13.07.2015 Views

CHRO ex. rel. Lenotti v. City of Stamford - Connecticut Employment ...

CHRO ex. rel. Lenotti v. City of Stamford - Connecticut Employment ...

CHRO ex. rel. Lenotti v. City of Stamford - Connecticut Employment ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3. Fire Chief Robert McGrath <strong>of</strong> respondent’s fire department is a non-votingmember <strong>of</strong> the fire commission and he provides the fire commission withinformation concerning a candidates’ performance and character. Tr. 456-57.4. The eligibility list <strong>ex</strong>pires after two years have elapsed and the candidatesmust take the <strong>ex</strong>am again to become eligible, which is administeredapproximately every two years. Tr. 178, 481-82, 870, 1069-69. R. Ex. 5, p.19.5. All <strong>ex</strong>ams have 100 multiple-choice questions and are timed <strong>ex</strong>ams providingthe candidate with three and one half (3 ½ ) hours to answer questions. Tr.1035, 699-701; R. Ex. 37 and 38. The Vantage McCann (McCann) companygrades the <strong>ex</strong>ams, provides the respondent with a report that <strong>ex</strong>plains the<strong>ex</strong>am process and provides the candidates’ <strong>ex</strong>am scores. C. Ex. 16; Tr. 43.6. Some candidates complete the <strong>ex</strong>am before the time has <strong>ex</strong>pired. Tr. 699,722, 732, 794-95, 821 and 826.7. In 1998, the complainant took the <strong>ex</strong>am to be appointed to lieutenant andpassed with a score <strong>of</strong> 70. Tr. 22 and 980; R. Ex. 20.8. In 2000, the complainant was appointed to lieutenant upon <strong>ex</strong>haustion <strong>of</strong> theeligibility list, which means all individuals remaining on the list wereappointed. Tr. 25 –30, 989.9. The fire commission did not conduct a thorough interview when appointingthe complainant to lieutenant because it had three open positions and threecandidates remaining on the list; thus, all were appointed. Tr. 35, 989. Allthree candidates met with the fire commission during the same time. Tr. 1168.10. As a lieutenant, the complainant completed a one hundred forty (140) hourcourse to become certified as a hazardous material (hazmat) technician. Tr.375, 525 and 1083.11. In 2000, the respondent had concerns about the complainant’s report writingand referred him to Barbara Boller, a school psychologist for the respondent.Tr. 261; 1011-16.12. On November 13, 2000, Boller diagnosed the complainant with a languagebasedlearning disability and memorialized her findings in herreport/evaluation. Tr. 254-55; C. Ex. 4. Also, she recommended that thePage 4 <strong>of</strong> 49

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!