2 Melbourne School of Continental PhilosophyMarx and MarxismPresented by Andy Blunden 6th-10th July 2pm-4pmIntroductory LevelThis course will focus on a series of 8 key texts written by Karl Marx himself, rather thanattempting to present yet another overview or ‘user manual’ of Marxism. In this way, participantswill be able to gain a thorough grasp of Marx’s legacy based on familiarity with Marx’s ownwritings. Participants will appreciate why Marx became the icon of a revolutionary workers’movement, and why a serious study of his work is the sine qua non of understanding twentiethcentury social theory and philosophy. <strong>The</strong> final day of the course will be devoted to assessing thereception of Marx in the social movement known as ‘Marxism’.<strong>The</strong> prescribed texts are:1. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Communist</strong> <strong>Manifesto</strong> (1848)2. Third Address to the International on the Paris Commune (1871)3. <strong>The</strong>ses on Feuerbach (1845)4. <strong>The</strong> “Method of Political Economy” from <strong>The</strong> Grundrisse (1857) and an excerptfrom the Preface to “A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy.” (1859)5. Introduction to Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right (1843)6. <strong>The</strong> Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte (Chapter 1. 1852)7. Capital, Volume I, Chapter 1, Commodities (excluding §3 1867)8. Capital, Volume III, Chapter 2, <strong>The</strong> Rate of Profit (posthumous).<strong>The</strong> presenter will introduce the texts and situate them in their historical context. Two texts will bediscussed each day in order, except for Friday, which has no prescribed reading. It is absolutelyessential that all participants read the relevant texts beforehand, as the seminar will rely on dialogueon the content and meaning of the prescribed text. <strong>The</strong> reading is not at all heavy by the standardsof MSCP courses, but is very rich. <strong>The</strong>se texts have been subject to multiple interpretations overthe past 150 years and it is important that participants ground their understanding in a reading ofthe original work. About half of the reader is prescribed for the first day.Each 2-hour seminar will be divided into two 1-hour sessions, each focusing on a different text.<strong>The</strong> texts are available on line at marx.org where there are also study guides to assist reading.See http://marx.org/archive/marx/works/subject/guides/index.htmReading will not be required for the final day, which will deal with Engels, Lenin, Trotsky, Mao andStalin, as leaders of mass movements originating from the First International, founded by Marx andothers in 1864.If possible, it would be an advantage to read Francis Wheen’s biography: “Karl Marx.”
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Communist</strong> <strong>Manifesto</strong>(February 1848)A spectre is haunting Europe – the spectre of communism. All the powers of old Europe haveentered into a holy alliance to exorcise this spectre: Pope and Tsar, Metternich and Guizot,French Radicals and German police-spies.Where is the party in opposition that has not been decried as communistic by its opponents inpower? Where is the opposition that has not hurled back the branding reproach of communism,against the more advanced opposition parties, as well as against its reactionary adversaries?Two things result from this fact:I. Communism is already acknowledged by all European powers to be itself a power.II. It is high time that <strong>Communist</strong>s should openly, in the face of the whole world, publish theirviews, their aims, their tendencies, and meet this nursery tale of the Spectre of Communismwith a manifesto of the party itself.To this end, <strong>Communist</strong>s of various nationalities have assembled in London and sketched thefollowing manifesto, to be published in the English, French, German, Italian, Flemish andDanish languages.I. Bourgeois and Proletarians<strong>The</strong> history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles.Freeman and slave, patrician and plebeian, lord and serf, guild-master and journeyman, in aword, oppressor and oppressed, stood in constant opposition to one another, carried on anuninterrupted, now hidden, now open fight, a fight that each time ended, either in arevolutionary reconstitution of society at large, or in the common ruin of the contending classes.In the earlier epochs of history, we find almost everywhere a complicated arrangement ofsociety into various orders, a manifold gradation of social rank. In ancient Rome we havepatricians, knights, plebeians, slaves; in the Middle Ages, feudal lords, vassals, guild-masters,journeymen, apprentices, serfs; in almost all of these classes, again, subordinate gradations.<strong>The</strong> modern bourgeois society that has sprouted from the ruins of feudal society has not doneaway with class antagonisms. It has but established new classes, new conditions of oppression,new forms of struggle in place of the old ones.Our epoch, the epoch of the bourgeoisie, possesses, however, this distinct feature: it hassimplified class antagonisms. Society as a whole is more and more splitting up into two greathostile camps, into two great classes directly facing each other – Bourgeoisie and Proletariat.From the serfs of the Middle Ages sprang the chartered burghers of the earliest towns. Fromthese burgesses the first elements of the bourgeoisie were developed.<strong>The</strong> discovery of America, the rounding of the Cape, opened up fresh ground for the risingbourgeoisie. <strong>The</strong> East-Indian and Chinese markets, the colonisation of America, trade with thecolonies, the increase in the means of exchange and in commodities generally, gave tocommerce, to navigation, to industry, an impulse never before known, and thereby, to therevolutionary element in the tottering feudal society, a rapid development.<strong>The</strong> feudal system of industry, in which industrial production was monopolised by closedguilds, now no longer sufficed for the growing wants of the new markets. <strong>The</strong> manufacturingsystem took its place. <strong>The</strong> guild-masters were pushed on one side by the manufacturingbourgeois; division of labour between the different corporate guilds vanished in the face ofdivision of labour in each single workshop.Meantime the markets kept ever growing, the demand ever rising. Even manufacturer no longersufficed. <strong>The</strong>reupon, steam and machinery revolutionised industrial production. <strong>The</strong> place ofmanufacture was taken by the giant, Modern Industry; the place of the industrial bourgeois byindustrial millionaires, the leaders of the whole industrial armies, the modern bourgeois.