Multifocal IOL - Hanita Lenses

More documents

Recommendations

Info

PurposeTo compare outcomes between a new design apodizeddiffractive hydrophilic multifocal <strong>IOL</strong>( Seelens MF; studygroup), and a well-known apodized diffractivehydrophobic multifocal <strong>IOL</strong> (SN6AD1; control group).Methods•comparative case series•refractive and visual outcomes at distance and near,•patient satisfaction with a validated questionnaire,•dysphotopsia and straylight measurement scores•at 3 months post-operatively.
Results: Uncorrected and CorrectedDistance Visual AcuityFigure 1:Mean uncorrected distance visual acuity(UCDA) up to 6 months form surgery. At alltime points measured postoperatively thestudy group and the control group performedequally in terms of uncorrected distance visualacuity and was not statistically significantlydifferent. @ 3 months: Seelens MF logMAR0.02 + 0.07 vs SN6AD1 0.04 + 0.09.Figure 2:The comparison of the postoperative correcteddistance acuity up to 6 months is shown. Thedifference between the groups is small butstatistically significant in favour of the studygroup (the Seelens MF) -0.04 + 0.05 vscontrol group (SN6AD1) -0.1 + 0.04 (
Page 1 and 2: Comparison of ahydrophilic and a hy
Page 3 and 4: • The diffractive rings on the op
Page 5: The Hydrophobic MFIOLSN6AD1 (“Res
Page 9 and 10: Demographic data study vs control g
Page 11 and 12: Visual quality, Halos, and Patient

Multifocal IOL - Hanita Lenses

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?