03.12.2012 Views

Adelaide Brighton Limited (ABC) - Taylor Collison Limited

Adelaide Brighton Limited (ABC) - Taylor Collison Limited

Adelaide Brighton Limited (ABC) - Taylor Collison Limited

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

19 February 2010<br />

<strong>Adelaide</strong> <strong>Brighton</strong> <strong>Limited</strong> (<strong>ABC</strong>) Marketperform<br />

Initiating Coverage & FY09 – Sound Business Constrained by Short Term Challenges $2.60<br />

Robin Morgan<br />

rmorgan@taylorcollison.com.au<br />

+618 8217 3900<br />

Summary<br />

Market Capitalisation $1,648.8M<br />

Share Price $2.60<br />

52 week low $1.45<br />

52 week high $3.01<br />

Ave Monthly Vol (year rolling) 61.354M<br />

Key Financials (A$ million)<br />

Year End FY09<br />

Actual<br />

FY10<br />

Est.<br />

FY11<br />

Est.<br />

Revenue ($m) 1,011.3 991.2 1,071.0<br />

EBIT ($m) 185.3 181.6 208.1<br />

NPAT ($m) 123.1 122.4 142.3<br />

EPS (c) 20.4 19.3 22.4<br />

Growth (pcp) -8.0% -5.3% 16.3%<br />

PE Ratio (x) 12.8 13.5 11.6<br />

DPS (c) 13.5 13.5 15.0<br />

Div Yield 5.2% 5.2% 5.8%<br />

Franking 100% 100% 100%<br />

EV ($M) 1,824.2 1,804.5 1,787.3<br />

EV/EBIT 9.8 9.9 8.6<br />

ROE 15.4% 13.4% 14.8%<br />

EBIT Margin 18.8% 18.5% 19.7%<br />

Payout Ratio 66.2% 69.9% 66.8%<br />

Share Price Graph (A$)<br />

$4.50<br />

$4.00<br />

$3.50<br />

$3.00<br />

$2.50<br />

$2.00<br />

$1.50<br />

$1.00<br />

$0.50<br />

No v-0 9<br />

Aug-09<br />

May-09<br />

Feb-09<br />

No v-0 8<br />

Aug-08<br />

May-08<br />

Feb-08<br />

Key Points<br />

Initiating coverage of <strong>Adelaide</strong> <strong>Brighton</strong> (<strong>ABC</strong>) with a<br />

Marketperform recommendation, believing its longer term<br />

attractions to be overshadowed by a challenging FY10.<br />

FY09 result above expectation with volume decline well<br />

managed through cost reductions and enhanced pricing.<br />

The high AUD and increased domestic competition will<br />

constrain <strong>ABC</strong>’s ability to recover FY10 cost increases and<br />

lower volumes through price increases.<br />

Our View<br />

• Sound long term strategy eclipsed by macro challenges –<br />

As an increasingly integrated cement and concrete supplier,<br />

<strong>Adelaide</strong> <strong>Brighton</strong>’s (<strong>ABC</strong>) ability to supplement domestic<br />

manufacture with imported product, has served it well through<br />

the current economic downturn. Whilst <strong>ABC</strong> has proven itself<br />

a resilient player in the building material sector, we<br />

acknowledge the tough macro environment is still to play out,<br />

believing market conditions will prove challenging in the 12<br />

months ahead.<br />

• Key long term attractions – Despite initiating coverage with<br />

a Marketperform recommendation, we believe <strong>ABC</strong>’s business<br />

model and long term strategies to be sound due to:<br />

� Increasingly vertically integrated structure<br />

� A balanced strategy of local manufacture and imports<br />

� Monopolistic lime assets well positioned in WA markets<br />

� Potential appeal as an acquisition target<br />

� Discount to domestic peer valuations<br />

• FY09 exceeded guidance and consensus estimates – <strong>ABC</strong><br />

reported NPAT up 1.9% to $123.1 million on sales down 3.3%<br />

to $985.0 million. EBIT declined 2.0% to $185.3 million, with<br />

margins increasing to 18.8% from 18.6% in pcp, as price<br />

increases, cost reduction strategies, and reduced sales of<br />

lower margin imported cement enabled margin expansion<br />

despite falling market activity. Improved operational cash<br />

flows, constrained capex, and the equity raising of April 2009,<br />

significantly strengthened the balance sheet with ND/E at<br />

19.6% and EBIT interest cover an impressive 10.1 times.<br />

• Initiate with a Marketperform recommendation – Trading<br />

on 13.5 times our FY10 EPS forecasts, and 9.9 times on an<br />

EV/EBIT basis, we are attracted to <strong>ABC</strong>’s business model, but<br />

do not believe the Company is a compelling buy in the current<br />

environment. Whilst <strong>ABC</strong> has in the past negated lower<br />

volumes through price increases and cost reductions, there is<br />

less scope to rely on these levers in FY10. Because of this,<br />

we believe that <strong>ABC</strong> is less leveraged to a 2010 recovery than<br />

its peers, with its current discount being justified. At this stage<br />

we initiate coverage with a Marketperform recommendation,<br />

and would look for buying opportunities further into the cycle.


<strong>Adelaide</strong> <strong>Brighton</strong> <strong>Limited</strong> Page 2 of 10<br />

A resilient player, but the<br />

tough macro environment is<br />

still to play out for <strong>ABC</strong>.<br />

<strong>Limited</strong> leverage when<br />

compared with peers in FY10.<br />

Less scope to rely on cost<br />

reductions and increased<br />

prices to negate FY10 volume<br />

decline.<br />

Trading in line with<br />

international cement players.<br />

Discount to domestic peers.<br />

<strong>ABC</strong>’s multiples unlikely to<br />

move towards domestic peers,<br />

in the short term at least.<br />

Initiating Coverage with a Marketperform Recommendation<br />

As an increasingly integrated cement and concrete supplier to the Australian<br />

construction market, <strong>Adelaide</strong> <strong>Brighton</strong>’s (<strong>ABC</strong>) ability to supplement domestic<br />

manufacture with imported product, has served it well through the current<br />

economic downturn.<br />

Whilst <strong>ABC</strong> has proven itself a resilient player in the building material sector, we<br />

acknowledge the tough macro environment is still to play out. We initiate<br />

coverage with a Marketperform recommendation believing market conditions will<br />

prove challenging in the 12 months ahead. We will be carefully monitoring<br />

<strong>ABC</strong>’s share price and any changes in industry conditions, and will review our<br />

recommendation as appropriate.<br />

Trading on 13.5 times our FY10 EPS forecasts, and 9.9 times on an<br />

EV/EBIT basis, we view <strong>ABC</strong>’s business model and long term strategies<br />

favourably, but believe the Company’s leverage to a construction industry<br />

recovery to be limited in FY10, when compared with building sector peers.<br />

Macro Environment Caution for FY10<br />

We expect a challenging year ahead for <strong>ABC</strong>. Cement demand is forecast to<br />

decline a further 5%, with improving residential construction activity in 2H10,<br />

likely to be more than offset by constrained commercial and industrial demand.<br />

Whilst <strong>ABC</strong> has in the past negated lower volumes through price increases and<br />

cost reductions, there is less scope to rely on these levers in FY10.<br />

Rising FY10 energy prices will make the task of reducing <strong>ABC</strong>’s cost base all the<br />

more difficult. Furthermore, the combination of an historically high AUD, lower<br />

shipping costs, and increased domestic competition in the cement market is<br />

placing downward pressure on import parity pricing. This constrains <strong>ABC</strong>’s ability<br />

to recover cost increases and lower expected volumes through enhanced<br />

pricing. The arrival of imported lime into the WA market is a further risk to prices,<br />

volumes and margins, and <strong>ABC</strong>’s FY10 year therefore merits some caution.<br />

Peer Group Comparison<br />

The table below compares <strong>ABC</strong> with both international and domestic peers.<br />

Despite <strong>ABC</strong>’s discount, we believe it to be less leveraged to a 2010 recovery<br />

than its peers who are not subject to the same magnitude of import parity price<br />

pressures and are typically more diversified. We note BLD and FBU have June<br />

year ends, exaggerating <strong>ABC</strong>’s discount to its domestic peer average.<br />

Mkt Cap<br />

PE EV/EBIT<br />

(AU$m) FY1 FY2 FY1 FY2<br />

International<br />

Heidelberg Cement 11,476 12.4 10.5 11.7 9.0<br />

Holcim N 19,122 14.5 13.4 10.6 8.9<br />

Lafarge 21,863 12.6 11.3 10.8 9.8<br />

International Average 13.1 11.8 11.0 9.2<br />

<strong>ABC</strong> Prem/(Disc) to Intl Av. 2.5% (1.2%) (9.7%) (7.0%)<br />

Domestic<br />

Boral <strong>Limited</strong> 3,298 25.3 15.8 17.9 12.3<br />

CSR <strong>Limited</strong> 2,522 10.3 9.7 8.3 7.9<br />

Fletcher Building 3,788 16.2 12.4 11.4 9.3<br />

James Hardie Indust 3,372 17.9 13.6 12.3 9.2<br />

<strong>Adelaide</strong> <strong>Brighton</strong> 1,629 13.5 11.6 9.9 8.6<br />

Domestic Average (excl. <strong>ABC</strong>) 17.4 12.9 12.5 9.7<br />

<strong>ABC</strong> Prem/(Disc) to Dom Av. (22.8%) (9.8%) (20.4%) (11.1%)<br />

Overall Average (excl. <strong>ABC</strong>) 17.9 12.6 11.9 9.5<br />

<strong>ABC</strong> Prem/(Disc) to Overall Av. (24.7%) (7.8%) (16.2%) (9.4%)<br />

Note: FY1 relates to the following yr ends: <strong>ABC</strong> & intl peers - 31 Dec 2010; BLD & FBU - 30 Jun 2010; CSR & JHX - 31 Mar 2011<br />

<strong>ABC</strong> typically trades at a discount to peers. Historically, <strong>ABC</strong> operated solely as<br />

a cement manufacturer, lacking growth opportunities or diversity. Even when<br />

lime and downstream concrete were introduced, <strong>ABC</strong>’s register was cramped by<br />

Barro and Boral. Having diversified its product offering, and with a register more<br />

open than it has been for over a decade (following Boral’s exit in May 09), <strong>ABC</strong>’s<br />

multiple may more closely align with peers. However, given the FY10 pressures<br />

on demand, pricing and costs are perhaps more excessive than those on peers<br />

– and with <strong>ABC</strong> less equipped to counter them – the current discount is justified.<br />

<strong>Taylor</strong> <strong>Collison</strong> <strong>Limited</strong> 19 February 2010


<strong>Adelaide</strong> <strong>Brighton</strong> <strong>Limited</strong> Page 3 of 10<br />

Attractive long term business<br />

model and strategies.<br />

Increasing vertical integration<br />

provides greater security to<br />

end market demand.<br />

Using imports as a balance<br />

against changing demand,<br />

enables full capacity<br />

utilisation.<br />

Longer Term Business Attractions<br />

Despite initiating coverage with a Marketperform recommendation based on<br />

challenging FY10 market conditions, we believe <strong>ABC</strong>’s business model and long<br />

term strategies to be sound. The following factors are key long term attractions:<br />

1. Increasingly vertically integrated structure<br />

2. Sensible balancing of domestic clinker manufacturing and overseas import<br />

3. Monopolistic lime assets serving the WA alumina and gold sectors<br />

4. Discount to peers and potential appeal as an acquisition target<br />

We first detail the above key attractions, before providing a business overview,<br />

and finally a summary of FY09 and the key risks facing the business.<br />

1. Increasing vertical integration across cement, aggregates & concrete<br />

Vertical integration is the key to long-term success in the cement industry,<br />

providing security of cement and clinker outlets and an extra avenue for<br />

diversified growth. Since its 2002 acquisition of Premier Resources, <strong>ABC</strong> has<br />

built an integrated portfolio of quarrying, clinker grinding and pre-mixed concrete<br />

assets. The charts below highlight the successful execution of <strong>ABC</strong>’s<br />

downstream strategy over the past 10 years.<br />

Segment Turnover - 2000<br />

20%<br />

12%<br />

68%<br />

Cement Lime Other<br />

Segment Turnover - 2009<br />

<strong>Taylor</strong> <strong>Collison</strong> <strong>Limited</strong> 19 February 2010<br />

16%<br />

14%<br />

16%<br />

54%<br />

Cement Lime<br />

Concrete & Agg's Masonry Prod's<br />

<strong>ABC</strong>’s strategy has provided market leverage, a greater security to end market<br />

demand, and exposure to existing facilities along Australia’s east coast. <strong>ABC</strong><br />

now derives integration benefits across the entire value chain. We note that<br />

whilst this is a major improvement for <strong>ABC</strong>, it simply brings it more into line with<br />

its already integrated competitors both in Australia and overseas.<br />

2. Two-pronged strategy of local manufacture with supplementary imports<br />

<strong>ABC</strong>’s focus on domestic clinker manufacture and long term import agreements<br />

provides some protection from both the vagaries of a fragile construction market,<br />

and the downside leverage associated with a high fixed cost cement industry.<br />

Using imports as a balancing factor against changing demand, <strong>ABC</strong> has<br />

maintained full utilisation at its local manufacturing facilities. The benefits of this<br />

strategy are further enhanced as imports command a lower margin, and are the<br />

first to be cut in a declining demand environment. In 2009, <strong>ABC</strong> manufactured<br />

1.9 mt of clinker and imported approx. 0.4 mt, maintaining its domestic<br />

manufacture at close to 2008 levels, but reducing its imports by approx. 45%.<br />

12.0<br />

10.0<br />

8.0<br />

6.0<br />

4.0<br />

2.0<br />

0.0<br />

2000<br />

2001<br />

Clinker Capacity vs. Demand<br />

2002<br />

2003<br />

2004<br />

2005<br />

2006<br />

2007<br />

2008<br />

2009<br />

Domestic clinker capacity (mtpa) Market Demand (mtpa)<br />

The chart above details the Australian clinker market over the past decade. With<br />

the exception of the 2001 recession, demand has consistently outstripped<br />

production, even in 2009’s GFC affected slowdown. Market commentators are<br />

currently calling a bottom in construction market demand with a predicted late<br />

2010 recovery, with <strong>ABC</strong> likely to maintain its clinker plants at full capacity.


<strong>Adelaide</strong> <strong>Brighton</strong> <strong>Limited</strong> Page 4 of 10<br />

<strong>ABC</strong>’s lime assets dominate<br />

the Australian marketplace.<br />

Low cost production means<br />

high profitability.<br />

Security of customers given<br />

their low global refining costs.<br />

Demand growth expected<br />

over medium term.<br />

More open register and<br />

attractive lime assets provide<br />

some acquisition appeal.<br />

3. Monopolistic lime assets serving the WA alumina and gold industries<br />

<strong>ABC</strong> has a leading position in the lime market with continuing expected strength<br />

in Australian lime demand:<br />

� <strong>ABC</strong>’s lime producing assets dominate the Australian lime market –<br />

Quicklime consumption by WA’s four alumina refineries (operated by Alcoa<br />

and Worsley) account for approximately 70% of <strong>ABC</strong>’s lime demand. The<br />

gold industry currently represents 15-20% of demand.<br />

� Low cost production – With <strong>ABC</strong>’s Cockburn lime business sourcing local low<br />

cost sea sands and utilising modern fuel efficient pre-heater kilns firing on<br />

local low cost coal, we understand <strong>ABC</strong>’s lime assets to be highly profitable.<br />

The capital costs involved in setting up a plant, and the difficulties in locating<br />

suitable resources near to suitable markets, provide high barriers to entry.<br />

� Only supplier of scale – With no other source able to logistically or<br />

economically supply 0.55 mt of lime to the Australian alumina industry (and<br />

0.35 mt to the WA gold industry), <strong>ABC</strong> is in a strong position. Major long term<br />

contracts with Alcoa and Worsley are to be renegotiated in 2011 and 2013<br />

and we believe <strong>ABC</strong> will achieve significant price increases. There is a risk<br />

that the arrival of import competition may affect price negotiations, but <strong>ABC</strong>’s<br />

low cost domestic operations put it at a competitive advantage.<br />

� Supplier to lowest quartile alumina cost producers – The security of BHP’s<br />

Worsley and Alcoa’s WA refineries is assured given they are in the lowest<br />

quartile of alumina refining cost worldwide. Even through the lowest points of<br />

a resources trough, risks to capacity are limited. In fact, during a resource<br />

downturn, marginal high-cost producers are forced out of production, only<br />

enhancing the prospects for the competitive Australian refineries.<br />

� Refinery expansion should drive demand – The medium term requirements<br />

for lime in the WA market are set to increase with the expansion of BHP’s<br />

Worsley alumina refinery currently underway. The expansion project is<br />

expected to lift Worsley’s alumina output capacity from the current 3.5 mtpa<br />

to 4.6 mtpa, increasing its lime consumption by some 60,000 to 70,000<br />

tonnes per year, and making it one of the largest alumina refineries in the<br />

world.<br />

4. Discount to peers and potential appeal as an acquisition target<br />

Following Boral’s sell down of its 17.6% stake in May 2009, <strong>ABC</strong>’s register is<br />

now more open with only Barro Group holding a substantial 23% position. There<br />

is a general consensus from our industry discussions that the structure of the<br />

Australian cement industry is likely to change over the medium term. We<br />

question Cement Australia’s current 75:25 Holcim:Hanson JV structure, and<br />

whether Holcim will take full ownership in time. We also note that Lafarge is the<br />

last major cement manufacturer without Australian exposure, although its Asian<br />

operations and the Australian market’s limited size, perhaps means it does not<br />

necessarily need a presence here. We believe industry change is likely, and<br />

whilst it is impossible to predict if this will involve <strong>ABC</strong> or not, <strong>ABC</strong>’s open<br />

register, smaller size, and its unique lime assets do make it a viable player in<br />

any medium term industry consolidation.<br />

<strong>Taylor</strong> <strong>Collison</strong> <strong>Limited</strong> 19 February 2010


<strong>Adelaide</strong> <strong>Brighton</strong> <strong>Limited</strong> Page 5 of 10<br />

Integrated construction<br />

materials and lime producer.<br />

Complicated Australian<br />

cement industry structure, but<br />

it works efficiently.<br />

Increasing downstream<br />

operations on the east coast.<br />

<strong>Adelaide</strong> <strong>Brighton</strong> - Business Overview<br />

<strong>ABC</strong> is an integrated construction materials and lime producer. The business can<br />

be split into three broad divisions involving: clinker (a raw material of cement)<br />

and lime production; pre-mixed concrete and aggregate manufacture; and a<br />

masonry products business.<br />

Clinker, cement and lime involves the production of clinker and cement in SA<br />

(1.5 mtpa capacity) and WA (0.6 mtpa capacity), and quicklime through <strong>ABC</strong>’s<br />

Cockburn operations at Kwinana in WA (1.0 mtpa capacity). Limestone is<br />

sourced from various quarry operations across SA, WA and the Northern<br />

Territory, with lime sand dredged from Owen Anchorage near Perth by Cockburn<br />

Cement.<br />

Ownership of the Australian cement industry is dominated by three domestic<br />

manufacturers – Blue Circle Southern Cement (100% Boral); Cement Australia<br />

(75% Holcim; 25% Hanson); and <strong>ABC</strong>. There are also two major independents<br />

importing clinker and cement directly – Buckeridge Group (WA) and Wagners<br />

(Qld). Given the numerous JV’s existing within the industry, the structure is best<br />

represented in a flow chart as below. Whilst complicated, we understand the<br />

Australian cement industry to work remarkably efficiently.<br />

Australian Cement Industry Ownership<br />

Source: <strong>Adelaide</strong> <strong>Brighton</strong> <strong>Limited</strong><br />

Concrete and aggregates is involved in the pre-mixed concrete markets of Vic,<br />

NSW and SE Qld through <strong>ABC</strong>’s 100% owned Hy-Tec business, and a 50:50 JV<br />

with the Mawson Group. Emerging positions exist in aggregates supply with<br />

strategic reserves of aggregates west of Sydney and in Northern NSW.<br />

Masonry products incorporates <strong>ABC</strong>’s Adbri Masonry brand which holds a<br />

market leading position in Australia in the masonry products markets with<br />

operations in Qld, NSW, Vic, Tasmania and SA.<br />

<strong>Taylor</strong> <strong>Collison</strong> <strong>Limited</strong> 19 February 2010


<strong>Adelaide</strong> <strong>Brighton</strong> <strong>Limited</strong> Page 6 of 10<br />

Resilient FY09 sales and<br />

earnings performance.<br />

EBIT margin expansion.<br />

EPS decline on equity raising.<br />

Tight control of working<br />

capital.<br />

Undergeared balance sheet.<br />

FY09 Result above Expectations<br />

Sales decline of 3.3% despite lower cement and concrete volumes. Lower<br />

demand for cement, concrete and concrete products was partially offset by<br />

enhanced pricing. The level of sales decline is commendable given cement<br />

volumes contracted by 11%, concrete volumes by 15%, and concrete product<br />

demand by 15%. The key components of <strong>ABC</strong>’s FY09 result are detailed below.<br />

($ million) FY08A FY09A FY10E FY11E<br />

Sales 1,018.3 985.0 979.3 1,059.0<br />

Growth (%) 15.1% -3.3% -0.6% 8.1%<br />

EBIT 189.1 185.3 181.6 208.1<br />

EBIT Margin (%) 18.6% 18.8% 18.5% 19.7%<br />

NPAT 120.8 123.1 122.4 142.3<br />

Growth (%) 6.1% 1.9% -0.6% 16.3%<br />

EBIT down 2.0%, but 9.0% ahead of our forecasts. FY09 margins increased<br />

to 18.8% from 18.6% in pcp. Price increases, cost reduction strategies<br />

(delivering $15 million of EBIT improvements), and reduced sales of lower<br />

margin imported cement enabled margin expansion despite falling market<br />

activity.<br />

NPAT increased 1.9% to $123.1 million, ahead of guided $105-115 million.<br />

<strong>ABC</strong>’s tax rate reverted back to a more typical 27%, following the 22% of pcp,<br />

further highlighting the quality of FY09’s earnings resilience.<br />

EPS decline to 20.4 cents from 22.2 cents in pcp, due to the dilutionary<br />

effects of 2009’s institutional equity raising and share purchase plan.<br />

Dividend of 8.0 cents declared, bringing FY09 payment to 13.5 cents, with<br />

the Board maintaining <strong>ABC</strong>’s 60-70% payout ratio. The 2.5% discounted DRP<br />

was suspended. At current prices <strong>ABC</strong> offers a 5.2% fully franked dividend yield.<br />

Operating cash flows of $188.1 million, up from $150.1 million in pcp.<br />

Focused working capital management enabled inventories to be reduced 7.1%,<br />

with tight control over engineering spare parts in particular.<br />

Net debt reduced to $175 million from $388 million in pcp, through improved<br />

operational cash flows, constrained capex, and the $111 million equity raising of<br />

April 2009. <strong>ABC</strong>’s balance sheet is now significantly undergeared with gearing<br />

(ND/E) of 19.6% well below management’s comfort range of 40-60%, and EBIT<br />

interest cover at an impressive 10.1 times. The chart below details <strong>ABC</strong>’s<br />

improving EBIT interest cover and gearing levels together with our forecasts.<br />

60%<br />

40%<br />

20%<br />

0%<br />

Gearing (ND/E) & EBIT Interest Cover<br />

FY06A<br />

<strong>Taylor</strong> <strong>Collison</strong> <strong>Limited</strong> 19 February 2010<br />

FY07A<br />

FY08A<br />

FY09A<br />

FY10E<br />

Gearing EBIT Interest Cover<br />

<strong>ABC</strong> operates in a high fixed cost industry with substantial cash tied up in clinker<br />

and lime producing assets. Cement and lime plants require ongoing and at times<br />

major capital works and this is represented in <strong>ABC</strong>’s rolling five year FCF cash<br />

conversion averaging a moderate, albeit consistent, 50-60%. <strong>ABC</strong>’s well<br />

documented WA lime kiln expansion plans have the potential to tie up $25-30<br />

million over a three year period when committed. We have factored this spend<br />

into our FY10 and FY11 numbers with <strong>ABC</strong>’s balance sheet flexibility and cash<br />

flow positions more than adequate to cover its downstream integration strategy.<br />

FY11E<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0


<strong>Adelaide</strong> <strong>Brighton</strong> <strong>Limited</strong> Page 7 of 10<br />

Cement to experience a 5%<br />

volume decline in FY10.<br />

Price increases constrained<br />

by higher AUD and lower<br />

shipping rates.<br />

Lack of funding in commercial<br />

and industrial sector.<br />

Flat lime demand in FY09,<br />

with expectations for the same<br />

in FY10.<br />

New entrant to WA lime<br />

market a threat to prices.<br />

Energy costs to rise $8-10<br />

million in FY10.<br />

Integration synergies now<br />

being delivered.<br />

FY09 Segmental Performance<br />

Cement, Lime & Concrete reported a 3.5% decline in EBIT on sales down<br />

4.7% as detailed below. EBIT margins expanded to 17.4% from 17.2% in pcp.<br />

Cement, Lime & Concrete FY08A FY09A FY10E FY11E<br />

Sales 1,114.7 1,062.5 1,035.9 1,121.4<br />

Sales Growth (%) 39.0% -4.7% -2.5% 8.3%<br />

EBIT 191.8 185.1 180.3 205.8<br />

EBIT Growth (%) 22.9% -3.5% -2.6% 14.2%<br />

EBIT Margin (%) 17.2% 17.4% 17.4% 18.4%<br />

Although this division is not split into cement, concrete and lime operations,<br />

management did disclose FY09 sales trends and provide an FY10 commentary.<br />

� Cement – Despite a 15% decline in FY09 Australian cement demand, <strong>ABC</strong>’s<br />

cement volumes declined only 11% with modest cement price increases<br />

achieved early in the year. Predictions are for a 5% national decline in cement<br />

volumes in FY10, although <strong>ABC</strong>’s greater SA, WA and mining exposure<br />

means it will be less impacted than its east coast centric peers. Lost volumes<br />

through BHP’s Olympic Dam shaft malfunction will however continue in 1Q10<br />

as the shaft remains under repair. We understand <strong>ABC</strong>’s quarterly supply of<br />

cement to Olympic Dam to be approx. 30,000 tonnes. Overall we forecast a<br />

3.5% reduction in <strong>ABC</strong> cement volumes during FY10.<br />

Price increases in FY10 will be more difficult given the combined effects that<br />

AUD strength and lower shipping rates have on import parity pricing, as well<br />

as the competitive pressures of Wagners’ new Qld clinker grinding facilities.<br />

� Concrete & Aggregates – With pre-mixed concrete volumes down 15% in<br />

FY09, commercial construction still constrained by funding, and any<br />

meaningful residential sector demand not expected until 2H10, <strong>ABC</strong>’s concrete<br />

business is likely to remain under pressure over the next six months. Pricing<br />

was increased early in FY09, but management indicate pressures were<br />

evident towards the end of the year.<br />

Aggregates demand in FY09 increased as the Pacific Highway upgrade and<br />

regional NSW infrastructure demand consumed volumes. Price increases<br />

were ahead of inflation, and this is likely to continue in FY10.<br />

� Lime – Lime volumes were flat in FY09 as demand from the gold and alumina<br />

sectors offset decreases in nickel. Demand is expected to remain flat in FY10.<br />

Lime pricing improved by 6% in FY09, enabling margins to be sustained. The<br />

ability to implement future price rises is expected to be impacted by the arrival<br />

of an overseas lime importer in to the WA market. With lime being the most<br />

profitable part of <strong>ABC</strong>’s business, management will aggressively protect<br />

market share. This is likely to see any new entrant crowded out of the market<br />

over the medium term, but short term price risks are a real threat.<br />

Energy costs are a major concern for FY10, effecting both cement and lime<br />

manufacture. Gas prices in particular are expected to increase energy costs by<br />

$8-10 million in FY10, adding to the headwinds currently facing <strong>ABC</strong>.<br />

Masonry Products reported 3.3% EBIT growth on 8.7% sales growth as<br />

detailed below. 2H09 earnings improved to $4.4 million following 1H09’s<br />

breakeven EBIT, although FY09 margins still fell to 3.3% from 7.0% in pcp.<br />

Masonry Products FY08A FY09A FY10E FY11E<br />

Sales 122.2 132.8 141.4 152.4<br />

Sales Growth (%) 48.1% 8.7% 6.5% 7.8%<br />

EBIT 8.5 4.4 5.7 6.9<br />

EBIT Growth (%) 372.2% -48.2% 28.6% 21.2%<br />

EBIT Margin (%) 7.0% 3.3% 4.0% 4.5%<br />

Industry volumes declined 25% on average. Price increases offset some of the<br />

input cost pressures, whilst the final stages of the integration of the Hanson/C&M<br />

acquisition successfully delivered $3.0 million of annualised synergies.<br />

<strong>Taylor</strong> <strong>Collison</strong> <strong>Limited</strong> 19 February 2010


<strong>Adelaide</strong> <strong>Brighton</strong> <strong>Limited</strong> Page 8 of 10<br />

Greatest risk is to industry<br />

stability.<br />

Industry conditions unlikely to<br />

improve in FY10.<br />

Imported clinker and lime a<br />

threat to volumes and pricing.<br />

AUD strength is placing<br />

downward pressure on import<br />

price parity.<br />

Gas price rises a risk for<br />

<strong>ABC</strong>’s energy intensive<br />

operations.<br />

Uncertainty over a future<br />

emissions trading scheme<br />

(ETS).<br />

Maintenance downtime and<br />

plant failures an ongoing<br />

industry risk.<br />

Key Risks<br />

Industry stability<br />

In the current environment of lower construction material demand, with a new<br />

CEO in place at Boral, and a new market entrant (Wagners) importing cement<br />

into the Qld market, the biggest risk to <strong>ABC</strong> currently is stability within the<br />

Australian cement industry.<br />

Market demand risks<br />

Whilst there are encouraging early signs for Australian residential markets, the<br />

next six months are likely to prove challenging. The commercial and industrial<br />

sectors remain impacted by funding constraints, with our industry discussions<br />

confirming the immediate outlook for commercial construction looks far from<br />

encouraging. Government stimulus packages are certainly helping, but need to<br />

be supported by the private sector.<br />

Imported Asian clinker and lime<br />

The Asian dumping of cement that was hugely problematic for the cement<br />

industry in 2000 are long gone, but the threat of independents importing product<br />

remains, as highlighted with Wagners in Qld. The arrival of imported lime in WA<br />

places pressure on <strong>ABC</strong>’s highly profitable lime operations and is a clear<br />

reminder of the risks associated with import competition.<br />

AUD strength<br />

With Australian cement prices linked to import price parity, the strengthening<br />

AUD is placing downward pressure on cement prices. In <strong>ABC</strong>’s case, sharp<br />

spikes in the AUD can in fact benefit its imported cement earnings, but longer<br />

term lower AUD rates are preferred. As previously indicated, historically high<br />

AUD levels, in combination with lower shipping costs and increased domestic<br />

competition, are placing downward pressure on import price parity.<br />

Cost inflation on higher energy prices<br />

With energy estimated at approximately 30% of cement and lime plant COGS,<br />

<strong>ABC</strong> is significantly exposed to energy price rises. The rising cost of gas has to<br />

some extent been managed through the conversion of <strong>ABC</strong>’s lime kilns to coal in<br />

the past 18 months, and <strong>ABC</strong>’s yearly maintenance shutdown being rescheduled<br />

to February each year when energy demand and energy costs can be at their<br />

most extreme. This however only mitigates a portion of energy cost pressures.<br />

<strong>ABC</strong>’s confirmation of an $8-10 million impact from gas costs in FY10 clearly<br />

highlights the risks for energy intensive industries.<br />

Emissions Trading Scheme...or lack thereof<br />

Uncertainty surrounding the Government’s failed ETS and what may replace it is<br />

cause for some caution. Any impacts are likely to still be some years away, but<br />

the ETS has potentially significant repercussions for highly energy intensive<br />

industries such as cement and lime. <strong>ABC</strong> has estimated the possible impacts of<br />

an ETS as anywhere from a $5-14 million EBIT reduction by 2016. We will<br />

continue to monitor developments over coming months.<br />

Operational issues<br />

With cement and lime being highly capital intensive industries there is the<br />

ongoing risk of plant failures, maintenance downtime, and the requirement for<br />

major capital investment. We do however understand <strong>ABC</strong>’s main cement plant<br />

at Birkenhead in SA to be well maintained, despite aging, whilst <strong>ABC</strong>’s lime<br />

assets are for the most part modern and efficient.<br />

<strong>Taylor</strong> <strong>Collison</strong> <strong>Limited</strong> 19 February 2010


<strong>Adelaide</strong> <strong>Brighton</strong> <strong>Limited</strong> Page 9 of 10<br />

<strong>Adelaide</strong> <strong>Brighton</strong> <strong>Limited</strong> - Summary of Forecasts <strong>ABC</strong> $ 2.60<br />

PROFIT & LOSS SUMMARY (A$m) BALANCE SHEET SUMMARY<br />

Period FY08A FY09A FY10E FY11E Period FY08A FY09A FY10E FY11E<br />

Total Revenue 1,034.1 1,011.3 991.2 1,071.0 Cash 23.1 25.5 29.1 31.9<br />

Growth (pcp) 15.5% -2.2% -2.0% 8.0% Receivables 151.6 162.8 175.9 192.8<br />

EBITDA 245.9 242.1 240.2 266.8 Inventories 116.1 107.8 114.0 128.5<br />

Dep'n/Other Amort'n (56.8) (56.8) (58.6) (58.7) Other 0.0 12.7 12.7 12.7<br />

EBIT 189.1 185.3 181.6 208.1 Total Current Assets 290.8 308.8 331.8 365.9<br />

Net Interest (33.8) (16.7) (13.9) (13.1) Receivables 28.4 30.4 34.7 37.5<br />

Pre-Tax Profit 155.3 168.6 167.7 195.0 Investments 67.6 72.5 72.5 72.5<br />

Tax Expense (34.5) (45.4) (45.3) (52.6) Inventories 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0<br />

Minorities 0.0 (0.1) 0.0 0.0 Property Plant & Equip 801.9 774.3 775.7 787.0<br />

NPAT Adj. 120.8 123.1 122.4 142.3 Intangibles 169.4 169.0 169.0 169.0<br />

Growth (pcp) 6.1% 1.9% -0.6% 16.3% Other 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.6<br />

Abnormals 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Non-Current Assets 1,067.3 1,046.2 1,052.9 1,067.6<br />

Reported Profit 120.8 123.1 122.4 142.3 TOTAL ASSETS 1,358.1 1,355.0 1,384.7 1,433.5<br />

Accounts Payable 98.0 106.1 114.0 123.2<br />

PER SHARE DATA Borrowings 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4<br />

Period FY08A FY09A FY10E FY11E Provisions 23.6 24.4 29.7 30.0<br />

EPS Adj. (c) 22.2 20.4 19.3 22.4 Other 20.9 31.0 26.1 26.6<br />

Growth (pcp) 5.6% -8.0% -5.3% 16.3% Total Current Liab 142.9 161.9 170.2 180.2<br />

Dividend (c) 15.0 13.5 13.5 15.0 Borrowings 410.5 200.5 184.5 170.0<br />

Franking 100% 100% 100% 100% Provisions 32.7 29.9 29.7 31.1<br />

Gross CF per Share (c) 25.2 30.3 26.1 27.8 Other 70.1 65.7 64.7 63.7<br />

NTA per share (c) 97.0 121.0 120.9 129.2 Total Non-Current Liab 513.3 296.1 278.9 264.7<br />

TOTAL LIABILITIES 656.2 458.0 449.2 444.9<br />

KEY RATIOS TOTAL EQUITY 701.9 897.0 935.5 988.6<br />

Period FY08A FY09A FY10E FY11E<br />

EBITDA/Sales Margin % 24.1% 24.6% 24.5% 25.2% CASH FLOW SUMMARY<br />

EBIT/Sales Margin % 18.6% 18.8% 18.5% 19.7% Period FY08A FY09A FY10E FY11E<br />

EBIT Interest cover (x) 5.1 10.1 12.5 15.0 EBIT (excl Abs/Extr) 189.1 185.3 181.6 208.1<br />

Free CF / NPAT (5 yr avg) 56.9% 66.5% 79.7% 80.8% Add: Depreciation 56.8 56.8 58.6 58.7<br />

Current ratio (x) 2.0 1.9 1.9 2.0 Change in Pay. 13.2 8.1 7.9 9.2<br />

Net Debt : Equity (%) 55.3% 19.6% 16.7% 14.0% Less: Tax paid (34.5) (45.4) (45.3) (52.6)<br />

ROE (%) 17.6% 15.4% 13.4% 14.8% Net Interest (33.8) (16.7) (13.9) (13.1)<br />

Dividend Payout Ratio (%) 67.7% 66.2% 69.9% 66.8% Change in Rec. (21.7) (13.2) (17.4) (19.6)<br />

Change in Inv. (31.8) 8.3 (6.2) (14.5)<br />

VALUATION MULTIPLES Gross Cashflows 137.3 183.2 165.2 176.1<br />

Period FY08A FY09A FY10E FY11E Capex (56.0) (43.1) (60.0) (70.0)<br />

PER (x) 11.7 12.8 13.5 11.6 Free Cashflows 81.3 140.1 105.2 106.1<br />

Dividend Yield (%) 5.8% 5.2% 5.2% 5.8% Dividends Paid (76.4) (45.6) (85.6) (88.8)<br />

FCF Yield (%) 5.7% 8.9% 6.4% 6.4% Net Cash Flow 4.9 94.5 19.6 17.3<br />

EV/EBITDA (x) 8.3 7.5 7.5 6.7<br />

EV/EBIT (x) 10.8 9.8 9.9 8.6<br />

<strong>Taylor</strong> <strong>Collison</strong> <strong>Limited</strong> 19 February 2010


<strong>Adelaide</strong> <strong>Brighton</strong> <strong>Limited</strong> Page 10 of 10<br />

Disclaimer<br />

Disclaimer<br />

The following Warning, Disclaimer and Disclosure relate to all material presented in this document and should be read before<br />

making any investment decision.<br />

Warning (General Advice Only): Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. This report is a<br />

private communication to clients and intending clients and is not intended for public circulation or publication or for the use of<br />

any third party, without the approval of <strong>Taylor</strong> <strong>Collison</strong> <strong>Limited</strong> ABN 53 008 172 450 ("<strong>Taylor</strong> <strong>Collison</strong>"), an Australian<br />

Financial Services Licensee and Participant of the ASX Group. While the report is based on information from sources that<br />

<strong>Taylor</strong> <strong>Collison</strong> considers reliable, its accuracy and completeness cannot be guaranteed. This report does not take into<br />

account specific investment needs or other considerations, which may be pertinent to individual investors, and for this reason<br />

clients should contact <strong>Taylor</strong> <strong>Collison</strong> to discuss their individual needs before acting on this report. Those acting upon such<br />

information and recommendations without contacting one of our advisors do so entirely at their own risk.<br />

This report may contain “forward-looking statements". The words "expect", "should", "could", "may", "predict", "plan" and<br />

other similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Indications of and guidance on, future earnings<br />

and financial position and performance are also forward looking statements. Forward-looking statements, opinions and<br />

estimates provided in this report are based on assumptions and contingencies which are subject to change without notice, as<br />

are statements about market and industry trends, which are based on interpretations of current market conditions.<br />

Any opinions, conclusions, forecasts or recommendations are reasonably held at the time of compilation but are subject to<br />

change without notice and <strong>Taylor</strong> <strong>Collison</strong> assumes no obligation to update this document after it has been issued. Except<br />

for any liability which by law cannot be excluded, <strong>Taylor</strong> <strong>Collison</strong>, its directors, employees and agents disclaim all liability<br />

(whether in negligence or otherwise) for any error, inaccuracy in, or omission from the information contained in this document<br />

or any loss or damage suffered by the recipient or any other person directly or indirectly through relying upon the information.<br />

Disclosure: Analyst remuneration is not linked to the rating outcome. <strong>Taylor</strong> <strong>Collison</strong> may solicit business from any company<br />

mentioned in this report. For the securities discussed in this report, <strong>Taylor</strong> <strong>Collison</strong> may make a market and may sell or buy<br />

on a principal basis. <strong>Taylor</strong> <strong>Collison</strong>, or any individuals preparing this report, may at any time have a position in any securities<br />

or options of any of the issuers in this report and holdings may change during the life of this document.<br />

Analyst Interests: The Analyst(s) may hold the product(s) referred to in this document, but <strong>Taylor</strong> <strong>Collison</strong> <strong>Limited</strong> considers<br />

such holdings not to be sufficiently material to compromise the rating or advice. Analyst(s)’ holdings may change during the<br />

life of this document.<br />

Analyst Certification: The Analyst(s) certify that the views expressed in this document accurately reflect their personal,<br />

professional opinion about the financial product(s) to which this document refers.<br />

Date Prepared: 19 February 2010<br />

Analyst: Robin Morgan<br />

Release Authorised by: Mark Pittman<br />

<strong>Taylor</strong> <strong>Collison</strong> <strong>Limited</strong> 19 February 2010

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!