Ben-Shlomo<strong>The</strong> <strong>Cemetery</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Azor</strong>Figure 18Selection <strong>of</strong> non-Philistine (Canaanite) pottery from <strong>Iron</strong> I graves at <strong>Azor</strong>linear decoration (Fig. 18:6–7); two examples <strong>of</strong>cooking jugs (Fig. 18:8–9) should also be noted. 3Many <strong>of</strong> these forms also have parallels in Tell QasileStrata XI–X (Mazar 1985, 60–63) or at Tel MiqneStrata VB–IVA (Ortiz 2000, 162–63). Flasks, eitherplain or with black decoration appear (Fig. 18:12),with one example <strong>of</strong> a ‘double flask’ (Fig. 18:13), aswell as several complete pixides (Fig. 18:10–11),plain, decorated in bichrome (Fig. 18:10) or redslipped (Fig. 18:11).3 <strong>The</strong> shape <strong>of</strong> the jug is very similar to <strong>Iron</strong> I Aegean style cooking jugs(Killebrew 1999, 93–94; Dothan <strong>and</strong> Zukerman 2004, 28–31, figs 36–37,Type P) but it appears here outside the Philistia core, in a late <strong>Iron</strong> Icontext <strong>and</strong> is very small (8 cm high). Possibly, the jug had some functionin relation to funerary customs. Cooking jugs appear in LCIII burials atKourion (Daniel 1937, 70, pls II:10, V:8,31) <strong>and</strong> a cooking amphora wasused for a dog burial at Ashkelon Phase 18 (Stager 2006, 15).Petrographic analysis conducted by the author onabout 30 samples from the burials indicate that thePhilistine pottery from the various burials at <strong>Azor</strong>was made <strong>of</strong> local clay. This pottery was made,similarly to the non-Philistine pottery, from hamricrendzina-derived soil, typical <strong>of</strong> the central coastalplain, <strong>and</strong> not occurring in proper Philistia, to thesouth. This implies that potters familiar with thePhilistine tradition worked at <strong>Azor</strong>; they could havebeen Philistine themselves, non-Philistine individualscatering a Philistine population, or local potterssupplying their customers with Philistine style vesselsas elaborate burial gifts.<strong>The</strong> pottery <strong>of</strong> Phases IV–V graves represents atypical late <strong>Iron</strong> I assemblage, which is not knownfrom many excavated sites, <strong>and</strong> especially not from44 Levant 2008 VOL 40 NO 1
Ben-Shlomo<strong>The</strong> <strong>Cemetery</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Azor</strong>Figure 19Selection <strong>of</strong> <strong>Iron</strong> IIA pottery from <strong>Azor</strong>funerary sites. <strong>The</strong> early <strong>Iron</strong> I (the 12th century BC)is not represented, as Philistine Monochrome, elaboratePhilistine <strong>and</strong> <strong>Iron</strong> IA Canaanite do not appearin the assemblage. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, this assemblageis earlier than the ‘full blown’ <strong>Iron</strong> IIA as it lacks thethick red-slipped <strong>and</strong> burnished pottery <strong>and</strong> theFigure 20Pottery types according to grave period (110 complete vessels)Levant 2008 VOL 40 NO 1 45