The Honorable Daniel J. Kaup - Mountain Legal â Colorado ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Daniel J. KaupAll District JudgesDaniel J. KaupAll District JudgesJudge Daniel J. KaupSurvey of Non-Attorneys Regarding Trial JudgesAverage GradesQ4. Overall Diligence4a. Beginning court on time.4b. Maintaining appropriate control overproceedings.4c. Setting reasonable schedules for cases.4d. Being prepared for his or her cases.4e. Managing court proceedings so that there islittle wasted time.3.603.613.393.503.743.733.633.613.693.683.563.55Q5. Overall Legal Ability5a. Giving reasons for rulings.5b. Willing to make decision without regard topossible outside pressure.5c. Being able to identify and analyzerelevant facts.3.623.593.603.573.633.603.623.592.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0Q6 Biased in favor of prosecution/defense.0.250.08-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5DefenseProsecution Q7 Lenience or Harshness in Sentencing.-0.020.07-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5LenientDaniel J. Kaup All District Judges2010 Judicial Performance Survey ReportHarsh 15
Daniel J. KaupAll District JudgesJudge Daniel J. KaupSurvey of Non-Attorneys Regarding Trial JudgesQ10. How strongly do you recommend that Judge Kaup be retained or notretained in office?Excluding Undecided RespondentsStrongly recommend retain in office87%93%Somewhat recommend retain in officeSomewhat recommend not retain in office4%6%1%2%Judge KaupAll DistJudgesTotal Retain 97% 93%Total Not Retain 4% 6%Strongly recommend not retain in office3%4%0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%Including Undecided RespondentsStrongly recommend retain in office84%82%Somewhat recommend retain in office4%6%UndecidedSomewhat recommend not retain in office9%6%0%2%Judge KaupAll DistJudgesTotal Retain 88% 88%Undecided 9% 6%Total Not Retain 2% 6%Strongly recommend not retain in office2%4%0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%Daniel J. KaupAll District Judges2010 Judicial Performance Survey Report16
Page 1: State of Colorado LogoCOMMISSION ON
Page 5 and 6: Due to sending questionnaires to al
Page 7 and 8: Survey of Attorneys Regarding Trial
Page 9 and 10: Judge Daniel J. KaupSurvey of Attor
Page 11 and 12: Judge Daniel J. KaupSurvey of Attor
Page 13 and 14: Survey of Appellate Judges Regardin
Page 15 and 16: Survey of Non-Attorneys Regarding T
Page 17: Judge Daniel J. KaupSurvey of Non-A
Page 21 and 22: MethodologyThe results shown in the
Page 23 and 24: . Questions:The survey questions as
Page 25 and 26: c. Comments:In addition to the A th
Page 27 and 28: c. Analysis:The Non-Attorneys Regar
Page 29 and 30: Judge Daniel J. KaupJudge Response
Page 31 and 32: ProjectabilityMost surveys seen by
Page 33 and 34: Survey of Attorneys Regarding Trial
Page 35 and 36: Survey of Non-Attorneys Regarding T
Page 37 and 38: Questionnaires
Page 39 and 40: Having observed Judge (Last Name) i
Page 41 and 42: DK2. Fairness: A B C D F N/Aa. Givi
Page 43 and 44: 10th Judicial DistrictThomas B. Fle
Page 45: Though your name will never be asso

The Honorable Daniel J. Kaup - Mountain Legal â Colorado ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?

The Honorable Daniel J. Kaup - Mountain Legal â Colorado ...