A Review of the Judicial Conduct Commission - Utah State Legislature

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Appendix F• Auditor’s request for confidential information: August 26, 2002• JCC’s request to <strong>the</strong> Supreme Court: September 12, 2002• Supreme Court’s response: October 16, 2002• Auditor’s response: November 6, 2002
Appendix C• House Bill 285, 2000 General Session• House Bill 136, 2002 General Session
Page 1 and 2: Office of theLEGISLATIVE AUDITOR GE
Page 3 and 4: the consistency of sanctions, the t
Page 5 and 6: officers for high crimes, misdemean
Page 7 and 8: The Judicial Conference can refer a
Page 9 and 10: complaints filed against judges pri
Page 11 and 12: Figure 3 shows that since 1996, the
Page 13 and 14: forward more complaints than is don
Page 15 and 16: Worthen.” The court further reque
Page 17 and 18: formal charges to also decide wheth
Page 19 and 20: commission members wrote a dissenti
Page 21 and 22: to the Utah Code 78-8-102 and four
Page 23 and 24: The Legislaturecannot set properpro
Page 25 and 26: AppendicesOffice of the Utah Legisl
Page 27 and 28: Agency ResponseOffice of the Utah L
Page 29: Wayne L. Welsh, CPANovember 6, 2002

A Review of the Judicial Conduct Commission - Utah State Legislature

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?