case study status report odense river basin, denmark - wise-rtd.info

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Elsehoved Strand Vejstrup NoErikshale Marstal YesFlyvesandet Otterup NoFuglsang Otterup NoFyns Badestrand Nyborg NoFynshoved Strand Martofte NoFøns Strand v/FønsStrandvejNørre AabyYesHasmark Otterup NoHelnæs Made Ebberup YesHelnæs Strand Ebberup YesHesselbjerg Strand(Østersøbadet)HumbleYesHesseløje Strand Faaborg NoHorne Sommerland Faaborg NoHou Nordstrand Tranekær NoKertemindeNordstrandKertemindeYesKerteminde Sydstrand KertemindeYesKlinten Strand vedferiehotel Klinten i FaaborgYesFaaborgKlintholm VormarkHesselagerHesselagerNoLehnskov Strand Svendborg NoMiddelfart Marina Middelfart YesNab Strand Faaborg NoRevsøre Strand Hesselager NoRistinge Strand Humble YesSaltofte Strand Assens YesSandager Næs Assens YesSinebjerg Strand Faaborg NoSkårupøre Strand Skårup Fyn NoSkåstrup Strand Bogense NoSlotshaven Strand v.Valdemars SlotSvendborgYesSmørmosen Svendborg YesSnøde/HesselbjergStrandTranekærNoStoense UdflytterStrandTranekærNoStrandholmen vedFaldsled byMillingeNoStrib Nordstrand Middelfart YesSønder Aaby Strand EjbyNoThurø Rev Svendborg NoTørresø Otterup NoVarbjerg Strand Ejby No18
Vejlby Fed Middelfart YesVesterstrand,ÆrøskøbingÆrøskøbing NoÅbyskov Strand Skårup Fyn NoÅ-Strand Ebberup YesNon use valuesThe non use values can be described from the protected areas description and from thedescription of biotic content. This is currently elaborated upon in the case study.3.2. List possible benefits and cost from water services [see Annex]These will be described using the former information in the blue print of the case study.3.3. Proposed methods and tools for the valuation of ERC:The cost estimationsDetailed analyses of impact of measurers and the related costs have been conducted for theOdense River Basin. The conclusion was that a reduction in N-loss of 1.200 tons N to OdenseFjord was needed to reach the likely target in The Water Framework DirectiveThe analysis of the costs described in Jacobsen et al., 2004 shows that the costs using a range ofpredefined measures including more catch crops, wetlands, afforestation, organic farming andreduction in livestock lead to a yearly direct cost of 8.6 million € (8 € per kg N reduced loss).Choosing the most cost effective measures the costs were reduced to around half of this amount.In order to achieve this, the area with wetlands was increased from 4,000 to 5,400 ha in modelruns, which is 8 percent of the total agricultural area. Furthermore, reductions in livestock andafforestation were replaced by higher utilization of N in animal manure.When large decreases in nitrogen losses is the aim, it is very important to analyze the effect ofmeasures in conjunction with the effect of other measures as a partial analysis might overestimatethe effect of some measures. The analyses showed that measures, such as wetlands, aimed atreducing both nitrogen and phosphors losses, can be very cost efficient. The future analyses willlook more closely at the realistic level of given measures, the costs, and the implication foranimal production in order to achieve the targets in the WRD. Also comparisons betweenmeasures aimed at reducing nitrogen or phosphorus loss might be possible, but this requiresmodels aimed at describing the P-transport from land to the water bodies and they are to bedeveloped further.With respect to lakes it is estimated that only one of 12 large lakes might fulfil the WRDrequirement in 2015. Good ecological conditions are set at 0.025–0.05 mg P/l depending on thedepth of the lake. The quality of the lakes can only improve if nutrient losses from agriculturaland households are reduced. Also for streams there is a need for a further reduction in mainly N-losses as a majority of the streams are not expected to reach the required standard in 2015. Theconclusion is that a range of measures will be required in order to achieve the targets in the WRDset for Odense Fjord, the lakes and the streams in the Pilot River Basin. Costs analyses willtherefore be broader than the cost analysis included in the Pilot River Basin analyses.19
Page 1: CASE STUDY STATUS REPORTODENSE RIVE
Page 4 and 5: Map of the Odense River Basin1.2. G
Page 7 and 8: The Odense River Basin also contain
Page 9 and 10: of the amount of water that flows i
Page 11 and 12: 2) PRESSURE, IMPACT, AND RISK ANALY
Page 13 and 14: Table 12 Overview of water bodies i
Page 15 and 16: Figure 2: The origin of N- and P-lo
Page 17: Bathing resorts/beaches (58 results
Page 21 and 22: iodiversity on the Danish moors pro

case study status report odense river basin, denmark - wise-rtd.info

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?