2Equipment by Department 4Equipment by Funding Sources 6Equipment by Year 8PageFuture Equipment 11Equipment Items2014 132015 262016 392017 492018 58277 of 360

This page intentionally left blank278 of 360

INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSEBackgroundThe Equipment Replacement Plan is a twenty year forecast of equipmentneeds in the City of Anoka. It is intended to inform the Council and citizensto the major equipment needs on the horizon. The first year of the planbecomes an adopted equipment budget and relates almost completely to theoperating budget of the garage fund, which is approved on an annual basis.The remaining nineteen years represent an estimate of equipment needs andfunding capabilities of the city. Funding requirements vary from year toyear. In order to maintain a fairly consistent levy each year, the twenty yearschedule is projected with a 3% inflation factor and a yearly average dollarneed for the garage fund is presently $540,000.The cash flow requirements to fund the equipment needs in the garage fundare projected to increase 4 to 5% over the next five years given the projectedequipment needs and 3% inflation rate. Available funds will be usedthrough 2016 to replace and purchase equipment. The fund will thenreplenish the reserves with a transfer from the general fund to reach asuitable fund balance reserve. It is anticipated that the annual charges to thegeneral fund will need to increase 4 to 5% a year for the next five years inorder to accomplish replacing all of the equipment in the plan.Staff continually reevaluates the requested or needed equipmentreplacements for the near future and adjusts them to reduce the neededcontributions from the general fund. Refurbishments, extended lifeexpectancy and closer cost estimates of replacements will be the tools usedin helping reduce future replacement costs. The charge to the general fundin 2014 is projected to be $538,300 which is 5% higher than 2013 budget.The charges to the general fund include costs attributed not only to thereplacement of equipment but maintenance and supplies associated with thevehicles and equipment.1 279 of 360

Highlights of the 2014 proposed purchases:Data Processing Server upgrades - $20,000Network switches - $6,200Smart board - $4,500Patrol squad cameras - $17,000Electric: Replace one bucket truck - $273,000Parking Security cameras for both parking ramps - $42,000Police:Two squad carsPublic Services: Senior bus - $70,000¾ ton pickup truck - $35,000Mechanical street sweeper - $190,0002 280 of 360

FIVE YEAR SUMMARY3 281 of 360

City of Anoka, MinnesotaCapital Improvement Plan2014 2018thruPROJECTS BY DEPARTMENTDepartment Project# PriorityData Processing2014 2015 2016 2017 2018TotalUpdate Software - Finance DP03-03 380,00080,000Network Computer DP09-01 2 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,00080,000SmartboardIT14-01 n/a4,5004,500Patrol squad cameras IT14-02 2 17,000 10,500 7,00034,500Network SwitchesIT14-03 n/a6,200 6,500 6,00018,700Data Processing Total47,700 37,000 113,000 20,000217,700Electric UtilityBucket Truck #155Digger Truck #122Pickup #127Pickup Truck #110EU10-02 n/a 273,000273,000EU10-03 n/a320,000320,000EU10-07 n/a34,20034,200EU10-09 n/a31,30031,300Pickup #156 EU10-13 334,20034,200Trackhoe #159Bucket Truck #146Bucket Truck #140Bucket Truck #135Forklift #119Portable GeneratorTrencher Case 475 #115EU11-02 n/a85,00085,000EU13-01 n/a235,000235,000EU15-01 n/a281,000281,000EU17-01 n/a300,000 300,000EU17-02 n/a75,00075,000EU17-03 n/a195,000195,000EU18-01 n/a50,00050,000Electric Utility Total273,000 312,300 320,000 590,000 418,4001,913,700Greenhaven Golf CourseGreens Mower GC02-2 141,00041,000Top Dresser GC02-4 112,00012,000Rough Mower GC09-01 265,00065,000Fairway mower GC09-03 357,00057,000Golf Simulator GC14-07 455,00055,000Golf Cars GC14-12 5100,000100,000Greenhaven Golf Course Total57,000 100,000 108,000 65,000330,000Liquor StoresReader Board - West storeVanLQ03-01 n/a33,60033,600LQ05-01 n/a21,00021,000Liquor Stores Total54,60054,600ParkingSecurity for Walker Parking RampPurchase New Security for HRRD Parking RampBM-005 n/a 14,00014,000BM-007 n/a 28,00028,000Parking Total42,00042,0004 282 of 360

Department Project# PriorityParks and Recreation2014 2015 2016 2017 2018TotalJohn Deere 4-wheel drive tractor PR02-01 442,00042,000Chevy 1500 4x2 PickupCemetery mower replacementPR03-01 n/a16,50016,500PR06-01 n/a10,50010,50024 Foot Trailer PR06-02 n/a8,5008,5002001 Chev 1500 4X4 pickup PR06-05 n/a26,10026,100Ford F450 1 ton 9 foot dumpbox 4X4Ford F450 11 ft dump truck with power lift 4X4Ford E450 Diamond Coach Senior BusJohn Deere 1445 tractor mower/snowblowerPR06-06 n/a43,40043,400pr06-07 n/a43,40043,400PR06-09 n/a 70,00070,000PR06-13 n/a31,00031,0003/4 Ton 4X2 pickup PR06-20 n/a35,00035,000MT trackless blower and plowPR06-22 n/a118,000 118,000Parks and Recreation Total70,000 139,400 69,500 16,500 149,000444,400PoliceMarked Police VehiclesPD02-01 n/a 61,300 92,000 65,000 96,300 68,250 382,850Police Total61,300 92,000 65,000 96,300 68,250382,850Public Works1/2 ton Pick up truck; 29 MP-005 n/a35,00035,000Tandem Axle Dump Truck with Plows; 12Rubber Tire Loader, 3.5 yard; # 71MP-006 n/a210,000210,000MP-012 n/a215,000215,0003/4 Ton Pick Up Truck 31 MP-013 n/a 35,00035,000Mechanical Street Sweeper #22Single Axle Dump Truck #18MP-051 n/a 190,000190,000MP-052 n/a150,000150,0003/4 Ton Pickup Truck with Snowplow MP-053 n/a32,00032,000One Ton Dump Truck #88Rubber Tire Loader, 3.5 yard; # 84MP-056 n/a60,00060,000MP-060 n/a260,000260,000Public Works Total225,000 305,000 625,000 32,0001,187,000Sanitary UtlityAir CompressorSW-005 n/a25,00025,000Sanitary Utlity Total25,00025,000Water UtilityBackhoe, Rubber Tire; 781WU-013 n/a 125,000125,000Water Utility Total125,000125,000GRAND TOTAL 844,000 967,700 1,292,500 842,800 775,250 4,722,2505 283 of 360

City of Anoka, MinnesotaCapital Improvement Plan2014 2018thruPROJECTS BY FUNDING SOURCESource Project# Priority 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018TotalCemetary fundCemetery mower replacementPR06-01 n/a5,2505,250Cemetary fund Total5,2505,250Data Processing FundUpdate Software - Finance DP03-03 380,00080,000Network Computer DP09-01 2 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,00080,000SmartboardIT14-01 n/a4,5004,500Patrol squad cameras IT14-02 2 17,000 10,500 7,00034,500Network SwitchesIT14-03 n/a6,200 6,500 6,00018,700Data Processing Fund Total47,700 37,000 113,000 20,000217,700ElectricBucket Truck #155Digger Truck #122Pickup #127Pickup Truck #110EU10-02 n/a 273,000273,000EU10-03 n/a320,000320,000EU10-07 n/a34,20034,200EU10-09 n/a31,30031,300Pickup #156 EU10-13 334,20034,200Trackhoe #159Bucket Truck #146Bucket Truck #140Bucket Truck #135Forklift #119Portable GeneratorTrencher Case 475 #115EU11-02 n/a85,00085,000EU13-01 n/a235,000235,000EU15-01 n/a281,000281,000EU17-01 n/a300,000 300,000EU17-02 n/a75,00075,000EU17-03 n/a195,000195,000EU18-01 n/a50,00050,000Electric Total273,000 312,300 320,000 590,000 418,4001,913,700Garage Fund1/2 ton Pick up truck; 29 MP-005 n/a35,00035,000Tandem Axle Dump Truck with Plows; 12Rubber Tire Loader, 3.5 yard; # 71MP-006 n/a210,000210,000MP-012 n/a215,000215,0003/4 Ton Pick Up Truck 31 MP-013 n/a 35,00035,000Mechanical Street Sweeper #22Single Axle Dump Truck #18MP-051 n/a 190,000190,000MP-052 n/a150,000150,0003/4 Ton Pickup Truck with Snowplow MP-053 n/a32,00032,000One Ton Dump Truck #88Rubber Tire Loader, 3.5 yard; # 84Marked Police VehiclesMP-056 n/a60,00060,000MP-060 n/a260,000260,000PD02-01 n/a 61,300 92,000 65,000 96,300 68,250 382,850John Deere 4-wheel drive tractor PR02-01 442,00042,000Chevy 1500 4x2 PickupCemetery mower replacementPR03-01 n/a16,50016,500PR06-01 n/a5,2505,2506 284 of 360

Source Project# Priority 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018Total24 Foot Trailer PR06-02 n/a8,5008,5002001 Chev 1500 4X4 pickup PR06-05 n/a26,10026,100Ford F450 1 ton 9 foot dumpbox 4X4Ford F450 11 ft dump truck with power lift 4X4Ford E450 Diamond Coach Senior BusJohn Deere 1445 tractor mower/snowblowerPR06-06 n/a43,40043,400pr06-07 n/a43,40043,400PR06-09 n/a 14,00014,000PR06-13 n/a31,00031,0003/4 Ton 4X2 pickup PR06-20 n/a35,00035,000MT trackless blower and plowPR06-22 n/a118,000 118,000Garage Fund Total300,300 531,150 759,500 144,800 217,2501,953,000Golf FundGreens Mower GC02-2 141,00041,000Top Dresser GC02-4 112,00012,000Rough Mower GC09-01 265,00065,000Fairway mower GC09-03 357,00057,000Golf Simulator GC14-07 455,00055,000Golf Cars GC14-12 5100,000100,000Golf Fund Total57,000 100,000 108,000 65,000330,000GrantsFord E450 Diamond Coach Senior BusPR06-09 n/a 56,00056,000Grants Total56,00056,000Liquor fundReader Board - West storeVanLQ03-01 n/a33,60033,600LQ05-01 n/a21,00021,000Liquor fund Total54,60054,600Parking fundSecurity for Walker Parking RampPurchase New Security for HRRD Parking RampBM-005 n/a 14,00014,000BM-007 n/a 28,00028,000Parking fund Total42,00042,000Sanitary Sewer FundAir CompressorSW-005 n/a25,00025,000Sanitary Sewer Fund Total25,00025,000Water FundBackhoe, Rubber Tire; 781WU-013 n/a 125,000125,000Water Fund Total125,000125,000GRAND TOTAL844,000 967,700 1,292,500 842,800 775,2504,722,2507 285 of 360

City of Anoka, MinnesotaCapital Improvement Plan2019 2023 thruPROJECTS BY YEARProject Name Department Project # Priority Project Cost2019Mini Sneaker #102 Electric UtilityEU19-02n/a 35,0004-Wheel Cushman Truckster Greenhaven Golf CourseGC03-22 23,100Fairway Mower Greenhaven Golf CourseGC03-33 32,000Replace 1989 Club Cab - 1 Ton Dump Truck Parks and RecreationPR03-02n/a 41,0002003 John Deere 324 front-end loader Parks and RecreationPR04-01n/a 92,0002005 Dodge Caravan Parks and RecreationPR05-01n/a 15,800Cross Country Ski Maintenance Equipment Parks and RecreationPR14-054 28,000Trailer Mounted Traffic Arrow & Hydro Barrier Public WorksMP-011n/a 15,000GPS Vehicle System Public WorksMP-0154 50,000Total for 2019331,9002020Electrian Truck #123 Electric UtilityEU10-04n/a 40,000Locater Truck - #134 Electric UtilityEU10-05n/a 50,000Greenhaven - Kitchen Ventilation Greenhaven Golf CourseBM-GH-0253 39,000Ford F350 1 ton construction vehicle Parks and RecreationPR06-12n/a 30,000Total for 2020159,0002021Forklift #160 Electric UtilityEU20-01n/a 100,000Green Mower Greenhaven Golf CourseGC14-165 82,0002003 John Deere 2020 progater/sprayer Parks and RecreationPR05-02n/a 26,600Total for 2021208,6002022Pickup #138 Electric UtilityEU10-06n/a 39,600Mini Linesman #114 Electric UtilityEU10-11n/a 162,000Fairway Mower Greenhaven Golf CourseGC14-175 57,000HD Utility Vehicle Greenhaven Golf CourseGC14-185 25,000Tractor/Loader Greenhaven Golf CourseGC14-195 45,000Downtown Maintenance Utility Vehicle; 83 Public WorksMP-009n/a 21,750Total for 2022350,3502023Bucket Truck #143 Electric UtilityEU11-01n/a 312,000Turbine blower Greenhaven Golf CourseGC09-023 13,000Sprayer Greenhaven Golf CourseGC14-205 65,000Total for 2023390,000GRAND TOTAL 1,439,8508 286 of 360

Project Name Department Project # Priority Project CostRubber Tire Loader, 3.5 yard; # 84 Public WorksMP-060n/a 260,000Total for 20161,286,5002017Digger Truck #122 Electric UtilityEU10-03n/a 320,000Forklift #119 Electric UtilityEU17-02n/a 75,000Portable Generator Electric UtilityEU17-03n/a 195,000Greens Mower Greenhaven Golf CourseGC02-21 41,000Top Dresser Greenhaven Golf CourseGC02-41 12,000Golf Simulator Greenhaven Golf CourseGC14-074 55,000Chevy 1500 4x2 Pickup Parks and RecreationPR03-01n/a 16,500Marked Police Vehicles PolicePD02-01n/a 96,3003/4 Ton Pickup Truck with Snowplow Public WorksMP-053n/a 32,000Total for 2017842,8002018Network Computer Data ProcessingDP09-012 20,000Pickup #127 Electric UtilityEU10-07n/a 34,200Pickup #156 Electric UtilityEU10-133 34,200Bucket Truck #135 Electric UtilityEU17-01n/a 300,000Trencher Case 475 #115 Electric UtilityEU18-01n/a 50,000Rough Mower Greenhaven Golf CourseGC09-012 65,000Reader Board - West store Liquor StoresLQ03-01n/a 33,600Van Liquor StoresLQ05-01n/a 21,000John Deere 1445 tractor mower/snowblower Parks and RecreationPR06-13n/a 31,000MT trackless blower and plow Parks and RecreationPR06-22n/a 118,000Marked Police Vehicles PolicePD02-01n/a 68,250Total for 2018775,250GRAND TOTAL 4,703,5509 287 of 360

PROPOSED EXPENDITURESFOR FUTURE EQUIPMENT10 288 of 360

City of Anoka, MinnesotaCapital Improvement Plan2019 2023 thruPROJECTS BY YEARProject Name Department Project # Priority Project Cost2019Mini Sneaker #102 Electric UtilityEU19-02n/a 35,0004-Wheel Cushman Truckster Greenhaven Golf CourseGC03-22 23,100Fairway Mower Greenhaven Golf CourseGC03-33 32,000Replace 1989 Club Cab - 1 Ton Dump Truck Parks and RecreationPR03-02n/a 41,0002003 John Deere 324 front-end loader Parks and RecreationPR04-01n/a 92,0002005 Dodge Caravan Parks and RecreationPR05-01n/a 15,800Cross Country Ski Maintenance Equipment Parks and RecreationPR14-054 28,000Trailer Mounted Traffic Arrow & Hydro Barrier Public WorksMP-011n/a 15,000GPS Vehicle System Public WorksMP-0154 50,000Total for 2019331,9002020Electrian Truck #123 Electric UtilityEU10-04n/a 40,000Locater Truck - #134 Electric UtilityEU10-05n/a 50,000Greenhaven - Kitchen Ventilation Greenhaven Golf CourseBM-GH-0253 39,000Ford F350 1 ton construction vehicle Parks and RecreationPR06-12n/a 30,000Total for 2020159,0002021Forklift #160 Electric UtilityEU20-01n/a 100,000Green Mower Greenhaven Golf CourseGC14-165 82,0002003 John Deere 2020 progater/sprayer Parks and RecreationPR05-02n/a 26,600Total for 2021208,6002022Pickup #138 Electric UtilityEU10-06n/a 39,600Mini Linesman #114 Electric UtilityEU10-11n/a 162,000Fairway Mower Greenhaven Golf CourseGC14-175 57,000HD Utility Vehicle Greenhaven Golf CourseGC14-185 25,000Tractor/Loader Greenhaven Golf CourseGC14-195 45,000Downtown Maintenance Utility Vehicle; 83 Public WorksMP-009n/a 21,750Total for 2022350,3502023Bucket Truck #143 Electric UtilityEU11-01n/a 312,000Turbine blower Greenhaven Golf CourseGC09-023 13,000Sprayer Greenhaven Golf CourseGC14-205 65,000Total for 2023390,000GRAND TOTAL 1,439,85011 289 of 360

PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS12 290 of 360

201413 291 of 360

Capital Improvement PlanCity of Anoka, MinnesotaProject #DP09-012014 2018 thruDepartmentContactUseful LifeData ProcessingIS ManagerProject Name Network ComputerCategory EquipmentTypeTechnology9 yearsUpdate flagPriority2 Very ImportantDescriptionReplace existing network computer and software associated with it.Total Project Cost: $162,500JustificationIn order to accommodate new products old equipment must be upgraded or replacedPriorTotal82,500ExpendituresEquip/Vehicles/FurnishingsTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total20,000 20,000 20,000 20,00080,00020,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 80,000Prior82,500Funding SourcesData Processing Fund2014 2015 2016 2017 201820,000 20,000 20,000 20,000Total80,000TotalTotal20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 80,00014 292 of 360

Capital Improvement PlanCity of Anoka, MinnesotaProject #IT14-012014 2018 thruDepartmentContactUseful LifeData ProcessingIS ManagerProject Name SmartboardCategory EquipmentTypeUnassignedUpdate flagPriorityn/aDescriptionpurchase smart board for use in meetings and presentationsTotal Project Cost: $4,500Justificationallows easy sharing of information with larger groups. Also allows group modifications to documents and so forth.ExpendituresEquip/Vehicles/FurnishingsTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total4,5004,5004,500 4,500Funding SourcesData Processing FundTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total4,5004,5004,500 4,50015 293 of 360

Capital Improvement PlanCity of Anoka, MinnesotaProject #IT14-022014 2018 thruDepartmentContactUseful LifeData ProcessingPolice Chief10 yearsProject Name Patrol squad camerasCategory Computer EquipmentTypeTechnologyUpdate flagPriority2 Very ImportantDescriptionsquad car camera systemTotal Project Cost: $34,500Justificationmost metro area police departments already have squad car camera systems installed. We have seven primary response patrol cars. Recommendputting camera system into new squads as purchased over the next three years than taking them out of old vehicles and putting them in newsquads. Improve protection of police officers and city.ExpendituresEquip/Vehicles/FurnishingsTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total17,000 10,500 7,00034,50017,000 10,500 7,000 34,500Funding SourcesData Processing FundTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total17,000 10,500 7,00034,50017,000 10,500 7,000 34,50016 294 of 360

Capital Improvement PlanCity of Anoka, MinnesotaProject #IT14-032014 2018 thruDepartmentContactUseful LifeData ProcessingIS ManagerProject Name Network SwitchesCategory EquipmentTypeEquipmentUpdate flagPriorityn/aDescriptionTotal Project Cost: $18,700Justificationnetwork switches in all city locations are twenty years old. Need updating to allow future changes.ExpendituresEquip/Vehicles/FurnishingsTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total6,200 6,500 6,00018,7006,200 6,500 6,000 18,700Funding SourcesData Processing FundTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total6,200 6,500 6,00018,7006,200 6,500 6,000 18,70017 295 of 360

Capital Improvement PlanCity of Anoka, MinnesotaProject #EU10-022014 2018 thruDepartmentContactUseful LifeElectric UtilityElectric Director13 yearsProject Name Bucket Truck #155Category VehiclesTypeEquipmentUpdate flagPriorityn/aDescriptionBucket Truck #155 - 2000Total Project Cost: $273,000JustificationExpendituresEquip/Vehicles/FurnishingsTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total273,000273,000273,000 273,000Funding SourcesElectricTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total273,000273,000273,000 273,00018 296 of 360

Capital Improvement PlanCity of Anoka, MinnesotaProject #BM-0052014 2018 thruDepartmentContactUseful LifeParkingProject Name Security for Walker Parking RampCategory EquipmentTypeMaintenanceUpdate flagxPriorityn/aDescriptionSecurity for Walker Parking Ramp. Cameras/DVR system. No card access inc.Total Project Cost: $14,000JustificationCameras, this is for both safety and the ability to catch people that are doing unlawful activities in Walker parking ramp.A cost / benefit analysis will need to be performed to justify that project.ExpendituresMaintenanceTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total14,00014,00014,000 14,000Funding SourcesParking fundTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total14,00014,00014,000 14,00019 297 of 360

Capital Improvement PlanCity of Anoka, MinnesotaProject #BM-0072014 2018 thruDepartmentContactUseful LifeParkingProject Name Purchase New Security for HRRD Parking RampCategory EquipmentTypeMaintenanceUpdate flagxPriorityn/aDescriptionTotal Project Cost: $28,000Security NCBD/HRRD for New Parking Ramp. Cameras/DVR.A security system was leased in 2009. This lease agreement expires in June of 2014. The original lease agreement was for $777.28/mo.JustificationCameras throughout the facility. This would be for safety deterrent and for the ability to stop/catch people doing unlawful acts in the new ramp.Proximity readers with electric strikes on interior doors gives us more secruity for the ramp.Assuming there is very little maintenance needed, purchase of the camera security system in 2014 when the lease expires will be more costeffective than renewing the lease.ExpendituresMaintenanceTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total28,00028,00028,000 28,000Funding SourcesParking fundTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total28,00028,00028,000 28,00020 298 of 360

Capital Improvement PlanCity of Anoka, MinnesotaProject #PR06-092014 2018 thruDepartmentContactUseful LifeParks and RecreationPublic Services Director15 yearsProject Name Ford E450 Diamond Coach Senior BusCategory EquipmentTypeEquipmentUpdate flagxPriorityn/aDescription#327 Replace 2002 Ford E450 Diamond Coach senior busTotal Project Cost: $70,000JustificationIt will be necessary to replace this senior bus with a handicap lift gate. This vehicle is used daily for the entire senior program, congregate dining,and any other activities. The handicap lift is absolutely necessary for senior mobility. Matching grant may be available.There will be no salvage of the 2002, this will be used for shorter commutes and possible expanded service.ExpendituresEquip/Vehicles/FurnishingsTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total70,00070,00070,000 70,000Funding SourcesGarage FundGrantsTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total14,00014,00056,00056,00070,000 70,00021 299 of 360

Capital Improvement PlanCity of Anoka, MinnesotaProject #PD02-012014 2018 thruDepartmentContactUseful LifePolicePolice ChiefProject Name Marked Police VehiclesCategory EquipmentTypeEquipment4 yearsUpdate flagPriorityn/aDescriptionSquad carsTotal Project Cost: $964,250Justificationreplace 2 to 3 squads every year as necessary2012 - two squads2013 - three squads2014 - two squads2015 - two squads and one Canine vehicle2016 - two squads2017 - three squads2018 - two squads2019 - three squadsPriorTotal581,400ExpendituresEquip/Vehicles/FurnishingsTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total61,300 92,000 65,000 96,300 68,250382,85061,300 92,000 65,000 96,300 68,250 382,850Prior581,400Funding SourcesGarage Fund2014 2015 2016 2017 201861,300 92,000 65,000 96,300 68,250Total382,850TotalTotal61,300 92,000 65,000 96,300 68,250 382,85022 300 of 360

Capital Improvement PlanCity of Anoka, MinnesotaProject #MP-0132014 2018 thruDepartmentContactUseful LifePublic WorksPublic Services Director12 yearsProject Name 3/4 Ton Pick Up Truck 31Category VehiclesTypeMaintenanceUpdate flagxPriorityn/aDescriptionThis is a replacement for vehicle # 15 which is a 2001 Chevrolet pick-up truck.Total Project Cost: $35,000JustificationThis old truck has over 100,000 miles on it, is rusting out and is due for replacement. It is used daily by the Public Services Supervisor.ExpendituresEquip/Vehicles/FurnishingsTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total35,00035,00035,000 35,000Funding SourcesGarage FundTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total35,00035,00035,000 35,00023 301 of 360

Capital Improvement PlanCity of Anoka, MinnesotaProject #MP-0512014 2018 thruDepartmentContactUseful LifePublic WorksPublic Services Director20 yearsProject Name Mechanical Street Sweeper #22Category EquipmentTypeEquipmentUpdate flagPriorityn/aDescription#22 - mechanical street sweeperTotal Project Cost: $190,000JustificationUnit is a 2002 with 3000 hours on the machine. Due to the environment it works, it is worn out and would be ready for partial refurbishing.Approximate trade in value $12,000 - $14,000.Thi ssweeper is used weekly and performs approximately 80% of our city street/parking lot sweeping.ExpendituresEquip/Vehicles/FurnishingsTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total190,000190,000190,000 190,000Funding SourcesGarage FundTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total190,000190,000190,000 190,00024 302 of 360

Capital Improvement PlanCity of Anoka, MinnesotaProject #WU-0132014 2018 thruDepartmentContactUseful LifeWater UtilityProject Name Backhoe, Rubber Tire; 781Category EquipmentTypeEquipmentUpdate flagxPriorityn/aDescriptionThis is a new vehicle for replacement of # 781 which is a John Deere Rubber Tire Backhoe/Loader Tractor.Total Project Cost: $125,000JustificationOur old Backhoe is due for replacement and is not big enough for some of the jobs we will be tasked with in the future. The lift capacity will be thebiggest deficiency when we are repairing or installing various underground utilities. There will be no salvage value, as Unit #781 will bereassigned to Parks.ExpendituresEquip/Vehicles/FurnishingsTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total125,000125,000125,000 125,000Funding SourcesWater FundTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total125,000125,000125,000 125,00025 303 of 360

201526 304 of 360

Capital Improvement PlanCity of Anoka, MinnesotaProject #EU10-092014 2018 thruDepartmentContactUseful LifeElectric UtilityElectric Director12 yearsProject Name Pickup Truck #110Category VehiclesTypeEquipmentUpdate flagPriorityn/aDescription3/4 ton pickup #110 - 2003Total Project Cost: $68,600(Del)JustificationExpendituresEquip/Vehicles/FurnishingsTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total31,30031,30031,300 31,300FutureTotal37,300Funding SourcesElectric2014 2015 2016 2017 201831,300Total31,300Future37,300Total31,300 31,300Total27 305 of 360

Capital Improvement PlanCity of Anoka, MinnesotaProject #GC09-032014 2018 thruDepartmentContactUseful LifeGreenhaven Golf CourseGolf Course Mananger15 yearsProject Name Fairway mowerCategory EquipmentTypeEquipmentUpdate flagPriority3 ImportantDescriptionFairway mower-2001Total Project Cost: $122,000Justificationreplace 2001 Toro 5400 fairway mowerExpendituresEquip/Vehicles/FurnishingsTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total57,00057,00057,000 57,000FutureTotal65,000Funding SourcesGolf Fund2014 2015 2016 2017 201857,000Total57,000Future65,000Total57,000 57,000Total28 306 of 360

Capital Improvement PlanCity of Anoka, MinnesotaProject #EU15-012014 2018 thruDepartmentContactUseful LifeElectric UtilityElectric Director13 yearsProject Name Bucket Truck #140Category VehiclesTypeEquipmentUpdate flagPriorityn/aDescriptionBucket Truck #140 - 2002Total Project Cost: $281,000JustificationExpendituresEquip/Vehicles/FurnishingsTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total281,000281,000281,000 281,000Funding SourcesElectricTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total281,000281,000281,000 281,00029 307 of 360

Capital Improvement PlanCity of Anoka, MinnesotaProject #PR02-012014 2018 thruDepartmentContactUseful LifeParks and RecreationProject Name John Deere 4-wheel drive tractorCategory EquipmentTypePublic Works DirectorEquipment9 yearsUpdate flagPriority4 Less ImportantDescriptionUnit #300 - 1998 John Deere tractor, 5210 4-wheel driveTotal Project Cost: $109,000Justification1998 John Deere tractor is the primary maintenance equipment in the Parks and Recreation Department. It is utilized to with a broom mounted onthe front end for winter operations for cleaning trailways and general skating rinks. It is also used in the fall with the leafblower for park clean-upof all leaves and debris in all park areas and cemetaries.This unit will be shared with the Golf DepartmentPriorTotal67,000ExpendituresEquip/Vehicles/FurnishingsTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total42,00042,00042,000 42,000Funding SourcesGarage FundTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total42,00042,00042,000 42,00030 308 of 360

Capital Improvement PlanCity of Anoka, MinnesotaProject #PR06-012014 2018 thruDepartmentContactUseful LifeParks and RecreationProject Name Cemetery mower replacementCategory EquipmentTypeEquipment6 yearsUpdate flagPriorityn/aDescription#301 2001 John Deere Z Trak M-653 cemetery mowerTotal Project Cost: $10,500JustificationThis 01 mower is utilized daily in the 2 cemeteries with the 50" mowing deck. The zero-turn radius allows us to cut, trim and manage both ourparks and adjacent to all the headstones. This piece of equipment will need replacement every ten years.ExpendituresEquip/Vehicles/FurnishingsTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total10,50010,50010,500 10,500Funding SourcesCemetary fundGarage FundTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total5,2505,2505,2505,25010,500 10,50031 309 of 360

Capital Improvement PlanCity of Anoka, MinnesotaProject #PR06-022014 2018 thruDepartmentContactUseful LifeParks and Recreation15 yearsProject Name 24 Foot TrailerCategory EquipmentTypeEquipmentUpdate flagPriorityn/aDescription#308 2000 Towmaster trailer 24 footerTotal Project Cost: $8,500JustificationThe 24 ft trailer pulls 2 pieces of snow removal equip throughout winter operations and also is utilized all season long for 2 pieces of grass cuttingequipment throughout the park maintenance grass cutting schedule. This trailer will need replacement in 10-15 years depending on conditions andwear.ExpendituresEquip/Vehicles/FurnishingsTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total8,5008,5008,500 8,500Funding SourcesGarage FundTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total8,5008,5008,500 8,50032 310 of 360

Capital Improvement PlanCity of Anoka, MinnesotaProject #PR06-062014 2018 thruDepartmentContactUseful LifeParks and RecreationPublic Services Director15 yearsProject Name Ford F450 1 ton 9 foot dumpbox 4X4Category EquipmentTypeEquipmentUpdate flagxPriorityn/aDescription#312 2000 Ford F450 1 ton 9 foot dumpbox 4X4Total Project Cost: $43,400JustificationThe 2000 4X4 1 ton dump truck is used for all snow removal operations. In addition, the 4X4 has the capacity to pull the 24 foot trailer with parkmaint equip for snow plowing or grass cutting. This piece of equipment will need replacement in 15 years.ExpendituresEquip/Vehicles/FurnishingsTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total43,40043,40043,400 43,400Funding SourcesGarage FundTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total43,40043,40043,400 43,40033 311 of 360

Capital Improvement PlanCity of Anoka, MinnesotaProject #PR06-202014 2018 thruDepartmentContactUseful LifeParks and RecreationPublic Services Director15 yearsProject Name 3/4 Ton 4X2 pickupCategory VehiclesTypeMaintenanceUpdate flagxPriorityn/aDescription#353A 1999 Dodge 250 4X2 pick-upTotal Project Cost: $35,000JustificationThe 1999 3/4 ton Dodge pick-up is used with the full utility box for irrigation construction installation and maintenance/repairs.ExpendituresEquip/Vehicles/FurnishingsTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total35,00035,00035,000 35,000Funding SourcesGarage FundTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total35,00035,00035,000 35,00034 312 of 360

Capital Improvement PlanCity of Anoka, MinnesotaProject #MP-0052014 2018 thruDepartmentContactUseful LifePublic WorksPublic Services Director11 yearsProject Name 1/2 ton Pick up truck; 29Category EquipmentTypeMaintenanceUpdate flagPriorityn/aDescriptionTotal Project Cost: $35,000This is a replacement for unit # 29 which is a 1997 Chevrolet 1/2 ton pick-up truck. This vehicle is used daily by the Public Works Mechanics fordaily tasks.JustificationThis vehicle is used to retrieve parts that are needed immediately in order to keep the rest of the fleet operational. It is also used as a field servicetruck for on-site repairs and/or maintenance when required. This vehicle is currently showing signs of age and is due for normal replacement. Wewill replace with a 3/4 ton because DOT requires this size vehicle for towing or plowing.ExpendituresEquip/Vehicles/FurnishingsTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total35,00035,00035,000 35,000Funding SourcesGarage FundTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total35,00035,00035,000 35,00035 313 of 360

Capital Improvement PlanCity of Anoka, MinnesotaProject #MP-0062014 2018 thruDepartmentContactUseful LifePublic Works12 yearsProject Name Tandem Axle Dump Truck with Plows; 12Category EquipmentTypeMaintenanceUpdate flagPriorityn/aDescriptionTotal Project Cost: $210,000This is a replacement for unit # 12 which is a tandem axle dump-truck equipped with main plow, wing plow and rear sanding equipment.JustificationThis existing vehicle is over 10 years old and is overdue for replacement. The physical act of plowing is very hard on the plows and equipment.Beyond that, the salt used for de-icing is also very hard on this equipment. We typically see greatly increased maintenance on our plow vehiclesover 10 years old. This vehicle is showing this tendency.ExpendituresEquip/Vehicles/FurnishingsTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total210,000210,000210,000 210,000Funding SourcesGarage FundTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total210,000210,000210,000 210,00036 314 of 360

Capital Improvement PlanCity of Anoka, MinnesotaProject #MP-0562014 2018 thruDepartmentContactUseful LifePublic WorksPublic Services Director10 yearsProject Name One Ton Dump Truck #88Category EquipmentTypeEquipmentUpdate flagxPriorityn/aDescription#88 - 1 Ton Dump Truck (Replace 1998 unit).Total Project Cost: $60,000JustificationThis vehicle is used daily for public works maintenance. Corrosion on the dump body is common, as this is the case with this truck. It may beworth our time to investigate the need to try a stainless steel dump body.ExpendituresEquip/Vehicles/FurnishingsTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total60,00060,00060,000 60,000Funding SourcesGarage FundTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total60,00060,00060,000 60,00037 315 of 360

Capital Improvement PlanCity of Anoka, MinnesotaProject #SW-0052014 2018 thruDepartmentContactUseful LifeSanitary UtlityProject Name Air CompressorCategory EquipmentTypePublic Works DirectorEquipment8 yearsUpdate flagxPriorityn/aDescriptionNew Air Compressor (trailer mounted).Total Project Cost: $25,000JustificationThis air compressor will be 15 years old and will have reached the end of its useful life.ExpendituresEquip/Vehicles/FurnishingsTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total25,00025,00025,000 25,000Funding SourcesSanitary Sewer FundTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total25,00025,00025,000 25,00038 316 of 360

201639 317 of 360

Capital Improvement PlanCity of Anoka, MinnesotaProject #DP03-032014 2018 thruDepartmentContactUseful LifeData ProcessingIS Manager12 yearsProject Name Update Software - FinanceCategory Computer EquipmentTypeTechnologyUpdate flagPriority3 ImportantDescriptionTotal Project Cost: $255,000Upgrade All Incode software to new Version X. This includes payroll, time entry, business license, all finance applications, utility billing, parkingand inventory, the majority of the incode software was purchased in 2003 and upgraded in 2008 for $30,000.Justificationupgrade all Incode software programs to promote increased efficiencies. Newer version of incode has many desired improvements.This upgrade is a entirely new software package with training and implementation costs associated with it.Prior55,000ExpendituresEquip/Vehicles/Furnishings2014 2015 2016 2017 201880,000Total80,000Future120,000TotalTotal80,000 80,000TotalPrior55,000Funding SourcesData Processing Fund2014 2015 2016 2017 201880,000Total80,000Future120,000TotalTotal80,000 80,000Total40 318 of 360

Capital Improvement PlanCity of Anoka, MinnesotaProject #EU11-022014 2018 thruDepartmentContactUseful LifeElectric UtilityElectric Director20 yearsProject Name Trackhoe #159Category EquipmentTypeEquipmentUpdate flagPriorityn/aDescription1997 TrackhoeTotal Project Cost: $201,000JustificationExpendituresEquip/Vehicles/FurnishingsTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total85,00085,00085,000 85,000FutureTotal116,000Funding SourcesElectric2014 2015 2016 2017 201885,000Total85,000Future116,000Total85,000 85,000Total41 319 of 360

Capital Improvement PlanCity of Anoka, MinnesotaProject #EU13-012014 2018 thruDepartmentContactUseful LifeElectric UtilityElectric DirectorProject Name Bucket Truck #146Category VehiclesTypeEquipment6 yearsUpdate flagPriorityn/aDescriptionBucket Truck #146 - 2007Total Project Cost: $285,000Justificationreplace chasis in 2013, replace entire truck in 2019PriorTotal50,000ExpendituresEquip/Vehicles/FurnishingsTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total235,000235,000235,000 235,000Prior50,000Funding SourcesElectric2014 2015 2016 2017 2018235,000Total235,000TotalTotal235,000 235,00042 320 of 360

Capital Improvement PlanCity of Anoka, MinnesotaProject #GC14-122014 2018 thruDepartmentContactUseful LifeProject Name Golf CarsCategory EquipmentTypeGreenhaven Golf CourseGolf Course ManangerEquipment8 yearsUpdate flagPriority5 Future ConsiderationDescription60 Golf Cars5 Light Duty Utility VehicleTotal Project Cost: $364,000price includes trade in of old golf cartsJustificationReplace 54 2008 Golf Cars, 1 2005 Utility Vehicle, 4 2003 Utility Vehiclescarts were purchased in 2008ExpendituresEquip/Vehicles/FurnishingsTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total100,000100,000100,000 100,000FutureTotal264,000Funding SourcesGolf Fund2014 2015 2016 2017 2018100,000Total100,000Future264,000Total100,000 100,000Total43 321 of 360

Capital Improvement PlanCity of Anoka, MinnesotaProject #PR06-052014 2018 thruDepartmentContactUseful LifeParks and Recreation15 yearsProject Name 2001 Chev 1500 4X4 pickupCategory EquipmentTypeEquipmentUpdate flagPriorityn/aDescription#311 2001 Chevy 1500 4X4 pickupTotal Project Cost: $26,100JustificationThe 4X4 pickup is used as a plow vehicle and is used on a daily basis by the mechanics to pick up parts, tow vehicles and assist in snow removaloperations. This vehicle will need to be replaced in the next 10-15 years.ExpendituresEquip/Vehicles/FurnishingsTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total26,10026,10026,100 26,100Funding SourcesGarage FundTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total26,10026,10026,100 26,10044 322 of 360

Capital Improvement PlanCity of Anoka, MinnesotaProject #pr06-072014 2018 thruDepartmentContactUseful LifeParks and RecreationPublic Services Director15 yearsProject Name Ford F450 11 ft dump truck with power lift 4X4Category EquipmentTypeEquipmentUpdate flagxPriorityn/aDescription#313 2001 Ford F450 11 foot dump truck with power lift gate and 4X4Total Project Cost: $43,400JustificationThe 01 Ford F450 is a major piece of snow removal equip for all winter operations. In addition, the 11 foot dump and gate provide the opportunityto use for leaf hauling and landscape materials. In addition, this same unit is used for playground construction. This piece of equipment will needreplacement in the next 15 years.ExpendituresEquip/Vehicles/FurnishingsTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total43,40043,40043,400 43,400Funding SourcesGarage FundTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total43,40043,40043,400 43,40045 323 of 360

Capital Improvement PlanCity of Anoka, MinnesotaProject #MP-0122014 2018 thruDepartmentContactUseful LifePublic WorksPublic Services Director12 yearsProject Name Rubber Tire Loader, 3.5 yard; # 71Category EquipmentTypeMaintenanceUpdate flagPriorityn/aDescriptionThis unit is a replacement for # 71 which is a 1998 John Deere 624G, rubber tire front end loader.Total Project Cost: $215,000JustificationOur old loader is due for replacement. These loaders usually reach a point of diminishing returns at ten years of service. This unit is used daily forcity tasks and also for plowing, removing and hauling snow.ExpendituresEquip/Vehicles/FurnishingsTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total215,000215,000215,000 215,000Funding SourcesGarage FundTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total215,000215,000215,000 215,00046 324 of 360

Capital Improvement PlanCity of Anoka, MinnesotaProject #MP-0522014 2018 thruDepartmentContactUseful LifePublic WorksPublic Services Director15 yearsProject Name Single Axle Dump Truck #18Category EquipmentTypeEquipmentUpdate flagxPriorityn/aDescription#18 Single Axle Dump Truck (Replace 1998 unit).Total Project Cost: $150,000JustificationThis truck is primarily used for snowplowing and removal. Corrosion will be a factor as well as snow plows, sander and components. It is wellused at this point, truck and components will be fifteen years old at this point. Approximate trade $10,000.ExpendituresEquip/Vehicles/FurnishingsTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total150,000150,000150,000 150,000Funding SourcesGarage FundTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total150,000150,000150,000 150,00047 325 of 360

Capital Improvement PlanCity of Anoka, MinnesotaProject #MP-0602014 2018 thruDepartmentContactUseful LifePublic WorksProject Name Rubber Tire Loader, 3.5 yard; # 84Category EquipmentTypePublic Services DirectorEquipmentUpdate flagPriorityn/aDescriptionRubber Tire Loader, 3.5 yard; # 71Total Project Cost: $260,000JustificationThi sloader is used daily by the Public Services Street & Park Diisions for various tasks. In the winter months it is a vital tool in clearing snowaround th e city. This loader wil replace a 1996 unit that has a great deal of rust an dis experiencing mechanical issues.ExpendituresEquip/Vehicles/FurnishingsTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total260,000260,000260,000 260,000Funding SourcesGarage FundTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total260,000260,000260,000 260,00048 326 of 360

201749 327 of 360

Capital Improvement PlanCity of Anoka, MinnesotaProject #EU10-032014 2018 thruDepartmentContactUseful LifeElectric UtilityElectric Director15 yearsProject Name Digger Truck #122Category VehiclesTypeEquipmentUpdate flagPriorityn/aDescriptionDigger Truck #122 - 2002Total Project Cost: $320,000JustificationExpendituresEquip/Vehicles/FurnishingsTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total320,000320,000320,000 320,000Funding SourcesElectricTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total320,000320,000320,000 320,00050 328 of 360

Capital Improvement PlanCity of Anoka, MinnesotaProject #EU17-022014 2018 thruDepartmentContactUseful LifeElectric UtilityElectric Director30 yearsProject Name Forklift #119Category EquipmentTypeEquipmentUpdate flagPriorityn/aDescriptionSamll nissan forklift 1988 #119Total Project Cost: $75,000JustificationExpendituresEquip/Vehicles/FurnishingsTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total75,00075,00075,000 75,000Funding SourcesElectricTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total75,00075,00075,000 75,00051 329 of 360

Capital Improvement PlanCity of Anoka, MinnesotaProject #EU17-032014 2018 thruDepartmentContactUseful LifeElectric Utility25 yearsProject Name Portable GeneratorCategory EquipmentTypeEquipmentUpdate flagPriorityn/aDescription110 KW Portable generator - 1990Total Project Cost: $195,000JustificationExpendituresEquip/Vehicles/FurnishingsTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total195,000195,000195,000 195,000Funding SourcesElectricTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total195,000195,000195,000 195,00052 330 of 360

Capital Improvement PlanCity of Anoka, MinnesotaProject #GC02-22014 2018 thruDepartmentContactUseful LifeGreenhaven Golf CourseGolf Course Mananger12 yearsProject Name Greens MowerCategory EquipmentTypeEquipmentUpdate flagPriority1 UrgentDescription2007 greens mowerTotal Project Cost: $115,000JustificationOver extended useful life, purchased in 2007, Trade inPrior25,000ExpendituresEquip/Vehicles/Furnishings2014 2015 2016 2017 201841,000Total41,000Future49,000TotalTotal41,000 41,000TotalPrior25,000Funding SourcesGolf Fund2014 2015 2016 2017 201841,000Total41,000Future49,000TotalTotal41,000 41,000Total53 331 of 360

Capital Improvement PlanCity of Anoka, MinnesotaProject #GC02-42014 2018 thruDepartmentContactUseful LifeGreenhaven Golf CourseUnassigned10 yearsProject Name Top DresserCategory EquipmentTypeEquipmentUpdate flagPriority1 UrgentDescriptionEquipment for putting servicesTotal Project Cost: $52,000Justificationpurchased in 2007, needs replacementPrior10,000ExpendituresEquip/Vehicles/Furnishings2014 2015 2016 2017 201812,000Total12,000Future30,000TotalTotal12,000 12,000TotalPrior10,000Funding SourcesGolf Fund2014 2015 2016 2017 201812,000Total12,000Future30,000TotalTotal12,000 12,000Total54 332 of 360

Capital Improvement PlanCity of Anoka, MinnesotaProject #GC14-072014 2018 thruDepartmentContactUseful LifeGreenhaven Golf CourseGolf Course Mananger10 yearsProject Name Golf SimulatorCategory EquipmentTypeEquipmentUpdate flagPriority4 Less ImportantDescriptionTotal Project Cost: $55,000We have space in the room that the insurance person has vacated to install a golf simulator. The cost of the simulators are around $49,000 + somelogistical and small remodeling would equal the $55,000.JustificationIn the attempt to make the facility busier during the winter and keep connected to our golfers we can install a simulator and operate it through thewinter.ExpendituresEquip/Vehicles/FurnishingsTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total55,00055,00055,000 55,000Funding SourcesGolf FundTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total55,00055,00055,000 55,00055 333 of 360

Capital Improvement PlanCity of Anoka, MinnesotaProject #PR03-012014 2018 thruDepartmentContactUseful LifeParks and RecreationPark Director10 yearsProject Name Chevy 1500 4x2 PickupCategory EquipmentTypeEquipmentUpdate flagxPriorityn/aDescriptionUnit #303 - 2003 Chevy 1500 4x2 pickupTotal Project Cost: $16,500Justificationt is utilized daily throughout the year and is available for pick-up and delivery as necessary. It needs replacement.As of May 2010: This item could be deleted. However,since we are using it until it's no longer serviceable, the status is being changed toPENDING.ExpendituresEquip/Vehicles/FurnishingsTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total16,50016,50016,500 16,500Funding SourcesGarage FundTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total16,50016,50016,500 16,50056 334 of 360

Capital Improvement PlanCity of Anoka, MinnesotaProject #MP-0532014 2018 thruDepartmentContactUseful LifePublic WorksPublic Services Director15 yearsProject Name 3/4 Ton Pickup Truck with SnowplowCategory EquipmentTypeEquipmentUpdate flagPriorityn/aDescription#37 3/4 ton pickup truck with snowplowTotal Project Cost: $32,000JustificationVehicle will be fifteen years old. Truck is used daily for maintenance and snow removal. Mileage and corrosion will be a factor at this point.ExpendituresEquip/Vehicles/FurnishingsTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total32,00032,00032,000 32,000Funding SourcesGarage FundTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total32,00032,00032,000 32,00057 335 of 360

201858 336 of 360

Capital Improvement PlanCity of Anoka, MinnesotaProject #EU10-132014 2018 thruDepartmentContactUseful LifeElectric UtilityElectric DirectorProject Name Pickup #156Category VehiclesTypeEquipment17 yrsUpdate flagPriority3 ImportantDescription2001 Chevy pickupTotal Project Cost: $34,200(Dan)JustificationExpendituresEquip/Vehicles/FurnishingsTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total34,20034,20034,200 34,200Funding SourcesElectricTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total34,20034,20034,200 34,20059 337 of 360

Capital Improvement PlanCity of Anoka, MinnesotaProject #EU10-072014 2018 thruDepartmentContactUseful LifeElectric UtilityElectric DirectorProject Name Pickup #127Category VehiclesTypeEquipment17 yrsUpdate flagPriorityn/aDescriptionChevy Silverrodo truck - 2001Total Project Cost: $70,500(Greg)JustificationExpendituresEquip/Vehicles/FurnishingsTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total34,20034,20034,200 34,200FutureTotal36,300Funding SourcesElectric2014 2015 2016 2017 201834,200Total34,200Future36,300Total34,200 34,200Total60 338 of 360

Capital Improvement PlanCity of Anoka, MinnesotaProject #EU17-012014 2018 thruDepartmentContactUseful LifeElectric UtilityElectric Director10 yearsProject Name Bucket Truck #135Category VehiclesTypeEquipmentUpdate flagPriorityn/aDescriptionBucket Truck #135 - 2008Total Project Cost: $300,000JustificationExpendituresEquip/Vehicles/FurnishingsTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total300,000300,000300,000 300,000Funding SourcesElectricTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total300,000300,000300,000 300,00061 339 of 360

Capital Improvement PlanCity of Anoka, MinnesotaProject #EU18-012014 2018 thruDepartmentContactUseful LifeElectric UtilityElectric DirectorProject Name Trencher Case 475 #115Category EquipmentTypeEquipment17 yrsUpdate flagPriorityn/aDescriptionTrencher Case 475 2001 #115Total Project Cost: $50,000JustificationExpendituresEquip/Vehicles/FurnishingsTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total50,00050,00050,000 50,000Funding SourcesElectricTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total50,00050,00050,000 50,00062 340 of 360

Capital Improvement PlanCity of Anoka, MinnesotaProject #GC09-012014 2018 thruDepartmentContactUseful LifeGreenhaven Golf CourseGolf Course Mananger20 yearsProject Name Rough MowerCategory EquipmentTypeEquipmentUpdate flagPriority2 Very ImportantDescriptionLarge area rough mowerTotal Project Cost: $65,000Justificationcurrent mower is needing lots of repairs. The age of the mower is 1999.ExpendituresEquip/Vehicles/FurnishingsTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total65,00065,00065,000 65,000Funding SourcesGolf FundTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total65,00065,00065,000 65,00063 341 of 360

Capital Improvement PlanCity of Anoka, MinnesotaProject #LQ03-012014 2018 thruDepartmentContactUseful LifeLiquor StoresLiquor Store Manager15 yearsProject Name Reader Board - West storeCategory EquipmentTypeEquipmentUpdate flagPriorityn/aDescriptionReader Board west storeTotal Project Cost: $58,600JustificationPriorTotal25,000ExpendituresEquip/Vehicles/FurnishingsTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total33,60033,60033,600 33,600Prior25,000Funding SourcesLiquor fund2014 2015 2016 2017 201833,600Total33,600TotalTotal33,600 33,60064 342 of 360

Capital Improvement PlanCity of Anoka, MinnesotaProject #LQ05-012014 2018 thruDepartmentContactUseful LifeLiquor StoresLiquor Store Manager12 yearsProject Name VanCategory EquipmentTypeEquipmentUpdate flagPriorityn/aDescription2006 Ford VanTotal Project Cost: $36,280JustificationReplacementPriorTotal15,280ExpendituresEquip/Vehicles/FurnishingsTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total21,00021,00021,000 21,000Prior15,280Funding SourcesLiquor fund2014 2015 2016 2017 201821,000Total21,000TotalTotal21,000 21,00065 343 of 360

Capital Improvement PlanCity of Anoka, MinnesotaProject #PR06-132014 2018 thruDepartmentContactUseful LifeParks and RecreationPublic Services Director13 yearsProject Name John Deere 1445 tractor mower/snowblowerCategory EquipmentTypeEquipmentUpdate flagxPriorityn/aDescription#389 2005 John Deere 1445 tractor mower with 72" cutting deck and 46" snowblower & cab.Total Project Cost: $71,100JustificationThis major tractor mower is utilized all year long for grass-cutting operations with the 72" cutting deck and is also utilized all winter long with the47" snowblower and cab. This tractor unit is scheduled for replacement in the next 13 years.ExpendituresEquip/Vehicles/FurnishingsTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total31,00031,00031,000 31,000FutureTotal40,100Funding SourcesGarage Fund2014 2015 2016 2017 201831,000Total31,000Future40,100Total31,000 31,000Total66 344 of 360

Capital Improvement PlanCity of Anoka, MinnesotaProject #PR06-222014 2018 thruDepartmentContactUseful LifeParks and RecreationPublic Services Director15 yearsProject Name MT trackless blower and plowCategory EquipmentTypeEquipmentUpdate flagxPriorityn/aDescription#375 2000 MT trackless blower and plowTotal Project Cost: $118,000JustificationThis sidewalk snow blower and plow is absolutly crucial in the removal of snow from the city's sidewalks. This unit will have served for over 16years. Mechanically this equipment is still very strong but will need to be replaced.ExpendituresEquip/Vehicles/FurnishingsTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total118,000118,000118,000 118,000Funding SourcesGarage FundTotal2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total118,000118,000118,000 118,00067 345 of 360

GARAGE FUND2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018Working Capital Begin YearRevenues from chargesInterest earningsOther revenuesTransfer InTotal SourcesPersonal ServicesSuppliesProfessional ServicesMaintenanceCapital Outlay - Equipmentlaser line painterZero turning mowerhustler tractorFlail mower attachmentMarked Police VehiclesTracked SkidsterStreet SweeperRubber Tire Loader, 3.5 yardMaintenance vehichle (downtown)3/4 ton pickupCapital Outlay - EquipmentTotal Uses745,561 617,609 493,519 643,392 68,490 128,151512,660 530,603 549,174 568,395 588,289 608,8799,296 9,236 8,604 12,830 1,499 3,15710,000 56,000 15,000 5,000 15,000 5,000500,000531,956 595,839 1,072,778 586,225 604,788 617,03699,952 102,451 105,012 107,637 110,328 113,086248,012 233,435 254,326 268,208 263,377 261,07622,031 20,868 19,730 19,090 19,961 20,8446,112 6,876 7,438 6,691 6,662 6,92512,00010,50050,00010,00087,300 61,300 92,000 65,000 96,300 68,20032,000190,000215,00052,00030,000105,000 444,400 479,500 48,500 149,000659,907 719,929 922,905 1,161,127 545,128 619,131Proceeds/LossInventory changeNet Source or (Use)Working Capital Ending BalanceCash balance(127,952) (124,090) 149,873 (574,902) 59,660 (2,095)617,609 493,519 643,392 68,490 128,151 126,055615,735 491,645 641,518 66,616 126,277 124,181Working Capital Balance 12/31/19 194,71468 346 of 360

DATA PROCESSING WITH ROSEVILLE2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018Working Capital Begin YearRevenues from chargesInterest earningsOther revenues/transfer inTotal SourcesPersonal ServicesSuppliesProfessional ServicesMaintenanceTransfer outCapital Outlay - EquipmentTotal UsesNet Source or (Use)Working Capital Ending BalanceCash balance76,870 30,507 31,398 43,376 39,216 129,819267,010 339,810 339,810 390,000 390,000 390,000752 360 446 730 751 2,883267,762 340,170 340,256 390,730 390,751 392,8832,650 2,703 2,757 2,812 2,868 2,92644,000 59,660 40,555 36,163 36,706 37,256129,254 139,240 143,139 147,218 151,488 155,95683,721 89,977 91,326 92,696 94,087 95,49854,500 47,700 50,500 116,000 15,000 25,000314,125 339,280 328,277 394,890 300,148 316,637(46,363) 891 11,979 (4,160) 90,603 76,24730,507 31,398 43,376 39,216 129,819 206,06628,839 29,730 41,708 37,548 128,151 204,398Working Capital Balance 12/31/19 276,14369 347 of 360

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK70 348 of 360

COUNCIL MEMO FORMMeeting Date July 1, 2013Agenda Section Updates & ReportsItem Description Tentative AgendasSubmitted ByAmy Oehlers, City Clerk12.1BACKGROUND INFORMATIONAttached are the tentative agenda(s) for future meeting(s).FINANCIAL IMPACTNone.COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTEDRequest Council review and discuss upcoming agenda(s).349 of 360

City Council - Regular MeetingMonday, July 15, 2013 - 7:00 p.m.Council Chambers1.2.CALL TO ORDERROLL CALL3. COUNCIL MINUTES3.1 Minutes of July 1, 2013 Regular Mtg.(meeting will be cablecast)4. OPEN FORUM *The open forum is an opportunity for the public to address the City Councilconcerning items not listed on the agenda. Please raise your hand to be recognized by the Mayor ormember officiating the meeting. Approach the podium and state your full name and address for therecord. Rules of Conduct as listed in the public folder provided at the entrance of the CouncilChambers must be adhered to.5. PUBLIC HEARING(S)6. CONSENT AGENDA6.16.2Verified Bills.Revising & Setting Council Calendars7. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS7.1 Planning Commission:7.1.A RES/Comprehensive Plan Land Use Amendment; Rum River Shores.7.1.B RES/Preliminary Plat; Rum River Shores.7.1.C RES/Final Plat; Rum River Shores.7.1.D ORD/Amending Chpt 74, Article V, Division 6, Section 74-270; Relating to SensitiveDevelopment District. (1 st reading)7.1.E RES/Conditional Use Permit; City of Anoka, Rum River Docks.7.1.F RES/Site Plan; 1101 McKinley St, Poly-Cam.7.1.G RES/Conditional Use Permit; 121 E. Main St.7.1.H RES/Variance for 2800 Greenhaven Road.7.1.I RES/Revocation of Conditional Use Permit; 626 E. River Rd.8. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATION350 of 360

Anoka City Council Regular Meeting – July 15, 20139. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS9.1 RES/Approving a Development Agreement with Landmark of Anoka, LLC.9.2 RES/Castle Field Project-Phase II; Approve Plans & Specifications, Set a bid date & Authorize Adfor Bids.9.3 RES/CSAH 116 & 41 st Ave Extension Intersection & Roadway Project; Approve Plans &Specifications, Authorize Advertisement for Bids and Set a Bid Date.9.4 RES/Mississippi River Trail; JPA with Anoka County & City of Ramsey.9.5 ORD/Amending City Code regarding fines. (1 st reading)10. UNFINISHED BUSINESS11. NEW BUSINESS12. UPDATES & REPORTS12.1 Tentative Agendas.ADJOURNMENT351 of 360

CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSIONMonday, July 22, 2013Council Worksession Room5:00 p.m.(Meeting will not be Cablecast)1. CALL TO ORDER2. ROLL CALL3. COUNCIL BUSINESS and/or DISCUSSION ITEMS3.1 Discussion; County Road Turnback Proposal.3.2 Update: Northstar Corridor Development Study.3.3 Discussion; New Stormwater Rules from State.4. ADJOURNMENT352 of 360

CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSIONMonday, July 29, 2013Council Worksession Room5:00 p.m.(Meeting will not be Cablecast)1. CALL TO ORDER2. ROLL CALL3. COUNCIL BUSINESS and/or DISCUSSION ITEMS3.1 Discussion; RFP – 1632 South Ferry.4. ADJOURNMENT353 of 360

*************************************CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSIONMonday, August 5, 2013 - 6:00 p.m.Council ChambersPurpose: Budget Presentation(by Powerpoint)*************************************354 of 360

City Council - Regular MeetingMonday, August 5, 2013 - 7:00 p.m.Council Chambers1.2.CALL TO ORDERROLL CALL3. COUNCIL MINUTES3.1 Minutes of July 15, 2013 Regular Mtg.(meeting will be cablecast)4. OPEN FORUM *The open forum is an opportunity for the public to address the City Councilconcerning items not listed on the agenda. Please raise your hand to be recognized by the Mayor ormember officiating the meeting. Approach the podium and state your full name and address for therecord. Rules of Conduct as listed in the public folder provided at the entrance of the CouncilChambers must be adhered to.5. PUBLIC HEARING(S)6. CONSENT AGENDA6.16.2Verified Bills.Revising & Setting Council Calendars.7. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS7.1 Planning Commission:7.1.A. ORD/Amending Chpt 74, Article V, Division 6, Section 74-270; Relating to SensitiveDevelopment District. (2 ndreading)7.1.B ORD/Amending Parking Ordinance. (1 st reading)8. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATION9. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS9.1 RES/Granting Easement to GRE.9.2 ORD/Amending City Code regarding fines. (2 nd reading)10. UNFINISHED BUSINESS355 of 360

Anoka City Council Regular Meeting – August 5, 201311. NEW BUSINESS11.112. UPDATES & REPORTS12.1 2 nd Quarter Financial Report.12.2 Tentative Agendas.ADJOURNMENT356 of 360

*************************************CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSIONMonday, August 12, 2013 - 5:00 p.m.City DockPurpose: City Council Governmental Budget Review*************************************357 of 360

*************************************CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSIONMonday, August 19, 2013 - 5:00 p.m.Council Worksession RmPurpose: City Council Proprietary Budget Review*************************************358 of 360

City Council - Regular MeetingMonday, August 19, 2013 - 7:00 p.m.Council Chambers1.2.CALL TO ORDERROLL CALL3. COUNCIL MINUTES3.1 Minutes of August 5, 2013 Regular Mtg.(meeting will be cablecast)4. OPEN FORUM *The open forum is an opportunity for the public to address the City Councilconcerning items not listed on the agenda. Please raise your hand to be recognized by the Mayor ormember officiating the meeting. Approach the podium and state your full name and address for therecord. Rules of Conduct as listed in the public folder provided at the entrance of the CouncilChambers must be adhered to.5. PUBLIC HEARING(S)6. CONSENT AGENDA6.16.2Verified Bills.Revising & Setting Council Calendars7. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS7.1 Planning Commission:7.1.A RES/Preliminary Plat; Woodbury House Estates.7.1.B RES/Final Plat; Woodbury House Estates.8. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATION9. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS9.1 RES/CSAH 116/41 st Ave Extension Intersection & Roadway Project – Accept Bids, AwardConstruction Contract.9.2 RES/Castle Field Project-Phase II; Accept Bids & Award Construction Contract.9.3 RES/Castle Field Project – Phase II; Accept bids & Award Construction Contract.10. UNFINISHED BUSINESS11. NEW BUSINESS12. UPDATES & REPORTS12.1 Tentative Agendas.359 of 360

CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSIONMonday, August 26, 2013Council Worksession Room5:00 p.m.(Meeting will not be Cablecast)BUDGET FINAL MEETING360 of 360