Trends in Dewatering Technologies

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Pilot Test Results: Cake Solids ContentBelt FilterPressCentrifuge Screw Press Rotary FanPressNorthwest WRF 14% 23% 21% ---- 39%South WRF 13% 20% 17% 14% 37%Eastern WRF 15% 21% 20% 17% 43%Electro-Dewater<strong>in</strong>g
Polymer ConsumptionPounds ActivePolymer per TonCentrifugeScrewPressRotaryFan PressNorthwest WRF 20-24 18-20 ----South WRF 33-37 30-35 12-16Eastern WRF 19-23 18-24 12-16
Page 1 and 2: Trends in DewateringWEAT Webinar 20
Page 3 and 4: Drivers for ChangeWorkforceChalleng
Page 5 and 6: Belt Filter Press Trends: 3- belt B
Page 7 and 8: Horizontal 3-belt BFPINDEPENDENT GR
Page 9 and 10: Case Study: Albany County Sewer Dis
Page 11 and 12: North PlantNorth WWTP (2-m) South W
Page 13 and 14: New BFPs Have Less Payback < 4 Year
Page 15: Centrifuge Dewatering• Commonly u
Page 18 and 19: Centrifuges in Texas• Historicall
Page 20 and 21: Screw Press Dewatering• Relativel
Page 22 and 23: Inclined Screw PressCourtesy: Huber
Page 24 and 25: Screw Press Advantages and Disadvan
Page 26 and 27: Rotary Press OperationDrainingAreaS
Page 28 and 29: Rotary Press Advantages/Disadvantag
Page 30 and 31: Electrodewatering• Suppliers : Ov
Page 32 and 33: Technology Comparison Case Study: O
Page 36 and 37: Solids CapturePercent Capture Centr
Page 38 and 39: Implications for Orange County Util
Page 40 and 41: Word of warning….Your results may

Trends in Dewatering Technologies

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?