13.07.2015 Views

5th March 2007 Dear Mr Henshaw, Thank you for your letters of ...

5th March 2007 Dear Mr Henshaw, Thank you for your letters of ...

5th March 2007 Dear Mr Henshaw, Thank you for your letters of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

As is clear from the enclosed booklet the Foundation has no such agendaand it does not support or promote ‘alternative’ medicine. ‘Integratedhealth’ is the use <strong>of</strong> the best <strong>of</strong> all healthcare <strong>for</strong> the whole person. TheFoundation <strong>for</strong> Integrated Health does not encourage anyone, directly orindirectly, to refuse conventional treatment in favour <strong>of</strong> ‘alternative’methods. The Foundation believes that safe and effective complementarytherapies can play a useful part in promoting health and wellbeing, but itspecifically encourages anybody considering the use <strong>of</strong> complementarytherapies to consult his or her GP be<strong>for</strong>e doing so.(ii)The NHS paid <strong>for</strong> a publication which runs contrary to the <strong>of</strong>ficialNHS viewFollowing the Foundation's application <strong>for</strong> a £20,000 grant to produce ThePatients’ Guide on Complementary Medicine (sic), the Department <strong>of</strong>Health remained involved throughout the process and at no time expressedany concern about the contents <strong>of</strong> the Guide. In the Foundation’s view, theDepartment’s <strong>of</strong>ficials were entirely satisfied that the Guide had deliveredproperly on the basis <strong>of</strong> the original proposal. Please may we see <strong>you</strong>revidence that this was not the case?Also, <strong>you</strong> say that “…when it was published, all evidence on safety andeffectiveness was omitted”; however, under the heading “What in<strong>for</strong>mationis there?” (pages 9-12), the Guide points readers to many sources <strong>of</strong>in<strong>for</strong>mation describing research and evidence about safety andeffectiveness <strong>of</strong> therapies. This allows the reader to check the latestin<strong>for</strong>mation online, as well as to seek in<strong>for</strong>mation from more than onesource.Furthermore, <strong>you</strong> say that “…critics believe the Guide is dangerous in thatthe advice it gives may encourage patients reading it to discontinueconventional treatment in favour <strong>of</strong> alternative therapies”; however, theGuide goes to great lengths to encourage patients to discuss treatment withtheir GPs be<strong>for</strong>e starting or ceasing any treatment:o under “Important points to be aware <strong>of</strong> be<strong>for</strong>e having treatment”there is a section called “Have <strong>you</strong> seen <strong>you</strong>r doctor first?” (p8); itsays, among other things, “It is important that <strong>you</strong>r doctor has thechance to rule out any dangerous or life-threatening illness and todiscuss treatment options with <strong>you</strong>”; ando another section (on the same page), “Keep everyone in<strong>for</strong>med”,states “This is very important <strong>for</strong> <strong>you</strong>r safety and includes telling<strong>you</strong>r doctor what complementary treatments <strong>you</strong> are taking andletting <strong>you</strong>r complementary practitioner know about any medicines<strong>you</strong>r doctor has prescribed <strong>for</strong> <strong>you</strong> and any other complementarytreatments <strong>you</strong> are having…Different treatments can sometimeshave an effect on each other, which could make them work less

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!