3.4-Breast cancer subtypes (Newman) - Breast Health Global Initiative

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Frequency of ER-Negative Breast CancerNOT Explained by Poverty:International Data on SES and ER Status• Glasgow, Scotland (Thomson et al, J Epi & Comm Health, 2001)– 35% ER-negative for affluent women compared to 52% ERnegativefor impoverished women– ER status missing for one-third of cases• Glasgow, Scotland (Carnon et al, BMJ 1994)– 51% ER-negative for affluent women compared to 52% ERnegativefor impoverished women• Sweden National Health Care System (Halmin et al ActaOncologica, 2008)– 37% ER-negative; no differences by SES• London, England (Bowen et al Br J Cancer, 2008)– 34% ER-neg for British Black women compared to 25% ER-negfor British White women; results unchanged by SES stratification
Dataset/Sample SizeCarey, 2006 97 premenopausal AA vs 164premenopausal WA women;Carolina Breast Cancer StudyFrequency of Triple-Neg CAAA WA P39% 16%
Page 1 and 2: BREAST CANCER SUBTYPES:Association
Page 3 and 4: Breast Cancer Treatment• All brea
Page 5 and 6: Systemic Therapy for Breast Cancer
Page 8 and 9: “Basal-like” breast cancerGene
Page 10 and 11: Triple-Positive Breast CancerH&EER-
Page 12 and 13: BREAST CANCER SUBTYPES:Association
Page 14 and 15: NCDB: Frequency of ER-Negative Tumo
Page 18 and 19: High-Risk Breast Cancer andAfrican
Page 20 and 21: Research Project: KATH-UMInternatio
Page 22 and 23: HFH WAN=1,008HFH AAN=581GhanaianN=7
Page 24 and 25: Other African Datasets• Huo et al
Page 26 and 27: ALDH1 as a Breast CancerStem Cell M
Page 28 and 29: ALDH1/Breast CA Stem Cell Marker:Gh

3.4-Breast cancer subtypes (Newman) - Breast Health Global Initiative

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?