A Voice For SafetyGood morning. It is, indeed, a pleasure to be here in the beautiful city of Shanghaiand to have this opportunity to share with you the views of the Oil CompaniesInternational Marine Forum (OCIMF) on the very important topic of safetransportation systems.The key points I plan to cover in this presentation are:1. A brief overview of OCIMF2. Tanker quality3. Enforcement of existing legislation4. Double hulls5. Structural integrity6. Port and terminal safety7. Maritime safety – a holistic approachFor those who may not be familiar with OCIMF, I would like to take a moment todescribe our organisation and it’s purpose.The Oil Companies International Marine Forum was established in 1970 in responseto increasing public awareness of marine pollution by oil in the wake of, what wasthen, the world’s worst oil spill – the grounding of the Torrey Canyon in 1967. OCIMFcurrently has 55 Members including virtually every major oil company in the world.The principal thrust of our activities is the same now as it was in 1970 and that is theprovision to our members, and all those involved in the business of oil transportationby sea, of high quality technical advice on all aspects of the safe andenvironmentally responsible operation of oil tankers and terminals.OCIMF discharges its safety and environmental responsibilities through participationat all IMO and IOPC Fund meetings, where OCIMF has consultative status and isrecognized as an authority on marine matters.Through the publication of our own internationally recognised guidelines andinformation papers prepared by technical experts from member companies OCIMFhas established itself as an industry leader in safety and environmental protection.Many of these guides have become in themselves benchmarks for the oil industry.Let us now move on for a brief discussion on tanker quality.
Tanker QualityLet me start by saying the majority of the world fleet of tankers is of good quality.However a concern is that a significant minority is not. As well as being a risk to theenvironment the operators of these sub-standard vessels also gain economicadvantage over good quality shipowners by cutting corners to reduce costs. Whilstthe application of vetting by oil companies, complemented by the development of theOCIMF Ship Inspection and Reporting Programme, SIRE, has been instrumental inimproving the standard of a significant part of the world fleet, it does not provide thesolution for sub-standard tankers which find employment in trades where there is noprofessional vetting. OCIMF therefore fully supports initiatives to reinforce theimplementation of the many already adequate international conventions andregulations which address all tankers.Major oil companies have systems for ship quality assurance to aid the selection ofquality ships for the transportation of oil. One of the key inputs is information fromship inspection reports. OCIMF members carry out over 10,000 inspections per year,with individual vessels typically being inspected twice per year. The inspectors areexperienced marine professionals who are specially trained and accredited byOCIMF as well as undergoing routine audits of their performance. The inspectionreports contain factual observations, not opinions or judgments and are entered intoa Ship Inspection Report database maintained by OCIMF. They are available to allOCIMF members for a nominal fee and are also available, free of charge, togovernment authorities, thus potentially providing a tool for more effective targetingof Port State Control inspections. The take-up by authorities worldwide is growing,but is still disappointingly low.Ship-owners generally recognise that, to be considered for charter by major oilcompanies, their ships need to have a valid SIRE inspection, the maximum period ofvalidity being twelve months. We’ll now move on to look at the enforcement ofexisting legislation.Enforcement of existing maritime regulationsThere are sufficient maritime standards and rules existing in the international,regional and national arena, which, if effectively implemented and enforced, wouldmeasurably improve safety and security at sea and thereby help prevent oil tankerpollution. Examples of these are SOLAS, MARPOL, the ISM Code and ISPS.Improved targeting of poor quality ships for inspection and increased frequency ofinspection is necessary to provide a disincentive to sub-standard shipping and it is inthis area that Port States have a key role in effectively enforcing existing legislation.We welcome actions by members of the Paris Memorandum of Understanding toincrease the number of ships inspected. As stated above, we believe that use of theSIRE system by authorities would be beneficial to target Port State Controlinspections at those tankers that pose the highest threat. In addition, Flag Stateshave an equally important role of ensuring that the ships they allow on their registerscomply with all relevant international regulations. The IMO model audit scheme forFlag States will provide the mechanism for achieving integrated enforcement among