1 PROVISIONAL BIBLIOGRAPHY for a new edition of ... - Protrepticus

1PROVISIONAL BIBLIOGRAPHYfor a new edition ofARISTOTLE'S PROTREPTICUScompiled by D. S. Hutchinson and Monte Ransome Johnsonversion of 2013 February 25A. Primary Sources1. Aristotlea. Collections of fragments of Aristotle's lost works, including hisProtrepticusb. Editions and translations of fragments of Aristotle’s Protrepticusc. Editions and translations of papyri attributable to Aristotle's Protrepticusd. Editions and translations of the Aristotle Corpuse. Editions and translations of other lost works of Aristotle2. Isocrates3. Plato4. Archytas of Tarentum5. Heraclides of Pontus6. Anonymous Iamblichi7. Cicero8. Clement of Alexandria (AD II-III)9. Lactantius (AD III-IV)10. Iamblichus of Chalcis (AD III-IV)a. Manuscripts of the Protrepticusb. Printed editions and translations of the Protrepticusc. Editions and translations of other works of Iamblichus11. Ancient Commentatorsa. Aristocles of Messene (AD I)b. Alexander of Aphrodisias (AD II)c. Ammonius (AD V)d. Proclus (AD V)e. Olympiodorus the younger (AD V-VI)f. Philoponus (AD VI)g. Asclepius of Tralles (AD VI)h. Elias (AD VI-VII)i. David the Invincible Philosopher (AD VI-VII)j. Anonymous Scholion on Cod.Par.Gr.206412. Boethius (AD V-VI)13. Stobaeus (AD VI)B. Secondary Sources (arranged alphabetically)

2A. Primary Sources1. Aristotlea. Collections of fragments of Aristotle's lost works, including hisProtrepticusFlashar, H. Aristoteles: Fragmente zu Philosophie, Rhetorik, Poetik, Dictung. Darmstadt,2006.Gigon, O. Librorum deperditorum fragmenta = vol. iii of Aristoteles Opera. Berlin, 1987.Gohlke, P. Aristoteles Fragmente. Paderborn, 1959.Rose, V. Aristoteles pseudographus. Leipzig, 1863.Rose V. Aristotelis qui ferebantur librorum fragmenta = 1463-1589 Opera Aristotelis, vol. v.Berlin, 1870.Rose V. Aristotelis qui ferebantur librorum fragmenta. Leipzig, 1886. Reprinted 1966.Walzer, R. Aristotelis dialogorum fragmenta. Florence, 1934.Ross, W. D. Select Fragments = vol. xii of The Works of Aristotle. Oxford, 1952.Ross, W. D. Aristotelis fragmenta selecta. Oxford, 1955.Zanatta, M. Aristotele I Dialoghi: testo greco a fronte. Milano 2008.b. Editions and translations of fragments of Aristotle’s ProtrepticusBarnes, J. & G. Lawrence. “Fragments: Dialogues” pp. 2404-2416 of The Complete Works ofAristotle vol. 2, ed. J. Barnes. Princeton, 1984.Berti, E. Aristotele: Esortazione alla filosofia. Padua, 1969.Berti, E. Aristotele: Protreptico: Esortazione alla filosofia. Turin, 2000.Buela, A. El Protréptico de Aristóteles (Texto bilingüe griego-castellano traducción, notas ycomentarios), 1984. 2 nd ed. 1993.Casaglia, M. Aristotele: Protreptico: Esortazione alla filosofia. Florence, 2001.Chroust, A. H. Aristotle’s Protrepticus. Notre Dame, 1964.Düring, I. Aristotle’s Protrepticus: An Attempt at Reconstruction. Göteborg, 1961.Düring, I. Der Protreptikos des Aristoteles. Frankfurt, 1969.Follon, J. Aristote: Invitation à la philosophie. Paris, 2000.Follon, J. (tr.) and P. Dulau (comm.), Aristote, Protreptique: invitation à la philosophie.Paris, 2006.Minca, B. & C. Partenie. Aristotel: Protrepticul. Bucharest, 2005.Pelletier, Y. Aristote: Le Protreptique. Fragments ordonnés par Anton-Hermann Chrousttraduits par Yvan Pelletier d’après le texts grec colligé par W.D. Ross. 1999.http://regislaurent.ifrance.com/textes/version%20imprimable.pdf.Rodriguez, C. M. Aristóteles: Protreptico. Una Exhortacion a la Filosofia. Madrid, 2006.Schneeweiss, G. Der Protreptikos des Aristoteles. Munich dissertation, 1966.Schneeweiss, G. Aristoteles: Protreptikos. Hinführung zur Philosophie. Darmstadt, 2005.Verhoeven, C. Aristoteles: Lof van de wijsbegeerte. Groningen, 1998.van der Meeren, S. Exhortation à la Philosophie: Le dossier Grec Aristote. Paris, 2011.von Fritz, K. and E. Kapp, Aristotle: Constitution of Athens and Related Texts. New York,1950. Contains a translation of and commentary on Iamblichus, Protrepticus X inAppendix 1.

3c. Editions and translations of papyri attributable to Aristotle'sProtrepticusCockle, H. M. P.Oxy 3659. The Oxyrhynchus Papyri LII: 59-62. London, 1984.Decleva Caizzi, F. & M. S. Funghi. P.Vindob G 26008 & 29329. Su alcuni frammentifilosofici della Österreichische Nationalbibliothek, Varia Papyrologica = Studi eTesti per il Corpus dei papyri filosofici greci e latini, 5: 49-99. Firenze, 1991.Haslam, M.W. P.Oxy 3699. The Oxyrhynchus Papyri LIII: 15-23. London, 1986.Vendruscolo, F. P.Oxy 666. Corpus dei Papiri Filosofici I.1: 269-279. Florence, 1989.d. Editions and translations and commentaries of the Aristotle CorpusBarnes, J. (ed.) The Complete Works of Aristotle: the revised Oxford translation (2 vols.,Princeton, 1984).Bekker, I. Aristotelis Opera ex recensione Immanuelis Bekkeri edidit Academia RegiaBorussica accedunt fragmenta scholia index aristotelicus (5 volumes, Berlin, 1831-1987).Burnet, J. The Ethics of Aristotle: edited with an introduction and notes. London, 1900.Crisp, R. (tr.) Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics. Cambridge, 2000.Gauthier, R. A. and J. Y. Jolif, L’Éthique a Nicomaque. Louvain and Paris, 1970. 3 vols.Smith J. A. and W. D. Ross (eds.) The Works of Aristotle Translated into English (12 vols.,Oxford, 1908-1952).e. Editions and translations of other lost works of AristotleJanko, R. Aristotle on Comedy: towards a reconstruction of Poetics II. (London 1984).Janko, R. Aristotle: Poetics, with the Tractatus Coislinianus, reconstruction of Poetics II,and the fragments of the On Poets (Indianapolis, 1987)Janko, R. Philodemus: the Aesthetic Works. Vol. I/3: Philodemus, On Poems Books 3–4, withthe Fragments of Aristotle, On Poets (Oxford, 2011)Moraux, P. A la recherché de l’Aristote perdu: La dialogue Sur la Justice. (Louvain 1957).Searby, D. M. Aristotle in the Greek Gnomological Tradition. (Uppsala, 1998).Schuhl, P.-M. et al. Aristote: De la richesse – De la prière – De la noblesse – Du plaisir – DeL’Éducation (fragments et témoignages). (Paris 1968).2. Editions and translations of IsocratesMandilaras, B. G. (ed.) Isocrates: Opera Omnia. 3 vols. Leipzig, 2003.Mirhady, D. C. & Y. L. Too. Isocrates I. Austin, 2000.Norlin, G. Isocrates. Loeb Classical Library. 3 vols. Cambridge, MA and London, 1928.Papillon, T. L. Isocrates II. (Austin, 2004).3. Editions and translations of PlatoCooper, J. and D. S. Hutchinson (ed.), Plato: Complete Works. Indianapolis and Cambridge,1997.

4Slings, S. R. Plato: Clitophon. Cambridge, 1999.Thompson, W. H. The Phaedrus of Plato. London, 1868.4. Editions and translations of Archytas of TarentumHuffman, C. Archytas of Tarentum: Pythagorean, Philosopher, and Mathematician-King.Cambridge, 2005.Thesleff, H. The Pythagorean Texts of the Hellenistic Period Collected and Edited (Åbo,1965), 2-48.5. Editions and translations of Heraclides of PontusHeraclides of Pontus: Texts and Translation. Edited by E. Schütrumpf. Translators: P. Stork,J. van Ophuijsen, and S. Prince. New Brunswick and London, 2008.6. Editions and translations of the Anonymous IamblichiMari, M. (ed. and trans.) Anonimo di Giamblico: La pace e il benessere (with a preface by D.Musti, Milan, 2003).7. Editions and translations of works of CiceroGrilli, A. M. Tulli Ciceronis Hortensius: edited with a commentary. Milan, 1962.Ruch, M. L’Hortensius de Ciceron—histoire et reconstruction. Paris, 1958.Straume-Zimmermann, L. Ciceros Hortensius. Bern, 1976.Shackleton-Bailey, D. R. Cicero: Letters to Atticus. N vols. Cambridge, MA and London,1999.Woolf, R. (tr.) and J. Annas (ed.), Cicero: On Moral Ends. Cambridge, 2001.8. Editions and translations of works of Clement of Alexandria (AD II-III)Stählin, O., ed. Clemens Alexandrinus. Erster Band: Protrepticus und Paedagogus. Berlin,1972.Stählin, O., ed. Clemens Alexandrinus. Zweiter Band: Stromata Buch I-VI. Berlin, 1960.9. Editions and translations of Lactantius (AD III-IV)McDonald, M. F., tr. Lactantius: The Divine Institutes. Washington, D. C., 1964.10. Manuscripts, Editions and translations of works of Iamblichus of Chalcis(AD III-IV)a. Manuscripts of the Protrepticus:B = Besançon, Bibl. Municipale 405, gr. 10 Omont, 7 Gollob, f. 60-106v.C = Zeitz Stiftsbibliothek, 61 (32), 58-99v.

5D = Munich, Bayerische Staatsbibliothek, cod.Monac.gr.102, f. 64-112vE = Munich, Bayerische Staatsbibliothek, cod.Monac.gr.392, f. 104-145F = Florence, Bibl. Laurenziana, cod.Laur.86,3, f. 46v-82v.G = Rome, Biblioteca Angelica 77 (olim A-2-16), p. 109-198.H = Vatican City, Bibl. Apostolica Vaticana, cod.Palatinus.gr.94, f. 74v-130vI = Vatican City, Bibl. Apostolica Vaticana, cod.Vaticanus.gr.322, f.1-27J = Vatican City, Bibl. Apostolica Vaticana, cod.Vaticanus.gr.324, p. 62-111L = Florence, Bibl. Laurenziana, cod.Laur.86,29, f. 89-154.M = Venice, Bibl. Marciana, cod.Marc.gr.243, f. 45v-82.N = Naples, Bibl. Nazionale, cod. Neap.Borbon.III-B-30, p. 74-132.O = Oxford, Bodleian Library, cod.Bodl.Auct.T.1.20 (misc.198), f. 55v-101.P = Paris, Bibl. Nationale, cod.Par.gr.2093, f. 48v-83v.Q = Madrid, Bibl. Nacional, cod.O46 , f. 59-106.R = Ravenna, Bibl. Classense, cod.381 (olim 139,6,G), f. 1-54.S = Escorial, Realbiblioteca , cod.Υ-I-11, f. 51-93v.T = Paris, Bibl. Nationale, cod.Par.gr.1981, f. 54v-94.U = Escorial, Realbiblioteca (Bibl. du Monastère), cod.Υ-I-.1.V = Vatican City, Bibl. Apostolica Vaticana, cod.Vaticanus.gr.1028.W = Vienna, Staatsbibliothek, cod.Vindob.philos.gr.11, f. 112v-156v.X = Torino, Bibl. Civica, cod.Taurinensis gr.146 Pasini (337 Cosentini), f. 39-68.Z = Escorial, Realbiblioteca, cod.Φ-II-4.b. Printed Editions and translations of the Protrepticus:Arcerius, Ioh. Arcerius Theodoretus, ed. Iamblichi Chalcidensis De vita pythagorica etProtrepticae orations ad philosophiam. Frankfurt, 1598.Des Places, E. Jamblique: Protreptique. Paris, 1989.Johnson, T. M. Iamblichus: The Exhortation to Philosophy. Orig. pub. 1920. Repr. GrandRapids, 1988.Kiessling, T., Iamblichi Chalcidensis ex Coele-Syria Adhotatio ad philosophiam (Leipzig,1813).Pistelli, H. Iamblichi Protrepticus, Leipzig, 1888.Romano, F. Giamblico: Summa pitagorica. Milan, 2006.Schönberger, O. Iamblichos: Aufruf zur philosophie. Erste deutsche Gesamtübersetzung mitzweisprachiger Ausgabe von Ciceros “Hortensius”. Würzburg, 1984.c. Editions and Translations of other works of IamblichusBrisson, L. & A. Ph. Segonds. Jamblique: Vie de Pythagore. Paris, 1996.Clark, E., J. M. Dillon & J. P. Hershbell (trans., comm.), Iamblichus: De mysteriis. Leiden,2004.Dueber, L. Iamblichi de vita pythagorica. Stuttgart, 1937. Revised by U. Klein, 1975.Dillon, J. M. & J. Hershbell, Iamblichus: On the Pythagorean way of life. Atlanta, 1991.Dillon, J. M. & W. Polleichtrer (ed., trans., comm..), Iamblichus of Chalcis: the letters.Atlanta, 2009.

6Festa, N. De communi mathmatica scienta. Leipzig, 1891. Revised by U. Klein, Stuttgart,1975.Finamore, J. F. and J. M. Dillon (ed., trans., comm.), Iamblichus: De anima. Leiden, 2002.Pistelli, H. Iamblichi in nicomachi arithmeticam introductionem. Leipzig, 1894. Revised byU. Klein, 1975.Urmson, J. O. Concerning the General Science of Mathematics by Iamblichus. Unpublishedmanuscript, London: Institute for Classical Studies, text deposited 2000.11. Editions and Translations of Ancient Commentatorsa. Aristocles of Messene (AD I)Chiesara, M. L. Aristocles of Messene: testimonia and fragments (Oxford 2001).b. Alexander of Aphrodisias (AD II)Barnes, J. et al., Alexander of Aphrodisias: On Aristotle’s Prior Analytics 1.1-7. Ithaca, NY,1991.Wallies, M. Alexandri Aphrodisiiensis in aristotelis analyticorum priorum librum Icommentarium (CIAG II 1). Berlin, 1883.Wallies, M. Alexandri Aphrodisiiensis in aristotelis topicorum libros octo commentaria(CIAG 2.2). Berlin, 1891.c. Ammonius (AD V)Wallies, M. Amonii in Aristotelis analyticorum priorum librum I commentarium (CIAG IVpars VI). Berlin, 1901.d. Proclus (AD V)Friedlein, G. Procli Diadochi in primum euclidis elementorum librum commentarii. Leipzig,1873.Morrow, G. Proclus: a Commentary on the First Book of Euclid’s Elements. Forward by I.Mueller. Princeton, 1970.e. Olympiodorus the younger (AD V-VI)Westerink, L. G. Olympiodorus: Commentary on the First Alcibiades of Plato. Amsterdam,1956.f. Philoponus (AD VI)Giardina, G. R. Giovanni Filopono Matematico tra neopithagorismo e neoplatonismo:Commentario alla Introduzione Aritmetica di Nicomaco di Gerasa: introduzione,testo, traduzione e note (Catania 1999).

7g. Asclepius of Tralles (AD VI)Taràn, L. Asclepius of Tralles: in Nicomachi Isagogen Arithm. Scholia I, Transactions of theAmerican Philological Society, NS 59.4 (Philadelphia 1969).h. Elias (wrote circa AD VI-VII)Busse, A. Eliae in prophyrii isagogen et Aristotelis categorias commentaria (CIAG supp.vol.?). Berlin, 1900.i. David the Invincible Philosopher (AD VI-VII)Busse, A. Davidis prolegomena et in porphyrii isagogen (CIAG 18.2). Berlin, 1904.Kendell, B. and R. W. Thomson, Definitions and Divisions of Philosophy by David theInvincible Philosopher. Chico, CA, 1983.j. Anonymous Scholion on Cod.Par.Gr.2064Wallies, M. Ammonii in aristotelis analyticorum priorum librum I commentarium (CIAG4.6), pp. ix-xii.12. Boethius (AD V-VI)Stump, E. Boethius's In Ciceronis topica. Ithaca, NY, 1988.13. Editions of Stobaeus (AD VI)Wachsmuth, C. and O. Hense (eds.), Ioannis stobaei anthologium (5 v. Berlin, 1958).B. Secondary Sources (arranged alphabetically)Acosta, E. En torno al Protréptico de la Carta de Epicuro a Meneceo. Helmantica 31 (1980),89-114.Allan, D. J. The Philosophy of Aristotle (London 1952, 2 nd ed. Oxford 1970).Allan, D. J. Fragmenta Aristotelica. The Philosophical Quarterly 3 (1953), 248-252.Allan, D. J. The Fragments of Aristotle. Review of W. D. Ross, Aristotelis FragmentaSelecta. The Classical Review n.s. 6 (1956), 224-225.Allan, D. J. Review of Rabinowitz. Classical Review, N.S. 9 (1959), 124-127Allan, D. J. A passage from Iamblichus in praise of the contemplative life. Archiv fürGeschichte der Philosophie, 57 (1975), 246-68.Allan, D. J. Critical and explanatory notes on some passages assigned to Aristotle’sProtrepticus. Phronesis 21 (1976), 219-41.Barwick, K. Die Rhetorik ad Alexandrum und Anaximenes, Alkidamas, Isokrates,Aristoteles, und die Theodekteia. Philologus, 111 (1967); 47-55.Bechtle, G. Iamblichus: Aspekte seiner Philosophie und Wissenschaftskonzeption. SanktAugustin, 2006.

Balla, C. Isocrates, Plato, and Aristotle on Rhetoric. Rhizai I (2004), 45-71.Benoit, W. ‘Isocrates and Aristotle on Rhetoric’ Rhetoric Society Quarterly XX (1990): 251-260.Bernays, J. Die Dialoge des Aristoteles in ihrem Verhältnis an seinen übrigen Werken (at116-22). Berlin, 1863.Berti, E. Le nuove ricerche sui frammenti di Aristotele. Bollettino filosofico 22 (1988), 33-40.Berti, E. Les écoles philosophiques d’Athènes et les princes de Chypre. Actes du Colloque“Chypre et les origines du Stoïcisme”, Publications du Centre Culturel Hellénique,Paris, 1996, pp. 15-20.Betegh, G. 'The Next Principle' Metaphysics A 3-4, 984b8-985b22. Aristotle's MetaphysicsAlpha - Symposium Aristotelicum (ed. C. Steel), 105-140 at 117 (Oxford 2012).Bignone, E. L’Aristotele perduto e la formazione filosofica di Epicuro, 2 vols. Firenze, 1936.Bignone, E. Nuove testimonianze e frammenti del Protrettico di Aristotele. RFIC # (1936),225-37.Bignone, E. Importante conferme all’ “Aristotele perduto”. Atene e Roma 3 ser.5 (1937),217-234. Chiarimenti e aggiunte all’ “Aristotele perduto”, Atene e Roma 3 ser.5(1937), 119-129.Blank, D. Aristotle’s ‘Academic Course on Rhetoric” and the end of Philodemus, OnRhetoric VIII’ Cronache Ercolanesi 37 (2007), 5-48.Bloch, O. R. Protreptique d’Aristote: Fragment 17 de l’édition Ross. Revue philosophique dela France et l’Étranger 154 (1964), 219-240.Bluck, R. S. The origin of the Greater Alcibiades. The Classical Quarterly n.s. 3 (1953), 46-52.Bobonich, C. Aristotle’s ethical treatises. The Blackwell Guide to Aristotle’s NicomacheanEthics (ed. R. Kraut), 12-36. Oxford, 2006.Bobonich, C. Why should philosophers rule? Plato’s Republic and Aristotle’s Protrepticus.Social Philosophy and Policy 24 (2007), 153-175.Bos, A. P. Aristotle’s Eudemus and Protrepticus: Are they really two different works?Dionysius, 8 (1984), 19-51.Bos, A. P. The divine monarchia and the system of world government in Aristotle’s DeMundo. Polis and Cosmopolis: Problems of a global era (ed. K. Boudouris), 51-68.Athens, 2003.Bos, A. P. The Soul and its Instrumental Body: a reinterpretation of Aristotle’s philosophy ofliving nature. Leiden, 2003.Bos, A. P. Aristotle on the Etruscan robbers: A core text of “Aristotelian dualism”. Journalof the History of Philosophy 41 (2003), 289-306.Bos, A. P. Aristotle’s De Spiritu as a critique of the doctrine of pneuma in Plato and hispredecessors. Mnemosyne 60 (2007), 565-588.Bos, A. P. Why is Aristotle treated so differently from other Greek philosophers? ElenchosXXIX (2008), 145-165.Brague, R. Aristote et la question du monde: Essai sur le contexte cosmologique etanthropologique de l’ontologie. Paris, 1988.Brink, C. O. Review of M. Ruch. The Journal of Roman Studies 51 (1961), 215-222.Buela, A. A. El Protreptico de Aristoteles. Interpretacion, desarrollo y bibliografia. Sapientia39 (1984), 231-234.8

Burkert, W. Platon oder Pythagoras? Zum Ursprung des wortes “Philosophie”. Hermes 88(1960), 159-177.Bywater, I. On a lost dialogue of Aristotle. Journal of Philology, 2 (1869), 55-69.Bywater, I. Aristotle’s dialogue On Philosophy. Journal of Philology 7 (1877), 64-87.Cambiano, G. The desire to know: Metaphysics A 1. Aristotle's Metaphysics Alpha –Symposium Aristotelicum (ed. C. Steel), 1-42 at 40 and n.77 (Oxford 2012).Carlini, A. Due finali di rigo dimenticate nel papiro del Protrettico di Aristotele (P. Oxy.666, 5253), SCO 33 (1983), 235.Castagnoli, L. Ancient Self-Refutation: the logic and history of self-refutation fromDemocritus to Augustine (Cambridge 2010).Cherniss, H. Review of H. D. Saffrey, Le peri\ filosofi/aj d’Aristote et la théorieplatonicienne des idées et des nombres. Gnomon 31 (1939): 36-51.Chroust, A. H. A brief account of the reconstruction of Aristotle’s Protrepticus. ClassicalPhilology 60 (1965), 229-239.Chroust, A. H. What prompted Aristotle to address the Protrepticus to Themison? Hermes 94(1966), 202-207.Chroust, A. H. An emendation to fragment 13 (Walzer, Ross) of Aristotle’s Protrepticus.Tijdschrift voor Philosophie 28 (1966), 366-377.Chroust, A. H. The term philosopher and the panegyric analogy in Aristotle’s Protrepticus.Apeiron I (1966), 14-17.Chroust, A. H. Werner Jaeger and the reconstruction of Aristotle’s lost works. SymbolaeOsloenses 42 (1968), 7-43.Chroust, A. H. Aristotle. New light on his life and on some of his lost works. 2 vols. London,1973.Chroust, A. H. Aristotle’s Protrepticus versus Aristotle’s On Philosophy: a controversy onthe nature of dreams. Theta Pi 3 (1974), 168-178.Cole, T. The anonymous Iamblichi and his place in Greek political theory. Harvard Studiesin Classical Philology 65 (1961), 127-163.Cole, T. Democritus and the Sources of Greek Anthropology. Cleveland, 1967.Cooper, J. M. 'Plato, Isocrates and Cicero on the independence of oratory from Philosophy',BACAP 1 (1986): 77-96.Croissant, J. Aristote et les mystères (Paris 1932).Crowley, T. J. Aristotle’s so-called elements. Phronesis 53 (2008), 223-242.de Laix, R. A. Aristotle’s conception of the Spartan constitution. Journal of the History ofPhilosophy 12 (1974), 21-30.den Boeft, J. Review of Straume-Zimmermann’s 1976 edition of Cicero’s Hortensius.Vigiliae Christianae 33 (1979), 412-414.de Vogel, C. J. Did Aristotle ever accept Plato’s theory of transcendent ideas? Problemsaround a new edition of the Protrepticus. AGPh 47 (1965), 261-298.de Vries, G. J. Isocrates’ reaction to the Phaedrus. Mnemosyne 6 (1953), 39-45.Diels, H. Über die exoterischen Reden des Aristoteles. Sitzungsberichte der BerlinerAkademie der Wissenschaften, 19 (1883), 447-94.Diels, H. Zu Aristoteles’ Protreptikos und Cicero’s Hortensius. Archiv fur Geschichte derPhilosophie, 1 (1888), 447-97.Dillon, J. Iamblichus of Chalcis (c. 240-325 A.D.). Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischenWelt, 36.2 (1987), 862-909. Larsen, B. D. Jamblique de Chalcis. Exégète et9

Philosophe. Aarhus, 1972.Dorandi, T. ‘La polemica fra Aristotele e Isocrate nella testimonianza Filodema’ in Etica,Politica, Retorica: Studi su Aristotele e la sua presenza nell’eta’ moderna, ed. E.Berti e L. M. Napolitano Valditara, Rome, 1989, 201-5.Dümmler, F. ‘Platon und Isokrates (Hippias I). Antisthenes Protreptikos berücksichtigt vonIsokrates, Platon und Xenophon’ = ch. 4 of Akademika (Giessen, 1889), 52-68.Düring, I. Problems in Aristotle’s Protrepticus. Eranos, 52 (1954), 139-71.Düring, I. Aristotle in the Protrepticus. Autour d’Aristote, 81-97. Louvain, 1955.Düring, I. Aristotle in the Ancient Biographical Tradition. Göteborg, 1957.Düring, I. Aristotle on ultimate principles from ‘nature and reality’ . In. Aristotle and Platoin the Mid-Fourth Century. Papers of the Symposium Aristotelicum held at Oxford inAugust, 1957, ed. I. Düring and G.E.L. Owen (Göteborg, 1960), 35-55.Düring, I. and G.E.L. Owen. Aristotle and Plato in the Mid-Fourth Century. Papers of theSymposium Aristotelicum held at Oxford in August, 1957. Göteborg, 1960.Dumoulin, B. Recherches sur le Premier Aristote (Eudeme, de la Philosophie, Protreptique).Paris, 1981.Einarson, B. Aristotle’s Protrepticus and the structure of the Epinomis. Transactions andProceedings of the American Philological Association 67 (1936), 261-85.Eucken, C. Isokrates: seine Positionen in der Auseinandersetzung mit den zeitgenössischenPhilosophen. Berlin, 1983.Feke, J. Ptolemy’s Defense of Theoretical Philosophy. Apeiron 45 (2012), 61-90.Festugière, A. J. La Révélation d’Hermes Trismégiste II: Le Dieu cosmique. Paris, 1949.Festugière, A. J. Un fragment nouveau du “Protreptique” d’Aristote. Revue philosophique dela France et l’Étranger 146 (1956), 117-127.Festugière, A. J. Les Trois Protreptiques de Platon: Euthydeme, Phaedon, Epinomis. Paris,1973.Flacelière, R. ‘L’éloge d’ Isocrate a la fin du ‘Phèdre’, RÉG xlvi (1933): 224-232.Flashar, H. Platon und Aristoteles im Protreptikos des Jamblichos. Archiv fur Geschichte derPhilosophie, 47 (1965), 53-79. Reprinted in: P. Moraux, ed., Frühschriften desAristoteles, Darmstadt, 1975 (“Wege der Forschung” CCXXIV, 247-69); and Eidola.Ausgewählte Kleine Schriften, Amsterdam, 1989, 297-323.Fujisawa, N. Aristotle’s conception of philosophy in the Protrepticus: comparison withIsocrates, Plato, and Aristotle himself in his later treatises. Journal of ClassicalStudies 21 (1973), 1-19 + 133-134.Furley, D. Review of Rabinowitz. JHS 89 (1959), 178.Furley, D.J. “Protrepticus” s.v. The Oxford Classical Dictionary. Oxford, 1996.Gadamer, H. Der Aristotelische Protreptikos und die EntwicklungsgeschichtlicheBetrachtung der Aristotelischen Ethik. Hermes, 63 (1928), 138-65.Gaiser, K. Protreptik und Paranese bei Platon. 1959.Gaiser, K. Zwei Protreptikos-Zitate in der Eudemischen Ethik des Aristoteles. RheinischesMuseum für Philologie 110 (1967), 314-345.Gaiser, K. ‘Ein Gespräch mit König Philipp: zum Eudemos des Aristoteles’ in AristotelesWerk und Wirkung: Paul Moraux Gewidmet 1. Band: Aristoteles und seine Schule,ed. J. Wiesner, Berlin, 1985, 457-84.Gallagher, R. L. “Protreptic Aims of Plato's Republic.” Ancient Philosophy 24 (2004), 293–319.10

Gerhäusser, W. Der Protreptikos des Poseidonios. Doctoral dissertation, Univ. of Heidelberg,1912.Gigon, O. Cicero und Aristoteles. Hermes, 87 (1959), 143-62.Gill, C. Protreptic and dialectic in Plato’s Euthydemus. In Plato: Euthydemus, Lysis,Charmides: Proceedings of the V Symposium Platonicum, 133-143, ed. M. Robinsonand L. Brisson. Sankt Augustin, 2000.Gottschalk, H. Heraclides of Pontus. Oxford, 1980.Griffo, S. Problemi di riconstruzione del Protreptico di Aristotele. Annali della ScuolaNormale Superiore di Pisa: Classe di Lettere e Filosofia 2 (1978), 375-392.Guthrie, W. G. The philosophy of Aristotle’s Protrepticus. Proceedings of the CambridgePhilological Society # (1932), 3-4.Haase, W. Ein vermeintliches Aristotelisches Fragment bei Johannes Philoponus. Sunusia:Festgabe für W. Schadwaldt, 323-354. Pfullingen, 1965.Hagen von, Benno von [sic], 'Isokrates und Alexander', Philologus lxvii 1908, 113-33.Halliwell, S. Philosophical Rhetoric or Rhetorical Philosophy? The strange case of Isocrates.In The Rhetoric Canon (ed. B. D. Schildgen) (Detroit 1997), 107-125.Hankinson, J. Aristotle on Kind-Crossing. In R. W. Sharples, ed., Philoosphy and theSciences in Antiquity. Burlington, 2005, 23-54.Hartlich, P. De exhortationum a Grecis Romanisque scriptorum historia. Leipziger Studienzur Klassischen Philologie, 11 (1889), 209-72.Harvey, S. The Hebrew translation of Averroes’ Prooemium to his Long Commentary onAristotle’s Physics. American Academy for Jewish Research Proceedings LII (1985),55-84.Hare, J. God and Morality: a philosophical history. Maldan, MA and Oxford, 2007.Haskins, E. V. Logos and Power in Isocrates and Aristotle. South Carolina, 2004.Heath, T. A History of Greek Mathematics, Volume I: Thales to Euclid (Oxford 1921).Heitz, E. Die verlornen Schriften des Aristoteles Leipzig, 1865.Hirzel, R. Über den Protreptikos des Aristoteles. Hermes, 10 (1876), 61-100.Hutchinson, D. S. “Doctrines of the Mean and the Debate concerning Skills in Fourth-Century Medicine, Rhetoric, and Ethics”, in Method, Medicine, and Metaphysics:Studies in the philosophy of ancient science, ed. R. J. Hankinson = Apeiron 21(1988), 17-52.Hutchinson, D. S. and M. R. Johnson. ‘Authenticating Aristotle’s Protrepticus’ in OxfordStudies in Ancient Philosophy 29 (2005), 193-294.Huxley, G. Crete in Aristotle’s Politics. Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 12 (1971),505-515.Jaeger, W. Paideia: the ideals of Greek culture. 3 vols. (originally published 1933);translated by G. Highet. Oxford, 1944.Jaeger, W. Aristoteles: Grundlegung einer Geschichte seiner Entwicklung (1 st ed. Berlin1923; 2 nd ed. 1955); English translation: Aristotle: Fundamentals of the history of hisdevelopment by R. Robinson. Oxford, 1948, 2nd ed., 1961.Jaeger, W. Ueber Ursprung und Kreislauf des philosophischen Lebensideals. InSitzungsberichte d. pruess. Akad. D. Wissensch. Phil. –Hist. Klasse 1928, p. 390++.Translated as appendix 2 in the above.Johnson, M. Aristotle on Teleology. Oxford, 2005.Johnson, M. The Aristotelian explanation of the halo. Apeiron 42 (2009), 325-357.11

Joly, R. Le Thème de genres de vie dans l’Antiquitè Classique. Brussels, 1956.Jordan, M. D. ‘Ancient philosophic protreptic and the problem of persuasive genres’.Rhetorica 4 (1986), 309-33.Kerferd, G. B. Platonism and Neoplatonism [review of Merlan, From Platonism toNeoplatonism]. The Classical Review n.s. 5 (1955), 58-60.Kurz, D. AKPIBEIA: Das Ideal der Exaktheit bei den Griechen bis Aristoteles. Göppingen,1970.Landolfi, L. Per l’analisi di un protreptikos logos: Manil. 4, 1-22. Orpheus (1994), 448-458.Langerbeck, H. Review of D. J. Allan, The philosophy of Aristotle. Gnomon 26 (1954), 1-8.Larsen, B. D. Jamblique de Chalcis: Exégète et Philosophy. Vol. I: Thèse. Vol. II.Appendice. Testimonia et Fragmenta Exegetica (Aarhus, 1972).Laskaris, J. The Art is Long: on the sacred disease and the scientific tradition. Leiden, 2002.Chapter Three: “On the Sacred Disease—A Sophistic Protreptic Speech”Leeman, A. D. De Aristotelis Protreptico Somnii Scripionis exemplo. Mnemosyne, 11(1958), 139-51.Leszl, W. L’Aristotele di Düring. Revista di Storia della Filosofia 2 (1984), 3-34 and 211-242.Livingstone, N. 'Voice of Isocrates and the dissimination of cultural power', in Y. L. Too andN. Livingstone (edd.) Pedagogy and Power: Rhetorics of classical learning(Cambridge, 1998).Long, A. A. Aristotle on eudaimonia, nous, and divinity. In J. Miller (ed.),Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics: a critical guide. (Cambridge 2011).Macleod, C. W. The poetry of ethics: Horace, Epistles I. The Journal of Roman Studies 69(1979), 16-27.Mansion, S. Review of Rabinowitz. Revue Philosophique de Louvain 56 (1958), 316-9.Mansion, S. Contemplation and action in Aristotle’s Protrepticus. In Aristotle and Plato inthe Mid-Fourth Century, ed. I. Düring and G.E.L. Owen, 56-75. 1960.Mansion, S. Les critères du meilleur dans le Protreptique d’Aristote. Zetesis, 164-176.Antwerp and Utrecht, 1973. Reprinted in Suzanne Mansion: ÉtudesAristotéliciennes, ed. J. Follon, 433-445, Louvain, 1984.Massaracchia, A. Isocrate e le scienze. Saggi di storia del pensiero scientific dedicati aValerio Tonini, 23-46. Rome, 1983.Masters, R. D. The case of Aristotle’s missing dialogues: who wrote the Sophist, theStatesman, and the Politics? Political Theory 5 (1977), 31-60.McBryde, D. I. The Foundations of Aristotle’s Ethics. Newcastle, Australia, Ph.D. Diss.2010.McKirahan Jr., R. Aristotle on subordinate sciences. British Journal for the History ofScience 11 (1970), 197-220.Menn, S., ‘The origins of Aristotle’s concept of e)ne/rgeia: e)ne/rgeia and du/namij’, AncientPhilosophy, 14 (1994), 73-114.Menn, S. Collecting the letters. Phronesis XLIII (1998), 291-305.Menn, S. Aristotle's Theology. The Oxford Handbook of Aristotle (ed. C. Shields), 422-464at 453n8 (Oxford 2012).Merlan, P. Isocrates, Aristotle and Alexander the Great. Historia 3 (1954): 60-81 = Kleinephilosophische Schriften, 167-188, ed. F. Merlan. Hildesheim and New York, 1976.Merlan, P. From Platonism to Neoplatonism (1 st ed. 1953, 2 nd ed., The Hague 1960).12

Merlan, P. Das Problem der Erasten. Horizons of a Philosopher. Festschrift für DavidBaumgardt (Leiden, 1963), 297-314 = Kleine philosophische Schriften, 109-126, ed.F. Merlan. Hildesheim and New York, 1976.Molina, J. Tradición y novedad en el Protréptico a la filosofia de Jámblico. Noua tellus 17(1999), 65-107.Monan, D. La connaissance morale dans le “Protreptique” d’Aristote. Revue philosophiquede Louvain 58 (1960), 185-219.Monan, D. Moral Knowledge and its Methodology in Aristotle. Oxford, 1968.Moraux, P. Une nouvelle trace de l’Aristote perdu. Les Ètudes classiques 16 (1948), 89-91.Moraux, P. Les listes anciennes des ouvrages d’Aristote. Preface by A. Mansion. Louvain,1951.Moraux, P. ‘Notes sur la tradition indirecte du ‘De Caelo’ d’Aristote’ Hermes 82 (1954),145-182.Moraux, P. Review of Rabinowitz. AntCl 27 (1958), 460-464.Moraux, P. From the Protrepticus to the dialogue On Justice. In Aristotle and Plato in theMid-Fourth Century, ed. I. Düring and G.E.L. Owen (Göteborg, 1960), 113-32.Most, G. Some new fragments of Aristotle’s Protrepticus? Studi su Codici e PapiriFilosofici. ed. L. Olschki, 189-216. Firenze, 1992.Muehlenberg, E. Review of Schneeweiss 1966. The Journal of the History of Philosophy 10(1972), 86-88.Mueller, I. Iamblichus and Proclus’ Euclid commentary. Hermes 115 (1987): 334-348.Natali, C. Rhetorical and scientific aspects of the Nicomachean Ethics. Phronesis 52 (2007),364-381.Needler, M. The Aristotelian Protrepticus and the developmental treatment of theAristotelian Ethics. Classical Philology, 23 (1928), 280-4.Nehemas, A. ‘Eristic, antilogic, sophistic, dialectic: Plato’s demarcation of philosophy fromsophistry’ in Virtues of Authenticity: essays on Plato and Socrates (Princeton, 1999).Nestle, W. ‘Hippocratica’, Hermes 73 (1938): 1-38.Nielsen, K. M. Ancient Ethics. International Encyclopedia of Ethics (ed. H. LaFollette),245-257. (Oxford, Blackwell 2013).Nightingale, A. W. Genres in Dialogue: Plato and the Construct of Philosophy. Cambridge,1995.Nightingale, A. Spectacles of Truth in Classical Greek Philosophy. Cambridge, 2004.Nix, G. E. Aristotle’s Protrepticus and Isocrates. University of Chicago Dissertation, 1969.Nuyens, F. L'Évolution de la Psychologie d'Aristote. Louvain, The Hague, and Paris, 1948.Ober J. I, Socrates…The Performative Audacity of Isocrates’ Antidosis, Isocrates and CivicEducation, ed. T. Poulakos and D. Depew (Austin, 2004), 21-43.O’Meara, D. Pythagoras Revived: Mathematics and philosophy in late antiquity. Oxford,1989.O’Meara, D. Faut-il Philosopher? Le voyage d’une question dans le monde antique. InPeregrina Curiositas ed. A. Kessler et al. (Freiburg (Schw.), 1995), 1-12.O’Meara, D. Iamblichus. The Oxford Classical Dictionary. 3rd edition. Oxford, 1996.O’Meara, D. Platonopolis: Platonic political philosophy in late antiquity. Oxford, 2003.Orlandi, T. Il primo Aristotele nel de comuni mathematica scientia di Iamblico. Revistacritica di storia della filosofia 18 (1963), 592-598.Ostwald, M. and J. P. Lynch ‘The Growth of Schools and the Advance of Knowledge’ = Ch.13

12a of The Cambridge Ancient History, Volume 6, The Fourth Century BC. 2nd ed.D. M. Lewis, J. Boardman, S. Hornblower, M. Ostwald, 592-633. Cambridge, 1994.Owen, G. E. L. Logic and metaphysics in some earlier works of Aristotle. In Aristotle andPlato in the Mid-Fourth Century, ed. I. Düring and G.E.L. Owen (Göteburg, 1960),163-190.Philippson, R. Cicero’s Hortensius. In RE VII A, coll. 1125-7.Pistelli, E. Dei manoscritti di Giamblico di una nuova edizione del Protrpetico. MuseoItaliano di Antichita Classica 2 (1888), 457-480.Pistelli, E. Iamblichea. Studi Italiani di Filologia Classica 1 (1893), 25-40.Pistelli, E. Per una nuova edizione del IV libro di Giamblico. Studi Italiani di FilologiaClassica 1 (1893), 233-238.Plezia, M. De quodam Protreptici Aristotelii loco supplendo. Classica et Mediaevalia 28(1967), 214-215.Pohlenz, M. Review of Bignone, L’Aristotele perduto. Göttinginische Gelehrte Anzeigen 198(1936), 514-31.Poulakos, T. Speaking for the Polis: Isocrates’ rhetorical education. South Carolina, 1997.Rabinowitz, W. G. Aristotle’s Protrepticus and the Sources of its Reconstruction. Berkeley,1957.Rashed, M. ‘Textes inédits transmis par l’Ambr. Q 74 sup. Alexandre d’Aphrodise etOlympiodore d’Alexandrie’ in Rev. Sc. ph. th. 81 (1997), 219-38.Rashed, M. ‘Alexandre d’Aphrodise, Lecteur du Protreptique’ in Les Prologues Mediévaux(ed. J. Hamesse). Turnhout, 2002.Ratte, C. La loi dans l'anonyme de Jamblique. Camenulae 2 (2008).Rees, D. A. Bipartition of the soul in the early academy. The Journal of Hellenic Studies 77(1957), 112-118.Regenbogen, O. Review of Bignone. Gnomon 16 (1940), 103-4.Renehan, R. An aristotelian mode of argumentation in Iamblichus’ Protrepticus. Hermes 92(1964), 507-508.Richter, L. Die Beziehung zwischen Theorie und Praxis der Musik im AristotelischenProtreptikos. Hermes 88 (1960), 177-188.Rodriguez, C. M. Propuesta de atribución de dos fragmentos del papiro de Viena PVindob26008. Emerita LXXVI (2008), 87-104.Rohatyn, D. The protreptic argument. International Logic Review 16 (1977), 192-204.Romeyer-Dherbey, G. Vie bienheureuse et philosophie Les traces du Protreptique dans lelivre X de l’Ethique de Nicomaque. Les Études philosophiques 4 (1975), 399-414.Roscalla, F. Strategie letterarie a confronto: Isocrate e Platone. Athenaeeum lxxxvi (1998):109-132.Rowe, C. Review of Dumoulin. The Journal of Hellenic Studies 105 (1985), 188-189.Rowe, C. ‘Aristotelian Constitutions’, The Cambridge History of Greek and Roman PoliticalThought, ed. C. Rowe and M. Schofield (Cambridge, 2000), 366-389.Saffrey, H. D. Le peri\ filosofi/aj d’Aristote et la théorie platonicienne des idées et desnombres. Leiden, 1955.Schmieja, H. Drei Prologe im Grossen Physikkommentar des Averroes? Aristotelisches Erbeim arabisch lateinischen Mittelalter: Übersetzungen, Kommentare, Interpretationen,ed. A. Zimmermann. Berlin and New York, 1986.Schneeweiss, G. Die Überlieferungen von Themison und Sardanapall: zur Datierung des14

aristotelischen Protreptikos. Gymnasium 117 (2010), 531-558.Sedley, D., ‘Is Aristotle's Teleology Anthropocentric?’, Phronesis, 36 (1991), 179-96.Sedley, D., ‘Becoming like God in the Timaeus and Aristotle’, in Interpreting the Timaeus-Critias (Proceedings of the IV Symposium Platonicum), ed. Calvo, Tomás andBrisson, Luc, (Sankt Augustin, 1997), 327-39.Shields, C. Aristotle's Philosophical Life and Writings. The Oxford Handbook ofAristotle (ed. C. Shields), 3-16 at 15n27 (Oxford 2012).Sicherl, M. Die Handschriften, Ausgaben und Übersetzungen von Iamblichos de mysteriis.Berlin, 1957.Sicherl, M. Ein uebersehener Iamblichos-Codex (Matrit. O 46). Emerita 28 (1960), 87-93.Sicherl, M. Der codex grimanianus graecus 11 und seine nachkommenschaft. ByzantischeZeitschrift 67 (1974), 313-336.Slings, S. R. Protreptic in ancient theories of philosophical literature. In Greek LiteraryTheory after Aristotle: A collection of papers in honour of D. M. Schenkveld, ed. J.J.Abbenes, S.R. Slings, I. Sluiter, 173-92. Amsterdam, 1995.Smith, T. W. The protreptic character of the Nicomachean Ethics. Polity XXVII (1994), 307-330.Spoerri, W. Review of Rabinowitz. Gnomon 32 (1960), 18-25.Stark, R. Rev. of During, Attempt, GGA 217 (1965), 55-68.Stark, R. Aristotelesstudien: Philologische untersuchungen zur Entwicklung derAristotelischen Ethik. München, 1972. Rev. by D. Russell, CR 1956, 70-71.Stowers, S. K. Letter Writing in Greco-Roman Antiquity. Philadelphia, 1986.Strycker , É. de. On the first section of fragment 5a of the Protrepticus: its logical structureand the platonic character of the doctrine. In Aristotle and Plato in the Mid-FourthCentury, ed. I. Düring and G.E.L. Owen (Göteborg, 1960), 76-104..Strycker, É. de. Prédicats univoques et prédicats analogiques dans le Protreptiqued’Aristote. In Revue Philosophique de Louvain 66 (1968), 597-618.Strycker, É. de. Review of Düring 1981. Gnomon 41, (1969), 233-55.Strycker, É. de. Sur un emploi technique de ma=llon chez Aristote. Mnemosyne 22 (1969),303-304.Stylianou, P. J. The Age of Kingdoms: a political history of Cyprus in the Archaic andClassical Periods. 1989.Swancutt, D. M. Paraenesis in light of protrepsis: troubling the typical dichotomy. In J. Starrand T. Engberg-Pederson, Early Christian Paranesis in Context (Berlin 2004), 113-153.Taran, L. Review of Larsen. The Classical World 68 (1975), 466-467.Too, Y. L. The Rhetoric of Identity in Isocrates: Text, power, pedagogy. Cambridge, 1995.Tuominen, M. The Ancient Commentators on Plato and Aristotle (California 2009).Turkowska, D. Protreptyk Arystotelesa w Swietle Ostatnich Badan. Meander 17 (1962), 34-39.Turkowska, D. L’Hortensius de Ciceron et le Protreptique d’Aristote. Warsaw, 1965.Usener, H. Vergessenes. Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 28 (1873), 392-403.Usener, H. Organisation der wissenschaftlichen Arbeit bilder aus der Geschichte derWissenschaft. Preussische Jahrbücher LIII (1884), 1-25. Reprinted in Vorträge undAufsätze, 69-102 (see esp. 101n1). Leipzig and Berlin, 1907.Usener, S. Isokrates, Platon, und ihr Publikum: Hörer und Leser von Literatur im 4.15

Jahrhundert v. Chr. (Tübingen, 1994).Usher, S. ‘Isocrates: Kingship and the barbarian’, The Birth of the European Identity: TheEurope-Asia contrast in Greek thought 490-322 B.C., ed. H. A. Kahn (ed.), ???-???.Vendruscolo, F. Gli Estratti Aristotelici nel Protrettico di Giamblico: Approfondimenticriticotestuali (Pisa dissertation, 1985).Vendruscolo, F. Due Frammenti Aristotelici (Protrepticus 6 e 15 Walzer-Ross): NoteTestuali e spunti per una ricostruzione. Studi Classici e Orientali 38 (1988), 293-330.Verbeke, G. Plutarch and the development of Aristotle. In Aristotle and Plato in the Mid-Fourth Century, ed. I. Düring and G.E.L. Owen (Göteburg, 1960), 236-247.Verdenius, W. J. Aristotle Protrepticus B.84 (Düring). Mnemosyne 15 (1962), 395-396.Villa, E. Il Protreptikos di Aristotele. Rendiconti dell’Istituto Lombardo, Classe di Lettere,Scienze e Storiche, 53 (1920), 539-49. Von der Mühll, P. Isocrates und derProtreptikos des Aristoteles. Philologus, 94 (1939-40), 259-65.van der Meeren, S. Le protreptique en philosophie: essai de définition d’un genre. REG 115(2002), 591-621.von Hagen, B. Isokrates und Alexander. Philologus 67 (1908), 113-133.von der Mühll, P. ‘Isocrates und der Protreptikos des Aristoteles’, Philologus 94 (1939-40):259-65.von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. ‘Platon und Isokrates’ = ch. 10 of Platon: Beilagen undTextkritik 3, 106-125. Berlin, 1962.Walker, M. Living by contemplation: Theoria, self-maintenance, and flourishing inAristotle's ethics. Yale Ph. D. diss., 2008.Walker, M. The utility of contemplation in Aristotle’s Protrepticus. Ancient Philosophy 30(2010), 135-153.Waszink, J. H. Traces of Aristotle’s lost dialogues in Tertullian. Vigiliae Christianae 1(1947), 137-149.Wendland, P. Anaximenes von Lampsakos: Studien zur ältesten Geschichte der Rhetorik.Berlin, 1905.Weil, M. R. Isocrate et le Protreptique d’Aristote. Revue des Études grecques 91 (1978),xviii.Wersdörfer, H. Die φιλοσοφια des Isokrates im Spiegel in ihren Terminologie.Untersuchungen zur frühattischen Rhetorik und Stillehre. (Klassisch philologischenStudien xiii). Bonn dissertation, 1940.Wieland, W. Die aristotelische Physik (Göttingen 1970).Wildberg, C. Three Neoplatonic Introductions to Philosophy: Ammonious, David, and Elias.Hermathena CXLIX (1990), 33-51.Wieland, W. Aristoteles also Rhetoriker und die exoterischen Schriften. Hermes 86 (1958),323-346.Wilpert, P. Zwei aristotelische Frühschriften über die Ideenlehre. Regensburg, 1949.Wilpert, P. Review of Rabinowitz. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 42 (1960), 101-6.Wilpert, P. The fragments of Aristotle’s lost writings. In Aristotle and Plato in the Mid-Fourth Century, ed. I. Düring and G.E.L. Owen, 257-264. Göteborg, 1960.Wolfsdorf, D. Epicurus on Eu)frosu/nh )and Ene/rgeia (DL 10.136). Apeiron 42 (2009), 222-257.Zhmud, L. Pythagoras and the Early Pythagoreans. First published in Russian 1994.Translated by K. Windle and R. Ireland (Oxford 2012).16

Zhmud, L. Mathematics and Philosophy: an alleged fragment of Aristotle in Iamblichus.Hyperboreus 13 (2007), 77-78.Zuntz, G. In Aristotelis Protrepticum Coniecturae. Mnemosyne 11 (1958), 158-9.17