13.07.2015 Views

Wood content in the bark fraction - PFI

Wood content in the bark fraction - PFI

Wood content in the bark fraction - PFI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SCAN-CM 53:94Accepted 1994<strong>Wood</strong> chips for pulp production<strong>Wood</strong> <strong>content</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>bark</strong> <strong>fraction</strong>1 ScopeThis SCAN-test Method describes <strong>the</strong> procedure fordeterm<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> wood <strong>content</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>bark</strong> <strong>fraction</strong> from a<strong>bark</strong><strong>in</strong>g drum or from o<strong>the</strong>r mach<strong>in</strong>es for <strong>bark</strong><strong>in</strong>g.The Method is applicable to <strong>the</strong> determ<strong>in</strong>ation of <strong>the</strong>wood losses <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>bark</strong><strong>in</strong>g process. The total wood lossalso <strong>in</strong>cludes breakage. The determ<strong>in</strong>ation of breakage isdescribed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Appendix.2 ReferencesSCAN-CM 39 <strong>Wood</strong> chips for pulp production −Dry matter <strong>content</strong>SCAN-CM 40 <strong>Wood</strong> chips for pulp production −Size distributionSCAN-CM 41 <strong>Wood</strong> chips for pulp production −Sampl<strong>in</strong>g3 Def<strong>in</strong>itionsFor <strong>the</strong> purpose of this Method <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g def<strong>in</strong>itionsapply:3.1 Bark <strong>fraction</strong> − The mixture of <strong>bark</strong>, wood,branches etc, which is separated from <strong>the</strong> pulp wood <strong>in</strong> a<strong>bark</strong><strong>in</strong>g drum or <strong>in</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r mach<strong>in</strong>es for <strong>bark</strong><strong>in</strong>g. Theexpression "<strong>bark</strong>" refers to <strong>the</strong> outer <strong>bark</strong> as well as <strong>the</strong><strong>in</strong>ner <strong>bark</strong>.For <strong>the</strong> purpose of this Method, needles and smalltwigs are regarded as <strong>bark</strong> whereas <strong>the</strong> cambium isregarded as wood.3.2 <strong>Wood</strong> <strong>content</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>bark</strong> <strong>fraction</strong> − The totalwood <strong>content</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>bark</strong> <strong>fraction</strong> exclud<strong>in</strong>g breakage.3.3 <strong>Wood</strong> loss − The part of <strong>the</strong> total wood <strong>in</strong>put to<strong>the</strong> <strong>bark</strong><strong>in</strong>g operation that is not used for <strong>the</strong> productionof pulp.3.4 Breakage − Piece of wood, from <strong>the</strong> trunk of atree, of oven-dry mass exceed<strong>in</strong>g 20 g, present <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><strong>bark</strong> <strong>fraction</strong>.Note − Breakage is normally formed <strong>in</strong> limitedamounts when process<strong>in</strong>g wood, for example <strong>in</strong> a<strong>bark</strong><strong>in</strong>g operation. It is part of <strong>the</strong> wood loss.


SCAN-CM 53:94Page 24 Pr<strong>in</strong>cipleThe breakage and <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>es are removed from <strong>the</strong> <strong>bark</strong><strong>fraction</strong> sample. The wood <strong>in</strong> particles > 3 mm isseparated manually and its total mass is determ<strong>in</strong>ed byweigh<strong>in</strong>g. The dry wood <strong>content</strong> is reported as apercentage of <strong>the</strong> dry sample, exclud<strong>in</strong>g breakage andf<strong>in</strong>es.5 Apparatus5.1 Conta<strong>in</strong>ers, of alum<strong>in</strong>ium foil, for weigh<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>wood and <strong>the</strong> wood-free <strong>bark</strong>.5.2 Chip classifier, as described <strong>in</strong> SCAN-CM 40.5.3 Dry<strong>in</strong>g oven, capable of be<strong>in</strong>g controlled at(105 ± 2) °C, and suitably ventilated.5.4 Balance, accurate and readable to 0,1 g.6 Sampl<strong>in</strong>g and preparation of sampleThe sampl<strong>in</strong>g procedure is not covered by this Method.Make sure that sampl<strong>in</strong>g has been carried out <strong>in</strong> amanner that ensures representative samples. A suitablesampl<strong>in</strong>g procedure for wood chips is described <strong>in</strong>SCAN-CM 41 and can be used for <strong>the</strong> <strong>bark</strong> <strong>fraction</strong>, asfar as it may be applicable.The test portion for each determ<strong>in</strong>ation is 4 to5 litres. If <strong>the</strong> sample has to be subdivided to obta<strong>in</strong> testportions of that size, take precautions to avoid any<strong>fraction</strong>ation of <strong>the</strong> material. A suitable procedure forsubdivid<strong>in</strong>g a sample is described <strong>in</strong> SCAN-CM 41.If <strong>the</strong> sample conta<strong>in</strong>s breakage, <strong>the</strong> breakage has tobe removed from <strong>the</strong> sample before <strong>the</strong> determ<strong>in</strong>ation.Determ<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> dry matter <strong>content</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>bark</strong> <strong>fraction</strong>sample as described <strong>in</strong> SCAN-CM 39.The dry matter <strong>content</strong> of <strong>the</strong> sample should exceed50 %. If <strong>the</strong> sample has a dry matter <strong>content</strong> below 50 %<strong>the</strong> separation of <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>es <strong>fraction</strong> will be <strong>in</strong>complete.Let <strong>the</strong> sample dry before screen<strong>in</strong>g.Screen <strong>the</strong> <strong>bark</strong> <strong>fraction</strong> sample <strong>in</strong> a chip classifier(5.2) as described <strong>in</strong> SCAN-CM 40 without us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>second screen (mean free distance between adjacent rods8,0 mm). Discard <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>es <strong>fraction</strong> and use <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rthree <strong>fraction</strong>s for <strong>the</strong> determ<strong>in</strong>ation of wood <strong>content</strong>.Note − The f<strong>in</strong>es <strong>fraction</strong> is discarded because <strong>the</strong>wood particles <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>es <strong>fraction</strong> are too small tobe separated from <strong>the</strong> <strong>bark</strong>.The fact that <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>es are left unconsidered <strong>in</strong>this test <strong>in</strong>troduces an error <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> result if <strong>the</strong> wood<strong>content</strong> of <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>es <strong>fraction</strong> deviates from <strong>the</strong>overall wood <strong>content</strong>. Normally <strong>the</strong> wood <strong>content</strong>of <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>es is slightly lower than that of <strong>the</strong> wholesample and <strong>the</strong> result of <strong>the</strong> test will be somewhathigher than <strong>the</strong> true value.For <strong>the</strong> purpose of this Method, <strong>the</strong> error isdisregarded.7 ProcedureWeigh <strong>the</strong> dry alum<strong>in</strong>ium conta<strong>in</strong>ers (5.1).Spread <strong>the</strong> sample <strong>in</strong> a th<strong>in</strong> layer over <strong>the</strong> top of alarge table. Remove all wood particles and collect <strong>the</strong>m<strong>in</strong> an alum<strong>in</strong>ium conta<strong>in</strong>er. With <strong>the</strong> aid of a sharp knifesplit those pieces <strong>in</strong> which wood is attached to <strong>the</strong> <strong>bark</strong>so that <strong>the</strong> wood can be removed. Put <strong>the</strong> rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gwood-free <strong>bark</strong> <strong>in</strong>to a separate alum<strong>in</strong>ium conta<strong>in</strong>er.Remove and report separately all stones, plastic ando<strong>the</strong>r objects belong<strong>in</strong>g nei<strong>the</strong>r to <strong>the</strong> wood nor to <strong>the</strong><strong>bark</strong> <strong>fraction</strong>.Dry <strong>the</strong> wood and <strong>the</strong> wood-free <strong>bark</strong> separately <strong>in</strong>conta<strong>in</strong>ers <strong>in</strong> a dry<strong>in</strong>g oven (5.3) at (105 ± 2) °C. After aperiod of not less than 16 h and not more than 24 h,remove <strong>the</strong> conta<strong>in</strong>ers with wood and <strong>bark</strong> and weigh<strong>the</strong>m immediately on a balance (5.4).Note − Weigh<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> conta<strong>in</strong>er before it reachesroom temperature causes a small weigh<strong>in</strong>g error.Ano<strong>the</strong>r error may arise because <strong>the</strong> sample is <strong>in</strong>contact with <strong>the</strong> surround<strong>in</strong>g air, and it may ga<strong>in</strong> orlose moisture dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> weigh<strong>in</strong>g. For <strong>the</strong> purposeof this Method, <strong>the</strong>se errors are disregarded andany prolonged wait<strong>in</strong>g for <strong>the</strong> read<strong>in</strong>g to stabilizeshould be avoided.8 Calculation and reportCalculate <strong>the</strong> wood <strong>content</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>bark</strong> <strong>fraction</strong> from <strong>the</strong>expression:aX = 100 [1]a + bwhereXabis <strong>the</strong> wood <strong>content</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>bark</strong> <strong>fraction</strong>, as apercentage;is <strong>the</strong> mass of <strong>the</strong> oven-dried <strong>bark</strong>-free wood, <strong>in</strong>grams;is <strong>the</strong> mass of <strong>the</strong> oven-dried wood-free <strong>bark</strong>, <strong>in</strong>grams.Report <strong>the</strong> wood <strong>content</strong> with one decimal.


SCAN-CM 53:94Page 3The test report shall <strong>in</strong>clude reference to this SCAN-testMethod and <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g particulars:(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)date and place of test<strong>in</strong>g;<strong>the</strong> sampl<strong>in</strong>g procedure;identification mark of <strong>the</strong> sample tested;<strong>the</strong> result;<strong>the</strong> mass of stones, plastic and o<strong>the</strong>r objects notbelong<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> wood or to <strong>the</strong> <strong>bark</strong> <strong>fraction</strong>, as apercentage of <strong>the</strong> dry sample exclud<strong>in</strong>g breakageand f<strong>in</strong>es;any departure from <strong>the</strong> standard procedure andany o<strong>the</strong>r circumstances that may have affected<strong>the</strong> test results.9 PrecisionThe method error has been calculated as:s =2∑d2n[2]The repeatability and <strong>the</strong> reproducibility, calculated as<strong>the</strong> method error, are given <strong>in</strong> Table 1.Table 1. The repeatability and <strong>the</strong> reproducibility,calculated as <strong>the</strong> method error (s), with<strong>in</strong> and betweenlaboratories for two different types of <strong>bark</strong> <strong>fraction</strong>samples (<strong>the</strong> samples conta<strong>in</strong>ed no breakage).Repeatability for two different laboratories:Bark<strong>fraction</strong>sampleLab AMethoderrorwith<strong>in</strong>labNumberofduplicatesamplesLab BMethoderrorwith<strong>in</strong>labNumberofduplicatesamplesBirch 0,6 13 0,4 20Spruce 0,6 10 0,3 36Reproducibility between two laboratories:wheres is <strong>the</strong> method error;d is <strong>the</strong> difference between <strong>the</strong> results ofduplicate determ<strong>in</strong>ations;n is <strong>the</strong> number of duplicates.Bark <strong>fraction</strong>sampleMethod errorbetween labBirch 1,0 18Number ofduplicatesamplesTwo laboratories made duplicate determ<strong>in</strong>ations on twodifferent types of <strong>bark</strong> <strong>fraction</strong>s samples, namely birchwood and spruce wood <strong>bark</strong> <strong>fraction</strong>s. For some of <strong>the</strong>duplicates, <strong>the</strong> laboratories each tested one of <strong>the</strong>m.


SCAN-CM 53:94Page 4Appendix - Determ<strong>in</strong>ation of breakageWhen calculat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> total wood loss, wood loss causedby breakage should be <strong>in</strong>cluded. A suitable procedure todeterm<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> breakage <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>bark</strong> <strong>fraction</strong> is to removeall breakage <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> out-flow from <strong>the</strong> <strong>bark</strong><strong>in</strong>g processdur<strong>in</strong>g a specified time.Calculate wood loss caused by breakage from <strong>the</strong>expression:100cY =[A.1]dwhereY is <strong>the</strong> wood loss (oven-dried) caused bybreakage, as a percentage;c is <strong>the</strong> flow of <strong>bark</strong>-free breakage out of <strong>the</strong><strong>bark</strong><strong>in</strong>g process, <strong>in</strong> kilograms oven-driedbreakage per hour;d is <strong>the</strong> flow of wood without <strong>bark</strong> <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> <strong>bark</strong><strong>in</strong>gprocess, <strong>in</strong> kilograms oven-dried wood per hour.SCAN-test Methods are issued and recommended byKCL, <strong>PFI</strong> and STFI-Packforsk for <strong>the</strong> pulp, paper andboard <strong>in</strong>dustries <strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>land, Norway and Sweden.Distribution: Secretariat, Scand<strong>in</strong>avian Pulp, Paperand Board Test<strong>in</strong>g Committee, Box 5604,SE-114 86 Stockholm, Sweden.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!