Presentation - Transportation Research At McGill (TRAM)

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Two possible routes through QuébecOn what basis should a choice be made ?
• If the train stops (and there is no reason to think thata high-speed train cannot stop – acceleration is veryfast), then the question changes.• To the engineering question – which remainsimportant – must be added a more complex (becausethere are few criteria) one:– what are the impacts of the high-speed rail link on theregions through which it runs?– is there any reason to think that one route will be far morebeneficial than another route?
Page 1 and 2: High-speed rail in Québec:choosing
Page 3 and 4: http://brokensidewalk.com/wp-conten
Page 5 and 6: How did I get into this?• In Autu
Page 7: • The natural response of transpo
Page 11: What is an impact?• Why does tran
Page 14 and 15: Is there any empirical basis for th
Page 16 and 17: Accessibility along transportnetwor
Page 19 and 20: So, the natural question, in the co
Page 21 and 22: The growth model usedDependent vari
Page 23 and 24: Note:• Both accessibility variabl
Page 25 and 26: Overview of results: geography of c
Page 27 and 28: Overview of results: geography ofne
Page 29 and 30: Beware• This is a theoretical exe
Page 31 and 32: ConclusionChoice between North Shor
Page 33: ConclusionIf Montreal (and the prov

Presentation - Transportation Research At McGill (TRAM)

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?