The Secondary SourcesThe Secondary Sources for the LessonAnalyzing Secondary SourcesHistorians write secondary source accounts of the past after studying primary source documents likethe ones you have studied on <strong>Manifest</strong> <strong>Destiny</strong>. However, they normally select documents from amonga great many others, <strong>and</strong> they stress some aspects of the story but not others. In doing this, historiansare guided by the questions they ask about the topic. Their selection of sources <strong>and</strong> their focus are alsoinfluenced by their own aims, bias, or point of view. No account of the past is perfectly neutral. In readinga secondary source, you should pay to what it includes, what it leaves out, what conclusions it reaches,<strong>and</strong> how aware it is of alternative interpretations.* * * *Secondary Source 1Information on the source: The passage in the box below is an excerpt from Throes ofDemocracy: The American Civil War Era, 1829–1877, by Walter A. McDougall (New York: HarperCollins,2008), p. 232.If expansionist ambitions <strong>and</strong> argument wereas old as the republic, why did the mania of<strong>Manifest</strong> <strong>Destiny</strong> sweep the nation in the 1840srather than before or after? One answer wasthe near disappearance of doubt concerningthe possibility of a continental republic. Even theexpansionist Thomas Hart Benson of Missourihad once thought the Rocky Mountains theabode of “the fabled God, Terminus,” <strong>and</strong> someNew Engl<strong>and</strong>ers thought even the Great Plainstoo remote to govern. The westward marchof constitutional government, supported bysteamboats, railroads, <strong>and</strong> telegraphs, dissolvedsuch fears by the 1840s. A second answerwas that American trappers, farmers, ranchers,planters, loggers, merchants, whalers, <strong>and</strong>missionaries were already infiltrating the GreatNorth Woods, Great Plains, Rockies <strong>and</strong> PacificRim. By 1840, the federal government had littlechoice but to extend its protection over them.A third answer, the one that caused <strong>Manifest</strong><strong>Destiny</strong> to melt into “manifest design,” was a fearthat Britain <strong>and</strong> France were colluding in a sort of“containment policy” against the upstart Yankees.This made expansion a matter of urgency. Afourth answer was simply that Democrats beatthe expansionist drum as an electoral ploy in1844.30 The Historian’s Apprentice | <strong>Manifest</strong> <strong>Destiny</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Its</strong> <strong>Critics</strong>
The Secondary Sources for the LessonSecondary Source 2The Secondary SourcesInformation on the source: The passage in the box below is an excerpt from <strong>Manifest</strong> <strong>Destiny</strong>, byDavid S. Heidler <strong>and</strong> Jeanne T. Heidler (Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press, 2003), p. 24.From another perspective, evolvingconcepts of racial uniqueness clearlyfigured into the rhetoric <strong>and</strong> meaning of<strong>Manifest</strong> <strong>Destiny</strong>. Reginald Horsman hasshown that assigning hierarchies accordingto racial identity existed as early as theeighteenth century. By the mid-1800s, bothscience <strong>and</strong> philosophy categorized thedifferent races almost as different species.Americans were adhering to historicaltrends when they justified expansion withclaims of Anglo-Saxon racial superiority.Believing that indigenous people (Indiansor blacks) or inhabitants of neighboringcountries (Mexicans) were fated by thenatural order for subjugation, Americanswithout guilt could justify perpetuatingslavery, acquiring l<strong>and</strong> for agriculturalincrease, <strong>and</strong> securing markets forcommercial growth. <strong>Manifest</strong> <strong>Destiny</strong>could thus validate the interests of empirewithout acknowledging the corruptionof imperialism.<strong>Manifest</strong> <strong>Destiny</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Its</strong> <strong>Critics</strong> | The Historian’s Apprentice 31