Photo by William Jonson.are <strong>the</strong>y legal?The first step <strong>in</strong> fight<strong>in</strong>g a digital billboardthat has been erected or proposed <strong>in</strong> your locality is to f<strong>in</strong>dout whe<strong>the</strong>r your state’s agreement with <strong>the</strong> Federal HighwayAdm<strong>in</strong>istration (FHWA) already prohibits <strong>the</strong>m. Many do.While that hasn’t stopped <strong>the</strong> billboard <strong>in</strong>dustry from erect<strong>in</strong>g<strong>the</strong> signs anyway, it can give you some powerful ammunitionwith which to challenge <strong>the</strong>m and argue for <strong>the</strong>ir removal.Flash<strong>in</strong>g, Intermittent, or Mov<strong>in</strong>g LightsOn July 17, 1996, <strong>the</strong> FHWA issued a memorandum clarify<strong>in</strong>g<strong>the</strong> status of “changeable message signs.” It noted that manyState-Federal agreements would allow for changeable messagessuch as <strong>the</strong> Tri-Vision signs that use rotat<strong>in</strong>g panels orslats. However, it also noted that, even if Tri-Vision signswere allowed, <strong>the</strong> agreement probably wouldn’t allow LEDsigns. “In nearly all States, <strong>the</strong>se signs may still not conta<strong>in</strong>flash<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>termittent, or mov<strong>in</strong>g lights,” <strong>the</strong> memo states.A 2006 letter to Texas Department of Transportation officialsgoes even fur<strong>the</strong>r. If <strong>the</strong> state agreement prohibits signs“illum<strong>in</strong>ated by any flash<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>termittent or mov<strong>in</strong>g light orlights…<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g any type of screen us<strong>in</strong>g animated or scroll<strong>in</strong>gdisplays, such as LED (light-emitt<strong>in</strong>g diode) screen or anyo<strong>the</strong>r type of video display, even if <strong>the</strong> message is stationary,”<strong>the</strong>n “<strong>the</strong> word<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> agreement clearly prohibits suchsigns,” it states.Nonconform<strong>in</strong>g SignsAno<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>dustry trick is to convert a static, nonconform<strong>in</strong>gsign to an LED sign and claim that <strong>the</strong> change is not an“improvement,” and <strong>the</strong>refore not prohibited. The 1996FHWA memo clearly states that this is not permitted, as“apply<strong>in</strong>g updated technology to nonconform<strong>in</strong>g signs wouldbe considered a substantial change and <strong>in</strong>consistent” withfederal regulations.A July 1998 FHWA memo offers fur<strong>the</strong>r guidance. It declaresthat signs with animation or scroll<strong>in</strong>g messages should beconsidered nonconform<strong>in</strong>g signs and notes that <strong>the</strong>y raise“significant highway safety questions because of <strong>the</strong> potentialto be extremely bright, rapidly chang<strong>in</strong>g, and distract<strong>in</strong>gto motorists.”Additionally, nonconform<strong>in</strong>g signs on state or local roads notcovered by <strong>the</strong> Highway Beautification Act are often governedby local ord<strong>in</strong>ances that do not allow <strong>the</strong>m to be substantiallyaltered or expanded ei<strong>the</strong>r. Local jurisdictions have deniedpermits for conversion to digital technology, although someof those denials have been challenged.Local cities, towns or counties mayusually impose stricter regulationson outdoor advertis<strong>in</strong>g than <strong>the</strong> stateor federal government does.Can Local Governments Prohibit SignsAllowed <strong>in</strong> State-Federal Agreements?Yes, <strong>in</strong> almost all states. Local cities, towns or counties mayusually impose stricter regulations on outdoor advertis<strong>in</strong>g than<strong>the</strong> state or federal government does. The State-Federal agreementsgovern signs on <strong>in</strong>terstate and federal-aid highways. Localitiesmay also create stricter standards for state and local roads.The First AmendmentOften, billboard <strong>in</strong>dustry representatives try to conv<strong>in</strong>ce localgovernments that if <strong>the</strong>y ban billboards, <strong>the</strong>y will be violat<strong>in</strong>g<strong>the</strong> First Amendment right to free speech. This is not true.In almost all states, localities may ban billboards outright, ormay restrict <strong>the</strong> size and types of billboards that are allowed.The only th<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>y cannot restrict is what <strong>the</strong>y say.“It’s only when you get <strong>in</strong>to bann<strong>in</strong>g content that you get <strong>in</strong>totrouble,” said Eric Kelly, an attorney and professor of urbanplann<strong>in</strong>g at Ball State University, who often helps local citiesand towns draft or revise <strong>the</strong>ir sign ord<strong>in</strong>ances.Kelly recommends that local governments also make any rulesregard<strong>in</strong>g sign technology consistent between on-premise andoff-premise signs to avoid potential litigation that might charge<strong>the</strong>y are giv<strong>in</strong>g preferential treatment to one type of bus<strong>in</strong>essover ano<strong>the</strong>r. But that doesn’t mean that you have to allowdigital billboards if you allow banks to show <strong>the</strong> time andtemperature, or gas stations to regularly change <strong>the</strong> pricesposted on <strong>the</strong>ir signs, he said.Allow<strong>in</strong>g signs to change messages no more than once perm<strong>in</strong>ute, or restrict<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> size of <strong>the</strong> sign to no more than 30square feet, allows for time and temperature signs, gas stationsand church message boards but essentially bans Tri-Visionbillboards and digital message boards that show new ads everysix or eight seconds.It also helps, said Kelly, to <strong>in</strong>clude language <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> ord<strong>in</strong>anceexpla<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g why <strong>the</strong> restrictions are <strong>the</strong>re. If <strong>the</strong> ord<strong>in</strong>ance statesthat its mission is to promote safety and aes<strong>the</strong>tics, and ties thisgoal back to goals <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> local comprehensive plan, it streng<strong>the</strong>ns<strong>the</strong> ord<strong>in</strong>ance and helps protect it from legal challenges.Follow this sign’s <strong>in</strong>structions and you may regret it. By tak<strong>in</strong>gextra seconds to watch <strong>the</strong> sign change (and change and change),drivers place <strong>the</strong>mselves and o<strong>the</strong>rs <strong>in</strong> potential danger.SCENIC AMERICA issue alert2electronicsigns
Warn<strong>in</strong>g Signs:Industry Tactics to Watch Out ForBillboard owners often lament on <strong>in</strong>dustry websites that current regulationsand public sentiment present <strong>the</strong>ir biggest hurdles to massdeployment of digital signs. But <strong>in</strong> addition to <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry’s normal political<strong>in</strong>fluence, it frequently employs some common strategies with localofficials for overcom<strong>in</strong>g those roadblocks. Here is what your communitycan expect to encounter if permission is sought for electronic signs:Amber Alerts and O<strong>the</strong>rPublic Service AnnouncementsWhen Clear Channel <strong>in</strong>stalled a network of 10 digital billboards <strong>in</strong>Albuquerque, part of its deal with <strong>the</strong> state was that it would run AmberAlerts and o<strong>the</strong>r emergency messages for free. It made <strong>the</strong> same deal <strong>in</strong>Cleveland. “Strategic relationships with <strong>the</strong> community are important,”a company representative told <strong>the</strong> Albuquerque Tribune.But many cities and states don’t need digital billboards to run AmberAlerts. Exist<strong>in</strong>g government-operated digital highway signs, which havebeen <strong>in</strong> place for many years, as well as television and radio, alreadyprovide a system for emergency communication.Nonprofits and police departments should not allow <strong>the</strong>mselves to beused as justification for <strong>the</strong> visual degradation of <strong>the</strong>ir community. Noamount of donated ad space or Amber Alerts can compensate for <strong>the</strong>aes<strong>the</strong>tic and safety damage done by <strong>the</strong>se signs.Let’s TradeTo erect seven digital billboards on highways enter<strong>in</strong>g Cleveland, ClearChannel took down several hundred billboards elsewhere <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> city.This might look like a good deal, but <strong>the</strong> truth is most of <strong>the</strong> boardstaken down <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>se swaps are nonconform<strong>in</strong>g or unprofitable signsanyway. Billboard companies are will<strong>in</strong>g to make <strong>the</strong> swap becauseDon’t take our word for it…How Big is <strong>the</strong> Issue?Electronics <strong>in</strong>dustry analyst, iSuppli, “predicts that by 2010, 75,000, or15 percent of total billboards <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> U.S., will be digital displays, up froma mere 500 digital billboards, or 0.1 percent, of all billboards <strong>in</strong> 2006.”Source: “Channel Viewpo<strong>in</strong>t: Consumer electronics—just <strong>the</strong> sideshow to <strong>the</strong> advertis<strong>in</strong>g at CES,”eChannelL<strong>in</strong>e Daily News, January 9, 2007What’s Bad for You is Good for Them“Nobody likes be<strong>in</strong>g stuck <strong>in</strong> a traffic jam, but Clear Channel executivesare com<strong>in</strong>g to love <strong>the</strong>m. ‘Hey, traffic is a good th<strong>in</strong>g,’ quips Clear ChannelCommunications Inc. CEO Mark Mays. ‘People listen to more radio, and<strong>the</strong>y have more time to look at billboards.’ Now that’s a captive audience.”Source: Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Week Onl<strong>in</strong>e, June 20, 2005And You Thought You’d Never Get that Big-Screen TV“As one drives along Hwy. 101 between San Jose and San Francisco,<strong>the</strong>re are many billboards that vie for your attention. But just as you nearSan Carlos, it is tough if not impossible to miss one particular two-sidedbillboard…. Its excellent position<strong>in</strong>g allows it to be seen by traffic as far<strong>the</strong> digital boards are so much more profitable, and because <strong>the</strong>y wouldo<strong>the</strong>rwise be unable to erect <strong>the</strong>m, s<strong>in</strong>ce many localities have limitationson erect<strong>in</strong>g new boards. And once <strong>the</strong> digital signs go up, <strong>the</strong>y becomecost-prohibitive to remove should <strong>the</strong> government later need to buy<strong>the</strong>m out due to road improvements, commercial development, or if <strong>the</strong>signs are proven to be hazardous.Governments should not fall for offers to take down old signs <strong>in</strong>exchange for permitt<strong>in</strong>g new digital ones. Whatever perceived benefitsaccrue from such deals don’t outweigh <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>troduction of devices thatwill potentially lead to traffic deaths and <strong>in</strong>juries and degrade <strong>the</strong> visualcharacter of <strong>the</strong> community. Fur<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> absence of a complete moratoriumon new signs, <strong>the</strong> old signs will <strong>in</strong>evitably be replaced somewherewith<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> jurisdiction.When an Improvement is Not an ImprovementThese days, governments should be wary of seem<strong>in</strong>gly <strong>in</strong>nocuous applicationsto “improve” old signs or “add or upgrade light<strong>in</strong>g,” which mayhide a plan by a sign company to replace a static billboard with a digitalsign. Install<strong>in</strong>g digital technology over a regular board is not an updateor “improvement,” but should be treated as construction of an entirelynew sign.Some sign companies, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir eagerness to convert <strong>the</strong>ir signs, simplyignore rules and regulations and make changes without permission, hop<strong>in</strong>gto <strong>in</strong>timidate local governments with <strong>the</strong> prospect of long and expensivelegal battles or count<strong>in</strong>g on a lack of political will to enforce <strong>the</strong> law.What Does <strong>the</strong> Public Th<strong>in</strong>k?Billboard companies often claim that digital signs are very popularwith <strong>the</strong> public, but never cite data to back up <strong>the</strong> claim. Perhapsthat’s because research shows <strong>the</strong> opposite.A 2005 survey conducted <strong>in</strong> Arizona found that by a marg<strong>in</strong> of73 percent to 21 percent, citizens opposed laws that would allowelectronic billboards on <strong>the</strong> state’s highways. When <strong>the</strong> 21 percentfavor<strong>in</strong>g digital signs were <strong>the</strong>n asked if <strong>the</strong>y would still support <strong>the</strong>signs if <strong>the</strong>y “might distract drivers,” <strong>the</strong> opposition to electronicsigns grew to 88 percent.The survey of 682 adults had a statistical precision of plus or m<strong>in</strong>us3.8 percent.as one kilometer from ei<strong>the</strong>r side…. But <strong>the</strong>n you couldn’t miss a 34 ft.x 19 ft. Hi Def<strong>in</strong>ition TV on <strong>the</strong> side of <strong>the</strong> road that stands almost 40feet above <strong>the</strong> ground, could you? And that’s exactly what SiliconView’sLED billboard looks like, a giant TV.”Source: Outdoor Today, January 2005If You Build It, They Will Stare…for More Than Two Seconds“[Electronic] Billboard schedul<strong>in</strong>g is based on a ‘repeat<strong>in</strong>g loop’ of advertis<strong>in</strong>gmessages. The SiliconView loop conta<strong>in</strong>s six different messages,each displayed for five seconds with a one-second pause between eachmessage. Thus, one message loop lasts approximately 36 seconds. The loopcont<strong>in</strong>uously repeats on a 24-hour basis, which gives each advertiser atleast 2,880 view<strong>in</strong>g exposures per day…. A factor that determ<strong>in</strong>es dwelltime, or <strong>the</strong> amount of time a commuter sees a billboard, is <strong>the</strong> vehicle’sspeed approach<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> board. At 65 mph, a Highway 101 driver sees onefull rotation of <strong>the</strong> SiliconView billboard. Dur<strong>in</strong>g peak hours, when trafficslows, a driver could see three to five loops.” [emphasis added]Source: “Pixels and Pr<strong>in</strong>ts: Outdoor’s Future Fusion,” Signs of <strong>the</strong> Times, August 2003