one lithology and a wireline density neutron log suggestingano<strong>the</strong>r — but some uncertainty in <strong>the</strong> interpretation, n<strong>of</strong>irm conclusion can be drawn. We had an illustrative caselike that on an appraisal well, where <strong>the</strong> initial geologicaldescription suggested an almost 100% dolomite lithologywith seemingly little doubt. The well site XRD system,however, showed a roughly 50/50 dolomite/anhydritemixture, Fig. 7, and only subsequent reexamination revealed<strong>the</strong> formation to consist <strong>of</strong> anhydrite grains fully coveredwith a thin layer <strong>of</strong> dolomite.Fig. 9. A good match between cuttings and wireline derived grain densities.Comparison between AML and Wireline NMRThe newly developed NMR system on its very first field testalready showed clear trends in determining formation porosityin line with porosity <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> wireline NMR, even when <strong>the</strong>actual porosity values were biased, confirming that some moredevelopment work is to be done in this area.AML Hydrocarbon Composition Matches PVT <strong>Results</strong>Fig. 7. Seemingly 100% dolomite turns out to be 50/50 anhydrite/dolomite on XRD.Correlation <strong>of</strong> XRF Trace Elements and Mud Gas ReadingsThe quality and potential value <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> XRF measurements isnicely illustrated in Fig. 8, showing a correlation betweentrace elements detected by XRF known to be associated withhydrocarbon resources, detected by XRF, and <strong>the</strong> mud gasreadings.Close Match between AML and Wireline Derived GrainDensitiesA comparison <strong>of</strong> grain densities derived <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> directcuttings measurements and those determined after elaboratemulti-mineral analysis using a full wireline logging set, includingelemental spectral logs, shows encouraging results, Fig. 9.All <strong>the</strong> efforts put into fine–tuning <strong>the</strong> whole acquisition andprocessing chain for <strong>the</strong> compositional analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mud gasstream came to fruition when <strong>the</strong> composition, determined inreal time and continuously obtained <strong>from</strong> this system, appearedto match perfectly with results <strong>from</strong> a full PVT analysison wireline fluid samples obtained subsequently, Fig. 10.This perfect match was one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> results obtained in amore elaborate test <strong>of</strong> two distinctly different AML systems<strong>from</strong> two different companies conducted on a specialtechnology test well. As mentioned before, having several(advanced) mud logging units operating in parallel whiledrilling is about <strong>the</strong> only realistic way in which mud gasanalysis systems really can be properly compared. If twosystems were tested on two different wells, and <strong>the</strong> match with<strong>the</strong> PVT results on one were not perfect, <strong>the</strong> question wouldremain whe<strong>the</strong>r or not <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r unit would have done better.The results <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r system employed, while very goodon any absolute scale one may use and significantly betterFig. 8. Correlation <strong>of</strong> XRF trace elements and mud gas readings.Fig. 10. AML gives real time, continuous equivalent <strong>of</strong> PVT analysis <strong>of</strong> wirelinefluid sample.SAUDI ARAMCO JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY FALL 2011 23
than many would have expected only a few years ago, were alittle less in terms <strong>of</strong> a perfect match than <strong>the</strong> results <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>system presented in Fig. 10.The potential business value <strong>of</strong> compositional informationas precise and reliable as this, provided in real time andcontinuously, is obviously enormous. The first benefit is anoptimization <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> subsequent formation fluid samplingprogram whe<strong>the</strong>r wireline or logging while drilling (LWD).For example, taking more subsequent samples in a case whereunexpected variations in fluid composition are encounteredacross a reservoir section would assist in <strong>the</strong> delineation <strong>of</strong>separate reservoirs; alternatively, one could economize onfur<strong>the</strong>r sampling activities when <strong>the</strong> information alreadyobtained is adequate.Reservoir Correlation and Geosteering with AML Fluid FaciesGiven <strong>the</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fluid characterization previouslymentioned, it becomes possible to do reservoir correlation andeven geosteering based on AML fluid facies. As shown in Fig.11, two distinct reservoirs, labeled “A” and “B,” had differentfluid types. Having penetrated reservoir/zone A, <strong>the</strong> well siteoperators easily established <strong>the</strong> reservoir <strong>from</strong> normallyavailable data and confirmed it with a few samples <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>determined fluid facies. When <strong>the</strong> new well penetrated zone“X,” even with conventional electric logs, it was not clearwhe<strong>the</strong>r or not this zone X was in reservoir B or whe<strong>the</strong>rreservoir B lay still deeper. The fluid facies analysis, however,clearly indicated that zone X did not belong to reservoir B, orthat reservoir B was split into distinct units/blocks withdifferent fluids, type B and type X.GETTING LARGE CHUNKS FROM PDC ANDCONVENTIONAL DIAMOND BITSHowever successful conventional diamond and PDC bits havebeen for drilling, <strong>the</strong> major drawback is that ra<strong>the</strong>r thancuttings <strong>of</strong> several millimeters, <strong>the</strong>se bits produce only powder.Making a “dream bit,” which combines <strong>the</strong> advantages <strong>of</strong>drilling performance with <strong>the</strong> production <strong>of</strong> (very) large pieces<strong>of</strong> rock, also described as “microcores,” can be done byleaving out <strong>the</strong> center <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bit, as if it were a very smallFig. 12. Typical chunks recovered <strong>from</strong> a “dream bit.”diameter core bit. The microcores that are drilled are broken<strong>of</strong>f, ejected into <strong>the</strong> annulus and <strong>the</strong>n transported with <strong>the</strong>cuttings to <strong>the</strong> surface.In several tests done in <strong>Saudi</strong> <strong>Aramco</strong>, <strong>the</strong> potential <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>sedream bits has been confirmed, with nice large chunks <strong>of</strong> rockbeing recovered amid <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rwise near powder formation,Fig. 12.While <strong>the</strong>se chunks are not as nicely shaped as, and smallerthan, a conventional core plug, clearly <strong>the</strong>y are large enough formany a measurement normally done on core plugs.Even though some more testing and fur<strong>the</strong>r development <strong>of</strong>this technology might be required, <strong>the</strong> problem <strong>of</strong> PDC bitsproducing only powder has been resolved in principle, and<strong>the</strong>refore moved <strong>from</strong> a research area to a development andapplication area.CONCLUSIONSGiven <strong>the</strong> still early stages <strong>of</strong> AML development, severalchallenges remain to be tackled: A fur<strong>the</strong>r reduction in <strong>the</strong>total well site footprint, including <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> staff requiredfor <strong>the</strong> unit’s full operation; a fur<strong>the</strong>r refinement <strong>of</strong> samplingand sample cleaning procedures; and an improvement in <strong>the</strong>accuracy and precision <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> measurements oncuttings. Therefore, fur<strong>the</strong>r R&D AML efforts will berequired to achieve <strong>the</strong> ultimate goals.Yet, based on <strong>the</strong> foregoing, we may conclude <strong>the</strong> following.Cuttings Size <strong>from</strong> PDC Bits Is No Real ProblemReservoir/Zone A infieldand fluid facies in newwell.Zone “X” in new well.Uncertain <strong>from</strong> conventionallogs whe<strong>the</strong>r Reservoir B hasalready been penetrated.Reservoir/Zone Binfield.Fig. 11. Zonation, correlation and possible geosteering with AML fluid facies.It can no longer be said that PDC and o<strong>the</strong>r diamond bitsproduce cuttings that are too small. When desired, a dream bitshould produce chunks large enough even for many conventionalcore plug measurement techniques.AML Is EstablishedWe have developed an Advanced Mud Logging system,including instruments and processes that serves: (1) In aid<strong>of</strong> formation evaluation, as a complete “first aid,” and(2) To assist, optimize and improve drilling operations.Measurements that previously were limited to large24 FALL 2011 SAUDI ARAMCO JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY