<strong>Police</strong><strong>New</strong>s<strong>The</strong> Voice of <strong>Police</strong>Write it here! Letters to the Editor are welcome.Signed letters are preferred, but in all cases the writer’s name and address must be supplied. Names will be published unless there is a goodreason for anonymity. <strong>The</strong> editor reserves the right to edit, abridge or decline letters without explanation. Email to: editor@policeassn.org.nz orwrite it to the Editor at PO Box 12344, Wellington. Letters under 400 words are preferred.Training for new recruitsI question the wisdom of the current trainingsystem for new recruits.After graduation, training is carried out throughVictoria University, with new memberscompleting a set number of assignments priorto permanent appointment being achieved.<strong>The</strong> speed at which the member completesthese assignments is the major contributingfactor for the granting of their permanentappointment.Trainees with no prior university experienceare clearly disadvantaged as they are notfamiliar with completing assignments in theuniversity format, thereby taking them longerto complete their training.Having seen some of the assignments thattrainees are required to complete, I fail to seetheir relevance. A lot of the material is suitablefodder for management consideration, butI feel its relevance to new frontline staff isquestionable.Surely, it is more desirable that membersbe trained in being able to pick the criminalliability of an offender, arrest them withas little fuss as possible, and successfullyprosecute them? Is it necessary to know theirmotivation?Do we want our trainee staff to be competentand efficient frontline police personnel (i.e.good crim-catchers), or academics?In the not-too-distant past all training wasinternal, supervised by a crusty sergeant inthe In-service Training Section who knewthe job, its requirements, expectations, andobligations.<strong>The</strong>y were in a position to correct trainees’inadequacies directly, or speak to supervisingNCOs so that perceived problems could beaddressed.A university tutor cannot possess thenecessary knowledge or ability to guide juniorstaff. When were they last in the situation ofhaving to deal with a drug or alcohol-inflamedsituation, needing split second evaluation andaction?<strong>The</strong> Criminal Investigation Branch (CIB) hashad the sense to retain its In-service TrainingSection and few can argue that detectiveconstables and detectives are, across the board,the best-trained and most knowledgeablemembers in the department, particularly inregard to serious frontline offences.Why then have we developed an externalsystem to train and assess our most valuablemembers, the frontline uniformed staff?Surely there are sufficient qualified NCOsto resurrect the Uniform In-service TrainingSection. If not, why not re-employ some of theaforementioned “crusties” to guide our youngstaff?I hate to think what the department pays toVictoria University to provide their “trainingservice”. I think there could be some enormoussavings by returning to the internal trainingmodel. To continue with the current systemis an abdication of our responsibility to guideand train new uniformed staff in carrying outtheir duties responsibly and in safety.Ray Smith(Howick)Thanks to the <strong>Police</strong> ‘family’I would like to thank all departments of the NZ<strong>Police</strong> Force for the beautiful flowers, cards,letters, telephone calls and kind words andthoughts following the recent, very sad loss ofour husband and father Percy Ruri (golfer).And thank you to Bruce Horne and the Rotorua<strong>Police</strong> Staff and surrounding districts as farfield as Wairewa, for making Percy’s send off avery proud and memorable occasion.It made us very proud of Percy’s chosenprofession.To the dog handler section and their dogs,‘beautiful’, right down to the dogs saluting.To Percy’s Intel girls, thank you for taking careof him away from home. I know you gave himspecial care throughout his sick spells.A special thank you to George, Kim, Willie,Wallace and their wives for the huge support,caring, kohas, food and liaison with my familyand making this sad occasion bearable for us.And lastly, to the Rotorua <strong>Police</strong> Chaplain,Jerry Harlow, thank you for easing the pain.Please accept this as a personal acknowledgementto all NZ <strong>Police</strong> Staff.Carole Ruru and Family(Rotorua)P.S. Percy Ruru (golfer) loved the Michael Hilladvert!Defer, delay and denyFor 34 years I’ve been a member of the<strong>Association</strong> and I have considered it to be, in thebroader sense, my union. I’ve read the objectives,service, mission and values statements of the<strong>Police</strong> <strong>Association</strong>. <strong>The</strong>y tell me, and anyoneelse who cares to read them, that memberscan rely on the <strong>Association</strong> to assist them inemployment disputes with their employer, the<strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> <strong>Police</strong> Department.My experience between 2001 and 2006 wasthat after two years of verbal complaints,nothing was done to alleviate problems withinour office. When I reported the issues inwriting, band-aids were placed over festeringsores, and nothing was done to rectify thecause. <strong>The</strong> local Human Resources OfficeOSH officer became involved but was laterwarned off the inquiry, given a slap on thewrist and told it had nothing to do with thatoffice – this from someone from the Officeof the Commissioner. Nothing further wasdone. Two further written reports outliningthe major issues were similarly ignored.Fourteen months after the first report wassubmitted one member of the office washospitalised and on sick leave and shortly after,two other members from an office of six staffwere off on sick leave (I am told there is nosuch thing as stress leave), all at the same time.<strong>The</strong> office collapsed, just as I had predictedin my first report to the <strong>Police</strong> administration.My regional manager asked me (at a meeting,while I was on sick leave) if I had consideredlooking for another job and even suggestedpositions that might be suitable. All I had donewas report the problem.I always believed my <strong>Association</strong>, my union,would come to the aid of its members againstthe excesses of their employer, and especiallyin such circumstances as I have mentionedabove. <strong>The</strong>re is no evidence that it came tomy defence or the other members in the officewhich raises the question, what does one haveto do to get assistance from the <strong>Association</strong>in employment issues where the <strong>Police</strong>Department has breached sections of theHealth and Safety in Employment Act 1992?What I have learnt from this whole sorryepisode is, if you report problems (as you arerequired to do) there is a very high price topay for your health and sanity. <strong>The</strong> report isignored; a brick wall erected so you can beatyour head against it, and the boss can hidebehind it knowing full well the only redressyou have is to sue in the Employment Court. Ihave also learnt the administration concept of‘defer, delay and deny’ is endemic within the<strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> <strong>Police</strong> administration.Colin A MacDonald(North Shore City)Anomalies with long service awardsI have read the article in the October issue of<strong>Police</strong> <strong>New</strong>s about ‘Eligibility to long serviceawards’.I believe the article missed an issue pertainingto the long service award though.My situation is this: I joined the <strong>Police</strong> as anon-sworn member in May 1992 and becamea sworn member in 2000. My service iscontinuous, apart from the odd day a longtime ago as LWOP (leave without pay).I have had my previous non-sworn servicecredited.Because I am now sworn, my service is notrecognised even though I have given almost 15years of my working life to the department.I am not asking to be recognised as a SeniorConstable as some have suggested. But it is304December 2006
odd when non-sworn staff that have beenwith the department for years, get recognitionfor their time at 14 years when I simply getnothing.I was a volunteer firefighter for seven years.During this time I received several medalsfor my service. Yet with the <strong>Police</strong> there is norecognition.I realise my situation is a minority one butthere are an increasing amount of non-swornstaff joining from jobs like Communicationsand from the watch houses. <strong>The</strong>re has beena large increase in non-sworn involvement inthese types of positions, which attract peoplewho intend to pursue a sworn career.I think the situation I find myself in willincrease in the future. I think it’s time welooked at recognising everyone as equals.I look forward to your response.Rob Taylor(Porirua)Sherwood Young replies on behalf of <strong>Police</strong>:Sworn staff have a medal, which is grantedby the Queen of <strong>New</strong><strong>Zealand</strong> under a RoyalWarrant for continuous sworn service.Non-sworn staff have a badge from theCommissioner. <strong>The</strong> two are not the same,nor is sworn service the same as non-swornservice. It is not possible for non-swornservice to be counted as equally eligible forthe sworn service when a person who hassuch a police history totals up his or her yearsin the <strong>Police</strong>. <strong>The</strong> non-sworn staff the writerrefers to, get a badge when they completetheir 14 years. Because he did not have 14years non-sworn service he did not receivethe badge. When Mr Taylor has completed 14years sworn service the writer’s conduct willalso be taken into account, and he or she maythen qualify for the medal.Not so happy with pay settlementCongratulations to Greg O’Connor on hiselection as chairman of the IOPRA. It isdeserved and this must also be a reflection ofour own fine <strong>Association</strong>. So I forgive Greg forhis naivety in thinking that “a good majorityare happy with the settlement”.I canvassed a number of members prior tothe ratification vote, and only found two“happy” with the proposal; one, an ‘I’ BandPNT member (with more allowances than hecould ever shake a megaphone at), the other amember of the “hundred grand” ‘J’ Band club.To the ratification meeting I went. I was buriedamongst my lowly ‘G’ Band members, standingroom only. We were merrily led throughthe awful scenarios of voting “no” includingarbitration — (remember what happened lasttime?), and doing battle with that hardenedcampaigner Wayne Annan (truly frightening).So everyone recruited post ‘nine-eleven’,rubbed their tummies and patted their headsand then when asked to vote, raised their armsin solidarity!So the pay round is ratified — and low andbehold — within 24 hours what makes thenews media headlines? <strong>Police</strong> to be issuedwith stab proof vests. I thought this was oldnews. I distinctly remember being measuredfor something, roughly 219 days ago. Surelythe department wasn’t waiting for the payround settlement before signing off on thevests? Maybe I’m the naive one.But seriously, does the <strong>Association</strong> genuinelybelieve that this new deal will do anything toattract good quality recruits? I can feel a ‘TuiBillboard’ coming on.Paul Devane(Howick)…Happy with pay settlementThanks for securing what I believe to be agreat wage round for members.I know that the team at the <strong>Police</strong> <strong>Association</strong>worked tirelessly on our behalf on this project,which must have been complicated and reallyfrustrating at times.As a member, I just wanted to say thatI appreciate your efforts and wanted toacknowledge your success on our behalf.Paul Basham(Tauranga)Verbal abuse optionsIn reply to Dave Mitchell, who wrote about theprevalence of verbal abuse in the November<strong>Police</strong> <strong>New</strong>s. I have never taken abuse fromanyone, if someone is abusive then arrest himor her for disorderly behavior or threateningor even a breach of the peace.<strong>The</strong> Courts have always looked favourablyupon these charges and the offenders aredealt with, taking them out of potentiallyviolent situations. A Court may have made thedecision that <strong>Police</strong> aren’t offended by abusivelanguage but there are other avenues open todealing with these situations.Denis Foster(Whakatane)Mixed messages on verbal abuse?I agree with Dave Mitchell’s letter relating toverbal abuse. However this may be difficult topursue, as the <strong>Police</strong> are seen to be condoningan advert with offensive language. <strong>The</strong> word“pissed” is often used in drink driving adverts,which are played on TV and radio duringprime time. <strong>The</strong> advert implies the word“pissed” is perfectly acceptable and I certainlydon’t want my young children listening to thattype of language. It’s disappointing to see thata “feel good” advert with two young childrendriving around the beach in a Hyundai 4WD isbanned yet an advert with offensive languageis perfectly acceptable.Dave Houston(Wellington)<strong>The</strong> pay round and segregationI’m a sworn member with a little over 15 yearsservice and as I sit here and answer anotherphone call or Email from either a uniformsection member, a uniform section sergeant, adetective and on the odd occasion a detectivesergeant seeking advice or guidance on a filefor a person they have just arrested, or I havesat at my desk with a constable by my sideguiding and assisting him/her through theproper procedure for a court file, I can’t beginto explain how aggrieved my fellow prosecutorsand I are at being left out of the supervisor’s’allowance in the latest pay round.<strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> <strong>Police</strong> <strong>Association</strong>Why? Because we don’t supervise staff...whatam I suppose to say on a daily basis to staff thatcome or phone the office asking for assistance?Sorry, I’m not paid a supervisors’ allowance,therefore I am not going to help you…go askyour sergeant who is too busy or has not gotthe experience to give you advice.Again the <strong>Police</strong> as an organisation havemanaged to differentiate and divide staff ofthe same rank into groups they deem are moreimportant than others. Us less-important oneswill again have enough good faith to supervisethe staff with their files/evidence when theycome asking for it and grin and bear it whenwe see our fellow sergeants, who may have gottheir stripes after a couple of years of policing,enjoying their extra $3,000 plus a year.It was bad enough that when I took promotion,from CIB to uniform sergeant I actuallytook a pay cut due to a loss of allowances. Idon’t know of any other organisation that,upon promotion, would give someoneless money. I understand that we need toencourage members of the CIB etc to stay,as their experience is urgently required, yetwhen we leave and choose to take our hardearnedexperience with us into another fieldof policing we are suddenly not recognised forthat knowledge.Some may say that I have it easier then others,as my hours are predominantly Monday toFriday 8am-4pm, yet 14 of my 15 years havebeen spent doing shift work. Have I not donemy time? Do my two pre-school children andmyself not deserve some quality family timetogether before they start school, and thenleave home before I know where the time hasgone?Yet I feel for my 14 years shift work andsix years CIB experience, coupled with thepressure required in a court room when Ihave five not guilty hearings in one day andfive separate defence counsel to try and outwit (as well as the O/C’s to supervise andguide through their evidence), the <strong>Police</strong> havedecided that as a Prosecutions sergeant I amnot worth the same as other sergeants outthere and will therefore pay me less.How was this current pay round sold to usby the <strong>Association</strong> at the ratification meetingsattended by shift workers, as us non-shiftworkers could not attend at 2pm on a weekdayafternoon? Sixty percent (60%) of staff will dovery well out of this pay round but what aboutthe other 40%? Are the <strong>Police</strong> only interestedin pleasing some and not all by offering someand not all more money – and thereby getthrough another pay round negotiation.Segregating staff is not the way to retain staff.Sean Brennan(Tauranga)Looking to the future, more and more tangiblerecognition would be directed towards shiftworkers and those that have to work overtime.But, as this pay round has signaled, it won’t beat the expense of deserved increases for dayworkers. In respect of Prosecution membersif they begin to experience recruitment andretention problems then the supervisoryincentive could become part of the solutionfor them. Regarding your comments onratification meetings, we held over 130December 2006305