13.07.2015 Views

View Article - Institute of Development Studies

View Article - Institute of Development Studies

View Article - Institute of Development Studies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

32The RSP MLA from Beldanga, Murshibbad, Timir Baran Bhaduri dissented on thefollowing points:i. The enhanced role <strong>of</strong> MPs and MLAs proposed in the Bill <strong>of</strong> 1973 would chokelocal leadership from emerging.ii. An ill-financed PRI under total governmental control will not be able to performsatisfactorily. This will have a negative impression upon the village folk. Theywould view with suspicion and cynicism the very notion <strong>of</strong> democraticinstitutions.iii. Pradhans and Upapradhans <strong>of</strong> GPs should be directly elected by the people soas to avoid factional feuds.iv. The provision that any matter can be taken up for discussion even if it is not inthe agenda if the members present agree to it by a majority decision can haveserious consequences. Any and every matter can be then decided upon by takingadvantage <strong>of</strong> an opportune moment when progressive and opposing membersare absent from the meetings.v. The state government must provide for funds.vi. Panchayat tax has to be so fixed that the rural rich are taxed at higher rates andthe poor at lower rates, ensuring exemption for the poorest.A Congress (O) legislator, Pradyot Kumar Mahanti, was eloquent in scripting hisdissent.i. A fundamental principle <strong>of</strong> people’s participation has been disregarded; powerhas been concentrated in the government, for use through its bureaucraticapparatus. Thus, it seeks to tie the hands <strong>of</strong> Panchayat bodies with differentcontrolling measures that act as brakes at every step.ii. No commitment for adequate resources has been made available to Panchayatbodies to enable them to discharge their responsibilities. Thus, there is amplescope for the government either to squeeze the power <strong>of</strong> Panchayat bodies in thename <strong>of</strong> granting financial assistance or to make them tools <strong>of</strong> the party in power.iii. There has been no move to place the Block staff at the disposal <strong>of</strong> the PanchayatSamiti.iv. Under Clause 216, the State may appoint administrators for PRIs; in such cases,the members <strong>of</strong> PRIs shall vacate their <strong>of</strong>fices. It can reasonably be apprehendedthat if the panchayat bodies fail to satisfy the party in power in spite <strong>of</strong> theircapability, sincerity and good work, they will be ousted from <strong>of</strong>fice. Suchprovisions are denial <strong>of</strong> democratic rights to elected bodies.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!