What Works in Reducing Reoffending: A Global Perspective

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Re-offending rates for offending behaviourprogrammesPredicted ratesActual rates%75706560555045403530Non-starters Starters / Dropouts CompletersDiff = 7.3% Diff = 4.8% Diff = 26.4%
Interim Accredited Programmes Software:2004 Community Cohort (Hollis, RDS NOMS, 2007)Reduction in Re-Offending Using Predicted DataTotal (n = 25,255)Drink impaired drivers (1,148)General offend. behav. (12,924)Domestic violence (1,148)***Sex offender progr. (741)Substance misuse (5,081)Anger management (1,148)Women's programme (62)***0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Page 2 and 3: Offender Rehabilitation:Recent Hist
Page 4 and 5: England & Wales: National Offender
Page 6 and 7: Evidence comes by replication• Mo
Page 8: Mean Effect Sizes (d) in Meta-Analy
Page 11 and 12: Mean Effect Sizes (d) in Meta-Analy
Page 13 and 14: Recidivism Rates(Length of follow u
Page 15 and 16: Mean Effect Sizes of OffenderRehabi
Page 17 and 18: What works:Relatively consistent po
Page 19 and 20: Promising: Not yet well-replicateda
Page 21 and 22: The Good Lives Model (Ward, 2002):N
Page 23 and 24: Principles of Appropriate Offender
Page 25 and 26: Criteria of the Correctional Servic
Page 28 and 29: Accredited Programmes in E & W (2)S
Page 30 and 31: Adult Re-offending Rates in E & WNu
Page 34 and 35: Conclusions for internationalpracti
Page 36 and 37: Factors that have an impact beyondp
Page 38 and 39: Problems of transnational transfer
Page 40 and 41: Incarceration Rates in EuropePer 10
Page 42 and 43: : England & Wales
Page 44 and 45: Conclusions and Perspectives (1)•
Page 46: Contact:starr@crim.cam.ac.ukfal23@c

What Works in Reducing Reoffending: A Global Perspective

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?