13.07.2015 Views

Dicoumarol enhances gemcitabine-induced cytotoxicity in high ...

Dicoumarol enhances gemcitabine-induced cytotoxicity in high ...

Dicoumarol enhances gemcitabine-induced cytotoxicity in high ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Onl<strong>in</strong>e Submissions: http://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327officewjg@wjgnet.comdoi:10.3748/wjg.v16.i19.2362World J Gastroenterol 2010 May 21; 16(19): 2362-2370ISSN 1007-9327 (pr<strong>in</strong>t)© 2010 Baishideng. All rights reserved.ORIGINAL ARTICLE<strong>Dicoumarol</strong> <strong>enhances</strong> <strong>gemcitab<strong>in</strong>e</strong>-<strong><strong>in</strong>duced</strong> <strong>cytotoxicity</strong> <strong>in</strong><strong>high</strong> NQO1-express<strong>in</strong>g cholangiocarc<strong>in</strong>oma cellsBenjaporn Buranrat, Auemduan Prawan, Upa Kukongviriyapan, Sar<strong>in</strong>ya Kongpetch, Veerapol KukongviriyapanBenjaporn Buranrat, Auemduan Prawan, Sar<strong>in</strong>ya Kongpetch,Veerapol Kukongviriyapan, Department of Pharmacology,Faculty of Medic<strong>in</strong>e, and Liver Fluke and Cholangiocarc<strong>in</strong>omaResearch Center, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002,ThailandUpa Kukongviriyapan, Department of Physiology, Faculty ofMedic<strong>in</strong>e, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, ThailandAuthor contributions: Buranrat B, Prawan A and KukongviriyapanV designed the research; Buranrat B and Kongpetch Sperformed the research; Buranrat B, Prawan A, KukongviriyapanU, Kongpetch S and Kukongviriyapan V analyzed the data;Buranrat B and Kukongviriyapan V wrote the paper; all authorsgave f<strong>in</strong>al approval of the manuscript.Supported by Thailand Research Fund, National Science andTechnology Development Agency, research fund<strong>in</strong>g from KhonKaen University; the Royal Golden Jubilee Ph.D. Program (toKongpetch S); the Office of the Commission on Higher Education(to Buranrat B)Correspondence to: Veerapol Kukongviriyapan, AssociateProfessor, Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medic<strong>in</strong>e,Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002,Thailand. veerapol@kku.ac.thTelephone: +66-43-348397 Fax: +66-43-348397Received: January 29, 2010 Revised: March 5, 2010Accepted: March 12, 2010Published onl<strong>in</strong>e: May 21, 2010METHODS: Four human cell l<strong>in</strong>es with different NQO1activity were used; the human CCA cell l<strong>in</strong>es, KKU-100,KKU-OCA17, KKU-M214, and Chang liver cells. NQO1 activityand mRNA expression were determ<strong>in</strong>ed. The cellswere pretreated with dicoumarol at relevant concentrationsbefore treatment with <strong>gemcitab<strong>in</strong>e</strong>. Cytotoxicitywas determ<strong>in</strong>ed by sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g with fluorescent dyes. Oxidantformation was exam<strong>in</strong>ed by assay of cellular glutathionelevels and reactive oxygen species productionby us<strong>in</strong>g dihydrofluoresce<strong>in</strong> diacetate. Measurement ofmitochondrial transmembrane potential was performedby us<strong>in</strong>g JC-1 fluorescent probe. Western blott<strong>in</strong>g analysiswas performed to determ<strong>in</strong>e levels of survival relatedprote<strong>in</strong>s.RESULTS: <strong>Dicoumarol</strong> markedly enhanced the <strong>cytotoxicity</strong>of <strong>gemcitab<strong>in</strong>e</strong> <strong>in</strong> KKU-100 and KKU-OCA17, the<strong>high</strong> NQO1 activity and mRNA express<strong>in</strong>g cells, but not<strong>in</strong> the other cells with low NQO1 activity. <strong>Dicoumarol</strong><strong><strong>in</strong>duced</strong> a marked decrease <strong>in</strong> cellular redox of glutathione<strong>in</strong> KKU-100 cells, <strong>in</strong> contrast to KKU-M214 cells.<strong>Dicoumarol</strong> at concentrations that <strong>in</strong>hibited NQO1 activitydid not alter mitochondrial transmembrane potentialand production of reactive oxygen species. Gemcitab<strong>in</strong>ealone <strong><strong>in</strong>duced</strong> activation of NF-κB and Bcl-XL prote<strong>in</strong>expression. However, <strong>gemcitab<strong>in</strong>e</strong> and dicoumarol comb<strong>in</strong>ation<strong><strong>in</strong>duced</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased p53 and decreased Bcl-XLlevels <strong>in</strong> KKU-100, but not <strong>in</strong> KKU-M214 cells.CONCLUSION: NQO1 may be important <strong>in</strong> sensitiz<strong>in</strong>gcells to anticancer drugs and <strong>in</strong>hibition of NQO1 may bea strategy for the treatment of CCA.© 2010 Baishideng. All rights reserved.AbstractAIM: To <strong>in</strong>vestigate whether dicoumarol, a potent <strong>in</strong>hibitorof NAD(P)H qu<strong>in</strong>one oxidoreductase-1 (NQO1),potentiates <strong>gemcitab<strong>in</strong>e</strong> to <strong>in</strong>duce <strong>cytotoxicity</strong> <strong>in</strong> cholangiocarc<strong>in</strong>omacells (CCA) and the role of reactiveoxygen generation <strong>in</strong> sensitiz<strong>in</strong>g the cells.Key words: NAD(P)H qu<strong>in</strong>one oxidoreductase-1; <strong>Dicoumarol</strong>;Cholangiocarc<strong>in</strong>oma; Chemotherapy; OxidativestressPeer reviewer: Ismail Matalka, MD, FRCPath, Professor, Departmentof Pathology and Laboratory Medic<strong>in</strong>e, K<strong>in</strong>g AbdullahUniversity Hospital and School of Medic<strong>in</strong>e, Jordan Universityof Science and Technology, Irbid, JordanBuranrat B, Prawan A, Kukongviriyapan U, Kongpetch S, KukongviriyapanV. <strong>Dicoumarol</strong> <strong>enhances</strong> <strong>gemcitab<strong>in</strong>e</strong>-<strong><strong>in</strong>duced</strong><strong>cytotoxicity</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>high</strong> NQO1-express<strong>in</strong>g cholangiocarc<strong>in</strong>omacells. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16(19): 2362-2370 Availablefrom: URL: http://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v16/i19/2362.htm DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v16.i19.2362WJG|www.wjgnet.com2362 May 21, 2010|Volume 16|Issue 19|


Buranrat B et al . <strong>Dicoumarol</strong> <strong>enhances</strong> cell kill<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> cholangiocarc<strong>in</strong>omaINTRODUCTIONNAD(P)H qu<strong>in</strong>one oxidoreductase-1 (NQO1 or DTdiaphorase)is a ubiquitous flavoprote<strong>in</strong> localized widely<strong>in</strong> body tissues. It is an obligated two-electron reductasethat reduces qu<strong>in</strong>ones to hydroqu<strong>in</strong>ones, thus bypass<strong>in</strong>gthe toxic semiqu<strong>in</strong>one <strong>in</strong>termediates, and these resultanthydroqu<strong>in</strong>ones are thus ready for further conjugationand excretion [1] . Several functions of NQO1 have beenproposed <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g xenobiotic detoxification, superoxidescaveng<strong>in</strong>g, ma<strong>in</strong>tenance of endogenous antioxidant,modulation of p53 and proteasomal degradation [2-4] . Itis conceivable that NQO1 functions primarily to protectnormal cells from oxidant stress and electrophilic attack.A number of experimental models and epidemiologicalstudies support the concept that <strong>in</strong>take of dietary phytochemicalsconfers a cancer chemoprevention effect andthese chemicals have been shown to <strong>in</strong>duce <strong>in</strong>creased expressionof phase Ⅱ drug detoxify<strong>in</strong>g enzymes <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>gNQO1 [5,6] . The cytoprotective role of NQO1 is supportedby reports that disruption of the NQO1 gene or geneticpolymorphism <strong>in</strong>crease the risk of chemical-<strong><strong>in</strong>duced</strong>toxicity and carc<strong>in</strong>ogenesis [7,8] . The expressions of NQO1and antioxidant enzymes are recognized as an adaptiveresponse to chemical stress [6,9] . On the other hand, analysisof several solid tumors found an over-expression ofthe NQO1 gene <strong>in</strong> cancers of the liver, thyroid, breast,colon, lung, and pancreas [10,11] . Under these circumstances,NQO1 probably functions to protect cancer cells byelim<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g oxidant species and mak<strong>in</strong>g cells resistant toanticancer drugs that <strong>in</strong>duce oxidative <strong>in</strong>jury [12] .Inhibition of NQO1 activity by dicoumarol has beenshown to suppress urogenital and pancreatic cancer cellgrowth and potentiate <strong>cytotoxicity</strong> of cisplat<strong>in</strong> and doxorubic<strong>in</strong>[13,14] . The <strong>in</strong>hibition of NQO1 with dicoumarolwas suggested to stimulate formation of superoxide, oxidativestress and subsequent suppression of pancreaticcancer cell growth and <strong>in</strong>duction of apoptosis [15,16] . However,dicoumarol has been shown to <strong>in</strong>duce formation ofreactive oxygen species (ROS) <strong>in</strong>dependently from NQO1activity by <strong>in</strong>hibition of the mitochondrial electron transportcha<strong>in</strong> [17] . Therefore, the question as to whether <strong>in</strong>hibitionof NQO1 renders cancer cells more sensitive tochemotherapeutic agents is still not clear. More study isnecessary to def<strong>in</strong>e the role of NQO1 <strong>in</strong> cancer cells.Sensitiz<strong>in</strong>g cancer cells to be more susceptible to radiotherapyor chemotherapy may be an important strategy toovercome resistance <strong>in</strong> cancer chemotherapy.Cholangiocarc<strong>in</strong>omas (CCA) are rare types of livercancers aris<strong>in</strong>g from the biliary duct system. Surgicalresection with a histologically free marg<strong>in</strong> is the onlychance for cure [18] . Unfortunately, only few patients areeligible for surgery. Furthermore, current chemotherapyand radiotherapy regimens do not substantially improvesurvival <strong>in</strong> CCA patients [18,19] . Gemcitab<strong>in</strong>e has beenthe most important nucleoside analog which has widespectrum activity aga<strong>in</strong>st various solid and hematologicaltumors [20] . It shows some efficacy and is well tolerated <strong>in</strong>CCA patients [21] . It is essential to ga<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>sight <strong>in</strong>to molecularmechanisms by which cancer cells operate to surviveand evade the attack by chemotherapeutic agents.Because NQO1 appears to be a potential target forexploitation <strong>in</strong> cancer chemotherapy, we <strong>in</strong>vestigatedwhether dicoumarol, a potent <strong>in</strong>hibitor of NQO1, sensitizedCCA cells to respond to the <strong>cytotoxicity</strong> of <strong>gemcitab<strong>in</strong>e</strong>.Furthermore, we exam<strong>in</strong>ed whether dicoumarol-and <strong>gemcitab<strong>in</strong>e</strong>-<strong><strong>in</strong>duced</strong> cell kill<strong>in</strong>g was associatedwith ROS generation, mitochondrial dysfunction andapoptotic prote<strong>in</strong> expression.MATERIALS AND METHODSHuman cell l<strong>in</strong>e culturesThree human CCA cell l<strong>in</strong>es established <strong>in</strong> our <strong>in</strong>stitute,KKU-100, KKU-OCA17 and KKU-M214, were derivedfrom human <strong>in</strong>trahepatic CCA tissues with the histologicaltypes of poorly differentiated, well differentiated andmoderately differentiated adenocarc<strong>in</strong>oma, respectively[22,23] . Chang liver cells were also used <strong>in</strong> the study. CCAcells and Chang liver cells were rout<strong>in</strong>ely cultured as previouslydescribed [24] <strong>in</strong> Ham’s F12 media, supplementedwith 4 mmol/L L-glutam<strong>in</strong>e, 12.5 mmol/L N-2-hydroxyethylpiperaz<strong>in</strong>e-N’-2-ethanesulfonicacid (HEPES), at pH7.3, 100 U/mL penicill<strong>in</strong> 100 μg/mL streptomyc<strong>in</strong> sulfateand 10% fetal calf serum. The media was renewed every3 d, tryps<strong>in</strong>ized with 0.25% tryps<strong>in</strong>-EDTA and subcultured<strong>in</strong> the same media.NQO1 activity assayNQO1 assay was performed essentially accord<strong>in</strong>g to apreviously published method [25] . Cells were seeded onto96-well cultured plates overnight. Cells were then lysedwith 50 μL of 0.8% digiton<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> 2 mmol/L EDTA atroom temperature for 10 m<strong>in</strong>. The assay was performedus<strong>in</strong>g menadione and MTT [3-(4,5-dmethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide, a tetrazole] <strong>in</strong> thesubstrate coupl<strong>in</strong>g reaction and measured as rate-k<strong>in</strong>etics<strong>in</strong> a micro-plate reader at a wavelength of 620 nm. The<strong>in</strong>itial velocity of reaction was calculated as NQO1 activityus<strong>in</strong>g the ext<strong>in</strong>ction coefficient of formazan of MTTof 11 300 L/mol per cm and correction factor for thelight path. In the determ<strong>in</strong>ation of the enzymatic propertyof NQO1 <strong>in</strong> each cell l<strong>in</strong>e, cells were <strong>in</strong>cubated withvary<strong>in</strong>g concentrations of dicoumarol for 10 m<strong>in</strong> beforecarry<strong>in</strong>g out assays as above.Cytotoxicity assayCCA cells (KKU-100, KKU-OCA17, and KKU-M214)and Chang liver cells were seeded onto 96-well culturedplates at a density of 5 × 10 3 cells/well (KKU-M214 andChang cells) or 7.5 × 10 3 cells/well (KKU-100 and KKU-OCA17) for an overnight, then media was renewed withfresh media conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g test compound and further <strong>in</strong>cubatedfor the <strong>in</strong>dicated times. The <strong>cytotoxicity</strong> was determ<strong>in</strong>edby fluorescence microscopy [26] . In brief, cells werewashed once with phosphate-buffered sal<strong>in</strong>e (PBS) and thefollow<strong>in</strong>g added: 4 μL mixture of acrid<strong>in</strong>e orange, ethidiumbromide (each 1 μg/mL) and trace amount of he-WJG|www.wjgnet.com2363 May 21, 2010|Volume 16|Issue 19|


Buranrat B et al . <strong>Dicoumarol</strong> <strong>enhances</strong> cell kill<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> cholangiocarc<strong>in</strong>omamoglob<strong>in</strong>. The cells were exam<strong>in</strong>ed us<strong>in</strong>g a Nikon EclipseTS100 <strong>in</strong>verted microscope with excitation and emissionfilters of 480 and 535 nm, respectively. The microphotographswere taken at predeterm<strong>in</strong>ed three areas per well<strong>in</strong> triplicate wells per concentration with a Nikon Coolpixdigital camera. The numbers of viable and non-viable cellswere counted. The viable cells were colored green with<strong>in</strong>tact nuclei. The non-viable cells <strong>in</strong>cluded necrotic andapoptotic cells which showed bright orange sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g andgreen fluorescence, with appearance of cell shr<strong>in</strong>kage andcondensation and fragmentation of the nuclei, respectively.The antiproliferation value was calculated as = (numberof viable cells <strong>in</strong> control wells - viable cells <strong>in</strong> treatmentwells)/(number of viable cells <strong>in</strong> control wells) × 100.Determ<strong>in</strong>ations of glutathione and glutathione disulfideTotal glutathione assay was performed essentially accord<strong>in</strong>gto Tietze methods [27] . Glutathione disulfide (GSSG)was assayed by the previously described method [28] us<strong>in</strong>g1-methyl-2-v<strong>in</strong>ylpyrid<strong>in</strong>ium triflate (M2VP) as a glutathionescavenger. Cell cultures were tryps<strong>in</strong>ized and washedthree times with cold PBS buffer and centrifuged at1500 g, 4℃ for 10 m<strong>in</strong> and resuspended <strong>in</strong> PBS buffer.Cell suspension of 100 μL was reacted with M2VP(33 mmol/L <strong>in</strong> DI) or without M2VP. The solution wasmixed gently and stored frozen at -20℃ until analysis.An aliquot of cell suspension was saved for prote<strong>in</strong> determ<strong>in</strong>ationby Bradford’s dye b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g assay.Measurement of mitochondrial transmembrane potentialTo measure the change <strong>in</strong> mitochondrial transmembranepotential (∆Ψm), the lipophilic cation fluorescent dye JC-1(5,5’,6,6’-tetrachloro-1,1’,3,3’-tetraethyl-benzimidazolylcarbocyan<strong>in</strong>eiodide) was used. After treatment with dicoumarol,<strong>gemcitab<strong>in</strong>e</strong> or the comb<strong>in</strong>ation at def<strong>in</strong>ed periodof times, cultured cells were loaded with JC-1 mitochondrialmembrane potential assay kit (Clayman Chemical,Ann Arbor, Michigan) by <strong>in</strong>cubation for 30 m<strong>in</strong> at 37℃.After that, cultured cells were r<strong>in</strong>sed, <strong>in</strong>cubated <strong>in</strong> JC-1assay buffer and mitochondrial transmembrane potentialwas analyzed by a fluorescent plate reader. In healthy mitochondria,JC-1 forms J-aggregates which display strongfluorescent <strong>in</strong>tensity with excitation and emission wavelengthat 560 and 595 nm, respectively. In depolarized mitochondria,JC-1 exists as J monomers which show strongfluorescence with excitation and emission wavelength at485 and 535 nm, respectively. The shift down <strong>in</strong> ratio offluorescent <strong>in</strong>tensity of JC-1 aggregates to fluorescent<strong>in</strong>tensity of monomers is used as an <strong>in</strong>dicator of depolarizationof ∆Ψm.Determ<strong>in</strong>ation of formation of reactive oxygen speciesReactive oxygen species (ROS) levels generated fromcultured cells were determ<strong>in</strong>ed by <strong>in</strong>cubat<strong>in</strong>g the cells <strong>in</strong>Hank’s buffer supplemented with 15 mmol/L HEPESconta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 1.2 μg/mL dihydrofluoresce<strong>in</strong> diacetate (H2-DHFDA) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) for 30 m<strong>in</strong> at37℃. H2-DHFDA was taken up <strong>in</strong>to the cells, hydrolyzedand oxidized to the fluorescent product DHF byROS. The fluorescent signal was determ<strong>in</strong>ed by a fluorescentplate reader with a sett<strong>in</strong>g of the excitation andemission wavelengths at 485 and 520 nm, respectively.RNA isolation and reverse transcription-polymerasecha<strong>in</strong> reactionTotal RNA was extracted from liver tissues and the fourcell l<strong>in</strong>es us<strong>in</strong>g Trizol ® LS reagent follow<strong>in</strong>g the manufacturer’s<strong>in</strong>structions. Total RNA (3 μg) was reversetranscribed<strong>in</strong> 20 μL conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 0.5 μg of oligo(dT)15primer, 20 U of RNas<strong>in</strong> ® ribonuclease <strong>in</strong>hibitor and 200 Uof ImProm-Ⅱ reverse transcriptase <strong>in</strong> 10 × PCR buffer,3 mmol/L MgCl2, and 1 mmol/L dNTPs. The first-strandcDNA was synthesized at conditions of 42℃ for 60 m<strong>in</strong>.The reverse transcription products served as a templatefor real-time PCR. PCR amplification was performedus<strong>in</strong>g specific primers for the NQO1 and the <strong>in</strong>ternalcontrol us<strong>in</strong>g FDFT1. The PCR primer sequences wereas follows: NQO1; forward primers: 5'GGCAGAAGAG-CACTGATCGTA3', NQO1; reverse primers: 5'TGAT-GGGATTGAAGTTCATGGC3', GenBank accessionnumber BC007659.2, FDFT1; forward primers: 5'TTTA-ACTTCTGTGCTATTCCAC3', FDFT1; reverse primers:5'TCTCCAGTCTGAACATAGTC3', GenBank accessionnumber NM_004462.3. The real-time fluorescence PCR,based on SYBR Green, was carried out <strong>in</strong> a f<strong>in</strong>al volumeof 20 μL conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 1 × SYBR Green PCR Master Mix(DyNAmo Flash SYBR ® Green qPCR Kit), 0.5 μmol/Lof each NQO1 or FDFT1 primer. Thermal cycl<strong>in</strong>g wasperformed for each gene <strong>in</strong> duplicate on cDNA samples<strong>in</strong> 96-well reaction plates us<strong>in</strong>g the ABI 7500 SequenceDetection system (Applied Biosystems). A negative controlwas <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the experimental runs. The negativecontrol was set up by substitut<strong>in</strong>g the template with deionizedH2O and this rout<strong>in</strong>ely had a <strong>high</strong> Ct value whichrepresented the lower detection limit. Real-time PCR wasconducted with the follow<strong>in</strong>g cycl<strong>in</strong>g conditions: 95℃ for10 m<strong>in</strong>, followed by 40 cycles of 95℃ for 15 s, 55℃ for30 s and 72℃ for 45 s. To verify the purity of the products,a melt<strong>in</strong>g curve analysis was produced after each run. Uponcompletion of 40 PCR amplification cycles, there was adissociation step of ramp<strong>in</strong>g temperature from 60℃ to95℃ steadily for 20 m<strong>in</strong>, while the fluorescence signal wascont<strong>in</strong>ually monitored, for melt<strong>in</strong>g curve analysis. The relativeexpression ratio (R) of target genes is calculated basedon efficiency (E) and Ct deviation and expressed <strong>in</strong> comparisonto a reference gene. The correspond<strong>in</strong>g real timePCR efficiencies were calculated accord<strong>in</strong>g to the equationE = 10 [-1/slope] . All data were analyzed us<strong>in</strong>g Sequence DetectorSoftware Version 1.4 (Applied Biosystems).Western blott<strong>in</strong>g analysis of whole cell and nuclearprote<strong>in</strong> extractsThe whole cell lysates and nuclear prote<strong>in</strong> were preparedaccord<strong>in</strong>g to a previous report [29] . Treated KKU-100and KKU-M214 cells were washed with PBS, collectedand lysed at 4℃ with cell lysis buffer [20 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mmol/L NaCl, 1 mmol/L Na2EDTA,1 mmol/L EGTA, 1% Triton, 2.5 mmol/L sodium py-WJG|www.wjgnet.com2364 May 21, 2010|Volume 16|Issue 19|


Buranrat B et al . <strong>Dicoumarol</strong> <strong>enhances</strong> cell kill<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> cholangiocarc<strong>in</strong>omarophosphate, 1 mmol/L β-glycerophosphate, 1 mmol/LNa3VO4, 1 μg/mL leupept<strong>in</strong>, 1 mmol/L dithiothreitol,0.1 mmol/L phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF)] withvigorous shak<strong>in</strong>g. Follow<strong>in</strong>g centrifugation at 10 000 g for15 m<strong>in</strong>, supernatant was collected and stored at -80℃until use. Nuclear prote<strong>in</strong> was prepared by lysis of culturedcells with hypotonic buffer A [10 mmol/L HEPES-KOH pH 7.9, 1.5 mmol/L MgCl2, 10 mmol/L KCl,0.5 mmol/L DTT, 0.2 mmol/L PMSF, 0.1 mmol/LEGTA], <strong>in</strong>cubated <strong>in</strong> an ice bath for 15 m<strong>in</strong> and then 1%NP-40 was added, cells were centrifuged at 12 000 g, 4℃ for15 m<strong>in</strong>, the nuclear pellet was resuspended <strong>in</strong> ice-cold bufferB (20 mmol/L HEPES-KOH pH 7.9, 25% glycerol,1.5 mmol/L MgCl2, 420 mmol/L NaCl, 0.2 mmol/L EDTA,0.5 mmol/L DTT, 0.2 mmol/L PMSF, and 1 mmol/LEGTA), followed by <strong>in</strong>cubation at 0℃ for 45 m<strong>in</strong>. Aftervortex mix<strong>in</strong>g, the suspension was centrifuged at 12 000 g,4℃ for 30 m<strong>in</strong>. The supernatant conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g nuclear prote<strong>in</strong>swas stored at -80℃ for the NF-κB Western immunoblotanalysis.The prote<strong>in</strong> samples were mixed with 5 × load<strong>in</strong>gdye buffer, heated at 95℃ for 5 m<strong>in</strong> and prote<strong>in</strong>s wereseparated by electrophoresis <strong>in</strong> 10% SDS-polyacrylamidegel. Prote<strong>in</strong>s were transferred to polyv<strong>in</strong>ylidene difluoride(PVDF) membranes at 50 V for 2 h. The PVDF membraneswere blocked for 1 h at room temperature with 5%(w/v) skimmed milk powder <strong>in</strong> Tris buffer sal<strong>in</strong>e (TBS)with 0.1% Tween-20. PVDF membrane was <strong>in</strong>cubatedovernight at 4℃ with primary antibodies of rabbit polyclonalIgG NF-κB p65 subunits (dilution 1:500) (sc-109:Santa Cruz Biotechnology), mouse monoclonal IgG Bcl-XL(1:1000) (sc-8392), rabbit polyclonal IgG Bax (1:2000)(sc-493), rabbit polyclonal IgG cycl<strong>in</strong> D1 (1:1500) (sc-718),and mouse monoclonal IgG1 β-act<strong>in</strong> (1:2500) (sc-8432)diluted with TBS. The primary antibody was then removedand the blots were extensively washed with TBS/Tween-20. Blots were then <strong>in</strong>cubated for 2 h at roomtemperature with the secondary antibody horseradishperoxidase goat anti-mouse IgG (sc-2005) and goat antirabbitIgG (sc-2004) at 1:5000 dilutions <strong>in</strong> TBS buffer.After removal of the secondary antibody and washes <strong>in</strong>TBS buffer, the blots were <strong>in</strong>cubated <strong>in</strong> the ECL substratesolution (Supersignal ® West Pico Chemilum<strong>in</strong>escent Substrate).Densities of the specific bands of NF-κB, Bcl-XL,Bax, cycl<strong>in</strong> D1, and β-act<strong>in</strong> were visualized and capturedby Imagequant 350 (GE Healthcare).Statistical analysisData are expressed as mean ± SE of duplicate assaysfrom three <strong>in</strong>dependent experiments. An analysis of variancewith repeated measurement was used to determ<strong>in</strong>esignificant differences between each experimental group.The level of significance was set at P < 0.05.ANQO1 activity (nmol/m<strong>in</strong> per mg prote<strong>in</strong>)BNormalized NQO1/FDFT1 ratio2502001501005001.21.00.80.60.40.20.0KKU-100 OCA17 M214 Chang liveraKKU-100 OCA17 M214 Chang liverFigure 1 NQO1 activity and mRNA expression of cultured cells. A: NQO1activity: Cholangiocarc<strong>in</strong>oma cells, KKU-100, KKU-OCA17, KKU-M214, andChang liver cells were cultured <strong>in</strong> 96-well plates for assay of NQO1 activity byenzymatic methods; B: Expression of NQO1 mRNA: The cells were cultured<strong>in</strong> 6-well plates. Total RNA was extracted by Trizol reagent, converted to cDNAand analyzed by real-time PCR us<strong>in</strong>g FDFT1 as <strong>in</strong>ternal control. Bars representmean ± SE, each from 3 experiments. a P < 0.05 vs control group.RESULTSActivity and expression of NQO1 <strong>in</strong> CCA cellsThree CCA cell l<strong>in</strong>es with different histological backgroundswere employed <strong>in</strong> this study for assess<strong>in</strong>g the statusof NQO1. The CCA cells illustrated vary<strong>in</strong>g degreesof NQO1 activity and mRNA expression. KKU-100 andKKU-OCA17 cells had <strong>high</strong> NQO1 activity, whereasKKU-M214 showed low NQO1 activity. Moreover,Chang liver cells, which were derived from normal livertissue, showed relatively low NQO1 activity and werecomparable to KKU-M214 cells (Figure 1A). Consistently,NQO1 mRNA expression <strong>in</strong> KKU-100 cells showed<strong>high</strong>er levels than <strong>in</strong> the other cell l<strong>in</strong>es (Figure 1B).Sensitivity of NQO1 to dicoumarol<strong>Dicoumarol</strong> is a very potent <strong>in</strong>hibitor of NQO1 activity.All four cell l<strong>in</strong>es were tested aga<strong>in</strong>st dicoumarol. NQO1<strong>in</strong> CCA and Chang cell lysates were assayed for k<strong>in</strong>eticsof <strong>in</strong>hibition by dicoumarol. The <strong>in</strong>hibition of NQO1activity was rapid, with<strong>in</strong> 10 m<strong>in</strong>, and was apparent with acomparable potency among the 4 cell l<strong>in</strong>es (Figure 2) withIC50 of 0.15 ± 0.07, 0.15 ± 0.07, 0.24 ± 0.14 and 0.10 ±0.22 μmol/L for KKU-100, KKU-OCA17, KKU-M214and Chang cells, respectively. S<strong>in</strong>ce the enzyme activity <strong>in</strong>all cell l<strong>in</strong>es was almost completely abolished at a dicoumarolconcentration of 10 μmol/L, <strong>in</strong> subsequent experimentsdicoumarol was used at the concentration of10 μmol/L.aaaaWJG|www.wjgnet.com2365 May 21, 2010|Volume 16|Issue 19|


Buranrat B et al . <strong>Dicoumarol</strong> <strong>enhances</strong> cell kill<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> cholangiocarc<strong>in</strong>omaResidual NQO1 activity (%)120100806040200aaaControlaKKU-100 OCA17 M214 Chang liverEnhancement of <strong>cytotoxicity</strong> of <strong>gemcitab<strong>in</strong>e</strong> bydicoumarolTo <strong>in</strong>vestigate whether <strong>in</strong>hibition of cellular NQO1activity was associated with <strong>in</strong>creased anticancer drugsensitivity, CCA cells were pre<strong>in</strong>cubated with dicoumarolat varied concentrations for 4 h followed by an additionof <strong>gemcitab<strong>in</strong>e</strong> at predeterm<strong>in</strong>ed concentrations. Theconcentrations of <strong>gemcitab<strong>in</strong>e</strong> that caused <strong>cytotoxicity</strong>of about 20%-30% were used <strong>in</strong> the experiments. Thosefor KKU-100, KKU-OCA17, KKU-M214 and Changcells were 1, 10, 1 nmol/L and 10 μmol/L, respectively.Treatment with dicoumarol alone at concentrationsof 0.1-10 μmol/L caused modest <strong>cytotoxicity</strong> after <strong>in</strong>cubationfor 24 h. <strong>Dicoumarol</strong> at a concentration of10 μmol/L <strong><strong>in</strong>duced</strong> ≤ 10% <strong>cytotoxicity</strong> <strong>in</strong> all cell types.Comb<strong>in</strong>ation of <strong>gemcitab<strong>in</strong>e</strong> and dicoumarol produceda markedly enhanced cytotoxic effect, particularly<strong>in</strong> KKU-100 and KKU-OCA17 cells. The enhancedcytotoxic effect <strong>in</strong> both cell l<strong>in</strong>es was conceivably morethan a simple additive effect of the drug and dicoumarol(Figure 3). The <strong>cytotoxicity</strong> of <strong>gemcitab<strong>in</strong>e</strong> <strong>in</strong>KKU-100 cells was enhanced from 34% to 68% and <strong>in</strong>KKU-OCA17 cells from 25% to 47% <strong>in</strong> the presence ofdicoumarol. On the other hand, the drug comb<strong>in</strong>ationproduced only an additive <strong>cytotoxicity</strong> <strong>in</strong> KKU-M214and Chang cells, i.e. <strong>in</strong>creased from 23% to 36% and23% to 40%, respectively. It is noted that KUU-100 andKKU-OCA17 cells are <strong>high</strong> NQO1 activity cells whencompared with KKU-M214 and Chang cells.<strong>Dicoumarol</strong>-<strong><strong>in</strong>duced</strong> oxidative stress <strong>in</strong> CCA cellsThe <strong>in</strong>teractive effect of dicoumarol with <strong>gemcitab<strong>in</strong>e</strong><strong>in</strong> enhanc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>cytotoxicity</strong> was explored with regard towhether dicoumarol <strong><strong>in</strong>duced</strong> cellular stress, render<strong>in</strong>gthe cells more susceptible to <strong>gemcitab<strong>in</strong>e</strong>. In thisstudy, KKU-100 and KKU-M214 cells were employedas representatives of <strong>high</strong> and low NQO1 activity cells,respectively. The basal total GSH levels <strong>in</strong> KKU-M214were <strong>high</strong>er than that <strong>in</strong> KKU-100 cells and significantly<strong>in</strong>creased by the treatment with dicoumarol (10 μmol/L)aaaa1 mmol/L Dic0.1 mmol/L Dic 10 mmol/L DicFigure 2 Concentration response of NQO1 <strong>in</strong>hibition by dicoumarol.KKU-100, KKU-OCA17, KKU-M214, and Chang liver cells were cultured <strong>in</strong>96-well plates overnight. The NQO1 activity was assayed <strong>in</strong> the presence of the<strong>in</strong>hibitor dicoumarol at concentrations from 0.1-10 mmol/L. Bars represent mean± SE, each from 3 experiments. a P < 0.05 vs control group.aaaAntiproliferation (%)10080604020aaaGem only1 mmol/L Dic0.1 mmol/L Dic 10 mmol/L Dic0Gem 1 nmol/L 10 nmol/L 1 nmol/L 10 mmol/LKKU-100 OCA17 M214 Chang liverFigure 3 Potentiation of <strong>cytotoxicity</strong> of <strong>gemcitab<strong>in</strong>e</strong> by dicoumarol.KKU-100, KKU-OCA17, KKU-M214, and Chang liver cells were cultured <strong>in</strong> 96-wellplates overnight. Cultured cells were pretreated with dicoumarol (0.1-10 mmol/L)for 4 h before treatment with <strong>gemcitab<strong>in</strong>e</strong> at 1 nmol/L, 10 nmol/L, 1 nmol/Land 10 mmol/L, for KKU-100, KKU-OCA17, KKU-M214, and Chang liver cells,respectively. Antiproliferation was analyzed by sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the cells with fluorescentdyes before exam<strong>in</strong>ation under fluorescent microscope. Bars represent mean ±SE, each from 3 experiments. a P < 0.05 vs control group.(Figure 4A). On the other hand, glutathione disulfide(GSSG) levels <strong>in</strong> KKU-100 were dramatically <strong>in</strong>creasedwith the treatment of dicoumarol, whereas the levels <strong>in</strong>KKU-M214 were decreased (Figure 4B). This <strong>in</strong>dicatesthat the two cell types have different oxidative responsesafter the treatment with dicoumarol.Determ<strong>in</strong>ation of the mitochondrial transmembrane potentialand formation of reactive oxygen speciesDisruption of ∆Ψm is recognized as one of the criticalsteps lead<strong>in</strong>g to apoptotic cell death. The <strong>in</strong>tegrity of the<strong>in</strong>ner mitochondrial membrane can be assessed by monitor<strong>in</strong>gof the potential gradient across the membraneus<strong>in</strong>g the fluorescent dye JC-1. There was no change <strong>in</strong>∆Ψm <strong>in</strong> cells after treatment with dicoumarol, <strong>gemcitab<strong>in</strong>e</strong>or the drug comb<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong> both cell types, at an earlytime (6 h) as well as at 24 h (Figure 5A and B). In contrast,dicoumarol at excessive concentrations (50 and150 μmol/L) showed a rapidly depolarized ∆Ψm, as shownby decrease <strong>in</strong> the ratio of fluorescent <strong>in</strong>tensity of JC-1 aggregates/JC-1monomers after 3 h <strong>in</strong>cubation (Figure 5C).The formation of ROS by cultured cells was monitored bya fluorescent dye, DHFDA. It was apparent that there wasno <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> ROS formation <strong>in</strong> cells treated with dicoumarol,<strong>gemcitab<strong>in</strong>e</strong> or the comb<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong> both cell l<strong>in</strong>es(data not shown), even at a concentration and time wherecell apoptosis was evident. High concentrations of dicoumarolalso did not <strong>in</strong>duce ROS production, even at thoseconcentrations which caused cell death.Alteration of survival response prote<strong>in</strong>s <strong><strong>in</strong>duced</strong> by<strong>gemcitab<strong>in</strong>e</strong> and dicoumarolIn order to understand how the comb<strong>in</strong>ation of <strong>gemcitab<strong>in</strong>e</strong>and dicoumarol enhanced <strong>cytotoxicity</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>high</strong> NQO1activity cells, prote<strong>in</strong>s related to cell survival were analyzedby Western immunoblott<strong>in</strong>g. Prote<strong>in</strong> p53 is a tumor suppressorprote<strong>in</strong> that responds to various noxious stimuli.aWJG|www.wjgnet.com2366 May 21, 2010|Volume 16|Issue 19|


Buranrat B et al . <strong>Dicoumarol</strong> <strong>enhances</strong> cell kill<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> cholangiocarc<strong>in</strong>omaA100Control<strong>Dicoumarol</strong>A25Cont 6 hDicGemGem + DicTotal GSH (nmol/mg prote<strong>in</strong>)80604020aJ-aggregates/monomers20151050KKU-100KKU-M2140KKU-100 cellsKKU-M214 cellsBGSSG (nmol/mg prote<strong>in</strong>)4321Control<strong>Dicoumarol</strong>aaBJ-aggregates/monomers40302010Cont 24 hDicGemGem + Dic0KKU-100KKU-M2140KKU-100 cellsKKU-M214 cellsFigure 4 Glutathione redox status <strong>in</strong> cells treated with dicoumarol. KKU-100and KKU-M214 cells were cultured and treated with dicoumarol (10 µmol/L) for 4 h,and cells were scraped for assays of (A) total glutathione and (B) glutathionedisulfide. Bars represent mean ± SE, each from 3 experiments. a P < 0.05 vscontrol group.<strong>Dicoumarol</strong> or <strong>gemcitab<strong>in</strong>e</strong> treatment <strong><strong>in</strong>duced</strong> <strong>in</strong>creasedp53 levels <strong>in</strong> KKU-100 cells and the level was further <strong>in</strong>creaseddur<strong>in</strong>g the treatment with the drug comb<strong>in</strong>ation.On the other hand, dicoumarol or <strong>gemcitab<strong>in</strong>e</strong> or the comb<strong>in</strong>ationdid not alter p53 levels <strong>in</strong> KKU-M214 cells. Bcl-2prote<strong>in</strong>s consist of proapoptotic (Bax) and antiapoptoticprote<strong>in</strong>s (Bcl-XL) where they regulate mitochondria outermembrane permeabilization. Bcl-XL levels were <strong><strong>in</strong>duced</strong> by<strong>gemcitab<strong>in</strong>e</strong> <strong>in</strong> both cell types, however, the comb<strong>in</strong>ationof <strong>gemcitab<strong>in</strong>e</strong> with dicoumarol suppressed elevated Bcl-XLlevels <strong>in</strong> KKU-100 cells but not <strong>in</strong> KKU-M214 cells. Onthe other hand, the changes <strong>in</strong> Bax levels were found witha similar pattern <strong>in</strong> both cell types, i.e. Bax levels were <strong><strong>in</strong>duced</strong>with <strong>gemcitab<strong>in</strong>e</strong>, while drug comb<strong>in</strong>ation <strong><strong>in</strong>duced</strong>no changes when compared with controls. Cycl<strong>in</strong> D1 levelswere decreased upon the treatment with dicoumarol <strong>in</strong>both cell types, but not by <strong>gemcitab<strong>in</strong>e</strong>. However, the drugcomb<strong>in</strong>ation apparently suppressed cycl<strong>in</strong> D1 levels whencompared with <strong>gemcitab<strong>in</strong>e</strong> alone.The expression of the nuclear p65 subunit of NF-κBwas slightly <strong>in</strong>creased after the treatment with <strong>gemcitab<strong>in</strong>e</strong>and showed little change <strong><strong>in</strong>duced</strong> by the co-treatment withdicoumarol <strong>in</strong> both cell l<strong>in</strong>es. Figure 6 shown the Westernanalysis of prote<strong>in</strong>s related to survival.DISCUSSIONNQO1 is one of the attractive targets <strong>in</strong> developmentCJ-aggregates/monomers20151050aKKU-100 cellsaKKU-M214 cellsCont 3 hDic 50Dic 150Figure 5 Assay of mitochondrial transmembrane potential and reactiveoxygen <strong>in</strong> CCA cells. The mitochondrial transmembrane potential was analyzedby us<strong>in</strong>g JC-1 fluorescent probe. Fluorescent read<strong>in</strong>gs of the J-aggregates and Jmonomers were used as measurement of mitochondrial transmembrane potential.KKU-100 and KKU-M214 cells were cultured <strong>in</strong> 96-well black plates. The culturedcells were pretreated with dicoumarol at 10 mmol/L for 4 h, then <strong>gemcitab<strong>in</strong>e</strong> at1 nmol/L was added and <strong>in</strong>cubated at various times. A: Incubation for 6 h; B:Incubation for 24 h; C: Other cultured cells were treated with dicoumarol at 50 and150 µmol/L for 3 h. Bars represent mean ± SE, each from triplicate assay. a P


Buranrat B et al . <strong>Dicoumarol</strong> <strong>enhances</strong> cell kill<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> cholangiocarc<strong>in</strong>omaA Cont Dic Gem Gem + Dic B Cont Dic Gem Gem + DicNF-kBNF-kB1.0 1.1 1.5 1.31.0 1.1 1.2 1.0P53P531.0 2.4 2.5 5.7 1.0 0.8 0.9 0.7Cycl<strong>in</strong> D1Cycl<strong>in</strong> D11.0 0.7 2.0 0.9 1.0 0.3 1.0 0.5BaxBax1.0 0.7 3.5 1.0 1.0 0.5 1.2 0.8Bcl-XLBcl-XL1.0 0.4 2.2 0.8 1.0 0.8 4.1 5.4Act<strong>in</strong>Act<strong>in</strong>Figure 6 Western blott<strong>in</strong>g analysis of prote<strong>in</strong>s related to survival. KKU-100 and KKU-M214 cells were cultured overnight, pretreated with 10 mmol/L dicoumarolfor 4 h before be<strong>in</strong>g treated with 1 nmol/L <strong>gemcitab<strong>in</strong>e</strong> for 24 h. Cultured cells were collected for Western blott<strong>in</strong>g analysis us<strong>in</strong>g β-act<strong>in</strong> as an <strong>in</strong>ternal control for equalprote<strong>in</strong> load<strong>in</strong>g. A: KKU-100 cells; B: KKU-M214 cells. Cont: Controls; Dic: <strong>Dicoumarol</strong> alone; Gem: Gemcitab<strong>in</strong>e alone; Gem + Dic: Comb<strong>in</strong>ation of <strong>gemcitab<strong>in</strong>e</strong> anddicoumarol. Values were an average from two experiments of the target prote<strong>in</strong> normalized with the <strong>in</strong>ternal control.enhanced p53 and decreased Bcl-XL expression, and thismay be related to the mechanism of cell sensitization andkill<strong>in</strong>g.NQO1 is well known to function as a drug metaboliz<strong>in</strong>gand antioxidant enzyme, protect<strong>in</strong>g the cell fromoxidative <strong>in</strong>jury [3] . Previous studies suggested that NQO1modulates p53 expression by <strong>in</strong>terference with 20S proteasome-mediateddegradation of p53 [3,31] . P53 is a tumorsuppressor gene that upon stimulation by DNA damageor oxidative stress, <strong>in</strong>duces either growth arrest or apoptosis[32] . Our study showed that dicoumarol <strong>in</strong>creasedlevels of p53 <strong>in</strong> KKU-100 cells, but these levels were unchanged<strong>in</strong> KKU-M214 cells. The <strong>in</strong>creased p53 expression,together with decreased Bcl-XL prote<strong>in</strong> expression,was associated with enhanced <strong>cytotoxicity</strong> of <strong>gemcitab<strong>in</strong>e</strong>.However, dicoumarol has been previously reported todecrease p53 prote<strong>in</strong> levels and this was associated witheither <strong>in</strong>hibition or <strong>in</strong>duction of apoptosis <strong>in</strong> myeloidleukemic cells or urogenital cancer cells, respectively [14,31] .The discrepancy <strong>in</strong> p53 levels <strong><strong>in</strong>duced</strong> by the treatmentwith dicoumarol is not readily comprehensible, althoughour study used much lower concentrations of dicoumarol.Moreover, treatment of <strong>gemcitab<strong>in</strong>e</strong> apparently <strong><strong>in</strong>duced</strong>the activation of NF-κB and expression of Bcl-XL. This<strong>in</strong>crease of antiapoptotic prote<strong>in</strong>s may be a survival signalengaged <strong>in</strong> response to <strong>gemcitab<strong>in</strong>e</strong> [33] . Interest<strong>in</strong>gly, thecomb<strong>in</strong>ation with dicoumarol dim<strong>in</strong>ished the expressionof Bcl-XL <strong>in</strong> KKU-100 cells concurrent with potentiationof the <strong>cytotoxicity</strong> of gemicitab<strong>in</strong>e, while this did nothappen <strong>in</strong> KKU-M214 cells.Prote<strong>in</strong> p53 and the Bcl-2 prote<strong>in</strong> family regulatemitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization [34] . Inductionof apoptotic cell death is often associated withdisruption of the mitochondrial <strong>in</strong>ner membrane whichis reflected as dissipation of ∆Ψm and formation of mitochondrialpermeability transition pore (MPTP) withsubsequent cell death [35] . In the treatment with low concentrationsof dicoumarol with or without <strong>gemcitab<strong>in</strong>e</strong>,∆Ψm appeared to be well ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed accord<strong>in</strong>g to theassay of JC-1, despite the drug comb<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong>duc<strong>in</strong>gmarked CCA cell kill<strong>in</strong>g. This suggests no disruption ofthe mitochondrial <strong>in</strong>ner membrane at the concentrationsthat potentiate <strong>gemcitab<strong>in</strong>e</strong> <strong>cytotoxicity</strong>. Likewise, it wasshown that prostagland<strong>in</strong> A2 <strong><strong>in</strong>duced</strong> human promyelocyticleukemia cell death associated with cytochrome crelease, with no change <strong>in</strong> ∆Ψm [36] . However, dicoumarolat the <strong>high</strong> concentrations caused disruption of ∆Ψm andrapid cell kill<strong>in</strong>g which is consistent with many previousreports [14,17] .<strong>Dicoumarol</strong> has been suggested to trigger cell kill<strong>in</strong>gvia <strong>in</strong>creased formation of ROS [15-17] . We did notobserve an <strong>in</strong>creased ROS formation when cells weretreated with dicoumarol or dicoumarol with <strong>gemcitab<strong>in</strong>e</strong>comb<strong>in</strong>ation. <strong>Dicoumarol</strong>, even at <strong>high</strong> concentrationsWJG|www.wjgnet.com2368 May 21, 2010|Volume 16|Issue 19|


Buranrat B et al . <strong>Dicoumarol</strong> <strong>enhances</strong> cell kill<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> cholangiocarc<strong>in</strong>oma(150 μmol/L) that rapidly killed both types of CCAcells with<strong>in</strong> 3 h of <strong>in</strong>cubation (data not shown), had nosignificant effect on ROS formation. This suggests thatsuperoxide formation may not be an important mediatorof cell kill<strong>in</strong>g by dicoumarol [17] ; it is probable that dicoumarolexerts its cell kill<strong>in</strong>g mechanism on CCA cells differentlyfrom other epithelial cells.GSH, a tripeptide found abundantly <strong>in</strong> cells, functionsas antioxidant and regulates activities of variousredox-sensitive prote<strong>in</strong>s [37] . Although dicoumarol did not<strong>in</strong>crease formation of ROS, it <strong><strong>in</strong>duced</strong> oxidant stress <strong>in</strong>KKU-100 cells, but not <strong>in</strong> KKU-M214 cells, evidentlyby <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g and decreas<strong>in</strong>g GSSG levels, respectively.The <strong>in</strong>creased cellular oxidant may be implicated <strong>in</strong> severalsignal transduction pathways which eventually leadto enhanced susceptibility of KKU-100 cells. Nonetheless,dicoumarol has been reported to show several differentpharmacological activities [15,17,38] and apoptotic cellkill<strong>in</strong>g may be dissociated with NQO1 <strong>in</strong>hibition [39] , assome synthetic mechanism-based NQO1 <strong>in</strong>hibitors haveshown lack of association between enzyme <strong>in</strong>hibitionand cytotoxic effect. The discrepancy of the reports maybe explicable partly on the grounds that the sensitiz<strong>in</strong>geffect of dicoumarol may be dependent on <strong>in</strong>herent activityof NQO1 <strong>in</strong> these cell types.In conclusion, NQO1 may play roles <strong>in</strong> the sensitivityof CCA cells to <strong>gemcitab<strong>in</strong>e</strong>. When us<strong>in</strong>g dicoumarol atrelevant concentrations to <strong>in</strong>hibit NQO1 activity, dicoumarol<strong>enhances</strong> <strong>gemcitab<strong>in</strong>e</strong> <strong>cytotoxicity</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>high</strong> NQO1activity CCA cells. Furthermore, the mechanism of dicoumarol-<strong><strong>in</strong>duced</strong>cell kill<strong>in</strong>g may not be mediated via disruptionof mitochondrial function and formation of ROS,but may be related to suppression of the pro-survivalresponse to the chemotherapy. NQO1 is a potential target<strong>in</strong> the development of chemotherapy for tumors with<strong>high</strong> enzyme expression.COMMENTSBackgroundNAD(P)H qu<strong>in</strong>one oxidoreductase-1 (NQO1) is a drug metaboliz<strong>in</strong>g andantioxidant enzyme which plays important roles <strong>in</strong> protection of cells aga<strong>in</strong>stelectrophiles and oxidants. Some cancers exhibit <strong>high</strong> activity of NQO1 whichsuggests a cytoprotective role <strong>in</strong> the cancer.Research frontiersInhibition of NQO1 activity may abate the adaptive survival response of cancercells <strong><strong>in</strong>duced</strong> by <strong>gemcitab<strong>in</strong>e</strong> therapy and render cancer cells more susceptibleto the drug.Innovations and breakthroughsThis report shows that dicoumarol, a potent <strong>in</strong>hibitor of NQO1 at low concentrations,potentiates <strong>cytotoxicity</strong> of <strong>gemcitab<strong>in</strong>e</strong> <strong>in</strong> cholangiocarc<strong>in</strong>oma cells which<strong>in</strong>herently have <strong>high</strong> NQO1 activity. Disruption of cellular glutathione redox maybe associated with modulation of redox-sensitive signal<strong>in</strong>g prote<strong>in</strong>s such as p53and render enhanced cells susceptible to <strong>gemcitab<strong>in</strong>e</strong>.ApplicationsInhibition of NQO1 is suggested to be a potential strategy for development <strong>in</strong>cancer chemotherapy, particularly for cholangiocarc<strong>in</strong>oma which was used <strong>in</strong>this study.Peer reviewThe methodology and the results are appropriate and support the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong>the literature.REFERENCES1 Talalay P, D<strong>in</strong>kova-Kostova AT. Role of nicot<strong>in</strong>amide qu<strong>in</strong>oneoxidoreductase 1 (NQO1) <strong>in</strong> protection aga<strong>in</strong>st toxicityof electrophiles and reactive oxygen <strong>in</strong>termediates. MethodsEnzymol 2004; 382: 355-3642 Asher G, Tsvetkov P, Kahana C, Shaul Y. A mechanism ofubiquit<strong>in</strong>-<strong>in</strong>dependent proteasomal degradation of the tumorsuppressors p53 and p73. Genes Dev 2005; 19: 316-3213 Nioi P, Hayes JD. Contribution of NAD(P)H:qu<strong>in</strong>one oxidoreductase1 to protection aga<strong>in</strong>st carc<strong>in</strong>ogenesis, andregulation of its gene by the Nrf2 basic-region leuc<strong>in</strong>e zipperand the arylhydrocarbon receptor basic helix-loop-helixtranscription factors. Mutat Res 2004; 555: 149-1714 Siegel D, Gustafson DL, Dehn DL, Han JY, BoonchoongP, Berl<strong>in</strong>er LJ, Ross D. NAD(P)H:qu<strong>in</strong>one oxidoreductase1: role as a superoxide scavenger. Mol Pharmacol 2004; 65:1238-12475 Nair S, Xu C, Shen G, Hebbar V, Gopalakrishnan A, HuR, Ja<strong>in</strong> MR, L<strong>in</strong> W, Keum YS, Liew C, Chan JY, Kong AN.Pharmacogenomics of phenolic antioxidant butylated hydroxyanisole(BHA) <strong>in</strong> the small <strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>e and liver of Nrf2knockout and C57BL/6J mice. Pharm Res 2006; 23: 2621-26376 Thimmulappa RK, Mai KH, Srisuma S, Kensler TW, YamamotoM, Biswal S. Identification of Nrf2-regulated genes<strong><strong>in</strong>duced</strong> by the chemopreventive agent sulforaphane byoligonucleotide microarray. Cancer Res 2002; 62: 5196-52037 Saldivar SJ, Wang Y, Zhao H, Shao L, L<strong>in</strong> J, Spitz MR, Wu X.An association between a NQO1 genetic polymorphism andrisk of lung cancer. Mutat Res 2005; 582: 71-788 Radjendirane V, Joseph P, Lee YH, Kimura S, Kle<strong>in</strong>-SzantoAJ, Gonzalez FJ, Jaiswal AK. Disruption of the DT diaphorase(NQO1) gene <strong>in</strong> mice leads to <strong>in</strong>creased menadionetoxicity. J Biol Chem 1998; 273: 7382-73899 Aleksunes LM, Goedken M, Manautou JE. Up-regulationof NAD(P)H qu<strong>in</strong>one oxidoreductase 1 dur<strong>in</strong>g human liver<strong>in</strong>jury. World J Gastroenterol 2006; 12: 1937-194010 Logsdon CD, Simeone DM, B<strong>in</strong>kley C, Arumugam T, GreensonJK, Giordano TJ, Misek DE, Kuick R, Hanash S. Molecularprofil<strong>in</strong>g of pancreatic adenocarc<strong>in</strong>oma and chronicpancreatitis identifies multiple genes differentially regulated<strong>in</strong> pancreatic cancer. Cancer Res 2003; 63: 2649-265711 Siegel D, Ross D. Immunodetection of NAD(P)H:qu<strong>in</strong>oneoxidoreductase 1 (NQO1) <strong>in</strong> human tissues. Free Radic BiolMed 2000; 29: 246-25312 Hu L, Miao W, Loignon M, Kandouz M, Batist G. Putativechemopreventive molecules can <strong>in</strong>crease Nrf2-regulatedcell defense <strong>in</strong> some human cancer cell l<strong>in</strong>es, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>resistance to common cytotoxic therapies. Cancer ChemotherPharmacol 2009; Epub ahead of pr<strong>in</strong>t13 Watanabe J, Nishiyama H, Matsui Y, Ito M, Kawanishi H,Kamoto T, Ogawa O. <strong>Dicoumarol</strong> potentiates cisplat<strong>in</strong><strong><strong>in</strong>duced</strong>apoptosis mediated by c-Jun N-term<strong>in</strong>al k<strong>in</strong>ase <strong>in</strong>p53 wild-type urogenital cancer cell l<strong>in</strong>es. Oncogene 2006; 25:2500-250814 Matsui Y, Watanabe J, D<strong>in</strong>g S, Nishizawa K, Kajita Y,Ichioka K, Saito R, Kobayashi T, Ogawa O, Nishiyama H.<strong>Dicoumarol</strong> <strong>enhances</strong> doxorubic<strong>in</strong>-<strong><strong>in</strong>duced</strong> <strong>cytotoxicity</strong> <strong>in</strong>p53 wild-type urothelial cancer cells through p38 activation.BJU Int 2010; 105: 558-56415 Cullen JJ, H<strong>in</strong>khouse MM, Grady M, Gaut AW, Liu J,Zhang YP, Weydert CJ, Domann FE, Oberley LW. Dicumarol<strong>in</strong>hibition of NADPH:qu<strong>in</strong>one oxidoreductase <strong>in</strong>ducesgrowth <strong>in</strong>hibition of pancreatic cancer via a superoxidemediatedmechanism. Cancer Res 2003; 63: 5513-552016 Lewis A, Ough M, Li L, H<strong>in</strong>khouse MM, Ritchie JM, SpitzDR, Cullen JJ. Treatment of pancreatic cancer cells withdicumarol <strong>in</strong>duces <strong>cytotoxicity</strong> and oxidative stress. Cl<strong>in</strong>Cancer Res 2004; 10: 4550-455817 Du J, Daniels DH, Asbury C, Venkataraman S, Liu J, SpitzWJG|www.wjgnet.com2369 May 21, 2010|Volume 16|Issue 19|


Buranrat B et al . <strong>Dicoumarol</strong> <strong>enhances</strong> cell kill<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> cholangiocarc<strong>in</strong>omaDR, Oberley LW, Cullen JJ. Mitochondrial production of reactiveoxygen species mediate dicumarol-<strong><strong>in</strong>duced</strong> <strong>cytotoxicity</strong><strong>in</strong> cancer cells. J Biol Chem 2006; 281: 37416-3742618 Khan SA, Thomas HC, Davidson BR, Taylor-Rob<strong>in</strong>son SD.Cholangiocarc<strong>in</strong>oma. Lancet 2005; 366: 1303-131419 Uttaravichien T, Bhudhisawasdi V, Pairojkul C, Pugkhem A.Intrahepatic cholangiocarc<strong>in</strong>oma <strong>in</strong> Thailand. J HepatobiliaryPancreat Surg 1999; 6: 128-13520 M<strong>in</strong>i E, Nobili S, Caciagli B, Land<strong>in</strong>i I, Mazzei T. Cellularpharmacology of <strong>gemcitab<strong>in</strong>e</strong>. Ann Oncol 2006; 17 Suppl 5:v7-v1221 Valle JW, Wasan H, Johnson P, Jones E, Dixon L, Sw<strong>in</strong>dell R,Baka S, Maraveyas A, Corrie P, Falk S, Goll<strong>in</strong>s S, Lofts F, EvansL, Meyer T, Anthoney A, Iveson T, Highley M, OsborneR, Bridgewater J. Gemcitab<strong>in</strong>e alone or <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation withcisplat<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> patients with advanced or metastatic cholangiocarc<strong>in</strong>omasor other biliary tract tumours: a multicentre randomisedphase II study - The UK ABC-01 Study. Br J Cancer2009; 101: 621-62722 Prawan A, Buranrat B, Kukongviriyapan U, Sripa B, KukongviriyapanV. Inflammatory cytok<strong>in</strong>es suppress NAD(P)H:qu<strong>in</strong>oneoxidoreductase-1 and <strong>in</strong>duce oxidative stress <strong>in</strong> cholangiocarc<strong>in</strong>omacells. J Cancer Res Cl<strong>in</strong> Oncol 2009; 135: 515-52223 Sripa B, Leungwattanawanit S, Nitta T, Wongkham C, BhudhisawasdiV, Puapairoj A, Sripa C, Miwa M. Establishmentand characterization of an opisthorchiasis-associated cholangiocarc<strong>in</strong>omacell l<strong>in</strong>e (KKU-100). World J Gastroenterol2005; 11: 3392-339724 Buranrat B, Prawan A, Sripa B, Kukongviriyapan V. Inflammatorycytok<strong>in</strong>es suppress arylam<strong>in</strong>e N-acetyltransferase 1<strong>in</strong> cholangiocarc<strong>in</strong>oma cells. World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13:6219-622525 Prochaska HJ, Santamaria AB. Direct measurement ofNAD(P)H:qu<strong>in</strong>one reductase from cells cultured <strong>in</strong> microtiterwells: a screen<strong>in</strong>g assay for anticarc<strong>in</strong>ogenic enzyme<strong>in</strong>ducers. Anal Biochem 1988; 169: 328-33626 Ribble D, Goldste<strong>in</strong> NB, Norris DA, Shellman YG. A simpletechnique for quantify<strong>in</strong>g apoptosis <strong>in</strong> 96-well plates. BMCBiotechnol 2005; 5: 1227 Tietze F. Enzymic method for quantitative determ<strong>in</strong>ation ofnanogram amounts of total and oxidized glutathione: applicationsto mammalian blood and other tissues. Anal Biochem1969; 27: 502-52228 Somparn N, Kukongviriyapan U, Tassaneeyakul W, JetsrisuparbA, Kukongviriyapan V. Modification of CYP2E1 andCYP3A4 activities <strong>in</strong> haemoglob<strong>in</strong> E-beta thalassemia patients.Eur J Cl<strong>in</strong> Pharmacol 2007; 63: 43-5029 Jang JH, Surh YJ. Bcl-2 attenuation of oxidative cell death isassociated with up-regulation of gamma-glutamylcyste<strong>in</strong>eligase via constitutive NF-kappaB activation. J Biol Chem2004; 279: 38779-3878630 D<strong>in</strong>kova-Kostova AT, Talalay P. Persuasive evidence thatqu<strong>in</strong>one reductase type 1 (DT diaphorase) protects cellsaga<strong>in</strong>st the toxicity of electrophiles and reactive forms ofoxygen. Free Radic Biol Med 2000; 29: 231-24031 Asher G, Lotem J, Cohen B, Sachs L, Shaul Y. Regulation ofp53 stability and p53-dependent apoptosis by NADH qu<strong>in</strong>oneoxidoreductase 1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98: 1188-119332 Bouchet BP, de Fromentel CC, Puisieux A, Galmar<strong>in</strong>i CM.p53 as a target for anti-cancer drug development. Crit RevOncol Hematol 2006; 58: 190-20733 Fahy BN, Schlieman MG, Virudachalam S, Bold RJ. Inhibitionof AKT abrogates chemotherapy-<strong><strong>in</strong>duced</strong> NF-kappaBsurvival mechanisms: implications for therapy <strong>in</strong> pancreaticcancer. J Am Coll Surg 2004; 198: 591-59934 Chao DT, Korsmeyer SJ. BCL-2 family: regulators of celldeath. Annu Rev Immunol 1998; 16: 395-41935 Chipuk JE, Bouchier-Hayes L, Green DR. Mitochondrial outermembrane permeabilization dur<strong>in</strong>g apoptosis: the <strong>in</strong>nocentbystander scenario. Cell Death Differ 2006; 13: 1396-140236 Lee SY, Ahn JH, Ko KW, Kim J, Jeong SW, Kim IK, KimJ, Kim HS. Prostagland<strong>in</strong> A2 activates <strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sic apoptoticpathway by direct <strong>in</strong>teraction with mitochondria <strong>in</strong> HL-60cells. Prostagland<strong>in</strong>s Other Lipid Mediat 2010; 91: 30-3737 Schafer FQ, Buettner GR. Redox environment of the cell asviewed through the redox state of the glutathione disulfide/glutathione couple. Free Radic Biol Med 2001; 30: 1191-121238 Madari H, Panda D, Wilson L, Jacobs RS. <strong>Dicoumarol</strong>: aunique microtubule stabiliz<strong>in</strong>g natural product that is synergisticwith Taxol. Cancer Res 2003; 63: 1214-122039 Dehn DL, Siegel D, Zafar KS, Reigan P, Swann E, MoodyCJ, Ross D. 5-Methoxy-1,2-dimethyl-3-[(4-nitrophenoxy)-methyl]<strong>in</strong>dole-4,7-dione, a mechanism-based <strong>in</strong>hibitorof NAD(P)H:qu<strong>in</strong>one oxidoreductase 1, exhibits activityaga<strong>in</strong>st human pancreatic cancer <strong>in</strong> vitro and <strong>in</strong> vivo. MolCancer Ther 2006; 5: 1702-1709S- Editor Wang JL L- Editor Logan S E- Editor Ma WHWJG|www.wjgnet.com2370 May 21, 2010|Volume 16|Issue 19|

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!