Evaluation of the 5th Amendment of the German Gambling Ordinance

More documents

Recommendations

Info

4. Design and sub-studies4.1 Design(3) Problems−−Planned oversampling of long-term gamblers: 75% with gamblingexperience before 2006 (in order to evaluate changes between 2006and 2010)Oversampling of intensive gamblers: by random selection of visitorsfor interviews→ Pathological gamblers probably overrepresented→ Comparison with representative population figures not possible8
4. Design and sub-studies4.2 Sub-studies(1) Sub-study 1: Interviews with gamblers on AWPs− 447 in gaming arcades, 144 in pubs (591, target: 576)− Quotation: 75% gambling experience before 2006− High rate of refusals to participate (47% and 33%)(2) Sub-study 3: Interviews with operators of gaming arcades and pubs− 84 in gaming arcades, 18 in restaurants(102, target: 96)− 86% resp. 67% in business / operation before 2006(3) Sub-study 4: participating observation in gaming arcades and pubs− Same sample as interviews with gamblers and operators9
Page 1: Evaluation of the 5 th Amendment of
Page 4 and 5: 1. Background1.2 Evaluation backgro
Page 6 and 7: 3. Project aimsAim 1:Aim 2:Aim 3:Ai
Page 10 and 11: 4. Design and sub-studies4.2 Sub-st
Page 12 and 13: 5. Major conclusions5.2 Aim 2: Impl
Page 14 and 15: 5. Major conclusions5.3 Aim 3: Impa
Page 16 and 17: 5. Major conclusions5.5 Aim 5: Impa
Page 18 and 19: 6. Recommendations6.1 Better knowle
Page 20 and 21: 6. Recommendations6.3 Improved impl

Evaluation of the 5th Amendment of the German Gambling Ordinance

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?