13.07.2015 Views

Standardised Hypnosis in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. - Asociatia ...

Standardised Hypnosis in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. - Asociatia ...

Standardised Hypnosis in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. - Asociatia ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Dirk Hermes, Samer G. Hakim, Peter Siegof surgery under hypnosis was less than 30m<strong>in</strong>utes.Dur<strong>in</strong>g post-operative <strong>in</strong>terviews patients reportednotieeable relaxation, anxiolysis. <strong>and</strong>a general feel<strong>in</strong>g of mental distanee from thesurgical situation. Although some patientsexperienced temporary pa<strong>in</strong>ful <strong>in</strong>traoperativesensations, subjeetive distanc<strong>in</strong>g fromthe procedure meant that hardly any patientsrequired additional doses of local anaesthetic.As a result of the typical time distortionoccurr<strong>in</strong>g from the hypnotic trance, durationof surgery was estimated mueh shorter bythe overwhelm<strong>in</strong>g majority of patients. A seriesof patients eould only remember parts ofthe procedure due to the amnesiac effects ofhypnosis, while five patients did not remembersurgery at all.All patients hav<strong>in</strong>g a positive trance experiencewould consent to another operation performedunder medical hypnosis. 26 patientshad multiple procedures (2-,'S) under comb<strong>in</strong>edlocal anaesthesia / hypnosis dur<strong>in</strong>g thestudy <strong>in</strong>terval.On the surgeon's side, the specific effects ofhypnosis improved treatment modalities signifieantly.Patients with a history of severetreatment anxiety eould be operated underloeal anaesthesia. In seleeted eases, majorsurgery on very cooperative <strong>and</strong> susceptiblepatients with a high risk for general anaesthesiawas possible under st<strong>and</strong>-by conditions.Nevertheless, the special requirements forhypnotic treatment {e.g. consistent reductionof noise <strong>and</strong> mov<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>side the operat<strong>in</strong>gtheatre) <strong>in</strong>itially required serious restructur<strong>in</strong>gof treatment sequences. In brief proeedures(e.g. extraetions performed on patientswith severe treatment anxiety), good therapyconditions were acquired through extendedpreoperative preparation time due to hypnosis.In the daily rout<strong>in</strong>e of a surgical department,the use of hypnosis is limited by theavailability of specially tra<strong>in</strong>ed staff members:although therapeutie measures werehighly st<strong>and</strong>ardised, tape recorded hypnosiscomb<strong>in</strong>ed with preoperative preparation <strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>traoperative aecompanimcnt of the patientsby a surgeon without hypnosis qualiheationsfrequently resulted <strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> mental relaxation,but not stable <strong>in</strong>traoperative tranee.In direet eomparison with treatment eircumstances<strong>in</strong> other surgical fields, a furtherm<strong>in</strong>or but specific disadvantage of the use ofmedical hypnosis <strong>in</strong> oral <strong>and</strong> maxillofacialsurgery became evident: at least patients <strong>in</strong>this group who needed oral surgery (e.g. surgicalremoval of third molars, apieeetomy)had to endure <strong>in</strong>traoperative stimuli suchas extraction motions <strong>and</strong>/or low frequencynoise or vibrations that resonate by bone conduction(e.g. drill<strong>in</strong>g). Neither live hypnosisnor hypnotic record<strong>in</strong>gs adequately shieldedthe patient from such irritants. Consequently.such stimuli (at least with iirst-timc application)regularly led to a short-lived re-orientationwith a remission of the hypnotie tranee.Patients undergo<strong>in</strong>g more <strong>in</strong>vasive <strong>and</strong> timeconsum<strong>in</strong>goncological or reconstructivesoft tissue surgery (n=61; figure 4,5) did notshow this phenomenon <strong>and</strong> success criteriawere met <strong>in</strong> each procedure.First Study ResultsAcceptance of hypnosis by oral <strong>and</strong> maxillofacialpatientsBefore <strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>g hypnosis <strong>in</strong>to the cl<strong>in</strong>icalrout<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> 2002. it seemed advisable to eollect<strong>in</strong>formation concern<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>dividualmotivation of patients for accept<strong>in</strong>g sueh atreatment option. 310 <strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> out-patients ofour department completed a questionnaireconsist<strong>in</strong>g of 21 questions. It turned out thatalthough a very low percentage of thosequestioned had detailed knowledge or personalexperience of hypnosis, the procedurehad a high level of theoretieal aeceptanee.1^.4% of all patients believe that hypnosisis an enrichment of medical therapy. 86.5 %f<strong>in</strong>d further research on the use of hypnosis<strong>in</strong> medic<strong>in</strong>e useful, <strong>and</strong> only a small m<strong>in</strong>orityrejects the adjuvant use of hypnosis <strong>in</strong>somatie medic<strong>in</strong>e on the whole (Hermes <strong>and</strong>Sieg. 2004).Treatment anxiety <strong>and</strong> susceptibility oforal <strong>and</strong> maxillofacial patientsSusceptibility as a characteristie feature ofpersonality is one basic condition for hypnosis,which could be modified by treatmentstress <strong>and</strong> anxiety. To <strong>in</strong>vestigate this possi-European Journal of Climcdi <strong>Hypnosis</strong>: 2006 volume 6 - issue 4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!