对高校教学工作水平评估的若干思考 - 扬州大学精品课程网

2008 11 24 6 H igher Education D evelopm ent and EvaluationN ov. , 2008N o. 6, V o l. 24( , 225009): , , , , , ,: ; ; ;: G420: B : 167228742 (2008) 0620039207, 2003 2008 , ,, , , : ?, , , , , , ? , , , (1940 ) , (20 60 ), , 19 , ,: (19672) , , , , 39

2008 : 6 () 1986 , , 2000 3 , , , , , , , , , 2006 , 540 , 1998 108 5 , 2500 , 22%, , , 20 80 , , , , , , 10 , , 1999 , , , , , , , , , , , : ; , , , ; , ;, , , ; , , , , , ?, ? , , 40

2008 : 6 : ?2003 , , 600 , , :, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,, , , ,, 41

2008 : 6 : ?, , [1 ] , :, , , , , : , , () , , , [2 ] , , : , , 2004 () , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 42

2008 : 6 , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , : ?, () , , :, , ; , , ; , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , : , , ; , 43

2008 : 6 , , , , , , , , , , , , , , E. Y. S , , , , , , : ?, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , : , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 44

2008 : 6 , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,, , , , , , ,? ? , [1 ] . [J ]. , 2007, (2).[2 ] . [M ]. : , 2004: 90.(: 2008207228; : )45

2008 ABSTRA CT 6 Key words: university; teach ing m anagem ent; talent cultivationM ed ita tion on Teach ing Eva lua tion in Un iversitiesShe Yuanfu Page 39Abstract:T he undergraduate teach ing evaluation p rogram carried out by the M inistry ofEducation every five years has m ade rem arkable ach ievem ents. How ever, there is still som e roomfo r imp rovem enṫ Fo r the fo llow 2up teach ing evaluation com ing soon, w e m ust conduct asystem atic analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of the p revious teach ing evaluation, keepon intensified research and active p reparation, and establish the fundam ental p rincip les and keyobservation aspectṡKey words: university; teach ing; teach ing evaluation; evaluation p ro jectAna lyz ing Index of L ibrary in Undergradua te Teach ing L evel Eva lua tionZheng Yu tang Page 46Abstract: T h is paper analyzes the indexes system of U nd erg rad uate T each ing L evelE valuation P rog ram f or R eg u lar H ig her E d ucation Institu tions (T rial V ersion ). T he indexessystem reflects the stress on university libraries.universities should be p romo ted.T herefo re, T he ro le and po sition of libraries inKey words: teach ing level evaluation; university; library constructionCom para tive Ana lysis of the Sub-d isc ipl inary A ssessm en t M ethods ofBusiness, Law and Eng ineer ing for U. S. News &W orld ReportChen D ishuZhang J in Page 52Abstract: By comparing analysis and study of the discip linary assessm ent index system fo r U.S. N ew s &W o rld R epo rt, th is paper has elabo rated the objectivity, feasibility and the scientificfeatures of the sub2discip linary assessm ent system. It has analyzed the characteristics ofm ultidiscip linary assessm ent index system of U. S. N ew s & W o rld R epo rt and the enligh tenm entfo r the university discip linary evaluation in Ch ina.Key words: U. S. N ew s & W o rld R epo rt; discip linary assessm ent; assessm ent index;assessm ent nethodAn Eva lua tion M ethod for Cla ssroom Teach ing Ba sed on Sector AreaH uang YanyanW ang R enw uPeng Dong Page 60Abstract:Fo r the absence of comp rehensiveness and rationality in evaluating classroomteach ing, an evaluation m ethod based on secto r area is p resented. A class teach ing index system isbuilt, and the secto r area is used to quantitatively exp ress the evaluation indexeṡm ethod,Based on th isthe evaluation value of each alternative is computed by the exp ression of secto r area.Som e examp les about the classroom teach ing evaluation in som e universities are tested. T heresults show that th is m ethod is reasonable and reliable.122