13.07.2015 Views

Standards of Practice - American Bar Association

Standards of Practice - American Bar Association

Standards of Practice - American Bar Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong>for Lawyers RepresentingVictims <strong>of</strong> Domestic Violence,Sexual Assault and Stalkingin Civil Protection Order Cases


ABA <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> n iiiM. Timothy GrayOklahoma Coalition AgainstDomestic Violence andSexual AssaultTulsa, OKHon. Divida GudeAtlanta, GALori GuevaraLegal Advocates forIndian CountrySeattle, WA<strong>Bar</strong>bara HartSandi MurphyBattered Women’sJustice ProjectMinneapolis, MNKaethe Morris H<strong>of</strong>ferMorris H<strong>of</strong>fer Karns, P.C.Chicago, ILSandra JohnsonNational Institute forTrial AdvocacyRaleigh, NCLisae C. JordanSexual Assault Legal InstituteMaryland Coalition AgainstSexual AssaultSilver Spring, MDJinny KimAsian Pacific IslanderLegal OutreachSan Francisco, CASusun KimBay Area Legal AidRichmond, CAVicky KimbrellGeorgia Legal ServicesAtlanta, GAPamela KushmaulJohn D. Wheeler & AssociatesAlamogordo, NMTerry LopezColorado Legal ServicesDenver, COElizabeth MartinWomensLaw.orgBrooklyn, NYPatricia McAllisterVolunteer Legal Services<strong>of</strong> Central TexasAustin, TXRamona NateraLake Worth, FLDana NelsonTravis County DistrictAttorney’s OfficeAustin, TXStephanie NilvaDay OneNew York, NYLeslye Orl<strong>of</strong>fLegal MomentumWashington, DCSandra S. ParkNew York, NYGail PendletonASISTADes Moines, IALinda PeytonLegal Clinic for the DisabledPhiladelphia, PADrucilla RameyNew York, NYJo-Hanna ReadLaw Office <strong>of</strong> Jo-Hanna ReadSeattle, WAHon. James RiehlPort Orchard, WAElizabeth RourkeEnlace ComunitarioAlbuquerque, NM


ABA <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> n <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong>for Lawyers RepresentingVictims <strong>of</strong> Domestic Violence,Sexual Assault and Stalkingin Civil Protection Order CasesPrefaceDomestic violence, sexual assault and stalking are epidemics inour society with dramatic, negative effects on individuals, familiesand communities. These crimes know no economic, racial, ethnic,religious, age or gender limits. Moreover, although these crimes canand do occur independently, they may also occur together, committedby the same perpetrator against the same victim. A sexual assaultvictim may have been stalked prior to the assault; a domestic violencevictim may experience systematic rape in addition to physical andpsychological abuse. Because these crimes may overlap and intersect,it is essential that lawyers providing legal assistance to victims beinformed and educated about them individually and collectively.In order to understand the dynamics <strong>of</strong> a particular domesticviolence, sexual assault or stalking case, it is important tounderstand the broader continuum <strong>of</strong> violence in which thesecases occur. By conservative estimates, 1.5 million women in theUnited States are assaulted by their intimate partners every year. Nationally, one in three women will experience sexual violencein her lifetime, and one in twelve women will be stalked in herlifetime. Although women are the victims in the majority <strong>of</strong> thesecrimes, men are also victims: the same studies reveal that 835,000men are physically assaulted by an intimate partner annually in theUnited States, one in five sexual assault victims are male, and one Patricia Tjaden & Nancy Thoennes, U.S. Dep’t <strong>of</strong> Just., NCJ 183781, Full Report <strong>of</strong> the Prevalence, Incidence,and Consequences <strong>of</strong> Intimate Partner Violence Against Women: Findings from the National Violence AgainstWomen Survey (2000), available at http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/nij/pubs-sum/183781.htm Id. Patricia Tjaden & Nancy Thoennes, U.S. Dep’t <strong>of</strong> Justice, NCJ 169592, Stalking in America: Findings fromthe National Violence Against Women Survey, (1998), available at http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/nij/pubssum/169592.htm


vi n ABA <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong>in forty-five men is stalked in his lifetime. The need for protectionfrom violence cannot be underestimated.Civil protection orders for victims <strong>of</strong> domestic violence areavailable in every state. Though states have begun to enact statutesspecifically creating civil protection orders for victims <strong>of</strong> sexualassault and stalking, only a minority <strong>of</strong> states have stalking civilprotection orders and fewer still have civil protection ordersavailable for victims <strong>of</strong> non-intimate partner sexual assault.Civil protection orders are typically issued by state or tribal civilcourts after a showing <strong>of</strong> abuse or violence or the likelihood <strong>of</strong>imminent harm. They may include a variety <strong>of</strong> provisions thatvary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction requiring, inter alia, thatthe perpetrator (1) stay a certain distance from the victim, (2) notassault or otherwise abuse the victim, and (3) refrain from director indirect contact with the victim. Civil protection orders vary intheir duration (e.g., emergency, temporary or “permanent”), andin many jurisdictions may include remedies such as emergencymonetary assistance, temporary child custody and support, andhousing. Similarly, in every jurisdiction there is an enforcementmechanism whereby the victim may call upon law enforcementto enforce the provisions <strong>of</strong> the civil protection order when itis violated. In these ways, civil protection orders are intendedto provide tangible, specific protection for victims that haveexperienced domestic violence, sexual assault or stalking.Victims <strong>of</strong> domestic violence, sexual assault and stalking do notseek protection orders readily, <strong>of</strong>ten concerned that the courtwill not believe them and fearing that the abuse will continueeven after the protection order is obtained. Many victims areconcerned about having to face the perpetrator in court, or fearlosing their privacy. In domestic violence cases, the majority<strong>of</strong> victims complain <strong>of</strong> serious physical assault, threats to kill orharm, or attempts or threats to take children. Protection ordersare emergency remedies designed to provide for immediatesafety. Nonetheless, victims <strong>of</strong> domestic violence, sexual assaultand stalking are regularly murdered by their assailants when they See supra notes 1, 2 and 3.


ABA <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> n viitry to escape, even after the court has issued a civil protectionorder, demonstrating that these orders can be ineffective withoutenforcement and skilled, holistic advocacy.Access to justice is essential to ensuring that victims <strong>of</strong> domesticviolence, sexual assault and stalking receive the protection andremedies necessary to prevent and minimize the lifelong, devastatingeffects <strong>of</strong> these crimes. These <strong>Standards</strong> recognize the importance<strong>of</strong> victims’ full access to the civil protection order remedies availableto them. In addition, lawyers may seek further guidance fromother <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong> <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> for use inconjunction with these <strong>Standards</strong>: <strong>Standards</strong> for the Provision <strong>of</strong> CivilLegal Aid, <strong>Standards</strong> for Programs Providing Civil Pro Bono LegalServices to Persons <strong>of</strong> Limited Means and <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> forLawyers Representing Children in Custody Cases.Use <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Standards</strong>These <strong>Standards</strong> are presented as aspirational guidelines for theoperation <strong>of</strong> legal service providers, pro bono legal service providers,and individual lawyers representing victims <strong>of</strong> domestic violence,sexual assault and stalking in civil protection order cases. They arebased on the combined and distilled judgment <strong>of</strong> individuals withsubstantial experience in the area. These <strong>Standards</strong> do not createany mandatory requirements and failure to comply with a <strong>Standards</strong>hould not give rise to a cause <strong>of</strong> action or a finding <strong>of</strong> a legal ethicsviolation, nor should it create any presumption that an individuallawyer, legal service provider, or pro bono legal service provider hasbreached any legal duty owed to a client or to a funding source.


ABA <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> n ix<strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong>for Lawyers RepresentingVictims <strong>of</strong> Domestic Violence,Sexual Assault and Stalkingin Civil Protection Order CasesHistoryIn October 2005, with generous funding from the Office onViolence Against Women, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice, the <strong>Standards</strong><strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> for Lawyers Representing Victims <strong>of</strong> Domestic Violence,Sexual Assault and Stalking in Civil Protection Order Cases(“<strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong>” or “<strong>Standards</strong>”) project was launched.Led by the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong> Commission on DomesticViolence and its partner organizations, the Washington Coalition<strong>of</strong> Sexual Assault Programs, Texas RioGrande Legal Aid and theNational District Attorneys <strong>Association</strong>’s National Center for theProsecution <strong>of</strong> Violence Against Women, the partners developedthese <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> together.The purpose <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> is to provide a referencetool for practicing lawyers representing victims <strong>of</strong> domesticviolence, sexual assault and stalking in civil protection ordercases. The <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> are intended to cover a wide range<strong>of</strong> victim issues that should be considered to provide effectiverepresentation to victims <strong>of</strong> diverse backgrounds in civil protectionorder cases. The <strong>Standards</strong> contemplate practice in all U.S. statecourt jurisdictions, but are not intended to be a comprehensiveresource on tribal court practice.The goals <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> are: (1) to improve the quality<strong>of</strong> legal representation <strong>of</strong> victims <strong>of</strong> domestic violence, sexual assaultand stalking; (2) to enable lawyers to effectively, ethically, andholistically represent victims in civil protection order cases; and (3)to raise awareness about the need for high-quality representationfor victims <strong>of</strong> domestic violence, sexual assault and stalking in civilprotection order cases.


n ABA <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong>A <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> Steering Committee met on May 8, 2006in Washington, DC. The Steering Committee was comprised <strong>of</strong>16 individuals, including practitioners, judges and others withvarious areas <strong>of</strong> expertise in civil protection orders. With theSteering Committee’s advice, guidance and discussion, a draft <strong>of</strong> the<strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> was created.To receive substantive and structural feedback on the draft version<strong>of</strong> the <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong>, the project partners designed threeWorking Group meetings, gathering lawyers from three geographicregions to maximize diverse input. The first Working Groupmeeting took place on September 18, 2006 in Chicago, IL. Thesecond meeting took place on December 1, 2006 in Seattle, WA, andthe third meeting took place on February 12, 2007 in Austin, TX.All <strong>of</strong> the Working Group meetings were comprised <strong>of</strong> approximately10-12 legal practitioners who handle civil protection order casesin various capacities. Through a series <strong>of</strong> facilitated discussions,dialogue among the meeting participants garnered substantiveand constructive comments which informed the drafting <strong>of</strong> the<strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong>. Finally, the project partners submitted acompleted draft <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> for peer review bypractitioners and national subject matter experts in a series <strong>of</strong>conference calls. With this input from “front-line” practitionersand pro bono lawyers, we believe that the <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> area helpful and practical resource for lawyers representing victims incivil protection order cases.On August 13, 2007, the ABA House <strong>of</strong> Delegates adopted theblack letter rules and the Preface <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> as<strong>of</strong>ficial policy.It is our hope that these <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> will not only be aninvaluable resource to lawyers, but will also increase the quality<strong>of</strong> legal services to victims <strong>of</strong> domestic violence, sexual assaultand stalking.


<strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong>for Lawyers RepresentingVictims <strong>of</strong> Domestic Violence,Sexual Assault and Stalkingin Civil Protection Order CasesTable <strong>of</strong> ContentsI. PURPOSE & SCOPE .................................................... 1II. DEFINITIONS............................................................... 1III. ETHICAL DUTIES OF ALL LAWYERSREPRESENTING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE,SEXUAL ASSAULT OR STALKING VICTIMS...... 3A. Competent Knowledge <strong>of</strong> Law ................ 31. Knowledge <strong>of</strong> Civil Protection Order Law............... 32. Knowledge <strong>of</strong> Related Legal Issues.......................... 12B. Competent Knowledge <strong>of</strong>Domestic Violence, Sexual Assaultand Stalking....................................................... 24C. Culturally CompetentRepresentation.................................................. 26D. Effective Client Communication.......... 281. Communication with Clients................................... 282. Physical Access to Direct Legal Representation.... 293. Interpreters and Other Language Resources.......... 304. Confidentiality and Third Party Privilege Issues..... 32


E. Client Safety ...................................................... 331. Lethality Assessment and Safety Planning............. 332. Sensitivity to Effects <strong>of</strong> Trauma............................... 34F. Scope <strong>of</strong> Representation............................. 351. Client-Centered Representation.............................. 352. Legal Capacity and Duty <strong>of</strong> Loyalty........................ 363. Scope <strong>of</strong> Representation, Case Closing andWithdrawal................................................................. 374. Coordination with Allied Pr<strong>of</strong>essionals; HolisticRepresentation........................................................... 38IV. PROCEDURES.............................................................. 40A. Office Intake Procedures.......................... 40B. Basic Procedural Obligations<strong>of</strong> the Lawyer..................................................... 41C. Pre-hearing Responsibilities..................... 44D. Hearings ............................................................... 54E. Post-hearing Responsibilities.................. 55


ABA <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> n I. Purpose & ScopeThe purpose <strong>of</strong> these <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> is to providea reference for lawyers representing victims <strong>of</strong> domesticviolence, sexual assault and stalking in civil protection ordercases, and to encourage lawyers to provide high quality legalrepresentation to those clients. These <strong>Standards</strong> keep the needs<strong>of</strong> the client at the center <strong>of</strong> representation and strive to buildpublic confidence in a just and fair legal system by working topromote safety for victims <strong>of</strong> domestic violence, sexual assaultand stalking, and accountability for perpetrators.II. DefinitionsA.B.C.D.E.“Domestic Violence”: Physical abuse, alone orin combination with sexual, economic or emotional abuse,stalking, or other forms <strong>of</strong> coercive control, by an intimatepartner or household member, <strong>of</strong>ten for the purpose <strong>of</strong>establishing and maintaining power and control overthe victim.“Sexual Assault”: Any type <strong>of</strong> non-consensual touchingor sexual penetration, however slight. Sexual assault may beperpetrated by an intimate partner (including a spouse), anon-intimate person known to the victim, or a stranger.“Stalking”: A course <strong>of</strong> conduct directed at aspecific person that would cause a reasonable personto experience fear.“Dating Violence”: Physical abuse, alone or incombination with sexual, economic or emotional abuse,stalking, or other forms <strong>of</strong> coercive control, by a person whois or has been in a romantic or intimate relationship with thevictim, <strong>of</strong>ten for the purpose <strong>of</strong> establishing and maintainingpower and control over the victim.“Victim”: A person who has been subjected to domesticviolence, sexual assault and/or stalking. Other terms used todescribe a victim may include “survivor” or “client.”This project was supported by Grant No. 2005-WT-AX-K011 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice.The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this document are those <strong>of</strong> the author and do not necessarily reflectthe views <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. Commentary to these <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> has not beenapproved by the House <strong>of</strong> Delegates or Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong> and, accordingly, should not beconstrued as representing the policy <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong>.


n ABA <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong>F.G.H.I.J.K.“Perpetrator”: A person who commits an act <strong>of</strong>domestic violence, sexual assault and/or stalking againsta victim. Other terms used to describe a perpetrator mayinclude “<strong>of</strong>fender,” “batterer,” “abuser,” or “assailant.”“Client”: Any person receiving the services <strong>of</strong> a lawyer.In these <strong>Standards</strong>, the person receiving services is avictim <strong>of</strong> domestic violence, sexual assault and/or stalkingwho is petitioning the court for a civil protection order, oris the person seeking the civil protection order on behalf<strong>of</strong> the victim.“Respondent”: Any person responding to a petition fora civil protection order. In these <strong>Standards</strong>, a respondent is aperson alleged to have committed an act or acts <strong>of</strong> domesticviolence, sexual assault and/or stalking and against whom thecivil protection order is sought. Other terms used to describethe respondent may include “defendant,” “perpetrator,”“<strong>of</strong>fender,” “batterer,” “abuser” or “assailant.”“Federally Recognized Tribe”: A group, band,nation or other organized group <strong>of</strong> indigenous <strong>American</strong>people, including any Alaska Native village, which isrecognized by the federal government as constituting adistinct and historically continuous political entity.“Civil Protection Order”: A civil court order,enforceable by law enforcement, intended to protect a victimand to stop the violent, dangerous and/or harassing behavior<strong>of</strong> a respondent. A civil protection order, if violated, cansubject the respondent to criminal prosecution. Other termsused to describe a civil protection order may include “orderfor protection,” “restraining order,” or “peace order”; however,in some jurisdictions these terms may have a distinct meaningand usage, and may not be enforceable by law enforcement.“Safety Plan”: An individualized set <strong>of</strong> strategiesdesigned to maximize the safety <strong>of</strong> a victim who may be indanger <strong>of</strong> further harm from a perpetrator.This project was supported by Grant No. 2005-WT-AX-K011 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice.The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this document are those <strong>of</strong> the author and do not necessarily reflectthe views <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. Commentary to these <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> has not beenapproved by the House <strong>of</strong> Delegates or Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong> and, accordingly, should not beconstrued as representing the policy <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong>.


ABA <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> n L. “Lethality Assessment”: An assessment, typicallyvia a screening instrument, designed to gauge the future risk<strong>of</strong> homicide to the victim by the perpetrator <strong>of</strong> domesticviolence, sexual assault and/or stalking.M. “Full Faith and Credit”: A constitutionallyand/or legislatively mandated rule <strong>of</strong> law requiring eachstate, federally recognized tribe or territory to recognizeand enforce some or all public acts, records, and judicialproceedings <strong>of</strong> every other state, tribe and territory. TheViolence Against Women Act 2005 (VAWA) mandates thatevery state, recognized tribe and territory provide full faithand credit to protection orders issued by other states, tribesor territories. This includes provisions in protection ordersrelating to custody, visitation and support. For the purposes<strong>of</strong> full faith and credit under VAWA, a protection order is anyinjunction, protection order, restraining or other order issuedfor the protection <strong>of</strong> victims <strong>of</strong> domestic violence, sexualassault, dating violence or stalking.III. Ethical Duties <strong>of</strong> All Lawyers RepresentingDomestic Violence, Sexual Assault orStalking VictimsLawyers are bound by their jurisdiction’s ethics rules in allmatters. In order to most effectively discharge their ethicalobligations, lawyers representing victims <strong>of</strong> domestic violence,sexual assault and stalking should comply with the standards<strong>of</strong> practice identified here.A. Competent Knowledge <strong>of</strong> Law1. Knowledge <strong>of</strong> Civil ProtectionOrder LawBefore representing a client in a civil protectionorder case, the lawyer should have competentknowledge <strong>of</strong> the civil protection order laws in therelevant jurisdiction(s).This project was supported by Grant No. 2005-WT-AX-K011 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice.The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this document are those <strong>of</strong> the author and do not necessarily reflectthe views <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. Commentary to these <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> has not beenapproved by the House <strong>of</strong> Delegates or Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong> and, accordingly, should not beconstrued as representing the policy <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong>.


n ABA <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong>CommentaryCompetent knowledge means, at a minimum, basiclitigation skills, an understanding <strong>of</strong> the burden <strong>of</strong> pro<strong>of</strong>,knowledge <strong>of</strong> the requirements to obtain a protectionorder and remedies available to victims under the statutes<strong>of</strong> their particular jurisdiction.All jurisdictions in the U.S. allow for civil protection ordersfor victims <strong>of</strong> domestic violence, while only a minority <strong>of</strong>jurisdictions allows civil protection orders specifically fornon-intimate partner sexual assault and stalking victims.These orders can have various application or eligibilityrequirements, and may provide different forms <strong>of</strong> relief todifferent affected parties.Domestic ViolenceEvery jurisdiction has relationship requirements thatmust be met in order for a victim to be eligible fora domestic violence civil protection order. In mostjurisdictions, a victim must be married or formerlymarried to, be living with or have lived with be relatedby blood to, or have a child with the perpetrator. Thevictim need not be separated from the perpetrator toqualify. However, the relationship requirement variesby jurisdiction and some allow other relationshipsto qualify. For example, some jurisdictions allow forprotection orders for teens or for those in non-sexualdating relationships. In some tribal jurisdictions broaderrelationship requirements may exist.Anti-harassment protection orders may also be usedto protect victims who do not meet the eligibilityrequirements for domestic violence protection orders,such as elders who are abused by non-family members,clients with disabilities who are abused by personalcare attendants, or teens who are victimized bysomeone with whom they do not have an intimate orsexual relationship.This project was supported by Grant No. 2005-WT-AX-K011 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice.The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this document are those <strong>of</strong> the author and do not necessarily reflectthe views <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. Commentary to these <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> has not beenapproved by the House <strong>of</strong> Delegates or Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong> and, accordingly, should not beconstrued as representing the policy <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong>.


ABA <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> n Not only is domestic violence physical, sexual,economic or emotional abuse, it is also the infliction<strong>of</strong> fear <strong>of</strong> imminent harm to a person. The threat <strong>of</strong>imminent harm is measured from the perspective <strong>of</strong>the victim. Perpetrators <strong>of</strong>ten threaten to take minorchildren away from victims, and victims are <strong>of</strong>tentold that they will never see their children again ifthey pursue legal action against the perpetrator. Itis important for the lawyer to make clients aware <strong>of</strong>their rights and the best interest standards regardingchild custody, visitation and child support in theirjurisdiction. The lawyer should also be aware <strong>of</strong>remedies to seek when a child has been abducted and isin immediate harm by being with the perpetrator (i.e.,how to obtain a writ <strong>of</strong> attachment for the immediatereturn <strong>of</strong> the minor child and language to include in thefinal protection order to prevent parental abduction).When a domestic violence civil protection order is issuedby a court, the order may include specific remedies. Inevery jurisdiction, the court may order the respondentto have no contact with the victim. Many jurisdictionsallow provisions for temporary child custody and childsupport, possession <strong>of</strong> the home, and other economicremedies. Some jurisdictions may order the immediatereturn <strong>of</strong> children through writs <strong>of</strong> attachment. Thelawyer is responsible for knowing what types <strong>of</strong> civilprotection orders are available in the jurisdiction, whatremedies are available under each type <strong>of</strong> order, and whatprovisions are subject to criminal sanctions.Sexual AssaultThe vast majority <strong>of</strong> reported rape victims are assaultedby a known perpetrator. Many times perpetratorspremeditate sexual violence, masking it in acceptablesocial behavior such as alcohol consumption. Similarlymany perpetrators <strong>of</strong> sexual violence employ instrumentalviolence, i.e., only the amount <strong>of</strong> violence necessary toThis project was supported by Grant No. 2005-WT-AX-K011 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice.The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this document are those <strong>of</strong> the author and do not necessarily reflectthe views <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. Commentary to these <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> has not beenapproved by the House <strong>of</strong> Delegates or Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong> and, accordingly, should not beconstrued as representing the policy <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong>.


n ABA <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong>subdue the victim. Victim consent and credibility are<strong>of</strong>ten key issues to address in civil protection ordercases. It is important for the lawyer to understand howrape myths will play into the case and how to represent asexual assault victim most effectively.The lawyer should be aware <strong>of</strong> any statutes or case law inthe jurisdiction that might afford clients specific remediesbased on their status as a victim. For example, a clientwho is a victim <strong>of</strong> domestic violence, sexual assault andstalking may have as many as four or five different types<strong>of</strong> civil protection orders available in some jurisdictions.Other civil remedies may also exist, including pursuingan action against the perpetrator and/or against a thirdparty whose failure to reasonably fulfill some legal dutywas a substantial contributing factor in the commission<strong>of</strong> the sexual assault, or pursuing a victim’s compensationapplication and award. The lawyer should discuss thedesired outcome with clients to determine which <strong>of</strong>fensebest qualifies them for what they are seeking from theprotection order process.The lawyer should also be aware <strong>of</strong> the applicability<strong>of</strong> rape shield evidentiary rules in civil cases in thejurisdiction. Rape shield rules govern the admissibility<strong>of</strong> a victim’s or witness’s extraneous sexual behavior aswell as his or her predisposition to certain behavior.In addition, the lawyer should be prepared to litigatemotions in limine to prevent the introduction <strong>of</strong>irrelevant “bad acts” <strong>of</strong> the victim, such as the victim’s use<strong>of</strong> drugs or alcohol.Many victims <strong>of</strong> sexual assault may be deeply concernedabout their privacy and how taking legal action againstthe perpetrator may affect their privacy interests. Thelawyer should be aware <strong>of</strong> the client’s privacy concernsand how they may affect case strategy. Similarly thelawyer should be aware that a client’s privacy concernsmay change throughout the course <strong>of</strong> representation, andThis project was supported by Grant No. 2005-WT-AX-K011 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice.The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this document are those <strong>of</strong> the author and do not necessarily reflectthe views <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. Commentary to these <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> has not beenapproved by the House <strong>of</strong> Delegates or Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong> and, accordingly, should not beconstrued as representing the policy <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong>.


ABA <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> n thus it is important for the lawyer to communicate <strong>of</strong>tenwith the client about privacy.In sexual assault cases, no relationship between theparties is required in order to be eligible for a civilprotection order. Most jurisdictions do not have specificcivil protection order statutes for victims <strong>of</strong> non-intimatepartner sexual assault and <strong>of</strong>ten civil anti-harassmentorder statutes or injunction statutes may be used.StalkingStalking is a crime that is <strong>of</strong>ten misunderstood,minimized or missed entirely. As with sexual assault,the vast majority <strong>of</strong> victims are stalked by someonethey know. In fact, a large percentage <strong>of</strong> stalking casesinvolve a perpetrator who is either a current or formerintimate partner. It makes sense that there is a significantconnection among the crimes <strong>of</strong> stalking, domesticviolence and sexual assault. A large percentage <strong>of</strong> victimswho are stalked by a current or former intimate partnerwere also previously physically and/or sexually assaultedby that partner.In stalking cases, no relationship between the parties isrequired in order to be eligible for a civil protection order.However, there may be a requirement that the victimmake a report to law enforcement or that the victim beable to show a pattern <strong>of</strong> conduct. As in sexual assaultcases, civil anti-harassment order statutes or injunctionstatutes may be used to protect victims because mostjurisdictions do not have specific civil protection orderstatutes for victims <strong>of</strong> stalking.Stalking is a crime under the laws <strong>of</strong> all 50 states, theDistrict <strong>of</strong> Columbia, and the federal government. Yet,stalking is vastly underreported and under-investigatedby the criminal justice system. Civil lawyers working withstalking victims should, therefore, be aware <strong>of</strong> the criminalstalking laws in their jurisdiction and the resourcesThis project was supported by Grant No. 2005-WT-AX-K011 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice.The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this document are those <strong>of</strong> the author and do not necessarily reflectthe views <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. Commentary to these <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> has not beenapproved by the House <strong>of</strong> Delegates or Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong> and, accordingly, should not beconstrued as representing the policy <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong>.


n ABA <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong>available to assist victims in accessing and navigating thecriminal systems.Additionally, civil lawyers should think about creativeways to assist stalking victims using the civil legal andsocial service systems in their communities. A majority<strong>of</strong> stalking victims take some type <strong>of</strong> self-protectivemeasures to keep themselves safe from their <strong>of</strong>fenders.Civil lawyers can help these victims by informing themabout available protection orders, as well as housingand employment laws that may assist the victim (suchas the ability to break a lease agreement or maintainemployment status). Civil lawyers should also bemindful <strong>of</strong> the privacy concerns <strong>of</strong> stalking victims andvigilantly protect all client information.Dating ViolenceMany victims <strong>of</strong> domestic violence, sexual assault andstalking are not married to, or do not have a childin common with or live with the perpetrator <strong>of</strong> theviolence. Victims may be in dating relationships whenexperiencing abuse, sexual assault or stalking from theirdating partner.In many states, dating violence victims are eligible forcivil protection orders if the court is able to determinethat a dating relationship exists. Several factors areexamined to determine the existence <strong>of</strong> a datingrelationship: the length <strong>of</strong> the relationship, the type<strong>of</strong> interaction between the abuser and the victim, andthe frequency <strong>of</strong> the interaction. Several states definea dating relationship as “intimate” or “romantic,” whileothers explicitly require a sexual relationship betweenthe parties to qualify as a dating relationship. When thestatute does not allow for dating violence relationshipsto qualify for a civil protection order, or the relationshipdoes not meet the statutory definition <strong>of</strong> a “datingrelationship,” civil anti-harassment order statutes orinjunction statutes should be considered.This project was supported by Grant No. 2005-WT-AX-K011 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice.The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this document are those <strong>of</strong> the author and do not necessarily reflectthe views <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. Commentary to these <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> has not beenapproved by the House <strong>of</strong> Delegates or Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong> and, accordingly, should not beconstrued as representing the policy <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong>.


ABA <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> n Civil lawyers should be aware <strong>of</strong> the remedies availableto dating victims <strong>of</strong> violence in their jurisdictions andcounsel the client accordingly.Mutual OrdersThe lawyer should be aware <strong>of</strong> the dangers <strong>of</strong> mutualprotection orders. A mutual order is an order issuedagainst both parties (i.e. both the client and therespondent) on the basis <strong>of</strong> only one petition. Becausemutual orders are issued sua sponte, without a petitionby the respondent and a finding that the respondent isentitled to protection, some jurisdictions prohibit mutualorders, pursuant to statute. Mutual orders are generallydiscouraged because they <strong>of</strong>ten serve to further emboldenthe perpetrator to abuse and discourage the victim fromseeking legal assistance. Mutual orders lack a finding <strong>of</strong>the predominant aggressor, and frequently lead to unfairmutual arrest in any future incident <strong>of</strong> abuse.Lawyers should also be aware that according to thefederal Violence Against Women Act (VAWA), mutualorders are not entitled to full faith and credit in otherjurisdictions, and the lawyer should counsel the clientaccordingly. If the lawyer discovers that there is amutual order in place, the lawyer needs to identify whothe original petitioner is. If the original petition wasfiled by the perpetrator, the lawyer should counsel theclient to file an independent petition to avoid the mutualprotection order problem. The lawyer should have a solidunderstanding <strong>of</strong> the dynamics <strong>of</strong> power and controlin order to effectively counsel clients about the risks <strong>of</strong>agreeing to mutual orders.However, “criss-cross” civil protection orders, in whicheach party petitions for and receives a separate civilprotection order against the other, do receive full faithand credit in other jurisdictions. Often times a crisscrossor counter-petition is filed by a respondent asa form <strong>of</strong> retaliation or intimidation toward a victimThis project was supported by Grant No. 2005-WT-AX-K011 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice.The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this document are those <strong>of</strong> the author and do not necessarily reflectthe views <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. Commentary to these <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> has not beenapproved by the House <strong>of</strong> Delegates or Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong> and, accordingly, should not beconstrued as representing the policy <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong>.


10 n ABA <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong><strong>of</strong> domestic violence. Lawyers should be alert to anyfraudulent, frivolous or vexatious counter-petitions andprepared to defend against the issuance <strong>of</strong> criss-crossorders. Though mutual orders and criss-cross orders aretechnically different, the effect <strong>of</strong> the orders and potentialdanger that may result to the victim due to these ordersmay be the same. The lawyer should carefully distinguishand explain the consequences <strong>of</strong> mutual orders and crisscrossorders to the client.In addition, federal law mandates that for state andtribal governments and courts to receive certain types<strong>of</strong> federal funding, the programs must meet statutoryrequirements regarding their arrest policies. Amongthe different requirements, the program must certifythat their laws, <strong>of</strong>ficial policies or practices prohibit theissuance <strong>of</strong> mutual protection orders except where bothparties have filed petitions and the court makes findings<strong>of</strong> fact that both parties acted primarily as aggressorsand that neither party acted primarily in self-defense.Therefore, lawyers should be aware that a court’sissuance <strong>of</strong> a mutual protection order without the filing<strong>of</strong> two separate petitions may be a federal law violationand should seek appropriate recourse, if necessary.Federal Firearms ProhibitionsLawyers should be cognizant <strong>of</strong> the federal and statefirearms prohibitions and their effect on protectionorders. Persons subject to a state court-issued civilprotection order that meets the federal statutorydefinition are generally prohibited from possessingany firearm or ammunition that affects commerce (i.e.,shipping or transporting any firearms in interstate orforeign commerce, or receiving any such firearm orammunition). A violation <strong>of</strong> this prohibition while theprotection order remains in effect is a federal <strong>of</strong>fensepunishable by up to ten years imprisonment.This project was supported by Grant No. 2005-WT-AX-K011 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice.The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this document are those <strong>of</strong> the author and do not necessarily reflectthe views <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. Commentary to these <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> has not beenapproved by the House <strong>of</strong> Delegates or Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong> and, accordingly, should not beconstrued as representing the policy <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong>.


ABA <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> n 11A state court-issued protection order meets thefederal definition if one <strong>of</strong> the following terms aremet: 1) the respondent received actual notice and hadan opportunity to participate; 2) the petitioner is anintimate partner <strong>of</strong> the respondent (i.e., a spouse, aformer spouse, has a child with, or cohabitates or hascohabitated); 3) the order restrains respondent fromharassing, stalking or threatening the intimate partner,child <strong>of</strong> the respondent, or child <strong>of</strong> the respondent’sintimate partner, or the order restrains respondentfrom engaging in conduct that would placed theintimate partner in reasonable fear <strong>of</strong> bodily injury tothe partner or child; or 4) the order includes a findingthat the respondent is a credible threat to the safety <strong>of</strong>the intimate partner or child, or the order explicitlyprohibits use <strong>of</strong> physical force against the intimatepartner or child that would reasonably be expected tocause physical injury.When interviewing and counseling clients, lawyersshould explain these firearm prohibitions to their clientsand ask about potential firearm possession by theperpetrators. Lawyers should tailor case strategy basedon the existence <strong>of</strong> firearms, including working with theprosecutor’s <strong>of</strong>fice to prosecute the perpetrator, keepingthe safety <strong>of</strong> all parties as the foremost concern.Inter-jurisdictional IssuesLawyers should be familiar with state and federal lawsgoverning interstate custody and domestic violence cases,which may involve protection order, relocation, custody,jurisdictional and parental kidnapping laws. These lawsfit together in complex ways, allowing lawyers to answercritical questions such as the following: May a clientflee for safety to another state with her children withoutbeing charged criminally? May a client file for custodyin a refuge state? May a court issue a custody provisionwithin a protection order? Lawyers who understand theThis project was supported by Grant No. 2005-WT-AX-K011 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice.The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this document are those <strong>of</strong> the author and do not necessarily reflectthe views <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. Commentary to these <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> has not beenapproved by the House <strong>of</strong> Delegates or Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong> and, accordingly, should not beconstrued as representing the policy <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong>.


12 n ABA <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong>relevant laws can assist client so that they do not losecustody <strong>of</strong> their children, jeopardize their safety, or servetime in jail for attempting to escape from abuse.2. Knowledge <strong>of</strong> Related Legal IssuesThe lawyer should screen for related legal issues arisingfrom the incidence <strong>of</strong> domestic violence, sexual assaultor stalking. If the lawyer is not competent or availableto represent the client in related matters, the lawyer hasa duty to refer the client to competent counsel.CommentaryClients who are seeking civil protection orders <strong>of</strong>tenhave a myriad <strong>of</strong> legal and non-legal issues that intersectwith their civil protection order matters, such ashousing, education, employment, privacy and privilege,child protective, child custody, emancipation, criminaljustice or immigration issues. The lawyer has a dutyto be competent in these areas <strong>of</strong> the law, or a duty toappropriately refer the case if training is not feasible.This is particularly true for clients with immigration lawconcerns as well as cases in criminal court, as these areas<strong>of</strong> law are highly specialized and have serious long-termconsequences for the client. For example, admissionsin one legal context will <strong>of</strong>ten compromise relief inanother area, i.e., an affidavit in a civil protection case canprovide powerful impeachment evidence for a criminaltrial. Therefore, the lawyer must be competent in theintersecting area <strong>of</strong> law or appropriately refer the client.Many state domestic violence and sexual assaultcoalitions or local bar associations <strong>of</strong>fer training in civilprotection order law and other related areas <strong>of</strong> law,specific to the needs <strong>of</strong> victims <strong>of</strong> domestic violence,sexual assault and stalking. Prior to representingclients, the lawyer should identify community resourcesand referrals, and associate with suitable mentors tosupplement the lawyer’s knowledge.This project was supported by Grant No. 2005-WT-AX-K011 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice.The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this document are those <strong>of</strong> the author and do not necessarily reflectthe views <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. Commentary to these <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> has not beenapproved by the House <strong>of</strong> Delegates or Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong> and, accordingly, should not beconstrued as representing the policy <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong>.


ABA <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> n 13Clients with DisabilitiesClients with disabilities (including age-relateddisabilities) <strong>of</strong>ten depend substantially on otherpeople in matters ranging from economic supportto help getting dressed. In domestic violence cases,clients with disabilities may have particular concernsabout leaving an abusive partner because <strong>of</strong> their fear<strong>of</strong> institutionalization and/or the fear <strong>of</strong> losing custody<strong>of</strong> their children. The lawyer should be prepared toargue why the client’s disability should not be used asthe basis for denying the client custody <strong>of</strong> the children.The lawyer should also be prepared to develop a planfor attendant care, transportation, medical treatment,food, housing and financial aid in order to permit aclient with disabilities to remain independent <strong>of</strong>the perpetrator.People with cognitive disabilities tend to experiencemuch higher rates <strong>of</strong> sexual victimization than peoplewho do not have a disability. Increased dependence oncaregivers, social isolation and institutions that fail toadequately supervise and perform criminal backgroundchecks on other clients, staff, and volunteers allcontribute to the high rates <strong>of</strong> sexual abuse. Indiscussing sexual abuse with a client, the lawyershould be aware that the client may have a differentunderstanding <strong>of</strong> what is considered sex, and how andwhen it is considered abusive.A disabled person might suffer abuse specific to his/herdisability that does not fit neatly under the definition<strong>of</strong> abuse in most states’ protection order statutes. Forexample, leaving someone unattended without readilyavailable food or water for extended periods <strong>of</strong> time,moving phones or assistive devices out <strong>of</strong> reach, takingpictures <strong>of</strong> the victim performing sexual acts, placingfurniture to obstruct the victim’s path, denying medicationor overdosing are all sufficient to constitute abuse.This project was supported by Grant No. 2005-WT-AX-K011 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice.The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this document are those <strong>of</strong> the author and do not necessarily reflectthe views <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. Commentary to these <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> has not beenapproved by the House <strong>of</strong> Delegates or Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong> and, accordingly, should not beconstrued as representing the policy <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong>.


14 n ABA <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong>Clients with Limited English Pr<strong>of</strong>iciency /Use <strong>of</strong> InterpretersIf the lawyer is using an interpreter to communicatewith the client, the lawyer should know how to workeffectively with interpreters and be aware that it maytake longer than English-speaking communications.Similarly, the lawyer should be aware <strong>of</strong> whether theinterpreter is in any way acquainted with the client or theclient’s family, and have procedures in place to respondto situations where interpreters and clients are from thesame small ethnic community, as this could affect theclient’s ability to communicate openly and effectively.Economic ConcernsA victim <strong>of</strong> domestic violence, sexual assault and/orstalking who is low income or who is prevented fromaccessing shared resources may struggle with economicissues related to the violence. Economic stability istantamount to client safety in many cases. For example,clients may need to move quickly for safety or becausethe violence occurred in the home and they can nolonger bear to reside there. Clients may experienceharassing behavior at work or have excessive absencesdue to physical and/or psychological injury, which maybe creating job insecurity. Clients may have a new orcontinuing need for public benefits such as food stamps,Temporary Assistance for Needy Families and Medicaid.The lawyer should have a general understanding <strong>of</strong>the myriad ways a client can lose economic supportand stability because it is fundamental to effectiverepresentation and meaningful, appropriate referrals.Elder AbuseElder abuse is the physical, sexual, emotional or financialabuse, or neglect or abandonment, <strong>of</strong> an older person bya family member, friend, fiduciary or caregiver. Elderabuse includes domestic violence and sexual violence inThis project was supported by Grant No. 2005-WT-AX-K011 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice.The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this document are those <strong>of</strong> the author and do not necessarily reflectthe views <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. Commentary to these <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> has not beenapproved by the House <strong>of</strong> Delegates or Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong> and, accordingly, should not beconstrued as representing the policy <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong>.


ABA <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> n 15later life, and may be committed by a current or formerspouse or intimate partner, as well as by adult children,grandchildren, other family members, a “friend,” or anon-relative caregiver or fiduciary. Issues related toan older person’s legal capacity and right to autonomyadd to the complexity <strong>of</strong> dealing with older abusedpersons in many cases. In addition, older persons maybe reluctant to disclose abuse, especially sexual assault,because <strong>of</strong> embarrassment or shame, or legitimate fears<strong>of</strong> retaliation, disbelief or institutionalization.The lawyer should consider the wide range <strong>of</strong> civillegal remedies that may be available to the older client.Lawsuits to recover money or property, restrainingorders or injunctions, or actions for damages all may beappropriate responses to elder abuse. In addition, theperpetrator should be removed from the setting andalternative care should be secured, if the perpetratorwas the client’s primary caregiver. The lawyer shouldbe familiar with state laws governing reporting <strong>of</strong> elderabuse, particularly if the state requires mandatoryreporting by lawyers.Older victims are <strong>of</strong>ten accompanied by others whenthey visit a lawyer’s <strong>of</strong>fice. The lawyer must be clear as towho is the client and then make that information knownto everyone involved. If the client is the elderly person,the lawyer must meet with the client separately in orderto preserve confidentiality and to ensure that the client isnot subjected to undue influence.The lawyer should strive to achieve remedies that placethe fewest restrictions on the client’s independence andautonomy. Guardianship or conservatorship <strong>of</strong> theclient or placement in a nursing home or other facility issometimes necessary, but is certainly not the only means<strong>of</strong> terminating the abuse, and should be considered onlyas a last resort.This project was supported by Grant No. 2005-WT-AX-K011 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice.The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this document are those <strong>of</strong> the author and do not necessarily reflectthe views <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. Commentary to these <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> has not beenapproved by the House <strong>of</strong> Delegates or Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong> and, accordingly, should not beconstrued as representing the policy <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong>.


16 n ABA <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong>Immigrant ClientsWhen meeting an immigrant client for the first time, thelawyer’s primary concern should be whether the clientqualifies for a civil protection order, and not the client’simmigration status. Immigration status has no bearingon a client’s eligibility for a civil protection order. Otherservices and relief may also be available. The lawyershould have a ready list <strong>of</strong> referrals <strong>of</strong> service providersthat can handle the immigration issues <strong>of</strong> the client withinthe service area.VAWA now provides immigrant victims <strong>of</strong> domesticviolence with access to some form <strong>of</strong> immigration relief.However, many immigrant victims are unaware <strong>of</strong> theseremedies. Perpetrators use this fact to solidify theirpower and control and inhibit the immigrant victim’sability to successfully escape violence. In addition,immigrant victims may have justified concerns aboutthe safety <strong>of</strong> family in their home country, a fear <strong>of</strong>parental abduction <strong>of</strong> the children by the perpetratoror other acts <strong>of</strong> retaliation by the respondent. Manyimmigrant clients are reluctant to obtain a finalprotection order against the respondent for fear that itwill result in the respondent’s deportation and a loss <strong>of</strong>financial support. A violation <strong>of</strong> a civil protection ordermay be a deportable <strong>of</strong>fense. Similarly, many immigrantclients are reluctant to obtain a civil protection orderagainst their employer or coworker for sexual assault,sexual harassment or stalking due to a fear <strong>of</strong> job loss,which may in turn, result in a loss <strong>of</strong> housing or evenloss <strong>of</strong> legal status. The lawyer should be aware <strong>of</strong>any specific remedies for victims <strong>of</strong> sexual assault orstalking that may exist for immigrant clients and referthem to appropriate resources as necessary.This project was supported by Grant No. 2005-WT-AX-K011 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice.The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this document are those <strong>of</strong> the author and do not necessarily reflectthe views <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. Commentary to these <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> has not beenapproved by the House <strong>of</strong> Delegates or Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong> and, accordingly, should not beconstrued as representing the policy <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong>.


ABA <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> n 17Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender(LGBT) RelationshipsMost LGBT victims <strong>of</strong> abuse, assault or stalking (andespecially men and transgendered individuals) do nothave the same access to support services, including legalservices, as heterosexual victims. Even when LGBTvictims are provided services, they may experiencesevere homophobia.In several states, victims <strong>of</strong> domestic violence in samesexrelationships are explicitly excluded from access tocivil protection orders. Legal complexities can arise insame-sex domestic violence cases when the relationshipbetween the victim and the perpetrator is not legallyacknowledged. Some examples include difficulties withchild custody, excluding the respondent from the home,or allocating property.Homophobia is a major barrier to LGBT victims <strong>of</strong>sexual assault. Lawyers should be aware that <strong>of</strong>tenLGBT victims are reluctant to discuss sexual assault,since LGBT sex is <strong>of</strong>ten perceived as deviant and/orcriminal. LGBT victims may also be reluctant to disclosechildhood sexual abuse due to fear <strong>of</strong> a homophobicreaction (e.g., “you’re LGBT because you were sexuallyabused”). Also, homophobic assumptions about LGBTadults working with youth (e.g., that they are pedophiles,or are “recruiting”) further serve to discourage LGBTvictims from disclosing sexual assault. Homophobia isalso a barrier in same-sex stalking cases where there isnot a pre-existing relationship between the stalker andthe victim.It is not uncommon for police <strong>of</strong>ficers (and judges)to disregard or downplay same-sex domesticviolence, sexual assault or stalking. Lawyers shouldbe specifically aware <strong>of</strong> the danger <strong>of</strong> the issuance<strong>of</strong> mutual civil protection orders if the victimand perpetrator are the same sex, because <strong>of</strong> theThis project was supported by Grant No. 2005-WT-AX-K011 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice.The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this document are those <strong>of</strong> the author and do not necessarily reflectthe views <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. Commentary to these <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> has not beenapproved by the House <strong>of</strong> Delegates or Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong> and, accordingly, should not beconstrued as representing the policy <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong>.


18 n ABA <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong>minimization that clients may experience when they seekto enforce the order. Enforcement <strong>of</strong> civil protectionorders issued to LGBT individuals may be unreliablebecause <strong>of</strong> institutionalized prejudices towards LGBTpeople by law enforcement and the courts.LGBT clients are sometimes sensitive to any publicdisclosure <strong>of</strong> their relationships because employmentand other positions may be jeopardized. The lawyermust remember that there may not be a mechanismfor confidentiality in court proceedings and policeintervention. In some cases it may be safer for a victimto seek shelter and remain anonymous. As with all cases,victims should decide the best option for themselves, inconsultation with the lawyer.Mental HealthA client’s mental health can have a bearing on effectiverepresentation. While many victims <strong>of</strong> domestic violence,sexual assault or stalking experience no significantor chronic mental health issues, some may be copingwith pre-existing mental health issues in addition tothe experience <strong>of</strong> violence, while others may developproblems as a result <strong>of</strong> being victimized. Typical ailmentsmay include depression, increased anxiety, disassociation,sleep or eating disorders, drug and alcohol dependenceand/or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The lawyershould always inform the client <strong>of</strong> relevant mental healthservices if the client seems to be suffering with mentalhealth issues, while being careful to safeguard the client’sprivacy and protect against the possibility <strong>of</strong> impeachment.If the victim does have a mental health issue and isreceiving treatment, the lawyer should consult with themental health pr<strong>of</strong>essional to determine how the client’scondition, medication and treatment may affect strategyin the case.This project was supported by Grant No. 2005-WT-AX-K011 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice.The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this document are those <strong>of</strong> the author and do not necessarily reflectthe views <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. Commentary to these <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> has not beenapproved by the House <strong>of</strong> Delegates or Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong> and, accordingly, should not beconstrued as representing the policy <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong>.


ABA <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> n 19Military ConcernsVictims <strong>of</strong> domestic violence or sexual assault who areassociated with the military have the option <strong>of</strong> “restrictedreporting,” which allows a victim to confidentiallydisclose the details <strong>of</strong> an assault to certain individualswithin the military community and receive medicaltreatment and counseling, without triggering the <strong>of</strong>ficialinvestigative process. Under these circumstances, thevictim’s report and any details provided to the individualsidentified above will not be reported to law enforcementto initiate the <strong>of</strong>ficial investigative process unless thevictim consents or an established exception is exercisedunder the Restricted Reporting Directive. However,lawyers must check local law and practice to ensure thatthe facts and injuries in the case do not trigger statemandatory reporting laws.Lawyers should be aware, however, that if clients do notelect to make a restricted report, current Department<strong>of</strong> Defense policy requires all members <strong>of</strong> the militarycommunity, including personnel on active duty, theirfamily members, civilian employees, and contractors, toreport known or suspected crimes to their commanding<strong>of</strong>ficer, including known or suspected incidents <strong>of</strong>domestic violence or sexual assault. The lawyer must beaware that if they advise a client to make an unrestrictedreport <strong>of</strong> an incident <strong>of</strong> domestic violence or sexualassault to military personnel, such personnel will initiatean investigation that will involve contacting the allegedperpetrator and any witnesses, such as medical staff,military police or other <strong>of</strong>ficers. If a client wants to speakto someone confidentially about options for services/interventions, the lawyer may make a referral to civilian,community-based domestic violence programs or rapecrisis centers.This project was supported by Grant No. 2005-WT-AX-K011 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice.The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this document are those <strong>of</strong> the author and do not necessarily reflectthe views <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. Commentary to these <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> has not beenapproved by the House <strong>of</strong> Delegates or Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong> and, accordingly, should not beconstrued as representing the policy <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong>.


20 n ABA <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong>Under the Armed Forces Domestic Security Act, militarycommanders are required to take all reasonable measuresto ensure that a civilian protection order preventingviolent or threatening acts or harassment against, orcontact or communication with or physical proximityto, another person is given full force and effect on amilitary installation. However, it excludes a supportor child custody order issued pursuant to state divorceand child custody laws except to the extent that suchan order is entitled to full faith and credit under otherfederal law. The lawyer should contact the installation’slegal <strong>of</strong>fice to register any civil protection orderpertaining to a person in the military, whether thatperson is on active duty, a civilian employee, contractor,or a family member <strong>of</strong> these.A military protection order is issued by a commanding<strong>of</strong>ficer to an active duty service member to both protecta victim <strong>of</strong> domestic violence or sexual assault, and toregulate the behavior <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fending service member.A military protection order may be oral rather than inwriting, although written orders are preferred. Becausea military protection order is issued by a commanding<strong>of</strong>ficer, it becomes invalid if the service member isreassigned to another command. Furthermore, civilianlaw enforcement agencies and civilian courts cannotenforce military protection orders because they do notmeet the due process requirements under the full faithand credit provisions <strong>of</strong> VAWA. However, civilianscan notify military law enforcement that a violationhas occurred and in many cooperative agreementsbetween local law enforcement and military installations,<strong>of</strong>fenders are to be held until military police arrive ortaken and turned over to the military police by civilians.It is important to note that a military service member isalways subject to the Uniform Code <strong>of</strong> Military Justice(UCMJ). Hence, if a service member violates a militaryprotection order, command can be notified <strong>of</strong> theThis project was supported by Grant No. 2005-WT-AX-K011 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice.The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this document are those <strong>of</strong> the author and do not necessarily reflectthe views <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. Commentary to these <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> has not beenapproved by the House <strong>of</strong> Delegates or Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong> and, accordingly, should not beconstrued as representing the policy <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong>.


ABA <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> n 21violation and take action because the person violated adirect order and engaged in conduct unbecoming, both<strong>of</strong> which are prohibited under the UCMJ.Finally, a service member may request temporarysuspension <strong>of</strong> civil judicial and administrativeproceedings (such as those regarding protection orders)pursuant to the Service Members Civil Relief Act, whenthe service member’s ability to participate in thoseproceedings is materially affected by their military duty.However, if the commander is aware that the subject <strong>of</strong>the proceedings is the protection <strong>of</strong> another person fromviolence or harassment, the commander is unlikely toconcur with the request. The lawyer should take steps toensure that the commander is apprised <strong>of</strong> the nature <strong>of</strong>the proceedings.Minor VictimsMany minor victims <strong>of</strong> domestic violence, sexualassault or stalking may not meet the age or relationshiprequirements <strong>of</strong> their state’s protection order statutes, andmust resort to more cumbersome procedures in order toobtain civil protection orders. For example, many statesprohibit unemancipated minors from bringing actionsfor protection on their own behalf. In these jurisdictions,an adult must bring the action on the minor’s behalf orthe court must appoint a lawyer or guardian ad litemto represent the minor’s interests. Anti-harassmentprotection orders may also be used to protect minorvictims who do not meet the relationship requirementsfor domestic violence protection orders. However theseorders may have age limits that impede access to thecourts for minors as well.Additional challenges in obtaining protection throughthe civil and criminal courts may arise for minors whoare being abused by other minors. For example, if aminor seeks a sexual assault protection order againstanother minor, not only does the petitioning minor likelyThis project was supported by Grant No. 2005-WT-AX-K011 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice.The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this document are those <strong>of</strong> the author and do not necessarily reflectthe views <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. Commentary to these <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> has not beenapproved by the House <strong>of</strong> Delegates or Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong> and, accordingly, should not beconstrued as representing the policy <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong>.


22 n ABA <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong>need an adult or guardian to file on her behalf, in orderto effect service, the minor respondent and his parentsmust be served in order to facilitate proper service. Thenrelief must be tailored to the unique needs <strong>of</strong> minors,who <strong>of</strong>ten are not in control <strong>of</strong> their own schedules, donot have access to transportation, and are engaged in fulltimemandatory education. This is <strong>of</strong> particular concernwhen the victim and the perpetrator attend the samepublic school and may have classes together.Lawyers must be familiar with the child abuse andneglect laws <strong>of</strong> the jurisdiction, as well as juveniledelinquency statutes and the Indian Child Welfare Act.In sexual assault cases, lawyers must also be familiarwith statutory rape laws, the age <strong>of</strong> consent for minors toengage in consensual sexual relations and what the localprosecutors’ policy is with regard to minors engagingin consensual sexual relations. Similarly these issueswill likely impact whether a minor can successfullypetition for a civil order <strong>of</strong> protection given the criminalanalysis <strong>of</strong> whether a crime has occurred or if the minorhas exposed herself to possible criminal sanctions forengaging in illegal activity prior to the assault, such asalcohol consumption.Lastly, lawyers working with minors must be careful todistinguish the minor client from the caregiver who mayaccompany them, and be aware <strong>of</strong> mandated reportingrequirements in their jurisdiction.Native <strong>American</strong> Victims<strong>American</strong> Indian and Alaska Native women arevictimized at a much higher rate than any other group<strong>of</strong> women in the United States. When the perpetratoris non-Native, particular jurisdictional challengesarise. When deciding whether to secure a protectionorder in state or tribal court when both appear to havejurisdiction, the ability to enforce the protection ordershould be considered. The tribal court may have limitedThis project was supported by Grant No. 2005-WT-AX-K011 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice.The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this document are those <strong>of</strong> the author and do not necessarily reflectthe views <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. Commentary to these <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> has not beenapproved by the House <strong>of</strong> Delegates or Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong> and, accordingly, should not beconstrued as representing the policy <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong>.


ABA <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> n 23subject matter jurisdiction, or limited court dates. SeeSection IV.C.8.Because tribes are sovereign entities, their governmentswill vary in their statutory and judicial responses todomestic violence, sexual assault and stalking. Lawyersserving Native victims must be aware <strong>of</strong> which tribeis involved, either because the victim is a member orbecause the <strong>of</strong>fense took place in Indian Country, andthen review the applicable code provisions that willaffect your client. In addition, seeking redress in a tribalcourt may afford the victim a means <strong>of</strong> justice that differsboth judicially and culturally from a state or federalsystem. Prior to moving forward with representation,it is imperative that the laws <strong>of</strong> the involved tribe beconsulted, the jurisdictional status be reviewed and theclient consulted regarding her desire to seek redress inthe community which may, or may not, afford a moreholistic, or traditional response to the <strong>of</strong>fense. Finally,ensure that you are respecting tribal sovereignty byaffording full faith and credit to all forms and orders <strong>of</strong>the court, regardless <strong>of</strong> whether they are handwritten orcontain provisions that may be outside the scope <strong>of</strong> yourusual practice.Substance Abuse IssuesSome victims <strong>of</strong> physical, sexual and psychological abusemay attempt to numb their physical and emotional painby using drugs and/or alcohol. Other victims are coercedinto drug use by their abusive partners. Whatever theinitial motivator, a client’s drug use or addiction providesthe perpetrator with another weapon to undermine theclient’s credibility.Clients who use drugs and alcohol may not be believedor taken seriously by others when they report abuse. Theyalso may be unable to access certain emergency servicessuch as shelters, many <strong>of</strong> which have a “sober-first”policy. The use <strong>of</strong> chemicals can compromise cognitiveThis project was supported by Grant No. 2005-WT-AX-K011 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice.The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this document are those <strong>of</strong> the author and do not necessarily reflectthe views <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. Commentary to these <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> has not beenapproved by the House <strong>of</strong> Delegates or Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong> and, accordingly, should not beconstrued as representing the policy <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong>.


24 n ABA <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong>functioning and motor coordination, leaving clientsless able to identify cues or indicators when violenceescalates, inhibiting their ability to defend against aphysical assault, to make and use a safety plan, or topresent well in court. If you suspect your client may bedealing with substance abuse issues, it is imperative thatyou inform the client <strong>of</strong> the relevant treatment resources.B. Competent Knowledge <strong>of</strong> DomesticViolence, Sexual Assault and StalkingBefore representing a client in a civil protection ordercase, the lawyer should have competent knowledge <strong>of</strong>the dynamics <strong>of</strong> domestic violence, sexual assaultand/or stalking.In particular, the lawyer should understand the potentialrisk <strong>of</strong> escalated violence due to litigation, and how theexperience <strong>of</strong> domestic violence, sexual assault and/or stalking may affect the client-lawyer relationship,including the process <strong>of</strong> establishing rapport with andgathering information, evidence and case direction fromthe client.CommentaryCompetent knowledge means, at a minimum, an accurateunderstanding <strong>of</strong> the dynamics <strong>of</strong> domestic violence, sexualassault and/or stalking, in addition to understanding thestatutes that protect victims against these types <strong>of</strong> violence.The lawyer should be aware <strong>of</strong> the issues a particular clientmay face and be able to counsel the client about the pros andcons <strong>of</strong> obtaining a civil protection order. For example, fordomestic violence victims, <strong>of</strong>ten the risk <strong>of</strong> violence increasessignificantly when a victim attempts to leave the batterer.Therefore, the lawyer should discuss with the client differentstrategies for getting protection, which may include notimmediately obtaining a civil protection order if obtaining anorder will compromise safety. Additionally, sometimes beingserved with a petition for a civil protection order promptsThis project was supported by Grant No. 2005-WT-AX-K011 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice.The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this document are those <strong>of</strong> the author and do not necessarily reflectthe views <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. Commentary to these <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> has not beenapproved by the House <strong>of</strong> Delegates or Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong> and, accordingly, should not beconstrued as representing the policy <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong>.


ABA <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> n 25respondents to file a retaliatory cross-petition. The lawyershould be prepared to discuss this possibility with the client,and prepare the client for defending against a cross-petition.In sexual assault cases, many victims are very concernedabout maintaining their privacy. Civil protection orderactions may result in family, friends, employers and otherinstitutions learning compromising details about a victim’ssexual or personal history. Lawyers should be mindful thatsuch disclosures can have very harmful consequences toa victim’s social and economic life. Protecting the victim’sprivacy is integral to protecting her safety, and thereforeprivacy concerns will inform case strategy. In stalking cases,victims may not even know the perpetrator and may havelimited ability to assess risks. Factors such as these, and others,will have an effect on the development <strong>of</strong> the case and thefeasibility <strong>of</strong> certain remedies.The lawyer must also be knowledgeable about the dynamics<strong>of</strong> violence in order to craft appropriate and effective ordersfor relief. For example, final protection orders which prohibitcontact “except to discuss the children” or prohibit weapons“except for hunting” are seldom useful to the client andare extremely difficult to enforce, due to their vagueness.Similarly, sexual assault protection orders which allow theperpetrator to continue to attend class with the victim maybe useless in helping the victim remain in school.Some clients who have experienced domestic violence,sexual assault or stalking may require a heightened level <strong>of</strong>patience and assurance from the lawyer before they will bewilling to disclose essential information. The additionalclient interview time this may require is well worth theinvestment, as it will likely result in more thorough,accurate and efficient trial preparation.The lawyer must understand the dynamics <strong>of</strong> power andcontrol in abusive relationships in order to understand thatit is common for victims <strong>of</strong> domestic violence to return tothe perpetrators, even after multiple separations. OftenThis project was supported by Grant No. 2005-WT-AX-K011 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice.The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this document are those <strong>of</strong> the author and do not necessarily reflectthe views <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. Commentary to these <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> has not beenapproved by the House <strong>of</strong> Delegates or Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong> and, accordingly, should not beconstrued as representing the policy <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong>.


26 n ABA <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong>victims will leave numerous times before finding the social,economic, and emotional resources to remain independent<strong>of</strong> their abusers. The lawyer should remain nonjudgmentaltoward clients who reunite with their perpetrators, andshould assure clients that should they decide to leave in thefuture, resources will be available to help them.C. Culturally Competent RepresentationThe lawyer should be aware <strong>of</strong> the culture <strong>of</strong> the client and<strong>of</strong> how violence is understood within that culture.In particular, the lawyer should understand howthe culture <strong>of</strong> the client may affect client-lawyercommunication and trust, identification andpresentation <strong>of</strong> evidence, and remedy selection.CommentaryCross cultural communication is an essential component <strong>of</strong>effective legal representation in domestic violence, sexualassault and stalking cases. Lawyers who develop what is <strong>of</strong>tenreferred to as “cultural competence” will be able to enhancerapport with clients, gather more information, investigatecases thoroughly, develop more meaningful strategies forresolving problems, counsel clients appropriately, negotiatecomprehensive agreements and conduct trials in a moreeffective manner.The lawyer is more likely to be aware <strong>of</strong> cross culturaldifferences when representing a client who was born inanother country or a client who does not speak English asa first language. However, cross cultural communicationextends beyond differences in ethnicity and languageand encompasses differences among individuals basedon a variety <strong>of</strong> factors including race, religion, education,socioeconomic status, gender, sexual orientation and age. Inaddition, there are tremendous differences within culturalgroups. Individuals who may be identified as Latino orAsian, for example, hail from a host <strong>of</strong> countries whichThis project was supported by Grant No. 2005-WT-AX-K011 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice.The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this document are those <strong>of</strong> the author and do not necessarily reflectthe views <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. Commentary to these <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> has not beenapproved by the House <strong>of</strong> Delegates or Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong> and, accordingly, should not beconstrued as representing the policy <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong>.


ABA <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> n 27have their own unique histories, languages/dialects, foods,religions and customs.Cultural differences exist in the ways in which survivors <strong>of</strong>domestic violence, sexual assault and stalking react to theviolence they experience; interact with police, lawyers andjudges; describe events which have transpired; communicateneeds and goals; and make decisions about how best toaddress the situation. While lawyers need to develop culturalawareness, it is important not to reinforce stereotypes in theprocess. In order to enhance cross cultural communication,lawyers should (1) refrain from making assumptionsabout a client based on the client’s cultural affiliation(s);and (2) refrain from generalizing based on the lawyer’sown experience. Instead, the lawyer must learn about theindividual client’s values, experiences and priorities throughsensitive questioning and perhaps more importantly, throughcareful listening and attention to verbal and nonverbal cues.Examples:Culturally competent practice for lawyers representingvictims <strong>of</strong> domestic violence, sexual assault and stalkinginclude (but are not limited to) the following:• Listening attentively to clients, using reflectivelistening and empathetic responses• Asking clients about their views or perceptions <strong>of</strong>events and interactions, spending significant timegathering information• Not assuming all people from a particular cultural groupare the same or share the same values and priorities;learning about clients’ beliefs and priorities throughdiscussion with them; asking clients how they definethemselves culturally• Being aware <strong>of</strong> the lawyer’s own cultural beliefs, values,customs and biasesThis project was supported by Grant No. 2005-WT-AX-K011 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice.The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this document are those <strong>of</strong> the author and do not necessarily reflectthe views <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. Commentary to these <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> has not beenapproved by the House <strong>of</strong> Delegates or Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong> and, accordingly, should not beconstrued as representing the policy <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong>.


28 n ABA <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong>• Identifying areas in which the lawyer and the client sharesimilarities, and using these areas <strong>of</strong> commonality tobuild rapport with the client• Becoming educated about other countries, cultures,and customs• Explaining how the U.S. legal system works using simple,straightforward language (orally and in writing)• Being careful in the use <strong>of</strong> humor• Before making negative judgments about a client,determining whether there may be cultural explanationsfor the client’s behavior or decision• Developing creative, flexible solutions which respect aclient’s priorities and cultural beliefs• For non-citizen clients, consulting with animmigration lawyer about the possible immigrationramifications <strong>of</strong> actions taken in a domestic violence,sexual assault or stalking case• Developing methods for using interpreters effectivelyD. Effective Client Communication1. Communication with ClientsThe lawyer should always personally consult withthe client prior to representation and prior to courtproceedings for a private and meaningful exchange <strong>of</strong>case-related information.CommentaryVictims <strong>of</strong> domestic violence, sexual assault and stalkingare a unique client population because their legalconcerns are <strong>of</strong>ten embedded in very personal, privatematters. Effective representation requires that the lawyerearn the trust <strong>of</strong> a client who has experienced betrayaland/or abuse. It is not uncommon for clients to withholdThis project was supported by Grant No. 2005-WT-AX-K011 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice.The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this document are those <strong>of</strong> the author and do not necessarily reflectthe views <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. Commentary to these <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> has not beenapproved by the House <strong>of</strong> Delegates or Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong> and, accordingly, should not beconstrued as representing the policy <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong>.


ABA <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> n 29crucial information from lawyers out <strong>of</strong> self-doubt,shame, fear <strong>of</strong> disapproval or disloyalty.Traumatized clients may have difficulty processingor remembering new or technical information. Itis important for the lawyer to take adequate time tocommunicate effectively with the client, to learn all therelevant facts <strong>of</strong> the case, and also to ensure that theclient has a complete understanding <strong>of</strong> the legal process,remedies, and consequences. The lawyer should listenreflectively with minimal interruption, avoid the use <strong>of</strong>jargon, be prepared to repeat information, and allow timefor the client to absorb and consider her options.In cases where this is simply not possible, the lawyershould work closely with an advocate who can take thenecessary time to communicate effectively with the client,and who can serve as a client-lawyer liaison throughoutthe case. However, the lawyer must be cautious if theclient is located in a jurisdiction with no advocate-clientprivilege, and make sure all parties are aware <strong>of</strong> that fact.2. Physical Access to DirectLegal RepresentationAll clients should have comparable access to the lawyer.When working with clients with physical and/ormental disabilities, the lawyer is obligated to ensurethat the appropriate accommodations are in place.CommentaryThe <strong>American</strong>s with Disabilities Act (ADA) requires,among other things, that the lawyer’s <strong>of</strong>fice and thecourtroom be free <strong>of</strong> architectural and communication(e.g., signs, alarms) barriers, and that auxiliary aids orservices be provided when they are necessary to ensureeffective communication (e.g., using a TTY or relayservice for clients who are Deaf or hard <strong>of</strong> hearing;reading documents to a client if providing it in Brailleis too expensive). Also, service and companion animalsThis project was supported by Grant No. 2005-WT-AX-K011 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice.The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this document are those <strong>of</strong> the author and do not necessarily reflectthe views <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. Commentary to these <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> has not beenapproved by the House <strong>of</strong> Delegates or Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong> and, accordingly, should not beconstrued as representing the policy <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong>.


30 n ABA <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong>must be permitted in facilities unless the animalspose a direct threat to the health or safety <strong>of</strong> others.The lawyer should remember that the ADA prohibitscharging persons with disabilities to cover the costs <strong>of</strong>needed accommodations.In addition to ADA requirements, it is good practiceto be aware <strong>of</strong> the effects <strong>of</strong> any medications the clientmay be taking, or <strong>of</strong> any cognitive impairments orpsychological diagnoses the client may have, both t<strong>of</strong>acilitate client communication and to better prepare forthe civil protection order hearing.The ADA describes the legal minimum for providingservices to people with disabilities. Lawyers areencouraged to go beyond these minimum guidelinesto provide the most accessible services possible.Appropriate accommodation will enhance representationby facilitating effective client-lawyer communication.3. Interpreters and OtherLanguage ResourcesWhen the client is not pr<strong>of</strong>icient in English or is Deafor hard <strong>of</strong> hearing, the lawyer should ensure a neutral,pr<strong>of</strong>essional, qualified interpreter is available for allclient meetings and court proceedings.CommentaryThe lawyer should ensure that competent and unbiasedinterpreter(s) are available at each client-lawyer meetingand court proceeding, as appropriate. In no caseshould the lawyer allow the client’s child or other familymember to interpret. If a pr<strong>of</strong>essional or certifiedinterpreter is not available, the lawyer should seek outcommunity resources, such as language departments <strong>of</strong>local universities, listserves, and referral sources to findan interpreter who is neutral and competent. If such anThis project was supported by Grant No. 2005-WT-AX-K011 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice.The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this document are those <strong>of</strong> the author and do not necessarily reflectthe views <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. Commentary to these <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> has not beenapproved by the House <strong>of</strong> Delegates or Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong> and, accordingly, should not beconstrued as representing the policy <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong>.


ABA <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> n 31interpreter is not available, the lawyer should seek outother resources, such as the AT&T language line or relayservice, to ensure that the client can fully participate inall proceedings.If a client is working with a bilingual advocate from acommunity-based domestic violence or sexual assaultprogram, it is not appropriate to use the advocate as aninterpreter. The advocate’s role is to advocate on behalf <strong>of</strong>the client, not to act as an interpreter.If the client is Deaf or hard <strong>of</strong> hearing and from anothercountry, the lawyer should be aware that he or she mayuse a different form <strong>of</strong> sign language (i.e., not <strong>American</strong>Sign Language). The lawyer should establish the best andsafest way to communicate with the client throughoutthe case if a qualified interpreter is not available, eitherby email, text telephone device, video relay or throughthe use <strong>of</strong> multiple interpreters, to minimize and avoidperpetrator manipulation <strong>of</strong> these devices.The lawyer should also be aware that some languagecommunities are very small and that the client must becomfortable with the interpreter chosen and satisfiedthat there are no potential conflicts <strong>of</strong> interest.Title VI <strong>of</strong> the Civil Rights Act (prohibiting discriminationon the basis <strong>of</strong> national origin) and the <strong>American</strong>swith Disabilities Act both describe the legal minimumsfor providing language access to clients. Lawyers areencouraged to go beyond these minimum guidelines toprovide the most accessible services possible. Appropriateaccommodation will enhance representation by facilitatingeffective client-lawyer communication.This project was supported by Grant No. 2005-WT-AX-K011 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice.The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this document are those <strong>of</strong> the author and do not necessarily reflectthe views <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. Commentary to these <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> has not beenapproved by the House <strong>of</strong> Delegates or Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong> and, accordingly, should not beconstrued as representing the policy <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong>.


32 n ABA <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong>4. Confidentiality andThird Party Privilege IssuesThe lawyer should inform the client that ordinarily,communication exchanged between the lawyer andclient is protected by the attorney-client privilege.The lawyer should advise the client about theapplicable rules and laws regarding confidentiality <strong>of</strong>communications with third parties (e.g. advocates,interpreters, counselors, personal care attendants,legal guardians, support persons) and any effect <strong>of</strong>these parties’ presence on attorney-client privilege.CommentaryThe lawyer should be aware that the scope <strong>of</strong> differenttypes <strong>of</strong> privilege varies by jurisdiction. Privilegeconcerns should be addressed first with the client and,if the client consents, then discussed in the presence <strong>of</strong>the client and the third party.In addition to attorney-client privilege, many statesalso have domestic violence or sexual assault advocatevictimprivilege statutes. It is important for lawyers toknow what privilege statutes exist in their state betweenthird parties and the client in order to appropriatelyaddress any privacy or confidentiality breaches that mayarise from working collaboratively.Finally, the lawyer should be cautious about includingthird parties who may be mandated to report suspectedchild or vulnerable adult abuse to authorities.If the client consents to the release <strong>of</strong> information toa third party, the consent should specify exactly whatinformation may be released, that the release is timelimited,and it should be in writing.This project was supported by Grant No. 2005-WT-AX-K011 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice.The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this document are those <strong>of</strong> the author and do not necessarily reflectthe views <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. Commentary to these <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> has not beenapproved by the House <strong>of</strong> Delegates or Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong> and, accordingly, should not beconstrued as representing the policy <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong>.


ABA <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> n 33E. Client Safety1. Lethality Assessment and Safety PlanningThe lawyer should ensure that comprehensive lethalityassessment and safety planning occur with the client.CommentaryLethality assessment and safety planning should occurwith the client throughout the case. In most instances,clients will be best situated to assess their own safetyand lethality risks, and the lawyer should defer to theirconcerns. In some cases, clients will minimize their riskas a means <strong>of</strong> coping, in which case the lawyer shouldnevertheless ensure that the client is provided withresponsible information about safety planning. As anadded consideration, discussing safety and lethality riskswith the client can <strong>of</strong>ten reveal valuable evidence for thecase. The lawyer should research the current practicein lethality assessment to determine how best to assessthe perpetrator’s lethality. However, if the lawyer is notfamiliar or comfortable with threat assessment or safetyplanning, he or she should consult with and connect thevictim with someone who is—an advocate or trainedlaw enforcement.Safety planning is intended to limit the risks <strong>of</strong>violence, regardless <strong>of</strong> the victim’s relationship with theperpetrator. A safety plan is not static but is dynamic andunique to each client. The lawyer should consider howthe safety plan fits in with the broader case strategy.In domestic violence cases, safety planning does notnecessarily require that the client leave the abusiverelationship; in fact, in many cases leaving will increasethe risk. A domestic violence safety plan may include(but is not limited to): methods for limiting harm duringa violent incident; keeping children safe from abuse;preserving assets; minimizing opportunities for abuseat court, at home, at work, online, or at school; planningThis project was supported by Grant No. 2005-WT-AX-K011 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice.The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this document are those <strong>of</strong> the author and do not necessarily reflectthe views <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. Commentary to these <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> has not beenapproved by the House <strong>of</strong> Delegates or Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong> and, accordingly, should not beconstrued as representing the policy <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong>.


34 n ABA <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong>before leaving an abusive relationship; and enforcinga protection order. If the client has made the lawyeraware that the respondent is in possession <strong>of</strong> weapons,the lawyer should take the necessary steps to ensurethat the respondent will have to go through a metaldetector or other security screening prior to any hearings,depositions, etc.In sexual assault or stalking cases, safety planning mayinclude helping clients to identify what they need to feelsafe – at work, at home, at school, and in transit. Othermeasures that can be taken include having the victimchange routines, relocating and informing friends andfamily <strong>of</strong> the stalking. The lawyer should be familiarwith the various models <strong>of</strong> effective safety planning thatexist. If a lawyer is not competent in safety planning, anadvocate should assist.Clients should conduct on-going lethality assessment andsafety planning as the case moves forward. The lawyershould <strong>of</strong>ten check in with the client about her safetyplan and encourage the client to work with communitybasedadvocates to help facilitate this process. Whenappropriate, the lawyer should make a safety plan forhimself or herself and staff.The lawyer should always discuss with the client thesafest way to conduct the client-lawyer relationship. Forexample, it may not be wise for the lawyer to call theclient at home, leave messages, send mail or be seenpublicly with the client. The lawyer should notify theclient in advance <strong>of</strong> legal developments, e.g., when theperpetrator will be served so the client can adapt thesafety plan.2. Sensitivity to Effects <strong>of</strong> TraumaLawyers should be sensitive to the effects <strong>of</strong> traumain their clients, and aware <strong>of</strong> the effects <strong>of</strong> vicarioustrauma on themselves and their staff.This project was supported by Grant No. 2005-WT-AX-K011 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice.The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this document are those <strong>of</strong> the author and do not necessarily reflectthe views <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. Commentary to these <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> has not beenapproved by the House <strong>of</strong> Delegates or Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong> and, accordingly, should not beconstrued as representing the policy <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong>.


ABA <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> n 35CommentaryWhile many victims <strong>of</strong> domestic violence, sexual assaultand stalking will display no signs <strong>of</strong> trauma at all, lawyersmust be prepared to accommodate the effects <strong>of</strong> traumain their clients. Some clients may present as excessivelyhostile or difficult or, in contrast, be surprisingly flat intheir affect. Aggressive or emotional over-reactions andemotional numbness (sometimes with accompanyinghigh-risk behaviors) are normal responses to both onetimeand ongoing assaults and should not be taken asindicators <strong>of</strong> instability or lack <strong>of</strong> credibility <strong>of</strong> the client.It is also common for trauma victims either to remembertheir abuse with vivid detail or to block it out entirely.Other victims may remember certain incidents ormoments <strong>of</strong> assault vividly, but not others, and may notremember the incidents or moments in sequential order.Additionally, vicarious trauma is a well-recognizedphenomenon among helping pr<strong>of</strong>essionals, and involvessymptoms and behaviors similar to those exhibited bypersons directly exposed to traumatic situations. Becauseworking with victims <strong>of</strong> domestic violence, sexual assaultand stalking involves stressful issues and situations,lawyers should be aware <strong>of</strong> the possibility <strong>of</strong> the effects <strong>of</strong>vicarious trauma on themselves and their staff.The lawyer should have access to counseling and othersupport referrals so that the client or others can bereferred if necessary.F. Scope <strong>of</strong> Representation1. Client-Centered RepresentationThe lawyer should advise the client about legal optionsand consequences, but must ultimately defer to theclient regarding legal decisions.This project was supported by Grant No. 2005-WT-AX-K011 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice.The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this document are those <strong>of</strong> the author and do not necessarily reflectthe views <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. Commentary to these <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> has not beenapproved by the House <strong>of</strong> Delegates or Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong> and, accordingly, should not beconstrued as representing the policy <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong>.


ABA <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> n 37CommentaryAll lawyers have the duties <strong>of</strong> loyalty and confidentiality,but these duties are heightened in cases where thelawyer may represent teen, elderly or disabled victims<strong>of</strong> domestic violence, sexual assault or stalking. Inthese cases, the potential client may have limited legalcapacity, and may also be accompanied by a third-partycaregiver. In some cases, the third-party caregiver mayactually be the abuser. The lawyer must consult therules <strong>of</strong> the jurisdiction to determine whether the clientlawyerrelationship can be formed, and continue to assesswhether it can be sustained.The lawyer must refrain from sharing informationwith or taking direction from third parties claiming torepresent the interests <strong>of</strong> the client, such as parents, adultchildren, or other caregivers, without the client’s expressand informed consent.3. Scope <strong>of</strong> Representation,Case Closing and WithdrawalThe lawyer should be clear about his or her role in theclient’s legal matters, including communicating to theclient the limits <strong>of</strong> the lawyer’s role and the anticipatedtime the lawyer will fulfill that role.CommentaryThe lawyer must communicate the limits <strong>of</strong> his/herrepresentation clearly from the outset <strong>of</strong> representation.A written retainer agreement, even in cases where legalservices are free, is always recommended. If the lawyerwill represent the client only for the civil protectionorder (or for an even more limited purpose), or ifthe lawyer must withdraw for any reason, the lawyershould nevertheless make the client aware <strong>of</strong> the client’sability to pursue, appeal, enforce, modify or renew theThis project was supported by Grant No. 2005-WT-AX-K011 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice.The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this document are those <strong>of</strong> the author and do not necessarily reflectthe views <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. Commentary to these <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> has not beenapproved by the House <strong>of</strong> Delegates or Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong> and, accordingly, should not beconstrued as representing the policy <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong>.


38 n ABA <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong>protection order regardless <strong>of</strong> whether the lawyer willbe able to assist. Referrals to other legal and non-legalservice providers should be made available to the client.The client should be advised <strong>of</strong> the statute <strong>of</strong> limitationsfor any pending legal claims.4. Coordination with AlliedPr<strong>of</strong>essionals; Holistic RepresentationThe lawyer should refer the client to suitable nonlegalpr<strong>of</strong>essionals for support, advocacy andtreatment when necessary and seek to holisticallyrepresent the client.CommentaryFailure to coordinate with other pr<strong>of</strong>essionals may lead toundue stress and frustration for both the lawyer and theclient, resulting in impaired representation.AdvocatesCommunity-based advocates at domestic violence orrape crisis centers can play a critical role in working withthe lawyer and client to provide support services to theclient. Advocates can assist victims with many tasks,including safety planning and preparing for economicindependence.If the client is receiving counseling services from adomestic violence program or rape crisis center, thelawyer should be aware that it is not the advocate’s roleto share such information. It is also not the advocate’sjob to provide the client with auxiliary services such astransportation to and from lawyer meetings or court, orto provide translation/interpreter services.This project was supported by Grant No. 2005-WT-AX-K011 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice.The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this document are those <strong>of</strong> the author and do not necessarily reflectthe views <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. Commentary to these <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> has not beenapproved by the House <strong>of</strong> Delegates or Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong> and, accordingly, should not beconstrued as representing the policy <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong>.


ABA <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> n 39Counselors and/or TherapistsClients may struggle to cope with the effects <strong>of</strong> domesticviolence, sexual assault or stalking in their lives. Areferral to mental health care and/or substance abusetreatment, when appropriate, will <strong>of</strong>ten improve theclient’s coping skills and facilitate the client-lawyerrelationship by <strong>of</strong>fering the client an appropriate venuefor healing. Lawyers should be aware <strong>of</strong> appropriateand well-regarded counseling services specifically forvictims <strong>of</strong> domestic violence, sexual assault or stalking.The lawyer must also be prepared to address thepotential for discovery and/or impeachment, breach <strong>of</strong>privacy or confidentiality, and the effect on collaterallitigation (e.g. custody litigation) when a client receivestreatment or counseling services.Clergy or Other Faith-Based AdvocatesClients who are members <strong>of</strong> a faith community mayfind support and counsel from religious leaders who arewell-versed in domestic violence, sexual assault and/orstalking. Lawyers should be aware, however, that clergywho are not well-informed may <strong>of</strong>fer dangerous adviceto clients. Lawyers should be familiar with well-trainedfaith leaders for client referral.Tribal Elders, Healers or Other Traditional PractitionersNative survivors may have a myriad <strong>of</strong> services opento them in their communities. Lawyers who practicein Indian Country may be aware <strong>of</strong> culturally specificopportunities for victim healing. Be prepared, however,to graciously accept that the community may not discussthese options with non-Native lawyers, or even members<strong>of</strong> other Native communities.This project was supported by Grant No. 2005-WT-AX-K011 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice.The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this document are those <strong>of</strong> the author and do not necessarily reflectthe views <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. Commentary to these <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> has not beenapproved by the House <strong>of</strong> Delegates or Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong> and, accordingly, should not beconstrued as representing the policy <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong>.


40 n ABA <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong>IV. ProceduresA. Office Intake ProceduresIntake for victims <strong>of</strong> domestic violence, sexual assaultand/or stalking should be conducted by personnel trainedto work sensitively with this client population. Intakeshould include, at a minimum, a conflict check, a safetyassessment, and identification <strong>of</strong> any accommodationsrequired by the client.CommentaryIntake procedures will vary by service provider; for example, asolo practice will likely have a different intake procedure thana large urban legal services <strong>of</strong>fice, which may have a differentintake process from a shelter-based lawyer. However, thesebasic principles should apply to any practice.The lawyer should strive to minimize the number <strong>of</strong> timesthe client is asked to repeat the facts <strong>of</strong> her case, and shouldunderstand that the intake and interview process may bere-traumatizing for the client. Enough time should beallocated for the intake and initial interview to allow theclient to approach the subject at her own pace. The lawyershould be prepared for the possibility that the client will notreveal crucial details in the initial interview, and that moredisclosure may come over time. The lawyer and any otherintake personnel should also be prepared to respond withoutjudgment or shock to details that the client may reveal.Examples:Appropriate intake questions for victims <strong>of</strong> domestic violence,sexual assault and stalking may include questions aboutmedical treatment, police reports, other court orders, criminalhistory, access to weapons, physical evidence, photographs,privacy concerns, excited utterances, other incidents <strong>of</strong>violence or stalking behaviors, involvement <strong>of</strong> child oradult protective services, economic resources, collateralconsequences <strong>of</strong> violence, immigration status and safety.This project was supported by Grant No. 2005-WT-AX-K011 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice.The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this document are those <strong>of</strong> the author and do not necessarily reflectthe views <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. Commentary to these <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> has not beenapproved by the House <strong>of</strong> Delegates or Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong> and, accordingly, should not beconstrued as representing the policy <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong>.


ABA <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> n 41B. Basic Procedural Obligations <strong>of</strong> theLawyer1.2.3.4.The lawyer should obtain an interpreter if necessary,advise the client regarding confidentiality <strong>of</strong>communication, and establish the limits <strong>of</strong> thelawyer’s role.CommentarySee the discussion at III.D and III.F.The lawyer should create and maintain a trustingrelationship with the client.CommentaryTrust with the client may be built over time. If the clientshows hesitation or reluctance in answering questions,the lawyer should not construe this to mean that theclient is not being honest or is unwilling to cooperate. Allcommunication with the client should be conducted in arespectful, non-judgmental manner.The lawyer should strive to document every aspect<strong>of</strong> the case as it progresses, taking written notes <strong>of</strong>client interviews, witness interviews and other casedevelopments, and collecting other relevant writtendocumentation in the file.The lawyer should interview and counsel the clientabout the client’s goals and desires, review the file andany other information that the client has provided,and help the client determine whether obtaining a civilprotection order is the best remedy.CommentaryThe lawyer should listen carefully to the client’sstatements and expressed desires, and ensure that theclient has realistic expectations given the facts <strong>of</strong> the case.After the initial intake has been completed, the lawyershould ask any follow up questions necessary to assessthe situation as thoroughly and completely as possible.This project was supported by Grant No. 2005-WT-AX-K011 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice.The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this document are those <strong>of</strong> the author and do not necessarily reflectthe views <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. Commentary to these <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> has not beenapproved by the House <strong>of</strong> Delegates or Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong> and, accordingly, should not beconstrued as representing the policy <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong>.


42 n ABA <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong>5.Examples:Some examples <strong>of</strong> possible legal and safety-relatedquestions to ask in deciding to obtain or refrain fromseeking a protection order may include: 1) Will itincrease the victim’s safety?; 2) Will it trigger other legaldevelopments?; 3) Will it give a state continuing exclusivejurisdiction over custody when she wants to move?The lawyer should advise the client about the civilcourt system, the proceedings at hand and thelawyer’s responsibilities. Additionally, the lawyershould understand the basic criminal procedurefor a misdemeanor and felony domestic violence,sexual assault or stalking case so as to inform theclient how each case is different if they are occurringsimultaneously. If relevant, the lawyer should alsounderstand the basic procedures <strong>of</strong> child and/or adultprotective services so as to inform the client about whatto expect if she has a case pending with either agency.CommentaryThe lawyer must explain clearly to the client the legalissues and procedures so that the client knows whatto expect at the hearing. This includes preparing theclient to see the respondent at court and safety planningaccordingly. This can be a deterrent for many clients andmay affect their decision to seek a civil protection order.The lawyer should ensure that the client understands thegeneral layout <strong>of</strong> the courtroom, the role <strong>of</strong> the bailiffs ormarshals and where the respondent and any other partieswill be.When explaining legal matters, the lawyer shouldclearly explain the procedures and processes in layterms, and take necessary steps to ensure that the clienthas understood the substance <strong>of</strong> their meeting. Theclient may not understand legal terminology, especiallyif the client is suffering the effects <strong>of</strong> trauma, if theThis project was supported by Grant No. 2005-WT-AX-K011 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice.The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this document are those <strong>of</strong> the author and do not necessarily reflectthe views <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. Commentary to these <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> has not beenapproved by the House <strong>of</strong> Delegates or Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong> and, accordingly, should not beconstrued as representing the policy <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong>.


ABA <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> n 436.client’s first language is not English or if the client ishard <strong>of</strong> hearing or has a cognitive disability. Identifyany necessary safety precautions and plan accordingly.The lawyer should inform the client <strong>of</strong> all relevantavailable remedies and make sure the clientunderstands the legal implications <strong>of</strong> not seeking thecivil protection order (i.e., whether the civil protectionorder will be dismissed with or without prejudice,etc.). The lawyer should assist the client with a plan forself-sufficiency and seek economic remedies, wherepermitted, through the legal process.CommentaryClients who are victims <strong>of</strong> domestic violence, sexualassault or stalking are likely to have justified doubts aboutthe advisability <strong>of</strong> proceeding with a civil protectionorder. Many clients will withdraw from the case prior tohearing and some will return at a later time to continuelegal action. The lawyer should be prepared to advise theclient about the consequences <strong>of</strong> withdrawal for the legalcase and its effect (if any) on the ability to bring a similarcase in the future.Often, the primary relief sought by the client is for therespondent to stay away from the victim and ceaseall further contact. In most jurisdictions the courtwill specify the distance, relevant places and types <strong>of</strong>contact the respondent is restrained from engaging in.In domestic violence cases, some jurisdictions allow awide range <strong>of</strong> additional relief such as: child custody,visitation and exchange, child support, spousal support,and possession <strong>of</strong> the residence or other property. Indomestic violence, sexual assault and stalking cases,additional remedies may include: damages or monetaryreimbursement, forfeiture <strong>of</strong> firearms, relocation costs,emergency assistance and a catch-all provision which canbe utilized to ask for a wide range <strong>of</strong> remedies that theThis project was supported by Grant No. 2005-WT-AX-K011 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice.The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this document are those <strong>of</strong> the author and do not necessarily reflectthe views <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. Commentary to these <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> has not beenapproved by the House <strong>of</strong> Delegates or Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong> and, accordingly, should not beconstrued as representing the policy <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong>.


44 n ABA <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong>victim may need. While not an exhaustive list, the lawyershould carefully consider all <strong>of</strong> these potential remediessince the civil protection order hearing may be theonly time the client enters the courtroom and has theseremedies available. The lawyer may ask for many otherforms <strong>of</strong> relief by creatively using the catch-all provision,if available.C. Pre-hearing Responsibilities1.The lawyer should interview the client to identify casetheory, strategy and evidence; engage in appropriatediscovery when permitted and defend againstinappropriate discovery requests; and gather andinvestigate evidence as appropriate.CommentaryThe lawyer should carefully think through the logistics<strong>of</strong> obtaining the necessary evidence. For example,the lawyer should obtain the crime lab report fromthe forensic exam, torn clothing, pictures and any lawenforcement investigative reports if made. Similarly thelawyer should determine with the client which personalor household items the client wants or needs from thehouse if she is not currently staying there. The lawyershould be familiar with the process for obtaining 911tapes, police reports, medical reports and in domesticviolence cases, evidence <strong>of</strong> the respondent’s income.Other sources <strong>of</strong> potential evidence include (but are notlimited to): police reports, crime lab reports, forensicexaminations, medical records, voice mail messagesor other correspondence, relevant documents fromprevious court cases involving the client and/or therespondent and drug or alcohol abuse screens <strong>of</strong> theclient or respondent.This project was supported by Grant No. 2005-WT-AX-K011 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice.The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this document are those <strong>of</strong> the author and do not necessarily reflectthe views <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. Commentary to these <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> has not beenapproved by the House <strong>of</strong> Delegates or Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong> and, accordingly, should not beconstrued as representing the policy <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong>.


ABA <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> n 452.3.The lawyer should identify potential related legalissues and consequences for the client, such as interjurisdictionalenforcement <strong>of</strong> the order, effect <strong>of</strong>the order on current or future immigration status,intersection <strong>of</strong> the civil proceeding with criminalprosecution, and crime victim rights.CommentaryThe lawyer should always be aware that any evidenceused for the civil protection order hearing may also beused in future family, criminal, immigration or otherlitigation. For example, an affidavit used in a civilprotection hearing can be used to impeach the victimin a criminal trial or to harm credibility in a schooldisciplinary proceeding.The lawyer should also carefully consider potentiallegal consequences, depending on the client’s situationand specific concerns. For example, if the client isconsidering relocating to another jurisdiction to protectherself or her children, the lawyer should be able toadvise the client about full faith and credit, jurisdictionalrequirements for permanent custody orders and whatsteps to take in order to avoid parental abduction claims.Similarly, if the client does not want her employer toknow about the stalking or assault because she wants toprotect her privacy as much as possible, but clearly wantsa protection order, the lawyer should consider how thismay affect the client in her workplace.The lawyer should timely file all pleadings, motions,briefs and responses; identify, subpoena and preparewitnesses, including potential expert witnesses;prepare the cross-examination <strong>of</strong> respondent,including the gathering <strong>of</strong> respondent’s writtenadmissions, criminal history and police reportsinvolving both parties; research applicable legal issues;and advance legal arguments.This project was supported by Grant No. 2005-WT-AX-K011 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice.The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this document are those <strong>of</strong> the author and do not necessarily reflectthe views <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. Commentary to these <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> has not beenapproved by the House <strong>of</strong> Delegates or Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong> and, accordingly, should not beconstrued as representing the policy <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong>.


46 n ABA <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong>CommentaryUnless state law explicitly precludes filing pleadings, thelawyer should file any appropriate pleadings on behalf<strong>of</strong> the client, including, if necessary, amendments <strong>of</strong> herpro se filings and responses to pleadings <strong>of</strong> other parties,to ensure that appropriate issues are properly before thecourt and to expedite the court’s consideration <strong>of</strong> issuesimportant to the client’s interests.The lawyer should strive to obtain the best evidencepossible. Often, there may not be any direct witnessesto the violence other than the client, and she may behesitant to testify. Therefore, when formulating strategiesfor gathering evidence, the lawyer must be creative andchoose witnesses the court is most likely to find credible:for example, neutral parties such as the children’s teacher,neighbors, or the gas station attendant or store clerk whosaw the client immediately after the assault. The lawyershould think creatively about other witnesses and otherevidence that may corroborate any part <strong>of</strong> the client’scase, including coordinating with the prosecutor’s <strong>of</strong>ficeto develop evidence.The lawyer should consider whether using an expertwitness would be beneficial to the client’s case in orderto provide the court with more information regardingspecific topics such as the dynamics <strong>of</strong> domestic violence,sexual assault or stalking, lethality assessment, custodyevaluations, the effects <strong>of</strong> trauma, immigration issues orother unique concerns.To ensure that witnesses are ready for trial, the lawyershould ask them questions about the worst possiblething that the respondent may say about them,regardless <strong>of</strong> whether it would be true. Witnessesshould be thoroughly prepared for cross-examination.Additionally, the lawyer should ensure that witnesses arefamiliar with the dress code when going to court, beingspecific about what is appropriate and what is not. TheThis project was supported by Grant No. 2005-WT-AX-K011 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice.The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this document are those <strong>of</strong> the author and do not necessarily reflectthe views <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. Commentary to these <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> has not beenapproved by the House <strong>of</strong> Delegates or Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong> and, accordingly, should not beconstrued as representing the policy <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong>.


ABA <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> n 474.5.lawyer should explain about general procedures <strong>of</strong> thecourt and what they can expect.Again, the lawyer should always be aware that anyevidence used for the civil protection order hearing mayalso be used in future family, criminal, immigration orother litigation.If there are children involved and the law <strong>of</strong> thejurisdiction permits it, the lawyer should discuss withthe client her wishes regarding temporary custody andvisitation, keeping in mind jurisdictional issues. Thelawyer should carefully consider the pros and cons <strong>of</strong>having the children <strong>of</strong>fer witness testimony, in light <strong>of</strong>current law and scholarship on childhood development.CommentaryWhen the lawyer discusses issues related to temporarychild custody and visitation with the client, the lawyershould advise the client on the pros and cons <strong>of</strong> herparticular choices. While the ultimate decision to makedecisions about custody and visitation lie with the client,the lawyer should candidly inform the client aboutwhether the client’s wishes are the best course <strong>of</strong> action totake for overall success <strong>of</strong> the case.If the client has privacy concerns, the lawyer shouldconsider how protecting her privacy will affect thecase progression and continue to discuss the issue withthe client.CommentaryRegardless <strong>of</strong> whether a client announces her privacyconcerns, lawyers should assume that privacy concernsexist for every sexual assault victim. These concernsshould be considered at every step in the process. Thelawyer should ask clients specific questions abouthow they want their privacy protected. To addressthese concerns, the lawyer should consider the use <strong>of</strong>pseudonyms or initials in court documents, redactionThis project was supported by Grant No. 2005-WT-AX-K011 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice.The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this document are those <strong>of</strong> the author and do not necessarily reflectthe views <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. Commentary to these <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> has not beenapproved by the House <strong>of</strong> Delegates or Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong> and, accordingly, should not beconstrued as representing the policy <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong>.


48 n ABA <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong>6.7.<strong>of</strong> home/school addresses, limiting witnesses, sealing<strong>of</strong> court records, and holding the hearing in closed orprivate chambers.If the respondent subpoenas the client’s records, thelawyer must be prepared to address privacy concernswith the court.If the respondent is unrepresented by counsel, thelawyer should consider how this may affect his or herability to negotiate, conduct the hearing, protect theclient during cross-examination, and keep the lawyerand the client safe in the courthouse.CommentaryWhen the respondent is unrepresented, the lawyer shouldmake an effort to keep all communications in writingfor clarity and to create a record. The lawyer shouldalso seek to require the respondent to submit his crossexamination <strong>of</strong> the victim to the court in writing, forrecital by the court, in order to minimize the opportunityfor harassment or intimidation <strong>of</strong> the victim.The lawyer should prepare a specific, enforceableproposed order that both protects the client and holdsthe respondent accountable.CommentaryThe victim’s lawyer should draft the proposed orderwhenever permitted because <strong>of</strong> the importance <strong>of</strong>securing specific, enforceable relief. If the court willnot accept the proposed order, the lawyer shouldnevertheless advocate in closing for inclusion <strong>of</strong> itsprovisions in the court’s order. Alternatively, manycourts utilize a standardized form order. Usage <strong>of</strong> theform may prevent omission <strong>of</strong> important requirementsand facilitate enforcement. The lawyer should firstensure that the forms are entirely consistent with thecivil protection order statute. If the lawyer chooses toThis project was supported by Grant No. 2005-WT-AX-K011 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice.The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this document are those <strong>of</strong> the author and do not necessarily reflectthe views <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. Commentary to these <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> has not beenapproved by the House <strong>of</strong> Delegates or Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong> and, accordingly, should not beconstrued as representing the policy <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong>.


ABA <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> n 49use the standardized form, the lawyer should fill out theform using specific language to ensure that the order isenforceable and tailored to meet the needs <strong>of</strong> the victim.For example, if children are involved, the order shouldexplicitly articulate the day, time and location forvisitation or exchange, include timed windows forexchanges and consequences for a failure to appear, ordesignate a named supervisor for supervised visitation.If the parties work together, the order should be specificabout how the distance will be maintained between theparties and how and through whom any work-relatedcommunication is to occur. Other proposals caninclude ordering the respondent to make credit card andmortgage payments, or ordering police stand-by to obtainthe client’s belongings. In addition, in sexual assault andstalking cases, if the victim and the perpetrator attend thesame school, the order should specify that the respondentmay not attend the same classes or reside in the samedormitory or residence as the client.The lawyer should seek to ensure that the orderincludes information relevant to enforcement such asjurisdictional basis, penalties for violation, weaponsprohibitions, and contact information for the court. Thelawyer should also be aware <strong>of</strong> any other orders issuedin the same jurisdiction or other jurisdictions (includingschool-based orders) and their content and seek to avoidthe issuance <strong>of</strong> competing and/or conflicting orders.The lawyer must also remember that the proposed ordershould state what the client wants or needs, not what thelawyer thinks is appropriate. For example, some victims<strong>of</strong> domestic violence, sexual assault or stalking may wantto have contact with the respondent, such as continuingto work with or co-parent with the respondent, andwant the order simply to prohibit the respondent fromassaulting or harassing them or from being violent orthreatening towards them.This project was supported by Grant No. 2005-WT-AX-K011 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice.The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this document are those <strong>of</strong> the author and do not necessarily reflectthe views <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. Commentary to these <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> has not beenapproved by the House <strong>of</strong> Delegates or Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong> and, accordingly, should not beconstrued as representing the policy <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong>.


50 n ABA <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong>8.Batterers Intervention Programs; CounselingIf the respondent is ordered to attend a batterer’sintervention program, the lawyer should ensure that theprogram is a certified program that is designed to addressthe unique needs <strong>of</strong> this perpetrator population. Thelawyer should be well-informed about these programsand be prepared with the name, address and telephonenumber <strong>of</strong> the specific program the lawyer and clientwant included in the order.Any program requiring the parties to communicate orspend time together (including mediation, marriagecounseling or joint parenting classes) is dangerous andill-advised. Additionally, anger management programstypically are not appropriate for perpetrators <strong>of</strong> domesticviolence, sexual assault or stalking, because they fail toadequately address the seriousness <strong>of</strong> the violence, andthey can minimize the dynamics <strong>of</strong> power and control atthe root <strong>of</strong> these behaviors.The lawyer should be cognizant <strong>of</strong> the client’s rights inother forums such as immigration, tribal or criminaljustice, and when appropriate, the lawyer shouldcoordinate with those systems.CommentaryCriminal Law IssuesIf appropriate, the lawyer should work with prosecutorsto achieve victim safety and <strong>of</strong>fender accountability.This includes asking the prosecutor to drop theprosecution when appropriate, understanding thatthe ultimate decision to prosecute lies within theprosecutor’s discretion.When working with the prosecutor, the lawyer must beaware <strong>of</strong> the conflicts that may arise when a criminalcase against the respondent or the petitioner occurssimultaneously with the civil protection order hearing.For example, the lawyer should be aware <strong>of</strong> the potentialThis project was supported by Grant No. 2005-WT-AX-K011 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice.The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this document are those <strong>of</strong> the author and do not necessarily reflectthe views <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. Commentary to these <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> has not beenapproved by the House <strong>of</strong> Delegates or Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong> and, accordingly, should not beconstrued as representing the policy <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong>.


ABA <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> n 51for clients’ testimony or other evidence during protectionorder hearings to be used against them in a criminal trialwhere they are the complaining witness, and vice versa.In addition, the lawyer should be aware <strong>of</strong> any issuesthat arise from the intersection <strong>of</strong> the client’s statutoryand/or constitutional crime victim rights and the civilproceeding and/or other administrative hearings suchas an immigration hearing, making sure no inadvertentwaiver <strong>of</strong> privilege or privacy occurs.Clients must also understand that they do not have aconfidential relationship with the prosecutor or advocatesworking in the prosecutor’s <strong>of</strong>fice, and that the prosecutoris not the client’s lawyer and does not represent theclient’s individual interests. The lawyer should make surethat clients understand the difference between a criminaland civil order, the differences in the relief each <strong>of</strong> theseorders may provide, and most importantly, the durationand renewability <strong>of</strong> the orders.The lawyer should be familiar with state and federalkidnapping or custodial interference statutes, and beprepared to discuss these provisions with the client ifeither party has crossed state lines or concealed thechildren. When both a criminal and civil case is pending,the lawyer should be aware that the judge may inform therespondent <strong>of</strong> his or her Fifth Amendment rights beforetestifying in the civil protection order hearing, and maynot allow cross examination <strong>of</strong> the respondent. The courtmay also set over the civil case, pending resolution <strong>of</strong> thecriminal matters.Issues in Indian CountryWhen representing a Native <strong>American</strong> victim wholives or works in Indian Country, lawyers should, asa preliminary matter, ensure that they are licensed topractice in the tribal courts. Domestic violence codesmay be more expansive in Indian Country (e.g. “family”This project was supported by Grant No. 2005-WT-AX-K011 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice.The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this document are those <strong>of</strong> the author and do not necessarily reflectthe views <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. Commentary to these <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> has not beenapproved by the House <strong>of</strong> Delegates or Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong> and, accordingly, should not beconstrued as representing the policy <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong>.


52 n ABA <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong>may be more loosely defined) and therefore affordgreater protections for the client.The lawyer should also become familiar with theprovisions <strong>of</strong> the Indian Child Welfare Act and thestate and tribal implementations <strong>of</strong> the law, as it maybe relevant to custody determinations subsequent toincidents <strong>of</strong> domestic violence, sexual assault or stalking.The lawyer should be aware <strong>of</strong> the jurisdictional andchoice <strong>of</strong> law considerations that may arise when a victimis Native, and consult with a tribal law expert if needed.For example, the lawyer must determine whether therelevant tribe can exercise civil jurisdiction over a non-Native respondent. When considering civil remedies,the lawyer should be aware that VAWA gives tribes theauthority to punish non-Indians by civil contempt orexclusion from tribal lands. However, not all tribes mayhave civil contempt statutes or exclusion provisionswhich apply to non-Indians.In criminal matters, if the community or reservationwhere the victim lives or works is subject to PublicLaw 280, the state and the tribe may have concurrentjurisdiction. If the perpetrator is non-Native the tribewill not have jurisdiction. If the perpetrator is Native,the tribe will have jurisdiction. Even if the <strong>of</strong>fender isnon-Native and the tribe does not have jurisdiction toprosecute, tribal law enforcement does have the authorityto hold the perpetrator until state <strong>of</strong> federal authoritiesare available. In addition, the ability <strong>of</strong> the tribe tosentence Native <strong>of</strong>fenders is limited. When the <strong>of</strong>fenseis a major crime, however, the federal government willalso have jurisdiction, and the sentencing ability will besignificantly greater.This project was supported by Grant No. 2005-WT-AX-K011 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice.The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this document are those <strong>of</strong> the author and do not necessarily reflectthe views <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. Commentary to these <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> has not beenapproved by the House <strong>of</strong> Delegates or Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong> and, accordingly, should not beconstrued as representing the policy <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong>.


ABA <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> n 53Finally, even though VAWA ensures full faith andcredit for protection orders, there are still some countyand tribal law enforcement agents that do not honorprotection orders issued by other jurisdictions. Sincethis is such a critical safety issue, knowledge <strong>of</strong> localpractice is important.9.Immigration Law issuesThe lawyer should also be aware <strong>of</strong> immigrationimplications for the client in getting involved with acriminal case against the respondent. The issues toconsider include whether or not the victim and/orthe respondent are documented or undocumented, orwhether the respondent is sponsoring the victim in animmigration case. The lawyer should consult with animmigration lawyer or refer the client to an immigrationexpert if necessary.The lawyer should become familiar with the practices<strong>of</strong> the judge or hearing <strong>of</strong>ficer on the case, as well as anylocal procedural rules or standing orders, and plan forsafety at court.CommentaryIf needed, the lawyer should seek out communityresources and/or mentors to learn about particular judgesand local practices to effectively represent the client.The lawyer should be familiar with local procedural rulesregarding protection orders, for example: the sequence <strong>of</strong>what must happen between the issuance <strong>of</strong> an emergencyprotection order and the final protection order, appealtimes, how to confirm service prior to the final protectionorder hearing, etc.This project was supported by Grant No. 2005-WT-AX-K011 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice.The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this document are those <strong>of</strong> the author and do not necessarily reflectthe views <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. Commentary to these <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> has not beenapproved by the House <strong>of</strong> Delegates or Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong> and, accordingly, should not beconstrued as representing the policy <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong>.


54 n ABA <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong>D. HearingsThe lawyer should participate actively in all courtproceedings on issues within the scope <strong>of</strong> the lawyer’srepresentation <strong>of</strong> the client.1.2.3.The lawyer should prepare for and attend all hearingswith the client, using creativity and skill in presentingthe evidence. Specifically, the lawyer should prepareand make all appropriate motions, responses andevidentiary objections; prepare, present and crossexaminewitnesses and exhibits; and seek everyappropriate remedy the client is entitled to under thelaw, subject to the client’s direction.The lawyer should make/protect a record for appeal,ensuring that the court makes specific findings on therecord, if possible.CommentaryThe lawyer should always seek to have proceedingsrecorded, according to the rule <strong>of</strong> the jurisdiction. Thelawyer should make sure that all the required elementsare proven and that all objections and pr<strong>of</strong>fers arerecorded. Off-the-record and in-chambers conferencesshould be avoided. If unavoidable, the lawyer shouldsummarize what transpired for the record and ensurejudge’s ruling is recorded, including any denials.Finally, the lawyer should ensure that the court makesspecific findings on the record and/or issues a statement<strong>of</strong> decision.The lawyer should seek to ensure that the courtroom issafe for the client and the lawyer, including preparingfor litigating against a pro se respondent.CommentaryThe lawyer should always be familiar with courtroomsecurity procedures and make use <strong>of</strong> the availability<strong>of</strong> court marshals and bailiffs. In some jurisdictions,This project was supported by Grant No. 2005-WT-AX-K011 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice.The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this document are those <strong>of</strong> the author and do not necessarily reflectthe views <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. Commentary to these <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> has not beenapproved by the House <strong>of</strong> Delegates or Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong> and, accordingly, should not beconstrued as representing the policy <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong>.


ABA <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> n 554.this may require calling ahead to ensure that adequatepersonnel or screening equipment will be available.At no time should the client be left alone while in thecourthouse; it is advisable to ask a support person,community-based advocate or paralegal to accompanythe client during times when the lawyer must attend toother matters. Additionally, if the client has children,arrangements should be made to ensure that they arenot left unattended at the courthouse. Finally, the lawyershould request that the client be allowed to leave thecourthouse first and that the respondent be ordered toremain in the courtroom for a period <strong>of</strong> time adequate toensure that the respondent will not be able to follow and/or lie in wait for the client. If necessary, clients shouldalso request a security escort to their car or other mode<strong>of</strong> transportation after the hearing.Lawyers should consider asking the court to clear thecourtroom or to be put last on the docket when theyanticipate detailed and/or difficult testimony about abuse,sexual violence or child sexual abuse.The lawyer should consider a negotiated settlement onlywhen it is in the best interest <strong>of</strong> the client, keeping inmind the danger <strong>of</strong> mutual orders and the importance<strong>of</strong> legal findings for inter-jurisdictional enforcement.E. Post-hearing ResponsibilitiesEthical representation does not end with the hearing.At a minimum, the lawyer should ensure that the clientunderstands the outcome <strong>of</strong> the proceedings, discussimplementation and any alternative legal options, and,when the client-lawyer relationship has ended, clearlycommunicate that fact to the former client.1.The lawyer should seek to ensure that the order isclear and accurate and that the client understands allprovisions <strong>of</strong> the order, including its expiration date(if any) and the requirements for renewal or extension.This project was supported by Grant No. 2005-WT-AX-K011 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice.The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this document are those <strong>of</strong> the author and do not necessarily reflectthe views <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. Commentary to these <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> has not beenapproved by the House <strong>of</strong> Delegates or Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong> and, accordingly, should not beconstrued as representing the policy <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong>.


56 n ABA <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong>The lawyer should also advise the client about howto modify the order and the availability <strong>of</strong> civil andcriminal contempt proceedings.CommentaryThe lawyer should ensure the client has a validenforceable order and that the client understands all<strong>of</strong> the language <strong>of</strong> the order, and how it is likely to beenforced. The lawyer should take any additional actionrequired to ensure or facilitate enforcement, for example:registration with a statewide database; providing a copyto the local sheriff for service; contacting appropriateauthorities to set up wage assignments for child support;setting up bank accounts or other mechanisms forreceiving economic relief.The lawyer should note the expiration date <strong>of</strong> the orderand, if it is safe to do so, send a reminder to the clientwhen appropriate. The lawyer should analyze the casefor other causes <strong>of</strong> action and discuss with the clientthe possibility <strong>of</strong> pursuing other needed civil actions.If the respondent was ordered to attend any particularprogram or treatment, the lawyer should request areview hearing from which the client is exempted toensure that the respondent is complying with the order.In addition, the lethality <strong>of</strong> a respondent may increaseafter the hearing. The lawyer should, therefore ensurethat the client has a sufficient safety plan even after acivil protection order has been obtained.The lawyer should also, if the client desires, engagethe legal process to ensure proper enforcement <strong>of</strong>a civil protection order when it has been violated.The lawyer should counsel the client about full faithand credit and enforceability <strong>of</strong> protection orders inother jurisdictions, should the client choose to go toa different jurisdiction. In some cases, the client maywish to reconcile with the respondent but keep otherprovisions <strong>of</strong> the civil protection order in place. InThis project was supported by Grant No. 2005-WT-AX-K011 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice.The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this document are those <strong>of</strong> the author and do not necessarily reflectthe views <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. Commentary to these <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> has not beenapproved by the House <strong>of</strong> Delegates or Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong> and, accordingly, should not beconstrued as representing the policy <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong>.


ABA <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> n 572.such cases, the lawyer should seek a modification <strong>of</strong> theorder, refer the client to competent counsel, or advisethe client how to proceed pro se.The lawyer should advise the client about enforcementor contempt procedures. The lawyer should be aware<strong>of</strong> the differences between civil and criminal contemptand discuss with the client which forum is the bestoption. The lawyer should explain to the client that if therespondent is found in criminal contempt for violatinga civil protection order, double jeopardy will prevent asubsequent criminal prosecution for the same act.However, if there has been a prosecution <strong>of</strong> theperpetrator in a tribal court for criminal contemptor a crime for the same acts, it is possible that actioncould also be brought in state court. Since the tribalgovernment is a sovereign nation, federal doublejeopardy protection generally does not apply. A fewstates (such as Alaska, Minnesota, Colorado, New Yorkand possibly others) have state laws granting doublejeopardy protection that exceed federal constitutionalprotection. They do not observe the “dual sovereigns”exception and may arguably extend double jeopardyprotection to situations where the individual has beenbrought forward on charges before tribal and state courtsfor the same act.The lawyer should ensure that the order is served on therespondent and that the client is prepared to respondsafely and effectively to violations by the respondent.CommentaryAfter the hearing, the lawyer should advise the clientthat a violation <strong>of</strong> the protection order, depending onthe law in the jurisdiction, may be a crime and that ifthe protection order is violated, the client can call thepolice and report the nature <strong>of</strong> the violation. The lawyershould know how local law enforcement typicallyThis project was supported by Grant No. 2005-WT-AX-K011 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice.The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this document are those <strong>of</strong> the author and do not necessarily reflectthe views <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. Commentary to these <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> has not beenapproved by the House <strong>of</strong> Delegates or Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong> and, accordingly, should not beconstrued as representing the policy <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong>.


58 n ABA <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong>3.responds if there is a violation and inform the client.The lawyer should prepare the client to documentall incidents <strong>of</strong> violation and counsel the client onsteps to take if the police fail to enforce the protectionorder. The lawyer should check in with the client aboutcontinued safety planning.The lawyer should counsel the client to keep a copy <strong>of</strong>the protection order available at all times. The clientshould be advised to distribute copies <strong>of</strong> the protectionorder (with pictures <strong>of</strong> the respondent, if possible)where the client feels it is safe to do so, including home,school, work and child care providers. The lawyer shouldadvise the client about the risks and benefits <strong>of</strong> notifyingothers about the violence or threat <strong>of</strong> violence, includingpotential adverse employment consequences. The lawyershould tell the client that no court order is self-enforcingand that the client is an active part <strong>of</strong> the enforcementprocess. The client should be reminded <strong>of</strong> the protectionorder’s expiration date and the steps to take to renew, ifnecessary. With the client, the lawyer should set up asafety plan to obtain the order in jurisdictions where theorder is not produced immediately by the court.If the hearing does not result in the issuance <strong>of</strong> a safeand effective protection order, the lawyer should discusswith the client the process for appeal, rehearing and/ormodification.CommentaryWhen faced with an adverse decision from the court, thelawyer should counsel the client on the likelihood <strong>of</strong>success on appeal. The lawyer and client should alsoconsider how the respondent may react to an appeal, theimplications <strong>of</strong> a loss on a pending or future custody case,if applicable, and any increased safety or privacy concernsthat may arise if the case is appealed. Where it is the ruleThis project was supported by Grant No. 2005-WT-AX-K011 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice.The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this document are those <strong>of</strong> the author and do not necessarily reflectthe views <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. Commentary to these <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> has not beenapproved by the House <strong>of</strong> Delegates or Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong> and, accordingly, should not beconstrued as representing the policy <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong>.


ABA <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> n 594.<strong>of</strong> the jurisdiction, clients should also be warned thatthey may be responsible for the opposing party’s legal feesif the appeal is unsuccessful.The lawyer should always communicate with the clientabout case closing procedures, including withdrawal,and implications.CommentaryThe lawyer should, in writing, inform clients <strong>of</strong> theirrights and what to expect from the lawyer in the future.For example, if the scope <strong>of</strong> the lawyer’s representationwas limited to obtaining the protection order, and thelawyer will not handle possible enforcement issues thatmay arise in the future, the lawyer should make sure thatthe client understands these parameters.This project was supported by Grant No. 2005-WT-AX-K011 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice.The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this document are those <strong>of</strong> the author and do not necessarily reflectthe views <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. Commentary to these <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> has not beenapproved by the House <strong>of</strong> Delegates or Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong> and, accordingly, should not beconstrued as representing the policy <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Association</strong>.


740 15th Street, NWWashington, DC 20005Phone (202) 662-1744Fax (202) 662-1594abacdvta@abanet.orgwww.abanet.org/domviol

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!