13.07.2015 Views

Revisiting speech rate and utterance length ... - ResearchGate

Revisiting speech rate and utterance length ... - ResearchGate

Revisiting speech rate and utterance length ... - ResearchGate

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

M. Blomgren, A.M. Goberman / Journal of Communication Disorders 41 (2008) 159–178 165presentation order effects, the order of presentation of the four tasks was r<strong>and</strong>omizedfor each participant. Specific information on the four experimental speaking tasksfollows.2.2.2.1. Length of <strong>utterance</strong>.a. Monosyllabic words. Forty-five monosyllabic consonant + vowel + consonant (CVC)words were presented via index cards to each participant to be read aloud. Thespecific CVC words were chosen to represent various word initial phonemevariations in voicing, place, <strong>and</strong> manner of articulation. Johnson <strong>and</strong> Brown (1935)have noted that for most individuals who stutter, the likelihood they will stutter on agiven word is strongly influenced by the word-initial phoneme. However, the specificphonemes that may lead to difficulty vary markedly from one individual who stuttersto another (Quarrington, Conway, & Siegel, 1962; Wells, 1983), so a broadrepresentation of word-initial phonemes was sampled. There is also evidence thatstuttering occurs more often on content words (nouns, verbs, adjectives, <strong>and</strong>adverbs) compared to function words (e.g. articles, prepositions, pronouns; Brown,1937; Eisenson & Horowitz, 1945; Quarrington et al., 1962; Wingate, 1979),therefore a majority of the words presented were content words. The words are listedin Appendix A.b. Short phrases. Each participant read aloud 45 three-word phrases presented via indexcards. Each word in each of the phrases was monosyllabic; therefore, all phrasescontained three syllables. In an attempt to partially balance the lexical content betweenthe word <strong>and</strong> phrase conditions, each phrase contained one of the 45 CVC words fromthe word task. The phrases are also listed in Appendix A.2.2.2.2. Speech <strong>rate</strong> stability.a. Stable (habitual) <strong>speech</strong> <strong>rate</strong>. During the stable <strong>rate</strong> <strong>speech</strong> tasks, participants wererequired to read all of the words <strong>and</strong> phrases at a steady, self-determined habitualspeaking <strong>rate</strong>.b. Unstable (variable) <strong>speech</strong> <strong>rate</strong>. During the unstable <strong>speech</strong> <strong>rate</strong> tasks, participants readthe same words <strong>and</strong> phrases as during the stable <strong>speech</strong> <strong>rate</strong> tasks. For this task, eachtoken was read using variable <strong>speech</strong> <strong>rate</strong>s, which r<strong>and</strong>omly alternated between slow,habitual, <strong>and</strong> fast. Fifteen of the 45 words were produced at a fast <strong>rate</strong>, 15 at a normal(habitual) <strong>rate</strong>, <strong>and</strong> 15 at a slow <strong>rate</strong>. Rate cues (‘‘fast,’’ ‘‘normal,’’ or ‘‘slow’’) wereprinted on the lower left corner of each card.Before performing the experimental speaking tasks, each participant viewed a videotapecontaining demonstrations of the tasks. The videotape displayed an adult male speakerproducing five words <strong>and</strong> five phrases at slow, habitual, <strong>and</strong> fast <strong>rate</strong>s. Thedemonstration words <strong>and</strong> phrases were different from those used in the study. Slow<strong>rate</strong> of <strong>speech</strong> was produced at a <strong>rate</strong> of approximately one syllable/s. Habitual <strong>rate</strong> wasmodeled at approximately two syllables/s, <strong>and</strong> fast <strong>rate</strong> was modeled at approximatelyfour syllables/s. This videotape was presented as an example of the tasks, <strong>and</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!