Words & ReflectionsThe book is illustrated with blackand white cartoons by Jeff Danzigerand Signe Wilkinson, and it is notedthat this sparest of forms is representedby staff cartoonists at fewer than onetenthof U.S. daily newspapers. Whileit won’t help the employment situationof professional cartoonists in thecurrent news economy, in this bookthe editors give ways to solicit cartoonsfrom the public—and soundsomewhat surprised that this has actuallyworked.“In the end, the secrets are simpleand the rules are few,” Aregood concludes.“If you have something to say,spit it out. If you don’t, shut up. Therest is mere technique.” ■Nancy Day, a 1979 <strong>Nieman</strong> Fellow,is director of Advanced JournalismStudies at Boston <strong>University</strong> and afreelance editor and writer.Nday@bu.eduEssays by a Mexican Journalist Explore the AmericasExposing the ‘nervous system of countries struggling with great change.’Looking for History: Dispatches From Latin AmericaAlma GuillermoprietoPantheon. 303 Pages. $25.By Dianne SolísAmerica and the Americas are oftentwo concepts that those of us living inthe United States have trouble grasping.We think of America as limited toonly the United States. Yet travel thewhole of the Americas and its citizenswill tell you that they, too, are Americanswith their own histories, theirown pursuits of liberty and justice.And so Mexico-born writer AlmaGuillermoprieto tells us simply andbluntly that she wrote her new book,“Looking for History,” with the “convictionthat Latin America has its ownindependent life.”What emerges is a collection of 17essays that take readers through thesad psychological and political battlesof Colombians, Cubans and Mexicans—allfrom countries that shapeU.S. policy like no others in the WesternHemisphere. Interspersed are profilesof the Argentineans Evita Perónand Che Guevara and Peruvian MarioVargas Llosa.Nearly half of the book is devoted toa series of scarcely believable talesfrom Mexico, where Guillermoprietowas born and returned to live in themid-1990’s. All of these essays appearedin The New Yorker and in TheNew York Review of Books between1994 and 2000.In this book, Guillermoprieto is ather best in her psychological portraitsof Latin America’s unconventional politicos.Among them are Vargas Llosa,the Peruvian writer who lost a presidentialbid; Guevara, the icon by whichthe Latin American left defined itself,and Vicente Fox, the Mexican rancherwho dethroned a corrupt politicalmachine to take the presidency.Guillermoprieto makes it clear whyVargas Llosa, an author of inspiringprose, failed miserably in his presidentialbid. He wasn’t much of a patriot,having written, “Although I was born inPeru, my vocation is that of a cosmopolitanand an expatriate who has alwaysdetested nationalism.”Her essay about Vargas Llosa alsoopens up a window into a crueltheme—what Guillermoprieto calls afundamental trait of Peruvians, but isvery much a continuing problem ofLatin America and those in the diasporato the United States. These nations andtheir peoples are constantly immersedin conflict over their mixed blood andclass. It’s “the deep-seated explanationfor the conflicts and frustrations ofPeruvian life,” Guillermoprieto writes.In her artfully handled essay on Che,it’s easy to understand whyGuillermoprieto, with her sympathiesfor the poor, was drawn to Che as asubject matter. Here she dissects threeweighty tomes, published in 1997, onChe. And in doing so she quickly takesthe reader into her generation’s ownpsyche. “Guevara was born in LatinAmerica’s hour of the hero,” she writes.“So many of our leaders have been socorrupt, and the range of allowed andpossibly public activity has been sonarrow, and injustice has cried out so106 <strong>Nieman</strong> Reports / Fall 2001
Books and Commentarypiercingly to the heavens, that only ahero can answer the call, and only aheroic mode of life could seem worthy.Guevara stood out against the inflamedhorizon of his time, alone and unique.”She sees Che’s flaws, though. Withhorizon inflamed, a generation of followerswere “incinerated” by their Cheideology. In a very personal passage,she details how those “children of Che”armed in radical revolution would die,including a great friend ofGuillermoprieto’s mother, a poet andfeminist editor named Alaíde Foppa.And by synthesizing details from a bookby Jon Anderson, she shows how Che,this man of the people, was a machistaof an elitist background who wouldhave his sexual way with the familymaids. She writes that Guevara’s slogansnow sound foolish. And she highlightsthat with work from a book byJorge Castaneda, a political scientistwho is now Mexico’s foreign minister.Castaneda’s Che is a man who cannotbear the natural ambivalence of theworld, a world of gray where peoplehave mixed allegiances. As the eventualhead of the Central Bank, for example,Che was flummoxed by day-todayrealities of running a government.“Why corrupt workers by offering themmore money to work harder?” Giventhe region’s history of rickety economies,the reader wonders if a LatinAmerican could be found today whoshares that view.The Mexican section is full of painfulreading. It’s devoted largely to theopera buffa that Mexico became duringthe years that Carlos Salinas reignedin the imperial presidency and the yearsthat followed when the sober economistErnesto Zedillo took over thescript. These are librettos of sex, drugs,murder and guerrilla uprisings, unearthedskeletons, and paid informantswho worked as sorcerers. The materialis interwoven with a few topsy-turvyplot twists in which heroes frequentlybecame villains.The book’s “Losing the Future” is asmall essay about a large tragedy. Itdeals with the assassination of LuisDonaldo Colosio, the virtual presidentof Mexico, in a hilly slum named afterbullfighting in Tijuana. On March 23,This book illustrates Guillermoprieto’s veteranability to rush into what sometimes seemsmadness and expose the nervous system ofcountries struggling with great change.1994, the candidate was shot in thehead at close range. A lynching mobsurrounded the man believed to be theassassin. The details of the hysteria andthe hugely disorganized investigationthat followed in Tijuana are left out ofthe book. Instead, the author focuseson Mexico City and the tremors in theseat of power. The discipline that hadkept the Institutional RevolutionaryParty together for an astonishing numberof years after the Mexican Revolutionno longer exists, she wrote in a1994 dispatch. But it would take anothersix years to fully knock the corruptruling party from power in LosPiños, the pine-studded presidentialcomplex in the polluted capital.And when the reader fast-forwardsto July 2000, there is at last a sense ofoptimism. It is in the portrait of Fox,the rancher who took the Mexican presidencyfrom the ruling party, and in asmaller snapshot of a political activistnamed Sergio Aguayo, who built anorganization called Alianza Cívica toinsure clean, not just cleaner, electionsin Mexico.Guillermoprieto takes note of the“nutty extremes” to which Fox will takehis rhetoric: He is the man who, afterall, first came to the Mexican public’sattention by looping a pair of papervoting ballots over his ears in an attemptto make fun of the protrudingears of then-president Carlos Salinas.The hope comes in her elegant passageswith Aguayo, who as a youngmember of the feared Los Vikingosbattled an opposing gang linked to theruling party in Guadalajara. Aguayo isnow in his early 50’s. The night afterthe elections, the author calls Aguayoto see how he fared in his bid for a seatin Congress. “Isn’t it wonderful?” heasked. Assuming he’d won,Guillermoprieto answered that she wasdelighted to congratulate him on hisvictory. “What, me?” he said. “Oh, no, Ilost. But the PRI lost, too, and that’sjust marvelous.” Finally, a Mexican subjectwith the dignity of a patriot.Guillermoprieto’s reputation washoned in the wars of Central America.As a Washington Post reporter, she wasone of only two journalists to travel toEl Salvador and report on a horrific1981 massacre at El Mozote conductedby a U.S.-trained Salvadoran army.“Looking for History” illustratesGuillermoprieto’s veteran ability torush into what sometimes seems madnessand expose the nervous system ofcountries struggling with great change.While her previous book, “The HeartThat Bleeds: Latin America Now,” dealtwith common experiences of LatinAmericans in a set of chronicles froman earlier period, “Looking for History”deals largely with politics. Thoselooking for heart-that-bleeds chroniclesof windowpane fitters, garbage collectorsand ranchera singers will find fewessays that are similar. One exception:“The Children’s War,” a penetratingessay from Colombia on girl guerrillas,cocaine and U.S. military aid.But this book should more thansatisfy anyone looking forGuillermoprieto’s ear and eye for detailand her poetic metaphors. Andthose wanting to learn more about theregion’s politics will be equally enriched.■Dianne Solís, a 1990 <strong>Nieman</strong> Fellow,is a writer for The Dallas MorningNews. She was formerly based inMexico City for The Wall StreetJournal in 1991 through 1997.Dsolis@dallasnews.com<strong>Nieman</strong> Reports / Fall 2001 107