hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and learning disabilities (LDs), as well as G/T (gifted/talented). The multiplelabels often blur who the child is and disguise appropriate educational needs. In addition, despite thelarge number of publications on attention problems, few have addressed the coincidence of ADHD withgiftedness and creativity. This article explores this dilemma through a case study of an 8-yr-old boydiagnosed as G/T with ADHD, mild opposition defiant disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and a mildLD. The problems that occur when teams do not consider behavioral characteristics from amultidisciplinary perspective are explored. Guidelines are suggested for careful diagnosis and adiagnostic matrix is offered for interpreting behavior.Bouchet, N. & Falk, R. (2001). The relationship among giftedness, gender, and overexcitability. GiftedChild Quarterly, 45, 260-261.This study examines the relationship among giftedness, gender, and overexcitability. Previous studiesexamining these relationships were based on an open-ended questionnaire and small samples. Thisstudy uses a new self-rating questionnaire to assess overexcitabilities, the Overexcitability QuestionnaireII, and findings are based on a large sample of 562 university students. Giftedness was measured by astudent's participation in either a gifted, advanced, or standard curriculum program. Results show thatprevious findings on the relationship between giftedness and overexcitability can be confirmed; giftedstudents scored significantly higher on intellectual and emotional overexcitability than students in either ofthe other two programs. Further, males scored higher overall on intellectual, imaginational, andpsychomotor overexcitability, while females scored higher on emotional and sensual overexcitability.Author's Abstract: COPYRIGHT 2001 National Association for Gifted Children.Kerr, B., & Kurpius, S. (2004). Encouraging talented girls in math and science: Effects of a guidanceintervention. High Ability Studies. 15, 85-102.Although gifted girls are closing the gap in math and science achievement, they continue to lose interestand drop out of math/science careers. An intervention was developed for talented at-risk young womenthat emphasized enhancing career identity and exploration, building science self-efficacy and self-esteemand reducing risky behaviors. Self-esteem, school self-efficacy, and future self-efficacy increased frompre-test to the 3- to 4-month follow-up. Girls significantly increased their seeking information about careerand were likely to stay with nontraditional choices. The risk factor suicidality also decreased over thisperiod. (from the journal).Neihart, M., Reis, S., Robinson, N., & Moon, S. (Eds.) (2002). The social and emotional development ofgifted children: What do we know? Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.This book offers an examination of the topics teachers, parents, and researchers need to know about thesocial and emotional development of gifted children. It includes chapters on peer pressure and socialacceptance, resilience, delinquency, and underachievement, and summarizes several decades worth ofresearch on special populations, including minority, learning-disabled, and gay and lesbian giftedstudents. The organization of this book follows a four-section outline: section one, issues deriving fromstudents' advancement compared with age peers and from internal unevenness in development; sectiontwo, common areas of psychological response; section three, groups of gifted children and youth withspecial needs; and section four, promising practices and interventions.VanTassel-Baska, J., Johnson, D., & Avery, L.D. (2002). Using performance tasks in the identification ofeconomically disadvantaged and minority gifted learners: Findings from Project STAR. Gifted ChildQuarterly, 46, 110-123.Examined the ability of performance assessment tasks developed by Project STAR to identifyeconomically disadvantaged and minority-gifted students. 1,792 3rd-6th-grade students residing in SouthCarolina completed various verbal and non-verbal tasks concerning gifted abilities. Results show thatProject STAR identified an additional group of students who were 12% African American and 14% lowincomechildren during the field test of the instrument, who would not have qualified for gifted programsusing traditional measures.44
Literature/Theory-based ReferencesBrody, L. & Mills, C. (1997). Gifted children with learning disabilities: A Review of the issues. Journal ofLearning Disabilities, 30, (3), pp.282-286Many people have difficulty comprehending that a child can be gifted and also have learning disabilities.As a result, children with special needs that result from both their high abilities and their learningproblems are rarely identified and are often poorly served. This article explores the current policies andpractices with regard to defining, identifying, and educating this population. Recommendations areincluded that would help ensure that students who are gifted and have learning disabilities receive theintervention needed to help them achieve their full potential. (Author abstract)Castellano, J. A., & Pinkos, M. (2005). A rationale for connecting dual language programs with giftededucation. In V. Gonzalez & J. Tinajero (Eds). (2005). Review of research and practice, Vol 3. (pp. 107-124). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.The purpose of this article is to offer a rationale for connecting dual language programs with giftededucation. Because both programs share common characteristics and the caliber of students alsoexhibit parallel levels of intelligence and verbal/linguistic strengths the collaboration between the twocategorical entities seems to make sense. It is a logical evolution in this age of bridge building coalitions,particularly in light of cost-cutting measures that are currently impacting schools across the country.Furthermore, bilingual dual language programs specific to the School District of Palm Beach County,Florida will be examined; gifted education program models will be reviewed; and the connection betweenthe two will be presentedGrantham, T. C., & Ford, D.Y. (2003). Beyond self-concept and self esteem: Racial identity and giftedAfrican American students. High School Journal, 87, 18-29.While it is recognized that self-concept and self-esteem affect the academic achievement of students,few publications have focused on the affective and psychological needs of students who are gifted andethnically or culturally diverse. In this article, we extend the discussion of self-concept and achievementby focusing on how racial identity development affects the achievement of gifted African Americanstudents. We argue that few efforts, designed to improve gifted Black students' achievement and socialemotionalwell-being, will be successful until educators focus specifically on their racial identity. Whilewe acknowledge that a focus on racial identity is necessary for all African American students, we aremost concerned in this article with gifted Black students because so few have been identified as gifted.Along with describing racial identity development and issues facing gifted African American students, weoffer solutions for change.Greene, M. (2003). Gifted adrift? Career counseling of the gifted and talented. Roeper Review, 25, 66-72The author concludes the article thus: “Inadequate career services have left many of our gifted andtalented students adrift, forcing them to tread water until a flotation device passes by or to learn on theirown to swim to the nearest shore. Our society loses potential contributions and many gifted and talentedindividuals continue to be anxious, confused, or frustrated about their career decisions. It is time to equipour diverse gifted population with a lifeboat of appropriate and interconnected counseling services,including a lifelong approach to career counseling that emphasizes career education, personalresponsibility for decision making, and continual awareness of and adaptation to changes in self, incareer, and in life”. She makes a strong case for differentiated counseling, taking into consideration theindividual’s level and type of giftedness, sexual orientation, ethnicity, gender, religion, language andculture.Kirschenbaum, R. J. (2004). Dynamic assessment and its use with underserved gifted and talentedpopulations. In A. Baldwin, & S. Reis (Eds). (2004). Culturally diverse and underserved populations ofgifted students. Essential reading in gifted education. (pp. 49-62). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press,Inc.45
- Page 3 and 4: This book provides a survey of fede
- Page 5 and 6: Castellano, J. A. (1998). Identifyi
- Page 7 and 8: U.S. Department of Education. (1993
- Page 9 and 10: This qualitative investigation expl
- Page 11 and 12: four as “unsuccessful.” A child
- Page 13 and 14: from a comparison school district.
- Page 15 and 16: Cross and Coleman, Feldhusen, Gagn
- Page 17 and 18: Books, and Talents Unlimited. Teach
- Page 19 and 20: Kitano, M. K. (2003). What’s miss
- Page 21 and 22: Russo, C. J., & Ford, D. Y. (1993).
- Page 23 and 24: CEC Knowledge/Skills Evidence-BaseR
- Page 25 and 26: Piechowski, M. M. (1992). Giftednes
- Page 27 and 28: 14-18 in a competitive gifted progr
- Page 29 and 30: Many students of color are not perf
- Page 31 and 32: Bloom, B. S., & Sosniak, L. A. (198
- Page 33 and 34: the academic achievement of 273 ele
- Page 35 and 36: Silverman, L. K. (1997). The constr
- Page 37 and 38: Milbrath, C. (1998). Patterns of ar
- Page 39 and 40: differentiated instruction, student
- Page 41 and 42: condition. (adapted from the journa
- Page 43: Practice-based ReferencesCline, S.
- Page 47 and 48: This book focuses on ways teacher c
- Page 49 and 50: students; and compared the learning
- Page 51 and 52: Standard 3: Individual Learning Dif
- Page 53 and 54: This edited volume delineates couns
- Page 55 and 56: Literature/Theory-based ReferencesA
- Page 57 and 58: schools (one affluent community, on
- Page 59 and 60: Gagné’s Differentiated Model of
- Page 61 and 62: considerations in planning a sound
- Page 63 and 64: Stamps, L. (2004). The effectivenes
- Page 65 and 66: and menus.Standard 4: Instructional
- Page 67 and 68: determining the central purpose or
- Page 69 and 70: Swiatek, M. A. (1993). A decade of
- Page 71 and 72: applications and theoretical modeli
- Page 73 and 74: curricular dimensions that are resp
- Page 75 and 76: Standard 4: Instructional Strategie
- Page 77 and 78: CEC Knowledge/Skills Evidence-BaseR
- Page 79 and 80: Perry, T., Steele, C. & Hilliard, A
- Page 81 and 82: competence and superior adjustment
- Page 83 and 84: challenging and provocative arena.
- Page 85 and 86: the influence of verbal skills on p
- Page 87 and 88: perceived as positive. (ERIC abstra
- Page 89 and 90: Christophersen, E., & Mortweet, S.
- Page 91 and 92: Standard 5: Learning Environments a
- Page 93 and 94: practical advice for all classroom
- Page 95 and 96:
Kerr, B., & Cohn, S. (2001). Smart
- Page 97 and 98:
CEC Knowledge/Skills Evidence-BaseR
- Page 99 and 100:
Standard 6: Language and Communicat
- Page 101 and 102:
Practice-based ReferencesGavin, M.
- Page 103 and 104:
This article focuses on recommended
- Page 105 and 106:
This study was designed to measure
- Page 107 and 108:
Standard 6: Language and Communicat
- Page 109 and 110:
The authors conclude that more targ
- Page 111 and 112:
Standard 6: Language and Communicat
- Page 113 and 114:
Standard 7: Instructional PlanningG
- Page 115 and 116:
The four parallel approaches to cur
- Page 117 and 118:
suggested curriculum or supplementa
- Page 119 and 120:
Part of the Gifted Treasury Series,
- Page 121 and 122:
Prufrock Press.This teacher-friendl
- Page 123 and 124:
introductory chapter, individual ch
- Page 125 and 126:
all individuals and it improves sel
- Page 127 and 128:
Both of these books outline how to
- Page 129 and 130:
Standard 8: AssessmentGifts and Tal
- Page 131 and 132:
Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.The
- Page 133 and 134:
contribution of dynamic assessment
- Page 135 and 136:
School District's advocacy efforts.
- Page 137 and 138:
students not using the unit.Literat
- Page 139 and 140:
identification of more economically
- Page 141 and 142:
Standard 8: AssessmentGT8S2Use tech
- Page 143 and 144:
eviews the literature related to pr
- Page 145 and 146:
Practice-based ReferencesCallahan,
- Page 147 and 148:
CEC Knowledge/Skills Evidence-BaseR
- Page 149 and 150:
Standard 9: Professional and Ethica
- Page 151 and 152:
Standard 9: Professional and Ethica
- Page 153 and 154:
excellence and equity in education.
- Page 155 and 156:
culturally diverse students. Journa
- Page 157 and 158:
Standard 9: Professional and Ethica
- Page 159 and 160:
elated to giftedness and the prepar
- Page 161 and 162:
Americans (n=580). Approximately 50
- Page 163 and 164:
Standard 10: CollaborationGifts and
- Page 165 and 166:
Sixty-three Latina women (43 doctor
- Page 167 and 168:
Standard 10: CollaborationGT10S1Res
- Page 169 and 170:
associations, burnout, and resource
- Page 171 and 172:
activities with insects and arthrop
- Page 173 and 174:
“kids can make a difference!”St
- Page 175 and 176:
Rash, P. K. (1998). Meeting parents
- Page 177 and 178:
Standard 10: CollaborationGT10S4Col
- Page 179 and 180:
the interface with general educatio
- Page 181 and 182:
for gifted Hispanic LEP students an
- Page 183 and 184:
student portfolios, the Torrance Te
- Page 185:
Parker, J. (1996). NAGC standards f