BE SHOVEL-READY: <strong>The</strong>re will come a time when escalating climate impacts force even the most recalcitrantpolitical leaders to acknowledge we must mitigate and adapt to global climate change. Some of those impactsalready are evident in the record-setting, aberrant, and destructive weather patterns we are experiencingin the United States and other parts of the world. When Congress finally accepts its responsibility to deal withclimate change head-on, we urge the President to put his full weight behind legislation to cap U.S. greenhousegas emissions, put a price on carbon, establish a national renewable energy portfolio standard, and takeother decisive action to expedite the nation’s withdrawal from carbon-based fuels. In the meantime, we urgethe President’s chief science advisor, John Holdren, and his colleagues in the U.S. Global Change ResearchProgram to become much more visible and proactive in educating the public about the connection betweenclimate change and the extreme weather events we are experiencing today.Serving in the federal government is often compared to endless “fire drills” – the unrelenting daily pressure to respondto crises that can, and often do, dominate an Administration’s agenda. But more than any other current issueexcept a collapse of the economy, the climate-induced collapse of a benign biosphere requires crisis prevention aswell as crisis response.<strong>The</strong> challenge facing President Obama and other government leaders over the next two years will be to close theenormous gap between what scientists say we must do and what politicians think we can do. With or withoutthe help of Congress, Barack Obama can become the leader who mobilized the American people to confront thebiggest global and intergenerational issue of our time.Figure 1: <strong>The</strong> World Resources Institute has created a web portal to trackthe Obama Administration’s authorities and actions related to climatechange: http://www.wri.org/stories/2010/12/keeping-track-federalagencies-actions-reduce-us-greenhouse-gas-emissions.<strong>The</strong> Center for<strong>Climate</strong> Strategies tracks state climate profiles and policies: http://www.climatestrategies.us/policy_tracker/state/index7
THE PRESIDENT AS CONVENERPresident Obama has brought government and private-sector experts together torecommend policies on several issues, from ocean ecology and climate adaptation toreducing federal debt. But there is much more potential for the President to conveneAmerica’s best experts to solve its most difficult problems.It is remarkable that in a time of formidable economic, environmental, and energy challenges, the mostinnovative nation on Earth has few long-term plans to guide its investments and policies. By “plans” we don’tmean aspirations; we mean roadmaps that identify what the United States needs to achieve by 2030 and 2050and that plot the policies, technologies, and information we need to get there. We mean specific goals, milestones,and performance measures on what we must accomplish to ensure America’s competitiveness, security, andsustainable prosperity in the 21 st century. We don’t have that now.For example, we have no national plan to conserve our fresh water supplies or to mediate conflicts over who usesthem. In fact, we don’t even know enough about them. <strong>The</strong> federal government has not conducted a “watercensus” since 1978. Until Lisa Jackson was appointed to head the EPA in 2009, the agency apparently had neverdone statistically valid assessments of the condition of our lakes, rivers, wetlands, and estuaries.Our soils are critical not only to the production of food and fiber, but also to carbon sequestration and theproduction of renewable energy crops. Nevertheless, they are being depleted by agricultural practices we encouragewith federal incentives. One study published in 2006 – said to be the most extensive analysis of U.S. soil fertilityever undertaken – found that 41 percent of the croplands tested needed phosphorous supplements and 39 percentneeded potassium supplement to sustain profits from major crops. 17 Weather extremes and shifting isotherms– including intense rainfalls and severe drought, sometimes occurring in the same regions – will affect theproductivity of our farmland. But there is no long-term plan for restoring and protecting America’s soils byadjusting our agricultural practices to deal with these new realities.<strong>The</strong> National Intelligence Council is one of several groups of security and military experts who advise us thatglobal climate change will destabilize some of the most volatile regions of the world, with implications for terrorism,national security and defense spending, not to mention the sacrifices of the young Americans who will be deployedto the world’s trouble spots. President Obama has proposed that the United States cut its greenhouse gas emissions3 percent by 2020 compared to 1990 levels, leading to a reduction of around 80 percent by mid-century. Eventhis modest goal will require a profound transformation of the American economy, but we have no nationalroadmap to guide us.Half of all Americans live close to the nation’s coasts. Power plants, petroleum refineries, chemical plants andcritical infrastructure are located in coastal areas. As we saw in Hurricane Katrina in 2005 and the BP oil spillfive years later, ocean and coastal degradation are “threat multipliers” for major American cities, facilities andindustries. Experts tell us that oceans worldwide are undergoing changes that undermine their health, a result ofglobal climate change and human activity. But we in the United States have no long-term plan for reducing ourimpact on ocean ecology or for protecting our coastlines from climate impacts such as sea-level rise and moreintense hurricanes.17 <strong>The</strong> Mosaic Company “Back to Basics” web site. http://www.back-to-basics.net/soil_test_summary.htm <strong>The</strong> company’s results were based on tests of 3.4 millionacres of cropland in the United States, conducted by 70 test laboratories in the 2005 crop year.8