13.07.2015 Views

The Cemetery of Azor and Early Iron Age Burial Practices

The Cemetery of Azor and Early Iron Age Burial Practices

The Cemetery of Azor and Early Iron Age Burial Practices

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Ben-Shlomo<strong>The</strong> <strong>Cemetery</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Azor</strong>Table 3Main characteristics <strong>of</strong> the various burial practices at <strong>Azor</strong><strong>Burial</strong> type <strong>Burial</strong> position <strong>Burial</strong> age No. <strong>of</strong> individuals <strong>Burial</strong> goods Date (typical) No. <strong>of</strong> gravesPit burial supine 0–50 1–2 yes <strong>Iron</strong> I–IIA 27–28Brick-case supine adult 1 mostly no <strong>Iron</strong> I 6–8<strong>Burial</strong> structure supine adults/children multiple yes <strong>Iron</strong> IIA 2Jar burial ? 0–14 1 yes <strong>Iron</strong> I 8–10Cremation cremation 10–45 1–2 yes <strong>Iron</strong> I 2–3no clear parallels for this customs during this period,as this is not a usual cist grave (contra to Bloch-Smith1992a, 183), as it includes several layers <strong>of</strong> burials <strong>and</strong>was not placed in a pit (it was surrounded by wallswhich were probably visible above the ground). Apossibly similar burial comes from Tomb 201 at TellFarah (S) (Petrie 1930, 17). This type <strong>of</strong> burial may bea certain substitute for the multiple burial in caves,common during the LBII (e.g., Gonen 1992, 41–69).As noted, excluding cremation burials, the resemblance<strong>of</strong> the <strong>Azor</strong> cemetery to the 13th–12th centuryBC cemetery <strong>of</strong> Tell es-Sai’diyeh is quite striking. Ontop <strong>of</strong> the similar pit burial <strong>and</strong> brick-case burials,similar jar burials occur in both sites; similarly,figurines are lacking from the burials (Pritchard 1980,30), while metal finds are abundant. A recent study <strong>of</strong>the cemetery (Green 2005, 34–36; Green 2006) furtherillustrates these similarities, <strong>and</strong> indicates that twothirds<strong>of</strong> the 500 tombs excavated in the cemetery aredated to the LBII–<strong>Iron</strong> IIA, a time slot identical tothe the period <strong>of</strong> the main use <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Azor</strong> cemeteryexcavated by M. Dothan. <strong>The</strong> resemblance could beexplained by a certain relationship in the populations<strong>of</strong> the two sites, <strong>and</strong> indeed it was suggested, on thesegrounds, that a certain population <strong>of</strong> Philistines <strong>of</strong>Sea Peoples settled in the transjordan (Tubb 1998, 98;Tubb 2000). Yet, these similarities could result fromthe fact that both sites reflect to a large extent typicallocal Canaanite burial practices.<strong>The</strong> variability <strong>of</strong> burial practices at <strong>Azor</strong> can beattributed to several reasons. <strong>The</strong> ethnic or culturalaspect has received relatively more attention, affiliatingthe cremation burials with Aegean practices.Religious <strong>and</strong> cosmological beliefs are naturallystrongly related to burial customs <strong>and</strong> can bereflected in types <strong>of</strong> burial <strong>and</strong> burial goods (e.g.,discussion <strong>and</strong> references, Biran et al. 1996, 255–58;Hallote 2002, 108–10). Ethnographic studies show us,however, that it is quite difficult to anticipate thesocial or ideological background <strong>of</strong> certain burialcustoms or burial gifts (e.g. Ucko 1969, 275–77;Bartal 1982). Philistine burial customs are quiteunknown as no cemetery was uncovered in the mainPhilistine cities (Dothan (1982, 252–88), concentratedin her study on the phenomenon <strong>of</strong> anthropoid c<strong>of</strong>finburials, which hardly appears in <strong>Iron</strong> <strong>Age</strong> Philistia).Yet, certain tombs were affiliated with the Philistinesor with Aegean or Cypriote influence, including<strong>Cemetery</strong> 500 at Tell Farah (S) <strong>and</strong> certain exampleat Tell el Ajjul <strong>and</strong> other sites (Waldbaum 1966;Table 4 Description <strong>of</strong> Figs 17–19, 21Fig. Form Reg. No., IAA No. Tomb Fig. Form Reg. No., IAA No. Tomb17:1 Bowl 56d/1, 602141 D56 19:1 Bowl 79d/27, 602543 D79D17:2 Bowl D68/1, 582611 D20 19:2 Chalice 79d/21, 602531 D97A17:3 Bowl 602555 D56 19:3 Jug D65/1 D2117:4 Krater 87d/25, 602142 D87 19:4 Jug 79d/3, 602570 D79C17:5 Krater 88d/1, 602514 D88 19:5 Juglet 79d/7, 602564 D79C17:6 Jug 74d/3 D74 19:6 Juglet D44/4 D1417:7 Jug 58d/11 D58 19:7 Juglet 79d/13, 602141 D79C18:1 Bowl D56/1, 582612 D16 19:8 Juglet D83/27 D2818:2 Bowl D78 D24 19:9 Flask D94/2 D3018:3 Bowl 62d/24a D62 19:10 Pomegranate vessel D94/1 D3018:4 Jar D101 D36 21:1 Bronze bowl 63d/7, 602552 D6318:5 Jar 9322841 D63 21:2 <strong>Iron</strong> knife 79d/16, 602544 D79C18:6 Jug 63d D63 21:3 Bronze mirror D53/9, 6821035 D1518:7 Jug 62d/15, 602532 D62 21:4 Gold mouth piece 63d/9, 60263 D6318:8 Cooking jug D67/1, 682603 D23 21:5 Bronze bracelet 58d/19b D5818:9 Cooking jug 74d/4, 602530 D74 21:6 Bronze fibula 79d/22 D79B18:10 Pyxis 56d/2, 602140 D56 21:7 <strong>Iron</strong> earring 79d/46 D79D18:11 Pyxis 86d/2, 602567 D86 21:8 Steatite scarab D87/5 D3018:12 Flask D78/3, 582604 D24 21:9 Stone seal D86/14b D3018:13 Flask 62d/25 D62Levant 2008 VOL 40 NO 1 49

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!