Trends in Dewatering Technologies

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Centrifuges in Texas• Historically not dominant choice– Low disposal/use costs– Historic preference for BFPs– Historic maintenance requirements• Drivers moving in favorable direction– Disposal/use costs increasing– O&M somewhat simplified• Easy start up/shut down– Enclosed process (odors)• Concerns– Product odor– Regrowth/reactivation (AnD biosolids)
Centrifuge Trends• Focus on energyreduction (varies bymanufacturer)• Other– Controls – focus on “setit and forget it”– Interchangeable partsfor major maintenance(scrolls)• 4 hr vs multi-weekeffortSource: Alfa Laval (Islander),2012
Page 1 and 2: Trends in DewateringWEAT Webinar 20
Page 3 and 4: Drivers for ChangeWorkforceChalleng
Page 5 and 6: Belt Filter Press Trends: 3- belt B
Page 7 and 8: Horizontal 3-belt BFPINDEPENDENT GR
Page 9 and 10: Case Study: Albany County Sewer Dis
Page 11 and 12: North PlantNorth WWTP (2-m) South W
Page 13 and 14: New BFPs Have Less Payback < 4 Year
Page 15: Centrifuge Dewatering• Commonly u
Page 20 and 21: Screw Press Dewatering• Relativel
Page 22 and 23: Inclined Screw PressCourtesy: Huber
Page 24 and 25: Screw Press Advantages and Disadvan
Page 26 and 27: Rotary Press OperationDrainingAreaS
Page 28 and 29: Rotary Press Advantages/Disadvantag
Page 30 and 31: Electrodewatering• Suppliers : Ov
Page 32 and 33: Technology Comparison Case Study: O
Page 34 and 35: Pilot Test Results: Cake Solids Con
Page 36 and 37: Solids CapturePercent Capture Centr
Page 38 and 39: Implications for Orange County Util
Page 40 and 41: Word of warning….Your results may

Trends in Dewatering Technologies

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?