Leptin transiently antagonizes ghrelin and long-lastingly orexin in ...
Leptin transiently antagonizes ghrelin and long-lastingly orexin in ...
Leptin transiently antagonizes ghrelin and long-lastingly orexin in ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
6352 ISSN 1007-9327 CN 14-1219/R World J Gastroenterol November 7, 2008 Volume 14 Number 41<strong>Lept<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>in</strong>hibits <strong>ghrel<strong>in</strong></strong>-<strong>in</strong>duced [Ca 2+ ]i <strong>in</strong>creases<strong>transiently</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>orex<strong>in</strong></strong>-A-<strong>in</strong>duced [Ca 2+ ]i <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>long</strong><strong>last<strong>in</strong>gly</strong><strong>in</strong> NPY neuronsTypical results of the effects of lept<strong>in</strong> on [Ca 2+ ]iresponses to <strong>ghrel<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>orex<strong>in</strong></strong>-A are shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 1;lept<strong>in</strong> at 10 -12 mol/L <strong>in</strong>hibited <strong>ghrel<strong>in</strong></strong>-<strong>in</strong>duced [Ca 2+ ]i<strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> a transient manner (Figure 1A) <strong>and</strong> <strong>orex<strong>in</strong></strong><strong>in</strong>duced[Ca 2+ ]i <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> a <strong>long</strong>er-last<strong>in</strong>g manner (Figure1C) dur<strong>in</strong>g the 20 m<strong>in</strong> period of lept<strong>in</strong> adm<strong>in</strong>istration.Among 20 neurons that exhibited [Ca 2+ ]i responses to<strong>ghrel<strong>in</strong></strong>, adm<strong>in</strong>istration of 10 -12 mol/L lept<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>hibited[Ca 2+ ]i <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> 9 neurons (45%) dur<strong>in</strong>g the earlier2-7 m<strong>in</strong> of lept<strong>in</strong> treatment, but only <strong>in</strong> 4 neurons(20%) later <strong>in</strong> the 10-15 m<strong>in</strong> period of treatment(Figure 1E), show<strong>in</strong>g attenuation of the counteract<strong>in</strong>geffect of lept<strong>in</strong> for <strong>ghrel<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>in</strong> the later period (Figure 1F).In contrast, among 20 neurons that exhibited [Ca 2+ ]iresponses to <strong>orex<strong>in</strong></strong>, adm<strong>in</strong>istration of 10 -12 mol/L lept<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>hibited [Ca 2+ ]i <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> 12 neurons (60%) dur<strong>in</strong>g the2-7 m<strong>in</strong> of lept<strong>in</strong> treatment, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> 10 neurons (50%) <strong>in</strong>the 10-15 m<strong>in</strong> period of treatment (Figure 1E), show<strong>in</strong>ga <strong>long</strong>-last<strong>in</strong>g counteract<strong>in</strong>g effect of lept<strong>in</strong> (Figure 1F).The <strong>long</strong>-last<strong>in</strong>g effect was also evoked by lept<strong>in</strong> at alower concentration of 10 -14 mol/L (Figure 1D). <strong>Lept<strong>in</strong></strong>at both 10 -14 mol/L <strong>and</strong> 10 -12 mol/L counteracted <strong>ghrel<strong>in</strong></strong><strong>in</strong>duced[Ca 2+ ]i <strong>in</strong>creases predom<strong>in</strong>antly <strong>in</strong> a transientmanner <strong>and</strong> <strong>orex<strong>in</strong></strong>-<strong>in</strong>duced [Ca 2+ ]i <strong>in</strong>creases ma<strong>in</strong>ly <strong>in</strong> a<strong>long</strong>-last<strong>in</strong>g manner (Figure 1F).Pretreatment with lept<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>hibited <strong>orex<strong>in</strong></strong>-<strong>in</strong>duced, butnot <strong>ghrel<strong>in</strong></strong>-<strong>in</strong>duced, [Ca 2+ ]i <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> NPY neuronsThe data that lept<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>hibited <strong>ghrel<strong>in</strong></strong>-<strong>in</strong>duced [Ca 2+ ]i<strong>in</strong>creases <strong>transiently</strong> prompted us to hypothesize thatefficacy of lept<strong>in</strong> is attenuated by time. Therefore, weexam<strong>in</strong>ed whether prior adm<strong>in</strong>istration of lept<strong>in</strong> is lesseffective <strong>in</strong> counteract<strong>in</strong>g <strong>ghrel<strong>in</strong></strong> action. Repetitiveadditions of <strong>ghrel<strong>in</strong></strong> or <strong>orex<strong>in</strong></strong>-A twice <strong>in</strong>ducedrepeated [Ca 2+ ]i <strong>in</strong>creases twice <strong>in</strong> a similar manner(Figure 3A <strong>and</strong> C). Follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>fusion of lept<strong>in</strong> thathad started 8 m<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> advance, the addition of <strong>ghrel<strong>in</strong></strong><strong>in</strong>duced [Ca 2+ ]i <strong>in</strong>creases with amplitudes comparable tothose <strong>in</strong> the control without lept<strong>in</strong> (Figure 3B), <strong>and</strong> thesimilar result was observed <strong>in</strong> the majority of neurons(Figure 3E). This result <strong>in</strong>dicates a marked attenuationof <strong>in</strong>hibitory ability of lept<strong>in</strong> by time. In contrast,<strong>in</strong>fusion of lept<strong>in</strong> that started 8 m<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> advance <strong>in</strong>hibited[Ca 2+ ]i responses to the addition of <strong>orex<strong>in</strong></strong>-A <strong>in</strong> 8 of 16<strong>orex<strong>in</strong></strong>-responsive neurons (50%) (Figure 3D <strong>and</strong> E).This <strong>in</strong>cidence of the <strong>in</strong>hibition by lept<strong>in</strong> adm<strong>in</strong>istered<strong>in</strong> prior to <strong>orex<strong>in</strong></strong> was comparable to the <strong>in</strong>hibition bylept<strong>in</strong> adm<strong>in</strong>istered after <strong>orex<strong>in</strong></strong> (12 of 20 neurons, 60%)(Figure 1E). These data <strong>in</strong>dicate that the ability of lept<strong>in</strong>to counteract <strong>orex<strong>in</strong></strong> action is well preserved withoutappreciable attenuation.We next exam<strong>in</strong>ed whether the difference <strong>in</strong> thetime dependence of lept<strong>in</strong> action on <strong>ghrel<strong>in</strong></strong>-vs <strong>orex<strong>in</strong></strong><strong>in</strong>duced[Ca 2+ ]i <strong>in</strong>creases could <strong>in</strong>volve different lept<strong>in</strong>signal<strong>in</strong>g mechanisms <strong>in</strong> NPY neurons. <strong>Lept<strong>in</strong></strong> isl<strong>in</strong>ked to several signal<strong>in</strong>g pathways, which <strong>in</strong>cludephosphatidyl<strong>in</strong>ositol 3 (PI3)-k<strong>in</strong>ase <strong>and</strong>, its downstreameffecter phosphodiesterase 3 (PDE3) [23] , signal transducer<strong>and</strong> activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) [24] , <strong>and</strong> mitogenactivatedprote<strong>in</strong> (MAP)-k<strong>in</strong>ase [25] . We have previouslyshown that lept<strong>in</strong> suppresses <strong>ghrel<strong>in</strong></strong>-<strong>in</strong>duced [Ca 2+ ]i<strong>in</strong>creases via PI3-k<strong>in</strong>ase- <strong>and</strong> PDE3-, but not MAP-k<strong>in</strong>ase<strong>and</strong>STAT3-, mediated pathway [17] . Therefore, whetherthese signal<strong>in</strong>g mechanisms could be <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the lept<strong>in</strong>action to counteract <strong>orex<strong>in</strong></strong>-<strong>in</strong>duced [Ca 2+ ]i <strong>in</strong>creases wasexam<strong>in</strong>ed. Pretreatment with <strong>in</strong>hibitors for PI3-k<strong>in</strong>ase,LY294002 (Figure 2A) or wortmann<strong>in</strong> (data not shown),blocked the lept<strong>in</strong> action to suppress [Ca 2+ ]i responses to<strong>ghrel<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>in</strong> both the response <strong>in</strong>cidence (Figure 2H) <strong>and</strong>response amplitude (Figure 2I). Likewise, pretreatmentwith an <strong>in</strong>hibitor for PDE3, milr<strong>in</strong>one, blocked the lept<strong>in</strong>action aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>ghrel<strong>in</strong></strong> (Figure 2D, H <strong>and</strong> I). These resultsconfirm previous report [17] . In contrast, LY294002 (Figure2B), wortmann<strong>in</strong> (Figure 2C) <strong>and</strong> milr<strong>in</strong>one (Figure 2E)failed to significantly affect the lept<strong>in</strong> suppression of<strong>orex<strong>in</strong></strong>-<strong>in</strong>duced [Ca 2+ ]i <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> both the response<strong>in</strong>cidence <strong>and</strong> amplitude (Figure 2H <strong>and</strong> I). Furthermore,pretreatment with a MAP k<strong>in</strong>ase <strong>in</strong>hibitor U0126 (Figure2F) or a STAT3 <strong>in</strong>hibitor peptide (Figure 2G) little alteredthe lept<strong>in</strong> ability to <strong>in</strong>hibit [Ca 2+ ]i responses to <strong>orex<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>in</strong>both the response <strong>in</strong>cidence <strong>and</strong> amplitude (Figure 2H<strong>and</strong> I), the results similar to those reported for <strong>ghrel<strong>in</strong></strong><strong>in</strong>duced[Ca 2+ ]i <strong>in</strong>creases [17] .DISCUSSIONThe present data <strong>in</strong>dicate that lept<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>hibits <strong>ghrel<strong>in</strong></strong><strong>in</strong>duced[Ca 2+ ]i <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> a transient manner <strong>and</strong> <strong>orex<strong>in</strong></strong><strong>in</strong>duced[Ca 2+ ]i <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> a <strong>long</strong>-last<strong>in</strong>g manner. Thetransient action of lept<strong>in</strong> to <strong>in</strong>hibit <strong>ghrel<strong>in</strong></strong>-<strong>in</strong>duced [Ca 2+ ]i<strong>in</strong>creases is not due to <strong>in</strong>sufficient concentration of lept<strong>in</strong>,s<strong>in</strong>ce lept<strong>in</strong> at a lower concentration of 10 -14 mol/L isalready maximal <strong>in</strong> counteract<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>ghrel<strong>in</strong></strong> effect [17] <strong>and</strong>more specifically <strong>in</strong> exhibit<strong>in</strong>g the transient <strong>in</strong>hibitoryproperty (Figure 1F). Furthermore, the transient propertyfor lept<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>hibition of <strong>ghrel<strong>in</strong></strong>-<strong>in</strong>duced [Ca 2+ ]i <strong>in</strong>creasesis neither due to excessive concentration of <strong>ghrel<strong>in</strong></strong>,s<strong>in</strong>ce the <strong>ghrel<strong>in</strong></strong> concentration of 10 -10 mol/L used <strong>in</strong>the present study is close to a maximal, but never supermaximalconcentration <strong>in</strong> activat<strong>in</strong>g NPY neurons [16] .Therefore, the transient manner with which lept<strong>in</strong>counteracts <strong>ghrel<strong>in</strong></strong> action reflects the <strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sic propertyof <strong>in</strong>teraction between lept<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>ghrel<strong>in</strong></strong>.The present study clearly <strong>in</strong>dicated that the lept<strong>in</strong>signal<strong>in</strong>g underly<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>hibition of [Ca 2+ ]i responsesto <strong>orex<strong>in</strong></strong>-A <strong>in</strong> NPY neurons is dist<strong>in</strong>ct from thatto <strong>ghrel<strong>in</strong></strong>. The transient action of lept<strong>in</strong> to <strong>in</strong>hibit<strong>ghrel<strong>in</strong></strong>-<strong>in</strong>duced [Ca 2+ ]i <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> NPY neurons maybe mediated by the lept<strong>in</strong> signal<strong>in</strong>g via PI3-k<strong>in</strong>ase <strong>and</strong>PDE3, s<strong>in</strong>ce the <strong>in</strong>hibitors for these enzymes block thelept<strong>in</strong> action (Figure 2A <strong>and</strong> D) [17] . The <strong>ghrel<strong>in</strong></strong> signal<strong>in</strong>gvia the cAMP system could be the target for this lept<strong>in</strong>signal<strong>in</strong>g [17] . On the other h<strong>and</strong>, the <strong>long</strong>-last<strong>in</strong>g actionof lept<strong>in</strong> to counteract <strong>orex<strong>in</strong></strong>-<strong>in</strong>duced [Ca 2+ ]i <strong>in</strong>creaseswww.wjgnet.com