Nietzsche and the Morality Critics - The University of Texas at Austin
Nietzsche and the Morality Critics - The University of Texas at Austin
Nietzsche and the Morality Critics - The University of Texas at Austin
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Leiter <strong>Nietzsche</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Morality</strong> <strong>Critics</strong> 283fl<strong>at</strong>s <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> herd conscience, wreck <strong>the</strong> self-confidence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>community.... Hence just <strong>the</strong>se drives are br<strong>and</strong>ed <strong>and</strong> sl<strong>and</strong>eredmost. High <strong>and</strong> independent spirituality, <strong>the</strong> will to st<strong>and</strong>alone, even a powerful reason are experienced as dangers; everythingth<strong>at</strong> elev<strong>at</strong>es an individual above <strong>the</strong> herd <strong>and</strong> intimid<strong>at</strong>es<strong>the</strong> neighbor is henceforth called evil; <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> fair, modest, conformingmentality, <strong>the</strong> mediocrity <strong>of</strong> desires <strong>at</strong>tains moral design<strong>at</strong>ions<strong>and</strong> honors. (BGE, 201)"High <strong>and</strong> independent spirituality," "<strong>the</strong> will to st<strong>and</strong> alone": do <strong>the</strong>setraits not call to mind many an artist, poet, <strong>and</strong> even a gre<strong>at</strong> philosopheror two? Yet it is <strong>the</strong>se traits th<strong>at</strong> MPS "br<strong>and</strong>s" <strong>and</strong> "sl<strong>and</strong>ers," <strong>and</strong>who would be surprised if someone should ab<strong>and</strong>on <strong>the</strong>ir independentways with <strong>the</strong> force <strong>of</strong> morality against <strong>the</strong>m? It is not, <strong>the</strong>n, th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong>reis too much pity <strong>and</strong> altruism in <strong>the</strong> world, but ra<strong>the</strong>r th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong>re istoo much belief in <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> pity, altruism, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r norms<strong>of</strong> MPS.4. One might want to respond on Foot's behalf, however, <strong>and</strong> insistth<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong>re is still something perverse about <strong>the</strong> <strong>Nietzsche</strong>an complaint.Granted <strong>Nietzsche</strong> does not believe th<strong>at</strong> most people are actually tooaltruistic <strong>and</strong> society in practice is too egalitarian; granted th<strong>at</strong><strong>Nietzsche</strong>'s real worry is about <strong>the</strong> fact th<strong>at</strong> we, as a moral culture,pay so much lip service to <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> altruism, egalitarianism, <strong>and</strong><strong>the</strong> rest, with <strong>the</strong> resultant deleterious effects on <strong>the</strong> self-conception<strong>and</strong> development <strong>of</strong> nascent Goe<strong>the</strong>s. Yet surely it is still <strong>the</strong> caseth<strong>at</strong> if our society really were more altruistic <strong>and</strong> egalitarian, moreindividuals would have <strong>the</strong> chance to flourish <strong>and</strong> do cre<strong>at</strong>ive work.This is <strong>the</strong> core <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> charge <strong>of</strong> perversity, <strong>and</strong> nothing said so farhas exoner<strong>at</strong>ed <strong>Nietzsche</strong> from it.Now, in fact, it seems th<strong>at</strong> it is precisely this moral optimismcommon, for example, to utilitarians <strong>and</strong> Marxists-this belief th<strong>at</strong> amore moral society would produce more opportunity for more peopleto do cre<strong>at</strong>ive work-th<strong>at</strong> <strong>Nietzsche</strong> does, indeed, want to question.<strong>Nietzsche</strong>'s illiberal <strong>at</strong>titudes in this regard are apparent. He says, totake but one example, "We simply do not consider it desirable th<strong>at</strong> arealm <strong>of</strong> justice <strong>and</strong> harmony [Eintracht] should be established onearth" (GS, 377). It is bad enough for <strong>Nietzsche</strong> th<strong>at</strong> MPS values haveso far succeeded in saying, "stubbornly <strong>and</strong> inexorably, 'I am moralityitself, <strong>and</strong> nothing besides is morality"' (BGE, 202); it could only beworse on his view if more <strong>and</strong> more <strong>of</strong> our actions were really broughtinto accord with <strong>the</strong>se values. For <strong>Nietzsche</strong> wants to urge-contraryto <strong>the</strong> moral optimists-th<strong>at</strong>, in a way largely unappreci<strong>at</strong>ed <strong>and</strong> (perhaps)unintended, a thoroughly moral culture undermines <strong>the</strong> conditionsunder which <strong>the</strong> most splendid human cre<strong>at</strong>ivity is possible <strong>and</strong>gener<strong>at</strong>es instead a society <strong>of</strong> Zar<strong>at</strong>hustra's "last men."66 If we are66. See <strong>the</strong> earlier quot<strong>at</strong>ions from Zar<strong>at</strong>hustra's description <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> last man.This content downloaded on Tue, 12 Mar 2013 14:02:16 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms <strong>and</strong> Conditions