The Sub-Carpathian Messenger - Jay T. Carrigan

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Fig. 1: Postcard, Jászdózsa to Alsószinevér, September 8 th , 1942,and returned to JászdózsaFig. 2: Postcard, Királyháza to Budapest, May 19 th , 1942 – why 5 fillér?The printed matter postage (up to February 28 th , 1943) was 3f, so this card is simply overpaid.Fig. 3: Postcard, Királymezı to Ercsi, July 19 th , 1943 – 4 fillérThe Sub-Carpathian Messenger – Number 12 (September 2010) Page: 18
Fig. 4: Postcard, Rahó to Budapest, September 27 th , 1943 – 4 fillérFig. 5: Postcard, Rahó to Eger, April 17 th , 1943 – 8 fillér (underpaid)Fig. 6: Postcard, Ilosva to Budapest, April 6 th , 1944 – 8 fillér (overpaid)Well, this demonstrates that domestic picture postcards holding up to five words of greeting weretreated as printed matter. The cards demonstrate, too, that you always can find the odd piecewhich is NOT in line with regulations and still slipped through.The Sub-Carpathian Messenger – Number 12 (September 2010) Page: 19
Page 1 and 2: The Sub-Carpathian MessengerNewslet
Page 3 and 4: Helmut KobelbauerAuction News: Czec
Page 5 and 6: For a booklet which is now nearly 1
Page 7 and 8: Helmut KobelbauerSome information o
Page 9 and 10: Fig. 2a: Field post card, F. P. O.
Page 11 and 12: But back to our actual question: wh
Page 13 and 14: Helmut Kobelbauer:The railway netwo
Page 15 and 16: Helmut KobelbauerPictures from the
Page 17: Helmut KobelbauerOn Hungarian Posta
Page 21 and 22: 1939, 22 March. Buštino to Debrece
Page 23 and 24: 1942. Szobranc to Tiszaujlak. Too m

The Sub-Carpathian Messenger - Jay T. Carrigan

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?