The Honorable Daniel J. Kaup - Mountain Legal – Colorado ...

Survey of Non-Attorneys Regarding Trial JudgesAll District JudgesSample Size = 10232 A B C D Fail DK/NAAverageGrade1. Demeanor:1a. Giving court proceedings a sense of dignity. 78% 15% 4% 1% 1% 1% 3.681b. Treating participants in the case politely and with respect. 80% 12% 3% 2% 2% 1% 3.681c. Conducting court in a neutral manner. 78% 13% 4% 2% 3% 1% 3.631d. Having a sense of compassion and human understandingfor those who appear before the court.73% 15% 4% 2% 3% 2% 3.572. Fairness:Overall Demeanor2a. Giving participants an opportunity to be heard. 78% 13% 3% 2% 2% 1% 3.662b. Treating those involved in the case without bias. 77% 13% 3% 2% 3% 2% 3.612c. Treating fairly people who represent themselves. 49% 8% 2% 1% 2% 38% 3.622d. Giving each side enough time to present his or her case. 76% 13% 3% 2% 2% 4% 3.653. Communications:Overall Fairness3a. Making sure participants understand the proceedings, andwhat is going on in the courtroom.80% 13% 4% 1% 1% 1% 3.703b. Using language that everyone can understand. 79% 15% 3% 1% 1% 1% 3.713c. Speaking clearly so everyone in the courtroom can hearwhat is being said.81% 13% 3% 1% 1% 1% 3.734. Diligence:Overall Communications4a. Beginning court on time 65% 22% 7% 2% 2% 2% 3.504b. Maintaining appropriate control over proceedings. 80% 13% 3% 1% 1% 1% 3.734c. Setting reasonable schedules for cases. 67% 16% 4% 1% 2% 10% 3.614d. Being prepared for cases. 75% 13% 3% 1% 2% 6% 3.684e. Managing court proceedings so that there is little wastedtime.69% 20% 6% 2% 2% 2% 3.555. Application of Law:Overall Diligence5a. Giving reasons for rulings. 69% 15% 4% 2% 3% 7% 3.575b. Willing to make decisions without regard to possibleoutside pressure.64% 11% 3% 2% 3% 18% 3.605c. Being able to identify and analyze relevant facts. 71% 13% 3% 2% 3% 8% 3.59Overall Application of Law3.643.643.713.613.59Overall Average Grade:3.642010 Judicial Performance Survey Report31