Grade Sheet - KCC New Media Arts

INSTRUCTOR: Chris GargiuloCOURSE: ART XXX Title of CourseKCC New Media ArtsStudent NamePROJECT: Project TitleSCALE 0 to 20 pointsDid not complete/Poor Below Average/Fair Average Good Excellent0-11 12-13 14-15 16-17 18-20C R I T E R I A F O R G R A D I N GTHE DESIGN PROCESSPREPARATION, RESEARCH, PROCESS & PROGRESSHow successful was your progress and time/project management? Did you come toclass prepared and ready to work? Did you present homework on the due dates andScore:Notes:make/show weekly progress such as research, writings, sketches, storyboards,drawings, digital/printed studies as evidence of going through the full design process?How receptive were you to feedback?CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCONCEPT & ORIGINALITYHow well does your design demonstrate a creative, original, and clearly consideredconcept? How well does it match your written component and/or design brief and/oryour verbal expression/intentions of that concept? How well does it match the primarygoals/needs of your client or assignment specifications?Score:Notes:VISUAL EXECUTIONCOMPOSITION & VISUAL DESIGNHow well does your assignment demonstrate knowledge of design theory andprinciples including visual unity, variation, scale, proportion, hierarchy, framing,typography, typesetting, color, contrast, and other compositional considerations? Howsuccessfully does your assignment meet and go beyond the basic designrequirements?TECHNICAL EXECUTIONTECHNICAL CONTROL, TECHNIQUES USED, & PROBLEM SOLVINGHow successful was your technical skill and control of the tools used in the digitalproduction of your finished piece? How successfully does your assignment meet or gobeyond the basic technical requirements? How successfully did you apply problemsolvingskills? If there is coding involved, is your code well formed and semantic? Doesthe code validate? Is there any redundant or unnecessary code? If there is no coding,how successful was your technical control of the software?Score:Notes:Score:Notes:SYNTHESIS & PRESENTATIONFINAL DELIVERABLES, COMMUNICATION, & PARTICIPATIONHow well did your final project and presentation synthesize the concepts and skillsrequired? How complete were you in submitting all the required elements? Did youcommunicate and articulate your project in a professional and clear manner (as ifpresenting to a client) demonstrating an understanding of art and design terminology?Was your work coherently organized in a professional manner adhering to high qualitystandards? Did you participate as an active member during class critiques?LATE & INCOMPLETE PROJECTS:Was your project submitted on time? All late projects will receive the equivalent of oneletter grade off the total score. Incomplete assignments will be docked points basedupon the level of completion.BONUS POINTS:Did you do any bonus projects for extra points? (instructor pre-approval needed)Score:Notes:TOTAL PROJECT SCORE:xx/100 = LCOMPREHENSIVE CLASS GRADE: xx.x% = L(INCLUDES ALL OTHER CLASS GRADING CRITERIA)

Grading Rubric (points in parentheses)Poor (0-11) Fair (12-13) Average (14-15) Good (16-17) Excellent (18-20)THE DESIGNPROCESSDemonstrateslittle to noevidence of goingthrough full designprocess.Conducted noresearch,demonstrated noprogress, and didnot receive orimplementfeedback.Demonstratesbelow averageevidence of goingthrough full designprocess.Conducted littleresearch, madelittle progress, anddid not receive andimplementfeedback well.Demonstratesaverageevidence of goingthrough full designprocess.Conducted basicresearch, madeaverage progress,and received andimplemented basicfeedback.Demonstratesgood evidence ofgoing through fulldesign process.Conducted goodresearch, madegood progress,and received andimplementedfeedback well.Demonstratesexceptionalevidence of goingthrough full designprocess.Conducted throughresearch, madestrong progress,and received andimplementedfeedbackexceptionally well.CONCEPTUALDESIGNDemonstrateslittle to noevidence of acreative concept.Does not meet theprimarygoals/needs of theproject.Demonstratesbelow averageevidence of acreative concept.Partially meets theprimarygoals/needs of theproject.Demonstratesaverageevidence of anbasic creativeconcept. Meets theprimarygoals/needs of theproject.Demonstratesgood evidence ofa good creativeconcept. Does agood job meetingthe primarygoals/needs of theproject.Demonstratesexceptionalevidence of astrong creativeconcept. Does anexcellent jobmeeting andexceeding theprimarygoals/needs of theproject.VISUALEXECUTIONDemonstrateslittle to noevidence ofdesign principlesor compositionalconsiderations.Demonstratesbelow averageevidence ofdesign principlesand compositionalconsiderations.Demonstratesaverageevidence ofdesign principlesand compositionalconsiderations.Demonstratesgood evidence ofdesign principlesand compositionalconsiderations.Demonstratesexceptionalevidence ofdesign principlesand compositionalconsiderations.TECHNICALEXECUTIONDemonstrateslittle to notechnical control orproblem solvingskills. No evidenceof proper use oftechnology.Demonstratesbelow averagetechnical controland problemsolving skills. Doesnot use technologyeffectively.Demonstratesaverage technicalcontrol andproblem solvingskills. Use oftechnology is basicand meets theminimumrequirements.Demonstratesgood technicalcontrol andproblem solvingskills. Use oftechnology is goodand meets mostrequirements.Demonstratesexceptionaltechnical controland problemsolving skills.Exceptional use oftechnology thatexceeds therequirements.SYNTHESIS &PRESENTATIONDemonstrateslittle to nosynthesis ofconcepts andskills. Did notpresent ordemonstrate avocabulary of artterminology. Didnot submit anyrequired elements.No participationduring critiques.Demonstratesbelow averagesynthesis ofconcepts andskills.Demonstratedpoorcommunicationskills. Showedlittle evidence of avocabulary of artterminology.Submitted some ofthe requiredelements. Someparticipationduring critiquesDemonstratesaverage synthesisof concepts andskills.Demonstratedbasiccommunicationskills. Showedaverage evidenceof a vocabulary ofart terminology.Submitted most ofthe requiredelements. Averageparticipationduring critiques.Demonstratesgood synthesis ofconcepts andskills.Demonstratedgoodcommunicationskills. Showedevidence of avocabulary of artterminology.Submitted all ofthe requiredelements. Goodparticipationduring critiquesDemonstratesexceptionalsynthesis ofconcepts andskills.Demonstratedclearcommunicationskills. Showedstrong evidence ofa vocabulary of artterminology.Submitted morethan the requiredelements. Strongparticipationduring critiques