Appendix K - Discharge Report

More documents

Recommendations

Info

$Daubenton\'s Bat Waterways Survey (PDF-191 kb) - Mayo County ...$

DOCUMENT INFORMATIONDOCUMENT TITLE:CORRIB ONSHORE PIPELINE – DISCHARGE WATER QUALITYEVALUATION REPORTISSUE DATE: 21 ST JUNE 2011REPORT NUMBER:COR-14-OP-SH-0000MULTI-DISIPLINARY TEAM OF AUTHORS/CONTRIBUTORSMICHAEL GILLENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER/HYDROLOGIST (HES)AOIFE REYNOLDS SENIOR ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISOR (SEPIL)EVELYN MCAULLIFFE SENIOR SCIENTIST (PROCESS & WATER - RPS)FRANICS FINERTY ASSOCIATE ENGINEER (DRAINAGE & WATER - RPS)DR. PAMELA BARTLEY HYDROGEOLOGIST (HES)GER MORGANFRESHWATER ECOLOGIST (AQUATIC SERVICES UNIT, UCC)JENNY NEFF FIEEM PROJECT ECOLOGISTREPORT NO.: COR-14-OP-SH-0000
TABLE OF CONTENTS1. INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................................11.1 BACKGROUND & PURPOSE .............................................................................................................11.2 AUGHOOSE COMPOUND - CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE .............................................................11.3 DISCHARGE EVALUATION – OTHER SURFACE WATER DISCHARGES .......................................12. EVALUATION METHODOLOGY..................................................................................................................22.1 EVALUATION CONCEPT....................................................................................................................22.2 DISCUSSION ON RECEIVING ENVIRONMENT ................................................................................22.2.1 Ecological evaluation of the receiving environment.........................................................................22.2.2 Discussion on the receiving environment ........................................................................................32.3 ASSIMILATION CAPACITY SIMULATION APPROACH .....................................................................53. ASSIMILATION CAPACITY RESULTS........................................................................................................83.1 SUMMARY ASSIMILATION CAPACITY DISCHARGE CRITERIA RESULTS ....................................83.2.1 Scope & Objective.........................................................................................................................103.2.2 Phases of Work Identified .............................................................................................................103.2.3 Proposed Mitigation / Sediment Prevention Measures..................................................................103.2.4 Potential Sources of Run-Off and Possible Contaminants ............................................................113.2.5 Run-Off Characterisation...............................................................................................................113.2.6 Design Flows.................................................................................................................................133.2.7 Output Specification ......................................................................................................................133.2.8 Criteria Informing Treatment Solution Selection............................................................................143.2.9 Suitable Treatment Systems .........................................................................................................143.2.10 Selected Treatment Solutions for Each Phase .........................................................................153.2.11 Proposed Mechanisms for Compliance Sampling and <strong>Report</strong>ing for Aughoose Compound ....154. OTHER PROPOSED DISCHARGES..........................................................................................................174.1 DISCHARGES TO COASTAL AND TRANSITIONAL WATERS........................................................174.2 DISCHARGES TO RFRESHWATER.................................................................................................175. CONCLUSIONS ..........................................................................................................................................186. REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................................19FIGURESFIGURE 1FIGURE 2ROUTE LAYOUTSCHEMATIC OF RECEIVING WATER HYDROLOGICAL REGIMETABLES (in text)TABLE ATABLE BTABLE CTABLE DSIMULATION ADOPTED WATER QUALITY & RELEVANT WATER QUALITYOBJECTIVESASSIMILATION CAPACITY DISCHARGE CRITERIA RESULTSSUGGESTED PERMISSIBLE DISCHARGE CRITERIA FOR COMPLIANT RECEIVINGWATER’S EQS’SSUGGESTED PERMISSIBLE DISCHARGE CRITERIA TO FRESHWATERAPPENDICESAPPENDIX IAPPENDIX IIAPPENDIX IIIAPPENDIX IVAPPENDIX VAPPENDIX VIAPPENDIX VIIINTERPRETATION OF THE SIGNIFICANCE OF EUROPEAN COMMUNITIESENVIRONMENTAL OBJECTIVES (SURFACE WATERS) REGULATIONS 2009(S.I. NO. 272 OF 2009)'TYPICAL' PHYSICO-CHEMICAL VALUES FOR Q-VALUE CATEGORIES: SOURCE:MARTIN MCGARRIGLE, EPASURFACE WATER ASSIMILATION CAPACITY SIMULATION DATA - HYDROMETRICSASSIMILATION CAPACITY SIMULATION OUTPUTSPROPOSED TREATMENT SOLUTIONS MAP AND FLOW DIAGRAMPROPOSED MECHANISMS FOR COMPLIANCE SAMPLING AND REPORTINGUWWTD - LOOK UP TABLEREPORT NO.: COR-14-OP-SH-0000
Page 1: CORRIB ONSHORE PIPELINEDISCHARGE WA
Page 8 and 9: Corrib Onshore PipelineDischarge Cr
Page 33 and 34: HYDRO-ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICESCORRIB
Page 37 and 38: Enabling WorksPhase & InitialConstr
Page 40 and 41: Initial ConstructionPhase (part)Bul
Page 44: Corrib Onshore PipelineDischarge Cr

Appendix K - Discharge Report

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?