05.12.2012 Views

Demographic Side Effects of Selective Hunting in Ungulates and ...

Demographic Side Effects of Selective Hunting in Ungulates and ...

Demographic Side Effects of Selective Hunting in Ungulates and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Milner et al. <strong>Demographic</strong> <strong>Effects</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Selective</strong> <strong>Hunt<strong>in</strong>g</strong> 41<br />

sheep (S<strong>in</strong>ger & Zeigenfuss 2002). Higher mortality rates<br />

have been detected only among young rams <strong>in</strong> a heavily<br />

hunted Dall sheep population (S<strong>in</strong>ger & Zeigenfuss 2002).<br />

Where selective hunt<strong>in</strong>g leads to high adult mortality,<br />

populations tend to have a high proportion <strong>of</strong> juveniles<br />

<strong>and</strong> yearl<strong>in</strong>gs. Because overw<strong>in</strong>ter survival <strong>of</strong> these<br />

classes is variable from year to year (Gaillard et al. 1998),<br />

such populations are more sensitive to w<strong>in</strong>ter mortality <strong>in</strong><br />

harsh years than unhunted populations, lead<strong>in</strong>g to greater<br />

population variability (Cameron & Benton 2004; Gordon<br />

et al. 2004).<br />

<strong>Effects</strong> on Body Weights<br />

Another cost to young males participat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the rut is<br />

reduced body growth as resources are diverted to reproduction<br />

(Stearns 1992). In populations with few mature<br />

males, one might expect <strong>in</strong>creased energy expenditure<br />

<strong>of</strong> young males participat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> mat<strong>in</strong>g behavior to lead<br />

to greater weight loss dur<strong>in</strong>g the rut. This is observed <strong>in</strong><br />

male re<strong>in</strong>deer (Mysterud et al. 2003) <strong>and</strong> moose (Solberg<br />

&Sæther 1994; Garel et al. 2006). However, Sæther et<br />

al. (2003) found no such effect when mature male moose<br />

were removed from a population, although they found an<br />

<strong>in</strong>direct negative effect on calf body weight the follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

w<strong>in</strong>ter due to delayed parturition dates. Similarly, lower<br />

birth <strong>and</strong> autumn body weights occur <strong>in</strong> second-estrus<br />

<strong>of</strong>fspr<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> moose (Schwartz & Becker 1994) <strong>and</strong> re<strong>in</strong>deer<br />

(Hol<strong>and</strong> et al. 2003, 2006). Low mass at birth has<br />

implications for other life-history traits such as survival,<br />

age <strong>and</strong> body size at maturity, <strong>and</strong> lifetime reproductive<br />

success (Kruuk et al. 1999).<br />

As a result <strong>of</strong> expend<strong>in</strong>g more energy <strong>in</strong> avoidance<br />

behavior, female fallow deer <strong>in</strong> an enclosure with only<br />

young males lost significantly more body weight than females<br />

enclosed with only mature males (Komers et al.<br />

1999). Female white-tailed deer <strong>in</strong> a low-density hunted<br />

population significantly <strong>in</strong>creased their daily movement<br />

<strong>and</strong> home range size <strong>in</strong> peak <strong>and</strong> late rut, apparently <strong>in</strong> response<br />

to low availability <strong>of</strong> adult males (Labisky & Fritzen<br />

1998). By contrast, S<strong>in</strong>ger <strong>and</strong> Zeigenfuss (2002) found no<br />

compell<strong>in</strong>g evidence for any negative effects on ewe energetics<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased harassment <strong>of</strong> ewes by young rams<br />

<strong>in</strong> hunted mounta<strong>in</strong> sheep populations.<br />

Consequences <strong>of</strong> Remov<strong>in</strong>g a Few Targeted<br />

Individuals<br />

Trophy hunt<strong>in</strong>g typically targets the largest males or those<br />

with impressive ornaments but is generally restricted to<br />

relatively few <strong>in</strong>dividuals. Nonetheless, a high proportion<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividuals that qualify as trophy <strong>in</strong>dividuals may be removed<br />

each year (Coltman et al. 2003). Species subject to<br />

trophy hunt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>clude large carnivores <strong>and</strong> large horn-,<br />

tusk-, or antler-bear<strong>in</strong>g herbivores. Trophy hunt<strong>in</strong>g is usu-<br />

ally associated with a considerable fee, mak<strong>in</strong>g it an important<br />

tool for wildlife management <strong>and</strong> conservation<br />

programs, particularly <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g countries, where<br />

it <strong>of</strong>fers potential benefits for rural economies (Festa-<br />

Bianchet 2003). With<strong>in</strong> Europe <strong>and</strong> North America, there<br />

is also considerable <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> the trophy hunt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> some<br />

relatively common ungulate species that, are also hunted<br />

for meat or population control (Festa-Bianchet 2003; Milner<br />

et al. 2006).<br />

In many mammals the largest <strong>in</strong>dividuals are also the<br />

oldest <strong>and</strong>, as such, play an important role <strong>in</strong> lead<strong>in</strong>g social<br />

groups that benefit from their greater experience.<br />

Nevertheless, these are <strong>of</strong>ten the same <strong>in</strong>dividuals that<br />

are typically targeted by trophy hunters because <strong>of</strong> their<br />

size. For example, <strong>in</strong> elephants, tusk size is related to age,<br />

<strong>and</strong> hunters or poachers focus their efforts on <strong>in</strong>dividuals<br />

with the largest tusks, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g matriarchs (Dobson &<br />

Poole 1998). Older matriarchs have social discrim<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

abilities that are superior to those <strong>of</strong> young matriarchs,<br />

so enabl<strong>in</strong>g them to make more appropriate responses<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g encounters with other elephant groups (McComb<br />

et al. 2001). These factors <strong>and</strong> a greater knowledge <strong>of</strong> the<br />

distribution <strong>of</strong> resources may result <strong>in</strong> higher per capita<br />

reproductive success for female groups led by older <strong>in</strong>dividuals.<br />

Consequently, if groups rely on older members for<br />

their store <strong>of</strong> social knowledge, then whole populations<br />

may be affected by the removal <strong>of</strong> a few key <strong>in</strong>dividuals<br />

(McComb et al. 2001).<br />

Among lions, the absence <strong>of</strong> males with<strong>in</strong> a pride enables<br />

hyenas to drive females <strong>and</strong> subadults <strong>of</strong>f their<br />

kills under certa<strong>in</strong> circumstances, constitut<strong>in</strong>g a constant<br />

energy dra<strong>in</strong> by forc<strong>in</strong>g them to hunt more frequently<br />

(Cooper 1991). In populations where adult males are<br />

scarce, due, for example, to trophy hunt<strong>in</strong>g, cleptoparasitism<br />

by hyenas is likely to <strong>in</strong>crease.<br />

In most species managers assume that sport hunt<strong>in</strong>g<br />

for trophy males only reduces the overall population size<br />

when the rate <strong>of</strong> male removal is so high that not all<br />

females are impregnated. In many cases it is thought that<br />

sport hunt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> males may even have a positive effect<br />

on population growth through compensatory density dependence<br />

(McLellan 2005; but see also Miller 1990). In<br />

monogamous species <strong>and</strong> species <strong>in</strong> which males provide<br />

parental care, however selective removal <strong>of</strong> even<br />

a modest number <strong>of</strong> adult males is predicted to have a<br />

stronger impact on population growth than r<strong>and</strong>om removals<br />

(Greene et al. 1998).<br />

<strong>Effects</strong> on Juvenile Survival<br />

Removal <strong>of</strong> trophy <strong>in</strong>dividuals, especially dom<strong>in</strong>ant males,<br />

can have far-reach<strong>in</strong>g effects where male replacement is<br />

associated with <strong>in</strong>fanticide. Sexually selected <strong>in</strong>fanticide<br />

(SSI) can occur when a male ga<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong>creased mat<strong>in</strong>g success<br />

by kill<strong>in</strong>g dependent young he has not sired himself<br />

(Swenson 2003). By kill<strong>in</strong>g unrelated <strong>of</strong>fspr<strong>in</strong>g a mature<br />

Conservation Biology<br />

Volume 21, No. 1, February 2007

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!