Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Article 200 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spanish Civil Code, <strong>the</strong> criteria to declare a pers<strong>on</strong><strong>in</strong>capacitated are c<strong>on</strong>sist <strong>of</strong> two complementary elements: (a) <strong>the</strong> existence <strong>of</strong> a“physical or psychic illness or deficiencies with a permanent character”; <strong>and</strong> (b) <strong>the</strong>impossibility for <strong>the</strong> pers<strong>on</strong> to exercise self-determ<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> 256 due to that illness orimpairment. The <strong>in</strong>capacitati<strong>on</strong> is generally followed with <strong>the</strong> appo<strong>in</strong>tment <strong>of</strong> aguardian who substitutes <strong>the</strong> pers<strong>on</strong>‟s decisi<strong>on</strong> mak<strong>in</strong>g. In certa<strong>in</strong> cases though <strong>the</strong>court, based <strong>on</strong> Article 267 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spanish Civil Code, may <strong>in</strong>dicate acti<strong>on</strong>s that <strong>the</strong><strong>in</strong>capacitated pers<strong>on</strong> is authorised to carry out <strong>on</strong> his/her own.Limited guardianship is also provided for <strong>in</strong> Spa<strong>in</strong> with <strong>the</strong> appo<strong>in</strong>tment <strong>of</strong> a curator toassist <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>capacitated pers<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> a series <strong>of</strong> acts expressly <strong>in</strong>dicated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> judicial<strong>in</strong>capacitati<strong>on</strong> order. In this case decisi<strong>on</strong> mak<strong>in</strong>g is usually <strong>on</strong> a co-decisi<strong>on</strong> basis. 257Curatorship is not <strong>in</strong>tended to substitute, but ra<strong>the</strong>r complement <strong>the</strong> will <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pers<strong>on</strong>subject to <strong>the</strong> curatorship, who should be <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> decisi<strong>on</strong> mak<strong>in</strong>g. Whilecuratorship is under Spanish Law a less restrictive measure <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> decisi<strong>on</strong> mak<strong>in</strong>gprocess, it should be po<strong>in</strong>ted out that it is excepti<strong>on</strong>ally used by <strong>the</strong> court <strong>in</strong> situati<strong>on</strong>s<strong>of</strong> capacity assessment <strong>of</strong> pers<strong>on</strong>s with <strong>in</strong>tellectual or psycho-social disabilities.In c<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong>, guardianship systems can deprive pers<strong>on</strong>s with disabilities <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir rightto make decisi<strong>on</strong>s about <strong>the</strong>ir own life, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> exercis<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir legal capacity <strong>on</strong> anequal basis with o<strong>the</strong>rs. Problems aris<strong>in</strong>g out from guardianship systems illustrateimportant challenges to <strong>the</strong> effective implementati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Article 12 UN CRPD. Systemslike curatorship <strong>in</strong> Spa<strong>in</strong>, which is based <strong>on</strong> co-decisi<strong>on</strong>, seem to have positiveelements <strong>and</strong> allow for <strong>the</strong> establishment <strong>of</strong> a supportive decisi<strong>on</strong> mak<strong>in</strong>g system forpers<strong>on</strong>s with disabilities. However, <strong>the</strong> pre-c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>capacitati<strong>on</strong> makes <strong>the</strong>curatorship system <strong>in</strong>c<strong>on</strong>sistent with <strong>the</strong> UN CRPD requirement to recognise pers<strong>on</strong>swith disabilities as holders <strong>of</strong> rights.A positive effort <strong>of</strong> legislative reform to recognise legal capacity <strong>of</strong> pers<strong>on</strong>s withdisabilities has been taken <strong>in</strong> Hungary, which is <strong>in</strong> process <strong>of</strong> codificati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> its CivilCode. Reforms <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> Civil Code aim to abolish plenary guardianship <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>troducemeasures for supportive decisi<strong>on</strong> mak<strong>in</strong>g for pers<strong>on</strong>s with disabilities. 258256 The literal translati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> word<strong>in</strong>g used <strong>in</strong> Article 200 (impidan a la pers<strong>on</strong>a gobernarse por símisma) would be „that prevents <strong>the</strong> pers<strong>on</strong> to govern<strong>in</strong>g him/herself‟257 See Articles 287-289 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spanish Civil Code, available (<strong>in</strong> Spanish) athttp://civil.udg.es/normacivil/estatal/CC/INDEXCC.htm258 An un<strong>of</strong>ficial English translati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> articles <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Hungarian Civil Code relat<strong>in</strong>g to legal capacity<strong>and</strong> guardianship can be downloaded from <strong>the</strong> website <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mental Disability Advocacy Centre,available at: http://www.mdac.<strong>in</strong>fo/en/webfm_send/18Page | 96
The follow<strong>in</strong>g elements <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> future reforms, if entered <strong>in</strong>to force, 259 could bec<strong>on</strong>sidered as positive efforts to ensure legal capacity for pers<strong>on</strong>s with disabilities. Thereforms require that <strong>the</strong> pers<strong>on</strong>‟s legal capacity rema<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong>tact <strong>and</strong> enables a network<strong>of</strong> supporters to assist <strong>the</strong> disabled pers<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> mak<strong>in</strong>g his/her own decisi<strong>on</strong>s, <strong>the</strong>rebyenhanc<strong>in</strong>g his/her self-determ<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong>. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> reforms, a pers<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> legal agemay designate <strong>on</strong>e or more pers<strong>on</strong>s to support him/her when mak<strong>in</strong>g decisi<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> agiven area (or areas). 260 The support to be given to a pers<strong>on</strong> will also be regulated by<strong>the</strong> new Civil Code <strong>and</strong> will <strong>in</strong>clude safeguards <strong>in</strong> order to ensure that support doesnot result <strong>in</strong> restricti<strong>on</strong>s. 261 These reforms could become <strong>the</strong> vehicle for effectiveimplementati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Article 12 UN CRPD.Never<strong>the</strong>less, an issue still rema<strong>in</strong>s to be addressed if Hungary is to achieve full <strong>and</strong>effective implementati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Article 12 UN CRPD. This is <strong>the</strong> rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g form <strong>of</strong> partialguardianship, which should be applied by <strong>the</strong> court “if no o<strong>the</strong>r provisi<strong>on</strong> which doesnot limit legal capacity would result <strong>in</strong> protect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> affected pers<strong>on</strong> from harm”. 262 Inthis case, <strong>the</strong> evaluati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> a pers<strong>on</strong>‟s „discreti<strong>on</strong>ary ability‟ serves <strong>the</strong> basis for <strong>the</strong>acknowledgment (or lack) <strong>of</strong> his/her legal capacity. The evaluati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> discreti<strong>on</strong>aryability <strong>of</strong> a pers<strong>on</strong> should be „decisi<strong>on</strong>-specific‟ 263 <strong>and</strong> is a complex assessment. Thelatter <strong>in</strong>cludes, <strong>in</strong>ter alia, <strong>the</strong> assessment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pers<strong>on</strong>‟s ability to make decisi<strong>on</strong>s <strong>in</strong> abroad range <strong>of</strong> matters, <strong>and</strong> an analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> human <strong>and</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial resourcesallocated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> social envir<strong>on</strong>ment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pers<strong>on</strong>. In such an assessment pr<strong>of</strong>essi<strong>on</strong>alsfrom a diverse range <strong>of</strong> fields are <strong>in</strong>cluded, for example, psychiatrists, psychologists,special educators, social workers <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs. Follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> necessary assessment,restricti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> a pers<strong>on</strong>‟s legal capacity will <strong>in</strong>volve specific areas (e.g. f<strong>in</strong>ancialmanagement) <strong>of</strong> decisi<strong>on</strong> mak<strong>in</strong>g. Even if <strong>in</strong> cases <strong>of</strong> partial guardianship decisi<strong>on</strong>s(aga<strong>in</strong>) need to be made jo<strong>in</strong>tly by <strong>the</strong> disabled adult <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> guardian, it appears that259 It was anticipated that <strong>the</strong> new Hungarian Civil Code would enter <strong>in</strong>to force <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sec<strong>on</strong>d quarter <strong>of</strong>2010. However, <strong>on</strong> April 27 th , 2010 <strong>the</strong> Hungarian C<strong>on</strong>stituti<strong>on</strong>al Court declared as unc<strong>on</strong>stituti<strong>on</strong>al <strong>the</strong>parliamentary Act c<strong>on</strong>firm<strong>in</strong>g 1 May 2010 as <strong>the</strong> date <strong>on</strong> which Book 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Civil Code wouldenter <strong>in</strong>to force. Book 2 c<strong>on</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>s a wealth <strong>of</strong> reforms relevant to pers<strong>on</strong>s with disabilities, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>aboliti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> plenary guardianship <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>troducti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> supported decisi<strong>on</strong> mak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> advancedirectives. More <strong>in</strong>formati<strong>on</strong> are available at: http://mdac.<strong>in</strong>fo/en/c<strong>on</strong>stituti<strong>on</strong>al-court-underm<strong>in</strong>es-legalstatus-hunga260 See Book 2, Chapter III, Article 2:16 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Code referr<strong>in</strong>g to „<strong>the</strong> advanced directive‟.261 See Book 2, Chapter III, Articles 2:18 to 2:21 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Code.262 See Book 2, Chapter III, Article 2:22 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Civil Code.263 The „discreti<strong>on</strong>ary power‟ <strong>of</strong> a pers<strong>on</strong> to make a decisi<strong>on</strong> does not <strong>on</strong>ly depend <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> ability <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>pers<strong>on</strong> to decide, but also <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> nature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> decisi<strong>on</strong>, <strong>and</strong> its future implicati<strong>on</strong>s to <strong>the</strong> pers<strong>on</strong>‟s life.Therefore, legal capacity depends <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> relati<strong>on</strong> between <strong>the</strong> discreti<strong>on</strong>ary power <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pers<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>abilities “dem<strong>and</strong>ed” by a decisi<strong>on</strong> to be taken. For fur<strong>the</strong>r details see “The experiences <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>implementati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Article 12 UN CRPD <strong>in</strong> Hungary”, by <strong>the</strong> Hungarian Associati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Pers<strong>on</strong>s withIntellectual disabilities (EFOESZ), at www.efoesz.huPage | 97
- Page 3 and 4:
Project TeamDirectors of ResearchPr
- Page 5 and 6:
3.5 General Accessibility .........
- Page 7 and 8:
List of AbbreviationsANEDCFICEDAWCR
- Page 9 and 10:
identified by this study. In additi
- Page 11 and 12:
Nonetheless, several challenges to
- Page 13 and 14:
• National Implementation and Mon
- Page 15 and 16:
the UN CRPD is unavoidable, they sh
- Page 17 and 18:
and facilities would reduce, or avo
- Page 19 and 20:
Structure of this report:This repor
- Page 21 and 22:
the Law of Treaties, 7 to identify
- Page 23 and 24:
specific context of disability. To
- Page 25 and 26:
The overall structure of the UN CRP
- Page 27 and 28:
the case of the UN CRPD), but also
- Page 29 and 30:
300(7) TEC. 29 Article 300(7) TEC a
- Page 31 and 32:
. whether provisions of the agreeme
- Page 33 and 34:
. From the EU law perspective: the
- Page 35 and 36:
1.3 EU declared competence in matte
- Page 37 and 38:
Directives 2004/17/EC 58 and Direct
- Page 39 and 40:
action; and (c) development coopera
- Page 41 and 42:
2.0 The Paradigm Shift: A social mo
- Page 43 and 44:
As regards the European Union, even
- Page 45 and 46: “moral compass”. 81 They are be
- Page 47 and 48: Section 3.2 presents the core eleme
- Page 49 and 50: developing and implementing legisla
- Page 51 and 52: Both screening reports, prepared by
- Page 53 and 54: in relevant jurisdictions - of all
- Page 55 and 56: discrimination against persons with
- Page 57 and 58: elow, and aim to illustrate the dif
- Page 59 and 60: which covers the welfare of employe
- Page 61 and 62: have to take in order to change tha
- Page 63 and 64: States Parties should establish an
- Page 65 and 66: ecommended that the EU discusses wi
- Page 67 and 68: 3.4.3 General Recommendations for S
- Page 69 and 70: Article 9 also underscores the need
- Page 71 and 72: uildings (Article 41); transportati
- Page 73 and 74: However, LIONDAU is a national fram
- Page 75 and 76: consider disability accessibility i
- Page 77 and 78: The Regulation is a disability-spec
- Page 79 and 80: the Inclusive Communications Group
- Page 81 and 82: • existing legislation enables pe
- Page 83 and 84: 4.0 Substantive ProvisionsArticles
- Page 85 and 86: authority to supervise all services
- Page 87 and 88: 4.1.2 General Recommendations for S
- Page 89 and 90: institutionalised in a psychiatric
- Page 91 and 92: the independence, autonomy and dign
- Page 93 and 94: donation, buying or selling propert
- Page 95: with disabilities are diverse, it i
- Page 99 and 100: areas, may challenge the successful
- Page 101 and 102: Consultation with key actors, espec
- Page 103 and 104: emphasises that persons with disabi
- Page 105 and 106: for domestic, social, educational a
- Page 107 and 108: supporting research for the develop
- Page 109 and 110: Similar VAT exemptions are also inc
- Page 111 and 112: support necessary for them to live
- Page 113 and 114: an interpreter in the hearing of is
- Page 115 and 116: instrument was listed in the Append
- Page 117 and 118: participate in the conduct of publi
- Page 119 and 120: Additionally, Section 190 of the Ac
- Page 121 and 122: States Parties should provide train
- Page 123 and 124: Article 24 UN CRPD also requires St
- Page 125 and 126: statutory assessment and compatibil
- Page 127 and 128: practice reveals that the discretio
- Page 129 and 130: 4.5.2 General Recommendations for S
- Page 131 and 132: legislation in this field, and in p
- Page 133 and 134: Following the adoption of the Emplo
- Page 135 and 136: In addition, the obligation to acco
- Page 137 and 138: discrimination on the ground of dis
- Page 139 and 140: 5.0 The Dynamic of ReformUnlike oth
- Page 141 and 142: The Central Statistics Office (here
- Page 143 and 144: ESSPROS core system are required to
- Page 145 and 146: Disability inclusive development re
- Page 147 and 148:
European Commission Regulation 718/
- Page 149 and 150:
some objectives that beneficiary co
- Page 151 and 152:
disability dimension in the fields
- Page 153 and 154:
order to positively contribute to t
- Page 155 and 156:
pursuant to Article 33(2) UN CRPD.
- Page 157 and 158:
the Federal Ministry of Labour, Soc
- Page 159 and 160:
all Commissioners include disabilit
- Page 161 and 162:
• Systematic departmental monitor
- Page 163 and 164:
DGs and Agency‟s organisational s
- Page 165 and 166:
public policies. Covering a variety
- Page 167 and 168:
actions/activities to promote the i
- Page 169 and 170:
Promote the implementation of the U
- Page 171 and 172:
that the funding provisions will no
- Page 173 and 174:
• Reviewing regularly any reserva
- Page 175 and 176:
Where Member States, or the EU, det
- Page 177 and 178:
level and oversee screening and imp
- Page 179 and 180:
organisations and other interested
- Page 181 and 182:
• Promoting compliance with the U
- Page 183 and 184:
6.3 Suggested practices for the imp
- Page 185 and 186:
should not support any residential,
- Page 187:
• students with disabilities in b