EDU 645 Week 1 DQ 2 No Child Left Behind/UOPHELP
For more course tutorials visit www.uophelp.com No Child Left Behind (NCLB) and High-Stakes Testing (HST) Debate. The effects of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act on high-stakes testing (HST) has generated controversy amongst educators. In this discussion you will briefly debate the efficacy of NCLB. Find your assigned “Debate Group” below: Debate
For more course tutorials visit
www.uophelp.com
No Child Left Behind (NCLB) and High-Stakes Testing (HST) Debate. The effects of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act on high-stakes testing (HST) has generated controversy amongst educators. In this discussion you will briefly debate the efficacy of NCLB. Find your assigned “Debate Group” below: Debate
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>EDU</strong> <strong>645</strong> <strong>Week</strong> 1 <strong>DQ</strong> 2 <strong>No</strong> <strong>Child</strong> <strong>Left</strong> <strong>Behind</strong> (NCLB) andHigh-Stakes Testing (HST) DebateClick Here to Buy the Tutorialhttp://www.uophelp.com/edu-<strong>645</strong>-(ash)/product-8291-edu-<strong>645</strong>-week-1-dq-2-no-child-left-behind-(nclb)-and-high-stakes-testing-(hst)-debateFor more course tutorials visitwww.uophelp.com<strong>No</strong> <strong>Child</strong> <strong>Left</strong> <strong>Behind</strong> (NCLB) and High-Stakes Testing (HST)Debate. The effects of the <strong>No</strong> <strong>Child</strong> <strong>Left</strong> <strong>Behind</strong> (NCLB) Act onhigh-stakes testing (HST) has generated controversy amongsteducators. In this discussion you will briefly debate the efficacy ofNCLB. Find your assigned “Debate Group” below: DebateGrouping (by first letter of last name)A-L: Proponents of NCLB and HSTM-Z: Opponents of NCLB and HSTConduct research on NCLB using the web and the Ashford library,and develop a cohesive and research-based argument for or againstNCLB based on the position you’ve been assigned. Then, respondto at least two peers of the opposite group with a critical evaluation
of their argument. Comment on the accuracy and clarity of theirpost and ask follow-up questions if needed. Your response shouldbe based on your research and not on your opinion
Change language