Formulaire de demande afin de déterminer l'assujettissement à l ...

Vertragsnummer: .....................................................................................................................Numéro de contrat:Letzter Arbeitgeber in der Schweiz (Name + Adresse):Dernier employeur en Suisse (nom + adresse):......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................Neuer Arbeitgeber (Name + Land):Nouvel employeur (nom + pays):....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................Der Antragsteller bestätigt die Richtigkeit der oben stehenden Angaben.Le demandeur confirme l’exactitude des données ci-dessus.Ort, Datum: …………………………………Lieu, date:Unterschrift: ………………………………………..Signature:(Die Prüfung der Voraussetzungen für eine Barauszahlung und die Auszahlung der Freizügigkeitsleistung erfolgt durchdie zuständige Vorsorgeeinrichtung. / L’examen des conditions pour le versement en espèces et le versement de laprestation de libre passage est réalisé par l’institution de prévoyance compétente.)2. Von der Krankenkasse in Frankreich ausfüllen lassen :2. A faire compléter par la Caisse d’assurance maladie en France:La Caisse d’assurance maladie compétente confirme que la personne susmentionnée, en date du................................... (l’examen peut être effectué au plus tôt 90 jours après le départ de la Suisse oude la fin des rapports de travail en Suisse) est assurée à titre de:□ salariée□ indépendante□ bénéficiaire de prestations de chômage□ CMU (couverture maladie universelle)□ autre : …………………………………….Lieu, date: ......................................................Signature, timbre: .................................................... ……..Das vollständig ausgefüllte und unterzeichnete Formular (Teil 1 und 2) ist dem Sicherheitsfonds BVG, Geschäftsstelle,Postfach 1023, CH-3000 Bern 14 einzureichen.Le formulaire dûment complété et signé (partie 1 et 2) doit être remis au Fonds de garantie LPP, Organe dedirection, case postale 1023, CH-3000 Berne 14.2

Continuity and Rupture: The “New CHP” or ‘What Has Changed in the CHP?’with the local province president and hisgroup, and worked against them. For thisreason, when we sat down to interviewparty leaders we found that the followingview prevailed: “In politics nobody isyour friend, or your enemy, forever” 7 .The spring of 2010 witnessedthe inception of a process thatwould lead to some significantchanges for Turkey’s oldestpolitical partyThe CHP has been presenting itself for some time as a party going throughthe process of reform. In this paper, I would like to discuss the CHP within theparadigm of party individualization and “the political firm.” In what ways has theCHP made a break from its past? In what ways has it maintained considerablehistorical continuity? In short, just how new is the “New CHP?” Working fromWeber’s concept of the political firm, examining the CHP in this framework hasbecome even more crucial in light of the recent election results. 8 After all, theseelection results provide a good indicator of just how convinced the public is of theCHP’s “renewal.”In this paper, I will be working from two reference points as I evaluate thecontinuities and ruptures displayed by the “New CHP”: election campaigns anddiscourse of the CHP, and organization and leadership. But before moving intomy analysis, it is worthwhile to provide a short overview of what the CHP hasbeen up to for the past year and a-half. After all, these were the developments thatbrought about the claims of a changing “New CHP,” and its “changing ideologicalaxis” to the fore.The spring of 2010 witnessed the inception of a process that would lead tosome significant changes for Turkey’s oldest political party. Until this period, twoheavyweights dominated the party leadership, Chairman Deniz Baykal and GeneralSecretary Önder Sav. However, the competition between these two men forcontrol of the party’s organization had become increasingly apparent during thepast few years. In 2008, a new party charter 9 was passed. It reduced the GeneralSecretary’s authority, dividing his former areas of responsibility among a handfulof Assistant Chairmen. This development was widely interpreted as an attempt todilute Secretary Önder Sav’s weight in the party. Secretary Sav must have interpretedthese changes in much the same way, judging by how forcefully he resistedthe new amendments. 10 The previous charter stipulated considerable authority forthe General Secretary, shaping the contours of intraparty competition around theChairman and the General Secretary. Shifting alignments within the party couldbe sorted according to whether they were part of the Önder Sav faction or not.Of course, there were also groups who were disgruntled and excluded. On May 7,131