17.07.2015 Views

Faxcore - Fax over-IP T.38 Issues - Ingate

Faxcore - Fax over-IP T.38 Issues - Ingate

Faxcore - Fax over-IP T.38 Issues - Ingate

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

10/9/2012 1


<strong>Fax</strong>-<strong>over</strong>-<strong>IP</strong> <strong>T.38</strong> <strong>Issues</strong>FAX-OVER-<strong>IP</strong> (Fo<strong>IP</strong>) TASK GROUPBackground and Current Status<strong>T.38</strong> Interoperability10/9/2012 2


PresenterMAX SCHROEDERS<strong>IP</strong> Forum <strong>Fax</strong>-<strong>over</strong>-<strong>IP</strong> Task Group WhipSenior Vice President, <strong>Fax</strong>Core, Inc.10/9/2012 3


Today’s ProgramObjective is to present an <strong>over</strong>view of theS<strong>IP</strong> Forum / I3 ForumTesting programs, observations and suggestions10/9/2012 4


Why Is <strong>Fax</strong> Relevant• Considered a legal document in most countries• Simple to use with minimal equipment• Meets H<strong>IP</strong>PA and other regulatory requirements• Continues to grow– Overall <strong>Fax</strong> Market 2010 – 2015– $350 to $620 million– 12.1% CAGR10/9/2012 5


The Beginning• ITU Telecommunication StandardizationSector (ITU-T)• T.30 protocol (published by the ITU in 1980)• <strong>T.38</strong> protocol (Fo<strong>IP</strong>) approved and publishedin 1998 - Some input from the IETF• Early days of general Internet usage10/9/2012 6


Fo<strong>IP</strong> Interoperability WorkshopSan Francisco, November 10, 2008• S<strong>IP</strong> Forum 2008 Annual General Meeting on 18September 2008• Westin Bonaventure Hotel LA– Informal Meeting– Dr. Eric Burger - Chairman of the Board, S<strong>IP</strong> Forum– Rich Shockey - Board of Directors– Marc Robins - S<strong>IP</strong> Forum Managing Director– Max Schroeder10/9/2012 7


Fo<strong>IP</strong> Interoperability WorkshopSan Francisco, November 10, 2008• Issue: G.711 <strong>Fax</strong> Reliability• Issue: <strong>T.38</strong> <strong>Fax</strong> Interoperability• Topics of Interest– Interoperability failures seen in the field or lab– Reliability or quality issues seen in the field or lab– Deployment experiences10/9/2012 8


Fo<strong>IP</strong> Interoperability Workshop• Short Summary of Action Items– Publish problem statement– Definitions of successful fax transmission– Marketing <strong>Issues</strong>– Technical <strong>Issues</strong>10/9/2012 9


Fo<strong>IP</strong> Task Group Timelines• Problem Statement– Feb 2009 Strawman - Mike Oliszewski (<strong>Fax</strong>Back)– April -- Neil Weldon - chair for the Fo<strong>IP</strong> Task Group– May – First Task Group Conference Call– July --1 st Draft of problem statement completed– Aug -- S<strong>IP</strong> Forum announced Version 1.0 of the <strong>Fax</strong><strong>over</strong>-<strong>IP</strong>Interoperability Task Group ProblemStatement10/9/2012 10


Fo<strong>IP</strong> Task Group / i3 Forum• I3 Forum– 37 telecommunications operators– Combined retail base in excess of onebillion customers– In <strong>over</strong> 80 countries10/9/2012 11


Fo<strong>IP</strong> Task Group / i3 Forum• Timelines:– Nov/Dec 2009 Richard Shockey initiatescontact– December 2009 first conference call– January 2010 i3 Meeting in Rome– June 2010 i3 Meeting in Warsaw10/9/2012 12


Fo<strong>IP</strong> Task Group / i3 Forum• Timelines:– September 2010 - S<strong>IP</strong> Forum and i3 Forum LaunchGroundbreaking International Test Program for <strong>Fax</strong><strong>over</strong> Internet Protocol– October 2011 - S<strong>IP</strong> Forum and i3 Forum completePhase I testing– December 2011 – IETF publishes RFC10/9/2012 13


Testing Report <strong>Fax</strong>-<strong>over</strong>-<strong>IP</strong> serviceResults/ConclusionsTask Group/i3 tests show that neither S<strong>IP</strong> nor<strong>T.38</strong> are themselves the problem• Voice is generally the default• Many networks are untested for Fo<strong>IP</strong>.• Many firewalls and other network elements arenot correctly configured.• Excessive signaling delay remains undiagnosed10/9/2012 14


Testing Report <strong>Fax</strong>-<strong>over</strong>-<strong>IP</strong> serviceStatus of S<strong>IP</strong> and <strong>T.38</strong>Results/Conclusions• S<strong>IP</strong> works to setup Fo<strong>IP</strong> calls• <strong>T.38</strong> works well to carry them on a par with purePSTN fax calls• Goal is to make it just as effective when thecarriers use S<strong>IP</strong> and <strong>T.38</strong>.• Intelligent Fo<strong>IP</strong> Routing is Essential10/9/2012 15


Results/ConclusionsBest Practices Quarter 1, 2012• ENUM – not preferred as of 2012• User=fax - Working with this as the preferredchoice. Selected mostly as a default choice• March 1, 2012 Meeting Agendao Update on testingo Progressing 'user=fax' discussiono Possible IETF concerns -not a supported/proper usage10/9/2012 16


Task Group InformationTask Group Co-Chairs– Mike Coffee – Commetrex– Gonzalo Salguerio -- Cisco Systems, Inc.Task Group Whip– Max Schroederhttp://www.sipforum.orghttp://www.sipforum.org/content/view/310/25210/9/2012 18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!