Improved Reliability of Retail & Commercial Payments Information

More documents

Recommendations

Info

MX messages for SEPA: how?< “TVS”• Technical Validation Subsets = RESTRICTED schemas• In line with:• Credit Transfer and Direct Debit Rulebooks defining SEPA core andbasic payments• SEPA Implementation Guidelines defining the use <strong>of</strong> UNIFI MXs forSEPASlide 42
SEPA: regional use <strong>of</strong> global MX messagesSlide 43
Page 1 and 2: Improved Reliability ofRetail & Com
Page 3 and 4: Agenda< Industry concerns with comm
Page 7 and 8: The UNIFI value proposition (1/5)Ob
Page 9 and 10: The UNIFI value proposition (2/5)Pr
Page 11 and 12: The UNIFI value proposition (4/5)Gr
Page 13 and 14: What is driving the move to UNIFI?<
Page 15 and 16: UNIFI methodology:Threelayered ap
Page 17 and 18: UNIFI (ISO20022) Standards repos
Page 19 and 20: UNIFI (ISO 20022) Registration b
Page 21 and 22: UNIFI -The Payments SEG (1/3)< Memb
Page 23 and 24: UNIFI -The Payments SEG (3/3)includ
Page 25 and 26: UNIFI -How does it fit into the ISO
Page 29 and 30: Harmonisation meeting participantsM
Page 31 and 32: MX party identificationsUltimate Cr
Page 33 and 34: FATF: NonFinancial Institution Pa
Page 35 and 36: MX account identificationsAll parti
Page 37 and 38: MX remittance informationThe sameco
Page 39 and 40: MX related remittance informationTh
Page 41: MX messages for SEPADirect DebitCre
Page 45 and 46: 197 corporate entities…•North A
Page 47 and 48: XML Cash Management standards in TA
Page 49 and 50: SWIFT messaging services for EBASTE
Page 51 and 52: Uptake in other markets< Securities

Improved Reliability of Retail & Commercial Payments Information

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?