13.07.2015 Views

Leptin transiently antagonizes ghrelin and long-lastingly orexin in ...

Leptin transiently antagonizes ghrelin and long-lastingly orexin in ...

Leptin transiently antagonizes ghrelin and long-lastingly orexin in ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6352 ISSN 1007-9327 CN 14-1219/R World J Gastroenterol November 7, 2008 Volume 14 Number 41<strong>Lept<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>in</strong>hibits <strong>ghrel<strong>in</strong></strong>-<strong>in</strong>duced [Ca 2+ ]i <strong>in</strong>creases<strong>transiently</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>orex<strong>in</strong></strong>-A-<strong>in</strong>duced [Ca 2+ ]i <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>long</strong><strong>last<strong>in</strong>gly</strong><strong>in</strong> NPY neuronsTypical results of the effects of lept<strong>in</strong> on [Ca 2+ ]iresponses to <strong>ghrel<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>orex<strong>in</strong></strong>-A are shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 1;lept<strong>in</strong> at 10 -12 mol/L <strong>in</strong>hibited <strong>ghrel<strong>in</strong></strong>-<strong>in</strong>duced [Ca 2+ ]i<strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> a transient manner (Figure 1A) <strong>and</strong> <strong>orex<strong>in</strong></strong><strong>in</strong>duced[Ca 2+ ]i <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> a <strong>long</strong>er-last<strong>in</strong>g manner (Figure1C) dur<strong>in</strong>g the 20 m<strong>in</strong> period of lept<strong>in</strong> adm<strong>in</strong>istration.Among 20 neurons that exhibited [Ca 2+ ]i responses to<strong>ghrel<strong>in</strong></strong>, adm<strong>in</strong>istration of 10 -12 mol/L lept<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>hibited[Ca 2+ ]i <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> 9 neurons (45%) dur<strong>in</strong>g the earlier2-7 m<strong>in</strong> of lept<strong>in</strong> treatment, but only <strong>in</strong> 4 neurons(20%) later <strong>in</strong> the 10-15 m<strong>in</strong> period of treatment(Figure 1E), show<strong>in</strong>g attenuation of the counteract<strong>in</strong>geffect of lept<strong>in</strong> for <strong>ghrel<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>in</strong> the later period (Figure 1F).In contrast, among 20 neurons that exhibited [Ca 2+ ]iresponses to <strong>orex<strong>in</strong></strong>, adm<strong>in</strong>istration of 10 -12 mol/L lept<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>hibited [Ca 2+ ]i <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> 12 neurons (60%) dur<strong>in</strong>g the2-7 m<strong>in</strong> of lept<strong>in</strong> treatment, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> 10 neurons (50%) <strong>in</strong>the 10-15 m<strong>in</strong> period of treatment (Figure 1E), show<strong>in</strong>ga <strong>long</strong>-last<strong>in</strong>g counteract<strong>in</strong>g effect of lept<strong>in</strong> (Figure 1F).The <strong>long</strong>-last<strong>in</strong>g effect was also evoked by lept<strong>in</strong> at alower concentration of 10 -14 mol/L (Figure 1D). <strong>Lept<strong>in</strong></strong>at both 10 -14 mol/L <strong>and</strong> 10 -12 mol/L counteracted <strong>ghrel<strong>in</strong></strong><strong>in</strong>duced[Ca 2+ ]i <strong>in</strong>creases predom<strong>in</strong>antly <strong>in</strong> a transientmanner <strong>and</strong> <strong>orex<strong>in</strong></strong>-<strong>in</strong>duced [Ca 2+ ]i <strong>in</strong>creases ma<strong>in</strong>ly <strong>in</strong> a<strong>long</strong>-last<strong>in</strong>g manner (Figure 1F).Pretreatment with lept<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>hibited <strong>orex<strong>in</strong></strong>-<strong>in</strong>duced, butnot <strong>ghrel<strong>in</strong></strong>-<strong>in</strong>duced, [Ca 2+ ]i <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> NPY neuronsThe data that lept<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>hibited <strong>ghrel<strong>in</strong></strong>-<strong>in</strong>duced [Ca 2+ ]i<strong>in</strong>creases <strong>transiently</strong> prompted us to hypothesize thatefficacy of lept<strong>in</strong> is attenuated by time. Therefore, weexam<strong>in</strong>ed whether prior adm<strong>in</strong>istration of lept<strong>in</strong> is lesseffective <strong>in</strong> counteract<strong>in</strong>g <strong>ghrel<strong>in</strong></strong> action. Repetitiveadditions of <strong>ghrel<strong>in</strong></strong> or <strong>orex<strong>in</strong></strong>-A twice <strong>in</strong>ducedrepeated [Ca 2+ ]i <strong>in</strong>creases twice <strong>in</strong> a similar manner(Figure 3A <strong>and</strong> C). Follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>fusion of lept<strong>in</strong> thathad started 8 m<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> advance, the addition of <strong>ghrel<strong>in</strong></strong><strong>in</strong>duced [Ca 2+ ]i <strong>in</strong>creases with amplitudes comparable tothose <strong>in</strong> the control without lept<strong>in</strong> (Figure 3B), <strong>and</strong> thesimilar result was observed <strong>in</strong> the majority of neurons(Figure 3E). This result <strong>in</strong>dicates a marked attenuationof <strong>in</strong>hibitory ability of lept<strong>in</strong> by time. In contrast,<strong>in</strong>fusion of lept<strong>in</strong> that started 8 m<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> advance <strong>in</strong>hibited[Ca 2+ ]i responses to the addition of <strong>orex<strong>in</strong></strong>-A <strong>in</strong> 8 of 16<strong>orex<strong>in</strong></strong>-responsive neurons (50%) (Figure 3D <strong>and</strong> E).This <strong>in</strong>cidence of the <strong>in</strong>hibition by lept<strong>in</strong> adm<strong>in</strong>istered<strong>in</strong> prior to <strong>orex<strong>in</strong></strong> was comparable to the <strong>in</strong>hibition bylept<strong>in</strong> adm<strong>in</strong>istered after <strong>orex<strong>in</strong></strong> (12 of 20 neurons, 60%)(Figure 1E). These data <strong>in</strong>dicate that the ability of lept<strong>in</strong>to counteract <strong>orex<strong>in</strong></strong> action is well preserved withoutappreciable attenuation.We next exam<strong>in</strong>ed whether the difference <strong>in</strong> thetime dependence of lept<strong>in</strong> action on <strong>ghrel<strong>in</strong></strong>-vs <strong>orex<strong>in</strong></strong><strong>in</strong>duced[Ca 2+ ]i <strong>in</strong>creases could <strong>in</strong>volve different lept<strong>in</strong>signal<strong>in</strong>g mechanisms <strong>in</strong> NPY neurons. <strong>Lept<strong>in</strong></strong> isl<strong>in</strong>ked to several signal<strong>in</strong>g pathways, which <strong>in</strong>cludephosphatidyl<strong>in</strong>ositol 3 (PI3)-k<strong>in</strong>ase <strong>and</strong>, its downstreameffecter phosphodiesterase 3 (PDE3) [23] , signal transducer<strong>and</strong> activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) [24] , <strong>and</strong> mitogenactivatedprote<strong>in</strong> (MAP)-k<strong>in</strong>ase [25] . We have previouslyshown that lept<strong>in</strong> suppresses <strong>ghrel<strong>in</strong></strong>-<strong>in</strong>duced [Ca 2+ ]i<strong>in</strong>creases via PI3-k<strong>in</strong>ase- <strong>and</strong> PDE3-, but not MAP-k<strong>in</strong>ase<strong>and</strong>STAT3-, mediated pathway [17] . Therefore, whetherthese signal<strong>in</strong>g mechanisms could be <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the lept<strong>in</strong>action to counteract <strong>orex<strong>in</strong></strong>-<strong>in</strong>duced [Ca 2+ ]i <strong>in</strong>creases wasexam<strong>in</strong>ed. Pretreatment with <strong>in</strong>hibitors for PI3-k<strong>in</strong>ase,LY294002 (Figure 2A) or wortmann<strong>in</strong> (data not shown),blocked the lept<strong>in</strong> action to suppress [Ca 2+ ]i responses to<strong>ghrel<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>in</strong> both the response <strong>in</strong>cidence (Figure 2H) <strong>and</strong>response amplitude (Figure 2I). Likewise, pretreatmentwith an <strong>in</strong>hibitor for PDE3, milr<strong>in</strong>one, blocked the lept<strong>in</strong>action aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>ghrel<strong>in</strong></strong> (Figure 2D, H <strong>and</strong> I). These resultsconfirm previous report [17] . In contrast, LY294002 (Figure2B), wortmann<strong>in</strong> (Figure 2C) <strong>and</strong> milr<strong>in</strong>one (Figure 2E)failed to significantly affect the lept<strong>in</strong> suppression of<strong>orex<strong>in</strong></strong>-<strong>in</strong>duced [Ca 2+ ]i <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> both the response<strong>in</strong>cidence <strong>and</strong> amplitude (Figure 2H <strong>and</strong> I). Furthermore,pretreatment with a MAP k<strong>in</strong>ase <strong>in</strong>hibitor U0126 (Figure2F) or a STAT3 <strong>in</strong>hibitor peptide (Figure 2G) little alteredthe lept<strong>in</strong> ability to <strong>in</strong>hibit [Ca 2+ ]i responses to <strong>orex<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>in</strong>both the response <strong>in</strong>cidence <strong>and</strong> amplitude (Figure 2H<strong>and</strong> I), the results similar to those reported for <strong>ghrel<strong>in</strong></strong><strong>in</strong>duced[Ca 2+ ]i <strong>in</strong>creases [17] .DISCUSSIONThe present data <strong>in</strong>dicate that lept<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>hibits <strong>ghrel<strong>in</strong></strong><strong>in</strong>duced[Ca 2+ ]i <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> a transient manner <strong>and</strong> <strong>orex<strong>in</strong></strong><strong>in</strong>duced[Ca 2+ ]i <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> a <strong>long</strong>-last<strong>in</strong>g manner. Thetransient action of lept<strong>in</strong> to <strong>in</strong>hibit <strong>ghrel<strong>in</strong></strong>-<strong>in</strong>duced [Ca 2+ ]i<strong>in</strong>creases is not due to <strong>in</strong>sufficient concentration of lept<strong>in</strong>,s<strong>in</strong>ce lept<strong>in</strong> at a lower concentration of 10 -14 mol/L isalready maximal <strong>in</strong> counteract<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>ghrel<strong>in</strong></strong> effect [17] <strong>and</strong>more specifically <strong>in</strong> exhibit<strong>in</strong>g the transient <strong>in</strong>hibitoryproperty (Figure 1F). Furthermore, the transient propertyfor lept<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>hibition of <strong>ghrel<strong>in</strong></strong>-<strong>in</strong>duced [Ca 2+ ]i <strong>in</strong>creasesis neither due to excessive concentration of <strong>ghrel<strong>in</strong></strong>,s<strong>in</strong>ce the <strong>ghrel<strong>in</strong></strong> concentration of 10 -10 mol/L used <strong>in</strong>the present study is close to a maximal, but never supermaximalconcentration <strong>in</strong> activat<strong>in</strong>g NPY neurons [16] .Therefore, the transient manner with which lept<strong>in</strong>counteracts <strong>ghrel<strong>in</strong></strong> action reflects the <strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sic propertyof <strong>in</strong>teraction between lept<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>ghrel<strong>in</strong></strong>.The present study clearly <strong>in</strong>dicated that the lept<strong>in</strong>signal<strong>in</strong>g underly<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>hibition of [Ca 2+ ]i responsesto <strong>orex<strong>in</strong></strong>-A <strong>in</strong> NPY neurons is dist<strong>in</strong>ct from thatto <strong>ghrel<strong>in</strong></strong>. The transient action of lept<strong>in</strong> to <strong>in</strong>hibit<strong>ghrel<strong>in</strong></strong>-<strong>in</strong>duced [Ca 2+ ]i <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> NPY neurons maybe mediated by the lept<strong>in</strong> signal<strong>in</strong>g via PI3-k<strong>in</strong>ase <strong>and</strong>PDE3, s<strong>in</strong>ce the <strong>in</strong>hibitors for these enzymes block thelept<strong>in</strong> action (Figure 2A <strong>and</strong> D) [17] . The <strong>ghrel<strong>in</strong></strong> signal<strong>in</strong>gvia the cAMP system could be the target for this lept<strong>in</strong>signal<strong>in</strong>g [17] . On the other h<strong>and</strong>, the <strong>long</strong>-last<strong>in</strong>g actionof lept<strong>in</strong> to counteract <strong>orex<strong>in</strong></strong>-<strong>in</strong>duced [Ca 2+ ]i <strong>in</strong>creaseswww.wjgnet.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!