13.07.2015 Views

SOBER APPROACH SPACES 1. Introduction In this article we will ...

SOBER APPROACH SPACES 1. Introduction In this article we will ...

SOBER APPROACH SPACES 1. Introduction In this article we will ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>SOBER</strong> <strong>APPROACH</strong> <strong>SPACES</strong> 13Take A ⊂ aprim(L) and a ∈ aprim(L), then δ(a, A) = h a ( ∧ a i ∈A a i) = ∞if a ≱ ∧ a i ∈A a i since b ≤ A α c ⇔ S α b ≤ c and S α ( ∧ a i ∈A a i) = ∧ a i ∈A a i. Andif ∧ a i ∈A a i ≤ a, then obviously δ(ξ, A) = 0.□6.5. Definition. An approach frame is metric iff it can be obtained as theregular function frame of a ∞pq-metric space.6.6. Proposition. X is metric iff arbitrary infima in RX are pointwise.Proof. ⇒ If the pointwise infimum ∧p f i is a contraction, then it is theinfimum of the f i in RX.We know f i (x) ≤ f i (y) + d(x, y) for all i, hence∧fi (x) ≤ ∧ (f i (y) + d(x, y)) = ∧ f i (y) + d(x, y)and so the pointwise infimum is an element of RX.⇐ We know ∀a ∈ A : δ(·, A) ≤ δ(·, {a}) and( ∧ δ(·, {a}) − sup( ∧ δ(·, {a}))(b)) ≤ δ(·, A).a∈Ab∈ABut since the infimum of functions is the pointwise infimum <strong>we</strong> find thatδ(·, {a}) ≤ δ(·, A) and so <strong>we</strong> have equality.□∧ pa∈A6.7. Proposition. If every ξ ∈ ΣL is a complete lattice homomorphism,then ΣL is metric.Proof. δ(ξ, A) = ξ( ∧ ζ∈A a ζ) = ∧ ξ(a ζ ) = ∧ δ(ξ, {ζ}).It is clear that with X is metric and sober, <strong>we</strong> find that all ξ : RX → Jare complete lattice homomorphisms, since every ξ is a ˜x and the infimumof functions is pointwise, so ( ∧ f i )(x) = ∧ f i (x).References[1] Adámek J., Herrlich H. and Strecker G.E., Abstract and concrete categories. New York,John Wiley, 1990.[2] Banaschewski B., A Sobering Suggestion. Lecture Notes, Cape Town, 1999.[3] Johnstone P.T., Stone Spaces, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Math. no. 3.Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1982.[4] Lo<strong>we</strong>n R., Approach spaces: a common supercategory of TOP and MET,Math. Nachr. 141 (1989), p. 183–226.[5] Lo<strong>we</strong>n R., Approach Spaces: the Missing Link in the Topology-Uniformity-MetricTriad, Oxford Mathematical Monographs. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1997.[6] Lo<strong>we</strong>n R., Sioen M., A Unified Look at Completion in MET, UNIF and AP, Appl.Cat. Struct. 8 (2000), p. 447–46<strong>1.</strong>[7] Robeys K., Extensions of Products of Metric Spaces, Ph D thesis, University Ant<strong>we</strong>rp,1992.□

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!