13.07.2015 Views

Released August 2007 - The Indian Society for Parasitology

Released August 2007 - The Indian Society for Parasitology

Released August 2007 - The Indian Society for Parasitology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6Agrawal and Banerjeespecies. This genetic make-up influences host range,pathogenicity and patency etc. of the parasite. <strong>The</strong>genetic variations in S. japonicum are wellestablished, which later led to creation of new specieslike S. mekongi, S. malayalensis and S. sinensium orstrains which differ in their snail susceptibilities(Attwood, 2001).with a variety of host species, there is all the possibilityof the existence of wide genetic variations amongsame helminthic species from different geographicalareas. However, this subject has failed to attract <strong>Indian</strong>scientists perhaps because of the complexity of subjectand requirements of more sophisticated equipments toprove genetic variations at molecular level.Attempts have been made by Dutt and Srivastava(1968)to differentiate S. nasale species/ strains whichinfect cattle and buffaloes, as only the <strong>for</strong>mer host wasfound to suffer clinically from nasal schistosomosis.<strong>The</strong> cross-transmission experiments revealed nodifference between S. nasale species from these twohost species. Nevertheless, no attempt was made tocompare S. nasale from different geographical areaseither from the same or different host species to recordgenetic variation.When nasal schistosomosis from differentgeographical areas was compared, indirect evidencewas obtained which suggested the existence ofdifferent parasite strains, which were found to differ intheir host susceptibility and clinical symptoms. Thus,Banerjee and Agrawal (1991)recorded the presence ofS. nasale at Jabalpur in buffaloes, whereas local cattledid not show any symptoms, though it was present incross-bred cattle where parasite was causing a mild<strong>for</strong>m of the disease. In contrast, at Bhubaneswar localcattle did suffer from larger granuloma and profusewatery nasal discharge (Agrawal et al., 2003). Even S.nasale at Balaghat of Madhya Pradesh was differentfrom that of Bhubaneswar with regard to clinicalsymptoms etc. All these findings suggested geneticvariation among S. nasale belonging to differentgeographical areas.Variation in prevalence of fasciolosis, among differentdomestic animals and incrimination of different snailspecies (Choudhary, 1994) in different geographicalareas suggest that genetic factors play role in suchvariations.EPIDEMIOLOGY<strong>The</strong> epidemiology consists of four components i.e.host, etiological agent, transmission factors andenvironment. Diagnosis, as fifth component, has beenincorporated by Agrawal (2003) as it influencesepidemiological findings to a great extent. <strong>The</strong>epidemiological aspects of fluke infections in Indiahave been dealt with in greater details recently byAgrawal (2003), whereas details of haemonchosis inIndia have been covered by Sood (2003b). <strong>The</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e,these aspects are not discussed here.<strong>The</strong>re is influx of research papers in recent pastdealing with prevalence of helminths in differentdomestic animals from different parts of the country.<strong>The</strong>se works, some of which claim to be the first timework in a particular animal, helminth species orlocation or by a different technique, have notcontributed much except variation in the prevalencerates of a particular parasite in a host or in a givengeographical area. In these studies, no serious ef<strong>for</strong>thas been made either to study biological behaviour ofthe helminth in nature or in different domestic animalspecies in the locality or correlating prevalence withecological changes, husbandry practices, introductionof new animals or with production traits or even withhealth condition of the animals. In the absence of thesedata, such repeated works do not add any newin<strong>for</strong>mation on helminthic diseases.With regards to host, no serious attempt has been madeto identify resistant breeds of animals either <strong>for</strong> one ormore helminthic infections. However, there iscircumstantial evidence that Garole sheep of<strong>The</strong>re are reports of buffalo-dog, camel-dog, goat-dog Sunderban area in West Bengal is resistant tostrains of Echinococcus granulosus from India but fasciolosis despite grazing in marshy land. A moreconfirmation on molecular basis is awaited (Das et al., detailed study, including experimental infection, is2003). Human susceptibility to these different strains needed <strong>for</strong> confirming the phenomenon with work <strong>for</strong>of E. granulosus has yet to be acertained.isolating-resistant gene.A new variety of helminthic population in the <strong>for</strong>m ofdrug-resistant strains is emerging in different parts ofthe country, which sooner or later may replacesusceptible strains leading to a big problem. BecauseIndia is characterized by different agro-climatic zonesIndia is well known <strong>for</strong> its rich biodiversity, whereanimals are resistant to many pathogens (includinghelminths), and hence able to survive under adverseconditions. However, resistant animal breeds orresistant genes <strong>for</strong> important helminthic infections

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!