13.07.2015 Views

5th March 2007 Dear Mr Henshaw, Thank you for your letters of ...

5th March 2007 Dear Mr Henshaw, Thank you for your letters of ...

5th March 2007 Dear Mr Henshaw, Thank you for your letters of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>for</strong> example, to catch-up with <strong>of</strong>ficial paperwork and meetings which hehas not had a moment to address when undertaking engagements inLondon, round the Country and overseas.(vii)The Duchy is “extracting” the last ounce out <strong>of</strong> the Isles <strong>of</strong> ScillyThe first general point to make is that the Duchy <strong>of</strong> Cornwall receivesminimal financial return from the Isles <strong>of</strong> Scilly and contributes, in effect, alarge financial subsidy to support the islanders, The Duchy is, <strong>for</strong> example,currently investing over £2 million refurbishing the <strong>of</strong>f-island quays on theIsles <strong>of</strong> Scilly <strong>for</strong> no direct financial return.The Duchy lets 153 residential properties on the Isles. Of these 85% (or130) are let at between 50% and 75% <strong>of</strong> open market values, whichrepresents considerable support to local people. In the last four years theDuchy has constructed seven new, locals only, dwellings and released land<strong>for</strong> the provision <strong>of</strong> six Cornwall Rural Housing Association rental onlyproperties. In addition the Duchy is discussing with the Cornwall RuralHousing Association the provision <strong>of</strong> land to construct a further 12af<strong>for</strong>dable homes.In comparison, two refurbishments are on course <strong>for</strong> Duchy visitor letswhich will give a total <strong>of</strong> four Duchy visitor lets. For the Isles as a whole25% <strong>of</strong> properties are holiday or second homes. Fewer than 3% <strong>of</strong> theDuchy’s properties are holiday homes, which <strong>of</strong> course provide the bestfinancial return.In other words it could not be further from the truth to say that the Duchy is“extracting the last ounce out <strong>of</strong> the Isles <strong>of</strong> Scilly”.(viii) The Duchy’s letting <strong>of</strong> the Little House to holiday-makers was “blatantpr<strong>of</strong>iteering” and “immoral”Little House on Bryher was leased to tenants who lived in Middlesex andused the property as holiday accommodation <strong>for</strong> their own use. The lease<strong>of</strong> Little House was due to expire on the 25 th <strong>March</strong> 2003. The Duchymade the tenants aware that as this property was holiday accommodationthey were not protected tenants and that the Duchy would not be granting anew tenancy. The Duchy suggested that they surrender the property, whichthey did three months be<strong>for</strong>e the expiry <strong>of</strong> the lease. The initial intentionhad been to re-let the property <strong>for</strong> full-time local use; however, followingits surrender an inspection <strong>of</strong> the property revealed it to be in extremelypoor condition with £300,000 needed <strong>for</strong> a total rebuild. The tenants’ return<strong>of</strong> the Little House to the Duchy was agreed without any charge <strong>for</strong>dilapidations. These would have been likely to have run into tens <strong>of</strong>thousands <strong>of</strong> pounds.In view <strong>of</strong> the very high cost <strong>of</strong> the repairs needed to the property it wasdecided to let it as a holiday let; however, this did not mean that there was

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!