08.08.2015 Views

Economic Report of the President 1994 - The American Presidency ...

Economic Report of the President 1994 - The American Presidency ...

Economic Report of the President 1994 - The American Presidency ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

S : Sf:' ;: W^W't-^WW': ;, S 4 Si : •&' I! ' ; ' ! v i ! '^.^wiiilIiiii?Bi'-tfl


<strong>Economic</strong> <strong>Report</strong><strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>President</strong>Transmitted to <strong>the</strong> CongressFebruary <strong>1994</strong>TOGETHER WITHTHE ANNUAL REPORTOF THECOUNCIL OF ECONOMIC ADVISERSUNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICEWASHINGTON : <strong>1994</strong>For sale by <strong>the</strong> U.S. Government Printing OfficeSuperintendent <strong>of</strong> Documents, Mail Stop: SSOP, Washington, DC 20402-9328ISBN 0-16-043028-3


unitedminds


ECONOMIC REPORTOF THE PRESIDENT


<strong>Economic</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>President</strong>To <strong>the</strong> Speaker <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> House <strong>of</strong> Representatives and <strong>the</strong> <strong>President</strong><strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Senate:America has always thrived on change. We have used <strong>the</strong> opportunitiesit creates to renew ourselves and build our prosperity. Butfor too long and in too many ways, our Nation has been drifting.For <strong>the</strong> last 30 years, family life in America has been breakingdown. For <strong>the</strong> last 20 years, <strong>the</strong> real compensation <strong>of</strong> working<strong>American</strong>s has grown at a disappointing rate. For 12 years a policy<strong>of</strong> trickle-down economics built a false prosperity on a mountain <strong>of</strong>Federal debt. As a result <strong>of</strong> our national drift, far too many <strong>American</strong>families, even those with two working parents, no longerdream <strong>the</strong> <strong>American</strong> dream <strong>of</strong> a better life for <strong>the</strong>ir children.In 1992, <strong>the</strong> <strong>American</strong> people demanded change. A year ago, Isought your support for a comprehensive short-term and long-termstrategy to restore <strong>the</strong> promise <strong>of</strong> our country's economic future.You responded, and toge<strong>the</strong>r we replaced drift and gridlock withrenewal and reform. Toge<strong>the</strong>r we have taken <strong>the</strong> first necessarysteps to restore growth in <strong>the</strong> living standards <strong>of</strong> all <strong>American</strong>s.We have created a sound macroeconomic environment andstreng<strong>the</strong>ned <strong>the</strong> foundations <strong>of</strong> future economic growth. As a result<strong>of</strong> our efforts, <strong>the</strong> economy is now on a path <strong>of</strong> rising output,increasing employment, and falling deficits.Establishing <strong>the</strong> Fiscal Conditions for Sustained GrowthFor more than a decade, <strong>the</strong> Federal Government has been livingwell beyond its means—spending much more than it has taken in,and borrowing <strong>the</strong> difference. <strong>The</strong> resulting deficits have beenhuge, both in sheer magnitude and as a percentage <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Nation'soutput. Since 1981 <strong>the</strong> Federal debt has been growing faster than<strong>the</strong> economy, reversing <strong>the</strong> trend <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> previous three decades. Asa consequence <strong>of</strong> this binge <strong>of</strong> deficit financing, Federal budgetdeficits have been gobbling up an inordinate share <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Nation'ssavings, driving up real long-term interest rates, discouraging privateinvestment, and impeding long-run private sector growth.On August 10, 1993, I signed <strong>the</strong> historic budget plan that youpassed several days earlier. It will reduce Federal deficits by morethan $500 billion. <strong>The</strong> plan is a balanced package <strong>of</strong> cuts in spendingand increases in revenues. <strong>The</strong> spending cuts are specific, farreaching,and genuine. <strong>The</strong>y will reduce discretionary spending byover 12 percent in real terms in 5 years. <strong>The</strong> plan increases income


tax rates for only <strong>the</strong> top 1.2 percent <strong>of</strong> taxpayers, <strong>the</strong> group <strong>of</strong><strong>American</strong>s who gained <strong>the</strong> most during <strong>the</strong> 1980s and are mostable to pay higher taxes to help reduce <strong>the</strong> deficit. At <strong>the</strong> sametime, a broad expansion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> earned income tax credit will helpmake work pay for up to 15 million <strong>American</strong> families. Nine out<strong>of</strong> ten small businesses will benefit from more-generous tax breaksthat will help <strong>the</strong>m invest and grow. And new, targeted capitalgains tax relief will encourage investment in new small businesses.Our deficit reduction plan has been <strong>the</strong> principal factor in <strong>the</strong>dramatic decline in long-term interest rates since my election inNovember 1992. Lower interest rates, in turn, have sparked an investment-driveneconomic expansion that has created more privatesector jobs during <strong>the</strong> last year than were created during <strong>the</strong> previousfour. <strong>The</strong> fact that investment is leading <strong>the</strong> recovery is goodnews for living standards, because investment is <strong>the</strong> key to productivitygrowth and hence to growth in real incomes for all <strong>American</strong>s.Investing in Our Nation's FutureLaying <strong>the</strong> macroeconomic groundwork for sustained growth is<strong>the</strong> government's first responsibility, but not its only responsibility.Government also has a vital role to play in providing some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>critical raw materials for economic growth: science and technology,an educated and well-trained work force, and public infrastructure.For much too long we have underinvested in <strong>the</strong>se areas, in comparisonboth with our global competitors and with our own economichistory. Our overall budget deficit has masked ano<strong>the</strong>r,equally disturbing deficit—a deficit in <strong>the</strong> kinds <strong>of</strong> public investmentsthat lay <strong>the</strong> foundations for private sector prosperity.Like private investments, well-chosen public investments raisefuture living standards. As a consequence, deficit reduction at <strong>the</strong>expense <strong>of</strong> public investment has been and will continue to be selfdefeating.That is why our budget package increases much-neededpublic investment even as it takes steps to reduce <strong>the</strong> budget deficit.One without <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r will not work.With <strong>the</strong> help <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Congress, our public investment initiativesin <strong>the</strong> areas <strong>of</strong> technology, infrastructure, <strong>the</strong> environment, andeducation and training received about 70 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> funding werequested in fiscal year <strong>1994</strong>. We increased funding for such provensuccesses as Head Start and <strong>the</strong> WIC program in <strong>the</strong> human resourcesarea, and <strong>the</strong> Advanced Technology Program <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> NationalInstitute <strong>of</strong> Standards and Technology in <strong>the</strong> area <strong>of</strong> technologicalresearch. We also launched a number <strong>of</strong> new initiatives, including<strong>the</strong> National Service program, a new program <strong>of</strong>empowerment zones and enterprise communities for urban andrural development, and several new technology programs, including


<strong>the</strong> Technology Reinvestment Project, designed to help defense contractorsretool to serve civilian markets. We increased funding forresearch into new environmental technologies. In addition, we developeda comprehensive, cost-effective Climate Change ActionPlan, comprising nearly 50 initiatives to reduce U.S. greenhousegas emissions to 1990 levels by <strong>the</strong> year 2000.As <strong>the</strong>se examples bear witness, we have made significantprogress on our investment agenda, but much more remains to bedone. We will have to work toge<strong>the</strong>r to find room to fund essentialnew investments even as we reduce real government outlays tomeet tight annual caps on discretionary spending. This will not beeasy. But it is essential, for we face a dual challenge—we must fundamentallychange <strong>the</strong> composition <strong>of</strong> discretionary spending evenas we reduce it in real terms.This year my Administration is requesting funding for severalnew investment initiatives. Our Goals 2000 proposal will encouragelocal innovation in and accelerate <strong>the</strong> pace <strong>of</strong> school reform. It willlink world-class academic and occupational standards to grassrootseducation reforms all across America. Our School-to-Work initiativewill provide opportunities for post-secondary training for those notgoing on to college. Our reemployment and training program willstreamline today's patchwork <strong>of</strong> training programs and make <strong>the</strong>ma source <strong>of</strong> new skills for people who lose <strong>the</strong>ir jobs. Finally, ourproposed welfare reform will provide <strong>the</strong> support, job training, andchild care necessary to move people <strong>of</strong>f welfare after 2 years. Thatis <strong>the</strong> only way we will make welfare what it ought to be: a secondchance, not a way <strong>of</strong> life.Reforming Our Health Care SystemThis year we will also make history by reforming <strong>the</strong> Nation'shealth care system. We face a health care crisis that demands a solution,both for <strong>the</strong> health <strong>of</strong> our citizens and for <strong>the</strong> health <strong>of</strong> oureconomy over <strong>the</strong> long run. <strong>The</strong> United States today spends moreon health care relative to <strong>the</strong> size <strong>of</strong> its economy than any o<strong>the</strong>radvanced industrial country. Yet we insure a smaller fraction <strong>of</strong>our population, and we rank poorly on important overall health indicatorssuch as life expectancy and infant mortality. Over 15 percent<strong>of</strong> <strong>American</strong>s—nearly 39 million people—were uninsuredthroughout 1992. And tens <strong>of</strong> millions more have inadequate insuranceor risk becoming uninsured should <strong>the</strong>y lose <strong>the</strong>ir jobs. Meanwhilehealth care costs continue to climb, increasing premiums andmedical bills for <strong>American</strong> families and aggravating budget crisesat all levels <strong>of</strong> government. Both <strong>the</strong> Office <strong>of</strong> Management andBudget and <strong>the</strong> Congressional Budget Office have concluded thatunless <strong>the</strong> system is reformed, rising health care costs will begin


ationalized our export promotion activities to help our producers,workers, and farmers increase <strong>the</strong>ir sales around <strong>the</strong> world.Improving <strong>the</strong> Efficiency <strong>of</strong> GovernmentMy Administration is committed to improving <strong>the</strong> Federal government'sefficiency across <strong>the</strong> board. <strong>The</strong> National PerformanceReview (NPR), completed under <strong>the</strong> bold leadership <strong>of</strong> Vice <strong>President</strong>Gore, provides a road map for what must be done. <strong>The</strong> NPR'sreport shows how substantial budgetary savings can be realized bymaking existing programs more efficient and cutting those that areno longer necessary. As a result <strong>of</strong> our efforts to reinvent how <strong>the</strong>government performs, we will reduce <strong>the</strong> Federal bureaucracy by252,000 positions, bringing it down to <strong>the</strong> lowest level in decades.My Administration is also committed to reducing <strong>the</strong> burden <strong>of</strong>government regulations by improving <strong>the</strong> regulatory review process.My Executive Order on Regulatory Planning and Review requiresthat all new regulations carefully balance costs and benefits,that only those regulations whose benefits exceed <strong>the</strong>ir costs beadopted, and that in each case <strong>the</strong> most cost-effective regulationsbe chosen.This year we will also work with <strong>the</strong> Congress to develop <strong>the</strong>new regulatory framework required to encourage <strong>the</strong> development<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> national information superhighway. We must cooperate with<strong>the</strong> private sector to connect every classroom, every library, andevery hospital in America to this highway by <strong>the</strong> year 2000. Rapidaccess to <strong>the</strong> most advanced information available will increaseproductivity and living standards, help to educate our children, andhelp health providers improve medical care for our citizens.<strong>The</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> OutlookAn economic strategy built on long-run investments will not bearfruit overnight. But <strong>the</strong>re are already signs that our policy initiativesare beginning to pay <strong>of</strong>f. Prospects for sustained economic expansionlook far brighter now than <strong>the</strong>y did a year ago, when myAdministration first asked for your support. Growth <strong>of</strong> real grossdomestic product increased steadily over <strong>the</strong> course <strong>of</strong> 1993, and<strong>the</strong> economic expansion has continued into <strong>1994</strong>. Consumer spendingshould remain healthy because <strong>of</strong> continued gains in employmentand output, and investment spending should remain strongbecause <strong>of</strong> low long-term interest rates and increasing levels <strong>of</strong> demand.Low interest rates will also continue to support <strong>the</strong> recentexpansion in residential construction. <strong>The</strong> Administration forecaststhat <strong>the</strong> economy will grow at 3 percent in <strong>1994</strong> and will remainon track to create 8 million jobs over 4 years.As <strong>1994</strong> begins, our economy is strong and growing stronger.With continued deficit reduction, more public investment, a re-


formed health care system, increased exports, and a reinventedgovernment, we can create <strong>the</strong> foundations for an even more prosperousAmerica.THE WHITE HOUSEFEBRUARY 14, <strong>1994</strong>8


LETTER OF TRANSMITTALCOUNCIL OF ECONOMIC ADVISERS,Washington, D.C., February 4, <strong>1994</strong>.MR. PRESIDENT:<strong>The</strong> Council <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Advisers herewith submits its 1993 Annual<strong>Report</strong> in accordance with <strong>the</strong> provisions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> EmploymentAct <strong>of</strong> 1946 as amended by <strong>the</strong> Full Employment and BalancedGrowth Act <strong>of</strong> 1978.Sincerely,Laura D'Andrea TysonChairAlan S. BlinderMemberJoseph E. StiglitzMember11


CONTENTSPageCHAPTER 1. A STRATEGY FOR GROWTH AND CHANGE 21<strong>The</strong> Legacy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Recent Past 22Inadequate Recovery from Recession 22Inadequate Productivity Growth 23Worsening Income Inequality 25Large Deficits, Mounting Debt 26Inadequate Public Investment 29Prosperity and Growth: <strong>The</strong> Benefits <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong>Change 30Reducing <strong>the</strong> Deficit to Promote Capital Formation 31Investing in People 39Investing in Public Infrastructure 41Investing in Technology 43Trade Policy and Living Standards 45Health Care Reform 48Summary: Prosperity and Change 49Creating Opportunity 50Summary 53CHAPTER 2. THE U.S. ECONOMY IN 1993 AND BEYOND 55Struggling to Grow 56<strong>The</strong> End <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Cold War 56Weak Foreign Economies 57<strong>The</strong> Debt Workout 59Oversupply <strong>of</strong> Commercial Buildings 61Credit Crunch 63Corporate Downsizings 63<strong>The</strong> Headwinds Are Mostly Calming 64Overview <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Economy in 1993 64Consumption Expenditures 65Business Fixed Investment 66Inventories 66Residential Investment 68Net Exports 68Employment and Productivity 68Incomes 69Inflation 69Monetary Policy 70Fiscal Policies and <strong>the</strong> Timing <strong>of</strong> Output 7013


Page<strong>The</strong> Federal Government's Fiscal Stance 75Industrial and Regional Disparities 76Deficit Reduction and <strong>the</strong> Real Interest Rate 78How Deficit Reduction Reduces Long-Term InterestRates 81Short-Run Effects <strong>of</strong> Interest Rates 84Long-Term Effects <strong>of</strong> Deficit Reduction 85<strong>The</strong> Economy's Response to Higher Income Taxes 87Do Taxes Change Behavior? 88Do Higher Tax Rates Increase Tax Revenues? 89<strong>The</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Outlook 90Risks to <strong>the</strong> Forecast 92Sources <strong>of</strong> Long-Run Growth 93Conclusion 95CHAPTER 3. TRENDS AND RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN THE U.S.LABOR MARKET 97Employment Growth 98A Slow Recovery 99Sources <strong>of</strong> Job Growth 101Unemployment and Nonemployment 103Trends 103Is <strong>the</strong> Natural Rate <strong>of</strong> Unemployment Increasing? ... 110Direct Measures <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Natural Rate 112<strong>The</strong> Magnitude and Costs <strong>of</strong> Job Loss 114Slowing Wage Growth and Widening Inequality 115Slow Income Growth 115Growing Inequality 115Explaining Slow Wage Growth 117Explaining <strong>the</strong> Growth <strong>of</strong> Inequality 118Job Quality 121Hours <strong>of</strong> Work 121Job Stability 123Benefits 127Toward a Comprehensive Work Force Policy 128CHAPTER 4. Health Care Reform 131Universal Coverage and Health Security 133Insurance Market Reform 137Insuring Major Risks and Preexisting Conditions 137Community Rating 138Reducing Administrative Costs 139Creating a More Efficient Market and Containing Costs 140Explaining Cost Increases 144Who Pays for Health Care? 145Health Care and Government Budgets 149<strong>The</strong> Architecture <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Health Security Act 151Elements <strong>of</strong> Reform 15114


PageProviding Comprehensive Benefits 153Organizing <strong>the</strong> Insurance Market 154Paying for Insurance 155Providing Discounts 157Using Savings to Guarantee Health Security andReduce <strong>the</strong> Deficit 159<strong>Economic</strong> Effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Health Security Act 163Macroeconomic Effects 163Sectoral Effects 163Conclusion 167CHAPTER 5. MICROECONOMIC INITIATIVES TO PROMOTE EFFI-CIENCY AND PRODUCTIVITY 169Promoting Efficiency in <strong>the</strong> Public and Private Sectors ... 170Creating a More Effective Government 170Promoting Competition 173More Efficient Regulation <strong>of</strong> Natural Monopolies 175Addressing Environmental Externalities 179Managing Resources on Federal Lands 181Climate Change Action Plan 184Superfund Reauthorization: <strong>the</strong> Administration Position186Sustainable Development and Green Accounting 188Promoting Technology 189Principles <strong>of</strong> Technology Policy 190<strong>The</strong> Administration's Technology Initiatives 194Technology Policy, Growth, and Competitiveness 204CHAPTER 6. THE UNITED STATES IN THE WORLD ECONOMY 205Trends in U.S. Trade 206Trade, Jobs, and Wage Inequality 212<strong>The</strong> Administration's Trade Initiatives 214Domestic Initiatives: <strong>The</strong> National Export Strategy 214Bilateral Negotiations 215Regional Initiatives 225Multilateral Initiatives: <strong>The</strong> Uruguay Round 233<strong>The</strong> Trade Policy Agenda 238Trade and <strong>the</strong> Environment 238International Trade and Competition Policy 239Regionalism 240Foreign Exchange Market Developments 240<strong>The</strong> European Monetary System 243<strong>The</strong> European Currencies in Turmoil 244<strong>The</strong> Maastricht Treaty on <strong>Economic</strong> and MonetaryUnion 245Conclusions 24715


LIST OF CHARTSPage1-1 Growth <strong>of</strong> Real GDP in Recoveries 231-2 Real Income, Productivity, and Compensation 241-3 Shares <strong>of</strong> Total After-Tax Income by Income Category 25l-4a Federal Budget Deficits With and Without 1993 DeficitReduction Package 28l-4b Net Federal Debt as Percent <strong>of</strong> GDP 281-5 Federal Civilian Fixed Investment as Percent <strong>of</strong> GDP 301-6 Federal Deficits and Real Interest Rates 311-7 Correlation <strong>of</strong> Investment and Productivity 371-8 Ratio <strong>of</strong> Wages <strong>of</strong> College Graduates to Wages <strong>of</strong> HighSchool Graduates 401-9 Ratio <strong>of</strong> Public to Private Net Nonresidential CapitalStock 431-10 Projected Real Growth Rates <strong>of</strong> Principal FederalBudget Components 491-11 Shares <strong>of</strong> Wages and Benefits in Compensation 501-12 Earned Income Tax Credit for Families with Two orMore Children 522-1 Recovery Pattern <strong>of</strong> Nonfarm Payroll Employment 572-2 National Defense Purchases as Share <strong>of</strong> GDP 582-3 U.S. Merchandise Exports to Various Trading Partners602-4 U.S. Exports Implied by Industrial Country GDP 602-5 Households: Credit Market Debt as Percentage <strong>of</strong> DisposableIncome 622-6 Nonfinancial Corporate Business: Credit Market Debtas Percentage <strong>of</strong> Output 622-7 Defense Spending: Actual Versus Baseline 722-8 Effects <strong>of</strong> 1992 Tax Withholding Change on PersonalConsumption 732-9 Alternative Measures <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Stance <strong>of</strong> Fiscal Policy 762-10 772-11 772-12 Ten-Year Treasury Note Yields 792-13 Real Interest Rates 802-14 Federal Debt as Percent <strong>of</strong> Nominal GDP 822-15 Dynamic Effects <strong>of</strong> Deficit Reduction 862-16 Personal Income Taxes as a Share <strong>of</strong> GDP 903-1 Changes in Output and Payroll Employment in FirstEleven Quarters <strong>of</strong> Recovery 1003-2 Employment and Output in Recoveries 1013-3 Civilian Unemployment Rate 1053-4 Long-Term Unemployment as Share <strong>of</strong> TotalUnemployment 10617


LIST OF CHARTS—CONTINUEDPage3-5 Long-Term Unemployment and <strong>the</strong> UnemploymentRate 1063-6 Employment-to-Population Ratios <strong>of</strong> Women 1073-7 Unemployment Rates by Educational Attainment,March 1993 1083-8 Ratio <strong>of</strong> White-Collar to Blue-Collar UnemploymentRates 1093-9 Real Hourly Compensation and Wages 1163-10 Average Annual Growth <strong>of</strong> Mean Family Income byIncome Quintile 1173-11 Productivity Growth and Price Reductions, 1950-90 ... 1183-12 Average Weekly Hours <strong>of</strong> Production and NonsupervisoryWorkers 1223-13 Help Supply Industry Employment as Share <strong>of</strong> TotalEmployment 1243-14 Part-Time Employment: Total and Voluntary 1253-15 Reallocation <strong>of</strong> Employment Between Industries 1264-1 Distribution <strong>of</strong> Population by Source <strong>of</strong> Health InsuranceCoverage: 1991 1344-2 Sources <strong>of</strong> Payment for Health Care by Insurance Status:<strong>1994</strong> Estimates 1354-3 Administrative Expenses <strong>of</strong> Commercial Insurers as aShare <strong>of</strong> Claims Paid 1404—4 Health Expenditure and Life Expectancy in IndustrialCountries 1414-5 Estimates <strong>of</strong> Inappropriate Care for Five CommonProcedures 1444-6 Sources <strong>of</strong> Health Care Financing as Percent <strong>of</strong> TotalExpenditures 1484-7 Government Spending on Health Care as Percent <strong>of</strong>Total Government Revenues 1504-8 Health Expenditures as Percent <strong>of</strong> GDP 1624-9 Business Spending on Health Insurance 1656-1 U.S. Trade as Share <strong>of</strong> Real Gross Domestic Product 2076-2 U.S. Exports <strong>of</strong> Goods and Services 2086-3 Nominal and Real Effective Dollar Exchange Rates 2416-4 Exchange Rates <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Dollar Against Selected Currencies2426-5 French Franc-Deutsche Mark Exchange Rates 246LIST OF BOXESPage1-1 <strong>The</strong> New Measure <strong>of</strong> Unemployment 221-2 Saving, Investment, and Current Account Deficits 2918


LIST OF BOXES—CONTINUEDPage1-3 Credible Deficit Reduction and Real Interest Rates 351-4 A Balanced Budget Amendment to <strong>the</strong> Constitution? .. 391-5 <strong>The</strong> National Service Program 421-6 How Does <strong>the</strong> Earned Income Tax Credit Work? 512-1 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Midwest Floods <strong>of</strong> 1993 672-2 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Effects <strong>of</strong> Lower Oil Prices 712-3 Are Current Long-Term Interest Rates Sustainable? ... 812-4 Estimating <strong>the</strong> Long-Run Effects <strong>of</strong> Deficit Reduction 873-1 <strong>The</strong> New Current Population Survey 1043-2 Growing Inequality <strong>of</strong> Employment and Unemployment1163-3 Consequences <strong>of</strong> Productivity Growth 1193-4 Why Productivity Growth Does Not Cause Unemployment1204—1 Moral Hazard and Adverse Selection 1374-2 Recent Reductions in Health Care Inflation 1464-3 Capped Entitlements 1645-1 Selected National Performance Review Recommendations1725-2 Market Power 1745-3 Natural Monopoly 1765-4 Externalities 1806-1 U.S. Exports: More Than Peanuts 2096-2 <strong>The</strong> Case <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Polish Golf Carts 2246-3 Mexican <strong>Economic</strong> Reforms 2266-4 <strong>The</strong> Asian "Miracle" 2326-5 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Impact <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Uruguay Round 2346-6 <strong>The</strong> Uruguay Round and U.S. Trade Laws 2376-7 Exchange-Rate Volatility and International Trade 2446-8 Criteria for Joining <strong>the</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> and MonetaryUnion 24719


CHAPTER 1A Strategy for Growth and ChangeON ELECTION DAY 1992, <strong>the</strong> <strong>American</strong> economy faced a number<strong>of</strong> daunting challenges—both short term and long term. <strong>The</strong>principal short-term problem was that recovery from <strong>the</strong> 1990-91recession had been disappointing in almost all respects. Real grossdomestic product (GDP) had grown at only a 2.2-percent annualrate from <strong>the</strong> first quarter <strong>of</strong> 1991 through <strong>the</strong> third quarter <strong>of</strong>1992, less than half <strong>the</strong> pace <strong>of</strong> a typical recovery. Payroll employmenthad actually fallen during <strong>the</strong> first year <strong>of</strong> recovery and hadrisen a scant 0.4 percent from March 1991 to October 1992. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore,<strong>the</strong> seesaw pattern that had plagued <strong>the</strong> recovery raisedfears that <strong>the</strong> weak economy might relapse into recession.But America's long-run problems ran deeper and <strong>the</strong>ir causeswere less well understood. While U.S. workers and firms remained<strong>the</strong> world's most productive, our productivity growth had been sluggishfor almost two decades. In consequence, real hourly compensationand GDP per capita had advanced extremely slowly, and realmedian family income had barely increased at all. In addition, inequalityhad been rising for more than a decade, leaving <strong>the</strong> <strong>American</strong>economy with <strong>the</strong> most unequal distribution <strong>of</strong> income in itspostwar history. <strong>The</strong> combination <strong>of</strong> stagnant average incomes andwidening dispersion meant that many middle-class and low-incomefamilies had actually suffered declines in <strong>the</strong>ir real incomes.Finally, <strong>the</strong> Federal budget deficit was large and rising, <strong>the</strong> nationaldebt had been growing faster than GDP for about a decade,and huge amounts <strong>of</strong> foreign borrowing had transformed <strong>the</strong> UnitedStates from <strong>the</strong> world's biggest creditor nation into its biggestdebtor.National economic policy was <strong>the</strong> major cause <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> our economicdifficulties, such as <strong>the</strong> Federal budget deficit, but only acontributing factor to o<strong>the</strong>rs, such as growing income inequality.Although <strong>the</strong> economic policy agenda <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> new Administrationcannot cure all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se problems overnight, steps we have takenhave already contributed to noticeable progress on several fronts.<strong>The</strong> recovery has solidified. Job growth has resumed. Fiscal policiesthat will reduce <strong>the</strong> Federal deficit substantially have been put inplace. Although much more needs to be done, taxes have beenmade more progressive and starts have been made on educationand labor market policies that will address <strong>the</strong> inequality problem.21


And, perhaps most fundamentally <strong>of</strong> all, <strong>the</strong> Administration hasembarked on a comprehensive investment agenda designed to raiseproductivity, which is <strong>the</strong> wellspring <strong>of</strong> higher living standards in<strong>the</strong> long run.This chapter explains <strong>the</strong> Administration's economic strategy andexamines some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> specific policy initiatives that have been undertakento pursue that strategy. <strong>The</strong> chapters that follow providemuch more detail.THE LEGACY OF THE RECENT PAST<strong>The</strong> policies <strong>of</strong> any new Administration are dictated in part by<strong>the</strong> challenges it faces and <strong>the</strong> problems it inherits from <strong>the</strong> past.Because America's current problems are both short run and longrun in nature, <strong>the</strong> solutions must be, too.INADEQUATE RECOVERY FROM RECESSIONShort-run cyclical problems are, almost by definition, transitory.But when <strong>the</strong> <strong>American</strong> macroeconomy performs poorly, that onefact seems to overwhelm all o<strong>the</strong>rs and crowd out consideration <strong>of</strong>longer run problems. In fact, <strong>the</strong> U.S. economy has been operatingwell below its productive capacity for years now. From 1989through 1992, real GDP grew only 1.5 percent per year, and <strong>the</strong>civilian unemployment rate (by what was <strong>the</strong> standard measureuntil this year—Box 1-1) has remained above 6 percent since November1990. Under such circumstances, public concerns with economicpolicy tend to be summarized in a single word: jobs.Box 1-1 .—<strong>The</strong> New Measure <strong>of</strong> UnemploymentBeginning with its February 4 announcement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> January<strong>1994</strong> unemployment rate, <strong>the</strong> Bureau <strong>of</strong> Labor Statistics haschanged its principal measure <strong>of</strong> joblessness* <strong>The</strong> changes, reflectingtechnical improvements in <strong>the</strong> household survey usedto estimate unemployment (Chapter 3 contains more details),are expected to increase <strong>the</strong> measured unemployment rate byabout 0.5 to 0.6 percentage point, although <strong>the</strong> precise amountis impossible to know. All unemployment numbers used in this<strong>Report</strong> are measured on <strong>the</strong> old, traditional basis.As Chart 1-1 shows, <strong>the</strong> recovery that began in <strong>the</strong> second quarter<strong>of</strong> 1991 has been exceptionally slow by historical standards—so slow, in fact, that <strong>the</strong> unemployment rate was still rising morethan a year into <strong>the</strong> "recovery." Only in mid-1993 did unemploymentfall back to its rate at <strong>the</strong> recession trough. Growth has beennot only slow but extremely uneven, proceeding in fits and starts22


which have left consumers and business people wondering how long<strong>the</strong> recovery would last.Chart 1 -1 Growth <strong>of</strong> Real GDP in RecoveriesReal GDP in <strong>the</strong> current recovery has grown at only about half <strong>the</strong> rate <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>typical post-World War II recovery.Percent change from trough141 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11Quarters after TroughNote: "Average" includes all recoveries from 1954 to 1982, except 1980. <strong>The</strong> trough quarter for <strong>the</strong> currentrecovery is first quarter 1991.Sources: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce and National Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Research.Thus <strong>the</strong> Administration's first task was to put <strong>the</strong> recovery ona sound footing—not to produce a short-run burst <strong>of</strong> activity, butto lay <strong>the</strong> groundwork for a sustained expansion that would restoreconfidence and encourage firms to resume hiring. In large measurethis task was accomplished in 1993. (Chapter 2 provides more details.)Sluggish economic growth in <strong>the</strong> first half <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> year gaveway to solid growth in <strong>the</strong> second half. More important, job growthbegan in earnest: Employers added about 2 million jobs to nonfarmpayrolls between December 1992 and December 1993. As <strong>1994</strong>began, <strong>the</strong> outlook for sustained expansion looked brighter than ithad in a long time.INADEQUATE PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH<strong>The</strong> economy's longer run problems will not be dealt with soquickly. <strong>The</strong>y require sustained attention over a long period <strong>of</strong>time. Primary among <strong>the</strong>m is <strong>the</strong> troubling fact that growth in productivityhas been anemic for about two decades.23


Chart 1-2 shows <strong>the</strong> remarkable slowdown in productivitygrowth that occurred around 1973—from an annual average <strong>of</strong> 3.1percent in <strong>the</strong> 1947-73 period to just 1.0 percent since 1973. Inpart, this slowdown is exaggerated by <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong> first fewpostwar decades were aberrant: <strong>The</strong>re was much catching up to doafter <strong>the</strong> Great Depression and <strong>the</strong> Second World War. But America'slong-run average productivity growth rate over <strong>the</strong> centuryleading up to 1973 was slightly above 2 percent per year; since1973 it has averaged about 1 percent. At 2-percent growth, productivitydoubles in 35 years; at 1-percent growth, doubling takes 70years. Even seemingly modest changes in productivity can havedramatic effects on living standards in <strong>the</strong> long run. Thus <strong>the</strong> Nationhas much at stake in improving its productivity growth rate.Chart 1-2 Real Income, Productivity, and CompensationProductivity, real income, and real hourly compensation all slowed markedly around 1973.1992 dollars40,000Index, 1959=10020030,000Real MedianFamily Income(left scale)17515020,00010,000Real Compensationper Hour 1(right scale)Outputper Hour(productivity) 1(right scale)12510075I I I I I I I I1947 1950 1953 1956 1959 1962 1965 1968 1971 1974 1977 1980 1983 1986 1989 19921 Business sector. Compensation deflated by implicit price deflator.Sources: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce and Department <strong>of</strong> Labor.50Labor productivity—output per hour <strong>of</strong> work—may seem an abstractconcept, <strong>of</strong> more interest to analysts than to working menand women. But without productivity growth, higher real wageswould lead directly to lower employment as pr<strong>of</strong>it-oriented firms reactedto higher labor costs by trimming <strong>the</strong>ir work forces. It is onlysteady productivity gains that enable <strong>the</strong> economy to generatemore jobs and rising real wages at <strong>the</strong> same time. Chart 1-2 shows24


that growth in both real compensation per hour and real medianfamily income slowed markedly at just about <strong>the</strong> time that productivitygrowth slowed. This coincidence in time is, <strong>of</strong> course, no coincidenceat all. Productivity growth is <strong>the</strong> ultimate source <strong>of</strong> growingreal wages and family incomes.Nothing is more important to <strong>the</strong> long-run well-being <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> U.S.economy than accelerating productivity growth. Most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Administration'seconomic strategy is <strong>the</strong>refore devoted to that end.WORSENING INCOME INEQUALITYStarting some time in <strong>the</strong> late 1970s, income inequalities widenedalarmingly in America. Chart 1-3 shows that <strong>the</strong> share <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>Nation's income received by <strong>the</strong> richest 5 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>American</strong> familiesrose from 18.6 percent in 1977 to 24.5 percent in 1990, while<strong>the</strong> share <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> poorest 20 percent fell from 5.7 percent to 4.3 percent.Part <strong>of</strong> this change was due to <strong>the</strong> cuts in taxes and socialspending <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> early 1980s, <strong>the</strong> net benefits <strong>of</strong> which were heavilyskewed toward <strong>the</strong> rich. But <strong>the</strong>re was a much more powerful forceat work, one not attributable to fiscal policy: <strong>The</strong> distribution <strong>of</strong>wage rates grew substantially more unequal. In real terms, wagesat <strong>the</strong> bottom <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> distribution fell while wages at <strong>the</strong> top rose.Chart 1 -3 Shares <strong>of</strong> Total After-Tax Income by Income Category<strong>The</strong> richest 5 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>American</strong>s saw <strong>the</strong>ir share <strong>of</strong> total income rise sharply in <strong>the</strong> 1980s,while <strong>the</strong> poorest 20 percent saw <strong>the</strong>ir share decline.Lowest QuintileTop 5 Percent1977 • 1990Source: Congressional Budget Office.25


<strong>The</strong> forces underlying this widening <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> wage distribution arenot well understood. (More details are contained in Chapter 3.) But<strong>the</strong> facts are stark. Between 1979 and 1990, <strong>the</strong> real median income<strong>of</strong> males with 4 years <strong>of</strong> college fell about 1 percent, but that<strong>of</strong> males with only 4 years <strong>of</strong> high school fell a stunning 21 percent,and high school dropouts fared even worse. A similar patternemerges almost any way one slices <strong>the</strong> data: Wages near <strong>the</strong> top<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> distribution rose faster than wages near <strong>the</strong> bottom. Salaries<strong>of</strong> chief executive <strong>of</strong>ficers rose rapidly while <strong>the</strong> minimum wage fellin real terms. Wages <strong>of</strong> skilled workers rose faster than those <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> unskilled. Wages <strong>of</strong> experienced workers grew faster thanentry-level wages.<strong>The</strong> widening dispersion <strong>of</strong> wages accounts for most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>squeeze on <strong>the</strong> middle class, because <strong>the</strong> middle 60 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>income distribution derives about three-quarters <strong>of</strong> its income fromwages and salaries. And <strong>the</strong>se people do not bring home <strong>the</strong> highestwages, but those nearer <strong>the</strong> middle. When middle-class wagesstagnate, middle-class family incomes do, too. That is preciselywhat happened in <strong>the</strong> 1980s.In sum, for whatever reasons, in <strong>the</strong> late 1970s our market economybegan to dish out more-handsome rewards to <strong>the</strong> well-<strong>of</strong>f andstingier ones to <strong>the</strong> middle class. Government policies compounded<strong>the</strong> problem by weakening <strong>the</strong> social safety net, lowering <strong>the</strong> taxburdens <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> wealthy, and driving up real interest rates. In concert,<strong>the</strong> market and <strong>the</strong> government produced <strong>the</strong> greatestdisequalization <strong>of</strong> incomes since at least before World War II.This Administration sees <strong>the</strong> combination <strong>of</strong> stagnating averageincomes and rising inequality as a threat to <strong>the</strong> social fabric thathas long bound <strong>American</strong>s toge<strong>the</strong>r and made ours a society withminimal class distinctions. Although <strong>the</strong> underlying forces <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>market are vastly more powerful than anything <strong>the</strong> governmentcan do, <strong>the</strong> right kinds <strong>of</strong> policies can make a difference. For example,changes in Federal tax policy have already shifted <strong>the</strong> burden<strong>of</strong> taxation away from <strong>the</strong> working poor and toward <strong>the</strong> well-to-do.And several initiatives in <strong>the</strong> human investment arena, describedlater in this chapter and in Chapter 3, should help mitigate risingwage inequality.LARGE DEFICITS, MOUNTING DEBTOf all <strong>the</strong> Nation's economic problems, <strong>the</strong> one most directlytraceable to government policy is <strong>the</strong> large Federal budget deficit.Although <strong>the</strong> Federal budget has been in deficit almost every year<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> postwar period, until <strong>the</strong> 1980s <strong>the</strong>se deficits were smallenough that <strong>the</strong> ratio <strong>of</strong> public debt to GDP was stable or falling.In fact, <strong>the</strong> structural budget (that is, <strong>the</strong> one that would result if<strong>the</strong> economy were at a high level <strong>of</strong> employment) after adjustment26


for inflation was on average roughly balanced for decades (Table 1-1). This approximate balance was not achieved by any formal, legalrequirement, but ra<strong>the</strong>r through an informal, unstated politicalconsensus.TABLE 1-1.—Structural Budget Deficit as Percent <strong>of</strong> GDPFiscal yearsAdjusted deficit as percent<strong>of</strong> GDPi1959-19821983-1993<strong>1994</strong>-1998 (forecast)1 Adjusted deficit is unified structural budget deficit corrected for depreciation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> Federal debt due to inflation.Sources: Office <strong>of</strong> Management and Budget, Congressional Budget Office, and Council <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Advisers.<strong>The</strong> budget picture changed dramatically with <strong>the</strong> tax cuts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>early 1980s, and <strong>the</strong> structural, inflation-adjusted budget began todisplay chronic, large deficits for <strong>the</strong> first time. <strong>The</strong> deficit in fiscal1992, <strong>the</strong> last year before <strong>the</strong> election <strong>of</strong> <strong>President</strong> Clinton, was awhopping $290 billion in <strong>the</strong> unified budget and $131 billion on astructural, inflation-adjusted basis. Worse yet, both <strong>the</strong> deficit and<strong>the</strong> debt-GDP ratio were expected to rise fur<strong>the</strong>r (Charts l-4a andDeficits <strong>of</strong> this magnitude—around 5 percent <strong>of</strong> GDP—wouldhave been far less worrisome if <strong>American</strong> households were savingenough to cover both <strong>the</strong> government budget deficit and <strong>the</strong> needs<strong>of</strong> business to finance investment. But, in fact, <strong>American</strong> householdsaving rates not only are among <strong>the</strong> lowest in <strong>the</strong> world, but actuallyfell in <strong>the</strong> 1980s. So for both <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se reasons—declining householdsaving and rising budget deficits—national saving as a share<strong>of</strong> GDP dropped sharply in <strong>the</strong> 1980s.Casual discussions <strong>of</strong>ten equate national saving with domesticinvestment, but <strong>the</strong> two can differ in an open economy (Box 1-2).And in <strong>the</strong> United States <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1980s, <strong>the</strong>y differed dramatically.While national saving was falling as a share <strong>of</strong> GDP, <strong>the</strong> share <strong>of</strong>domestic investment, although low by international standards, wasroughly constant. To plug <strong>the</strong> gap between saving and investment,<strong>the</strong> United States had to import massive amounts <strong>of</strong> foreign capital.In consequence, our current account balance went from asmall surplus to a large deficit in <strong>the</strong> 1980s.All this foreign capital had its positive side: By limiting <strong>the</strong> rise<strong>of</strong> real U.S. interest rates, it partly shielded investment from <strong>the</strong>consequences <strong>of</strong> huge Federal deficits. But it left <strong>the</strong> United States<strong>the</strong> greatest debtor nation in <strong>the</strong> world. Even more disturbing, allthis borrowing from abroad went to maintaining <strong>the</strong> Nation's comparativelymeager investment rate, not to increasing it.-0.11.9.827


Chart 1-4a Federal Budget Deficits With and Without 1993 Deficit Reduction PackageBudget deficits will now reverse course. Deficits would have kept risingwithout <strong>the</strong> reduction package.Billions <strong>of</strong> dollars350300 -250Without DeficitReduction Package200150100With DeficitReduction Package50_L _L _L _L J_1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992Fiscal YearsNote: Data exclude health care reform. Projected for fiscal years <strong>1994</strong>-98.Source: Office <strong>of</strong> Management and Budget.<strong>1994</strong> 1996 1998Chart 1 -4b Net Federal Debt as Percent <strong>of</strong> GDPFederal indebtedness as a percent <strong>of</strong> GDP is expected to plateau after fiscal <strong>1994</strong>under OBRA93, instead <strong>of</strong> rising as estimated without deficit reduction.Percent504030_^ — ^Without DeficitReduction Package-1----*""tWith DeficitReduction Package2010-nI I I I I I I i i1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 <strong>1994</strong> 1996 1998Fiscal YearsNote: Net federal debt defined as debt held by <strong>the</strong> public less debt held by <strong>the</strong> Federal Reserve. Data excludehealth care reform. Projected for fiscal years <strong>1994</strong>-98.Sources: Council <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Advisers and Office <strong>of</strong> Management and Budget.28


Box 1-2.—Saving, Investment, and Current Account DeficitsPrivate saving, whe<strong>the</strong>r generated by households or by businesses,can be used for one <strong>of</strong> three purposes: to finance domesticprivate investment, to purchase debt issued by <strong>the</strong> government,or to purchase foreign assets. If private saving is insufficientto cover <strong>the</strong> sum <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> first two uses—private investmentand <strong>the</strong> combined deficit <strong>of</strong> all levels <strong>of</strong> government—we must borrow <strong>the</strong> difference from abroad. Such a shortage<strong>of</strong> saving has characterized <strong>the</strong> United States for about a decadenow.When <strong>American</strong>s borrow from foreigners, we run a surplusin our international capital account. But, since <strong>the</strong> capital accountand <strong>the</strong> current account must balance under floating exchangerates, <strong>the</strong> mirror image <strong>of</strong> this capital account surplusis an equally large current account deficit. Thus, a country thatsaves less than it invests and runs a large budget deficit isbound to have a large current account deficit. Indeed, chronic,large current account deficits date from precisely <strong>the</strong> time that<strong>the</strong> United States started running huge fiscal deficits. Between1981 and 1984 <strong>the</strong> overall government budget deficit rose from1.0 percent <strong>of</strong> GDP to 2.9 percent. During those same years <strong>the</strong>current account balance went from a surplus <strong>of</strong> 0.2 percent <strong>of</strong>GDP to a deficit <strong>of</strong> 2.6 percent <strong>of</strong> GDP.<strong>The</strong> legacy <strong>of</strong> foreign debt was not <strong>the</strong> only cost <strong>of</strong> our addictionto foreign borrowing. To attract <strong>the</strong> needed capital to <strong>American</strong>shores, <strong>the</strong> United States had to <strong>of</strong>fer interest rates higher thanthose prevailing in <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r leading industrialized countries. Thisgap between U.S. and foreign interest rates, in turn, led to a sharpappreciation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dollar, as foreign investors demanded more dollar-denominatedassets. <strong>The</strong> sky-high dollar made life exceedinglypleasant for <strong>American</strong> tourists in Europe in <strong>the</strong> mid-1980s. But ithandicapped portions <strong>of</strong> <strong>American</strong> industry by making many U.S.manufactured goods uncompetitive on world markets. It has takenyears for our manufacturing sector to recover from this shock.INADEQUATE PUBLIC INVESTMENT<strong>The</strong> budget deficit and <strong>the</strong> trade deficit were major national concernsin <strong>the</strong> 1980s and on into <strong>the</strong> 1990s. But <strong>the</strong>re was also athird deficit: a shortage <strong>of</strong> funds for public investment in criticalnational needs like education and training, transportation facilities,and environmental infrastructure.<strong>The</strong> share <strong>of</strong> Federal civilian fixed investment in GDP is onlyabout half what it was in <strong>the</strong> 1960s (Chart 1-5). Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>the</strong>share <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Federal budget devoted to all types <strong>of</strong> public invest-151-444 0 - 9 4 - 229


ment—including education and research and development, as wellas civilian and military fixed investment—fell from 35 percent in1963 to 17 percent in 1992. As <strong>the</strong> 1990s started, more and more<strong>American</strong>s were becoming painfully aware that our public investmentwas not what it should be.Chart 1-5 Federal Civilian Fixed Investment as Percent <strong>of</strong> GDPRelative to GDP, <strong>the</strong> Federal government invested little more than half as muchin nonmilitary infrastructure in <strong>the</strong> 1980s as it had in <strong>the</strong> 1960s.1960 1964 1968 1972 1976 1980 1984 1988 1992Note: Includes Federal nonmilitary, nonresidential, fixed capital investment.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce.PROSPERITY AND GROWTH: THE BENEFITS OFECONOMIC CHANGE<strong>The</strong> economic strategy <strong>of</strong> this Administration follows logicallyfrom this legacy. We must secure <strong>the</strong> expansion and spur long-termeconomic growth. We must reverse <strong>the</strong> trend toward rising inequality.We must reduce Federal borrowing and shrink <strong>the</strong> trade deficit.We must invest more in both private and public capital. Andwe must bolster our human resources.While <strong>the</strong> Administration's economic policy agenda is broad andvaried, it can be summarized in a single word: investment—investmentin private capital, investment in people, investment in publicinfrastructure, investment in technology, and investment in environmentalpreservation. Six major <strong>the</strong>mes stand out and define <strong>the</strong>essence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Administration's economic strategy: deficit reduction;30


investments in human capital; investments in public infrastructure;investments in technology; expanding international trade; andhealth care reform.REDUCING THE DEFICIT TO PROMOTE CAPITALFORMATION<strong>The</strong> legacy <strong>of</strong> large and growing Federal budget deficits requiredthat first attention be devoted to <strong>the</strong>ir reduction, so as to free upresources for expansion <strong>of</strong> private physical capital—<strong>the</strong> machines,factories, and <strong>of</strong>fices that make <strong>American</strong> labor more productive.For too long, Federal budget deficits have been gobbling up an inordinateshare <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Nation's saving, <strong>the</strong>reby keeping real interestrates too high (Chart 1-6) and leaving <strong>the</strong> Nation with a Hobson'schoice between lower domestic investment and higher foreign borrowing.Reducing <strong>the</strong> budget deficit was a necessary part <strong>of</strong> clearingaway <strong>the</strong> financial underbrush that had grown up around usin <strong>the</strong> 1980s—so that economic growth could be put on a sounderand more sustained footing.Chart 1 -6 Federal Deficits and Real Interest RatesInterest rates adjusted for inflation rose and fell sharply in <strong>the</strong> 1980s, in tandem with<strong>the</strong> sharp increase and subsequent decrease in <strong>the</strong> Federal budget deficit.Percent8Real Yield on 10-YearTreasury Securities(right scale)Percent12Deficit asPercent <strong>of</strong> GDP(left scale)J1955 1958 1961 1964 1967 1970 1973 1976 1979 1982 1985 1988 1991Note: Real rates are nominal rates minus 10-year forecast <strong>of</strong> inflation.Sources: Council <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Advisers, Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, and Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Treasury.Deficit reduction is difficult and painful. But <strong>the</strong> <strong>President</strong> concludedthat <strong>the</strong> Nation could not remain on <strong>the</strong> path bequea<strong>the</strong>d31


us by <strong>the</strong> previous Administration—a path on which <strong>the</strong> nationaldebt was growing faster than GDP and deficits were threateningto explode (Chart 1-4). So he gave first priority to putting <strong>the</strong> Nation'sfiscal house back in order.Policy changes in <strong>the</strong> <strong>President</strong>'s deficit reduction package willgradually reduce <strong>the</strong> Federal deficit after 5 years by 1% percent<strong>of</strong> GDP. By fiscal 1998, <strong>the</strong> last year <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> program, <strong>the</strong> deficit isexpected to be $146 billion below what it o<strong>the</strong>rwise would havebeen: falling from $333 billion to $187 billion (Table 1-2). <strong>The</strong> ratio<strong>of</strong> debt to GDP at <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> fiscal 1998 falls from a projected 51percent without <strong>the</strong> deficit reduction program to 46 percent with it.TABLE 1-2.—Effect<strong>of</strong>OBRA93 on Fiscal 1998 Budget[Billions <strong>of</strong> dollars]Item Before OBRA93 After 0BRA93 ChangeOutlaysDiscretionary .MandatoryDebt service ..RevenueDeficitNote.—Data exclude health reform.Source: Office <strong>of</strong> Management and Budget.1,825.5584.3970.6270.51,492.2333.21,738.2548.1945.0245.01,550.8187.4-87.3-36.2-25.6-25.558.6-145.8<strong>The</strong> Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act <strong>of</strong> 1993Because <strong>the</strong> <strong>President</strong> did not want to delay deficit reduction forano<strong>the</strong>r year, <strong>the</strong> fiscal <strong>1994</strong> budget had to be prepared on a compressedschedule. <strong>The</strong> <strong>President</strong> introduced a detailed budget planto a joint session <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Congress in February 1993, just 4 weeksafter taking <strong>of</strong>fice. <strong>The</strong> House and Senate passed <strong>the</strong> final version<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> budget resolution on April 1—<strong>the</strong> earliest date in <strong>the</strong> history<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> modern congressional budget process. A spirited congressionaldebate followed, leading to enactment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Omnibus BudgetReconciliation Act <strong>of</strong> 1993 (OBRA93) in August.Several principles guided <strong>the</strong> design <strong>of</strong> OBRA93. First and foremost,<strong>the</strong> deficit reduction had to be large, genuine, and credible.To this end, <strong>the</strong> Administration proposed hundreds <strong>of</strong> specificspending cuts and increases in revenue. Second, <strong>the</strong> package hadto be balanced between expenditure cuts and tax increases. Specifically,<strong>the</strong> $146 billion <strong>of</strong> deficit reduction in fiscal 1998 consists <strong>of</strong>$87 billion in net spending cuts—including $25 billion in lowerdebt service—and $59 billion in additional net revenue. Third, <strong>the</strong>tax increases were highly progressive—heavily skewed toward <strong>the</strong>people who are most able to pay and who benefited most from<strong>the</strong> large tax cuts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> early 1980s. Income tax rates were raisedfor only about <strong>the</strong> top 1.2 percent <strong>of</strong> taxpayers. Some 90 percent<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> new taxes in OBRA93 will be borne by <strong>the</strong> upper 6.5 percent32


<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> income distribution (Table 1-3). Fourth, even while cutting<strong>the</strong> deficit, room had to be found in <strong>the</strong> budget for a variety <strong>of</strong> criticalpublic investments (more on this below).TABLE 1-3.—Distribution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Change in Taxes Under OBRA93 byIncome CategoryLess than 10,00010,000-20,00020,000-30,00030,000-40,00040,000-50,00050,000-75,00075,000-100,000100,000-200,000200,000 or moreFamily income (dollars) 1All incomes 2Share <strong>of</strong>families(percent)14.017.415.712.69.915.56.85.21.3100.01 Pretax family income (CBO definition).2 Total includes negative incomes, not included in categories above.Source: Congressional Budget Office (CBO).Average changein taxes(dollars per family)-£8-86-415010519231264923,521382Share <strong>of</strong>total changein taxes(percent)<strong>The</strong> spending cuts touched virtually every part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> budget. On<strong>the</strong> discretionary side, <strong>the</strong> Congress imposed what amounts to a 5-year freeze on nominal spending, capping fiscal 1998 spending at$548 billion, or about $2.5 billion below <strong>the</strong> fiscal 1993 level. Withinflation (as measured by <strong>the</strong> implicit deflator for GDP) projectedto average about 2.8 percent per year over <strong>the</strong> period, <strong>the</strong> impliedcut in real discretionary spending is about 13 percent. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore,if inflation comes in lower than <strong>the</strong> forecast, <strong>the</strong> caps will belowered commensurately. <strong>The</strong> budget cuts in OBRA93 include a reductionin <strong>the</strong> Federal work force by 100,000 positions (since raisedto 252,000 positions), delay <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>1994</strong> cost-<strong>of</strong>-living adjustment forFederal employees, defense cutbacks beyond those projected by <strong>the</strong>previous Administration, and a host <strong>of</strong> smaller cuts in discretionaryprograms.On <strong>the</strong> mandatory side <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> budget, <strong>the</strong> largest cuts were in <strong>the</strong>medicare program (about $18 billion by fiscal 1998). But <strong>the</strong>re werealso reductions in agricultural and veterans' programs, savings in<strong>the</strong> student loan program, new receipts from auctioning portions <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> radio spectrum (discussed in Chapter 5), and savings fromshortening <strong>the</strong> maturity structure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> national debt. Total cutsin mandatory spending o<strong>the</strong>r than debt service are expected toreach $25.6 billion by fiscal 1998.OBRA93 also increased taxes. Higher income tax rates on <strong>the</strong> top1.2 percent <strong>of</strong> households constitute <strong>the</strong> biggest source <strong>of</strong> new revenueby far: $27.2 billion by fiscal 1998. (<strong>The</strong> bracket structures be--2.5-3.9-1.71.62.77.85.68.881.3100.033


fore and after OBRA93 are compared in Table 1-4.) In addition,<strong>the</strong> 2.9-percent payroll tax for medicare, which formerly appliedonly to <strong>the</strong> first $135,000 <strong>of</strong> earnings, now applies to all earnings(raising $7.2 billion by fiscal 1998), <strong>the</strong> taxable portion <strong>of</strong> Social Securitybenefits was raised for <strong>the</strong> top 13 percent <strong>of</strong> recipients ($4.5billion), and <strong>the</strong> motor fuels tax went up by 4.3 cents per gallonin October 1993 ($5 billion). Finally, OBRA93 increased <strong>the</strong> top corporatetax rate and closed a variety <strong>of</strong> business tax loopholes, butalso enhanced or created several tax incentives for investment. <strong>The</strong>net effect <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se increases and decreases in business taxes shouldyield about $8 billion in revenue by fiscal 1998.TABLE 1-4.—Changes in Statutory Marginal Tax Rates Under OBRA93 forMarried Individuals Filing JointlyTaxable income (dollars)Marginal rate (percent)0-36,90036,900-89,150 ....89,150-140,000 ..140,000-250,000Over 250,000Source: Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Treasury.OBRA93, Interest Rates, and InvestmentAs critical elements <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>President</strong>'s deficit reduction packagestarted to become known, long-term interest rates began to fall—indicating that <strong>the</strong> financial markets viewed <strong>the</strong> proposals as substantial,genuine, and credible (Box 1-3). Rates fell dramaticallybetween January and October 1993 before backing <strong>of</strong>f a bit late in<strong>the</strong> year.As documented more completely in Chapter 2, <strong>the</strong> medicine <strong>of</strong>low interest rates now seems to be taking hold. Business investmenthas been leading <strong>the</strong> economy's expansion, with consumer durablesand housing important sources <strong>of</strong> strength. If we divide GDPinto its interest-sensitive components (business fixed investment,housing, and consumer durables) and everything else, <strong>the</strong> data tella fascinating story. While <strong>the</strong> three interest-sensitive pieces typicallyaccount for about 30 percent <strong>of</strong> GDP growth, in 1993 <strong>the</strong>y accountedfor virtually all <strong>of</strong> GDP growth. <strong>The</strong> rest <strong>of</strong> GDP barely increasedover <strong>the</strong> year (Table 1-5).It is important to understand why this Administration made deficitreduction a top priority and worked so hard to see it through<strong>the</strong> Congress. One important reason was <strong>the</strong> concern being expressedin many quarters that deficits were growing out <strong>of</strong> controland might threaten financial stability—and <strong>the</strong>reby macroeconomicstability.34


Box 1-3.—Credible Deficit Reduction and Real Interest RatesLong-term nominal and real interest rates dropped sharplyin 1993. <strong>The</strong> decline in rates was closely linked to <strong>the</strong> proposaland enactment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Administration's budget (as argued inChapter 2).Lower deficits reduce real bond yields through several channels:• Lower Federal borrowing reduces interest rates directly,by reducing demand for credit.• A more prudent fiscal policy reduces <strong>the</strong> likelihood that<strong>the</strong> Federal Reserve will need to pursue a restrictivemonetary policy, and so reduces expected future shorttermrates.• As long as international capital mobility is not perfect,increased national saving leads to an increase in investment,in <strong>the</strong> long run, <strong>the</strong> consequent increase in <strong>the</strong>capital stock reduces <strong>the</strong> marginal product <strong>of</strong> capital and<strong>the</strong>refore <strong>the</strong> interest rate.Because <strong>the</strong> plan had credibility, financial markets anticipated<strong>the</strong>se effects. Since future expected short-term interestrates govern current long-term rates, long rates fell immediatelyIn response to <strong>the</strong> proposal and enactment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ad*ministration's plan. <strong>The</strong>re would have been no such market responseif <strong>the</strong> plan had lacked credibility. What features <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>Administration's plan account for its apparently high 'credibility?• <strong>The</strong> plan is based on realistic economic assumptions; itdoes not presume that <strong>the</strong> economy can "grow its wayout" <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> deficit problem,• <strong>The</strong> <strong>President</strong> proposed and <strong>the</strong> Congress enacted manyspecific spending cuts in <strong>the</strong> fiscal <strong>1994</strong> budget, <strong>the</strong>rebydemonstrating <strong>the</strong> feasibility <strong>of</strong> maintaining <strong>the</strong> discretionaryspending caps.• <strong>The</strong> tax provisions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> plan by and large result in permanentincreases in revenue; <strong>the</strong>y do not merely shiftfuture revenue into <strong>the</strong> current budget window.« <strong>The</strong> <strong>President</strong> showed himself willing to make difficultchoices to correct <strong>the</strong> fiscal imbalance: freezing total discretionaryspending; increasing <strong>the</strong> taxation <strong>of</strong> Social Securitybenefits for recipients with <strong>the</strong> highest incomes;and proposing reform <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Nation's health care system.35


TABLE 1-5.—Contributions to Growth <strong>of</strong> Interest-Sensitive and O<strong>the</strong>rComponents <strong>of</strong> GDP[Average annual percent change]ComponentHistoricalaverage(1955-92)Fourth quarter 1992t<strong>of</strong>ourth quarter 19931Interest-sensitive components 2All o<strong>the</strong>rGDP1 Preliminary.2 Business fixed investment, housing,Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce.0.82.12.9and expenditures on consumer durables.But <strong>the</strong> central objective <strong>of</strong> deficit reduction was and remains expenditureswitching—away from consumption and government purchasestoward investment. <strong>The</strong> lower interest rates brought aboutby deficit reduction are <strong>the</strong> way <strong>the</strong> market accomplishes this expenditureswitching.<strong>The</strong> reasons for wanting to raise <strong>the</strong> investment share <strong>of</strong> GDPare straightforward: Workers are more productive when <strong>the</strong>y areequipped with more and better capital, more-productive workersearn higher real wages, and higher real wages are <strong>the</strong> mainspring<strong>of</strong> higher living standards. Few economic propositions are bettersupported than <strong>the</strong>se—or more important. As Chart 1-7 shows, investmentrates and productivity growth rates correlate well acrosscountries. Lower budget deficits that raise private investment are<strong>the</strong>refore critical to raising <strong>the</strong> economy's long-run growth rate.However, some people worry that deficit reduction might retardgrowth in <strong>the</strong> short run by siphoning <strong>of</strong>f aggregate demand. Sucha concern is justified. Deficit reduction by itself certainly does tendto contract <strong>the</strong> economy. After all, raising taxes and cutting governmentspending reduce <strong>the</strong> demand for goods and services. But deficitreduction accompanied by sufficient declines in long-term interestrates need not be contractionary. It is, <strong>of</strong> course, <strong>the</strong> latter, not<strong>the</strong> former, that we experienced in 1993.Economists judge <strong>the</strong> impact <strong>of</strong> fiscal policy on aggregate demandby looking at changes in <strong>the</strong> structural deficit. Table 1-6 showsthat OBRA93 will reduce <strong>the</strong> structural deficit by about $65 billionfrom fiscal 1993 to fiscal 1995, after which it is expected to riseslightly. <strong>The</strong> large deficit reductions after fiscal 1995 serve to limitwhat would o<strong>the</strong>rwise have been even larger increases in <strong>the</strong> structuraldeficit—mainly due to rising expenditures on health care.Analysis by <strong>the</strong> Council <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Advisers suggests that <strong>the</strong> declinesin long-term interest rates that have occurred since <strong>the</strong> 1992election, even after <strong>the</strong> backup late in 1993, are more than enoughto <strong>of</strong>fset <strong>the</strong> contractionary effects <strong>of</strong> this decrease in <strong>the</strong> structural2.6.22.836


Chart 1-7 Correlation <strong>of</strong> Investment and Productivity<strong>The</strong>re is a close correlation between investment rates and productivity growthrates across countries.Average annual per capita real GDP growth rate (1970-90)t.u3.53.02.52.01.51.0_BelgiumTurkey•^Denmark #^ ^ ^ ^ • • Ne<strong>the</strong>rlandsU.S. SwedenIreland• Iceland Portugal• *ItalyCanada * _ .^ % SpamFinlandI \^Austria^-^^^^*rmany


is that cutting <strong>the</strong> annual deficit by about $140 billion to $150 billionover a period <strong>of</strong> 5 years is roughly <strong>the</strong> right amount, given <strong>the</strong>current strength <strong>of</strong> our economy. Some critics dispute this judgmentand call for much deeper cuts in spending than those providedin OBRA93, or for substantial increases in taxes. <strong>The</strong> Administrationviews this strategy <strong>of</strong> more aggressive deficit cutting in<strong>the</strong> near term as risky.A small amount <strong>of</strong> additional deficit reduction would, <strong>of</strong> course,have only small effects on <strong>the</strong> economy. But fur<strong>the</strong>r large spendingcuts or tax increases at this time would require additional large declinesin long-term interest rates to replace <strong>the</strong> lost aggregate demand.Should interest rates decline by less than <strong>the</strong> requiredamount, economic growth would slow and jobs would be lost. Forexample, a deficit reduction package substantially larger thanOBRA93 would be needed to comply with <strong>the</strong> proposed balancedbudget amendment to <strong>the</strong> Constitution (Box 1-4). <strong>The</strong> Council estimatesthat it would take a decline in long-term interest rates <strong>of</strong>roughly 3 percentage points to <strong>of</strong>fset <strong>the</strong> contractionary effect <strong>of</strong>such a large fiscal package. Since a 3-percent long-term interestrate seems quite unlikely, complying with a balanced budgetamendment seems likely to harm <strong>the</strong> economy—perhaps severely.Deficit Reduction and Public InvestmentOnce it is understood that deficit reduction is not an end in itself,but a means to an end—<strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> greater investment—two importantprinciples become evident.First, it is clear that deficit reduction is only a first step. Wemust start to build—to invest in our future. That is why <strong>the</strong> <strong>President</strong>'seconomic plan contains more than just deficit reduction; italso includes new proposals to encourage private investment andneeded public investments in education and training, public infrastructure,and technology. We must worry about <strong>the</strong> debt we bequeathto our children, but we must also worry about <strong>the</strong> qualityand quantity <strong>of</strong> capital—broadly conceived—that <strong>the</strong>y will inherit.Second, it is clear that squeezing worthwhile public investmentsout <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> budget is <strong>the</strong> wrong way to reduce <strong>the</strong> deficit. After all,<strong>the</strong> main purpose <strong>of</strong> deficit reduction is to pave <strong>the</strong> way for moreprivate investment. Cutting public investment to make room formore private investment is like running on a treadmill. <strong>American</strong>eeds more <strong>of</strong> both, not a swap <strong>of</strong> one for <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r.Shifting Federal spending priorities from consumption to investmentis one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> hallmarks <strong>of</strong> this Administration's approach toeconomic policy. We seek not only to constrain total governmentspending, but also to reorient it toward more productive uses.Doing so will take time and requires use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> surgical scalpel, not<strong>the</strong> meat-ax, in cutting <strong>the</strong> budget. As <strong>the</strong> Administration and <strong>the</strong>Congress struggle toge<strong>the</strong>r over tight Federal budgets in fiscal38


Box 1~4*~-A Balanced Budget Amendment to <strong>the</strong> Constitution?To argue that substantial deficit reduction was imperative in1993 is not to argue that <strong>the</strong> budget deficit must be reducedeven fur<strong>the</strong>r in <strong>the</strong> short run—and certainly not to argue thatwe should mandate a balanced budget every year by constitutionalamendment, as some have advocated*This Administration opposes <strong>the</strong> proposed balanced budgetamendment to <strong>the</strong> Constitution for many reasons. First andforemost, <strong>the</strong> amendment would put fiscal policy in a straitjacketthat might imperil macroeconomic stability, <strong>the</strong>reby abdicatingone <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> government's principal responsibilities andraising <strong>the</strong> specter <strong>of</strong> mass unemployment. Second, <strong>the</strong> proposedamendment would lead to budgetary gimmickry—suchas mixing one-time asset sales with recurring income transactions—andwould be almost impossible to enforce. It couldpush economic policy decisions into <strong>the</strong> courts, or even provokea constitutional crisis.Third, <strong>the</strong>re are many candidate definitions <strong>of</strong> "<strong>the</strong> budgetdeficit," making it both hazardous and unwise to enshrine anyparticular definition in <strong>the</strong> Constitution. For example, do wewant to balance <strong>the</strong> unified budget or exclude Social Security?Why not <strong>the</strong> structural deficit, or even <strong>the</strong> inflation-adjustedstructural deficit? Fourth, <strong>the</strong> amendment's call for a 60-percentcongressional supermajority to waive <strong>the</strong> balanced budgetrequirement threatens to reinstall both gridlock and <strong>the</strong> tyranny<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> minority.Fifth, and finally, <strong>the</strong> amendment by itself would not reduce<strong>the</strong> deficit by a single penny; all <strong>the</strong> hard choices that face usnow would still face us. A deficit reduction package leading toa balanced budget would most likely have to include major newtaxes on <strong>the</strong> middle class, substantial cuts in Social Securitybenefits, reductions in defense spending that go far beyond <strong>the</strong>Administration's proposals, and cuts in Federal spending onmedical care large enough to imperil health reform. <strong>The</strong> Administrationopposes all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se.1995 and beyond, it is essential that we not allow fiscal myopia tolead to underinvestment in America's future.INVESTING IN PEOPLE<strong>The</strong> <strong>American</strong> work force remains <strong>the</strong> most productive in <strong>the</strong>world. Our aim should be simple: to keep it that way. But <strong>the</strong> rest<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> world is not standing still; it is gaining on us, becoming evermore productive. And that is what compels change.39


America has never competed on <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> low wages, and wemust not start doing so now. It is widely believed that modern industrialprocesses demand workers with higher levels <strong>of</strong> educationand training; and evidence on <strong>the</strong> relative wages <strong>of</strong>, say, collegeeducatedversus high school-educated labor (Chart 1-8) seems tobear this out. In 1981, workers with college degrees earned about45 percent more than workers with only high school degrees; by1992, this gap had reached almost 65 percent.Chart 1 -8 Ratio <strong>of</strong> Wages <strong>of</strong> College Graduates to Wages <strong>of</strong> High School GraduatesWorkers with college degrees earn substantially more than workers without, and <strong>the</strong> gapbetween <strong>the</strong> two groups' wages grew during <strong>the</strong> 1980s.1.40 -1.30 -1.20 -1.10 -1.001974 1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992Note: Data for 1991-92 are not strictly comparable with earlier data.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce.Some observers claim that average work force quality may actuallyhave deteriorated in <strong>the</strong> United States in recent decades.Whe<strong>the</strong>r or not this is true, few dispute that <strong>the</strong> supply <strong>of</strong> workforce skills has failed to keep pace with <strong>the</strong> growing demand. Although<strong>American</strong>s are, if measured by average years <strong>of</strong> schooling,among <strong>the</strong> most educated people on earth, <strong>the</strong> rate <strong>of</strong> illiteracy inour country has long been high. Tens <strong>of</strong> millions <strong>of</strong> adult <strong>American</strong>sare ei<strong>the</strong>r functionally illiterate or barely literate. Internationaltest scores suggest that our primary and secondary studentsare learning less science and ma<strong>the</strong>matics than <strong>the</strong>ir counterpartsin o<strong>the</strong>r countries.40


This educational record is not good enough in a world economythat grows ever more competitive and ever more skill-intensive.<strong>American</strong> workers must build <strong>the</strong> additional human capital <strong>the</strong>yneed as a bridgehead to higher wages and living standards. Lifelonglearning must cease being a slogan and become a reality.In a fundamental sense, each <strong>American</strong> must be responsible forhis or her own education and training. This Administration is committedto creating <strong>the</strong> requisite opportunities through a comprehensiveagenda <strong>of</strong> education and training that starts before formalschooling and extends into <strong>the</strong> workplace. For example:• Head Start will be expanded so that disadvantaged childrenhave a chance to get ahead. Head Start has been proved effectivein preparing <strong>the</strong>se children for primary school, and hasbeen estimated to save about six dollars in future governmentspending for every dollar invested today.• Goals 2000 is a comprehensive legislative package that will sethigher performance standards for <strong>American</strong> teachers and students.• <strong>The</strong> Departments <strong>of</strong> Labor and Education are collaborating ona new School-to-Work transition program that will help studentsget hands-on, work-related training while still in highschool. This is an area <strong>of</strong> our educational system that has beenneglected for too long.• <strong>The</strong> new National Service program (Box 1-5) will not only provideopportunities for community service and <strong>the</strong> acquisition <strong>of</strong>job-related skills, but also help send more <strong>American</strong>s to college.• <strong>The</strong> reformed student loan program will also help more <strong>of</strong>America's youth attend college by reducing borrowing costs and<strong>of</strong>fering, for <strong>the</strong> first time on a national scale, loans whose repaymentschedules depend on future earnings.• <strong>The</strong> new program for dislocated workers will have an importantretraining component, which will make opportunitiesavailable to displaced <strong>American</strong> workers. Some income supportwill be provided so that displaced workers can afford to takeadvantage <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> training.Each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se programs will help augment <strong>the</strong> Nation's stock <strong>of</strong>human resources, <strong>the</strong>reby raising <strong>the</strong> <strong>American</strong> standard <strong>of</strong> living.INVESTING IN PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE<strong>The</strong> most obvious kind <strong>of</strong> public investment is building new publicinfrastructure—<strong>the</strong> Nation's highways, bridges, airports, andwater and sewage systems. <strong>The</strong> Administration believes <strong>the</strong> UnitedStates has underinvested in its public infrastructure. For example,<strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Transportation estimates that almost 20 percent<strong>of</strong> our Nation's highways have poor or mediocre pavement andabout 20 percent <strong>of</strong> our bridges are structurally deficient.41


Box l-5.—<strong>The</strong> National Service ProgramIn August 1993 <strong>the</strong> Congress passed <strong>the</strong> National and CommunityService Trust Act <strong>of</strong> 1993, '^d^^ti&^/^^wm N&-tional Service program. National Service provides participantsboth current compensation (at below-market wa^s) aad>duc&tiOTuglgrants <strong>of</strong> up to $4,725 per year td pay &* college ando<strong>the</strong>r post-secondary education. Participants also receive valuableon-<strong>the</strong>-job training, accumulate exi^loyih^it ^kiEsi tod acquiret^l-worid workexperience.<strong>The</strong> economic rationale for this program is threefold* First,employers may be reluctant to provide training in skills thatcan be utilized in a wide variety <strong>of</strong> employment applicationsbecause, if <strong>the</strong> employee leaves <strong>the</strong> firm soon <strong>the</strong>reafter, <strong>the</strong>firm will fail to recoup <strong>the</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> its investment. Since <strong>the</strong> accumulation<strong>of</strong> employment skills is socially desirable, it may beeconomically efficient for <strong>the</strong> government to finance part <strong>of</strong> thistraining.Second, <strong>the</strong> decline in Federal revenue sharing has reduced<strong>the</strong> intergovernmental resources available to State and localgovernments. <strong>The</strong>se levels <strong>of</strong> government <strong>of</strong>ten know best whatservices <strong>the</strong>ir residents need most. Accordingly, <strong>the</strong> NationalService program provides in-kind resources (labor services) toprecisely those types <strong>of</strong> public and nonpr<strong>of</strong>it organizations bestable to determine what services are required.Third, <strong>the</strong> National Service program provides all <strong>American</strong>s<strong>the</strong> opportunity to undertake community service positions byrelaxing <strong>the</strong> trade<strong>of</strong>f that workers <strong>of</strong>ten face between currentcompensation and <strong>the</strong> richness <strong>of</strong> an employment experience.<strong>The</strong> program ensures that valuable but low-paid public servicepositions will not be <strong>the</strong> province <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> wealthy.<strong>The</strong> National Service program is funded through an initialappropriation <strong>of</strong> $300 million over previous funding for relatedprograms. This is scheduled to rise to $500 million in 1995 and$700 million in 1996. At <strong>the</strong>se funding levels, it is expectedthat <strong>the</strong> program will be able to support approximately 20,000participants in <strong>1994</strong> and about 100,000 participants over <strong>the</strong>3-year period covered by <strong>the</strong> legislation.A variety <strong>of</strong> evidence indicates that <strong>the</strong>re has beenunderinvestment. First, while <strong>the</strong> statistical evidence is not unequivocal,<strong>the</strong> weight <strong>of</strong> it points to handsome rates <strong>of</strong> return onwell-planned investments in public infrastructure. Second, estimatedbenefit-cost ratios on specific infrastructure projects are<strong>of</strong>ten quite high. Third, <strong>the</strong> ratio <strong>of</strong> public to private capital has42


fallen markedly since <strong>the</strong> 1960s (Chart 1-9). Unless <strong>the</strong> data aregrossly misleading, <strong>the</strong> principle <strong>of</strong> diminishing marginal returnsleaves only two possible conclusions: Ei<strong>the</strong>r America wasoverinvested in public capital in <strong>the</strong> early 1970s, or it isunderinvested today.Chart 1-9 Ratio <strong>of</strong> Public to Private Net Nonresidential Capital Stock<strong>The</strong> ratio <strong>of</strong> public to private capital stock declined steadily and markedlyin <strong>the</strong> 1970s and 1980s.0.50 -0.45 -0.40 -0.351947 1950 1953 1956 1959 1962 1965 1968 1971 1974 1977 1980 1983 1986 1989 1992Note: Public capital stock is defined as Federal and State and local net stock, excluding military capital.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce.Finally, <strong>the</strong>re is <strong>the</strong> evidence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> senses: America's roads andbridges are badly in need <strong>of</strong> repair, a number <strong>of</strong> our airports areovercrowded, and our sewage treatment facilities are overburdened.To many thoughtful observers, America's public infrastructure issimply not commensurate with our bounteous private wealth.INVESTING IN TECHNOLOGYBut physical capital is not <strong>the</strong> only determinant <strong>of</strong> productivity,nor even <strong>the</strong> most important. Over long periods <strong>of</strong> time, rising productivityand hence advances in living standards depend on <strong>the</strong> upwardmarch <strong>of</strong> technology. Indeed, studies <strong>of</strong> long-term economicgrowth attribute a large share <strong>of</strong> growth to improvements in knowhow(Table 1-7). <strong>The</strong> history <strong>of</strong> progress in <strong>the</strong> industrial world isworking smarter, not working harder.43


TABLE 1-7.—Sources <strong>of</strong> U.S. <strong>Economic</strong> Growth[Average annual percent change]Source1947to19731973to1992Labor inputsCapital inputsTotal factor productivity (technological change)Adjustment from nonfarm business output to GDPTOTAL (GDP growth)1.011.451.63-.143.94Note.—Labor and capital inputs are measured for <strong>the</strong> nonfarm business sector.Detail may not add to totals because <strong>of</strong> rounding.Sources: Council <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Advisers, Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, and Department <strong>of</strong> Labor.0.881.07.40-.042.30Technological change does not come for free. Technology advancesbecause scientists and engineers working in laboratoriesand on shop floors make new discoveries. And research is expensive.Since <strong>the</strong> dawn <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> industrial revolution, alarmists have arguedthat technology and automation threaten jobs. Such claimsare still heard today. But history shows that <strong>the</strong>y have never beenright in <strong>the</strong> past and suggests that <strong>the</strong>y are wrong again. Timeafter time, in epoch after epoch and country after country, technologicaladvance has produced higher wages and living standards,not mass unemployment. That is exactly what we expect to happenagain in <strong>the</strong> 21st century. And <strong>the</strong> government should be helpingthis process along—facilitating growth and change, not impeding it.While <strong>the</strong> bulk <strong>of</strong> research and development (R&D) must andshould be done by private industry, support for basic and genericresearch has long been recognized as a legitimate function <strong>of</strong> governmentbecause <strong>of</strong> informational externalities. New technology isexpensive to discover but cheap to disseminate. So what one companylearns passes quickly to o<strong>the</strong>rs, making it impossible for <strong>the</strong>innovator to capture all <strong>the</strong> returns from its discovery. In fact, estimatesfind that innovating businesses capture less than half <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>social returns to <strong>the</strong>ir R&D. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, estimated social rates <strong>of</strong>return on R&D range as high as 50 to 100 percent, suggesting that<strong>the</strong>re is systematic underinvestment.For this reason, <strong>the</strong> Administration asked <strong>the</strong> Congress to extend<strong>the</strong> research and experimentation tax credit, which was done inOBRA93. For <strong>the</strong> same reason, <strong>the</strong> Administration is increasingfunding for research partnerships with industry, such as <strong>the</strong> AdvancedTechnology Program, and adding dozens <strong>of</strong> new manufacturingextension centers. Each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se initiatives and o<strong>the</strong>rs aredesigned to speed <strong>the</strong> pace at which precompetitive technologiesare invented and disseminated. Once that stage is passed, <strong>the</strong> marketmechanism should and will take over. (Chapter 5 has more detailson <strong>the</strong> Administration's technology policy.)44


<strong>The</strong> development and deployment <strong>of</strong> new technology have longbeen <strong>of</strong> interest to <strong>the</strong> government. But technology policy is especiallycritical in a period <strong>of</strong> large-scale defense cutbacks, becausemore than half <strong>of</strong> total Federal support for R&D has traditionallybeen related to national defense. With less need for research onweaponry, <strong>the</strong> Federal Government must now make a choice. Willwe reduce total research support, or will we shift <strong>the</strong> research dollarsinto civilian technologies? <strong>The</strong> <strong>President</strong> believes that <strong>the</strong> latteris <strong>the</strong> wiser course, which is why <strong>the</strong> Administration isreorienting <strong>the</strong> research capabilities <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Defense Departmentand <strong>the</strong> national laboratories toward R&D partnerships with industry.Technology surely creates <strong>the</strong> wave <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> future. America mustbe on <strong>the</strong> crest <strong>of</strong> that wave—with <strong>the</strong> technology, capital, andskilled work force needed to take advantage <strong>of</strong> tomorrow's economy.TRADE POLICY AND LIVING STANDARDSThis Administration's policies toward private physical capital,human capital, public infrastructure, and technology all share acommon objective: to raise <strong>the</strong> living standards <strong>of</strong> <strong>American</strong> families.Trade policy is yet ano<strong>the</strong>r means toward that same end. ThisAdministration vigorously supported <strong>the</strong> North <strong>American</strong> FreeTrade Agreement (NAFTA), worked hard to complete <strong>the</strong> UruguayRound <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT),streamlined <strong>the</strong> Nation's export promotion programs and eased restrictionson exports, and is striving to open <strong>the</strong> Japanese marketthrough bilateral negotiations, all for <strong>the</strong> same reason—to openmarkets and boost <strong>American</strong> exports. (Chapter 6 contains more detailson <strong>the</strong> Administration's trade policy.) <strong>The</strong> emphasis on tradeexpansion is, in turn, driven by two simple facts.First, <strong>American</strong>s now live in an increasingly integrated worldeconomy and must <strong>the</strong>refore become increasingly outward-lookingto stay on top. <strong>The</strong>re is simply no way to close America's bordersand return to <strong>the</strong> insular days <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1950s and 1960s. Trying todo so would be an exercise in futility, doomed not only to fail butto lower living standards in <strong>the</strong> process. International competitionthrough trade has long been a powerful engine <strong>of</strong> change andprogress—for America and for <strong>the</strong> world. We must not let that engineidle. Instead, we must use it to power America up <strong>the</strong> technologyladder—by moving our workers into <strong>the</strong> jobs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> future,not keeping <strong>the</strong>m mired in <strong>the</strong> jobs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> past. In <strong>the</strong> <strong>President</strong>'swords, we must "compete, not retreat."Second, jobs in export industries pay wages that are about 22percent above <strong>the</strong> economy-wide average, according to <strong>the</strong> Council'slatest estimates. <strong>The</strong> implication is that, if <strong>the</strong> Administration succeedsin shifting <strong>the</strong> composition <strong>of</strong> GDP toward more exports, we45


will automatically shift <strong>the</strong> composition <strong>of</strong> <strong>American</strong> employmenttoward better paying jobs. No government program or central directionis needed to accomplish this. <strong>The</strong> market will do <strong>the</strong> work forus.Trade expansion is sometimes inaccurately characterized as "exportingjobs." Nothing could be fur<strong>the</strong>r from <strong>the</strong> truth. A more accuratedescription is that international trade and investment leadlow-skill, low-paid jobs that would inevitably migrate to poorercountries to go <strong>the</strong>re in exchange for high-skill, better-paying jobsin <strong>the</strong> United States. <strong>American</strong> companies that compete successfullyboth at home and in foreign markets <strong>of</strong>fer <strong>the</strong> best job opportunitiesfor <strong>the</strong>ir workers. <strong>The</strong> history <strong>of</strong> capitalism throughout <strong>the</strong>world shows that companies and industries sheltered from <strong>the</strong>winds <strong>of</strong> competition tend to stagnate.This Administration's focus on exports does not signal a revival<strong>of</strong> mercantilism. Ra<strong>the</strong>r, it reflects a belief that America's exportpromotion efforts have lagged behind those <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r countries andthat our markets are already among <strong>the</strong> most open in <strong>the</strong> world.<strong>The</strong> Administration fully expects trade liberalization—such asthrough NAFTA and <strong>the</strong> Uruguay Round <strong>of</strong> GATT—to raise bothU.S. exports and U.S. imports. And we welcome both.<strong>The</strong> North <strong>American</strong> Free Trade AgreementIndeed, <strong>the</strong> recently ratified NAFTA illustrates <strong>the</strong> basic goals <strong>of</strong>Administration trade policy extremely well. NAFTA should boosttrade with Mexico in both directions. In consequence, economic resourceswill be allocated more efficiently on both sides <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> border.Inevitably, some <strong>American</strong> industries will <strong>the</strong>refore contractwhile o<strong>the</strong>rs expand. Supported by <strong>the</strong> overwhelming preponderance<strong>of</strong> scholarly evidence, <strong>the</strong> Administration believes thatNAFTA will lead to net job creation in <strong>the</strong> United States.Equally important is <strong>the</strong> composition <strong>of</strong> those jobs, however. <strong>The</strong>new jobs that will arise in <strong>the</strong> United States will, on average, payhigher wages than <strong>the</strong> jobs that migrate south. It would be surprisingindeed if anything else happened when a low-wage country anda high-wage country reduced trade barriers. In addition, <strong>the</strong> lowertariffs and reduced trade barriers from NAFTA will reduce pricesfor a variety <strong>of</strong> goods that <strong>American</strong> families buy. Toge<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong>shift in <strong>the</strong> composition <strong>of</strong> employment toward higher paid jobs and<strong>the</strong> reduction in prices lead to a clear conclusion: NAFTA will raise<strong>the</strong> standard <strong>of</strong> living <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> average <strong>American</strong> family—and <strong>the</strong> averageMexican family as well.<strong>The</strong> Uruguay Round <strong>of</strong> GATT<strong>The</strong> recently completed Uruguay Round <strong>of</strong> GATT was a landmarkachievement for <strong>the</strong> entire world trading system. It literallyrewrites <strong>the</strong> rules <strong>of</strong> trade for <strong>the</strong> start <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> next century.46


Earlier rounds <strong>of</strong> GATT talks had focused almost exclusively ontariff reductions. <strong>The</strong> market access component <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> UruguayRound continues this tradition by reducing tariffs on literally thousands<strong>of</strong> manufactured goods—by more than one-third on average.Such tariff reductions should be a tonic for world trade and growth,just as <strong>the</strong>y have been in <strong>the</strong> past, and should increase specializationand economic efficiency around <strong>the</strong> globe. As usual, producerswill gain from bigger markets and consumers will gain from lowerprices.But <strong>the</strong> most remarkable achievements <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Uruguay Roundare to be found elsewhere. For <strong>the</strong> first time, trade in agriculturalcommodities has been brought under GATT—a goal that had eludedtrade negotiators for decades. When fully effective, <strong>the</strong> agreementwill reduce agricultural export subsidies by 21 percent in volumeand 36 percent in value, saving taxpayers and consumers inmany countries billions <strong>of</strong> dollars. Trade in agricultural goods willalso be liberalized by reducing tariffs on certain commodities (likebeef and fruits and vegetables), partially opening markets thatwere previously closed (like rice in Japan and <strong>the</strong> Republic <strong>of</strong>Korea), and prohibiting certain food "safety" measures that werereally disguised trade barriers. America's farmers, consumers, andtaxpayers all stand to gain handsomely from this agreement.In addition, for <strong>the</strong> first time GATT disciplines have been extendedto a variety <strong>of</strong> service industries. This achievement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>Uruguay Round is a vitally important precedent for <strong>the</strong> UnitedStates for two reasons. One is that production patterns both hereand elsewhere have been shifting and will continue to shift towardservices. <strong>The</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r is that <strong>the</strong> United States seems to have astrong comparative advantage in many service industries; in fact,our trade surplus in services is already three times larger than ourtrade surplus in agriculture.<strong>The</strong> United States did not succeed in bringing all services into<strong>the</strong> agreement, and will continue to press for trade liberalizationin sectors that were left out <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Uruguay Round. But <strong>the</strong> gainswere still significant: Trade rules in such important industries asaccounting, consulting, construction, and telecommunications willnow require that foreign countries grant <strong>the</strong> same treatment to<strong>American</strong> firms operating abroad as <strong>the</strong>y do to <strong>the</strong>ir own companies.Finally, <strong>the</strong> path-breaking agreement will provide much strongerprotection for a range <strong>of</strong> intellectual property rights including patents,copyrights, trademarks, and trade secrets. Since <strong>the</strong> UnitedStates is <strong>the</strong> home <strong>of</strong> so much commercial innovation, we will reaplarge gains from <strong>the</strong> agreement. Among <strong>the</strong> biggest industrial winnersare s<strong>of</strong>tware, Pharmaceuticals, and biotechnology.47


In sum, <strong>the</strong> Council estimates that <strong>the</strong> various provisions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>Uruguay Round, once fully phased in after a decade, will increaseU.S. GDP by at least IV2 percent by raising real wages, loweringconsumer prices, and protecting our national property rights.HEALTH CARE REFORMSuccessful health care reform will accomplish many things. Perhapsprimary among <strong>the</strong>m is health security for all <strong>American</strong>s—aprecious commodity that too many <strong>of</strong> our citizens have been deniedfor too long. In today's United States, workers who lose <strong>the</strong>ir jobs<strong>of</strong>ten lose <strong>the</strong>ir health insurance, too. O<strong>the</strong>r people and businesseslose <strong>the</strong>ir coverage because a family member or employee becomesill and incurs large medical bills. Still o<strong>the</strong>r people are afraid totake jobs that would lift <strong>the</strong>m out <strong>of</strong> welfare because <strong>the</strong>y cannotrisk losing medicaid coverage. In total, nearly 39 million <strong>American</strong>slack health insurance, millions more are inadequately covered, andtens <strong>of</strong> millions live in fear <strong>of</strong> losing <strong>the</strong> coverage <strong>the</strong>y have. Fewpeople in o<strong>the</strong>r industrialized countries face such insecurity.Under <strong>the</strong> <strong>President</strong>'s health care reform proposal, which is describedin detail in Chapter 4, none <strong>of</strong> this would ever happenagain. <strong>American</strong>s would know that <strong>the</strong>ir health insurance wouldnever lapse, whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y changed jobs, moved, quit to start a newbusiness, or had <strong>the</strong> misfortune <strong>of</strong> serious illness in <strong>the</strong> family.When effective health care reform is enacted, one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> majorsources <strong>of</strong> economic insecurity facing <strong>American</strong>s today will havebeen removed.Health care reform is also fundamental to long-run budget control.It is <strong>of</strong>ten said that <strong>the</strong> fastest growing part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> budget is"entitlements." But <strong>the</strong> fastest growing part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> entitlementbudget by far is health care spending (Chart 1-10). As <strong>the</strong> <strong>President</strong>has repeatedly emphasized, controlling <strong>the</strong> costs <strong>of</strong> medicalcare is <strong>the</strong> key to controlling entitlements, and <strong>the</strong>refore to longrundeficit reduction.But health care reform will accomplish more than just budgetcontrol and security. <strong>The</strong> Administration also sees it as a route tohigher standards <strong>of</strong> living.For years, <strong>the</strong> rising cost <strong>of</strong> health care has forced a shift in <strong>the</strong>composition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> typical pay packet away from wages and salariestoward fringe benefits, especially health insurance. Chart 1-11shows that <strong>the</strong> share <strong>of</strong> health benefits in total labor compensationrose from 1.8 percent in 1960 to 8.5 percent in 1992. Correspondingly,<strong>the</strong> share <strong>of</strong> cash wages fell. In absolute terms, in fact, realwages and salaries have barely increased in 20 years. Almost all<strong>the</strong> gains in compensation have been taken as fringe benefits. Thismeans that working men and women have, for <strong>the</strong> most part, paid48


Chart 1-10 Projected Real Growth Rates <strong>of</strong> Principal Federal Budget ComponentsFrom fiscal <strong>1994</strong> to fiscal 1998, health care spending is projected to grow four times asrapidly as any o<strong>the</strong>r major component.Average annual percent change10Defense Nondefense O<strong>the</strong>r Net Social HealthDiscretionary Entitlements Interest Security EntitlementsSource: Office <strong>of</strong> Management and Budget.for <strong>the</strong>ir escalating health costs by taking home lower wages than<strong>the</strong>y would have o<strong>the</strong>rwise.We can arrest this process only by containing medical costs. <strong>The</strong><strong>President</strong>'s health care reform is designed to do precisely that bymaking <strong>the</strong> market more competitive and making both consumersand providers more cost conscious. On <strong>the</strong> assumption that <strong>the</strong> futurewill look like <strong>the</strong> past, <strong>the</strong> Administration expects most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>benefits from effective health care cost containment to redound toworking <strong>American</strong>s in <strong>the</strong> form <strong>of</strong> higher take-home pay.SUMMARY: PROSPERITY AND CHANGEAll <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> policy initiatives described here—from deficit reduction,to public investments (both human and physical), to trade expansion,to health care—share a common goal: raising <strong>the</strong> standard<strong>of</strong> living <strong>of</strong> average <strong>American</strong> families. But all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m also requirechange, sometimes wrenching change. Deficit reduction required ahost <strong>of</strong> painful changes in government programs and some increasedtaxes. Lifelong learning requires changes in <strong>the</strong> way weview education. Freer trade and export expansion mean that somejobs will disappear so that more and better jobs can be created.49


Chart 1 -11 Shares <strong>of</strong> Wages and Benefits in CompensationMost <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> decline in <strong>the</strong> wage share <strong>of</strong> total compensation has gone toincreased health benefits.Percent94Percent1492Wages (left scale)1290108886848280_L1960 1964 1968 1972 1976 1980 1984 1988 1992Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce.And health care reform requires nothing less than a major overhaul<strong>of</strong> one-seventh <strong>of</strong> our economy.None <strong>of</strong> this will be quick or easy. Real change rarely is. But, intruth, we have no choice, for standing still is not an option thathistory allows. <strong>The</strong> secret to economic success is making changeour friend, not our enemy—coming to view change as <strong>the</strong> opportunityfor advancement that it is, not as <strong>the</strong> threat that it sometimesappears to be.CREATING OPPORTUNITYOur focus on raising <strong>the</strong> standard <strong>of</strong> living <strong>of</strong> middle-class <strong>American</strong>smust not blind us to <strong>the</strong> fact that some <strong>of</strong> our fellow citizenshave not managed to attain a middle-class living standard. Andchange is especially threatening to those at <strong>the</strong> bottom <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> economicladder.When money incomes are corrected for purchasing power, Americais <strong>the</strong> richest <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> world's major nations in terms <strong>of</strong> per capitaincome. But a nagging poverty problem remains in this land <strong>of</strong>plenty. Millions <strong>of</strong> <strong>American</strong>s have little or no earning power and50


are <strong>the</strong>refore on <strong>the</strong> public dole. Millions more work but do notearn enough to support <strong>the</strong>ir families. Two key policy initiativesenacted in 1993, <strong>the</strong> expansion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> earned income tax credit and<strong>the</strong> introduction <strong>of</strong> empowerment zones, were designed to help lowincomeworkers by making work pay.<strong>The</strong> earned income tax credit (EITC) provides needy familieswith both income support and greater rewards for working (Box 1-6). In part, <strong>the</strong> credit <strong>of</strong>fsets income taxes that low-income workingfamilies would o<strong>the</strong>rwise have to pay. But <strong>the</strong> credit is also refundable,meaning that if a family's credit exceeds its tax liability, <strong>the</strong>Internal Revenue Service sends a check for <strong>the</strong> difference. As part<strong>of</strong> OBRA93, <strong>the</strong> EITC was increased substantially, both by makingpayments more generous and by extending <strong>the</strong> credit to more families.Box 1-6.—How Does <strong>the</strong> Earned Income Tax Credit Work?<strong>The</strong> earned income tax credit is <strong>of</strong>ten thought <strong>of</strong> as a type<strong>of</strong> negative income tax, but in fact it is more complicated thanthat. <strong>The</strong> EITC has three ranges: a "credit range*" in which itfunctions like a wage subsidy, a "plateau" in which it has nomarginal effect, and a "phaseout" range in which <strong>the</strong> credit ispaid back as earnings rise (Chart 1-12).To illustrate, when <strong>the</strong> increases enacted in 1993 are fullyeffective (in 1996), <strong>the</strong> credit will work as follows for a familywith two or more children. (Less generous schedules apply toone-child and childless families.) As earnings rise from zero to$8,425 (all dollar figures are in <strong>1994</strong> dollars), <strong>the</strong> EITC willprovide a 40-percent wage subsidy, so that each $100 <strong>of</strong> additionalearnings will net <strong>the</strong> family $140. <strong>The</strong> maximum creditis $3,370, which is <strong>the</strong>refore reached when earnings hit $8,425.<strong>The</strong> credit will <strong>the</strong>n be constant as earnings rise from $8,425to $11,000. Beyond $11,000, however, <strong>the</strong> family's tax credit isreduced 21 cents for each extra dollar earned. Benefits arethus exhausted when earnings reach $27,000.Clearly, <strong>the</strong> EITC provides a marginal work incentive in <strong>the</strong>credit range (unlike a negative income tax), a marginal disincentivein <strong>the</strong> phaseout range, and nei<strong>the</strong>r in <strong>the</strong> plateau.However, to <strong>the</strong> extent that labor supply decisions involvewhe<strong>the</strong>r or not to work, ra<strong>the</strong>r than how many hours to work,<strong>the</strong> credit provides a positive work incentive to all recipients.As a first step toward welfare reform, <strong>the</strong> EITC has many virtues.It will lift many families with children out <strong>of</strong> poverty. Itprovides positive work incentives for many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> lowest-paid employeesin our society. It is better targeted on <strong>the</strong> low-income popu-51


lation than is, say, an increase in <strong>the</strong> minimum wage, because minimum-wageworkers are found in all family-income brackets. It issimple to administer, requiring no special bureaucracy. And, finally,it apparently reaches a larger fraction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> eligible recipientsthan is typical <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r income-support programs, perhaps becauseit is easy to claim and carries no stigma.Chart 1-12 Earned Income Tax Credit for Families with Two or More Children<strong>The</strong> expanded earned income tax credit will substantially increase <strong>the</strong> creditfor eligible families.Tax credit in <strong>1994</strong> dollars4,0003,000 -2,000 -1,000 -Source: Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Treasury.10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000Earnings in <strong>1994</strong> dollars<strong>The</strong> goal <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> innovative empowerment zone program is tostreng<strong>the</strong>n business activity in certain geographic areas that areextremely depressed, so that synergies from concentrated economicactivity can help revive <strong>the</strong>se areas. <strong>The</strong> program's main tax incentiveis a 20-percent tax credit for wages up to $15,000 per year paidby a zone business to a zone resident. This should be a powerfulincentive to create jobs in <strong>the</strong> zones. In addition, a variety <strong>of</strong> regulatorywaivers may be granted to give communities greater flexibility,and several Federal agencies will direct spending toward <strong>the</strong>zones.Beginning this year, nine empowerment zones, six urban andthree rural, will be selected by a competitive process that shouldencourage both imaginative thinking and private-public partnerships.In addition, 95 o<strong>the</strong>r neighborhoods will be designated enter-52


prise communities and be granted smaller benefits than <strong>the</strong> zoneswhile sharing <strong>the</strong> relaxed regulatory environment. <strong>The</strong> programwill be carefully monitored and evaluated over a 10-year period,during which time we should learn a great deal about what worksand what does not.No <strong>American</strong> should think that programs like empowermentzones, <strong>the</strong> EITC, and welfare reform serve only <strong>the</strong> poor. Every citizenbenefits when <strong>the</strong> welfare rolls are reduced, when low-incomefamilies earn more, when blighted neighborhoods come to life, andwhen city streets once again become safe. We are, after all, one Nation.SUMMARYAn economic strategy based on long-run investments, as ours is,will not bear fruit overnight. It takes time to see tangible resultsand patience to wait for <strong>the</strong>m. <strong>The</strong> important thing is to get starteddown <strong>the</strong> right path—and soon. <strong>The</strong> Administration believes that1993 marked a turning point in that regard. Recovery firmly tookhold in 1993, and prospects for sustained economic expansion lookfar brighter now than <strong>the</strong>y did a year ago. <strong>The</strong> long-run deficitproblem, while not completely solved, looks far less threateningthan it did <strong>the</strong>n. <strong>The</strong> Congress has begun to fund <strong>the</strong> <strong>President</strong>'sambitious investment agenda—including infrastructure, humancapital, technology, and environmental preservation. Two historictrade agreements whose negotiations began years ago—NAFTAand <strong>the</strong> Uruguay Round <strong>of</strong> GATT—were brought to a successfulconclusion. And <strong>the</strong> stage has been set for a much-needed nationaldebate on health care reform in <strong>1994</strong>. All <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se accomplishmentsset in place <strong>the</strong> foundation for a more prosperous America.53


CHAPTER 2<strong>The</strong> U.S. Economy in 1993 andBeyondTHE ECONOMIC EXPANSION consolidated in 1993, setting <strong>the</strong>stage for sustained growth in <strong>1994</strong>. A sharp decline in long-terminterest rates to 25-year lows, in large part <strong>the</strong> result <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Administration'sdeficit reduction package, was <strong>the</strong> major economicstory <strong>of</strong> 1993. Momentum picked up in <strong>the</strong> second half, with interest-sensitivesectors like housing and consumers' and producers'durable goods leading <strong>the</strong> way. Continued advances in <strong>the</strong>se sectorshelped to create sustained employment and income gains thatput real gross domestic product (GDP) on roughly a 3-percent-peryeargrowth path.During 1992 <strong>the</strong> economy was widely described as being in a joblessrecovery, advancing with a disconcerting seesaw quality. <strong>The</strong>combination <strong>of</strong> self-sustaining forces that typically appear in a recovery—stronglyrising employment, accelerating incomes, sharplyrebounding automobile sales and housing activity, markedly higherlevels <strong>of</strong> consumer confidence, and a renewed willingness on <strong>the</strong>part <strong>of</strong> consumers to take on debt—was missing. Many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>seforces did appear over <strong>the</strong> course <strong>of</strong> 1993. <strong>The</strong> economy experienceda sustained moderate expansion with healthier job creation. Payrollemployment increased by 162,000 jobs per month in 1993, double<strong>the</strong> 81,000-job-per-month pace <strong>of</strong> 1992. <strong>The</strong> unemployment rate,higher at <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> 1992 than it had been at <strong>the</strong> beginning, fellby almost a full percentage point in 1993.Many interest-sensitive sectors <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> economy finally exhibitedclear-cut improvements during 1993. Business spending for durableequipment increased at <strong>the</strong> fastest rate since 1972. Consumerspending for furniture and household furnishings, ano<strong>the</strong>r leadingsector in business cycle upswings, also posted one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> biggestgains in a decade. Motor vehicle sales rebounded smartly as consumersexhibited a newfound willingness to incur debt to financea major purchase. Toge<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>se forces have put <strong>the</strong> economy ontrack for sustainable growth.With a greatly improved outlook for <strong>the</strong> Federal budget deficit,<strong>the</strong> Council <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Advisers expects long-term interest ratesto remain relatively low for <strong>the</strong> foreseeable future—which will helpto keep economic growth on track. Low interest rates are <strong>the</strong> key55


ingredient that should allow <strong>the</strong> economy to grow in <strong>the</strong> face <strong>of</strong> futurelarge deficit reductions, which would o<strong>the</strong>rwise tend to contract<strong>the</strong> economy. Expected growth in <strong>the</strong> 2^2- to 3-percent rangefor 4 years should create about 8 million new jobs and steadily reduce<strong>the</strong> unemployment rate from its currently unacceptable leveltoward a rate that is close to noninflationary full employment.STRUGGLING TO GROWGDP growth over <strong>the</strong> current expansion has been much slowerthan usual. In <strong>the</strong> first year after a recession trough, output typicallygrows by 6 percent in real terms; in this recovery, outputgrowth over <strong>the</strong> first year after <strong>the</strong> trough was less than 2 percent.Even though potential GDP growth is lower today than it was in<strong>the</strong> 1960s and 1970s—mainly because <strong>of</strong> slower productivitygrowth—this factor can only explain a small part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> slower rebound.Not surprisingly, given <strong>the</strong> well-established linkage between outputgrowth and employment growth, job growth in this expansionhas also been atypically slow. <strong>The</strong> decline in employment during<strong>the</strong> recent contraction did not bottom out with <strong>the</strong> rest <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> economy,and no rebound in job growth was evident until a year after<strong>the</strong> recession's trough. By late 1993 <strong>the</strong> growth path <strong>of</strong> employmentwas still well below <strong>the</strong> typical postwar recovery path (Chart 2-1).After 11 quarters, we have had <strong>the</strong> employment gains normally expectedafter just three quarters. Adjusted for <strong>the</strong> sluggish pace <strong>of</strong>output growth, however, employment growth has been closer tonormal. (For fur<strong>the</strong>r discussion, see Chapter 3.)A number <strong>of</strong> special factors have combined to induce this sluggisheconomic performance. <strong>The</strong>se "headwinds" include defense cutbacks,weak foreign economies, an oversupply <strong>of</strong> commercial buildingsin <strong>the</strong> wake <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1980s, <strong>the</strong> credit crunch, debt overhang,and a wave <strong>of</strong> corporate downsizings. None <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se factors by itselfexplains why <strong>the</strong> recovery has run so far behind historical levels,but <strong>the</strong>re is evidence that toge<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y have retarded economicgrowth significantly.THE END OF THE COLD WAR<strong>The</strong> end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cold war was a major geopolitical event for <strong>the</strong>United States, and <strong>the</strong> ensuing defense builddown has had pr<strong>of</strong>oundeconomic effects. In 1986 defense spending accounted for 6.5percent <strong>of</strong> U.S. GDP. By 1993 its share had fallen to about 4.8 percent,and by 1997 it is predicted to drop to about 3.2 percent (Chart2-2). This massive shift <strong>of</strong> national resources away from defensehas meant numerous base closings, cancellations <strong>of</strong> major weaponsprograms, scaled-back procurement plans, and attendant lay<strong>of</strong>fs in56


Chart 2-1 Recovery Pattern <strong>of</strong> Nonfarm Payroll EmploymentEmployment growth in this recovery has been much weaker than in <strong>the</strong> averagepostwar recovery.Index, trough=100110108 -Average Postwar Recovery104Current Recovery10098I-4 -2 T 2 4 6 8 10Quarters from TroughNote: "Average" includes all recoveries from 1954 to 1982, except 1980. <strong>The</strong> trough quarter for <strong>the</strong>current recovery is first quarter 1991.Sources: Department <strong>of</strong> Labor and National Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Research.<strong>the</strong> whole defense sector. For example, total defense-related jobsare projected to number 4.5 million by 1997, down from 7.2 millionjobs in 1987. In a purely arithmetical sense, reduced defensespending subtracted roughly 0.5 percentage point <strong>of</strong>f <strong>the</strong> real GDPgrowth rate in 1993. Moreover, <strong>the</strong> defense cutbacks have had afur<strong>the</strong>r adverse impact on aggregate demand through <strong>the</strong> expendituremultiplier. Moving resources out <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> defense sector frees<strong>the</strong>m up for use in <strong>the</strong> production <strong>of</strong> consumption and investmentgoods and services, improving living standards. But this is a longerterm effect. <strong>The</strong> conversion process takes time, and although <strong>the</strong>defense scaledown is not as large relative to <strong>the</strong> size <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> economyas it was at <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> several wars, reconversion will causepainful dislocations in <strong>the</strong> short run.WEAK FOREIGN ECONOMIESWeak economic performance in <strong>the</strong> rest <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> industrializedworld over <strong>the</strong> past few years has also taken a toll on <strong>the</strong> U.S.economy by slowing export growth. <strong>The</strong> period 1991-93 will godown in history as <strong>the</strong> worst for economic performance in foreignindustrial countries since at least 1960. During this 3-year period,57


Chart 2-2 National Defense Purchases as Share <strong>of</strong> GDPDefense spending as a share <strong>of</strong> nominal GDP is projected to continue to fallsteadily over <strong>the</strong> 1990s.1973 1975 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999Note: Defense spending projections taken from Mid-Session Review <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>1994</strong> Budget.Sources: Council <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Advisers, Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Treasury, andOffice <strong>of</strong> Management and Budget.output growth averaged just 0.6 percent per year in <strong>the</strong> EuropeanCommunity, 1.7 percent per year in Japan, and only 0.2 percentper year in <strong>the</strong> world's o<strong>the</strong>r industrial countries (Table 2-1). Eventhough U.S. growth has been sluggish over <strong>the</strong> past couple <strong>of</strong>years, it has been <strong>the</strong> fastest among all <strong>the</strong> Group <strong>of</strong> Seven majorindustrial market economies. <strong>The</strong> world's second- and third-largestindustrial economies, Japan and Germany, both entered deep recessionsin <strong>the</strong> latter part <strong>of</strong> 1992 and are now operating wellbelow <strong>the</strong>ir capacities. During 1993, all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Group <strong>of</strong> Seven countrieshad substantial output gaps (that is, actual GDP was wellbelow potential), and growth was slowing in such developing-countrymarkets for U.S. exports as Mexico and <strong>the</strong> Middle East.In large part because <strong>of</strong> this global weakness, U.S. merchandiseexports, which had increased by about 7 percent in nominal termsin 1991 and 5 percent in 1992, rose by only 2 percent in 1993. Merchandiseexports to Japan and Western Europe, which toge<strong>the</strong>raccount for 35 percent <strong>of</strong> total U.S. merchandise experts, were especiallyhard hit, dropping by about 3 percent (Chart 2-3). Evenexports to Mexico flattened in 1993 after half a decade <strong>of</strong> rapid increases.With excellent cost competitiveness in world markets, U.S.58


TABLE 2-1.— Foreign Country Real GDP Growth[Average annual percent change]19891990199119921993European CommunityJapanO<strong>the</strong>r industrial countriesDeveloping countriesNote— 1993 figures are forecasts.Source: International Monetary Fund.exporters have been able to do better than a trade-weighted average<strong>of</strong> major industrial economies' GDP growth rates would suggest(Chart 2-4). Still, what had been a strong engine <strong>of</strong> growth from<strong>the</strong> mid-1980s until 1991 clearly shifted into neutral in 1993.Meanwhile, growing U.S. reliance on foreign computers has ledto a surge <strong>of</strong> imported capital goods. Office automation equipment,which now accounts for nearly 45 percent <strong>of</strong> real private investmentin producers' durable equipment, has become <strong>the</strong> fastestgrowing major demand component in <strong>the</strong> U.S. economy, and importshave been filling a growing portion <strong>of</strong> this demand. Importsalso account for about one-third <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> nonautomotive, noncomputerportion <strong>of</strong> producers' durable equipment spending—up sharply over<strong>the</strong> past decade.Toge<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong> slowing <strong>of</strong> U.S. exports and <strong>the</strong> surge in importshave meant that net exports (<strong>the</strong> difference between <strong>the</strong>m) are nowworking against U.S. growth, after making strong positive contributionsfrom <strong>the</strong> mid-1980s to 1991. For example, according toa simple calculation holding o<strong>the</strong>r components <strong>of</strong> demand fixed, ifnet exports had simply not deteriorated in 1993 from <strong>the</strong>ir 1992level, U.S. GDP growth would have been over 1 percentage pointhigher than it actually was in 1993.THE DEBT WORKOUTWorking <strong>of</strong>f <strong>the</strong> heavy indebtedness built up over <strong>the</strong> 1980s mayalso have retarded growth. During <strong>the</strong> 1960s and 1970s, householdsand firms only gradually increased <strong>the</strong>ir levels <strong>of</strong> indebtednessrelative to <strong>the</strong>ir incomes. Over <strong>the</strong> 1984-90 period, thischanged abruptly as individuals and businesses increased <strong>the</strong>ir indebtednesssharply (Charts 2-5 and 2-6). For <strong>the</strong> corporate sector,<strong>the</strong> proximate cause <strong>of</strong> increased indebtedness was a rise in debtbasedfinancial restructurings, such as leveraged buyouts. A portion<strong>of</strong> new debt issues in <strong>the</strong> 1980s was used to purchase equityin existing companies, not to finance increases in plant and equipmentinvestment. It is unclear exactly what motivated householdsto move fur<strong>the</strong>r into debt during this period, although rapid appre-3.54.73.24.13.04.81.13.70.84.0-1.14.51.11.30.65.8-0.2-0.11.26.159


Chart 2-3 Growth <strong>of</strong> U.S. Merchandise ExportsContinued weak economic growth in industrialized countries has depressed demandfor U.S. exports.Percent change from year earlier, 6-month moving average20 r •15Western Europe10All Countries-5-10Japan1990 1991 1992 1993Note: Data are not seasonally adjusted, f.a.s. basis.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce.Chart 2-4 U.S. Exports Implied by Industrial Country GDPU.S. export demand has been healthier than would be expected given <strong>the</strong>lackluster performance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> major foreign industrial economies.Billions <strong>of</strong> 1987 dollars (ratio scale)600-Actual500400Implied byIndustrial Country Demand,'/300200I I I ! I I I I1973 1975 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993Note: <strong>The</strong> dashed line plots fitted values from a regression relating exports to industrial country GDP.Sources: Council <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Advisers and Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce.60


ciation in <strong>the</strong> stock market and booms in numerous housing marketsprobably played a role. Higher asset values may have givenconsumers a greater sense <strong>of</strong> financial security to borrow andspend even in <strong>the</strong> face <strong>of</strong> modest personal income growth.<strong>The</strong> debt-income ratios for both households and firms flattenedas <strong>the</strong> 1980s came to a close. Beginning in 1991, firms initiated adramatic reduction in <strong>the</strong>ir leverage. This balance sheet repair waspresumably triggered by a reversal <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> factors that led <strong>the</strong>m toaccumulate debt. Moreover, <strong>the</strong>re were declines in firms' net worth,which might have caused <strong>the</strong>m to reduce leverage out <strong>of</strong> fear <strong>of</strong> insolvency.For a domestic debtor to repay a domestic creditor, <strong>the</strong>re neednot be any increase in national saving. Ra<strong>the</strong>r, such repaymentsrepresent—in <strong>the</strong> first instance—adjustments in <strong>the</strong> portfolios <strong>of</strong>domestic households, businesses, and financial institutions. Yet <strong>the</strong>recent balance sheet adjustments probably did stem in part froman increase in saving and <strong>the</strong>refore acted to slow growth in aggregatedemand.By what mechanism would such balance sheet adjustments affectnational saving? If <strong>the</strong> households and firms who repaid debts hadhigher marginal propensities to spend than those who got <strong>the</strong> repayments,<strong>the</strong> balance sheet restructuring would have increasedsaving. By virtue <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir indebtedness, we can infer that firms andhouseholds who retired debt had in <strong>the</strong> past shown much more eagernessto spend or to undertake investment projects. Extrapolationwould suggest that <strong>the</strong>y still had a high propensity to spendrelative to <strong>the</strong> creditor firms and households. <strong>The</strong>refore, balancesheet restructuring was probably a drag on aggregate demand inrecent years.Of course, <strong>the</strong> causality could be reversed. Indebted householdsand firms might have decided for reasons o<strong>the</strong>r than those basedon <strong>the</strong> state <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir balance sheets (e.g., reduced expectations <strong>of</strong>income or pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> investment projects) to reduce expenditures,using <strong>the</strong>ir free cash flow to repay debt ra<strong>the</strong>r than to spend.OVERSUPPLY OF COMMERCIAL BUILDINGSYet ano<strong>the</strong>r headwind has been <strong>the</strong> glut <strong>of</strong> nonresidential structuresthat was built up over <strong>the</strong> 1980s. Investment innonresidential structures soared in <strong>the</strong> early 1980s, fueled in partby high inflation and changes to <strong>the</strong> Tax Code in 1981 that madecommercial real estate investment more attractive. As this overbuildingcontinued, vacancy rates rose sharply across <strong>the</strong> country.<strong>The</strong> reversal <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1981 tax provisions by <strong>the</strong> 1986 tax reforms,toge<strong>the</strong>r with higher interest rates in <strong>the</strong> late 1980s, derailed <strong>the</strong>boom in commercial real estate. <strong>The</strong> decline in this sector was fur<strong>the</strong>rexacerbated by <strong>the</strong> movement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> rest <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> economy into151-444 0 - 9 4 - 361


Chart 2-5 Households: Credit Market Debt as Percent <strong>of</strong> Disposable IncomeAfter trending upward slowly over most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1960s and 1970s, <strong>the</strong> ratio <strong>of</strong> householdcredit-market debt to disposable personal income increased sharply in <strong>the</strong> 1980s.1960 1963 1966 1969 1972 1975 1978 1981 1984 1987Sources: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce and Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Federal Reserve System.Chart 2-6 Nonfinancial Corporate Business: Credit Market Debt as Percent <strong>of</strong> Output<strong>The</strong> ratio <strong>of</strong> nonfinancial corporate business debt to nonfinancial corporateGDP rose sharply in <strong>the</strong> 1980s. It has since begun to decline.1960 1963 1966 1969 1972 1975 1978 1981 1984 1987 19901993Sources: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce and Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Federal Reserve System.62


ecession in 1990. Even by late 1993—more than 2 years into <strong>the</strong>recovery—<strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> investment in nonresidential structures wasmore than 25 percent below its 1990 peak in real terms. Clearlythis small but volatile sector <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> economy has failed to provideits normal cyclical lift.CREDIT CRUNCH<strong>The</strong> credit crunch and its vestiges have also slowed economic activityover this recovery period. Many banks developed balancesheet problems in <strong>the</strong> 1980s as <strong>the</strong> developing-country debt crisisand widespread lending for speculative construction projects led tomassive loan write<strong>of</strong>fs and weak pr<strong>of</strong>itability. This weak pr<strong>of</strong>itabilityreduced <strong>the</strong> banks' ability to lend and probably aggravated<strong>the</strong> credit crunch. More-aggressive bank regulation, some <strong>of</strong> it a reactionto <strong>the</strong> 1980s savings and loan debacle, accentuated <strong>the</strong> problem.In 1991 and 1992 <strong>the</strong>re were widespread reports that wouldbeborrowers were having difficulty obtaining funds, although <strong>the</strong>sereports tended to be concentrated in certain industries (notablyreal estate) and regions (particularly <strong>the</strong> Nor<strong>the</strong>ast). A NationalAssociation <strong>of</strong> Home Builders survey <strong>of</strong> its members, for example,consistently ranked "obtaining financing for construction projects"as a top business problem over this period.CORPORATE DOWNSIZINGSFinally, corporations across <strong>the</strong> industrial spectrum have beenrestructuring <strong>the</strong>ir businesses and paring costs. <strong>The</strong> prolonged economicsluggishness apparently induced many firms to hunker downand reduce <strong>the</strong>ir breakeven points as much as possible, <strong>of</strong>ten byshedding workers. Foreign competition and cutbacks associatedwith debt workouts might also have been factors. Technologicalchanges have played a role as well; some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> most notable lay<strong>of</strong>fshave been at mainframe computer companies, for example. Inaddition, lower capital costs may have led some firms to substitutecapital for labor.Even though downsizing may well have made corporations moreefficient and better poised to earn pr<strong>of</strong>its in <strong>the</strong> future, <strong>the</strong> widespreadlay<strong>of</strong>fs have helped to depress wage and salary growth andprobably consumer confidence as well. In addition, although higherpr<strong>of</strong>its can imply higher incomes for corporate stockholders, thisgroup's marginal propensity to consume is probably lower than itis among individuals whose primary source <strong>of</strong> income is wages.This would also have reduced consumption spending and overalleconomic growth.63


THE HEADWINDS ARE MOSTLY CALMINGAs <strong>the</strong> economy enters <strong>1994</strong>, many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se headwinds are dissipating.<strong>The</strong> credit crunch is fading as banks show new signs <strong>of</strong>wanting to make business loans. <strong>The</strong> decline in yields on governmentbonds, where banks had parked large amounts <strong>of</strong> assets, and<strong>the</strong> improvement in overall business conditions are making suchloans relatively more pr<strong>of</strong>itable. Aided by lower interest rates andgreatly improved margins, banks have also been posting recordpr<strong>of</strong>its for <strong>the</strong> past 2 years. Bank lending surveys by <strong>the</strong> FederalReserve also suggest that credit conditions have eased. For <strong>the</strong>sereasons, bank lending today is becoming less <strong>of</strong> a retardant togrowth.Meanwhile, <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r industrial countries will not remain miredin recession forever. Indeed, <strong>the</strong> ones that entered recession firstin this global slowdown—<strong>the</strong> United Kingdom, Canada, Australia,and New Zealand, for example—are all showing signs <strong>of</strong> economicrebound. Even Germany, a late arrival on <strong>the</strong> global recessionscene, recorded positive GDP growth in <strong>the</strong> second and third quarters<strong>of</strong> 1993. By late 1993 <strong>the</strong>re were increasing signs that <strong>the</strong> Europeanrecession was nearing bottom, and that at least modestgrowth would return in <strong>1994</strong>. Even a small rebound in Europewould be welcome news to U.S. exporters. <strong>The</strong> odds <strong>of</strong> economic recoveryin Japan, at least by 1995, seem good as well.Commercial construction has also started to improve, although itwill not be as bullish as it was in <strong>the</strong> mid-1980s. By late 1993<strong>the</strong>re were signs that vacancy rates for commercial real estate wereposting significant declines, implying that <strong>the</strong> worst might be overfor this sector.<strong>The</strong> key exception to <strong>the</strong> forecast <strong>of</strong> diminishing headwinds is defensecutbacks. <strong>The</strong>se seem almost certain to continue over <strong>the</strong> rest<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> decade unless <strong>the</strong>re is some major change in <strong>the</strong> world's geopoliticalcircumstances—which might have o<strong>the</strong>r, far less beneficialrepercussions. Still, with most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se headwinds blowing lessfiercely over <strong>the</strong> mid-1990s than <strong>the</strong>y did earlier in <strong>the</strong> decade, <strong>the</strong>economy should be able to turn in a better performance.OVERVIEW OF THE ECONOMY IN 1993Although economic growth was sluggish in early 1993, substantialprogress was made despite <strong>the</strong>se headwinds. Employment increasedsteadily, <strong>the</strong> unemployment rate dropped, inflation remainedsubdued, and real GDP increased by 2.8 percent from <strong>the</strong>fourth quarter <strong>of</strong> 1992 to <strong>the</strong> fourth quarter <strong>of</strong> 1993. Claims earlyin <strong>the</strong> year that only a half-speed economic expansion was underway gradually gave way to <strong>the</strong> view that more-normal growth was64


eturning. Fourth-quarter growth <strong>of</strong> 5.9 percent (annual rate)—<strong>the</strong>highest in 6 years—reinforced this view.<strong>The</strong> 1993 economy actually exhibited more underlying strengththan was reflected in press reports or in indexes <strong>of</strong> consumer andbusiness confidence. Domestic demand and real final sales bothposted healthy increases. Real final sales to domestic purchasers(that is, excluding inventories and exports but including imports)actually increased at an annual rate <strong>of</strong> 4 percent on average frommid-1992 until <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> 1993, and only dipped below 3 percentgrowth once over that period—in <strong>the</strong> first quarter <strong>of</strong> 1993. At leasta portion <strong>of</strong> that dip was arguably caused by a policy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> previousAdministration: increased tax liabilities in early 1993 owingto a reduction in withholding that began in March 1992. In addition,an early 1993 defense spending collapse caused a growth letdownin early 1993.A look at economic performance sector by sector provides a clearerpicture <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> laggards and leaders in <strong>the</strong> present expansion.CONSUMPTION EXPENDITURESBecause consumer spending represents about two-thirds <strong>of</strong> GDP,it is not surprising that <strong>the</strong> modest output growth in <strong>the</strong> expansionto date has been associated with sluggish consumption growth. Indeed,consumption as a whole has failed to show <strong>the</strong> kind <strong>of</strong> sharprebound typical <strong>of</strong> postwar recoveries: 11 quarters after <strong>the</strong> recession'strough, consumption had advanced only two-thirds as far aswould be expected from postwar experience. Consumer sentimentmanifested a typical recovery pattern for only a short time; <strong>the</strong>sharp advance usually seen when a recession ends sputtered to ahalt two quarters after <strong>the</strong> 1991 trough. Sentiment trended upwardonly slowly over 1992 and 1993, although <strong>the</strong>re was a sharp accelerationlate in 1993.Weakness in consumer spending can also be seen in <strong>the</strong> behavior<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> saving rate. Typically, <strong>the</strong> saving rate falls as a recovery begins,as consumers begin to spend ahead <strong>of</strong> income. Increases inspending on consumer durables, such as automobiles and householdfurnishings, typically follow. Such a drop in <strong>the</strong> saving ratedid not occur after <strong>the</strong> 1991 trough, however; <strong>the</strong> saving rate actuallytrended upward slightly for almost 2 years into <strong>the</strong> recovery.Over 1992, real consumer spending lagged behind real incomegrowth, suggesting that households were still getting <strong>the</strong>ir balancesheets in order.Nineteen hundred and ninety-three saw belated reductions in <strong>the</strong>saving rate. Between <strong>the</strong> fourth quarter <strong>of</strong> 1992 and <strong>the</strong> thirdquarter <strong>of</strong> 1993, for example, <strong>the</strong> saving rate fell by more than 2percentage points, and this provided much <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> overall lift that<strong>the</strong> economy experienced. In fact, over <strong>the</strong> last three quarters <strong>of</strong>65


1993, real consumer spending increased at a 3.9-percent averageannual rate—not high by historical standards, but at least tendingtoward <strong>the</strong> normal range for a postwar expansion.BUSINESS FIXED INVESTMENTAfter a late start, several important components <strong>of</strong> investmentspending have rebounded in line with typical recovery patterns.While investment in structures has remained weak for <strong>the</strong> reasonsdiscussed earlier, producers' durable equipment has turned in astellar performance. For about a year after <strong>the</strong> recession trough,equipment investment remained stagnant; <strong>the</strong>n it spurted to agrowth path above <strong>the</strong> postwar recovery average. Today, investmentin producers' durable equipment remains one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> strongestcomponents <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> expansion. In fact, over <strong>the</strong> year ending in <strong>the</strong>fourth quarter <strong>of</strong> 1993, investment in <strong>the</strong>se goods increased byabout 18 percent—a growth rate more typical <strong>of</strong> a Japanese ra<strong>the</strong>rthan an <strong>American</strong> business cycle expansion. Certainly as far asequipment investment spending is concerned, <strong>the</strong> weak portion <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> recovery was limited to <strong>the</strong> first year after <strong>the</strong> trough. More recentactivity has actually exceeded <strong>the</strong> postwar norm.INVENTORIESBusinesses kept inventories at extremely low levels relative tosales throughout 1993, and a major swing in farm inventories resultingfrom <strong>the</strong> Midwest floods and Sou<strong>the</strong>ast drought influenced<strong>the</strong> quarterly GDP growth pattern over <strong>the</strong> year (Box 2-1). <strong>The</strong> inventory-to-salesratio was under 1.5 throughout <strong>the</strong> year, and <strong>the</strong>ratio for manufacturing hit an all-time low during <strong>the</strong> fourth quarteras sales perked up faster than some businesses expected. Severalfactors were at work. First, <strong>the</strong> inventory-to-sales ratio inmanufacturing industries is in secular decline. Second, businessesseemed to lack confidence in <strong>the</strong> strength <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> recovery. Disappointinggrowth in <strong>the</strong> first and second quarters <strong>of</strong> 1993 and pessimismabout <strong>the</strong> economy's future prospects probably made businessesextremely cautious about producing at a faster rate thanwas absolutely necessary. Third, production problems in some keysectors that did experience a sharp pickup in demand, especiallyautomobiles, probably prevented some firms from achieving <strong>the</strong>level <strong>of</strong> inventories that <strong>the</strong>y deemed optimal.<strong>The</strong> extremely lean inventories <strong>of</strong> late 1993 are good news for<strong>1994</strong>. As <strong>1994</strong> opens, manufacturers are in a position where <strong>the</strong>yrisk losing business because <strong>of</strong> inadequate inventories, and <strong>the</strong>yare <strong>the</strong>refore under pressure to increase output. <strong>The</strong>re seems to berelatively little risk that overaccumulation <strong>of</strong> inventories will leadto production cutbacks in <strong>1994</strong>.66


Box 2-1,—<strong>The</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Midwest Floods <strong>of</strong> 1993Last summer's floods in <strong>the</strong> Midwest were a human tragedywhose immense scope was obvious to all. Measuring <strong>the</strong>ir economiceffects is more difficult, however. <strong>The</strong> floods disrupted<strong>the</strong> day-to-day operations <strong>of</strong> businesses, destroyed inventoriesand crops, and wrecked a significant portion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> region's infrastructureand housing stock But because <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong> economicactivity that would have occurred without <strong>the</strong> floods isunknowable, <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> flooding on third- and fourthquartereconomic performance cannot be definitively assessed.<strong>The</strong> clearest effect <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> floods on national economic performancewas a decline in farm output <strong>The</strong> Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong>Analysis (BEA) <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce judgedthat $2.5 billion worth <strong>of</strong> farm output was destroyed by <strong>the</strong>floods and <strong>the</strong> simultaneous drought in <strong>the</strong> Sou<strong>the</strong>ast <strong>The</strong>BEA accounted for this crop loss by lowering its estimates <strong>of</strong>farm output by $7*5 billion (ammalized) in <strong>the</strong> third quarter <strong>of</strong>1993 and by a fur<strong>the</strong>r $2.5 billion in <strong>the</strong> fourth quarter, <strong>The</strong>adjustments were reflected in <strong>the</strong> change in farm inventories,<strong>The</strong> result <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se acljustments was that measured real GDPgrowth was lowered by about 0,6 percentage point in <strong>the</strong> thirdquarter <strong>of</strong> 1993 and increased by about 0*4 percentage point in<strong>the</strong> fourth quarter* <strong>The</strong> BEA also;• reduced estimated farm proprietors' income to accountfor crop damage and uninsured losses to farm property• lowered estimates <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> rental income <strong>of</strong> persons andnonfarm proprietors* income to account for uninsuredproperty losses*O<strong>the</strong>r flood effects are too embedded in <strong>the</strong> source data to beexplicitly measured. <strong>The</strong>se include:* effects <strong>of</strong> reduced farm output on inflation• <strong>the</strong> negative effect <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> floods on nonfarm businessoutput in affected areas• potential stimulative effects from <strong>the</strong> rebuilding <strong>of</strong> flooddamagedroads, bridges, railways, and houses**~espe~ciaHy if <strong>the</strong> rebuilding was funded from savings and notinsurance company payouts (whose effects are more likea transfer from owners <strong>of</strong> insurance companies to policy*Holders)/ - ' - "• • '-' •/"'.•'.# <strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> Federal disaster assistance^ insurance payments,and emergency grants.67


RESIDENTIAL INVESTMENTResidential investment was an enigma over <strong>the</strong> first part <strong>of</strong>1993. Mortgage rates fell to 20-year lows, affordability was at 20-year highs, yet housing starts were flat for <strong>the</strong> first half <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>year. Finally, starting in August, housing activity began to respondto <strong>the</strong>se favorable economic conditions and posted sharp additionalgains. Housing starts rose a stunning 25 percent between July andDecember.A healthy fraction <strong>of</strong> new homes being sold today are sold beforeconstruction has started. This suggests that <strong>the</strong> gains in residentialconstruction are solid and that <strong>the</strong> upward trend in housing shouldcontinue without any likely inventory cycle. As 1993 ended, <strong>the</strong> inventory-to-salesratio <strong>of</strong> new homes, as measured by <strong>the</strong> stock <strong>of</strong>homes for sale divided by <strong>the</strong> number actually sold in a month, wasat its lowest level since 1986. Given <strong>the</strong> unfavorable underlying demographicfactors for housing, especially <strong>the</strong> relatively low rate <strong>of</strong>household formation, housing turned in a very good performancelate in <strong>the</strong> year and was a solid contributor to <strong>the</strong> economy's advance.NET EXPORTSAs mentioned earlier, net exports shifted from being a major contributorto economic growth over <strong>the</strong> 1987-90 period to being a retardantin 1992 and 1993. Weak foreign economies severelycrimped export growth, while imports surged with <strong>the</strong> capitalequipment spending boom. Even <strong>the</strong> growth rate <strong>of</strong> service-sectorexports, <strong>the</strong> brightest component <strong>of</strong> U.S. trade, was hit by slow foreigngrowth. In current dollar terms U.S. trade in services stillposted a $68 billion surplus in 1993, however, illustrating <strong>the</strong>strong comparative advantage <strong>of</strong> U.S. firms in this sector. And exports<strong>of</strong> services represented about 25 percent <strong>of</strong> total U.S. real exportsin 1993. By comparison, agricultural exports in 1993 representedonly about 6 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> total.EMPLOYMENT AND PRODUCTIVITY<strong>The</strong> increases in consumer spending and investment and <strong>the</strong> generalpickup in <strong>the</strong> economy over <strong>the</strong> past year and a half have finallyled to a more acceptable pace <strong>of</strong> job creation—something thatwas completely missing over <strong>the</strong> first year <strong>of</strong> recovery. On average,<strong>the</strong> economy generated 162,000 jobs per month over 1993, comparedwith only 81,000 jobs per month over 1992, and <strong>the</strong> loss <strong>of</strong>73,000 jobs per month over 1991.One important development in 1993 was <strong>the</strong> leng<strong>the</strong>ning <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>factory workweek and <strong>the</strong> increase in manufacturing overtime. InNovember <strong>the</strong> workweek reached a postwar record high, and overtimereached its highest level since <strong>the</strong> data series was begun in68


<strong>the</strong> 1950s. Employers have apparently been concerned about <strong>the</strong>fixed costs <strong>of</strong> adding new workers and about <strong>the</strong> unsteady nature<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> expansion. Many have apparently been concerned that ano<strong>the</strong>rdecline in orders might force new rounds <strong>of</strong> lay<strong>of</strong>fs, and so<strong>the</strong>y have been trying to squeeze <strong>the</strong> most output possible out <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong>ir existing work forces. <strong>The</strong> good news is that, with <strong>the</strong> workweekand overtime so high, <strong>the</strong>re should be building pressure onbusinesses to add new workers as demand continues to increase.Productivity growth was weak over <strong>the</strong> first half <strong>of</strong> 1993 but reboundedin <strong>the</strong> third quarter as <strong>the</strong> economy picked up speed. Employerskept a tight rein on labor costs as output increased. Given<strong>the</strong> moderate rates <strong>of</strong> wage increase, nonfarm unit labor costs (<strong>the</strong>cost <strong>of</strong> labor needed to produce one unit <strong>of</strong> output) increased byabout 2 percent, about <strong>the</strong> same as <strong>the</strong> 1992 increase. <strong>The</strong>se modestgains in unit labor costs helped to give a healthy boost to corporatepr<strong>of</strong>its and maintained <strong>the</strong> prospects for low inflation.INCOMESReal disposable income increased by a modest 1 percent in 1993.Pretax pr<strong>of</strong>its posted strong increases, and proprietors' income wasup by over 7 percent. But wages and salaries increased by a moremodest percentage, and interest income was stagnant as interestrates fell. Average weekly earnings <strong>of</strong> production workers barelykept up with inflation.INFLATIONNineteen hundred and ninety-three saw <strong>the</strong> best inflation performancein a generation. <strong>The</strong> implicit price deflator increased by<strong>the</strong> smallest percentage since 1964. During 1993 <strong>the</strong> consumerprice index (CPI) registered its smallest increase since 1986, and<strong>the</strong> core CPI (excluding food and energy) increased by <strong>the</strong> smallestpercentage since 1972. Meanwhile <strong>the</strong> producer price index (PPI)for finished goods showed virtually no increase over <strong>the</strong> course <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> year. <strong>The</strong> producer price index for finished goods excluding foodand energy, <strong>the</strong> so-called core PPI, showed its smallest annual increasesince <strong>the</strong> government began compiling this series in 1973.Measured inflation increased as 1993 began, as prices <strong>of</strong> apparel,public transportation, tobacco products, and motor fuels postedlarge increases. <strong>The</strong> GDP price deflator, <strong>the</strong> CPI, and <strong>the</strong> PPI forfinished goods all accelerated from <strong>the</strong>ir previous quarter's rate <strong>of</strong>change. <strong>The</strong> increase in inflation was temporary, however; manyanalysts believe it was due to problems with seasonal adjustment.Lower measured inflation returned after <strong>the</strong> spring.Wage gains remained modest, as mentioned, and showed notendency to accelerate over <strong>the</strong> course <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> year. Medical costsshowed some signs <strong>of</strong> moderating over 1993 and recorded <strong>the</strong>ir69


smallest annual increase in 20 years. <strong>The</strong>y still increased at roughlytwice <strong>the</strong> pace <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> nonmedical CPI, however. External pricefactors, such as commodity prices, remained generally tamethroughout <strong>the</strong> year, and oil prices fell sharply, suggesting a flatcommodity price trajectory as <strong>1994</strong> began. (Box 2-2 discusses <strong>the</strong>possible economic effects <strong>of</strong> lower oil prices.) Given that <strong>the</strong> economyremains below its potential output level, <strong>the</strong>re appear to befew inflationary seeds from 1993 blowing into <strong>1994</strong>.MONETARY POLICYShort-term interest rates were essentially constant over <strong>the</strong>course <strong>of</strong> 1993, and <strong>the</strong> Federal Reserve continued its vigilance oninflation. After indications <strong>of</strong> an acceleration <strong>of</strong> prices in <strong>the</strong> firstseveral months <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> year, <strong>the</strong> Fed adopted an asymmetrical policytilt, poised to tighten monetary policy if inflation gained momentum.Over <strong>the</strong> summer, however, low inflation returned, and <strong>the</strong>Fed reverted to its neutral policy stance.<strong>The</strong> tendency in recent years for <strong>the</strong> broad monetary aggregatesto behave in atypical ways, given changes in interest rates and economicactivity, led <strong>the</strong> Federal Reserve to place less emphasis on<strong>the</strong>se money supply measures in 1993. Some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> change in <strong>the</strong>behavior <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> monetary aggregates stems from massive portfolioshifts by <strong>American</strong> households. For example, <strong>the</strong> sharp decline ininterest rates on bank certificates <strong>of</strong> deposit led many householdsto shift money into stock and bond mutual funds. <strong>The</strong> downwardshift <strong>of</strong> M2 (<strong>the</strong> broad monetary aggregate) relative to income thatresulted from this and o<strong>the</strong>r developments clearly reduced that aggregate'susefulness as a short-term policy indicator. <strong>The</strong> sluggishgrowth <strong>of</strong> M2 did not signal that <strong>the</strong> Fed was running a tight monetarypolicy: In 1993, growth rates <strong>of</strong> Ml (<strong>the</strong> narrow monetary aggregate)and <strong>the</strong> monetary base were up to 10 percentage pointshigher than M2 growth.Ano<strong>the</strong>r policy indicator in which <strong>the</strong> Federal Reserve has expressedsome interest is <strong>the</strong> concept <strong>of</strong> a real short-term interestrate—<strong>the</strong> nominal rate less expected inflation. It is generally assumedthat real short-term rates will gradually rise as <strong>the</strong> economystreng<strong>the</strong>ns and <strong>the</strong> output gap shrinks. <strong>The</strong> Federal Reserve'sshift toward reliance on a broader set <strong>of</strong> guidelines for setting monetarypolicy, including short-term interest rates, appears to be anappropriate adaptation to changing events. It should allow <strong>the</strong>overall condition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> economy to be carefully monitored, and anappropriate policy response to be crafted.FISCAL POLICIES AND THE TIMING OF OUTPUT<strong>The</strong> uneven pattern <strong>of</strong> strong growth in late 1992 and slowdownin early 1993 was attributable in part to tax and spending changes70


Box 2-2.—<strong>The</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Effects <strong>of</strong> Lower Oil PricesOil prices tumbled during 1993. Over <strong>the</strong> first half <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>year, West Texas Intermediate crude oil averaged about $20per barreL By <strong>the</strong> middle <strong>of</strong> October <strong>the</strong> price was down toabout $18,25 per barrel, and by late December <strong>the</strong> price hadfallen to about $14.25—more than 25 percent lower than earlierin <strong>the</strong> year. Weak global economic conditions, including <strong>the</strong>recessions in Europe and Japan, <strong>the</strong> seeming inability <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>Organization <strong>of</strong> Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) to restrictits members' production levels, and <strong>the</strong> possibility thatIraq would soon be exporting substantial quantities <strong>of</strong> oil againwere likely contributors to <strong>the</strong> price declines.A drop in <strong>the</strong> price <strong>of</strong> oil, like any relative price change, hasmicroeconomic consequences; Some sectors benefit and o<strong>the</strong>rsare hurt. Lower oil prices will likely bring painful dislocationsin <strong>the</strong> ILS. oil industry and <strong>the</strong> regions where it is concentrated.If oil prices remain low, domestic oil output is likelyto decline faster than it already has been. U.S. dependence onforeign oil would also be likely to increase. Lower oil priceswould also cause more energy to be used and might lead tohigher levels <strong>of</strong> pollution*Because oil is such an important input into <strong>the</strong> VS. economy,however, lower oil prices will also have favorable effectson <strong>the</strong> U*S* macroeconomy in <strong>1994</strong>—if prices stay in <strong>the</strong> $15-per~barrel range. <strong>The</strong>re are several transmission channels. <strong>The</strong>main beneficial effect is that lower oil prices translate intolower inflation, which boosts real disposable income for consumers,giving <strong>the</strong>m <strong>the</strong> wherewithal to make more nonoil purchases.Lower oil prices also mean that businesses have lowercosts, which translate into higher cash flow and pr<strong>of</strong>it margins,leading in turn to more investment spending. Foreign industrialeconomies also get an upward boost from lower oil pricesand in turn demand more US. exports.Some economic models suggest that if <strong>the</strong> 25-percent drop inoil prices in 1993 were sustained over <strong>1994</strong>, real GDP growthwould be between 0,3 and 0.4 percentage point higher in <strong>1994</strong>.<strong>The</strong> same models predict that CPI inflation would be noticeablylower.in 1992 that served to raise aggregate demand in 1992 and depressit in <strong>the</strong> first half <strong>of</strong> 1993. First, <strong>the</strong>re was a temporary burst indefense spending in <strong>the</strong> second half <strong>of</strong> 1992. Second, a decrease inindividual income tax withholding raised consumer spending in1992 but reduced it in 1993 as households made <strong>the</strong>ir final settle-71


ments with <strong>the</strong> Internal Revenue Service (IRS). <strong>The</strong> Council estimatesthat <strong>the</strong>se two factors added 0.2 percent to <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong> GDPin <strong>the</strong> second quarter <strong>of</strong> 1992 and 0.4 percent in <strong>the</strong> third andfourth quarters. <strong>The</strong>se gains were temporary, however. GDPgrowth was 0.3 percent lower in <strong>the</strong> first quarter <strong>of</strong> 1993 and 0.4percent lower in <strong>the</strong> second quarter than it would have been without<strong>the</strong>se fiscal factors. <strong>The</strong>re were also effects on <strong>the</strong> timing <strong>of</strong>consumer spending arising from <strong>the</strong> expectation and misperception<strong>of</strong> 1993 tax changes.Defense SpendingDuring <strong>the</strong> second half <strong>of</strong> 1992, defense spending temporarily increasedwell above its trend. Part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> change was in purchases<strong>of</strong> durables. <strong>The</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r portion was in "o<strong>the</strong>r services," whose increasewas in part due to expenditures to close military bases.Chart 2-7 shows <strong>the</strong> temporary burst <strong>of</strong> spending relative to abaseline which is estimated as <strong>the</strong> trend in defense spending from<strong>the</strong> third quarter <strong>of</strong> 1989 to <strong>the</strong> third quarter <strong>of</strong> 1993, excluding<strong>the</strong> quarters <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Persian Gulf crisis and <strong>the</strong> last two quarters<strong>of</strong> 1992.Chart 2-7 Defense Spending: Actual Versus BaselineAlthough defense spending is falling in <strong>the</strong> post-Cold War era, two recent periods <strong>of</strong>relatively high defense spending stand out.Billions <strong>of</strong> 1987 dollarsouu290Persian Gulf War280270Actual>Baseline\\^x ^ ^ \ Temporary Defense Spending260-* \ / A250-240-1 111 1 11989 1990 1991 1992 1993Note: Baseline is trend in spending from 1989:111 to 1993:1V, excluding 1990.IV-1991:111 and 1992:III-IV.Sources: Council <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Advisers and Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce.72


Change in Tax Withholding<strong>The</strong> change in <strong>the</strong> withholding tables reduced income tax withholdingfor most taxpayers by an average <strong>of</strong> $25 a month beginningin March 1992. Taxpayers <strong>the</strong>refore owed <strong>the</strong> IRS an additional$250 (or received a smaller refund) in 1993. Households basicallyfaced two choices: <strong>The</strong>y could let <strong>the</strong> cash accumulate in <strong>the</strong>ir bankaccounts and use it to make <strong>the</strong> extra $250 payment in April, or<strong>the</strong>y could spend it. From both time-series and cross-sectional estimates<strong>of</strong> consumer behavior, <strong>the</strong> Council estimates that roughly 40percent <strong>of</strong> households spent <strong>the</strong> extra cash because <strong>of</strong> ei<strong>the</strong>r liquidityconstraints, myopia, or inertia. Given <strong>the</strong>ir incomes, thosehouseholds <strong>the</strong>n had to reduce spending when <strong>the</strong>y settled with <strong>the</strong>IRS in 1993. This shift in take-home pay led to <strong>the</strong> estimated shifting<strong>of</strong> consumption from 1993 to 1992 shown in Chart 2-8. <strong>The</strong>presumption is that households readjusted withholding and spendingafter <strong>the</strong>ir 1993 final settlements, so that this pattern will notrepeat itself.Chart 2-8 Effects <strong>of</strong> 1992 Tax Withholding Change on Personal Consumption<strong>The</strong> reduction in personal income tax withholding in 1992 induced some householdsto shift consumption from 1993 to 1992.Billions <strong>of</strong> 1987 dollars3500Reduced Consumption asHouseholds Repay IRS3450 -3400 -(Actual)33503300Extra Consumption fromReduced Withholding(Estimated)3250J_ I I I1991 :IV 1992:1 II III IVNote: See text for calculation details.Sources: Council <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Advisers and Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce.1993:1<strong>The</strong>re have been o<strong>the</strong>r changes in tax rules that worked in an<strong>of</strong>fsetting direction regarding tax payments, but not in an <strong>of</strong>fsettingdirection regarding consumption. Specifically, <strong>the</strong> change in <strong>the</strong>73


safe-harbor rules for underpayment <strong>of</strong> estimated tax probablycaused some high-income taxpayers to move payments that <strong>the</strong>ywould have normally made in <strong>the</strong>ir April 1993 final settlementswith <strong>the</strong> IRS to 1992 estimated tax payments. A household payingestimated tax is probably less likely to let changes in <strong>the</strong> timing<strong>of</strong> tax payments affect its consumption than is <strong>the</strong> typical household.Expectations <strong>of</strong> 1993 Tax ChangesAnticipation and misperception <strong>of</strong> proposed 1993 changes in <strong>the</strong>tax law could have had fur<strong>the</strong>r effects on <strong>the</strong> timing <strong>of</strong> demand.During his campaign for <strong>the</strong> <strong>Presidency</strong>, <strong>the</strong>n-Governor Clintonproposed an investment tax credit. In December 1992, <strong>the</strong>n-SenateFinance Committee Chairman Bentsen and House Ways andMeans Committee Chairman Rostenkowski announced that anycredit would be retroactive to December 3, 1992. Earlier in <strong>the</strong>quarter some firms may have delayed making investments in anticipation<strong>of</strong> receiving such a credit. Except for information-processingequipment, however, <strong>the</strong>re was no discernable shift in investmentspending during <strong>the</strong> fourth quarter <strong>of</strong> 1992. Given <strong>the</strong> lagsin making investment decisions, it is not surprising that <strong>the</strong> anticipation<strong>of</strong> a possible credit appears to have had little effect on mostcomponents <strong>of</strong> investment. <strong>The</strong>re was, however, a substantial decelerationin investment in computer and o<strong>the</strong>r information-processingequipment during <strong>the</strong> final quarter <strong>of</strong> 1992. It is probablyrelatively easy to change <strong>the</strong> scheduling <strong>of</strong> purchases <strong>of</strong> such equipment.Hence, this deceleration could well be explained in part byfirms delaying purchases in anticipation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> credit.Apparently <strong>the</strong>re were also widespread misperceptions about <strong>the</strong>scope <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> income tax increases in <strong>the</strong> Administration's economicplan. As late as <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> July 1993, over 70 percent <strong>of</strong> respondentsto a Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll thought that middleclasstaxpayers would bear most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> tax increases. In fact, <strong>the</strong>income tax increases apply only to families with taxable incomesover $140,000—<strong>the</strong> top 1.2 percent <strong>of</strong> households. Hence, it appearedfor much <strong>of</strong> 1993 that many consumers incorrectly expectedan income tax increase. This misperception may have accounted forsome <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> weakness <strong>of</strong> consumption in early 1993.Do <strong>the</strong> 1993 Fiscal Measures Threaten <strong>1994</strong> Growth'?High-income households will have to make increased tax paymentsin April <strong>1994</strong> because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> increase in income tax rates enactedin 1993. <strong>The</strong>re is reason to expect, however, that <strong>the</strong>se extrapayments by high-income individuals in <strong>1994</strong> will have a smallereffect on GDP than <strong>the</strong> extra payments made in 1993 by taxpayersaffected by <strong>the</strong> 1992 change in withholding. One reason is thathigh-income taxpayers are presumably more likely to make <strong>the</strong>74


payments out <strong>of</strong> savings. Ano<strong>the</strong>r is that many high-income taxpayersreduced <strong>the</strong>ir 1993 tax liability by shifting income from1993 to December 1992. Moreover, under provisions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> OmnibusBudget Reconciliation Act <strong>of</strong> 1993 (OBRA93), <strong>the</strong>se taxpayerscan spread <strong>the</strong>ir increased 1993 payments over 3 years.Nineteen hundred and ninety-four will also see an increase in<strong>the</strong> earned income tax credit (EITC). Payment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> EITC willtend to stimulate demand. Although households are entitled to collect<strong>the</strong> EITC during <strong>the</strong> tax year, most only claim it when <strong>the</strong>yfill out <strong>the</strong>ir returns <strong>the</strong> following year, and <strong>the</strong>y are likely tospend most <strong>of</strong> it.THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT'S FISCAL STANCE<strong>The</strong> size <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> budget deficit is an incomplete measure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>stance <strong>of</strong> fiscal policy. One important function <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> budget is toact as an automatic stabilizer against economic fluctuations. When<strong>the</strong> economy enters a recession, tax collections fall as incomes decline,and <strong>the</strong>re is an increase in government spending on suchitems as unemployment insurance and income maintenance programs.As a result, <strong>the</strong> budget deficit tends to increase in recessionsand fall in recoveries, without any change to <strong>the</strong> tax systemor in legislated expenditures. Chart 2-9 plots historical and predictedlevels <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> actual Federal budget deficit, which is expectedto fall from 4 percent <strong>of</strong> GDP in fiscal 1993 to about 2.3 percent<strong>of</strong> GDP by <strong>the</strong> late 1990s.<strong>The</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> business cycle and inflation mask <strong>the</strong> true fiscalstance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> government. Declines in output from its full-employmentlevel reduce revenue and increase expenditures. Inflationreduces <strong>the</strong> real interest cost to <strong>the</strong> government for a given level<strong>of</strong> nominal interest payments, which are included in <strong>the</strong> deficit.Chart 2-9 shows <strong>the</strong> actual deficit and <strong>the</strong> inflation-adjusted structuraldeficit. (<strong>The</strong> structural deficit is <strong>the</strong> one that would prevailat a high level <strong>of</strong> employment.) <strong>The</strong> estimates use <strong>the</strong> CongressionalBudget Office's estimate <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cyclical adjustment. For <strong>the</strong>inflation adjustment, <strong>the</strong> outstanding Federal debt (bonds held by<strong>the</strong> private sector plus <strong>the</strong> monetary base) is multiplied by <strong>the</strong> inflationrate. As a result <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Administration's budget plan, <strong>the</strong> inflation-adjustedstructural deficit falls to less than 1 percent <strong>of</strong>GDP after fiscal <strong>1994</strong>—its lowest level since 1982. This share,moreover, remains constant for <strong>the</strong> remainder <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> forecast period.<strong>The</strong> conclusion is that current fiscal policy—primarily as a result<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Administration's recently adopted deficit reductionplan—is following a more balanced and stable course than did <strong>the</strong>policies <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> previous decade.75


Chart 2-9 Alternative Measures <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Stance <strong>of</strong> Fiscal PolicyFiscal policy as measured by <strong>the</strong> adjusted structural budget deficit is forecastto move to a more stable trajectory with <strong>the</strong> current deficit reduction plan.Percent <strong>of</strong> GDP1959 1962 1965 1968 1971 1974 1977 1980 1983 1986 1989 1992 1995 1998Fiscal YearsNote: See text for details.Sources: Council <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Advisers, Congressional Budget Office, Office <strong>of</strong> Management and Budget, andBoard <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Federal Reserve System.INDUSTRIAL AND REGIONAL DISPARITIESDisparities in growth across industries became more pronouncedover 1993. Information-processing equipment benefited from heavyinvestment demand and experienced double-digit output gains.Certain interest-sensitive sectors <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> economy, especially furniture,motor vehicles, and major appliances, were clearly helpedby <strong>the</strong> sharply lower long-term interest rates and also posted largeoutput gains. At <strong>the</strong> opposite end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> spectrum, <strong>the</strong> defenserelatedindustries—aerospace, instruments, and ordnance—sawcontinued sharp production cutbacks.<strong>The</strong>se industrial disparities contributed to regional differences ineconomic activities. <strong>The</strong> State <strong>of</strong> California has been particularlyhard hit by <strong>the</strong> defense builddown and has yet to start postinggains in nonagricultural employment, even though <strong>the</strong> rebound in<strong>the</strong> Nation as a whole began in March 1992. Aerospace jobs are aparticularly acute problem: Of <strong>the</strong> 125,000 defense-related jobs thatare projected to be lost in California from 1993 to 1997, 90,000 willbe in <strong>the</strong> aerospace sector. California's 8.7-percent unemploymentrate at year-end contrasted with a rate <strong>of</strong> just 6.4 percent for <strong>the</strong>Nation as a whole (Chart 2-10).76


Chart 2-10 Unemployment Rates by State, December 1993<strong>The</strong> national unemployment rate masks substantial regional differences. California is <strong>the</strong>only large state with an unemployment rate above 8 1/2 percent.8.5% and over7.3% - 8.4%ED 6.2% - 7.2%3 5.0% - 6.1%• 4.9% or belowSource: Department <strong>of</strong> Labor.Chart 2-11 Nonfarm Employment Growth by State, November 1992 to November 1993Employment gains are now widespread across <strong>the</strong> country. California remains akey exception.I j 2.0% and overE3 1.0% - 1.9%0% - .9%-.1% or belowNote: Chart shows percent change in nonfarm payroll employment.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Labor.77


Meanwhile, <strong>the</strong> Mountain States were 1993's growth leaders.Strong income and employment gains were seen in Utah, Colorado,New Mexico, and Arizona (Chart 2-11).DEFICIT REDUCTION ANDTHE REAL INTEREST RATEAs <strong>the</strong> new Administration took <strong>of</strong>fice, it appeared that <strong>the</strong> ratio<strong>of</strong> Federal Government debt to GDP was on an unsustainable upwardpath. <strong>The</strong> explosion <strong>of</strong> debt in <strong>the</strong> 1980s had kept real interestrates high throughout <strong>the</strong> decade. Hence, nominal rates did notfall by as much as <strong>the</strong> 1980s' victory against inflation warranted.Much <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> recent reduction in long-term interest rates, it will beargued below, should be attributed to <strong>the</strong> change in budget policyin early 1993. <strong>The</strong> close linkage <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> decline in long-term interestrates to <strong>the</strong> political and legislative events <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> last 15 monthsgives strong support to <strong>the</strong> view that high Federal debt in <strong>the</strong>1980s was responsible for <strong>the</strong> high real returns on long-term bonds,and that <strong>the</strong> change in Federal fiscal policy is responsible in largepart for <strong>the</strong> declines in real interest rates.<strong>The</strong> <strong>President</strong>'s economic plan reoriented fiscal policy from consumptiontoward investment, both by reducing <strong>the</strong> size <strong>of</strong> projectedbudget deficits and by changing <strong>the</strong> composition <strong>of</strong> Federal spendingfrom current expenditures to investment. <strong>The</strong> reduction in futureFederal borrowing was well received by <strong>the</strong> financial markets.In <strong>the</strong> words <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Federal Reserve Board Chairman in his July1993 Humphrey-Hawkins testimony, <strong>the</strong> financial markets"brought forward" <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> future deficit reduction. <strong>The</strong> eventanalysis shown in Chart 2-12, linking <strong>the</strong> announcement and enactment<strong>of</strong> credible budget reduction to changes in <strong>the</strong> long-terminterest rate, provides support for <strong>the</strong> view that <strong>the</strong> interest ratedeclines were largely due to budget policy.Long-term interest rates are near <strong>the</strong> lowest <strong>the</strong>y have beensince <strong>the</strong> 1960s. On election day 1992, <strong>the</strong> 10-year Treasury yieldwas 6.87 percent. It has ratcheted down several times since <strong>the</strong>n,with <strong>the</strong> declines closely tied to political and legislative events. <strong>The</strong>yield fell to 6.02 percent at <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> February, following TreasurySecretary Bentsen's announcement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> proposed energy tax and<strong>the</strong> <strong>President</strong>'s speech announcing his economic plan. <strong>The</strong> declinestalled in April when <strong>the</strong> stimulus component <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>President</strong>'splan was filibustered in <strong>the</strong> Senate. It resumed its downwardmovement when <strong>the</strong> House passed <strong>the</strong> <strong>President</strong>'s budget in lateMay. It <strong>the</strong>n fell to 5.51 percent at <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> August after <strong>the</strong> planwas finally enacted by <strong>the</strong> Congress.Long-term rates did increase in late 1993, reversing some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>decline that followed <strong>the</strong> passage <strong>of</strong> OBRA93. <strong>Report</strong>s in <strong>the</strong> finan-78


Chart 2-12 Yields on 10-Year Treasury SecuritiesAdministration policy actions have had a noticeable effect in reducinginterest rates.Percent7.06.5 \-* '6.0Secretary BentsenDetails FiscalMeasures (1/24/93)<strong>President</strong>'s PlanIntroduced (2/17/93)House Approves<strong>President</strong>'s Plan (5/27/93)5.5Final Approval<strong>of</strong> Budget (8/6/93)5.0_L1992 1993Source: Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Treasury.cial press attributed <strong>the</strong> increase in yields to <strong>the</strong> release <strong>of</strong> favorableeconomic data and to speculation by some financial observersthat <strong>the</strong> Federal Reserve would tighten monetary policy. But <strong>the</strong>sedata and statements did not actually signal much that was newabout <strong>the</strong> state <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> economy nor any change <strong>of</strong> monetary policy.Unobserved factors, psychological or o<strong>the</strong>rwise, are important determinants<strong>of</strong> market prices. Still, despite large, unexplained fluctuations,<strong>the</strong> three major moves in yields shown in <strong>the</strong> chart haveresulted in a cumulative reduction in yields on 10-year Treasuries<strong>of</strong> 104 basis points from <strong>the</strong> election to December 31, 1993.<strong>The</strong> sharp decline in long-term interest rates in 1993 continued<strong>the</strong> downward trend that began in <strong>the</strong> early 1980s. Interest rates,both short- and long-term, had reached historic highs in <strong>the</strong> late1970s and early 1980s, during <strong>the</strong> period <strong>of</strong> very high inflation and<strong>the</strong> subsequent period <strong>of</strong> very tight money. <strong>The</strong> latter period wascharacterized by a negative or slightly positive slope to <strong>the</strong> yieldcurve (which relates interest rates to leng<strong>the</strong>ning maturities).Long-term real rates remained high throughout <strong>the</strong> 1980s. Chart2-13 decomposes <strong>the</strong> nominal yield on 10-year Treasuries into expectedinflation and <strong>the</strong> implied ex ante real interest rate. Expected79


inflation is measured by <strong>the</strong> Blue Chip consensus forecast (a privatesector survey <strong>of</strong> forecasts) for 10-year inflation, which hasbeen compiled semiannually since 1980.Chart 2-13 Real Interest RatesRecent declines in <strong>the</strong> nominal long-term interest rate reflect declines in <strong>the</strong>ex ante real rate from its unusually high level over most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1980s.Percent16Nominal 10-Year Treasury YieldEx Ante Real 10-Year Treasury Yield1980 1983 1986 1989 1992Note: Real rate is nominal rate minus a consensus forecast <strong>of</strong> 10-year inflation.Sources: Council <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Advisers, Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Treasury, and Eggert's Blue Chip<strong>Economic</strong> Indicators.Over <strong>the</strong> period shown in <strong>the</strong> chart, <strong>the</strong> ex ante real rate averagedalmost 5 percent. Unfortunately, comparable data on longtermexpected inflation are not available prior to 1980. Ex post realrates provide only an imperfect guide to ex ante rates, especially forlong-term rates, because <strong>the</strong>re are so few time periods over whichto average <strong>the</strong> expectational errors. Over <strong>the</strong> second half <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>1950s, <strong>the</strong> average ex post real 10-year rate was about 1 percentagepoint, over <strong>the</strong> 1960s it was -0.4 percentage point, and over <strong>the</strong>1970s it was about +0.7 percentage point. <strong>The</strong> low ex post realrates <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1960s and 1970s were surely partly explained by <strong>the</strong>unexpected rise in inflation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1970s. For <strong>the</strong> 1960s and 1970s,<strong>the</strong> ex post 10-year real interest rate understates <strong>the</strong> ex ante realrate because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> unexpected inflation in <strong>the</strong> late 1960s andthroughout <strong>the</strong> 1970s. Based on forecasts <strong>of</strong> 10-year inflation, <strong>the</strong>Council estimates that ex ante real 10-year interest rates averagedslightly above 0.5 percent in <strong>the</strong> 1960s and about 2.4 percent in <strong>the</strong>80


1970s. Although higher than <strong>the</strong> ex post rates for <strong>the</strong> same periods,<strong>the</strong>se rates are well below <strong>the</strong> ex ante rates <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1980s.<strong>The</strong>refore, it appears that real rates were unusually highthroughout <strong>the</strong> 1980s. Only with <strong>the</strong> declines in nominal rates over<strong>the</strong> last few years has <strong>the</strong> real rate begun to decline. With <strong>the</strong> mostrecent set <strong>of</strong> observations, those <strong>of</strong> October 1993, <strong>the</strong> 10-yearTreasury yield was 5.33 percent and <strong>the</strong> Blue Chip consensus forecastfor long-term inflation was 3.3 percent, so <strong>the</strong> real rate wasclose to 2 percent. This level <strong>of</strong> real rates is somewhat above historicalnorms (Box 2-3).Box 2-3.—Are Current Long-Term Interest Rates Sustainable?Long-term Treasury bonds now yield about 6 percent. <strong>The</strong>senominal interest rates are very low by <strong>the</strong> standards <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> lastdecade. But given <strong>the</strong> expected rate <strong>of</strong> inflation and historicalstandards for real interest rates, <strong>the</strong>y appear to be sustainable.Long-term expected inflation is probably between 3 and 3%percent, implying a 2V2- to 3-percent real yield on long-termTreasuries. A real interest rate in this range, although low relativeto recent experience, is not low relative to historical experience.From 1953 to 1982 <strong>the</strong> ex post real yield on 10-year Treasuriesaveraged about 1 percent. Over <strong>the</strong> period 1900-50, <strong>the</strong> expost real yield on government bonds was under 1 percent, but<strong>the</strong>se bonds are not wholly comparable to current Treasurynotes because <strong>the</strong>y were callable and had tax benefits.Clearly, if inflation remains under control, bond yields havesome way to fall to come into line with <strong>the</strong>ir historical realaverages.HOW DEFICIT REDUCTION REDUCES LONG-TERMINTEREST RATES<strong>The</strong> previous section discussed <strong>the</strong> circumstantial evidence linkingFederal deficit reduction to <strong>the</strong> decline in real long-term interestrates. Over <strong>the</strong> 1980s, which saw a growing and potentially explosiveFederal debt, real long-term rates were unprecedentedlyhigh. Over <strong>the</strong> last 15 months <strong>the</strong>re have been sharp declines inreal rates associated with policy changes that provide for credibledeficit reduction. This section explores <strong>the</strong> four economic mechanismsthat link Federal deficit reduction policy with <strong>the</strong> real rate:national saving, investment, and capital accumulation; <strong>the</strong> policymix; short-run real activity; and inflation risk.81


Saving, Investment, and Capital Accumulation<strong>The</strong> Federal debt-GDP ratio doubled in <strong>the</strong> 1980s, jumping from22 percent <strong>of</strong> GDP in 1980 to 46 percent currently (Chart 2-14).To <strong>the</strong> extent that Federal debt substitutes for productive capitalin an individual's portfolio, <strong>the</strong> increase in debt reduces income andproductivity and raises <strong>the</strong> marginal product <strong>of</strong> capital and <strong>the</strong>refore<strong>the</strong> real interest rate. <strong>The</strong> Administration's economic plan ismeant to increase national saving and national investment. <strong>The</strong> cumulatedadditional investment will have a significant effect on <strong>the</strong>capital stock and <strong>the</strong>refore on future real interest rates. (See <strong>the</strong>section on "Long-Term Effects <strong>of</strong> Deficit Reduction" below for estimates<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> impact <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> plan on wages and <strong>the</strong> capital stock.)Chart 2-14 Net Federal Debt as Percent <strong>of</strong> Nominal GDPFrom <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> World War II until 1980, <strong>the</strong> debt-GDP ratio fell to about 20 percent.Since 1980 it has increased to over 45 percent.1945 1949 1953 1957 1961 1965 1969 1973 1977 1981 1985 1989 1993Fiscal YearNote: Net Federal debt is defined as debt held by <strong>the</strong> public less debt held by <strong>the</strong> Federal Reserve.Sources: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce and Office <strong>of</strong> Management and Budget.<strong>The</strong> policy changes in OBRA93 reduce <strong>the</strong> projected deficit forfiscal 1998 by 1% percent <strong>of</strong> GDP. Not all <strong>of</strong> this projected reductionin <strong>the</strong> deficit will go to national investment, however. Changesin ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> current account or private saving could <strong>of</strong>fset <strong>the</strong> decreasein Federal dissaving.During <strong>the</strong> 1980s much <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Federal deficit was <strong>of</strong>fset by increasesin <strong>the</strong> current account deficit. As <strong>the</strong> budget deficit is reduced,<strong>the</strong>re should be similar decreases in <strong>the</strong> current account82


deficit. <strong>The</strong> mechanism is simple. Deficit reduction is generally associatedwith an improvement in <strong>the</strong> price competitiveness <strong>of</strong> U.S.goods and services abroad, and <strong>the</strong>refore an increase in net exports.This expansion in net exports provides a stimulus that partially<strong>of</strong>fsets <strong>the</strong> contractionary impact <strong>of</strong> spending cuts and tax increaseson domestic demand. While it is difficult to determine <strong>the</strong>magnitude <strong>of</strong> this <strong>of</strong>fset precisely, studies suggest that net exportswill rise by approximately 40 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> initial deficit reduction.Declines in private saving could also <strong>of</strong>fset decreased Federal dissaving.However, <strong>the</strong> experience <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1980s provides strong evidenceon <strong>the</strong> reaction <strong>of</strong> private savers to government deficits. Personalsaving did not act to <strong>of</strong>fset ballooning Federal deficits in <strong>the</strong>1980s, contrary to <strong>the</strong> predictions <strong>of</strong> neo-Ricardian <strong>the</strong>ory. <strong>The</strong>refore,we expect no decrease in private saving as deficits are reducedunder <strong>the</strong> <strong>President</strong>'s economic plan. After taking into account <strong>the</strong>reduction in <strong>the</strong> current account deficit, we estimate that <strong>the</strong> deficitreduction plan enacted in OBRA93 should increase <strong>the</strong> share <strong>of</strong>national investment in GDP by about 1 percentage point.<strong>The</strong> deficit reduction package should increase <strong>the</strong> capital stock,as productive capital substitutes for government debt in privateportfolios. An increase in <strong>the</strong> share <strong>of</strong> investment in GDP <strong>of</strong> 1 percentagepoint would have a substantial effect on <strong>the</strong> capital-laborratio—raising it in steady state by about 10 percent (see below fordetails <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> assumptions underlying this calculation). With conservativeassumptions about <strong>the</strong> curvature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> production function(which governs how much output per worker will increase fora given increase in capital per worker), such a change in <strong>the</strong> capital-laborratio would be expected to reduce <strong>the</strong> return on capitalby about 2 percentage points—which is slightly higher than <strong>the</strong> declinein real long-term rates that we have seen to date.It takes many years, however, to adjust to a new steady state.Along <strong>the</strong> transition path, <strong>the</strong> return on capital would fall onlygradually. So, even if we accept <strong>the</strong> implied reduction in <strong>the</strong>steady-state return on capital, capital deepening alone cannot accountfor <strong>the</strong> sharp reduction <strong>of</strong> interest rates on long-term bondsthat has already occurred.Policy MixCredible deficit reduction also might affect long-term interestrates through <strong>the</strong> expectation <strong>of</strong> a changed mix <strong>of</strong> fiscal and monetarypolicy. In <strong>the</strong> 1980s, <strong>the</strong> Federal Reserve pursued a relativelyrestrictive policy to counter <strong>the</strong> stimulus engendered by loose fiscalpolicy. This mix resulted in high real interest rates. With credibledeficit reduction, <strong>the</strong> Federal Reserve will be able to achieve agiven level <strong>of</strong> nominal demand with a less restrictive monetary policy.This shift in <strong>the</strong> policy mix should reduce future real shortterminterest rates. Expectations that short rates will be lower in83


<strong>the</strong> future should be reflected in lower real long-term rates. As aconsequence, <strong>the</strong> composition <strong>of</strong> output will shift toward investmentat <strong>the</strong> expense <strong>of</strong> consumption.<strong>The</strong> Short-Run Level <strong>of</strong> Real ActivityLong-term rates might also fall because <strong>of</strong> bad news about expectedfuture real economic activity. Real growth in <strong>the</strong> first half<strong>of</strong> 1993 was indeed disappointing. But both Administration and privateforecasters believed, correctly as it turned out, that growthwould be better in <strong>the</strong> second half <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> year. Moreover, if <strong>the</strong>reare fears <strong>of</strong> a future slump, why is <strong>the</strong> stock market at recordhighs? Presumably, market participants expect good earnings anddividends. <strong>The</strong> low bond yields and high stock values are consistentwith <strong>the</strong> path <strong>of</strong> stable growth, low inflation, and decreasing unemploymentthat <strong>the</strong> Administration forecasts. Finally, <strong>the</strong> news <strong>of</strong> increasinggrowth that began to emerge in <strong>the</strong> fall was greeted byonly modest increases in long-term rates.Inflation RiskA decline in expected inflation could also account for <strong>the</strong> declinein long-term bond rates associated with <strong>the</strong> deficit reduction plan.Chart 2-13 shows, however, that <strong>the</strong>re is no break in inflation expectationsassociated with this decline in long-term bond rates. <strong>The</strong>difference between <strong>the</strong> nominal and real interest rates in Chart 2-13 gives a time-series <strong>of</strong> expected long-term inflation. In October1992 <strong>the</strong> Blue Chip consensus expected an average annual GDP inflation<strong>of</strong> 3.3 percent for <strong>1994</strong>-98 and 3.4 percent for 1999-2003.In October 1993, <strong>the</strong> consensus was again for 3.3-percent inflationfor 1995-99, and 3.3 percent for 2000-2004. Hence, <strong>the</strong> consensusforecast implies that virtually all <strong>the</strong> recent reductions in nominallong-term rates were also reductions in real rates.SHORT-RUN EFFECTS OF INTEREST RATES<strong>The</strong> reduction in real long-term interest rates has been an importantelement powering <strong>the</strong> economic recovery. As discussed elsewherein this chapter, reductions in Federal purchases—especiallyfor defense—have been an important factor holding back <strong>the</strong> recovery.As <strong>the</strong> reductions in expenditures and increases in taxes builtinto <strong>the</strong> Administration's plan take effect, <strong>the</strong>y—taken in isolation—wouldplace a continued drag on <strong>the</strong> economy. But <strong>the</strong>yshould not be taken in isolation. Because long-term interest ratesanticipate credible future fiscal consolidation, <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> deficitreduction in long-term rates show up in advance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> actual deficitreduction. <strong>The</strong> resulting increases in interest-sensitive expendituresprovide a boost to economic growth that works in <strong>the</strong> oppositedirection <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> direct fiscal effect. This increase in interest-sensitivespending is closely linked with <strong>the</strong> sustained reduction in84


long rates. In 1993, real GDP in <strong>the</strong> interest-sensitive sectors (businessfixed investment, housing, and consumer durables) rose 11percent, while <strong>the</strong> non-interest-sensitive sectors showed virtuallyno growth.<strong>The</strong> interest-sensitive components <strong>of</strong> spending did not, however,increase uniformly throughout 1993. Producers' durable equipmentwas strong throughout <strong>the</strong> year, growing 18 percent from fourthquarter to fourth quarter. Expenditure on consumer durables wasalso strong throughout <strong>the</strong> year (with an 8-percent growth rate),but production <strong>of</strong> automobiles was irregular. Investment innonresidential structures was weak for most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> year, most likelyas a result <strong>of</strong> high vacancy rates in existing buildings, due inturn partly to overbuilding in <strong>the</strong> 1980s. <strong>The</strong> lags in <strong>the</strong> response<strong>of</strong> residential construction to <strong>the</strong> low interest rates were unusuallylong. Residential investment fell at a 4-percent annual rate in <strong>the</strong>first two quarters <strong>of</strong> 1993, but rose at a 21-percent rate in <strong>the</strong> lasttwo quarters.Net exports would appear on many economists' lists <strong>of</strong> interestsensitiveexpenditures. Normally, low interest rates should lead todepreciation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dollar and <strong>the</strong>refore to increased exports. Thischannel for interest rates was <strong>of</strong>fset by o<strong>the</strong>r factors, however.Short-term rates fell around <strong>the</strong> world, not just in <strong>the</strong> UnitedStates, and <strong>the</strong> dollar has actually appreciated slightly on a multilateralbasis. (A fur<strong>the</strong>r discussion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> exchange rate is presentedin Chapter 6.)LONG-TERM EFFECTS OF DEFICIT REDUCTION<strong>The</strong> key macroeconomic rationale for reducing <strong>the</strong> Federal deficitis to increase investment and <strong>the</strong>refore productivity and real incomesin <strong>the</strong> future. Changes in fiscal policy should exert sustainedeffects on national investment and saving. As discussed above, <strong>the</strong><strong>President</strong>'s economic plan should increase <strong>the</strong> share <strong>of</strong> domestic investmentin GDP by about 1 percent once it is fully phased in.Chart 2-15 shows <strong>the</strong> projected impact <strong>of</strong> such an increase in <strong>the</strong>national investment rate on <strong>the</strong> marginal product <strong>of</strong> capital, <strong>the</strong>real wage rate, and <strong>the</strong> capital stock. (Box 2-4 contains details <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> computation.) <strong>The</strong> data are expressed relative to <strong>the</strong> initialsteady-state position.All <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> variables require several decades to adjust to <strong>the</strong>irsteady-state values. <strong>The</strong> ultimate reduction in <strong>the</strong> return to capitalis about 2 percentage points. <strong>The</strong> reduction in long-term rates wehave already seen is closer to IV2 percentage points. <strong>The</strong> reductionin <strong>the</strong> marginal product <strong>of</strong> capital takes place, however, over a verylong period <strong>of</strong> time. Indeed, as presented in <strong>the</strong> chart, <strong>the</strong> marginalproduct <strong>of</strong> capital is down only 1 percentage point after 8 years.Moreover, since capital and bonds are not perfect substitutes, <strong>the</strong>ir85


Chart 2-15 Dynamic Effects <strong>of</strong> Deficit Reduction<strong>The</strong> real effects <strong>of</strong> raising <strong>the</strong> saving rate through deficit reduction includehigher wages and investment and lower real interest rates.Percent12Percentage points10Wage(left scale)Marginal Product <strong>of</strong> Capital(right scale)0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50YearsSource: Council <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Advisers.rates will move by less than one for one. O<strong>the</strong>r factors, such as expectationsabout <strong>the</strong> policy mix, <strong>the</strong>refore must explain <strong>the</strong> bulk <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> rate reduction.A small increase in <strong>the</strong> investment rate buys a substantial increasein <strong>the</strong> capital stock, again over a long period. This increasein <strong>the</strong> capital stock should ultimately raise real wages and productivityby about 3 3 A percent.Initially, consumption falls because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> direct effect <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Federalbudget package. As output and productivity increase, however,so does consumption. It takes about 5 years for <strong>the</strong> change in fiscalpolicy to have a net positive effect on consumption. <strong>The</strong>reafter, <strong>the</strong>effect <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> economic plan is to raise consumption permanently,eventually by more than 2V2 percent per year.<strong>The</strong>se calculations are quite conservative. <strong>The</strong>y do not assumeany externality from capital accumulation or any extra boost toproductivity from embodied technological progress. If <strong>the</strong>se factorsare present, <strong>the</strong> gains from <strong>the</strong> increase in investment could besubstantially higher.86


Box 2-4.—-Estimating <strong>the</strong> Long-Run Effects <strong>of</strong> DeficitReductionChart 2-15 shows <strong>the</strong> results <strong>of</strong> applying a model <strong>of</strong> economicgrowth developed by Robert M, Solow to <strong>the</strong> change in<strong>the</strong> investment rate engendered by OBRA93. To carry out<strong>the</strong>se calculations, we make several assumptions:• <strong>The</strong> production function is Cobb-Douglas with a capitalshare <strong>of</strong> one-third. (<strong>The</strong> Cobb-Douglas function presumesa fairly large degree <strong>of</strong> substitutability between capitaland labor and will thus show a substantial output effect<strong>of</strong> increasing capital).• <strong>The</strong> rate <strong>of</strong> growth <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> economy's potential output (alittle below 2,5 percent) plus <strong>the</strong> rate <strong>of</strong> depreciation (alittle above 9 percent) is 1L5 percent.• <strong>The</strong> initial investment rate is 13 percent, about <strong>the</strong> ratio<strong>of</strong> fixed investment to GDP in 1993. It is assumed to riseto 13.4 percent <strong>the</strong> first year, 13*7 percent in <strong>the</strong> second,13.8 percent in <strong>the</strong> third, and is 14.0 percent <strong>the</strong>reafter.<strong>The</strong> magnitude and timing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> increases in investment re*fleet <strong>the</strong> increase in Federal saving from <strong>the</strong> deficit reductionpackage and <strong>the</strong> assumption (see text) that 40 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>increased Federal saving will be <strong>of</strong>fset by a reduced current accountdeficit.<strong>The</strong>se calculations are subject to a considerable degree <strong>of</strong> tincertainty.<strong>The</strong>y are sensitive to <strong>the</strong> form <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> productionfunction and <strong>the</strong> assumed rates <strong>of</strong> depreciation and growth inpotential.THE ECONOMY'S RESPONSE TO HIGHERINCOME TAXESCritics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> increase in income tax rates enacted in August1993 make two related claims: first, that higher tax rates will havean adverse effect on <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong> saving, investment, and employmentin <strong>the</strong> economy, and second, that <strong>the</strong> higher tax rates onhigh-income taxpayers will not result in much (or any) increase intax revenues. <strong>The</strong> arguments <strong>of</strong>fered to bolster <strong>the</strong>se claims havea common foundation, namely, that <strong>the</strong> disincentive effects <strong>of</strong> highermarginal tax rates have a pr<strong>of</strong>ound influence on individuals' behavior.We note first that economies can thrive under a wide range <strong>of</strong>top marginal tax rates—which already weakens <strong>the</strong> arguments <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong>se critics. In fact, <strong>the</strong> U.S. economy has performed extremelywell during periods <strong>of</strong> relatively high top marginal rates: We en-87


joyed healthy average real GDP growth <strong>of</strong> 4 percent per year over<strong>the</strong> decade <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1960s, when <strong>the</strong> top marginal income tax rate onwage and salary income averaged 80.3 percent, but less impressive2V2-percent average annual growth in <strong>the</strong> decade <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1980s,when <strong>the</strong> top rate on wages and salaries averaged 48.4 percent.Also, many people in <strong>the</strong> United States admired <strong>the</strong> investment-ledeconomic boom that Japan enjoyed in <strong>the</strong> 1980s, when that countryhad much higher marginal income tax rates than did <strong>the</strong> UnitedStates. Obviously, many o<strong>the</strong>r important factors besides marginaltax rates determine saving and investment patterns and economicgrowth.DO TAXES CHANGE BEHAVIOR?A central tenet <strong>of</strong> economics is that relative prices matter. Taxeson capital and wage income change <strong>the</strong> relationships among <strong>the</strong>various prices that people face when deciding how much to save,invest, and work, and thus have an effect on <strong>the</strong> way people chooseto allocate <strong>the</strong>ir time (between supplying labor and taking leisure)and <strong>the</strong>ir income (between current consumption and saving). Thisobservation serves as <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> supply-side dictum that a reductionin taxes, by inducing people to work harder and save more,can induce higher rates <strong>of</strong> investment and economic growth.<strong>The</strong> extent to which changes in <strong>the</strong> marginal tax rate on incomeaffect labor supply and saving has been a subject <strong>of</strong> extensive researchfor many years. <strong>The</strong> preponderance <strong>of</strong> evidence seems to indicatethat <strong>the</strong> changes are small. Saving rates seem to be little affectedby movements in after-tax interest rates, and hours workedand labor force participation rates for most demographic groupsshow only limited sensitivity to changes in after-tax wages.It is undeniable that <strong>the</strong> sharp reduction in taxes in <strong>the</strong> early1980s was a strong impetus to economic growth. But it is unlikelythat <strong>the</strong> principal source <strong>of</strong> this growth was people reacting to reductionsin marginal tax rates by working and saving more. <strong>The</strong>expansion that took place over <strong>the</strong> 1980s was tax-induced mainlyins<strong>of</strong>ar as lower taxes raised disposable income, which led to increasedconsumption. For example, between 1981 and 1986, <strong>the</strong>consumption share <strong>of</strong> GDP increased from 64.5 percent to 67.4 percent.In o<strong>the</strong>r words, <strong>the</strong> 1980s' saw a classical Keynesian, demand-drivenexpansion—not <strong>the</strong> kind <strong>of</strong> expansion that supply-side<strong>the</strong>ory predicted. Those who would point to <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1980'stax cuts as evidence <strong>of</strong> strong supply-side effects <strong>of</strong> taxation aregrossly overstating <strong>the</strong> case.<strong>The</strong> increases in <strong>the</strong> top marginal income tax rates enacted by<strong>the</strong> Congress in 1993 will affect directly only <strong>the</strong> top 1.2 percent<strong>of</strong> <strong>American</strong> families. Moreover, top marginal tax rates remain lowby historical standards. While some individuals may alter <strong>the</strong>ir be-88


havior because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> higher tax rates and, for example, cut back<strong>the</strong>ir hours worked, o<strong>the</strong>rs may actually increase <strong>the</strong>ir work effortin order to meet saving or consumption objectives. Overall, it is unlikelythat <strong>the</strong> Administration's plan will induce large responses inlabor force participation, hours worked, or savings in <strong>the</strong> overalleconomy.DO HIGHER TAX RATES INCREASE TAX REVENUES?Some also argue that income tax collections do not vary muchwhen top marginal tax rates increase or decrease. In this view, anincrease in income tax rates provides such a strong incentive forpeople to reduce <strong>the</strong>ir taxable income that <strong>the</strong> tax base shrinks andno additional revenue is generated. For example, a worker facinghigher taxes on wages might choose to take some compensation in<strong>the</strong> form <strong>of</strong> nonwage benefits, such as more vacation time or largerfuture pensions. Similarly, individuals facing higher tax rates onunearned income might change <strong>the</strong> composition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir savings(while keeping <strong>the</strong> level constant) by investing in tax-exempt bondsra<strong>the</strong>r than stocks or corporate debt.History can serve as a guide to determining whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>se <strong>of</strong>fsettingeffects <strong>of</strong> a change in tax rates are strong enough to have asignificant impact on revenues. For <strong>the</strong> United States, contrary to<strong>the</strong> supply-siders' claims, income tax cuts have generally reducedincome tax revenues and tax increases have generally raised <strong>the</strong>m.Chart 2-16 illustrates <strong>the</strong> effect that a number <strong>of</strong> changes in taxpolicy have had on personal income tax receipts. Several episodesstand out:• <strong>The</strong> 1964 tax cut reduced <strong>the</strong> top marginal rate from 91 percentin 1963 to 77 percent in 1964 and <strong>the</strong>n to 70 percent in1965. Income tax revenue as a share <strong>of</strong> GDP dropped sharply.• <strong>The</strong> special Vietnam war surtax imposed additional chargesequal to 7.5 percent <strong>of</strong> tax in 1968, 10 percent in 1969, and 2.5percent in 1970. <strong>The</strong> result was a sharp increase in revenuesin 1968 and 1969, followed by a decline as <strong>the</strong> surtax wasphased out.• <strong>The</strong> 1981 tax cut reduced <strong>the</strong> top marginal rate from 70 percentto 50 percent in 1982 and cut tax rates for lower incomeindividuals over <strong>the</strong> 1982-84 period. Since <strong>the</strong>n, personal incometax revenues as a share <strong>of</strong> GDP have never regained <strong>the</strong>ir1981-82 levels. Similarly, <strong>the</strong> 1986 tax reform reduced marginalrates in stages over 1987 and 1988, and revenues as ashare <strong>of</strong> GDP in 1988 fell slightly below <strong>the</strong>ir 1986 level.In short, evidence from postwar experience strongly suggeststhat personal income tax revenues rise when marginal rates are increased,and fall when marginal rates are reduced.89


Chart 2-16 Personal Income Taxes as Percent <strong>of</strong> GDPA number <strong>of</strong> historical changes in tax rates demonstrate <strong>the</strong> effect that ratechanges have on revenues.Percent10 |TaxReductionAct <strong>of</strong> 19751981 ReaganTax Cut(phased inover 1981-84)I I I I III M I I M MI I I l 111I I I I1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990Note: Shaded bars denote recessions.Sources: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce and National Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Research.THE ECONOMIC OUTLOOKA credible deficit reduction plan and low long-term interest rateshave set <strong>the</strong> stage for moderate but sustainable economic growthover <strong>the</strong> mid-1990s. As <strong>the</strong> ratio <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Federal budget deficit toGDP declines, financial markets should be reassured that inflationand interest rates can be sustained at <strong>the</strong> levels <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1950s and1960s. Interest-sensitive sectors <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> economy, particularly businessfixed investment, should thrive and provide a steady demandbase. Housing and demand for household durable goods and automobilesshould also do well and underpin a steady economic expansion.<strong>The</strong> lean inventories that <strong>the</strong> economy was carrying as it entered<strong>1994</strong> suggest that manufacturers should face gradually increasingorder levels. With <strong>the</strong> factory workweek and manufacturing overtimeat postwar highs, <strong>the</strong>re will be growing pressure on firms toadd new workers to meet production demands. Higher employmentshould contribute to a steady increase in income and provide lift forall sectors <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> economy. Income growth, which was outstrippedby increases in consumer spending over <strong>the</strong> course <strong>of</strong> 1993, should90


gradually overtake spending growth over <strong>the</strong> next couple <strong>of</strong> years,leading to a slowly increasing saving rate.Finally, foreign economies should recover over <strong>the</strong> next couple <strong>of</strong>years and provide an export lift for U.S. firms. By early 1995, netexports should once again be contributing to U.S. growth ra<strong>the</strong>rthan subtracting from it. Strength in <strong>the</strong>se sectors is expected tomore than <strong>of</strong>fset <strong>the</strong> continued declines in real Federal spendingthat are expected over <strong>the</strong> next 5 years.<strong>The</strong> projected decline in <strong>the</strong> Federal budget deficit, from 4.0 percent<strong>of</strong> GDP in fiscal 1993 to about 2.3 percent <strong>of</strong> GDP by fiscal1996, should have benefits for <strong>the</strong> economy that go beyond interestrates. First, with less government "crowding out," more funds willbe available for private business investment. This higher investmentlevel will increase <strong>the</strong> Nation's capital stock and hence increaseits long-run potential output. Second, <strong>the</strong>re is a linkage between<strong>the</strong> Federal budget deficit and <strong>the</strong> current account deficit.Because foreign savings have been steadily flowing into <strong>the</strong> UnitedStates to cover <strong>the</strong> imbalance between domestic saving and domesticinvestment, we have been running large capital account surpluses.<strong>The</strong>se in turn have required large current account deficits,because <strong>the</strong> two accounts are mirror images. A steady reduction <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> Federal budget deficit, <strong>the</strong>refore, should also translate intosmaller current account deficits.With <strong>the</strong>se developments, GDP growth <strong>of</strong> 2V2 percent to 3 percentper year—in line with 1993 growth—seems likely to continueover <strong>the</strong> rest <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1990s (Table 2-2). This growth should be sufficientto reduce <strong>the</strong> unemployment rate steadily from <strong>the</strong> roughly6V2-percent level <strong>of</strong> late 1993 to about 5V2 percent (under <strong>the</strong> oldunemployment definition) by <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> 1998. (Box 3-1 in Chapter3 contains a discussion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> relationship between <strong>the</strong> old unemploymentrate, based on <strong>the</strong> historical Current Population Survey,and <strong>the</strong> new unemployment rate, based on <strong>the</strong> revised version <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> survey.) <strong>The</strong>se gains will be paired with healthy increases inreal disposable income, which are as important as job growth to <strong>the</strong><strong>American</strong> worker. After two decades <strong>of</strong> relative stagnation, realwages should post solid gains and allow <strong>American</strong> families onceagain to enjoy steadily improving living standards.Within this macroeconomic environment, short-term interestrates are likely to drift slowly upward over <strong>the</strong> coming years as <strong>the</strong>economy streng<strong>the</strong>ns. Long-term interest rates are not expected toincrease appreciably, however, because inflation should remainsubdued and budget deficits will continue to shrink. Healthy gainsin productivity, <strong>the</strong> mainspring <strong>of</strong> rising living standards, will be<strong>the</strong> key to keeping inflation tame. <strong>The</strong> higher rate <strong>of</strong> business investmentin <strong>the</strong> 1990s than in <strong>the</strong> 1970s and 1980s should keepproductivity on a relatively fast track and prevent unit labor costs91


TABLE 2-2.— Administration ForecastsItem 1993 <strong>1994</strong> 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999Percent change, fourth quarter to fourth quarterReal GDPGDP implicit deflator .Consumer price index(CPI-U)2.82.22.73.02.73.02.72.83.22.72.93.32.63.03.42.63.03.42.53.03.4Calendar year averageUnemployment rate(percent)Old basisNew basisInterest rate, 91-dayTreasury bills(percent)Interest rate, 10-yearTreasury note(percent)Nonfarm payroll employment(millions)6.83.05.9110.26.3(6.6-7.2)3.45.7112.35.9(6.2-6.8)3.85.7114.35.7(6.0-6.6)4.15.7116.25.6(5.9-6.5)4.45.7118.25.5(5.8-6.4)Sources: Council <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Advisers, Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Treasury, and Office <strong>of</strong> Management and Budget.4.45.7120.05.5(5.8-6.4)from accelerating. Health care reform should help rein in <strong>the</strong> spiralingcosts that have plagued that huge sector <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> economy andthus help control overall inflation.<strong>The</strong> Administration's forecast is in line with private sector forecastsfor <strong>1994</strong> and <strong>the</strong> mid-1990s. It assumes no dramatic shift inaggregate economic performance beyond <strong>the</strong> trends clearly establishedover 1993—low inflation, low long-term interest rates, andhealthy investment spending. It also assumes that <strong>the</strong> historical(Okun's law) relationship between output and unemployment continuesto hold.RISKS TO THE FORECASTAs always, <strong>the</strong>re are risks to this forecast. First, foreign economicactivity may not pick up as expected, especially if o<strong>the</strong>r governmentsremain reluctant to stimulate <strong>the</strong>ir economies by easing interestrates or pursuing countercyclical fiscal policies. It is also possiblethat <strong>the</strong> kind <strong>of</strong> industrial restructuring that <strong>the</strong> UnitedStates has endured over <strong>the</strong> past decade may prove to be a biggerhurdle than realized for key European trading partners and Japan.Also, <strong>the</strong> timetable for <strong>the</strong> correction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Japanese speculativebubble <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> late 1980s is unclear and could take longer than expected.<strong>The</strong> better <strong>the</strong> Group <strong>of</strong> Seven countries coordinate <strong>the</strong>irmacroeconomic policies over <strong>the</strong> next couple <strong>of</strong> years, <strong>the</strong> lower <strong>the</strong>risk <strong>of</strong> a prolonged pause in industrial-country growth.4.45.7121.992


A second risk is that long-term interest rates could take backmore <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir declines <strong>of</strong> 1993. Such a move could crimp <strong>the</strong> interest-sensitivesectors that provided <strong>the</strong> economy with most <strong>of</strong> itsgrowth in 1993. Housing and business fixed investment would likelybe <strong>the</strong> most vulnerable sectors.A stalling out <strong>of</strong> consumer demand cannot be ruled out ei<strong>the</strong>r.Consumers have been increasing <strong>the</strong>ir spending by a larger percentagethan <strong>the</strong>ir incomes have been rising over <strong>the</strong> past year,and <strong>the</strong>y could turn pessimistic about <strong>the</strong> future again. Indeed,<strong>the</strong>y have already done so several times in this business cycle expansion.An unexpected cutback in consumer spending would leadto higher than desired inventory levels, which would in turn reverberateback through <strong>the</strong> economy in <strong>the</strong> form <strong>of</strong> lower orders andperhaps lower employment in manufacturing.But economic growth could also exceed this forecast in <strong>the</strong> shortrun. <strong>The</strong> U.S. output gap widened sharply over <strong>the</strong> 1990-91 recession,and <strong>the</strong> economy could grow faster than its noninflationarypotential for a couple <strong>of</strong> years as part <strong>of</strong> a catchup process. Certainlygrowth <strong>of</strong> 4 percent would not be unprecedented during sucha phase. Among <strong>the</strong> factors that might contribute to faster than expectedgrowth are a faster than expected rebound <strong>of</strong> economicgrowth in Europe, Japan, and <strong>the</strong> rest <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> industrial world,which would sharply boost U.S. exports; oil prices remaining relativelylow and giving a healthy boost to real disposable incomes;and <strong>the</strong> possibility that <strong>American</strong>s have more pent-up demandthan realized for houses, automobiles, and o<strong>the</strong>r durable goods.SOURCES OF LONG-RUN GROWTH<strong>The</strong> long-run rate <strong>of</strong> real GDP growth can be expressed as <strong>the</strong>sum <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> individual growth rates <strong>of</strong> four components: (1) <strong>the</strong>number <strong>of</strong> available workers in <strong>the</strong> economy (<strong>the</strong> labor force); (2)<strong>the</strong> rate at which <strong>the</strong>se workers are employed (<strong>the</strong> employmentrate); (3) <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> hours worked per year (which is proportionalto <strong>the</strong> average workweek); and (4) <strong>the</strong> quantity <strong>of</strong> goods andservices produced by an hour <strong>of</strong> labor (labor productivity). Table 2-3 details <strong>the</strong> contribution <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se components to real GDPgrowth over several historical time periods and as projected for <strong>the</strong>rest <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> decade. Because many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se components vary with<strong>the</strong> business cycle, <strong>the</strong>ir growth rates are measured from cyclicalpeak to cyclical peak. Estimates in <strong>the</strong> fourth column are based onactual data through <strong>the</strong> fourth quarter <strong>of</strong> 1993 and forecasts by <strong>the</strong>Administration through 1999.<strong>The</strong> projected growth <strong>of</strong> nonfarm business product from <strong>the</strong> businesscycle peak in <strong>the</strong> third quarter <strong>of</strong> 1990 to <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> 1999 is2.7 percent per year. Underlying this projection is a growth in outputper hour <strong>of</strong> 1.5 percent per year and growth in hours <strong>of</strong> 1.2 per-151-444 0 - 9 4 - 493


TABLE 2-3.— Accounting for Growth in Real GDP, 1960-99[Average annual percent change!1960 Ito1981 I1973 IVto1981 III1981 IIIto1990 III1990 IIIto1999 IV1) Civilian2) PLUS.3) EQUALS4) PLUS.5) EQUALS:6) PLUS:ployment7) EQUALS:8) PLUS:9) EQUALS:10) PLUS:11) EQUALS.12) LESS:13) EQUALS: Real GOPnoninstitutional population aged 16 and overCivilian labor force participation rateCivilian labor forceCivilian employment rateCivilian employmentNonfarm business employment as a share <strong>of</strong> civilian em-Nonfarm business employmentAverage weekly hours (nonfarm business sector) ...Hours <strong>of</strong> all persons (nonfarm business)Output per hour (productivity, nonfarm business) ..Nonfarm business outputNonfarm business output as a share <strong>of</strong> real GDP 21 Line six translates <strong>the</strong> civilian employment growth rate into <strong>the</strong> nonfarm business employment growth rate.2 Line 12 translates nonfarm business output back into output for all sectors (GDP), which includes <strong>the</strong> output <strong>of</strong> farmsand general government.Note.—Data may not sum to totals due to rounding.Time periods are from business cycle peak to business cycle peak to avoid cyclical variation.Source: Council <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Advisers, Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, Department <strong>of</strong> Labor, Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Treasury, andOffice <strong>of</strong> Management and Budget.cent per year. <strong>The</strong> share <strong>of</strong> nonfarm business in GDP is projectedto grow at 0.4 percent per year, so <strong>the</strong> growth rate <strong>of</strong> GDP overthis period is projected to be roughly 2.4 percent per year.<strong>The</strong> forecast for nonfarm hours assumes a civilian labor forcegrowth rate <strong>of</strong> 1.2 percent per year, which is about a percentagepoint lower than labor force growth during <strong>the</strong> 1960s and 1970s.Virtually all <strong>of</strong> this difference reflects <strong>the</strong> slower growth <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>labor force. It also assumes no change in <strong>the</strong> average workweek.<strong>The</strong> return <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> economy to full employment by 1998 implies zeropeak-to-peak growth in <strong>the</strong> civilian employment rate over <strong>the</strong> forecastperiod.More than half <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> predicted growth in real GDP results froman assumed rate <strong>of</strong> nonfarm labor productivity growth <strong>of</strong> 1.5 percentper year. This rate is somewhat higher than <strong>the</strong> actual rateover <strong>the</strong> past two decades. While <strong>the</strong> sources <strong>of</strong> productivity growthare complex, and <strong>the</strong> causes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> well-documented "productivityslowdown" <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1970s remain under debate, we believe <strong>the</strong>re isjustification for assuming an increase in labor productivity growthover <strong>the</strong> near term.First, <strong>the</strong> baby-boom generation, which entered <strong>the</strong> labor marketen masse during <strong>the</strong> 1970s, has now been fully assimilated. <strong>The</strong>workforce <strong>of</strong> today is thus older, more educated, and more experiencedthan in previous years. Second, capital deepening (see above)is likely to occur. As business continues to respond to low real interestrates, <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong> investment in <strong>the</strong> economy should rise,1.80.32.1-0.12.00.12.1-0.61.51.73.30.13.21.80.52.4-0.42.00.12.1-0.71.30.61.9-0.22.11.10.41.60.21.80.22.00.02.00.92.90.22.71.00.21.20.01.20.01.20.01.21.52.70.42.494


leading to an increase in capital intensity. Third, <strong>the</strong> Administration'sprograms <strong>of</strong> promoting public investment—including bettertransportation and communications infrastructure—and humancapital formation should enhance private sector productivity. <strong>The</strong>implication <strong>of</strong> all <strong>the</strong>se factors is that some improvement in <strong>the</strong>rate <strong>of</strong> productivity growth over <strong>the</strong> next several years is likely.CONCLUSION<strong>The</strong> performance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> U.S. economy was unsatisfactory fromearly 1990 until <strong>the</strong> second half <strong>of</strong> 1992. Job creation was lackluster,unemployment was higher than it should have been, andreal output failed to manifest <strong>the</strong> gains that are usual for an economicrecovery. Even today <strong>the</strong> economy is operating below its potentiallevel <strong>of</strong> output. Some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sluggishness over this periodwas payback for a decade <strong>of</strong> debt-financed growth. Over <strong>the</strong> 1980sand early 1990s, <strong>the</strong> Federal Government ran massive budget deficitseven in years <strong>of</strong> strong economic growth, and <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong> netFederal debt jumped from about $800 billion in 1982 to about $2.7trillion in 1992. A key result was historically high real interestrates.Corporations followed suit, heavily leveraging <strong>the</strong>ir operations.Even individuals got into <strong>the</strong> act and allowed debt levels to risemarkedly. Meanwhile, large budget deficits contributed to <strong>the</strong> remarkabletransformation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> United States, from a country thatlent more to foreigners than it borrowed, into <strong>the</strong> world's largestdebtor.Many necessary corrections have now taken place, including new,more responsible fiscal policy. <strong>The</strong> Federal budget deficit shouldfall roughly in half as a share <strong>of</strong> GDP over <strong>the</strong> next 4 years. Thisanticipated deficit reduction has already caused long-term real interestrates to tumble. With inflation likely to remain subdued,<strong>the</strong>se lower interest rates poise <strong>the</strong> economy for a period <strong>of</strong> sustainedgrowth in <strong>the</strong> mid-1990s. This growth should be sufficientto generate 8 million new jobs within 4 years.Lower interest rates should also boost <strong>the</strong> share <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> economygoing to investment. More investment should lead to capital deepening,higher labor productivity, and higher real <strong>American</strong> wages.As <strong>the</strong> government share <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> economy falls, <strong>the</strong> net export shareshould increase. A higher level <strong>of</strong> exports should give a boost toreal wages, too, partly because export jobs on average pay betterwages than average U.S. jobs, and partly because <strong>of</strong> increasing specializationby <strong>American</strong> industry. Real income gains, in <strong>the</strong> finalanalysis, are <strong>the</strong> ultimate pay<strong>of</strong>f from economic growth.95


CHAPTER 3Trends and Recent Developments in<strong>the</strong> U.S. Labor MarketTHE CLINTON ADMINISTRATION has made increasing both<strong>the</strong> quantity and <strong>the</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> jobs its highest priority. Providinga stable macroeconomic foundation for private sector activity is essentialto achieving this goal, but it is not enough. Sound macroeconomicpolicies are necessary but not sufficient for <strong>the</strong> task athand. <strong>The</strong>y must be complemented by labor market policies to remedya number <strong>of</strong> deep and longstanding impediments to <strong>the</strong> maintenance<strong>of</strong> high employment and to improvements in <strong>the</strong> quality <strong>of</strong>jobs. This chapter discusses <strong>the</strong>se impediments and <strong>the</strong> Administration'sproposals for addressing <strong>the</strong>m.<strong>The</strong> 1990-91 recession and <strong>the</strong> first year <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> recovery witnessedrising unemployment. Even though output and employmenthave since been increasing, <strong>the</strong> news has been filled with stories<strong>of</strong> corporate downsizings and <strong>the</strong> increasing use <strong>of</strong> "contingentworkers." <strong>The</strong>se reports have sharpened fundamental fears about<strong>the</strong> security <strong>of</strong> employment. Popular accounts <strong>of</strong> recent events alsoallege that technical change is reducing employment throughout<strong>the</strong> economy.After rising steadily for several decades, U.S. real wages havehardly grown since <strong>the</strong> early 1970s, while <strong>the</strong> growth <strong>of</strong> total realcompensation (wages plus benefits) has slowed considerably. At <strong>the</strong>same time, <strong>the</strong> income gap between rich and poor has been growing,so that <strong>the</strong> poor are worse <strong>of</strong>f in real terms now than <strong>the</strong>ywere two decades ago. Incomes <strong>of</strong> those in <strong>the</strong> middle have stagnated.<strong>The</strong> unemployment rate, both at peaks and troughs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>business cycle, has tended to be higher in <strong>the</strong> last two decades thanin <strong>the</strong> first half <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> postwar period. Employment-to-populationratios have risen for women, but fallen for men—especially forblack men, whose employment prospects are particularly bleak.Fur<strong>the</strong>r, although <strong>the</strong>re is little evidence <strong>of</strong> any large increase injob instability, turnover rates in <strong>the</strong> U.S. labor market have longbeen very high, and job displacement is <strong>of</strong>ten very costly for thoseunlucky enough to lose a job <strong>the</strong>y have held for many years. Highturnover rates combined with rising inequality imply increasinguncertainty about future income for many <strong>American</strong>s.97


In response to <strong>the</strong>se problems in <strong>the</strong> Nation's labor market,many <strong>of</strong> which have been with us for several years, this Administrationhas set out a long-term work force strategy to help <strong>the</strong>economy create more jobs—at least 8 million over 4 years. To reducejob insecurity, <strong>the</strong> Administration aims to ease labor markettransitions in a number <strong>of</strong> ways. By making sure that people havehealth insurance whe<strong>the</strong>r or not <strong>the</strong>y are employed, <strong>the</strong> Administrationseeks to reduce <strong>the</strong> trauma <strong>of</strong> job loss. <strong>The</strong> strategy also includesplans to help young workers enter <strong>the</strong> labor market moresmoothly by providing a bridge between school and work. <strong>The</strong> WorkForce Security Act will help experienced workers who have lost jobsfind new employment more quickly, and will provide support fortraining for those who cannot.Finally, and importantly, <strong>the</strong> Administration's strategy seeks toimprove worker productivity and increase earnings. To this end,<strong>the</strong> Administration is pursuing policies to increase investment inresearch and development, to spur private investment in plant andequipment, and to facilitate <strong>the</strong> spread <strong>of</strong> modern cooperative employmentpractices (such as total quality management and qualitycircles). <strong>The</strong>se initiatives address <strong>the</strong> general problem <strong>of</strong> slow wagegrowth, but growing inequality and real wage declines for <strong>the</strong> leastadvantaged are problems that require specific attention. Sincegrowing inequality is due in large part to <strong>the</strong> growing mismatchbetween <strong>the</strong> demand for trained labor and its supply, <strong>the</strong> Administrationaims to provide more and higher quality training so thatwages may rise—particularly for <strong>the</strong> middle-class and <strong>the</strong> least advantaged.Income inequality has also been directly addressed by anincrease in <strong>the</strong> earned income tax credit.EMPLOYMENT GROWTHU.S. employment grew rapidly from 1950 to 1990, with <strong>the</strong> number<strong>of</strong> nonfarm jobs increasing on average by over 2.2 percent ayear. In contrast, from <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> 1990 to <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> 1992, jobgrowth was virtually nonexistent. During 1993, employmentgrowth improved considerably to an annual rate <strong>of</strong> 1.8 percent, butjob creation remains low compared with past recoveries. As <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>fourth quarter <strong>of</strong> 1993, <strong>the</strong> U.S. economy had been in recovery for11 quarters. <strong>The</strong> unemployment rate fell from its postrecessionhigh <strong>of</strong> 7.7 percent in June 1992 to 6.4 percent in December 1993.Yet despite <strong>the</strong>se signs <strong>of</strong> recovery <strong>the</strong>re has been widespread concernabout <strong>the</strong> pace <strong>of</strong> job growth.A SLOW RECOVERYWithout question, job growth has been relatively weak since <strong>the</strong>trough <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> recent recession. During <strong>the</strong> 11 quarters after <strong>the</strong>98


first quarter <strong>of</strong> 1991, nonfarm payroll employment grew by 2.3 million,an increase <strong>of</strong> only 2.1 percent. In fact, employment did notbegin to rebound until <strong>the</strong> first quarter <strong>of</strong> 1992. In previous recoveriesemployment growth was much stronger. For example, during<strong>the</strong> first 11 quarters after <strong>the</strong> recession <strong>of</strong> 1981-82, nonfarm employmentgrew by 10.1 percent. In seven previous postwar recoveries,employment increased, on average, by 8.8 percent over <strong>the</strong> first11 quarters <strong>of</strong> recovery and expansion.A key difference between <strong>the</strong> current and past recoveries, however,is <strong>the</strong> extraordinarily slow pace <strong>of</strong> output growth. Real grossdomestic product (GDP) grew only 7.7 percent during <strong>the</strong> first 11quarters <strong>of</strong> this recovery, compared with an average increase <strong>of</strong>14.3 percent during <strong>the</strong> previous postwar recoveries. Possible reasonsfor <strong>the</strong> slow growth <strong>of</strong> output are discussed in Chapter 2. <strong>The</strong>yinclude balance sheet adjustments by firms and consumers, cutbacksin defense purchases, slow growth <strong>of</strong> construction spending,<strong>the</strong> credit crunch, and slower export growth due to weak economiesabroad. Given <strong>the</strong> slow rate <strong>of</strong> output growth, it should not be surprisingthat employment growth has also been slow.Never<strong>the</strong>less, <strong>the</strong> current recovery still stands out relative too<strong>the</strong>r recoveries when one compares <strong>the</strong> ratio <strong>of</strong> total employmentgrowth to output growth. By <strong>the</strong> 11th quarter <strong>of</strong> previous recoveries,that ratio was about 0.62, compared with 0.27 in <strong>the</strong> currentrecovery (Chart 3-1). It is comparisons such as this that have ledobservers to claim that corporate restructuring and rapidly risingproductivity have allowed output to grow without commensurateincreases in employment. Some critics see deeper forces at work.For example, it has been argued that productivity growth—strongestin <strong>the</strong> manufacturing sector—is now proceeding at a rapid pacein <strong>the</strong> service sector as well. Historically, job losses in manufacturingwere <strong>of</strong>fset by rapid growth in <strong>the</strong> service sector, but withstrong productivity growth in <strong>the</strong> service sector this is alleged tobe no longer possible.However, simple comparisons <strong>of</strong> total labor force growth to totaloutput growth miss an essential point. As output rises during <strong>the</strong>early stages <strong>of</strong> a recovery, <strong>the</strong> ratio <strong>of</strong> employment growth to outputgrowth is usually low. This is because employers keep moreworkers on <strong>the</strong>ir payrolls than are needed during downturns, and<strong>the</strong>refore do not hire more workers until <strong>the</strong>ir existing work forceis fully employed and <strong>the</strong>y are confident <strong>of</strong> continued growth. Consequently,employment grows slowly, and may even continue to decline,for <strong>the</strong> first few quarters after GDP begins to recover.Chart 3-2 compares <strong>the</strong> cumulative growth <strong>of</strong> employment andoutput during <strong>the</strong> most recent recovery with that in previous recoveries.<strong>The</strong> boxes show how output and employment have grown toge<strong>the</strong>rhistorically. <strong>The</strong> circles show how output and employment99


Chart 3-1 Changes in Output and Payroll Employment in First Eleven Quarters <strong>of</strong> Recovery<strong>The</strong> ratio <strong>of</strong> employment to output growth is much lower in <strong>the</strong> current recoverythan in <strong>the</strong> past. Output growth is much slower, too.Percent30- 0.21952 1956 1960 1963 1973 1977Year <strong>of</strong> 11 th Quarter <strong>of</strong> Recovery1985 19930.01HOutput Growth I I Employment-Output Growth Ratio(left scale)(right scale)Sources: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce and Department <strong>of</strong> Labor.have grown toge<strong>the</strong>r in <strong>the</strong> most recent recovery. Although <strong>the</strong> cumulativegrowth <strong>of</strong> output and that <strong>of</strong> employment have both beenextraordinarily slow in this recovery, <strong>the</strong> relationship between <strong>the</strong>mis consistent with historical experience. Using <strong>the</strong> historical relationshipbetween output and employment growth, one can estimatewhat employment growth should have been during <strong>the</strong> most recentrecovery given output growth. This exercise yields estimates <strong>of</strong> cumulativeemployment growth that are larger than actual employmentgrowth during this recovery by as much as 1 percent <strong>of</strong> totalemployment. This is a large difference, but not a statistically significantone. In o<strong>the</strong>r words, employment growth in <strong>the</strong> most recentrecovery appears to have been at <strong>the</strong> low end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> range <strong>of</strong> historicalexperience, but is none<strong>the</strong>less consistent with it.A similar conclusion applies to <strong>the</strong> behavior <strong>of</strong> manufacturingemployment. Analysis <strong>of</strong> past experience shows that <strong>the</strong> actualgrowth <strong>of</strong> manufacturing employment during <strong>the</strong> most recent recoveryis not statistically different from what would have been predictedbased on GDP growth and long-term trends. (Manufacturingemployment has been declining as a fraction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> labor force since1953 and reached its postwar peak in 1979.) This is surprising be-100


cause defense cutbacks have caused large job losses in manufacturingin <strong>the</strong> most recent recovery. Evidently, growth in demand formanufactured goods in o<strong>the</strong>r parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> economy was strongenough to <strong>of</strong>fset <strong>the</strong> depressing effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se cutbacks on manufacturingemployment.Chart 3-2 Employment and Output in RecoveriesEmployment growth in <strong>the</strong> recent recovery is in line with past experience given<strong>the</strong> slow growth <strong>of</strong> output.Cumulative employment growth (percent)10-8 -Q10Q11m6 -® ^ s ^ Average Postwar Recovery-2 -912913 914Q2Q1*"" 922I923I924I04,-•934- # 933931 93: I \ v Current RecoveryII I I0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16Cumulative Output Growth (percent)Note: Recoveries are dated from <strong>the</strong> quarter <strong>of</strong> minimum real GDP.Sources: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce and Department <strong>of</strong> Labor.SOURCES OF JOB GROWTHAlthough much has been written about <strong>the</strong> sources <strong>of</strong> job growth,it is hard to get an accurate picture from <strong>the</strong> pastiche <strong>of</strong> popularaccounts. Are new jobs good jobs or bad jobs? What does <strong>the</strong> futurehold?Industry and Occupation<strong>The</strong> service sector—defined to include personal and businessservices but exclude trade and finance—was <strong>the</strong> economy's job enginein 1993. Although <strong>the</strong>se industries account for less than 30percent <strong>of</strong> total employment, <strong>the</strong>y were responsible for more than60 percent <strong>of</strong> total job growth in that year. Many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se jobs—about 350,000—were created in <strong>the</strong> personnel supply industry(mainly temporary agencies), which represented almost 20 percent<strong>of</strong> total payroll job growth. O<strong>the</strong>r sectors registering strong job cre-101


ation over 1993 included retail trade (more than 400,000 jobs) andconstruction (about 200,000 jobs). In contast, manufacturing employmentdeclined by about 180,000 during <strong>the</strong> year.<strong>The</strong>se sectoral patterns are not new, however. Since January1983, service sector employment has grown by 11.5 million and hasaccounted for 52 percent <strong>of</strong> total nonfarm job growth. And, jobs inretail trade have accounted for an additional 21 percent <strong>of</strong> all jobscreated over this period. Since January 1983, construction employmenthas risen by 785,000, but manufacturing payrolls haveshrunk by 325,000.A common misconception identifies manufacturing jobs as "goodjobs" and service jobs as "bad jobs." However, growth in high-endservices such as various kinds <strong>of</strong> business services have led to increaseddemand for high-level white-collar workers. During 1993,48 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> increase in employment occurred in <strong>the</strong> managerialand pr<strong>of</strong>essional occupations. <strong>The</strong> large increases in <strong>the</strong>se relativelywell-paying occupations belie <strong>the</strong> criticism that most employmentgrowth has been in "bad jobs."<strong>The</strong> recent occupational pattern <strong>of</strong> employment growth is largelyin line with <strong>the</strong> experience <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> last 10 years, during which managerialand pr<strong>of</strong>essional jobs accounted for 49 percent <strong>of</strong> new employment.Both over <strong>the</strong> last year and over <strong>the</strong> last decade, newemployment has shifted toward better paying jobs requiring moreskills and education, not toward low-paid, low-skilled jobs.Outlook for <strong>the</strong> FutureOne <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> major goals <strong>of</strong> this Administration is to increase employmentby at least 8 million jobs in 4 years. Progress toward thisgoal has been moderate but steady. Between January and December1993, nonfarm payroll employment grew by 1.8 million jobs,and <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> unemployed fell by 809,000, lowering <strong>the</strong> unemploymentrate from 7.1 percent to 6.4 percent. With a highergrowth rate <strong>of</strong> output expected next year, <strong>the</strong> pace <strong>of</strong> job creationshould accelerate.<strong>The</strong> Bureau <strong>of</strong> Labor Statistics (BLS) projects employment togrow between 1.1 and 1.9 percent per year through 2005. Most <strong>of</strong>this growth is expected in service-producing industries, which <strong>the</strong>BLS expects will add between 1.4 million and 2.1 million jobs peryear. Employment in manufacturing is expected to fall or to riseonly modestly, with losses or gains <strong>of</strong> fewer than 160,000 workersper year. Many new jobs (about 500,000 a year) will be in serviceoccupations such as food service workers and home health aides,but even more will be in <strong>the</strong> comparatively higher-paying managerial,pr<strong>of</strong>essional, and technical occupations (about 825,000 a year).102


UNEMPLOYMENT AND NONEMPLOYMENT<strong>The</strong> United States has a history <strong>of</strong> strong job growth, and <strong>the</strong>outlook for job creation over <strong>the</strong> next decade is good. But how manynew jobs are enough? <strong>The</strong> best indicator <strong>of</strong> how well we are doingis how many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> people who want jobs are able to get <strong>the</strong>m. <strong>The</strong>unemployment rate is one measure <strong>of</strong> this. <strong>The</strong> unemployed are definedas people who are not working but are ei<strong>the</strong>r waiting to returnto a job or looking for a new one. If jobs are sufficiently difficultto find, however, some people may give up looking. <strong>The</strong>n <strong>the</strong>yare counted not as unemployed but as "discouraged workers." Thus,both unemployment rates and <strong>the</strong> employment-to-population rationeed to be examined to determine if <strong>the</strong> economy is providingenough jobs.TRENDS<strong>The</strong> National Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Research, <strong>the</strong> private organizationthat dates <strong>the</strong> beginning and endpoints <strong>of</strong> U.S. business cycles,fixed <strong>the</strong> trough <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1990-91 recession at March 1991. Yetunemployment did not reach its peak <strong>of</strong> 7.7 percent until June1992. Since <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> unemployment rate has fallen steadily to 6.4percent in December 1993. (In January <strong>1994</strong> <strong>the</strong> BLS began measuringunemployment in a new way: Box 3-1 describes <strong>the</strong> changes).This represents a considerable improvement, but <strong>the</strong> economy hasa way to go before unemployment reaches normal levels. Unemploymentwas below 6.4 percent from April 1987 to January 1991,and from February 1978 to March 1980. After World War II andprior to 1974, unemployment topped 6.4 percent for only three briefperiods, each <strong>of</strong> less than a year.Chart 3—3 shows <strong>the</strong> time path for unemployment since 1948.Besides <strong>the</strong> ups and downs that correspond to business cycles, <strong>the</strong>outstanding feature is <strong>the</strong> apparent ratcheting up in <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong>unemployment in <strong>the</strong> 1970s. Since <strong>the</strong> early 1970s, unemploymenthas never returned to <strong>the</strong> levels typical <strong>of</strong> recoveries in <strong>the</strong> 1950sand 1960s, and has peaked at much higher rates. It is widely believedthat this long-term increase in unemployment is at least inpart due to an increase in <strong>the</strong> minimum level to which unemploymentcan be reduced without causing increasing inflation—<strong>the</strong> socallednatural rate <strong>of</strong> unemployment. <strong>The</strong> natural rate in turn isthought to depend on labor market frictions, and skill and geographicmismatches, between labor supply and labor demand.<strong>The</strong>re have also been changes in <strong>the</strong> incidence <strong>of</strong> long-term unemployment.As <strong>of</strong> December 1993, 1.7 million workers, comprising21.0 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> unemployed, had been unemployed for 27 weeksor longer. This is a reduction from September 1992, when <strong>the</strong> number<strong>of</strong> long-term unemployed reached 2.1 million and comprised103


Box 3-1.—<strong>The</strong> New Current Population Survey<strong>The</strong> Current Population Survey (CPS), a national survey <strong>of</strong>60,000 U.S. households, provides a monthly picture <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Nation'slabor force, employment, and <strong>the</strong> unemployment rate.Beginning in January <strong>1994</strong>, that picture is being takenthrough a new lens. For <strong>the</strong> first time since 1967, <strong>the</strong> CPS hasundergone a major redesign. Changes in <strong>the</strong> patterns <strong>of</strong> employmentby industry, <strong>the</strong> increased labor force participation <strong>of</strong>women, and several o<strong>the</strong>r factors have made <strong>the</strong> pre-<strong>1994</strong> surveyless accurate as a guide to <strong>the</strong> Nation's work force. <strong>The</strong>new survey includes new and revised questions that reflect<strong>the</strong>se changes and incorporates new procedures (including <strong>the</strong>use <strong>of</strong> portable computers to conduct <strong>the</strong> survey ra<strong>the</strong>r thanpencil and paper) designed to lead to more-accurate and consistentresponses.Between July 1992 and December 1993, a pilot version <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>new survey was conducted in parallel with <strong>the</strong> old CPS to determine<strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> new questions and data collectionprocedures. Results <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> parallel survey indicate significantlydifferent estimates for key statistics, including <strong>the</strong> unemploymentrate. Specifically, <strong>the</strong> unemployment rate as measured by<strong>the</strong> parallel survey averaged a half a percentage point higherthan <strong>the</strong> estimates from <strong>the</strong> old CPS. In addition, <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong>new population weights increased <strong>the</strong> measured unemploymentrate ano<strong>the</strong>r 0.1 percentage point. <strong>The</strong> unemployment rate isexpected to rise for all demographic groups, but particularly forwomen, since <strong>the</strong> old CPS questionnaire may have tended toclassify women who were unemployed as out <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> labor force.<strong>The</strong> new survey is expected to produce several o<strong>the</strong>r changesas well. For example, measured labor force participation ratesand employment-to-population ratios are expected to rise forwomen and fall for men. Changes in <strong>the</strong> questions defining discouragedworkers and people working part-time for economicreasons are expected to lead to a decline in numbers <strong>of</strong> discouragedworkers <strong>of</strong> 60 percent and part-time workers for economicreasons <strong>of</strong> 20 to 25 percent.21.7 percent <strong>of</strong> all unemployed workers. <strong>The</strong>re is still a sense, however,that long-term unemployment is unusually high today. <strong>The</strong>peak share <strong>of</strong> long-term unemployed workers during <strong>the</strong> current recoverywas higher than during most previous postwar recoveries(Chart 3-4). In addition, <strong>the</strong> share <strong>of</strong> long-term unemployment ishigh given <strong>the</strong> overall unemployment rate (Chart 3-5).104


Chart 3-3 Civilian Unemployment RateUnemployment rate peaks and troughs have been higher since 1973.1948 1951 1954 1957 1960 1963 1966 1969 1972 1975 1978 1981 1984 1987 1990 1993Note: Quarterly data.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Labor.While average unemployment rates have risen, <strong>the</strong>y have risenmore for some groups than for o<strong>the</strong>rs. <strong>The</strong> unemployment rate forwomen, which used to be consistently above <strong>the</strong> unemploymentrate for men, is somewhat lower (6.2 percent for women, 6.5 percentfor men in December 1993). In contrast, <strong>the</strong> black unemploymentrate has risen more than <strong>the</strong> white unemployment rate (1.5percentage points for whites between 1970 and 1993, and 3.5 percentagepoints for blacks and o<strong>the</strong>rs).Employment-to-population ratios show some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> same patterns<strong>of</strong> relative distress for different groups. While black women had ahigher employment ratio than white women in <strong>the</strong> 1970s, <strong>the</strong> reverseis now true (Chart 3-6). Both black and white men have hadfalling employment-to-population ratios since <strong>the</strong> early 1970s; but<strong>the</strong> decline for black men has been larger than for white men (10percentage points for black men from 1972 to 1993; 6 percentagepoints for white men).<strong>The</strong> unemployment rate for teenage workers (aged 16 to 19years) has always been higher than <strong>the</strong> rate for all workers, and<strong>the</strong> current situation is no exception. While <strong>the</strong> unemployment ratefor all workers during 1993 averaged 6.8 percent, <strong>the</strong> rate for teen-105


Chart 3-4 Long-Term Unemployment as Share <strong>of</strong> TotaS Unemployment<strong>The</strong> share <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> unemployed who have been out <strong>of</strong> work 27 weeks or more approachedhistorical highs in <strong>the</strong> last downturn.1948 1951 1954 1957 1960 1963 1966 1969 1972 1975 1978 1981 1984 1987 1990 1993Note: Quarterly data.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Labor.Chart 3-5 Long-Term Unemployment and <strong>the</strong> Unemployment Rate<strong>The</strong> share <strong>of</strong> long-term unemployment in total unemployment has been high recently,given <strong>the</strong> unemployment rate.Long-term unemployed (percent)25• 1983s^15 -10 -5 -^D• 1970•••1993 ^1992D1984• s^• 1961 s^59 ry' meDiP^P ••••rjn• 1949D1980• 1982ISource: Department <strong>of</strong> Labor.I6 8Unemployment Rate (percent)II10 12106


Chart 3-6 Employment-to-Population Ratios <strong>of</strong> Women<strong>The</strong> employment rate <strong>of</strong> black women fell below that <strong>of</strong> white women in <strong>the</strong>last recession.Percent6050Black Women4540 rWhite Women35 J L1972 1975 1978 1981 1984 1987Note: Quarterly data.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Labor.agers was nearly three times as high at 19 percent. Teenage unemploymentrates were 17.6 percent and 14.6 percent for white malesand females, respectively. <strong>The</strong> unemployment rates for black teenageworkers were more than twice as high at 40.1 percent formales and 37.5 percent for females. Over <strong>the</strong> last 20 years, <strong>the</strong>teenage unemployment rate rose along with <strong>the</strong> overall unemploymentrate. Unemployment rates also differ by education. Chart 3-7 compares <strong>the</strong> unemployment rates <strong>of</strong> those without a high schooldiploma, high school graduates, those with some college, collegegraduates, and those with advanced degrees.According to popular accounts, ano<strong>the</strong>r distinguishing feature <strong>of</strong>recent labor market developments is <strong>the</strong> "white-collar recession."That expression implies that <strong>the</strong> recent unemployment experience<strong>of</strong> white-collar workers relative to that <strong>of</strong> blue-collar workers hasbeen significantly worse than in past recessions.In fact, as in <strong>the</strong> past, <strong>the</strong> unemployment rate among white-collarworkers has been significantly below that <strong>of</strong> blue-collar workersin <strong>the</strong> most recent recession and recovery (3.2 percent versus 9.9percent in 1992). However, <strong>the</strong> white-collar unemployment rate relativeto <strong>the</strong> blue-collar rate has been rising (Chart 3-8). <strong>The</strong> ratio107


Chart 3-7 Unemployment Rates by Educational Attainment, March 1993Unemployment is generally lower for more-educated workers.No Diploma Some College Master's Degree Pr<strong>of</strong>essional DegreeHigh School Diploma Bachelor's Degree Doctoral DegreeNote: Data relate to workers age 25-64.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Labor.<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> two rates in 1992 was 0.33, <strong>the</strong> highest since 1979. <strong>The</strong> ratio<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> unemployed white-collar workers to <strong>the</strong> number<strong>of</strong> unemployed blue-collar workers has been rising since 1982, <strong>the</strong>first year for which we have consistent occupational estimates. By1992, <strong>the</strong> ratio <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> white-collar unemployed to that<strong>of</strong> blue-collar unemployed was about one-third, compared with onlyone-fifth in 1983. This happened both because <strong>the</strong> ratio <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>white-collar to <strong>the</strong> blue-collar unemployment rate has increased, asalready noted, and because white-collar workers now make up alarger fraction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> work force than <strong>the</strong>y did before.Just as <strong>the</strong> rate <strong>of</strong> overall employment growth is not out <strong>of</strong> linewith past experience given output growth, <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong> unemploymentin <strong>the</strong> most recent recession is within <strong>the</strong> bounds <strong>of</strong> what wewould expect given GDP growth. Fur<strong>the</strong>r, as already noted, unemploymenthas fallen by 1.3 percentage points from its June 1992peak, with nearly a percentage point <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> drop coming in 1993.However, three concerns are raised by trends and recent experience.<strong>The</strong> first problem is increasing disparities between black andwhite rates <strong>of</strong> both employment and unemployment. <strong>The</strong>se changes108


Chart 3-8 Ratio <strong>of</strong> White-Collar to Blue-Collar Unemployment Rates<strong>The</strong> ratio <strong>of</strong> white-collar to blue-collar unemployment rates has been risingbut is still below historical highs.0.32 -0.30 -0.28 -0.26 -0.241968 1970 1972 1974 1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992Note: Data after 1981 are not strictly comparable with earlier years because <strong>of</strong> changes in occupational definitions.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Labor.are linked to equally disturbing changes in <strong>the</strong> distribution <strong>of</strong> incomeand job security, discussed later in this chapter. <strong>The</strong> secondconcern is <strong>the</strong> long-term increase in <strong>the</strong> average level <strong>of</strong> unemployment.<strong>The</strong> third concern is that recent high levels <strong>of</strong> long-term unemploymentsuggest that we may be seeing an increase in <strong>the</strong>share <strong>of</strong> unemployment caused by mismatches between workers'skills and job demands. If this is <strong>the</strong> case, it is argued, it may bedifficult to lower <strong>the</strong> unemployment rate much fur<strong>the</strong>r withoutcausing labor market bottlenecks. As we will see below, little evidencecan be found that skill mismatches have contributed muchto recent increases in unemployment, but <strong>the</strong>y do seem to havebeen a major cause <strong>of</strong> growing income inequality.IS THE NATURAL RATE OF UNEMPLOYMENTINCREASING?How would we know if <strong>the</strong>re had been an increase in what economistscall <strong>the</strong> natural rate <strong>of</strong> unemployment? A sustained increasein long-term unemployment might be one indication, an increase in<strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> people who have given up looking for work mightbe ano<strong>the</strong>r, and an increase in <strong>the</strong> fraction <strong>of</strong> job losers among <strong>the</strong>109


unemployed yet ano<strong>the</strong>r. <strong>The</strong>se are all indirect indicators <strong>of</strong> an increasein <strong>the</strong> natural rate <strong>of</strong> unemployment. <strong>The</strong> problem is that<strong>the</strong>se indicators also respond to cyclical conditions—<strong>the</strong>y increasewhen <strong>the</strong> economy is in recession, and <strong>the</strong>y can be slow to decline,or may even increase, in periods <strong>of</strong> slow recovery.Not surprisingly, <strong>the</strong>refore, concerns that mismatch unemploymentis increasing are likely to develop in recessionary times. Lessskilled workers are more likely to find <strong>the</strong>mselves unemployedthan better skilled workers. During recessions, labor market slackmakes it easier for employers to find better qualified employees, allowing<strong>the</strong>m to raise job qualifications without raising compensation.Thus recessions may create <strong>the</strong> appearance <strong>of</strong> increasing mismatchunemployment. Once a recovery is under way, however,more jobs <strong>of</strong> all types are created, and <strong>the</strong> unemployment rate for<strong>the</strong> less skilled usually declines. Thus indirect indicators <strong>of</strong> increasingskill mismatch are not enough to determine whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> naturalrate is increasing. We must consider additional evidence.If most new jobs require skills that many workers do not have,<strong>the</strong>y might experience leng<strong>the</strong>ning periods <strong>of</strong> unemployment as<strong>the</strong>y wait for jobs appropriate to <strong>the</strong>ir skills to become available.On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, <strong>the</strong> available statistical evidence does not ruleout <strong>the</strong> possibility that relatively slow output growth since <strong>the</strong> recessiontrough in 1991 is <strong>the</strong> major reason why recent levels <strong>of</strong>long-term unemployment have been so high. Since high levels <strong>of</strong>overall unemployment have persisted for so long, <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong>people looking for work for a long period <strong>of</strong> time has also increased.A statistical analysis relating <strong>the</strong> percentage change in <strong>the</strong> number<strong>of</strong> workers unemployed for 27 weeks or more to <strong>the</strong> percentagechange in output indicates that <strong>the</strong> behavior <strong>of</strong> long-term unemploymentin <strong>the</strong> most recent period <strong>of</strong> recession and recovery is notstatistically different from that during previous recession-recoverycycles. Although <strong>the</strong> recent behavior <strong>of</strong> long-term unemploymentmay not be different, it is worth noting that <strong>the</strong> average number<strong>of</strong> long-term unemployed increased substantially during <strong>the</strong> 1970sand has remained high since <strong>the</strong>n.Ano<strong>the</strong>r possible indicator <strong>of</strong> worsening mismatch unemploymentis <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> discouraged workers. Because <strong>the</strong>y have given uplooking for work, <strong>the</strong>y are not counted as unemployed. Yet large increasesin <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> discouraged workers might be taken asindirect evidence that many people are having a very difficult timefinding jobs. Again, however, <strong>the</strong> slow speed <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> recovery couldalso explain such an increase. Although <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> discouragedworkers is up, reaching 1.1 million in <strong>the</strong> fourth quarter <strong>of</strong> 1993compared with fewer than 800,000 in <strong>the</strong> first quarter <strong>of</strong> 1990, <strong>the</strong>percentage increase in <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> discouraged workers is less110


than would be expected given its historical relationship with outputgrowth.In summary, after taking into account <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> slow outputgrowth, nei<strong>the</strong>r recent high levels <strong>of</strong> long-term unemployment norrecent increases in <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> discouraged workers suggest that<strong>the</strong>re has been an abrupt worsening <strong>of</strong> mismatch unemployment oran abrupt increase in <strong>the</strong> natural rate <strong>of</strong> unemployment in <strong>the</strong>most recent period <strong>of</strong> recession and recovery.A third indirect indicator <strong>of</strong> a changing natural rate <strong>of</strong> unemploymentis <strong>the</strong> share <strong>of</strong> permanent job losers in total unemployment.If unemployment is truly cyclical, firms lay <strong>of</strong>f workers for a while,but recall <strong>the</strong>m when conditions improve. However, if mismatch isincreasing, one might expect to see more permanent job losersamong <strong>the</strong> unemployed ra<strong>the</strong>r than individuals on temporary lay<strong>of</strong>f.Indeed, <strong>the</strong> share <strong>of</strong> permanent job losers among <strong>the</strong> unemployedhit an all-time high <strong>of</strong> 43.9 percent in <strong>the</strong> second quarter<strong>of</strong> 1992, and has fallen only slightly since <strong>the</strong>n. However, this numbermust be interpreted with caution. Despite <strong>the</strong> image <strong>of</strong> cyclicalunemployment as due to temporary lay<strong>of</strong>fs, <strong>the</strong> fact is that <strong>the</strong>share <strong>of</strong> permanent job losers among <strong>the</strong> unemployed rises in everyrecession. Recessions bring not only temporary interruptions in employmentdue to slack demand, but also business failures andforced restructurings that cause permanent job loss at a higherrate than during normal times.A statistical analysis relating <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> permanent job losersto output growth indicates that <strong>the</strong> relatively large number <strong>of</strong>permanent job losers in <strong>the</strong> most recent period <strong>of</strong> recession and recoverycan be explained by relatively slow output growth. Thus<strong>the</strong>re is little evidence <strong>of</strong> any recent increase in <strong>the</strong> natural rate<strong>of</strong> unemployment in this relationship, ei<strong>the</strong>r. <strong>The</strong> predictions <strong>of</strong>this analysis for earlier periods do suggest that <strong>the</strong>re was an abruptincrease in <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> unemployed permanent job losersin <strong>the</strong> early to mid-1970s, compared with what would have been expectedgiven business conditions. This is consistent with o<strong>the</strong>r datawhich suggest an increase in <strong>the</strong> natural rate around that time.DIRECT MEASURES OF THE NATURAL RATETraditionally, economists have used two methods to identify <strong>the</strong>natural rate, and two additional methods for evaluating how itmight be changing. <strong>The</strong> simplest way to identify <strong>the</strong> natural rateis to look back and see at what unemployment rate <strong>the</strong> last acceleration<strong>of</strong> inflation began. Alternatively, a statistical model <strong>of</strong> inflationthat embodies <strong>the</strong> assumption <strong>of</strong> a natural rate (anaccelerationist "Phillips curve") can be used to estimate <strong>the</strong> naturalrate.Ill


Changes in <strong>the</strong> natural rate have been identified in two ways.Since different demographic groups have different unemploymentrates, it has become a common procedure to assume that <strong>the</strong> naturalrate changes whenever <strong>the</strong> composition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> work forcechanges. More recently, several authors have looked at <strong>the</strong> relationbetween unemployment and proxies for job vacancies. If increasesin <strong>the</strong> natural rate are caused by an increasing mismatch <strong>of</strong> workersand jobs, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> job vacancy rate should be rising along with<strong>the</strong> unemployment rate.All <strong>the</strong>se approaches have serious shortcomings. Many factorso<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong> tightness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> labor market influence <strong>the</strong> rate <strong>of</strong>wage and price inflation. Taxes, raw material prices, exchangerates, expectations, and a host <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r factors all come into play.Thus, determining <strong>the</strong> natural rate by looking back to see what <strong>the</strong>unemployment rate was <strong>the</strong> last time inflation picked up worksonly if inflation was caused by labor market tightness.Some economists argue, however, that <strong>the</strong> principal causes <strong>of</strong> inflationsince <strong>the</strong> early 1970s have been factors o<strong>the</strong>r than tightnessin <strong>the</strong> labor market—for example, oil and o<strong>the</strong>r commodity price increasesin <strong>the</strong> 1970s and <strong>the</strong> falling value <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dollar in <strong>the</strong> late1980s. If this is true, estimating <strong>the</strong> natural rate by estimatingmodels <strong>of</strong> inflation is a misleading exercise unless all causes <strong>of</strong> inflationbesides tightness in <strong>the</strong> labor market are adequately controlledfor. Moreover, even estimates <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> natural rate obtainedin this manner may be very sensitive to assumptions about <strong>the</strong>form <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Phillips curve relation. Without direct evidence <strong>of</strong> arapidly increasing rate <strong>of</strong> inflation below a particular unemploymentrate, estimates <strong>of</strong> a changing natural rate from statisticalmodels <strong>of</strong> inflation are suspect at best.Determining how <strong>the</strong> natural rate has changed by looking at demographicchanges also poses problems. In <strong>the</strong> 1970s, <strong>the</strong> apparentincrease in <strong>the</strong> natural rate was attributed in large part to increasinglabor force participation <strong>of</strong> women and teenagers—both <strong>of</strong>whom had higher than average unemployment rates at <strong>the</strong> time.However, as women have changed <strong>the</strong>ir attachment to <strong>the</strong> laborforce, <strong>the</strong>ir unemployment experience has also changed. In <strong>the</strong> recentpast, women have had a lower unemployment rate than men.Should we <strong>the</strong>refore believe that <strong>the</strong> increased labor force participation<strong>of</strong> women has tended to decrease <strong>the</strong> natural rate belowwhat it was prior to <strong>the</strong> surge in <strong>the</strong>ir participation? <strong>The</strong> share <strong>of</strong>teenagers in <strong>the</strong> labor force has also fallen in <strong>the</strong> last decade, andthis too should have reduced <strong>the</strong> natural rate.Fur<strong>the</strong>r, why focus on <strong>the</strong>se particular demographic changes to<strong>the</strong> exclusion <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs? Black male labor force participation rateshave been falling over <strong>the</strong> last two decades. Since black men havehigher unemployment rates than white men, should we conclude112


that <strong>the</strong> natural rate is falling? More important, people with collegeeducations have a much lower rate <strong>of</strong> unemployment thanthose with less education, and <strong>the</strong>ir share <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> labor force has increasedconsiderably over <strong>the</strong> last two decades. Again, this wouldsuggest that <strong>the</strong> natural rate should be lower today than in 1970,before <strong>the</strong> ratcheting up <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> unemployment rate.Finally, although <strong>the</strong> U.S. Government does not collect <strong>the</strong> dataon job vacancies that would allow us to examine directly whe<strong>the</strong>r<strong>the</strong>re is an increasing mismatch <strong>of</strong> jobs and workers, <strong>the</strong> ConferenceBoard does publish an index <strong>of</strong> help-wanted advertising.<strong>The</strong> relationship between this index and <strong>the</strong> unemployment ratehas changed over time, but <strong>the</strong>re is no evidence <strong>of</strong> any increase in<strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong> help-wanted advertising, given <strong>the</strong> unemployment rate,in <strong>the</strong> last decade. <strong>The</strong>re is, however, a higher level <strong>of</strong> help-wantedadvertising at all levels <strong>of</strong> unemployment since <strong>the</strong> early 1970s.<strong>The</strong> increase in help-wanted advertising could be interpreted asevidence <strong>of</strong> an increase in mismatch unemployment, but manyo<strong>the</strong>r things affect <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong> help-wanted advertising. Differenttypes <strong>of</strong> employers advertise in different ways for different types <strong>of</strong>jobs. Changes in <strong>the</strong> industrial and occupational mix <strong>of</strong> employmentmake an advertising index a questionable measure <strong>of</strong> longtermchanges in job vacancies. Changes in advertising prices, <strong>the</strong>structure <strong>of</strong> media markets, and legal requirements for advertisingcertain jobs also change <strong>the</strong> relationship between vacancies and advertisingin ways that call into question <strong>the</strong> meaning <strong>of</strong> any longtermchanges.Altoge<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong> various pieces <strong>of</strong> statistical evidence examined in<strong>the</strong> preceding discussion suggest that <strong>the</strong> increase in <strong>the</strong> unemploymentrate since 1989 has been largely cyclical in nature. <strong>The</strong>re issome evidence <strong>of</strong> an increase in <strong>the</strong> natural rate—possibly due toan increase in mismatch unemployment—in <strong>the</strong> early 1970s, butlittle evidence <strong>of</strong> any increase since <strong>the</strong>n. <strong>The</strong> evidence also suggeststhat today's unemployment rate exceeds <strong>the</strong> natural rate bya significant amount. <strong>The</strong>refore, wage-push price inflation is unlikelyto be a factor constraining economic growth in <strong>the</strong> near future.THE MAGNITUDE AND COSTS OF JOB LOSS<strong>The</strong> U.S. economy is constantly in flux, and while <strong>the</strong>re is no evidencethat <strong>the</strong> rate <strong>of</strong> churning in <strong>the</strong> labor market has increasedin recent years (see <strong>the</strong> discussion <strong>of</strong> job stability below), normalrates <strong>of</strong> structural adjustment are quite high and impose significantcosts.Estimates <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> jobs created and destroyed each yearin <strong>the</strong> United States are staggering. Data from various sources suggestthat on average more than 10 percent <strong>of</strong> all jobs disappear113


every year, while even more new jobs are created. Luckily, notevery job that is lost forces someone to become unemployed. Companiesreducing <strong>the</strong> size <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir operations can <strong>of</strong>ten do so usingnormal attrition—quits and retirements. When <strong>the</strong>y cannot, workersgiven advance notice <strong>of</strong> an imminent lay<strong>of</strong>f can sometimes findwork before <strong>the</strong>y lose <strong>the</strong>ir old job, allowing a seamless transitionwith no unemployment. But for <strong>the</strong> many workers who do notmake such easy transitions, <strong>the</strong> costs <strong>of</strong> dislocation can be high.Between 1981 and 1990, about 2 million full-time workers peryear lost <strong>the</strong>ir jobs. <strong>The</strong>se workers spent an average <strong>of</strong> nearly 30weeks unemployed, and <strong>of</strong> those who found new employment, abouta third suffered earnings losses <strong>of</strong> more than 20 percent.Wage losses were most severe for those who had been with <strong>the</strong>iremployers <strong>the</strong> longest. For example, those with 10 or more years<strong>of</strong> tenure on <strong>the</strong>ir previous job were nearly four times as likely tosee <strong>the</strong>ir earnings fall by 20 percent as to see <strong>the</strong>m rise by 20 percentin <strong>the</strong>ir new jobs. <strong>The</strong>y were also less likely than o<strong>the</strong>r displacedworkers to find new employment at all. One set <strong>of</strong> surveysasking about job loss found that 73 percent <strong>of</strong> all job losers had obtainednew jobs, but only 65 percent <strong>of</strong> those with 10 or more years<strong>of</strong> job tenure had found new work.<strong>The</strong> special problems <strong>of</strong> workers with long job tenure are understandable.Those who work for <strong>the</strong> same employer for a long timebuild up skills that are most valuable to that employer. Fur<strong>the</strong>r,many employers reward long job tenure with higher wages as away <strong>of</strong> motivating employees and ensuring <strong>the</strong>ir loyalty. <strong>The</strong> loss<strong>of</strong> a job when one has obtained <strong>the</strong> privileges <strong>of</strong> long tenure canbe particularly devastating.SLOWING WAGE GROWTH AND WIDENINGINEQUALITYIn <strong>the</strong> last two decades, family income growth has stagnated andincomes have become more unequally distributed. In fact, <strong>the</strong> realincomes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bottom 60 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>American</strong> families were lowerin <strong>the</strong> early 1990s than for <strong>the</strong> analogous families at <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>1970s. Underlying <strong>the</strong> rising disparity in <strong>the</strong> fortunes <strong>of</strong> <strong>American</strong>families has been a rise in labor market inequality that has shiftedwage and employment opportunities in favor <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> more educatedand <strong>the</strong> more experienced. Less educated workers suffered substantiallosses in real earnings during <strong>the</strong> 1980s. Here we consider <strong>the</strong>dimensions, and some likely causes, <strong>of</strong> slow income growth andwidening inequality.114


SLOW INCOME GROWTHIncome trends have been discouraging for about two decades—<strong>the</strong> median family today has virtually <strong>the</strong> same real income as<strong>the</strong> median family 20 years ago. This stagnation is a marked departurefrom <strong>the</strong> substantial income growth that occurred over previousgenerations.From 1947 to 1973 <strong>the</strong> real income <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> median <strong>American</strong> familyincreased by a robust 2.8 percent a year, more than doubling.In contrast, from 1973 to 1992 <strong>the</strong> income <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> typical <strong>American</strong>family was essentially stagnant, rising by only 0.1 percent a yearafter adjusting for inflation. (<strong>The</strong> trend from 1979 to 1989—roughlyequivalent years in <strong>the</strong> economic cycle—is similar.) At <strong>the</strong> pace <strong>of</strong>income growth from 1973 to 1992, it would take centuries for realmedian family income to double.Although <strong>the</strong> labor force participation decisions <strong>of</strong> women andchanges in <strong>the</strong> composition <strong>of</strong> families have affected family income,<strong>the</strong> major trends in family income are dominated by trends in realwages. Chart 3-9 shows <strong>the</strong> changes in wages and total hourlycompensation, adjusted for inflation, since 1948. Both wages andcompensation suffered abrupt slowdowns in growth rates around1973.GROWING INEQUALITYFamilies have been affected unevenly by recent income trends.Real incomes at <strong>the</strong> top have increased smartly, real incomes at<strong>the</strong> middle have essentially stagnated, and real incomes at <strong>the</strong> bottomhave fallen. Box 3-2 discusses <strong>the</strong> implications <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se developmentsfor employment and unemployment.From 1973 to 1992, <strong>the</strong> average real income <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> upper 20 percent<strong>of</strong> families rose 19 percent, or about 1 percent per year. Thisis well below <strong>the</strong> rate for <strong>the</strong> 1950s and 1960s, but far better thanfor <strong>the</strong> rest <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> population. Between 1973 and 1992, <strong>the</strong> averageincome <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> middle 20 percent <strong>of</strong> families rose a paltry 4 percentin real terms. Lower income families fared even worse. Among <strong>the</strong>bottom 20 percent <strong>of</strong> families, mean real income fell by 12 percentfrom 1973 to 1992. Chart 3-10 shows <strong>the</strong> growth <strong>of</strong> mean familyincomes for different income groups over <strong>the</strong> periods before andafter 1973. It makes clear just how abrupt <strong>the</strong> changes in <strong>the</strong> distribution<strong>of</strong> income growth have been. A trend toward greaterequality in <strong>the</strong> 1960s and toward greater inequality in <strong>the</strong> 1970sand 1980s is apparent in both income and consumption measures<strong>of</strong> economic well-being. Rising inequality <strong>of</strong> family incomes during<strong>the</strong> 1980s is apparent in both pretax and posttax income measures.115


Chart 3-9 Real Hourly Compensation and Wages<strong>The</strong> growth <strong>of</strong> real compensation per hour and <strong>of</strong> real hourly wages has declinedsince 1973.1982-84 dollars14.00Hourly Compensation12.0010.00Hourly Wages8.006.004.00j I I | | | I | | | |1948 1952 1956 1960 1964 1968 1972 1976 1980 1984 1988 1992Note: Compensation and average hourly earnings deflated by CPI-U-X1.Sources: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce and Department <strong>of</strong> Labor.Box 3-2.—Growing Inequality <strong>of</strong> Employment andUnemployment<strong>The</strong> falling relative wages <strong>of</strong> those with less experience andschooling may explain, at least in part, some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> observedchanges in employment-to-population ratios for certain demographicgroups. <strong>The</strong> black and teenage populations tend tohave less schooling than <strong>the</strong> average for all <strong>American</strong>s. Consequently,<strong>the</strong> wages <strong>the</strong>y command have fallen, making workless attractive. To <strong>the</strong> extent that <strong>the</strong> shift in demand awayfrom less-educated workers is manifest in fewer available jobsinstead <strong>of</strong> lower wages, <strong>the</strong>se groups face higher unemploymentrates as well.EXPLAINING SLOW WAGE GROWTHStagnant wages and slow total compensation growth since <strong>the</strong>early 1970s largely reflect a substantial slowdown in productivitygrowth. From 1947 to 1973 productivity rose at a compound annualrate <strong>of</strong> 3.1 percent, and inflation-adjusted compensation per hour116


Chart 3-10 Average Annual Growth <strong>of</strong> Mean Family Income by Income QuintileFamily incomes in alt income groups grew more or less evenly, but slightly faster forlower income groups, before 1973.Average annual percent change1947-73322.992 652.76 2.792.461• } • • "nLowest Second ThirdQuintileFourthHighest1973-92I-0.69I-0.180.19I0.50I0.93SecondThirdQuintileFourthHighestSource: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce.grew at a similar rate. From 1973 to 1979 <strong>the</strong> rate <strong>of</strong> productivitygrowth fell to an average <strong>of</strong> 0.8 percent a year, and compensationgrowth fell with it. Since 1979 <strong>the</strong> productivity growth rate haspicked up only slightly, averaging 1.2 percent on an annual basis.Chart 3-11 shows <strong>the</strong> close relation between productivity and realcompensation. Boxes 3-3 and 3-4 discuss some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r effects<strong>of</strong> productivity growth.<strong>The</strong> productivity slowdown has been intensely studied. Manypartial explanations have been given, but no complete accountinghas been made.EXPLAINING THE GROWTH OF INEQUALITYSeveral factors have contributed to widening inequality. Onemajor factor is increasing returns to education and experience. <strong>The</strong>college-high school wage premium increased by over 100 percentfor workers aged 25 to 34 between 1974 and 1992, while increasing20 percent for all workers 18 years old and over (Chart 1-8). In addition,among workers without college degrees, <strong>the</strong> average wages<strong>of</strong> older workers increased relative to those <strong>of</strong> younger workers.Since <strong>the</strong> relative supply <strong>of</strong> educated workers has increased at <strong>the</strong>117


Chart 3-11 Productivity Growth and Price Reductions, 1950-90Productivity growth in an industry leads to lower relative prices.Average annual percent change in relative prices2.0s. • Construction1.0 -1 O<strong>the</strong>r services0.0-1.0 -• FIRE ^ \ ^Retail trade •Wholesale trade •H MiningManufacturingTransportation•Agriculture-2.01111-1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0Average annual percent change in productivityNote: FIRE = finance, insurance, and real estate.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce.same time that wage disparities have grown, <strong>the</strong> demand for educatedworkers must have increased faster than <strong>the</strong>ir supply. Somehave suggested that increasing trade has undermined demand forless educated workers in <strong>the</strong> United States, since <strong>the</strong>y are plentifulelsewhere in <strong>the</strong> world. So far, however, several studies have beenunable to discern any substantial impact <strong>of</strong> trade on wage inequality,however. If increased trade were <strong>the</strong> cause <strong>of</strong> growing wage inequality,<strong>the</strong> relative prices <strong>of</strong> goods that use highly educated laborwould be rising relative to those <strong>of</strong> goods that use less highly educatedlabor. But studies have found no evidence <strong>of</strong> such a changein relative prices. Similarly, if increased trade were responsible forincreased wage inequality, <strong>the</strong> growth <strong>of</strong> wage differentials wouldlead firms in all sectors to substitute less educated labor for moreeducated labor. Instead, studies find that virtually all manufacturingindustries have increased <strong>the</strong>ir relative use <strong>of</strong> educated labordespite growing wage differentials. Rising wage differentials withgreater use <strong>of</strong> educated labor suggest that demand for skilled laborhas been rising broadly in <strong>the</strong> economy. Thus it appears that most<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> demand shift toward highly educated workers must haveoriginated domestically.118


Box 3-3.—Consequences <strong>of</strong> Productivity GrowthRising productivity has been shown to have a variety <strong>of</strong> beneficialeffects:• <strong>The</strong> prices <strong>of</strong> goods produced by industries that have hadrapid productivity growth have fallen relative to those <strong>of</strong>goods from industries with slower productivity growth.Chart 3-11 shows average productivity growth and pricechanges by industry for <strong>the</strong> 1950-90 period.• Periods <strong>of</strong> rapid productivity growth have been accompaniedby increases in real wages. <strong>The</strong> prices <strong>of</strong> productsin industries experiencing productivity growth also declinerelative to wages. This decline in product pricesmeans that real wages tend to rise during periods <strong>of</strong>rapid productivity growth.• Periods <strong>of</strong> rapid productivity growth have also been periods<strong>of</strong> low inflation. Productivity growth allows nominalwages to increase without putting pressure on prices.• Periods <strong>of</strong> rapid productivity growth have not been associatedwith large increases in unemployment In periodswhen productivity growth was more rapid, such as <strong>the</strong>1960s, unemployment rates have tended to be low. Incontrast, periods with slow rates <strong>of</strong> productivity growth,such as <strong>the</strong> 1970s, have been periods <strong>of</strong> relatively highunemployment.Since <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> more-educated labor has increased in all industries,a logical explanation <strong>of</strong> this trend is technical change. For example,one study shows that people who work with personal computersearn a substantial wage premium over those who do not,and that this can account for half <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> increasing gap between<strong>the</strong> wages <strong>of</strong> college and high school graduates.Although changes in labor demand induced by changes in <strong>the</strong>composition <strong>of</strong> trade do not appear to explain much <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> increasein income inequality, <strong>the</strong> internationalization <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> U.S. economymay affect wages in o<strong>the</strong>r ways. For example, <strong>the</strong> threat <strong>of</strong> increasedimport competition or <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> relocation <strong>of</strong> a factory to ano<strong>the</strong>rcountry may undermine worker bargaining power or cause adecline in <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> workers employed in unionized firms. Atthis time, no reliable studies have properly quantified how importantsuch effects have been. In addition, <strong>the</strong>re is no guarantee that<strong>the</strong> future will resemble <strong>the</strong> past. Trade could become a more importantfactor in bringing down <strong>the</strong> wages <strong>of</strong> less educated workersin <strong>the</strong> future. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, technical change could move in119


Box 3-4.—Why Productivity Growth Does Not CauseUnemploymentProductivity growth need not cause an increase in unemploymentbecause, as productivity rises, more goods can be producedwith <strong>the</strong> same number <strong>of</strong> workers. This means a costsaving, which must result in ei<strong>the</strong>r increased pr<strong>of</strong>its, increasedwages, or lower prices. If pr<strong>of</strong>its or wages increase, those benefitingfrom <strong>the</strong> increase will increase <strong>the</strong>ir spending. If pricesfall, consumers' incomes will go fur<strong>the</strong>r and <strong>the</strong>y will buymore. In any case, <strong>the</strong> increased spending will lead to <strong>the</strong> purchase<strong>of</strong> more goods and services, which will create new jobs<strong>of</strong>fsetting losses from <strong>the</strong> productivity increase. If <strong>the</strong> new jobscreated are not equal in number to <strong>the</strong> jobs lost, <strong>the</strong>re will bea tendency for wages to change to equate supply and demandfor labor. None<strong>the</strong>less, in <strong>the</strong> short run some workers are likelyto have to change jobs. As <strong>the</strong> discussion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> costs <strong>of</strong> jobloss makes clear, this can be a traumatic experience for <strong>the</strong> establishedworker.<strong>the</strong> direction <strong>of</strong> economizing on educated labor and making betteruse <strong>of</strong> less educated labor.In addition to rapidly increasing demand for educated labor, twoinstitutional factors seem to have contributed to rising wage inequality:<strong>the</strong> decline <strong>of</strong> unions and <strong>the</strong> erosion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> minimumwage by inflation. In <strong>the</strong> early 1970s, 27 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> work forcewere union members. By 1990 that fraction had declined to 16 percent,and it has probably fallen fur<strong>the</strong>r since. Several studies concludethat this decline can account for about 20 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> increasein wage inequality.In 1970 <strong>the</strong> minimum wage was 50 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> average hourlywage <strong>of</strong> private production and nonsupervisory workers. By 1992 ithad fallen to 40 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> average. This erosion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> minimumwage has allowed a substantial fattening <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> lower tail <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> wage distribution and contributed to increasing wage inequality.<strong>The</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> minimum wage on <strong>the</strong> distribution <strong>of</strong> incomeis less obvious, since it is possible that <strong>the</strong> decline in <strong>the</strong> inflationadjustedminimum wage may have caused an increase in employment<strong>of</strong> low-wage workers.Immigration has increased <strong>the</strong> relative supply <strong>of</strong> less educatedlabor and appears to have contributed to <strong>the</strong> increasing inequality<strong>of</strong> income, but <strong>the</strong> effect has been small. A study <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong>immigration between 1980 and 1988 found that it explains lessthan 1 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> change in <strong>the</strong> college-high school wage differential.Although immigration flows were considerably larger in<strong>the</strong> late 1980s than <strong>the</strong> early 1980s, this study makes it seem un-120


likely that immigration could explain more than a few percent <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> total change in this differential.JOB QUALITY<strong>The</strong> Administration is concerned about increasing <strong>the</strong> quality aswell as <strong>the</strong> quantity <strong>of</strong> jobs in <strong>the</strong> <strong>American</strong> economy. Job qualityencompasses a number <strong>of</strong> factors beyond wage levels—including jobsecurity, employer-provided benefits such as pensions and healthinsurance, and hours <strong>of</strong> employment.HOURS OF WORKAverage weekly hours in manufacturing were consistently higherthrough December 1993 than during most previous recoveries since1958 (excluding <strong>the</strong> short recovery in 1980-81), and <strong>the</strong>y reacheda post-World War II high <strong>of</strong> 41.7 hours per week in November1993. This was slightly above <strong>the</strong> previous peak <strong>of</strong> 41.6 hours perweek reached in February 1966 (Chart 3-12). Factory overtimehours also reached a record in November at 4.4 hours per week,<strong>the</strong> highest level since <strong>the</strong> data series began in 1956.Chart 3-12 Average Weekly Hours <strong>of</strong> Production and Nonsupervisory WorkersAverage weekly hours in manufacturing are at a postwar high, while averagehours for all industries show a long-term decline.Hours4240Manufacturing383634Total Private Nonfarm32I I ! I I I I I I L . I I I1947 1950 1953 1956 1959 1962 1965 1968 1971 1974 1977 1980 1983 1986 1989 1992Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Labor.121


In contrast, over <strong>the</strong> past half-century, average weekly hoursworked by production and nonsupervisory employees on nonfarmprivate payrolls have declined significantly from 40.3 hours perweek in 1947 to 34.5 hours per week in 1993. <strong>The</strong> patterns <strong>of</strong> averageweekly hours <strong>of</strong> all private sector workers and those in manufacturinghave diverged over <strong>the</strong> last 50 years.In keeping with <strong>the</strong>ir long-term trend, average weekly hours <strong>of</strong>all private nonfarm workers have been lower since <strong>the</strong> trough <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> last recession than during comparable periods following <strong>the</strong>three previous recessions after 1970. Average hours typically riseduring recoveries, as employers respond to rising demand by using<strong>the</strong>ir existing work forces more intensively before <strong>the</strong>y begin significanthiring <strong>of</strong> new employees. <strong>The</strong> increase in average hourssince <strong>the</strong> 1991 recession trough has generally been in line with previousrecoveries since 1970—although in recent months <strong>the</strong> increasein hours has been higher than in recent recoveries.Popular accounts have suggested that <strong>American</strong>s are workingmore. How can this be if hours worked on <strong>the</strong> average job are declining?<strong>The</strong> answer is that women's labor force participation is up,so that average hours <strong>of</strong> paid work per person are up. How doworkers feel about <strong>the</strong>ir hours <strong>of</strong> work? Most studies find that, onaverage, people would like to work more hours if <strong>the</strong>y were paid<strong>the</strong>ir hourly rate for <strong>the</strong> additional hours.JOB STABILITY<strong>The</strong> slow pace <strong>of</strong> job creation and <strong>the</strong> relatively high unemploymentrate in <strong>the</strong> current recovery, along with continuing corporatedownsizing and increased use <strong>of</strong> part-time and temporary workers,have led to <strong>the</strong> perception that employment is becoming less stablethan in <strong>the</strong> past. <strong>The</strong> fear is that a decline in permanent employmentwill lead to a largely "contingent" work force, meaning that<strong>the</strong>re will no longer be an understanding between worker and employerthat a job will last for a long time. Is <strong>the</strong> current sense <strong>of</strong>less stable employment <strong>the</strong> result <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> recent recession, or arelong-term forces at work?<strong>The</strong>re are several different approaches to measuring <strong>the</strong> stability<strong>of</strong> employment. To some extent, growth <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> contingent workforce can be measured directly. We can also look at how likely individualsare to stay with an employer, at <strong>the</strong> dynamics <strong>of</strong> firm size,and at changes in <strong>the</strong> industrial composition <strong>of</strong> employment.No <strong>of</strong>ficial statistics are kept on <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> workers employedon a contingent basis. One study that examined employment practicesat a number <strong>of</strong> large firms in 1985 found that slightly lessthan 1.5 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> labor <strong>the</strong>y used was explicitly hired on atemporary basis.122


We do, however, know how many workers are employed in <strong>the</strong>personnel supply industry (largely temporary workers). This numberhas increased dramatically since <strong>the</strong> early 1970s, and particularlyrapidly in <strong>the</strong> current recovery. From <strong>the</strong> trough <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> recessionin March 1991 to December 1993, employment in <strong>the</strong> personnelsupply industry grew by 687,000 workers. This was 26 percent<strong>of</strong> all employment growth over this period.Taking a longer perspective, employment in <strong>the</strong> temporary helpindustry has grown from less than one-third <strong>of</strong> 1 percent <strong>of</strong> totalemployment in <strong>the</strong> early 1970s to nearly 1.3 percent today (Chart3-13). While growth has been explosive, <strong>the</strong> fraction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> workforce employed on a contingent basis is probably still less than 3percent.Chart 3-13 Help Supply Industry Employment as Share <strong>of</strong> Total EmploymentTemporary workers are a small but increasing share <strong>of</strong> total employment.Percent1.41.2 -1.0 -0.80.60.40.200I I I J I L .._1972 1974 1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992Note: Values before 1982 are estimated from <strong>the</strong> relationship between help supply industry employmentand personnel supply industry employment after 1982.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Labor.Ano<strong>the</strong>r potential indicator <strong>of</strong> declining job stability is <strong>the</strong> growinguse <strong>of</strong> part-time workers. Like temporary workers, part-timeworkers usually do not receive pension and health benefits andtend to have a weak attachment to <strong>the</strong>ir firms. Several authorshave included <strong>the</strong>m when enumerating <strong>the</strong> contingent work force.Between August 1990 and December 1993, part-time employmentincreased by 6.4 percent, compared with only a 1.7-percent123


increase for full-time employment. But part-time employment alwaysexpands during recessions, and <strong>the</strong> increased use <strong>of</strong> part-timeworkers during this recession is not significantly different from <strong>the</strong>pattern <strong>of</strong> past recessions, given sluggish output growth. Over <strong>the</strong>last several decades, however, <strong>the</strong>re has been a small secular increasein <strong>the</strong> fraction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> labor force working part-time, but ithas not been a steady increase. <strong>The</strong> fraction grew considerablyfrom <strong>the</strong> late 1960s through <strong>the</strong> early 1980s, reaching a peak in1983. It <strong>the</strong>n declined through <strong>the</strong> rest <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1980s and increasedmoderately in <strong>the</strong> 1990 recession. <strong>The</strong> fraction <strong>of</strong> workers workingpart-time by choice has remained nearly constant since <strong>the</strong> early1970s (Chart 3-14).Chart 3-14 Part-Time Employment: Total and VoluntarySince <strong>the</strong> late 1960s <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> part-time workers has grown, but <strong>the</strong> numberworking part-time by choice has not.Percent <strong>of</strong> employment18/ \ Total16-*1412s'Voluntary10oI !I I I I I I I I1960 1963 1966 1969 1972 1975 1978 1981 1984 1987 1990Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Labor.What accounts for <strong>the</strong> secular shifts toward temporary and parttimeemployment? One possibility is that <strong>the</strong> underlying demandfor goods and services has become more volatile, leading firms todesire less permanent work forces so that <strong>the</strong>y can more easily respondto shifting needs. If this were so, we should observe greatervolatility in <strong>the</strong> industrial composition <strong>of</strong> employment or in firmsize. Such evidence is lacking, however. Data from <strong>the</strong> Census <strong>of</strong>Manufactures show no long-term increase in variability <strong>of</strong> firm124


size. No data are available on volatility <strong>of</strong> firm size in <strong>the</strong> rest <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> economy.A simple measure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> reallocation <strong>of</strong> labor betweenindustries is <strong>the</strong> sum <strong>of</strong> changes in <strong>the</strong> share <strong>of</strong> each industry's employmentin total employment for those industries that are increasing<strong>the</strong>ir employment share. (This is equal to <strong>the</strong> absolute value <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> sum <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> decreases in <strong>the</strong> share <strong>of</strong> employment in each industrywith a shrinking share.) When total employment is constant,this measure is simply interpreted as <strong>the</strong> fraction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> work forcebeing reallocated between industries. According to this measure,<strong>the</strong> rate <strong>of</strong> change in <strong>the</strong> industrial structure across all industriesincreased in 1990 and 1991, which is typical for a recession. <strong>The</strong>rate <strong>of</strong> change in industry composition typically declines during recoveries,and <strong>the</strong> current recovery fits this pattern, with churningdeclining in 1992 and 1993 (Chart 3-15).Chart 3-15 Reallocation <strong>of</strong> Employment Between Industries<strong>The</strong> rate <strong>of</strong> reallocation <strong>of</strong> employment between industries follows businessconditions but shows no upward trend.Percent <strong>of</strong> nonfarm employment3.02.5 -1949 1952 1955 1958 1961 1964 1967 1970 1973 1976 1979 1982 1985 1988 1991Note: <strong>The</strong> series measures one half <strong>the</strong> sum <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> absolute value <strong>of</strong> changes in industry employment shares.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Labor.Has <strong>the</strong> rate <strong>of</strong> change <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> industrial composition <strong>of</strong> employmenttrended upward over time? Chart 3-16 shows that <strong>the</strong> answeris no. <strong>The</strong>re is a big spike in 1975 after <strong>the</strong> first oil shock,but no trend. Over <strong>the</strong> entire 1949-93 period, <strong>the</strong> average rate <strong>of</strong>reallocation was 0.9 percent per year. Recent experience appears151-444 0 - 9 4 - 5125


consistent with <strong>the</strong> past. Since 1980, <strong>the</strong> average rate <strong>of</strong>reallocation has also been 0.9 percent per year.How are we to reconcile what we know to be major changes in<strong>the</strong> industrial composition <strong>of</strong> employment (such as those due to defensecutbacks) with <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong>re has been no apparent increasein <strong>the</strong> rate <strong>of</strong> industrial change? Evidently <strong>the</strong> economy istypically experiencing significant changes in its structure. Just ashorseshoes gave way to tires and mechanical adding machines gaveway to electronic calculators, industries today continue to grow anddie.If job instability is increasing, it does not appear to be because<strong>of</strong> changes in <strong>the</strong> volatility <strong>of</strong> firm size or industry demand. If <strong>the</strong>reare significant changes in job stability, apparently <strong>the</strong>y are happeningat <strong>the</strong> individual level. If individuals' attachments to <strong>the</strong>irjobs are becoming more tenuous, we should observe a drop in <strong>the</strong>length <strong>of</strong> time workers spend with each employer, and an increasein <strong>the</strong> probability that a worker will leave his or her firm in anygiven year. But analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Current Population Survey shows<strong>the</strong> fraction <strong>of</strong> workers holding jobs for 8 years or more to havebeen 30 percent in 1979, and 31 percent in 1983, 1987, and 1991.A constant fraction <strong>of</strong> workers holding long-term jobs might hidechanges in <strong>the</strong> experience <strong>of</strong> individuals. For example, older workersare more likely than young workers to stay with <strong>the</strong> same employer.<strong>The</strong> aging <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> work force might <strong>the</strong>refore have broughtabout an increase in average job tenure, even if individuals at anyparticular age were experiencing greater job instability. Two studiesthat have attempted to examine this question provide mixedevidence. Both find that employment for nonwhites and collegegraduates has become less stable, but both also find that employmentstability for some groups has increased. No strong trend towardincreasing overall instability can be found in ei<strong>the</strong>r study. Itis impossible to rule out increasing overall instability on <strong>the</strong> basis<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se studies, but if <strong>the</strong>re has been an increase it is ei<strong>the</strong>r toorecent or too subtle to be reflected in <strong>the</strong> aggregate tenure statisticsdiscussed in <strong>the</strong> previous paragraph.Whe<strong>the</strong>r or not job security is decreasing, two things are clear.First, <strong>the</strong>re has aiways been a great deal <strong>of</strong> instability in <strong>the</strong> U.S.labor market. Second, <strong>the</strong>re is no question that <strong>the</strong>re is a perceptionthat job security is decreasing. This may be due entirely to <strong>the</strong>normal increase in job losses during <strong>the</strong> recent recession, to mediaaccounts <strong>of</strong> mass lay<strong>of</strong>fs at companies that used to <strong>of</strong>fer unusuallystable jobs, or to increases in job instability that simply are not reflectedin aggregate statistics. Alternatively, a constant rate <strong>of</strong> jobloss combined with greater income inequality has meant an increasein income (as opposed to employment) insecurity.126


BENEFITSOne <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> concerns raised by <strong>the</strong> growing use <strong>of</strong> contingentworkers is that fewer workers will be covered by employer-providedhealth insurance and retirement income programs. In fact, <strong>the</strong>re issome evidence that this has occurred, at least for some recent periods.<strong>The</strong> timing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se changes, however, does not appear to correspondto <strong>the</strong> timing <strong>of</strong> increases in temporary or part-time work,but <strong>the</strong> changes are troubling none<strong>the</strong>less.After rising for several decades, <strong>the</strong> fraction <strong>of</strong> workers coveredby employer-provided health insurance has fallen since <strong>the</strong> mid-1980s. However, it is likely that this fall represents less than 10percent <strong>of</strong> all workers. None<strong>the</strong>less, since 1985 <strong>the</strong> fraction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>population covered by job-related health insurance has remainedroughly constant (around 60 percent). Evidently <strong>the</strong> decline in coverageper worker is being <strong>of</strong>fset by <strong>the</strong> increase in <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong>households with more than one person working.Retirement income is ano<strong>the</strong>r area where different surveys suggestdifferent conclusions. Business tax records show no decline in<strong>the</strong> fraction <strong>of</strong> workers covered by retirement income programs;however, studies examining defined-benefit pension coverage find adecline in <strong>the</strong> late 1980s. <strong>The</strong> difference is at least in part due to<strong>the</strong> growth <strong>of</strong> tax-exempt retirement savings plans provided by employers.<strong>The</strong>se tend to be less generous than defined-benefit retirementplans, so that <strong>the</strong>re has at least been a decline in <strong>the</strong> quality<strong>of</strong> retirement security plans, if not in <strong>the</strong> quantity. Even here <strong>the</strong>story is mixed. At least one recent study finds that pension coveragehas begun to increase again in <strong>the</strong> 1990s.TOWARD A COMPREHENSIVE WORK FORCEPOLICY<strong>The</strong> labor market has changed. Although <strong>the</strong>re is little evidence<strong>of</strong> any recent abrupt changes in <strong>the</strong> fundamental behavior <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>labor market, three aspects <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> longer term picture are worthy<strong>of</strong> concern: (1) <strong>the</strong> slow growth <strong>of</strong> incomes and increasing incomeinequality; (2) increasing unemployment and nonemployment, particularlyfor certain groups; and (3) <strong>the</strong> high rates <strong>of</strong> job loss anddislocation that are normal for our economy.Real income has grown very slowly since <strong>the</strong> early 1970s, and <strong>the</strong>real incomes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> least well-<strong>of</strong>f have actually fallen. <strong>The</strong> Administration'spolicies address <strong>the</strong>se problems at four levels.First, <strong>the</strong> primary source <strong>of</strong> income growth is productivitygrowth. To increase productivity growth, we must invest more inresearch and development <strong>of</strong> new technologies. To take advantage<strong>of</strong> technical progress, we must invest more in new plant and equipment.Second, U.S. employers have learned new ways to organize127


work that make better use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> vast pool <strong>of</strong> talent in our workforce. <strong>The</strong>se participatory techniques are particularly effective inorganizations adapting to rapid technical change but have widerapplicability as well. Third, to deal with <strong>the</strong> problems <strong>of</strong> incomegrowth and inequality, we must invest more and invest more equitablyin education and training for our work force. Finally, in orderto promote investment and to ensure that incomes grow with increasingproductivity, <strong>the</strong> Administration's macroeconomic policiesaim to encourage full employment built on a sound fiscal foundation.<strong>The</strong> Administration's main vehicle for encouraging investments<strong>of</strong> all sorts has been to reduce Federal borrowing so as to makeroom in credit markets for private borrowers. As noted in Chapter2, deficit reduction has resulted in much lower interest rates, makingit easier for firms and individuals to undertake productivity-enhancinginvestments. As <strong>the</strong> recovery continues, we expect to seemore individuals and firms taking advantage <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se opportunities.Funding for research is also a high priority for this Administration,In addition to promoting capital formation and technical change,<strong>the</strong> Administration aims to increase <strong>the</strong> productivity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> workforce by helping employers make better use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir workersthrough increased worker participation. Numerous studies havenow demonstrated that cooperative techniques increase productivitysubstantially in a wide range <strong>of</strong> enterprises. By helping to disseminateinformation on what successful firms have been able toaccomplish, <strong>the</strong> Administration hopes to speed <strong>the</strong> adoption <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong>se practices throughout <strong>the</strong> economy.Improvements in education and training to boost <strong>the</strong> skills andenhance <strong>the</strong> flexibility <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> U.S. work force are top priorities. Tothis end, <strong>the</strong> Administration is increasing spending and reorganizingprograms to increase effectiveness. From increasing funding forHead Start to proposals for developing "lifelong learning," <strong>the</strong> Administrationhopes to address education and training needs everywherein our society. <strong>The</strong> Administration's Goals 2000: EducateAmerica Act and <strong>the</strong> Improving America's Schools Act aim to ensurea quality education for all students, first by guaranteeing allstudents a safe environment for learning, and <strong>the</strong>n by setting nationalstandards for students and teachers. To ensure that all postsecondarystudents have access to <strong>the</strong> means to finance <strong>the</strong>ir highereducation, <strong>the</strong> Congress has passed legislation proposed by thisAdministration establishing a direct lending program where <strong>the</strong>rate at which <strong>the</strong> loan will be paid back will depend on <strong>the</strong> recipient'sincome.Recognizing <strong>the</strong> need to coordinate education and job training,<strong>the</strong> Departments <strong>of</strong> Education and Labor have joined in an unprec-128


edented partnership to develop a number <strong>of</strong> new programs. Governmentprograms have traditionally provided extensive support forthose going to college. <strong>The</strong> School-to-Work initiative <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Departments<strong>of</strong> Education and Labor will help those who begin <strong>the</strong>ir careerswith a high school diploma to obtain meaningful work-basedtraining. This training will go hand in hand with a new system <strong>of</strong>skill standards and certification, which will make <strong>the</strong> skills workerslearn more portable and consequently more valuable. <strong>The</strong> Administration'sWorkforce Security Act will provide training and jobsearch assistance to dislocated workers who are having difficultyfinding new work. <strong>The</strong> aim is to transform our unemployment systeminto a reemployment system. <strong>The</strong> Administration's proposedwelfare reform plan will provide funds for training to some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>most disadvantaged in our society: mo<strong>the</strong>rs and fa<strong>the</strong>rs with childrenin poverty.Ano<strong>the</strong>r part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Administration's answer to <strong>the</strong> problem <strong>of</strong>growing inequality is <strong>the</strong> substantial increase in <strong>the</strong> earned incometax credit that has been put in place. This tax credit, primarily forlow-wage workers with children, along with <strong>the</strong> full range <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rgovernment transfer programs, will lift many families with a fulltimeworker out <strong>of</strong> poverty. It is described in detail in Chapter 1.Increased productivity growth is <strong>the</strong> answer to stagnant realwages, and improved training and education—particularly for <strong>the</strong>least advantaged—is a major part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> solution to growing inequality.But we cannot expect firms to purchase new equipmentunless <strong>the</strong>re is demand for more products, and we cannot expectworkers to train for jobs that do not exist. <strong>The</strong>refore, an integralgoal <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Administration's economic policies is <strong>the</strong> return to fullemployment.Maintaining a high rate <strong>of</strong> economic growth is also essential fordealing with <strong>the</strong> second major labor market trend <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> last twodecades: increased unemployment. <strong>The</strong> analysis presented abovesuggests that most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> increase in average unemployment over<strong>the</strong> 1970s and 1980s was due to slack aggregate demand. <strong>The</strong>re isalso some indication <strong>of</strong> a permanent increase in <strong>the</strong> natural rate<strong>of</strong> unemployment in <strong>the</strong> 1970s. Whatever <strong>the</strong> cause <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> increasein <strong>the</strong> natural rate, <strong>the</strong> Administration's Workforce Security Actshould help reduce <strong>the</strong> natural rate by facilitating a more efficientmatching <strong>of</strong> workers and employers.An initial step toward <strong>the</strong> establishment <strong>of</strong> a reemployment systemwas taken last fall with <strong>the</strong> passage <strong>of</strong> legislation extendingFederal emergency unemployment benefits. That legislation put inplace for <strong>the</strong> first time a system <strong>of</strong> worker pr<strong>of</strong>iling to help identifyworkers who are likely to experience long-term unemployment, andto provide <strong>the</strong>m with a package <strong>of</strong> job search assistance services.Several controlled experiments have now shown such services to be129


effective in reducing <strong>the</strong> duration <strong>of</strong> unemployment. Once fully inplace, <strong>the</strong> Workforce Security Act will provide both job search assistanceand long-term training to those who lack <strong>the</strong> skills necessaryto secure good employment. This will help reduce mismatchunemployment and <strong>the</strong> natural rate <strong>of</strong> unemployment.Existing training programs for dislocated workers have beencriticized as ineffective. <strong>The</strong> new programs proposed by <strong>the</strong> Administrationaddress this problem by emphasizing long-term trainingand continuing postsecondary education. <strong>The</strong> large human capitalliterature shows substantial potential benefits from this approachto increasing worker skills.Dislocated workers have always faced problems with income securityand health care. With growing income inequality, <strong>the</strong> normallyhigh rates <strong>of</strong> dislocation in our economy mean greater incomeinsecurity. <strong>The</strong> Administration is moving to make job transitionseasier for displaced workers in a number <strong>of</strong> ways. <strong>The</strong> WorkforceSecurity Act will help ease transitions and help those who need itwith retraining for a new career. <strong>The</strong> Administration's health careplan will provide universal coverage, relieving one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> majorworries <strong>of</strong> a dislocated worker—what to do if a family member becomesill after health coverage from <strong>the</strong> lost job has lapsed.Overall, <strong>the</strong> labor, education, health, and welfare programs proposedby <strong>the</strong> Clinton Administration hold out <strong>the</strong> hope <strong>of</strong> lower unemploymentrates, reduced inequality, and stronger income growthfor <strong>American</strong> workers and <strong>the</strong>ir families.130


CHAPTER 4Health Care ReformTHE UNITED STATES SPENDS far more per capita on and devotesa much larger share <strong>of</strong> its income to health care than doesany o<strong>the</strong>r country. In 1993, one out <strong>of</strong> every seven dollars that<strong>American</strong>s spent—14.3 percent <strong>of</strong> gross domestic product (GDP)—went to health services. In 1991, <strong>the</strong> most recent year for whichcomparable international data are available, <strong>the</strong> United Statesspent 13.2 percent <strong>of</strong> GDP on health care, while no o<strong>the</strong>r industrializedcountry spent more than 10 percent. Indeed <strong>the</strong> average forall <strong>the</strong> industrialized countries <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Organization for <strong>Economic</strong>Cooperation and Development (OECD) was only about 8 percent.Yet despite this massive commitment <strong>of</strong> resources, <strong>the</strong> UnitedStates insures a much smaller fraction <strong>of</strong> its population than domost o<strong>the</strong>r industrial countries, and ranks comparatively poorly onsuch important overall indicators <strong>of</strong> health outcomes as life expectancyand infant mortality. Tens <strong>of</strong> millions <strong>of</strong> <strong>American</strong>s remainuninsured and live in constant fear <strong>of</strong> bankruptcy should <strong>the</strong>y becomeill. Tens <strong>of</strong> millions more have inadequate insurance or riskbecoming uninsured if <strong>the</strong>y lose <strong>the</strong>ir jobs.For <strong>the</strong> lucky <strong>American</strong>s who have comprehensive benefits andlittle worry about becoming uninsured, <strong>the</strong> current system buyscare <strong>of</strong> high quality and provides genuine health security. For o<strong>the</strong>rsless fortunate, <strong>the</strong> system works less well or not at all. Andeven <strong>the</strong> lucky suffer from <strong>the</strong> shortcomings <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> current system,as <strong>the</strong> costs <strong>of</strong> covering services for <strong>the</strong> uninsured and some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>costs for those served by government programs are shifted ontohospitals and o<strong>the</strong>r providers and ultimately onto private sector insurancepremiums.Health care spending is not only high but growing rapidly. In almostevery year <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> last three decades, health care costs haveincreased at more than twice <strong>the</strong> rate <strong>of</strong> total income. In <strong>the</strong> 1980s,real per capita health care spending increased at an annual rate<strong>of</strong> 4.4 percent in <strong>the</strong> United States, compared with an average <strong>of</strong>only 3.2 percent in Canada, France, Germany, Japan, and <strong>the</strong>United Kingdom. Current projections indicate that, without reform,<strong>the</strong> United States will devote nearly 18 percent <strong>of</strong> its GDP tohealth care by <strong>the</strong> turn <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> century.At <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> individual, <strong>the</strong> family, and <strong>the</strong> firm, <strong>the</strong> inexorablegrowth in health care spending means ever-increasing insur-131


ance premiums and ever-higher medical bills. And at <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong>Federal and State and local governments, rising health care costsmean that health expenditures claim larger and larger budgetshares, with less left over for essential competing demands likepublic safety, infrastructure maintenance and expansion, and improvementsin education and training. Despite a sustained reductionin real discretionary spending, <strong>the</strong> Congressional Budget Officeprojects that escalating health care costs will be <strong>the</strong> dominantforce pushing Federal budget deficits back up as <strong>the</strong> 20th centurynears its end.<strong>The</strong> facts speak for <strong>the</strong>mselves: <strong>The</strong> United States faces a healthcare crisis that demands a solution, both for <strong>the</strong> health <strong>of</strong> its citizensand for <strong>the</strong> health <strong>of</strong> its economy over <strong>the</strong> long run.For analytical purposes, this crisis can be divided into four separatebut interrelated parts. First, <strong>the</strong> current system fails to providehealth security for millions <strong>of</strong> <strong>American</strong>s, both insured anduninsured. Insured <strong>American</strong>s do not have health security when<strong>the</strong>y face <strong>the</strong> prospect <strong>of</strong> losing <strong>the</strong>ir coverage if <strong>the</strong>y lose or change<strong>the</strong>ir jobs. Some estimates suggest that such worries may reducejob mobility by as much as 25 percent. <strong>The</strong> health security <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>uninsured is still more precarious: Even when <strong>the</strong>y do manage toobtain care, <strong>the</strong> evidence indicates that <strong>the</strong>y receive less treatment,are sicker, and suffer higher mortality rates than <strong>the</strong> insured. Itis simply not true, as some claim, that all <strong>American</strong>s get decentcare when <strong>the</strong>y need it.Shortcomings in private insurance markets are a second and relatedproblem. Under <strong>the</strong> current system people who are lesshealthy pay more, sometimes much more, for insurance than peoplewho are healthy. Insurance for those with preexisting conditions is<strong>of</strong>ten ei<strong>the</strong>r unavailable or available only at prices that put it out<strong>of</strong> reach for many <strong>American</strong>s. And many insurance policies simplydo not cover a variety <strong>of</strong> large financial risks—exactly <strong>the</strong> kinds <strong>of</strong>risks that insurance is designed to address in <strong>the</strong> first place.<strong>The</strong> third problem in our current health care system is <strong>the</strong> lack<strong>of</strong> effective competition, which in turn weakens <strong>the</strong> incentives forboth providers and consumers to make cost-conscious decisions. Inadequatecompetition is a major reason why <strong>the</strong> costs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>American</strong>health care system are so high. Studies suggest that a variety<strong>of</strong> common procedures are <strong>of</strong>ten performed in circumstances where<strong>the</strong>y are inappropriate or <strong>of</strong> equivocal value on purely medicalgrounds. Fee-for-service providers clearly have an incentive to providemore care, including care that is inappropriate, because <strong>the</strong>yare generally reimbursed for each additional test or procedure <strong>the</strong>yperform. Consumers <strong>of</strong>ten do not have <strong>the</strong> information <strong>the</strong>y needto evaluate whe<strong>the</strong>r a particular service is indicated, and some donot have <strong>the</strong> choice among providers that might allow <strong>the</strong>m to132


make cost-conscious decisions. In addition, many consumers haveweak incentives to choose among health care services on <strong>the</strong> basis<strong>of</strong> cost, and among health care plans on <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> price. Finally,because many insurance policies do not cover preventive care, consumersmay underutilize cost-effective services at earlier stages <strong>of</strong>medical need.<strong>The</strong> fourth problem with our current system is <strong>the</strong> burden itplaces on public sector budgets. Large and growing public healthcare expenditures force governments to make painful choicesamong cutting o<strong>the</strong>r spending programs, increasing revenues, or increasingbudget deficits—each <strong>of</strong> which can have adverse consequencesfor long-term economic growth.None <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se four problems can be solved in isolation. For example,in <strong>the</strong> absence <strong>of</strong> systemwide reform, arbitrary caps on Federalhealth care programs, which some have proposed, would simplyshift still more <strong>of</strong> government program costs onto <strong>the</strong> private sector.According to one recent estimate, uncompensated care and governmentprograms that reimbursed hospitals below market pricesshifted $26.1 billion onto <strong>the</strong> private sector in 1991. Caps on governmentprograms would simply aggravate this problem. Similarly,any attempt to provide universal coverage without complementarymeasures to improve competition and sharpen <strong>the</strong> incentives formore cost-conscious decisions would mean even more dramatic increasesin systemwide costs. And reforms designed only to address<strong>the</strong> most glaring shortcomings <strong>of</strong> private insurance markets wouldnot solve ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> problem <strong>of</strong> providing health security for all<strong>American</strong>s or <strong>the</strong> problem <strong>of</strong> escalating public health care bills.In short, a piecemeal approach will not work. Health care reformrequires a comprehensive solution. At <strong>the</strong> same time, it requires asolution that preserves what is good about <strong>the</strong> current system andthat maintains choice at all levels. This is indeed a daunting challenge,but one that <strong>the</strong> Nation can ill afford to ignore.UNIVERSAL COVERAGE AND HEALTHSECURITYProviding universal health coverage and security for all <strong>American</strong>sis an essential objective <strong>of</strong> health care reform. Chart 4-1shows <strong>the</strong> sources <strong>of</strong> health insurance for <strong>the</strong> <strong>American</strong> population.According to <strong>the</strong> Current Population Survey, over 15 percent <strong>of</strong><strong>American</strong>s—nearly 39 million people—were uninsured throughout1992. That is one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> highest shares in <strong>the</strong> industrialized world.While some people remain uninsured for long periods <strong>of</strong> time, manymore experience brief episodes during which <strong>the</strong>y lack coverage, forinstance when <strong>the</strong>y lose a job. <strong>The</strong> Survey <strong>of</strong> Income and ProgramParticipation (SIPP) found that over three times as many people133


are uninsured at some time during a given year as are uninsuredthroughout <strong>the</strong> year. <strong>The</strong> SIPP estimates that more than one infour <strong>American</strong>s were uninsured at some point in a 28-month periodfrom 1987 to 1989.Chart 4-1 Distribution <strong>of</strong> Population by Source <strong>of</strong> Health Insurance Coverage: 1991Most <strong>American</strong>s receive health insurance through <strong>the</strong>ir employers. Fifteen percent <strong>of</strong><strong>American</strong>s are uninsured.Employment Based 55.6%O<strong>the</strong>r Private 7.3%m& Uninsured 15.4%Medicare 12.4%Medicaid 8.2%CHAMPUSandVA 1.0%Note: Detail does not sum to 100 percent due to rounding.Source: Employee Benefit Research Institute.<strong>The</strong> fact that so many people are uninsured at least some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>time means that <strong>the</strong> prospect <strong>of</strong> being uninsured may influence <strong>the</strong>behavior <strong>of</strong> a large number <strong>of</strong> <strong>American</strong>s. As long as people canlose <strong>the</strong>ir health coverage simply by changing employment, healthinsecurity will remain a barrier to changing jobs or starting newbusinesses. An important rationale for universal coverage is <strong>the</strong>reforeto increase mobility and employment opportunities for thosewho already have insurance but do not have health security.Similarly, many people remain on welfare because <strong>the</strong>y will lose<strong>the</strong>ir medicaid coverage if <strong>the</strong>y take a job. Some estimates indicatethat up to one-quarter <strong>of</strong> recipients <strong>of</strong> aid to families with dependentchildren (AFDC) would take a job if private health insuranceequivalent to that provided by medicaid were available to <strong>the</strong>m. Asecond rationale for universal coverage is thus to reduce <strong>the</strong> number<strong>of</strong> people on welfare and to fur<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> Administration's goal<strong>of</strong> welfare reform.134


A third rationale for universal coverage is to improve <strong>the</strong> health<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> uninsured. <strong>The</strong> uninsured do use health care—<strong>the</strong>y do notsimply do without. It is estimated that those without insurance forall <strong>of</strong> <strong>1994</strong> will consume about $1,200 <strong>of</strong> medical care per capita—60 percent <strong>of</strong> which will be paid for by governments and privatepayers, not by <strong>the</strong> uninsured <strong>the</strong>mselves (Chart 4-2). This expenditureis roughly half <strong>the</strong> over $2,300 per capita consumed by thosewho are currently insured.Chart 4-2 Sources <strong>of</strong> Payment for Health Care by Insurance Status: <strong>1994</strong> EstimatesAbout 60 percent <strong>of</strong> care for <strong>the</strong> uninsured is financed by governments, o<strong>the</strong>r private payers,bad debt, free care, or workers' compensation.Uninsured All Year(Per capita spending = $1,224)Any Private Insurance(Per capita spending = $2,332)$95$129[ J Out-<strong>of</strong>-Pocket \/A Insurance ||| Government j_J Bad debt, free care,and workers' compensationSource: Department <strong>of</strong> Health and Human Services.While <strong>the</strong> uninsured do receive care, it is <strong>of</strong>ten nei<strong>the</strong>r timelynor appropriate. <strong>The</strong> uninsured are more likely than <strong>the</strong> insuredto receive care in <strong>the</strong> emergency room, are less healthy when <strong>the</strong>yare admitted to a hospital, and receive less treatment than peoplewith similar diagnoses once admitted. Some studies indicate—andcommon sense suggests—that <strong>the</strong> health <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> uninsured suffersas a result.Indeed, without reform, <strong>the</strong> problem <strong>of</strong> adverse health outcomesfor <strong>the</strong> uninsured is likely to worsen over time. Historically, governmentsand private payers have shouldered <strong>the</strong> burden <strong>of</strong> financingcare for <strong>the</strong> uninsured. As health care costs continue to esca-135


late, however, <strong>the</strong>se payers may become less willing to bear thisburden.Perhaps surprisingly, providing universal health insurance tocover those currently uninsured will not require a large increase intotal health expenditures. While <strong>the</strong> uninsured are poorer than <strong>the</strong>population as a whole, <strong>the</strong>y are also younger and healthier. Almostall <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> elderly already have insurance—through medicare.Among <strong>the</strong> nonelderly population, 24 percent <strong>of</strong> those with employer-sponsoredinsurance are between <strong>the</strong> ages <strong>of</strong> 45 and 64,compared with only 17 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> uninsured. Only 9 percent <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> privately insured are between <strong>the</strong> ages <strong>of</strong> 18 and 24, comparedwith 18 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> uninsured. And while uninsured adults <strong>of</strong>tenperceive <strong>the</strong>mselves to be in poorer general health than <strong>the</strong> populationas a whole, <strong>the</strong>y are less likely than <strong>the</strong> insured to havechronic conditions (Table 4-1). Estimates that account for <strong>the</strong>se demographicand health factors generally find that insuring <strong>the</strong> uninsuredwould increase national health spending by less than 10 percent.TABLE 4-1.—Health Perception and Health Status by Type <strong>of</strong> InsuranceCoverage, 1987[Percent]Insurance coverageSelf-reported general health perception:FairPoorAny chronic conditionCharacteristicNote—<strong>The</strong> sample is composed <strong>of</strong> adults aged 18 to 64.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Health and Human Services.Private,employmentrelated10.61.333.1Uninsured18.12.426.1A fourth rationale for universal coverage is to solve <strong>the</strong> "freerider" problem. At least some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> uninsured could afford to purchaseinsurance but choose to go without because <strong>the</strong>y feel <strong>the</strong>y donot need it, and because <strong>the</strong>y know that if <strong>the</strong>y do become sick <strong>the</strong>ywill be cared for on an emergency basis at little cost to <strong>the</strong>mselves.For some, relying on such "free" catastrophic insurance can bemore attractive than purchasing insurance in <strong>the</strong> private market.By requiring that all individuals pay something for coverage,health reform can help eliminate this problem.Finally, as discussed below, universal coverage is essential if everyonein <strong>the</strong> population is to share equally in <strong>the</strong> costs <strong>of</strong> insurance(Box 4-1).136


Box 4-1.—Moral Hazard and Adverse SelectionAll insurance markets face two potential problems. <strong>The</strong> first,called moral hazard, involves incentives. Insurance may encouragethose who are covered to use insured services morethan <strong>the</strong>y o<strong>the</strong>rwise would, or it may discourage <strong>the</strong> insuredfrom taking steps to lower <strong>the</strong>ir need for such services. Insuranceagainst any kind <strong>of</strong> risk—including health risks—alwaysinvolves some element <strong>of</strong> moral hazard. When people usehealth services more than <strong>the</strong>y would without insurance, <strong>the</strong>total amount insurers must pay increases, and <strong>the</strong>y in turnmust increase <strong>the</strong>ir prices. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, because individualspay less than <strong>the</strong> full social cost <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> services <strong>the</strong>y receive,too much <strong>of</strong> society's resources will be devoted to such services.<strong>The</strong> second problem is adverse selection. People who knowthat <strong>the</strong>y are more at risk than o<strong>the</strong>rs <strong>of</strong> falling ill are morelikely to purchase health insurance. <strong>The</strong>refore, insurers whoset <strong>the</strong>ir prices at <strong>the</strong> average cost for <strong>the</strong> population as awhole are likely to discover that <strong>the</strong>ir prices do not cover <strong>the</strong>ircosts, because <strong>the</strong>ir customers are on average sicker than <strong>the</strong>population at large. To address this problem, insurers have incentivesboth to charge prices that exceed <strong>the</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> covering<strong>the</strong> average person and to select risks as best <strong>the</strong>y can. <strong>The</strong>higher prices <strong>of</strong> insurance that result from adverse selectionhave <strong>the</strong> perverse effect <strong>of</strong> discouraging some healthy peoplefrom purchasing insurance. Because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> adverse selectionproblem, all people must be required to purchase insurance ifeach <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m is to be charged <strong>the</strong> average cost <strong>of</strong> providing insurance.INSURANCE MARKET REFORMPrivate insurance markets have a number <strong>of</strong> shortcomings thatimpede <strong>the</strong> realization <strong>of</strong> universal coverage.INSURING MAJOR RISKS AND PREEXISTINGCONDITIONS<strong>Economic</strong> <strong>the</strong>ory suggests that at a minimum well-functioning insurancemarkets should insure against <strong>the</strong> expenses that accompanylarge medical risks because those are precisely <strong>the</strong> ones thatcause <strong>the</strong> most financial hardship to individuals and families, are<strong>the</strong> least susceptible to moral hazard, and have <strong>the</strong> lowest administrativecosts as a share <strong>of</strong> benefits. In our current system, however,private insurance markets <strong>of</strong>ten fail even when judged against thisminimal standard.137


About 80 percent <strong>of</strong> conventional health insurance policies havelimits—generally ranging from $250,000 to over $1 million—on <strong>the</strong>amount that <strong>the</strong> insurer will pay over <strong>the</strong> policyholder's lifetime.Many insurers also initially exclude coverage <strong>of</strong> "preexisting conditions"—healthproblems that exist before <strong>the</strong> policy takes effect. Atypical rule, for example, is to exclude for 6 months a conditionthat was present in <strong>the</strong> 6 months prior to joining a plan. Some estimatessuggest that up to 80 million <strong>American</strong>s have preexistingconditions that could be excluded from any new coverage or wouldrequire payment <strong>of</strong> a higher premium.Both <strong>the</strong> exclusion <strong>of</strong> coverage for preexisting conditions and <strong>the</strong>limitations on maximum lifetime payments are ways that insurersrespond to <strong>the</strong> adverse selection problem discussed in Box 4-1.Such practices also reflect <strong>the</strong> fact that insurers who know in advanceabout <strong>the</strong> likely health status <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir potential policyholderscan choose which risks <strong>the</strong>y are willing to insure and which <strong>the</strong>yare not, and can choose to charge different prices to different individualsbased on this assessment.Such common insurance practices may be privately optimal forindividual insurers, but <strong>the</strong>y are not socially efficient. People withpreexisting conditions and people who have exhausted <strong>the</strong>ir lifetimeinsurance limits may still require care, and someone mustbear <strong>the</strong> costs. If <strong>the</strong>y cannot obtain private insurance and <strong>the</strong>yhave exhausted <strong>the</strong>ir own funds, ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y will get insurancethrough public sector programs, such as medicaid, or <strong>the</strong> costs <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong>ir care will be shifted onto <strong>the</strong> premiums <strong>of</strong> those who are ableto obtain insurance. By compelling all insurers to cover preexistingconditions and by eliminating limitations on lifetime payments, <strong>the</strong>government could reduce <strong>the</strong> adverse selection problem in privateinsurance markets and <strong>the</strong>reby improve how <strong>the</strong>y function.COMMUNITY RATINGA second essential component <strong>of</strong> insurance reform is "communityrating"—charging everyone in a large group <strong>the</strong> same price regardless<strong>of</strong> individual differences in demographic or health status. Currently,health insurance is <strong>of</strong>ten experience rated—<strong>the</strong> price formembers <strong>of</strong> a particular group is based in whole or in part on thatgroup's expected utilization <strong>of</strong> insured services. However, <strong>the</strong>re arestrong reasons for requiring community rating.<strong>The</strong> rationale for any kind <strong>of</strong> insurance is to spread coststhroughout <strong>the</strong> insured population. Complete health insurancewould spread <strong>the</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> care across everyone in <strong>the</strong> population, regardless<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir health status. Similarly, complete insurance wouldguarantee that <strong>the</strong> price paid by each individual for coverage wouldbe <strong>the</strong> average cost <strong>of</strong> such coverage for <strong>the</strong> population. In contrast,experience rating means that <strong>the</strong> price one pays for insurance var-138


ies depending on one's health status. But at least for those healthproblems and <strong>the</strong>ir associated costs that individuals cannot influenceby <strong>the</strong>ir behavior, experience rating is at odds with <strong>the</strong> basicfunction <strong>of</strong> insurance—to insure against risk.In principle, <strong>of</strong> course, one can distinguish between those healthrisks that individuals can influence and those that <strong>the</strong>y cannot,and apply experience rating to <strong>the</strong> former. In practice, however,this is <strong>of</strong>ten difficult to do, because it would require detailed monitoring<strong>of</strong> personal behavior. In addition, many major health risks,with <strong>the</strong> obvious exception <strong>of</strong> those associated with smoking, arelinked quite imperfectly to individual behavior, or <strong>the</strong> medical pr<strong>of</strong>ession'sunderstanding <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> linkage remains rudimentary. Basedon <strong>the</strong>se considerations, community rating <strong>of</strong> health insurance, andcontinued public programs to deter smoking, are appropriate elements<strong>of</strong> health insurance reform.However, community rating is difficult to enact without complementaryreforms. <strong>The</strong> adverse selection issue described in Box4-1 is one potential problem, which universal coverage could addressby requiring people to have coverage. A related problemstems from <strong>the</strong> fact that insurers who are compelled to charge acommunity rate will have incentives to seek out <strong>the</strong> healthiest consumers,because <strong>the</strong>y can be covered for <strong>the</strong> lowest cost and thusare likely to yield insurers <strong>the</strong> highest pr<strong>of</strong>its. This risk selectionmay involve high administrative costs, for example in determining<strong>the</strong> medical history <strong>of</strong> each member <strong>of</strong> a group. Resources devotedto this activity increase <strong>the</strong> overall costs <strong>of</strong> health care without providingany additional health benefits.Several steps could be taken to minimize <strong>the</strong> possibility <strong>of</strong> suchselection. First, a system <strong>of</strong> "risk adjustment payments" could bedesigned—monetary transfers from plans that have a healthier mix<strong>of</strong> enrollees to plans with a sicker mix <strong>of</strong> enrollees. If risk adjustmentperfectly compensated for true differences in health risk, itwould eliminate <strong>the</strong> incentives for selection on <strong>the</strong> part <strong>of</strong> insurers.Second, all insurers could be required to <strong>of</strong>fer <strong>the</strong> same package<strong>of</strong> benefits, <strong>the</strong>reby eliminating <strong>the</strong> opportunity to use <strong>the</strong> variationsin <strong>the</strong> benefits package to attract better risks. Finally,"guaranteed issue" and "guaranteed renewability" <strong>of</strong> insurancecould be required—that is, people could not be denied <strong>the</strong> right toenroll initially or renew enrollment in a health plan because <strong>of</strong> demographicor health status.REDUCING ADMINISTRATIVE COSTSIn part because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> experience rating practices <strong>of</strong> insurancecompanies, <strong>the</strong>re is insufficient standardization across insurers.Providers must deal with different insurers using different claimforms and covering different sets <strong>of</strong> services. Lack <strong>of</strong> standardiza-139


tion results in high administrative expenses. In 1991 over 6 percent<strong>of</strong> all health care expenditures went for administrative expenses.This exceeds total spending on all public health service programs.Standardizing benefits and billing procedures and increasing <strong>the</strong>automation <strong>of</strong> bill payment could produce substantial administrativesavings. Grouping small firms and individuals into larger purchasingpools would have <strong>the</strong> same effect. As Chart 4-3 shows, <strong>the</strong>administrative load charged by commercial insurers for smallgroups (1 to 4 employees) averages about 40 percent <strong>of</strong> claimspaid—in contrast to only about 5V2 percent for large groups (over10,000 employees).Chart 4-3 Administrative Expenses <strong>of</strong> Commercial Insurers as Percent <strong>of</strong> Claims PaidAdministrative expenses are much higher in proportion to claims paid for small groups than forlarge groups.Percent504040.035.03030.025.02018.016.010mi•Iilllli5-9 10-19 20-49 50-99 100-499Group size500-2,4995.510.000+Source. Hay/Huggins Company, Inc.CREATING A MORE EFFICIENT MARKET ANDCONTAINING COSTS<strong>The</strong> third problem with <strong>the</strong> current health care system is that itappears to be far from efficient. As already noted, <strong>the</strong> UnitedStates spends a larger share <strong>of</strong> its GDP on health care than anyo<strong>the</strong>r industrialized nation. If <strong>American</strong>s valued medical care more140


than people in o<strong>the</strong>r countries do, this might not be cause for concern.But <strong>the</strong> facts suggest o<strong>the</strong>rwise.Although <strong>the</strong> fraction <strong>of</strong> national resources devoted to health carein <strong>the</strong> United States is partially explainable by our higher income,Chart 4-4 reveals that <strong>the</strong> United States is an outlier—we spendconsiderably more per capita on health care yet achieve a somewhatlower life expectancy than our higher income would predict.Nor can <strong>the</strong>se differences be explained away by <strong>the</strong> age <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><strong>American</strong> population. In fact, <strong>the</strong> percentage <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> population over65 is lower in <strong>the</strong> United States than in most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r OECDcountries. Since older people tend to use more medical care thanyounger people, <strong>the</strong> age distribution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>American</strong> populationsuggests that <strong>the</strong> United States should spend a smaller ra<strong>the</strong>r thana larger fraction <strong>of</strong> GDP on health care than do o<strong>the</strong>r industrializedcountries.Chart 4-4 Health Expenditure and Life Expectancy in Industrial Countries<strong>The</strong> United States spends more on health care yet has lower life expectancy thanwould be expected given its level <strong>of</strong> income.Deviation from predicted life expectancy (years)D4-Better outcome,lower expenditureBetter outcome,higher expenditureGreece2#Japan#


expenditures. No comparative studies have assessed whe<strong>the</strong>r violenceis a more important determinant <strong>of</strong> health care spending in<strong>the</strong> United States than elsewhere.At least part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> higher health care costs in America stemfrom inefficiencies <strong>of</strong> various sorts. First, <strong>the</strong>re are <strong>the</strong> administrativeinefficiencies in <strong>the</strong> insurance market discussed earlier. Inadequatecompetition among providers and inadequate incentives forcost-conscious behavior by both providers and consumers are a secondmajor source <strong>of</strong> inefficiency in <strong>the</strong> current health care system.Traditional fee-for-service plans, which pay providers for each testand procedure <strong>the</strong>y perform, are used by 58 percent <strong>of</strong> private sectoremployees who receive health insurance through <strong>the</strong>ir employers.Such plans have built-in incentives encouraging providers toperform more care than may be appropriate. <strong>The</strong>se incentives aresometimes reinforced by self-referral arrangements whereby providersprescribe tests or o<strong>the</strong>r services from laboratories or clinicsin which <strong>the</strong>y have a direct financial interest. For example, onestudy found that doctors who performed and charged for <strong>the</strong>ir ownradiological tests prescribed <strong>the</strong>m at least four times as <strong>of</strong>ten andcharged higher fees than did doctors who referred <strong>the</strong>ir patients tounaffiliated radiologists.Providers sometimes have an incentive to overprescribe tests andprocedures because <strong>the</strong>y fear malpractice suits. Available estimatessuggest that such "defensive medicine" accounts for about 3 percent<strong>of</strong> total health spending.Even when <strong>the</strong>re are many providers in a particular health caremarket, competition among <strong>the</strong>m is <strong>of</strong>ten weak. Only 53 percent <strong>of</strong>people insured through an employer, for example, can chooseamong alternative health care plans, and <strong>of</strong>ten <strong>the</strong> choice <strong>of</strong> acapitated plan, such as a health maintenance organization (HMO),is not available. Many small firms do not <strong>of</strong>fer multiple policies.One study found that only 5 percent <strong>of</strong> workers in firms with lessthan 25 employees were <strong>of</strong>fered any choice among health careplans. As a result, many consumers have only limited choicesamong both plans and providers. Consumers also may not have achoice <strong>of</strong> hospitals, since hospital selection is usually left to doctors,who choose on <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> where <strong>the</strong>y practice and may not chooseon <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> price.Moreover, effective consumer choice depends on adequateconsumer information. But many consumers rely primarily on <strong>the</strong>irproviders for advice about what services are indicated in a particularsituation. Consumers <strong>of</strong>ten do not even know <strong>the</strong> prices <strong>of</strong> medicalgoods and services, and <strong>the</strong>y seldom have <strong>the</strong> information <strong>the</strong>ywould need to evaluate <strong>the</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> services <strong>the</strong>y receive.This means that providers are <strong>of</strong>ten in a position to influence both<strong>the</strong> supply and <strong>the</strong> demand sides <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir markets. In short, con-142


sumers are ill equipped to bring strong competitive pressures tobear on providers to make cost-conscious decisions.Nor do consumers <strong>the</strong>mselves have strong incentives to exertsuch pressure. Even when <strong>the</strong>y have a choice, consumers usuallyface weak incentives to opt for a low-cost health care plan. Manyemployers pay a fixed percentage—generally 80 percent—<strong>of</strong> whateverplan an employee chooses. Thus, when an employee selects aless expensive plan, 80 cents <strong>of</strong> each dollar saved goes to <strong>the</strong> employerand only 20 cents to <strong>the</strong> employee.As <strong>the</strong> earlier discussion <strong>of</strong> moral hazard suggested, <strong>the</strong> currentsystem <strong>of</strong> insurance may also encourage some consumers to usemore care or more-expensive care options than <strong>the</strong>y would if <strong>the</strong>ywere forced to pay higher out-<strong>of</strong>-pocket costs for services. On <strong>the</strong>o<strong>the</strong>r hand, if consumer copayments or deductibles were increasedto reduce utilization, some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> insurance would be lost.Higher copayments might also discourage utilization <strong>of</strong> preventiveservices, with potentially adverse effects on health outcomes. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore,even drastic increases in deductibles would provide onlylimited incentives. Table 4-2 shows that even if all families had a$5,000 deductible, only 29 percent <strong>of</strong> health dollars would be spentby individuals or families paying <strong>the</strong> full marginal cost <strong>of</strong> care.TABLE 4-2.—Distribution <strong>of</strong> Population and Health Spending by SpendingCategory, Estimates for <strong>1994</strong>Annual health spending (dollars)Percent <strong>of</strong>populationPercent <strong>of</strong>spending01-500501-1 0001,001-3,0003,001-5,0005 001-10 00010,001-30,000Over 30 000Note.—Health spending is in <strong>1994</strong> dollars. <strong>The</strong> estimates pertain to <strong>the</strong> noninstitutionalized population under <strong>the</strong> age <strong>of</strong>65, excluding people who receive aid to families with dependent children or supplemental security income. <strong>The</strong> distributionpresented is for health insurance units.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Health and Human Services.Available evidence indicates that <strong>the</strong> weakness <strong>of</strong> effective competitionin <strong>the</strong> health care marketplace results in substantial fraudand abuse as well as inappropriate care or care <strong>of</strong> equivocal value.Some estimates suggest that fraud and abuse may account forabout 10 percent <strong>of</strong> total health care spending. And, as noted aboveand summarized in Chart 4-5, as much as one-third <strong>of</strong> some commonprocedures may be performed in cases where <strong>the</strong>y are inappropriateor <strong>of</strong> equivocal value on medical grounds.7.826.013.125210.49.36.51.6001.42.513412.019.431.020.3143


Chart 4-5 Estimates <strong>of</strong> Inappropriate Care for Five Common ProceduresStudies have shown that as many as one-third <strong>of</strong> some procedures may be inappropriate or<strong>of</strong> equivocal value.Coronary Bypass Coronary Angiogram Pacemaker Insertion Carotid Artery Upper G.I. EndoscopySurgerySurgeryH| Appropriate j | Equivocal \_j InappropriateSource: <strong>The</strong> RAND Corporation.<strong>The</strong>re are <strong>of</strong>ten large differences in <strong>the</strong> amounts <strong>of</strong> medical carethat people receive in different regions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> country, and even indifferent areas within <strong>the</strong> same region. <strong>The</strong>se geographic differencesmay be evidence <strong>of</strong> resource misallocation. In 1989, for example,medicare physician payments per capita were 57 percenthigher in Detroit than in New York City. O<strong>the</strong>r research has foundthat <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong> use <strong>of</strong> hospital beds in a community is determinedprimarily by <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> beds in that community. People inareas with more hospital beds are not any healthier than peoplewho live in areas with fewer beds, but <strong>the</strong>y are more likely to diein a hospital.EXPLAINING COST INCREASESNot only are <strong>the</strong> costs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>American</strong> health care system high,but <strong>the</strong>y are rising rapidly as well (Box 4—2). Several factors havebeen identified as possible sources <strong>of</strong> cost growth, including <strong>the</strong>aging <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> population; <strong>the</strong> growth in incomes and <strong>the</strong> reductionsin cost sharing by consumers; slow productivity growth in mos<strong>the</strong>alth care services; and technological change.144


By itself, <strong>the</strong> aging <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> population can explain about 5 to 10percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> growth in health care spending. Some estimates <strong>of</strong>individual behavior based on controlled experiments suggest thatroughly ano<strong>the</strong>r quarter can be explained by more-rapid incomegrowth and <strong>the</strong> reduction in <strong>the</strong> cost-sharing component <strong>of</strong> heaUhinsurance over <strong>the</strong> last 40 years.Health care costs may also have risen rapidly because so muchmedical care consists <strong>of</strong> personally provided services ra<strong>the</strong>r thangoods. On average, over long periods <strong>of</strong> time, <strong>the</strong> prices <strong>of</strong> personalservices rise faster than <strong>the</strong> prices <strong>of</strong> goods because productivityadvances more rapidly in goods production than it does in services.Unfortunately, <strong>the</strong>re is no reliable estimate <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> magnitude <strong>of</strong>this factor. If <strong>the</strong>re were no productivity growth at all in <strong>the</strong> healthsector, <strong>the</strong> relative price <strong>of</strong> health care would be expected to rise,on average, at <strong>the</strong> economy-wide productivity growth rate—about Ito IV-2 percent per year in recent years, which is about one-quarterto one-third <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> observed increase in relative prices. <strong>The</strong>re is,however, almost certainly some productivity growth in health care,so <strong>the</strong> so-called cost disease factor cannot account for even thismuch extra health inflation.Finally, many health economists believe that technologicalchange itself drives health care costs upward. Once again, however,no reliable measures <strong>of</strong> its quantitative importance are available.In <strong>the</strong>ory, <strong>the</strong> introduction <strong>of</strong> a new technology may increase or decreasehealth care costs, depending on whe<strong>the</strong>r it substitutes for orcomplements existing methods <strong>of</strong> treatment and, if <strong>the</strong> former, onwhe<strong>the</strong>r it costs more or less than <strong>the</strong> technology currently available.In addition, some technological change may consist <strong>of</strong> applyingpreviously existing technologies to different diagnoses.Technology's influence on future trends in health care costs isdifficult to predict. Medical science is on <strong>the</strong> brink <strong>of</strong> new technologiesmade possible by <strong>the</strong> revolution in genetic research, and<strong>the</strong>se may prove to be less costly substitutes for existing technologies.In addition, as historians <strong>of</strong> technological progress havedemonstrated, technological change is not entirely exogenous—itsform depends on <strong>the</strong> incentive environment in which it occurs. Ahealth care reform that encourages more cost-conscious decisionsby providers and consumers may in fact encourage new technologiesthat are more cost effective. Finally, an increase in competitivepressure in health care markets will exercise greater pricediscipline on both existing and new technologies and <strong>the</strong>reby moderate<strong>the</strong>ir effects on <strong>the</strong> growth <strong>of</strong> health care spending.WHO PAYS FOR HEALTH CARE?Table 4-3 shows who paid for health care in 1991, and where <strong>the</strong>money was spent. <strong>The</strong> largest amount <strong>of</strong> health care spending (38145


Box 4-2.—Recent Reductions in Health Care Inflation<strong>The</strong> rate <strong>of</strong> inflation in <strong>the</strong> health sector slowed in 1993,largely as a result <strong>of</strong> slower growth in prices for health services,including physicians and hospital care:Inflation rate <strong>of</strong>:Average1983-91Year endingDecember(percentages)19921993Total CP1Health careExcess <strong>of</strong> health care inflationover totalSource: Department <strong>of</strong> Labor.Historically, health care inflation tends to move in parallelwith inflation in <strong>the</strong> rest <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> economy, but at a higher averagelevel. In 1993 <strong>the</strong> gap between health care inflation andoverall inflation narrowed somewhat, but <strong>the</strong> change does notappear to be statistically significant.Some have argued that <strong>the</strong> recent slowdown in health inflationis a sign that reform <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> health care system is not required.But despite <strong>the</strong> slowdown, <strong>the</strong> relative price <strong>of</strong> healthcare continues to increase: <strong>The</strong> medical care component <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>consumer price index grew at twice <strong>the</strong> rate <strong>of</strong> total consumerprice inflation in 1993. Moreover, this argument overlooks severalo<strong>the</strong>r important motives for health reform: <strong>the</strong> lack <strong>of</strong>health security and universal coverage, <strong>the</strong> failures <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> insurancemarket, and <strong>the</strong> burden <strong>of</strong> health care expenditures ongovernment budgets. <strong>The</strong> cost problem will not be solved withoutreforms that increase competition in <strong>the</strong> health care marketplace.3.97.33.42.96.63.72.75.42.7percent) is for hospital care. Payments to physicians and o<strong>the</strong>rhealth care pr<strong>of</strong>essionals are <strong>the</strong> second-largest category, at 29 percent<strong>of</strong> total spending. <strong>The</strong> remainder <strong>of</strong> personal health care is forhome and nursing home care (9 percent), and drugs and o<strong>the</strong>r personalcare outside <strong>of</strong> hospitals and nursing homes (12 percent). <strong>The</strong>costs <strong>of</strong> insurance administration are estimated at 6 percent <strong>of</strong>health spending. Finally, public health activities and research andconstruction total 6 percent <strong>of</strong> spending.Health spending is financed in four principal ways. Businessespay for health care directly through health insurance premiums($153 billion in 1991) and workers' compensation and disability insurance($18 billion). Total business spending ($171 billion) wasabout 23 percent <strong>of</strong> total health spending and 6.3 percent <strong>of</strong> total146


TABLE 4-3.- Sources and Uses <strong>of</strong> Health Care Funds, 1991[Billions <strong>of</strong> dollars!Private spendingGovernmentBusinessHouseholdUses <strong>of</strong> fundsTotalNonpatientrevenuePremiums'Workers'compensationPremiumsOut<strong>of</strong>pocketMedicareMedicaidEmployerO<strong>the</strong>rTotalHospital carePhysician careC<strong>the</strong>r pr<strong>of</strong>essionals,dental visitsHome health and nursinghome careDrugs, vision, o<strong>the</strong>rpersonal careAdministrationPublic healthResearch and construction752289142737087442523153644218162200188710110052221460270014410263027520003315042210912373334733001014374311240040171150260091383117025141 Includes household and employer premiums.Source: Health Care Financing Administration.compensation. Households pay for health care through insurancepremiums ($52 billion in 1991) and out-<strong>of</strong>-pocket expenses ($144billion). Total household spending <strong>of</strong> $196 billion was 26 percent <strong>of</strong>national health spending. <strong>The</strong> average household spent about$2,100 on health care in 1991. <strong>The</strong> health care industry receivesadditional nonpatient revenues <strong>of</strong> $33 billion (4 percent <strong>of</strong> totalspending) from such activities as parking lot receipts.Finally, governments pay for 47 percent <strong>of</strong> all health spending($355 billion), most <strong>of</strong> it for medicare and medicaid. <strong>The</strong>re is additionalspending on health insurance for government employees andon activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Veterans Affairs, <strong>the</strong> Department<strong>of</strong> Defense, and <strong>the</strong> Public Health Service. About 21 percent<strong>of</strong> Federal Government revenues and over 21 percent <strong>of</strong> State andlocal government revenues are devoted to health care.Governments also subsidize health care indirectly, by excludingemployer-provided health insurance from taxable income. In 1991this tax expenditure cost <strong>the</strong> Federal Government an estimated$36 billion in individual income taxes. <strong>The</strong> government lost SocialSecurity revenues as well, although Social Security payments in<strong>the</strong> future will also be somewhat lower.Chart 4-6 shows <strong>the</strong> evolution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se payment sources overtime. Between 1965 and 1991, payments by health insurers, medicare,and medicaid increased from 24 percent to 62 percent <strong>of</strong> totalhealth care spending. O<strong>the</strong>r government spending fell from 25 to147


14 percent, and out-<strong>of</strong>-pocket spending declined from 46 percent to20 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> total. <strong>The</strong> dramatic extension <strong>of</strong> insurance coverage—inboth <strong>the</strong> public and <strong>the</strong> private sectors—may be both aresponse to and a cause <strong>of</strong> increased costs.Chart 4-6 Sources <strong>of</strong> Health Care Financing as Percent <strong>of</strong> Total ExpendituresHealth insurance and government-financed expenditures have been rising as a share <strong>of</strong> totalspending, while out-<strong>of</strong>-pocket expenditures have been falling.1965 1967 1969 1971 1973 1975 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991Source: Health Care Financing Administration.While Table 4-3 shows who is responsible for paying for healthcare, it does not show <strong>the</strong> economic incidence—whose income is ultimatelyreduced because <strong>of</strong> high health care costs. In response tohigher costs, businesses have several options: <strong>The</strong>y can reducehealth benefits; lower workers' wages or o<strong>the</strong>r benefits so that totalcompensation does not rise; reduce employment; lower returns toshareholders; reduce payments to o<strong>the</strong>r factors <strong>of</strong> production; reduceinvestment in plant and equipment or research and development;or raise prices to <strong>the</strong>ir customers.<strong>Economic</strong> <strong>the</strong>ory suggests that most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> increase in healthcare costs will be reflected in lower wages. <strong>The</strong> reason is simple.Firms are indifferent between spending a dollar on wages or onhealth premiums. But since wages are taxed while health insurancepremiums are not, employees should be willing to "buy" increasedhealth insurance by sacrificing wages until <strong>the</strong> marginaldollar <strong>of</strong> health insurance is worth one dollar <strong>of</strong> after-tax wages, or148


about 65 to 70 cents for a typical family. At this point, <strong>the</strong> workershould also be indifferent between contributing more to health insuranceor to wages.Empirical research suggests that <strong>the</strong> dominant long-run response<strong>of</strong> businesses to rising health care costs has indeed been to lower<strong>the</strong> rate <strong>of</strong> increase <strong>of</strong> workers' wages. Between 80 and 100 percent<strong>of</strong> increases in health care spending appears to be reflected inlower wages. As noted in Chapter 1, <strong>the</strong> share <strong>of</strong> wages in totalcompensation has been falling since 1960, while <strong>the</strong> share <strong>of</strong> businesshealth insurance spending has increased markedly.When firms slow wage increases to <strong>of</strong>fset rising health insurancecosts, <strong>the</strong>y limit <strong>the</strong> increase in <strong>the</strong>ir total labor costs, and thuslimit <strong>the</strong> job losses that might o<strong>the</strong>rwise result. <strong>The</strong> slower wagegrowth due to rising business health expenditures has led to slowerincreases in incomes than would o<strong>the</strong>rwise have occurred. If businessspending on health care were <strong>the</strong> same share <strong>of</strong> compensationtoday as it was in 1975, wages per employee could be over $1,000higher.If increases in business spending on health insurance are not entirelybalanced by reductions in o<strong>the</strong>r forms <strong>of</strong> labor payments,total compensation will rise. In this case, some o<strong>the</strong>r business decisionsare likely to be affected, such as employment, pricing, or investmentdecisions. Empirical research, however, has not exploredsuch alternative responses in any depth.In summary, <strong>the</strong> economic literature on <strong>the</strong> incidence <strong>of</strong> healthcare costs suggests that employees eventually pay for most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>iremployer-provided health coverage by taking home lower cashwages. Reforms that enhance <strong>the</strong> efficiency <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> health care marketwill allow employees to have both more health care coverageand higher take-home pay at <strong>the</strong> same time. Greater efficiency will<strong>the</strong>refore translate into an improvement in living standards for societyas a whole.HEALTH CARE AND GOVERNMENT BUDGETS<strong>The</strong> final problem in <strong>the</strong> current health care system is <strong>the</strong> growingburden it places on government finances. Because governmentspay for such a large share <strong>of</strong> health spending, increases in healthcosts contribute directly to pressures on Federal, State, and localbudgets. Public sector spending on health care grew over 2 percentagepoints faster than private sector spending in <strong>the</strong> 1970s, and atabout <strong>the</strong> same rate as private sector spending in <strong>the</strong> 1980s. <strong>The</strong>result has been an increasing share <strong>of</strong> health spending by governments.In addition, as was pointed out in Chapter 1, health spendingis growing four times as rapidly as any o<strong>the</strong>r component <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>Federal budget. Over <strong>the</strong> two decades ending in 1991, Federal149


health spending increased from 9 percent to 21 percent <strong>of</strong> totalFederal revenues (Chart 4-7). Similar changes have occurred inState and local government spending.Chart 4-7 Government Spending on Health Care as Percent <strong>of</strong> Total Government RevenuesFederal and State and local spending on health care account for increasing shares <strong>of</strong> totalgovernment revenues.1965 1967 1969 1971 1973 1975 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991Sources: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce and Department <strong>of</strong> Health and Human Services.<strong>The</strong> Federal Government has responded to increasing health carecosts in part by attempting to limit <strong>the</strong> reimbursement rates paidby public programs to health care providers. This approach in turnhas resulted in <strong>the</strong> substantial shifting <strong>of</strong> costs to <strong>the</strong> private sectordescribed earlier. In <strong>the</strong> absence <strong>of</strong> systemwide reform, <strong>the</strong> imposition<strong>of</strong> caps on Federal health care programs would ei<strong>the</strong>r fur<strong>the</strong>raggravate <strong>the</strong> cost-shifting problem or gradually limit accessto care.Without health care reform, escalating health care costs will continueto confront <strong>the</strong> Federal Government—as well as State andlocal governments—with painful choices among additional taxes,cuts in spending on education and o<strong>the</strong>r programs that promoteeconomic prosperity, or increases in budget deficits. As alreadynoted, projected increases in Federal spending on medicare andmedicaid are <strong>the</strong> main force behind a projected increase in <strong>the</strong> Federaldeficit toward <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> this century.150


THE ARCHITECTURE OF THE HEALTHSECURITY ACT<strong>The</strong> Administration's approach to health care reform, while boldand comprehensive, builds on <strong>the</strong> strengths <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> current marketbasedsystem. <strong>The</strong> Administration considered but rejected radicalapproaches such as a single-payer system or government-set healthcare prices in favor <strong>of</strong> restructuring <strong>the</strong> current system and relyingon <strong>the</strong> forces <strong>of</strong> market competition. <strong>The</strong> Administration's frameworkpreserves and expands consumer choice among providers andpreserves <strong>the</strong> current employer-based system <strong>of</strong> health insurance.<strong>The</strong> Administration's plan also allows large firms to continue operatingself-insured plans. Such firms generally provide comprehensivebenefits, and many have managed to control health carespending. Indeed, <strong>the</strong> Administration's plan reflects many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>lessons learned from <strong>the</strong> experience <strong>of</strong> such firms.ELEMENTS OF REFORMTo address <strong>the</strong> Nation's health care problems, meaningful reformsmust address <strong>the</strong> four interrelated issues identified in <strong>the</strong>preceding discussion: universal coverage and health security; reform<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> private insurance system; efficiency improvements andcost control; and sustained deficit reduction. <strong>The</strong> Health SecurityAct, which <strong>the</strong> Administration proposed in 1993, contains reformsthat simultaneously meet <strong>the</strong>se objectives. <strong>The</strong> principal features <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> Administration's reforms are outlined in this section and discussedin greater detail in <strong>the</strong> remainder <strong>of</strong> this chapter.Universal Coverage<strong>The</strong> Health Security Act guarantees all <strong>American</strong>s a health insurancepackage with a comprehensive set <strong>of</strong> benefits. <strong>The</strong> medicareprogram will be left largely unchanged, and medicare will remain<strong>the</strong> insurer for most <strong>American</strong>s over <strong>the</strong> age <strong>of</strong> 65. Most medicaidrecipients under 65 will be absorbed into <strong>the</strong> new system.With very few exceptions, all o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>American</strong>s will receive <strong>the</strong>irhealth insurance from <strong>the</strong> "health alliances" described below.Universal coverage is essential for <strong>the</strong> reasons noted earlier.Comprehensive benefits are equally important if health security forall <strong>American</strong>s is to be achieved. Some reform proposals promiseuniversal coverage but guarantee coverage only for catastrophic expenses.In practice, people with high incomes may be able to affordadditional coverage beyond catastrophic, but many o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>American</strong>scannot. Plans that guarantee only catastrophic coverage leavemany people without genuine health security—subject to <strong>the</strong> riskthat <strong>the</strong>ir insurance coverage will deteriorate if <strong>the</strong>y lose <strong>the</strong>ir jobs,just when <strong>the</strong>ir incomes are falling.151


Since <strong>the</strong> Administration's comprehensive benefits package includesa prescription drug benefit for <strong>the</strong> under-65 population, <strong>the</strong>Administration's proposal also calls for a comparable drug benefitto be added to <strong>the</strong> medicare program. In addition, <strong>the</strong> proposal includesfunding for long-term care services, primarily to expand <strong>the</strong>amount <strong>of</strong> home- and community-based care.Reforming Insurance MarketsUnder <strong>the</strong> Health Security Act, individuals and families will receivecoverage through regional or corporate "health alliances"—pools <strong>of</strong> individuals who purchase from a set <strong>of</strong> health plans. Noinsurer will be able to impose restrictions on preexisting conditionsor lifetime limitations on insurance benefits, or to deny people <strong>the</strong>right to initiate or renew enrollment because <strong>of</strong> demographic orhealth status. Insurers will have to charge a community rate to everyonein an alliance.Because <strong>the</strong>re will be only one regional alliance in each geographicarea, and coverage will be universal, healthy people in eacharea will naturally be pooled with sicker people. Pooling healthrisks makes insurance affordable for everyone. It also provides <strong>the</strong>healthy with <strong>the</strong> knowledge that <strong>the</strong>ir insurance premiums will notrise if <strong>the</strong>y or a family member become ill.Eliminating exclusions for preexisting conditions and lifetimelimitations on benefits guarantees that large financial risks will becovered. Providing for guaranteed issue and guaranteed renewabilityallows individuals to exercise <strong>the</strong>ir choices among health plans.Efficiency Improvements and Cost SavingsTo encourage cost-conscious decisions, <strong>the</strong> Health Security Act allowsconsumers a choice among several plans with identical benefits,gives <strong>the</strong>m information about <strong>the</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> competing plansand <strong>the</strong>ir customers' satisfaction, and allows <strong>the</strong>m to receive more<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> savings if <strong>the</strong>y choose a less expensive health plan. In addition,<strong>the</strong> act sets a limit on <strong>the</strong> growth <strong>of</strong> premiums in <strong>the</strong> alliances.Promoting choice among health plans is essential to controllingcosts. By encouraging plan choice, <strong>the</strong> act attempts to create amore efficient health care delivery system and thus lower overallspending.<strong>The</strong> act's proposed limits on <strong>the</strong> allowable growth <strong>of</strong> premiumsare intended to guarantee control over <strong>the</strong> growth <strong>of</strong> costs, in caseenhanced private incentives fail to have <strong>the</strong> anticipated effect.<strong>The</strong>se limits are an important safeguard because <strong>the</strong>y reduce <strong>the</strong>risk to <strong>the</strong> government <strong>of</strong> runaway health spending.Deficit ReductionOver time, cost savings from <strong>the</strong> provisions just described andfrom reimbursement changes in public programs will provide budg-152


etary savings for <strong>the</strong> Federal Government. As noted above, longrunsuccess in keeping <strong>the</strong> Federal deficit under control is directlytied to success in reducing <strong>the</strong> growth rate <strong>of</strong> Federal health carespending. In <strong>the</strong> short term, <strong>the</strong> Health Security Act entails somenew Federal costs—discounts for <strong>the</strong> poor and for small and lowaverage-wagebusinesses, a new drug benefit for medicare, and coverage<strong>of</strong> long-term care. <strong>The</strong> savings from slowing <strong>the</strong> rate <strong>of</strong>growth <strong>of</strong> health care spending start right away, but <strong>the</strong>y are smallat first. Over time, <strong>the</strong>se savings grow larger, and deficit reductionincreases accordingly.Maintaining Choice<strong>The</strong> Health Security Act allows families, doctors, firms, andStates to make significant choices about <strong>the</strong> nature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir involvementin <strong>the</strong> new health care system.Households will get to choose <strong>the</strong>ir own doctors, and many familiesthat currently have no choice over <strong>the</strong>ir health plan will begiven several options. Doctors will get to choose <strong>the</strong> plan or plansin which <strong>the</strong>y work, and may remain in <strong>the</strong> fee-for-service sectorif <strong>the</strong>y wish. Large firms may choose to form corporate alliances orto join regional alliances. And each State will be allowed to adjustits health care system to its particular circumstances—including<strong>the</strong> establishment <strong>of</strong> a single-payer system if it so chooses.PROVIDING COMPREHENSIVE BENEFITSAll health plans organized under <strong>the</strong> Health Security Act must<strong>of</strong>fer <strong>the</strong> same set <strong>of</strong> comprehensive benefits. <strong>The</strong>se benefits includehospital services; services <strong>of</strong> health pr<strong>of</strong>essionals; clinical preventiveservices; mental illness and substance abuse services; familyplanning services; hospice care; home health care; extended careservices; ambulance services; outpatient laboratory, radiology, anddiagnostic services; outpatient prescription drugs and biologicalagents; outpatient rehabilitative services; durable medical equipmentand pros<strong>the</strong>tic and orthotic devices; vision care; and pediatricdental care. <strong>The</strong> guaranteed benefit package to be in effect through<strong>the</strong> year 2000 provides <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong> benefits currently <strong>of</strong>fered by atypical medium-sized to large firm. In <strong>the</strong> year 2001 <strong>the</strong> benefitpackage expands to include services not fully covered previously—principally, adult dental benefits and broader coverage for mentalillness and substance abuse.Health plans will <strong>of</strong>fer one <strong>of</strong> three forms <strong>of</strong> cost sharing. <strong>The</strong>first is a "higher cost-sharing" option similar to those in traditionalfee-for-service plans. <strong>The</strong>re is a general deductible <strong>of</strong> $200 per yearfor a single individual and $400 per year for a family, with separatedeductibles for mental illness and substance abuse treatment,prescription drugs, and dental services. After <strong>the</strong> deductible is met,<strong>the</strong> insured individual pays 20 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> most services.153


<strong>The</strong> second option is a "lower cost-sharing" option similar to thosein HMOs. This option has only a $10 copayment for most services,a $5 copayment for prescription drugs, and higher copayments forservices such as hospital emergency room services, inpatient mentalillnesses services, outpatient psycho<strong>the</strong>rapy, and orthodonticcare. Preventive services are covered without cost sharing under ei<strong>the</strong>rschedule. <strong>The</strong> final option is "combination cost sharing" similarto that in preferred provider organizations (PPOs). This optionfollows <strong>the</strong> lower cost sharing for services provided inside a networkand <strong>the</strong> higher cost sharing for services outside <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> network.Under all cost-sharing schedules, out-<strong>of</strong>-pocket payments willnot exceed $1,500 per year for a single individual or $3,000 for afamily. All <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cost-sharing limits are in <strong>1994</strong> dollars and are indexedin subsequent years to <strong>the</strong> rate <strong>of</strong> premium growth.ORGANIZING THE INSURANCE MARKET<strong>The</strong> organizing mechanism for health insurance under <strong>the</strong>Health Security Act is <strong>the</strong> health alliance. <strong>The</strong> alliance is <strong>the</strong>"broker" between consumers and plans—negotiating with healthplans and <strong>of</strong>fering choices to consumers, and accepting premiumpayments from consumers and distributing <strong>the</strong>m to plans.<strong>The</strong> act creates two types <strong>of</strong> health alliances: regional alliancesand corporate alliances. Regional health alliances are designed forworkers in firms with fewer than 5,000 employees, nonworkers,and most medicaid recipients. Each State will have one or more regionalalliances, but alliances may not overlap geographically.Boundaries <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> regional alliances may not be drawn to segregatepeople with high expected health care costs in one area. Firms withover 5,000 employees will have <strong>the</strong> option to form a corporate alliance,but <strong>the</strong>y must provide <strong>the</strong> guaranteed package and will notreceive any discounts on <strong>the</strong>ir premium contributions.<strong>The</strong> alliance structure is designed to enhance competition andthus produce efficiency savings. Within an alliance, consumershave a choice <strong>of</strong> health plans. Plans will be ei<strong>the</strong>r fee-for-service,PPOs, or HMOs. HMOs must <strong>of</strong>fer consumers <strong>the</strong> opportunity topurchase a point-<strong>of</strong>-service option, allowing <strong>the</strong>m to use care outside<strong>the</strong> HMO as in a fee-for-service plan if <strong>the</strong>y choose. All planswill <strong>of</strong>fer <strong>the</strong> same set <strong>of</strong> benefits, so individuals will not fearchanges in covered services if <strong>the</strong>y switch plans.<strong>The</strong>re will be an annual open enrollment period during whichconsumers can switch from one health plan to ano<strong>the</strong>r without loss<strong>of</strong> coverage. To increase consumers' ability to evaluate competingplans, <strong>the</strong> alliance will also publish price and quality data about<strong>the</strong> different plans. Consumers are required to pay <strong>the</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>plan <strong>the</strong>y select, less <strong>the</strong> amount <strong>the</strong>ir employers are required tocontribute. Employers are allowed to supplement <strong>the</strong>ir required154


contribution, within limits. Outside <strong>of</strong> collective bargaining agreements,employers must <strong>of</strong>fer <strong>the</strong> same supplementation to everyworker in a given rating pool (rating pools are described in <strong>the</strong>next section). <strong>The</strong> supplementation cannot cause <strong>the</strong> total employercontribution to exceed <strong>the</strong> premium <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> highest cost plan forthat rating pool in <strong>the</strong> alliance. Employers who choose to contributemore must give full rebates to employees who choose a plan thatcosts less. Thus, <strong>the</strong> consumer will realize <strong>the</strong> full savings (subjectto taxes) from choosing a less expensive health plan.Individuals may also use after-tax dollars to purchase health coveragefor benefits beyond <strong>the</strong> guaranteed package or for supplementalpolicies to reduce out-<strong>of</strong>-pocket payments. <strong>The</strong> Health SecurityAct specifies a floor for coverage below which individualsshould not fall, ra<strong>the</strong>r than a ceiling on <strong>the</strong> generosity <strong>of</strong> healthbenefits an individual can receive.On <strong>the</strong> provider side, <strong>the</strong> health alliance solves many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> problemsinherent in <strong>the</strong> current market. As a requirement for sellinginsurance in an alliance, plans must agree to community rating,guaranteed issue, and guaranteed renewability, and must cover individualswith preexisting conditions. <strong>The</strong> health alliance must acceptall qualified health plans into <strong>the</strong> alliance, with <strong>the</strong> exceptionthat <strong>the</strong> alliance can exclude plans that charge over 120 percent <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> average premium.Some economists have argued that <strong>the</strong> Federal Governmentshould tax employer contributions for health insurance as if <strong>the</strong>sebenefits were paid as wages. Such a tax change would raise <strong>the</strong>price to consumers <strong>of</strong> more-expensive health plans, <strong>the</strong>reby providingan incentive to limit health care spending. <strong>The</strong>re are severalways to reform <strong>the</strong> tax treatment <strong>of</strong> health benefits. First, employeescould be prohibited from contributing pretax dollars to healthinsurance under certain employee benefit arrangements called "cafeteriaplans." This limitation is a part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Health Security Act.Second, employer payments for covered services beyond <strong>the</strong> guaranteedbenefit package—whe<strong>the</strong>r in reduced cost sharing or in additionalservices—could be considered taxable income. This limitationis scheduled to occur in <strong>the</strong> year 2004 under <strong>the</strong> Health SecurityAct. Finally, all or part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> a guaranteed benefitpackage above some level could be considered taxable income. Thischange is not part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Health Security Act.PAYING FOR INSURANCE<strong>The</strong> Health Security Act classifies people into four rating pools:singles, couples with no children, families with children and oneadult, and families with children and two adults. Table 4-4 shows<strong>the</strong> estimated premiums in <strong>1994</strong> for policies for <strong>the</strong>se four pools.For a two-adult family with children, for example, <strong>the</strong> national av-155


erage premium in <strong>1994</strong> is estimated to be $4,360. <strong>The</strong> actual premiumswill vary by region <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> country, as health spending doescurrently.TABLE 4-4.—Estimated Premiums in <strong>the</strong> Regional Alliance, <strong>1994</strong>Payments by.Rating poolAveragepremiumFamily(20 percent)Per-familyrequirement(80 percent)EmployerAverage number<strong>of</strong> workersper familyPer-workerrequirementSinglesCouples (no children)One-adult familyTwo-adult family$1,9323,8653,8934,360$386773779872$1,5463,0921 3,4091.001.451.38$1,546Note—Premiums are national averages. Actual premiums will differ from alliance to alliance. Employer payments forone-adult and two-adult families are pooled.Source: Administration estimates.Employers are required to pay 80 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> average premiumfor each family. Single individuals are considered to haveone worker per family. An employer <strong>of</strong> a full-time single worker<strong>the</strong>refore pays 80 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> $1,932 premium cost, or $1,546.In <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> childless couples, <strong>the</strong>re are on average in <strong>the</strong> UnitedStates about 1.45 workers per family. Since 80 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> premiumfor childless couples is $3,092, <strong>the</strong> amount per worker is only$3,092 divided by <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> workers per family, or $2,125. Employersmust pay this amount for each worker. Workers in familieswith children—whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> family has one adult or two—arepooled. <strong>The</strong> alliance computes total requirements ($3,409 per family)and divides this by <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> workers per family (about1.38 as a national average). <strong>The</strong> employer payment for a full-timeworker in a family with children is <strong>the</strong>refore $2,479. Because <strong>the</strong>seamounts are independent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> workers in a family,employers do not have to coordinate payments with employers <strong>of</strong>o<strong>the</strong>r family members. This system is thus relatively simple to administer.Employer payments for part-time workers are prorated, based on<strong>the</strong> percentage <strong>of</strong> a 120-hour month (about 30 hours per week) that<strong>the</strong> person works. If <strong>the</strong> employee works 60 hours per month, <strong>the</strong>employer would owe one-half <strong>of</strong> an employer premium. No employerpayment is required if <strong>the</strong> individual works fewer than 40hours per month. Thus, an employee who worked at two 60-hourper-monthjobs would be credited with two half-payments, or onefull-time payment. An employee who did not work at any job forat least 40 hours per month is treated as a nonworker.Self-employed people will make <strong>the</strong>ir own employer payments, as<strong>the</strong>y do now. However, if a self-employed worker also has wage and2,1252.479156


salary income, payments from <strong>the</strong> employer will be credited against<strong>the</strong> amount owed on <strong>the</strong> worker's self-employment income. Thus, aworker who earns wages or a salary for half <strong>the</strong> year and is selfemployedfor <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r half would owe only half <strong>of</strong> an employerpayment on his or her self-employment earnings, with discountsavailable for those with low self-employment earnings. In addition,self-employed people will be able to deduct all <strong>the</strong>ir payments forhealth insurance in computing taxable income, compared with <strong>the</strong>25-percent deductibility under current law.<strong>The</strong> equivalent <strong>of</strong> at least one employer premium must be collectedfor each family. In cases where no family member receivesemployer coverage, or <strong>the</strong> family members worked less than 12 fulltimemonths in a year, <strong>the</strong> balance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> premium is <strong>the</strong> responsibility<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> family. If <strong>the</strong> family members worked 6 full-timemonths, for example, <strong>the</strong> family would owe one-half <strong>of</strong> an employershare, <strong>the</strong> employer having paid <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r half.Finally, each family owes any difference between <strong>the</strong> employercontribution and <strong>the</strong> price <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> plan <strong>the</strong>y select (but low-incomefamilies will be eligible for discounts on <strong>the</strong>ir share). For <strong>the</strong> averagefamily, this difference will be 20 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> total premium,or $872 in <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> a family with children. If <strong>the</strong> family choosesa more expensive plan, it will pay <strong>the</strong> additional cost. If <strong>the</strong> familychooses a less expensive plan, it will keep <strong>the</strong> savings.PROVIDING DISCOUNTS<strong>The</strong> government provides discounts on <strong>the</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> insurance tosmall and low-wage businesses and low-income families. <strong>The</strong>re arefive types <strong>of</strong> discounts in <strong>the</strong> Health Security Act, which are detailedin Table 4-5: discounts to families on <strong>the</strong>ir 20-percent share<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> premium; discounts to families that (for reasons just explained)owe some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> employer payment; discounts to early retirees;discounts to firms; and discounts to low-income families facinghigh out-<strong>of</strong>-pocket payments. <strong>The</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> providing <strong>the</strong>se discountsis made up by government payments.Low-income families in <strong>the</strong> regional alliances receive a discounton <strong>the</strong>ir 20-percent share <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> premium. No payment at all is requiredon <strong>the</strong> first $1,000 <strong>of</strong> income. <strong>The</strong> discount phases out at150 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> poverty line—about $23,000 for a family <strong>of</strong> fourin <strong>1994</strong>. Income for <strong>the</strong>se purposes is defined as adjusted gross incomeplus tax-exempt interest income. <strong>The</strong> $1,000 disregard and<strong>the</strong> poverty line are indexed to <strong>the</strong> consumer price index.Additional discounts are provided for families that owe part <strong>of</strong> anemployer payment. No payment is required if nonwage income isbelow $1,000, and full payment is expected if nonwage income isgreater than 250 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> poverty level, or about $39,000 fora family <strong>of</strong> four in <strong>1994</strong>. Nonwage income is defined as adjusted151-444 0 - 9 4 - 6157


TABLE 4-5.—Discounts Under <strong>the</strong> Health Security Act in 2000[Billions <strong>of</strong> dollars]DiscountPurposeAmountEmployerHouseholdNonretireeNonworker discounts to re-Limit employer payments for time spent not workingtirees.Early retireesOut-<strong>of</strong>-pocketCushionTotalLimit firm payments to 7.9 percent <strong>of</strong> payroll or lessLimit payment for 20 percent share <strong>of</strong> premiums and for time spent notworkingEliminate remaining employer paymentLower cost sharing for poor familiesAllowance for behavioral effects and unfavorable economic circumstances294775313103Source: Administration estimates.gross income less unemployment compensation and wage and salaryand self-employed income (up to $60,000 per year), and includingtax-exempt interest. Labor income is excluded from this calculationbecause it is assumed that families have already "paid" for<strong>the</strong>ir employer's contribution through lower wages and salaries.Beginning in 1998, if a retired individual is between <strong>the</strong> ages <strong>of</strong>55 and 64, has less than $90,000 in income, and meets <strong>the</strong> SocialSecurity earnings test, <strong>the</strong> government pays <strong>the</strong> entire employershare <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> retiree's premium. This discount supplants any paymentfor <strong>the</strong> employer share that <strong>the</strong> individual or his or her employerwould have made. <strong>The</strong> largest benefit to corporations wi<strong>the</strong>arly retirees, however, will come not from this special provisionfor retirees (which will save firms about $2 billion), but from communityrating <strong>of</strong> premiums, which will save about $7 billion. From1998 through 2000, firms that are currently providing health insuranceto <strong>the</strong>ir retirees must pay <strong>the</strong> government 50 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>savings <strong>the</strong>y realize from this provision.Total household discounts are expected to be $59 billion in <strong>the</strong>year 2000. This total includes $47 billion in nonretiree discounts,$7 billion in low-income discounts given to retirees, and almost $5billion in additional discounts to early retirees.Some firms will also receive discounts on <strong>the</strong>ir required payments.Contributions from each firm in <strong>the</strong> regional alliances arecapped at 7.9 percent <strong>of</strong> payroll. If a firm's required paymentswould be greater than 7.9 percent <strong>of</strong> payroll, <strong>the</strong> government pays<strong>the</strong> overage. Small, low-wage firms are capped at even lower percentages<strong>of</strong> payroll, as detailed in Table 4-6. Employer discountstotal $29 billion in 2000 (Table 4-5), about three-quarters <strong>of</strong> whichare for firms with fewer than 25 employees.Finally, low-income individuals can receive discounts for <strong>the</strong>irout-<strong>of</strong>-pocket payments if <strong>the</strong>y live in areas where <strong>the</strong>re are no158


TABLE 4-6.—Caps on Premiums by Firm Size[Percent <strong>of</strong> total payroll]Average wage (dollars)Less than 25Firm size (number <strong>of</strong> workers)25-4950-7475 and overLess than 12 00012 000-15 00015,000-18,00018 000-2100021,000-24,000Over 24,000Source: Administration estimates.3.54.45.36.27.17.9health plans that <strong>of</strong>fer lower cost sharing or that charge premiumsat or below <strong>the</strong> average-cost plan. <strong>The</strong>se discounts end at 150 percent<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> poverty level. <strong>The</strong> total cost <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se discounts is estimatedto be $3 billion in <strong>the</strong> year 2000.Numerous behavioral effects could influence <strong>the</strong> discounts <strong>the</strong>government is obligated to pay. For example, firms that have highaverage wages, and <strong>the</strong>refore pay <strong>the</strong> full premiums for <strong>the</strong>ir workers,may find it in <strong>the</strong>ir interest to contract out for low-wage servicesfrom firms that receive discounts. To allow for this and o<strong>the</strong>rbehavioral reactions, <strong>the</strong> projected discounts were increased by 15percent above <strong>the</strong> static estimate, or $13 billion in <strong>the</strong> year 2000.USING SAVINGS TO GUARANTEE HEALTH SECURITYAND REDUCE THE DEFICITAt <strong>the</strong> broadest level, <strong>the</strong> Health Security Act is designed to financenew spending and deficit reduction out <strong>of</strong> savings from reducedexpenditures relative to <strong>the</strong> no-reform baseline. Savings areexpected to result from reduced administrative costs, consumersswitching to less expensive plans, and lower costs from improvedincentives.Insurance reform will save money through lower underwritingcosts. On net, <strong>the</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> insurance administration should declineby about 3.5 percent <strong>of</strong> claims paid. Since current premiums for <strong>the</strong>population that will be included in <strong>the</strong> health alliances are about$200 billion, <strong>the</strong> savings from <strong>the</strong> insurance reforms in <strong>the</strong> healthalliances should be about $7 billion annually.<strong>The</strong>re are also likely to be savings from consumers switching tolower cost plans. Several studies have found that managed care arrangementshave lower health spending than open-ended plans.<strong>The</strong> most comprehensive forms <strong>of</strong> managed care—group and staffmodel HMOs—save an estimated 15 percent on health spending by,for example, finding alternatives to hospitalization.A number <strong>of</strong> governments and corporations have experimentedwith paying a fixed amount for health insurance, regardless <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>4.45.36.27.17.97.95.36.27.17.97.97.97.97.97.97.97.97.9159


plan <strong>the</strong> employee chooses, and have found that <strong>the</strong>se paymentrules have a large effect on individual choices. <strong>The</strong> State <strong>of</strong> Minnesota,for example, implemented a fixed-dollar contribution forpublic sector employees in 1989. Between 1988 and 1993, <strong>the</strong> share<strong>of</strong> employees in <strong>the</strong> highest cost plan fell from 42 to 17 percent,while <strong>the</strong> share in <strong>the</strong> lowest cost plan increased from 28 to 54 percent.<strong>The</strong> State <strong>of</strong> Wisconsin implemented a similar system for itspublic employees in 1984. In one year, enrollment in HMOs increasedby over 60 percent. Similar responses have been observedin several private companies.Finally, <strong>the</strong>re is <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> California, which passed laws in <strong>the</strong>early 1980s increasing <strong>the</strong> ability <strong>of</strong> plans to contract selectivelywith providers. Since <strong>the</strong>n, growth in health care costs has beenmuch lower in California than in o<strong>the</strong>r States. Between 1982 and1991, real per capita costs for hospitals, physicians, and prescriptiondrugs increased 2.8 percent annually in California, comparedwith 4.8 percent annually in <strong>the</strong> rest <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> United States. As a result,California's per capita costs fell from 18 percent above <strong>the</strong> averageState in 1982 to 2 percent above <strong>the</strong> average in 1991.As a backup to <strong>the</strong> market incentives it provides, <strong>the</strong> Health SecurityAct places a limit on <strong>the</strong> growth <strong>of</strong> premiums in regional andcorporate alliances. Up to <strong>the</strong> year 2000, growth in total premiumsis constrained to <strong>the</strong> growth <strong>of</strong> inflation and population, plus an adjustmentfactor ranging from 1.5 percent in 1996 to zero in 1999and 2000 (Table 4-7). This reduction in growth rates is in anticipation<strong>of</strong> one-time savings in health expenditures. After 2000 <strong>the</strong>growth rate <strong>of</strong> spending is expected to increase, but not to <strong>the</strong> levelin <strong>the</strong> current system.TABLE 4-7.—Allowed Growth Rates[Percent]<strong>of</strong> Alliance PremiumsGrowth rate199519961997199819992000BaselineReformiAdjustment factor 29.09.01 Projected average annual growth rates. Some alliances may experience higher annual growth rates prior to 1998.2 Adjustment factor added to inflation plus population growth to find reform growth limits.Source: Baseline projections are from Congressional Budget Office, updated for higher estimates <strong>of</strong> inflation by <strong>the</strong>Administration. Reform projections are Administration estimates.Each year, plans will submit bids on <strong>the</strong> premiums <strong>the</strong>y proposefor serving <strong>the</strong> alliance population. If an alliance's expected weighted-averagepremium is above <strong>the</strong> premium limit, and plans do notvoluntarily reduce <strong>the</strong>ir bids, <strong>the</strong> premiums <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> plans that exceed<strong>the</strong> limit will be reduced so that <strong>the</strong> cap is met.9.55.81.59.25.31.09.04.8.58.94.3.09.04.2.0160


An example will illustrate <strong>the</strong> process. If <strong>the</strong> average premiumin one year is $4,000 and <strong>the</strong> target growth rate is 5 percent, <strong>the</strong>allowed increase in <strong>the</strong> average premium in <strong>the</strong> next year is $200.Suppose <strong>the</strong>re are two plans with equal enrollments, one <strong>of</strong> whichwants to increase <strong>the</strong> premium by $100 and <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r by $400.Under <strong>the</strong> cap, <strong>the</strong> second plan would be allowed to increase itspremium by only $300, so that <strong>the</strong> average increase would be $200.Finally, if more people than expected join high-cost plans, so thatactual premiums exceed <strong>the</strong> target, <strong>the</strong> premium target is reducedin <strong>the</strong> next 2 years to recoup <strong>the</strong> overage.Chart 4-8 shows <strong>the</strong> projected change in national health expendituresunder <strong>the</strong> act. Spending initially increases, because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>extension <strong>of</strong> coverage to <strong>the</strong> uninsured. By 1998, when universalcoverage is complete, spending is above baseline by 0.3 percent <strong>of</strong>GDP. Over time, however, <strong>the</strong> savings from <strong>the</strong> market reforms—or, as a backstop, from <strong>the</strong> caps on premium growth—rise andspending falls relative to <strong>the</strong> baseline. In 1999 and 2000, spendingis projected to grow at almost <strong>the</strong> rate <strong>of</strong> nominal GDP, so tha<strong>the</strong>alth care as a share <strong>of</strong> GDP rises by only 0.2 percentage point.By <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> decade, health expenditures with reform are projectedto be below <strong>the</strong> level estimated to occur without reform.Both <strong>the</strong> new Federal health spending and deficit reduction arefinanced out <strong>of</strong> savings in <strong>the</strong> existing system (Table 4-8). Spendingrises with <strong>the</strong> implementation <strong>of</strong> universal coverage, but <strong>the</strong>slower growth <strong>of</strong> costs generates savings to <strong>the</strong> government. Healthreform is essentially deficit-neutral in <strong>the</strong> first 4 years and deficitreducing<strong>the</strong>reafter. By 2000, new Federal spending is projected tobe $94 billion, and savings are projected to be $132 billion, yieldingdeficit reduction <strong>of</strong> $38 billion.<strong>The</strong> new spending comes in five principal areas, detailed for <strong>the</strong>year 2000 in Table 4-9. First, net premium and o<strong>the</strong>r discountstotal $42 billion. <strong>The</strong>se discounts are <strong>the</strong> difference between $103billion in gross spending and $61 billion in medicare and medicaid"<strong>of</strong>fsets," as people leave <strong>the</strong>se programs and receive coverage in<strong>the</strong> alliances instead. <strong>The</strong>re is additional spending for <strong>the</strong> Department<strong>of</strong> Veterans Affairs, public health (including WIC [women, infants,and children] expansions and funding for academic medicalcenters), administration ($10 billion), <strong>the</strong> prescription drug benefitto <strong>the</strong> medicare program ($17 billion), and long-term care. Finally,allowing 100-percent tax deducibility <strong>of</strong> health insurance premiumsfor <strong>the</strong> self-employed will cost $3 billion in forgone revenues.<strong>The</strong>se new costs are financed by seven sources <strong>of</strong> funds. First, atobacco tax will raise $11 billion, and a 1-percent payroll assessmenton corporations that choose to form <strong>the</strong>ir own corporate allianceswill raise $5 billion. <strong>The</strong>re are also savings in public sector161


Chart 4-8 Health Expenditures as Percent <strong>of</strong> GDPHealth expenditures will increase in <strong>the</strong> short term but will fall below baseline by <strong>the</strong>end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> decade.PercentIOWithout Reform\ 17.41716.716.2 ,'*'^ 1 6 . 7TWith Reform1615.6 ,-''15^14.6^5III<strong>1994</strong> 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000Note: Baseline is from <strong>the</strong> Congressional Budget Office, updated with Administration economic assumptions.Source: Administration estimates.iIIiTABLE 4—8.—New Federal Spending and Savings Due to Reform[Billions <strong>of</strong> dollars]Item199519961997199819992000Mew spendingSavingsChange in deficit3.514.5—11023.526.7-3.250.944.06.979.474.74.888.8107.0-18.292.1129.8-37.7Note.—A negative number for change in deficit denotes a reduction in <strong>the</strong> deficit.Source: Administration estimates.programs. Medicare savings are projected at $39 billion in <strong>the</strong> year2000. <strong>The</strong>se savings result from 28 specific changes, ranging fromlower hospital payment updates to increased premiums for <strong>the</strong>high-income elderly. Medicaid savings are projected to be $27 billionin 2000, due to lower payments for hospitals that treat <strong>the</strong> uninsured(since everyone will be covered) and slower growth <strong>of</strong> costsfor medicaid beneficiaries in <strong>the</strong> health alliances, resulting from<strong>the</strong> improved incentives. O<strong>the</strong>r programs such as those <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Department<strong>of</strong> Veterans Affairs, <strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Defense, and <strong>the</strong>Federal Employees Benefit Program are projected to realize sav-162


TABLE 4-9.—Sources and Uses <strong>of</strong> Federal Funds Under Reform, 2000[Billions <strong>of</strong> dollars]Source Amount Use AmountTobacco taxCorporate assessment..MedicareMedicaidO<strong>the</strong>r Federal programsO<strong>the</strong>r revenue effects ...Debt service115392711352Discounts:Gross spendingOffsetsNetVeterans Administration, Public Health, New AdministrationMedicare drug benefitLong-term care100 percent tax deduction for self-employed103-61421017203TotalSource: Administration estimates.130Total spendingDeficit reductionings <strong>of</strong> $11 billion from slower cost growth, <strong>the</strong> provisions relatedto early retirees, and <strong>the</strong> increase in payments from private payers.Additional revenue amounting to $35 billion comes from a combination<strong>of</strong> factors, including additional tax revenue from <strong>the</strong> reductionin employer health care costs over time, removing health insurancepremiums from "cafeteria plans" <strong>of</strong>fered by employers, paymentsfrom corporations with early retirees, dedicated premium revenuefor academic health centers, and o<strong>the</strong>r tax changes. Finally, <strong>the</strong>plan generates $2 billion in lower debt service as a result <strong>of</strong> deficitreduction in years prior to 2000.To protect <strong>the</strong> Federal budget against open-ended commitments,<strong>the</strong> Health Security Act sets a ceiling on discounts that can be paid(Box 4-3). Authorized discount payments that are not utilized inany one year can be carried forward into future years to increase<strong>the</strong> maximum payment. This reduces <strong>the</strong> probability that <strong>the</strong> limitswill be exceeded.ECONOMIC EFFECTS OF THE HEALTHSECURITY ACT<strong>The</strong> Health Security Act is certain to have impacts both on <strong>the</strong>overall <strong>American</strong> economy and on <strong>the</strong> health care sector in particular.MACROECONOMIC EFFECTSOne important concern about health care reform is its effect onemployment. Because employer mandates to provide insurance mayinitially increase labor costs to firms that are not now providing or9238163


Box 4-3.—Capped EntitlementsBoth <strong>the</strong> premium discounts and <strong>the</strong> new long-term care programare "capped entitlements." <strong>The</strong> long-term care program isan entitlement to States, not to individuals. <strong>The</strong> amount <strong>of</strong>money that States may receive is specified explicitly. Federalliability is limited to that amount, even if demand is greaterthan predicted. Similarly, <strong>the</strong>re is no authority to pay for premiumdiscounts beyond what is provided in <strong>the</strong> Health SecurityAct. In <strong>the</strong> event that spending is projected to exceed <strong>the</strong>amount in <strong>the</strong> legislation, <strong>the</strong> <strong>President</strong> must submit to <strong>the</strong>Congress a plan for addressing <strong>the</strong> issue. <strong>The</strong> Congress will<strong>the</strong>n act on this plan through an expedited process.<strong>The</strong> notion <strong>of</strong> a capped entitlement is not new. A number <strong>of</strong>Federal entitlement programs operate under a budget limit, including<strong>the</strong> social services block grant and payments to Statesfor AFDC work programs. <strong>The</strong> legislated appropriation sets alimit on how much can be spent in total. <strong>The</strong>n, if spending isexpected to be above projections, <strong>the</strong> government must change<strong>the</strong> eligibility requirements, change <strong>the</strong> benefits, or pass a supplementaryappropriation.are underproviding insurance, fears have arisen that labor demandmight decline as a consequence <strong>of</strong> reform.In fact, however, changes in employer-paid health insurancecosts can have several effects on workers o<strong>the</strong>r than changes in employment.As noted earlier, <strong>the</strong> dominant effect <strong>of</strong> increases inhealth care costs in <strong>the</strong> past has been a reduction in <strong>the</strong> real wagesreceived by employees.Chart 4—9 shows projections <strong>of</strong> total employer health insurancepayments with and without health reform. While reform will havedifferent effects on different firms, total employer spending is essentiallyunchanged through 1998 and <strong>the</strong>n declines relative to <strong>the</strong>baseline. This pattern reflects <strong>the</strong> balance <strong>of</strong> spending increasesfrom <strong>the</strong> employer mandate and spending reductions from cost savings.Through 1998 <strong>the</strong>se effects are roughly equal, resulting in littleadditional business spending. Between 1998 and 2000, <strong>the</strong> savingsincrease but <strong>the</strong>re is no increase in spending. <strong>The</strong> result is anet savings in employer payments.<strong>The</strong>re are many things employers can do with <strong>the</strong> savings fromreform: <strong>The</strong>y can hire more workers, pay higher returns to shareholders,or increase employee compensation. Empirical evidencesuggests, however, that as total employer payments fall over time,<strong>the</strong> likely result will be a corresponding increase in workers' wages.By <strong>the</strong> year 2000, wage and salary compensation could <strong>the</strong>refore164


Chart 4-9 Business Spending on Health InsuranceBusiness spending will increase slightly after reform but will fall below baseline by <strong>the</strong> end<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> decade.Billions <strong>of</strong> dollars300 -Without Reform 303280 -260 -256240 -2 3 6 ^With Reform220 -218 ^ >200 -180 -180I I I<strong>1994</strong> 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000Note: Business spending is for services and populations that will be in regional or corporate health alliances.Source: Administration estimates.IIllincrease by $20 billion to $30 billion, or about 0.6 percent <strong>of</strong> payroll.Although reform is unlikely to lead to a large reduction in <strong>the</strong>demand for labor, it could affect <strong>the</strong> supply. Some individuals whowork mainly to obtain health insurance may voluntarily leave <strong>the</strong>labor force after health reform is passed. Evidence from continuation<strong>of</strong> coverage (COBRA) laws passed by <strong>the</strong> Federal Governmentand many State governments suggests that <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> peopledeciding to retire is about 1 percent higher when <strong>the</strong>y have <strong>the</strong> optionto purchase coverage through <strong>the</strong>ir former employer after retirement.<strong>The</strong>se estimates must be raised to account for <strong>the</strong> lowerprice <strong>of</strong> insurance under reform; with this adjustment, it is estimatedthat about 350,000 to 600,000 additional people will be retiredas a result <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> provisions in <strong>the</strong> Health Security Act.On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, some welfare recipients are likely to decideto enter <strong>the</strong> labor force when health benefits become universal. Awelfare recipient currently receiving medicaid benefits who <strong>the</strong>ntakes a job incurs a "tax" <strong>of</strong> two-thirds or more on earnings because<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> resulting reduction in AFDC benefits, food stamps, and medicaidbenefits. Once health care is guaranteed universally, <strong>the</strong> loss165


<strong>of</strong> income associated with leaving welfare should fall by up to 10percentage points. A number <strong>of</strong> studies suggest that many morewelfare recipients will decide to work in response to <strong>the</strong>se lowerimplicit tax rates.Weighing all this evidence, several private sector economistshave concluded, as has this Council, that <strong>the</strong> net effect <strong>of</strong> healthreform on employment is likely to be small: at most plus or minusone-half <strong>of</strong> 1 percent <strong>of</strong> total employment. <strong>The</strong> reason is that anumber <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fsetting factors are in <strong>the</strong> plan, some <strong>of</strong> which will increaseemployment and some <strong>of</strong> which will reduce it. On net, <strong>the</strong>sefactors are likely to cancel out.SECTORAL EFFECTSHealth reform will affect different firms differently (Table 4-10).Firms that are not now providing insurance will face increasedcosts after reform. Firms that are currently <strong>of</strong>fering coverage, however,will on average enjoy cost reductions. <strong>The</strong>se gains come fromspreading <strong>the</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> universal coverage over everyone in <strong>the</strong> population,from premium discounts, and from slower growth <strong>of</strong> costsover time. Putting <strong>the</strong>se two groups toge<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong> average firm willexperience cost reductions <strong>of</strong> about $230 per worker in 2000. <strong>The</strong>rewill also be changes in <strong>the</strong> distribution <strong>of</strong> spending across industries.Industries that have traditionally provided generous benefitsto much <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir work force, such as manufacturing, will see expenditurereductions compared with industries in which most firmsdo not currently provide insurance.TABLE 4-10.—Employer Payments for Health Care: Baseline and Reform,2000Insurance status <strong>of</strong> firmNumber <strong>of</strong> workers(millions)Average spending per worker (dollars)BaselineReformChangeAllCurrently <strong>of</strong>fers insuranceDoes not <strong>of</strong>fer insurance122.796.324.42.4783,09202.2452.4821.292-233-€101.292Source: Urban Institute.Employment is expected to increase in <strong>the</strong> health sector in <strong>the</strong>short run, because <strong>of</strong> increased spending on <strong>the</strong> uninsured andunderinsured. Universal coverage by itself will increase health-relatedemployment by more than 400,000 jobs, although employmentwill not increase uniformly throughout <strong>the</strong> sector. Resourcesare likely to shift from administration to providing care. As <strong>the</strong>growth rate <strong>of</strong> health spending falls, employment in health carewill grow less rapidly than without reform. <strong>The</strong> number <strong>of</strong> employeeswill still increase over time, however.166


Health care reform should set <strong>the</strong> stage for increased productivitygrowth. As administrative expense and inappropriate care decreaseand <strong>the</strong> health care industry becomes more productive, <strong>the</strong>economy should be able to produce more output than it would havewithout reform. As a result, <strong>American</strong>s will be able to consumehealth services <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> same or better quality as before, as well asmore <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r goods and services. This productivity increase willraise living standards, which is <strong>the</strong> principal objective <strong>of</strong> this Administration'seconomic policies.CONCLUSIONReforming <strong>the</strong> Nation's health care system is integral to <strong>the</strong>health <strong>of</strong> both our citizens and our economy. One-seventh <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>Nation's economy is currently characterized by weak competition,inadequate information, and inappropriate incentives. <strong>The</strong> Administration'shealth care reform proposal builds on <strong>the</strong> strengths <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> current system while correcting its shortcomings. It preservesconsumer choice and our employer-based private insurance system.It relies on enhanced market competition and improved incentivesto provide health security for all <strong>American</strong>s, slow rising health carecosts, and address our long-run budget deficit problem.167


CHAPTER 5Microeconomic Initiatives toPromote Efficiency and ProductivityAS WORKERS AND CONSUMERS, we conduct our economic affairsthrough markets. <strong>The</strong>se markets provide us with a vast array<strong>of</strong> products and services to purchase, and a host <strong>of</strong> different waysto earn our livelihoods.Yet markets are not flawless. <strong>The</strong>y may, for example, becomecontrolled by monopolies, generate excessive pollution, or lead toinsufficient investment in research and development. Through collectiveaction, we can sometimes correct such "market failures,"and <strong>the</strong>reby improve <strong>the</strong> ability <strong>of</strong> private markets to serve socialgoals. When targeted microeconomic policies are successful, <strong>the</strong>yreduce <strong>the</strong> costs <strong>of</strong> production and distribution, place goods andservices in <strong>the</strong> hands <strong>of</strong> those who value <strong>the</strong>m most, and maximize<strong>the</strong> increase in social well-being that derives from trade in <strong>the</strong> privatemarketplace. For <strong>the</strong>se reasons, well-chosen government initiativesare as important for microeconomic policy as <strong>the</strong>y are formacroeconomic policy.<strong>The</strong> United States has a long history <strong>of</strong> employing targetedmicroeconomic policies to improve <strong>the</strong> performance <strong>of</strong> private enterprisein significant industries. Roughly three-fourths <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Nation'sinvestment in canal construction before <strong>the</strong> Civil War waspublicly financed. Land grants and o<strong>the</strong>r subsidies encouraged <strong>the</strong>development <strong>of</strong> intercontinental railroads during <strong>the</strong> second half <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> 19th century. Since 1914, <strong>the</strong> Extension Service <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Department<strong>of</strong> Agriculture, a cooperative venture <strong>of</strong> Federal, State, andlocal governments, has vastly improved <strong>the</strong> Nation's agriculturalproductivity by spreading information about modern farming techniques.Our massive national commitment to create high-technologyindustries critical to our defense, such as computers and jetaircraft, dates from <strong>the</strong> Second World War. Targeted microeconomicpolicies such as <strong>the</strong>se have been employed throughout <strong>the</strong>history <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Republic, regardless <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> political party in power.<strong>The</strong> Administration's initiatives described in this chapter areaimed at both correcting failures <strong>of</strong> private markets and improving<strong>the</strong> functioning <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Federal Government. <strong>The</strong> initiatives are organizedaround three <strong>the</strong>mes: promoting efficiency in <strong>the</strong> public169


and private sectors, addressing environmental externalities, andpromoting technology.PROMOTING EFFICIENCY IN THE PUBLIC ANDPRIVATE SECTORSIn all modern industrialized nations, some goods and services areprovided directly by <strong>the</strong> government, o<strong>the</strong>rs almost entirelythrough unregulated private markets, and still o<strong>the</strong>rs by <strong>the</strong> privatesector through regulated markets. Because none <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>semethods <strong>of</strong> conducting our economic affairs is flawless, it is importantto develop ways <strong>of</strong> improving <strong>the</strong> performance <strong>of</strong> each. For thisreason, <strong>the</strong> Administration has developed initiatives to promote amore effective government, more competitive markets, and more efficientregulation.CREATING A MORE EFFECTIVE GOVERNMENTGovernmental activities, however well-intended, are not alwaysperformed as efficiently as possible. <strong>The</strong>re are two importantsources <strong>of</strong> what might be termed "government failure."First, as recognized by both <strong>the</strong> framers <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Constitution andmodern scholars <strong>of</strong> public choice, all political systems provide interestgroups with an incentive for "rent seeking," that is, manipulation<strong>of</strong> collective action for private benefit. Rent-seeking behaviorcan bias public actions away from maximizing aggregate social welfare.It can, for example, lead government agencies to make decisionsthat benefit a particular interest group even though <strong>the</strong>y arecostly to society as a whole.Second, <strong>the</strong> government—in providing services to citizens, in hiringand managing personnel, in procuring supplies, and in makinginvestments—generally does not face <strong>the</strong> same competitive pressuresas private industry to serve customers well and minimizecosts. Competition among <strong>the</strong> political parties; oversight by <strong>the</strong> Office<strong>of</strong> Management and Budget (OMB), by <strong>the</strong> Congress, and byheads <strong>of</strong> agencies; and public scrutiny through <strong>the</strong> media providea partial but incomplete substitute for market competition. Frequently,internal governmental regulations, such as personnel andprocurement rules or reporting requirements, are introduced to address<strong>the</strong>se problems. But <strong>the</strong>se are blunt instruments that maycreate significant managerial inefficiencies <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir own.<strong>The</strong> Administration has placed a high priority on governmentalreform—or "reinventing government." A major objective is to improve<strong>the</strong> performance <strong>of</strong> government by introducing market-likemechanisms and benefit-cost tests wherever possible. Such mechanismsare designed to reduce rent seeking and <strong>the</strong> governmentalinefficiencies resulting from <strong>the</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> competitive pressures.170


<strong>The</strong> National Performance Review<strong>The</strong> National Performance Review (NPR), directed by <strong>the</strong> Vice<strong>President</strong>, took a fresh look at <strong>the</strong> way <strong>the</strong> Federal Governmentperforms its tasks, with less emphasis on <strong>the</strong> related issue, routinelyconsidered in <strong>the</strong> budgetary process, <strong>of</strong> whe<strong>the</strong>r those functionsshould be performed at all.<strong>The</strong> NPR identified 384 ways that <strong>the</strong> Federal Government couldsave money without reducing <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong> service and, indeed, <strong>of</strong>tenwhile improving governmental performance. Its report concludedthat, by shifting to a market-like focus on customer service, by introducingcompetition where possible, and by streamlining internalgovernment processes to facilitate better management, we couldhave a government that "works better and costs less."<strong>The</strong> Administration has moved rapidly to introduce <strong>the</strong> NPR reforms.One important element is a set <strong>of</strong> recommendations to improve<strong>the</strong> procurement process. <strong>The</strong>se include changing laws andregulations to make it easier for <strong>the</strong> government to buy commerciallyproduced goods and services, to raise <strong>the</strong> threshold for <strong>the</strong>use <strong>of</strong> simplified acquisition procedures, and to amend contract protestrules to streamline contracting and discourage frivolous protests.<strong>The</strong>se reforms can be accomplished while preserving oversightby <strong>the</strong> Congress and OMB, which is necessary to protectagainst fraud and abuse. O<strong>the</strong>r NPR recommendations identifyways to streamline management control; improve customer services;shift to mission-driven, results-oriented budgeting; improve financialand human resource management; integrate informationtechnology into <strong>the</strong> business <strong>of</strong> government; and improve <strong>the</strong> functioning<strong>of</strong> every executive branch department (Box 5-1). In a similareffort, <strong>the</strong> Defense Department has conducted a "bottom-up" review<strong>of</strong> its activities.A New Framework for Regulatory Review<strong>The</strong> <strong>President</strong>'s Executive Order 12866 on Regulatory Planningand Review provides a framework for developing regulations thatserve <strong>the</strong> best interests <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>American</strong> people without imposingunreasonable burdens on business. <strong>The</strong> order directs agencies topromulgate only those regulations made necessary by law or compellingpublic need, such as correcting market failures. <strong>The</strong> regulatoryphilosophy that underlies <strong>the</strong> order calls on agencies to assessall <strong>the</strong> costs and benefits <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> available alternatives whendeciding whe<strong>the</strong>r and how to regulate, including <strong>the</strong> alternative <strong>of</strong>not regulating. Fur<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong> order requires that, to <strong>the</strong> extent permittedby statute, agencies select a regulatory approach that maximizes<strong>the</strong> net benefits to <strong>the</strong> public (benefits less costs). Applyingthis test to public regulation will lead affected firms in <strong>the</strong> private171


Box 5-1.—Selected National Performance ReviewRecommendations• Allow agencies to create innovation capital funds fromretained savings to invest in innovations that can improveservice and provide a return on investment.• Provide line managers with greater budget flexibility toachieve results by expediting <strong>the</strong> reprogramming <strong>of</strong>funds within agencies.• Use electronic funds transfer to pay and reimburse expensesfor all Federal employees, to make payments too<strong>the</strong>r agencies, and to pay for purchases from <strong>the</strong> privatesector.• Create competitive enterprises within <strong>the</strong> government tomanage real property on a fee basis, and give Federalmanagers <strong>the</strong> authority to choose <strong>the</strong>ir source <strong>of</strong> propertymanagement services.• Establish a corporation to provide air traffic controlservices.sector to roughly mimic what a properly functioning market woulddo absent <strong>the</strong> market failure that necessitates regulation.In conducting benefit-cost analyses <strong>of</strong> regulatory alternatives, <strong>the</strong>order directs agencies to consider all <strong>the</strong> benefits and costs—thosethat are easily measured as well as those that are not. This approachaddresses one major criticism <strong>of</strong> centralized regulatory reviewin previous Administrations: that <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> a benefit-cost testwas subject to bias against appropriate regulations whenever <strong>the</strong>costs <strong>of</strong> regulation were more readily quantified than <strong>the</strong> benefits—which happens frequently.In addition, <strong>the</strong> order encourages agencies to act to limit anyeconomic distortions <strong>the</strong>ir regulations cause. Agencies must, for example,design regulations to achieve <strong>the</strong>ir objectives in <strong>the</strong> mostcost-effective manner. To <strong>the</strong> extent feasible, agencies must specifyperformance standards ra<strong>the</strong>r than specify a behavior or manner <strong>of</strong>compliance. Agencies must also consider alternatives to direct regulationthat provide economic incentives to encourage <strong>the</strong> desired behavior.This framework does not apply solely to new regulatory initiatives.<strong>The</strong> Executive order also sets forth a procedure for review <strong>of</strong>existing regulations to ensure that <strong>the</strong>y too maximize <strong>the</strong> net benefitsto society. This wide-ranging review <strong>of</strong> old and new regulationsalike promises to improve <strong>the</strong> performance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> public sector bymaking regulation more effective.172


PROMOTING COMPETITIONCompetition among <strong>the</strong> providers <strong>of</strong> goods and services is <strong>the</strong>most effective method ever devised for organizing most economicactivity. Competition simultaneously leads to low production costs,innovation in product design and production techniques, low pricesfor consumers, and <strong>the</strong> allocation <strong>of</strong> goods and services to thosewho value <strong>the</strong>m most. For <strong>the</strong>se reasons, our economy must relyupon competition to <strong>the</strong> maximum extent possible, and <strong>the</strong> governmentshould act to promote and streng<strong>the</strong>n competition throughout<strong>the</strong> private sector. When market failures necessitate public regulationor public provision <strong>of</strong> services, <strong>the</strong> resulting public policiesshould rely on market-like mechanisms to <strong>the</strong> extent feasible, inorder to realize <strong>the</strong> benefits <strong>of</strong> competition.Antitrust EnforcementFor more than a century, <strong>the</strong> antitrust laws have been, in <strong>the</strong>words <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Supreme Court, "a comprehensive charter <strong>of</strong> economicliberty aimed at preserving free and unfettered competition as <strong>the</strong>rule <strong>of</strong> trade." <strong>The</strong> antitrust laws address market failures arisingfrom <strong>the</strong> exercise <strong>of</strong> market power (Box 5-2). <strong>The</strong>se laws are enforceddirectly by <strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Justice, <strong>the</strong> Federal TradeCommission, <strong>the</strong> States, and private plaintiffs.Over <strong>the</strong> past dozen years, Federal antitrust enforcement hasemphasized challenges to mergers among competitors in concentratedindustries and <strong>the</strong> prosecution <strong>of</strong> bid-rigging schemes bygovernment contractors. Frequently, <strong>the</strong> defendants were smallfirms. Federal antitrust enforcement efforts are now beingrefocused to encompass harmful conduct by large firms, affectingbroad sectors <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> economy, through means in addition to mergeror bid rigging.For example, <strong>the</strong> Justice Department is vigorously pursuing acourt case charging <strong>the</strong> major domestic airlines with widespreadprice fixing from 1988 to 1992. <strong>The</strong> conspiracies were allegedly accomplishedin a novel way: through <strong>the</strong> computerized exchange <strong>of</strong>prospective fare information. In terms <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> magnitude <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> violationand <strong>the</strong> size <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> firms involved, this alleged price-fixingscheme recalls <strong>the</strong> electrical equipment conspiracy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1950s.<strong>The</strong> government's actions to promote and protect competition gobeyond filing lawsuits. When appropriate, government agenciesissue guidelines that will encourage procompetitive behavior andminimize <strong>the</strong> private costs <strong>of</strong> understanding and complying with<strong>the</strong> law. Merger guidelines are <strong>the</strong> best examples, but <strong>the</strong> two Federalantitrust agencies have also recently promulgated enforcementguidelines to promote competitive behavior among health care providers.173


Box 5-2*—Market PowerFirms are said to exercise market power when <strong>the</strong>y reduceoutput below what a competitive industry would sell, in orderto raise prices above competitive levels. Firms may achievemarket power collectively—for example, through an agreementamong competitors to raise prices—or unilaterally, as by engagingin practices that inhibit <strong>the</strong> ability <strong>of</strong> current or potentialrivals to compete. Firms may also obtain market powerthrough government action, as when imports are blocked bytariffs or quotas.<strong>The</strong> exercise <strong>of</strong> market power is harmful for several reasons.First, an industry in which market power is exercised producesless and employs fewer workers than would a competitive industry.Second, sellers who exercise market power in effect taxbuyers unfairly, forcing <strong>the</strong>m to pay more for <strong>the</strong>ir productsthan <strong>the</strong>y would have paid under competition. Finally, firmsexercising market power may tend to innovate less than competitors,because <strong>the</strong>y recognize that a successful new productcould cannibalize <strong>the</strong>ir existing market share and decrease <strong>the</strong>value <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir capital. (In some industries, however, large firmsexercising market power may be more likely than small orcompetitive firms to take <strong>the</strong> risk <strong>of</strong> investing in large-scale innovations.)Although market power is costly to society, <strong>the</strong>se problemsare <strong>of</strong> limited concern in markets in which new competitioncan quickly and easily appear. <strong>The</strong>n <strong>the</strong> exercise <strong>of</strong> marketpower is likely to be nonexistent or temporary, and new entrantsattracted by <strong>the</strong> opportunity to share monopoly pr<strong>of</strong>itswill tend to shift resources into <strong>the</strong>ir most socially valuableuses. In some circumstances, moreover, society accepts someexercise <strong>of</strong> market power in order to achieve ano<strong>the</strong>r economicbenefit o<strong>the</strong>rwise unavailable. For example, since <strong>the</strong> founding<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> United States, <strong>the</strong> award <strong>of</strong> a patent monopoly as aprize for a successful invention has been <strong>the</strong> cornerstone <strong>of</strong>government policy to encourage research and promote innovation.<strong>The</strong> antitrust guidelines for health care respond to <strong>the</strong> concernthat health providers may have delayed cooperative cost-cutting arrangementsbecause <strong>of</strong> uncertainty about antitrust restrictions. Togive providers some security, <strong>the</strong> guidelines establish a number <strong>of</strong>"antitrust safety zones," which describe circumstances under which<strong>the</strong> government will not normally challenge cooperative ventures.One example is a safety zone for hospital mergers if ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>174


merging hospitals averages fewer than 100 beds and less than 40patients per day over a 3-year period. Ano<strong>the</strong>r is a safety zone forphysician networks (such as preferred provider organizations, orPPOs) that comprise no more than 20 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> doctors ineach specialty in <strong>the</strong> relevant geographic market, so long as <strong>the</strong>network members share substantial financial risk. Mergers or jointventures by physicians that fall outside <strong>the</strong> safety zones are notnecessarily antitrust violations but will be evaluated individually todetermine <strong>the</strong>ir legality. <strong>The</strong> two Federal antitrust agencies havealso committed to reduce uncertainty by providing advice to healthcare providers on an expedited basis.O<strong>the</strong>r government agencies have also taken steps to limit <strong>the</strong>exercise <strong>of</strong> market power. For example, a widely reported investigationby <strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Transportation helped ensure that an establishedair carrier would not use anticompetitive practices to excludea new entrant.Government can go beyond simply preventing anticompetitivepractices; it can act to stimulate competition directly. Thus, <strong>the</strong> Department<strong>of</strong> Transportation has provided new airlines with assistancein complying with its regulations. Partly as a result <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> department'sactions to promote competition, 18 new cargo, charter,and scheduled passenger carriers began service during 1993, and20 more new carriers are awaiting certification to begin passengerjet service.Spectrum AuctionsAs <strong>the</strong> Transportation Department's efforts to foster new air carrierssuggest, competition can be promoted by encouraging entry.<strong>The</strong> Federal Communications Commission (FCC) will soon seek topromote competition in this way by allocating portions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> electromagneticspectrum for telecommunications services. Legislationenacted in August 1993 authorizes <strong>the</strong> FCC to auction most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>new licenses to use spectrum, and requires <strong>the</strong> FCC to begin issuinglicenses for personal communications services (PCS) by May<strong>1994</strong>. <strong>The</strong> allocation <strong>of</strong> spectrum to PCS will encourage competitionbetween new firms <strong>of</strong>fering PCS and existing cellular providers.<strong>The</strong> auction mechanism will ensure that <strong>the</strong> spectrum goes to thoseprivate parties who place <strong>the</strong> highest value on it. <strong>The</strong> auction willalso raise billions <strong>of</strong> dollars for <strong>the</strong> government, by selling <strong>the</strong> rightto <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> a scarce public resource instead <strong>of</strong> giving it away.MORE EFFICIENT REGULATION OF NATURALMONOPOLIESEconomists have long recognized that competition will performpoorly in certain industries that are "natural monopolies" (Box 5-3). In Europe, natural monopolies have <strong>of</strong>ten been turned into governmententerprises. <strong>The</strong> traditional U.S. response is to impose175


ate regulation. For example, State public utility commissions typicallyregulate <strong>the</strong> local distribution <strong>of</strong> electricity, water, naturalgas, and telephone service, and Federal agencies regulate interstatepipelines and long-distance telephone service.Box 5-3.—Natural MonopolyAn industry is a natural monopoly if a single firm can serve<strong>the</strong> market at lower total cost than two or more firms. A naturalmonopoly may result when an industry's production technologyis characterized by economies <strong>of</strong> scale, that is, whenaverage production costs decline as output rises. A natural monopolymay also have economies <strong>of</strong> scope, in which two or morerelated products can be produced more cheaply by a single firmthan by separate firms. <strong>The</strong> size <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> market interacts with<strong>the</strong> production technology in determining whe<strong>the</strong>r an industryis a natural monopoly. For example, if most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cost reductionsfrom producing at scale are achieved at low levels <strong>of</strong> outputrelative to market demand, <strong>the</strong> market is not likely to bea natural monopoly.In an unregulated market, some natural monopoly industrieswould be served by a single firm that exercises market power.Entry would be deterred even though <strong>the</strong> incumbent firmcharges a price in excess <strong>of</strong> its long-run average cost. Potentialentrants, tempted by <strong>the</strong> opportunity to undercut <strong>the</strong> incumbent'sprice, would refrain from doing so because <strong>the</strong>y wouldrecognize that <strong>the</strong> incumbent would lower its price in responseand could sustain that lower price pr<strong>of</strong>itably while <strong>the</strong> entrantcould not. One way to avoid <strong>the</strong> exercise <strong>of</strong> market power insuch a case is to regulate <strong>the</strong> natural monopolist's prices.Oil Pipeline Rate RegulationFor nearly 90 years <strong>the</strong> Federal Energy Regulatory Commission(FERC) and its predecessors have regulated rates charged by interstateoil pipelines. Over this period, many if not most pipelineshave likely been natural monopolies. Pipeline rates were setthrough a cost-<strong>of</strong>-service methodology, similar to <strong>the</strong> approach thatState public utility commissions typically employ to determinerates for electricity, gas, water, and telephone service.Under <strong>the</strong> cost-<strong>of</strong>-service approach, <strong>the</strong> regulated firm is allowedto earn enough revenues to cover its expected costs <strong>of</strong> operationsplus a fair return on capital to its investors. <strong>The</strong> regulator setsprices on <strong>the</strong> regulated firm's individual services in such a waythat <strong>the</strong> firm's expected revenues (based on forecasts <strong>of</strong> buyer demand)will reach <strong>the</strong> permitted level. Although this method is generallysuccessful at preventing regulated firms from charging mo-176


nopoly prices, it has been criticized on several grounds. Cost-<strong>of</strong>servicerate setting can be expensive to administer, as <strong>the</strong> regulatorycommission typically engages in a trial-type hearing beforedetermining rates. In addition, if <strong>the</strong> regulator adjusts rates rapidlywhen operating costs change, <strong>the</strong> regulated firm may lack astrong incentive to keep costs low, reduce costs fur<strong>the</strong>r, or innovate.Incentive methodologies for setting rates promise to reduce inefficienciescreated by <strong>the</strong> cost-<strong>of</strong>-service methodology. One form <strong>of</strong> incentiveregulation is a "price cap." <strong>The</strong> regulator sets a maximumprice (or a price path, <strong>of</strong>ten set to decline over time) for a collection<strong>of</strong> regulated services, and permits <strong>the</strong> firm to set whatever ratesit chooses for individual services so long as <strong>the</strong> price cap is not exceeded.If <strong>the</strong> regulator and <strong>the</strong> firm are willing to live by a pricecap for a long time, <strong>the</strong> administrative costs <strong>of</strong> regulation aregreatly reduced. In addition, <strong>the</strong> regulated firm is given a strongincentive to reduce costs and to innovate: As long as <strong>the</strong> price capis not revised downward, <strong>the</strong> firm gets to keep any additional pr<strong>of</strong>itsthat result from cost savings. Finally, if <strong>the</strong> price cap appliesto <strong>the</strong> average rate for a broad collection <strong>of</strong> services, this form <strong>of</strong>incentive regulation permits <strong>the</strong> regulated firm to exercise significantdiscretion in rate design. <strong>The</strong> resulting rates may distortconsumer choice less than those set by regulators. For such reasons,in 1989 <strong>the</strong> FCC adopted price cap regulation for <strong>the</strong> longdistancetelephone rates charged by <strong>American</strong> Telephone and TelegraphCo. (AT&T).In 1993, FERC replaced cost-<strong>of</strong>-service rate setting for oil pipelineswith an incentive methodology. <strong>The</strong> new approach generallystarts with cost-<strong>of</strong>-service-based rates and caps rate increases forpipeline services at 1 percent below <strong>the</strong> increase in <strong>the</strong> producerprice index for finished goods. Moreover, wherever <strong>the</strong> scope <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>natural monopoly has narrowed, permitting <strong>the</strong> pipeline to demonstratethat it lacks significant market power, <strong>the</strong> regulatory constraintmay be removed in favor <strong>of</strong> relying on competition to determineprices and output.Telecommunications Regulation<strong>The</strong> rapid pace <strong>of</strong> innovation in telecommunications is creatingnew industries, transforming old ones, and promising to change <strong>the</strong>way we live and work. In <strong>the</strong> coming years, <strong>American</strong> householdsand businesses will have access to a National Information Infrastructure(Nil)—an interconnected web <strong>of</strong> networks linking computers,databases, consumer electronics, and communications devicesthat will put vast amounts <strong>of</strong> information at every user's fingertips.<strong>The</strong> technologies to create, manage, manipulate, and useinformation will fuel economic growth, promote <strong>the</strong> international177


competitiveness <strong>of</strong> U.S. industry, and create challenging, high-payingjobs.Many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> innovations that are creating <strong>the</strong> new informationinfrastructure are also shrinking <strong>the</strong> scope <strong>of</strong> natural monopoly in<strong>the</strong> provision <strong>of</strong> telecommunications services. Microwave technologymade competition in long-distance telephone service possible. <strong>The</strong>development <strong>of</strong> low-cost private branch exchange (PBX) technologyhas carved out a competitive market for carrying telephone callswithin <strong>of</strong>fice buildings. For many business customers <strong>the</strong> local telephonemonopoly now ends at <strong>the</strong> street ra<strong>the</strong>r than continuing into<strong>the</strong> building. Competitive access providers now sell alternativehigh-capacity services that allow some business customers to completecalls while bypassing some or all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> local telephone company'snetwork. It is now feasible and increasingly practical fortelephone lines to carry video programming, for cable lines to carrytelephone calls, and for wireless providers to carry both. If andwhen <strong>the</strong>se developments end <strong>the</strong> natural monopoly in local telephoneand video service altoge<strong>the</strong>r, competition can replace regulationas <strong>the</strong> best economic mechanism for setting prices and providingtelecommunications services to buyers.<strong>The</strong> information highways that will be central to <strong>the</strong> emerginginformation infrastructure will be built in part with fiber opticlines, coaxial cable, and copper wire, and in part through wirelesstechnologies such as cellular telephone, PCS, and direct broadcastsatellites. <strong>The</strong> private sector will make <strong>the</strong> necessary investments,and <strong>the</strong> government will promote those investments by encouragingcompetition. In consequence, <strong>the</strong> market will determine, to <strong>the</strong>extent possible, which technologies provide <strong>the</strong> most value relativeto cost and, accordingly, how <strong>the</strong> information highways will bebuilt.<strong>The</strong> Administration's regulatory policies will promote competitionamong <strong>the</strong> firms that build and operate <strong>the</strong> information highways,and among <strong>the</strong> firms that sell <strong>the</strong>ir services and programmingthrough <strong>the</strong> network. Under <strong>the</strong> Administration's legislative proposals,for example, local telephone monopolies will be required tounbundle <strong>the</strong> services <strong>the</strong>y <strong>of</strong>fer and to interconnect with new entrantson a nondiscriminatory basis. This will facilitate new competitionin local telephone service by allowing new providers tocombine, for example, switching provided by <strong>the</strong> telephone companywith <strong>the</strong>ir own transmission facilities. <strong>The</strong> legislative proposalswill also set forth a process by which local telephone companieswill be permitted to provide new competition in <strong>the</strong> interstate longdistancetelephone market. <strong>The</strong> Administration's proposals willidentify safeguards that will protect against regulatory evasionthrough transfer pricing (strategic pricing <strong>of</strong> goods and servicessold to affiliates) and <strong>the</strong> abuse <strong>of</strong> monopoly power until <strong>the</strong> time178


that competition in local telephone service makes rate regulationunnecessary.Rapid developments in technology and <strong>the</strong> marketplace will createnew challenges for telecommunications regulation. Old regulatorystructures based on <strong>the</strong> natural monopoly paradigm are notappropriate for a market now characterized by mixed elements <strong>of</strong>competition and monopoly. Accordingly, <strong>the</strong> Administration willpropose adding a new title to <strong>the</strong> Communications Act <strong>of</strong> 1934,specifying a flexible regulatory framework for this new environment.<strong>The</strong> new framework can adapt to technological and marketplacedevelopments, to protect consumers from monopolies withoutdiscouraging investment, innovation, or <strong>the</strong> growth <strong>of</strong> competition.In addition, <strong>the</strong> Administration's legislative initiative will give <strong>the</strong>FCC broad power to forbear from regulating when markets becomeeffectively competitive, and <strong>the</strong> power to preempt State and localregulation made unnecessary by <strong>the</strong> emergence <strong>of</strong> competition.<strong>The</strong> Administration's policies will also promote universal service,to avoid creating a permanent class <strong>of</strong> information "have-nots," andopen access to <strong>the</strong> network, to allow all service and informationproviders to reach potential customers. <strong>The</strong> government will alsoencourage research and development designed to create new technologiesand new applications, as discussed below along with o<strong>the</strong>rtechnology initiatives.ADDRESSING ENVIRONMENTALEXTERNALITIES<strong>The</strong> notion <strong>of</strong> trade<strong>of</strong>fs is among <strong>the</strong> most fundamental in economics:nothing is free; everything has an opportunity cost. In privatemarkets, trade<strong>of</strong>fs are handled automatically, as consumerschoose among alternative goods and services and producers chooseamong alternative inputs. Prices guide <strong>the</strong>se decisions. Trade<strong>of</strong>fsinvolving <strong>the</strong> environment cannot be made so easily, however, becauseuse <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> environment is generally unpriced. As a result,firms and individuals, in <strong>the</strong>ir marketplace decisions, do not alwaysmake <strong>the</strong> best trade<strong>of</strong>fs from <strong>the</strong> standpoint <strong>of</strong> society as awhole. <strong>The</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> failing to price environmental goods and servicesare examples <strong>of</strong> externalities (Box 5-4). When externalities aresignificant, <strong>the</strong> government can <strong>of</strong>ten design policies that improve<strong>the</strong> functioning <strong>of</strong> markets and <strong>the</strong>reby increase aggregate socialwelfare.<strong>The</strong> Administration has sought to encourage <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong>environmental technologies to mitigate trade<strong>of</strong>fs and foster economicgrowth. Improvements in <strong>the</strong> technologies for preventing andtreating pollution, and efforts to spread knowledge about technologiesalready available, can free resources for o<strong>the</strong>r socially ben-179


Box 5-4.—ExternalitiesAn externality, or spillover, is a type <strong>of</strong> market failure thatarises when <strong>the</strong> private costs or benefits <strong>of</strong> production differfrom <strong>the</strong> social costs or benefits. For example, if a factory pollutes,and nei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> firm nor its customers pay for <strong>the</strong> harmthat pollution causes, <strong>the</strong> pollution is an externality. In <strong>the</strong>presence <strong>of</strong> this negative (harmful) externality, market forceswill generate too much <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> activity causing <strong>the</strong> externality,here <strong>the</strong> factory's production, and too much <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> externalityitself, here <strong>the</strong> pollution. In <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> beneficial externalities,firms will generate too little <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> activity causing <strong>the</strong> externality,and too little <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> externality itself, because <strong>the</strong>y arenot compensated for <strong>the</strong> benefits <strong>the</strong>y <strong>of</strong>fer. For example, <strong>the</strong>development <strong>of</strong> laser technology has had beneficial effects farbeyond whatever gains its developers captured, improvingproducts in industries as diverse as medicine and telecommunications.Too little research and development and o<strong>the</strong>r activitiesgenerating positive externalities will take place in <strong>the</strong> absence<strong>of</strong> some governmental intervention.To remedy market failures and induce <strong>the</strong> market to provide<strong>the</strong> efficient level <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> externality-causing activity, <strong>the</strong> privateparties involved in <strong>the</strong> activity must face <strong>the</strong> full socialcosts and benefits <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir actions. Policymakers may employ avariety <strong>of</strong> tools to accomplish this result, such as taxes, userfees, subsidies, or <strong>the</strong> establishment or clarification <strong>of</strong> propertyrights.eficial purposes or permit <strong>the</strong> attainment <strong>of</strong> higher environmentalgoals without increasing <strong>the</strong> burden on <strong>the</strong> economy. Given <strong>the</strong>worldwide explosion in environmental regulatory activity—in <strong>the</strong>Far East, in eastern Europe, in Mexico, and elsewhere—<strong>the</strong> development<strong>of</strong> more-effective and lower cost pollution control technologycan also increase our export competitiveness. In fact, we alreadyenjoy considerable success in this area. <strong>The</strong> United States is now<strong>the</strong> world leader in exports <strong>of</strong> environmental equipment. In a globalmarket for environmental technologies <strong>of</strong> $295 billion in 1992,<strong>the</strong> $134 billion U.S. share is <strong>the</strong> largest by far. Our trade surplusin pollution control equipment has been increasing and was $1.1billion in 1991.<strong>The</strong> Administration has also sought to improve <strong>the</strong> "technology"<strong>of</strong> regulating <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> natural and environmental resources. Thiseffort involves seeking a better balance among conflicting interestsin <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> natural resources, and developing approaches to regulatepollution that rely more on economic incentives and eliminate<strong>the</strong> economic distortions <strong>of</strong> some current regulations. Examples <strong>of</strong>180


improving <strong>the</strong> technology for regulating <strong>the</strong> environment are foundin <strong>the</strong> Administration's plan for managing <strong>the</strong> old growth forests<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Pacific Northwest, in its approach to grazing on Federallands, in <strong>the</strong> Climate Change Action Plan, and in <strong>the</strong> Administration'sposition favoring <strong>the</strong> reauthorization <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ComprehensiveEnvironmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, betterknown as "Superfund." To better assess where interventions to improve<strong>the</strong> environment will benefit <strong>the</strong> economy, <strong>the</strong> Administrationis also engaged in efforts to define sustainable developmentand develop "green" GDP accounts.MANAGING RESOURCES ON FEDERAL LANDS<strong>The</strong> Federal Government owns vast tracts <strong>of</strong> land, primarily in<strong>the</strong> West. <strong>The</strong>se lands contain natural resources <strong>of</strong> economic importanceto both local communities and <strong>the</strong> Nation, including timberand o<strong>the</strong>r forest products, forage for grazing livestock, and mineraldeposits. <strong>The</strong>y are also sources <strong>of</strong> extremely valuable environmentalamenities, such as open space for recreational uses likewildlife viewing, scenery, camping, hiking, and hunting; fish andwildlife (including endangered species) habitat; watershed protection;and many o<strong>the</strong>rs.Improving <strong>the</strong> "technology" <strong>of</strong> regulating <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se Federallands is a centerpiece <strong>of</strong> Administration policy. Two principlesguide that policy: (1) reducing inefficiencies caused by improperpricing and regulatory restrictions, and (2) ensuring that both pricingand regulation will achieve a better balance among competinguses <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se resources, particularly between extractive (timber,grazing, mining) and environmental uses. <strong>The</strong>se principles can beseen at work in <strong>the</strong> Administration's plans for managing oldgrowth forests in <strong>the</strong> Pacific Northwest and for rangeland reform.Old Growth Forests, Spotted Owls, and Timber<strong>The</strong> controversy over logging in <strong>the</strong> old growth forests and spottedowl habitat <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Northwest provides a case study in reconcilingenvironmental and economic objectives and illustrates how acareful balancing <strong>of</strong> competing interests can result in progress onall fronts.<strong>The</strong> forest products industry is a major industry in <strong>the</strong> PacificNorthwest, where it is heavily dependent on timber from Federallands. Much <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Federal land on which this logging has takenplace consists <strong>of</strong> mature forest stands. Referred to as "old growth,"this mature forest is <strong>the</strong> habitat <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn spotted owl, athreatened species, and many o<strong>the</strong>r plants and animals.For several years Federal forest policy in <strong>the</strong> Northwest failed totake appropriate account <strong>of</strong> impacts on environmental quality andbiodiversity. In particular, timber harvests on Federal lands wereaccelerated substantially in <strong>the</strong> mid- and late 1980s: Such harvests181


in <strong>the</strong> habitat <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> spotted owl rose from 2.4 billion board feet(bbf) in 1982 to 6.7 bbf in 1988. According to experts, <strong>the</strong>se levelswere too high to be sustained indefinitely. Legal challenges to Federaltimber policy resulted in injunctions blocking <strong>the</strong> sale <strong>of</strong> timberon Federal forest lands in <strong>the</strong> spotted owl region, in part becauseagencies within <strong>the</strong> Federal Government had failed to workcooperatively to comply with environmental and forest managementlaws. <strong>The</strong> injunctions had a severe impact on <strong>the</strong> timber industry,albeit in large part because harvest levels had been extraordinarilyand unsustainably large.<strong>The</strong> Administration put a high priority on resolving <strong>the</strong> problemsassociated with forest management policy in <strong>the</strong> Pacific Northwest.Accordingly, in July 1993 <strong>the</strong> Administration announced a "ForestPlan for a Sustainable Economy and a Sustainable Environment."<strong>The</strong> plan attempts to end <strong>the</strong> uncertainty caused by legal wranglingand confusion and ameliorate <strong>the</strong> impact <strong>of</strong> economic dislocation,while achieving full compliance with existing laws. It alsoseeks to maintain and improve <strong>the</strong> ecosystem as a whole, balance<strong>the</strong> interests <strong>of</strong> competing uses <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ecosystem for environmentaland economic purposes, and create a political consensus to avoideconomic instability.<strong>The</strong> plan provides for <strong>the</strong> maximum legally defensible harvestfrom Federal forests in <strong>the</strong> spotted owl region (about 1.2 bbf annually).<strong>The</strong> process <strong>of</strong> adjustment to <strong>the</strong> new, lower harvest levelswill be smoo<strong>the</strong>d by an economic adjustment plan that is expectedto create more than 8,000 new jobs and 5,400 retraining opportunitiesin <strong>the</strong> region in <strong>1994</strong>. Many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> new jobs will be in enterprisesthat improve water quality, expand <strong>the</strong> prospects for commercialfishing, and improve forest management in <strong>the</strong> region.<strong>The</strong> plan focuses on maintaining and improving <strong>the</strong> environmentalquality <strong>of</strong> watersheds in <strong>the</strong> region, recognizing how <strong>the</strong>complex interactions <strong>of</strong> flora, fauna, and human activities affectthat ecosystem. It establishes old growth reserves and protects over6.5 million acres <strong>of</strong> old growth forest (about 80 percent <strong>of</strong> existingold growth). It also establishes 10 "adaptive management areas" forexperimentation into better ways <strong>of</strong> integrating ecological and economicobjectives.Rangeland Reform<strong>The</strong> Federal Government owns extensive rangelands throughout<strong>the</strong> West. While <strong>the</strong>se lands are used primarily for grazing cattleand sheep, increased demand for environmental uses has fueledcontroversy over Federal management. <strong>The</strong> controversy over rangelandreform shows <strong>the</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> integrating pricing with regulationto use <strong>the</strong> Nation's resources more efficiently and strike abetter balance between economic and environmental objectives.182


A central point <strong>of</strong> contention involves <strong>the</strong> fees that <strong>the</strong> FederalGovernment charges ranchers to graze animals on Federal land.<strong>The</strong>se fees should reflect both <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> forage used by anadditional animal and <strong>the</strong> external environmental costs <strong>of</strong> grazingan additional animal (such as <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> reductions in recreationor water quality). Charging ranchers <strong>the</strong> marginal value <strong>of</strong> forage,<strong>the</strong> first component, encourages efficient use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> range. By preventingovergrazing, it protects <strong>the</strong> condition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> range forfuture grazing uses. It also promotes long-run efficiency in <strong>the</strong> livestockindustry: Prices for forage that are too low encourage excessiveinvestment in <strong>the</strong> industry. Forage value varies from tract totract because <strong>of</strong> differences in forage productivity, location, proximityto roads and o<strong>the</strong>r transportation, rainfall, and access to water.But it can still be measured easily and reliably using <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong>private rangelands in nearby locations. <strong>The</strong> second component, <strong>the</strong>external costs <strong>of</strong> grazing, cannot be determined from private markettransactions. But economists have developed ways <strong>of</strong> inferring<strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> open space or o<strong>the</strong>r environmental amenities from <strong>the</strong>costs people willingly incur to use <strong>the</strong>m or from sophisticated surveymethods.Current Federal management policies are relics <strong>of</strong> an earlier erawhen <strong>the</strong> Federal Government used resource subsidies to encouragesettlement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> West. One result is that grazing fees on Federallands average only 17 to 37 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> grazing oncomparable private lands. Moreover, <strong>the</strong> formula used to calculateFederal grazing fees has kept those fees from increasing along withprivate grazing lease rates. Promoting efficiency thus means bothincreasing grazing fees and ensuring that Federal grazing feeschange from year to year in accordance with changes in rent on privategrazing land. <strong>The</strong> Administration's plans for rangeland reformdo both. <strong>The</strong> current proposal calls for phasing in a new fee structurethat more than doubles current fees, and for using an updatingformula that will adjust Federal fees at <strong>the</strong> same rate that privatefees change.Pricing reform must be accompanied by changes in regulation.For example, Federal grazing permits have "use-it-or-lose-it" provisions,under which decreases in <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> animals grazed mayresult in <strong>the</strong> loss <strong>of</strong> a grazing permit or a reduction in <strong>the</strong> number<strong>of</strong> animals that <strong>the</strong> permitholder may graze in <strong>the</strong> future. This policyprevents ranchers from temporarily reducing <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> animalsgrazed to improve range condition. <strong>The</strong> Administration's planallows <strong>the</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> grazing permits to be rewritten to allow ranchersto vary <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> animals <strong>the</strong>y graze in response tochanges in wea<strong>the</strong>r or economic conditions. <strong>The</strong> plan also includesprovisions to streng<strong>the</strong>n environmental management.183


CLIMATE CHANGE ACTION PLANCertain gases emitted into <strong>the</strong> atmosphere by industrial, automotive,and o<strong>the</strong>r combustion have been implicated as a threat to<strong>the</strong> global climate: By preventing reflected solar radiation from escapinginto space, <strong>the</strong>se "greenhouse gases" may be causing a generalizedwarming <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> planet. For this reason, an internationalagreement to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, <strong>the</strong> FrameworkConvention on Climate Change, was signed in 1992. <strong>The</strong> previousAdministration had adopted what was called a "no regrets" policy;it was willing to take steps to reduce emissions only if those actionswould be beneficial for o<strong>the</strong>r reasons—that is, even if greenhousegas emissions were ultimately found unrelated to changes in <strong>the</strong>global climate. In contrast, this Administration sees cost-effectivepolicies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions as appropriate "insurance"against <strong>the</strong> threat <strong>of</strong> climate change. Accordingly, <strong>the</strong> <strong>President</strong>,in his Earth Day speech on April 21, 1993, issued a "clarioncall" for <strong>the</strong> creation <strong>of</strong> a cost-effective plan to reduce U.S. greenhousegas emissions to 1990 levels by <strong>the</strong> year 2000.<strong>The</strong> <strong>President</strong>'s call resulted 6 months later in <strong>the</strong> ClimateChange Action Plan, containing nearly 50 initiatives that cover reductionsin all significant greenhouse gases and will affect mostsectors <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> economy. <strong>The</strong> plan was based on <strong>the</strong> understandingthat <strong>the</strong> climate change threat results from all greenhouse gases,that it depends on net emissions (after accounting for greenhousegas "sinks" such as forests and oceans), and that <strong>the</strong> problem isglobal. <strong>The</strong> strategies adopted to address <strong>the</strong> externalities associatedwith greenhouse gas emissions were chosen on <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> aqualitative assessment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cost-effectiveness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> alternatives,in part by selecting policies that make markets work better.Some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> strategies expand upon initiatives <strong>of</strong> this and previousAdministrations to promote energy-saving technology. For example,<strong>the</strong> Green Lights program improves <strong>the</strong> diffusion <strong>of</strong> technologyby providing consumers and firms with information aboutenvironmentally friendly products such as energy-saving lights thatpromise to reduce electricity generation and <strong>the</strong> resulting emissions.O<strong>the</strong>r strategies reduce emissions by making governmentmore efficient. Two examples are (1) reform <strong>of</strong> regulations thatblock <strong>the</strong> seasonal use <strong>of</strong> natural gas (a low-polluting alternativeto coal) by electric utilities, and (2) removal <strong>of</strong> regulatory impedimentsto private investments in upgrading Federal hydroelectricfacilities.Parking CashoutGreenhouse gas emissions will also be reduced by improving <strong>the</strong>pricing <strong>of</strong> activities that generate externalities. <strong>The</strong> parkingcashout policy attempts to correct a distortion in private incentivesresulting from <strong>the</strong> tax treatment <strong>of</strong> employer-provided parking.184


Currently, <strong>the</strong> Internal Revenue Code allows employers to deductany costs for employer-provided parking as a business expense, andlets workers exclude <strong>the</strong> benefits from <strong>the</strong>ir taxable income (up to$155 a month). As a result, 95 percent <strong>of</strong> automobile commuters receivefree or subsidized parking, more than half <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m in centralbusiness districts. All told, U.S. companies claim $52 billion peryear in parking-related deductions from this free or subsidizedservice.<strong>The</strong> Climate Change Action Plan proposes that Federal tax lawsbe modified to require that firms <strong>of</strong>fer employees <strong>the</strong> option <strong>of</strong> taking<strong>the</strong> cash value <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir employer-provided parking benefit astaxable income ra<strong>the</strong>r than accepting <strong>the</strong>ir free parking space. <strong>The</strong>program would apply initially only to those firms with more than25 employees that make monthly cash payments for <strong>the</strong>ir employeesto park in lots owned by third parties. Thus, only about 15 percent<strong>of</strong> employer-provided parking would be covered at first, although<strong>the</strong> program would expand later as new parking leases arenegotiated.This policy change should reduce <strong>the</strong> overuse <strong>of</strong> automobiles forcommuting resulting from <strong>the</strong> current parking subsidy, by makingcommuters face more <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> social costs <strong>of</strong> driving. As consumersshift to carpools and public transportation, greenhouse gas emissions,o<strong>the</strong>r pollutants, and traffic congestion should all be reduced.O<strong>the</strong>r distortions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> choice between commuting by car and bypublic transit will remain uncorrected, however, to <strong>the</strong> extent thatcurrent regulation <strong>of</strong> automobile emissions does not fully capture<strong>the</strong>ir environmental, congestion, and health costs.International Strategies for Greenhouse Gas ReductionsOne hundred and sixty-one countries signed <strong>the</strong> Framework Conventionon Climate Change in 1992, agreeing that it is necessaryto stabilize greenhouse gas concentrations at a level that will prevent"dangerous anthropogenic interference with <strong>the</strong> climate system."Because this is a global problem, <strong>the</strong> Climate Change ActionPlan addressed what is termed "joint implementation"—<strong>the</strong> cooperativeeffort between countries or entities within <strong>the</strong>m to reducegreenhouse gas emissions. <strong>The</strong> plan recognizes that <strong>the</strong>re may beenormous cost savings to meeting global goals for greenhouse gasreductions if acceptable international strategies can be developed toreduce emissions where it is cheapest to do so, ra<strong>the</strong>r than haveeach country pursue its emissions reduction goals on its own. Someimportant questions need resolution, however, such as how reductionsare to be identified, monitored, and enforced. To begin testing<strong>the</strong> joint implementation concept, <strong>the</strong> plan creates a pilot programthat evaluates investments by U.S. firms and government assistanceto foreign countries for new greenhouse gas emission reductions;measures, tracks, and scores <strong>the</strong>se reductions; and, in gen-185


eral, lays a foundation for broader, more formal policy initiativesin <strong>the</strong> future.SUPERFUND REAUTHORIZATION: THEADMINISTRATION POSITION<strong>The</strong> Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation,and Liability Act, better known as Superfund, was enacted in 1980and amended in 1986 in response to widespread concerns that improperlydisposed-<strong>of</strong> wastes threatened human health and valuablenatural resources, such as groundwater aquifers. <strong>The</strong> act has beenunsatisfactory in addressing this problem. Fewer than 20 percent<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1,300 disposal sites on <strong>the</strong> priority list drawn up by <strong>the</strong> EnvironmentalProtection Agency (EPA) have been fully "cleaned up,"although 3,500 separate actions have been taken to remove wastesposing an immediate threat to health.At <strong>the</strong> same time, <strong>the</strong> costs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> program have been substantial,running almost $7 billion per year. This figure includes directdraws on <strong>the</strong> Superfund trust fund collected from <strong>the</strong> oil and chemicalindustries to pay for EPA expenses (including $1.6 billion inspending on cleanups where no private parties can be assigned responsibility),$3.2 billion in spending by Federal agencies that ownor contributed to hazardous waste sites, and $2 billion in spendingby private parties, much <strong>of</strong> which goes to lawyers' fees and o<strong>the</strong>rtransactions costs in an effort to escape or reduce liability. Someestimates put <strong>the</strong> total cost <strong>of</strong> cleaning up <strong>the</strong> 3,000 sites projectedto be on <strong>the</strong> EPA's National Priority List (NPL) over <strong>the</strong> next 30to 40 years at $130 billion to $150 billion, with $200 billion to $300billion more needed for Federal facility cleanups.In response to <strong>the</strong> poor cost-effectiveness and slow pace <strong>of</strong> thisprogram, <strong>the</strong> Administration has proposed several significant reforms.<strong>The</strong> two most important involve <strong>the</strong> standards and processesgoverning <strong>the</strong> cleanup strategy chosen at a site, and <strong>the</strong> process forassigning and financing liability.Remedy SelectionUnder <strong>the</strong> current law, remedial measures at Superfund sites arechosen with a preference for treatment and permanent cleanup <strong>of</strong>soil and water. <strong>The</strong>y are also selected to meet high standards <strong>of</strong>cleanliness: land generally must become suitable for residentialuse, and water <strong>of</strong>ten must achieve drinking quality. Costs have littleweight in remedy selection; <strong>the</strong>y come into play only to identify<strong>the</strong> cheapest <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> set <strong>of</strong> remedies meeting o<strong>the</strong>r criteria.<strong>The</strong> Administration's position establishes more-reasonable goalsand processes for cleanup decisions. It sets uniform national goalsfor health and environmental protection to guide remedy selection.It substitutes a concern for long-term reliability as a factor to considerin remedy selection, in place <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> preference for treatment186


and permanence (except for treatment <strong>of</strong> "hot spots"). It explicitlyrecognizes containment as a legitimate cleanup strategy. It limits<strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> State and Federal standards designed for o<strong>the</strong>r pollutioncontexts. Finally, it introduces greater flexibility and communityinput into <strong>the</strong> determination <strong>of</strong> appropriate land use for <strong>the</strong> site,permitting some sites to be designated for industrial use, with appropriatelylower levels <strong>of</strong> cleanup required.<strong>The</strong> Administration's proposal also <strong>of</strong>fers a streamlined approachto remedy selection at individual sites. With EPA approval, partieswill be able to avail <strong>the</strong>mselves <strong>of</strong> a set <strong>of</strong> cost-effective "generic"remedies established by <strong>the</strong> EPA that apply to certain frequentlyencountered types <strong>of</strong> waste disposal problems. Alternatively, <strong>the</strong>ycan formulate designs that meet national cleanup levels that arebased on realistic assumptions and practices concerning risks. If<strong>the</strong> party liable for cleanup believes it can devise an even cheaperremedy that can meet <strong>the</strong> national health standards, it can performa site-specific risk analysis to make its case to EPA. This optionallows parties to propose remedies based on <strong>the</strong> ultimate goal<strong>of</strong> protecting health and <strong>the</strong> environment, ra<strong>the</strong>r than on <strong>the</strong> "intermediate"targets <strong>of</strong> reductions in soil or water concentrations,and helps tailor remedies chosen for a site to its particular features.Most important, a factor in <strong>the</strong> remedy selection process at individualsites will be a comparison <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reasonableness <strong>of</strong> costsagainst several measures <strong>of</strong> effectiveness. This approach introducesdiscipline, transparency, and recognition <strong>of</strong> trade<strong>of</strong>fs into <strong>the</strong> remedyselection process, while retaining consideration <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r factorssuch as community acceptance and meeting <strong>the</strong> primary criterion<strong>of</strong> protecting health and <strong>the</strong> environment. Cost will also be consideredin decisions on whe<strong>the</strong>r to defer final cleanups for cases wherea new technology is on <strong>the</strong> horizon to replace a current one thathas disproportionately high costs.<strong>The</strong> Liability System<strong>The</strong> transactions costs associated with cleanups, especially litigationexpenses, have been massive under current law. One studyfound that <strong>the</strong>se costs account for 19 to 27 percent <strong>of</strong> all Superfundcosts. Transaction costs are substantial in part because liabilityunder current law is strict, joint and several, and retroactive: Aparty that contributed waste to a site used by o<strong>the</strong>rs can be heldliable for <strong>the</strong> entire cost <strong>of</strong> cleanup, and a party is liable for <strong>the</strong>results <strong>of</strong> its dumping even if its action was legal at <strong>the</strong> time. Asa result, potentially responsible parties (PRPs) have strong incentivesto contest <strong>the</strong>ir liability (resulting in high enforcement coststo-<strong>the</strong> EPA), to sue o<strong>the</strong>r PRPs to recover costs, and to sue <strong>the</strong>irinsurance companies when <strong>the</strong> latter refuse to pay related claims.187


<strong>The</strong> Administration's proposal seeks to limit <strong>the</strong>se transactionscosts by streamlining <strong>the</strong> liability allocation process and making itmore fair. <strong>The</strong> new allocation process is based upon nonbinding arbitration,in which PRPs are assigned a share <strong>of</strong> liability based onfactors such as <strong>the</strong> volume and toxicity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir wastes. PRPs whosettle for <strong>the</strong>ir assigned shares would surrender <strong>the</strong>ir rights to pursueo<strong>the</strong>r PRPs for contribution, be protected from suits by o<strong>the</strong>rPRPs, and be <strong>of</strong>fered, for a fee, protection from future liability arisingfrom remedy failure or undiscovered harms. As an added incentiveto settle, <strong>the</strong> EPA would pay settling parties for <strong>the</strong>ir share<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> "orphan shares"—<strong>the</strong> share <strong>of</strong> liability attributed to an identifiedbut insolvent party—but nonsettling parties could still beheld liable for all or part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> "orphan share."<strong>The</strong> Administration proposal also addresses <strong>the</strong> growing problem<strong>of</strong> Superfund-related insurance litigation. <strong>The</strong> problem arises becauseinsurance contracts written before Superfund was enacteddid not expressly allocate Superfund liabilities. Subsequently,courts in some States have interpreted those contracts to requireinsurance companies to assume most Superfund liabilities, butcourts in some o<strong>the</strong>r States have held <strong>the</strong> opposite. <strong>The</strong> scope <strong>of</strong>insurers' liability in most States is undecided. Building on a proposaloriginally suggested by <strong>the</strong> insurance industry, <strong>the</strong> Administrationproposal calls for creation <strong>of</strong> an Environmental InsuranceResolution Fund financed through fees and assessments on propertyand casualty insurers. If <strong>the</strong> PRPs can show sufficient insurancecoverage before 1986, <strong>the</strong> fund would be used to settle <strong>the</strong>irinsurance claims for cleanup and restoration costs at pre-1986 NPLsites, as well as some costs at non-NPL sites, at rates determinedsimultaneously for all <strong>of</strong> a PRP's sites. <strong>The</strong> combination <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> allocationprocess and <strong>the</strong> insurance settlement process should substantiallyreduce transactions costs and increase fairness.SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND GREENACCOUNTINGAccording to <strong>the</strong> 1987 report <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> World Commission on Environmentand Development, sustainable development is that which"meets <strong>the</strong> needs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> present without compromising <strong>the</strong> ability<strong>of</strong> future generations to meet <strong>the</strong>ir own needs." In short, futuregenerations must be able to attain a quality <strong>of</strong> life, in both economicand environmental terms, equal to ours if <strong>the</strong>y desire. Tomake this possible, <strong>the</strong> present generation must leave <strong>the</strong> futurewith <strong>the</strong> wherewithal—<strong>the</strong> "social capital," consisting <strong>of</strong> human,natural, and physical (manmade) capital—to create our kind <strong>of</strong> lifeor a life <strong>of</strong> at least equal quality to ours. Although this definitionis widely accepted, its interpretation remains subject to debate.One controversy concerns <strong>the</strong> extent to which <strong>the</strong> three types <strong>of</strong>188


capital can substitute for one ano<strong>the</strong>r, given <strong>the</strong> underlying scientificprinciples and economic behavior, while keeping <strong>the</strong> resultingdevelopment sustainable.However this controversy is resolved, it will be necessary tomeasure social capital and <strong>the</strong> value its use brings in order to understandwhe<strong>the</strong>r a growth path for <strong>the</strong> economy is sustainable.This is <strong>the</strong> province <strong>of</strong> "green accounting," an idea first raised in1969. Much <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> recent research effort to augment <strong>the</strong> nationalincome and product accounts to incorporate previously unmeasuredaspects <strong>of</strong> social welfare focuses on identifying <strong>the</strong> net change in<strong>the</strong> stock <strong>of</strong> social capital resulting from environmentalexternalities. This research effort seeks to identify <strong>the</strong> loss (depreciation)<strong>of</strong> social capital caused by pollution, <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reduction<strong>of</strong> finite resources (such as fossil fuels and minerals), <strong>the</strong> lossfrom overharvesting <strong>of</strong> renewable resources (such as forests andfisheries), and <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> environmental services (e.g., cleanair) derived from investments in pollution control equipment.<strong>The</strong> <strong>President</strong> has made it a priority <strong>of</strong> his Administration toaugment <strong>the</strong> national accounts to incorporate <strong>the</strong>se aspects <strong>of</strong> socialcapital. In his 1993 Earth Day speech <strong>the</strong> <strong>President</strong> directedthat "green" gross domestic product (GDP) measures be developedto improve existing national income and wealth accounts that ignore<strong>the</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> pollution or <strong>the</strong> loss <strong>of</strong> natural resources. In <strong>the</strong>first phase <strong>of</strong> fulfilling this mandate, <strong>the</strong> Commerce Department'sBureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Analysis will publish modified GDP accountsin <strong>1994</strong> to reflect <strong>the</strong> depletion <strong>of</strong> selected natural resources andwill continue to explore measures that incorporate additional environmentalvalues. This effort will be aided by <strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong>Interior's forthcoming National Biological Survey, an effort to inventory<strong>the</strong> biological and ecological resources <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Nation.PROMOTING TECHNOLOGYTechnological progress fuels economic growth. It creates new industriesand reinvigorates old ones. It can enable small businessesto do high-quality design and manufacturing work that previouslyrequired <strong>the</strong> resources <strong>of</strong> big business. It can help big businessesachieve <strong>the</strong> speed, flexibility, and closeness to customers that oncewere a defining characteristic <strong>of</strong> small business. Technology helpsto make our work force more productive and, in doing so, improves<strong>the</strong> Nation's standard <strong>of</strong> living. Every recent generation has seenits dreams turn into technological marvels, new products from newindustries that have transformed <strong>the</strong> way we live and work: from<strong>the</strong> telephone, radio, airplanes, and x-rays, to television, xerography,computers, and magnetic resonance imaging equipment. Ad-151-444 0 - 9 4 - 7189


vances in technical know-how have accounted for at least one-quarter<strong>of</strong> our Nation's economic growth over <strong>the</strong> past half-century.During <strong>the</strong> past two decades, powerful trends have altered <strong>the</strong>environment for <strong>American</strong> technology development. Commercialtechnology has become increasingly science-based and interdisciplinary.International competition has intensified as o<strong>the</strong>r nationshave advanced in wealth and technological sophistication. <strong>The</strong> Nation'sdefense capability has become increasingly dependent ontechnologies developed and applied first in commercial markets. Amicroelectronics-based revolution in production has transformed<strong>the</strong> organization <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fice and factory work, increasing <strong>the</strong> need fora well-trained and flexible work force.By <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1980s, many analysts believed that <strong>the</strong>setrends required a reexamination <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> existing approaches <strong>of</strong> governmentand industry for supporting technology development anddiffusion. Accordingly, in its first year <strong>the</strong> Administration has supportedtax incentives for investments in research and development(R&D) and new businesses, liberalized export controls, shifted Federalresources toward basic research and civilian technology, investedin worker skills, and promoted defense conversion. In addition,<strong>the</strong> Administration's technology initiatives, such as <strong>the</strong> promotion<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> National Information Infrastructure discussed above,<strong>the</strong> Partnership for a New Generation <strong>of</strong> Vehicles, and <strong>the</strong> creation<strong>of</strong> a Manufacturing Extension Partnership, rely on an alliance <strong>of</strong>government and industry. <strong>The</strong>y also require rigorous attention to<strong>the</strong> economic rationales for cooperative efforts and <strong>the</strong>n to <strong>the</strong> details<strong>of</strong> project design and assessment, to ensure that market failuresare corrected, not made worse, by government action.PRINCIPLES OF TECHNOLOGY POLICY<strong>The</strong> Administration's technology initiatives aim to promote <strong>the</strong>domestic development and diffusion <strong>of</strong> growth- and productivityenhancingtechnologies. <strong>The</strong>y seek to correct market failures thatwould o<strong>the</strong>rwise generate too little investment in R&D, with programsthat avoid "government failure."<strong>The</strong> <strong>Economic</strong>s <strong>of</strong> AppropriabilityNew technologies <strong>of</strong>ten fail to attract sufficient private sector investmentbecause <strong>the</strong>ir technical risk is high or because <strong>of</strong> limitedappropriability—that is, <strong>the</strong> new technologies create economic andsocial benefits beyond what <strong>the</strong> investing firms can capture for<strong>the</strong>mselves. Indeed, despite intellectual property protection, <strong>the</strong> socialreturns to innovation have been estimated to exceed <strong>the</strong> privatereturns by between 35 and 60 percent.<strong>The</strong> most important innovations generate spillover benefits forinterconnected sectors, creating economic gains well beyond anythat eventually accrue to <strong>the</strong>ir inventors. <strong>The</strong>se innovations include190


isky "pathbreaking" technologies that pay <strong>of</strong>f in <strong>the</strong> creation <strong>of</strong>new industries (or <strong>the</strong> transformation <strong>of</strong> existing industries), andlower risk "infratechnologies" that can enhance <strong>the</strong> productive performance<strong>of</strong> a broad spectrum <strong>of</strong> firms and industries but that receivelow levels <strong>of</strong> investment because <strong>of</strong> barriers to appropriabilityand implementation. For example, <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> refrigeratedsteamships at <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> nineteenth century increased <strong>the</strong>availability <strong>of</strong> perishable agricultural products throughout <strong>the</strong>world. Most <strong>of</strong> this benefit ultimately accrued to farmers and consumersra<strong>the</strong>r than to <strong>the</strong> inventors <strong>of</strong> refrigerated steamships.Similarly, <strong>the</strong> principle <strong>of</strong> interchangeable parts in manufacturing,originally developed for <strong>the</strong> production <strong>of</strong> firearms, soon was adoptedfor use in <strong>the</strong> fabrication <strong>of</strong> clocks, hardware, sewing machines,and o<strong>the</strong>r manufactured products.<strong>The</strong> appropriability problem is not limited to basic research, butfrequently extends to so-called precommercial technology developmentand eventual commercial applications. Indeed, technologicalprogress is full <strong>of</strong> feedbacks where developments downstream alter<strong>the</strong> course <strong>of</strong> behavior upstream, as well as <strong>the</strong> degree <strong>of</strong> ultimatemarket success. A sharp distinction between basic research andprecommercial development activities is difficult to draw. Investmentsthat are necessary to <strong>the</strong> utilization and adoption <strong>of</strong> researchresults—investments in information ga<strong>the</strong>ring, work forcetraining, or <strong>the</strong> integration <strong>of</strong> new production equipment into automatedsystems—can also create spillover benefits that <strong>the</strong> investingfirm cannot perfectly appropriate. In addition, new manufacturingprocesses that lower cost or improve quality may not be patentable,and new ideas embodied in computer s<strong>of</strong>tware can <strong>of</strong>ten beimitated rapidly without violating <strong>the</strong> originators intellectual propertyrights. In all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se cases, public actions can <strong>of</strong>fset <strong>the</strong> effects<strong>of</strong> underinvestment by <strong>the</strong> private sector that is caused by limitationson appropriability.Avoiding "Government Failure"<strong>The</strong> goal <strong>of</strong> technology policy is not to substitute <strong>the</strong> government'sjudgment for that <strong>of</strong> private industry in deciding which potential"winners" to back. Ra<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong> point is to correct a genuineand significant market failure—underinvestment in basic researchand in precommercial R&D resulting from <strong>the</strong> divergence betweenprivate and social returns to those activities. A complementary goalis to design <strong>the</strong> technology investments that <strong>the</strong> government itselfmakes in public goods—national security, public health, education,a clean environment, an efficient transportation system—in waysthat maximize <strong>the</strong> potential external benefits for <strong>the</strong> Nation's commercialtechnology base. In both cases, technology policy enhances<strong>the</strong> Nation's economic and social welfare.191


Investments in R&D are risky. Like all risky investments, publicor private, government-supported explorations sometimes drill dryholes—such as <strong>the</strong> efforts during <strong>the</strong> 1960s and 1970s to developsyn<strong>the</strong>tic fuels, a supersonic transport, and a fast breeder reactor.Yet even research that never delivers an enormous economic pay<strong>of</strong>ffor itself <strong>of</strong>ten contributes useful technical knowledge and lessonsfor <strong>the</strong> future. And when <strong>the</strong> drilling strikes oil, as with governmentsupport <strong>of</strong> R&D for computers and integrated circuits, jet enginesand airframes, and biotechnology and medical equipment, <strong>the</strong>initial gusher can generate an entire field <strong>of</strong> newly productive,wealth-enhancing, job-creating economic activity. For this reason,<strong>the</strong> success <strong>of</strong> government R&D policy must be measured by <strong>the</strong>rate <strong>of</strong> return on <strong>the</strong> entire portfolio <strong>of</strong> R&D investments supportedby <strong>the</strong> public.We can learn from both <strong>the</strong> gushers and <strong>the</strong> dry holes about howto design programs to promote investments in basic andprecommercial R&D to maximize <strong>the</strong>ir prospects for success. FederalR&D investment programs leading to successful commercialproducts tend to share certain design features: <strong>The</strong>y are insulatedfrom <strong>the</strong> demands <strong>of</strong> distributional politics; <strong>the</strong>y subject potentialprojects to rigorous technical and economic evaluation; and <strong>the</strong>yrecognize that product specifications must be developed with an eyetoward manufacturability and a balance between product performanceand cost that will be acceptable to commercial customers. Accordingly,<strong>the</strong> Administration's efforts to promote innovative technologycontain design features that are meant to limit <strong>the</strong> possibility<strong>of</strong> "government failure" in <strong>the</strong> implementation <strong>of</strong> technology policy:• To ensure that R&D funded by <strong>the</strong> government in cooperativeventures with <strong>the</strong> private sector has direct market applications,participating firms must bear a significant share <strong>of</strong> programcosts. In most cases, <strong>the</strong> Administration's technologypartnerships require that private firms cover at least 50 percent<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> costs.• To ensure that both <strong>the</strong> timing and <strong>the</strong> content <strong>of</strong> governmentinvestments in technology-based infrastructure impart maximumleverage on industry's competitive efforts, researchframeworks for collaborative R&D should be initiated and designedby private industry and should be closely coordinatedwith industry investment patterns.• To insulate publicly supported R&D efforts from political pressuresexerted on behalf <strong>of</strong> special interests, evaluations <strong>of</strong> competingR&D proposals should be conducted by independent expertsin <strong>the</strong> relevant scientific, technological, and economicfields. Political considerations should not be allowed to influ-192


ence a project's technical objectives, <strong>the</strong> location <strong>of</strong> R&D facilities,or <strong>the</strong> way that management <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> project is structured.• Investments in a broad array <strong>of</strong> technical fields, including materialssciences, manufacturing product and process technologies,biotechnology and biomedical sciences, and telecommunicationsand computer-related technologies, shouldcompete for a finite flow <strong>of</strong> funds. This competition will helpto ensure that expanded Federal support for precommercialR&D does not get captured by <strong>the</strong> champions <strong>of</strong> any particulartechnology or by any particular set <strong>of</strong> firms.• Government investments in basic and precommercial R&Dshould be reviewed while in progress to determine whe<strong>the</strong>rfunding should continue. Such reviews are difficult because <strong>the</strong>success <strong>of</strong> an R&D project is <strong>of</strong>ten not apparent for manyyears, but rigorous assessments can never<strong>the</strong>less be made byindependent expert panels at regular intervals.A New ApproachAn enduring <strong>American</strong> approach to promoting technology developmentand diffusion evolved just after <strong>the</strong> Second World War. <strong>The</strong>United States channeled public investment into basic research atuniversities and government laboratories, <strong>the</strong>n supported <strong>the</strong> initialapplication <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> results in products and production processesprocured by public agencies. New technologies first developed for(and procured by) <strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Defense, <strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong>Energy, or <strong>the</strong> National Aeronautics and Space Administration(NASA), or supported by <strong>the</strong> National Science Foundation or <strong>the</strong>National Institutes <strong>of</strong> Health (NIH), would <strong>the</strong>n diffuse, or "spin<strong>of</strong>f," into commercial use. In this manner, <strong>the</strong> Federal Governmentsupported <strong>the</strong> development and diffusion <strong>of</strong> jet aircraft and engines,semiconductor microelectronics, computers and computercontrolledmachine tools, Pharmaceuticals and biotechnology, advancedenergy and environmental technologies, advanced materials,and a whole host <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r commercially successful technologies.This system worked well as long as military systems represented<strong>the</strong> leading-edge applications <strong>of</strong> new industrial technologies and aslong as foreign competitors, with direct support from <strong>the</strong>ir own governments,did not pose a significant competitive challenge. In manyareas <strong>of</strong> basic research supported outside <strong>the</strong> defense establishment,including biomedical research and <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> pharmaceuticals,biotechnology, and medical diagnostic devices, <strong>the</strong> systemcontinues to work well. But <strong>the</strong> circumstances that allowed <strong>the</strong>United States to rely primarily on a defense-led model havechanged. With <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cold war, demand for new defensesystems is now less than it was. Commercial product spin<strong>of</strong>fs frommilitary research have also diminished from <strong>the</strong>ir heyday <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>193


1950s and 1960s, and <strong>American</strong> companies face intense internationalcompetition from increasingly capable foreign firms. On<strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, <strong>the</strong>se changes also create exciting new opportunities:Innovative defense technologies are now more likely to emergefirst in commercial products and production techniques, and <strong>American</strong>companies are taking advantage <strong>of</strong> expanded opportunities inforeign markets. Accordingly, <strong>the</strong> Administration's technology initiativesare shifting <strong>the</strong> composition <strong>of</strong> Federal R&D from militaryto civilian concerns, and <strong>the</strong> composition <strong>of</strong> military R&D toward<strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> so-called dual-use technologies—those with applicationsto both military and commercial products.THE ADMINISTRATION'S TECHNOLOGY INITIATIVES<strong>The</strong> Administration's investments in growth- and productivityenhancingtechnologies encompass a wide range <strong>of</strong> physical andhuman resource priorities. <strong>The</strong>y finance basic research and leverageprivate funds for technology development and commercialization.<strong>The</strong>y promote <strong>the</strong> diffusion and adoption <strong>of</strong> advanced manufacturingtechnologies by U.S. industry. <strong>The</strong>y facilitate defenseconversion by easing defense suppliers into civilian markets, focusingmilitary R&D on dual-use technologies, and freeing <strong>the</strong> Pentagonto purchase commercial products and processes. <strong>The</strong>y seek topromote <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> a national telecommunications infrastructurefor <strong>the</strong> information age. Finally, <strong>the</strong>y create partnershipswith industry and academia to ensure that <strong>the</strong> government's investmentsto solve pressing problems in energy, transportation,and <strong>the</strong> environment simultaneously work to promote <strong>the</strong> Nation'seconomy and overall standard <strong>of</strong> living.Basic Research<strong>The</strong> Administration worked with <strong>the</strong> Congress to increase budgetauthority for basic research in all categories to $13.8 billion in fiscalyear <strong>1994</strong>. This includes a 7.2-percent increase in <strong>the</strong> NationalScience Foundation's budget to a total <strong>of</strong> $1.9 billion. <strong>The</strong> NationalScience Foundation will continue to provide strong support for fundamentalresearch critical to manufacturing, advanced materials,environmental technologies, and biotechnology. It has also doubledits support for modernizing academic research facilities and instrumentation.In addition, basic space science research is continuingat NASA, representing an investment <strong>of</strong> $1.9 billion in fiscal <strong>1994</strong>.<strong>The</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Defense has been appropriated $1.2 billion forbasic research in fiscal <strong>1994</strong>; <strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Energy will supportan additional $1.7 billion in basic research, in areas includingmaterials science, chemical science, engineering and geoscience,high-energy nuclear physics, and nuclear fusion. Finally, <strong>the</strong> Administrationcontinues to support basic research conducted through<strong>the</strong> National Institutes <strong>of</strong> Health, which account for over 40 per-194


cent <strong>of</strong> federally sponsored basic research. NIH is projected tospend nearly $6 billion for basic research in fiscal <strong>1994</strong>, exceedinglast year's level by almost $300 million (or 5 percent).Technology Development and CommercializationThrough <strong>the</strong> Commerce Department's Advanced Technology Programand through <strong>the</strong> hundreds <strong>of</strong> cooperative research and developmentagreements that have been signed between private firmsand researchers at many <strong>of</strong> America's 726 Federal laboratories, <strong>the</strong>government is investing in industrial projects to develop and topromote commercialization <strong>of</strong> technologies with high pay<strong>of</strong>f potential.<strong>The</strong> Nation's antitrust laws have also been clarified to avoiddiscouraging beneficial private research collaborations.<strong>The</strong> Advanced Technology Program (ATP). <strong>The</strong> ATP is administeredby <strong>the</strong> Commerce Department's National Institute <strong>of</strong> Standardsand Technology (NIST). In four competitions completed over<strong>the</strong> past 4 years, <strong>the</strong> ATP has made 89 awards to 66 companiesand 23 joint ventures. <strong>The</strong> projects receiving awards have includedventures to develop a way to control personal computer programsthrough "natural language" instructions; a pen-based characterrecognitionsystem for <strong>the</strong> Chinese language, with <strong>the</strong> goal <strong>of</strong> enhancings<strong>of</strong>tware exports to Chinese-speaking companies; and atechnology for preserving patients' bone marrow during chemo<strong>the</strong>rapy.<strong>The</strong> ATP is designed to avoid government failure. Governmentacts as <strong>the</strong> catalyst, but <strong>the</strong> ATP relies on industry to define andcarry out its R&D projects. Independent expert panels selectprojects through rigorous competitions based on both technical andbusiness merit. <strong>The</strong> ATP provides technology development fundsunder cooperative research agreements. It requires single-companyapplicants to pay <strong>the</strong>ir own indirect costs, and joint ventures toprovide matching funds. In general, award recipients may patentinventions or copyright s<strong>of</strong>tware developed under an ATP award,but <strong>the</strong> government retains a nonexclusive license.<strong>The</strong> total <strong>of</strong> ATP awards plus private sector funds over <strong>the</strong> life<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> first 89 awards amounts to over $500 million. <strong>The</strong> Administrationhas proposed to increase <strong>the</strong> ATP budget from $68 millionin 1993 to $750 million in 1997, and $200 million has been appropriatedfor <strong>the</strong> program in <strong>1994</strong>. In addition to announcing about100 new awards to industry in fiscal <strong>1994</strong>, <strong>the</strong> ATP will embarkon a set <strong>of</strong> "strategic" program competitions. <strong>The</strong>se competitionswill focus on particular technology areas recommended by industryas having especially significant potential to generate large economicand social pay<strong>of</strong>fs.Cooperative Research at Government Laboratories. <strong>The</strong> Nation's726 Federal laboratories, especially <strong>the</strong> three large, multiprogramnuclear weapons laboratories (Los Alamos and Sandia in New Mex-195


ico and Lawrence Livermore in California), <strong>of</strong>fer a repository <strong>of</strong>vast technical expertise that can be leveraged to enhance <strong>the</strong> competitiveperformance <strong>of</strong> <strong>American</strong> industry. As part <strong>of</strong> its plan toalter <strong>the</strong> balance between military and civilian objectives in <strong>the</strong>Federal R&D budget, <strong>the</strong> Administration has authorized <strong>the</strong> weaponslabs to redirect at least 10 to 20 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir defense programbudgets to commercial technology-transfer activities with industry.<strong>The</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Energy's 31 laboratories, which employover 23,000 scientists and engineers and perform $6 billion in civilianand military research annually, already have in place over 650cooperative research and development agreements (CRADAs) withprivate firms, totaling $1.4 billion in combined public and privatefunds. CRADAs are also used to structure public-private partnershipsinvolving laboratories at NIST and <strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Defense.A similar program is in place at NASA.Using CRADAs, Federal laboratories have already begun orstreng<strong>the</strong>ned jointly financed collaborations with companies and industryconsortia in a number <strong>of</strong> research and productionprototyping projects. <strong>The</strong>se have covered semiconductor productionequipment, flat panel display technology, new technologies for textilemanufacturing, <strong>the</strong> investigation <strong>of</strong> new polymer blends,biosensors, new aerospace alloys, and microscopic-sized machinesknown as microelectromechanical systems. <strong>The</strong>se partnerships maybegin a longer term process <strong>of</strong> redirecting <strong>the</strong> defense-oriented labs'missions toward civilian needs—ranging from <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong>energy-efficient and environmentally sustainable industries to <strong>the</strong>invention <strong>of</strong> new medical, manufacturing, and transportation technologies—whileutilizing <strong>the</strong> labs' expertise in such fields as highperformancecomputing, communications, and new materials.Collaboration in Research and Development. Competition promotesR&D, but collaboration can also promote both research and<strong>the</strong> effective commercialization <strong>of</strong> research results. When firmshave complementary skills or information, an R&D joint ventureamong <strong>the</strong>m may speed <strong>the</strong> development and commercial adoption<strong>of</strong> a new technology. And when firms have similar skills or information,an R&D joint venture may avoid costly duplication <strong>of</strong> effort.Yet allowing collaboration in R&D risks facilitating undesirablecooperation in <strong>the</strong> firms' o<strong>the</strong>r activities. For example, it maymake it easier to engage in price fixing or o<strong>the</strong>r anticompetitivepractices in <strong>the</strong> sale <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> products manufactured by <strong>the</strong> firms collaboratingon research. This risk is small if collaboration is limitedto early-phase R&D, however.<strong>The</strong> Congress balanced <strong>the</strong>se concerns in 1984 when it passedlegislation guaranteeing that collaborative research would violate<strong>the</strong> antitrust laws only if <strong>the</strong> collaboration were found unreasonable.That legislation also provided that research joint ventures196


could register with <strong>the</strong> government and <strong>the</strong>reby limit <strong>the</strong>ir antitrustexposure to actual damages, ra<strong>the</strong>r than face <strong>the</strong> usual trebledamage penalty for antitrust violations. Legislation enacted in1993 extends <strong>the</strong>se protections to production joint ventures, <strong>the</strong>rebyremoving a barrier to collaborative efforts to implement newmanufacturing techniques and production processes. Because <strong>the</strong>seaspects <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> production process can be understood as researchinto product commercialization, this extension serves a purposesimilar to that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1984 legislation.Development and Diffusion <strong>of</strong> Advanced ManufacturingTechnologyAnecdotal examples abound <strong>of</strong> technologies developed in <strong>the</strong>United States, such as numerically controlled machine tools, thatwere commercially exploited first or more successfully abroad.<strong>The</strong>se anecdotes point to market failures o<strong>the</strong>r than imperfectappropriability that also contribute to insufficient adoption and utilization<strong>of</strong> research results. For example, firms may face unnecessarilyhigh transactions costs for obtaining information, and firmswith good ideas but limited sources <strong>of</strong> collateral or internal financemay find <strong>the</strong>mselves unable to raise funds in <strong>the</strong> capital markets.<strong>The</strong> effort to commercialize a new technology <strong>of</strong>ten presentsfirms with an array <strong>of</strong> organizational challenges: New manufacturingprocesses and distribution channels must be developed, workersmust be retrained, and new suppliers and perhaps even new customersmust be identified. In meeting <strong>the</strong>se challenges, firms developa great deal <strong>of</strong> valuable information—from manufacturingknow-how to marketing insights—some <strong>of</strong> which cannot be protectedas intellectual property or trade secrets.On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, firms sometimes have difficulty gaining accessto o<strong>the</strong>r types <strong>of</strong> technological know-how developed insideo<strong>the</strong>r companies and <strong>the</strong> ways different firms have met implementationchallenges. Adoption <strong>of</strong> advanced manufacturing technologyis typically a "systems" problem. Suppliers must be able to sellcomponents that fit into complex automated production systems.Buyers must be assured <strong>of</strong> compatibility among machines, robots,transfer lines, and <strong>the</strong> like, or <strong>the</strong>y will not adopt <strong>the</strong> technology.To help remedy <strong>the</strong>se market failures, and so promote morerapid and extensive commercialization and diffusion <strong>of</strong> importantnew technologies, <strong>the</strong> Administration is expanding NIST's ManufacturingExtension Partnership (MEP) program. ManufacturingTechnology Centers (MTCs) form <strong>the</strong> backbone <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> program.MTCs <strong>of</strong>fer impartial advice to small and medium-sized manufacturersfrom people with extensive industrial experience. This adviceis backed by hands-on technical assistance. MTCs will belinked among <strong>the</strong>mselves to a set <strong>of</strong> smaller Manufacturing OutreachCenters (MOCs), geared to areas with smaller concentrations197


<strong>of</strong> industry. MOCs will be affiliated with technical colleges, vocationalschools, and State technical assistance centers. Toge<strong>the</strong>rMTCs and MOCs will help firms to identify, evaluate, install,adapt, and <strong>the</strong>n commercially exploit appropriate advanced technologyin <strong>the</strong>ir manufacturing and business operations. <strong>The</strong> Administrationanticipates that 100 centers will be established nationwideby 1997, up from 7 at <strong>the</strong> outset <strong>of</strong> this Administration.Linkages have also been formed between <strong>the</strong> MEP and o<strong>the</strong>rFederal agencies with roles to play in <strong>the</strong> delivery <strong>of</strong> technical assistance,work force training, and small business support services.<strong>The</strong>se agencies include <strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Energy, NASA, <strong>the</strong>Small Business Administration, and <strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Labor. Inaddition, <strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Energy dedicated over $400 million toadvanced manufacturing-related technologies in fiscal 1993 andhas under way or in negotiation more than 115 advanced manufacturingcooperative projects involving over 60 companies. One <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong>se is <strong>the</strong> AMTEX Partnership, a model collaboration between<strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Energy's national laboratories and <strong>the</strong> <strong>American</strong>textile industry. Finally, <strong>the</strong> deployment portion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Administration'sdefense conversion Technology Reinvestment Project (discussedbelow) includes an additional $87 million for manufacturingextension programs.Telecommunications Infrastructure for <strong>the</strong> Information AgeAll <strong>American</strong>s have a stake in <strong>the</strong> construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> advancedNational Information Infrastructure described earlier in this chapter.Private industry is already developing and deploying <strong>the</strong> Nil,and, as explained above, it is <strong>the</strong> private sector that should buildand own <strong>the</strong> Nil <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> future. <strong>The</strong>re never<strong>the</strong>less remain essentialroles for <strong>the</strong> government to play in ensuring <strong>the</strong> growth <strong>of</strong> an affordableand universally accessible telecommunications infrastructure.Many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> key breakthroughs in telecommunications andcomputing stemmed from research funded by <strong>the</strong> Federal Government.For example, <strong>the</strong> Internet and laser technology both grewout <strong>of</strong> government-sponsored research.<strong>The</strong> Administration will continue <strong>the</strong> High-Performance Computingand Communications program, which funds R&D into morepowerfulcomputers, faster computer networks, and more-sophisticateds<strong>of</strong>tware. A key objective <strong>of</strong> this program is <strong>the</strong> application<strong>of</strong> computers to economically important problems. <strong>The</strong> Department<strong>of</strong> Energy has funded several collaborations among national laboratories,universities, and industry, applying <strong>the</strong>se computing technologiesto materials, chemistry, energy, and environmentalproblems. Beyond that, <strong>the</strong> Administration has created a new component<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> program, emphasizing information infrastructuretechnologies and applications. This program will develop and applyhigh-performance computing and high-speed networking tech-198


nologies for use in <strong>the</strong> fields <strong>of</strong> health care, education, libraries,manufacturing, and provision <strong>of</strong> government information. Additionalresearch on information technologies and applications will beconducted by <strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Energy's national laboratories.Finally, <strong>the</strong> government is supporting an array <strong>of</strong> Nil pilot anddemonstration projects. Federal matching grants will be awardedon a competitive basis to school districts, libraries, State and localgovernments, health care providers, universities, and o<strong>the</strong>r nonpr<strong>of</strong>itentities to connect institutions to existing networks, to enhancethose networks, and to permit users to interconnect amongdifferent networks. <strong>The</strong> program is presently funded at $28 millionper year and is planned to grow in coming years to $100 millionannually. Its goal is to ensure that every school and library in <strong>the</strong>country is connected. In addition, NASA has launched <strong>the</strong> AdvancedCommunications Technology Satellite, an experiment totest pioneering concepts and technologies that promise to advanceon-demand, flexible communications services.Transportation, Energy, and <strong>the</strong> Environment: NewTechnologies for GrowthEnvironmental improvements have traditionally been viewed assomething we trade <strong>of</strong>f for increased economic performance. Yet, asnoted earlier in this chapter, a strong environmental policy frameworkcan encourage innovation, streng<strong>the</strong>n key competitive industries,and improve our environment simultaneously. Environmentalpolicy can create new demand for <strong>the</strong> goods and services <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> environmentalprotection industries, which <strong>the</strong>n increase employmentand production to meet this demand. Policies that call for leadingedgeenvironmental solutions can induce U.S. industry to respondwith novel, world-class technologies. This response positions U.S.industry to meet <strong>the</strong> rapidly growing world demand for advanced"green" technologies, providing additional economic and environmentalbenefits for U.S. consumers and producers.Accordingly, this Administration is developing an environmentalpolicy framework whose objective is to maintain and streng<strong>the</strong>n environmentalprotection while also promoting economic and technologicaldevelopment. <strong>The</strong> Administration is working with <strong>the</strong> U.S.business and research communities to promote <strong>the</strong> developmentand deployment <strong>of</strong> new technologies that simultaneously preventpollution, increase energy efficiency and <strong>the</strong> efficiency <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Nation'stransportation infrastructure, and promote economic growth.Clean technologies—such as energy-efficient light bulbs and motors,alternative fuel vehicles, computerized traffic managementsystems, and advanced steelmaking—reduce many kinds <strong>of</strong> pollutants.Such technologies can also reduce <strong>the</strong> energy needs <strong>of</strong> U.S.companies, trimming costs and improving international competi-199


tiveness. Again, <strong>the</strong> hoped-for result is both enhanced environmentalquality and greater long-term economic growth.Partnership for a New Generation <strong>of</strong> Vehicles. This initiative,begun in September 1993, is a joint effort <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Federal Governmentand <strong>the</strong> three leading domestic automobile manufacturers.<strong>The</strong> initiative aims to develop <strong>the</strong> technologies necessary to createa new type <strong>of</strong> automobile, one that is both safer and up to threetimes more fuel efficient than today's cars. In both its goals and itsimplementation, <strong>the</strong> program is characteristic <strong>of</strong> this Administration'stechnology policy. It focuses on developing technologies thatmay generate technological progress in two important areas: inmaking U.S. automobile producers more technologically competitivein <strong>the</strong> international marketplace and in reducing air pollution. <strong>The</strong>initiative is structured as a set <strong>of</strong> public-private partnerships inR&D. One such partnership seeks to develop a "hybrid" vehiclethat combines electric propulsion with conventional heat enginesystems to increase efficiency and meet tight emission standards.<strong>The</strong> Environmental Technologies Initiative. <strong>The</strong> EPA haslaunched <strong>the</strong> Environmental Technologies Initiative to stimulatetechnological innovation to meet <strong>the</strong> Nation's environmental objectives.<strong>The</strong> initiative aims to create a more productive environmentaltechnology marketplace and works toward incorporating environmentalconsiderations into <strong>the</strong> design <strong>of</strong> new technologies andinto upgrades <strong>of</strong> existing technologies. This program is also designedto aid <strong>the</strong> Administration's defense conversion effort by facilitating<strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> military bases for demonstrations <strong>of</strong> environmentalremediation or "cleanup" technologies. In addition, <strong>the</strong> EPAand <strong>the</strong> Commerce Department are jointly developing environmentaltechnology programs at NIST regional technology centers;and <strong>the</strong> EPA has undertaken a new collaborative venture with <strong>the</strong>Small Business Administration to help small businesses access informationon pollution prevention. <strong>The</strong>se and o<strong>the</strong>r domestic initiativesalso support <strong>the</strong> Administration's strategic framework for environmentaltechnologies exports, which engages U.S. environmentalbusinesses in <strong>the</strong> design and implementation <strong>of</strong> market-specificexport assistance and export financing strategies.<strong>The</strong> NICE 3 program (National Industrial Competitivenessthrough Energy, Environment, and <strong>Economic</strong>s), jointly administeredby <strong>the</strong> EPA and <strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Energy, aims to promoteinnovative technologies that simultaneously improve energy efficiency,reduce waste generation, and increase economic competitivenessand productivity. <strong>The</strong> program also seeks to improvecooperation between State agencies and industry. In addition, <strong>the</strong><strong>President</strong> has directed <strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Energy and <strong>the</strong> EPA toaccelerate <strong>the</strong> commercialization <strong>of</strong> advanced, energy-efficient technologiesthrough <strong>the</strong> formation <strong>of</strong> partnerships with key market200


players. <strong>The</strong>se partnerships may include contests for new technologyintroductions; working with government procurement agenciesto leverage <strong>the</strong>ir purchasing power to acquire qualifying products;and working with utilities to coordinate incentives for marketsfor new technologies. For instance, <strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Energy,toge<strong>the</strong>r with <strong>the</strong> EPA and utilities, is using such partnerships tocreate a new market for manufacturers <strong>of</strong> chlor<strong>of</strong>luorocarbon-freerefrigerators (chlor<strong>of</strong>luorocarbons have been implicated in degradation<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> atmospheric ozone layer).Finally, <strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Energy is engaged in developing anddeploying innovative environmental remediation and cleanup technologiesto deal with <strong>the</strong> cleanup <strong>of</strong> military bases slated for closure,as well as <strong>of</strong> contaminated facilities and sites administered by<strong>the</strong> Energy Department itself.O<strong>the</strong>r Transportation Technology Initiatives. <strong>The</strong> Department <strong>of</strong>Transportation has begun a series <strong>of</strong> outreach seminars entitled"Promoting Transportation Applications in Defense Conversion andO<strong>the</strong>r Advanced Technologies." In addition, <strong>the</strong> department has initiatedstudies aimed at having a prototype demonstration <strong>of</strong> anautomated intelligent vehicle highway system by 1997. <strong>The</strong> DefenseDepartment's Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA)has selected six regional coalitions—in Hawaii, Sacramento, LosAngeles, Indianapolis, Atlanta, and Boston—to work on electric andhybrid electric vehicle technology and infrastructure. A team <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficialsfrom <strong>the</strong> Departments <strong>of</strong> Defense and Transportation is alsoinvestigating how to augment <strong>the</strong> existing satellite-based global positioningsystem for use in improving air navigation and collisionavoidance. <strong>The</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Energy's Clean Cities programmakes use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Federal Government's purchasing power to accelerate<strong>the</strong> introduction <strong>of</strong> alternative fuel vehicles (and an alternativerefueling infrastructure) into urban areas in order to reduceemissions. Finally, <strong>the</strong> Administration is continuing to fund researchinto an array <strong>of</strong> next-generation transportation technologies,including high-speed ground transportation, advanced subsonicplanes, and supersonic air transports.Facilitating Defense Conversion<strong>The</strong> share <strong>of</strong> gross domestic product (GDP) devoted to nationaldefense is expected to shrink from 6.5 percent in 1986 to 3.3 percentin 1997. This decline in defense spending, resulting from <strong>the</strong>end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cold war, is smaller relative to <strong>the</strong> size <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> economythan <strong>the</strong> cutbacks that followed World War II and <strong>the</strong> Korean andVietnam wars, and much more gradual. Yet <strong>the</strong> impact on particularregions, such as sou<strong>the</strong>rn California, is severe, and three additionalfactors work to make <strong>the</strong> economic adjustment this timemore difficult. First, <strong>the</strong> economy's recovery from <strong>the</strong> recession <strong>of</strong>1990-91 was weaker than <strong>the</strong> average postwar recovery, while ef-201


forts to cut <strong>the</strong> massive Federal budget deficit leave little room forfiscal expansion to stimulate economic growth. Second, many defensefirms and workers are more isolated from commercial marketpractice than during earlier builddowns, because <strong>the</strong> defense procurementsystem that has evolved over time has erected a wall betweencommercial sectors and defense. Third, technological innovationand <strong>the</strong> economic growth it generates may be hard hit by <strong>the</strong>defense retrenchment, because nearly 60 percent <strong>of</strong> Federal supportfor domestic R&D was defense related and because roughlyone-fifth <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Nation's engineers work in defense-related areas.<strong>The</strong> end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cold war was an unanticipated event with seriouseconomic consequences for several domestic economic sectors. OurNation has long accepted a collective responsibility to ease <strong>the</strong>transition for those most heavily affected by major economicshocks, for example by providing unemployment insurance and disasterrelief. This principle readily extends to transitional assistancewhen <strong>the</strong> shock results from a large and unanticipated structuraleconomic change, particularly when government is effectively <strong>the</strong>agent <strong>of</strong> that change.For workers, <strong>the</strong> problem <strong>of</strong> large, regionally concentrated economicdislocations is made worse by a capital market imperfection.It is <strong>of</strong>ten difficult for workers to borrow for retraining and relocationbecause <strong>the</strong>ir human capital cannot serve as collateral. Suchcapital market transactions are particularly difficult to arrange forpeople who have just lost a job or who have incurred a capital losson <strong>the</strong>ir home—a frequent consequence <strong>of</strong> geographically concentrateddefense cuts. Moreover, dislocated workers may have adifficult time learning about job opportunities in o<strong>the</strong>r regions oroccupations.Defense conversion is also difficult for firms. Although many defensecontractors have access to knowledge, production facilities,and skilled workers that could be valuable if channeled to commercialapplications, <strong>the</strong> many years spent designing <strong>the</strong>ir organizationsto serve <strong>the</strong> needs <strong>of</strong> one customer—<strong>the</strong> Defense Department—<strong>of</strong>tenleave <strong>the</strong>m without crucial skills or <strong>the</strong> right organizationalconfiguration to serve <strong>the</strong> commercial marketplace. To <strong>the</strong>extent that <strong>the</strong>se firms lack internal funds to finance new investment,and to <strong>the</strong> extent <strong>the</strong>y are unable credibly to demonstrate tolenders and o<strong>the</strong>r capital providers <strong>the</strong>ir potential to serve o<strong>the</strong>rlines <strong>of</strong> business, <strong>the</strong>se resources will not be able to move to <strong>the</strong>irmost efficient uses.<strong>The</strong> Administration's 5-year, $22 billion Defense Reinvestmentand Conversion Initiative addresses <strong>the</strong>se problems <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> post-coldwar transition.Workers. <strong>The</strong> initiative provides $5 billion over 5 years for workeradjustment, including funding for retraining displaced defense202


workers and early retirement benefits for military personnel withat least 15 years <strong>of</strong> service. In addition, <strong>the</strong> Administration is sponsoringpilot programs to train defense workers and personnel leaving<strong>the</strong> military for national service as teachers, health care workers,and law enforcement personnel.Communities. <strong>The</strong> Administration is also expanding <strong>the</strong> DefenseDepartment's Office <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Adjustment, so that communitiesaffected by scheduled military base closures have <strong>the</strong> resources andtechnical assistance necessary to plan a smoo<strong>the</strong>r adjustment tonew economic activities. More resources are being devoted to <strong>the</strong>Commerce Department's <strong>Economic</strong> Development Administration, totarget help to communities hardest hit by <strong>the</strong> defense industrydrawdown. Meanwhile <strong>the</strong> Defense Department is working with<strong>the</strong> EPA and o<strong>the</strong>r public and private bodies to make sure that <strong>the</strong>process <strong>of</strong> environmental cleanup and restoration at closed militarybases does not hamper local economic recovery.Technology: <strong>The</strong> Technology Reinvestment Project. <strong>The</strong> Administration'sTechnology Reinvestment Project (TRP) is an effort to promote<strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> dual-use (commercial and military) technologiesand to help small defense firms make <strong>the</strong> transition tocommercial production. <strong>The</strong> TRP is jointly implemented by a sixagencycouncil representing <strong>the</strong> Departments <strong>of</strong> Commerce, Energy,Transportation, and Defense, NASA, and <strong>the</strong> NationalScience Foundation, and is chaired by an <strong>of</strong>ficial from ARPA. Onehundredand sixty-two projects had been selected for TRP supportas <strong>of</strong> early December 1993, totaling nearly $1 billion in combinedpublic and private funds (<strong>the</strong> Federal share is about $415 million).<strong>The</strong> TRP funds three types <strong>of</strong> projects: technology development(46 projects), technology deployment (70), and manufacturing educationand training (46). Examples include construction <strong>of</strong> a highwaybridge from composite plastics, development <strong>of</strong> a new jaws-<strong>of</strong>liferescue device powered by pyrotechnic cartridges, and <strong>the</strong> exploration<strong>of</strong> medical uses for a noninvasive diagnostic device thatmeasures oxygen levels in <strong>the</strong> blood. <strong>The</strong> TRP is also funding <strong>the</strong>development <strong>of</strong> a new manufacturing engineering curriculum at aState college, a manufacturing technology center to help defensesuppliers adapt to o<strong>the</strong>r fields, and a project to retrain laid<strong>of</strong>f defenseengineers in pollution-prevention and remediation.MARITECH. <strong>The</strong> Defense Department's MARITECH (maritimetechnology) initiative, a defense conversion program focused onshipbuilding, is structured similarly to <strong>the</strong> TRP. This 5-year, $220million program will supply matching funds to help U.S. shipyardsshift production from military to commercial markets.203


TECHNOLOGY POLICY, GROWTH, ANDCOMPETITIVENESSGovernment must work with <strong>American</strong> industry to provide asound communications and transportation infrastructure and asolid science and industrial technology base. <strong>The</strong>se are among <strong>the</strong>prerequisites for economic growth. Yet to be effective in a marketeconomy, technology policy must leverage private investment, notdirect it. It must be sensitive to those reasons why markets by<strong>the</strong>mselves may lead to insufficient investment. <strong>The</strong> Administration'stechnology initiatives take <strong>the</strong>ir inspiration from a long<strong>American</strong> history <strong>of</strong> public-private partnerships, from <strong>the</strong> AgriculturalExtension Service to <strong>the</strong> Arpanet (now <strong>the</strong> Internet worldwidecomputer network). <strong>The</strong>se initiatives seize strategic opportunitiesinherent in <strong>the</strong> shifting composition <strong>of</strong> Federal R&D frommilitary to civilian concerns, help remedy <strong>the</strong> underinvestment inR&D created by <strong>the</strong> limitations on private appropriability <strong>of</strong> itseconomic returns, and focus Federal R&D funds on facilitating <strong>the</strong>commercialization and commercial diffusion <strong>of</strong> technology. Toge<strong>the</strong>r<strong>the</strong>se technology initiatives are essential to promote U.S. economiccompetitiveness, meaning not only <strong>the</strong> ability <strong>of</strong> <strong>American</strong> firms tosell high-quality goods and services in <strong>the</strong> international marketplace,but more importantly, <strong>the</strong> ability to do so while maintaininghigh and rising wages and living standards for <strong>the</strong> <strong>American</strong>people.204


CHAPTER 6<strong>The</strong> United States in <strong>the</strong> WorldEconomySOON AFTER TAKING OFFICE, <strong>the</strong> <strong>President</strong> described <strong>the</strong>basic principles and goals <strong>of</strong> his Administration's international economicpolicy in a February 1993 speech at <strong>American</strong> University.He committed <strong>the</strong> United States to active global engagement topromote world trade and growth, to aid <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> lessprosperous nations, to address <strong>the</strong> emerging problems <strong>of</strong> global environmentaldegradation, and to encourage market reform in Russiaand o<strong>the</strong>r parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> former Soviet empire. <strong>The</strong> <strong>President</strong> affirmedthat <strong>the</strong> United States would continue to champion openmarkets and expanded trade: In <strong>the</strong> <strong>President</strong>'s words, "We mustcompete, not retreat." Acting upon <strong>the</strong>se words, <strong>the</strong> Administrationsuccessfully concluded two <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> most important trade agreementsin <strong>the</strong> Nation's history: <strong>the</strong> North <strong>American</strong> Free Trade Agreement(NAFTA) and <strong>the</strong> Uruguay Round Agreement under <strong>the</strong> GeneralAgreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT).Like previous Administrations, Democratic and Republican alike,this Administration recognizes that international trade—<strong>the</strong> voluntaryexchange <strong>of</strong> goods and services across national borders—isa means <strong>of</strong> increasing standards <strong>of</strong> living and economic well-beingboth at home and abroad. During <strong>the</strong> last half-century, world tradehas grown enormously, largely as a result <strong>of</strong> <strong>American</strong> leadershipin liberalizing global markets. Trade has been a major engine <strong>of</strong>growth for <strong>the</strong> world economy since World War II, in marked contrastto <strong>the</strong> 1930s, when protectionism worsened and helped spreadglobal economic depression. As economists have long predicted,freer trade has been a win-win strategy for both <strong>the</strong> United Statesand its trading partners, allowing all to reap <strong>the</strong> benefits <strong>of</strong> enhancedspecialization, lower costs, greater choice, and an improvedinternational climate for investment and innovation. <strong>American</strong> industries—both<strong>the</strong>ir workers and <strong>the</strong>ir owners—have benefitedfrom increased export markets and from cheaper imported inputs.<strong>American</strong> consumers have been able to purchase a wider variety <strong>of</strong>products at lower prices than <strong>the</strong>y could have without <strong>the</strong> expansion<strong>of</strong> trade.Recent changes in <strong>the</strong> global economy pose new challenges andnew opportunities for <strong>the</strong> United States as we maintain our com-205


mitment to an open international trading system. <strong>The</strong> new opportunitiescome from <strong>the</strong> explosion <strong>of</strong> global markets, while <strong>the</strong> newchallenges come from <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> new global competitors.During much <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> last 50 years, <strong>the</strong> United States was <strong>the</strong> onlyglobal economic superpower. But now <strong>the</strong>re are three: <strong>the</strong> EuropeanUnion (EU, <strong>the</strong> deeper integration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> European Community),Japan, and <strong>the</strong> United States; and all increasingly interdependentas a result <strong>of</strong> trade and capital flows, and increasinglycompetitive. All three superpowers face both intensifying competitionfrom and expanding market opportunities in <strong>the</strong> rapidly industrializingcountries <strong>of</strong> East Asia, which continue to increase <strong>the</strong>irexport competitiveness even as <strong>the</strong>y open <strong>the</strong>ir own markets togreater trade and investment. Meanwhile <strong>the</strong> global trading systemis being transformed by <strong>the</strong> emergence <strong>of</strong> new democratic and market-orientedregimes in central and eastern Europe, <strong>the</strong> former SovietUnion, Latin America, and Asia—regimes that have made substantialprogress in tearing down <strong>the</strong>ir protectionist barriers andare now actively encouraging exports, accepting imports, and seekingforeign capital for development.This Administration is committed to a high-wage strategy to enable<strong>the</strong> United States to take advantage <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> new opportunitiesand to meet <strong>the</strong> new challenges <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> changing global marketplace.This strategy consists <strong>of</strong> two distinct but interrelated parts:trade policies that will promote trade and foster more-open marketsboth at home and abroad; and domestic policies that will help<strong>American</strong> companies remain <strong>the</strong> world's productivity and technologicalleaders, and <strong>American</strong> workers remain <strong>the</strong> most skilled andproductive in <strong>the</strong> world. This two-part strategy reflects <strong>the</strong> fundamentalgoal <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Administration's o<strong>the</strong>r economic policy initiatives:higher living standards for all <strong>American</strong>s. Realizing this goalrequires that America compete not on <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> lower wages, buton <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> superior productivity, technology, and quality. Italso requires that our trade policy be complemented by domesticpolicies designed to increase labor force skills and facilitate <strong>the</strong> adjustment<strong>of</strong> <strong>American</strong> workers and communities to changing economiccircumstances—whatever <strong>the</strong>ir source. O<strong>the</strong>r chapters inthis <strong>Report</strong> have analyzed <strong>the</strong> domestic economy. This chapter addresses<strong>the</strong> international dimension.TRENDS IN U.S. TRADETrade has become increasingly important to <strong>the</strong> <strong>American</strong> economy.As shown in Chart 6-1, <strong>the</strong> share <strong>of</strong> exports <strong>of</strong> goods andservices in real gross domestic product (GDP) has gradually risenand now stands at a postwar high <strong>of</strong> 11.6 percent. Between 1985and 1993, U.S. merchandise exports increased from $222 billion to206


$460 billion in current dollars, and by 95 percent in real terms. By1992, <strong>the</strong> United States had regained its status as <strong>the</strong> world's largestexporter, and one in six <strong>American</strong> manufacturing jobs was directlyor indirectly related to exports.Chart 6-1 U.S. Trade as Share <strong>of</strong> Real Gross Domestic Product<strong>The</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> trade to <strong>the</strong> U.S. economy has risen more or less steadilyfor three decades.Percent <strong>of</strong> real GDP14Imports <strong>of</strong>12 r- Goods and Services 410fExports <strong>of</strong>Goods and Services4J | L1965 1968 1971 1974 1977 1980 1983 1986 1989 1992Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce.Imports have also grown in significance. As Chart 6-1 shows, <strong>the</strong>share <strong>of</strong> imports <strong>of</strong> goods and services in GDP has increased steadilyand is also at a postwar high <strong>of</strong> 13.2 percent. Perhaps <strong>the</strong> moststriking development has been <strong>the</strong> increasing role <strong>of</strong> multinationalcorporations in U.S. trade and, indeed, <strong>the</strong> growing importance <strong>of</strong>intrafirm trade—cross-border trade between <strong>the</strong> separate operations<strong>of</strong> a single firm. By 1990, multinational firms accounted forover 75 percent <strong>of</strong> total U.S. merchandise trade, and around 40percent <strong>of</strong> U.S. merchandise trade was intrafirm. And whereasintrafirm trade initially involved mainly U.S.-based multinationals,more recently it has been led by foreign-based firms, especiallyJapanese firms.<strong>The</strong> impact <strong>of</strong> international trade on <strong>the</strong> national economy is notrestricted to exports and imports. International trade also affects<strong>the</strong> fortunes <strong>of</strong> producers who do not directly export or import butinteract with producers who do. According to input-output analy-207


ses, which take such intersectoral or interproducer relations intoaccount, when <strong>the</strong> indirect effects <strong>of</strong> trade are included, exports accountedfor nearly four-fifths <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> increase in domestic production<strong>of</strong> manufactures between 1987 and 1992. Moreover, exports havebecome more dependent on imports. Between 1982 and 1987, <strong>the</strong>most recent years for which data are available, <strong>the</strong> import content<strong>of</strong> exports rose from 10 percent to 14 percent. Thus exports are becomingmore important for <strong>the</strong> economy, and imports are becomingmore important for exports. Overall, international trade is increasinglyvital to <strong>American</strong> prosperity.<strong>The</strong> growth <strong>of</strong> U.S. trade has been accompanied by significantchanges in both its sectoral and its regional composition. As shownin Chart 6-2, real exports <strong>of</strong> nonagricultural merchandise and serviceshave grown rapidly during <strong>the</strong> past quarter-century (Box 6-1),while <strong>the</strong> contribution <strong>of</strong> agricultural exports has remained relativelysmall. At <strong>the</strong> same time, <strong>the</strong> relative contributions <strong>of</strong> particularsectors within nonagricultural merchandise trade have beenshifting (Table 6-1).Chart 6-2 U.S. Exports <strong>of</strong> Goods and ServicesExports <strong>of</strong> services and nonagricultural goods have grown rapidly since<strong>the</strong> late 1960s.Billions <strong>of</strong> 1987 dollars500NonagriculturalMerchandise^300200Services100AgriculturalMerchandisej |1967 1970 1973 1976 1979 1982 1985 1988 1991Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce.208


Box 6-1.—U.S. Exports: More Than PeanutsIn 1992, <strong>American</strong> service firms exported to nonafflliatesabroad:• over two-thirds as much in passenger fares ($17.4 billion),such as seats on U.S.-flagged air carriers, as <strong>the</strong>United States exported civilian aircraft ($24.5 billion)• more educational services ($6.1 billion) than <strong>the</strong> UnitedStates exported corn ($5.7 billion)• more financial services ($5.4 billion) than <strong>the</strong> UnitedStates exported wheat ($4.6 billion)• more equipment installation and repair services ($2.8billion) than <strong>the</strong> United States exported agricultural machinery($2.1 billion)• more information services, including computer and dataprocessing and database services ($2.6 billion), than <strong>the</strong>United States exported aluminum ($1.2 billion)• more legal services ($1.4 billion) than <strong>the</strong> United Statesexported vegetable oils ($1.0 billion)• more management consulting services ($0.78 billion)than <strong>the</strong> United States exported milled rice ($0.72 billion)or peanuts ($0.21 billion).TABLE 6-1.—U.S. Merchandise Trade by Industry, 1972 and 1992[Percent <strong>of</strong> total]IndustryExports1972ImportsExports1992ImportsAgricultural and forest productsMineralsFuelsChemicalsTextiles, apparel, lea<strong>the</strong>r products, and footwearPaperNonmetallic minerals productsIron and steelMachineryTransportation equipmentFurniture and fixturesInstrumentsMiscellaneous manufacturesO<strong>the</strong>r industriesNote -<strong>The</strong> classifications are based on <strong>the</strong> SITC Revision 1 coding system,reexports.Detail may not add to 100 percent due to rounding.Source: United Nations, Commodity Trade Statistics Division.18.53.13.28.43.91.51.21.727.016.9.32.83.77.815.45.88.53.68.82.32.35.314.017.5.71.66.57.511.72.32.610.43.41.5.91.030.517.7.93.65.77.96.22.311.15.410.51.61.81.924.815.71.43.17.76.3Import figures have been adjusted to net out209


An important sectoral development in recent years has been <strong>the</strong>growth <strong>of</strong> high-technology products and industries in both U.S. exportsand imports. In 1992, <strong>the</strong> United States exported $107 billionin advanced technology products, up in nominal terms from $83 billionin 1989. Imports <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se products also increased—from $56billion in 1989 to $72 billion in 1992. Aerospace, information andcommunications, and electronics toge<strong>the</strong>r contributed <strong>the</strong> predominantshare <strong>of</strong> U.S. high-technology exports. <strong>The</strong>se sectors, alongwith a few high-technology product lines within o<strong>the</strong>r industrialsectors, are considerably more export-intensive than U.S. manufacturingas a whole. Indeed, aircraft and computers and <strong>of</strong>fice equipmenthave <strong>the</strong> highest ratios <strong>of</strong> export sales to value added amongall manufacturing industries.Heightened foreign competition and <strong>the</strong> globalization <strong>of</strong> production(technology respects no border) have made many high-technologyindustries relatively import-intensive as well. In fact, <strong>the</strong>most export-intensive <strong>of</strong> America's high-technology industries (with<strong>the</strong> marked exceptions <strong>of</strong> plastics and aircraft) are now also <strong>the</strong>most import-intensive. <strong>The</strong> electronics industries have been <strong>the</strong>arena <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> most dramatic penetration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> U.S. high-technologymarket, both because Japanese and East Asian electronics producershave become more formidable competitors, and because <strong>American</strong>electronics multinationals have spread <strong>the</strong>ir own productionaround <strong>the</strong> world.Just as <strong>the</strong> commodity composition <strong>of</strong> U.S. trade has been changing,so has its geographical composition. As shown in Table 6-2,<strong>the</strong> shares <strong>of</strong> U.S. exports going to and imports coming from developingcountries have risen, while <strong>the</strong> shares to and from industrialcountries have fallen. <strong>The</strong>se trends reflect <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong> developingcountries as a group have been growing more rapidly than<strong>the</strong> industrial countries.TABLE 6-2.—U.S. Merchandise Trade by World Region, 1972 and 1992[Percent <strong>of</strong> total]RegionExports1972ImportsExports1992ImportsIndustrial countriesJapanEuropean Community 1O<strong>the</strong>rDeveloping countriesAsiaMiddle EastWestern HemisphereO<strong>the</strong>r ,66.810.026.830.033.28.94.114.65.672.416.324.032.127.69.61.612.63.858.510.723024.941.516.64.516.93.557.718.017.622.142.322.83.113.03.41 Membership as <strong>of</strong> 1992.Note-Detail may not add to totals due to rounding.Source: International Monetary Fund.210


<strong>The</strong> fast-growing countries <strong>of</strong> Asia have provided a rapidly expandingmarket for U.S. exports; <strong>the</strong>ir share <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> total nearlydoubled from 9 percent in 1972 to 17 percent in 1992. Indeed, by1992 our trans-Pacific trade was 50 percent greater than our trans-Atlantic trade. <strong>The</strong> increasing importance <strong>of</strong> Asia in U.S. trade appearsto contradict <strong>the</strong> common contention that <strong>the</strong> world is devolvinginto three trading blocs centered on Europe, Asia, and NorthAmerica. Nor is such a conclusion supported by more-sophisticatedevidence. When researchers have modeled <strong>the</strong> pattern <strong>of</strong> tradeflows among different countries, <strong>the</strong>y have found no real evidencethat intraregional trade flows in Asia are unusually large once economicfundamentals are taken into account. <strong>The</strong> observed increasesin intraregional flows can be explained largely in terms <strong>of</strong> differencesin economic growth rates and geographical proximity.Likewise, when researchers have looked at financial flows, exchange-ratedetermination, and <strong>the</strong> like, <strong>the</strong>re is little evidencethat a "y en bloc" is developing in Asia.In addition to leading <strong>the</strong> world in trade, <strong>the</strong> United States leads<strong>the</strong> world in <strong>the</strong> stock <strong>of</strong> foreign direct investment, both as investorand as recipient. In 1992, U.S. firms owned 25 percent, and <strong>the</strong>United States hosted 22 percent, <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> world's foreign direct investmentstock. <strong>The</strong> largest hosts <strong>of</strong> outward U.S. foreign direct investment(ranked in order <strong>of</strong> importance) are <strong>the</strong> United Kingdom,Canada, Germany, Switzerland, and Japan, which toge<strong>the</strong>r accountfor nearly half <strong>the</strong> total (Table 6-3). Similarly, five industrial countries(again ranked in order <strong>of</strong> importance)—Japan, <strong>the</strong> UnitedKingdom, <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands, Canada, and Germany—account formore than three-quarters <strong>of</strong> existing foreign direct investment in<strong>the</strong> United States. <strong>The</strong> predominant role <strong>of</strong> high-wage industrialcountries in both inward and outward foreign direct investment in<strong>the</strong> United States refutes <strong>the</strong> popular notion that such investmentis motivated primarily by <strong>the</strong> search for lower wages. In fact, manyforeign investment decisions are motivated by o<strong>the</strong>r considerations,most <strong>of</strong>ten <strong>the</strong> need to have an active presence in large or rapidlyexpanding markets or <strong>the</strong> need to overcome trade and o<strong>the</strong>r barriersthat impede access.It is sometimes argued that outward foreign direct investment"exports" jobs. However, <strong>the</strong> parallel expansion <strong>of</strong> two-way foreigndirect investment and intrafirm trade suggests that such investmentis more likely to complement ra<strong>the</strong>r than substitute for trade,creating high-wage jobs domestically ra<strong>the</strong>r than destroying <strong>the</strong>m.Several recent studies have concluded that foreign direct investmentis more likely to create trade than reduce it. Ano<strong>the</strong>r recentstudy found that inward foreign direct investment brings with itcompetition, new technologies, and new management techniques,211


TABLE 6-3.—Stock <strong>of</strong> U.S. Outward and Inward ForeignDirect Investment, 1992CountryNVESTMENT BY U.S. FIRMS ABROAD (OUTWARD):United KingdomCanadaGermanySwitzerlandJdpdnAll countriesBillions <strong>of</strong> dollars77.868.435.428.726.2486.7INVESTMENT BY FOREIGN FIRMS IN THE UNITED STATES (INWARD):JapanUnited KingdomNe<strong>the</strong>rlandsCanadaGermanyAll countries96.794.761.339.029.2419.5Note.—All figures are on a historical cost basis.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Analysis.each <strong>of</strong> which has contributed to <strong>the</strong> resurgence in U.S. productivity,fur<strong>the</strong>r enhancing national competitiveness.TRADE, JOBS, AND WAGE INEQUALITYIn <strong>the</strong> short run, both <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong> output and <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong> employmentin <strong>the</strong> <strong>American</strong> economy depend on <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong> aggregatedemand. One component <strong>of</strong> aggregate demand is net exports, <strong>the</strong>difference between exports and imports. Thus, as long as <strong>the</strong>re isslack in <strong>the</strong> economy, an increase in net exports will stimulate productionand create jobs. For example, most scholars estimate thatNAFTA will create additional <strong>American</strong> jobs over <strong>the</strong> next severalyears because it will boost U.S. net exports to Mexico. Once <strong>the</strong><strong>American</strong> economy nears full employment, however, additional netexports could create upward pressure on prices as well. Even when<strong>the</strong> economy is at full employment, however, and even if trade liberalizationincreases both imports and exports equally, leaving netexports unchanged, <strong>the</strong> <strong>American</strong> economy still reaps <strong>the</strong> benefits<strong>of</strong> freer trade in <strong>the</strong> form <strong>of</strong> greater productive efficiency, lowerprices, and higher living standards.Despite <strong>the</strong> possible benefits <strong>of</strong> trade liberalization for <strong>the</strong> level<strong>of</strong> employment in <strong>the</strong> short run, and <strong>the</strong> certain benefits <strong>of</strong> tradeliberalization for living standards in <strong>the</strong> long run, some observersworry that expanding trade with developing countries will depress<strong>the</strong> wages <strong>of</strong> low-skilled <strong>American</strong> workers. As explained in Chapter3, wage inequality has, in fact, increased over <strong>the</strong> past two decadesas <strong>the</strong> share <strong>of</strong> trade in <strong>the</strong> U.S. economy has grown. Not surprisingly,concerns have been voiced that greater internationaltrade may be responsible for greater inequality in <strong>the</strong> wage distribution.212


Such concerns are plausible and are consistent with economic<strong>the</strong>ory. Skilled labor is relatively abundant in <strong>the</strong> U.S. economy.According to <strong>the</strong>ory, when <strong>the</strong> United States trades with economiesin which unskilled labor is relatively abundant, we will tend to exportproducts requiring skilled labor and import products using unskilledlabor. <strong>The</strong> relative prices <strong>of</strong> skill-intensive goods will <strong>the</strong>reforerise in <strong>the</strong> United States, and U.S. production will expand inexport industries and contract in industries that compete with imports.Demand for skilled labor will rise, while demand for unskilledlabor falls. <strong>The</strong>se changes in labor demand will raise <strong>the</strong>wages <strong>of</strong> skilled workers relative to those <strong>of</strong> unskilled workers.Thus, on a priori grounds, one might expect an expansion <strong>of</strong> tradewith developing countries to lead to greater wage inequality in <strong>the</strong>United States.Despite <strong>the</strong> plausibility <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>oretical argument, however,several studies find that it is difficult to discern any substantialimpact <strong>of</strong> trade on wage inequality. Economists have posited a systematicrelationship between <strong>the</strong> relative prices <strong>of</strong> goods and <strong>the</strong>relative returns to factors <strong>of</strong> production. If increased trade with developingcountries were <strong>the</strong> cause <strong>of</strong> growing wage inequality, <strong>the</strong>relative prices <strong>of</strong> goods that use highly skilled labor would be risingrelative to those <strong>of</strong> goods that use unskilled labor. However, onestudy has found no evidence that <strong>the</strong> relative price <strong>of</strong> skill-intensivegoods has risen in <strong>the</strong> United States. Indeed, it is difficult t<strong>of</strong>ind any evidence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> changes in relative prices that would berequired for changes in trade patterns to have altered <strong>the</strong> relativereturns to different types <strong>of</strong> labor.Similarly, if increased trade were responsible for increased wageinequality, <strong>the</strong> growth in wage differentials would lead firms in allsectors to substitute unskilled labor for skilled labor. Instead, studiesfind that virtually all manufacturing industries have increased<strong>the</strong>ir relative use <strong>of</strong> skilled labor despite growing wage differentials.Rising wage differentials along with greater use <strong>of</strong> skilledlabor suggests that demand for skilled labor has been rising broadlyin <strong>the</strong> economy. As expected, <strong>the</strong>se wage differentials have ledto an upgrading <strong>of</strong> skills in <strong>the</strong> work force, allowing firms to meet<strong>the</strong>ir rising demand for skilled labor.Taken toge<strong>the</strong>r, this evidence (little change in relative prices,and economy-wide increases in <strong>the</strong> demand for skilled labor) suggeststhat growing demand for skilled labor has resulted fromwidespread changes within industries ra<strong>the</strong>r than from changes in<strong>the</strong> structure <strong>of</strong> production engendered by greater trade. <strong>The</strong> preponderance<strong>of</strong> evidence indicates that <strong>the</strong> primary sources <strong>of</strong> growingwage inequality are domestic ra<strong>the</strong>r than foreign. As discussedin Chapter 3, <strong>the</strong> sources <strong>of</strong> wage inequality are difficult to pinpoint,but to <strong>the</strong> extent that growing inequality can be explained,213


technical change has been <strong>of</strong>fered as <strong>the</strong> leading candidate. Increasedtrade with developing countries may have reinforced some<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> changes in wages caused by technological change, but carefulstudies have failed to discern a sizable impact <strong>of</strong> trade on wage inequality.Two explanations <strong>of</strong> this finding have been <strong>of</strong>fered. First, althoughtrade with developing countries has been growing, mostU.S. trade—about 60 percent—still involves o<strong>the</strong>r industrializedcountries whose skill levels and wages are similar to those in <strong>the</strong>United States. Second, while trade is a growing part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> U.S.economy, it remains a relatively small part. Only extremely largechanges in <strong>the</strong> composition <strong>of</strong> trade could have a discernable impacton wages and wage disparity in <strong>the</strong> U.S. economy.None<strong>the</strong>less, <strong>the</strong> expansion <strong>of</strong> trade will inevitably disadvantagesome workers in <strong>the</strong> short run. One goal <strong>of</strong> Administration policy,as described in Chapter 3, is to facilitate <strong>the</strong> adjustment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>labor force to changing economic circumstances whatever <strong>the</strong> putativesource <strong>of</strong> change. It is by recognizing both <strong>the</strong> opportunitiesand <strong>the</strong> challenges presented by <strong>the</strong> changing global economy that<strong>the</strong> Administration seeks to achieve a productive and stable basisfor U.S. engagement in <strong>the</strong> world economy.THE ADMINISTRATION'S TRADE INITIATIVES<strong>The</strong> Clinton Administration supports <strong>the</strong> goal <strong>of</strong> freer trade ona reciprocal basis. In pursuit <strong>of</strong> that goal, <strong>the</strong> Administration isdedicated to working with <strong>the</strong> private sector and its trading partnersto open foreign markets through bilateral, regional, and multilateraltrade agreements. At <strong>the</strong> same time, <strong>the</strong> Administration believesthat trade policy should complement, not substitute for,domestic policies to enhance <strong>the</strong> global competitiveness <strong>of</strong> <strong>American</strong>companies and <strong>the</strong>ir workers and to make <strong>the</strong> United Statesan attractive production location for both domestic and foreignfirms.DOMESTIC INITIATIVES: THE NATIONAL EXPORTSTRATEGY<strong>The</strong> Administration's trade policy begins at home with an activistcommitment to promote <strong>American</strong> exports both by reducing domesticbarriers to <strong>the</strong>m and by improving <strong>the</strong> efficiency <strong>of</strong> our exportpromotion programs. Working within <strong>the</strong> interagency Trade PromotionCoordinating Committee, created by <strong>the</strong> Congress to reduce<strong>the</strong> fragmentation <strong>of</strong> our export promotion programs, <strong>the</strong> Administrationunveiled a new National Export Strategy in September1993. This strategy reflected six underlying <strong>the</strong>mes: streamliningand combining functions across agencies, allocating resources stra-214


tegically, involving <strong>the</strong> private sector and State and local governments,effectively advocating <strong>the</strong> interests <strong>of</strong> U.S. exporters abroad,measuring performance, and reducing export controls (restrictionson exports to meet national security, antiproliferation, or foreignpolicy objectives). Among <strong>the</strong> actions to be undertaken immediatelyare:• Revising outmoded export controls on high-technology products.<strong>The</strong> specific technical revisions are expected to reduceregulation significantly on an estimated $35 billion worth <strong>of</strong>high-technology exports. For example, export restrictions thatpreviously affected sales <strong>of</strong> even some personal computers tomany foreign markets have been relaxed.• Consolidating all Federal export promotion services in one locationto facilitate "one-stop shopping." Initially, four centerswill be created; more will be added until a national networkhas been created.• Providing high-level government advocacy on behalf <strong>of</strong> U.S.firms pursuing major foreign government procurement opportunitiesthrough an interagency "Advocacy Network" and an"Advocacy Center" located in <strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce.• Improving our export finance programs by combating <strong>the</strong> "tiedaid" practices <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r nations, increasing <strong>the</strong> limits on insuranceguarantees by <strong>the</strong> Overseas Private Investment Corporation,broadening assistance to U.S. companies seeking to participatein activities funded by <strong>the</strong> multilateral developmentbanks (such as <strong>the</strong> World Bank), and combining into one agency<strong>the</strong> infrastructure feasibility funds that are <strong>the</strong> seed moneyfor U.S. firms' participation in major infrastructure projectsabroad.Taken toge<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong> actions outlined in <strong>the</strong> National ExportStrategy are expected to increase both <strong>the</strong> responsiveness and <strong>the</strong>efficiency <strong>of</strong> export promotion efforts.BILATERAL NEGOTIATIONSAlong with <strong>the</strong>se unilateral actions, <strong>the</strong> Administration has engagednumerous foreign countries in bilateral trade talks. <strong>The</strong> mostprominent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se efforts has been with Japan.<strong>The</strong> U.S.-Japan Framework TalksJapan presents a special case for <strong>the</strong> United States. Japan is <strong>the</strong>world's second-largest economy, after <strong>the</strong> United States, and oursecond-largest trading partner, after Canada. And it is with Japanthat <strong>the</strong> United States maintains its largest bilateral merchandisetrade imbalance: a deficit <strong>of</strong> $49.6 billion in 1992 (Table 6-4). (In<strong>the</strong> same year, we enjoyed a $13.3 billion surplus with Japan inservices trade.) Japan's large surplus with <strong>the</strong> United States is animportant part <strong>of</strong> its large global current account surplus (<strong>the</strong> cur-215


ent account is a broader measure <strong>of</strong> trade that includes both goodsand services), which stood at $118 billion in 1992.TABLE 6-4.—U.S. Merchandise Trade Balances withSelected Countries, 1987-92[Billions <strong>of</strong> dollars]YearEuropeanCommunityJapanTotal"Greater China"People'sRepublic <strong>of</strong>ChinaHong KongTaiwanRest <strong>of</strong>world198719881989199019911992-20.6-9.21.26.317.09.0-56.3-51.8-49.1-41.1-43.4-49.6-25.9-20.6-22.6-24.4-23.7-28.4-2.8-3.5-6.2-10.4-12.7-18.3Note.—Exports are fas. and imports are customs value.China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan have been grouped toge<strong>the</strong>r as "Greater China" for analytical convenience.Detail may not add to totals due to rounding.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Census.-5.9-4.6-3.4-2.8-1.1-0.7-17.2-12.6-13.0-11.2-9.8-9.3-49.3-36.9-38.9-42.5-16.6-15.5Moreover, certain <strong>of</strong> Japan's trade patterns appear to differ fromthose <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r major industrial countries. Japan has an unusuallylow share <strong>of</strong> manufactured imports in domestic consumption, anunusually low share <strong>of</strong> intraindustry trade, an unusually smallstock <strong>of</strong> inward foreign direct investment, an unusually small share<strong>of</strong> domestic sales accounted for by foreign-owned firms, and an unusuallyhigh share <strong>of</strong> intrafirm trade, which is predominantly controlled,moreover, by Japanese ra<strong>the</strong>r than foreign-based firms.Manufactured imports play a relatively small role in <strong>the</strong> Japaneseeconomy, with <strong>the</strong> share <strong>of</strong> manufactured imports in consumptionless than half that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r major industrialized countries(Table 6-5). And while this measure has risen considerably in <strong>the</strong>o<strong>the</strong>r countries, it has remained relatively unchanged in Japan for20 years.TABLE 6-5.—Selected Trade Indicators for Six Industrialized Countries,1990IndicatorJapanUnitedStatesGermanyUnitedKingdomFranceItalyImport share <strong>of</strong> domestic consumption <strong>of</strong>manufactures (percent)Intraindustry trade indexForeign firms' share <strong>of</strong> domestic sales (percent)5.9.581.21 Data for 1989.2 Not available.Note.—Intra-European Community trade has been excluded from <strong>the</strong> intraindustry trade and import share calculations.Sources: Institute for International <strong>Economic</strong>s; United Nations, Commodity Trade Statistics Division; World Bank; andDepartment <strong>of</strong> Commerce.15.3.8316.415.4.7314.017.7.79124.113.7.7728.412.6.67216


Ano<strong>the</strong>r interesting aspect <strong>of</strong> Japan's trade pattern is its relativelylow level <strong>of</strong> intraindustry trade—trade in differentiatedmanufactures within a given industry. (One common example istrade in different makes and models <strong>of</strong> automobiles.) As economiesdevelop and <strong>the</strong> demands <strong>of</strong> firms and consumers become morecomplex, individual firms become less able to produce <strong>the</strong> vastlybroader range <strong>of</strong> products required to satisfy all demands.Intraindustry trade <strong>the</strong>n increases, as firms penetrate each o<strong>the</strong>rs'domestic markets to supply those particular products in which <strong>the</strong>yspecialize. Intraindustry trade, it is sometimes argued, is <strong>of</strong> particularimportance because <strong>the</strong> adjustment costs associated with anexpansion <strong>of</strong> intraindustry trade are thought to be lower than fora comparable expansion <strong>of</strong> interindustry trade—import-competingfirms can retool and specialize ra<strong>the</strong>r than disappear. If this is so,expansion <strong>of</strong> intraindustry trade should be more compatible withtrade liberalization.Japan also exhibits an unusually high share <strong>of</strong> intrafirm trade.Intrafirm trade is important both as a major channel <strong>of</strong> trade andbecause intracorporate transactions may be less responsive to normalprice and cost determinants than are arm's-length transactions.This issue is <strong>of</strong> considerable interest with regard to Japan because<strong>of</strong> Japan's unusual pattern <strong>of</strong> intrafirm trade. For most countries,intrafirm trade is dominated by shipments from parent firmsto <strong>the</strong>ir foreign affiliates. That is to say, intrafirm trade is exportoriented.Japan is unusual in that Japanese parents dominatetrade in both exports and imports. Some researchers have attributedthis dominance to <strong>the</strong> prominent role <strong>of</strong> giant trading companiesand keiretsu relationships in Japanese trade and argue thatthis pattern <strong>of</strong> trade is consistent with imperfectly competitive Japanesedomestic markets. (Keiretsu are large groups <strong>of</strong> Japanesefirms that share financial, production, personnel, and o<strong>the</strong>r linkages.)Table 6-6 reports data on U.S. bilateral trade with Europe andJapan. Intrafirm trade is a more important part <strong>of</strong> U.S.-Japantrade than <strong>of</strong> U.S.-Europe trade. Three-quarters <strong>of</strong> all U.S. importsfrom Japan are intrafirm (compared with less than 50 percent fortrade with Western Europe), and 36 percent <strong>of</strong> U.S. exports toJapan are intrafirm (compared with 32 percent for Western Europe).Japanese markets are not completely closed. Indeed, some U.S.firms excel in Japan. On <strong>the</strong> whole, however, <strong>the</strong> role <strong>of</strong> foreignfirms and foreign goods is strikingly small (Table 6-5).Explanations <strong>of</strong> Japan's apparent distinctiveness fall into twobroad groups, one emphasizing direct trade and industrial policyinterventions and <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r emphasizing structural characteristics217


TABLE 6-6.—Intrafirm Trade as Share <strong>of</strong> Total U.S. Exports to andImports from Europe and Japan, 1992[Percent <strong>of</strong> total]U.S. importsRegion to fromregionEurope 32.4 46.3Japan 36.2 75.0World total 30.6 45.0Note.—Intrafirm trade is defined as merchandise trade between "related parties" (that is, between affiliates <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> samefirm).Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Census.<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> economy. Domestic industrial support policies in Japan haveincluded subsidies to producers and to research and developmentconsortia, preferential tax treatment, preferential access to credit,government procurement preferences, establishment <strong>of</strong> producercartels, and lax antitrust enforcement. External policies have includedtrade protection, restrictions on inward foreign direct investment,and control over high-technology trade. <strong>The</strong>se policies havebeen applied to both infant and senescent industries.With a few notable exceptions, including agriculture, Japanesetariffs and import quotas are not significant trade barriers. Yet Japan'smarket is regarded by many as effectively closed to imports<strong>of</strong> many foreign manufactures, especially those that directly competewith Japanese goods. Structural barriers alleged to deter importsinclude reliance on bureaucratic control to ensure productsafety; domestic cartels, discriminatory pr-ctices by <strong>the</strong> keiretsu,and weak enforcement <strong>of</strong> competition policies; inadequate intellectualproperty protection; government procurement procedures thatfavor domestic suppliers; imperfect capital markets that inhibit inwardforeign investment; and impediments in <strong>the</strong> distributionchannels for imported products—to name a few.Estimating <strong>the</strong> impact <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mostly overt barriers to trade inprimary products is relatively straightforward. One recent studyconcluded that complete elimination <strong>of</strong> all agricultural trade barriersin Japan might increase <strong>the</strong> incomes <strong>of</strong> U.S. producers by 28percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> bilateral agricultural exports. This wouldoccur through a combination <strong>of</strong> higher export volumes to Japan andhigher prices on exports to all markets. Comparable figures for potentialgains in minerals and, importantly, services, are not available.What attracts <strong>the</strong> most attention, however, is <strong>the</strong> potential gainin manufactures. And here <strong>the</strong> story is far more controversial because<strong>the</strong> subtle nature <strong>of</strong> Japan's trade barriers poses difficultproblems for economists trying to assess <strong>the</strong>ir impact. In consequence,researchers have eschewed direct measurement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>sebarriers and focused instead on inferring <strong>the</strong>ir impact indirectly by218


examining differences in predicted and actual trade volumes. <strong>The</strong>sestudies have been virtually unanimous in <strong>the</strong>ir conclusion that Japan'slow volume <strong>of</strong> manufactured imports cannot be entirely explainedby economic fundamentals.In addition to examining quantities, one can look at prices. Ifmarkets were really open, traded goods should sell at "internationalprices" adjusted for transport costs. A number <strong>of</strong> studieshave concluded that traded-goods prices are far higher in Japanthan in o<strong>the</strong>r countries. Among <strong>the</strong>se surveys were two involvingexact brand and model comparisons conducted by <strong>the</strong> Department<strong>of</strong> Commerce and <strong>the</strong> Japanese Ministry <strong>of</strong> International Trade andIndustry as part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Structural Impediments Initiative talks.<strong>The</strong> 1991 survey found that two-thirds <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> products coveredwere on average 37 percent more expensive in Japan than in <strong>the</strong>United States; <strong>the</strong> 1989 survey obtained quantitatively similar results.Additional evidence comes from Japanese researchers whoused Japan's input-output table to calculate <strong>the</strong> tariff-equivalents<strong>of</strong> Japanese nontariff barriers. In some sectors <strong>the</strong>y discovered tariff-equivalents<strong>of</strong> 500 percent and higher.<strong>The</strong> question naturally arises as to why <strong>the</strong>se price differencesare not eliminated through arbitrage. Such large price differentialscould perhaps be dismissed as <strong>the</strong> product <strong>of</strong> exchange-rate misalignment,were <strong>the</strong>y temporary, but <strong>the</strong>ir persistence suggeststhat <strong>the</strong>y are <strong>the</strong> product <strong>of</strong> market closure. Indeed, one recentstudy concluded that Japanese manufactured imports might increaseby more than 20 percent if <strong>the</strong> price differentials were eliminated.<strong>The</strong>se studies, which extrapolate well beyond <strong>the</strong> historical experienceand are <strong>the</strong>refore unavoidably imprecise, have reached a variety<strong>of</strong> conclusions as to <strong>the</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> economic policy in determiningJapanese trade patterns. <strong>The</strong> preponderance <strong>of</strong> evidence,however, points to <strong>the</strong> closed nature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Japanese market. Accordingto one recent comprehensive study, if Japan were to eliminateall formal and informal barriers to trade, U.S. exports toJapan would initially increase by somewhere in <strong>the</strong> range <strong>of</strong> $9 billionto $18 billion per year.It should be made clear, however, that even if <strong>the</strong>se barrierswere eliminated, <strong>the</strong> bilateral balance would not change by this fullamount: Japanese imports would increase initially, but <strong>the</strong> resultantdepreciation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> yen and reallocation <strong>of</strong> resources wouldboost Japanese exports and reduce Japanese imports, at least partly<strong>of</strong>fsetting <strong>the</strong> initial change in <strong>the</strong> balance. Moreover, liberalizationwould occur over an extended period <strong>of</strong> time, making it potentiallydifficult to disentangle changes in <strong>the</strong> balance due to liberalizationfrom those due to macroeconomic developments, even in retrospectbut this in no way diminishes <strong>the</strong> desirability <strong>of</strong> obtaining219


greater access to <strong>the</strong> Japanese market, though. With more-openmarkets not only will <strong>American</strong> firms sell more but, because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>exchange-rate adjustments, many <strong>American</strong> firms will receive morefor what <strong>the</strong>y sell. Moreover, Japanese consumers will benefit—for<strong>the</strong> same reasons that <strong>American</strong> consumers benefit—from openingtrade: Both will have access to a greater variety <strong>of</strong> goods at lowerprices. Open markets are a win-win situation in which both sidesgain.<strong>The</strong> existence <strong>of</strong> such a large, technologically dynamic, and distinctiveeconomy as Japan poses special trade problems for <strong>the</strong>United States. Current U.S. policy centers around <strong>the</strong> UnitedStates-Japan Framework for a New <strong>Economic</strong> Partnership, announcedin July 1993. <strong>The</strong> Framework is <strong>the</strong> successor to <strong>the</strong>1985-86 Market Oriented Sector Selective (MOSS) talks and <strong>the</strong>SII talks already mentioned. <strong>The</strong> Framework document adopted at<strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1993 Tokyo economic summit calls for macroeconomic,sectoral, and structural reforms and cooperation on globalissues <strong>of</strong> common interest such as <strong>the</strong> environment. In particular,Japan committed itself to "actively pursue <strong>the</strong> medium-runobjectives <strong>of</strong> promoting strong and sustainable domestic demandledgrowth...intended to achieve...a highly significant decrease inits current account surplus...." Japan also committed to "promotinga significant increase in global imports <strong>of</strong> goods and services." Forits part, <strong>the</strong> United States "will...actively pursue <strong>the</strong> medium-termobjectives <strong>of</strong> substantially reducing <strong>the</strong> fiscal deficit, promoting domesticsaving, and streng<strong>the</strong>ning its international competitiveness."<strong>The</strong> sectoral and structural parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> talks are organized int<strong>of</strong>ive baskets: government procurement, regulatory reform and competitiveness,o<strong>the</strong>r major sectors (in <strong>the</strong> first instance, automobilesand auto parts), economic harmonization, and implementation <strong>of</strong>existing arrangements and measures. Topics under <strong>the</strong> governmentprocurement basket include Japanese procurement practices insuch sectors as computers, supercomputers, satellites, medical technology,and telecommunications, as well as overall government procurementpolicies in both countries. Regulatory issues include policiesand practices relating to financial services, insurance, competitionpolicy, retail and wholesale distribution, and U.S. exportcompetitiveness. <strong>Economic</strong> harmonization covers foreign direct investment,intellectual property rights, access to technology, andlong-term buyer-supplier relationships. <strong>The</strong> implementation basketis concerned with carrying out existing agreements between <strong>the</strong>two countries (including SII). <strong>The</strong> Framework agreement explicitlystates that <strong>the</strong> United States and Japan are committed to <strong>the</strong> multilateraltrading system and that "benefits under this Frameworkwill be on a Most Favored Nation basis."220


<strong>The</strong> Framework represents a departure from previous negotiationsin two substantive ways. <strong>The</strong> first is <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> "objective criteria"to assess progress. <strong>The</strong> Framework agreement states that"assessment will be based upon sets <strong>of</strong> objective criteria, ei<strong>the</strong>rqualitative or quantitative or both as appropriate," on which <strong>the</strong>two governments will agree. In this sense <strong>the</strong> negotiation is results-oriented,with both governments agreeing that "tangibleprogress must be achieved." By establishing objective criteria,progress can be independently verified, allowing negotiators toagree on those areas where problems have successfully been resolvedand to focus on those where progress is lacking.<strong>The</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r innovation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Framework talks is procedural: Byexplicitly incorporating biannual meetings between <strong>the</strong> <strong>President</strong> <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> United States and <strong>the</strong> Prime Minister <strong>of</strong> Japan, <strong>the</strong> Frameworkdramatically raises <strong>the</strong> political pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> negotiations. <strong>The</strong>hope is that this will significantly increase <strong>the</strong> pressure on policymakersto make steady progress on resolving outstanding issues.Trade with ChinaChina is also an important focus <strong>of</strong> U.S. trade policy because <strong>of</strong>its size, its reforming economy, and its large trade surplus with <strong>the</strong>United States, which reached $18.3 billion in 1992.It is misleading to focus exclusively on China's bilateral balancewith <strong>the</strong> United States. Table 6-4 reports trade balances for China,Taiwan, and Hong Kong and aggregates <strong>the</strong>m as "Greater China."It becomes apparent that <strong>the</strong> increase in <strong>the</strong> U.S. deficit withChina has been largely <strong>of</strong>fset by declines in <strong>the</strong> U.S. deficits withTaiwan and Hong Kong. <strong>The</strong>se developments are <strong>the</strong> result <strong>of</strong> largerealignments in exchange rates since <strong>the</strong> late 1980s that have encouragedfirms to relocate labor-intensive activities, such as <strong>the</strong>production <strong>of</strong> shoes, garments, and toys, from Hong Kong and Taiwanto China, where wage rates are lower. In o<strong>the</strong>r words, <strong>the</strong>growing U.S.-China trade imbalance represents in part a geographicreallocation <strong>of</strong> production, not a fundamental change inU.S. trade relations.With regard to China, U.S. trade policy centers on prison laborand workers' rights, intellectual property rights, market access,textiles, services, and <strong>the</strong> issue <strong>of</strong> China's most-favored-nation(MFN) status. In <strong>the</strong> area <strong>of</strong> intellectual property rights, <strong>the</strong> UnitedStates and China signed a memorandum <strong>of</strong> understanding inJanuary 1992. China agreed to provide product patent protectionbeginning January 1, 1993, and to adhere to international conventionson <strong>the</strong> protection <strong>of</strong> copyrights. A process has been establishedto enforce <strong>the</strong> memorandum, although <strong>the</strong>re has been littleactual progress on enforcement thus far.In October 1992 <strong>the</strong> United States and China signed a marketaccess agreement, under which China committed itself to increase151-444 0 - 9 4 - 8221


<strong>the</strong> transparency <strong>of</strong> its trade regime, to remove import restrictionssuch as licensing requirements and quotas from hundreds <strong>of</strong> products,and to liberalize its import administration substantially. <strong>The</strong>United States agreed to liberalize restrictions that limit Chineseaccess to technology, providing greater opportunities for U.S. producers.China is largely in compliance with <strong>the</strong> market accessagreement, although some issues remain unresolved with respectto transparency, quotas, and agricultural trade. <strong>The</strong> Administrationis continuing to push for greater access in <strong>the</strong>se areas, as wellas for better access to <strong>the</strong> Chinese market for U.S. providers <strong>of</strong> financial,maritime, and air transport services.A memorandum <strong>of</strong> understanding on exports to <strong>the</strong> UnitedStates produced by prison labor was concluded in 1992 and providesfor prison inspections. China has begun to allow U.S. <strong>of</strong>ficialsaccess to prisons to investigate allegations, and <strong>the</strong>re has been adecline in such allegations since <strong>the</strong> memorandum was signed.China continues to be denied coverage under investment guarantees<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Overseas Private Investment Corporation, however.Coverage was suspended in 1990 on <strong>the</strong> grounds that China wasnot taking steps to extend internationally recognized workers'rights to its citizens.In <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> textiles, conflicts have arisen over China's shortcomingsin implementing <strong>the</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Multi-Fiber Arrangement,which regulates trade in textiles and apparel. Chinese producershave at times resorted to fraudulent practices to evade restrictionson Chinese exports <strong>of</strong> textiles and apparel to <strong>the</strong> UnitedStates. <strong>The</strong> most common technique has been to ship goods producedin China to third countries, and from <strong>the</strong>re reexport <strong>the</strong>m to<strong>the</strong> United States under <strong>the</strong> third countries' quotas. In January<strong>1994</strong> <strong>the</strong> United States and China reached a new agreement onthis issue. In <strong>the</strong> long run, <strong>the</strong> transshipment problem can besolved through China's entry into GATT and <strong>the</strong> tariffication <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>U.S. import control system as envisioned in <strong>the</strong> Uruguay Roundagreement (discussed below). In <strong>the</strong> meantime, however, <strong>the</strong> UnitedStates will continue its two-track policy <strong>of</strong> negotiations with <strong>the</strong>Chinese government combined with criminal prosecutions for customsfraud.<strong>The</strong> last major remaining U.S.-China issue is <strong>the</strong> annual renewal<strong>of</strong> China's MFN status. Under <strong>the</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Jackson-VanikAmendment to <strong>the</strong> Trade Act <strong>of</strong> 1974, MFN status can be extendedto nonmarket economies only if <strong>the</strong> <strong>President</strong> grants a waiver certifyingthat <strong>the</strong> country does not impede emigration. (<strong>The</strong> law wasoriginally designed to encourage <strong>the</strong> Soviet Union to permit <strong>the</strong>emigration <strong>of</strong> Soviet Jews.) China first gained MFN status in <strong>the</strong>U.S. market in 1980, and renewal was routine until <strong>the</strong> TiananmenSquare incident in 1989. Since <strong>the</strong>n, renewal <strong>of</strong> China's MFN sta-222


tus has become increasingly controversial, with renewal in <strong>1994</strong>tied explicitly to human rights improvements.In each trade area, <strong>the</strong> Administration is carefully monitoringChinese implementation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bilateral agreements and will useall means at its disposal to ensure compliance. Successful implementationwill lay <strong>the</strong> foundation for Chinese accession to GATTand a far closer economic relationship between <strong>the</strong> United Statesand China.Trade and <strong>the</strong> Reform Process in <strong>the</strong> Former Socialist BlocAno<strong>the</strong>r crucial focus <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Administration's foreign economicpolicy is support <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reform process in <strong>the</strong> countries <strong>of</strong> centraland eastern Europe and <strong>the</strong> former Soviet Union, especially Russia.Never before has a country <strong>of</strong> Russia's size and influence (with apopulation <strong>of</strong> 150 million, a large conventional military presence,and nuclear weapons) attempted such a rapid metamorphosis. Because<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> immediate implications <strong>of</strong> Russian economic reform forworld peace, world economic growth, and <strong>the</strong> U.S. economy, <strong>the</strong><strong>President</strong> has made support <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reforms one <strong>of</strong> his top foreignpolicy objectives. This involves both providing assistance to domesticreforms and facilitating <strong>the</strong> integration <strong>of</strong> Russia into <strong>the</strong> worldtrading system.Most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fundamental issues in economic reform—includingliberalization (<strong>the</strong> freeing <strong>of</strong> prices), privatization (<strong>the</strong> transfer <strong>of</strong>ownership to private entities), and stabilization (<strong>the</strong> reduction <strong>of</strong>inflation and <strong>the</strong> budget deficit)—are essentially Russia's domesticpolicy decisions. Never<strong>the</strong>less, outside organizations including <strong>the</strong>International Monetary Fund, <strong>the</strong> World Bank, <strong>the</strong> Group <strong>of</strong> Seven(G-7), and <strong>the</strong> U.S. Government have important roles to play. Indeed,along with its G—7 partners, <strong>the</strong> United States has been activelyassisting <strong>the</strong> cause <strong>of</strong> economic reform in Russia. In April1993 <strong>the</strong> G-7 pledged $15 billion <strong>of</strong> debt rescheduling and $28.4billion in o<strong>the</strong>r assistance. By <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> November over half <strong>of</strong> thistotal had been approved.<strong>Economic</strong> assistance packages such as <strong>the</strong> one presented inTokyo constitute a significant source <strong>of</strong> finance for reform policies.But Russian exports to <strong>the</strong> West represent ano<strong>the</strong>r, perhaps evenmore important, source <strong>of</strong> hard-currency revenues. Because <strong>the</strong>trade patterns <strong>of</strong> Russia and <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r transitional economies wereformerly based on arbitrary central planning decisions, not marketforces, <strong>the</strong>se countries have encountered difficulties in establishingnormal commercial relations with o<strong>the</strong>r countries. <strong>The</strong> transition toa market economy has involved dramatic changes in both <strong>the</strong> productcontent and geographical composition <strong>of</strong> trading patterns. Aftermost <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se changes have been effected, Russia may be a substantialparticipant in world trade. Russia's share <strong>of</strong> U.S. trade isquite small (0.4 percent <strong>of</strong> total U.S. trade), but one study found223


that if <strong>the</strong> states <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> former Soviet Union were like typical industrialeconomies, <strong>the</strong>ir share <strong>of</strong> world exports would eventuallyrise to over 10 percent, from around 4 percent in 1988. Through <strong>the</strong>first 9 months <strong>of</strong> 1993, Russia's two most important exports to <strong>the</strong>United States were aluminum ($326 million) and crude oil ($131million), which toge<strong>the</strong>r accounted for more than 40 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>total.Expanding trade with economies in transition from socialismraises special problems for <strong>the</strong> application <strong>of</strong> U.S. antidumpinglaws, which divide <strong>the</strong> world into market and nonmarket economies(NMEs), with separate methodologies for assessing dumping specifiedfor each. (Russia, for example, is classified as an NME.) Formarket economies, dumping is determined to have occurred whena foreign producer charges lower prices in <strong>the</strong> U.S. than in itshome market (or, alternatively, prices below its costs in <strong>the</strong> homemarket). In <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> NMEs, since nei<strong>the</strong>r prices nor input costsare market determined, <strong>the</strong>y are not used in dumping investigations.Instead, U.S. law instructs <strong>the</strong> Commerce Department toconstruct cost estimates based on costs in a "surrogate" country ata similar stage <strong>of</strong> development. In practice, <strong>the</strong> surrogates are <strong>of</strong>tenat quite dissimilar stages <strong>of</strong> development, thus potentially tilting<strong>the</strong> calculation toward finding large dumping margins. For example,<strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce has used Swiss, Canadian,Dutch, French, German, and Japanese producers as surrogates forChinese firms in antidumping petitions. Perhaps <strong>the</strong> best knownexample, however, is that <strong>of</strong> Polish golf carts, described in Box6—2.Box 6-2.—<strong>The</strong> Case <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Polish Golf CartsIn <strong>the</strong> mid-1970s an antidumping petition was filed againstPolish electric golf carts* Because Poland was an NME thathad no golf courses and <strong>the</strong>refore little domestic demand forgolf carts, <strong>the</strong> U.S. authorities rightly concluded that it wasimpossible to compare <strong>the</strong> prices at which <strong>the</strong> carts were soldin <strong>the</strong> United States with prices in Poland. Instead, <strong>the</strong> authoritiesemployed a surrogate-country approach: <strong>the</strong>y attemptedto estimate what golf carts cost in a country similarto Poland. Canada was chosen. Unfortunately, Canada didn'tproduce golf carts ei<strong>the</strong>r, so <strong>the</strong> final determination was basedon an estimate <strong>of</strong> what golf carts would have cost in Canada—if Canada had actually produced <strong>the</strong>m.Reclassification <strong>of</strong> NMEs such as Russia as market economieswould not necessarily solve <strong>the</strong> problem, however, since <strong>the</strong>y would<strong>the</strong>n become subject to U.S. countervailing duty law at a time224


when <strong>the</strong>ir subsidies to state-owned producers remain sizable. Asa result, ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> market or <strong>the</strong> nonmarket methodology may impedeimports from economies in transition.This situation is particularly problematic since allowing Russiaand o<strong>the</strong>r economies in transition to export <strong>the</strong> goods in which <strong>the</strong>yhave comparative advantage benefits both <strong>the</strong>se economies (whichobtain valuable hard-currency revenues as well as experience inworld markets) and Western nations (which obtain goods producedrelatively more efficiently than <strong>the</strong>y can be produced in <strong>the</strong> West).Open market access is <strong>the</strong>refore a positive-sum means <strong>of</strong> encouraging<strong>the</strong> reform process.REGIONAL INITIATIVESSome issues cannot be handled on a bilateral basis, and <strong>the</strong> Administrationhas been deeply engaged in a number <strong>of</strong> regional efforts.<strong>The</strong> most prominent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se has been <strong>the</strong> North <strong>American</strong>Free Trade Agreement, which will solidify <strong>the</strong> ongoing reforms inMexico and help expand U.S.-Mexican trade.<strong>The</strong> North <strong>American</strong> Free Trade AgreementIn November 1993 <strong>the</strong> Congress ratified <strong>the</strong> North <strong>American</strong>Free Trade Agreement, which went into effect on January 1, <strong>1994</strong>.NAFTA creates a free-trade area <strong>of</strong> 370 million consumers and over$6.5 trillion <strong>of</strong> annual output, linking <strong>the</strong> United States to Canadaand Mexico, our largest and third-largest trading partners. Buildingon <strong>the</strong> earlier United States-Canada Free-Trade Agreement,NAFTA will contribute to productive efficiency, enhance <strong>the</strong> ability<strong>of</strong> North <strong>American</strong> producers to compete globally, and raise <strong>the</strong>standard <strong>of</strong> living <strong>of</strong> all three countries. By improving <strong>the</strong> investmentclimate in North America, and by providing innovative companieswith a larger market, NAFTA will also increase economicgrowth.NAFTA will help reinforce <strong>the</strong> market reforms already underway in Mexico (Box 6-3). Mexico's reforms have raised its rate <strong>of</strong>economic growth, making it an increasingly important export marketfor <strong>the</strong> United States. A stable and prosperous Mexico is importantto <strong>the</strong> United States for both economic and geopolitical reasons.<strong>The</strong> United States shares a border roughly 2,000 miles longwith Mexico; and as economic opportunities in Mexico improve,Mexican workers will have fewer incentives to migrate to <strong>the</strong> UnitedStates. NAFTA will help forge a lasting relationship between<strong>the</strong> two countries, based on open trade and cooperation.In addition to dismantling trade barriers in industrial goods,NAFTA includes agreements on services, investment, intellectualproperty rights, agriculture, and streng<strong>the</strong>ning <strong>of</strong> trade rules.<strong>The</strong>re are also side agreements on labor adjustment provisions,protection <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> environment, and import surges.225


Box 6-3.—Mexican <strong>Economic</strong> ReformsMexico is one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> outstanding economic success stories <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> last decade. After <strong>the</strong> debt crisis <strong>of</strong> 1982, <strong>the</strong> Mexican governmentbegan a broad program <strong>of</strong> economic reform, which hascontinued through <strong>the</strong> early 1990s. Fiscal policy changes,which moved <strong>the</strong> primary budget (that is, excluding interestpayments) from a deficit <strong>of</strong> about 7 percent <strong>of</strong> GDP in 1982 toa sustained surplus, were <strong>the</strong> first step. More-fundamental reformbegan in December 1987 when <strong>the</strong> Mexican governmentimplemented a concerted program that combined macroeconomicstabilization with microeconomic liberalization.Stabilization efforts in 1989-91 were pursued through a fiscalpolicy <strong>of</strong> tight spending controls and tax reform that broadened<strong>the</strong> tax base and lowered tax rates, while maintaining aroughly stable level <strong>of</strong> revenue. Monetary and exchange-ratepolicies were combined to reduce inflation while preventinglarge exchange-rate movements. Finally, incomes policies wereused to reduce expectations <strong>of</strong> inflation and any inflationaryinertia.<strong>The</strong> microeconomic reforms were sweeping. More than 80percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1,155 public sector enterprises in existence in1982 have already been privatized or liquidated. Privatizationhas enhanced microeconomic efficiency and reduced <strong>the</strong> fiscaldemands imposed by badly run state-owned enterprises. In addition,Mexico joined GATT in 1986. Tariffs were cut sharplyand many nontariff barriers to trade, such as quotas and importlicenses, were removed. Finally, a renegotiation and restructuring<strong>of</strong> Mexico's external debt eased its debt burden andgreatly reduced <strong>the</strong> uncertainty associated with debt service.<strong>The</strong> results <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se reforms have been impressive. Inflationfell from approximately 160 percent in 1987 to 12 percent in1992. At <strong>the</strong> same time, real GDP growth rose from -3.8 percentin 1986 to 4.5 percent in 1990 before slowing somewhatto 2.6 percent in 1992. <strong>The</strong> recent passage <strong>of</strong> NAFTA shouldstreng<strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> reform effort in Mexico and make a positivecontribution to its economic performance in <strong>the</strong> future.NAFTA and Industrial Trade. As a result <strong>of</strong> NAFTA, existing dutieson most goods from member countries ei<strong>the</strong>r were eliminatedon January 1, <strong>1994</strong>, or will be phased out in 5 or 10 years (for certainsensitive items, up to 15 years). Among those industrial goodsfor which trade is now tariff-free are computers, medical equipment,agricultural equipment, internal combustion engines, andtelephone switches, all <strong>of</strong> which previously faced tariffs <strong>of</strong> 10 per-226


cent or more in <strong>the</strong> Mexican market. Approximately 65 percent <strong>of</strong>U.S. industrial and agricultural exports to Mexico will be eligiblefor duty-free treatment within 5 years. NAFTA will also eliminatequotas and import licenses that are not essential for such purposesas protecting human health.NAFTA and Services Trade. NAFTA will allow U.S. service firmsto provide <strong>the</strong>ir services directly from <strong>the</strong> United States on a nondiscriminatorybasis, with any exceptions clearly spelled out. Forinvestors, NAFTA assures nondiscriminatory treatment: <strong>American</strong>swill generally be able to establish, acquire, and operate firms on<strong>the</strong> same basis as Mexicans in Mexico and Canadians in Canada.NAFTA also protects U.S. investors against restrictions on <strong>the</strong>ir repatriation<strong>of</strong> capital, pr<strong>of</strong>its, and royalties, and against expropriationswithout full compensation. Investors can seek monetary relieffrom an international arbitral panel for violation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir rights.Virtually all types <strong>of</strong> inventions, including Pharmaceuticals andagricultural chemicals, are protected under NAFTA provisions thatrequire patents to be granted for both products and processes developedby firms in member countries. <strong>The</strong> agreement also protectscopyrights for computer programs and databases, and rental rightsfor computer programs and sound recordings. Service marks andtrade secrets are also covered, along with integrated circuit masksboth directly and as components <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r products.NAFTA and Agricultural Trade. NAFTA will virtually eliminatebarriers to trade in agricultural commodities between <strong>the</strong> UnitedStates and Mexico over a 15-year period. All restrictions on productsrepresenting about 50 percent <strong>of</strong> U.S.-Mexico agriculturaltrade were lifted as soon as <strong>the</strong> agreement took effect. Productssuch as frozen beef, strawberries, and cut flowers—all <strong>of</strong> which previouslywere subject to tariffs <strong>of</strong> 20 percent or more in <strong>the</strong> Mexicanmarket—now trade tariff-free. For <strong>the</strong> remaining products, <strong>the</strong>phaseout will take between 5 and 15 years. <strong>The</strong> phaseout for mosttariffs imposed by <strong>the</strong> United States will simply involve an annualreduction in <strong>the</strong> tariff rate.In cases where <strong>the</strong> existing trade barrier is a nontariff barrier,such as an import license or quota, <strong>the</strong> phaseout process is morecomplicated. First, <strong>the</strong> license or quota will be replaced by a "tariffratequota," allowing a limited quantity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> good to be importedat a low (or zero) tariff rate, but charging a tariff for quantitiesabove <strong>the</strong> limit. Second, <strong>the</strong> tariff-rate quota will be phased outgradually over a 10- to 15-year period by increasing <strong>the</strong> quantitylimit and/or reducing <strong>the</strong> tariff rate applied to imports above <strong>the</strong>limit.With respect to <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r bilateral flows, U.S.-Canada trade liberalizationwill continue as specified under <strong>the</strong> earlier free-tradeagreement, with tariffs on all agricultural goods eliminated by227


1998, while nontariff barriers on a few products (poultry, eggs,dairy products, and sugar) are maintained. In a separate agreementunder NAFTA, Mexico and Canada will eliminate tariffs on<strong>the</strong>ir bilateral trade (except for <strong>the</strong> four products listed above). Allthree countries agreed to work for <strong>the</strong> elimination <strong>of</strong> agriculturalexports subsidies.As a consequence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se changes under NAFTA, U.S.-Mexicoagricultural trade is expected to grow significantly. U.S. corn growers,for example, can expect to export more corn to Mexico, whileMexican farmers can expect to export more fresh vegetables to <strong>the</strong>Untied States.NAFTA-Plus: <strong>The</strong> Side Agreements. <strong>The</strong> Clinton Administrationaccepted NAFTA as negotiated by its predecessor, but argued thatmore was needed. <strong>The</strong> result was <strong>the</strong> negotiation <strong>of</strong> three innovativeside agreements.<strong>The</strong> North <strong>American</strong> Agreement on Labor Cooperation represents<strong>the</strong> first attempt to manage <strong>the</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> potential change inlabor markets brought about by an accord between <strong>the</strong> UnitedStates and a trading partner. <strong>The</strong> agreement involves such issuesas restrictions on child labor, health and safety standards, andminimum wages. <strong>The</strong> supplemental labor agreement was developedaround three fundamental principles: (1) enhanced collaboration,cooperation, and information exchange among <strong>the</strong> three countries;(2) increased efforts to make each country's labor laws and <strong>the</strong>irimplementation explicit and highly visible; and (3) increased use <strong>of</strong>effective mechanisms to encourage <strong>the</strong> enforcement <strong>of</strong> nationallabor laws. <strong>The</strong> agreement establishes procedural mechanisms forenforcement, including channels <strong>of</strong> public communication, exchanges<strong>of</strong> information, discussion <strong>of</strong> issues, and various levels <strong>of</strong>consultations. If a solution cannot be reached, <strong>the</strong> agreement providesfor binding arbitration and assessment <strong>of</strong> penalties. In additionto signing <strong>the</strong> labor side agreement, <strong>the</strong> Mexican governmenthas pledged to link increases in <strong>the</strong> Mexican minimum wage toproductivity increases. Moreover, <strong>the</strong> United States has retainedits right to use its domestic trade laws, such as Section 301 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>1974 trade act, with respect to labor issues not covered underNAFTA.<strong>The</strong> North <strong>American</strong> Agreement on Environmental Cooperationexplicitly ensures our right to safeguard <strong>the</strong> environment. NAFTAmaintains all existing U.S. health, safety, and environmentalstandards. It allows States and cities to enact even tougher standards,while providing mechanisms to encourage all parties to harmonize<strong>the</strong>ir standards upward. <strong>The</strong> environmental side agreementcreates a new North <strong>American</strong> Commission on Environmental Cooperation,with a Council made up <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> three countries' top environmental<strong>of</strong>ficials. <strong>The</strong> Commission will have a Secretariat with228


a permanent staff. <strong>The</strong>re is a "layered" enforcement mechanism toensure that countries obey <strong>the</strong>ir own environmental laws. <strong>The</strong>mechanism starts with "sunshine" provisions that guarantee publicparticipation in monitoring <strong>the</strong> enforcement <strong>of</strong> environmental laws.Trade sanctions are <strong>the</strong>n provided for, if o<strong>the</strong>r avenues are not sufficientto resolve disputes. Besides <strong>the</strong> Commission, two new institutionswill be established to fund and implement environmentalinfrastructure projects along <strong>the</strong> U.S.-Mexican border.<strong>The</strong> side agreement on import surges creates an early warningmechanism to identify those sectors where explosive trade growthmay do significant harm to domestic industry. <strong>The</strong> side agreementalso establishes that, in <strong>the</strong> future, a working group can provide forrevisions in <strong>the</strong> treaty text based on <strong>the</strong> experience with <strong>the</strong> existingsafeguard mechanisms.During <strong>the</strong> transition period, safeguard relief is available in <strong>the</strong>form <strong>of</strong> a temporary snapback to pre-NAFTA duties if an importsurge threatens serious injury to a domestic industry. And, unlessa NAFTA member's exports account for a substantial share <strong>of</strong> totalimports and contribute significantly to <strong>the</strong> injury or its threat,<strong>the</strong>se exports must be excluded from safeguard actions taken byo<strong>the</strong>r members against imports from all countries.O<strong>the</strong>r NAFTA Issues. NAFTA preserves <strong>the</strong> right <strong>of</strong> each memberto retain its own contingent protection laws (such as antidumpingand countervailing duty laws), but in reviewing determinationunder <strong>the</strong>se laws, binational panels will replace domestic judicialreview (as in <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> United States-Canada Free-TradeAgreement). <strong>The</strong> panel will apply to domestic law <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> importingcountry, and its decision is final. Ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> importing or <strong>the</strong> exportingcountry may request a review <strong>of</strong> a panel's determination.In o<strong>the</strong>r areas, such as intellectual property rights, dispute resolutionis layered. First, a country may request consultations, andshould <strong>the</strong>se fail to resolve <strong>the</strong> dispute, it may call a meeting <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>Trade Commission, which will include Ministers from each country.If <strong>the</strong> Commission is unable to resolve <strong>the</strong> dispute, it is submittedto an arbitral panel which issues a report. If <strong>the</strong> panel upholds <strong>the</strong>complaint, but <strong>the</strong> disputants are still unable to reach a resolution,<strong>the</strong> complaining country is authorized to suspend benefits as appropriate.<strong>The</strong> North <strong>American</strong> Development Bank (NADBank) was createdto address concerns about <strong>the</strong> environment and about worker dislocation.It will serve as a major lending institution to finance, coordinate,and implement environmental, infrastructure, and communitydevelopment projects, both along <strong>the</strong> border and elsewhere,related to continuing North <strong>American</strong> integration. NADBank willbe organized to invest specifically in <strong>the</strong> environmental, physical,and social infrastructure that will be needed to bring about an up-229


ward convergence in environmental and social standards and practicesbetween Mexico and <strong>the</strong> United States. In this way it will facilitate<strong>the</strong> adjustment <strong>of</strong> workers adversely impacted by NAFTArelatedtrade liberalization. <strong>The</strong> bank will be capitalized to provide$2 billion to $3 billion in loans and guarantees and will be able toleverage additional private and public funds, to generate an estimatedtotal <strong>of</strong> $20 billion in project finance.<strong>The</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Impact <strong>of</strong> NAFTA. NAFTA may be <strong>the</strong> most thoroughlystudied trade agreement in history. A review <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> majorstudies <strong>of</strong> NAFTA's economic impact indicates a broad consensuson key points in <strong>the</strong> NAFTA debate: (1) All three NAFTA countriesgain from <strong>the</strong> agreement. (2) In <strong>the</strong> United States, labor will gainfrom increased employment, increased wages, or both. (3) Increasedinvestment in Mexico will not come at <strong>the</strong> expense <strong>of</strong> investmentin <strong>the</strong> United States. <strong>The</strong> few studies reaching contrary conclusionshave been strongly criticized by academic and o<strong>the</strong>r pr<strong>of</strong>essionaleconomists.In a letter to <strong>the</strong> <strong>President</strong>, 286 academic economists, including13 Nobel Prize winners, expressed <strong>the</strong>ir support for NAFTA, stating,"While we may not agree on <strong>the</strong> precise employment impact<strong>of</strong> NAFTA, we do concur that <strong>the</strong> agreement will be a net positivefor <strong>the</strong> United States, both in terms <strong>of</strong> employment creation andoverall economic growth." Nineteen out <strong>of</strong> twenty studies surveyedfound that NAFTA would benefit <strong>the</strong> United States; <strong>the</strong> lone negativeassessment was based on <strong>the</strong> unrealistic assumption that factoriesliterally would be dismantled in <strong>the</strong> United States andmoved to Mexico.It has been estimated that <strong>the</strong> agreement will increase exportemployment in <strong>the</strong> United States by 200,000 jobs; on average Mexicanexport-related jobs pay wages 12 percent higher than <strong>the</strong> nationalaverage. Moreover, studies <strong>of</strong> NAFTA have found that gainswould occur even among groups sometimes alleged to be adverselyaffected. For example, it was found that union workers will benefitfrom NAFTA because <strong>the</strong> growing sectors <strong>of</strong> U.S. exports to Mexicoare disproportionately unionized. Likewise, African-<strong>American</strong> workersare more heavily concentrated in industries that export to Mexicothan in Mexican import-competing sectors. As a result, African-<strong>American</strong>s too may benefit disproportionately from <strong>the</strong> agreement.Finally, by contributing to <strong>the</strong> creation <strong>of</strong> more and better jobs inMexico, NAFTA will discourage illegal immigration from Mexico to<strong>the</strong> United States.In summary, NAFTA is an epochal agreement, and its passagewas a triumph <strong>of</strong> facts over fear. It is <strong>the</strong> world's first free-tradeagreement between industrial and developing countries. Its sideagreements embody innovative ideas to deal with environmentaland labor issues. <strong>The</strong> best available evidence shows that NAFTA230


will create good, high-paying jobs for <strong>American</strong> workers. It willstreng<strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> ability <strong>of</strong> U.S. firms to compete in <strong>the</strong> global marketplace.It will help <strong>the</strong> Mexican and Canadian economies as well,providing a disincentive for illegal transborder migration and o<strong>the</strong>rillegal activities. <strong>The</strong> Administration's trade policy can be describedas "export activism"—<strong>the</strong> United States will work actively to openforeign markets, and in return we will keep our market open.NAFTA is a key component <strong>of</strong> this activist strategy.Asia-Pacific <strong>Economic</strong> Cooperation<strong>The</strong> Asia-Pacific <strong>Economic</strong> Cooperation (APEC) was begun in1989 to encourage economic cooperation among countries <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Pacificregion. In <strong>the</strong> past quarter-century, <strong>the</strong> United States' APECpartners—Australia, Brunei, Canada, China, Hong Kong, Indonesia,Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea,<strong>the</strong> Philippines, <strong>the</strong> Republic <strong>of</strong> Korea, Singapore, Chinese Taipei(Taiwan), and Thailand—have increased <strong>the</strong>ir combined share <strong>of</strong>world income and trade by more than half (Box 6-4). <strong>The</strong>se economiesnow account for more than half <strong>of</strong> all U.S. trade, or more thantriple U.S. trade with <strong>the</strong> European Union. Even if Canada andMexico are excluded from <strong>the</strong> calculation, U.S. trade with o<strong>the</strong>rAPEC countries is 76 percent greater than our trade with <strong>the</strong> EUcountries.One consequence <strong>of</strong> this rapid growth is striking: as long as <strong>the</strong>Asian countries grow faster than <strong>the</strong> United States, <strong>the</strong>y will becomemore important in our trade while we will become less importantin <strong>the</strong>irs. <strong>The</strong>refore past trade strategies based on threats <strong>of</strong>market closure are liable to become less and less effective.This analysis suggests that, to achieve its trade policy goals in<strong>the</strong> region, <strong>the</strong> United States will increasingly have to act in concertwith o<strong>the</strong>r countries ra<strong>the</strong>r than unilaterally. Thus it may bedesirable to begin establishing <strong>the</strong> appropriate institutional infrastructurefor cooperation now, and APEC is <strong>the</strong> leading candidate.<strong>The</strong> United States held <strong>the</strong> rotating chairmanship <strong>of</strong> APEC in 1993and hosted <strong>the</strong> annual Ministerial meeting in Seattle in November,which was attended by economic policymakers from each <strong>of</strong> itsmembers. <strong>The</strong> <strong>President</strong> elevated <strong>the</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> APEC byhosting <strong>the</strong> first-ever meeting <strong>of</strong> APEC leaders in Seattle.At <strong>the</strong> APEC Ministerial meeting, a group <strong>of</strong> private individualspreviously commissioned by <strong>the</strong> APEC Ministers to serve as anEminent Persons Group presented its report. <strong>The</strong> report described<strong>the</strong> threats to trade and investment in <strong>the</strong> region and recommendedways to promote regional trade liberalization and cooperation.<strong>The</strong> Ministers indicated that those recommendationsclosely linked to ongoing work in APEC should be implementedpromptly. <strong>The</strong>se include recommendations to achieve a common set<strong>of</strong> investment principles, harmonize standards, and create a mecha-231


Box 6-4.—<strong>The</strong> Asian "Miracle"Per capita gross national product (GNP) in East Asia grew,on average, by over 5 percent per year between 1965 and 1990.During <strong>the</strong> same period, per capita GNP in <strong>the</strong> industrializedcountries that make up <strong>the</strong> Organization for <strong>Economic</strong> Cooperationand Development (OECD) grew by less than 2.5 percentper year. What explains this relatively rapid growth inEast Asia? A recent World Bank book argues that a major part<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> explanation is that <strong>the</strong> average OECD member wasmuch more technologically advanced than <strong>the</strong> average EastAsian country in 1965. By adopting and adapting techniquesfrom <strong>the</strong> industrial countries, <strong>the</strong> East Asian countries wereable to increase both productivity levels and per capita GNP ata rapid pace.This is undoubtedly true. But o<strong>the</strong>r countries that were poorin 1965 did not grow as fast as <strong>the</strong> successful East Asian nations.Why did East Asia experience faster growth? One keyfactor is almost certainly <strong>the</strong> macroeconomic environment: inflationand budget deficits were kept relatively low, and nationalcurrencies were kept from becoming overvalued. Macroeconomicpolicies encouraged, or at least did not discourage,high saving and investment rates as well as strong exportgrowth. Governments also emphasized education. <strong>The</strong> focuswas primarily on <strong>the</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> basic education, ra<strong>the</strong>r than onhigher education. As a result <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se policies, East Asiancountries accumulated substantial physical and human capital,which spurred relatively rapid growth in GNP per capita.<strong>The</strong> impact <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r, more interventionist policies on growthin several East Asian countries remains a source <strong>of</strong> controversy.Some government interventions in <strong>the</strong> market mayhave improved economic performance, particularly when <strong>the</strong>ywere not excessively distortionary, were administered competently,were aimed at particular market imperfections, andwere adapted to meet changing circumstances*<strong>The</strong> Asian countries are expected to account for increasingshares <strong>of</strong> world income and trade. By 2000 it is likely that Asiawill have surpassed North America and Europe as <strong>the</strong> world'slargest economic zone. As its share <strong>of</strong> world income rises, sowill its share <strong>of</strong> world trade—<strong>the</strong> Asian share <strong>of</strong> U.S. trade isprojected to rise to 40 percent by <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> decade.232


nism for resolving trade and investment disputes. O<strong>the</strong>r recommendations,relating to deepening and broadening <strong>the</strong> UruguayRound <strong>of</strong> GATT, were singled out for additional study. <strong>The</strong> APECleaders instructed <strong>the</strong> Eminent Persons Group to elaborate on <strong>the</strong>irrecommendations relating to longer term trade liberalization in areport to be presented to <strong>the</strong> leaders in <strong>1994</strong> in Indonesia.MULTILATERAL INITIATIVES: THE URUGUAY ROUND<strong>The</strong> most far-reaching <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Administration's market-opening effortshas been on a global scale: <strong>the</strong> Uruguay Round negotiations<strong>of</strong> GATT, whose 116 participating countries account for approximately85 percent <strong>of</strong> world trade. GATT was created after WorldWar II to reduce tariffs and remove nontariff barriers to internationaltrade. In seven rounds <strong>of</strong> GATT-sponsored multilateraltrade negotiations (<strong>the</strong> Uruguay Round is <strong>the</strong> eighth), <strong>the</strong> membercountries have lowered tariffs and agreed on codes <strong>of</strong> conduct fornontariff barriers.In <strong>the</strong> Uruguay Round negotiations, effectively completed on December15, 1993, <strong>the</strong> United States and o<strong>the</strong>r GATT membersagreed not only to lower tariffs on merchandise trade, but also tointegrate into GATT certain areas <strong>of</strong> trade and investment thathad not been subject to effective GATT discipline, including agriculture,textiles, trade in services, investment, and intellectualproperty rights. <strong>The</strong> Uruguay Round also made progress in reformingmultilateral dispute settlement procedures and o<strong>the</strong>r multilateraltrade rules, including those dealing with nontariff measures.<strong>The</strong> Congress is expected to ratify this agreement this year.<strong>The</strong> stakes in <strong>the</strong> Uruguay Round negotiations were enormous.In <strong>the</strong> short run, failure to complete <strong>the</strong> Round would have significantlyundermined business confidence around <strong>the</strong> globe and mighthave contributed to <strong>the</strong> erosion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> open trading system. In <strong>the</strong>long run, <strong>the</strong> successful completion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Round will mean a majorboost to <strong>the</strong> world economy. Preliminary studies suggest that <strong>the</strong>likely gains to <strong>the</strong> U.S. economy alone are more than $100 billionbut less than $200 billion annually by 2005 (Box 6-5). <strong>The</strong>se efficiencygains will manifest <strong>the</strong>mselves in <strong>the</strong> form <strong>of</strong> more and betterjobs for <strong>American</strong> workers.<strong>The</strong> Round achieved major reductions in trade barriers facing industrialproducts. Key provisions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> market access agreementinclude <strong>the</strong> following:• Tariffs imposed by major industrial countries are to be eliminated,and those <strong>of</strong> many developing countries ei<strong>the</strong>r eliminatedor sharply reduced, in <strong>the</strong> following areas: constructionequipment, agricultural equipment, medical equipment, steel,beer, distilled spirits, Pharmaceuticals, paper, toys, and furniture.233


Box 6-5.—<strong>The</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Impact <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Uruguay RoundEven before <strong>the</strong> Uruguay Round was completed, researcherswere attempting to quantify its likely effects on <strong>the</strong> <strong>American</strong>economy. Studies based on existing formal economic modelsunanimously conclude that <strong>the</strong>se effects will be beneficial. It isquite likely that new studies incorporating some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Round'sfinal accomplishments in such areas as intellectual propertyprotection will yield even larger estimates <strong>of</strong> benefits.<strong>The</strong> Uruguay Round will increase <strong>American</strong> output because<strong>the</strong> specialization encouraged by more-open markets will raiseproductivity. As foreign markets open, we will produce more <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> goods that make use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> highly skilled, highly productiveU.S. work force. <strong>Economic</strong> models <strong>of</strong>fer a range <strong>of</strong> estimates<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> output gain from greater specialization. A recentOECD study estimates those gains to be 0.4 percent <strong>of</strong> GDP for<strong>the</strong> United States. But this is almost certainly a gross under*estimate <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> impact <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Round, because it ignored a host<strong>of</strong> important factors, including gains from specialization within<strong>the</strong> manufacturing sector. Ano<strong>the</strong>r study by World Bank andOECD economists estimates even smaller gains, but focuses onagriculture. Studies that more adequately capture gains fromspecialization suggest that <strong>the</strong> benefit to <strong>the</strong> U.S* economy islikely to be approximately 1 percent <strong>of</strong> GDP after <strong>the</strong> UruguayRound tariff cuts are fully phased in.O<strong>the</strong>r important sources <strong>of</strong> benefit are not captured by <strong>the</strong>existing models, which do not quantify <strong>the</strong> impact <strong>of</strong> trade liberalizationin services or enhanced protection <strong>of</strong> intellectualproperty rights. In addition, higher productivity will result inincreased investment and innovation, providing an importantadditional benefit. <strong>The</strong>se additional gains are difficult to quantify,but <strong>the</strong>y are almost certainly sizable and may even exceed<strong>the</strong> more easily quantified gains. <strong>The</strong> total gain 10 years afterimplementation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> agreement begins is <strong>the</strong>n likely to bemore than $100 billion but less than $200 billion annually.Major U.S. trading partners agreed to deep tariff cuts, rangingfrom 50 to 100 percent, on important electronics items includingsemiconductors, computer parts, and semiconductor manufacturingequipment.Tariffs <strong>of</strong> industrial and major developing countries on chemicalproducts are to be harmonized at very low rates (zero, 5.5,or 6.5 percent, according to product).<strong>The</strong> agreement significantly increased access to markets representingapproximately 85 percent <strong>of</strong> world trade by reducingtariffs on certain specific items <strong>of</strong> key interest to U.S. export-234


ers. Progress in textiles and apparel was particularly significant.For decades, international trade in textiles and apparelproducts has effectively been exempted from GATT rules. Instead,<strong>the</strong> Multi-Fiber Arrangement establishes a procedure forlimiting textile and apparel exports from developing to industrialcountries. Under <strong>the</strong> final Uruguay Round agreement,products covered by <strong>the</strong> Multi-Fiber Arrangement will be free<strong>of</strong> quotas after 10 years, and textiles will be integrated intogeneral GATT rules. Tariffs will be reduced as well.Throughout <strong>the</strong> Uruguay Round negotiations, one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mostcontentious issues was agricultural trade liberalization. <strong>The</strong> finalagreement on agriculture streng<strong>the</strong>ns <strong>the</strong> long-term rules for agriculturaltrade and sharply limits national policies that distort thattrade. U.S. agricultural exports will benefit significantly from reductionsin foreign export subsidies and from market opening byour trading partners.<strong>The</strong> United States was successful in its effort to obtain meaningfulrules and explicit commitments to reduce export subsidies, cutdomestic subsidies, and increase market access. Agricultural exportsubsidies and trade-distorting domestic farm subsidies are not onlyto be reduced, but for <strong>the</strong> first time will be subject to explicit multilateraldisciplines. <strong>The</strong> United States also prevailed in establishing<strong>the</strong> principle <strong>of</strong> comprehensive tariffication, which will lead to <strong>the</strong>eventual removal <strong>of</strong> all import quotas and o<strong>the</strong>r nontariff importbarriers. Nontariff barriers will first be replaced by tariffs, ensuringminimum or current access, and <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong>se tariffs will graduallybe reduced.Progress in creating a more hospitable trading system for hightechnologyproducts was achieved on two fronts. First, <strong>the</strong> UnitedStates was able to win greater protection for intellectual propertyrights, such as patents, copyrights, and trademarks. This is veryimportant for a diverse set <strong>of</strong> U.S. industries, including <strong>the</strong> electronicsindustry (where semiconductor masks will be protected), <strong>the</strong>pharmaceutical industry (patents), and <strong>the</strong> communications industry(protection <strong>of</strong> copyrights).Second, <strong>the</strong> Uruguay Round agreement sets forth multilateralrules governing subsidies. Because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> beneficial social spilloversassociated with research and development activities, governmentsupport cannot and should not be ruled out altoge<strong>the</strong>r. <strong>The</strong> challengefor <strong>the</strong> multilateral trading system is to find rules that permitgovernments to support innovations that benefit all nationswhile precluding rent-shifting subsidies designed to benefit one nationat <strong>the</strong> expense <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs. <strong>The</strong> Uruguay Round agreementmakes progress in this respect by establishing clearer rules andstronger disciplines in <strong>the</strong> subsidies area. It also makesnonactionable certain subsidies relating to basic research, regional235


development, and environmental cleanup, provided <strong>the</strong>y are subjectto conditions designed to limit <strong>the</strong>ir distorting effects.Negotiators were able to agree on comprehensive GATT rulesgoverning trade and investment in services (<strong>the</strong> so-called GeneralAgreement on Trade in Services, or GATS), such as telecommunications,pr<strong>of</strong>essional, and financial services. <strong>The</strong> agreement containsa strong national-treatment provision: Member countriesmust accord to service suppliers <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r countries treatment noless favorable than that accorded <strong>the</strong>ir own suppliers. GATS alsoincludes a market access provision that incorporates disciplines ondiscriminatory measures that governments frequently impose tolimit competition. <strong>The</strong>se measures include restrictions on <strong>the</strong> number<strong>of</strong> firms allowed into <strong>the</strong> market, "economic need" tests, andmandatory local incorporation rules. Because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> breadth andcomplexity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se issues, not as much progress was made as wasdesirable. To realize additional progress, GATS establishes a proceduralframework for fur<strong>the</strong>r negotiation.<strong>The</strong> Uruguay Round negotiations also yielded systematic prohibitionson trade-related investment measures. For example, <strong>the</strong>agreement prohibits so-called local content requirements, whichforce foreign firms to use a set amount <strong>of</strong> locally produced inputsas a condition for investment. It also prohibits "trade balancing" requirements,under which a foreign affiliate must export as much <strong>of</strong>its production as it imports for use as inputs. <strong>The</strong>se requirementshave bedeviled U.S. firms operating abroad in <strong>the</strong> past.Lastly, <strong>the</strong> Uruguay Round agreement prohibits so-called voluntaryexport restraints and o<strong>the</strong>r, similar measures that are <strong>of</strong>tenused as safeguards outside GATT rules. It also provides specifictime limits for <strong>the</strong> formation and operation <strong>of</strong> dispute settlementpanels and requires <strong>the</strong> automatic adoption <strong>of</strong> panel reports (exceptin <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> unanimous veto). Previously, any country, including<strong>the</strong> country against which <strong>the</strong> complaint was lodged, could effectivelyblock <strong>the</strong> implementation <strong>of</strong> a panel's decision. <strong>The</strong> new procedureswill greatly expedite <strong>the</strong> resolution <strong>of</strong> international tradedisputes. <strong>The</strong> members <strong>of</strong> GATT agreed to establish a new multilateralorganization, to be called <strong>the</strong> World Trade Organization(WTO), to enforce <strong>the</strong>se new agreements.In summary, <strong>the</strong> U.S. negotiators in <strong>the</strong> Uruguay Round weresuccessful in negotiating broad-ranging multilateral trade liberalization.This was accomplished by reducing existing barriers andbringing areas <strong>of</strong> trade that had been largely outside <strong>the</strong> GATTsystem, such as agriculture, textiles, intellectual property, andservices, under <strong>the</strong> GATT rubric. At <strong>the</strong> same time, GATT procedureshave been streng<strong>the</strong>ned to ensure that signatories meet <strong>the</strong>irobligations, without compromising our ability to implement our nationaltrade or o<strong>the</strong>r laws (Box 6-6). <strong>The</strong> liberalization <strong>of</strong> global236


trade resulting from <strong>the</strong>se substantive and procedural achievementswill raise real incomes in <strong>the</strong> United States by billions <strong>of</strong>dollars annually in <strong>the</strong> coming years.Box 6-6.—-<strong>The</strong> Uruguay Round and U.S. Trade Laws<strong>The</strong> Uruguay Round final agreement contains a number <strong>of</strong>provisions that will enhance dispute resolution and facilitatebetter enforcement <strong>of</strong> U.S. rights. <strong>The</strong> agreement both movesGATT procedures closer to U.S. laws and complements U.S.laws for dealing with unfair foreign trade practices.Section 301 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Trade Act <strong>of</strong> 1974 provides <strong>the</strong> basis foractions to enforce U.S, rights under trade agreements and torespond to foreign practices that impede or restrict U.S. exports.When disputes arise in areas covered by GATT* Section301 requires <strong>the</strong> United States to use GATT dispute resolutionprocedures before undertaking unilateral action. <strong>The</strong> UruguayRound brings agriculture, textiles, and services under GATTrules for <strong>the</strong> first time and enhances <strong>the</strong> speed and effectiveness<strong>of</strong> GATT dispute resolution procedures. As a result, <strong>the</strong>United States can now use GATT to accomplish objectives thatformerly required unilateral action. When disputes arise inareas outside <strong>the</strong> GATT framework, <strong>the</strong> United States can stilluse Section 301 to combat unfair foreign trade practices.<strong>The</strong> Uruguay Round brings GATT closer to U.S. practices ino<strong>the</strong>r areas. For example, in dealing with food safety measures,<strong>the</strong> Uruguay Round agreement allows countries to choose <strong>the</strong>irown levels <strong>of</strong> safety but requires that each country's standardshave a scientific basis and not be used as disguised trade barriers.Because U.S. laws already have a scientific basis, it isunlikely that <strong>the</strong>y will be susceptible to challenge. O<strong>the</strong>r countries,however, have used food safety regulations in an arbitrarymanner to block imports. <strong>The</strong> agreement adopts similarprovisions for dealing with technical barriers to trade, such asso-called conformity assessment procedures (registration, inspection,and laboratory accreditation procedures, among o<strong>the</strong>rs)used to evaluate conformance with technical regulations.Antidumping is ano<strong>the</strong>r area in which <strong>the</strong> post-UruguayRound GATT will become more like U.S. trade laws. <strong>The</strong> UnitedStates has a transparent process for implementing its antidumpinglaws. <strong>The</strong> Uruguay Round agreement will make foreignantidumping actions more transparent, which should helpU.S. exporters by improving <strong>the</strong> fairness <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r countries'antidumping procedures.237


THE TRADE POLICY AGENDABy lowering tariffs and providing a framework for cooperation ininternational trade, GATT has contributed significantly to a moreharmonious world trading regime. But new issues in trade policyare coming to <strong>the</strong> fore as <strong>the</strong> world economy evolves. Among <strong>the</strong>important new issues confronting GATT and <strong>the</strong> new WTO will beissues relating to trade and <strong>the</strong> environment, competition policies,and regionalism.TRADE AND THE ENVIRONMENTTrade and environmental issues have become intertwined in recentyears. Some accuse GATT <strong>of</strong> being hostile to <strong>the</strong> environment,while o<strong>the</strong>rs argue that some countries' environmental policies arethinly veiled protectionism. In reality, protectionism <strong>of</strong>ten contributesto environmental degradation by encouraging inappropriatepatterns <strong>of</strong> production. An obvious example is agricultural protection,which stimulates agricultural production in poorly suited locations.Farmers in <strong>the</strong>se areas overuse chemicals or exhaust scarcewater resources to compensate for <strong>the</strong>ir natural disadvantages,<strong>the</strong>reby contributing to environmental degradation. Freer tradewould encourage more-appropriate patterns <strong>of</strong> production and improve<strong>the</strong> environment even as it increased living standards.Standard economic analysis suggests <strong>of</strong>fsetting government actionwhen prices fail to reflect environmental costs (Chapter 5). Buttrade restraints are rarely <strong>the</strong> best solution to environmental problems.If <strong>the</strong> environmental problem is limited to one country,domestic policies, not trade protection, should be employed. If pollutionor o<strong>the</strong>r environmental problems spill across borders, internationalrules and cooperation will be necessary. But here againtrade protection will seldom be <strong>the</strong> most effective remedy.Sometimes trade sanctions are used (or threatened) as a way toenforce environmental agreements. For example, <strong>the</strong> 1987Montreal Protocol, which seeks to reverse <strong>the</strong> depletion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>upper-atmosphere ozone layer caused by <strong>the</strong> release <strong>of</strong> chlor<strong>of</strong>luorocarbonsand o<strong>the</strong>r chemicals, requires trade actions againstcountries that do not abide by <strong>the</strong> environmental standards in <strong>the</strong>agreement. A second example is <strong>the</strong> Convention on InternationalTrade in Endangered Species <strong>of</strong> Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES),which aims to protect endangered species <strong>of</strong> wildlife by restrictingand monitoring <strong>the</strong>ir trade.During 1993, <strong>the</strong> possibility <strong>of</strong> using trade sanctions for environmentalpurposes was raised, pursuant to a recommendation <strong>of</strong>CITES, in <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> trade by China and Taiwan in rhinoceros andtiger parts, and in regard to Norwegian whaling practices under<strong>the</strong> Pelly Amendment to enforce <strong>the</strong> International Whaling Con-238


vention moratorium on whaling. In both cases, however, sanctionswere deferred.<strong>The</strong> founders <strong>of</strong> GATT could not have foreseen <strong>the</strong> present importance<strong>of</strong> environmental problems. Some headway in harmonizingtrade and environmental concerns has already been made in<strong>the</strong> environmental side agreement to NAFTA. And <strong>the</strong> preamble to<strong>the</strong> agreement establishing <strong>the</strong> WTO recognizes <strong>the</strong> importance <strong>of</strong>environmental concerns. <strong>The</strong> WTO negotiators have also agreed todevelop a work program on trade and <strong>the</strong> environment to ensure<strong>the</strong> responsiveness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> multilateral trading system to environmentalobjectives.INTERNATIONAL TRADE AND COMPETITION POLICYAs tariff and nontariff barriers to trade fall and as nationaleconomies become more integrated into <strong>the</strong> world trading system,differences in national business practices and laws become moreimportant determinants <strong>of</strong> trade outcomes. Currently <strong>the</strong>re are nomultilateral rules to redress possibly restrictive practices in <strong>the</strong>way companies compete—such as price fixing, price discrimination,and <strong>the</strong> preferential supplier and distributor relationships characteristic<strong>of</strong> Japan's keiretsu. Many nations, including <strong>the</strong> UnitedStates, rely on antitrust laws to prevent anticompetitive businesspractices by domestic firms in <strong>the</strong>ir domestic market.National antidumping laws are <strong>the</strong> most commonly used remedyin such circumstances. But unlike domestic antitrust laws, whichgenerally increase competition and lower prices, national antidumpinglaws sometimes reduce competition and raise prices. Bothin <strong>the</strong> United States and elsewhere, antidumping laws go beyondpreventing anticompetitive practices—which should be <strong>the</strong>ir rationale—and<strong>of</strong>ten have <strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> protecting domestic industriesfrom foreign competition. For example, a recent study found that,during <strong>the</strong> Reagan Administration, nontariff barriers includingantidumping actions probably reduced U.S. manufactured importsby around a fifth—largely by discouraging foreign producers fromentering <strong>the</strong> U.S. market or by discouraging those that do expor<strong>the</strong>re from lowering <strong>the</strong>ir prices.If sound competition policies were present and effectively enforcedin more nations, and if such laws were more easily enforceableagainst foreign misconduct, <strong>the</strong>y could serve as <strong>the</strong> first line<strong>of</strong> defense against restrictive business practices by both domesticand foreign firms. <strong>The</strong> United States is currently pursuing thisgoal through such bilateral mechanisms as antitrust cooperationagreements.Here NAFTA is a step in <strong>the</strong> right direction. <strong>The</strong> agreement commitsits signatories to cooperate in <strong>the</strong> area <strong>of</strong> competition law enforcement,and imposes discipline on certain government-des-239


ignated monopolies. It also establishes a trilateral committee toconsider <strong>the</strong> relationship between trade and competition policy in<strong>the</strong> NAFTA countries. Some o<strong>the</strong>r free-trade areas have gone fur<strong>the</strong>r.For example, in <strong>the</strong> European Union and <strong>the</strong> Australia-NewZealand Free Trade Area, antidumping laws do not apply to tradeamong member countries, since this is considered internal trade,subject to organization-wide competition policies.Until <strong>the</strong>re is greater convergence and international cooperationin <strong>the</strong> enforcement <strong>of</strong> antitrust laws against cross-border conduct,international disputes over unfair pricing between corporations <strong>of</strong>different national origins will <strong>of</strong>ten continue to play out in one <strong>of</strong>two ways: through <strong>the</strong> application <strong>of</strong> national competition laws,with <strong>the</strong> continuing difficulties associated with <strong>the</strong>ir internationalenforcement, or through <strong>the</strong> application <strong>of</strong> overly restrictive nationaltrade laws. As part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Uruguay Round, <strong>the</strong> WTO Councilfor Trade in Goods will consider provisions on investment policyand competition policy in <strong>the</strong> future. <strong>The</strong> OECD is also pursuinga work program in this area.REGIONALISMAlthough <strong>the</strong>re may be significant benefits to trade liberalizationon a regional basis, some nonmember countries could be hurtthrough trade and investment diversion, as trade and investmentare preferentially shifted from <strong>the</strong>m to <strong>the</strong> member countries. Oneway to mitigate <strong>the</strong>se concerns is for members <strong>of</strong> a free-trade areato move toward a customs union whose common external tariffwould match <strong>the</strong> lowest tariff within <strong>the</strong> region prior to <strong>the</strong> formation<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> customs union. Ano<strong>the</strong>r possibility would be to open regionalarrangements to new members. It has also been suggestedthat GATT rules be amended to allow compensation fornonmembers hurt by regional liberalization agreements. <strong>The</strong>se ando<strong>the</strong>r proposals to deal with regional free-trade associations mayneed to be discussed in GATT in order to preserve <strong>the</strong> benefits <strong>of</strong>regional trade liberalization while addressing <strong>the</strong> concerns <strong>of</strong> outsiders.FOREIGN EXCHANGE MARKETDEVELOPMENTS<strong>The</strong> international value <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dollar, as measured by its tradeweightedaverage exchange rate, rose by an astonishing 50 percentbetween <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> 1980 and early 1985. By mid-1988, however,<strong>the</strong> dollar had returned to its 1980 level, and since <strong>the</strong>n it has continuedon a slight downward trend, with much narrower fluctuationsthan earlier in <strong>the</strong> 1980s. <strong>The</strong> large appreciation and subsequentdepreciation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dollar had a marked impact on <strong>the</strong> com-240


petitive position <strong>of</strong> U.S. firms. Had <strong>the</strong>y been <strong>of</strong>fset by differencesbetween <strong>the</strong> inflation rates <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> United States and its tradingpartners, <strong>the</strong>se large swings in <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dollar would havehad no impact on our competitiveness. Inflation differentials, however,were much smaller than <strong>the</strong> exchange-rate swings. As a result,<strong>the</strong> dollar appreciated and <strong>the</strong>n depreciated in both real andnominal terms by roughly equal amounts.Chart 6-3 shows indexes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dollar relative to <strong>the</strong>currencies <strong>of</strong> our major trading partners. In addition to <strong>the</strong> nominaleffective exchange rate, which does not adjust for inflation differences,<strong>the</strong> chart shows two measures <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> real effective exchangerate: one in which relative consumer prices are used for <strong>the</strong>inflation adjustment, and one in which relative unit labor costs areused. <strong>The</strong> chart clearly demonstrates <strong>the</strong> high correlation betweennominal and real exchange-rate movements since 1980. In addition,<strong>the</strong> chart shows that relative unit labor costs in manufacturinghave declined sharply since <strong>the</strong>ir 1985 peak. Partly as a result,U.S. manufacturing firms have become extremely competitive inworld markets.Chart 6-3 Nominal and Real Effective Dollar Exchange Rates<strong>The</strong> value <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dollar has been more stable in <strong>the</strong> 1990s than during <strong>the</strong> 1980s.Index, 1985=100120110 ~1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993Real effective Relative unit labor Nominal effectiveexchange rate costs (manufacturing) exchange rateNote: Indexes are based on units <strong>of</strong> foreign currency per U.S. dollar. A decline in any <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> indexes indicatesfalling relative costs and increasing competitiveness.Source: International Monetary Fund.241


<strong>The</strong> dollar ended 1993 roughly where it began. After risingsharply in <strong>the</strong> second half <strong>of</strong> 1992, it varied in a narrow range in1993 (Chart 6-4). <strong>The</strong> relatively small movements in <strong>the</strong> dollar'seffective exchange rate masked considerable changes in <strong>the</strong> value<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dollar relative to individual currencies, however. <strong>The</strong> U.S.dollar rose relative to <strong>the</strong> Canadian dollar and most continentalEuropean currencies but declined sharply relative to <strong>the</strong> yen.Chart 6-4 Exchange Rates <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Dollar Against Selected Currencies<strong>The</strong> dollar streng<strong>the</strong>ned against <strong>the</strong> Canadian and German currencies after mid-1992but weakened against <strong>the</strong> yen.Index, January 1992=100120115 -Canadian $110 -105 -100 -f/-y^^^^K /iv^Effective^..r.^.yN~^T \/^ 1xN ^jN/DM95 -90 -85 -\ /\ /\ /\ /\ _ JYen80I1992 1993Note: Indexes are based on units <strong>of</strong> foreign currency per U.S. dollar.Source: International Monetary Fund.1<strong>The</strong> appreciation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dollar relative to <strong>the</strong> European currenciesoccurred despite low short-term and falling (until November) longterminterest rates in <strong>the</strong> United States. Since low and falling interestrates are frequently associated with currency depreciations,this may at first appear puzzling. <strong>The</strong> decline in European interestrates during 1993 explains <strong>the</strong> apparent puzzle.<strong>The</strong> stability <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dollar and <strong>the</strong> cyclical behavior <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Japaneseand European economies are important in understanding <strong>the</strong>likely impact <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>President</strong>'s deficit reduction package on <strong>the</strong>U.S. current account. As Chapter 2 points out, deficit reduction isgenerally associated with an increase in net exports. This expansionin net exports provides a stimulus that partially <strong>of</strong>fsets <strong>the</strong>impact <strong>of</strong> spending cuts and tax increases on domestic demand.242


<strong>The</strong> weakness in <strong>the</strong> economies <strong>of</strong> our major trading partners has,on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, reduced demand for U.S. exports. Some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>boost to export demand that can be expected to result from <strong>the</strong> deficitreduction package may <strong>the</strong>refore be delayed until economic activitypicks up in Europe and Japan. But by 1995 export demandshould begin to rise.THE EUROPEAN MONETARY SYSTEM<strong>The</strong> European Monetary System (EMS) was created in March1979 to limit exchange-rate variability among <strong>the</strong> European currencies(Box 6-7). A majority <strong>of</strong> countries in <strong>the</strong> EMS agreed toparticipate in <strong>the</strong> system's Exchange Rate Mechanism (ERM),under which most member countries were required to maintain<strong>the</strong>ir exchange rates within 2.25 percent <strong>of</strong> "central rates" between<strong>the</strong>ir currency and each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r members' currencies. When anexchange rate between two members' currencies moves to <strong>the</strong> limits<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> band, both central banks are required to intervene to prevent<strong>the</strong> exchange rate from moving outside <strong>the</strong> band. In <strong>the</strong> event<strong>of</strong> irresistible pressure on a member country's exchange rate,realignments <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> country's central rate are permitted.Inflation in most European economies declined by <strong>the</strong> mid-1980s,moving toward <strong>the</strong> rates <strong>of</strong> Germany and <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands. Countriesconcentrated on maintaining <strong>the</strong>ir parities with respect to <strong>the</strong>deutsche mark, since Germany had for historical reasons establishedan unwavering commitment to price stability. Increasingly,<strong>the</strong>n, <strong>the</strong> deutsche mark became <strong>the</strong> monetary anchor for <strong>the</strong> EMS.By linking <strong>the</strong>ir monetary policies to German policy, o<strong>the</strong>r ERMmembers brought <strong>the</strong>ir inflation rates down. French inflation, forexample, declined from over 10 percent at <strong>the</strong> start <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1980sto under 3 percent in 1992.To some observers, <strong>the</strong> disinflation achieved within <strong>the</strong> EMShighlights an important rationale for pegging exchange rates. Analternative view holds that disinflation was not simply a product<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> EMS but was worldwide in scope. During <strong>the</strong> 1980s, for example,inflation also declined in <strong>the</strong> United Kingdom, which didnot join <strong>the</strong> ERM until 1990, and in <strong>the</strong> United States and Canada.So perhaps <strong>the</strong> relative stability <strong>of</strong> EMS parities in recent yearswas as much <strong>the</strong> result as <strong>the</strong> cause <strong>of</strong> a convergence in inflationrates.Realignments took place relatively frequently in <strong>the</strong> first years<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> EMS but not <strong>the</strong>reafter. Between 1979 and 1987 <strong>the</strong>re were11 realignments; <strong>the</strong>se tended to be small as well as frequent and<strong>the</strong>reby occurred without major crises. After January 1987, essentiallyno realignments took place until September 1992.243


Box 6-7.—Exchange-Rate Volatility and International TradeProponents <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ERM argue that stabilizing exchange ratesis important for expanding trade. Exchange-rate volatility,<strong>the</strong>y argue, is a source <strong>of</strong> uncertainty to firms engaging intrade because it adds volatility to <strong>the</strong> domestic currency value<strong>of</strong> future foreign currency transactions. Firms <strong>the</strong>refore facegreater uncertainty in revenues and pr<strong>of</strong>its from foreign saleswhen exchange rates are more volatile. This added uncertainty,it is claimed, discourages firms from engaging in tradeand from making <strong>the</strong> investments that support trade.Such claims seem plausible, but <strong>the</strong>y enjoy little empiricalsupport. <strong>The</strong> volume <strong>of</strong> U.S. trade did grow slightly faster between1950 and 1971, when <strong>the</strong> dollar was fixed, than between1973 and 1993, when <strong>the</strong> dollar floated. Relative to GDP, however,trade volumes grew more quickly in <strong>the</strong> second period. Inaddition, studies that have examined <strong>the</strong> extent to whichgreater exchange-rate volatility inhibits trade flows have generallyfailed to find a robust relationship. One possible explanationis that financial markets provide firms with riskmanagement tools that can be used to hedge exchange-ratemovements. For example, a firm can buy currencies forward t<strong>of</strong>ix <strong>the</strong> domestic currency value <strong>of</strong> future payments. Whatever<strong>the</strong> explanation, it is difficult to find empirical support for anadverse impact <strong>of</strong> exchange-rate volatility on trade volumes.THE EUROPEAN CURRENCIES IN TURMOIL<strong>The</strong> EMS has experienced a series <strong>of</strong> crises since <strong>the</strong> summer <strong>of</strong>1992. Germany adopted tight monetary policies in response to inflationarypressures that arose following German reunification in1990. As a result, German short-term interest rates, which hadbeen rising since 1988, continued to rise, reaching nearly 10 percentby <strong>the</strong> summer <strong>of</strong> 1992.German policy, in turn, created a dilemma for o<strong>the</strong>r ERM participants.Maintaining fixed parities with <strong>the</strong> deutsche mark required<strong>the</strong>m to tighten monetary policy despite stagnating or decliningoutput, rising unemployment, and low rates <strong>of</strong> inflation.When investors are free to choose among assets denominated indifferent currencies, <strong>the</strong> rates <strong>of</strong> return <strong>the</strong>y expect to receive forcomparable degrees <strong>of</strong> risk cannot vary too far from one currencyto ano<strong>the</strong>r. Expected exchange-rate changes are important in determiningexpected rates <strong>of</strong> return on assets denominated in differentcurrencies. If, for example, investors expect <strong>the</strong> French franc to depreciaterelative to <strong>the</strong> deutsche mark, <strong>the</strong>y will move funds fromFrench franc deposits into deutsche mark deposits unless <strong>the</strong>y are244


compensated by a higher franc interest rate. Thus interest rates onfranc-denominated assets would have to rise above <strong>the</strong> interest rateon deutsche mark assets to prevent sustained flows <strong>of</strong> capital out<strong>of</strong> franc assets and into deutsche mark assets.Speculative pressures motivated by <strong>the</strong> possibility <strong>of</strong> a change inparities precipitated a crisis in September 1992. In <strong>the</strong> UnitedKingdom, where output had declined by more than 4 percent fromits previous peak and <strong>the</strong> unemployment rate had topped 10 percent,pressure increased to realign or to drop out <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> EMS sothat interest rates could be lowered. Finland and Sweden, althoughnot formal participants in <strong>the</strong> ERM, had been unilaterally maintainingpegged exchange rates, and so faced similar dilemmas as<strong>the</strong>ir economies went through deep and prolonged recessions. InSeptember 1992, Finland, <strong>the</strong> United Kingdom, and Italy decidedto allow <strong>the</strong>ir currencies to float, with <strong>the</strong> last two effectively leaving<strong>the</strong> ERM. Sweden followed in November. Spain, Portugal, andIreland all devalued within <strong>the</strong> ERM between September 1992 andJanuary 1993.A second crisis erupted in mid-July 1993, following additionalsigns <strong>of</strong> growing slack in <strong>the</strong> European economies. Massive speculativecapital flows occurred. Belgium, Denmark, France, and Portugalall raised interest rates and intervened heavily to defend<strong>the</strong>ir currencies. None<strong>the</strong>less, <strong>the</strong> Belgian franc, <strong>the</strong> French franc,and <strong>the</strong> Danish krone dropped through <strong>the</strong>ir ERM floors. Sellingpressures on <strong>the</strong>se currencies continued, and on August 2, 1993,<strong>the</strong> countries participating in <strong>the</strong> ERM decided to widen <strong>the</strong> bandsaround <strong>the</strong> (unchanged) central parities to ±15 percent (Chart 6-5). (A separate agreement maintains bands <strong>of</strong> ±2.25 percent for <strong>the</strong>deutsche mark and <strong>the</strong> Dutch guilder.) Since all currencies werewell within <strong>the</strong> wider bands, central banks were not obliged to interveneand <strong>the</strong> speculative crisis stopped.<strong>The</strong> wider bands allow <strong>the</strong> participating countries much greaterlatitude to change interest rates independently. For <strong>the</strong> most part,however, <strong>the</strong> authorities have not used this ability to push interestrates down. Instead, <strong>the</strong>y have sought to maintain relatively stableexchange rates with <strong>the</strong> deutsche mark and have cut interest ratesonly in parallel with Germany. By <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> 1993 <strong>the</strong> Belgian,Danish, French, Portuguese, and Spanish currencies were within ornear <strong>the</strong> old ERM limits relative to <strong>the</strong> deutsche mark. <strong>The</strong> UnitedKingdom aggressively cut interest rates after leaving <strong>the</strong> ERM inSeptember 1992.THE MAASTRICHT TREATY ON ECONOMIC ANDMONETARY UNIONIn <strong>the</strong> Maastricht Treaty <strong>of</strong> 1991, <strong>the</strong> members <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> EuropeanCommunity agreed to replace <strong>the</strong> EMS with an <strong>Economic</strong> and Mon-245


Chart 6-5 French Franc-Deutsche Mark Exchange RatesLast summer's exchange-rate crisis precipitated a widening <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ExchangeRate Mechanism's intervention bands.Francs per DM4.03.8 -Upper intervention limit3.6 -September 16-17, 1992:Pound and lira leave ERMAugust 2, 1993:Bands widened \December 8, 1993:Franc returns tonarrow bands3.4 -3.23.0Lower intervention limit2.81992 1993Note: <strong>The</strong> Exchange Rate Mechanism prescribes intervention bands for participating members <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> European Monetary System.Sources: Council <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Advisers and Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Federal Reserve System.etary Union (EMU), a common currency, and a European CentralBank overseeing a single monetary policy. Under <strong>the</strong> treaty,progress toward EMU would take place in stages, with <strong>the</strong> finalstage—under which exchange rates are fixed irrevocably—comingno later than 1999.<strong>The</strong> treaty establishes conditions for implementing a commoncurrency and monetary policy (Box 6-8). As <strong>of</strong> late 1993, no countryin <strong>the</strong> European Union met <strong>the</strong>se conditions. With reunificationswelling its public sector deficit, even Germany failed to meet <strong>the</strong>criteria.<strong>The</strong> process <strong>of</strong> ratifying <strong>the</strong> Maastricht Treaty was completed in1993, although <strong>the</strong> timing <strong>of</strong> full implementation will depend inpart on <strong>the</strong> achievement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> agreed conditions. In May 1993,Danish voters reversed <strong>the</strong> outcome <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> previous year's referendumand accepted <strong>the</strong> treaty. <strong>The</strong> British House <strong>of</strong> Commons <strong>the</strong>napproved <strong>the</strong> treaty in July. <strong>The</strong> final steps in <strong>the</strong> ratification processwere completed when court challenges to <strong>the</strong> treaty failed inJuly in <strong>the</strong> United Kingdom and in October in Germany. <strong>The</strong>Maastricht Treaty entered into force on November 1, 1993, creating<strong>the</strong> European Union.246


Box 6-8.—Criteria for Joining <strong>the</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> and MonetaryUnionCountries acceding to EMU must meet several strict criteria:• <strong>The</strong> entering country's inflation rate must not exceed <strong>the</strong>average <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> lowest three members' rates by more than1.5 percentage points.• Its interest rate on long-term government bonds cannotexceed those <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> three lowest-inflation members bymore than 2 percentage points.• <strong>The</strong> country's general-government budget deficit mustnot exceed 3 percent <strong>of</strong> GDP, and outstanding governmentdebt must not exceed 60 percent <strong>of</strong> GDP.• For at least 2 years, <strong>the</strong> country's currency must haveremained within its narrow ERM band without realignment.Shortly after completing <strong>the</strong> ratification process, <strong>the</strong> EU countriesselected Frankfurt as <strong>the</strong> home <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> new European MonetaryInstitute, <strong>the</strong> forerunner <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> European Central Bank. Despite<strong>the</strong>ir failure to complete <strong>the</strong> first stage (bringing all countrieswithin narrow ERM bands), <strong>the</strong> EU countries are proceeding with<strong>the</strong> timetable set out in <strong>the</strong> Maastricht Treaty.CONCLUSIONS<strong>The</strong> year 1993 proved to be <strong>the</strong> most important year for <strong>American</strong>trade policy in half a century, thanks to developments thatvastly increased <strong>the</strong> prospects for free and open trade.During <strong>the</strong> past year, <strong>the</strong> Administration completed two landmarknegotiations. <strong>The</strong> first created a North <strong>American</strong> Free TradeArea encompassing <strong>the</strong> United States, Canada, and Mexico. Inmany respects this agreement is historically unprecedented: It is<strong>the</strong> first free-trade agreement between industrialized and developingcountries; it is <strong>the</strong> first trade agreement to incorporate environmentalprovisions explicitly; and it contains technical innovationsin areas such as dispute settlement that may become models for<strong>the</strong> global trade regime.<strong>The</strong> Administration did not stop <strong>the</strong>re, however. It also led a successfulconclusion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Uruguay Round <strong>of</strong> GATT, <strong>the</strong> most farreachingglobal trade agreement in history. This agreement will reducetrade barriers, protect <strong>the</strong> legitimate interests <strong>of</strong> U.S. producersin areas such as intellectual property rights where none existedbefore, and bring areas <strong>of</strong> trade such as agriculture and textilesinto <strong>the</strong> multilateral system for <strong>the</strong> first time.247


Besides bringing <strong>the</strong>se endeavors to fruition, <strong>the</strong> Administrationlaunched several new trade initiatives and brea<strong>the</strong>d new life intosome old ones. <strong>The</strong> Administration made major progress in establishingAPEC as a prominent forum for advancing our interests in<strong>the</strong> critical Asia-Pacific region. In addition, <strong>the</strong> United Statesreached a new bilateral agreement with Japan. Complementing <strong>the</strong>new international initiatives, <strong>the</strong> Administration also launched anew National Export Strategy to promote <strong>American</strong> exports.This Administration understands that expanding trade relationsare not only inevitable but critical to <strong>the</strong> future health <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> U.S.economy. It is determined to ensure that <strong>the</strong> growing interdependencewith our trading partners brings benefits to <strong>the</strong> United States.To this end <strong>the</strong> United States Government is committed to act unilaterally,bilaterally, regionally, plurilaterally, and globally to openmarkets to maintain <strong>the</strong> ability <strong>of</strong> U.S. firms to compete around<strong>the</strong> world. Through increasing integration into <strong>the</strong> global economy,we can achieve ever-rising living standards for all <strong>of</strong> our people.248


Appendix AREPORT TO THE PRESIDENT ON THE ACTIVITIESOF THECOUNCIL OF ECONOMIC ADVISERS DURING 1993


LETTER OF TRANSMITTALCOUNCIL OF ECONOMIC ADVISERSWashington, B.C., December 31, 1993MR. PRESIDENT:<strong>The</strong> Council <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Advisers submits this report on itsactivities during <strong>the</strong> calendar year 1993 in accordance with <strong>the</strong>requirements <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Congress, as set forth in section 10(d) <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>Employment Act <strong>of</strong> 1946 as amended by <strong>the</strong> Full Employment andBalanced Growth Act <strong>of</strong> 1978.Sincerely,Laura D'Andrea Tyson, ChairAlan S. Blinder, MemberJoseph E. Stiglitz, Member251


Council Members and <strong>the</strong>ir Dates <strong>of</strong> ServiceNamePositionOath <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fice dateSeparation dateidwin G NourseLeon H. KeyserlingJohn D. ClarkRoy BlcughRobert C. Turner\rthur F. BurnsNeil H. JacobyWalter W. StewartRaymond J. SaulnierJoseph S. DavisPaul W. McCrackenKarl BrandtHenry C. WallichWalter W. HellerJames TobinKermit GordonGardner AckleyJohn P. LewisOtto EcksteinArthur M. OkunJames S. DuesenberryMerton J. PeckWarren L SmithPaul W. McCrackenHendrik S. HouthakkerHerbert SteinEzra SoiomonMarina v.N. WhitmanGary L. SeeversWilliam J. FellnerAlan GreenspanPaul W. MacAvoyBurton G. MalkielCharles L. SchultzeWilliam D. NordhausLyle E. GramleyGeorge C. EadsStephen M. GoldfeldMurray L. WeidenbaumWilliam A. NiskanenJerry L. JordanMartin FeldsteinWilliam PooleBeryl W. SprinkelThomas Gale MooreMichael L. MussaMichael J. BoskinJohn B. TaylorRichard L SchmalenseeDavid F. BradfordPaul WonnacottLaura D'Andrea TysonAlan S. BlinderJoseph E. StiglitzChairmanVice ChairmanActing ChairmanChairmanMemberVice ChairmanMemberMemberChairmanMemberMemberMemberChairmanMemberMemberMemberMemberChairmanMemberMemberMemberChairmanMemberMemberMemberChairmanMemberMemberMemberChairmanMemberMemberChairmanMemberMemberMemberMemberChairmanMemberMemberChairmanMemberMemberMemberMemberChairmanMemberMemberChairmanMemberChairmanMemberMemberChairmanMemberMemberMemberMemberChairMemberMemberAugust 9, 1946August 9, 1946November 2, 1949May 10, 1950August 9, 1946May 10, 1950June 29, 1950September8, 1952March 19, 1953September 15, 1953December 2 1953April 4, 1955December 3, 1956May 2, 1955December 3, 1956November 1, 1958May 7, 1959January 29, 1961January 29, 1961January 29, 1961August 3, 1962November 16, 1964May 17, 1963September 2, 1964November 16, 1964February 15, 1968February 2, 1966February 15, 1968July 1 1968February 4, 1969February 4, 1969February 4, 1969January 1, 1972September 9 1971March 13, 1972July 23, 1973October 31, 1973September 4, 1974June 13, 1975July 22, 1975January 22, 1977March 18, 1977March 18, 1977June 6, 1979August 20, 1980February 27, 1981June 12, 1981July 14, 1981October 14, 1982December 10 1982April 18, 1985July 1, 1985August 18, 1986February 2, 1989June 9, 1989October 3, 1989November 13, 1991November 13, 1991February 5, 1993July 27, 1993July 27, 1993November 1, 1949.January 20, 1953.February 11, 1953.August 20, 1952.January 20, 1953.December 1, 1956.February 9, 1955.April 29, 1955.January 20, 1961.October 31, 1958.January 31, 1959.January 20, 1961.January 20, 1961.November 15, 1964.July 31, 1962.December 27, 1962.February 15, 1968.August 31, 1964.February 1, 1966.January 20, 1969.June 30, 1968.January 20, 1969.January 20 1969December 31, 1971.July 15, 1971.August 31, 1974.March 26 1973August 15, 1973.April 15, 1975.February 25, 1975.January 20, 1977.November 15, 1976.January 20, 1977.January 20, 1981.February 4, 1979.May 27, 1980.January 20, 1981.January 20, 1981.August 25, 1982.March 30, 1985.July 31, 1982.July 10, 1984.January 20, 1985.January 20, 1989.May 1, 1989.September 19, 1988.January 12, 1993.August 2, 1991June 21, 1991January 20, 1993.January 20, 1993.252


<strong>Report</strong> to <strong>the</strong> <strong>President</strong> on <strong>the</strong> Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>Council <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Advisers During 1993<strong>The</strong> Statutory Mission <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Council<strong>The</strong> Council <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Advisers was established by <strong>the</strong> EmploymentAct <strong>of</strong> 1946 to provide <strong>the</strong> <strong>President</strong> with objective economicanalysis and advice on <strong>the</strong> development and implementation<strong>of</strong> a wide range <strong>of</strong> domestic and international economic policy issues.<strong>The</strong> Chair <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Council<strong>The</strong> inauguration <strong>of</strong> <strong>President</strong> Clinton brought changes to <strong>the</strong>membership <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Council <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Advisers. In February1993, Laura D'Andrea Tyson was appointed Chair <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Counciland a Member <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>President</strong>'s Cabinet. Dr. Tyson is on leavefrom <strong>the</strong> University <strong>of</strong> California, Berkeley, where she is Pr<strong>of</strong>essor<strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong>s and Business Administration and Research Director<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Berkeley Roundtable on <strong>the</strong> International Economy. AsChair <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Council, Dr. Tyson is responsible for communicating<strong>the</strong> Council's views on economic developments to <strong>the</strong> <strong>President</strong>through personal discussions and written reports. She is <strong>the</strong> Council'schief public spokesperson.Dr. Tyson represents <strong>the</strong> Council at Cabinet meetings and variouso<strong>the</strong>r high-level meetings including those <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> National SecurityCouncil focusing on economic issues, daily White House seniorstaff meetings, budget team meetings with <strong>the</strong> <strong>President</strong>, andmany o<strong>the</strong>r formal and informal meetings with <strong>the</strong> <strong>President</strong>, seniorWhite House staff, and o<strong>the</strong>r senior government <strong>of</strong>ficials.Dr. Tyson is one <strong>of</strong> six members <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Principals Committee <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>newly established National <strong>Economic</strong> Council and is a member <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> Domestic Policy Council. She guides <strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Council <strong>of</strong><strong>Economic</strong> Advisers and exercises ultimate responsibility for <strong>the</strong>work <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional staff. Dr. Tyson succeeded Michael J.Boskin, who returned to Stanford University, where he is <strong>the</strong>Friedman Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong>s; he is also a Senior Fellow at <strong>the</strong>Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace.151-444 O - 94 - 9253


<strong>The</strong> Members <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> CouncilAlan S. Blinder and Joseph E. Stiglitz are <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r new Members<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Council <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Advisers. <strong>The</strong>y succeeded PaulWonnacott, who is now a Senior Fellow at <strong>the</strong> Institute for International<strong>Economic</strong>s, and David F. Bradford, who returned toPrinceton University. Dr. Blinder is on leave from Princeton Universitywhere he is <strong>the</strong> Gordon S. Rentschler Memorial Pr<strong>of</strong>essor<strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong>s. Dr. Stiglitz is on leave from Stanford Universitywhere he is <strong>the</strong> Joan Kenney Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong>s. Members <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> Council are involved in <strong>the</strong> full range <strong>of</strong> issues within <strong>the</strong>Council's purview and are responsible for <strong>the</strong> daily supervision <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional staff. Members represent <strong>the</strong> Councilat a wide variety <strong>of</strong> interagency and international meetings and assumemgyor responsibility for selecting issues for <strong>the</strong> Council's attention.<strong>The</strong> small size <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Council permits <strong>the</strong> Chair and Members towork as a team on most policy issues. <strong>The</strong> Chair works on <strong>the</strong>whole range <strong>of</strong> economic issues under <strong>the</strong> Council's purview. <strong>The</strong>recontinues to be, however, an informal division <strong>of</strong> subject matteramong <strong>the</strong> Members. Dr. Stiglitz is primarily responsible for microeconomicand sectoral analysis and regulatory issues. Dr. Blinderis primarily responsible for domestic and international macroeconomicanalysis and economic projections. All three Members,under Dr. Tyson's lead, are heavily involved in international tradeissues and participate in <strong>the</strong> deliberations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> National <strong>Economic</strong>Council.MACROECONOMIC POLICIES<strong>The</strong> Council advised <strong>the</strong> <strong>President</strong> on all major macroeconomicissues in 1993. <strong>The</strong> Council prepared for <strong>the</strong> <strong>President</strong>, <strong>the</strong> Vice<strong>President</strong>, and <strong>the</strong> White House senior staff a comprehensive series<strong>of</strong> memoranda on <strong>the</strong> statistical releases that help monitor U.S.economic activity. It also prepared special analyses <strong>of</strong> economic policyissues and briefing papers on significant economic events, suchas <strong>the</strong> 1993 floods in <strong>the</strong> Midwest (and <strong>the</strong> earthquake in sou<strong>the</strong>rnCalifornia early in <strong>1994</strong>).<strong>The</strong> Council participated in discussions <strong>of</strong> macroeconomic policyissues with <strong>of</strong>ficials from <strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Treasury, <strong>the</strong> Office<strong>of</strong> Management and Budget (OMB), and o<strong>the</strong>r members <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><strong>President</strong>'s economic policy team. It was a leading participant in<strong>the</strong> formulation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Administration's economic policies throughvarious Cabinet and sub-Cabinet working groups. <strong>The</strong> Council alsoplayed an important role in setting priorities within <strong>the</strong> fiscal <strong>1994</strong>and 1995 budgets.<strong>The</strong> Council analyzed <strong>the</strong> macroeconomic effects <strong>of</strong> all major Administrationpolicy proposals, including <strong>the</strong> <strong>President</strong>'s deficit re-254


duction budget package, <strong>the</strong> North <strong>American</strong> Free Trade Agreement,and <strong>the</strong> Uruguay Round <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> General Agreement on Tariffsand Trade (GATT). In addition, <strong>the</strong> Council carefully monitored <strong>the</strong>response <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> interest-sensitive sectors <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> economy to <strong>the</strong>sharp reduction in long-term interest rates that followed <strong>the</strong> proposaland enactment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>President</strong>'s deficit reduction plan.<strong>The</strong> Council, <strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Treasury, and <strong>the</strong> OMB—<strong>the</strong>economic "Troika"—produced <strong>the</strong> economic forecasts that underlie<strong>the</strong> Administration's budget projections. Dr. Blinder, in collaborationwith Dr. Tyson and Council senior economists, led this forecastingeffort. Two <strong>of</strong>ficial forecasts are released each year. <strong>The</strong>first is published early in <strong>the</strong> year and is relied upon for <strong>the</strong> <strong>President</strong>'sbudget calculations. An update is <strong>the</strong>n published in <strong>the</strong> summeras part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Administration's mid-session budget review. Inpreparing its forecasts, <strong>the</strong> Troika took particular care to presenteconomic assumptions that were not unduly optimistic so as tomaintain <strong>the</strong> credibility <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Administration's budget projectionsand its economic plan. Leading private sector forecasters visited<strong>the</strong> Council before <strong>the</strong> forecasting rounds to share <strong>the</strong>ir views on<strong>the</strong> economic outlook.<strong>The</strong> Council worked to improve <strong>the</strong> public's understanding <strong>of</strong> economicissues and <strong>the</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> economic information through regularbriefings with <strong>the</strong> White House financial and general presscorps, periodic discussions with distinguished outside economists,and meetings with leading business executives. <strong>The</strong> Chair and <strong>the</strong>o<strong>the</strong>r Members made numerous presentations to outside organizationsto explain <strong>the</strong> Administration's economic strategy and policies.Dr. Tyson, Dr. Blinder, and Dr. Stiglitz regularly exchangedinformation and met with <strong>the</strong> Chairman and Members <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Board<strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Federal Reserve System to discuss <strong>the</strong> economicoutlook and monetary policy.Finally, <strong>the</strong> Council worked to improve <strong>the</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> governmenteconomic statistics. <strong>The</strong> Council urged increased funding for economicand demographic statistics in interagency discussions and indeliberations over Federal budget priorities.INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC POLICIESInternational economic issues were a high priority for <strong>the</strong> Councilin 1993. All three Members continued <strong>the</strong> Council's active rolein <strong>the</strong> Organization <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Cooperation and Development(OECD). Dr. Tyson attended <strong>the</strong> OECD's <strong>Economic</strong> Policy Committeemeeting in Paris in May and served as its Acting Chair in November.Dr. Blinder led <strong>the</strong> U.S. delegation to <strong>the</strong> OECD to assessU.S. economic policy and was a member <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> U.S. delegation toOECD Working Party 3 on macroeconomic policy coordination.Dr. Stiglitz headed <strong>the</strong> U.S. delegation to OECD Working Party 1meetings on microeconomic and structural issues. Senior staff255


members represented <strong>the</strong> Council at <strong>the</strong> semiannual Short-Term<strong>Economic</strong> Projections meetings at <strong>the</strong> OECD in Paris, and at <strong>the</strong>annual Asia-Pacific <strong>Economic</strong> Experts Meeting in Sydney. <strong>The</strong> goal<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se meetings was to support <strong>the</strong> coordination <strong>of</strong> macroeconomicpolicies to promote economic growth. <strong>The</strong> Chair and <strong>the</strong>o<strong>the</strong>r Members helped formulate Administration policies thatbrought to completion two major trade agreements, <strong>the</strong> North<strong>American</strong> Free Trade Agreement and <strong>the</strong> Uruguay Round <strong>of</strong> GATT,and provided economic analyses <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> implications <strong>of</strong> those agreementsfor <strong>the</strong> U.S. economy. <strong>The</strong> Council also participated in formulatingo<strong>the</strong>r Administration policies in <strong>the</strong> international arena,including such important initiatives as <strong>the</strong> National Export Strategy,and <strong>the</strong> ongoing evaluation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> economic relationship between<strong>the</strong> United States and <strong>the</strong> People's Republic <strong>of</strong> China.Dr. Tyson and Dr. Blinder were deeply involved in <strong>the</strong> negotiations<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> United States-Japan Framework for a New <strong>Economic</strong>Partnership, with Dr. Blinder making two trips to Japan as part<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> negotiations. <strong>The</strong> Council also engaged in discussions withJapan's <strong>Economic</strong> Planning Agency on <strong>the</strong> current account imbalancesand o<strong>the</strong>r macroeconomic issues. <strong>The</strong> Council was involvedthroughout <strong>the</strong> year in Administration policies for advancing economicreform in <strong>the</strong> former Soviet Union. Dr. Stiglitz traveled toRussia and Ukraine and established an <strong>of</strong>ficial relationship with<strong>the</strong> Russian Government's Working Center for <strong>Economic</strong> Reform.<strong>The</strong> Council provided <strong>the</strong> <strong>President</strong> with regular briefings oninternational developments and was particularly active in <strong>the</strong> preparationsfor <strong>the</strong> Asia-Pacific <strong>Economic</strong> Cooperation (APEC) Ministerialmeeting and <strong>the</strong> first-ever APEC leaders' meeting hosted by<strong>the</strong> <strong>President</strong> in Seattle.MICROECONOMIC POLICIES<strong>The</strong> Council was an active participant in a broad range <strong>of</strong> Administrationmicroeconomic initiatives in 1993. Dr. Tyson and <strong>the</strong>Secretary <strong>of</strong> Transportation jointly led <strong>the</strong> Administration's WorkingGroup on Aviation, which developed <strong>the</strong> Administration's CivilAviation Initiative. At <strong>the</strong> request <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>President</strong>, Dr. Tyson alsoserved on <strong>the</strong> National Commission for a Strong, Competitive AirlineIndustry. <strong>The</strong> Council also assisted in <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>Administration's Domestic Natural Gas and Oil Initiative, issuedby <strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Energy.Dr. Stiglitz played an important role in <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> twoExecutive Orders—one on regulatory planning and review and ano<strong>the</strong>ron <strong>the</strong> Nation's infrastructure. Each order directs executivebranch agencies to rely upon cost-benefit analysis when identifyingappropriate regulatory approaches and when determining which infrastructureprojects should be undertaken. Dr. Stiglitz also servesas co-chair <strong>of</strong> a committee <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Administration's Regulatory256


Working Group studying cost-benefit analysis methodology and heparticipated in a number <strong>of</strong> working groups on financial marketsand economic development. Dr. Tyson and Dr. Stiglitz are alsoworking closely with <strong>the</strong> Vice <strong>President</strong> and o<strong>the</strong>r Administration<strong>of</strong>ficials in developing legislative proposals for telecommunicationsregulation. In addition, Dr. Tyson and <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r Members are involvedin analyzing various proposals for bank regulatory agencyconsolidation.Dr. Tyson was a member <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Health Care Task Force headedby <strong>the</strong> First Lady and <strong>the</strong> Council was deeply involved with <strong>the</strong>health care reform effort over <strong>the</strong> past year, especially in analyzing<strong>the</strong> economic effects <strong>of</strong> reform options. <strong>The</strong> Council also helped develop<strong>the</strong> tax, empowerment zone, and enterprise communities provisions<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1993 Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (OBRA). Dr.Tyson is a member <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>President</strong>'s Community EnterpriseBoard. In addition, <strong>the</strong> Council participated in <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> Administration's work force security and welfare reform initiativesand in <strong>the</strong> design <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Administration's defense reinvestmentinitiative. Dr. Tyson was appointed a member <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>President</strong>'sNational Science and Technology Council and was appointed<strong>the</strong> Administration's representative on <strong>the</strong> Competitiveness PolicyCouncil. Dr. Tyson and Dr. Stiglitz both served on <strong>the</strong> Administration'sWelfare Reform Task Force.Dr. Stiglitz was particularly active in <strong>the</strong> Administration's environmentalpolicymaking efforts. He chaired <strong>the</strong> Subcommittee on<strong>Economic</strong>s Research on Natural Resources and Environment, createdto identify key research areas in economics common to manyenvironmental quality and natural resource management issues.He has also been actively involved in developing <strong>the</strong> Administration'sproposals for Superfund reauthorization, Clean Water Act reauthorization,and <strong>the</strong> <strong>President</strong>'s Climate Change Action Plan.WEEKLY ECONOMIC BRIEFINGSDr. Tyson conducts a weekly economic briefing for <strong>the</strong> <strong>President</strong>,<strong>the</strong> Vice <strong>President</strong>, and <strong>the</strong> <strong>President</strong>'s o<strong>the</strong>r senior economic andpolicy advisers. Dr. Blinder and Dr. Stiglitz also attend. <strong>The</strong> Council,in cooperation with <strong>the</strong> Office <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Vice <strong>President</strong>, preparesa written Weekly <strong>Economic</strong> Briefing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>President</strong>, which servesas <strong>the</strong> basis for <strong>the</strong> oral briefing. <strong>The</strong> briefing includes analysis <strong>of</strong>current economic developments, more extended treatments <strong>of</strong> awide range <strong>of</strong> economic issues and problems, and summaries <strong>of</strong>news on different regions and sectors <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> economy.<strong>The</strong> Staff <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Council <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Advisers<strong>The</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional staff <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Council consists <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Chief <strong>of</strong> Staff,<strong>the</strong> Senior Statistician, fourteen senior economists, six staff econo-257


mists, and two research assistants. <strong>The</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional staff and <strong>the</strong>irareas <strong>of</strong> concentration at <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> 1993 were:Jonathan B. BakerDavid M. CutlerRobert E. CumbyWilliam T. DickensConstance R. DunhamWarren E. FarbSally M. KaneAlan J. KrupnickErik R. LichtenbergMark J. MazurMarcus NolandMat<strong>the</strong>w D. ShapiroJay S. StowskyRobert F. WescottKevin C. MurdockKimberly J. O'NeillPeter R. OrszagJeremy B. RuddElizabeth A. SchneirovDarryl S. WillsChief <strong>of</strong> StaffThomas P. O'DonnellSenior EconomistsRegulation, Industrial Organization, andLawHealthInternational <strong>Economic</strong>sLabor, Welfare, and EducationFinancial Markets and Foreign AssistanceBusiness and Regional AnalysisClimate Change and Natural ResourcesEnvironment and Natural ResourcesAgriculture, International Trade, andNatural ResourcesPublic FinanceInternational <strong>Economic</strong>sMacroeconomics and <strong>the</strong> Weekly <strong>Economic</strong>Briefing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>President</strong>Technology, Defense Conversion, andRegional <strong>Economic</strong> DevelopmentMacroeconomics and ForecastingSenior StatisticianCa<strong>the</strong>rine H. FurlongStaff EconomistsTechnology and FinanceHealth and Public FinanceInternational <strong>Economic</strong>sMacroeconomics and ForecastingRegulation, Industrial Organization, andEnvironmentLabor, Welfare, and AgricultureResearch AssistantsD. W. Clark DeesJames C. HritzStatistical OfficeMrs. Furlong manages <strong>the</strong> Statistical Office. <strong>The</strong> Statistical Officemaintains and updates <strong>the</strong> Council's statistical information,258


prepares <strong>the</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Indicators and <strong>the</strong> statistical appendix to<strong>the</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> <strong>Report</strong>, and verifies statistics in <strong>President</strong>ial andCouncil memoranda, testimony, and speeches.Susan P. ClementsStatisticianLinda A. ReillyStatistical AssistantBrian A. AmorosiResearch AssistantMargaret L. Snyder Secretary<strong>The</strong> Administrative OfficeElizabeth A. KaminskiCa<strong>the</strong>rine FibichAdministrative OfficerAdministrative AssistantOffice <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ChairAlice H. WilliamsSandra F. DaigleLisa D. BranchFrancine P. ObermillerExecutive Assistant to <strong>the</strong> ChairExecutive Assistant to <strong>the</strong> Chair andAssistant to <strong>the</strong> Chief <strong>of</strong> StaffExecutive Assistant to Dr. BlinderExecutive Assistant to Dr. StiglitzStaff SecretariesMary E. JonesRosalind V. RasinMary A. ThomasMrs. Thomas also served as Executive Assistant for <strong>the</strong> Weekly<strong>Economic</strong> Briefing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>President</strong>.Michael Treadway provided editorial assistance in <strong>the</strong> preparation<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>1994</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> <strong>Report</strong>.Sherman Robinson, University <strong>of</strong> California, Berkeley, servedduring <strong>the</strong> summer and early fall <strong>of</strong> 1993 as a senior economistspecializing in <strong>the</strong> North <strong>American</strong> Free Trade Agreement. Omri S.Dahan, Michelle R. Dorman, Mark H. Fithian, Ian B. Goldberg,and Jennifer Howard served as student assistants during <strong>the</strong> year.Suzanne M. Tudor returned to serve as Dr. Blinder's Executive Assistantduring Lisa Branch's leave <strong>of</strong> absence. Volunteers during<strong>the</strong> year were Diana Billik, William P. Cowin, Mat<strong>the</strong>w T.Henshon, John D. Levin, and Megan R. Sweeney.DEPARTURESJames D. Foster, who served as Special Assistant to <strong>the</strong> Chairman,resigned in January 1993 to accept a position with <strong>the</strong> TaxFoundation. Shelley A. Slomowitz, Staff Assistant to <strong>the</strong> Chairman,also resigned in January 1993.<strong>The</strong> Council's senior economists, in most cases, are on leave <strong>of</strong>absence from faculty positions at academic institutions or from259


o<strong>the</strong>r government agencies or research institutions. <strong>The</strong>ir tenurewith <strong>the</strong> Council is usually limited to 1 or 2 years. Most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> senioreconomists who resigned during <strong>the</strong> year returned to <strong>the</strong>ir previousaffiliations. <strong>The</strong>y are Kwok-Chiu Fung (University <strong>of</strong> California,Santa Cruz), Sherry Glied (Columbia University), Andrew S.Joskow (Department <strong>of</strong> Justice), Steven B. Kamin (Board <strong>of</strong> Governors<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Federal Reserve System), Michael M. Knetter (DartmouthCollege), Howard D. Lea<strong>the</strong>rs (University <strong>of</strong> Maryland),Deborah J. Lucas (Northwestern University), Andrew B. Lyon(University <strong>of</strong> Maryland), and Raymond L. Squitieri (Department<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Treasury). John H. Kitchen went on to a new position at <strong>the</strong>Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Treasury. Jonathan B. Wiener accepted a positionon <strong>the</strong> faculty <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Duke University Law School.Kevin Berner, staff economist, accepted a position with McKinseyand Company, Inc., Cleveland, Ohio. Junior staff economists (nowdesignated staff economists) are generally graduate students whospend 1 year with <strong>the</strong> Council and <strong>the</strong>n return to complete <strong>the</strong>irdissertations. Those who returned to <strong>the</strong>ir graduate studies in 1993are: Christopher J. Acito (University <strong>of</strong> Chicago), Lucy P. Allen(Yale University), Sherif Lotfi (Columbia University), and NatalieJ. Tawil (Massachusetts Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology). Joshua B. Michaelaccepted a position with <strong>The</strong> Eiger Development Corporation,Seattle, Washington. Bret M. Dickey, research assistant, begangraduate studies at Stanford University. Janet J. Twyman, staffsecretary, resigned in 1993.Public Information<strong>The</strong> Council's Annual <strong>Report</strong> is <strong>the</strong> principal medium throughwhich <strong>the</strong> Council informs <strong>the</strong> public <strong>of</strong> its work and its views. Itis an important vehicle for presenting <strong>the</strong> Administration's domesticand international economic policies. Annual distribution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><strong>Report</strong> in recent years has averaged about 45,000 copies. <strong>The</strong> Councilalso has primary responsibility for compiling <strong>the</strong> monthly <strong>Economic</strong>Indicators, which is issued by <strong>the</strong> Joint <strong>Economic</strong> Committee<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Congress and has a distribution <strong>of</strong> approximately 10,000.260


Appendix BSTATISTICAL TABLES RELATING TO INCOME,EMPLOYMENT, AND PRODUCTION


CONTENTSNATIONAL INCOME OR EXPENDITURE:PageB-l. Gross domestic product, 1959-93 268B-2. Gross domestic product in 1987 dollars, 1959-93 270B-3. Implicit price deflators for gross domestic product, 1959-93 272B-4. Fixed-weighted price indexes for gross domestic product, 1987weights, 1959-93 274B-5. Changes in gross domestic product and personal consumption expenditures,and related implicit price deflators and fixedweightedprice indexes, 1960-93 276B-6. Selected per capita product and income series in current and1987 dollars, 1959-93 277B-7. Gross domestic product by major type <strong>of</strong> product, 1959-93 278B-8. Gross domestic product by major type <strong>of</strong> product in 1987 dollars,1959-93 279B-9. Gross domestic product by sector, 1959-93 280B-10. Gross domestic product by sector in 1987 dollars, 1959-93 281B-ll. Gross domestic product by industry, 1947-91 282B-12. Gross domestic product by industry in 1987 dollars, fixed 1987weights, 1977-91 283B-13. Gross domestic product <strong>of</strong> nonfinancial corporate business, 1959-B-14.93 284Output, costs, and pr<strong>of</strong>its <strong>of</strong> nonfinancial corporate business,1959-93 285B-15. Personal consumption expenditures, 1959-93 286B-16. Personal consumption expenditures in 1987 dollars, 1959-93 287B-l7. Gross and net private domestic investment, 1959-93 288B-18. Gross and net private domestic investment in 1987 dollars, 1959-93 289B-19. Inventories and final sales <strong>of</strong> domestic business, 1959-93 290B-20.B-21.B-22.B-23.Inventories and final sales <strong>of</strong> domestic business in 1987 dollars,1959-93 291Foreign transactions in <strong>the</strong> national income and product accounts,1959-93 292Exports and imports <strong>of</strong> goods and services and receipts and payments<strong>of</strong> factor income in 1987 dollars, 1959-93 293Relation <strong>of</strong> gross domestic product, gross national product, netnational product, and national income, 1959-93 294B-24. Relation <strong>of</strong> national income and personal income, 1959-93 295B-25. National income by type <strong>of</strong> income, 1959-93 296B-26. Sources <strong>of</strong> personal income, 1959-93 298B-27. Disposition <strong>of</strong> personal income, 1959-93 300B-28. Total and per capita disposable personal income and personalconsumption expenditures in current and 1987 dollars, 1959-93 301B-29. Gross saving and investment, 1959-93 302B-30. Personal saving, flow <strong>of</strong> funds accounts, 1946-93 303B-31. Median money income (in 1992 dollars) and poverty status <strong>of</strong>families and persons, by race, selected years, 1971-92 304263


POPULATION, EMPLOYMENT, WAGES, AND PRODUCTIVITY:PageB-32. Population by age group, 1929-93 305B-33. Population and <strong>the</strong> labor force, 1929-93 306B-34. Civilian employment and unemployment by sex and age, 1947-93 308B-35. Civilian employment by demographic characteristic, 1954-93 309B-36. Unemployment by demographic characteristics, 1954-93 310B-37. Civilian labor force participation rate and employment/populationratio, 1948-93 311B-38. Civilian labor force participation rate by demographic characteristic,1954-93 312B-39. Civilian employment/population ratio by demographic characteristic,1954-93 313B-40. Civilian unemployment rate, 1948-93 314B-41. Civilian unemployment rate by demographic characteristic,1950-93 315B-42. Unemployment by duration and reason, 1950-93 316B-43. Unemployment insurance programs, selected data, 1962-93 317B-44. Employees on nonagricultural payrolls, by major industry, 1946-93 318B-45. Hours and earnings in private nonagricultural industries, 1959-93 320B-46. Employment cost index, private industry, 1979-93 321B-47. Productivity and related data, business sector, 1947-93 322B-48. Changes in productivity and related data, business sector, 1948-93 323PRODUCTION AND BUSINESS ACTIVITY:B-49. Industrial production indexes, major industry divisions, 1947-93 .. 324B-50. Industrial production indexes, market groupings, 1947-93 325B-51. Industrial production indexes, selected manufactures, 1947-93 326B-52. Capacity utilization rates, 1948-93 327B-53. New construction activity, 1929-93 328B-54. New housing units started and authorized, 1959-93 330B-55. Business expenditures for new plant and equipment, 1947-94 331B-56. Manufacturing and trade sales and inventories, 1950-93 332B-57. Manufacturers' shipments and inventories, 1950-93 333B-58. Manufacturers' new and unfilled orders, 1950-93 334PRICES:B-59. Consumer price indexes for major expenditure classes, 1950-93 335B-60. Consumer price indexes for selected expenditure classes, 1950-93. 336B-61. Consumer price indexes for commodities, services, and specialgroups, 1950-93 338B-62. Changes in special consumer price indexes, 1958-93 339B-63. Changes in consumer price indexes for commodities and services,1929-93 340B-64. Producer price indexes by stage <strong>of</strong> processing, 1947-93 341B-65. Producer price indexes by stage <strong>of</strong> processing, special groups,1974-93 343B-66. Producer price indexes for major commodity groups, 1950-93 344B-67. Changes in producer price indexes for finished goods, 1955-93 346264


MONEY STOCK, CREDIT, AND FINANCE:PageB-68. Money stock, liquid assets, and debt measures, 1959-93 347B-69. Components <strong>of</strong> money stock measures and liquid assets, 1959-93.. 348B-70. Aggregate reserves <strong>of</strong> depository institutions and monetary base,1959-93 350B-71. Commercial bank loans and securities, 1972-93 351B-72. Bond yields and interest rates, 1929-93 352B-73. Total funds raised in credit markets by nonflnancial sectors,1984-93 354B-74. Mortgage debt outstanding by type <strong>of</strong> property and <strong>of</strong> financing,1940-93 356B-75. Mortgage debt outstanding by holder, 1940-93 357B-76. Consumer credit outstanding, 1952-93 358GOVERNMENT FINANCE:B-77. Federal receipts, outlays, surplus or deficit, and debt, selectedfiscal years, 1929-95 359B-78. Federal receipts, outlays, and debt, fiscal years, 1982-95 360B-79. Federal budget receipts, outlays, surplus or deficit, and debt, aspercentages <strong>of</strong> gross domestic product, 1934-95 362B-80. Federal and State and local government receipts and expenditures,national income and product accounts, 1959-93 363B-81. Federal and State and local government receipts and expenditures,national income and product accounts, by major type,1959-93 364B-82. Federal Government receipts and expenditures, national incomeand product accounts, 1976-93 365B-83. State and local government receipts and expenditures, nationalincome and product accounts, 1959-93 366B-84. State and local.government revenues and expenditures, selectedfiscal years, 1927-91 367B-85. Interest-bearing public debt securities by kind <strong>of</strong> obligation,1967-93 368B-86. Maturity distribution and average length <strong>of</strong> marketable interestbearingpublic debt securities held by private investors, 1967-93 369B-87. Estimated ownership <strong>of</strong> public debt securities by private investors,1976-93 370CORPORATE PROFITS AND FINANCE:B-88. Corporate pr<strong>of</strong>its with inventory valuation and capital consumptionadjustments, 1959-93 371B-89. Corporate pr<strong>of</strong>its by industry, 1959-93 372B-90. Corporate pr<strong>of</strong>its <strong>of</strong> manufacturing industries, 1959-93 373B-91. Sales, pr<strong>of</strong>its, and stockholders' equity, all manufacturing corporations,1952-93 374B-92. Relation <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>its after taxes to stockholders' equity and toB-93.sales, all manufacturing corporations, 1947-93 375Sources and uses <strong>of</strong> funds, nonfarm nonfinancial corporate business,1947-93 376B-94. Common stock prices and yields, 1955-93 377B-95. Business formation and business failures, 1950-93 378265


AGRICULTURE:PageB-96. Farm income, 1940-93 379B-97. Farm output and productivity indexes, 1948-91 380B-98. Farm input use, selected inputs, 1948-92 381B-99. Indexes <strong>of</strong> prices received and prices paid by farmers, 1950-93 382B-100. U.S. exports and imports <strong>of</strong> agricultural commodities, 1940-93 383B-101. Farm business balance sheet, 1950-92 384INTERNATIONAL STATISTICS:B-102. International investment position <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> United States at yearend,1984-92 385B-103. U.S. international transactions, 1946-93 386B-104. U.S. merchandise exports and imports by principal end-use category,1965-93 388B-105. U.S. merchandise exports and imports by area, 1984-93 389B-106. U.S. merchandise exports, imports, and trade balance, 1972-93 390B-107. International reserves, selected years, 1952-93 391B-108. Industrial production and consumer prices, major industrialcountries, 1967-93 392B-109. Civilian unemployment rate, and hourly compensation, major industrialcountries, 1967-93 393B-110. Foreign exchange rates, 1969-93 394B-lll. Growth rates in real gross domestic product, 1975-93 395NATIONAL WEALTH:B-112. National wealth, 1946-92 396B-113. National wealth in 1987 dollars, 1946-92 397SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE:B-114. Selected historical series on gross domestic product and relatedseries, 1929-58 398266


General NotesDetail in <strong>the</strong>se tables may not add to totals because <strong>of</strong> rounding.Unless o<strong>the</strong>rwise noted, all dollar figures are in current dollars.Symbols used:p Preliminary.Not available (also, not applicable).Data in <strong>the</strong>se tables reflect revisions made by <strong>the</strong> source agencies fromJanuary 1993 through early February <strong>1994</strong>.267


NATIONAL INCOME OR EXPENDITURETABLE B-l.—Gross domestic product, 1959-93[Billions <strong>of</strong> dollars, except as noted; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]Year or quarterGrossdomesticproductPersonal consumption expendituresTotalDurablegoodsNondurablegoodsServicesGross private domestic investmentTotalFixed investmentTotalNonresidentialTotalStructuresProducers'durableequipmentResidentialChangeinbusinessinventories19591960196119621963196419651966196719681969197019711972197319741975197619771978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921993 "1982: IV..1983: IV..1984: IV..1985: IV..1986: IV..1987: IV..1988: IV..1989: IV..1990:1 IIIV1991:1.IIIllIV1992:1 IIIllIV1993:1 IIIllIV "...494.2513.3531.8571.6603.1648.0702.7769.8814.3889.3959.51,010.71,097.21,207.01,349.61,458.61,585.91,768.41,974.12,232.72,488.62,708.03,030.63,149.63,405.03,777.24,038.74,268.64,539.94,900.45,250.85,546.15,722.96,038.56,374.03,195.13,547.33,869.14,140.54,336.64,683.05,044.65,344.85,461.95,540.95,583.85,597.95,631.75,697.75,758.65,803.75,908.75,991.46,059.56,194.46,261.66,327.66,395.96,510.8318.1332.4343.5364.4384.2412.5444.6481.6509.3559.1603.7646.5700.3767.8848.1927.71,024.91,143.11,271.51,421.21,583.71,748.11,926.22,059.22.257.52,460.32,667.42,850.63,052.23,296.13,523.13,761.23,906.44,139.94,390.62,128.72,346.82,526.42,739.82,923.13,124.63,398.23,599.13,679.33,727.03,801.73,836.63,843.63,887.83,929.83,964.14,046.54,099.94,157.14,256.24,296.24,359.94,419.14,487.442.843.541.947.051.856.863.568.570.681.086.285.397.2110.7124.1123.0134.3160.0182.6202.3214.2212.5228.5236.5275.0317.9352.9389.6403.7437.1459.4468.2457.8497.3537.7246.9297.7328.2354.4406.8408.8452.9458.3479.8466.0467.3459.5448.9452.0465.1465.2484.0487.8500.9516.6515.3531.6541.9561.9148.5153.1157.4163.8169.4179.7191.9208.5216.9235.0252.2270.4283.3305.2339.6380.8416.0451.8490.4541.5613.3682.9744.2772.3817.8873.0919.4952.21,011.11,073.81,149.51,229.21,257.91,300.91,350.2787.3839.8887.8939.5963.71,029.41,105.81,173.51,201.71,213.61,241.01,260.71,252.31,259.21,260.01,260.01,278.21,288.21,305.71,331.71,335.31,344.81,352.41,368.4126.8135.9144.1153.6163.1175.9189.2204.6221.7243.1265.3290.8319.8351.9384.5423.9474.5531.2598.4677.4756.2852.7953.51,050.41,164.71,269.41,395.11,508.81,637.41,785.21,914.22,063.82,190.72,341.62,502.71,094.61,209.31,310.41,446.01,552.61,686.41,839.51,967.31,997.82,047.52,093.42,116.42,142.42,176.62,204.82,239.02,284.42,323.82,350.52,407.92,445.52,483.42,524.82,557.278.878.777.987.993.4101.7118.0130.4128.0139.9155.2150.3175.5205.6243.1245.8226.0286.4358.3434.0480.2467.6558.0503.4546.7718.9714.5717.6749.3793.6832.3808.9736.9796.5892.0464.2614.8722.8737.0697.1800.2814.8825.2828.9837.8812.5756.4729.1721.5744.5752.4750.8799.7802.2833.3874.1874.1884.0935.874.675.575.081.887.796.7108.3116.7117.6130.8145.5148.1167.5195.7225.4231.5231.7269.6333.5406.1467.5477.1532.5519.3552.2647.8689.9709.0723.0777.4798.9802.0745.5789.1875.2510.5594.6671.8704.4715.9740.9797.5795.0819.3804.5804.1780.3749.0744.5745.0743.5755.9786.8792.5821.3839.5861.0876.3924.146.549.248.652.855.662.474.184.485.292.1102.9106.7111.7126.1150.0165.6169.0187.2223.2274.5326.4353.8410.0413.7400.2468.9504.0492.4497.8545.4568.1586.7555.9565.5622.9397.7426.9491.5511.3491.7514.3560.2568.8586.2582.1594.1584.4566.8561.0552.6543.3547.0566.3569.2579.5594.7619.1624.9653.018.119.619.720.821.223.728.331.331.533.637.740.342.747.255.061.261.465.974.693.9118.4137.5169.1178.8153.1175.6193.4174.0171.3182.0193.3201.6182.6172.6178.6168.9154.6184.1195.4168.4180.0186.8198.0203.6203.2203.8195.7192.2188.4178.0171.7173.9174.5170.8171.1172.4177.6179.1185.228.329.728.932.134.438.745.853.053.758.565.266.469.178.995.1104.3107.6121.2148.7180.6208.1216.4240.9234.9247.1293.3310.6318.4326.5363.4374.8385.1373.3392.9444.4228.8272.3307.3315.9323.3334.3373.4370.8382.5378.9390.3388.7374.6372.6374.6371.5373.1391.7398.4408.3422.2441.6445.8467.828.126.326.429.032.134.334.232.332.438.742.641.455.869.775.366.062.782.5110.3131.6141.0123.3122.5105.7152.0178.9185.9216.6225.2232.0230.9215.3189.6223.6252.3112.8167.7180.4193.1224.2226.5237.3226.2233.2222.4209.9195.8182.2183.6192.4200.3208.9220.6223.3241.8244.9241.9251.3271.14.23.22.96.15.75.09.713.810.59.19.72.38.09.917.714.3-5.716.724.727.912.8-9.525.4-15.9-5.571.124.68.626.316.233.36.9-8.67.316.8-46.320.251.032.6-18.859.317.330.29.633.38.4-23.9-19.9-23.0-.58.9-5.112.99.712.034.613.17.711.7See next page for continuation <strong>of</strong> table.268


TABLE B-l.—Gross domestic product. 1959-93—Continued[Billions <strong>of</strong> dollars, except as noted; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]Year orquarter19591960196119621963196419651966196719681969197019711972197319741975197619771978 ,.197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921993 p1982: IV....1983: IV....1984: IV....1985: IV....1986: IV....1987: IV....1988: IV...1989: IV...1990: I II....III...IV...1991:1 II....III...IV...1992:1 II....III...IV...1993:1 II....III...IVNet exports <strong>of</strong> goods andservicesNetexports-1.72.43.42.43.35.53.91.91.4-1.3-1.21.2-3.0-8.0.6-3.113.6-2.3-23.7-26.1-23.8-14.7-14.7-20.6-51.4-102.7-115.6-132.5-143.1-108.0-79.7-71.4-19.6-29.6-65.7-29.5-71.8-107.1-135.5-133.2-143.2-106.0-73.9-73.9-61.3-78.7-71.6-34.0-11.5-19.8-13.0-7.0-33.9-38.8-38.8-48.3-65.1-71.9-77.7Exports20.625.326.027.429.433.635.438.941.445.349.357.059.366.291.8124.3136.3148.9158.8186.1228.9279.2303.0282.6276.7302.4302.1319.2364.0444.2508.0557.1601.5640.5660.1265.6286.2308.7304.7333.9392.4467.0523.8542.0553.5555.3577.6576.5600.7603.0625.7633.7632.4641.1654.7651.3660.0653.2675.8Imports22.322.822.725.026.128.131.537.139.946.650.555.862.374.291.2127.5122.7151.1182.4212.3252.7293.9317.7303.2328.1405.1417.6451.7507.1552.2587.7628.5621.1670.1725.8295.1358.0415.7440.2467.1535.6573.1597.7615.9614.8634.0649.2610.6612.2622.8638.8640.7666.3679.9693.5699.6725.0725.1753.5Total99.099.8107.0116.8122.3128.3136.3155.9175.6191.5201.8212.7224.3241.5257.7288.3321.4341.3368.0403.6448.5507.1561.1607.6652.3700.8772.3833.0881.5918.7975.21,047.41,099.31,131.81,157.1631.6657.6727.0799.2849.7901.4937.6994.51,027.71,037.31,048.31,076.51,093.01,099.91,104.01,100.21,118.51,125.81,139.11,143.81,139.71,158.61,164.81,165.3GovernmentpurchasesFederalTotal57.155.358.665.466.467.569.581.392.899.2100.5100.1100.0106.9108.5117.6129.4135.8147.9162.2179.3209.1240.8266.6292.0310.9344.3367.8384.9387.0401.6426.5445.9448.8443.4281.4289.7324.7356.9373.1392.5392.0405.1422.7423.6423.2436.5450.2449.4446.8437.4445.5444.6452.8452.4442.7447.5443.6439.7Nationaldefense46.445.347.952.151.550.451.062.073.479.178.976.874.177.477.582.689.693.4100.9108.9121.9142.7167.5193.8214.4233.1258.6276.7292.1295.6299.9314.0322.5313.8303.6205.5222.8242.9268.6278.6295.8296.8302.5312.1312.5309.1322.5331.4326.3321.2311.2312.3310.4316.7315.7304.8307.6301.9300.0Nondefense10.810.010.613.314.917.018.519.319.420.021.623.325.929.431.135.039.842.447.053.357.566.473.372.777.577.885.791.192.991.4101.7112.5123.4135.0139.875.966.981.988.394.596.795.2102.6110.6111.2114.1114.0118.7123.0125.6126.2133.1134.2136.1136.7137.9140.0141.7139.7Stateandlocal41.844.548.451.455.860.966.874.682.792.3101.3112.6124.3134.7149.2170.7192.0205.5220.1241.4269.2298.0320.3341.1360.3389.9428.1465.3496.6531.7573.6620.9653.4683.0713.7350.3367.9402.2442.4476.6509.0545.7589.3605.0613.7625.1640.0642.9650.5657.3662.8673.0681.2686.2691.4697.0711.1721.2725.6Finalsales <strong>of</strong>domesticproduct490.0510.1528.9565.5597.5643.0693.0756.0803.8880.2949.81,008.41,089.21,197.11,331.91,444.41,591.51,751.71,949.42,204.82,475.92,717.53,005.23,165.53,410.63.706.14,014.14,260.04,513.74,884.25,217.55,539.35,731.66,031.26,357.23,241.43,527.13,818.14,107.94,355.44,623.75,027.35,314.65,452.45,507.65,575.35,621.85,651.65,720.85,759.15,794.85,913.95,978.66,049.96.182.56,227.16,314.56,388.26,499.0Grossdomesticpurchases'495.8510.9528.4569.1599.8642.5698.8767.9812.9890.6960.71.009.51,100.21,215.01,349.01,461.81,572.31,770.71,997.82,258.82,512.52,722.83,045.33,170.23,456.53,879.94,154.34,401.24,683.05,008.45,330.55,617.55,742.56,068.26,439.73,224.63,619.13,976.24,276.04,469.84,826.25,150.75,418.75,535.95,602.25,662.45,669.55,665.85,709.25,778.45,816.75,915.86,025.36,098.36,233.26,309.96,392.76,467.86,588.5Addendum:Grossnationalproduct2497.0516.6535.4575.8607.7653.0708.1774.9819.8895.5965.61,017.11,104.91,215.71,362.31,474.31,599.11,785.51,994.62,254.52,520.82,742.13,063.83,179.83,434.43,801.54,053.64,277.74,544.54,908.25,266.85,567.85,737.16,045.83,222.63,578.43,890.24,156.24,340.54,690.55,054.35,365.05,482.15,559.35,599.95,630.05,656.15,710.65,766.25,815.55,927.65,996.36,067.36,191.96,262.16,327.16,402.3Percent changefrom precedingperiodGrossdomesticproduct8.73.93.67.55.57.48.49.55.89.27.95.38.610.011.88.18.711.511.613.111.58.811.93.98.110.96.95.76.47.97.25.63.25.55.69.15.93.11.02.44.84.33.27.45.74.69.24.44.34.47.4Grossdomesticpurchases'9.13.03.47.75.47.18.89.95.99.67.95.19.010.411.08.47.612.612.813.111.28.411.84.19.012.27.15.96.46.96.45.42.25.76.18.94.94.4.5-.33.14.92.77.07.64.99.15.05.44.87.71 Gross domestic product (GDP) less exports <strong>of</strong> goods and services plus imports <strong>of</strong> goods and services.2 GDP plus net receipts <strong>of</strong> factor income from rest <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> world.Source-. Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Analysis.269


TABLE B-2.—Gross domestic product in 1987 dollars, 1959-93[Billions <strong>of</strong> 1987 dollars, except as noted; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]Year orquarterGrossdomesticproductPersonal consumptionexpendituresTotalDurablegoodsNondurablegoodsServicesGross private domestic investmentTotalFixed investmentTotalNonresidentialTotalStructuresProducers'durableequipmentResidentialChangeinbusinessinventories19591960196119621963196419651966196719681969197019711972197319741975197619771978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921993 p .1982: IV1983: IV1984: IV1985: IV1986: IV1987:IV1988: IV1989: IV1990: I IIIllIV1991: I IIIllIV1992: IIIIV1993: III1,928.81,970.82,023.82,128.12,215.62,340.62,470.52,616.22,685.22,796.92,873.02,873.92,955.93,107.13,268.63,248.13,221.73,380.83,533.33,703.53,796.83,776.33,843.13,760.33,906.64,148.54,279.84,404.54,539.94,718.64,838.04,897.34,861.44,986.35,132.73,759.64,012.14,194.24,333.54,427.14,625.54,779.74,856.74,892.34,917.14,906.54,867.24,837.84,855.64,872.64,879.64,922.04,956.54,998.25,068.35,078.25,102.15,138.35,212.11,178.91,210.81,238.41,293.31,341.91,417.21,497.01,573.81,622.41,707.51,771.21,813.51,873.71,978.42,066.72,053.82,097.52,207.32,296.62,391.82,448.42,447.12,476.92,503.72,619.42,746.12,865.82,969.13,052.23,162.43,223.33,272.63,258.63,341.83,452.52,539.32,678.22,784.82,895.33,012.53,074.73,202.93,242.03,264.43,271.63,288.43,265.93,242.73,256.93,267.13,267.53,302.33,316.83,350.93,397.23,403.83,432.73,469.63,503.9114.4115.4109.4120.2130.3140.7156.2166.0167.2184.5190.8183.7201.4225.2246.6227.2226.8256.4280.0292.9289.0262.7264.6262.5297.7338.5370.1402.0403.7428.7440.7443.1426.6456.6489.7272.3319.1347.7369.6415.7404.7439.2436.8454.8441.8442.4433.2420.3422.0432.6431.5446.6447.5459.0473.4471.9484.2493.1509.9518.5526.9537.7553.0563.6588.2616.7647.6659.0686.0703.2717.2725.6755.8777.9759.8767.1801.3819.8844.8862.8860.5867.9872.2900.3934.6958.7991.01,011.11,035.11,051.61,060.71,048.21,062.91,088.1880.7915.2942.9968.71,000.91,014.61,046.81,058.91,059.81,060.61,065.01,057.51,048.21,051.11,049.31,044.01,052.01,055.01,062.91,081.81,076.01,083.11,093.01,100.1546.0568.5591.3620.0648.0688.3724.1760.2796.2837.0877.2912.5946.7997.41,042.21,066.81,103.61,149.51,196.81,254.11,296.51,323.91,344.41,368.91,421.41,473.01,537.01,576.11,637.41,698.51,731.01,768.81,783.81,822.31,874.71,386.21,443.91,494.21,557.11,595.81,655.51,716.91,746.31,749.81,769.21,781.11,775.21,774.21,783.81,785.21,792.01,803.71,814.31,829.01,842.01,855.91,865.41,883.51,893.9296.4290.8289.4321.2343.3371.8413.0438.0418.6440.1461.3429.7475.7532.2591.7543.0437.6520.6600.4664.6669.7594.4631.1540.5599.5757.5745.9735.1749.3773.4784.0746.8675.7732.9820.9503.5669.5756.4763.1705.9793.8785.0769.5766.5773.9751.0695.7667.8659.8682.8692.3691.7737.0739.6763.0803.0803.6813.4863.6282.8282.7282.2305.6327.3356.2387.9401.3391.0416.5436.5423.8454.9509.6554.0512.0451.5495.1566.2627.4656.1602.7606.5558.0595.1689.6723.8726.5723.0753.4754.2741.1684.1726.4805.5548.4640.2708.4732.9725.9733.9764.1744.6761.8745.8740.1716.6685.2682.1683.8685.2696.7724.4730.0754.3773.7790.6806.9851.0165.2173.3172.1185.0192.3214.0250.6276.7270.8280.1296.4292.0286.8311.6357.4356.5316.8328.7364.3412.9448.8437.8455.0433.9420.8490.2521.8500.3497.8530.8540.0546.5514.5529.2591.3417.2449.6509.6525.5495.5510.6538.8536.7550.2544.5551.2540.2521.4517.8512.8506.1510.5528.8533.8543.7562.3584.3594.8623.874.480.882.386.186.995.9111.5119.1116.0117.4123.5123.3121.2124.8134.9132.3118.0120.5126.1144.1163.3170.2182.9181.3160.3182.8197.4176.6171.3174.0177.6179.5160.2150.6151.4173.2162.6189.5198.3170.4177.9175.7179.8182.9181.6180.9172.8169.0165.2155.6151.0152.8152.9148.8148.0148.2151.1151.2155.190.892.589.898.9105.4118.1139.1157.6154.8162.7172.9168.7165.6186.8222.4224.2198.8208.2238.2268.8285.5267.6272.0252.6260.5307.4324.4323.7326.5356.8362.5367.0354.3378.6439.9244.0287.0320.1327.2325.0332.7363.1356.9367.3363.0370.3367.4352.5352.6357.2355.2357.7375.9385.1395.7414.1433.2443.6468.7117.6109.4110.1120.6135.0142.1137.3124.5120.2136.4140.1131.8168.1198.0196.6155.6134.7166.4201.9214.5207.4164.8151.6124.1174.2199.3202.0226.2225.2222.7214.2194.5169.5197.1214.2131.2190.6198.8207.4230.5223.3225.3208.0211.6201.2189.0176.3163.8164.3171.0179.1186.2195.6196.2210.6211.4206.2212.1227.213.68.17.215.616.015.725.136.727.623.624.85.920.822.537.730.9-13.925.534.337.213.6-8.324.6-17.54.467.922.18.526.319.929.85.7-8.46.515.4-44.929.347.930.2-20.159.920.924.94.728.110.9-20.9-17.4-22.3-.97.1-5.012.69.68.729.313.06.512.7See next page for continuation <strong>of</strong> table.270


TABLE B-2.—Gross domestic product in 1987 dollars, 1959-93—Continued[Billions <strong>of</strong> 1987 dollars, except as noted; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]Year orquarterNet exports <strong>of</strong> goods andservicesGovernmentpurchasesFederalNetexports Exports Imports NationalTotalTotaldefenseNondefenseStateandlocalFinalsales <strong>of</strong>domesticproductGrossdomesticpurchases1Addendum:Grossnationalproduct2Percent changefrom precedingperiodGrossdomesticproductGrossdomesticpurchases*1959..I960..1961..1962..1963..1964..1965..1966..1967..1968..1969..197019711972197319741975197619771978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921993 ".1982: IV..1983: IV..1984: IV..1985: IV..1986: IV..1987: IV..1988: IV..1989: IV..1990: IIIIII...IV...1991: IIIIII..IV..1992: III1993: IIIIV "-21.8-7.6-5.5-10.5-5.82.5-6.4-18.0-23.7-37.5-41.5-35.2-45.9-56.5-34.1-4.123.1-6.4-27.8-29.9-10.630.722.0-7.4-56.1-122.0-145.3-155.1-143.1-104.0-73.7-54.7-19.1-33.6-79.3-19.0-83.7-131.4-155.4-156.0-136.0-102.7-67.4-60.8-58.9-62.2-36.8-21.6-13.3-25.0-16.4-15.2-38.0-42.5-38.8-59.9-75.2-86.3-95.673.889.995.0101.8115.4118.1125.7130.0140.2147.8161.3161.9173.7210.3234.4232.9243.4246.9270.2293.5320.5326.1296.7285.9305.7309.2329.6364.0421.6471.8510.5543.4578.0596.4280.4291.5312.8312.0342.9386.1438.2487.7501.8511.1508.6520.4519.4542.9546.9564.2571.0570.2579.3591.6588.0593.2591.9612.595.696.195.3105.5107.7112.9124.5143.7153.7177.7189.2196.4207.8230.2244.4238.4209.8249.7274.7300.1304.1289.9304.1304.1342.1427.7454.6484.7507.1525.7545.4565.1562.5611.6675.7299.4375.1444.2467.4498.9522.1540.9555.0562.6570.0570.7557.2541.0556.2571.9580.7586.2608.2621.8630.3647.9668.4678.2708.1475.3476.9501.5524.2536.3549.1566.9622.4667.9686.8682.0665.8652.4653.0644.2655.4663.5659.2664.1677.0689.3704.2713.2723.6743.8766.9813.4855.4881.5886.8904.4932.6946.3945.2938.6735.9748.1784.3830.5864.8893.0894.5912.6928.1930.6929.2942.4948.9952.3947.6936.2943.1940.7950.2946.9931.3941.1941.7940.1265.7259.0270.1287.3285.7281.8282.1319.3350.9353.1340.1315.0290.8284.4265.3262.6262.7258.2263.1268.6271.7284.8295.8306.0320.8331.0355.2373.0384.9377.3376.1384.1386.5373.0355.1316.0322.2341.7363.7377.5391.6378.4376.1385.4384.7379.6386.5393.8393.6386.6372.1372.1369.2377.0373.7357.6359.4353.7349.8209.6191.3185.8184.9179.9181.6182.1185.1194.2206.4221.4234.2245.8265.6280.6292.1287.0281.4283.6281.3261.2242.7229.4242.9254.3272.1282.2295.0285.7281.5285.3285.0278.5285.7292.0288.7279.4264.9261.2257.9264.4261.3246.0246.4240.1238.274.874.176.877.878.381.486.586.690.689.484.786.685.189.592.492.990.294.8100.4105.3111.8112.586.679.387.491.695.396.692.794.7100.199.8101.1100.8101.8104.9107.2107.2110.9111.3112.5112.4111.5113.0113.7111.6209.6217.9231.4236.9250.6267.3284.8303.1317.0333.7341.9350.9361.6368.6378.9392.9400.8401.1401.0408.4417.6419.4417.4417.6423.0436.0458.2482.4496.6509.6528.3548.5559.7572.2583.4419.9425.9442.6466.7487.3501.4516.1536.5542.8545.9549.6555.8555.1558.7561.0564.1571.0571.5573.2573.2573.7581.6588.0590.41,915.21,962.72,016.62,112.52,199.62,324.92,445.42,579.52,657.52,773.22,848.22,868.02,935.23,084.53,230.93,217.23,235.63,355.33,499.03,666.33,783.23,784.63,818.63,777.83,902.24,080.64,257.64,395.94,513.74,698.64,808.34,891.64,869.84,979.85,117.33,804.53,982.84,146.24,303.34,447.24,565.64,758.74,831.84,893.64,889.04,895.64,888.04,855.24,878.04,873.54,872.54,926.94,943.84,988.65,059.65,048.95,089.15,131.85,199.41,950.61,978.52,029.32,138.62,221.42,338.12,476.92,634.22,708.92,834.42,914.52,909.13,001.83,163.63,302.73,252.23,198.63,387.13,561.13,733.33,807.43,745.73,821.23,767.73,962.84,270.54,425.14,559.64,683.04,822.64,911.74,951.94,880.55,019.95,211.93,778.64,095.84,325.54,488.94,583.14,761.54,882.44,924.14,959.14,976.04,968.64,904.04,859.44,869.04,897.64,896.04,937.14,994.55,040.75,107.15,138.15,177.45,224.65,307.71 Gross domestic product (GDP) less exports <strong>of</strong> goods and services plus imports <strong>of</strong> goods and services.2 GDP plus net receipts <strong>of</strong> factor income from rest <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> world.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Analysis.1,939.61,982.82,037.12,143.32,231.82,358.12,488.92,633.22,702.62,815.62,890.92,891.52,975.93,128.83,298.63,282.43,247.63,412.23,569.03,739.03,845.33,823.43,884.43,796.13,939.64,174.54,295.04,413.54,544.54,726.34,852.74,916.54,874.54,994.03,791.74,046.64,216.44,349.54,430.84,633.04,789.04,875.14,916.44,933.44,920.94,895.44,859.34,867.54,880.34,890.94,939.04,962.25,006.45,068.45,080.75,104.15,145.85.52.22.75.24.15.65.55.92.64.22.7.02.95.15.2-.64.94.54.82.5-.51.8-2.23.96.23.22.93.13.92.51.2-.72.62.93.51.5-.9-3.2-2.41.51.4.63.52.83.45.75.81.42.65.43.95.35.96.42.84.62.8-.23.25.44.4-1.5-1.65.95.14.82.0-1.62.0-1.45.27.83.63.02.73.01.8-1.42.93.82.91.4-.6-5.1-3.6.82.4-.13.44.73.85.42.53.13.76.5271


TABLE B-3.—Implicit price deflators for gross domestic product, 1959-93[Index numbers, 1987 = 100, except as noted; quarterly data seasonally adjusted]Year or quarterGrossdomesticproductPersonal consumptionexpendituresTotalDurablegoodsNondurablegoodsServicesGross private domestic investment:Fixed investmentTotalNonresidentialTotalStructuresProducers'durableequipmentResidential19591960196119621963196419651966196719681969197019711972197319741975197619771978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921993 P1982.1V1983: IV1984: IV....1985: IV1986: IV1987: IV....1988: IV1989: IV1990:1IIIII....IV....1991:1IIIllIV1992:1IIIII....IV....1993:1IIIII....IV..25.626.026.326.927.227.728.429.430.331.833.435.237.138.841.344.949.252.355.960.365.571.778.983.887.291.094.496.9100.0103.9108.5113.3117.7121.1124.285.088.492.395.598.0101.2105.5110.1111.5112.7113.8115.0116.4117.3118.2118.9120.0120.9121.2122.2123.3124.0124.5124.927.027.527.728.228.629.129.730.631.432.734.135.637.438.841.045.248.951.855.459.464.771.477.882.286.289.693.196.0100.0104.2109.3114.9119.9123.9127.283.887.690.794.697.0101.6106.1111.0112.7113.9115.6117.5118.5119.4120.3121.3122.5123.6124.1125.3126.2127.0127.4128.137.437.738.339.139.740.440.641.342.343.945.246.448.349.250.354.159.262.465.269.174.180.986.490.192.493.995.496.9100.0102.0104.2105.7107.3108.9109.890.693.394.495.997.8101.0103.1104.9105.5105.5105.6106.1106.8107.1107.5107.8108.4109.0109.1109.1109.2109.8109.9110.228.629.129.329.630.130.531.132.232.934.335.937.739.040.443.750.154.256.459.864.171.179.485.788.690.893.495.996.1100.0103.7109.3115.9120.0122.4124.189.491.894.297.096.3101.5105.6110.8113.4114.4116.5119.2119.5119.8120.1120.7121.5122.1122.8123.1124.1124.2123.7124.423.223.924.424.825.225.626.126.927.829.030.231.933.835.336.939.743.046.250.054.058.364.470.976.781.986.290.895.7100.0105.1110.6116.7122.8128.5133.579.083.787.792.997.3101.9107.1112.7114.2115.7117.5119.2120.8122.0123.5124.9126.6128.1128.5130.7131.8133.1134.0135.026.426.726.626.826.827.127.929.130.131.433.334.936.838.440.745.251.354.558.964.771.279.287.893.192.893.995.397.6100.0103.2105.9108.2109.0108.6108.793.192.994.896.198.6101.0104.4106.8107.6107.9108.6108.9109.3109.2109.0108.5108.5108.6108.6108.9108.5108.9108.6108.628.128.428.228.628.929.229.630.531.532.934.736.539.040.542.046.453.356.961.366.572.790.195.395.195.796.698.4100.0102.8105.2107.3108.0106.9105.395.395.096.497.399.2100.7104.0106.0106.5106.9107.8108.2108.7108.3107.8107.3107.1107.1106.6106.6105.7106.0105.1104.724.424.224.024.124.424.725.426.327.228.630.532.735.237.840.746.352.054.759.265.272.580.892.598.695.596.198.098.5100.0104.6108.9112.3114.0114.6117.997.595.197.298.598.8101.2106.3110.1111.3111.9112.7113.3113.8114.0114.4113.8113.8114.2114.8115.7116.3117.5118.5119.431.232.132.232.432.632.832.933.634.736.037.739.441.742.242.746.554.158.262.467.272.980.988.593.094.895.495.798.4100.0101.9103.4104.9105.4103.8101.093.894.996.096.599.5100.5102.8103.9104.2104.4105.4105.8106.3105.7104.9104.6104.3104.2103.5103.2102.0101.9100.599.823.924.024.024.023.824.124.925.926.928.430.431.433.235.238.342.446.649.654.661.368.074.880.985.287.389.792.095.8100.0104.2107.8110.7111.8113.4117.886.088.090.793.197.3101.5105.3108.8110.2110.5111.1111.1111.3111.7112.5111.8112.2112.8113.8114.9115.8117.3118.5119.3See next page for continuation <strong>of</strong> table.272


TABLE B-3.—Implicit price deflators for gross domestic product,[Index numbers, 1987=100, except as noted; quarterly data seasonally adjusted]1959-93—ContinuedYear or quarterExports andimports <strong>of</strong> goodsand servicesExportsImportsTotalGovernment purchases<strong>of</strong> goodsand servicesTotalFederalNationaldefenseNondefenseStateandlocalFinalsales <strong>of</strong>domesticproductGrossdomesticpurchases'Percentchangefromprecedperiod,GDPimplicitpricedeflator21959..28.023.420.821.519.925.625.42.81960..1961..1962..1963..1964..28.629.028.928.929.123.823.823.724.324.920.921.322.322.823.421.321.722.823.323.920.420.921.722.322.826.026.226.827.227.725.826.026.627.027.51.61.22.31.11.81965..1966..1967..1968..1969..30.031.031.832.333.325.325.826.026.226.724.025.026.327.929.624.625.526.528.129.623.524.626.127.729.628.329.330.231.733.328.229.230.031.433.02.53.53.15.05.01970197119721973197435.336.638.143.653.028.430.032.237.353.531.934.437.040.044.031.834.437.640.944.836.940.544.539.341.945.532.134.436.539.443.535.237.138.841.244.934.736.738.440.844.95.45.44.66.48.71975197619771978197958.561.264.368.978.058.560.566.470.783.148.451.855.459.665.149.352.656.260.466.048.551.955.659.865.851.254.157.761.766.447.951.254.959.164.549.252.255.760.165.449.252.356.160.566.09.66.36.97.98.61980198119821983198487.192.995.296.898.9101.4104.599.795.994.772.078.784.087.791.473.481.487.191.093.973.581.187.691.694.873.382.185.989.591.371.176.781.785.289.471.878.783.887.490.872.779.784.187.290.99.510.06.24.14.41985....1986....1987....1988....1989....97.796.9100.0105.3107.791.993.2100.0105.1107.895.097.4100.0103.6107.896.998.6100.0102.6106.897.398.6100.0103.0106.695.798.6100.0101.4107.393.496.4100.0104.3108.694.396.9100.0103.9108.593.996.5100.0103.9108.53.72.63.23.94.41990199119921993"1982: IV..1983: IV..1984: IV..1985: IV..1986: IV..1987: IV..1988: IV..1989: IV..109.1110.7110.8110.794.798.298.797.797.4101.6106.6107.4111.2110.4109.6107.498.595.493.694.293.6102.6106.0107.7112.3116.2119.7123.385.887.992.796.298.3100.9104.8109.0111.0115.4120.3124.889.089.995.098.198.8100.2103.6107.7110.7114.7120.1125.189.691.795.598.798.7100.3103.9107.5112.0117.2120.8124.387.784.393.796.499.2100.1102.6108.4113.2116.7119.4122.383.486.490.994.897.8101.5105.7109.9113.2117.7121.1124.285.288.692.195.597.9101.3105.6110.0113.4117.7120.9123.685.388.491.995.397.5101.4105.5110.04.43.92.92.51990: I ....II...IV108.0108.3109.2111.0109.5107.9111.1116.5110.7111.5112.8114.2109.7110.1111.5112.9109.4109.6111.0112.9110.5111.4112.8113.1111.5112.4113.7115.2111.4112.7113.9115.0111.6112.6114.0115.65.24.44.04.31991:1111.0110.6110.2110.9112.9110.1108.9110.0115.2115.5116.5117.5114.3114.2115.6117.5113.5113.0114.9117.5116.7117.3117.2117.8115.8116.4117.2117.5116.4117.3118.2118.9116.6117.3118.0118.85.03.13.12.41992: I ..111.0110.9110.7110.7109.3109.6109.3110.0118.6119.7119.9120.8119.7120.4120.1121.1119.6120.3119.8120.8120.0120.6121.0121.6117.9119.2119.7120.6120.0120.9121.3122.2119.8120.6121.0122.13.83.01.03.31993: I ..IIIllIV P....110.8111.3110.4110.3108.0108.5106.9106.4122.4123.1123.7123.9123.8124.5125.4125.7123.9124.8125.7126.0123.6123.9124.6125.1121.5122.3122.7122.9123.3124.1124.5125.0122.8123.5123.8124.13.62.31.51.41 Gross domestic product (GDP) less exports <strong>of</strong> goods and services plus imports <strong>of</strong> goods and services.2 Quarterly changes are at annual rates.Note.—Separate deflators are not calculated for gross private domestic investment, change in business inventories, and net exports<strong>of</strong> goods and services.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Analysis.273


TABLE B-4.—Fixed-weighted price indexes for gross domestic product, 1987 weights, 1959-93[Index numbers, 1987 = 100, except as noted; quarterly data seasonally adjusted]Year or quarterGrossdomesticproductPersonal consumptionexpendituresTotalDurablegoodsNondurablegoodsServicesGross private domestic investment:Fixed investmentTotalNonresidentialTotalStructuresProducers'durableequipmentResidential19591960196119621963196419651966196719681969197019711972197319741975197619771978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921993"1982: IV..1983: IV..1984: IV..1985: IV..1986: IV..1987: IV..1988: IV..1989: IV..1990: I....IV1991:1..IV...1992:1IV..1993:1IIIllIV84.888.191.194.397.0100.0104.0108.6113.6118.2122.1125.986.389.392.395.598.0101.3105.6110.2111.7112.9114.3115.3116.8117.8118.7119.5120.8121.8122.5123.5124.8125.6126.3127.030.430.831.131.331.631.932.232.833.735.036.337.939.540.842.746.750.553.356.760.765.872.678.983.286.789.993.396.1100.0104.3109.5115.2120.5124.9128.784.788.291.094.897.1101.6106.2111.2113.0114.2115.9117.9119.0119.9121.0122.0123.4124.5125.5126.5127.5128.4128.9129.754.454.153.853.453.153.152.151.351.853.154.255.156.757.157.861.066.069.171.775.280.084.789.592.493.794.996.097.1100.0102.0104.5106.3109.1111.5113.892.694.595.296.397.9101.0103.3105.2105.9106.0106.3106.9108.1108.7109.6110.0110.7111.5111.8112.1112.6113.5114.1114.931.431.832.032.132.532.833.334.335.136.538.139.941.142.445.351.355.357.560.864.771.379.686.088.891.193.796.296.1100.0103.8109.5116.2120.5123.0124.989.792.094.497.296.3101.5105.7111.0113.8114.6116.8119.7119.9120.3120.5121.2122.0122.7123.4123.8124.9125.0124.5125.223.924.525.025.325.726.126.727.428.329.630.732.434.335.937.440.343.746.950.554.659.065.371.977.482.486.490.995.8100.0105.1110.7116.8123.3129.5134.679.684.287.992.997.3101.9107.2112.8114.3115.9117.8119.5121.2122.5124.0125.5127.3128.8130.1131.6132.8134.2135.2136.224.124.124.024.224.524.925.626.627.528.830.732.835.237.940.846.351.553.757.863.771.395.694.894.795.797.9100.0103.3106.3109.1110.8112.0114.795.494.695.196.498.8101.0104.5107.3108.3108.7109.5110.0110.5110.6111.0110.9111.2111.7112.4112.8113.5114.4115.2115.7100.398.396.897.398.8100.0102.8105.6108.4110.2111.4113.399.697.697.097.999.5100.7104.0106.6107.4107.9108.7109.4110.1110.1110.3110.4110.7111.2111.7112.0112.4113.1113.6114.078.587.392.992.594.196.998.5100.0104.6109.0112.4113.9114.6117.893.592.495.397.899.0101.2106.2110.3111.4112.0112.8113.3113.7114.0114.4113.7113.8114.2114.8115.6116.3117.4118.4119.3104.2101.398.397.599.0100.0101.9103.9106.2108.3109.7110.9102.8100.397.997.999.8100.5102.9104.7105.3105.7106.6107.4108.1108.0108.2108.7109.1109.6110.1110.1110.4110.9111.2111.225.025.125.125.024.724.925.526.427.228.630.631.733.535.538.642.746.749.754.761.468.275.381.385.387.389.892.195.8100.0104.3107.8110.7111.9113.4117.786.288.090.893.197.3101.5105.4108.8110.2110.5111.1111.1111.4111.8112.6112.0112.3112.8113.8114.8115.8117.2118.5119.3See next page for continuation <strong>of</strong> table.274


TABLE B-4.—Fixed-weighted price indexes for gross domestic product, 1987 weights,[Index numbers, 1987=100, except as noted; quarterly data seasonally adjusted]1959-93—ContinuedYear or quarterExports andimports <strong>of</strong> goodsand servicesExportsTotalGovernment purchases<strong>of</strong> goodsand servicesTotalFederalImportsNationaldefenseNondefenseStateandlocalFinalsales<strong>of</strong>domesticproductGrossdomesticpurchasesJPercentchangefromprecedingperiod,GDPfixedweightedpriceindex 21959196019611962196319641965196619671968196919701971 .1972 ...197319741975197619771978197919801981198219831984198519861987 . . .198819891990199119921993".. .. .1982: IV1983- IV1984- IV1985- IV1986: IV1987- IV1988: IV1989- IV1990:1IllIV1991-1 .IIIllIV1992-1 IIIllIV1993-1IIIII100.499.799.998.297.3100.0105.7108.2110.0112.4113.7115.599.4100.399.397.997.6101.7107.0108.1108.8109.2110.3111.9112.4112.2112.1112.91131113.7113.9114.3114.7115 5115.7116.0101.297.796.894.693.8100.0105.4108.5112.4113.8115.1114.999.497.396.096.093.7102.8106.5108.6110.3108.81120118.3115.4113.1112.6114.11139114.5116.3115.9114.51156114.8114.924625125.526326 827.327 929030.231.833.736238.641.143.746.951.454.457 761.766.873.379.685 088.592.295.497.6100.0103.7107.9112.6116.7120.6124.286.789.393.996.998.3101.0104.8109.1111.0111.81131114.4115.5116.1117.0118.01193120.3121.0121.7123.21240124.8124.828629029330030631.332032833.935.637.440242.946.048.450.254.657.360464.168.975.282.388592.295.697.999.0100.0102.8107.0111.8116.5121.8126.190.492.797.799.499.0100.2103.7108.2110.3111.0112.4113.5115.2115.6116.7118.61206121.41222122.8125.11258126.8126.646.249.051.255.157.860764.569.676.383.389793.596.998.899.5100.0103.1107.1112.1116.5122.3127.191.493.999.3100.599.3100.3103.9108.3110.6111.3112.7114.0115.1115.3116.7118.91210121.8122.8123.5125.91268127.9127.745.246.447.452.955.859462.866.671.979.184788.491.494.997.5100.0102.0106.7110.8116.5120.2122.987.188.792.695.998.3100.1102.9107.8109.5110.2111.4112.0115.5116.3116.8117.5119.6119.9120.3120.9122.5122.5123.4123.221 522122.523 423 824 224 826 027 428.930.833135.337.340.144.348.952.155 759.965.171.977.682 385.589.693.596.5100.0104.3108.6113.2116.8119.6122.883.886.791.194.997.8101.5105.8109.9111.5112.4113.7115.1115.8116.4117.2117.7118.2119.5120.0120.9121.8122.7123.2123.484 988.291.294.497.0100.0104.0108.6113.6118.3122.2126.086.389.492.395.698.0101.3105.7110.2111.8113.0114.3115.4116.8117.8118.8119.6120.8121.8122.6123.6124.9125.7126.4127.185.488.391.094.096.6100.0104.0108.6113.7118.2122.0125.586.789.392.195.497.6101.4105.6110.2111.8112.8114.3115.9117.0117.7118.6119.5120.6121.6122.5123.4124.4125.3125.9126.53.93.43.52.83.14.04.54.64.13.33.15.84.44.73.85.13.43.42.74.23.42.53.14.32.82.12.21 Gross domestic product (GDP) less exports <strong>of</strong> goods and services plus imports <strong>of</strong> goods and services.* Quarterly changes are at annual rates.Note.—Separate deflators are not calculated for gross private domestic investment, change in business inventories, and net exports<strong>of</strong> goods and services.Source.- Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Analysis.275


TABLE B-5.—Changes in gross domestic product and personal consumption expenditures, and relatedimplicit price deflators and fixed-weighted price indexes, 1960-93[Percent change from preceding period; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]Gross domestic productPersonal consumption expendituresYear or quarterCurrentdollarsConstant(1987)dollarsImplicitpricedeflatorFixedweightedpriceindex(1987weights)CurrentdollarsConstant(1987)dollarsImplicitpricedeflatorFixedweightedpriceindex(1987weights)196019611962196319641965. .196619671968196919701971197219731974197519761977 . . .197819791980198119821983. ..1984198519861987198819891990 .199119921993".1987-1II111IV..1988:1IIIllIV3.93.67.55.57.4849.5589.27.95.38.610.011.88.18.711.511.613.111.58.81193.98.110.96.95.76.47.97.256325.55.6688 17.29.96.19.17.68.12.22.75.24.15.6555.9264.22.7.02.95.15.2-.6-.84.94.54.82.5-.518-2.23.96.23.22.93.13.92.512_ 72.62.93.0514.05.92.64.32.53.91.61.22.31.11.8253.53 15.05.05.45.44.66.48.79.66.36.97.98.69.510 06.24.14.43.72.63.23.94.444392.92.633293.33.63.64.45.13.93.93.43.52.83.14.04.5464 13.33.134283.33.73.74.55.43.74.53.36.15.47.4788.3589.88.07.18.39.610.59.410.511.511.211.811.410.410 26.99.69.08.46.97.18.06.968396.06.15.5948.34.49.97.98.48.92.72.34.43.85.6565.1315.23.72.43.35.64.5-.62.15.24.04.12.4-.11.21.14.64.84.43.62.83.61.91.5-.42.63.3_.l4.83.97.12.52.94.11.9.71.81.41.7213.0264.14.34.45.13.75.710.28.25.96.97.28.910.49.05.74.93.93.93.14.24.24.95.14.43.32.75.9454.14.52.85.25.14.71.3.8.6.91.1101.8263.83.84.44.43.34.69.38.15.66.47.08.510.38.65.44.33.73.83.04.14.35.05.34.53.73.05.6444.34.52.75.25.34.61989:1II .IllIV1990:1 ..IIIIIIV1991:1II111IV1992:1 ...IIIIIIV.1993:1..IIIII..IV8.6633.8519.1593.11.02.4484.3327.4574.69.24.4434.47.43.21801.53.5159-3.2-2.41.51.4.63.5283.45.7.81.92.95.95.4463.8375.2444.04.35.0313.1243.8301.03.33.6231.61.35.0483.8375.8444.73.85.13.43.42.74.2342.53.14.3282.12.25.1706.35.39.2538.33.7.74.74.43.58.6545.79.93.8615.56.3.11.12.9.82.8 92.1-2.7-2.81.81.3.04.31.84.25.6.8344.44.05.0573.34.46.3436.16.73.43.13.03.44.03.61.63.92.9261.32.25.25.93.54.46.6426.37.03.93.23.43.54.53.63.43.13.4291.42.7Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Analysis.276


TABLE B-6.—Selected per capita product and income series in current and 1987 dollars, 1959-93[Quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates, except as noted]Year orquarterCurrent dollarsGrossdomesticproductPersonalincomeDisposablepersonalincomePersonal consumptionexpendituresTotalDurablegoodsNondurablegoodsServ-Constant (1987) dollarsGrossdomesticproductDisposablepersonalincomePersonal consumptionexpendituresTotalDurablegoodsNondurablegoodsServ-Population(thousands)'19591960196119621963196419651966196719681969197019711972197319741975197619771978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921993 "1982: IV1983: IV1984: IV1985: IV1986: IV1987: IV1988.1V1989: IV1990:1II1991:1 IIIllIV1992:1 IIIllIV1993:1 IIIllIV "...2,7912,8402,8943,0633,1863,3763,6163,9154,0974,4304,7334,9285,2835,7506,3686,8197,3438,1098,96110,02911,05511,89213,17713,56414,53115,97816,93317,73518,69419,99421,22422,18922,64723,63724,68113,70915,08516,31017,29617,95319,21320,50621,51921,94222,20322,30922,29922,37822,58222,75722,86923,22723,48723,68524,14324,34624,53824,73225,1052,2092,2642,3212,4302,5162,6612,8453,0613,2533,5363,8164,0524,3024,6715,1845,6376,0536,6327,2698,1219,0329,94811,02111,58912,21613,34514,17014,91715,65516,63017,70618,69919,19620,13920,86111,78612,61313,66814,44015,10216,07617,05317,99518,42118,62818,78618,95819,01019,15619,20119,41719,72519,96920,09020,76720,43020,83720,93021,2451,9581,9942,0482,1372,2102,3692,5272,6992,8613,0773,2743,5213,7794,0424,5214,8935,3295,7966,3167,0427,7878,5769,4559,98910,64211,67312,33913,01013,54514,47715,30716,20516,74117,61518,22210,18911,03311,92512,56513,12113,90714,85015,55815,96316,11416,27516,46716,56016,71216,75216,93917,24517,48117,57718,15317,87618,19618,26518,5491,7961,8391,8691,9532,0302,1492,2872,4502,5622,7852,9783,1523,3723,6584,0024,3374,7455,2415,7726,3847,0357,6778,3758,8689,63410,40811,18411,84312,56813,44814,24115,04815,45916,20517,0019,1349,98010,64911,44512,10112,81913.81414,49114,78114,93515,18915,28315,27315,40915,53015,62115,90616,07216,24916,58916,70416,90717,08817,3032422402282522732963273483554044254164685285855756227348299099529339941,0181,1731,3451,4801,6191,6621,7831,8571,8731,8121,9472,0821,0591,2661,3831,4801,6841,6771,8411,8451,9281,8671,8671,8311,7841,7921,8381,8331,9021,9121,9582,0132,0042,0622,0952,1668478578788959369871,0601,0911,1711,2441,3181,3641,4541,6021,7801,9262,0722,2262,4322,7252,9993,2363,3263,4903,6933,8553,9564,1634,3814,6474,9184,9785,0925,2283,3783,5723,7423,9243,9904,2234,4954,7254,8284,8634,9585,0224,9764,9914,9794,9655,0245,0505,1045,1905,1925,2155,2295,2767167527848238619179741,0411,1161,2111,3081,4181,5401,6761,8141,9822,1972,4362,7173,0433,3593,7454,1464,5234,9715,3705,8496,2696,7427,2847,7378,2578,6699,1669,6914,6965,1435,5246,0406,4286,9197,4777,9218,0258,2058,3648,4318,5138,6268,7138,8238,9809,1109,1879,3859,5089,6319,7639,86010,89210,90311,01411,40511,70412,19512,71213,30713,51013,93214,17114,01314,23214,80115,42215,18514,91715,50216,03916,63516,86716,58416,71016,19416,67217,54917,94418,29918,69419,25219,55619,59319,23819,51819,87416,13217,06217,68018,10218,32818,97719,42919,55419,67819,70419,60319,38819,22419,24519,25619,22819,34819,43019,53719,75419,74419,78619,86920,0977,2567,2647,3827,5837,7188,1408,5088,8229,1149,3999,6069,87510,11110,41411,01310,83210,90611,19211,40611,85112,03912,00512,15612,14612,34913,02913,25813,55213,54513,89014,00514,10113,96514,21914,32912,15412,59113,14513,27813,52213,68513,99614,01514,16314,14414,07814,01813,97114,00013,92713,96314,07314,14214,16914,49014,16314,32614,34114,4846,6586,6986,7406,9317,0897,3847,7038,0058,1638,5068,7378,8429,0229,4259,7529,6029,71110,12110,42510,74410,87610,74610,77010,78211,17911,61712,01512,33612,56812,90313,02913,09312,89513,08113,36910,89511,39011,73912,09512,47212,61513,02013,05313,11413,11013,13813,01012,88512,90812,91112,87612,98113,00213,09813,24113,23413,31213,41613,5116466385956446887338038448419<strong>1994</strong>18969701,0731,1641,0621,0501,1761,2711,3161,2841,1541,1501,1311,2701,4321,5521,6701,6621,7491,7811,7731,6881,7871,8961,1691,3571,4661,5441,7211,6601,7851,7591,8271,7701,7671,7261,6701,6721,7091,7001,7561,7541,7941,8451,8351,8781,9071,9662,9282,9152,9262,9642,9773,0653,1733,2943,3163,4173,4693,4973,4943,6013,6703,5523,5523,6743,7223,7953,8333,7793,7743,7563,8423,9534,0194,1184,1634,2234,2514,2444,1484,1614,2133,7793,8923,9754,0464,1444,1624,2554,2634,2584,2504,2554,2124,1654,1664,1474,1144,1354,1364,1544,2164,1844,2004,2264,2423,0833,1453,2183,3233,4233,5863,7263,8674,0064,1694,3274,4494,5584,7514,9174,9885,1105,2715,4335,6335,7605,8145,8455,8956,0666,2316,4446,5486,7426,9306,9977,0777,0597,1337,2595,9486,1416,2986,5056,6076,7926,9797,0317,0297,0897,1167,0727,0507,0707,0557,0617,0907,1127,1497,1797,2167,2347,2837,303177,073180,760183,742186,590189,300191,927194,347196,599198,752200,745202,736205,089207,692209,924211,939213,898215,981218,086220,289222,629225,106227,715229,989232,201234,326236,393238,510240,691242,860245,093247,397249,951252,699255,472258,256233,060235,146237,231239,387241,550243,745246,004248,372248,927249,552250,291251,035251,659252,312253,048253,776254,392255,090255,836256,569257,197257,872258,612259,3431 Population <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> United States including Armed Forces overseas-, includes Alaska and Hawaii beginning 1960. Annual data areaverages <strong>of</strong> quarterly data. Quarterly data are averages for <strong>the</strong> period.Source-. Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce (Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Analysis and Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Census).277


TABLE B-7.—Cross domestic product by major type <strong>of</strong> product, 1959-93[Billions <strong>of</strong> dollars; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]Year orquarter19591960196119621963196419651966196719681969197019711972197319741975197619771978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921993"1982: IV1983: IV1984: IV1985: IV1986: IV1987: IV1988: IV1989: IV1990:1 IIIllIV1991:1 IIIllIV1992:1IIIllIV1993:1 IIIllIVGrossdomesticproduct494.2513.3531.8571.6603.1648.0702.7769.8814.3889.3959.51,010.71,097.21,207.01,349.61,458.61,585.91,768.41 974.12,232.72,488.62,708.03,030.63,149.63,405.03,777.24,038.74,268.64,539.94,900.45,250.85,546.15,722.96,038.56,374.03,195.13,547.33,869.14,140.54,336.64,683.05,044.65,344.85,461.95,540.95,583.85,597.95,631.75,697.75,758.65,803.75,908.75,991.46,059.56,194.46,261.66,327.66,395.96,510.8Finalsales <strong>of</strong>domesticproduct490.0510.1528.9565.5597.5643.0693.0756.0803.8880.2949.81,008.41,089.21,197.11,331.91,444.41,591.51,751.71,949.42,204.82,475.92,717.53,005.23,165.53,410.63,706.14,014.14,260.04,513.74,884.25,217.55,539.35,731.66,031.26,357.23,241.43,527.13,818.14,107.94,355.44,623.75,027.35,314.65,452.45,507.65,575.35,621.85,651.65,720.85,759.15,794.85,913.95,978.66,049.96,182.56,227.16,314.56,388.26,499.0Changeinbusinessinventories4.23.22.96.15.75.09.713.810.59.19.72.38.09.917.714.3-5.716.724.727.912.8-9.525.4-15.9-5.571.124.68.626.316.233.36.9-8.67.316.8-46.320.251.032.6-18.859.317.330.29.633.38.4-23.9-19.9-23.0-.58.9-5.112.99.712.034.613.17.711.7Goods 1TotalTotal250.8257.1260.4281.5293.2313.5342.9380.1395.1427.4456.6467.8493.0537.4616.6662.8715.1798.8880.4989.11,100.21,176.21,324.61,315.01,407.31,591.91,652.61,705.31,794.51,942.02,097.02,185.22,218.42,312.82,419.91,302.21,483.01,617.51,673.71,714.51,865.42,007.02,115.92,164.32,193.42,194.22,189.02,197.82,208.92,229.32,237.62,264.12,291.22,318.32,377.62,397.42,408.12,409.42,464.7Finalsales246.6253.9257.4275.4287.5308.5333.2366.3384.6418.3446.8465.6485.0527.5598.9648.5720.8782.0855.7961.21,087.51,185.71,299.21,330.91,412.81,520.81,628.01,696.71,768.21,925.72,063.62,178.42,227.02,305.52,403.11,348.51,462.81,566.51,641.11 733 31,806.11,989.72,085.72,154.72,160.12,185.82,212.92,217.72,231.92,229.82,228.72,269.32,278.42,308.62,365.62,362.92,395.02,401.72,452.9Changeinbusinessinventories4.23.22.96.15.75.09.713.810.59.19.72.38.09.917.714.3-5.716.724.727.912.8-9.525.4-15.9-5.571.124.68.626.316.233.36.9-8.67.316.8-46.320.251.032.6-18.859.317.330.29.633.38.4-23.9-19.9-23.0-.58.9-5.112.99.712.034.613.17.711.7Durable goodsFinalsales91.193.893.1103.4110.0119.6132.4147.9154.5169.1180.1182.1189.4209.7242.0257.1288.8323.6368.3416.9474.5502.1544.2541.6579.4647.0704.8730.2753.5835.6891.2933.5934.3975.81,034.6550.6620.5676.3705.7751.5769.3861.0893.9944.6926.3932.3931.0921.9940.8938.8935.7953.4963.2978.41,008.31,003.51,037.81,032.91,064.3Changeinbusinessinventories3.11.6-.13.42.74.06.710.25.54.76.4-.12.87.215.011.2-7.010.39.720.39.6-2.66.2-16.05.544.98.61.621.624.325.2-2.1-12.92.013.0-41.125.538.510.9-11.937.135.333.0-4.110.09.8-24.1-32.1-21.03.0-1.5-13.016.75.7-1.215.02.714.819.5Nondurable goodsFinalsales155.5160.1164.3172.0177.5188.9200.8218.5230.2249.1266.8283.5295.5317.8356.9391.4432.0458.4487.4544.3613.0683.6755.0789.3833.4873.8923.2966.51,014.71,090.11,172.51,244.81,292.71,329.61,368.5798.0842.3890.2935.4981.81,036.91,128.71,191.81,210.11,233.81,253.51,281.91,295.91,291.11,291.01,293.01,315.91,315.11,330.21,357.31,359.31,357.11,368.81,388.6Changeinbusinessinventories1.11.63.02.73.01.03.03.65.04.43.32.35.22.72.83.11.36.415.07.63.1-6.819.2.1-11.026.216.07.14.7-8.18.19.04.35.33.8-5.2-5.312.521.7-7.022.2-18.0-2.813.723.3-1.4 .312.2-2.0-3.510.47.9-3.84.013.219.510.4-7.2-7.7Services1181.7195.1208.6223.0238.1256.9276.0302.8330.7363.0395.8434.3477.0523.6571.0631.3706.9782.2870.4975.51,079.61,215.41,357.41,494.21,636.31,770.71,939.02,097.32,267.22,460.92,642.12,849.43,032.73,221.13,409.51,553.31,686.11,824.72,008.92,154.12,327.62,528.52,715.22,767.72,829.02,880.62,920.52,964.83,018.53,057.03,090.43,152.73,196.23,239.33,296.13,341.83,388.13,437.83,470.3Structures61.761.162.867.071.977.683.886.988.598.9107.1108.6127.2145.9161.9164.5163.8187.5223.3268.1308.8316.4348.6340.4361.5414.7447.1466.0478.2497.5511.7511.5471.9504.6544.6339.5378.2426.9457.9468.1490.1509.1513.7530.0518.5509.0488.4469.0470.4472.3475.7491.9504.0501.9520.8522.4531.5548.7575.8Autooutput19.421.317.822.425.125.931.130.227.835.034.728.538.941.445.938.840.355.164.267.966.259.268.365.388.3104.2115.8120.4118.9129.1135.1129.2121.1133.2142.163.2101.9110.4115.1122.5120.9136.1131.0128.4132.1137.6118.8114.2118.7127.8123.5125.6137.9133.0136.4142.8145.9134.6145.11 Exports and imports <strong>of</strong> certain goods, primarily military equipment purchased and sold by <strong>the</strong> Federal Government, are included inservices.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Analysis.278


TABLE B-8.—Cross domestic product by major type <strong>of</strong> product in 1987 dollars, 1959-93[Billions <strong>of</strong> 1987 dollars; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]Year orquarter19591960196119621963196419651966196719681969197019711972197319741975197619771978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921993"1982: IV1983: IV1984:IV1985: IV1986: IV1987: IV1988: IV1989: IV1990:1IIIllIV1991:1IIIllIV1992:1IIIllIV1993:1IIIllIVGrossdomesticproduct1,928.81,970.82,023.82,128.12,215.62,340.62,470.52,616.22,685.22,796.92,873.02,873.92,955.93,107.13,268.63,248.13,221.73,380.83,533.33,703.53,796.83,776.33,843.13,760.33,906.64,148.54,279.84,404.54,539.94,718.64,838.04,897.34,861.44,986.35,132.73,759.64,012.14,194.24,333.54,427.14,625.54,779.74,856.74,898.34,917.14,906.54,867.24,837.84,855.64,872.64,879.64,922.04,956.54,998.25,068.35,078.25,102.15,138.35,212.1Finalsales <strong>of</strong>domesticproduct1,915.21,962.72,016.62,112.52,199.62,324.92,445.42,579.52,657.52,773.22,848.22,868.02,935.23,084.53,230.93,217.23,235.63,355.33,499.03,666.33,783.23,784.63,818.63,777.83,902.24,080.64,257.64,395.94,513.74,698.64,808.34,891.64,869.84,979.85,117.33,804.53,982.84,146.24,303.34,447.24,565.64,758.74,831.84,893.64,889.04,895.64,888.04,855.24,878.04,873.54,872.54,926.94,943.84,988.65,059.65,048.95,089.15,131.85,199.4Changeinbusinessinventories13.68.17.215.616.015.725.136.727.623.624.85.920.822.537.730.9-13.925.534.337.213.6-8.324.6-17.54.467.922.18.526.319.929.85.7-8.46.515.4-44.929.347.930.2-20.159.920.924.94.728.110.9-20.9-17.4-22.3-.97.1-5.012.69.68.729.313.06.512.7Goods lTotalTotal825.2835.3840.9889.6914.9967.61,033.01,113.31,129.41,168.91,193.91,173.01,182.01,251.01,349.81,328.21,291.81,372.71,436.91,507.31,537.11,509.51,547.41,468.71,531.71,667.71,695.01,740.11,794.51,892.51,961.71,973.21,946.52,005.72,081.31,447.71,597.81,680.91,708.11,741.81,850.81,926.01,956.91,978.01,985.71,975.81,953.51,939.11,937.51,953.31,956.31,967.61,986.62,011.02,057.72,060.22,069.12,074.92,121.0Finalsales811.6827.1833.7874.0898.9952.01,007.91,076.61,101.71,145.31,169.11,167.11,161.31,228.41,312.11,297.31,305.71,347.21,402.61,470.11,523.51,517.71,522.91,486.21,527.31,599.81,672.91,731.61,768.21,872.61,932.01,967.51,954.91,999.22,065.91,492.61,568.51,633.01,677.91,761.81,790.91,905.01,932.01,973.31,957.61,964.91,974.31,956.51,959.81,954.21,949.21,972.61,973.92,001.42,049.02,030.92,056.12,068.52,108.3Changeinbusinessinventories13.68.17.215.616.015.725.136.727.623.624.85.920.822.537.730.9-13.925.534.337.213.6-8.324.6-17.54.467.922.18.526.319.929.85.7-8.46.515.4-44.929.347.930.2-20.159.920.924.94.728.110.9-20.9-17.4-22.3-.97.1-5.012.69.68.729.313.06.512.7Durable goodsFinalsales273.8277.8273.5296.5310.4334.3364.1399.4413.7430.4438.4428.0419.2458.4528.0524.6521.6540.6583.6623.7654.1626.4619.4578.9601.5655.1703.4731.5753.5833.1868.1893.1878.9911.7968.1580.9639.4677.6703.1750.4769.4852.9862.3907.5889.9889.2885.7871.8885.6881.1877.1891.3897.6915.2942.6938.2964.9968.71,000.7Changeinbusinessinventories8.64.6-.38.67.511.318.327.114.512.815.7-.98.916.231.219.6-11.517.015.628.711.7-4.36.3-16.06.345.79.31.921.623.323.8-1.9-12.02.412.3-41.926.739.711.9-11.936.933.531.0-3.99.89.1-22.4-28.5-19.72.3-2.0-11.615.66.3-.813.03.913.918.3Nondurable goodsFinalsales537.8549.3560.2577.5588.5617.6643.8677.2688.0714.9730.7739.1742.1770.0784.1772.7784.1806.6819.0846.4869.3891.4903.4907.3925.8944.7969.51,000.11,014.71,039.51,063.91,074.51,076.01,087.61,097.8911.6929.1955.3974.91,011.41,021.51,052.21,069.61,065.81,067.71,075.71,088.61,084.61,074.21,073.11,072.11,081.31,076.31,086.21,106.41,092.71,091.11,099.81,107.6Changeinbusinessinventories5.03.57.57.08.64.46.99.613.110.99.16.911.96.46.511.3-2.58.518.78.51.9-4.018.3-1.5-1.822.312.96.74.7-3.46.07.53.64.13.1-3.02.68.318.3-8.223.0-12.5-6.18.618.31.81.511.1-2.6-3.29.06.6-2.93.39.616.39.1-7.4-5.6Services1843.7877.3916.7956.8999.91,052.61,102.11,168.41,226.61,277.81,324.61,362.01,401.81,454.11,508.31,553.91,602.21,649.11,701.21,770.61,821.71,864.31,895.71,922.81,976.82,033.12,115.32,185.02,267.22,349.72,403.92,464.52,495.92,534.72,586.21,942.11,998.32,058.12,148.82,208.22,290.92,372.42,430.02,441.12,464.42,475.12,477.32,481.22,500.92,502.02,499.42,515.12,522.32,544.82,556.52,565.32,577.52,596.72,605.5Structures259.9258.2266.1281.7300.8-320.4335.4334.5329.3350.1354.5338.9372.1401.9410.4366.1327.7359.0395.2425.6438.0402.5400.0368.8398.1447.7469.4479.3478.2476.4472.5459.6419.0445.8465.1369.8416.0455.1476.5477.2483.8481.3469.8479.2467.1455.6436.5417.6417.2417.3423.9439.3447.7442.3454.2452.7455.5466.6485.6Autooutput59.563.853.163.368.969.583.280.472.486.682.965.485.389.998.779.074.896.8106.0104.294.879.186 879.2101.7115.8125.0124.4118.9127.3128.0121.4109.5117.4120.375.3113.7122.4122.4124.1120.3134.6123.8121.4123.9129.9110.3104.5109.0115.1109.5110.9121.8116.8120.1122.5123.4113.5123.71 Exports and imports <strong>of</strong> certain goods, primarily military equipment purchased and sold by <strong>the</strong> Federal Government, are included inservices.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Analysis.279


TABLE B-9.—Gross domestic product by sector, 1959-93[Billions <strong>of</strong> dollars; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]Year or quarterGrossdomesticproductBusiness 1Total » Nonfarm 1 FarmStatisticaldiscrepancyHouseholdsandinstitutionsGeneral government 2TotalFederalStateandlocal195919601961196219631964196519661967196819691970197119721973197419751976197719781979198019811982198319841985.19861987198819891990199119921993".1982: IV1983: IV1984: IV1985-.IV1986: IV1987: IV1988-.IV1989: IV1990:1 IIIllIV1991:1 IIIllIV1992:1 IIIllIV1993:1 IIIllIV494.2513.3531.8571.6603.1648.0702.7769.8814.3889.3959.51,010.71,097.21,207.01,349.61,458.61,585.91,768.41,974.12,232.72,488.62,708.03,030.63,149.63,405.03,777.24,038.74,268.64,539.94,900.45,250.85,546.15,722.96,038.56,374.03,195.13,547.33,869.14,140.54,336.64,683.05,044.65,344.85,461.95,540.95,583.85,597.95,631.75,697.75,758.65,803.75,908.75,991.46,059.56,194.46,261.66,327.66,395.96,510.8436.9451.4465.7500.5527.1565.7614.1670.1703.5765.4822.5858.7931.21,025.31,151.51,242.71,346.11,507.41,691.11,921.12,147.92,328.92,611.72,692.12,914.83,251.13,473.53,665.73,890.84,201.04,495.94,725.94,848.55,114.45,400.62,724.03,046.63,330.33,561.23,718.34,016.64,327.34,569.84,664.84,726.24,756.14,756.54,770.74,827.34,880.74,915.35,001.95,071.25,130.25,254.45,303.05,359.05,416.65,523.7419.8434.7447.9481.4508.7547.2592.9644.4680.5742.8799.9832.5900.0991.71,102.21,193.91,291.41,450.61,633.01,858.72,069.72,259.22,530.92,634.42,855.53,191.63,420.33,601.53,849.54,161.84,413.74,633.04,760.15,006.45,301.02,674.12,986.93,283.23,501.53,656.03,970.94,291.94,476.64,564.74,641.04,656.44,670.14,691.24,739.94,774.74,834.64,894.04,964.25,028.85,138.75,184.75,263.75,330.15,425.418.919.820.120.220.419.321.922.922.222.725.226.228.132.649.847.448.846.447.254.764.556.169.965.149.268.567.162.966.067.681.185.178.884.481.360.045.867.565.764.370.660.886.987.184.881.579.283.078.774.584.883.485.883.683.883.373.285.0-1.8-3.1-2.2-1.0-2.0-.7-.72.8.8-.1-2.6.03.11.1-.51.46.010.410.97.613.813.610.9-7.410.2-9.0-13.91.2-24.8-28.41.17.89.623.618.2-10.113.8-20.5-5.9-2.0-24.9-25.412.813.1-1.814.94.9.24.527.36.223.123.615.732.134.412.013.313.312.413.914.515.616.717.919.321.323.426.129.532.435.639.043.047.252.057.162.471.078.989.3100.5111.6121.3132.0141.7153.3170.5187.6206.1227.5245.3267.0286.3115.5125.1135.6145.6157.8177.6194.3213.3218.9225.1230.9235.0238.0242.7247.6252.7258.7264.0269.6275.7280.3284.7288.1292.344.948.151.655.559.364.469.378.487.497.8107.5119.5130.4142.6155.1168.8187.7203.9220.6240.7261.9289.8318.4345.8368.9394.1423.6449.6478.7511.7548.8592.8629.1657.1687.1355.6375.6403.2433.6460.5488.8523.0561.7578.2589.6596.8606.4623.0627.7630.2635.6648.0656.3659.8664.3678.4683.9691.2694.721.722.623.725.226.528.530.034.337.941.944.948.551.154.957.261.166.671.075.681.887.196.3107.7117.3125.0132.2140.3143.7151.4159.8169.1180.1192.7199.8207.0121.1126.2134.1142.4144.9153.2161.3170.6177.9180.4179.7182.3193.2192.7192.1192.7200.0200.6200.0198.7206.2206.2208.3207.123.125.527.930.232.935.939.344.149.555.962.671.179.387.797.9107.6121.1132.9145.0158.9174.8193.5210.7228.5243.9261.9283.2305.9327.3351.9379.8412.7436.5457.3480.1234.5249.4269.2291.2315.6335.6361.7391.2400.4409.2417.1424.1429.8435.1438.1442.9448.0455.7459.7465.6472.1477.7483.0487.61 Includes compensation <strong>of</strong> employees in government enterprises.2 Compensation <strong>of</strong> government employees.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Analysis.280


TABLE B-10.—Gross domestic product by sector in 1987 dollars, 1959-93[Billions <strong>of</strong> 1987 dollars; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]Year or quarterGrossdomesticproductBusiness'Total l Nonfarm' FarmStatisticaldiscrepancyHouseholdsandinstitutionsGeneral government 2TotalFederalStateandlocal1959...1960...1961...1962...1963...1964...1965...1966...1967...1968...1969...197019711972197319741975197619771978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921993".1982: IV1983:IV1984: IV1985: IV ,1986: IV1987: IV1988: IV1989: IV1990:1IV1991:1..IIIII....IV....1992: IIIllIV1993: f....IV..1,928.81,970.82,023.82,128.12,215.62,340.62,470.52,616.22,685.22,796.92,873.02,873.92,955.93,107.13,268.63,248.13,221.73,380.83,533.33,703.53,796.83,776.33,843.13,760.33,906.64,148.54,279.84,404.54,539.94,718.64,838.04,897.34,861.44,986.35,132.73,759.64,012.14,194.24,333.54,427.14,625.54,779.74,856.74,898.34,917.14,906.54,867.24,837.84,855.64,872.64,879.64,922.04,956.54,998.25,068.35,078.25,102.15,138.35,212.11,582.11,609.51,650.71,740.81,818.81,930.42,045.32,162.62,208.02,303.02,366.22,368.42,447.42,594.82,749.72,719.62,684.62,840.12,987.83,144.23,226.03,193.43,253.63,167.33,308.23,541.73,658.13,768.33,890.84,050.64,150.54,190.84,144.84,267.64,404.33,166.33,411.53,583.03,706.13,786.73,969.94,104.24,161.94,199.44,211.94,197.74,154.34,119.44,137.04,157.64,165.04,206.74,239.84,277.94,346.24,353.94,374.14,408.44,480.81,543.41,574.31,611.61,698.01,778.61,886.82,001.72,109.12,158.82,258.02,326.72,318.92,388.62,541.32,702.02,666.02,619.62,768.12,914.63,083.83,155.03,123.43,179.23,115.83,243.13,496.43,608.63,702.83,849.54,014.84,083.44,112.44,066.24,168.44,315.53,116.93,349.03,548.93,646.83,724.43,925.54,074.54,085.04,118.74,141.74,112.54,076.54,047.74,062.24,065.04,090.04,110.04,141.04,182.64,240.04,247.44,288.14,330.14,396.445.246.446.946.347.146.046.144.546.545.146.849.550.550.748.650.753.152.553.848.250.451.060.860.253.755.164.264.366.063.266.271.670.479.673.961.147.056.165.564.469.053.865.269.071.872.173.571.671.069.269.777.279.182.279.778.276.267.573.6-6.5-11.2-7.8-3.6-6.8-2.4-2.59.02.6-.1-7.2.08.32.8-1.03.011.919.519.412.220.619.013.6-8.711.5-9.8-14.71.3-24.8-27.4 .96.98.119.714.9-11.715.5-22.0-6.2-2.1-24.6-24.111.711.8-1.613.14.2.23.823.35.319.419.713.126.528.39.810.810.886.587.591.193.696.5100.4104.7108.3111.8115.5114.1116.7120.0123.2124.3128.0128.6129.8135.1138.3142.6145.6148.9151.0154.9159.9166.3170.5180.6190.5196.9202.4209.1217.0149.6151.7156.8162.3166.9173.2184.7193.2193.8196.2198.5199.2200.0201.9202.9204.7206.5207.4210.3212.4213.5216.8218.4219.5266.5274.8285.6296.2303.2313.7324.8348.9368.9382.1391.3391.4391.8392.2395.7404.1409.1412.0415.6424.2432.5440.3443.9444.2447.4451.9461.8469.9478.7487.4497.0509.5514.3509.5511.3443.8448.9454.4465.1473.5482.3490.7501.7505.0509.1510.2513.6518.4516.7512.2509.9508.8509.3510.0509.8510.8511.3511.5511.8130.5132.1135.3141.6140.9141.7142.3155.4168.1170.7171.2161.6152.4143.7138.0137.9137.1137.0137.0138.4137.5139.2140.9142.4144.8146.4148.6149.0151.4153.5154.2156.2157.3150.5147.4143.2145.2147.1148.7149.8152.8154.0154.8155.2156.5155.6157.4161.3158.8155.6153.3152.0151.0150.1148.8148.8147.8146.9146.0136.0142.7150.3154.7162.3172.0182.5193.5200.8211.4220.1229.8239.5248.6257.7266.2272.0275.0278.6285.8295.0301.1303.0301.8302.6305.4313.2320.8327.3333.9342.7353.3357.0359.0363.9300.6303.7307.3316.5323.7329.5336.7346.9349.9352.6354.6356.2357.1357.8356.6356.5356.8358.3360.0361.0362.0363.4364.5365.81 Includes compensation <strong>of</strong> employees in government enterprises.2 Compensation <strong>of</strong> government employees.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Analysis.281


TABLE B-ll.—Gross domestic product by industry, 1947-91[Billions <strong>of</strong> dollars]YearGrossdomesticproduct234.3260.3259.3287.0331.6349.7370.0370.9404.3426.2448.6454.7494.2513.3531.8571.6603.1648.0702.7769.8814.3889.3959.51,010.71,097.21,207.01,349.61,458.61,585.91,768.41,974.12,232.72,488.62,708.03,030.63,149.63,405.03,777.24,038.74,268.64,539.94,539.94,900.45,250.85,546.15,722.9Agriculture,forestry,andfisheries20.824.019.420.723.823.221.120.719.819.719.621.920.321.321.722.122.321.424.225.424.925.728.529.832.137.355.053.254.953.854.463.374.666.781.177.062.783.784.381.788.588.590.8104.8112.0108.6Mining6.89.48.19.310.210.210.811.012.513.613.712.712.512.913.013.213.513.914.014.715.216.317.118.718.919.623.837.042.847.554.161.471.2112.6148.1146.1127.9137.1130.682.783.083.087.984.2103.191.8Construction9.111.511.513.215.616.917.517.719.021.222.121.823.724.225.227.028.931.534.637.739.543.348.451.156.162.569.873.775.285.193.9110.7124.8128.7129.4129.4137.9161.2179.2201.9213.0213.0227.6235.9240.1223.4ManufacturingTotal66.274.772.384.199.1103.4112.4106.8121.4127.4132.0124.6142.2144.8145.3159.1168.6180.5199.1218.2223.7244.3257.8253.1266.7294.3327.6341.2358.8409.6466.8521.9575.7588.3653.0647.5693.3773.9798.5829.3878.4877.8961.01,004.61,024.71,026.2Durablegoods33.538.237.245.955.659.066.161.070.874.078.070.181.782.681.792.198.3105.9118.8131.1134.1146.4154.4146.2154.2172.6195.8202.2207.1239.9277.7317.5343.8348.9385.3372.9396.0461.2471.5480.0503.2501.9541.1562.6563.7551.4Nondurablegoods32.736.635.138.243.544.346.445.850.553.554.054.560.562.263.667.170.474.680.387.189.697.9103.4106.9112.5121.7131.8139.0151.7169.7189.1204.5231.9239.4267.7274.6297.3312.7327.0349.3375.2375.9419.9442.0461.0474.8Transportationandpublicutilities21.023.723.926.630.132.134.133.736.739.541.541.744.947.148.751.754.658.162.267.170.376.182.588.097.1108.3119.1129.9142.3161.2179.2202.2219.1242.2273.3292.1326.7358.8378.0393.8419.9419.8442.1463.3481.2506.0Wholesaletrade16.618.317.619.822.522.723.223.526.629.030.531.134.235.336.438.840.543.647.251.554.860.265.168.674.383.293.5107.1117.0124.8137.9157.1178.6191.6212.7216.5223.6258.4276.6290.9302.6293.1331.0351.6363.0375.1Retailtrade27.530.130.331.734.336.337.238.140.542.444.645.349.150.451.755.457.963.568.072.778.286.694.2100.2109.2118.9131.0136.9153.0172.4190.4214.9233.2244.7269.3286.6321.1361.3390.9418.7440.1441.8471.7502.5515.7532.1Finance,insurance,andrealestate24.027.229.432.335.839.443.747.551.455.059.263.968.973.578.082.487.192.999.9108.0117.3126.8136.4146.3163.1176.5193.1208.9226.7250.1283.6328.6370.8418.4469.6503.9565.3619.0681.8743.5809.9809.7866.3926.5982.41,039.7Services20.221.922.624.226.428.230.231.635.238.741.844.148.451.655.059.363.469.174.782.690.899.4110.7120.5130.3144.9163.2179.4199.3224.1255.7294.6333.0377.0425.1469.8521.3586.9650.9712.8784.0782.5865.5948.81,040.01,089.8Government20.220.923.124.230.935.636.837.940.042.545.448.951.755.459.163.568.474.179.589.198.8110.7121.4134.2146.2160.4173.9189.9209.8229.3247.1270.5293.9324.2358.1388.0415.0445.9481.8512.1545.3545.3584.8627.6676.3720.6StatisticaldiscrepancylBased on 1972 SIC:19471948194919501951195219531954195519561957195819591960196119621963196419651966196719681969197019711972197319741975197619771978197919801981198219831984198519861987Based on 1987 SIC:198719881989199019911.8-1.21.01.02.91.82.82.41.2-2.8-1.9-1.1-1.8-3.1-2.2-1.0-2.0-.7-.72.8.8-.1-2.6.03.11.1-.51.46.010.410.97.613.813.610.9-7.410.2-9.0-13.91.2-24.8-24.8-28.41.17.89.61 Equals gross domestic product (GDP) measured as <strong>the</strong> sum <strong>of</strong> expenditures less gross domestic income—that is, GDP measured as<strong>the</strong> costs incurred and pr<strong>of</strong>its earned in domestic production.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Analysis.282


TABLE B-12.—Gross domestic product by industry in 1987 dollars, fixed 1987 weights, 1977-91[Billions <strong>of</strong> dollars]YearGrossdomesticproductTotalManufacturingAgriculture,forestry,andfisheriesMiningConstructionDurablegoodsNondurablegoodsTransportationandpublicutilitiesWholesaletradeRetailtradeFinance,insurance,andrealestateServicesGovernmentStatisticaldiscrepancyxResidual2Based on1972 SIC:19771978197919801981198219831984198519861987Based on1987 SIC:198719881989199019913,533.33,703.53,796.83,776.33,843.13,760.33,906.64,148.54,279.84,404.54,539.94,539.94,718.64,838.04,897.34,861.463.759.262.463.272.773.368.471.581.984.588.588.585.188.095.897.483.585.071.979.974.273.171.382.083.383.083.083.094.283.391.891.5190.8198.8200.3185.4174.7164.9170.0190.9209.0209.1213.0213.0211.7213.1210.2194.5741.6773.1777.1725.4746.7711.1733.8791.4810.5819.1878.4877.8923.5932.2928.5908.0440.9460.9458.0424.3429.7392.4402.5458.4468.1471.5503.2501.9536.4543.2537.0525.5300.7312.2319.2301.1317.1318.7331.3333.0342.4347.7375.2375.9387.2389.1391.5382.5314.3325.1335.5336.3337.1331.3351.7377.6381.8386.9419.9419.8437.1449.4462.6478.1170.1185.8195.8190.5207.5218.2224.2259.5273.0307.1302.6303.1311.3324.5319.5326.4318.0338.1334.8320.1330.6336.8365.1397.7421.4453.2440.1441.8469.7483.9478.1474.1596.5631.0667.4692.8704.7708.4727.9762.1776.4776.6809.9809.7846.5865.5868.3878.4538.9573.5592.8609.0624.4629.2649.5687.8722.0751.7784.0782.5812.8845.7869.4866.7475.7488.3498.6508.9511.6507.1512.5516.9527.5 -14.7536.4 1.3545.3 -24.8545.3555.9567.0581.5586.519.412.220.619.013.6-8.711.5-9.8-24.8-27.4.920.833.439.645.745.315.620.821.07.7-4.4.0.01.8-15.56.9 -15.38.1 -48.41 Equals <strong>the</strong> current-dollar statistical discrepancy deflated by <strong>the</strong> implicit price deflator for gross domestic business product.2 Equals cross domestic product (GDP) in constant dollars measured as <strong>the</strong> sum <strong>of</strong> expenditures less <strong>the</strong> statistical discrepancy inconstant dollars and GDP in constant dollars measured as <strong>the</strong> sum <strong>of</strong> gross product originating by industry.Note.—Constant-dollar values are equal to fixed-weighted quantity indexes with 1987 weights divided by 100 and multiplied by <strong>the</strong>1987 value <strong>of</strong> current-dollar GDP.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Analysis.283


TABLE B-13.—Gross domestic product <strong>of</strong> nonfinancial corporate business, 1959-93[Billions <strong>of</strong> dollars; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]Year orquarterTotalGrossdomesticCon-product sump-tion <strong>of</strong>nonfinancialfixed<strong>of</strong>corporatitalcap-businessIndirectbusinesstaxes*TotalTotalNet domestic productDomestic incomeCorporate pr<strong>of</strong>its with inventory valuation and capitalconsumption adjustmentsPr<strong>of</strong>itsbeforetaxPr<strong>of</strong>itstaxliabilityPr<strong>of</strong>itsTotalPr<strong>of</strong>its after taxCompensation<strong>of</strong>employeesDividendsUndistributedpr<strong>of</strong>itsInventoryvaluationadjustmentCapitalconsumptionadjustmentNetinterest1959196019611962196319641965 .196619671968196919701971197219731974197519761977197819791980198119821983,1984198519861987198819891990199119921993 "1982: IV1983: IV1984: IV1985: IV1986: IV1987: IV1988: IV1989: IV1990: IIIillIV1991: IIIIllIV1992: IIIIllIV1993: IIIIllIV P267.5278.1285.5311.7331.8358.1393.5431.0453.4500 5543.35614606.4673 3754.5814.6881.2994.61124.71,279.41,423.71,546.51,748.61802 81,936.12,166.52,293.62 386 32!547.32 764 82,913.53,045.53 082.13,243.41,806.32,037.22,228.22,338.82,422.82,627.62,843.22,951.53,007.73,064.13,057.83,052.53,048.b3,063.43,086.83,129.53,159.83,218.13,264.23,331.63,331.73,395.93,432.224.225.226.026.928.129.531534.337.541445.349 754.661066.277.593.3103.8116.2132.3153.0174.8207.0229 4242.1248.1258.02714281.4297 5317.4329.33415352 7362.3238.8261.5258.9263.4275.8286.1304.5326.5322.6326.6332.0336.1339.4340.4342.3343.9345.1347.8366.1351.7356.8359.0367.0366.3243.2252.9259.6284.8303.7328.6362 0396.7415.94591498.05116551.7612 4688.3737.1788.0890.81,008.51,147.21,270.71,371.71,541.51573 41,694.01,918.32,035.52 114 92,265.92 467 32,596.22,716.22 740 62,890.71,567.51,775.71,969.42,075.42,147.12,341.42,538.82,625.02,685.12,737.52,725.82,716.42,709.22,722.92,744.52,785.62,814.62,870.32,898.22,979.92,975.03,036.83,065.126.028.329.532.034.036.639.240.543.149 754.758 864.569 276.381.487.495.1104.1114.6123.3139.4167.9169 4185.8206.9220.32314241.02571274.2290.43115327 7345.5172.6194.0212.4223 8233.6245.4263.1279.0285.3285.8294.0296.6304.2307.1315.3319.5321.8323.9329.1336.0333.0344.0347.0357.9217.2224.6230.1252.8269.7292.0322.8356.2372.8409 3443.3452 84873543 2612.0655.7700.6795.7904.41,032.61,147.41,232.41,373.61404 01,508.21,711.41,815.31883 62,024.92 210 22,322.02,425.82,429.02,563.11,394.91,581.71,756.91,851.61,913.52,096.02,275.72,346.02,399.82,451.72,431.82,419.82,405.02,415.82,429.22,466.12,492.92,546.42,569.02,643.92,642.02,692.82,718.1171.5181.2185.3200.1211.1226.7246.5274.0292.3323 2358.8378 7402.0447 1505.9556.8580.3656.7741.8850.2964.21,053.51,164.81209 91,271.61,409.21,503.21 581 5l!675.01 814 2l!920.22,020.92,053.82 149 52,255.41,213.91,327.61,449.71,540.11,611.41,730.11,868.81,954.61,987.42,019.42,037.52,039.32,028.32,040.12,061.62,085.32,103.82,135.42,162.72,195.92,215.02,244.72,267.12,294.942.640.040.848.253.860.070.374.971.876 071.357 167.277 083.670.691.5111.5132.0146.1138.1120.7136.91115159.9214.3221.4203.8244.2274.4255.2256.4233.9278 3314.8101.5175.2211.4221.4198.6256.8278.5240.7263.9282.9246.5232.4232.8235.5227.0240.4252.3273.9272.7314.1292.1315.0318.243.640.340.145.049.856.066.271.467.574 070.858167.178 698.6109.2109.9137.3158.6183.5195.5181.6181.0132 9155.9189.0165.5149.1212.0256.6232.9232.1214.82551286.8116.5168.1169.0168.4168.5224.8271.4215.9223.3233.8244.6226.7207.8209.9218.2223.3235.1260.2251.8273.2268.4291.2281.820.719.219.520.622.824.027.229.527.833 633.327 229.933 840.242.241.553.059.967.169.667.063.946 359.473.769.975.693.5101.799.593.982.798.2114.940.664.462.671.186.599.6107.991.189.695.098.892.079.781.184.385.990.8100.895.3105.8106.4117.6112.51 Indirect business tax and nontax liability plus business transfer payments less subsidies.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Analysis.22.921.120.724.327.032.139.041.939.740 437.531037.144 858.467.068.484 498.7116.4125.9114.6117.186 796.4115.495.673.5118.5154 9133.3138.3132.1156 9171.875.9103.7106.497.282.0125.1163.5124.8133.7138.8145.8134.8128.2128.8133.9137.4144.3159.4156.5167.4162.0173.6169.310.010.610.611.412.613.715 616.817.519119.118 518.520121.121.724.827.832 037.239.345.553.456 466.569.574.576.377.982 0101.9118.194.0105 2125.359.067.468.774.775.284.084.3102.3118.0117.4120.0117.2103.192.989.090.993.9100.3105.9120.7127.4125.4124.012.910.610.113.014.418.423 425.122.221 318.412 518.724 737.345.243.656.666 879.186.769.163.730 229.945.921.1-2.840.672 931.520.138.151746.516.936.337.722.56.841.279.222.515.821.425.817.525.135.944.946.550.559.150.546.734.648.245.3-0.3-.2.3.0.1-.5-1.2-2.1-1.6-37-5.9-66-4.6-66-20.0-39.5-11.0-14.9-16.6-25.0-41.6-43.0-25.7-99-8.5-4.1.29.7-14.5-27 3-17.5-11.04.9-5.3-7.8-8.6-7.63.5-3.8-10.7-17.8-31.7-13.5-2.08.9-31.5-19.58.212.7-3.01.9-4.6-13.7-7.84.9-12.7-12.21.0-7.2-0.7-.2.33.23.94.55.35.65.8566.3554.7505.0.9-7.4-10.9-10.0-12.3-15.9-17.8-18.4-11512.529.455.644.946.745.039.935.314.228.535.9-6.414.738.956.940.849.838.838.342.640.133.425.216.812.811.815.221.827.428.836.036.436.035.435.73.13.54.04.54.85.36.17.48.810113.217 118.119 222.528.328.727.530.636.345.158.271.982 576.787.990.798.3105.8121.6146.6148.5141.3135.379.678.995.890.0103.5109.2128.4150.7148.5149.5147.9148.2143.9140.2140.6140.5136.8137.1133.6133.9134.9133.1132.8284


TABLE B-14.—Output, costs, and pr<strong>of</strong>its oj nonfinancial corporate business, 1959-93[Quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]Year or quarterGross domesticproduct <strong>of</strong>nonfinancialcorporatebusiness(billions <strong>of</strong>dollars)Current 1987dollars dollarsTotalcostandpr<strong>of</strong>it 2Current-dollar cost and pr<strong>of</strong>it per unit <strong>of</strong> output (dollars)»Consumption<strong>of</strong>fixedcapitalIndirectbusinesstaxes 3Compensation<strong>of</strong>smploy-Corporate pr<strong>of</strong>its withinventory valuation andcapital consumptionadjustmentsTotalPr<strong>of</strong>itstaxliabilityPr<strong>of</strong>itsaftertax 4NetinterestOutputper hour<strong>of</strong> allemployees(1987dollars)Compensationper hour<strong>of</strong> allemployees(dollars)195919601961196219631964.,19651966196719681969197019711972197319741975197619771978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921982: IV..1983: IV..1984: IV..1985: IV..1986: IV..1987: IV...1988: IV..1989: IV..267.5278.1285.5311.7331.8358.1393.5431.0453.4500.5543.3561.4606.4673.3754.5814.6881.2994.61,124.71,279.41,423.71,546.51,748.61,802.81,936.12,166.52,293.62,386.32,547.32,764.82,913.53,045.53,082.13,243.41,806.32,037.22,228.22,338.82,422.82,627.62,843.22,951.5928.7955.6978.21,047.51,104.81,179.31,262.21,336.01,367.41,444.31,492.51,473.41,525.91,629.51,706.91,669.71,625.61,748.51,866.71,967.11,995.71,980.92,035.12,001.32,112.32,284.12,364.32,439.32,547.32,684.82,718.92,747.42,710.02,822.31,999.62,204.22,328.42,396.92,463.32,604.02,719.02,722.70.288.291.292.298.300.304.312.323.332.347.364.381,397.413.442.488.542.569.603.650.713.781.859.901.917.949.970.9781.0001.0301.0721.1091.1371.149.903.924.957.976.9841.0091.0461.0840.026.026.027.026.025.025.025.026.027.029.030.034.036.037.039.046.057.059.062.067.077.088.102.115.115.109.109.111.110.111.117.120.126.125.119.119.111.110.112.110.112.1200.028.030.030.031.031.031.031.030.032.034.037.040.042.042.045.049.054.054.056.058.062.070.082.085.088.091.093.095.095.096.101.106.115.116.086.088.091.093.095.094.097.1020.185.190.189.191.191.192.195.205.214.224.240.257.263.274.296.333.357.376.397.432.483.532.572.605.602.617.636.648.658.676.706.736.758.762.607.602.623.643.654.664.687.7180.046.042.042.046.049.051.056.056.052.053.048.039.044.047.049.042.056.064.071.074.069.061.067.056.076.094.094.084.096.102.094.093.086.099.051.079.091.092.081.099.1020.022.020.020.020.021.020.022.022.020.023.022.018.020.021.024.025.026.030.032.034.035.034.031.023.028.032.030.031.037.038.037.034.031.035.020.029.027.030.035.038.040.0330.024.022.022.026.028.031.034.034.032.029.025.020.024.027.025.017.031.033.039.040.034.027.036.033.048.062.064.053.059.064.057.059.056.064.030.050.064.063.045.060.063.0550.003.004.004.004.004.005.005.006.006.007.009.012.012.012.013.017.018.016.016.018.023.029.035.041.036.038.038.040.042.045.054.054.052.048.040.036.041.038.042.042.047.05515.44315.66116.18216.67517.20417.85518.07418.14318.36218.85818.75018.77619.48719.79319.76219.23019.76320.36520.76620.71120.22220.26520.53820.80321.59621.92622.15022.73523.12923.57223.18923.44623.86524.83621.07021.89322.05422.34722.89223.35823.52423.1472.8512.9693.0663.1863.2873.4323.5293.7203.9254.2204.5084.8255.1345.4305.8586.4137.0567.6488.2528.9519.77010.77711.75512.57713.00213.52714.08314.74115.20815.83316.37717.24618.08718.91512.79113.18713.73214.35914.97515.51816.07116.6181990:1IIIllIV3,007.73,064.13,057.83,052.52,742.92,771.42,750.52,725.01.097.106.112.120.118.118.121.123.104.103.107.109.725.729.741.748.096.102.090.085.033.034.036.034.064.068.054.052.054.054.054.05423.23123.53723.46823.54916.83217.15017.38517.6231991:1IIIllIV3,048.63,063.43,086.83,129.52,694.12,692.42,708.52,745.0.132.138.1401.140.126.126.126.125.113.114.116.116.753.758.761.760.086.087.084.088.030.030.031.031.057.057.053.056.053.052.052.05123.63423.73823.88924.24617.79417.98818.18318.4191992:1IIIllIV3,159.83,218.13,264.23,331.62,759.52,802.62,839.82,887.41.1451.1481.1491.154.125.124.129.122.117.116.116.116.762.762.762.761.091.098.096.109.033.036.034.037.059.062.062.072.050.049.047.04624.39424.67825.03125.31018.59718.80319.06219.2491993:1II3,331.73,395.93,432.22,867.52,916.62,948.91.1621.1641.164.124.123.124.116.118.118.772.770.769.102.108.108.037.040.038.065.068.070.047.046.04525.05325.29625.51219.35319.46819.6291 Output is measured by gross domestic product <strong>of</strong> nonfinancial corporate business in 1987 dollars.2 This is equal to <strong>the</strong> deflator for gross domestic product <strong>of</strong> nonfinancial corporate business with <strong>the</strong> decimal point shifted twoplaces to <strong>the</strong> left.3 Indirect business tax and nontax liability plus business transfer payments less subsidies.4 With inventory valuation and capital consumption adjustments.Sources: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce (Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Analysis) and Department <strong>of</strong> Labor (Bureau <strong>of</strong> Labor Statistics).151-444 0 - 9 4 - 1 0285


TABLE B-15.—Personal consumption expenditures. 1959-93[Billions <strong>of</strong> dollars; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]Year orquarterPersonalconsumptionexpendituresTotal»Durable goodsMotorvehiclesandpartsFurnitureandhouseholdequipmentNondurable goodsTotal !FoodClothingandshoesGasolineandoilFueloilandcoalServicesTotal l Hous- TotalHouseholdoperationEjectricityandgasTransportationMedicalcare19591960196119621963196419651966196719681969197019711972197319741975197619771978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921993 "....1982: IV.1983: IV.1984:1V.1985: IV.1986: IV.1987: IV.1988:1V.1989: IV.1990:1...IV1991:1..IIIllIV1992:1 IIIllIV1993:1 IIIllIV "....318.1332.4343.5364.4384.2412.5444.6481.6509.3559.1603.7646.5700.3767.8848.1927.71,024.91,143.11,271.51,421.21,583.71,748.11,926.22,059.22,257.52,460.32,667.42,850.63,052.23,296.13,523.13,761.23,906.44,139.94,390.62,128.72,346.82,526.42,739.82,923.13,124.63,398.23,599.13,679.33,727.03,801.73,836.63,843.63,887.83,929.83,964.14,046.54,099.94,157.14,256.24,296.24,359.94,419.14,487.442.843.541.947.051.856.863.568.570.681.086.285.397.2110.7124.1123.0134.3160.0182.6202.3214.2212.5228.5236.5275.0317.9352.9389.6403.7437.1459.4468.2457.8497.3537.7246.9297.7328.2354.4406.8408.8452.9458.3479.8466.0467.3459.5448.9452.0465.1465.2484.0487.8500.9516.6515.3531.6541.9561.918.919.717.821.524.426.029.930.330.036.138.435.544.551.156.149.554.871.383.592.291.584.091.697.7120.6144.6167.4184.9183.5197.8205.4202.9185.5204.3222.4105.1134.8149.3162.9188.2186.3203.4198.1213.9202.2202.8192.9182.0180.0190.0190.2199.4200.6203.4213.7211.7220.8221.7235.418.118.018.319.320.723.225.128.230.032.934.735.737.842.447.951.554.560.267.174.082.386.091.392.5104.4115.3123.4135.5144.0156.7167.9174.2180.6194.5211.795.6109.7118.7128.1140.6145.9162.5170.8175.1173.6173.6174.5176.1181.2182.9182.4188.7190.2196.5202.7203.3208.6214.0220.9148.5153.1157.4163.8169.4179.7191.9208.5216.9235.0252.2270.4283.3305.2339.6380.8416.0451.8490.4541.5613.3682.9744.2772.3817.8873.0919.4952.21,011.11,073.81,149.51,229.21,257.91,300.91,350.2787.3839.8887.8939.5963.71,029.41,105.81,173.51,201.71,213.61,241.01,260.71,252.31,259.21,260.01,260.01,278.21,288.21,305.71,331.71,335.31,344.81,352.41,368.480.782.684.887.189.594.6101.0109.0112.3121.6130.5142.1147.5158.5176.1198.1218.5236.0255.9280.6313.0341.8367.3386.0406.2430.2451.1476.8500.7533.6565.1604.8621.4633.7658.3394.9413.9436.8460.7486.7507.4549.5575.3591.0601.3611.4615.6617.1623.1622.1623.2628.8626.6631.7647.6648.2654.1660.0671.126.427.027.629.029.832.434.137.439.243.246.547.851.756.462.566.070.876.684.194.3101.2107.3117.2120.5130.8142.5152.2163.2174.5186.4200.4207.3213.0228.2237.1122.7136.7145.7156.2165.8177.6194.4205.4206.2206.8208.5207.6208.9214.3215.5213.4221.4224.5230.7236.1233.1235.2238.2241.911.312.012.012.613.013.614.816.017.118.620.521.923.224.428.136.139.743.046.950.166.286.797.994.193.394.596.979.784.786.996.2108.4102.9103.4103.693.094.994.997.673.087.888.595.9102.299.7108.7123.0107.4102.7101.1100.399.9102.9105.8105.2106.0103.6102.4102.54.03.83.83.84.04.14.44.74.84.74.64.44.65.16.37.88.410.111.111.514.415.415.814.513.814.214.112.012.012.112.013.213.013.815.114.014.113.814.311.312.211.713.212.312.314.113.913.512.413.312.712.814.713.913.915.114.915.415.0126.8135.9144.1153.6163.1175.9189.2204.6221.7243.1265.3290.8319.8351.9384.5423.9474.5531.2598.4677.4756.2852.7953.51,050.41,164.71,269.41,395.11,508.81,637.41,785.21,914.22,063.82,190.72,341.62,502.71,094.61,209.31,310.41,446.01,552.61,686.41,839.51,967.31,997.82,047.52,093.42,116.42,142.42,176.62,204.82,239.02,284.42,323.82,350.52,407.92,445.52,483.42,524.82,557.245.048.251.254.758.061.465.469.574.179.786.894.0102.7112.1122.7134.1147.0161.5179.5201.7226.6255.2287.1311.1334.6362.3392.5421.8452.5484.2514.4547.5574.4600.0627.7320.2344.6373.8404.6432.7466.6496.0526.6534.5543.2553.6558.6564.5571.4577.5584.2591.2596.9602.5609.2617.6625.1631.1636.918.720.321.222.423.625.026.528.230.232.335.137.841.045.349.855.563.772.481.991.2100.0113.0126.0141.4153.6165.5176.2181.1187.8199.5209.8215.6227.1234.4251.0145.8159.3168.8180.7182.5189.7203.8217.7208.1216.2219.1219.1220.8229.7230.3227.8228.0234.5230.3245.0245.7246.7255.2256.37.68.38.89.49.910.410.911.512.213.014.015.216.618.420.023.528.532.537.642.146.856.363.472.680.784.688.787.188.493.498.097.4104.3105.8113.274.984.885.990.186.888.695.3103.792.498.199.799.6100.5107.1105.9103.7101.3104.7106.0111.0111.1109.8116.4115.610.511.211.712.212.713.414.515.917.318.920.923.727.129.831.233.335.741.349.253.659.465.169.471.678.989.199.0105.8116.6128.5135.6142.5146.2155.4170.273.682.992.5101.5109.0121.3132.7137.6139.9141.7143.1145.4144.0145.0147.0148.8152.5153.7153.0162.4166.3169.1170.9174.416.317.418.620.722.425.727.730.533.739.044.450.156.563.571.280.193.0106.2122.4139.7157.8181.3213.6240.5265.7290.6319.3346.4384.7427.7471.9526.2577.1628.4680.6250.9274.8299.9333.0358.4398.5444.4489.2504.4519.0534.8546.6558.3569.9582.4597.6609.1622.6634.9646.9662.2675.4686.9698.01 Includes o<strong>the</strong>r items not shown separately.2 Includes imputed rental value <strong>of</strong> owner-occupied housing.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Analysis.286


TABLE B-16.—Personal consumption expenditures in 1987 dollars, 1959-93[Billions <strong>of</strong> 1987 dollars; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]Year orquarter19591960196119621963196419651966196719681969197019711972197319741975197619771978197919701981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921993 '.1982: IV1983: IV1984: IV1985: IV1986: IV1987: IV1988: IV1989: IV1990:1 IIIll ..IV1991:1 IIIllIV1992:1IIIllIV1993:1IIIllIV....Personalconsumptionexpenditures1178 91,210.81,238.41,293.31,341.91,417 21,497.01,573.81,622.41,707.51,771.21,813.51,873.71,978.42,066.72,053.82,097.52,207.32,296.62,391.82,448.42,447.12,476.92,503.72,619.42,746.12,865.82,969.13,052.23,162.43,223.33,272.63,258.63,341.83,452.52,539.32,678.22,784.82,895.33,012.53,074.73,202.93,242.03,264.43,271.63,288.43,265.93,242.73,256.93,267.13,267.53,302.33,316.83,350.93,397.23,403.83,432.73,469.63,503.9Durable goodsTotal»114 4115.4109.4120.2130.3140 7156.2166.0167.2184.5190.8183.7201.4225.2246.6227.2226.8256.4280.0292.9289.0262.7264.6262.5297.7338.5370.1402.0403.7428.7440.7443.1426.6456.6489.7272.3319.1347.7369.6415.7404.7439.2436.8454^8441.8442.4433.2420.3422.0432.6431.5446.6447.5459.0473.4471.9484.2493.1509.9Motorvehiclesandparts59 761.354.962.268.471281.281.880.391.895.185.6100.8114.3123.4102.2102.9124.6137.3141.5130.5111.4113.5115.6138.1160.3180.2193.3183.5194.8196.4192.7170.5182.3191.7123.7151.6164.3173.9193.6183.6197.7188.3203.0192.8193.0182.1169.4165.9173.7173.0180.6179.5180.6188.6185.7191.3189.9199.9Furnitureandhouseholdequipment38 237.738.140.443.148 352.157.659.562.964.364.466.873.681.581.979.184.291.496.6101398.597.794.2104.3115.3123.8136.3144.0155.4165.8171.6180.0194.8216.396.4109.3118.7128.6141.4145.9160.3167.9172.0171.0171.0172.3174.3180.0182.7182.9188.2189.8197.1204.2206.5212.4219.4227.0Nondurable goodsTotal J518 5526.9537.7553.0563.6588 2616.7647.6659.0686.0703.2717.2725.6755.8777.9759.8767.1801.3819.8844.8862 8860.5867.9872.2900.3934.6958.7991.01,011.11,035.11,051.61,060.71,048.21,062.91,088.1880.7915.2942.9968.71,000.91,014.61,046.81,058.91,059.81,060.61,065.01,057.51,048.21,051.11,049.31,044.01,052.01,055.01,062.91,081.81,076.01,083.11,093.01,100.1Food3019305.8312.1316.3319.23310346.5359.1364.5380.7389.7397.5399.2411.9412.6404.7413.2431.9441.5442.8448.0448.8446.6451.4463.4472.3483.0494.1500.7513.4515.0523.9518.7520.5531.2458.3467.1475.1488.2496.9502.4518.0515.6519.0524.1526.5525.8518.7519.0518.8518.2518.8515.7518.2529.3526.7528.6532.6536.9Clothingandshoes58 258.759.862.463.668 571.576.376.980.281.981.084.690.496.995.498.5103.2108.7119.01241126.0132.8133.7142.4153.1158.8170.3174.5178.9187.8186.2184.7193.7199.2135.7147.7154.7161.7171.9174.5182.8190.9188.5185.4186.4184.5182.9187.0185.9183.1188.3191.1195.4200.0194.8197.8200.6203.7Gasolineandoil38 139.439.841.542.845147.350.251.855.559.262.965.968.672.168.670.673.475.777.476.472.073.273.975.777.979.282.984.786.187.386.483.183.984.973.476.979.079.584.685.487.588.687.986.786.584.682.783.783.482.582.783.784.784.483.984.186.285.3Fueloilandcoal22 621.720.620.621.622 523.524.224.223.021.820.219.521.523.318.418.120.319.619.518.114.011.810.911.111.211.512.112.012.011.410.510.711.913.010.511.411.111.412.411.912.012.010.011.011.69.510.310.611.410.611.112.811.711.912.912.613.213.2ServicesTotal»546 0568.5591.3620.0648.0688 3724.1760.2796.2837.0877.2912.5946.7997.41,042.21,066.81,103.61,149.51,196.81,254.11 296.51,323.91,344.41,368.91,421.41,473.01,537.01,576.11,637.41,698.51,731.01,768.81,783.81,822.31,874.71,386.21,443.91,494.21,557.11,595.81,655.51,716.91,746.31,749.81,769.21,781.11,775.21,774.21,783.81,785.21,792.01,803.71,814.31,829.01,842.01,855.91,865.41,883.51,893.9Housing2159 8168.1176.0185.8194.4203 5214.6224.4234.5246.0259.1269.3280.9295.9310.8326.9336.5346.7355.4372.9387 9399.4407.3409.6415.5426.8435.9442.1452.5461.8469.2474.6478.6484.2492.0411.0419.7431.3438.1444.8457.0465.6471.3473.3474.3475.0475.9476.3478.1479.4480.6481.7483.2485.1486.7488.8490.7493.3495.0HouseholdoperationTotal J75 078.581.285.288.492 696.8101.4106.2110.1115.3118.9120.8126.8132.0132.5138.1143.9151.0158.0162 9167.1165.6166.7169.4173.7179.1180.8187.8196.9202.6204.3208.2211.7218.7166.2173.3174.8182.6182.8189.3198.6208.5197.9205.1208.0206.0203.8211.3210.6207.3205.9210.7213.6216.6217.9215.6220.8220.8Electricityandgas34 536.338.340.942.845147.249.752.455.058.060.461.864.966.566.970.472.976.078.879.381.680.381.283.784.386.685.688.492.794.392.295.895.399.080.286.884.588.586.888.693.098.887793.294.493.892.598.997.394.492.495.195.398.599.196.2100.6100.1Transportation45 446.747.048.750.553.055.458.662.065.468.971.073.677.879.679.981.484.490.292.996.191.388.987.491.6100.0109.2112.6116.6122.5123.8124.0120.0122.7126.388.294.2103.5111.2113.4117.9124.2124.3124.9124.4124.0122.7120.2120.1119.7120.2120.4121.9125.0123.7124.5126.1126.5128.3Medicalcare95 098.4102.0110.2117.1129.8135.8142.3148.1159.5171.3180.7193.7207.0222.4231.1243.8255.5267.9279.2790 9302.1318.3323.7332.6341.9353.0366.2384.7399.4408 6424.6437.6449.2463.2327.8334.8344.9359.1372.0390.7403.0411.8418.0423.2427.7429.4432.6435.3438.8443.6445.3447.9450.4453.2458.0461.1465.1468.61 Includes o<strong>the</strong>r items not shown separately.2 Includes imputed rental value <strong>of</strong> owner-occupied housing.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Analysis.287


TABLE B-17.—Gross and net private domestic investment, 1959-93[Billions <strong>of</strong> dollars; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]Year or quarterGrossprivatedomesticinvestmentLess:Consumption<strong>of</strong>fixedcapitalEquals: Net private domestic investmentTotalNet fixed investmentTotalNonresidentialTotalStructuresProducers'durableequipmentdentialChange inbusinessinventories1959..1960196119621963196419651966196719681969197019711972197319741975197619771978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921993".1982: IV1983: IV1984: IV1985: IV1986: IV1987: IV1988: IV1989: IV1990:1 IIIllIV1991:1IV....1992:1 IIIllIV1993:178.878.777.987.993.4101.7118.0130.4128.0139.9155.2150.3175.5205.6243.1245.8226.0286.4358.3434.0480.2467.6558.0503.4546.7718.9714.5717.6749.3793.6832.3808.9736.9796.5892.0464.2614.8722.8737.0697.1800.2814.8825.2828.9837.8812.5756.4729.1721.5744.5752.4750.8799.7802.2833.3874.1874.1884.0935.844.646.347.749.351.353.957.362.167.473.981.597.6109.9120.4140.2165.2182.8205.2234.8272.4311.9362.4399.1418.4433.2454.5478.6502.2534.0580.4602.7626.1657.9671.2412.5439.7448.0465.6488.2512.1547.2600.8590.2597.9607.8614.8619.9622.3626.7635.4631.7637.2714.6648.0663.2663.3679.7678.734.232.430.338.642.047.860.768.360.666.073.761.578.095.7122.7105.560.9103.6153.1199.3207.8155.7195.6104.3128.2285.6260.0239.1247.1259.6251.9206.2110.8138.6220.851.7175.1274.8271.4208.9288.1267.6224.4238.7239.9204.7141.5109.399.2117.9117.0119.1162.587.6185.2210.8210.8204.3257.130.129.227.332.536.442.851.054.550.156.964.059.269.985.8105.091.366.586.8128.3171.3195.1165.2170.2120.3133.8214.6235.4230.4220.9243.4218.6199.3119.5131.2204.098.0154.9223.8238.8227.8228.8250.3194.2229.1206.6196.3165.4129.2122.3118.4108.1124.2149.677.9173.3176.3197.7196.6245.412.313.812.215.316.421.330.336.733.235.040.538.436.842.559.058.941.545.664.994.1117.3113.8127.199.169.1126.6146.1114.4103.0125.8117.1116.167.260.46.67.77.68.38.310.314.116.015.115.817.918.418.418.723.824.518.819.923.435.549.959.175.572.446.265.175.251.846.747.948.651.827.513.95.76.14.67.08.111.016.220.718.119.222.620.018.423.835.234.522.725.641.558.667.454.751.626.722.961.570.962.656.377.968.564.339.746.517.815.415.117.220.021.520.717.816.921.923.520.833.143.246.032.325.141.263.477.377.851.443.121.264.687.989.3116.0117.9117.6101.583.252.370.84.23.22.96.15.75.09.713.810.59.19.72.38.09.917.714.3-5.716.724.727.912.8-9.525.4-15.9-5.571.124.68.626.316.233.36.9-8.67.316.8-46.320.251.032.6-18.859.317.330.29.633.38.4-23.9-19.9-23.0-.58.9-5.112.99.712.034.613.17.711.7Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Analysis.288


TABLE B-18.—Gross and net private domestic investment in 1987 dollars, 1959-93[Billions <strong>of</strong> 1987 dollars; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]Year or quarterGrossprivatedomesticinvestmentLess:Consumption<strong>of</strong>fixedcapitalEquals.- Net private domestic investmentTotalNet fixed investmentTotalNonresidentialTotalStructuresProducers'durableequipmentResidentialChange inbusinessinventories19591960196119621963196419651966196719681969197019711972197319741975197619771978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921993".1982: IV1983: IV1984: IV1985: IV1986: IV1987: IV1988: IV1989: IV1990:1IIIllIV1991:1 IIIllIV1992:1IIIllIV1993:1IIIllIV296.4290.8289.4321.2343.3371.8413.0438.0418.6440.1461.3429.7475.7532.2591.7543.0437.6520.6600.4664.6669.7594.4631.1540.5599.5757.5745.9735.1749.3773.4784.0746.8675.7732.9820.9503.5669.5756.4763.1705.9793.8785.0769.5766.5773.9751.0695.7667.8659.8682.8692.3691.7737.0739.6763.0803.0803.6813.4863.6168.8173.7178.6183.6189.6196.4205.0214.9225.2235.3246.7258.0269.1285.0296.4310.3322.8334.6348.4364.5384.5400.7417.8429.5447.4455.5471.5486.7502.2518.5545.5554.8569.2595.0598.6439.2468.5467.4480.1492.5508.1524.7559.6549.7553.1556.5559.9563.3566.5569.5577.6574.8577.6643.7584.0595.0592.5604.4602.6127.5117.1110.8137.6153.7175.4208.1223.0193.4204.7214.6171.7206.6247.2295.3232.6114.8186.1252.1300.0285.2193.7213.2111.0152.1302.0274.4248.4247.1254.9238.5192.0106.4137.8222.364.3201.0289.0283.0213.3285.7260.3209.9216.8220.7194.5135.8104.593.2113.4114.6116.9159.595.9179.0208.1211.1208.9261.0114.0109.0103.6122.0137.7159.7182.9186.3165.8181.1189.8165.8185.8224.6257.6201.7128.7160.6217.8262.8271.6201.9188.7128.5147.7234.0252.3239.9220.9235.0208.7186.3114.8131.3206.9109.2171.7241.1252.8233.4225.8239.3185.0212.1192.6183.7156.7121.9115.6114.3107.6121.9146.886.3170.3178.8198.1202.5248.339.244.139.949.552.869.799.9118.1103.9105.1112.298.785.098.9134.6122.372.074.599.0134.4154.1129.5131.6101.071.6134.3154.0118.3103.0122.6114.8111.168.269.025.430.530.632.932.139.553.058.353.052.256.053.549.049.257.953.436.736.839.855.270.173.382.075.350.369.379.454.946.746.745.947.325.913.413.813.79.416.620.730.246.959.850.952.956.245.236.049.776.768.935.337.759.279.284.056.149.625.721.465.074.663.356.375.968.963.842.355.574.864.863.772.584.990.083.068.261.976.077.667.1100.8125.7123.079.456.886.1118.8128.4117.572.557.127.576.099.898.3121.6117.9112.494.075.246.662.413.68.17.215.616.015.725.136.727.623.624.85.920.822.537.730.9-13.925.534.337.213.6-8.324.6-17.54.467.922.18.526.319.929.85.7-8.46.515.4-44.929.347.930.2-20.159.920.924.94.728.110.9-20.9-17.4-22.3-.97.1-5.012.69.68.729.313.06.512.7Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Analysis.289


TABLE B-19.—Inventories and final sales <strong>of</strong> domestic business, 1959-93[Billions <strong>of</strong> dollars, except as noted; seasonally adjusted]QuarterTotal 2FarmTotal 2Inventories lNonfarmManufacturingWholesaletradeRetailtradeO<strong>the</strong>rFinalsales <strong>of</strong>domesticbusiness3Ratio <strong>of</strong> inventoriesto final sales <strong>of</strong>domestic businessTotalNonfarmFourth quarter:195919601961196219631964141.2145.2147.0153.4158.7164.231.633.033.734.834.933.3109.6112.2113.4118.6123.8130.955.256.257.260.362.265.921.021.321.822.423.925.226.227.527.028.329.631.07.27.27.47.58.08.836.537.739.641.944.647.53.873.853.713.663.563.463.002.972.862.832.782.7619651966196719681969178.4194.0206.0221.4242.537.436.336.538.741.9141.0157.8169.5182.6200.670.780.987.594.0103.426.930.332.734.637.933.736.236.940.744.59.810.412.413.314.952.555.659.165.069.03.403.493.483.413.512.692.842.872.812.9119701971197219731974249.4267.4296.6365.1435.240.145.055.378.074.3209.2222.4241.3287.1360.9105.8107.3113.6136.1177.041.745.250.059.475.645.852.357.766.474.616.017.619.925.233.772.779.288.397.2105.23.433.383.363.764.142.882.812.732.953.4319751976197719781979440.1475.3521.6605.3702.675.572.275.292.197.9364.5403.1446.4513.2604.7177.8194.9210.6238.0280.676.286.196.2111.7141.274.782.793.3107.5118.935.839.446.355.964.1117.5129.1144.3166.6185.43.743.683.613.633.793.103.123.093.083.26198019811982 i1983 11984 |784.1836.2817.0827.5898.9104.9101.4103.6103.2100.9679.3734.7713.5724.4797.9309.8331.9318.5319.2349.0174.2184.8174.7168.9187.2125.0137.0139.5153.7173.570.381.180.782.588.3203.5220.3230.9252.2273.33.853.803.543.283.293.343.343.092.872.92198519861987198819891990199119921993 P1990:1IllIV1991.1IIIllIV1992:1IIIllIV904.3887.9950.61,025.11,081.61,110.41,083.41,099.01,133.41,081.81,090.91,115.61,110.41,096.51,089.61,085.01,083.41,087.51,093.91,098.71,099.096.690.590.995.496.394.790.795.191.996.598.297.594.798.1101.596.690.794.894.394.995.1807.7797.3859.7929.6985.31,015.7992.71,003.91,041.5985.4992.71,018.21,015.7998.4988.1988.4992.7992.7999.61,003.81,003.9339.9328.1349.3383.2409.7423.7407.3400.9405.3411.5412.9424.7423.7419.1412.1409.1407.3404.6404.6406.8400.9184.9183.4196.3215.3224.8236.9239.7247.9255.3226.3229.5236.0236.9236.9233.7235.3239.7239.5243.4244.9247.9188.6193.4216.1229.9250.2257.2257.4269.5286.9246.1250.0258.4257.2248.6249.8254.3257.4259.8264.2266.4269.594.392.498.0101.2100.698.088.385.694.0101.5100.399.098.093.892.489.788.387.585.785.6294.1311.4329.8359.2378.3398.4408.9436.9459.3387.9391.1395.6398.4399.2404.2406.8408.9417.3421.5426.7436.93.082.852.882.852.862.792.652.522.472.792.792.822.792.752.702.672.652.612.602.572.522.752.562.612.592.602.552.432.302.272.542.542.572.552.502.442.432.432.382.372.352.301993:1IIIllIV1,119.51,119.61,119.21,133.499.195.495.191.91,020.41,024.21,024.11,041.5402.0402.4407.0405.3249.6251.3242.9255.3280.1281.2282.7286.988.789.391.594.0439.0445.5450.7459.32.552.512.482.472.322.302.272.271 Inventories at end <strong>of</strong> quarter. Quarter-to-quarter change calculated from this table is not <strong>the</strong> current-dollar change in businessinventories (CBI) component <strong>of</strong> GOP. <strong>The</strong> former is <strong>the</strong> difference between two inventory stocks, each valued at <strong>the</strong>ir respective end-<strong>of</strong>quarterprices. <strong>The</strong> latter is <strong>the</strong> change in <strong>the</strong> physical volume <strong>of</strong> inventories valued at average prices <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> quarter. In addition,changes calculated from this table are at quarterly rates, whereas CBI is stated at annual rates.2 Inventories <strong>of</strong> construction establishments are included in "o<strong>the</strong>r" nonfarm inventories.3 Quarterly totals at monthly rates. Final sales <strong>of</strong> domestic business equals final sales <strong>of</strong> domestic product less gross product <strong>of</strong>households and institutions and general government and includes a small amount <strong>of</strong> final sales by farms.Note.—<strong>The</strong> industry classification <strong>of</strong> inventories is on an establishment basis and is based on <strong>the</strong> 1987 Standard IndustrialClassification (SIC) beginning 1987 and on <strong>the</strong> 1972 SIC for earlier years shown.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Analysis.290


TABLE B-20.—Inventories and final sales <strong>of</strong> domestic business in 1987 dollars, 1959-93[Billions <strong>of</strong> 1987 dollars, except as noted; seasonally adjusted]QuarterTotal 2FarmTotal 2Inventories lNonfarmManufacturingWholesaletradeRetailtradeO<strong>the</strong>rFinalsales <strong>of</strong>domesticbusiness3Ratio <strong>of</strong> inventoriesto final sales <strong>of</strong>domestic businessTotalNonfarmFourth quarter:1959388.679.6. 308.9152.461.267.627.8131.52.962.3519601961196219631964396.7403.9419.5435.6451.280.582.183.985.483.4316.2321.8335.7350.2367.8153.9157.9166.1171.6179.662.463.765.969.673.471.470.273.876.980.328.530.029.932.034.5134.3139.9145.3153.5161.12.952.892.892.842.802.352.302.312.282.2819651966196719681969476.4513.1540.7564.3589.284.683.584.586.986.9391.7429.6456.3477.5502.3190.2212.1227.6237.4246.777.686.592.094.7100.386.892.592.199.3105.937.238.444.646.149.4174.2177.3183.8192.6195.42.732.892.942.933.012.252.422.482.482.5719701971197219731974595.1615.8638.4676.1707.086.389.290.692.992.5508.8526.7547.7583.3614.5246.1243.9249.6264.9283.7106.9112.3116.3121.1130.8105.8117.8125.3134.5133.650.052.656.562.766.4197.6205.1220.4225.9220.93.013.002.902.993.202.572.572.492.582.7819751976197719781979693.1718.6752.9790.1803.792.990.893.693.095.7600.2627.8659.2697.1708.0277.2289.6297.1309.2320.1127.3135.3144.4155.8157.3127.6134.8144.5153.7153.568.068.173.378.377.1229.1238.3249.4264.6270.23.033.023.022.992.972.622.632.642.632.6219801981198219831984795.4820.0802.5806.9874.892.398.3101.493.194.8703.1721.7701.0713.8780.0319.9324.0311.3311.9339.4161.9164.8159.9159.3174.7146.7152.9151.7162.8181.474.680.078.179.884.5268.5266.5267.6281.8294.62.963.083.002.862.972.622.712.622.532.6519851986198719881989896.9905.5931.8951.7981.597.295.188.781.781.6799.8810.4843.1870.0899.9335.7333.6340.2355.3373.9178.7185.7192.7199.1202.5194.1196.7213.6219.7231.091.394.496.695.992.5306.3317.2325.8340.3344.72.932.852.862.802.852.612.552.592.562.611990199119921993 *987.2978.8985.31,000.684.184.388.182.2903.1894.5897.2918.4376.9370.6365.9368.0208.8212.3217.7220.8229.4230.5236.4247.688.081.077.181.9347.9346.5361.5372.32.842.822.732.692.602.582.482.471990:1IIIllIV982.6989.7992.4987.282.082.984.684.1900.7906.8907.8903.1376.0377.5378.8376.9203.7206.0208.4208.8227.4230.6231.0229.493.692.889.588.0349.6348.6348.9347.92.812.842.842.842.582.602.602.601991:1IIIllIV982.8977.2977.0978.884.485.385.184.3898.4891.9891.9894.5377.9374.6372.4370.6209.9207.3208.5212.3224.8225.3228.5230.585.884.782.581.0344.7346.6346.5346.52.852.822.822.822.612.572.572.581992:1IIIllIV977.5980.7983.1985.385.586.987.888.1892.1893.8895.3897.2368.7367.2369.0365.9211.3214.2215.1217.7230.8232.9234.0236.481.379.577.277.1351.0352.3355.7361.52.792.782.762.732.542.542.522.481993:1II992.6995.9997.51,000.688.187.183.982.2904.5908.8913.6918.4365.7366.9367.7368.0217.9219.6221.2220.8242.4243.2244.4247.678.579.180.381.9360.4363.4366.8372.32.752.742.722.692.512.502.492.471 Inventories at end <strong>of</strong> quarter. Quarter-to-quarter changes calculated from this table are at quarterly rates, whereas <strong>the</strong> constantdollarchange in business inventories component <strong>of</strong> GDP is stated at annual rates.2 Inventories <strong>of</strong> construction establishments are included in "o<strong>the</strong>r" nonfarm inventories.3 Quarterly totals at monthly rates. Final sales <strong>of</strong> domestic business equals final sales <strong>of</strong> domestic product less gross product <strong>of</strong>households and institutions and general government and includes a small amount <strong>of</strong> final sales by farms.Note.—<strong>The</strong> industry classification <strong>of</strong> inventories is on an establishment basis and is based on <strong>the</strong> 1987 Standard IndustrialClassification (SIC) beginning 1987 and on <strong>the</strong> 1972 SIC for earlier years shown.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Analysis.291


TABLE B-21.—Foreign transactions in <strong>the</strong> national income and product accounts, 1959-93[Billions <strong>of</strong> dollars; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]Receipts from rest <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> worldPayments to rest <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> worldYear orquarterTotal»Exports <strong>of</strong> goods andservicesTotalMerchandise2Services2Receipts<strong>of</strong> factorincome 3TotalImports <strong>of</strong> goods andservicesTotalchandise2Services2Payments<strong>of</strong>factorincome4TotalTransfer payments (net)Frompersons(net)Fromgovernment(net)FrombusinessNetforeigninvestment19591960196119621963196419651966196719681969197019711972197319741975 ...197619771978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921993"1982: IV....1983: IV....1984: IV....1985: IV....1986: IV....1987: IV....1988: IV....1989: IV....25.030.231.433.536.141.043.547.250.255.661270.874.283.4115.6152 6164.4181.6196.5233.3299.7360.9398.2379.9372.5410.5399.3415.2469.0572.9665.5725.7747.6769.7357.5388.3415.2402.9426.7506.8606.9683.120.625.326.027.429.433.635.438.941.445.349 357.059.366.291.8124 3136.3148.9158.8186.1228.9279.2303.0282.6276.7302.4302.1319.2364.0444.2508.0557.1601.5640.56601265.6286.2308.7304.7333.9392.4467.0523.816.520.520.921.723.326.727.830.732.235.338 344.545.651.873.91010109.6117.8123.7145.4184.2226.0239.3215.2207.5225.8222.4226.2257.7325.8371.6398.7426.4448.7459 5198.2218.2231.4222.6235.8283.3345.4380.74.24.85.15.76.16.97.68.29.210.011012.413.814.417.823 326.731.135.140.744.753.263.767.469.276.679.793.0106.2118.4136.4158.4175.1191.7200 667.467.977.382.198.1109.2121.6143.14.35.05.46.16.67.48.18.38.910.311913.014.116.423.830 328.232.837.747.169.780.694.197.395.8108.197.396.0105.1128.7157.5168.6146.1129.291.9102.1106.698.192.8114.4139.9159.325.030.231.433.536.141.043.547.250.255.661270.874.283.4115.6152 6164.4181.6196.5233.3299.7360.9398.2379.9372.5410.5399.3415.2469.0572.9665.5725.7747.6769.7357.5388.3415.2402.9426.7506.8606.9683.122.322.822.725.026.128.131.537.139.946.650 555.862.374.291.2127 5122.7151.1182.4212.3252.7293.9317.7303.2328.1405.1417.6451.7507.1552.2587.7628.5621.1670.1725 8295.1358.0415.7440.2467.1535.6573.1597.715.315.215.116.917.719.422.226.327.833.936 840.946.656.971.8104 599.0124.6152.6177.4212.8248.6267.7250.6272.7336.3343.3370.0414.8452.1485.1509.0500.7544.5593 0241.6300.0344.1363.0382.4437.6470.1492.27.07.67.68.18.48.79.310.712.212.613 714.915.817.319.322 923.726.529.834.839.945.349.952.655.468.874.381.792.3100.1102.6119.5120.4125.6132 853.458.071.677.284.798.0103.0105.61.51.81.81.82.12.42.73.13.44.1586.66.47.711.114 614.915.717.225.337.546.560.967.166.583.882.486.9100.5120.8141.5146.9131.9121.964.471.085.582.488.9106.9130.2139.12.42.42.72.82.83.03.03.23.43.2323.64.14.34.6545.46.06.06.47.59.010.012.112.915.617.418.316.617.825.628.8-11.932.731.413.817.820.419.419.621.423.830.30.4.5.5.5.6.7.8.81.01.0111.21.31.31.4121.21.21.21.31.41.61.82.11.82.32.72.53.02.78.910.110.510.411.01.92.02.52.52.83.12.79.81.81.92.12.12.12.12.12.22.11.9182.02.42.52.5323.53.73.43.84.15.05.06.47.39.411.412.310.410.411.313.2-27.916.314.28.211.013.913.512.814.615.115.10.1.1.1.1.1.2.2.2.2.33.4.4.5.710.71.11.41.42.02.43.23.63.83.93.23.53.24.85.45.55.66.0613.74.84.03.44.03.85.95.4-1.23.24.33.95.07.56.23.93.51.71 84.91.3-2.98.75121.48.8-9.2-10.72.011.59.5-2.5-35.0-94.01181-141.7-155.1-118.0-89.3-78.56.4-55.1-15.8-58.5-106.3-139.1-149.0-157.1-120.1-84.01990: IIIIII....IV ..705.9718.9720.5757.4542.0553.5555.3577.6391.7399.0395.1409.0150.2154.6160.1168.6164.0165.4165.2179.7705.9718.9720.5757.4615.9614.8634.0649.2501.6498.1512.3523.9114.3116.7121.7125.4143.8147.0149.0147.726.530.929.628.29.910.110.310.211.615.313.412.45.05.45.85.6-80.3-73.8-92.1-67.71991:1II ...Ill .IV...738.9747.9742.1761.4576.5600.7603.0625.7414.3426.7424.6440.0162.3174.0178.3185.8162.4147.2139.1135.7738.9747.9742.1761.4610.6612.2622.8638.8489.8492.3504.3516.3120.8119.9118.5122.5138.0134.3131.5123.9-61.1-15.810.618.910.410.410.310.8-76.9-32.0-5.12.25.45.85.45.951.417.2-22.8-20.21992: III ..Ill .IV...768.0765.3768.4777.0633.7632.4641.1654.7442.6442.8447.5462.0191.0189.6193.6192.8134.4132.9127.3122.3768.0765.3768.4777.0640.7666.3679.9693.5515.4540.6557.3564.7125.3125.7122.6128.7115.6127.9119.5124.829.631.628.541.211.110.59.710.512.615.012.824.65.96.15.96.1-17.7-60.6-59.4-82.41993: III ..Ill .IV.774.1791.8788.3651.3660.0653.2675.8453.2458.6452.2473.7198.0201.3200.9202.1122.8131.9135.1774.1791.8788.3699.6725.0725.1753.5569.6592.6591.9618.1130.0132.4133.3135.3122.4132.3128.729.729.930.935.111.011.010.811.413.112.913.717.25.66.06.36.5-77.6-95.4-96.41 Includes capital grants received by <strong>the</strong> United States (net), not shown separately. See Table B-29 for data.2 Exports and imports <strong>of</strong> certain goods, primarily military equipment purchased and sold by <strong>the</strong> Federal Government, are included inservices.3 Consists largely <strong>of</strong> receipts by U.S. residents <strong>of</strong> interest and dividends and reinvested earnings <strong>of</strong> foreign affiliates <strong>of</strong> U.S.corporations.4 Consists largely <strong>of</strong> payments to foreign residents <strong>of</strong> interest and dividends and reinvested earnings <strong>of</strong> U.S. affiliates <strong>of</strong> foreigncorporations.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Analysis.292


TABLE B-22.—Experts and imports <strong>of</strong> goods and services and receipts and payments oj factor income in1987 dollars. 1959-93[Billions <strong>of</strong> 19S7 dollars; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]Year or quarterTotalExports <strong>of</strong> goods and servicesTotaliMerchandiseDurablegoodsNondurablegoodsServices1Do«eceipts<strong>of</strong>factorincome2TotalImports <strong>of</strong> goods and servicesTotalMerchandiseDurablegoodsiNondura-blegoodsServices1Payments<strong>of</strong>factorincome3195973.858.031.526.515.817.095.660.226.034.235.46.21960196119621963196488.489.995.0101.8115.471.271.574.880.391.439.239.441.243.650.232.032.133.536.741.217.218.420.321.524.019.120.622.524.426.696.195.3105.5107.7112.959.159.268.070.975.624.723.728.029.632.834.435.540.041.242.837.036.137.536.837.37.27.27.38.29.119651966196719681969118.1125.7130.0140.2147.892.198.4100.1108.8114.452.256.163.870.075.239.942.336.338.739.225.927.329.931.533.328.328.029.232.335.7124.5143.7153.7177.7189.286.5100.2105.2128.1137.040.550.653.168.774.146.049.652.159.462.837.943.548.649.652.39.911.011.813.517.819701971197219731974161.3161.9173.7210.3234.4125.2124.1136.5166.9183.480.479.387.1108.0123.544.744.949.558.959.936.137.837.243.451.036.837.942.257.567.5196.4207.8230.2244.4238.4142.1156.1177.5194.7189.375.484.495.7100.9101.366.771.781.793.987.954.451.752.849.749.219.217.920.527.633.219751976197719781979232.9243.4246.9270.2293.5178.5183.9183.9203.0225.7121.3121.8119.5132.1148.157.262.164.470.977.654.459.563.067.267.857.463.067.978.7107.1209.8249.7274.7300.1304.1163.3200.4223.2245.2248.782.1100.9112.9130.0132.181.299.5110.3115.3116.746.549.351.554.855.331.631.532.243.258.619801981198219831984320.5326.1296.7285.9305.7248.2244.0217.7208.3221.3161.0154.2130.5124.6133.887.389.787.283.887.572.382.279.077.684.4113.7120.7117.9111.0119.4289.9304.1304.1342.1427.7235.6246.1243.1276.5346.1133.6143.4143.0167.6219.9102.0102.7100.1108.9126.254.258.061.165.681.666.679.482.178.093.519851986198719881989309.2329.6364.0421.6471.8224.8234.3257.7307.4343.8139.3144.8163.0202.8230.985.689.694.7104.6112.984.495.3106.2114.2128.0103.499.2105.1123.8144.7454.6484.7507.1525.7545.4366.5398.0414.8'431.3450.4237.2254.6264.2274.7287.1129.3143.4150.6156.7163.388.186.792.394.395.088.290.2100.5116.1130.11990199119921993 "510.5543.4578.0596.4368.9396.7422.7438.2249.4269.2288.0304.9119.5127.4134.7133.3141.6146.7155.4158.2148.0123.1105.5565.1562.5611.6675.7461.4463.9511.9572.3292.5297.2332.5379.9168.9166.7179.4192.5103.798.599.7103.3128.8110.097.71982: IV1983.1V1984: IV1985: IV1986: IV1987: IV1988: IV1989: IV280.4291.5312.8312.0342.9386.1438.2487.7202.8215.5229.0226.4243.5278.0322.0354.8119.0131.0138.5139.6150.0180.1214.7237.883.784.590.586.893.597.8107.2116.977.675.983.885.599.4108.1116.2132.9109.7116.5116.1102.994.8112.9132.3144.3299.4375.1444.2467.4498.9522.1540.9555.0236.3306.6357.9380.0409.1427.4444.8458.5134.6191.1229.3243.5259.8273.8284.0290.4101.7115.5128.6136.5149.3153.7160.8168.163.168.686.387.489.894.696.196.577.682.093.986.891.2105.4123.0125.91990:1IIIllIV501.8511.1508.6520.4364.3370.4366.4374.6245.9252.3248.6250.9118.4118.1117.8123.8137.5140.7142.2145.8146.4146.0144.4155.4562.6570.0570.7557.2459.6466.5466.4453.1285.7293.5296.2294.4173.8173.0170.2158.8103.0103.5104.3104.1128.2129.8130.0127.11991:1IIIllIV519.4542.9546.9564.2381.6396.1398.2410.7254.5271.7271.7279.0127.2124.4126.5131.7137.8146.8148.7153.5138.5124.4116.7112.9541.0556.2571.9580.7442.1457.2474.6481.7284.2288.9304.7311.2158.0168.3169.9170.598.999.197.398.9117.0112.5109.0101.61992:1IIIllIV571.0570.2579.3591.6414.4415.9423.0437.3280.9283.6287.4300.0133.5132.4135.6137.3156.6154.2156.3154.3110.7108.7103.798.9586.2608.2621.8630.3486.8509.0521.6530.3315.1328.5338.4348.0171.7180.4183.2182.499.399.2100.1100.093.6103.095.598.81993:1IIIllIV P.588.0593.2591.9612.5430.2434.5434.1454.1296.5302.4302.2318.4133.7132.1131.9135.6157.8158.6157.8158.598.3105.0107.1647.9668.4678.2708.1545.9565.7574.9602.8360.5372.1381.0405.9185.5193.6193.9196.9102.0102.7103.3105.395.8103.099.61 Exports and imports <strong>of</strong> certain goods, primarily military equipment purchased and sold by <strong>the</strong> Federal Government, are included inservices.2 Consists largely <strong>of</strong> receipts by U.S. residents <strong>of</strong> interest and dividends and reinvested earnings <strong>of</strong> foreign affiliates <strong>of</strong> U.S.corporations.3 Consists largely <strong>of</strong> payments to foreign residents <strong>of</strong> interest and dividends and reinvested earnings <strong>of</strong> U.S. affiliates <strong>of</strong> foreigncorporations.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Analysis.293


TABLE B-23.—Relation <strong>of</strong> gross domestic product, gross national product, net national product, andnationaI income, 1959-93[Billions <strong>of</strong> dollars; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]Year orquarterGrossdomesticproductPIUS:Receipts<strong>of</strong> factorincomefrom rest<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>world '19591960196119621963196419651966156719681969 .197019711972197319741975197619771978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921993 p1982: IV1983: IV1984: IV1985: IV1986: IV1987: IV1988: IV1989: IV1990:1IIIllIV1991:1IIIllIV1992:1IIIllIV1993:1IIIllIV..494.2513.3531.8571.6603.1648 0702.7769.8814.3889.3959 51,010.71,097.21,207.01,349.61,458.61,585.91,768.41,974.12,232.72 488 62,708.03,030.63,149.63,405.03,777.24,038.74,268.64,539.94,900.45 250 85,546.15,722.96,038.56 374 03,195.13,547.33,869.14,140.54,336.64,683.05,044.65,344.85,461.95,540.95,583.85,597.95,631.75,697.75,758.65,803.75,908.75,991.46,059.56,194.46,261.66,327.66,395.96,510.84.35.05.46.16.6748.18.38.910.311913.014.116.423.830.328.232.837.747.169 780.694.197.395.8108.197.396.0105.1128.7157 5168.6146.1129.291.9102.1106.698.192.8114.4139.9159.3164.0165.4165.2179.7162.4147.2139.1135.7134.4132.9127.3122.3122.8131.9135.1Less:Payments<strong>of</strong> factorincome torest <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong>world 2 1.5Equals:GrossnationalproductLess:Consumption<strong>of</strong>fixedcapitalEquals:NetnationalproductIndirectbusinesstax andnontaxliabilityLess:BusinesstransferpaymentsStatisticaldiscrepancyPIUS:Subsidieslesscurrentsurplus<strong>of</strong>governmententerprisesEquals:Nationalincome1.81.81.82.1242.73.13.44.1586.66.47.711.114.614.915.717.225.337 546.560.967.166.583.882.486.9100.5120.8141 5146.9131.9121.964.471.085.582.488.9106.9130 2139.1143.8147.0149.0147.7138.0134.3131.5123.9115.6127.9119.5124.8122.4132.3128.7497 0516.6535.4575.8607.7653 0708.1774.9819.8895.5965 61,017.11,104.91,215.71,362.31,474.31,599.11,785.51,994.62,254.52 520 82,742.13,063.83,179.83,434.43,801.54,053.64,277.74,544.54,908.25 266 85,567.85,737.16,045.83,222.63,578.43,890.24,156.24,340.54,690.55,054 35,365.05,482.15,559.35,599.95,630.05,656.15,710.65,766.25,815.55,927.65,996.36,067.36,191.96,262.16,327.16,402.344 646.347.749.351.353 957.362.167.473.981588.897.6109.9120.4140.2165.2182.8205.2234.8272 4311.9362.4399.1418.4433.2454.5478.6502.2534.0580 4602.7626.1657.96712412.5439.7448.0465.6488.2512.1547 2600.8590.2597.9607.8614.8619.9622.3626.7635.4631.7637.2714.6648.0663.2663.3679.7678.7452.5470.2487.7526.5556.4599 2650.7712.8752.4821.5884 2928.31,007.31,105.71,241.91,334.11,433.91,602.71,789.42,019.82 248 42,430.22,701.42,780.83,016.03,368.33,599.13,799.24,042.44,374.24 686 44,965.15,111.05,387.92,810.13,138.73,442.23,690.73,852.34,178.54,507.24,764.24,891.94,961.44,992.25,015.15,036.25,088.35,139.65,180.05,295.95,359.15,352.85,543.95,598.85,663.95,722.641945.548.151.754.758 862.765.470.479.086 694.3103.6111.4121.0129.3140.0151.6165.5177.8188 7212.0249.3256.4280.1309.5329.9345.5365.0385.3414 7444.0476.6502.8530 5262.3291.7317.7335.1351.6372.3394.2424.4436.2437.2448.0454.8465.6470.5481.3488.9493.4497.3504.8515.7515.6526.2532.4547.91.41.41.51.61.8202.22.32.52.8313.23.43.94.55.05.26.57.38.29911.213.415.416.619.021.024.224.025.626 626.826.327.628 016.018.120.222.224.924.227.226.226.327.027.126.726.126.326.026.627.027.627.828.127.027.828.428.8-1.8-3.1-2.2-1.0-2.07-.72.8.8-.126.03.11.1-.51.46.010.410.97.613 813.610.9-7.410.2-9.0-13.91.2-24.8-28.4117.89.623.6-10.113.8-20.5-5.9-2.0-24.9-25.412.813.1-1.814.94.9.24.527.36.223.123.615.732.134.412.013.3-0.9-.8.2.3-.31.31.41.21.2152.62.43.42.6.42.61.43.33.6294.84.76.211.79.56.49.714.110.9544.57.7729.619.29.72.68.222.016.54.49.93.0-5.610.41.8.8-8.04.33.03.9-3.77.717.16.1-5.310.7410.1425.7440.5474.5501.55391586.9643.7679.9741.0798.6833,5899.5992.91,119.51,198.81,285.31,435.51,609.11,829.82,038 92,198.22,432.52,522.52,720.83,058.33,268.43,437.93,692.34,002.64 249 54,491.04,598.34,836.62,551.52,834.33,134.43,341.93,486.03,828.84,127.64,305.24,426.24,502.04,496.64,539.24,546.04,587.84,596.94,662.64,755.44,814.64,800.84,975.85,038.95,104.05,143.21 Consists largely <strong>of</strong> receipts by U.S. residents <strong>of</strong> interest and dividends and reinvested earnings <strong>of</strong> foreign affiliates <strong>of</strong> U.S.corporations.2 Consists largely <strong>of</strong> payments to foreign residents <strong>of</strong> interest and dividends and reinvested earnings <strong>of</strong> U.S. affiliates <strong>of</strong> foreigncorporations.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Analysis.294


TABLE B-24.—Relation <strong>of</strong> national income and personal income, 1959-93[Billions <strong>of</strong> dollars; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]Year or quarter195919601961196219631964196519661967!19681969197019711972197319741975197619771978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921993"1982 IV1983 IV1984 IV1985 IV1986 IV1987 IV1988 IV1989 IV1990 1 IIIIIIV1991 1 IIIIIIV1992 1 IIIIIIV1993 1 IIIIIIV PNationalincome410.1425.7440.5474.5501.5539.1586.9643.7679.9741.0798.6833.5899.5992.91,119.51,198.81,285.31,435.51,609.11,829.82,038.92,198.22,432.52,522.52,720.83,058.33,268.43,437.93,692.34,002.64,249.54,491.04,598.34,836.62,551.52,834.33,134.43,341.93,486.03,828.84,127.64,305.24,426.24,502.04,496.64,539.24,546.04,587.84,596.94,662.64,755.44,814.64,800.84,975.85,038.95,104.05,143.2Less:Corporatepr<strong>of</strong>itswithinventoryvaluationandcapitalconsumptionadjustments52.350.751.659.665.172.182.988.686.092.689.677.590.3103.2116.4104.5121.9147.1175.7199.7202.5177.7182.0151.5212.7264.2280.8271.6319.8365.0362.8380.6369.5407.2150.3229.1261.3284.9264.6343.3378.3354.5382.6409.3367.5362.8369.3370.8359.0378.8409.9411.7367.5439.5432.1458.1468.5Netinterest10.211.213.114.616.118.221.124.328.130.433.640.045.449.356.571.880.085.1100.7120.5149.9191.2233.4262.4270.0307.9326.2350.2360.4387.7452.7463.7462.8442.0256.8281.8321.1331.9349.7368.6408.1459.8460.5459.5460.6474.4468.8466.3464.2451.9439.5440.8440.1447.7450.1443.2444.6Contributionsforsocialinsurance18.821.922.925.428.530.131.640.645.550.457.962.268.979.097.6110.5118.5134.5149.8171.8197.8216.6251.3269.6290.2325.0353.8379.8400.7442.3473.2503.1528.4555.6585.3272.8298.3332.2362.3388.7409.6453.5480.4495.9500.7506.4509.5520.7525.7531.5535.7548.5552.7556.6564.6568.9585.9590.5596.0Wageaccrualslessdisbursements0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.6.0-.1-.5.1.1.1.3-.2.0,1.0- 4.2-.2 .0.0.0.0.1-.1-20.020.0.0.0.6.0.0-.2 .0.0.0.0.0.2.2-.4 .0.0.0.0.0-80.080.0.0.0.0Personalinterestincome22.725.026.929.332.436.140.344.949.554.660.869.275.781.894.1112.4123.0134.6155.7184.5223.2274.0336.1376.8397.5461.9498.1531.7548.1583.2668.2698.2715.6694.3695.8373.6418.7485.4507.5532.6562.3608.9681.2686.9692.8702.8710.3715.4720.0717.3709.6694.4696.0692.2694.5695.4693.1695.7699.2Personaldividendincome12.713.414.015.016.118.020.220.922.124.525.123.523.525.527.729.629.234.739.444.250.457.166.967.177.878.887.9104.7100.4108.4126.5144.4127.9140.4158.369.480.679.392.7105.6100.1113.8132.9141.2145.6146.6144.4136.6126.7123.9124.3128.2136.0144.9152.3157.0157.8159.0159.4>IUS:Governmenttransferpaymentstopersons25.727.531.532.634.536.039.143.652.360.667.581.897.0108.4124.1147.4185.7202.8217.5234.8262.8312.6355.7396.3426.1437.8468.1497.1521.3555.9603.8666.3749.2836.8889.7419.9428.0442.3474.8505.8528.1563.5624.0649.0656.1669.2690.9724.2740.9754.8776.8816.6830.9844.3855.4873.0883.7896.4905.6Businesstransferpaymentstopersons1.31.31.41.51.71.82.02.12.32.52.82.83.03.43.84.04.55.55.96.87.98.810.211.812.815.117.820.720.820.821.121.320.721.621.912.313.216.218.820.920.421.320.821.321.521.321.120.820.520.620.821.121.521.822.021.421.822.122.3Equals:Personalincome391.2409.2426.5453.4476.4510.7552.9601.7646.5709.9773.7831.0893.5980.51,098.71,205.71,307.31,446.31,601.31,807.92,033.12,265.42,534.72,690.92,862.53,154.63,379.83,590.43,802.04,075.94,380.34,673.84,850.95,144.95,387.62,746.82,965.33,242.53,456.73,647.83,918.54,195.24,469.44,585.64,648.64,701.94,759.14,783.94,833.44,858.84,927.55,017.85,093.85,139.85,328.35,254.75,373.25,412.75,509.8Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Analysis.295


TABLE B-25.—National income by type <strong>of</strong> income, 1959-93[Billions <strong>of</strong> dollars; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]Compensation<strong>of</strong> employeesProprietors' income with inventory valuation andcapital consumption adjustmentsYear or quarterNationalincome 1TotalWagesandSupplementstowagesandsalaries2TotalTotalFarmProprietors'income*TotalCapitalconsumptionadjustmentProprietors'incomeNonfarm"tor?"valuationadjustmentCapitalconsumptionadjustment1959...1960...1961...1962...1963...1964...1965...1966...1967...1968...1969...1970...1971...1972...1973...1974...1975197619771978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921993 '1982: IV1983: IV1984: IV1985: IV1986: IV1987: IV1988: IV1989: IV1990:11991: IIIIllIV1992:I..IIIllIV1993:1410.1425.7440.5474.5501.5539.1586.9643.7679.9741.0798.6833.5899.5992.91,119.51,198.81,285.31,435.51,609.11,829.82,038.92,198.22,432.52,522.52,720.83,058.33,268.43,437.93,692.34,002.64,249.54,491.04,598.34,836.62,551.52,834.33,134.43,341.93,486.03,828.84,127.64,305.24,426.24,502.04,496.64,539.24,546.04,587.84,596.94,662.64,755.44,814.64,800.84,975.85,038.95,104.05,143.2281.2296.7305.6327.4345.5371.0399.8443.0475.5524.7578.4618.3659.4726.2812.8891.3948.71.058.31.177.31.333.01,496.41.644.41,815.51,916.02.029.42,226.92,382.82,523.82,698.72,921.33,100.23,297.63,402.43,582.03,772.11,940.42,101.22,288.12,442.52,582.52,785.13,004.93,162.83,231.53,288.23,326.33,344.23,355.73,382.83,415.83,455.43,507.83,558.13,603.63,658.63,705.13,750.63,793.93,839.0259.8272.8280.5299.3314.8337.7363.7400.3428.9471.9518.3551.5584.5638.7708.6772.2814.7899.6994.01,120.91,255.31,376.61,515.61,593.31,684.21,850.01,986.32,105.42,261.22,443.02,586.42,745.02,814.92,953.13,100.41,611.81,747.31,903.92,039.12,153.92,336.72,510.62,637.92,689.22,739.12,770.62,781.32,782.22,800.62,823.42,853.62,892.22,933.62,970.73,015.83,054.33,082.73,115.43,149.221.423.825.128.130.733.236.142.746.652.860.166.874.987.6104.2119.1134.0158.7183.3212.1241.1267.8299.8322.7345.2376.9396.5418.4437.4478.3513.8552.5587.5629.0671.7328.6353.9384.2403.3428.6448.4494.3524.9542.3549.2555.7562.9573.4582.3592.4601.8615.7624.5632.9642.8650.7668.0678.5689.851.751.954.356.457.760.565.069.470.975.178.979.986.297.4116.5115.3121.2132.9146.4167.7181.8171.8180.8170.7186.7236.0259.9283.7310.2324.3347.3363.3376.4414.3442.1179.9200.1239.6268.7284.4325.0333.4349.7367.5361.4355.5368.9363.8379.7374.2387.7406.8411.1408.1431.2444.1439.4422.5462.410.711.211.911.911.810.612.914.012.712.714.414.615.219.132.225.523.718.317.121.524.711.521.213.52.421.321.522.331.330.940.241.936.843.745.010.26.321.917.823.642.430.938.449.942.531.643.837.242.629.837.645.644.936.847.655.747.024.852.411.612.112.712.712.511.313.714.813.513.615.615.916.620.934.328.227.522.521.827.031.219.430.223.112.130.830.531.039.638.848.349.844.451.252.120.015.831.226.732.150.638.846.457.550.239.651.745.150.237.445.052.952.244:954.862.854.132.159.4-0.9-.7-.7-.7-.9-1.1-1.3-1.4-1.8-2.0-2.8-3.8-4.2-4.8-5.5-6.4-7.9-9.0-9.7-9.7-9.4-9.0-8.7-8.3-8.0-8.1-7.8-7.6-7.5-7.1-9.8-9.5-9.3-8.9-8.6-8.2-7.9-8.0-7.6-7.8-8.0-7.9-7.8-7.6-7.6-7.4-7.3-7.2-8.2-7.2-7.1-7.1-7.3-7.041.140.642.444.545.949.852.155.358.262.464.565.370.978.384.389.897.5114.6129.4146.2157.0160.3159.6157.3184.3214.7238.4261.5279.0293.4307.0321.4339.5370.6397.1169.6193.8217.7250.9260.9282.6302.5311.4317.6318.9323.9325.1326.6337.1344.4350.1361.2366.2371.3383.6388.4392.4397.6410.140.239.841.843.945.249.251.955.458.363.065.066.072.079.386.594.2100.2117.6132.5150.2161.8165.8160.9157.8176.1197.1212.4230.6252.4266.8281.1305.6327.7358.0385.2168.0182.5196.6223.2230.0254.2274.9288.7290.4284.0329.5318.4312.8320.6340.1337.5350.4360.0359.4362.2376.4380.3385.4398.70.0.0.0.0.0-.1-.2-.2-.2-.4-.5-.5-.6-.7-2.0-3.8-1.2-1.3-1.3-2.1-2.9-3.0-1.4-.6-.5-.2-.1-.8-1.5-1.2-.4.0-L0.6-1.6.1-1.4.71.7-1.4-.76.417.6-19.8-5.62.34.9-7.5.3-2.1-7.0-.87.8-1.6-1.2-.4-.90.9.8.6.6.7.7.4.2.1-.2.0-.1-.2-.6-1.4-1.7-1.8-2.0-1.9-2.5.2.08.718.126.130.927.428.127.216.211.813.113.01.112.921.029.130.126.729.023.420.817.414.312.411.511.611.712.312.913.212.713.713.713.312.712.31 National income is <strong>the</strong> total net income earned in production. It differs from gross domestic product mainly in that it excludesdepreciation charges and o<strong>the</strong>r allowances for business and institutional consumption <strong>of</strong> durable capital goods and indirect businesstaxes. See Table B-23.See next page for continuation <strong>of</strong> table.296


TABLE B-25.—National income by type <strong>of</strong> income, 1959-93—Continued[Billions <strong>of</strong> dollars; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]Year or quarterRental income <strong>of</strong> personswith capital consumptionadjustmentTotalRentalincome<strong>of</strong>personsCapitalconsumptionadjustmentCorporate pr<strong>of</strong>its with inventory valuation and capital consumption adjustmentsTotalPr<strong>of</strong>its with inventory valuation adjustment and withoutcapital consumption adjustmentTotalPr<strong>of</strong>itsPr<strong>of</strong>itsbeforetaxPr<strong>of</strong>itstaxliabilityPr<strong>of</strong>its after taxTotalDividendsUndistributedpr<strong>of</strong>itsInventoryvaluationadjustmentCapitalconsumptionadjustmentNetinterest19591960196119621963196419651966196719681969197019711972......197319741975197619771978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921993 "...1982: IV1983: IV1984: IV1985: IV1986: IV1987: IV1988: IV1989: IV1990:1..1991: I ...II..1992:1993:IV1IIIllIV1II14.715.315.816.517.117.318.018.519.418.218.017.818.216.817.315.813.512.19.08.98.413.220.821.922.123.318.78.73.24.3-13.5-14.2-12.8-8.913.024.122.224.314.04.76.82.8-21.6-15.9-16.4-13.3-11.1-11.7-11.9-16.3-11.2-8.7-7.2-18.5-1.27.512.713.717.918.018.719.219.820.320.521.322.123.422.823.924.225.626.128.229.329.529.930.034.439.149.061.164.464.866.563.453.450.053.444.242.745.257.475.466.564.567.660.050.254.252.639.840.140.244.146.445.144.741.049.847.349.375.757.471.373.277.280.0-3.4-3.4-3.3-3.3-3.2-3.2-3.3-3.6-3.9-4.6-5.9-6.4-7.4-9.3-10.9-13.5-15.9-17.8-21.0-25.5-30.8-35.8-40.2-42.4-42.8-43.2-44.6-44.7-46.8-49.1-57.7-56.9-57.9-66.3-62.5-42.3-42.4-43.4-46.0-45.5-47.4-49.7-61.3-56.0-56.6-57.4-57.4-56.8-56.6-57.2-61.0-56.0-56.5-94.2-58.6-63.8-60.4-63.5-62.152.350.751.659.665.172.182.988.686.092.689.677.590.3103.2116.4104.5121.9147.1175.7199.7202.5177.7182.0151.5212.7264.2280.8271.6319.8365.0362.8380.6369.5407.253.151.051.356.461.267.577.683.080.386.983.271.885.597.9110.9103.4129.4158.8186.7212.8219.8197.8203.2166.4202.2236.4225.3227.6273.4320.3325.4354.7367.3390.153.451.151.056.461.268.078.885.181.890.689.078.490.1104.5130.9142.8140.4173.7203.3237.9261.4240.9228.9176.3210.7240.5225.0217.8287.9347.5342.9365.7362.323.622.722.824.026.228.030.933.732.739.439.734.437.741.949.351.850.964.273.083.588.084.881.163.177.294.096.5106.5127.1137.0141.3138.7129.829.728.428.232.434.940.047.951.449.251.249.444.052.462.681.691.089.5109.5130.3154.4173.4156.1147.8113.2133.5146.4128.5111.3160.8210.5201.6227.1232.5249.1150.3229.1261.3284.9264.6343.3378.3354.5382.6409.3367.5362.8369.3370.8359.0378.8409.9411.7367.5439.5432.1458.1468.5160.0216.2223.6228.0225.0293.4340.5320.6346.8377.9344.7349.3364.6370.1359.0375.4399.7395.7350.1414.8407.0433.4444.8168.6223.8220.1231.8235.7311.2372.2334.1348.8369.0376.2368.9356.5357.4362.0373.5404.3409.5357.9409.9419.8445.6443.858.782.283.897.6116.6135.2146.2134.2132.0139.8145.7137.0125.4128.0132.5133.4147.0153.0130.1155.0160.9173.3169.5109.9141.6136.3134.2119.2176.0226.0200.0216.8229.2230.5231.8231.1229.4229.5240.1257.3256.5227.8254.9258.9272.3274.312.713.414.015.016.118.020.220.922.124.625.223.723.725.828.130.430.135.640.745.952.459.069.270.081.282.792.4109.8106.2115.3134.6153.5137.4150.5169.072.584.283.497.4111.0106.3121.0141.3149.9154.6155.7153.7145.9136.2133.4133.9138.0146.1155.2162.9167.5168.5169.7170.417.015.014.317.418.822.027.830.527.126.624.120.328.636.953.560.659.473.989.5108.5121.097.178.643.252.363.836.11.654.695.267.173.695.298.637.557.452.936.98.269.7105.058.767.074.674.878.185.293.296.1106.1119.3110.472.792.091.4103.9104.6-0.3-.2.3.0.1_ 5-1.2-2.1-1.6-3.7-5.9-6.6-4.6-6.6-20.0-39.5-11.0-14.9-16.6-25.0-41.6-43.0-25.7-9.9-8.5-4.1.29.7-14.5-27.3-17.5-11.04.9-5.3-7.8-8.6-7.63.5-3.8-10.7-17.8-31.7-13.5-2.08.9-31.5-19.58.212.7-3.01.9-4.6-13.7-7.84.9-12.7-12.21.0-7.2-0.8-.3.33.23.94.65.35.65.75.66.45.64.85.35.51.2-7.6-11.7-11.0-13.1-17.3-20.2-21.2-14.910.427.855.544.146.444.737.425.92.217.124.3-9.612.937.756.939.649.937.933.935.831.422.813.54.73.510.216.017.424.725.124.723.823.610.211.213.114.616.118.221.124.328.130.433.640.045.449.356.571.880.085.1100.7120.5149.9191.2233.4262.4270.0307.9326.2350.2360.4387.7452.7463.7462.8442.0256.8281.8321.1331.9349.7368.6408.1459.8460.5459.5460.6474.4468.8466.3464.2451.9439.5440.8440.1447.7450.1443.2444.62 Consists mainly <strong>of</strong> employer contributions for social insurance and to private pension, health, and welfare funds.3 With inventory valuation adjustment.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Analysis.297


TABLE B-26.—Sources <strong>of</strong> personal income, 1959-93[Billions <strong>of</strong> dollars; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]Year or quarterPersonalincomeTotalWage and salary disbursements *CommodityproducingindustriesTotalManufacturingDistributiveindustriesServiceindustriesGovernmentO<strong>the</strong>rlaborincome JProprietor' ' incomewith invcmuiyvaluation andcap talconsunlptionadjustr lentsFarmNonfarm1959391.2259.8109.986.965.138.846.010.610.741.119601961196219631964409.2426.5453.4476.4510.7272.8280.5299.3314.8337.7113.4114.0122.2127.4136.089.889.996.8100.7107.368.669.673.376.882.041.744.447.650.754.949.252.456.360.064.911.211.813.014.015.711.211.911.911.810.640.642.444.545.949.819651966196719681969552.9601.7646.5709.9773.7363.7400.3428.9471.9518.3146.6161.6169.0184.1200.4115.7128.2134.3146.0157.787.995.1101.6110.8121.759.465.372.080.490.669.978.386.496.6105.517.819.921.725.228.512.914.012.712.714.452.155.358.262.464.519701971197219731974831.0893.5980.51,098.71,205.7551.5583.9638.7708.7772.6203.7209.1228.2255.9276.5158.4160.5175.6196.6211.8131.2140.4153.3170.3186.899.4107.9119.7133.9148.6117.1126.5137.4148.7160.932.536.743.049.256.514.615.219.132.225.565.370.978.384.389.8197519761977197819791,307.31,446.31,601.31,807.92,033.1814.6899.5993.91,120.71,255.4277.1309.7346.1392.6442.1211.6238.0266.7300.1334.9198.1219.5242.7274.9308.4163.4181.6202.8233.7267.7176.0188.6202.3219.4237.365.979.794.7110.1124.323.718.317.121.524.797.5114.6129.4146.2157.0198019811982198319842,265.42,534.72,690.92,862.53,154.61,376.61,515.61,593.31,684.71,849.8471.9513.7513.5525.1580.8355.7386.9384.3397.7439.8336.4368.1385.8406.2445.4306.9348.1386.5427.4475.8261.4285.7307.5325.9347.8139.8153.0165.4174.6184.711.521.213.52.421.3160.3159.6157.3184.3214.7198519861987198819893,379.83,590.43,802.04,075.94,380.31,986.52,105.42,261.22,443.02,586.4612.2628.5651.8699.1724.2461.3473.8490.1524.5542.2475.9501.7536.9575.3607.0524.5579.5650.7719.6776.8373.9395.7421.8449.0478.5191.8200.7210.4230.5251.921.522.331.330.940.2238.4261.5279.0293.4307.01990199119921993 "4,673.84,850.95,144.95,387.62,745.02,815.02,973.13,080.4745.7738.1756.5763.6555.6557.2577.6577.2635.1648.0682.0706.4848.3883.5967.01,020.8515.9545.4567.5589.7274.3296.9322.7350.741.936.843.745.0321.4339.5370.6397.11982 IV1983 IV1984 IV1985 IV1986 IV1987 IV1988 IV1989 IV2,746 82,965.83,242.53,456.73P647.83,918.54,195.24,469.41,611.71,747.31,903.32,039.12,153.92,337.02,510.62,637.9503.9547.6594.5622.6635.3668.4715.3732.1378.0415.7450.5469.1478.5501.6537.5545.7391.2422.4458.4487.6512.5551.9589.9616.1400.9445.8494.4546.8602.1685.0746.8800.0315.6331.5356.1382.2404.0431.7458.5489.7169.2179.0187.7193.9205.3216.5240.3259.110.26.321.917.823.642.430.938.4169.6193.8217.7250.9260.9282.6302.5311.41990 1IIIIIIV4,585.64,648.64,701.94,759.12,689.12,739.12,770.62,781.1740.6748.2749.1744.8549.7557.5558.4556.9624.7634.4640.2641.0821.5843.5861.4866.8502.3513.0519.9528.5268.0271.5276.2281.349.942.531.643.8317.6318.9323.9325.11991 1IIIIIIV4,783.94,833.44,858.84,927.52,782.02,800.92,823.42,853.6735.3733.3739.3744.4551.0552.0559.3566.4639.8645.9651.0655.4866.1876.8886.9904.1540.8545.0546.2549.7287.1293.3300.1307.037.242.629.837.6326.6337.1344.4350.11992 1IIIIIIV5,017.85,093.85,139.85,328.32,892.22,933.62,970.73,095.8741.3750.0751.6783.3564.0571.2573.3602.0663.5672.2682.5709.9928.1944.6966.81,028.4559.3566.9569.7574.2313.4319.9326.0331.545.644.936.847.6361.2366.2371.3383.61993 1IIIIIIV5,254.75,373.25,412.75,509.82,974.33,082.73,115.43,149.2740.7765.1769.4779.0559.7580.3581.5587.5682.9709.1714.4719.2966.61,022.21,038.81,055.5584.1586.3592.8595.5338.5346.6354.7362.955.747.024.852.4388.4392.4397.6410.11 <strong>The</strong> total <strong>of</strong> wage and salary disbursements and o<strong>the</strong>r labor income differs from compensation <strong>of</strong> employees in Table B-25 in that itexcludes employer contributions for social insurance and <strong>the</strong> excess <strong>of</strong> wage accruals over wage disbursements.298


TABLE B-26.—Sources <strong>of</strong> personal income, 1959-93—Continued[Billions <strong>of</strong> dollars-, quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]Year or quarterRentalincome<strong>of</strong>personswithcapitalconsumptionadjustmentPersonaldividendincomePersonalinterestincomeTotalOld-age,survivors,disability,andhealthinsurancebenefitsTransfer payments to personsGovernmentunemploymentinsurancebenefitsVeteransbenefitsGovernmentemployeesretirementbenefitsAid t<strong>of</strong>amilieswithdependentchildren(AFDC)O<strong>the</strong>rLess:PersonalcontributionsforsocialinsuranceNonfarmpersonalincome 219591960196119621963196419651966196719681969197019711972197319741975197619771978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921993 »1982: IV1983: IV1984: IV1985: IV1986: IV1987: IV1988: IV1989: IV1990:1IIIllIV1991: IIIIllIV1992:IIIIllIV1993:L IIIllIV "...14.715.315.816.517.117.318.018.519.418.218.017.818.216.817.315.813.512.19.08.98.413.220.821.922.123.318.78.73.24.3-13.5-14.2-12.8-8.913.024.122.224.314.04.76.82.8-21.6-15.9-16.4-13.3-11.1-11.7-11.9-16.3-11.2-8.7-7.2-18.5-1.27.512.713.717.912.713.414.015.016.118.020.220.922.124.525.123.523.525.527.729.629.234.739.444.250.457.166.967.177.878.887.9104.7100.4108.4126.5144.4127.9140.4158.369.480.679.392.7105.6100.1113.8132.9141.2145.6146.6144.4136.6126.7123.9124.3128.2136.0144.9152.3157.0157.8159.0159.422.725.026.929.332.436.140.344.949.554.660.869.275.781.894.1112.4123.0134.6155.7184.5223.2274.0336.1376.8397.5461.9498.1531.7548.1583.2668.2698.2715.6694.3695.8373.6418.7485.4507.5532.6562.3608.9681.2686.9692.8702.8710.3715.4720.0717.3709.6694.4696.0692.2694.5695.4693.1695.7699.227.028.832.834.136.237.941.145.754.663.270.384.6100.1111.8127.9151.3190.2208.3223.3241.6270.7321.5365.9408.1438.9452.9485.9517.8542.2576.7625.0687.6769.9858.4911.6432.2441.3458.5493.6526.6548.5584.8644.8670.4677.7690.4712.0745.0761.4775.4797.6837.7852.4866.1877.4894.4905.5918.5927.910.211.112.614.315.216.018.120.825.530.232.938.544.549.660.470.181.492.9104.9116.2131.8154.2182.0204.5221.7235.7253.4269.2282.9300.4325.1352.0382.3413.9438.2216.4226.7241.3256.7273.3285.8303.8334.4348.1348.7352.7358.6374.5379.1384.3391.3406.3412.0416.6420.8433.1435.0439.4445.42.83.04.33.13.02.72.31.92.22.12.24.05.85.74.46.817.615.812.79.79.816.115.925.226.315.815.716.314.513.414.419.026.739.234.031.819.915.615.316.713.413.015.617.117.719.222.024.127.126.429.339.140.439.737.834.534.435.132.04.64.65.04.74.84.74.94.95.65.96.77.78.89.710.411.814.514.413.813.914.415.016.116.416.616.416.716.716.616.917.317.818.319.320.016.616.516.416.516.416.516.817.318.017.817.717.818.118.618.318.320.518.918.819.020.020.220.119.72.83.13.43.74.24.75.26.16.97.68.710.211.813.816.019.022.726.129.032.736.943.049.454.658.060.966.670.776.082.287.594.5102.0108.3115.456.159.558.068.072.477.783.089.392.893.794.996.5101.6101.2102.1103.1106.7107.7108.4110.2112.8114.6116.4117.90.91.01.11.31.41.51.71.92.32.83.54.86.26.97.27.99.210.110.610.711.012.413.013.314.214.815.416.416.717.318.019.822.023.323.913.614.514.815.716.716.717.518.419.119.620.020.521.121.822.222.722.923.223.523.523.624.124.024.05.76.16.57.07.68.29.010.312.214.516.219.423.026.129.535.744.749.152.458.466.889.794.1102.1109.2118.1128.5135.5146.5162.6184.5218.5254.4280.097.6104.2112.5121.3131.1138.3150.6169.9175.2180.2185.9196.6205.6213.6222.0232.9242.2250.1259.2266.2270.4277.2283.5289.07.99.39.710.311.812.613.317.820.622.926.227.930.734.542.647.950.455.561.269.881.088.6104.5112.3119.7132.8149.1162.1173.6194.5211.4224.9237.8249.3264.3113.3123.4135.6152.8165.4177.7199.5214.7221.6223.1227.0227.9234.4236.7239.2240.8246.2248.1249.8253.3256.6264.5266.8269.2376.7393.7410.4437.0460.0495.3534.9582.4628.3691.4753.1809.8871.5954.21,058.11,170.21,272.51,415.11,569.91,770.31,989.32,231.62,488.52,649.82,832.63,106.13,333.23,545.63,749.44,023.94,318.04,608.64,792.05,080.15,320.32,708.52,932.03,193.83,414.93,602.33,854.94,142.94,408.54,512.74,582.74,647.04,692.24,724.04,768.44,807.24,868.54,950.85,027.75,082.05,259.85,177.25,303.85,365.45,434.72 Personal income exclusive <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> farm component <strong>of</strong> wages and salaries, o<strong>the</strong>r labor income, proprietors' income with inventoryvaluation and capital consumption adjustments, and net interest.Note.—<strong>The</strong> industry classification <strong>of</strong> wage and salary disbursements and proprietors' income is on an establishment basis and isbased on <strong>the</strong> 1987 Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) beginning 1987 and on <strong>the</strong> 1972 SIC for earlier years shown.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Analysis.299


TABLE B-27.—Disposition <strong>of</strong> personal income, 1959-93[Billions <strong>of</strong> dollars, except as noted; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]Year or quarterPersonalincomeLess:Personaltax andnontaxpaymentsEquals:DisposablepersonalincomeLess: Personal outlaysTotalPersonalconsumptionexpendituresInterestpaid bypersonsPersonaltransferpaymentsto rest<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>world(net)Equals:PersonalsavingPercent <strong>of</strong> disposablepersonal income lPersonal outlaysTotalPersonalconsumptionexpendituresPersonalsaving19591960196119621963196419651966196719681969197019711972197319741975197619771978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921993 '1982: IV1983: IV1984: IV1985: IV1986: IV1987: IV1988: IV1989: IV1990:1 IIIllIV1991:1 IIIllIV1992:1 IIIllIV1993:1 IIIllIV ".391.2409.2426.5453.4476.4510.7552.9601.7646.5709.9773.7831.0893.5980.51,098.71,205.71,307.31,446.31,601.31,807.92,033.12,265.42,534.72,690.92,862.53,154.63,379.83,590.43,802.04,075.94,380.34,673.84,850.95,144.95,387.62,746.82,965.83,242.53,456.73,647.83,918.54,195.24,469.44,585.64,648.64,701.94,759.14,783.94,833.44,858.84,927.55,017.85,093,85,139.85,328.35,254.75,373.25,412.75,509.844.548.750.354.858.056.061.971.077.992.1109.9109.0108.7132.0140.6159.1156.4182.3210.0240.1280.2312.4360.2371.4368.8395.1436.8459.0512.5527.7593.3623.3620.4644.8681.6372.1371.6413.4448.8478.5528.6542.0605.1611.9627.4628.5625.2616.4616.6619.7628.8630.9634.6642.8670.7657.1681.0689.0699.1346.7360.5376.2398.7418.4454.7491.0530.7568.6617.8663.8722.0784.9848.5958.11,046.51,150.91,264.01,391.31,567.81,753.01,952.92,174.52,319.62,493.72,759.52,943.03,131.53,289.53,548.23,787.04,050.54,230.54,500.24,706.02,374.72,594.32,829.13,007.93,169.33,389.93,653.23,864.33,973.74,021.24,073.44,133.94,167.54,216.84,239.14,298.84,386.94,459.24,497.04,657.64,597.54,692.24,723.74,810.7324.7339.9351.3372.8393.7423.1456.4494.4522.8573.9620.5664.5719.4788.7872.0953.11,050.61,170.91,303.41,460.01,629.61,799.11,982.62,120.12,325.12,537.52,753.72,944.03,147.53,392.53,634.93,880.64,029.04,261.54,515.72,190.92,417.92,606.52,828.73,018.23,220.13,496.73,715.53,797.23,845.63,921.93,957.73,966.04,010.74,052.34,087.04,169.44,221.34,277.34,377.94,419.74,483.64,544.04,615.5318.1332.4343.5364.4384.2412.5444.6481.6509.3559.1603.7646.5700.3767.8848.1927.71,024.91,143.11,271.51,421.21,583.71,748.11,926.22,059.22,257.52,460.32,667.42,850.63,052.23,296.13,523.13,761.23,906.44,139.94,390.62,128.72,346.82,526.42,739.82,923.13,124.63,398.23,599.13,679.33,727.03,801.73,836.63,843.63,887.83,929.83,964.14,046.54,099.94,157.14,256.24,296.24,359.94,419.14,487.46.17.07.37.88.910.011.112.012.513.815.716.817.819.622.424.224.526.730.737.544.549.454.658.865.775.083.690.992.393.7103.0109.3112.2111.1114.060.269.277.686.492.392.495.8106.7108.0108.4109.8110.9111.9112.5112.2112.1111.9110.9110.5111.3112.5112.7114.1116.70.4.5.5.5.6.71.01.01.11.21.31.31.41.21.21.21.21.31.41.61.82.11.82.32.72.53.02.78.910.110.510.411.01.92.02.52.52.83.12.79.89.910.110.310.210.410.410.310.811.110.59.710.511.011.010.811.422.020.624.925.924.631.634.636.345.843.943.357.565.459.786.193.4100.393.087.9107.8123.3153.8191.8199.5168.7222.0189.3187.5142.0155.7152.1170.0201.5238.7190.3183.8176.3222.6179.2151.1169.8156.4148.8176.5175.7151.6176.2201.5206.0186.8211.7217.5237.9219.6279.7177.9208.7179.7195.293.794.393.493.594.193.193.093.291.992.993.592.091.793.091.091.191.392.693.793.193.092.191.291.493.292.093.694.095.795.696.095.895.294.796.092.393.292.194.095.295.095.796.295.695.696.395.795.295.195.695.195.094.795.194.096.195.696.295.991.892.291.391.491.890.790.590.789.690.590.989.589.290.588.588.689.190.491.490.790.389.588.688.890.589.290.691.092.892.993.092.992.392.093.389.690.589.391.192.292.293.093.192.692.793.392.892.292.292.792.292.291.992.491.493.492.993.693.36.35.76.66.55.96.97.06.88.17.16.58.08.37.09.08.98.77.46.36.97.07.98.88.66.88.06.46.04.34.44.04.24.85.34.07.76.87.96.04.85.04.33.94.44.43.74.34.84.94.44.95.05.34.96.03.94.43.84.11 Percents based on data in millions <strong>of</strong> dollars.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Analysis.300


TABLE B-28.—Total and per capita disposable personal income and personal consumption expenditures incurrent and 1987 dollars, 1959-93[Quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates, except as noted]Year or quarterDisposable personal incomeTotal (billions <strong>of</strong>dollars)Currentdollars1987dollarsCurrentdollarsPer capita(dollars)1987dollarsPersonal consumption expendituresTotal (billions <strong>of</strong>dollars)Currentdollars1987dollarsCurrentdollarsPer capita(dollars)1987dollarsPopulation(thousands)l19591960196119621963196419651966196719681969197019711972197319741975197619771978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921993 »1982: IV1983: IV1984: IV1985: IV1986: IV1987: IV1988: IV1989: IV1990:1..II....III..IV...1991:1IIIllIV1992:11993:1....II...IV "...346.7360.5376.2398.7418.4454.7491.0530.7568.6617.8663.8722.0784.9848.5958.11,046.51,150.91,264.01,391.31,567.81,753.01,952.92,174.52,319.62,493.72,759.52,943.03,131.53,289.53,548.23,787.04,050.54,230.54,500.24,706.02,374.72,594.32,829.13,007.93,169.33,389.93,653.23,864.33,973.74,021.24,073.44,133.94,167.54,216.84,239.14,298.84,386.94,459.24,497.04,657.64,597.54,692.24,723.74,810.71,284.91,313.01,356.41,414.81,461.11,562.21,653.51,734.31,811.41,886.81,947.42,025.32,099.92,186.22,334.12,317.02,355.42,440.92,512.62,638.42,710.12,733.62,795.82,820.42,893.63,080.13,162.13,261.93,289.53,404.33,464.93,524.53,529.03,632.53,700.52,832.62,960.63,118.53,178.73,266.23,335.83,443.13,480.93,525.63,529.83,523.53,519.03,515.93,532.53,524.23,543.43,580.13,607.53,624.83,717.63,642.63,694.43,708.73,756.41,9581,9942,0482,1372,2102,3692,5272,6992,8613,0773,2743,5213,7794,0424,5214,8935,3295,7966,3167,0427,7878,5769,4559,98910,64211,67312,33913,01013,54514,47715,30716,20516,74117,61518,22210,18911,03311,92512,56513,12113,90714,85015,55815,96316,11416,27516,46716,56016,71216,75216,93917,24517,48117,57718,15317,87618,19618,26518,5497,2567,2647,3827,5837,7188,1408,5088,8229,1149,3999,6069,87510,11110,41411,01310,83210,90611,19211,40611,85112,03912,00512,15612,14612,34913,02913,25813,55213,54513,89014,00514,10113,96514,21914,32912,15412,59113,14513,27813,52213,68513,99614,01514,16314,14414,07814,01813,97114,00013,92713,96314,07314,14214,16914,49014,16314,32614,34114,484318.1332.4343.5364.4384.2412.5444.6481.6509.3559.1603.7646.5700.3767.8848.1927.71,024.91,143.11,271.51,421.21,583.71,748.11,926.22,059.22,257.52,460.32,667.42,850.63,052.23,296.13,523.13,761.23,906.44,139.94,390.62,128.72,346.82,526.42,739.82,923.13,124.63,398.23,599.13,679.33,727.03,801.73,836.63,843.63,887.83,929.83,964.14,046.54,099.94,157.14,256.24,296.24,359.94,419.14,487.41,178.91,210.81,238.41,293.31,341.91,417.21,497.01,573.81,622.41,707.51,771.21,813.51,873.71,978.42,066.72,053.82,097.52,207.32,296.62,391.82,448.42,447.12,476.92,503.72,619.42,746.12,865.82,969.13,052.23,162.43,223.33,272.63,258.63,341.83,452.52,539.32,678.22,784.82,895.33,012.53,074.73,202.93,242.03,264.43,271.63,288.43,265.93,242.73,256.93,267.13,267.53,302.33,316.83,350.93,397.23,403.83,432.73,469.63,503.91,7961,8391,8691,9532,0302,1492,2872,4502,5622,7852,9783,1523,3723,6584,0024,3374,7455,2415,7726,3847,0357,6778,3758,8689,63410,40811,18411,84312,56813,44814,24115,04815,45916,20517,0019,1349,98010,64911,44512,10112,81913,81414,49114,78114,93515,18915,28315,27315,40915,53015,62115,90616,07216,24916,58916,70416,90717,08817,3036,6586,6986,7406,9317,0897,3847,7038,0058,1638,5068,7378,8429,0229,4259,7529,6029,71110,12110,42510,74410,87610,74610,77010,78211,17911,61712,01512,33612,56812,90313,02913,09312,89513,08113,36910,89511,39011,73912,09512,47212,61513,02013,05313,11413,11013,13813,01012,88512,90812,91112,87612,98113,00213,09813,24113,23413,31213,41613,511177,073180,760183,742186,590189,300191,927194,347196,599198,752200,745202,736205,089207,692209,924211,939213,898215,981218,086220,289222,629225,106227,715229,989232,201234,326236,393238,510240,691242,860245,093247,397249,951252,699255,472258,256233,060235,146237,231239,387241,550243,745246,004248,372248,927249,552250,291251,035251,659252,312253,048253,776254,392255,090255,836256,569257,197257,872258,612259,3431 Population <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> United States including Armed Forces overseas; includes Alaska and Hawaii beginning 1960. Annual data areaverages <strong>of</strong> quarterly data. Quarterly data are averages for <strong>the</strong> period.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce (Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Analysis and Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Census).301


TABLE B-29.—Gross sating and investment, 1959-93[Billions <strong>of</strong> dollars; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]Gross savingGross investmentYear orquarterTotalGross private savingTotalPersonalsavingGrossbusinesssaving1Government surplus or deficit(-), national income andproduct accountsTotalFederalStateandlocalCapitalgrantsreceivedby <strong>the</strong>UnitedStates(net) 2TotalGrossprivatedomesticinvestmentNetforeigninvestment3Statisticaldiscrepancy19591960196119621963196419651966196719681969197019711972197319741975197619771978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921993 "1982: IV1983: IV1984: IV1985: IV1986: IV1987: IV1988: IV1989: IV1990:11991:1.1992:1II....III...IV...1993:1IllIV »79.485.184.492.8100.4110.0125.0131.5130.8141.7159.5155.2173.7201.7252.3249.5241.4284.8338.2415.7468.5465.4556.6508.4501.6633.9610.4574.6619.0704.0741.8722.7733.7717.8458.5542.4637.0603.8550.1667.9720.1728.4735.5765.9705.5683.8780.3734.3694.4726.0709.9715.5727.0718.8762.0766.7774.382.581.587.495.898.8111.5123.7132.5144.5146.4149.5165.8192.2204.9245.4256.0306.3323.1355.0412.8457.9499.6585.9616.9641.3742.7735.7721.4730.7802.3819.4861.1929.9986.9615.4678.7764.7734.7676.3783.7814.8828.6867.4888.5825.5863.1919.4935.0906.6958.7974.1987.71,016.5969.41,024.8988.3988.722.020.624.925.924.631.634.636.345.843.843.357.565.459.786.193.4100.393.087.9107.8123.3153.8191.8199.5168.7222.0189.3187.5142.0155.7170.0201.5238.7190.3183.8176.3222.6179.2151.1169.8156.4148.8176.5175.7151.6176.2201.5206.0186.8211.7217.5237.9219.6279.7177.9208.7179.7195.260.560.962.569.974.180.089.296.198.7102.5106.2108.2126.8145.1159.3162.6206.0230.0267.1305.0334.5345.7394.1417.5472.7520.7546.4533.9588.7646.6667.3691.2728.4748.3431.6502.4542.1555.5525.3613.9658.3679.8690.9712.9673.9686.9717.9728.9719.8746.9756.6749.8796.9689.7847.0779.6809.0-3.13.6-3.0-2.91.6-1.61.2-1.0-13.7-4.610.0-11.5-19.2-3.96.9-4.5-64.8-38.3-16.82.99.4-35.3-30.3-108.6-139.8-108.8-125.3-146.8-111.7-98.3-77.5-138.4-196.2-269.1-223.7-156.9-136.3-127.8-130.9-126.2-115.8-94.7-100.2-131.9-122.7-119.9-179.3-139.1-200.7-212.2-232.6-264.2-272.2-289.5-250.6-262.8-221.5-214.4-2.63.5-2.6-3.41.1-2.61.3-1.4-12.7-4.78.5-13.3-21.7-17.3-6.6-11.6-69.4-52.9-42.4-28.1-15.7-60.1-58.8-135.5-180.1-166.9-181.4-201.0-151.8-136.6-122.3-163.5-203.4-276.3-225.8-183.4-184.6-186.8-187.2-177.5-152.7-134.9-141.5-166.4-152.0-144.6-191.0-145.2-206.2-217.7-244.7-270.2-279.9-290.7-264.2-263.5-222.6-212.7-0.5.0-.4.5.41.0.0.5-1.1.11.51.82.513.413.47.14.614.625.631.125.124.828.526.940.358.156.154.340.138.444.825.17.37.22.126.548.359.056.351.237.040.241.334.529.324.711.76.15.55.512.16.17.81.213.51.1-1.777.682.082.291.898.4109.3124.2134.3131.6141.7157.0155.2176.8202.7251.8250.9247.4295.2349.1423.3482.2479.1567.5500.9511.7624.9596.5575.9594.2675.6742.9730.4743.3741.4448.4556.3616.5597.8548.1643.0694.7741.3748.6764.0720.4688.7780.5738.7721.8732.3733.0739.1742.7750.9796.5778.7787.678.878.777.987.993.4101.7118.0130.4128.0139.9155.2150.3175.5205.6243.1245.8226.0286.4358.3434.0480.2467.6558.0503.4546.7718.9714.5717.6749.3793.6832.3808.9736.9796.5892.0464.2614.8722.8737.0697.1800.2814.8825.2828.9837.8812.5756.4729.1721.5744.5752.4750.8799.7802.2833.3874.1874.1884.0935.8-1.23.24.33.95.07.56.23.93.51.71.84.91.3-2.98.75.121.48.8-9.2-10.72.011.59.5-2.5-35.0-94.0-118.1-141.7-155.1-118.0-89.3-78.56.4-55.1-15.8-58.5-106.3-139.1-149.0-157.1-120.1-84.0-80.3-73.8-92.1-67.751.417.2-22.8-20.2-17.7-60.6-59.4-82.4-77.6-95.4-96.4-1.8-3.1-2.2-1.0-2.0-.7-.72.8.8-.1-2.6.03.11.1-.51.46.010.410.97.613.813.610.9-7.410.2-9.0-13.91.2-24.8-28.41.17.89.623.6-10.113.8-20.5-5.9-2.0-24.9-25.412.813.1-1.814.94.9.24.527.36.223.123.615.732.134.412.013.31 Undistributed corporate pr<strong>of</strong>its with inventory valuation and capital consumption adjustments, corporate and noncorporateconsumption <strong>of</strong> fixed capital, and private wage accruals less disbursements.2 Consists mainly <strong>of</strong> allocations <strong>of</strong> special drawing rights (SDRs).3 Net exports <strong>of</strong> goods and services plus net receipts <strong>of</strong> factor income from rest <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> world less net transfers plus net capitalgrants received by <strong>the</strong> United States. See also Table B-21.4 Consists <strong>of</strong> a U.S. payment to India under <strong>the</strong> Agricultural Trade Development and Assistance Act. This payment is included incapital grants received by <strong>the</strong> United States, net.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Analysis.302


Year orquarterPersonalsavingTotalTABLE B-30.—Personal saving, flow <strong>of</strong> funds accounts, 1946-93Checkabledepositsandcurrency[Billions <strong>of</strong> dollars; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]MoneymarketfundsharesIncrease infinancial assetsTimeandsavingsdepositsGovernmentsecurities2SecuritiesCorporateequities3O<strong>the</strong>rsecurities4Insuranceandpensionreserves5O<strong>the</strong>rfinancialassets6Net investment intangible assets 7OwneroccupiedhomesConsumerdurablesNoncorporatebusinessassets8Less-. Net increase indebtMortgagedebtonnonfarmhomesConsumercreditO<strong>the</strong>rdebt 89194619471948194919501951..195219531954195519561957195819591960196119621963196419651966196719681969197019711972197319741975197619771978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921991:1II....III...IV...1992:1II....III...IV...1993:1II....III...17.219.024.921.231.135.738.736.227.636.038.938.537.036.038.538.344.849.361.568.583 084.682.782.692.1104.4121.9158.3121.6150.2171.1197.4206.2220.3217.6248.0257.1314.8363.5390.3463.7363.8361.3449.6435.3384.4441.4484.4298.1410.4344.6432.8419.0412.0501.9276.3544.3390.719.412.38.78.614.919.230.124.620.828.132.029.632.534.834.236.040.545.957.157.364 072.469.070.679.9107.6134.9147.5152.5177.2211.4255.7286.5329.1328.6324.8379.9496.9532.8625.1586.1502.4489.9556.2483.3452.0499.4543.0424.4415.9424.8485.1446.3524.7541.7249.1562.8563.456.0-2.9-2.02.74.61.6.92.11.21.9_ ^371.1.9-10-1.24.26.16.72410.39.5-1.37.413.513.213.16.36.215.619.821.535.89.236.224.622.54.728.697.5-1.927.7_ 5633.52.32.62.44.87.48.29.18.59.311.813.810.512.018125.825.925.927.518 834.930.38.642.565 872.662.855.379.6104.2106.3103.275.7120.867.5113.5196.8225.3116.690.392.8134.878.212.3 34.051.8 -103.9140.2 -123.537.3 -44.239.5 -61.6114.7 -170.315.7 -139.4118.7 -72.674.7 -160.4211.8 -142.8155.5 -118.06.0 -214.0119.8 -36.4123.7 -132.62.41.3.0-.45.730.023.787.031.8-30.143.83.738.224.320.285.144.724.5-3.8108.6-7.2-17.814.634.618.6-28.4-40.0-49.760.747.1-15.51.0.5.9-.7 7.43.7.16.44.53.7-2.78.22.081.0-1.13.73.813 6-2.61.228.5-7.5-12.7-2.114.517.012.72.57.927.560.629.437.425.474.9100.377.8-55.2112.2157.7101.2135.1-45.69.4-55.2110.5-62.9-174.9116.274.4-88.1-64.823.1-70.5-119.7121.21.0.8.71.91.51.1.8122.11.61.9.7.311-1.4-1.1.0-1.50-3.0-6.0-11.1.2-112-13 5-12.21.42.41.1-6.0-10.2-20.3.7-38.9-16.94.5-44.7-37.622.5-27.5-87.1-94.521.381.9189.1131.55.669.5121.0132.4171.2256.3196.6-0 8-.8.2-.3-.97-.1.3-1.441.21.4.9.23.40.21.21.2-.1496.47.210.85.937-2.87.417.8-4.6.516.56.01.8-10.5-8.6-7.921.7-9.353.133.531.45.5-24.526.25.334.556.4-7.8-63.035.7-13.19.716.0125.5172.0 -155.8248.3 -87.7351.4 -39.5515.45.35.66.16.38.58.08.0879.79.710.712.211.912 513.514.517.117.820 219.621.123.325.830 350.441.844.671.560.380.394.3103.5126.9126.7178.1176.2162.4281.9292.0220.9165.4338.4183.8384.5243.2433.7195.5470.0438.8162.8217.1305.8287.2392.1240.8312.5362.52.01.43.01.63.82.42.01.73.41.94.31.93.744 2.52.13.23.2416.85.711.85.518.317.020.17.78.027.231.338.542.028.517.531.330.550.4101.067.350.265.672.826.053.410.3-125.2149.975.6113.36.241.0-6.0_ 375.487.820.6586.89.38.511.911.911.612.613.017 116.013.612.319.217.216 318.220.522.121.619 018.519.919.917.727 836.740.230.428.244.865.978.575.251.350.530.071.393.693.6119.4123.3126.5114.498 575.794.068.270.678.985.086.796.572.0120.9106.1103.1105.51.59.410.210.914.911.48.710.37.012.78.87.93.77.77.2458.611.915.120.223 221.326.926.219.625 434.340.629.127.441.551.556.850.426.327.322.40.11.57.02.27.44.62.82.31.82.2 .71.84.2.92.2294.34.74.48.4797.310.211.710.115118.123.211.66.14.016.323.132.014.227.510.150.6 -11.881.895.8111.4102.9112.6109.090.024.326.816.012.37.418.44.6 176.753.1 -23.5 165.5 -13.167.7 -21.1 175.5 9.348.2 -18.0 166.7 -16.149.8 -17.1 159.8 -5.160.0 -24.854.5 -34.2159.7 -20.4176.0 -10.760.3 -13.6 216.0 -9.859.5 -8.7 111.1 -14.761.6 -41.689.2 -20.2202.8172.213.548.278.8 -9.295.0 —7 794.1 -17.14.14.94.84.27.06.46.47.49.012.210.88.69.512.911.012.213.816.216.816.812 713.116.717.413.026.339.343.634.239.362.093.0109.9116.294.169.656.1117.1135.6171.7203.4240.9219.0211.8127.8175.6229.12.93.53.13.16.01.45.24.11.37.03.62.6.37.74.02.25.98.59.510.1595.110.89.94.614.019.022.79.48.022.936.745.138.34.816.916.448.981.782.357.532.950.149.513.419.222.960.82.52.62.61.75.13.62.92.04.74.94.33.26.06.07.27.07.29.110.912.112 516.615.718.617.631.243.826.958.441.445.762.283.7111.8103.995.7112.7126.3151.8197.2108.1103.4106.187.151.120.513.86.574.8-19.620.2-20.678.3-11.69.31.510.365.21 Saving by households, nonpr<strong>of</strong>it institutions, farms, and o<strong>the</strong>r noncorporate business.2 Consists <strong>of</strong> U.S. savings bonds, o<strong>the</strong>r U.S. Treasury securities, U.S. Government agency securities and government sponsoredenterprise securities, federally-related mortgage pool securities, and State and local obligations.3 Includes mutual fund shares.5 Private life insurance reserves, private insured and noninsured pension reserves, and government insurance and pension reserves.6 Consists <strong>of</strong> security credit, mortgages, accident and health insurance reserves, nonlife insurance claims, and investment in bankpersonal trusts for households; and <strong>of</strong> consumer credit, equity in government-sponsored enterprises, and nonlife insurance claims fornoncorporate business.7 Purchases <strong>of</strong> physical assets less depreciation.8 Includes data for corporate farms.9 O<strong>the</strong>r debt consists <strong>of</strong> security credit, U.S. Government and policy loans, and noncorporate business debt.Source: Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Federal Reserve System.303


TABLE B-31.—Median money income (in 1992 dollars) and poverty status <strong>of</strong> families and persons, by race,selected years, 1971-92YearNumber(millions)Medianmoneyincome(in1992dollars)2Families 1TotalBelow poverty levelFemalehouseholderPersonsbelowpoverty levelMedian money income (in 1992 dollars)<strong>of</strong> persons 15 years old and over withincome 2 3AllpersonsMalesNumber(millions)PercentNumber(millions)PercentNumber(millions)PercentYearroundfull-timeworkersAllpersonsFemalesYearroundfull-timeworkersALL RACES197119731975 4197719781979 5198C198119821983 41984198519861987 419881989199019911992WHITE197119731975 4197719781979 51980198119821983 41984198519861987 419881989199019911992BLACK197119731975 4197719781979 51980198119821983 41984198519861987 41988198919901991199253.355.156.257.257.859.660.361.061.462.062.763.664.565.265.866.166.367.268.147.648.949.950.550.952.252.753.353.453.954.455.055.756.156.556.656.857.257.95.25.45.65.85.96.26.36.46.56.76.86.97.17.27.47.57.57.77.9$33,48035,82134,24935,53936,66537,13635,83934,86234,39034,75735,69336,16437,70938,24938,17738,71037,95037,02136,81234,74037,43835,61937,16238,17838,75137,34136,62036,10736,39537,38538,01139,43939,99740,22240,70439,62638,92038,909-20,96421,60721,91621,22922,61221,94421,60620,65719,95620,51120,83721,88722,53522,73222,92422,86622,99722,19721,1615.34.85.55.35.35.56.26.97.57.67.37.27.07.06.96.87.17.78.03.83.23.83.53.53.64.24.75.15.24.95.04.84.64.54.44.65.05.210.08.89.79.39.19.210.311.212.212.311.611.410.910.710.410.310.711.511.77.96.67.77.06.96.98.08.89.69.79.19.18.68.17.97.88.18.88.928.828.127.128.227.527.828.930.833.032.330.928.728.029.428.227.829.330.430.92.12.22.42.62.72.63.03.33.43.63.53.53.63.73.63.53.84.24.21.21.21.41.41.31.41.61.81.81.91.92.02.02.01.91.92.02.22.2.91.01.01.21.21.21.31.41.51.51.51.51.51.61.61.51.61.81.833.932.232.531.731.430.432.734.636.336.034.534.034.634.233.432.233.435.634.926.524.525.924.023.522.325.727.427.928.327.127.428.226.926.525.426.828.428.153.552.750.151.050.649.449.452.956.253.751.750.550.151.149.046.548.151.249.825.623.025.924.724.526.129.331.834.435.333.733.132.432.231.731.533.635.736.917.815.117.816.416.317.219.721.623.524.023.022.922.221.220.720.822.323.724.57.47.47.57.77.68.18.69.29.79.99.58.99.09.59.49.39.810.210.612.511.112.311.611.411.713.014.015.015.214.414.013.613.413.012.813.514.214.59.98.49.78.98.79.010.211.112.012.111.511.411.010.410.110.010.711.311.632.531.431.331.330.631.032.534.235.635.733.831.331.132.431.330.731.932.733.3$22,47123,94622,10122,47222,72922,33221,36020,98020,47320,65221,06521,26821,90821,96622,42422,50821,78421,08520,65423,55825,12623,21723,53823,80523,33022,72122,26121,64421,72722,23622,31123,11923,34823,67123,60522,72522,03921,64514,05015,19813,88013,96814,26114,44113,65313,23712,97012,70612,75814,04013,85313,85114,28414,26613,81313,35212,754$31,35134,08832,28933,45433,38533,13932,68532,22131,78031,70632,41332,59633,14732,95232,42732,15531,10831,24431,01232,23335,07533,03534,13834,00534,09733,61732,97832,62732,55933,52333,50134,07333,72033,51833,57232,29031,88531,73722,04123,64024,58523,53626,04424,57323,65323,33223,17323,11622,87923,43224,02324,11024,56923,42623,05923,30922,942$7,8398,3118,4508,7498,4558,2518,3878,4998,6409,0229,2749,4109,74210,24510,53610,88910,81010,79110,7747,9698,3918,5388,8828,5578,3298,4338,5948,7579,1809,3839,5939,93410,50610,79611,10211,07511,04411,0366,9827,5747,7567,6707,7057,5807,8087,6357,7247,8458,3238,1858,4058,5828,7168,9108,9409,0818,857$18,55819,28519,27019,56720,03919,96619,76019,39820,05120,39620,82521,19121,56121,69221,99422,21922,10321,88522,16718,77319,61219,31519,69120,22820,14119,95119,72120,32120,67521,03121,49121,89122,09422,32322,48322,37022,20422,42316,57616,63118,45418,40318,74818,45518,60717,81118,16318,31218,95319,02419,15619,73320,00420,22019,90619,71020,299! <strong>The</strong> term "family" refers to a group <strong>of</strong> two or more persons related by birth, marriage, or adoption and residing toge<strong>the</strong>r; all suchpersons are considered members <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> same family. Beginning 1979, based on householder concept and restricted to primary families.2 Current dollar median money income deflated by CPI-U-X1.3 Prior to 1979, data are for persons 14 years and over.4 Based on revised methodology; comparable with succeeding years.5 Based on 1980 census population controls; comparable with succeeding years.Note.—Poverty rates (percent <strong>of</strong> persons below poverty level) for all races for years not shown above are: 1959, 22.4; 1960, 22.2;1961, 21.9; 1962, 21.0; 1963, 19.5; 1964, 19.0; 1965, 17.3; 1966, 14.7; 1967, 14.2; 1968, 12.8; 1969, 12.1; 1970, 12.6; 1972, 11.9;1974, 11.2; and 1976, 11.8.Poverty thresholds are updated each year to reflect changes in <strong>the</strong> consumer price index (CPI-U).For details see "Current Population <strong>Report</strong>s," Series P-60, Nos. 184 and 185.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Census.304


POPULATION, EMPLOYMENT, WAGES, AND PRODUCTIVITYTABLE B-32.—Population by age group, 7929-93(Thousands <strong>of</strong> persons]July 1TotalAge (years)Under 5 5-15 16-19 20-24 25-44 45-6465 andover1929193319391940194119421943194419451946194719481949195019511952195319541955195619571958.,1959196019611962196319641965196619671968196919701971197219731974197519761977197819791980198119821983198419851986198719881989 ,1990199119921993121,767125,579130,880132,122133,402134,860136,739138,397139,928141,389144,126146,631149,188152,271154,878157,553160,184163,026165,931168,903171,984174,882177,830180,671183,691186,538189,242191,889194,303196,560198,712200,706202,677205,052207,661209,896211,909213,854215,973218,035220,239222,585225,055227,726229,966232,188234,307236,348238,466240,651242,804245,021247,342249,900252,671255,462258,23311,73410.61210,41810,57910,85011,30112,01612,52412,97913,24414,40614,91915,60716,41017,33317,31217,63818,05718,56619,00319,49419,88720,17520,34120,52220,46920,34220,16519,82419,20818,56317,91317,37617,16617,24417,10116,85116,48716,12115,61715,56415,73516,06316,45116,89317,22817,54717,69517,84217,96318,05218,19518,50818,85019,20419,51226,80026,89725,17924,81124,51624,23124,09323,94923,90724,10324,46825,20925,85226,72127,27928,89430,22731,48032,68233,99435,27236,44537,36838,49439,76541,20541,62642,29742,93843,70244,24444,62244,84044,81644,59144,20343,58242,98942,50842,09941,29840,42839,55238,83838,14437,78437,52637,46137,45037,40437,33337,59337,97238,59039,20139,8989,1279,3029.8229,8959,8409,7309,6079,5619,3619,1199,0978,9528,7888,5428,4468,4148,4608,6378,7448,9169,1959,54310,21510,68311,02511,18012,00712,73613,51614,31114,20014,45214,80015,28915,68816,03916,44616,76917,01717,19417,27617,28817,24217,16716,81216,33215,82315,29515,00515,02415,21515,19814,91314,44413,90313,64410,69411,15211,51911,69011,80711,95512.06412,06212,03612,00411,81411,79411,70011,68011,55211,35011,06210,83210,71410,61610,60310,75610,96911,13411,48311,95912,71413,26913,74614,05015,24815,78616,48017,20218,15918,15318,52118,97519,52719,98620,49920,94621,29721,59021,86921,90221,84421,73721,47820,94220,38519,84619,44219,30219,35219,17635,86237,31939,35439,86840,38340,86141,42042,01642,52143,02743,65744,28844,91645,67246,10346,49546,78647,00147,19447,37947,44047,33747,19247,14047,08447,01346,99446,95846,91247,00147,19447,72148,06448,47348,93650,48251,74953,05154,30255,85257,56159,40061,37963,47065,52867,69269,73371,73573,67375,65177,33878,59579,94381,20082,48882,59421,07622,93325,82326,24926,71827,19627,67128,13828,63029,06429,49829,93130,40530,84931,36231,88432,39432,94233,50634,05734,59135,10935,66336,20336,72237,25537,78238,33838,91639,53440,19340,84641,43741,99942,48242,89843,23543,52243,80144,00844,15044,28644,39044,50444,50044,46244,47444,54744,60244,66044,85445,47145,88246,28746,75948,3526,4747,3638,7649,0319,2889,5849,86710,14710,49410,82811,18511,53811,92112,39712,80313,20313,61714,07614,52514,93815,38815,80616,24816,67517,08917,45717,77818,12718,45118,75519,07119,36519,68020,10720,56121,02021,52522,06122,69623,27823,89224,50225,13425,70726,22126,78727,36127,87828,41629,00829,62630,12430,68231,22831,76432,285Note.—Includes Armed Forces overseas beginning 1940. Includes Alaska and Hawaii beginning 1950.All estimates are consistent with decennial census enumerations.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Census.305


TABLE B-33.—Population and <strong>the</strong> labor force, 1929-93[Monthly data seasonally adjusted, except as noted]Year or monthCiviliannoninstitutionalpopulation1ResidentArmedForces lLaborforceincludingresidentArmedForcesEmploymentincludingresidentArmedForcesTotalCivilian labor forceTotalEmploymentculturalNonagriculturalUnemploymentUnemploymentrateAllworkers2Civilianworkers3Civilianlaborforceparticipationrate 4Civilianemployment/populationratio 5Thousands <strong>of</strong> persons 14 years <strong>of</strong> age and overPercent1929193319391940194119421943194419451946194799,84099,90098,64094,64093,22094,090103,070106,01849,18051,59055,23055,64055,91056,41055,54054,63053,86057,52060,16847,63038,76045,75047,52050,35053,75054,47053,96052,82055,25057,81210,45010,0909,6109,5409,1009,2509,0808,9508,5808,3208,25637,18028,67036,14037,98041,25044,50045,39045,01044,24046,93049,5571,55012,8309,4808,1205,5602,6601,0706701,0402,2702,3563.224.917.214.69.94.71.91.21.93.93.955.756.057.258.758.657.255.856.847.650.454.557.657.956.153.654.5Thousands <strong>of</strong> persons 16 years <strong>of</strong> age and over1947194819491950195119521953 6195419551956195719581959I960 619611962 61963196419651966196719681969197019711972 61973 619741975197619771978 619791980198119821983198419851986 61987198819891990199119921993101,827103,068103,994104,995104,621105,231107,056108,321109,683110,954112,265113,727115,329117,245118,771120,153122,416124,485126,513128,058129,874132,028134,335137,085140,216144,126147,096150,120153,153156,150159,033161,910164,863167,745170,130172,271174,215176,383178,206180,587182,753184,613186,393188,049189,765191,576193,5501,1692,1432,3862,2312,1422,0641,9651,9481,8471,7881,8611,9002,0612,0062,0181,9462,1222,2182,2532,2382,1181,9731,8131,7741,7211,6781,6681,6561,6311,5971,6041,6451,6681,6761,6971,7061,7061,7371,7091,6881,6371,5641,5661,48563,37764,16064,52465,24665,78567,08768,51768,87769,48670,15771,48972,35972,67573,83975,10976,40177,89279,56580,99082,97284,88986,35588,84791,20393,67095,45397,826100,665103,882106,559108,544110,315111,872113,226115,241117,167119,540121,602123,378125,557126,424126,867128,548129,52560,08762,10462,63663,41062,25164,23465,76466,01964,88366,41867,63967,64668,76369,76871,32373,03475,01776,59078,17380,14080,79681,34083,96686,83888,51587,52490,42093,67397,679100,421100,907102,042101,194102,510106,702108,856111,303114,177116,677119,030119,550118,440119,164120,79159,35060,62161,28662,20862,01762,13863,01563,64365,02366,55266,92967,63968,36969,62870,45970,61471,83373,09174,45575,77077,34778,73780,73482,77184,38287,03489,42991,94993,77596,15899,009102,251104,962106,940108,670110,204111,550113,544115,461117,834119,865121,669123,869124,787125,303126,982128,04057,03858,34357,65158,91859,96160,25061,17960,10962,17063,79964,07163,03664,63065,77865,74666,70267,76269,30571,08872,89574,37275,92077,90278,67879,36782,15385,06486,79485,84688,75292,01796,04898,82499,303100,39799,526100,834105,005107,150109,597112,440114,968117,342117,914116,877117,598119,3067,8907,6297,6587,1606,7266,5006,2606,2056,4506,2835,9475,5865,5655,4585,2004,9444,6874,5234,3613,9793,8443,8173,6063,4633,3943,4843,4703,5153,4083,3313,2833,3873,3473,3643,3683,4013,3833,3213,1793,1633,2083,1693,1993,1863,2333,2073,07449,14850J1449,99351,75853,23553,74954,91953,90455,72257,51458,12357,45059,06560,31860,54661,75963,07664,78266,72668,91570,52772,10374,29675,21575,97278,66981,59483,27982,43885,42188,73492,66195,47795,93897,03096,12597,450101,685103,971106,434109,232111,800114,142114,728113,644114,391116,2322,3112,2763,6373,2882,0551,8831,8343,5322,8522,7502,8594,6023,7403,8524,7143,9114,0703,7863,3662,8752,9752,8172,8324,0935,0164,8824,3655,1567,9297,4066,9916,2026,1377,6378,27310,67810,7178,5398,3128,2377,4256,7016,5286,8748,4269,3848,7345.23.22.92.85.44.34.04.26.65.35.46.55.45.55.04.43.73.73.53.44.85.85.54.85.58.37.66.96.05.87.07.59.59.57.47.16.96.15.45.25.46.67.36.73.93.85.95.33.33.02.95.54.44.14.36.85.55.56.75.55.75.24.53.83.83.63.54.95.95.64.95.68.57.77.16.15.87.17.69.79.67.57.27.06.25.55.35.56.77.46.858.358.858.959.259.259.058.958.859.360.059.659.559.359.459.358.858.758.758.959.259.659.660.160.460.260.460.861.361.261.662.363.263.763.863.964.064.064.464.865.365.665.966.566.466.066.366.256.056.655.456.157.357.357.155.556.757.557.155.456.056.155.455.555.455.756.256.957.357.558.057.456.657.057.857.856.156.857.959.359.959.259.057.857.959.560.160.761.562.363.062.761.661.461.61 Not seasonally adjusted.2 Unemployed as percent <strong>of</strong> labor force including resident Armed Forces.3 Unemployed as percent <strong>of</strong> civilian labor force.4 Civilian labor force as percent <strong>of</strong> civilian noninstitutional population.5 Civilian employment as percent <strong>of</strong> civilian noninstitutional population.See next page for continuation <strong>of</strong> table.306


TABLE B-33.—Population and <strong>the</strong> labor force, 1929-93—Continued[Monthly data seasonally adjusted, except as noted]Year or monthCiviliannoninstitutionalpopulation1ResidentArmedForces lArmedForcesLaborforceincludingEmploymentincludingresidentArmedForcesTotalCivilian labor forceTotalEmploymentAgriculturalNonagriculturalUnemploymentUnemploymentrateAllworkers2Civilianworkers3Civilianlaborforce85:pationrate 4Civilianemployment/populationratio 5Thousands <strong>of</strong> persons 16 years <strong>of</strong> age and overPercent1990: Jan...Feb...Mar..Apr...May..June.July..Aug..Sept.Oct...Nov..Dec.1991: Jan...Feb...Mar..Apr...May..June.July..Aug..Sept.Oct...Nov..Dec.1992: Jan...Feb...Mar..Apr...May..June.July..Aug..Sept.Oct...Nov..Dec.1993: Jan...Feb...Mar..Apr...May..JuneJuly.Aug.SeptOct..Nov.Dec187,293187,412187,529187,669187,828187,977188,136188,261188,401188,525188,697188,866188,977189,115189,243189,380189,522189,668189,839189,973190,122190,289190,452190,605190,759190,884191,022191,168191,307191,455191,622191,790191,947192,131192,316192,509192,644192,786192,959193,126193,283193,456193,633193,793193,971194,151194,321194,4721,6971,6781,6691,6571,6391,6301,6271,6401,6011,5701,6151,6171,6151,6021,4601,4561,4581,5051,6041,6161,6241,6141,6051,6041,5991,5851,5851,5771,5741,5701,5681,5661,5661,5521,5311,5171,5151,5121,4971,4921,4841,4771,4711,4821,4821,4751,4701,461126,298126,299126,432126,470126,554126,282\126,284126,457126,504126,480126,477126,766126,402126,629126,716127,177126,643126,872126,706126,565127,231127,192127,124127,245127,748127,794128,130128,494128,610128,839128,926128,905128,872128,485128,818128,986128,739128,912128,937129,031129,559129,533129,573129,816129,590130,055130,132130,359119,687119,714119,942119,762119.955119,868119,576119,446119,389119,288118,974119,033118,582118.471118,251118,867118,104118,383118,342118,121118,766118,611118,453118,240118,729118,504118,840119,247119,108119,068119,331119,315119,338119,275119,505119.672119,693119,954120,059120,077120,664120.664120,841121.174121,050121.416121,802122,122124,601124,621124,763124,813124,915124,652124,657124,817124,903124,910124,862125,149124,787125,027125,256125,721125,185125,367125,102124,949125,607125,578125,519125.641126,149126,209126,545126,917127,036127,269127,358127.339127,306126,933127,287127,469127,224127,400127,440127,539128,075128.056128,102128,334128,108128,580128.662128,898117,990118,036118,273118,105118,316118,238117,949117,806117,788117,718117,359117,416116,967116,869116,791117,411116,646116,878116,738116,505117,142116,997116,848116,636117,130116,919117,255117,670117,534117,498117,763117,749117,772117,723117,974118,155118,178118,442118,562118,585119,180119,187119,370119,692119,568119,941120.332120,6613,1563,1233,2233,1673,2893,2573,1083,1493,1703,2013,1493,2523,1733,2283,1313,1893,2693,2813,2583,2733.2753,2313,2553,1413,1363,2183,2083,2203,1923,2483,2173,2373,2113,1883,1703.2223,1823,1163,0993,0713,0743,0313,0433,0053.0933,0213,1143.0%114,834114,913115,050114,938115,027114,981114,841114,657114,618114,517114,210114,164113,794113,641113,660114.222113,377113,597113,480113,232113,867113,766113,593113.495113,994113,701114,047114,450114,342114,250114,546114,512114,561114,535114,804114,933114,996115,326115,463115,514116,106116,156116,327116,687116,475116,920117,218117,5656,6116,5856,4906,7086,5996,4146,7087,0117,1157,1927,5037,7337,8208,1588,4658,3108,5398,4898,3648,4448,4658,5818,6719,0059,0199,2909,2909,2479,5029,7719,5959,5909,5349.2109,3139,3149,0468,9588,8788,9548,8958,8698,7328,6428,5408,6398,3308.2375.25.25.15.35.25.15.35.55.65.75.96.16.26.46.76.56.76.76.66.76.76.76.87.17.17.37.37.27.47.67.47.47.47.27.27.27.06.96.96.96.96.86.76.76.66.66.46.35.35.35.25.45.35.15.45.65.75.86.06.26.36.56.86.66.86.86.76.86.76.86.97.27.17.47.37.37.57.77.57.57.57.37.37.37.17.07.07.06.96.96.86.76.76.76.56.466.566.566.566.566.566.366.366.366.366.366.266.366.066.166.266.466.166.165.965.866.166.065.965.966.166.166.266.466.466.566.566.466.366.166.266.266.066.166.066.066.366.266.266.266.066.266.266.363.063.063.162.963.062.962.762.662.562.462.262.261.961.861.762.061.561.661.561.361.661.561.461.261.461.361.461.661.461.461.561.461.461.361.361.461.361.461.461.461.761.661.661.861.661.861.962.06 Not strictly comparable with earlier data due to population adjustments as follows: Beginning 1953, introduction <strong>of</strong> 1950 censusdata added about 600,000 to population and 350,000 to labor force, total employment, and agricultural employment. Beginning 1960,inclusion <strong>of</strong> Alaska and Hawaii added about 500,000 to population, 300,000 to labor force, and 240.000 to nonagricultural employment.Beginning 1962, introduction <strong>of</strong> 1960 census data reduced population by about 50.000 and labor force and employment by 200,000.Beginning 1972, introduction <strong>of</strong> 1970 census data added about 800,000 to civilian noninstitutional population and 333,000 to laborforce and employment. A subsequent adjustment based on 1970 census in March 1973 added 60,000 to labor force and to employment.Beginning 1978, changes in sampling and estimation procedures introduced into <strong>the</strong> household survey added about 250,000 to laborforce and to employment. Unemployment levels and rates were not significantly affected. Beginning 1986, <strong>the</strong> introduction <strong>of</strong> revisedpopulation controls added about 400,000 to <strong>the</strong> civilian population and labor force and 350,000 to civilian employment. Unemploymentlevels and rates were not significantly affected.Note.—Labor force data in Tables B-33 through B-42 are based on household interviews and relate to <strong>the</strong> calendar week including<strong>the</strong> 12th <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> month. For definitions <strong>of</strong> terms, area samples used, historical comparability <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> data, comparability with o<strong>the</strong>r series,etc., see "Employment and Earnings."Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Labor, Bureau <strong>of</strong> Labor Statistics.307


TABLE B-34.—Civilian employment and unemployment by sex and age. 1947-93[Thousands ot persons 16 years <strong>of</strong> age and over; monthly data seasonally adjusted]Year or monthCivilian employmentTotalMalesTotal16-19years20yearsandoverFemalesTotal16-19years20yearsandoverUnemploymentTotalMalesTotal16-19years20yearsandoverFemalesTotal16-19years20yearsandover194719481949195019511952195319541955195619571958195919601961196219631964196519661967196819691970197119721973197419751976197719781979198019811982198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931992. Jan..Feb...Mar..Apr...May..June.July..Aug..Sept.Oct...Nov..Dec.1993: Jan..Feb...Mar.Apr..May.JuneJuly.Aug.SeptOct..Nov.Dec.57,03858,34357,65158,91859,96160,25061,17960,10962,17063,79964,07163,03664,63065,77865,74666,70267,76269,30571,08872,89574,37275,92077,90278,67879,36782,15385,06486,79485,84688,75292,01796,04898,82499,303100,39799,526100,834105,005107,150109,597112,440114,968117,342117,914116,877117,598119,306117,130116,919117,255117,670117,534117,498117,763117,749117,772117,723117,974118,155118,178118,442118,562118,585119,180119,187119,370119,692119,568119,941120,332120,66140,99541,72540,92541,57841,78041,68242,43041,61942,62143,37943,35742,42343,46643,90443,65644,17744,65745,47446,34046,91947,47948,11448,81848,99049,39050,89652,34953,02451,85753,13854,72856,47957,60757,18657,39756,27156,78759,09159,89160,89262,10763,27364,31564,43563,59363,80564,70063,49963,31963,55363,85363,82163,73263,83063,86963,98063,92064,02864,17864,23764,32964,35564,41664,68764,64264,72864,90464,75664,97165,14465,2592,2182,3442,1242,1862,1562,1072,1361,9852,0952,1642,1152,0122,1982,3612,3152,3622,4062,5872,9183,2533,1863,2553,4303,4093,4783,7654,0394,1033,8393,9474,1744,3364,3004,0853,8153,3793,3003,3223,3283,3233,3813,4923,4773,2372,8792,7862,8362,8502,7402,6932,7632,7462,7232,7472,7652,8392,8492,8282,8642,8192,8522,8572,8022,8382,8372,8592,8982,8552,7992,8292,81538,77639,38238,80339,39439,62639,57840,29639,63440,52641,21641,23940,41141,26741,54341,34241,81542,25142,88643,42243,66844,29444,85945,38845,58145,91247,13048,31048,92248,01849,19050,55552,14353,30853,10153,58252,89153,48755,76956,56257,56958,72659,78160,83761,19860,71461,01961,86560,64960,57960,86061,09061,07561,00961,08361,10461,14161,07161,20061,31461,41861,47761,49861,61461,84961,80561,86962,00661,90162,17262,31562,44416,04516,61716,72317,34018,18118,56818,74918,49019,55120,41920,71420,61321,16421,87422,09022,52523,10523,83124,74825,97626,89327,80729,08429,68829,97631,25732,71533,76933,98935,61537,28939,56941,21742,11743,00043,25644,04745,91547,25948,70650,33451,69653,02753,47953,28453,79354,60653,63153,60053,70253,81753,71353,76653,93353,88053,79253,80353,94653,97753,94154,11354,20754,16954,49354,54554,64254,78854,81254,97055,18855,4021,6911,6821,5881,5171,6111,6121,5841,4901,5471,6541,6631,5701,6401,7681,7931,8331,8491,9292,1182,4682,4962,5262,6872,7352,7302,9803,2313,3453,2633,3893,5143,7343,7833,6253,4113,1703,0433,1223,1053,1493,2603,3133,2823,0242,7492,6132,6942,6772,6762,6242,6152,6242,5532,5652,6422,6012,5832,5792,6192,6332,6342,5912,6362,7162,6702,7412,7042,7402,7272,7652,77114,35414,93615,13715,82416,57016,95817,16417,00018,00218,76719,05219,04319,52420,10520,29620,69321,25721,90322,63023,51024,39725,28126,39726,95227,24628,27629,48430,42430,72632,22633,77535,83637,43438,49239,59040,08641,00442,79344,15445,55647,07448,38349,74550,45550,53551,18151,91250,95450,92451,07851,20251,08951,21351,36851,23851,19151,22051,36751,35851,30851,47951,61651,53351,77751,87551,90152,08452,07252,24352,42352,6312,3112,2763,6373,2882,0551,8831,8343,5322,8522,7502,8594,6023,7403,8524,7143,9114,0703,7863,3662,8752,9752,8172,8324,0935,0164,8824,3655,1567,9297,4066,9916,2026,1377,6378,27310,67810,7178,5398,3128,2377,4256,7016,5286,8748,4269,3848,7349,0199,2909,2909,2479,5029,7719,5959,5909,5349,2109,3139,3149,0468,9588,8788,9548,8958,8698,7328,6428,5408,6398,3308,2371,6921,5592,5722,2391,2211,1851,2022,3441,8541,7111,8413,0982,4202,4862,9972,4232,4722,2051,9141,5511,5081,4191,4032,2382,7892,6592,2752,7144,4424,0363,6673,1423,1204,2674,5776,1796,2604,7444,5214,5304,1013,6553,5253,7994,8175,3804,9325,2115,3795,3465,2795,5265,6505,4425,4765,4435,3445,3305,2014,9775,0675,1475,0985,0165,0415,0024,9434,8244,8494,5864,5542702563533181912051843102742693004163984264794085014874794324484264405996937116537579669398748138119139621,0901,0038128067797326676586297097617287247717727037428657687768206837647537377427298107317597317286877157036771,4221,3052,2191,9221,0299801,0192,0351,5801,4421,5412,6812,0222,0602,5182,0161,9711,7181,4351,1201,0609939631,6382,0971,9481,6241,9573,4763,0982,7942,3282,3083,3533,6155,0895,2573,9323,7153,7513,3692,9872,8673,1704,1094,6194,2044,4874,6084,5744,5764,7844,7854,6744,7004,6234,6614,5664,4484,2404,3254,4184,2884,2854,2824,2714,2154,1374,1343,8833,8776197171,0651,0498346986321,1889981,0391,0181,5041,3201,3661,7171,4881,5981,5811,4521,3241,4681,3971,4291,8552,2272,2222,0892,4413,4863,3693,3243,0613,0183,3703,6964,4994,4573,7943,7913,7073,3243,0463,0033,0753,6094,0053,8013,8083,9113,9443,9683,9764,1214,1534,1144,0913,8663,9834,1134,0693,8913,7313,8563,8793,8283,7303,6993,7163,7903,7443,6831441532231951451401231911762091972622562863493133833853954053914124135065685985836658027807897697437558008868256876616756165585365195815915685615795755595946826305776145356155765945965885756405715315345375715465314755648418546895595109978238328211,2421,0631,0801,3681,1751,2161,1951,0569211,0789851,0151,3491,6581,6251,5071,7772,6842,5882,5352,2922,2762,6152,8953,6133,6323,1073,1293,0322,7092,4872,4672,5553,0283,4133,2343,2473,3323,3693,4093,3823,4393,5233,5373,4773,3313,3683,5373,4753,2953,1433,2813,2393,2573,1993,1653,1793,2193,1983,152Note.—See footnote 6 and Note, Table B-33.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Labor, Bureau <strong>of</strong> Labor Statistics.308


TABLE B-35.—Civilian employment by demographic characteristic, 1954-93[Thousands <strong>of</strong> persons 16 years <strong>of</strong> age and over; monthly data seasonally adjusted]Year ormonthAllcivilianworkersWhiteTotalMalesFemalesBothsexes16-19Black and o<strong>the</strong>rTotalMalesFemalesBothsexes16-19BlackTotalMalesFemalesBothsexes16-1919541955195619571958195919601961196219631964196519661967196819691970197119721973197419751976197719781979198019811982198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931992: JanFeb....Mar....Apr....May...June...July....Aug....Sept...Oct....Nov....Dec...1993:JanFeb....Mar....Apr...May..June-July...Aug...Sept..Oct...Nov...Dec...60,10962,17063,79964,07163,03664,63065,77865,74666,70267,76269,30571,08872,89574,37275,92077,90278,67879,36782,15385,06486,79485,84688,75292,01796,04898,82499,303100,39799,526100,834105,005107,150109,597112,440114,968117,342117,914116,877117,598119,306117,130116,919117,255117,670117,534117,498117,763117,749117,772117,723117,974118,155118,178118,442118,562118,585119,180119,187119,370119,692119,568119,941120,332120,66153,95755,83357,26957,46556,61358,00658,85058,91359,69860,62261,92263,44665,02166,36167,75069,51870,21770,87873,37075,70877,18476,41178,85381,70084,93687,25987,71588,70987,90392,12093,73695,66097,78999,812101,584102,087101,039101,479102,812101,195101,051101,308101,599101,473101,277101,568101,479101,497101,547101,793101,944102,029102,076102,251102,190102,612102,721102,835103,179103,094103,273103,662103,80737,84638,71939,36839,34938,59139,49439,75539,58840,01640,42841,11541,84442,33142,83343,41144,04844,17844,59545,94447,08547,67446,69747,77549,15050,54451,45251,12751,31550,28750,62152,46253,04653,78554,64755,55056,35256,43255,55755,70956,39755,48555,35755,50755,74555,70955,59655,76855,74955,82955,82355,84656,05256,08656,10056,17556,16656,30456,36256,33656,52356,46756,62756,79956,79416,11117,11417,90118,11618,02218,51219,09519,32519,68220,19420,80721,60222,69023,52824,33925,47026,03926,28327,42628,62329,51129,71431,07832,55034,39235,80736,58737,39437,61538,27239,65940,69041,87643,14244,26245,23245,65445,48245,77046,41545,71045,69445,80145,85445,76445,68145,80045,73045,66845,72445,94745,89245,94345,97646,07646,02446,30846,35946,49946,65646,62746,64646,86347,0133,0783,2253,3893,3743,2163,4753,7003,6933,7743,8514,0764,5625,1765,1145,1955,5085,5715,6706,1736,6236,7966,4876,7247,0687,3677,3567,0216,5885,9845,7995,8365,7685,7925,8986,0305,9465,5184,9894,7614,8874,8774,7824,6884,7684,7634,6014,7004,7564,7954,7974,7644,8274,8084,8244,8294,8264,8784,8354,9024,9304,9394,9064,9914,9706,1526,3416,5346,6046,4236,6236,9286,8337,0037,1407,3837,6437,8778,0118,1698,3848,4648,4888,7839,3569,6109,4359,89910,31711,11211,56511,58811,68811,62411,94112,88513,41413,93714,65215,15615,75715,82715,83816,11916,49415,92815,94315,94516,02916,00216,17916,16816,31516,30516,21016,18916,20616,12616,43916,30616,35416,50716,40816,45916,52216,51216,69716,70516,8763,7733,9044,0134,0063,8333,9714,1494,0684,1604,2294,3594,4964,5884,6464,7024,7704,8134,7964,9525,2655,3525,1615,3635,5795,9366,1566,0596,0835,9836,1666,6296,8457,1077,4597,7227,9638,0038,0368,0968,3038,0408,0368,0418,0768,0388,1058,0768,1368,1578,1298,1898,1188,1578,2848,1628,2108,3078,2498,3678,3668,3028,3808,3638,4762,3792,4372,5212,5982,5902,6522,7792,7652,8432,9113,0243,1473,2893,3653,4673,6143,6503,6923,8324,0924,2584,2754,5364,7395,1775,4095,5295,6065,6415,7756,2566,5696,8307,1927,4347,7957,8257,8028,0238,1917,8887,9077,9047,9537,9648,0748,0928,1798,1488,0818,0008,0887,9698,1558,1448,1448,2008,1598,0928,1568,2108,3178,3428,4003964184304073653624304144204044404745455685846095745385736476526156116197037276896375655436076666817427748137436396376426656496096185976366266856396406406486356535936186756406816526306166287,8028,1288,2037,8948,2278,5409,1029,3599,3139,3559,1899,37510,11910,50110,81411,30911,65811,95311,96611,86311,93312,14611,86611,79911,83611,85611,84511,98211,97412,07912,04911,97611,95811,95411,86412,15711,99111,96512,14012,07612,13412,22512,20212,29212,29712,3974,3684,5274,5274,2754,4044,5654,7964,9234,7984,7944,6374,7535,1245,2705,4285,6615,8245,9285,9155,8805,8465,9575,8765,8125,8145,8235,8095,8625,8265,8555,8705,8505,8975,8495,8956,0095,8845,8465,9615,9316,0086,0315,9605,9915,9516,0133,4333,6013,6773,6183,8233,9754,3074,4364,5154,5614,5524,6224,9955,2315,3865,6485,8346,0256,0515,9836,0876,1895,9905,9876,0226,0336,0366,1206,1486,2246,1796,1266,0616,1055,9696,1486,1076,1196,1796,1456,1266,1946,2426,3016,3466,384509570554507508508571579547505428416474532536587601625573474474474519492477461445470462496467451465485485487443436494451513514484463461467Note.—See footnote 6 and Note, Table B-33.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Labor, Bureau <strong>of</strong> Labor Statistics.309


TABLE B-36.—Unemployment by demographic characteristic, 1954-93[Thousands <strong>of</strong> persons 16 years <strong>of</strong> age and over; monthly data seasonally adjusted]Year ormonthAllcivilianworkersWhiteTotalMalesFemalesBothsexes16-19Black and o<strong>the</strong>rTotalMalesFemalesBothsexes16-19BlackTotalMalesFemalesBothsexes16-1919541955195619571958195919601961196219631964196519661967196819691970197119721973197419751976197719781979198019811982198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931992: Jan...Feb..Mar..Apr..May.June.July..Aug..Sept.Oct..Nov..Dec.1993: Jan...Feb..Mar..Apr..May.June.July..Aug..Sept.Oct..Nov..Dec.3,5322,8522,7502,8594,6023,7403,8524,7143,9114,0703,7863,3662,8752,9752,8172,8324,0935,0164,8824,3655,1567,9297,4066,9916,2026,1377,6378,27310,67810,7178,5398,3128,2377,4256,7016,5286,8748,4269,3848,7349,0199,2909,2909,247.9,5029,7719,5959,5909,5349,2109,3139,3149,0468,9588,8788,9548,8958,8698,7328,6428,5408,6398,3308,2372,8592,2522,1592,2893,6802,9463,0653,7433,0523,2082,9992,6912,2552,3382,2262,2603,3394,0853,9063,4424,0976,4215,9145,4414,6984,6645,8846,3438,2418,1286,3726,1916,1405,5014,9444,7705,0916,4477,0476,5476,8266,9967,0716,9807,0407,3277,1937,1667,2146,9666,8996,9176,7506,6706,6716,6016,6226,6526,5586,4676,3986,7366,1426,2091,9131,4781,3661,4772,4891,9031,9882,3981,9151,9761,7791,5561,2411,2081,1421,1371,8572,3092,1731,8362,1693,6273,2582,8832,4112,4053,3453,5804,8464,8593,6003,4263,4333,1322,7662,6362,8663,7754,1213,7534,0534,1324,1364,0834,2394,3374,1344,1594,2034,0554,0293,9333,8473,8493,9093,8253,7813,8183,8333,7563,6573,7883,3863,5099467747938121,1911,0431,0771,3451,1371,2321,2201,1351,0141,1301,0841,1231,4821,7771,7331,6061,9272,7942,6562,5582,2872,2602,5402,7623,3953,2702,7722,7652,7082,3692,1772,1352,2252,6722,9262,7932,7732,8642,9352,8972,8012,9903,0593,0073,0112,9112,8702,9842,9032,8212,7622,7762,8412,8342,7252,7112,7412,9482,7562,7004233733824015415255756695807087087056516356446608711,0111,0219551,1041,4131,3641,2841,1891,1931,2911,3741,5341,3871,1161,0741,0709959108638569779839439399991,0449199571,1381,0069691,0328649929489519639459629839459099349121,0039228946736015915709237937889718618637876786226385905717549309779241,0581,5071,4921,5501,5051,4731,7521,9302,4372,5882,1672,1212,0971,9241,7571,7571,7831,9792,3372,1872,2572,2612,2422,2452,3882,4562,4012,4002,3262,3652,3422,3772,3552,2662,2222,3182,2042,2312,1692,1562,1322,0402,1332,0134313763453646105174985995094964263603103002772673804814864405448157797847317149229971,3341,4011,1441,0951,0979698888899331,0431,2591,1791,2521,2301,2241,1911,2641,2981,2931,2961,2561,3081,2431,2671,2271,2071,2481,2531,2131,2091,1581,1711,1691,0881,1511,0462422252462063132762903723523673613183123383133043744504914845146927137667747598309331,1041,1871,0221,0269999558698688509361,0791,0081,0051,0311,0181,0541,1241,1581,1081,1041,0701,0571,0991,1101,1281,0599741,0659911,0221,011985963952982967797795961381281381591421761651711862031941932352492882803183553553793943623773884434413843943833533163312923133693533373523143393723983863754003833933843713753804163793803443193063143373179068469651,3691,3341,3931,3301,3191,5531,7312,1422,2721,9141,8641,8401,6841,5471,5441,5271,6791,9581,7961,8711,9241,9151,8942,0222,0212,0102,0111,9271,9821,9441,9791,9531,8571,8711,9031,8041,8461,7861,7441,7501,6531,7601,6144483954947416986986416368158911,1671,2131,0039519468267717737938741,0469541,0171,0471,0409861,0631,0731,0651,0761,0461,0821,0181,0471,0069681,0341,0349709769299319508639508254584514706296376956906837388409751,059911913894858776772734805912842854877875908959948945935881900926932947889837869834870857813800790810789279262297330330354360333343357396392353357347312288300258270313302291313268288322328321316346329321316312311325361323321293259275269301274Note.—See footnote 6 and Note, Table B-33.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Labor, Bureau <strong>of</strong> Labor Statistics.310


TABLE B-37.—Civilian labor force participation rate and employment/population ratio, 1948-93[Percent; 1monthly data seasonally adjusted]Year or monthLabor force participation ratecivilianwork-MalesFemalesBothsexes16-19yearsWhiteBlackando<strong>the</strong>rBlackEmployment/population ratioAllcivilianworkersMalesFemalesBothsexes16-19yearsWhiteBlackando<strong>the</strong>rBlack19481949195019511952195319541955195619571958195919601961196219631964196519661967196819691970197119721973197419751976197719781979198019811982198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931992: Jan..Feb..Mar.Apr..May.JuneJuly..Aug.SeptOct..Nov..Dec.1993: Jan..Feb..Mar.Apr..May.JuneJuly..Aug.SeptOct..Nov..Dec.58.858.959.259.259.058.958.859.360.059.659.559.359.459.358.858.758.758.959.259.659.660.160.460.260.460.861.361.261.662.363.263.763.863.964.064.064.464.865.365.665.966.566.466.066.366.266.166.166.266.466.466.566.566.466.366.166.266.266.066.166.066.066.366.266.266.266.066.266.266.386.686.486.486.386.386.085.585.485.584.884.283.783.382.982.081.481.080.780.480.480.179.879.779.178.978.878.777.977.577.777.977.877.477.076.676.476.476.376.376.276.276.476.175.575.675.275.475.475.575.775.975.875.775.775.775.475.475.475.175.375.375.275.475.375.275.374.975.175.075.032.733.133.934.634.734.434.635.736.936.937.137.137.738.137.938.338.739.340.341.141.642.743.343.443.944.745.746.347.348.450.050.951.552.152.652.953.654.555.356.056.657.457.557.357.857.957.657.757.857.957.757.958.157.957.857.557.757.857.757.757.657.657.957.957.857.957.958.158.258.352.552.251.852.251.350.248.348.950.949.647.446.747.546.946.145.244.545.748.248.448.349.449.949.751.953.754.854.054.556.057.857.956.755.454.153.553.954.554.754.755.355.953.751.751.351.551.751.550.650.451.151.951.251.452.250.451.451.751.451.951.551.852.551.551.851.651.251.151.250.958.258.759.459.158.958.758.858.858.358.258.258.458.759.259.359.960.260.160.460.861.461.561.862.563.363.964.164.364.364.364.665.065.565.866.266.766.866.666.766.766.666.666.866.966.866.866.966.766.766.666.666.766.666.566.666.566.766.766.766.866.767.066.866.964.064.264.964.464.864.364.564.163.263.063.162.963.062.862.262.161.860.960.260.560.359.659.860.462.262.261.761.361.662.162.663.363.764.364.064.763.763.163.863.163.663.563.363.563.864.564.264.564.163.863.563.563.163.763.063.363.463.062.862.862.662.863.063.159.960.259.858.859.059.861.561.461.060.861.061.562.262.963.363.863.864.263.362.663.362.463.062.962.962.863.363.863.764.163.463.362.963.062.463.262.462.362.662.462.362.462.362.162.562.356.655.456.157.357.357.155.556.757.557.155.456.056.155.455.555.455.756.256.957.357.558.057.456.657.057.857.856.156.857.959.359.959.259.057.857.959.560.160.761.562.363.062.761.661.461.661.461.361.461.661.461.461.561.461.461.361.361.461.361.461.461.461.761.661.661.861.661.861.962.083.581.382.084.083.983.681.081.882.381.378.579.378.977.677.777.177.377.577.978.077.877.676.274.975.075.574.971.772.072.873.873.872.071.369.068.870.770.971.071.572.072.571.970.269.769.969.769.569.769.969.869.769.769.769.769.669.669.769.769.869.769.769.969.869.870.069.769.970.070.131.331.232.033.133.433.332.534.035.135.134.535.035.535.435.635.836.337.138.339.039.640.740.840.441.042.042.642.043.244.546.447.547.748.047.748.049.550.451.452.553.454.354.353.753.854.153.853.853.853.953.853.853.953.853.753.653.753.753.753.853.953.854.154.154.154.254.254.354.554.747.745.245.547.946.946.442.343.545.343.939.939.940.539.139.437.437.338.942.142.242.243.442.341.343.545.946.043.344.246.148.348.546.644.641.541.543.744.444.645.546.847.545.442.141.041.742.041.340.440.840.940.240.541.141.341.240.941.641.341.741.441.342.141.542.242.142.041.441.841.955.256.557.356.855.355.955.955.355.455.355.556.056.857.257.458.057.556.857.458.258.356.757.558.660.060.660.060.058.858.960.561.061.562.363.163.863.662.662.462.762.462.362.462.662.562.362.462.362.362.362.462.462.562.562.562.462.762.762.762.962.862.963.063.158.058.759.559.356.757.557.956.256.356.257.057.858.458.258.058.156.854.954.155.054.351.452.052.554.755.253.652.650.951.053.654.755.456.857.458.257.356.155.755.755.755.655.555.755.556.055.956.356.155.755.555.455.056.055.455.555.955.455.555.655.456.055.956.353.754.553.550.150.851.453.653.852.351.349.449.552.353.454.155.656.356.956.254.954.354.454.454.154.254.254.154.654.554.954.754.354.154.053.554.854.053.854.554.154.354.654.554.854.755.11 Civilian labor force or civilian employment as percent <strong>of</strong> civilian noninstitutional population in group specified.Note.—Data relate to persons 16 years <strong>of</strong> age and over.See footnote 6 and Note, Table B-33.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Labor, Bureau <strong>of</strong> Labor Statistics.311


TABLE B-38.—Civilian labor force participation rate by demographic characteristic, 1954-93[Percent; 1 monthly data seasonally adjusted]WhiteBlack and o<strong>the</strong>r or blackYear or monthAllcivilianworkersTotalTotalMales16-19years20yearsandoverTotalFemales16-19years20yearsandoverTotalTotalMales16-19years20yearsandoverTotalFemales16-19years20yearsandoverBlack and o<strong>the</strong>r19541955 .1956195719581959196019611962196319641965196619671968196919701971.197258.859 360.059 659.559.359.459.358.858.758.758 959.259 659.660.160.460.260.458.258 759.459158.958.758.858.858.358.258.258 458.759 259.359.960.260.160.485.685 485.684 884.383.883.483.082.181.581.180 880.680 680.480.280.079.679.657.658 660.459 256.555.955.954.553.853.152.754 155.956 355.956.857.557.960.187.887 587.686 986.686.386.085.784.984.484.283 983.683 583.283.082.882.382.033.334 535.735 735.836.036.536.936.737.237.538 139.240 140.741.842.642.643.240.640 743.142 240.139.640.340.639.838.737.839 242.642 543.044.645.645.448.132.734 035.135 235.535.636.236.636.537.037.538 038.839 840.441.542.242.342.764.064 264.964 464.864.364.564.163.263.063.162 963.062 862.262.161.860.960.285.285 185.184 284.183.483.082.280.880.280.179 679.078 577.776.976.574.973.961.260 861.558 857.355.557.655.853.551.549.951351.451 149.749.647.444.746.087.187 887.887 087.186.786.285.584.283.984.183 783.382 982.281.481.480.078.646.146147.347 148.047.748.248.348.048.148.648 649.449 549.349.849.549.248.831.032 736.333 231.928.232.932.833.132.631.729 533.535 234.834.634.131.232.347.747 548.448 649.849.849.950.149.649.950.751151.651651.452.051.851.851.2Black1972....1973197419751976197719781979198019811982198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931992: JanFebMarMay"!!!!!!!!!!JuneJulyAugSeptOctNovDec1993:JanFebMarJay!!!!!!!!!!JuneJulyAugSeptOctNovDec60.460.861.361.261662.363.263.763 863.964 064.064.464.865 365.665.966.566.466.066.366.266.166.166.266.466.466.566.566.466.366.166.266.266.066.166.066.066.366.266.266.266.066.266.266.360.460.861.461.561.862.563.363.964164.364 364.364.665.065.565.866.266.766.866.666.766.766.666.666.866.966.866.866.966.766.766.666.666.766.666.566.666.566.766.766.766.866.767.066.866.979.679.479.478.778 478.578.678.678 277.977.477.177.177.076.976.876.977.176.976.476.476.176.376.276.376.576.676.576.476.476.576.276.176.276.176.176.276.076.176.176.176.175.976.275.875.960.162.062.961.962 364.065.064.863 762.460 059.459.059.759 359.060.061.059.457.256.756.557.256.555.956.356.457.056.556.558.656.056.957.156.456.757.056.656.156.856.557.356.156.156.756.082.081.681.480.780 380.280.180.179 879.579 278.978.778.578 578.478.378.578.377.877.877.577.777.677.878.078.178.077.977.877.877.777.577.677.577.577.677.477.577.577.577.577.377.777.277.443.244.145.245.946 948.049.450.551251.952 452.753.354.155 055.756.457.257.557.457.858.057.757.757.957.957.757.857.957.857.757.657.857.857.757.757.757.658.058.058.058.158.158.358.358.448.150.151.751.552 854.556.757.456 255.455 054.555.455.256 356.557.257.155.454.352.653.752.953.152.951.952.652.552.652.652.451.852.652.753.053.252.553.155.052.653.353.354.155.254.454.242.743.544.445.346 247.348.749.850 651.552 252.553.154.054 955.656.357.257.657.758.158.358.058.058.258.358.058.158.358.158.058.058.158.158.158.058.057.958.258.458.358.558.458.558.658.759.960.259.858.859 059.861.561.461060.861 061.562.262.963 363.863.864.263.362.663.362.463.062.962.962.863.363.863.764.163.463.362.963.062.463.262.462.362.662.462.362.462.362.162.562.373.673.472.970.970 070.671.571.370 370.070 170.670.870.871 271.171.071.070.169.569.768.670.369.869.769.169.770.269.770.069.769.769.469.169.169.769.068.668.968.668.868.968.367.668.067.346.345.746.742.641343.244.943.643 241.639.839.941.744.643 743.643.844.640.637.440.739.544.442.939.237.237.341.440.340.641.141.740.942.141.141.741.344.642.739.841.039.238.034.934.935.278.578.477.676.075 475.676.276.375.174.574 775.274.874.474.874.774.674.473.873.473.172.073.373.073.272.873.473.673.173.473.073.072.772.272.373.072.271.372.071.972.072.471.871.571.870.948.749.349.048.849 850.853.153.153 153.553.754.255.256.556 958.058.058.757.857.058.057.457.157.257.457.758.158.658.759.258.358.057.657.956.857.856.957.257.457.357.057.157.357.658.158.132.234.233.434.232 932.937.336.834.934.033.533.035.037.939.139.637.940.436.733.535.234.533.634.832.635.036.835.835.537.837.333.534.734.935.534.932.431.835.534.036.034.533.834.136.935.151.251.651.451.152 553.655.555.455 656.056.256.857.658.658.960.060.160.660.059.360.159.559.359.359.859.860.160.860.961.260.360.359.760.158.959.959.259.659.459.559.859.259.559.860.160.31 Civilian labor force as percent <strong>of</strong> civilian noninstitutional population in group specified.Note.—Data relate to persons 16 years <strong>of</strong> age and over.See footnote 6 and Note, Table B-33.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Labor, Bureau <strong>of</strong> Labor Statistics.312


TABLE B-39.—Civilian employment/population ratio by demographic characteristic, 1954-93[Percent; 1 monthly data seasonally adjusted]Year or monthAllcivilianworkersTotalTotalMales16-19yearsWhite20yearsandoverTotalFemales16-19years20yearsandoverTotalTotalBlack and o<strong>the</strong>r or blackMales16-19years20yearsandoverTotalFemales16-19years20yearsandoverBlack and o<strong>the</strong>r19541955195619571958195919601961 ...19621963 ..19641965196619671968196919701971197255 556 757 557.155.456.056.155 455.555.455.756.256.957 357.558.057 456.657.055 256.557 356855.355.955 955 355 455 355.556 056.857 257.458.057 556 857.481582.282 781879.279.979 478 278.477 777.877.978.378.478.378.276 875776.049 952.054152447 648.148145 946 444745.047150.150 250.351.149 649*251.584084785.084181.882.882.48148L581181381581781781.681.480.179079.031.433^034 234233.634.034.634 534735 035I536 237 538 338.940.140 339940.736.437!(338 938235.034.835.134 634^832 932233 737 537 737 839.539 538641.331132733 833933.534.034.534 534735 235 836 537 538 339140.140.440140.658 058759 559356.757.557.956 256 356 257.057 858.458 258.058.156 854954.176 577^678 477272.573.874.171772 071872 973 774 073 873 372.870 968167.352 452752.248042.041.443.841041737 437^839 440 538 838 739.035 531*832.479.280481380576.077.677.975 575.776 277778 779 279 478.978.476 874 273.241942^243 043742 843.243 642 642 742 743 444145145045.245.944943 943.324 726428 026522 820.324 823 223.121321.820 223.124 824.725.122 420 219.943 743^944 745545.045.745.844 844.945 246.147.348.247.948.248.948 247 346.7Black19721973 .19741975197619771978197919801981 ..1982198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931992:JanFebMarAprMayJuneJulyAugSeptOctNovDec1993: JanFebMarAprMayJuneJulyAugSeptOctNovDec57.057.857.856.156 857.959 359.959.259.057.857.959 560.160 761.562.363.062.761.661.461.661.461.361.461.661461.461.561461.461.361.361.461.361.461.461.461.761.661.661.861.661.861.962.057.458 258.356.757 558.660 060.660.060.058.858.960 561.061562.363.163.863.662.662.462.762.462.362.462.662 562.362.462 362.362.362.462.462.562.562.562.462.762.762.762.962.862.963.063.176.076 575.973.073 474.175 075.173.472.870.670.472172.372 372.773.273.773 271.571.171.371.170.971.071.371271.071.271 171.171.171.071.271.271.271.271.271.371.371.271.471.371.471.671.551.554354.450.651554.456 355.753.451347.047.449 149.949 649.951.752.651047.246.346.647.445.744.446.645 945.146.046147.247.246.947.146.346.647.346.146.446.346.547.246.746.046.746.579.079 278.675.776 076.577 277.375.675173.072.674 374.374 374.775.175.475 073.372.973.172.872.773.073.173 072.973.072 972.972.872.873.073.073.073.073.073.173.173.073.273.173.373.473.340.741842 442.043 244.546 347.547.848 348.148.549 850.751752.853.854.654 854.354.354.754.454.354.454.554 354.254.354 254.154.154.454.354.354.354.454.354.654.754.854.954.954.955.155.241.343 644 342.544 245.948 549447.946 244.644.547 047.147 949.050.250.548 546.144.345.844.944.944.644.144 842.743.944 744.244.143.744.745.045.044.345.446.045.246.245.946.346.347.246.940.641642 241.943 144.446 147^347.848 548.448.950 051.052 053.154.054.955 254.854.955.355.054.955.155.155 055.055.054 854.854.855.154.954.954.955.154.955.255.355.455.555.455.455.655.853 754 553 550.150 851.453 653.852.351.349.449.552 353.454 155.656.356.956 254.954.354.454.454.154.254.254 154.654.554.954.754.354.154.053.554.854.053.854.554.154.354.654.554.854.755.166 867 565.860.660 661.463 363.460.459156.056.359 260.060 662.062.762.861860.559.159.159.959.259.159.158 959.358.959159.258.959.258.659.060.158.758.359.358.959.659.758.959.158.659.131.632 831426.325 826.428 528727.024 620.320.423 926.326 528.529.430.427 623.823.623.628.125.624.721.521222.123.022 723.223.723.124.624.825.223.123.725.624.425.525.522.920.821.221.573.073 771.966.566 867.569 169.165.864.561.461.664164.665166.467.167.066164.963.363.263.663.163.163.563 363.763.063 363.362.963.462.663.064.162.862.263.262.963.563.763.163.663.063.543.043 843.541.642 843.345 846.045.745.144.244.146 748.148 850.351.252.051650.350.450.550.049.950.150.150150.750.951551.050.549.950.249.150.550.150.150.550.250.050.550.851.251.551.719.222 020.920.219 218.522122.421.019 717.717.020123.123 825.825.827.125.721.422.121.621.921.921.323.021823.321.725.121.919.721.622.021.821.519.418.021.718.823.523.522.922.922.222.846.547 246.944.946 447.049 349.349.148 547.547.449 850.951653.053.954.654 253.153.153.252.652.652.952.752 853.353.754.053.853.452.652.951.653.253.053.153.253.152.553.053.453.954.254.51 Civilian employment as percent <strong>of</strong> civilian noninstitutional population in group specified.Note.—Data relate to persons 16 years <strong>of</strong> age and over.See footnote 6 and Note, Table B-33.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Labor, Bureau <strong>of</strong> Labor Statistics.313


TABLE B-40.—Civilian unemployment rate, 1948-93[Percent; 1monthly data seasonally adjusted]Year or month1948194919501951195219531954195519561957195819591960.19611962.19631964196519661967196819691970197119721973197419751976197719781979198019811982198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931992: JanFebMarAprMayJuneJulyAugSeptOctNovDec1993: JanFebMarMay!"'.!"!!'JuneJulyAugSeptOctNovDecAllcivilianworkers3.85.95.33.33.0295.5444.1436.85.55.56.75.5575.2453.83.8363.5495.95.64.95.6857.7716.15.87.1769.79.67.57.27.06.25.55.3.5.5677.46.87.17.47.37.37.57.77.57.57.57.37.37.37.17.07.07.06.96.96.86.76.76.76.56.4MalesTotal3.65.95.12.82.8285.3423.84 16.85.25.46.45.2524.640323.1292.8445.3504.24.9797.1635.35.16.9749.9997.47.06.96.25.55.25.6707.87.17.67.87.87.68.08.17.97.97.87.77.77.57.27.37.47.37.27.27.27.16.96.96.66.516-19years9.814.312.78.18.97913.511611.112 417.115.315.317.114.717 215.814 111712.311611.415 016.615 913.915.620 119.217 315.815.918.320124.423 319.619.519.017.816.015.916.319.821.520.420.322.022.320.321.324.121.821.922.419.321.320.820.720.620.322.420.521.120.420.119.420.319.919.420yearsandover325.44.72.52.4254.9383.4366!24.7475.74.6453.932252.3222.1354.4403.33.8685.9524.34.25.9638.8896.66.26.15.44.84.54.9637.06.46.97.17.07.07.37.37.17.17.07.16.96.86.56.66.76.56.56.56.56.46.36.25.95.8Total416.05.74.43.6336.04 94.8476!85.9597.26.2656.255485.2484.7596.9666.06.7938.6827.26.87.4799.4927.67.47.16.25.65.45.46.36.96.56.66.86.86.96.97.17.17.17.16.76.97.17.06.76.46.66.66.66.46.36.36.46.46.2Females16-19years8.312.311.48.38.07211.410 211.210 6R313.513 916.314.617 216.615 714 113.514 013.315 617.216 715.316.619 718.718 317.116.417.219 021.921318.017.617.615.914.414.014.717 418.517.417.317.818.017.618.521.119.717.919.117.219.318.018.418.518.517.919.117.616.216.516.417.316.516.120yearsandover365.35.1403.2295.54.4424 16!l5.25 1635.4545.245384.2383.7485.754495.5807.4706.05.76.4688.3816.86.66.25.44.94.74.85.76.35.96.06.16.26.26.26.36.46.56.46.16.26.46.36.05.76.05.95.95.85.75.85.85.75.7Bothsexes16-19years9.213.412.2828.57612!611.0n!i11 615!914.614 716 814.717 216.214 812 812.912 712.215 316.916 214 516.019 919.017 816.416.117.819 623.222 418.918.618.316.915.315.015.518.620.019.018.920.020.219.019.922.720.820.020.918.320.319.519.619.619.520.319.819.518.418.417.918.918.317.8White3.55.64.93.12.8275.0393.6386.14.8506.04.9504.6413.43.4323.1455.45.14.35.0787.0625.25.16.3678.6846.56.26.05.34.74.54.76.06.56.06.36.56.56.46.56.76.66.66.66.46.36.46.26.16.16.16.16.16.05.95.86.15.65.6Blackando<strong>the</strong>r5.98.99.05.35.4459.9878.37912.610.710 212.410.910 89.6817.37.4676.4829.910.09.09.913 813.113 111.911.313.114.217.317.814.413.713.111.610.410.010.111.112.711.712.412.412.312.313.013.212.912.812.512.712.612.812.712.112.012.411.812.011.611.511.410.911.310.7Black..„„..„.9.410.514 814.014 012.812.314.315 618.919 515.915.114.513.011.711.411.312.414.112.913.614.013.913.814.614.414.414.313.814.214.014.214.113.313.513.712.913.312.812.512.511.912.511.5Experiencedwageandsalaryworkers4.36.86.03.73.4326.2484.4467.35.7576.85.6565.0433.53.6343.3485.75.34.55.3827.3665.65.56.9739.39.27.16.86.65.85.25.05.36.57.16.56.97.17.17.07.27.27.27.27.27.07.07.06.86.76.76.76.66.66.56.46.36.46.26.2Marriedmen,spousepresent 23.54.61.51.4174.02623285.13.6374.63.6342.824191.8161.5263.2282.32.7514.2362.82.84.2436.56.54.64.34.43.93.33.03.44.45.04.44.85.14.84.95.15.25.25.25.25.14.94.84.54.64.74.54.54.44.54.44.24.44.03.9Womenwhomaintainfamilies4.94.44.45.47.37.27.17.010 010.1948.58.39.210.411.712.210.310.49.89.28.18.18.29.19.99.59.09.49.910.09.910.010.210.79.49.310.510.210.410.19.09.69.89.79.69.09.09.39.010.21 Unemployed as percent <strong>of</strong> civilian labor force in group specified.2 Data for 1949 and 1951-54 are for April; 1950, for March.Note.—Data relate to persons 16 years <strong>of</strong> age and over.See footnote 6 and Note, Table B-33.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Labor, Bureau <strong>of</strong> Labor Statistics.314


TABLE B-41.—Civilian unemployment rate by demographic characteristic, 1950-93[Percent; lmonthly data seasonally adjusted]Year or monthAllcivilianworkersWhiteTotalMalesTotal16-19years20yearsandoverFemalesTotal16-19years20yearsandoverBlack and o<strong>the</strong>r or blackTotalMalesTotal16-19years20yearsandoverFemalesTotal16-19years20yearsandoverBlack and o<strong>the</strong>r195019511952195319541955195619571958195919601961196219631964196519661967196819691970197119724.53.84.47.26.45.54.64.56.16.58.88.86.46.16.05.44.74.54.86.46.96.26.86.96.96.87.17.26.96.97.06.86.76.66.46.46.56.46.36.36.46.26.16.35.65.88.46.15.74.19.28.58.97.310.89.49.411.911.011.210.79.28.79.18.37.89.310.911.419721973197419751976197719781979198019811982198319841985....:198619871988198919901991199219931992: Jan...Feb...Mar..Apr...May..June.July..Aug..Sept.Oct..Nov..Dec.1993: Jan..Feb..Mar.feJuneJuly.Aug.SeptOct..Nov.Dec.5.64.95.68.57.77.16.15.87.17.69.79.67.57.27.06.25.55.35.56.77.46.87.17.47.37.37.57.77.57.57.57.37.37.37.17.07.07.06.96.96.86.76.76.76.56.45.14.35.07.87.06.25.25.16.36.78.68.46.56.26.05.34.74.54.76.06.56.06.36.56.56.46.56.76.66.66.66.46.36.46.26.16.16.16.16.16.05.95.86.15.65.613.411.310.511.515.714.014.015.713.715.914.712.910.510.710.110.013.715.114.214.212.313.518.317.315.013.513.916.217.921.720.216.816.516.315.513.913.714.217.518.417.617.219.020.617.218.620.818.618.519.515.717.617.517.917.817.118.517.218.417.717.716.817.917.716.93.63.03.56.25.44.73.73.65.35.67.87.95.75.45.34.84.13.94.35.76.35.66.26.36.26.36.56.56.36.36.36.36.16.05.85.85.95.75.75.75.85.65.55.75.05.210.49.19.79.512.712.012.714.812.815.114.914.012.111.512.111.513.415.114.214.213.014.517.416.415.914.414.014.816.619.018.315.214.814.913.412.311.512.615.215.714.615.015.415.715.014.718.716.515.115.714.816.815.215.015.315.514.516.314.013.414.014.316.013.313.44.94.35.17.56.86.25.25.05.65.97.36.95.85.75.44.64.14.04.14.95.45.15.25.35.45.45.25.45.75.65.65.55.25.65.45.25.15.25.15.35.15.05.05.35.14.910.38.87.98.313.711.510.712.810.910.58.97.46.36.05.65.37.39.18.914.413.415.018.426.825.224.026.822.027.324.323.321.323.922.121.425.028.829.79.98.47.47.612.710.59.611.710.09.27.76.04.94.33.93.75.67.36.9Black20.619.222.820.228.427.724.829.230.234.731.631.731.329.628.727.634.535.438.48.47.77.86.49.58.38.310.69.69.49.07.56.67.16.35.86.98.710.49.410.514.814.014.012.812.314.315.618.919.515.915.114.513.011.711.411.312.414.112.913.614.013.913.814.614.414.414.313.814.214.014.214.113.313.513.712.913.312.812.512.511.912.511.59.38.09.814.813.713.311.811.414.515.720.120.316.415.314.812.711.711.511.812.915.213.814.815.315.214.515.515.515.515.515.115.614.715.214.613.914.915.014.014.113.413.413.712.613.812.131.727.833.138.137.539.236.734.237.540.748.948.842.741.039.334.432.731.932.136.542.040.136.740.437.142.343.146.642.944.043.643.043.541.539.739.544.146.840.238.837.934.939.740.639.238.87.06.07.412.511.410.79.39.312.413.517.818.114.313.212.911.110.110.010.411.513.412.113.213.513.812.813.813.413.713.713.313.812.813.412.912.213.012.712.212.611.812.012.111.012.310.511.811.111.314.814.314.913.813.314.015.617.618.615.414.914.213.211.711.410.811.913.012.012.512.812.713.113.713.413.313.112.512.813.313.213.712.612.112.411.912.412.311.611.411.111.311.040.536.137.441.041.643.440.839.139.842.247.148.242.639.239.234.932.033.030.036.137.237.534.937.134.634.440.934.938.933.541.441.137.737.038.538.440.143.238.744.834.732.032.332.839.735.29.08.68.812.211.712.311.210.911.913.415.416.513.513.112.411.610.49.89.610.511.710.611.311.411.511.912.112.211.911.910.811.311.911.912.311.210.610.910.410.711.010.510.210.09.79.71 Unemployed as percent <strong>of</strong> civilian labor force in group specified.Note.-See Note, Table B-40.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Labor, Bureau <strong>of</strong> Labor Statistics.315


TABLE B-42.—Unemployment by duration and reason, 1950-93[Thousands <strong>of</strong> persons, except as noted; monthly data seasonally adjusted 1 ]Duration <strong>of</strong> unemploymentReason for unemploymentYear or monthUnemploymentLessthan5weeks5-14weeks15-26weeks27weeksandoverAverage(mean)duration(weeks)Medianduration(weeks)TotalJob losersOnlay<strong>of</strong>fO<strong>the</strong>rJobleaversReentrantsNewentrants19501951195219531954195519561957195819591960196119621963196419651966.196719681969197019711972197319741975197619771978197919801981...1982198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931992: Jan...FebMar....AprMay....June...July ....AugSeptOctNovDec1993:JanFebMarMay"!JuneJulyAugSeptOctNovDec3,2882,0551,8831,8343,5322,8522,7502,8594,6023,7403,8524,7143,9114,0703,7863,3662,8752,9752,8172,8324,0935,0164,8824,3655,1567,9297,4066,9916,2026,1377,6378,27310,67810,7178,5398,3128,2377,4256,7016,5286,8748,4269,3848,7349,0199,2909,2909,2479,5029,7719,5959,5909,5349,2109,3139,3149,0468,9588,8788,9548,8958,8698,7328,6428,5408,6398,3308,2371,4501,1771,1351,1421,6051,3351,4121,4081,7531,5851,7191,8061,6631,7511,6971,6281,5731,6341,5941,6292,1392,2452,2422,2242,6042,9402,8442,9192,8652,9503,2953,4493,8833,5703,3503,4983,4483,2463,0843,1743,1693,3803,2703,1603,3263,1013,3283,2323,2973,4753,3453,3413,3253,1943,1823,0403,2623,2323,1483,3093,2423,2323,2233,0463,0523,1562,9463,0631,0555745164821,1168158058911,3961,1141,1761,3761,1341,2311,1179837798938108271,2901,5851,4721,3141,5972,4842,1962,1321,9231,9462,4702,5393,3112,9372,4512,5092,5572,1962,0071,9782,2012,7242,7602,5222,7522,9392,7072,7412,7052,7602,7622,7742,8252,6052,7992,6742,5432,5492,5832,5372,5262,7582,5432,6082,4572,4912,4012,2474251661481324953663013217854695037285345354914042872712562424286686014835741,3031,0189137667061,0521,1221,7081,6521,1041,0251,0459438017308091,2251,4241,2741,4241,4891,4241,3221,4071,5121,4461,4721,3531,3841,3991,5381,3721,2841,2751,3111,2701,2571,2581,2591,2971,2841,2161,15035713784783173362322396675714548045855534823512391771561332355195663433811,2031,3481,0286485358201,1621,7762,5591,6341,2801,1871,0408096466951,0981,9301,7781,6001,7051,7841,7841,9792,1422,1042,0432,0832,0631,9252,0041,9211,8901,8351,6751,7761,7681,7491,7411,7501,7461,7551,71412.19.78.48.011.813.011.310.513.914.412.815.614.714.013.311.810.48.78.47.88.611.312.010.09.814.215.814.311.910.811.913.715.620.018.215.615.014.513.511.912.113.817.918.116.216.817.217.518.118.418.318.218.319.118.119.018.518.217.717.717.817.817.918.318.418.418.918.22.34.54.44.96.36.25.25.28.48.27.05.95.46.56.98.710.17.96.86.96.55.94.85.46.98.88.48.28.38.28.69.08.88.78.99.19.29.09.38.68.48.48.58.38.38.38.48.98.38.58.21,2291,0701,0171,8112,3232,1081,6942,2424,3863,6793,1662,5852,6353,9474,2676,2686,2584,4214,1394,0333,5663,0922,9833,3224,6085,2914,7694,9485,3575,3045,2545,4945,5285,3755,3165,3595,3745,1835,0764,9344,7994,8564,8624,7524,8454,8724,8644,6994,7794,4444,4423943343396757355824727461,6711,0508657128511,4881,4302,1271,7801,1711,1571,0909438518501,0181,2791,2461,1041,2571,2951,2491,2561,2011,3021,2621,2041,3391,2181,1711,1801,0721,0811,0961,0681,1441,1311,1831,1901,1121,2169631,0608367366781,1371,5881,5261,2211,4952,7142,6282,3001,8731,7842,4592,8374,1414,4783,2502,9822,9432,6232,2412,1332,3053,3294,0453,6643,6914,0624,0553,9984,2934,2264,1134,1124,0204,1564,0123,8963,8623,7183,7603,7943,6083,7143,6893,6743,5873,5633,4813,3824384314365505906416837688279039098748808919238408308238771,0159659831,0241,0149799759469859089149989871,0111,0151,0709728949709788341,0201,0619909609409158829269579609329459099651,2281,4721,4561,3401,4631,8921,9281,9631,8571,8061,9272,1022,3842,4122,1842,2562,1601,9741,8091,8431,8832,0872,2282,1452,2732,1582,2122,1482,1462,2512,2882,2672,2972,2202,2052,2702,2952,2812,0592,1872,2372,2012,1172,0812,0752,0842,0842,0183964074135046306776496818238959538858178729811,1851,2161,1101,0391,0299208166776547538908747998498248368481,0289729479437659339399508999229208908948708348438398337971 Because <strong>of</strong> independent seasonal adjustment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> various series, detail will not add to totals.2 Data for 1967 by reason for unemployment are not strictly comparable with those for later years and <strong>the</strong> total by reason is notequal to total unemployment.Note.—Data relate to persons 16 years <strong>of</strong> age and over.See footnote 6 and Note, Table B-33.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Labor, Bureau <strong>of</strong> Labor Statistics.316


TABLE B-43.—Unemployment insurance programs, selected data, 1962-93All programsState programsYear or monthCoveredemployment1Insuredunemployment(weeklyaverage)^ 3Totalbenefitspaid(millions<strong>of</strong>dollars) 2 4InitialclaimsInsuredunemploymentExhaustions5Insuredunemploymentaspercent<strong>of</strong>coveredemploymentBenefits paidTotal(millions<strong>of</strong>dollars) 4Averageweeklycheck(dollars) 6ThousandsWeekly average; thousands19621963196419651966196719681969197019711972197319741975197619771978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921993 "...47,77648,43449,63751,58054,73956,34257,97759,99959,52659,37566,45869,89772,45171,03773,45976,41988,80492,06292,65993,30091,62891,89896,47499,186101,099103,933107,157109,926111,498109,6131 110,1671,9467 1,9731,7531,4501,1291,2701,1871,1772,0702,6082,1921,7932,5584,9373,8463,3082,6452,5923,8373,4104,5923,7742,5602,6992,7392,3692,1352,2052,5753,4063,3482,8453,145.13,025.92,749.22,360.41,890.92,221.52,191.02,298.64,209.36,154.05,491.14,517.36,933.916,802.412,344.810,998.99,006.99,401.316,175.415,287.123,774.820,206.213,109.615,056.316,292.514,501.013,694.414,957.018,744.626,716.79 26,487.59 22,548.31,7837 1,8061,6051,3281,0611,2051,1111,1011,8052,1501,8481,6322,2623,9862,9912,6552,3592,4343,3503,0474,0593,3952,4752,6172,6432,3002,0812,1582,5223,3423,2452,7513027 2982682322032262012002962952612473634783863753463884884605834383773973783283103303884474083404.44.33.83.02.32.52.22.13.44.13.52.73.56.04.63.93.32.93.93.54.63.92.82.92.82.42.02.12.43.23.12.62,675.42,774.72,522.12,166.01,771.32,092.32,031.62,127.93,848.54,957.04,471.04,007.65,974.911,754.78,974.58,357.27,717.28,612.913,761.113,262.120,649.517,762.812,594.714,130.815,329.313,606.812,564.713,760.317,356.024,525.723,893.520,186.134.5635.2735.9237.1939.7541.2543.4346.1750.3454.0256.7659.0064.2570.2375.1678.7983.6789.6798.95106.70119.34123.59123.47128.14135.65140.55144.97151.73161.56169.88173.64179.611992-. JanFebMar....AprMay....June...July....Aug....Sept..OctNovDec1993: JanFeb....Mar...Apr....May...June..July ...Aug...Sept..Oct....Nov....Dec ".4,2114,2144,1163,6393,2023,1483,1243,1202,8202,5422,6763,0713,4003,3553,4052,9392,6042,8122,6602,7252,4262,3302,5692,7982,807.82,555.72,750.12,477.12,086.02,058.42,129.51,978.01,861.01,682.61,681.02,131.22,162.72,109.82,456.42,034.91,696.81,882.91,750.11,814.31,616.91,472.61,709.72,014.53,3503,3263,3373,3403,3143,2793,3043,1783,1683,0352,93?2,7832,7152,6402,7012,7642,7702,8132,8322,7962,8102,8062,7802,7104484524404134084144333874023653593413533433623473413433523273283443393283.23.13.23.23.23.13.23.03.02.92.82.72.62.52.62.62.62.72.72.72.72.72.62.62,723.82,476.22,664.12,397.91,946.01,983.22,049.01,899.51,778.11,601.01,598.72,035.32,075.52,024.32,361.51,958.01,631.51,811.01,684.31,746.31,552.21,402.31,609.11,904.6171.65173.39173.87173.88173.70173.22171.51173.95174.09174.86175.55175.49177.36179.47180.70180.50180.52179.88178.29179.71179.61180.45180.07179.17**Monthly data are seasonally adjusted.1 Includes persons under <strong>the</strong> State, UCFE (Federal employee, effective January 1955), and RRB (Railroad Retirement Board) programs.Beginning October 1958, also includes <strong>the</strong> UCX program (unemployment compensation for ex-servicemembers).2 Includes State, UCFE, RR, UCX, UCV (unemployment compensation for veterans, October 1952-January 1960), and SRA(Servicemen's Readjustment Act, September 1944-September 1951) programs. Also includes Federal and State extended benefitprograms. Does not include FSB (Federal supplemental benefits), SUA (special unemployment assistance), Federal SupplementalCompensation, and Emergency Unemployment Compensation programs, except as noted in footnote 9.3 Covered workers who have completed at least 1 week <strong>of</strong> unemployment.4 Annual data are net amounts and monthly data are gross amounts.5 Individuals receiving final payments in benefit year.6 For total unemployment only.7 Programs include Puerto Rican sugarcane workers for initial claims and insured unemployment beginning July 1963.8 Latest data available for all programs combined. Workers covered by State programs account for about 97 percent <strong>of</strong> wage andsalary earners.9 Including Emergency Unemployment Compensation and Federal Supplemental Compensation, total benefits paid for 1992 and 1993would be (in millions <strong>of</strong> dollars): for 1992, 40,275.2 and, for 1993, p34,484.8.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Labor, Employment and Training Administration.151-444 0 - 9 4 - 1 1317


TABLE B-44.—Employees on nonagricultural payrolls, by major industry, 1946-93[Thousands <strong>of</strong> persons; monthly data seasonally adjusted]Soods-producing industriesYear or monthTotalTotalMiningTotalManufacturingDurablegoodsConstructionNondurablegoods194619471948194919501951195219531954195519561957195819591960196119621963196419651966196719681969197019711972197319741975197619771978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921993"1992 JanFebMarAprMayJuneJulyAugSeptOctNovDec1993 JanFebMarAprMayJuneJulyAugSeptOct .Nov pDec"4165243^85744,86643,75445,19747,81948,79350,20248,99050,64152,36952,85351,32453,26854,18953,99955,54956,65358,28360,76563,90165,80367,89770,38470,88071,21473,67576,79078,26576,94579,38282,47186,69789,82390,40691,15289,54490,15294,40897,38799,344101,958105,210107,895109,419108,256108,519110,171108,051108,045108,164108,347108,470108,454108,605108,615108,674108,789108,921109,079109,235109,539109,565109,820110,058110,101110,338110,305110,502110,664110,866111,04917 24818]50918,77417,56518,50619,95920,19821,07419,75120,51321,10420,96419,51320,41120,43419,85720,45120,64021,00521,92623,15823,30823,73724,36123,57822,93523,66824,89324,79422,60023,35224,34625,58526,46125,65825,49723,81223,33024,71824,84224,53324,67425,12525,25424,90523,74523,14222,97423,31023,26623,26723,25123,23723,17223,16023,07323,01222,99522,99522,98523,00123,06923,01622,98023,00622,94122,94822,90322,88622,93422,99223,0028629559949309019298988667917928228287517327126726506356346326276136066196236096286426977527798138519581,0271,1391,1289529669271111117136927096896315996536496456426376306286236166186166136116006006006025965955925965965946031 6832^0092,1982,1942,3642,6372,6682,6592,6462,8393,0392,9622,8173,0042,9262,8592,9483,0103,0973,2323,3173,2483,3503,5753,5883,7043,8894,0974,0203,5253,5763,8514,2294,4634,3464,1883,9043,9464,3804,6684,8104,9585,0985,1715,1204,6504,4714,5734,5064,4684,4854,4854,4914,4694,4594,4594,4474,4664,4624,4594,4544,5154,4814,5174,5774,5744,5934,5934,5924,6294,6634,66214 70315^54515,58214,44115,24116,39316,63217,54916,31416,88217,24317,17415,94516,67516,79616,32616,85316,99517,27418,06219,21419,44719,78120,16719,36718,62319,15120,15420,07718,32318,99719,68220,50521,04020,28520,17018,78018,43219,37219,24818,94718,99919,31419,39119,07618,40618,04017,80218,15118,14918,13718,12418,10918,07318,07317,99117,94917,91117,91717,91317,93617,95417,93517,86317,82717,77117,76017,71817,69817,70917,73517,7377 7858,'3588,2987,4628,0669,0599,32010,0809,1019,5119,8029,8258,8019,3429,4299,0419,4509,5869,78510,37411,25011,40811,59411,86211,17610,60411,02211,86311,89710,66211,05111,57012,24512,73012,15912,08211,01410,70711,47611,45811,19511,15411,36311,39411,10910,56910,23710,04710,32810,33610,32410,30410,28610,26010,23610,19210,16410,13510,14210,13610,15210,16310,14410,09010,04710,0119,9969,9749,9749,98810,01310,0276 9187,1877,2856,9797,1757,3347,3137,4687,2137,3707,4427,3517,1447,3337,3677,2857,4037,4107,4897,6887,9638,0398,1878,3048,1908,0198,1298,2918,1817,6617,9468,1128,2598,3108,1278,0897,7667,7257,8967,7907,7527,8457,9517,9977,9687,8377,8047,7557,8237,8137,8137,8207,8237,8137,8377,7997,7857,7767,7757,7777,7847,7917,7917,7737,7807,7607,7647,7447,7247,7217,7227,710Note.—Data in Tables B-44 and B-45 are based on reports from employing establishments and relate to full- and part-time wage andsalary workers in nonagricultural establishments who received pay for any part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pay period which includes <strong>the</strong> 12th <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> month.Not comparable with labor force data (Tables B-33 through B-42), which include proprietors, self-employed persons, domestic servants,See next page for continuation <strong>of</strong> table.318


TABLE B-44.—Employees on nonagricultural payrolls, by major industry, 1946-93—Continued[Thousands <strong>of</strong> persons; monthly data seasonally adjusted]Service-producing industriesYear or monthTotalTransportationandpublicutilitiesWholesaletradeRetailtradeFinance,insurance,and realestateServicesTotalGovernmentFederalState andlocal194619471948194919501951195219531954195519561957195819591960196119621963196419651966196719681969197019711972197319741975197619771978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921993 P.1992: JanFebMar..AprMay..June.July..Aug..Sept.OctNov..Dec..1993:JanFebMar..AprMay.JuneJuly.Aug.SeptOct..NovDec24,40425,34826,09226,18926,69127,86028,59529,12829,23930,12831,26631,88931,81132,85733,75534,14235,09836,01337,27838,83940,74342,49544,16046,02347,30248,27850,00751,89753,47154,34556,03058,12561,11363,36364,74865,65565,73266,82169,69072,54474,81177,28480,08682,64284,51484,51185,37787,19784,74184,77984,89785,09685,23385,28285,44585,54285,66285,79485,92686,09486,23486,47086,54986,84087,05287,16087,39087,40287,61687,73087,87488,0474,0614,1664,1894,0014,0344,2264,2484,2904,0844,1414,2444,2413,9764,0114,0043,9033,9063,9033,9514,0364,1584,2684,3184,4424,5154,4764,5414,6564,7254,5424,5824,7134,9235,1365,1465,1655,0814,9525,1565,2335,2475,3625,5145,6255,7935,7625,7095,7105,7175,7195,7165,7135,7115,7115,7075,7015,7045,6995,6995,7075,7195,7255,7245,7205,7195,7115,7095,6905,6925,6935,7035,7162,2982,4782,6122,6102,6432,7352,8212,8622,8752,9343,0273,0372,9893,0923,1533,1423,2073,2583,3473,4773,6083,7003,7913,9194,0064,0144,1274,2914,4474,4304,5624,7234,9855,2215,2925,3755,2955,2835,5685,7275,7615,8486,0306,1876,1736,0816,0456,1146,0446,0406,0426,0416,0456,0426,0376,0376,0376,0526,0616,0626,0866,0976,1036,1106,1256,1106,1266,1076,1176,1226,1286,1386,0776,4776,6596,6546,7437,0077,1847,3857,3607,6017,8317,8487,7618,0358,2388,1958,3598,5208,8129,2399,6379,90610,30810,78511,03411,33811,82212,31512,53912,63013,19313,79214,55614,97215,01815,17115,15815,58716,51217,31517,88018,42219,02319,47519,60119,28419,34619,73419,22919,25819,26819,32519,35719,34419,36019,35919,38019,40219,40519,46019,52319,62919,60419,64819,70219,75119,79019,79519,83619,84619,83319,8651,6751,7281,8001,8281,8881,9562,0352,1112,2002,2982,3892,4382,4812,5492,6282,6882,7542,8302,9112,9773,0583,1853,3373,5123,6453,7723,9084,0464,1484,1654,2714,4674,7244,9755,1605,2985,3405,4665,6845,9486,2736,5336,6306,6686,7096,6466,5716,6056,5806,5816,5766,5776,5776,5696,5596,5586,5656,5706,5696,5756,5786,5776,5746,5856,5886,5906,6046,6026,6166,6326,6546,6684,6975,0255,1815,2395,3565,5475,6995,8355,9696,2406,4976,7086,7657,0877,3787,6197,9828,2778,6609,0369,49810,04510,56711,16911,54811,79712,27612,85713,44113,89214,55115,30216,25217,11217,89018,61519,02119,66420,74621,92722,95724,11025,50426,90727,93428,33629,05330,19328,64528,64328,71528,83328,92528,99629,11129,17829,24729,36129,43029,52429,57329,66529,75629,97730,09930,17530,32030,38130,43330,53430,65130,7195,5955,4745,6505,8566,0266,3896,6096,6456,7516,9147,2787,6167,8398,0838,3538,5948,8909,2259,59610,07410,78411,39111,83912,19512,55412,88113,33413,73214,17014,68614,87115,12715,67215,94716,24116,03115,83715,86916,02416,39416,69317,01017,38617,77918,30418,40218,65318,84118,52618,53818,58018,60718,61818,62018,67118,70918,72918,71018,76218,76618,75518,77718,78818,80018,81918,82318,84118,82718,92218,90318,90518,9412,2541,8921,8631,9081,9282,3022,4202,3052,1882,1872,2092,2172,1912,2332,2702,2792,3402,3582,3482,3782,5642,7192,7372,7582,7312,6962,6842,6632,7242,7482,7332,7272,7532,7732,8662,7722,7392,7742,8072,8752,8992,9432,9712,9883,0852,9662,9692,9142,9822,9822,9862,9822,9802,9732,9622,9612,9662,9452,9432,9682,9452,9442,9382,9232,9122,9012,8962,9062,9012,9012,8932,9023,3413,5823,7873,9484,0984,0874,1884,3404,5634,7275,0695,3995,6485,8506,0836,3156,5506,8687,2487,6968,2208,6729,1029,4379,82310,18510,64911,06811,44611,93712,13812,39912,91913,17413,37513,25913,09813,09613,21613,51913,79414,06714,41514,79115,21915,43615,68315,92715,54415,55615,59415,62515,63815,64715,70915,74815,76315,76515,81915,79815,81015,83315,85015,87715,90715,92215,94515,92116,02116,00216,01216,039Note (cont'd).—which count persons as employed when <strong>the</strong>y are not at work because <strong>of</strong> industrial disputes, bad wea<strong>the</strong>r, etc., evenif <strong>the</strong>y are not paid for <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong>f; and which are based on a sample <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> working-age population. For description and details <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>various establishment data, see "Employment and Earnings."Source-. Department <strong>of</strong> Labor, Bureau <strong>of</strong> Labor Statistics.319


TABLE B-45.—Hours and earnings in private nonagricultural industries, 1959-93 1[Monthly data seasonally adjusted, except as noted]Year or monthAverage weekly hoursTotalprivateManufacturingTntal1OI3IOvertimeAverage hourly earningsTotal privateCurrentdollars1QOOIDOL.ftf.1QOIlars2Manufacturing(currentdollars)Average weekly earnings, total privateCurrentdollarsLevel1982dollars 2Percent changefrnmirom ycaiearlier 3Currentdollars1QQOL)iocdollars219591960196119621963196419651966196719681969197019711972197319741975197619771978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921993 "1992:JanFebMarAprMayJuneJulyAugSeptOctNovDec1993:JanFebMarAprMay....JuneJulyAugSept....OctNov "..Dec "..39.038.638.638.738.838.738.838.638.037.837.737.136.937.036.936.536.136.136.035.835.735.335.234.835.035.234.934.834.834.734.634.534.334.434.534.234.534.534.334.534.334.334.634.234.434.634.334.534.434.234.434.734.434.534.734.334.534.634.640.339.739.840.440.540.741.241.440.640.740.639.839.940.540.740.039.540.140.340.440.239.739.838.940.140.740.540.741.041.141.040.840.741.041.440.841.041.141.141.241.141.141.141.041.141.241.241.441.441.241.541.441.241.441.441.541.641.741.72.72.52.42.82.83.13.63.93.43.63.63.02.93.53.83.32.63.13.53.63.32.82.82.33.03.43.33.43.73.93.83.63.63.84.13.63.73.83.84.03.83.83.83.63.83.93.94.04.24.04.24.14.04.04.14.14.34.44.4$2.022.092.142.222.282.362.462.562.682.853.043.233.453.703.944.244.534.865.255.696.166.667.257.688.028.328.578.768.989.289.6610.0110.3210.5810.8310.4510.4910.5210.5110.5410.5610.5710.6310.6210.6510.6910.6810.7310.7410.7810.7710.8210.8110.8110.8610.8610.9210.9310.95$6.696.796.887.077.177.337.527.627.727.897.988.038.218.538.558.288.128.248.368.408.177.787.697.687.797.807.777.817.737.697.647.527.457.427.397.437.447.437.417.427.427.407.437.417.407.417.407.407.387.397.367.397.387.377.397.397.407.407.40$2.192.262.322.392.452.532.612.712.823.013.193.353.573.824.094.424.835.225.686.176.707.277.998.498.839.199.549.739.9110.1910.4810.8311.1811.4611.7611.2911.3511.3911.4211.4411.4511.4611.5011.5111.5211.5511.5811.6111.6411.6611.7111.7111.7211.7211.7711.8411.8311.8811.94$78.7880.6782.6085.9188.4691.3395.4598.82101.84107.73114.61119.83127.31136.90145.39154.76163.53175.45189.00203.70219.91235.10255.20267.26280.70292.86299.09304.85312.50322.02334.24345.35353.98363.95373.64357.39361.91362.94360.49363.63362.21362.55367.80363.20366.36369.87366.32370.19369.46368.68370.49375.45371.86372.95376.84372.50376.74378.18378.87$260.86261.92265.59273.60278.18283.63291.90294.11293.49298.42300.81298.08303.12315.44315.38302.27293.06297.37300.96300.89291.66274.65270.63267.26272.52274.73271.16271.94269.16266.79264.22259.47255.40255.22254.87254.01256.67256.49254.05255.90254.36253.89257.02253.45254.59256.50253.68255.30253.92252.87253.24256.28253.83254.40256.53253.57255.24255.87255.994.92.42.44.03.03.24.53.53.15.86.44.66.27.56.26.45.77.37.77.88.06.98.54.75.04.32.11.92.53.03.83.32.52.82.72.83.83.72.73.21.62.53.11.12.53.31.93.42.22.02.83.42.62.92.83.03.02.23.14.2.41.43.01.72.02.9.8-.21.7.8-.91.74.1-.0-4.2-3.01.51.2-.0-3.1-5.8-1.5-1.22.0.8-1.3.3-1.0-.9-1.0-1.8-1.6.1-.1.41.0.7-.2.4-1.3-.5.0-1.8-.6.3-1.0.2-.9-1.0-.3.2-.2.2.1.5.4-.3.61 For production or nonsupervisory workers; total includes private industry groups shown in Table B-44.2 Current dollars divided by <strong>the</strong> consumer price index for urban wage earners and clerical workers on a 1982 = 100 base.3 Percent changes are based on data that are not seasonally adjusted.Note.—See Note, Table B-44.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Labor, Bureau <strong>of</strong> Labor Statistics.320


TABLE B-46.—Employment cost index, private industry, 1979-93Total privateGoods-producingService-producingManufacturingNonmanufacturingYear and monthTotalcompensationWagesandsalariesBenefits1TotalcompensationWagesandsala-Benefits1TotalcompensationWagesandsalariesfits" 61 "TotalcompensationWagesandsalariesBenefits1TotalcompensationWagesandsala- fits 1Index, June 1989=100; not seasonally adjustedDecember:1979198019811982198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931992: MarJuneSeptDec1993: MarJuneSeptDec59.164.871.275.880.184.087.390.193.197.6102.3107.0111.7115.6119.8113.1113.9114.8115.6117.1118.0119.1119.861.567.173.077.681.484.888.391.194.198.0102.0106.1110.0112.9116.4110.9111.6112.2112.9113.9114.6115.7116.453.259.466.671.476.781.784.687.590.596.7102.6109.4116.2122.2128.3118.6119.7121.2122.2125.2126.7127.7128.360.766.773.377.881.685.488.291.093.897.9102.1107.0111.9116.1120.6113.5114.3115.3116.1118.0119.1119.9120.663.769.775.780.083.286.489.492.395.298.2102.0105.8109.7112.8116.1110.7111.4112.1112.8113.8114.5115.3116.154.660.568.273.278.383.285.788.390.997.3102.6109.9116.7123.4130.3119.7120.6122.3123.4127.3129.0130.0130.357.763.369.574.178.982.986.689.392.697.3102.3107.0111.6115.2119.3112.8113.6114.4115.2116.4117.3118.5119.360.065.371.175.980.283.787.790.393.497.8102.2106.3110.2113.0116.6111.1111.7112.3113.0113.9114.7115.9116.651.958.465.169.675.280.483.686.890.296.1102.6109.0115.7121.2126.7117.7118.8120.4121.2123.4124.6125.7126.760.166.072.576.980.885.087.890.793.497.6102.0107.2112.2116.5121.3114.0114.7115.7116.5118.6119.7120.6121.363.068.974.979.182.586.189.292.195.298.1101.9106.2110.3113.7117.3111.5112.2112.9113.7114.7115.5116.3117.354.259.967.572.477.582.785.087.589.896.6102.3109.5116.1122.6130.0119.3120.1121.5122.6126.8128.6129.7130.058.564.270.475.179.683.487.089.792.997.5102.3106.9111.5115.1119.0112.7113.5114.4115.1116.3117.2118.4119.060.866.272.176.881.084.288.090.693.797.8102.2106.1109.8112.6116.0110.7111.3111.9112.6113.4114.2115.4116.052.559.166.170.676.281.184.487.591.096.8102.8109.3116.2122.0127.4118.2119.4121.0122.0124.2125.5126.5127.4Index, June 1989=100; seasonally adjusted1992: MarJuneSeptDec1993: MarJunesept :::::Dec112.9113.8114.7115.7116.8117.9118.9119.9110.9111.6112.1113.0113.9114.6115.6116.5118.2119.5121.3122.9124.7126.4127.7129.1113.3114.1115.2116.3117.7118.8119.8120.7110.7111.4112.1112.8113.8114.5115.3116.1119.1120.4122.3124.3126.7128.7130.0131.3112.7113.5114.3115.3116.2117.2118.3119.4111.1111.7112.1113.1113.9114.7115.8116.7117.4118.7120.4121.7123.1124.5125.7127.2113.7114.7115.7116.9118.3119.6120.6121.7111.5112.2112.9113.7114.7115.5116.3117.3118.6119.8121.5123.7126.0128.3129.7131.1112.6113.5114.3115.3116.2117.2118.3119.2110.7111.3111.8112.7113.4114.2115.3116.1117.9119.2121.0122.5123.9125.3126.5127.9Percent change from 12 months earlier, not seasonally adjustedDecember:198019811982198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931992: MarJuneSeptDec1993: MarJuneSeptDec9.69.96.55.74.93.93.23.34.84.84.64.43.53.64.23.73.43.53.53.63.73.69.18.86.34.94.24.13.23.34.14.14.03.72.63.13.43.02.72.62.72.73.13.111.712.17.27.46.53.53.43.46.96.16.66.25.25.06.35.55.25.25.65.85.45.09.99.96.14.94.73.33.23.14.44.34.84.63.83.94.64.13.93.84.04.24.03.99.48.65.74.03.83.53.23.13.23.93.73.72.82.93.53.13.12.82.82.82.92.910.812.77.37.06.33.03.02.97.05.47.16.25.75.67.05.95.65.76.37.06.35.69.79.86.66.55.14.53.13.75.15.14.64.33.23.64.03.53.13.23.23.33.63.68.88.96.85.74.44.83.03.44.74.54.03.72.53.23.32.82.42.52.52.73.23.212.511.56.98.06.94.03.83.96.56.86.26.14.84.55.75.15.14.84.84.94.44.59.89.86.15.15.23.33.33.04.54.55.14.73.84.15.04.34.03.84.04.44.24.19.48.75.64.34.43.63.33.43.03.94.23.93.13.23.83.53.33.12.92.93.03.210.512.77.37.06.72.82.92.67.65.97.06.05.66.07.36.05.45.66.37.16.76.09.79.76.76.04.84.33.13.65.04.94.54.33.23.43.93.53.23.23.23.33.53.48.98.96.55.54.04.53.03.44.44.53.83.52.63.03.22.72.42.62.42.63.13.012.611.86.87.96.44.13.74.06.46.26.36.35.04.45.65.25.15.05.15.14.54.4Percent change from 3 months earlier, seasonally adjusted1992: MarJuneSeptDec1993: MarJuneSeptDec0.90.7.6.4.8.8.6.9.81.21.11.51.31.51.41.01.11.1.71.01.01.2.9.8.80.9 1.4.6 1.1.6 1.6.6 1.6.9 1.9.6 1.6.7 1.0.7 1.00.8.7.7.9.8.9.9.90.7 1.1.5 1.1.4 1.4.9 1.1.7 1.2.7 1.11.0 1.0.8 1.21.1 1.1 1.3.9 .6 1.0.9 .6 1.41.0 .7 1.81.2 .9 1.91.1.8 .7 1.8.7 1.1.9 .9 1.10.8.8.7.9.8.9.9.80.7 1.0.5 1.1.4 1.5.8 1.2.6 1.1.7 1.11.0 1.0.7 1.11 Employer costs for employee benefits.Note.—<strong>The</strong> employment cost index is a measure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> change in <strong>the</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> labor, free from <strong>the</strong> influence <strong>of</strong> employment shiftsamong occupations and industries.Data exclude farm and household workers.Through December 1981, percent changes are based on unrounded data; <strong>the</strong>reafter changes are based on indexes as published.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Labor, Bureau <strong>of</strong> Labor Statistics.321


TABLE B-47.—Productivity and related data, business sector, 1947-93[1982=100; quarterly data seasonally adjusted]Year nrTear OfquarterOutput per hour<strong>of</strong> all personsBusinesssectorNonfarmbusinesssectorBusinesssectorOutput 1NonfarmbusinesssectorHours <strong>of</strong> allpersons 2BusinesssectorNonfarmbusinesssectorCompensationpert our 3BusinesssectorNonfarmbusinesssectorReal compensationper hour 4BusinesssectorNonfarmbusinesssectorUnit labor costsBusinesssectorNonfarmbusinesssectorImplicit pricedeflator«BusinesssectorNonfarmbusinesssector19471948194919501951195219531954195519561957195819591960196119621963196419651966196719681969197019711972197319741975197619771978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921982: IV1983: IV1984: IV1985: IV1986: IV1987: IV1988: IV1989: IV1990: IV1991:1IIIllIV1992:1IIIllIV1993:1IIIll43 445.346.049.951753.655.356.758.659.361.063.064.665.668.170.573 376.578 680.782.885.385.887.089.892.795.093.295.598 399.9100.599.498.699.9100.0102.3104.8106.3108.5109.6110.7109.9110.7111.8115.5101.1103.1105.4107.0108.3110.6110.9109.7110.5110.9111.6111.8112.8114.1114.8116.0117.1116.6116.6117.650 652.353.456.858 259.860.762.264.364.565.867.669.269.972.274.577180.081883.485.287.787.788.591.394.296.494.596.799.2100.7101.499.999.999.9100 0102.5104.7105.6107.7108.6109.6108.6109.1110.3113.7101.1103.3105.3106.0107.4109.5110.0108.5108.9109.4110.2110.4111.3112.4113.1114.1115.3114.8114.7115.934135.935.338.641142.644.444.047.148.449.048.251.452.253.356.158 762.265 969.370.874.076.275.878.083.088.286.685.089.994.9100.1102.1100.5102.4100.0104.1112.6116.7119.9124.8130.1132.3133.3131.6135.4100.0107.5114.4118.0120.6127.4131.7132.3132.1131.0131.5131.5132.4133.3134.5136.0137.9138.0139.3140.533 535.234.637.940 542.143.843.346.547.948.647.851.051.852.955.758 361.965 769.370.874.076.275.777.983.088.486.784.990 095.0100.5102.5100.8102.4100.0104.4113.0116.8120.1125.0130.6132.7133.5131.8135.4100.0108.1114.8118.2120.8127.6132.5132.7132.2131.2131.7131.8132.6133.3134.4135.9137.9138.1139.5141.078 779.376.677.479 679.680 377.680.481680.376.679.679.778.379.680 081.383 985.885.586.788.887.286.889.592.892.989.091595.099.6102.8101.9102.5100.0101.8107.4109.8110.5113.8117.5120.4120.5117.7117.398.9104.3108.5110.2111.3115.1118.8120.6119.6118.1117.8117.6117.3116.8117.1117.2117.7118.3119.5119.466 367.464.766.769 770.472 169.672.474 273.870.773.774.273.374.875 777.480 383.183.084.486.985.685.388.191.691.887.990 794.499.2102.6101.8102.5100.0101.9107.9110.7111.5115.1119.1122.2122.4119.5119.199.0104.7109.0111.4112.5116.5120.5122.3121.4119.9119.5119.4119.2118.7118.8119.0119.6120.3121.6121.710 411.311.512.313 514.415 415.916.317 418.519.420.221.121.923.023 825.126 027.829.431.834.136.739.141.645.149.654.559 564.370.076.885.093.0100 0103.8108.3113.2118.9123.1128.5133.0140.6147.4154.9102.1105.3109.9115.6120.9125.8130.6134.9143.5144.9146.6148.2150.1152.2153.7156.1157.8159.1160.1161.611312.312.713.514 615.516 316.917.518 619.620.421.322.223.023.924 725.926 728.330.032.334.537.039.441.945.449.954.959 664.470.176.784.993.0100 0104.0108.3112.8118.4122.5127.7131.9139.2146.2153.7102.1105.2109.9115.0120.4125.1129.8133.9142.1143.7145.4147.1148.8150.9152.6154.8156.6157.7158.4159.944 945.246.549.450 252.455 657.058.761763.664.767.068.870 873.375 178.079 782.985.088.389.891.393.195.998.197.097.8100 9102.4103.6102.199.598.7100 0100.6100.6101.5104.7104.6104.8103.5103.8104.5106.5100.6100.5100.7102.4105.6105.1104.7103.4103.5103.6104.2104.7105.2105.8106.0106.9107.3107.1107.0107.749 149.351.554.054 456.359.160.663.165 967.568.270.572.474176.378 080.581 984.386.689.690.892.093.996.898.797.698.4101 1102.5103.7102.099.498.8100 0100.8100.6101.2104.3104.1104.2102.7102.8103.6105.7100.6100.4100.7101.8105.2104.6104.1102.6102.5102.7103.4103.9104.3104.8105.2106.0106.4106.2105.9106.624 024.924.924.726 226.927.828.027.829.330.430.831.332.232.232.632 532.833 134.535.537.339.842.243.544.847.553.157.160 564.369.677.386.293.1100.0101.5103.4106.5109.5112.3116.0121.0127.1131.9134.1101.0102.1104.3108.0111.6113.7117.9123.0129.8130.6131.4132.6133.1133.4133.9134.5134.8136.4137.3137.422 423.623.823.725 225.926.927.127.328.829.830.230.831.831.832.132 132.332 733.935.236.839.441.843.144.547.152.856.860.163.969.176.885.793.1100.0101.5103.4106.8110.0112.8116.5121.5127.6132.6135.1101.0101.9104.4108.5112.2114.3118.0123.4130.5131.3132.0133.2133.7134.3134.9135.6135.8137.4138.2138.023 825.725.425.827 527.828.128.228.929.930.931.332.132.632.833.533 734.135 036.137.238.840.642.444.546.249.053.759.062.466.571.878.385.994.5100.0103.4107.7111.2113.6116.6120.8126.1131.2136.1139.2101.1104.8109.0112.4114.6117.9122.8127.8133.2134.8135.8136.6137.2138.3139.1138.7140.6141.6142.5142.922 524.224.424.826 426.827.527.628.529.530.530.831.832.332.533.133 433.934 635.836.938.640.442.244.345.847.952.858.361.966.171.277.585.694.2100.0104.0107.6111.6114.2117.2121.4126.5131.8137.0140.3101.4105.2109.0112.9115.2118.5123.4128.2134.0135.7136.6137.5138.2139.3140.2139.8141.8142.7143.5144.01 Output refers to gross domestic product originating in <strong>the</strong> sector in 1987 dollars.2 Hours at work <strong>of</strong> all persons engaged in <strong>the</strong> sector, including hours <strong>of</strong> proprietors and unpaid family workers. Estimates basedprimarily on establishment data.3 Wages and salaries <strong>of</strong> employees plus employers' contributions for social insurance and private benefit plans. Also includes anestimate <strong>of</strong> wages, salaries, and supplemental payments for <strong>the</strong> self-employed.4 Hourly compensation divided by <strong>the</strong> consumer price index for all urban consumers.5 Current dollar gross domestic product divided by constant dollar gross domestic product.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Labor, Bureau <strong>of</strong> Labor Statistics.322


TABLE B-48.—Changes in productivity and related data, business sector, 1948-93[Percent change from preceding period; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]Voar nrTear orquarter1948194919501951195219531954195519561957195819591960196119621963196419651966196719681969197019711972197319741975197619771978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921991:1IIIllIV1992:1IIillIV1993:1IIIllOutput per hour<strong>of</strong> all personsBusinessbusinessNonfarmsector sector4.5 3.31.6 2.28.5 6.53.6 2.33.7 2.83.2 1.62.5 2.53.4 3.21.3 .42.8 2.03.2 2.72.5 2.31.6 1.13.8 3.33.5 3.14.1 3.64.3 3.82.7 2.22.8 1.92.6 2.23.0 2.9.6 -.01.4 1.03.3 3.13.2 3.12.5 2.4-1.9 -2.02.4 2.33.0 2.61.7 1.5.6 .7-1.1 -1.4-.8 -.91.3 .9.1 .12.3 2.52.4 2.21.4 .82.1 2.01.0 .81.0 9_ 7 -.9.7 .41.0 1.13.3 3.11.5 1.92.5 2.7.6 .83.7 3.44.7 3.82.5 2.84.2 3.63.8 4.2-1.6 -1.8-.0 -.43.6Nonfarmbusinesssector5.0-1.89.67.03.84.0-1.07.33.01.5-1.76.71.72.15.34.76.26.15.42.24.62.9-.62.96.56.4-1.9-2.05.95.65.82.0-1.71.6-2.44.4 v8.23.42.84.1441.7.6-1.32.7-3.11.5.32.72.13.34.46.0.64.04.4Hours <strong>of</strong> allpersons 2Output 1Businesssector5.2-1.89.56.63.74.1-.97.12.81.3-1.66.51.72.15.14.66.06.05.22.24.52.9-.52.96.46.2-1.8-1.95.85.65.52.0-1.61.9-2.34.18.23.62.84.1431.7.7-1.32.9-3.31.4.12.72.93.44.65.6.53.84.3 3.5Businesssector0.7-3.3.92.8.0.9-3.33.61.5-1.5-4.63.8.1-1.61.6.51.63.22.3-.31.42.4-1.8-.43.23.6.1-422.83.84.93.2-.9.6-2.51.85.62.1.63.0332.5.1-2.3_ 4-4.7-1.1-.5-1.0-1.81.0.41.82.13.8_ iNonfarmbusinesssector1.7-3.93.04.61.02.4-3.43.92.5-.5-4.24.3.6-1.22.11.12.33.83.4-.11.72.9-1.5-.33.34.0.2-423.24.15.03.5-.8.7-2.41.95.92.5.83.2352.6.2-2.4_ 4-4.9-1.1-.6-.7-1.6.5.81.82.54.4.1Compensation perhour 3Businesssector8.61.77.49.86.36.83.32.66.76.64.64.34.34.04.7385.23.87.05.78.17.37.56.46.48.69.810 09.18.08.99.710.79.47.63.84.34.55.03.6443.55.74.95.04.14.84.55.25.74.16.24.63.32.53.9Nonfarmbusinesssector8.63.06.28.75.65.73.33.76.15.74.04.14.43.44.13.54.63.35.95.97.96.87.26.46.58.29.810.08.78.08.99.510.79.67.54.04.14.15.03.5423.35.55.05.14.44.94.64.95.64.75.94.62.91.93.7Real compensationper hour 4Businesssector0.53.06.11.84.36.02.53.05.13.11.73.62.62.93.62.43.92.24.02.63.81.71.71.93.12.3-1.1.83.21.41.2-1.5-2.5-.81.3.6.0.93.1-.12-1.3.3.62.0.42.51.81.92.3.93.41.4-.5-.42.7Ncnfarmbusinesssector0.54.34.8.73.64.92.54.14.52.31.23.42.62.33.02.23.31.72.92.73.51.31.42.03.21.9-1.182.71.41.2-1.7-2.5-.71.2.8-.2.63.1-.21-1.4.1.82.0.62.71.91.62.21.53.11.4-.9-1.02.5Unit labor costsBusinesssectorNonfarmbusinesssector4.0 5.2.1 .8-.9 -.36.0 6.22.6 2.83.5 4.1.7 .8-.7 .55.3 5.63.6 3.71.4 1.31.7 1.72.7 3.3.1 01.2 1.0-.3 -.1.9 .81.1 1.04.1 3.93.1 3.55.0 4.86.7 6.96.1 6.23.0 3.23.1 3.25.9 5.711.9 12.17.5 7.56.0 5.96.3 6.48.2 8.111.0 11.011.5 11.78.0 8.67.4 7.41.5 1.51.9 1.93.0 3.32.8 2.92.5 2.634 324.3 4.35.0 5.13.8 3.91.7 2.02.5 2.52.2 2.23.8 3.71.4 1.5.9 1.71.6 1.81.9 2.2.7 .45.0 4.82.5 2.3.3 -.6Implicit pricedeflator 5Businesssector7.9-1.21.66.71.01.3.42.53.33.21.42.71.5.52.0 .81.12.53.32.94.44.74.34.93.86.19.510.05.86.58.09.19.710.15.83.44.13.32.22.6364.44.13.72.34.83.12.41.73.32.4-1.25.62.72.61.2Nonfarmbusinesssector7.8.81.86.11.62.5.73.23.53.3.93.41.5.62.1.91.42.23.33.34.54.64.55.03.54.510.210.46.36.87.68.910.410.16.14.03.53.72.42.6364.24.23.92.44.92.72.62.23.22.7-1.15.62.52.41.21 Output refers to gross domestic product originating in <strong>the</strong> sector in 1987 dollars.2 Hours at work <strong>of</strong> all persons engaged in <strong>the</strong> sector, including hours <strong>of</strong> proprietors and unpaid family workers. Estimates basedprimarily on establishment data.3 Wages and salaries <strong>of</strong> employees plus employers' contributions for social insurance and private benefit plans. Also includes anestimate <strong>of</strong> wages, salaries, and supplemental payments for <strong>the</strong> self-employed.4 Hourly compensation divided by <strong>the</strong> consumer price index for all urban consumers.5 Current dollar gross domestic product divided by constant dollar gross domestic product.Note.—Percent changes are based on original data and <strong>the</strong>refore may differ slightly from percent changes based on indexes in TableB-47.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Labor, Bureau <strong>of</strong> Labor Statistics.323


PRODUCTION AND BUSINESS ACTIVITYTABLE B-49.—Industrial production indexes, major industry divisions, 1947-93[1987 = 100; monthly data seasonally adjusted]Year or monthTotalindustrialproductionTotalManufacturingDurableNondurableMiningUtilities194719481949195019511952195319541955195619571958195919601961196219631964196519661967196819691970197119721973197419751976 .1977197819791980 .1981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921993".1992: JanFebMarAprMayJuneJulyAugSeptOctNovDec1993:JanFebMarAprJuneJulyAugSeptOct"NovDec pSource: Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Federal Reserve System.111 21223.622.022.320.825.824.228.026.129.127.231.629.629.927.733.731.335.132.535.632.933.330.637.334.538135 238.435.341638 444.040.747 043 551.748.256 352 657.553.660 756 663.559.161456 462.257.368.363.373.868.972.767.966.361.172.467.478.273.382.677.885.780.984.178.885.780.381.976.684.980.992.889.394 491695.394.3100.0 100.0104.4 104.7106.0 106.4106.0 106.1104.1 103.7106.5 106.9111.0 111.9104.5 104.5105.3 105.4105.6 106.1106.3 106.5106.7 107.1106.0 106.5106.8 107.1106 6 107 0106.2 106.8107 5 108 0108.4 108.9108.9 109.2109.3 109.9109 9 110 5110.1 110.81104 1114110.2 111.3110 5 1113110.8 111.6111.0 111.9111.4 112.31 112 1 113 2113.2 114.5114.0 j 115.3i19 920.818.923.025.927.531.127.431.332.432.628.532.833 332.736 338.741447.152 352.955 557.753 353.159.366.264.856.762.668.773.978.375.777.472.776.888.491893.9100.0106.6108.6107.4103.8108.1115.9104.6106.2106.7107.2108.4107.6108.2108 5108.1109 8110.9111.8112.91138114.11150114.9114 6115.4115.7117.0118.3120.1121.722 623.423.025.626.426.928.028.231.332.933.533.737.138 039.141543.846 649.852 954.658161.161163.669.311172.367.774.680.183.584.683.184.582.587.090.891594.9100.0102.3103.7104.4103.5105.4106.8104.4104.6105.3105.5105.4105.2105.7105 2105.2105 8106.4106.0106.4106 4106.6106 9106.9107.2107.0107.3106.5107 0107.6107.455 558.351.757.763.462.864.563.270.574.274.368.171.372.773.175.278.281.484.488.990.694.197.8100 497.899.9100.8100.398.098.9101.5104.6106.6110.0114.3109.3104.8111.9109.0101.0100.0101.3100.0102.0100.497.697.097.596.797.297.498.897.198.597 097.197.697.898.298.395.995.396.497.398.096.495.597.798 297.497.911.713.013.915.818.119.621.322.925.628.130.031.434.536.939.041.944.848.751.755.658.463.168.772 976.481.384.583.584.387.689.992.795.395.994.391.893.697.099.596.3100.0105.0108.7109.9112.2112.0116.0110.2111.0111.4112.0111.2110.0111.2110 4111.2112.7114.7116.8112.81175117.81144112.1114 9116.9117.7115.3114 6115.4116.6324


TABLE B-50.—Industrial production indexes, market groupings, 1947-93[1987 = 100; monthly data seasonally adjusted]Year or monthTotalindustrialproductionFinal productsTotalConsumer goodsTotalAutomotiveproductsO<strong>the</strong>rdurablegoodsNondurablegoodsTotalEquipmentDefenseandspaceIntermediateproductsMaterialsTotalDurableNondurableEner-19471948194919501951195219531954195519561957195819591960196119621963196419651966196719681969197019711972197319741975197619771978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921993 ".1992:JanFebMar....AprMay....June..July...Aug...Sept..OctNov...Dec...1993: Jan....Feb....Mar...Apr....May...June..July...Aug...Sept..Oct".Nov.Dec".22.723.622.325.828.029.131.629.933.735.135.633.337.338.138.441.644.047.051.756.357.560.763.561.462.268.373.872.766.372.478.282.685.784.185.781.984.992.894.495.3100.0104.4106.0106.0104.1106.5111.0104.5105.3105.6106.3106.7106.0106.8106.6106.2107.5108.4108.9109.3109.9110.1110.4110.2110.5110.8111.0111.4112.1113.2114.020.821.520.923.525.427.329.127.629.831.632.531.034.035.135.438.440.642.947.151.653.756.358.156.056.561.365.965.761.866.271.676.179.080.082.180.883.091.094.295.7100.0104.8106.8107.0105.3108.2113.5105.3106.5106.9107.7108.3107.1108.1108.9108.1110.1111.0111.5111.9112.4112.7112.8112.5112.7113.2113.5113.8114.8115.9116.625.426.226.129.729.430.131.931.735.436.737.637.240.942.443.346.248.851.555.558.459.863.465.865.068.874.377.675.272.379.485.188.487.385.385.884.588.892.893.796.8100.0102.9104.0103.4102.8105.2108.1103.2104.0104.7105.4105.8104.0104.9105.1104.4106.4107.1107.5107.6108.5108.6108.1107.3107.3107.7107.8107.4108.6109.6109.821.722.622.528.325.022.528.426.535.228.930.324.130.234.631.638.341.943.954.153.947.456.456.747.760.865.672.462.659.073.284.086.378.559.559.257.571.986.692.795.3100.0106.4108.2100.789.899.4110.690.595.296.599.0102.999.098.899.597.3103.1104.1108.7112.7111.9111.2112.1109.7105.3103.3103.0105.6112.9119.5123.422.823.822.030.426.226.229.627.332.233.933.231.336.036.237.340.543.747.754.159.660.464.769.066.970.881.085.779.369.878.287.491.289.885.186.378.186.294.690.693.9100.0103.0105.2103.699.9105.2111.9102.5103.6104.7105.8107.9104.6106.3104.0104.1104.9107.1107.2109.3110.7111.7112.3111.8110.2113.2112.2112.5113.8114.9114.427.027.727.930.331.332.633.533.936.538.840.141.344.145.547.049.251.454.056.359.062.064.566.767.869.774.276.576.574.980.484.487.887.789.189.689.791.993.494.497.6100.0102.4103.2103.8105.0105.9107.2105.0105.2105.7106.1105.9104.6105.5106.0105.3107.1107.5107.4106.7107.7107.7106.9106.3107.2107.4107.8106.9107.3107.4107.215.015.814.115.321.225.527.624.224.727.128.225.227.728.528.131.333.135.039.646.149.050.451.848.145.049.355.056.852.053.858.864.271.074.678.277.076.889.294.894.5100.0107.6110.9112.1108.9112.7121.2108.3110.1110.2111.1112.0111.6112.7114.3113.5115.4116.7117.2118.1118.0118.7119.7119.9120.4121.2121.6122.9123.8125.:126.614.715.313.414.317.519.820.618.119.622.723.619.922.423.022.324.325.528.532.637.838.640.342.941.339.344.852.454.748.850.656.763.171.573.576.172.971.985.491.193.1100.0110.7115.5116.9115.7123.2137.0116.3118.8119.0120.6122.1121.9123.7126.1125.0127.5129.0129.6131.2131.7133.4134.8135.4136.1137.1137.6139.4140.8142.9144.97.58.89.210.826.537.244.639.335.935.136.736.838.839.940.646.950.649.054.363.772.772.969.458.752.851.350.149.448.549.249.249.551.557.458.565.771.878.989.496.0100.099.7100.198.891.785.978.789.589.088.987.787.286.585.184.584.483.583.282.582.081.580.780.579.578.678.678.077.576.976.676.122.423.622.426.127.427.229.129.032.934.434.433.637.137.438.140.442.745.548.451.453.556.659.658.760.567.671.969.462.669.074.979.181.277.077.075.180.386.288.391.9100.0101.8102.0101.296.597.6100.197.097.297.297.997.997.798.697.096.997.898.198.398.299.399.6100.099.799.4100.4100.6100.4101.0101.8101.925.126.223.928.631.632.135.632.938.939.939.935.941.442.042.045.848.752.658.763.963.367.571.569.070.077.284.582.872.681.287.391.895.491.392.885.188.396.696.695.9100.0105.0106.7106.8105.5107.9112.2106.2106.8107.3107.9108.0107.8108.5107.6107.4108.1109.3110.0110.4110.9110.9111.5111.6112.1112.0112.2112.7113.2114.3115.521.522.119.824.928.328.933.829.235.735.835.830.135.936.335.539.442.145.952.657.955.959.262.356.556.864.273.371.259.368.475.381.485.379.382.173.479.292.192.993.7100.0106.8108.4107.6105.2108.9116.0106.8107.8108.1108.8109.0108.7109.3108.9107.6109.7111.1111.9113.3114.2114.1114.9114.8114.9115.4115.8117.118.2119.7121.725.228.930.230.129.934.234.836.239.241.645.249.653.654.559.964.965.268.074.980.480.871.981.486.789.792.988.790.582.189.293.091.794.4100.0104.4107.1108.0107.1110.9114.0108.8109.9110.9111.2111.5111.5111.5110.7111.7110.7112.0111.5112.4112.1112.8113.8114.1114.8114.2115.2113.8114.4115.5115.352.759.362.763.458.862.363.163.665.869.772.575.880.683.487.291.796.297.1100.8101.598.896.799.0101.1102.2105.0106.2104.3100.798.9103.8103.499.5100.0102.2103.1104.2104.6103.4103.5103.1102.5102.7103.5103.3103.1104.4102.5103.6103.0103.9105.1103.4103.8103.5103.4103.4104.6103.7102.8103.3102.9103.0103.91 Two components—oil and gas well drilling and manufactured homes—are included in total equipment, but not in detail shown.Source: Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Federal Reserve System.325


TABLE B-51.—Industrial production indexes, selected manufactures, 1947-93[1987 = 100; monthly data seasonally adjusted]Durable manufacturesNondurable manufacturesYear or monthTotalPrimarymetalsIronandsteelFabricatedmetalproductsIndustrialandcommercialmachineryandcomputerequipmentElectricaimachineryTransportationequipmentTotalMotorvehiclesandpartsLumberandproductsApparelproductsTextilemillproductsPrintingandpublishingChemicalsandproductsFoods194719481949195019511952.195319541955195619571958195919601961 . .19621963196419651966196719681969197019711972197319741975197619771978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921993 "1992:JanFebMarAprMayJuneJulyAugSeptOctNovDec1993:JanFebMarAprMayJuneJulyAugSeptOct"Nov "Dec "70 273.061.477.384.176 887.070 491.590 987.169 080.780.478.984.691.2102 9113.2120.2111.1115.1123.8115.2109.2122.4138.9134 5107.2119 9121.5130 7133.0110 8117.583.291.0102 4101.893.7100.0108.7107.2106.598 4101.1105.5101.7102.4102.6101.8101.1101.2100.6100.598.0100.5101.6102.4102.8108.0104.2104.4104.2105.7105.3106.2106.0105.0107.1109.1102 1106.891.2112.4125.7110 6127.5991131.8129 3124.693 9108.1109.9104 9109.3119.1135 5148.7153.1141.5146.1159.2148.2135.5150.6171.51661133.5147 1145.1155 3156.5126 0135.186.296.1105.9104.590.8100 0112.7111.2111.5100.6104.7110.5105.5106.4106.5105.6104.8103.8104.7103.8102.0104.1103.6107.4107.0112.9107.6108.4108.1110.9111.9112.1111.1112.4111.1114.637 538.234.442.245.144 049.644 751.051853.147 653.453.452 156.758.562168.373.176.580.681.975.975.682.992.188 476.784 992.796 299.592 591.183.285.593 394.593.8100 0104.2102.899.594 996.7100.994.995.996.696.897.297.197.097.096.597.597.697.899.899.7100.3101.4100.6100.1101.2101.0100.9101.6102.7103.312 012.110.311.614.716 016.714 215.617 917.915 017.517.617 119.220.523 326.230.531.131.333.932.830.535.441.444 138.140 045.150 256.960 665.963.964.380 886.890.3100.0113.0117.3117.6113.7124.8146.8114.7118.1120.0120.9123.2123.8125.7126.9127.9130.6132.8133.8135.0136.7139.6142.8144.2145.4148.5149.9152.1153.7156.2158.8858.88.311.311413 014.913 315.316 516.415 018.219.821024.124.826 231.337.537.739.842.340.540.746.553.052 445.150 758.464 071.373 375.475.980.394 193.194.3100 0108.5111.0111.4112 8119.8131.7114.9116.3117.2118.2119.5119.3120.7120.6121.5122.6124.4124.8125.8127.1128.5129.0129.7130.1132.3133.5135.2136.0137.2138.719 621.421.525.728.733 341.836 441.940 643.534 338.940.337.843.748.049 258.562.761.366.666.155.560.164.173.066 459.768 073.779 581.072.368.764.872.783.191.896.9100 0105.2109.6107.0101.8102.6105.6100.6102.2102.3103.2104.5102.7101.4102.4100.5103.0103.6106.3108.4107.8106.9106.9105.5102.6100.8100.4102.4106.3110.0112.727 329.630.439.035.830 738.733 344.636 238.028 036.441.136 043.948.649 963.762.655.166.066.353.366.973.085.073 462.28<strong>1994</strong>.799.291.067 064.458.874.590.699.098.5100.0105.7106.9101.094.3104.8120.196.1100.3101.2104.5107.9104.8103.1105.0102.6108.0109.9116.2120.9120.7120.1120.4118.1114.3110.1110.0115.0124.1132.3138.838 840.435.743.443.242 745.144 850.149 545.446152.349.351.654.456.961 163.565.965.367.267.166.768.578.478.771466.575 682.383.682.476 974.767.379.986 088.095.1100.0100.199.497.190.596.4100.095.196.396.595.396.193.896.696.694.797.899.898.099.3101.898.098.197.496.599.199.9100.7104.0104.2104.643145.044.547.947.049.550.149.554.756.055.854 359.760.961363.866.468 772.674.574.176.078.475.376.280.981.577 971.183 991.693.989.089 291.090.193.895 792.696.3100 098.195.092.291.992.390.893.493.393.693.493.591.792.791.391.591.792.992.793.192.592.192.091.291.190.790.689.689.490.089.735 237.734.839.639.238 939.937 342.543 741.641 146.445.646 950.151.956 061.064.764.872.376.074.478.586.089.681577.786 391.692.095.092 189.483.093.293 789.793.9100.098.6100.397.196.8104.7106.3102.9104.3104.3105.0105.0103.8107.0103.5105.1103.5106.0106.0106.9106.2105.4104.2106.9107.1107.7107.4105.4106.6106.3106.822 123.223.824.925.425 326.527 630.332 333.432 634.836.236.437.739.742 144.848.350.951.754.252.753.256.758.357.453.758.764.368.169.970.372.175.279.084 587.690.6100.0100.9101.1100.896.895.094.196.495.695.195.894.595.695.793.594.194.594.294.794.794.094.795.694.794.593.893.493.894.394.493.3879.49.311.613.113.714.815.017.618 919.920 624.024.926.129.031.734 838.742.244.249.653.755.959.566.973.175.869.177.383.388.091.387.889.281.887.591.491.494.6100.0106.0109.2111.8111.3115.0118.3112.8113.6114.2114.6114.8114.9114.6114.4115.2116.2117.7116.7116.8116.2117.6117.8118.1119.1118.7119.1118.5118.1119.6120.033132.833.134.335.035.736.437.239.341.542.243.245.446.647.949.551.253 654.856.959.461.063.064.066.069.570.971.971.475.579.081.882.684.686.587.790.192.194.997.4100.0101.5102.5103.7105.3106.0106.9104.6105.8106.4106.0106.1105.4105.9106.3105.6106.8106.4106.2105.9106.9106.7106.7106.7107.1107.2107.8107.3107.8107.2107.0Source: Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Federal Reserve System.326


TABLE B-52.—Capacity utilization rates, 1948-93[Percent; 1monthly data seasonally adjusted]Year or monthTotalindustryManufacturingTotalDurablegoodsNondurablegoodsPrimaryprocessingAdvancedprocessingMiningUtilities1948194919501951195219531954195519561957195819591960196119621963196419651966196719681969197019711972197319741975197619771978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921993"1992:JanFebMarAprMayJuneJulyAugSeptOctNovDec1993:JanFebMar..M P ay"JuneJulyAugSeptOct pNov P.Dec "86.486.886.980.879.284.388.484.274.679.383.385.586.282.180.975.075.881.180.379.281.583.783.682.179.279.881.978.879.379.579.980.179.580.079.779.380.280.881.081.281.581.681.781.581.581.781.781.982.383.083.582.574.282.885.885.489.380.187.086.183.675.081.680.177.381.483.585.689.591.187.287.286.879.778.283.788.183.873.278.582.885.185.480.278.872.874.980.479.579.181.683.683.181.177.878.881.177.678.278.678.879.178.678.978.778.479.279.779.880.380.580.680.980.780.680.780.881.081.582.382.787.186.886.376.774.380.987.582.770.275.480.383.584.978.676.669.070.578.377.876.278.681.881.579.074.976.480.474.675.675.876.176.876.176.476.576.177.177.878.278.979.479.579.979.779.479.879.980.681.482.583.486.386.686.682.982.886.687.584.076.481.885.286.285.181.481.078.081.183.181.983.085.685.985.384.081.782.082.081.781.882.382.482.281.982.281.781.782.082.482.082.282.182.282.382.282.382.082.181.581.782.081.887.376.288.590.284.989.480.692.089.484.775.483.079.877.981.583.887.891.091.485.486.386.980.479.386.491.586.072.980.184.086.386.478.078.069.074.880.479.880.984.986.986.284.280.182.484.682.382.683.082.382.682.282.681.981.782.383.082.983.584.383.884.384.284.584.584.884.484.885.786.080.073.279.883.485.989.380.084.284.483.174.981.180.577.281.683.484.688.891.188.087.486.579.177.482.586.582.873.577.881.984.384.881.379.174.674.980.379.478.380.182.181.879.876.877.979.678.779.179.277.377.577.077.377.377.077.978.478.678.979.079.379.579.378.979.279.279.680.180.981.481.283.586.688.987.490.492.592.589.990.090.991.391.994.094.686.579.984.482.978.279.984.485.989.188.686.887.186.485.786.286.587.886.387.686.486.587.187.487.887.985.885.386.487.287.986.585.887.888.487.788.293.494.195.895.493.994.692.986.884.084.884.684.885.985.582.879.580.382.583.580.282.084.186.086.086.385.387.084.685.185.385.784.983.984.884.184.585.687.188.585.488.989.086.484.686.688.188.686.786.186.687.51 Output as percent <strong>of</strong> capacity.Source: Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Federal Reserve System.327


TABLE B-53.—New construction activity, 1929-93[Value put in place, billions <strong>of</strong> dollars; monthly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]Year or monthTotalnewconstructionPrivate constructionTotalResidentialbuildings 1Total 2NewhousingunitsNonresidential buildings and o<strong>the</strong>rconstruction»TotalCommercial3IndustrialO<strong>the</strong>r 4Public constructionTotal Federal State andlocal 51929193319391940194119421943194419451946New series19471948194919501951195219531954195519561957195819591960196119621963New series196419651966196719681969197019711972197319741975197619771978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921993*.10.82.98.28.712.014.18.35.35.814.320.026.126.733.635.436.839.141.446.547.649.150.055.454.756.460.264.872.178.081.283.092.499.8100.7117.3133.3146.8147.5145.6165.4193.1230.2259.8259.7272.0260.6294.9348.8377.4407.7419.4432.3443.6442.1403.4436.0470.38.31.24.45.16.23.42.02.23.412.116.721.420.526.726.226.027.929.734.834.935.134.639.338.939.342.345.551.956.157.457.665.072.072.887.6103.3114.5109.3102.3121.5150.0180.0203.2196.1207.3197.5231.5278.6299.5323.1328.7337.5345.5334.7293.5317.3342.73.6.52.73.03.51.7.91.36.29.913.112.418.115.915.816.618.221.920.219.019.824.323.023.125.227.930.530.228.628.734.237.235.948.560.765.156.051.668.392.0109.8116.4100.499.284.7125.5153.8158.5187.1194.7198.1196.6182.9157.8187.8207.93.02^32.63.01.4.7.6.74.87.810.510.015.613.212.913.414.918.216.114.715.419.217.317.119.421.724.123.821.821.526.729.227.138.750.154.643.436.350.872.285.689.369.669.457.094.6113.8114.7133.2139.9138.9139.2128.0110.6129.6144.54.7.81.72.12.71.71.11.42.15.86.98.28.08.610.310.211.311.512.914.716.114.815.115.916.217.217.621.425.828.828.830.834.837.039.142.649.453.450.753.258.070.286.895.7108.0112.9106.0124.8141.1136.0134.1139.4148.9151.8135.7129.4134.86.88.18.18.09.010.811.213.115.718.118.114.314.116.420.628.334.640.244.143.959.172.669.568.971.573.972.554.845.047.30.9.2.31.71.41.01.12.12.32.22.02.43.13.62.42.12.92.82.82.93.65.16.66.06.06.86.65.54.86.48.18.37.48.011.515.614.618.018.513.814.817.114.915.016.520.423.822.320.720.72.6.51.21.31.51.2.91.11.33.04.25.55.96.16.76.87.37.27.38.09.08.89.08.98.79.29.711.012.614.114.915.817.219.220.522.124.927.228.231.633.738.242.846.649.850.248.250.851.351.650.151.554.655.458.763.766.82.51.63.83.65.810.76.33.12.42.23.34.76.36.99.310.811.211.711.712.714.115.516.115.917.117.919.420.221.923.825.427.427.827.929.730.032.338.143.344.043.150.156.663.664.763.163.570.277.884.690.694.898.1107.5109.9118.8127.60.2.51.23.89.35.62.51.7.91.21.51.63.04.24.13.42.82.73.03.43.73.63.93.94.03.73.93.83.33.23.23.13.84.24.75.16.16.87.18.18.69.610.410.010.611.212.012.414.112.312.212.112.814.314.52.31.13.12.42.01.3.7.6.71.42.53.55.26.36.67.18.38.910.011.112.112.312.213.314.015.416.518.020.022.124.224.624.825.925.827.633.037.237.236.042.048.154.054.353.152.959.065.872.276.682.586.095.497.1104.5113.1See next page for continuation <strong>of</strong> table.328


TABLE B-53.—New construction activity, 1929-93—Continued[Value put in place, billions <strong>of</strong> dollars; monthly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]Private constructionPublic constructionYear or monthTotalResidentialbuildings 1Total 2NewhousingunitsNonresidential buildings and o<strong>the</strong>rconstruction 1TotalTotalnewconstructionCommercial3IndustrialO<strong>the</strong>r 4TotalFederalState andlocal 51992: JanFebMar£==JuneJulyAugSeptOctNovDec417.6416.5433.8429.9436.7434.9432.0430.4433.5442.6449.3455.2300.0297.8312.3313.6314.8319.3314.0312.3317.4324.8328.2335.4172.1171.7180.3185.4184.4186.7184.6187.3189.2194.6119.3206.4121.1120.1127.0131.0128.8129.4126.8127.9129.1132.1135.4138.9127.9126.1131.9128.2130.5132.6129.4125.0128.2130.3128.9128.945.845.746.244.744.447.443.843.044.145.644.843.622.221.524.521.121.220.521.118.919.319.419.220.059.958.961.262.464.964.764.563.164.965.364.865.3117.7118.7121.5116.3121.9115.6118.0118.1116.1117.7121.1119.914.614.414.613.614.914.013.713.013.214.415.816.0103.1104.4106.9102.6107.0101.6104.3105.1102.9103.3105.2103.91993: JanFebMarAprMayJune451.3453.8454.5449.1453.3460.7335.5334.8337.0328.1332.2335.0207.2205.7205.5197.3198.4200.5141.8142.9141.8137.7138.3139.3128.3129.1131.5130.8133.9134.544.845.945.346.247.347.819.620.522.219.520.119.363.962.764.065.266.467.4115.8119.0117.5120.9121.0125.714.214.815.614.912.813.4101.6104.2101.9106.0108.2112.2JulyAugSeptOctNovDec466.6468.5477.1489.7500.0513.1337.9341.4345.6354.1364.5371.9204.6206.6209.5215.2222.3228.6141.1143.0145.7149.9156.4161.8133.3134.8136.1138.9142.2143.345.846.847.049.150.551.319.820.121.321.322.322.867.767.867.868.469.369.2128.7127.2131.6135.6135.6141.214.213.414.315.615.216.2114.5113.8117.3120.0120.4125.01 Beginning 1960, farm residential buildings included in residential buildings; prior to 1960, included in nonresidential buildings ando<strong>the</strong>r construction.2 Includes residential improvements, not shown separately. Prior to 1964, also includes nonhousekeeping units (hotels, motels, etc.).3 Office buildings, warehouses, stores, restaurants, garages, etc., and, beginning 1964, hotels and motels; prior to 1964 hotels andmotels are included in total residential.4 Religious, educational, hospital and institutional, miscellaneous nonresidential, farm (see also footnote 1), public utilities(telecommunications, gas, ejectnc, railroad, and petroleum pipelines), and all o<strong>the</strong>r private.5 Includes Federal grants-in-aid for State and local projects.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Census.329


TABLE B-54.—New housing units started and authorized, 1959-93[Thousands <strong>of</strong> units]Year or monthPrivate and public*Total(farm andnonfarm)NonfarmNew housing units startedTotalPrivate (farm and nonfarm) 11 unitType <strong>of</strong> structure2 to 4 5 unitsunits or moreNew private housing units authorized 2Total1 unitType <strong>of</strong> structure2to4units5 unitsor more19591960196119621963196419651966196719681969197019711972197319741975197619771978197919801981 ,1982198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931,553.71,296.11,365.01,492.51,634.91,561.01,509.71,195.81,321.91,545.41,499.51,469.02,084.52,378.52,057.51,352.51,171.41,547.62,001.72,036.11,760.01,312.61,100.31,072.11,712.51,755.81,745.01,807.11,622.7()1,531.31,274.01,336.81,468.71,614.81,534.01,487.51,172.81,298.81,521.41,482.3()1,517.01,252.21,313.01,462.91,603.21,528.81,472.81,164.91,291.61,507.61,466.81,433.62,052.22,356.62,045.31,337.71,160.41,537.51,987.12,020.31,745.11,292.21,084.21,062.21,703.01,749.51,741.81,805.41,620.51,488.11,376.11,192.71,013.91,199.71,285.11,234.0994.7974.3991.41,012.4970.5963.7778.6843.9899.4810.6812.91,151.01,309.21,132.0888.1892.21,162.41,450.91,433.31,194.1852.2705.4662.61,067.61,084.21,072.41,179.41,146.41,081.31,003.3894.8840.41,029.91,123.4282.9257.5338.7471.5590.7108.486.661.171.680.985.084.8120.3141.3118.368.164.085.9121.7125.0122.0109.591.180.0113.5121.493.484.065.358.855.237.535.630.730.5450.0422.5325.1376.1527.3571.2535.9780.9906.2795.0381.6204.3289.2414.4462.0429.0330.5287.7319.6522.0544.0576.1542.0408.7348.0317.6260.4137.9139.0131.21,208.3998.01,064.21,186.61,334.71,285.81,239.8971.91,141.01,353.41,323.71,351.51,924.62,218.91,819.51,074.4939.21,296.21,690.01,800.51,551.81,190.6985.51,000.51,605.21,681.81,733.31,769.41,534.81,455.61,338.41,110.8948.81,094.91,214.2938.3746.1722.8716.2750.2720.1709.9563.2650.6694.7625.9646.8906.11,033.1882.1643.8675.5893.61,126.11,182.6981.5710.4564.3546.4901.5922.4956.61,077.61,024.4993.8931.7793.9753.5910.71,004.677.164.667.687.1118.9100.884.861.073.084.385.288.1132.9148.6117.064.363.993.1121.3130.6125.4114.5101.888.3133.6142.6120.1108.489.375.767.054.343.145.851.2192.9187.4273.8383.3465.6464.9445.1347.7417.5574.4612.7616.7885.71,037.2820.5366.2199.8309.5442.7487.3444.8365.7319.4365.8570.1616.8656.6583.5421.1386.1339.8262.6152.1138.4158.3Seasonally adjusted annual rates1992:JanFeb..Mar..May -June.JulyAugSeptOctNovDec1993: JanFebMarAprMayJuneJulyAugSeptOctNov pDec" ,( 3 )( 3 )( 3 )( 3 )( 3 )( 3 )( 3 )( 3 )( 3 )( 3 )1,1641,2851,3181,0951,1971,1411,1061,2291,2181,2261,2261,2861,1711,1801,1241,2061,2481,2481,2321,3281,3711,3901,4501,5409761,1371,0509391,0199949611,0381,0451,0791,0891,1331,0511,0369871,0591,1071,0791,0641,1831,1661,2111,2851,330282551283240253128182832262432262631541733343333160123217128146107120160145129109121941201051211151381141281721451321771,0771,1351,0821,0401,0531,0481,0831,0811,1201,1411,1361,1961,1571,1411,0341,1011,1211,1151,1621,2421,2711,3041,3741,4768939488968588778788828859189549631,0379729578719259199259771,0151,0471,0971,1451,19845 13941 14644 14242 14045 13148 12242 15952 14445 15751 13649 12445 11445 14045 13943 12049 12746 15647 1435113447180571675715058171522261 Units in structures built by private developers for sale upon completion to local public housing authorities under <strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong>Housing and Urban Development "Turnkey" program are classified as private housing. Military housing starts, including those financedwith mortgages insured by FHA under Section 803 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> National Housing Act, are included in publicly owned starts and excluded fromtotal private starts.2 Authorized by issuance <strong>of</strong> local building permit: in 17,000 permit-issuing places beginning 1984; in 16,000 places for 1978-83; in14,000 places for 1972-77; in 13,000 places for 1967-71; in 12,000 places for 1963-66; and in 10,000 places prior to 1963.3 Not available separately beginning January 1970.4 Series discontinued December 1988.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Census.330


TABLE B-55.—Business expenditures for new plant and equipment, 1947-94[Billions <strong>of</strong> dollars; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]Industries surveyed quarterly 'AddendaYear or quarterTotalManufacturingAllindustriesDurablegoodsNondurablegoodsTotal 2NonmanufacturingMiningTransportationPublicutilitiesCommercialando<strong>the</strong>rTotalnonfarmbusiness3NonmanufacturingTotalManufacturingSurveyedquarterlySurveyedannually419471948194919501951195219531954195519561957195819591960196119621963196419651966196719681969197019711972197319741975197619771978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921993 5<strong>1994</strong> 51992:1IIIllIV1993:1IIIllIV 5 ....<strong>1994</strong>:I 5II s20.1122.7820.2821.5626.8128.1629.9628.8630.9437.9040.5433.8435.8839.4438.3440.8643.6751.2659.5270.4072.7576.4285.7491.9192.91103.40120.03139.67142.42158.44184.82216.81255.26286.40324.73326.19321.16373.83410.12399.36410.52455.49507.40532.61528.39546.60584.64616.50534.85541.41547.40559.24564.13579.79594.11600.53616.38624.338.739.257.327.7311.0712.1212.4312.0012.5016.3317.5012.9813.7616.3615.5316.0317.2721.2325.4131.3732.2532.3436.2736.9933.6035.4242.3552.4853.6658.5367.4878.1395.13112.60128.68123.97117.35139.61152.88137.95141.06163.45183.80192.61182.81174.02179.46186.27173.82171.98172.86176.86175.05177.09182.17183.52186.22183.443.393.542.673.225.125.755.715.495.878.198.596.216.728.287.437.818.6410.9813.4917.2317.8317.9319.9719.8016.7818.2222.6326.7725.3727.5032.7739.0247.7254.8258.9354.5851.6164.5770.8765.6868.0377.0482.5682.5877.6473.3281.4984.9373.9874.0772.0973.3079.1180.8881.9983.9987.5083.925.345.714.644.515.956.376.726.516.628.158.916.777.048.088.108.228.6310.2511.9214.1514.4214.4016.3117.1916.8217.2019.7225.7128.2831.0334.7139.1047.4157.7769.7569.3965.7475.0482.0172.2873.0386.41101.24110.04105.17100.6997.97101.3499.8597.91100.77103.5695.9496.21100.1899.5398.7299.5211.3813.5312.9613.8315.7416.0417.5316.8518.4421.5723.0420.8622.1223.0822.8024.8326.4030.0434.1239.0340.5044.0849.4754.9259.3167.9877.6787.1988.7699.91117.34138.69160.13173.80196.06202.22203.82234.22257.24261.40269.46292.04323.60339.99345.58372.58405.18430.22361.03369.44374.54382.38389.08402.70411.94417.01430.16440.890.69.931.111.211.251.291.311.641.691.431.351.291.261.411.261.331.361.421.381.441.772.022.672.883.304.586.127.639.8110.5511.0512.7115.8114.1110.6411.8612.008.158.289.299.219.8810.028.8810.1310.848.929.208.988.478.899.1011.1411.3710.8311.142.693.172.802.873.603.563.582.913.103.563.842.723.473.543.143.593.644.715.666.686.576.917.237.176.427.148.009.169.9511.1012.2012.0713.9113.5612.6711.7510.8113.4414.5715.0515.0716.6318.8421.4722.6622.6422.3720.9121.8323.1523.9121.6022.4721.5821.7023.7321.4921.611.642.673.283.423.753.964.614.234.264.785.955.745.465.405.205.125.335.806.497.829.3310.5211.7013.0314.7016.2617.9919.9620.2322.9027.8332.1037.5341.3247.1753.5852.9557.5359.5856.6156.2660.3766.2867.2166.5772.2175.0081.4269.0072.6372.1874.0773.5174.5575.6276.3077.7880.806.386.776.016.707.297.318.098.429.7711.5911.5610.9711.8412.8613.2114.7116.1718.2020.6023.1123.2225.2228.7732.7135.5241.6948.3953.4952.4758.2967.5183.9697.64106.21120.41122.79129.41151.39171.09181.59189.84205.76229.28241.43246.32268.84297.69317.05261.27264.46269.46278.24284.21297.46303.47305.61320.06327.3322.2725.9724.0325.8131.3832.1634.2033.6237.0845.2548.6242.5545.1748.9948.1451.6153.5962.0270.7982.6283.8288.92100.02106.15109.18120.91139.26159.83162.60179.91208.15244.40285.24318.08358.77363.08359.73418.38454.93447.11461.51508.22563.93591.96587.93607.718.739.257.327.7311.0712.1212.4312.0012.5016.3317.5012.9813.7616.3615.5316.0317.2721.2325.4131.3732.2532.3436.2736.9933.6035.4242.3552.4853.6658.5367.4878.1395.13112.60128.68123.97117.35139.61152.88137.95141.06163.45183.80192.61182.81174.02179.46186.27173.82171.98172.86176.86175.05177.09182.17183.52186.22183.4413.5416.7316.7218.0820.3120.0421.7721.6224.5828.9131.1129.5731.4132.6332.6035.5836.3340.8045.3951.2551.5756.5863.7469.1675.5885.4996.91107.35108.95121.38140.67166.27190.11205.48230.09239.11242.38278.77302.05309.16320.45344.77380.13399.34405.12433.6911.3813.5312.9613.8315.7416.0417.5316.8518.4421.5723.0420.8622.1223.0822.8024.8326.4030.0434.1239.0340.5044.0849.4754.9259.3167.9877.6787.1988.7699.91117.34138.69160.13173.80196.06202.22203.82234.22257.24261.40269.46292.04323.60339.99345.58372.58405.18430.22361.03369.44374.54382.38389.08402.70411.94417.01430.16440.892.163.193.764.254.574.004.234.766.147.358.088.729.299.559.8010.759.9310.7611.2712.2211.0712.5014.2714.2416.2617.5119.2420.1620.1921.4723.3327.5829.9831.6834.0436.8938.5644.5544.8147.7550.9952.7356.5359.3559.5461.111 <strong>The</strong>se industries accounted for 90 percent <strong>of</strong> total nonfarm spending in 1992.2 Excludes forestry, fisheries, and agricultural services; pr<strong>of</strong>essional services; social services and membership organizations; and realestate, which, effective with <strong>the</strong> April-May 1984 survey, are no longer surveyed quarterly. See last column ("nonmanufacturing surveyedannually") for data for <strong>the</strong>se industries.3 "All industries" plus <strong>the</strong> part <strong>of</strong> nonmanufacturing that is surveyed annually.4 Consists <strong>of</strong> forestry, fisheries, and agricultural services; pr<strong>of</strong>essional services; social services and membership organizations; andreal estate.5 Planned capital expenditures as reported by business in October and November 1993, corrected for biases.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Census.331


Year or monthTABLE B-56.—Manufacturing and trade sales and inventories, 1950-93[Amounts in millions <strong>of</strong> dollars; monthly data seasonally adjusted]Total manufacturing andManufacturingwholesalerstradeMerchantRetailtradeInventories2 Ratio3 Sales J Inven-Inven-Sales*tories 2 Ratio3 Sales *tories 2 Ratio3 Sales 1 Inventories2Ratio319501951195219531954195519561957195819591960196119621963196419651966196719681969197019711972197319741975197619771978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921992: JanFebMarAprMayJune38,596JulyAugSeptOctNovDecJuneJulyAugSeptOctNov p1993:JanFebMar43,35644,84047,98746,44351,69454,06355,87954,20159,72960,82761,15965,66268,99573,68280,28387,18790,91898,794105,812108,352117,023131,227153,881178,201182,412204,386229,786260,755298,328328,112356,909348,771370,501411,427423,940431,786459,107497,031523,729543,097538,609560,383542,949549,893553,453553,683551,496558,715562,128557,117564,197566,536569,412580,840581,584584,903583,575584,943587,930589,990585,626592,598595,804600,304607,68959,82270,24272,37776,12273,17579,51687,30489,05287,05592,09794,71995,580101,049105,463111,504120,929136,824145,681156,611170,400178,594188,991203,227234,406287,144288,992318,345350,706400,931452,640510,126547,181575,504591,875651,551665,835664,624711,725767,538813,793837,445833,518849,117830,003830,846832,300835,805835,685839,937843,411844,942844,032845,196846,912849,117851,190854,715859,094862,478864,198864,227863,612865,939867,395869,709874,4651.361.551.581.581.601.471.551.591.611.541.561.561.541.531.511.511.571.601.591.611.651.611.551.521.611.581.561.531.541.521.551.531.671.561.531.551.551.501.491.531.531.541.501.531.511.501.511.521,501.50i.521.501.491.491.461.461.461.471.471.471.461.471.461.461.451.4418,63421,71422,52924,84323,35526,48027,74028,73627,24830,28630,87830,92233,35835,05837,33140,99544,87046,48650,22953,50152,80555,90663,02772,93184,79086,58998,797113,201126,905143,936154,391168,129163,351172,547190,682194,538194,657206,326223,541232,724239,459235,518244,511235,239239,081242,011242,706241,804246,459246,259241,716246,078245,459248,525256,609252,845256,800258,979255,114254,007258,299251,680256,556260,088260,471265,57431,07839,30641,13643,94841,61245,06950,64251,87150,20352,91353,78654,87158,17260,02963,41068,20777,98684,64690,56098,145101,599102,567108,121124,499157,625159,708174,636188,378211,691242,157265,215283,413311,852312,379339,516334,799322,669338,075367,422386,911399,068386,348379,238384,828383,771383,508382,502383,404382,908383,369385,186384,013383,095381,055379,238378,624379,232379,539380,307381,591381,326381,561381,392380,689380,301380,1811.481.661.781.761.811.621.731.801.841.751.741.771.741.711.701.661.741.821.801.831.921.831.721.711.861.841.771.661.671.681.721.691.951.781.731.731.681.591.581.641.651.671.571.641.611.581.581.591.551.561.591.561.561.531.481.501.481.471.491.501.481.521.491.461.461.437,6958,5978,7829,0528,9939,89310,51310,47510,25711,49111,65611,98812,67413,38214,52915,61116,98719,67521,12122,94024,29826,61930,01138,31948,27146,84850,93456,40966,84979,67893,977102,26796,357100,440113,502114,816116,326124,340135,357144,158149,489147,635152,337148,745149,749151,394150,726148,586151,021153,762152,241153,551154,211153,759155,297159,507158,987157,206159,291162,187159,095160,531161,459160,710161,284162,9719,2849,88610,21010,68610,63711,67813,26012,73012,73913,87914,12014,48814,93616,04817,00018,31720,76525,78627,16629,80033,35436,56840,29746,91858,66757,77464,62273,17986,93499,679123,833131,049129,024131,663144,223149,155155,445165,814180,519188,539196,901201,285209,232200,956201,423201,463201,687200,997204,373205,058205,399205,264206,655208,416209,232210,139209,765210,503211,860212,190212,058213,244215,199215,103214,991216,0941.071.161.121.171.181.131.191.231.241.211.211.211.181.201.171.171.221.311.291.301.371.371.341.221.221.231.271.301.301.251.321.281.361.281.231.281.321.291.301.291.291.341.341.351.351.331.341.351.351.331.351.341.341.361.351.321.321.341.331.311.331.331.331.341.331.3312,26813,04613,52914,09114,09515,32115,81116,66716,69617,95118,29418,24919,63020,55621,82323,67725,33024,75727,44529,37131,24934,49738,18942,63145,14148,97554,65560,17667,00274,71379,74386,51489,06297,514107,243114,586120,803128,442138,133146,847154,149155,456163,535158,965161,063160,048160,251161,106161,235162,107163,160164,568166,866167,128168,934169,232169,116167,390170,538171,736172,596173,415174,583175,006178,549179,14419,46021,05021,03121,48820,92622,76923,40224,45124,11325,30526,81326,22127,94129,38631,09434,40538,07335,24938,88542,45543,64149,85654,80962,98970,85271,51079,08789,149102,306110,804121,078132,719134,628147,833167,812181,881186,510207,836219,597238,343241,476245,885260,647244,219245,652247,329251,616251,284252,656254,984254,357254,755255,446257,441260,647262,427265,718269,052270,311270,417270,843268,807269,348271,603274,417278,1901 Annual data are averages <strong>of</strong> monthly not seasonally adjusted figures.2 Seasonally adjusted, end <strong>of</strong> period. Inventories beginning January 1982 for manufacturing and December 1980 for wholesale andretail trade are not comparable with earlier periods.3 Inventory/sales ratio. Annual data are-, beginning 1982, averages <strong>of</strong> monthly ratios; for 1958-81, ratio <strong>of</strong> December inventories tomonthly average sales for <strong>the</strong> year; and for earlier years, weighted averages. Monthly data are ratio <strong>of</strong> inventories at end <strong>of</strong> month tosales for month.Note.—Earlier data are not strictly comparable with data beginning 1958 for manufacturing and beginning 1967 for wholesale andretail trade.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Census.1.381.641.521.531.511.431.471.441.441.411.471.441.421.431.421.451.501.421.421.451.401.451.441.481.571.461.451.481.531.481.521.531.491.441.491.521.561.561.541.591.561.551.551.541.531.551.571.561.571.571.561.551.531.541.541.551.571.611.591.571.571.551.541.551.541.55332


TABLE B-57.—Manufacturers' shipments and inventories, 1950-93[Millions <strong>of</strong> dollars; monthly data seasonally adjusted]Year or monthShipments xTotalDurablegoodsindustriesNondurablegoodsindustriesInventories 2TotalDurable goods industriesTotalMaterialsandsuppliesWork inprocessFinishedgoodsNondurable goods industriesTotalMaterialsandsuppliesWorkinprocessFinishedgoods195019511952195319541955195619571958195919601961196219631964196519661967196819691970197119721973197419751976197719781979198019811982.....19831984198519861987198819891990199119921993 "..1992: JanFebMarAprMayJuneJulyAugSeptOctNovDec1993:JanFebMarAprMayJuneJulyAugSeptOctNov "Dec p 18,63421,71422,52924,84323,35526,48027,74028,73627,24830,28630,87830,92233,35835,05837,33140,99544,87046,48650,22953,50152,80555,90663,02772,93184,79086,58998,797113,201126,905143,936154,391168,129163,351172,547190,682194,538194,657206,326223,541232,724239,459235,518244,511258,523235,239239,081242,011242,706241,804246,459246,259241,716246,078245,459248,525256,609252,845256,800258,979255,114254,007258,299251,680256,556260,088260,471265,574269,2278,84510,49311,31313,34911,82814,07114,71515,23713,55315,59715,87015,60117,24718,25519,61122,19324,61725,23327,62429,40328,15629,92433,98739,63544,17343,59850,62359,16867,73175,92777,41983,72779,21285,48197,940101,279103,238108,128117,993121,703122,387119,151125,553135,982120,173122,865124,665124,249123,113126,166125,083124,246125,873126,425128,720134,228130,805134,133135,537132,763132,307135,042129,257134,521137,521138,153142,665146,0029,78911,22111,21611,49411,52712,40913,02513,49913,69514,68915,00815,32116,11116,80317,72018,80220,25321,25322,60524,09824,64925,98229,04033,29640,61742,99148,17454,03359,17468,00976,97284,40284,13987,06692,74293,25991,41998,198105,549111,022117,072116,367118,958122,542115,066116,216117,346118,457118,691120,293121,176117,470120,205119,034119,805122,381122,040122,667123,442122,351121,700123,257122,423122,035122,567122,318122,909123,22531,07839,30641,13643,94841,61245,06950,64251,87150,20352,91353,78654,87158,17260,02963,41068,20777,98684,64690,56098,145101,599102,567108,121124,499157,625159,708174,636188,378211,691242,157265,215283,413311,852312,379339,516334,799322,669338,075367,422386,911399,068386,348379,238377,941384,828383,771383,508382,502383,404382,908383,369385,186384,013383,095381,055379,238378,624379,232379,539380,307381,591381,326381,561381,392380,689380,301380,181377,94115,53920,99123,73125,87823,71026,40530,44731,72830,19432,01232,33732,49634,56535,77638,42142,18949,85254,89658,73264,59866,65166,13670,06781,192101,493102,590111,988120,877138,181160,734174,788186,443200,444199,854221,330218,212212,006220,776241,402256,065259,988249,117237,717236,370248,183246,482245,703244,355244,213243,625242,976243,597242,122240,909239,407237,717236,332237,034236,849237,043237,734237,514237,937237,688237,571237,632237,886236,3708,9667,8949,19410,41710,6089,97010,70910,30610,24610,79411,05311,94613,29815,46416,42317,34418,63619,14919,67920,80725,94435,07033,90337,45740,18645,19852,67055,17357,99859,13660,32566,03164,00561,40963,61469,38871,94272,78869,98768,16568,38869,82769,36668,87268,81168,90969,47768,87569,37169,39968,44268,26768,16567,70767,83967,86468,08968,40168,16368,35768,67868,44168,52268,67068,38810,7209,72110,75612,31712,83712,40813,08612,80913,21114,12414,83516,15818,05521,90824,93327,21330,28229,74528,55030,71335,49042,53043,22746,07450,22658,84869,32576,94580,99886,70786,89998,25198,08596,926102,328112,380121,919122,520115,107107,140105,364114,334113,342112,867111,601111,346110,257109,482109,507108,406108,730107,472107,140106,426106,552106,071105,671106,042106,306106,545106,463106,704106,943106,119105,3646,2066,0406,3487,5658,1257,8168,2179,2229,0399,6479,88810,31710,83612,48013,54014,17515,68017,75717,90718,54719,75823,89325,46028,45730,46534,13538,73942,67047,44754,60152,63057,04856,12253,67154,83459,63462,20464,68064,02362,41262,61864,02263,77463,96463,94363,95863,89164,61964,71964,31763,73763,66862,41262,19962,64362,91463,28363,29163,04563,03562,54762,42662,16763,09762,61815,53918,31517,40518,07017,90218,66420,19520,14320,00920,90121,44922,37523,60724,25324,98926,01828,13429,75031,82833,54734,94836,43138,05443,30756,13257,11862,64867,50173,51081,42390,42796,970111,408112,525118,186116,587110,663117,299126,020130,846139,080137,231141,521141,571136,645137,289137,805138,147139,191139,283140,393141,589141,891142,186141,648141,521142,292142,198142,690143,264143,857143,812143,624143,704143,118142,669142,295141,5718,3178,1678,5568,9718,7758,6769,0949,0979,5059,83610,00910,16710,48711,19711,76012,32812,75313,16813,68614,67718,14723,74423,56525,84727,38729,61932,81436,60638,16544,03944,81645,69244,08742,30945,28749,03049,63251,60651,55652,19451,97651,24951,36251,49651,65151,82152,18852,61652,47152,55452,52852,13752,19452,28652,12152,32952,67252,96553,05552,64752,59452,48952,25952,36351,9762,4722,4402,5712,7212,8642,8272,9422,9473,1083,3043,4203,5313,8254,2264,4314,8525,1205,2715,6785,9986,7298,1898,8349,92910,96112,08513,91015,88416,19418,61218,69119,32819,44518,12419,27920,44621,26122,44721,88622,88723,46122,10322,23322,25922,48022,47422,52922,50622,77322,90322,81722,75922,88722,96223,16123,12823,09922,99023,09723,20223,28023,32923,43723,47723,4617,4097,4157,6668,6228,6248,5068,8659,4059,76210,46710,82411,29111,70612,71113,55914,64815,67416,50917,06717,37918,43124,19924,71926,87229,15331,80634,69937,93742,61148,75749,01853,16653,05550,23052,73356,54459,95365,02763,78966,44066,13463,29363,69464,05064,01664,89664,56665,27166,34566,43466,84166,75266,44067,04466,91667,23367,49367,90267,66067,77567,83067,30066,97366,45566,1341 Annual data are averages <strong>of</strong> monthly not seasonally adjusted figures.2 Seasonally adjusted, end <strong>of</strong> period. Data beginning 1982 are not comparable with data for prior periods.Note.—Data beginning 1958 are not strictly comparable with earlier data.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Census.333


TABLE B-58.—Manufacturers' new and unfilled orders, 1950-93[Amounts in millions <strong>of</strong> dollars; monthly data seasonally adjusted]Year or monthTotalNew orders lDurable goodsindustriesTotalCapitalgoodsindustries,nondefenseNondurablegoodsindustriesTotalUnfilled orders 2DurablegoodsindustriesNondurablegoodsindustriesUnfilled orders—shipmentsTotalIdllU"DurablegoodsindustriesNondurablegoodsindustries19501951195219531954195519561957195819591960196119621963196419651966196719681969197019711972197319741975197619771978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921993"1992 JanFebMarAprMayJuneJulyAugSeptOct NovDec1993 JanFebMarMayJuneJulyAugSeptOct Nov"Dec ".20 11023,90723 20423 58622,33527 46528,36827 55927,19330,71130,23231,11233,44035 51138,24042,13746,42047 06750,65753,99052,02255,92164,18276,00387,32785,13999,513115,109131,629147,604156,359168,025162,140175,451192,879195,706195,204209,389227,026235,932240,646234,354241,545255,719233,924234,439239,462241,747238,933243,914241,079237,230240,685244,882243,106256,727253,626257,250253,007252,369248,335255,462250,566253,461255,309258,270262,773266,0191016512,84112 0611214710,76814 99615,3651411113,38715,97915,28815,75317,36318 67120,50723,28626,16325 80328,05129,87627,34029,90535,03842,62746,86241,95751,30761,03572,27879,48379,39283,65478,06488,140100,164102,356103,647110,809121,445124,933123,556117,878122,614133,300118,996118,369121,882123,221120,522123,746119,846120,007120,608125,656123,096134,348131,266134,533129,903129,838126,783132,252128,520131,752133,176136,613139,675142,6586,3147,0466,0726,6827,7459,92611,5949,88611,49013,68117,58821,15421,13521,80619,21319,62423,66924,54523,98326,09530,72932,72532,25429,46829,65331,90129,46028,89731,65529,65329,77830,16828,73227,48629,80130,12926,80432,27528,64532,74829,12230,45329,93133,85030,09331,99230,99232,82534,87835,3669 94511,066111431143911,56612 46913,00313 44813,80514,73214,94415,35916,07816 84017,73218,85120,2582126522,60624,11424,68226,01629,14433,37640,46543,18148,20654,07359,35168,12176,96784,37184,07787,31192,71593,35191,55798,579105,581110,999117,090116,476118,932122,419114,928116,070117,580118,526118,411120,168121,233117,223120,077119,226120,010122,379122,360122,717123,104122,531121,552123,210122,046121,709122,133121,657123,098123,3614145667,26675 85761 17848,26660 00467,3755318346,60951,71744,21346,62447,79853 41764,51878,24996,846103 711108,377114,341105,008105,247119,349156,561187,043169,546178,128202,024259,169303,593327,416326,547311,887347,273373,529387,095393,412430,288471,951510,459524,846511,122475,304442,111509,807505,165502,616501,657498,786496,241491,061486,575481,182480,605475,186475,304476,085476,535470,563467,818462,146459,309458,195455,100450,321448,120445,319442,11135 43563^39472 68058'63745,25056 24163,88050 35243,80748,36941,65043,58245,17050 34661,31574,45993,00299 735104,393110,161100,412100,225113,034149,204181,519161,664169,857193,323248,281291,321315,202314,707300,798333,114359,651372,027376,622408,602450,002488,780502,914487,892452,383420,646486,715482,219479,436478,408475,817473,397468,160463,921458,656457,887452,263452,383452,844453,244447,610444,685439,161436,371435,634432,865428,520426,980423,990420,6466 0213,8723 1772 5413,0163 7633,4952 8312,8023,3482,5633,0422,6283 0713,2033,7903,8443,9763,9844,1804,5965,0226,3157,3575,5247,8828,2718,70110,88812,27212,21411,84011,08914,15913,87815,06816,79021,68621,94921,67921,93223,23022,92121,46523,09222,94623,18023,24922,96922,84422,90122,65422,52622,71822,92322,92123,24123,29122,95323,13322,98522,93822,56122,23521,80121,14021,32921,4653.423.633.873 353.022.942.712.582.642 742.993.253.743.663.793.713.613.323.263.804.093.693.243.243.573.893.853.873.843.533.603.673.593.633.644.004.144.083.463.044.003.923.843.843.863.743.713.753.653.653.573.463.563.513.423.463.423.333.413.303.223.213.123.044.124.274.554.003.623.473.293.083.183.313.593.864.484.374.584.454.364.003.854.514.934.453.883.854.204.624.584.684.744.294.374.464.404.424.454.915.135.064.213.644.914.814.714.714.754.584.564.594.464.474.354.214.354.274.144.204.154.024.173.993.893.893.753.640.961.121.04.85.85.92.71.78.68.72.71.79.75.73.69.69.76.76.86.91.62.82.74.71.81.82.75.69.62.69.64.68.70.83.76.78.76.81.77.72.81.80.80.80.79.78.77.79.78.78.78.77.79.79.78.79.78.78.76.76.73.71.72.721 Annual data are averages <strong>of</strong> monthly not seasonally adjusted figures.2 Seasonally adjusted, end <strong>of</strong> period.3 Ratio <strong>of</strong> unfilled orders at end <strong>of</strong> period to shipments for period; excludes industries with no unfilled orders. Annual figures relateto seasonally adjusted data for December.Note.—Data beginning 1958 are not strictly comparable with earlier data.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Census.334


PRICESTABLE B-59.—Consumer price indexes for major expenditure classes, 1950-93[For all urban consumers; 1982-84=100]Year ormonthAll items(CPI-U)Food andUcvcFdgcSTotal l Food 2TotalShelter2HousingFuel ando<strong>the</strong>rutilities 2ApparelandupkeepUmiooHouseholdfurnishingsandoperationTransportation2Medicalcare 2O<strong>the</strong>rgoodsandservicesEntertainmentEnergy319501951 ,19521953195419551956195719581959196019611962196319641965196619671968196919701971197219731974197519761977197819791980198119821983..19841985.198619871988198919901991199219931992:JanFebMarAprMayJune....JulyAugSept....OctNovDec1993:JanFebMarAprMayJune....JulyAugSept....OctNovDec24.126.026 526.726.926.827.228.128.929.129.629.930.230.631.031.532.433 434.836.738.840.541.844.449.353.856.960.665.272.682 490.996 599.6103.9107.6109.6113.6118.3124.0130.7136.2140 3144.5138.1138.6139.3139.5139.7140.2140.5140.9141.3141.8142.0141.9142.6143.1143.6144.0144.2144.4144.4144.8145.1145.7145.8145.835036.238.140.141.443.148.855.560.262.165.872.279.986 793.597.399.5103.2105.6109.1113.5118.2124.9132.1136.8138 7141.6137.9138.1138.8138.8138.3138.3138.1138.8139.3139.2139.1139.5140.5140.7140.9141.4141.8141.1141.1141.5141.8142.3142.6143.325 428.228 728.328.227.828.028.930.229.730.030.430.631.131.532.233.834135.337.139.240.442.148.255.159.861.665.572.079.986 893.697 499.4103.2105.6109.0113.5118.2125.1132.4136.3137 91409137.2137.5138.1138.1137.4137.4137.2138.0138.5138.3138.3138.7139.8139.9140.1140.6141.1140.4140.3140.8141.1141.6141.9142.730832.034.036.438.039.441.245.850.753.857.462.470.181190.496.999.5103.6107.7110.9114.2118.5123.0128.5133.6137 5141.2135.7136.1136.6136.5136.7137.7138.3138.6138.4138.5138.5138.5139.3139.7140.2140.4140.5141.5141.9142.3142.3142.2142.0142.322.022.511123.124.024 524.725 225.425.826.126.527.027.828 830.132.635.537.038.740.544.448.851.554.960.568.981090.596.999.1104.0109.8115.8121.3127.1132.8140.0146.31512155.7149.2149.8150.4150.2150.2151.1151.8152.3151.9152.5152.4152.5153.7154.4154.8155.0154.9155.7156.3156.8156.6156.8156.7157.122 522.623.023.624.324 825.426 026.326.326.626.626.626.727 127.428.029.131.132.534.340.745.449.454.758.564.875 486.494.9100.2104.8106.5104.1103.0104.4107.8111.6115.3117 8121.3116.2115.9115.8115.8116.8119.0119.4119.4119.8118.5118.3118.7119.2118.4119.5119.6120.5122.9123.2123.3123.9122.4121.2121.742 043.645.246.848.649.751156.863.467.370.474.779.986 393.098 0100.2101.9103.8105.2107.1109.4111.2113.3116.0118 0119.3116.7117.3117.7118.0117.9118.2118.4118.3118.3118.4118.5118.2118.2118.6118.7119.2119.1119.1118.8119.2119.6120.0120.3120.340 343 943 543143.142.943.744.544.645.045 746.146.346.947.347.849.051053.756.859.261.162.364.669.472.575.278.681.484.990 995.397.8100.2102.1105.0105.9110.6115.4118.6124.1128.71319133.7127.9130.2133.4133.3133.1131.0129.2130.2133.3135.0134.5131.4129.7133.4136.2136.9135.0131.9129.4131.9134.6136.1136.2132.622 724125 726 526.125.826.227.728.629.829 830.130.830.931431.932.333 334.335.737.539.539.941.245.850.155.159.061.770.583193.297.099.3103.7106.4102.3105.4108.7114.1120.5123.8126 5130.4124.5124.1124.4125.2126.3126.9127.2126.9126.8128.0129.2129.0129.1129.2129.0129.4130.2120.3130.3130.2130.1131.8132.6132.115 115916 717317 818 218.919.720 621.522 322 923.524.124 625.226.328 229.931.934.036.137.338 842.447.552.057.061.867.574 982.992 5100.6106.8113.5122.0130.1138.6149.3162.8177.0190 1201.4184.3186.2187.3188.1188.7189.4190.7191.5192.3193.3194.3194.7196.4198.0198.6199.4200.5201.1202.2202.9203.3204.4204.9205.240 743.045.247.550.051.552.956.962.065.168.371.976.783 690.196.0100.1103.8107.9111.6115.3120.3126.5132.4138.4142 3145.8140.1140.7141.2142.0142.0142.0142.4142.6143.2143.5143.7143.8144.3144.5144.8145.3145.0145.5145.3145.8146.6147.3147.7147.835 136.938.740.942.944.746.449.853.957.060.464.368.975 282.691.1101.1107.9114.5121.4128.5137.0147.7159.0171.6183 3192.9178.6179.4179.8180.3181.3181.5182.3183.9187.0187.9188.0189.1191.0191.5192.0192.4193.2193.1193.7193.4193.1193.4193.8194.221.521.521.922.422.522.622.622.522.923.323 824.224.825.526.527.229.438.142.145.149.452.565.786.097.799 299.9100.9101.688.288.689.394.3102.1102.5103.0104.2100.199.098.999.5102.4105.9106.0105.4105.9104.5104.5103.9103.4102.2102.5103.1104.4106.5105.8105.2105.2105.4103.7102.41 Includes alcoholic beverages, not shown separately.2 See table B-60 for components.3 Household fuels—gas (piped), electricity, fuel oil, etc.—and motor fuel. Motor oil, coolant, etc. also included through 1982. Seetable B-60 for <strong>the</strong> components.Note.—Data beginning 1983 incorporate a rental equivalence measure for homeowners' costs.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Labor, Bureau <strong>of</strong> Labor Statistics.335


TABLE B-60.—Consumer price indexes for selected expenditure classes, 1950-93[For all urban consumers; 1982-84 = 100, except as noted]Food and beveragesShelterFuel and o<strong>the</strong>r utilitiesFoodRenters costsFuelsYear or monthTotal »TotalAthomeAwayfromhomeTotalTotal 2Rent,residentialHomeowners'costs 2MaintenanceandrepairsTotalTotalFuel oilando<strong>the</strong>rhouseholdfuelcommoditiesGas(piped)andelectricity(energyservices)O<strong>the</strong>rutilitiesandpublicservices1950195119521953195419551956195719581959196019611962196319641965196619671968196919701971197219731974197519761977197819791980198119821983198419851986198719881989199019911992.19931992: JanFeb ..MarAprMayJuneJulyAugSeptOctNovDec1993: JanFebMarAprMayJuneJulyAugSeptOct.NovDec35.036.238.140141.443148.855 560.262 165 872.279.986.793.597.399.5103.2105.61091113.5118.2124.9132.1136.8138 7141.6137.91381138.8138.8138.3138.3138.1138.8139.3139 2139.1139.5140.5140.7140.91414141.8141.1141.1141.5141.8142.3142.6143.325 428.228 728 328.227 828 028 930.229.730.030 430.631131.532 233.834.135.337.139 240.442.148.255.159.861.665 572.079.986.893.697.499.4103.2105.6109 0113.5118.2125.1132.4136.3137.9140.9137.2137.5138.1138.1137.4137.4137.2138.0138.5138 3138.3138.7139.8139.9140.1140 6141.1140.4140.3140.8141.1141.6141.9142.727 330.330 830 330129 529 630 632.031.231.531832.032 432.733 535 235.136.338.039 940.942.749.757.161.863.166 873.881.888.494.898.199.1102.8104.3107.3111.9116.6124.2132.3135.8136.8140.1136.4136 6137.5137.4136.2136.1135.7136.9137.4137 2137.0137.5139.1139.1139.4140 0140.7139.3139.1139.7140.0140.8141.2142.321 521922122.623 424.124.825.426 026.727 327.828 429 731.332.934.937 539.441044.249.854.558.262 668.375.983.490.995.8100.0104.2108.3112 5117.0121.8127.4133.4137.9140.7143.2139.7139.9140.1140.2140.4140.7140.8141.0141.21413141.5141.6142.0142.2142.4142 7142.9143.2143.4143.6143.8144.0144.2144.322 022 522 723 124 024 524.725.225 425.826 126.527 027 828.830.132.635 537.038.740.544 448.851554 960.568.981.090.596 999.1104.0109.8115 8121.3127.1132.8140.0146.3151.2155.7149.2149 8150.4150.2150.2151.1151.8152.3151.9152 5152.4152.5153.7154.4154.8155 0154.9155.7156.3156.8156.6156.8156.7157.1"'iifto108.6115.41219128.1133.6138.9146.7155.6160.9165.0158.8160.2161.2160.1159.5161.0162.8163.5161.71617160.6160.2162.5164.4165.2164 9164.2165.2166.8167.3165.3165.4164.4164.429 730.932 233 935.135 636.337 037 638.238.739 239.740 140.540 941542.243.344.746 548.750.452.555 258.061 164 869.374.380.987.994.6100.1105.3111.81183123.1127.8132.8138.4143.3146.9150.3145.4145.6146.4146.2146.3146.6147.0147.0147.2148 0148.6148.6148.9149.1149.1149 7149.9150.3150.4150.8151.0151.4151.6151.9""102:5107.3113.11194124.8131.1137.3144.6150.2155.3160.2153.2153 5154.1154.2154.4155.0155.5155.8156.0156 8157.2157.5158.2158.5158.7159 2159.4160.1160.3160.8161.4161.6162.0162.520 520.921422.323 223 624.024.424 825.025 325.826 327.528.930.633.235 838.640.643.649.554.157.662 067.274.082.490.796.499.9103.7106.5107.9111.8114.7118.0122.2126.3128.6130.6128.0128.3128.4128.0128.1128.5128.8128.1128.5129.4129.5129.3129.7130.5131.51318131.6131.2131.3131.6131.3130.8127.9127.622 522.623 023 624 324.825.426.026 326.326 626.626 626 727.127.428.029 131.132 534.340 745.449.454 758.564.875.486.494 9100.2104.8106.5104 1103.0104.4107.8111.6115.3117.8121.3116.2115 9115.8115.8116.8119.0119.4119.4119.8118 5118.3118.7119.2118.4119.5119 6120.5122.9123.2123.3123.9122.4121.2121.7"'21.4'21.722.123124.725 727.534.439.443.349 053.061.374.887.295.6100.5104 0104.599.297.398.0100.9104.5106.7108.1111.2106.6105.9105.2105.1106.5110.2110.4110.3111.1108.7108.2108.9109.2107.5108.6108 8110.3114.1114.2114.1114.8112.1110.1110.711 311.812 112 612.612 713.314 013.713.913.814 114.214 414.414 615.015.516.016.317 018.218.321.133.236.438.843 946.262.486.1104.6103.497.299.495.977.677.978.181.799.394.690.790.392.091.590.589.989.890.190.089.789.791.492.191.892.392.592.892 691.390.489.187.887.989.189.488.319 219.319 519.920.220.720.921.121.922.423.323 523.523 523.523 523.623.723.924.325 427.128.529.934.540.144.750 555.061.071.481.993.2101.5105.4107.1105 7103.8104.6107.5109.3112.6114.8118.5112.8112 0111.5111.3113.0117.4117.6117.5118.5115 4114.8115.6115.9113.8115.1115 3117.3122.0122.2122.2123.1119.7117.3118.1A6£47.148.450 053.456 257.860.763.967.770 873.774.377.084.393.399.5107.2112.1117.9120.1122.9127.1131.7137.9142.5147.0140.5141.2141.7142.2142.4142.2143.1143.3143.0143 4143.7143.6144.3145.3146.3146 2146.3146.5147.1147.8148.1148.4148.6148.81 Includes alcoholic beverages, not shown separately.2 December 1982 = 100.See next page for continuation <strong>of</strong> table.336


TABLE B-60.—Consumer price indexes for selected expenditure classes,1950-93—Continued[For all urban consumers; 1982-84=100, except as noted]Year or monthTransportationTotalPrivate transportationTotal 3NewcarsUsedcarsMotorfuel 4AutomobilemaintenanceandrepairO<strong>the</strong>rPublictransportationMedical careTotalMedicalcarecommoditiesMedicalcareservices195019511952195319541955195619571958195919601961196219631964196519661967196819691970197119721973197419751976197719781979198019811982198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931992: JanFebMarAprMayJuneJuly•AugSeptOctNovDec1993:JanFebMarAprMayJuneJulyAugSeptOctNovDec22.724.125.726.526.125.826.227.728.629.829.830.130.830.931.431.932.333.334.335.737.539.539.941.245.850.155.159.061.770.583.193.297.099.3103.7106.4102.3105.4108.7114.1120.5123.8126.5130.4124.5124.1124.4125.2126.3126.9127.2126.9126.8128.0129.2129.0129.1129.2129.0129.4130.2130.3130.3130.2130.1131.8132.6132.124.525.627.327.827.126.727.128.629.530.830.630.831.431.632.032.532.933.834.836.037.539.439.741.046.250.655.659.762.571.784.293.897.199.3103.6106.2101.2104.2107.6112.9118.8121.9124.6127.5122.5122.0122.2122.9124.3125.4125.5125.4125.4126.1127.0126.7126.6126.5126.3126.8127.5127.6127.4127.3127.1129.0129.5128.641.143.146.847.246.544.846.148.550.052.251.551.551.351.050.949.748.849.350.751.553.055.254.754.857.962.966.970.475.881.888.493.797.499.9102.8106.1110.6114.6116.9119.2121.0125.3128.4131.5128.0128.1128.2128.2128.4128.2127.8127.6127.4128.2129.7130.5130.9130.9130.9131.1131.3131.0130.9130.8130.6131.9133.4134.226.722.721.520.723.224.026.825.026.028.428.730.029.829.029.931.233.033.135.236.743.850.354.755.860.262.376.988.898.7112.5113.7108.8113.1118.0120.4117.6118.1123.2133.9117.8116.1115.7117.9120.5123.1124.8126.4127.7129.1129.9129.0127.4126.0126.6128.7131.5134.3136.1137.5138.7139.8140.7139.319.019.520.021.221.822.122.823.823.423.724.424.124.324.224.125.125.626.426.827.627.928.128.431.242.245.147.049.751.870.197.4108.5102.899.497.998.777.180.280.988.5101.299.499.098.094.592.993.495.099.4102.9102.8101.7101.7101.6102.2100.298.698.097.398.499.799.898.197.096.199.798.494.818.920.420.822.022.723.224.225.025.426.026.527.127.527.828.228.729.230.432.134.136.639.341.143.247.653.757.661.967.073.781.589.296.0100.3103.8106.8110.3114.8119.7124.9130.1136.0141.3145.9139.0139.7140.3140.5140.8141.2141.4141.6142.2142.5142.8143.2143.4144.3144.7145.2145.4145.8146.2146.2146.8147.1147.4147.737.939.241.645.248.648.948.450.253.561.867.269.975.284.391.497.798.8103.5109.0115.1120.8127.9135.8142.5149.1153.2156.8152.4152.2152.2152.4152.5152.6153.0153.1152.7154.4155.3155.5156.5156.8156.3156.1156.1155.8156.0156.4156.1157.8159.1159.013.414.815.816.818.018.519.219.920.921.522.223.224.024.324.725.226.127.428.730.935.237.839.339.740.643.547.850.051.554.969.085.694.999.5105.7110.5117.0121.1123.3129.5142.6148.9151.4167.0151.5150.7153.5154.7151.6145.3148.3146.7145.6152.9157.4158.2161.6164.1163.5162.8165.5164.5167.7168.1168.4168.2173.0176.515.115.916.717.317.818.218.919.720.621.522.322.923.524.124.625.226.328.229.931.934.036.137.338.842.447.552.057.061.867.574.982.992.5100.6106.8113.5122.0130.1138.6149.3162.8177.0190.1201.4184.3186.2187.3188.1188.7189.4190.7191.5192.3193.3194.3194.7196.4198.0198.6199.4200.5201.1202.2202.9203.2204.4204.9205.239.740.841.241.542.042.543.444.646.146.846.946.345.645.245.145.045.144.945.045.446.547.347.447.549.253.356.560.264.469.075.483.792.3100.2107.5115.2122.8131.0139.9150.8163.4176.8188.1195.0183.0185.1186.7187.9187.6188.0188.6188.9189.5189.8190.4191.1191.8193.2193.9193.7194.2194.7195.7196.1196.2196.6196.6197.012.813.414.314.815.315.716.317.017.918.719.520.220.921.522.022.723.926.027.930.232.334.735.937.541.446.651.356.461.267.274.882.892.6100.7106.7113.2121.9130.0138.3148.9162.7177.1190.5202.9184.6186.4187.4188.1188.9189.7191.1192.2192.9194.2195.2195.6197.5199.1199.7200.7202.0202.6203.8204.5205.0206.2206.8207.13 Includes o<strong>the</strong>r new vehicles, not shown separately. Includes direct pricing <strong>of</strong> new trucks and motorcycles beginning September1982.4 Includes direct pricing <strong>of</strong> diesel fuel and gasohol beginning September 1981.5 Not available.Note.—See Note, Table B-59.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Labor, Bureau <strong>of</strong> Labor Statistics.337


TABLE B-61.—Consumer price indexes for commodities, services, and special groups, 1950-93[For all urban consumers; 1982-84 = 100, except as noted]CommoditiesServicesSpecial indexesYear or monthAll items(CPI-U)FoodAllcommoditiesCommoditieslessfoodAllservicesMedicalcareservicesServiceslessmedicalcareservicesAllitemslessfoodAllitemslessenergyAllitemslessfoodandenergyAllitemslessmedicalcareCPI-U-X1(all items)(Dec. 1982= 97.6) J195019511952195319541955195619571958195919601961196219631964196519661967196819691970197119721973197419751976197719781979198019811982198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931992: JanFebMarffljZZZZ.JuneJulyAugSeptOctNovDec1993:JanFebMarMay'.'.".'.'.'.!"'.!JuneJulyAugSeptOctNovDec24.126.026.526.726.926.827.228.128.929.129.629.930.230.631.031.532.433.434.836.738.840.541.844.449.353.856.960.665.272.682.490.996.599.6103.9107.6109.6113.6118.3124.0130.7136.2140.3144.5138.1138.6139.3139.5139.7140.2140.5140.9141.3141.8142.0141.9142.6143.1143.6144.0144.2144.4144.4144.8145.1145.7145.8145.829.031.632.031.931.631.331.632.633.333.333.633.834.134.434.835.236.136.838.139.941.743.244.547.853.558.260.764.268.876.686.093.297.099.8103.2105.4104.4107.7111.5116.7122.8126.6129.1131.5127.2127.6128.4128.8129.1129.2129.0129.3129.9130.3130.5130.1130.4130.9131.4131.9132.0131.4130.9131.1131.3132.3132.5132.025.428.228.728.328.2127.828.0!28.930.229.730.030.430.631.131.532.233.834.135.337.139.240.442.148.255.159.861.665.572.079.986.893.697.499.4103.2105.6109.0113.5118.2125.1132.4136.3137.9140.9137.2137.5138.1138.1137.4137.4137.2138.0138.5138.3138.3138.7139.8139.9140.1140.6141.1140.4140.3140.8141.1141.6141.9142.731.433.834.134.233.833.633.934.935.335.836.036.136.336.636.937.237.738.640.041.743.445.146.147.752.857.660.563.867.575.385.793.196.9100.0103.1105.2101.7104.3107.7112.0117.4121.3124.2126.3121.6122.1123.0123.5124.4124.5124.3124.3125.1125.7126.1125.3125.1125.8126.4127.0126.9126.3125.5125.7125.9127.1127.3126.116.917.818.619.420.020.420.921.822.623.324.124.525.025.526.026.627.628.830.332.435.037.038.440.143.848.052.056.060.867.577.988.196.099.4104.6109.9115.4120.2125.7131.9139.2146.3152.0157.9149.6150.1150.7150.8150.9151.7152.5153.0153.2153.7154.0154.2155.2155.8156.2156.5156.9157.8158.4159.0159.3159.5159.6160.012.813.414.314.815.315.716.317.017.918.719.520.220.921.522.022.723.926.027.930.232.334.735.937.541.446.651.356.461.267.274.882.892.6100.7106.7113.2121.9130.0138.3148.9162.7177.1190.5202.9184.6186.4187.4188.1188.9189.7191.1192.2192.9194.2195.2195.6197.5199.1199.7200.7202.0202.6203.8204.5205.0206.2206.8207.122.823.624.225.025.425.926.326.827.428.329.330.832.935.637.538.940.644.348.352.255.960.767.578.288.796.499.2104.4109.6114.6119.1124.3130.1136.8143.3148.4153.6146.3146.6147.1147.2147.3148.1148.8149.2149.4149.9150.1150.3151.2151.7152.1152.3152.6153.6154.1154.7155.0155.1155.2155.623.825.325.926.426.626.627.128.028.629.229.730.030.330.731.131.632.333.434.936.839.040.842.043.748.052.556.059.663.971.281.590.496.399.7104.0108.0109.8113.6118.3123.7130.3136.1140.8145.1138.3138.8139.5139.7140.1140.7141.1141.4141.8142.4142.7142.5143.1143.7144.2144.6144.8145.1145.2145.6145.9146.4146.6146.428.929.729.930.430.731.131.532.032.533.534.435.938.040.342.043.446.150.655.158.261.966.773.481.990.196.199.6104.3108.4112.6117.2122.3128.1134.7140.9145.4150.0143.3144.0144.7144.9144.9145.0145.3145.8146.2146.9147.1147.1147.9148.7149.1149.5149.6149.6149.7150.3150.6151.2151.5151.728.929.630.230.631.031.431.832.332.733.534.736.338.440.842.744.045.649.453.957.461.065.571.980.889.295.899.6104.6109.1113.5118.2123.4129.0135.5142.1147.3152.2144.9145.6146.4146.6146.7146.9147.3147.7148.1149.0149.3149.2149.9150.8151.4151.7151.7151.8152.0152.6152.9153.5153.9153.928.729.529.830.230.530.831.131.532.033.033.735.137.039.240.842.144.849.854.357.260.865.472.982.891.496.899.6103.7107.2108.8112.6117.0122.4128.8133.8137.5141.2135.5135.9136.5136.7136.9137.4137.6138.0138.4138.8139.0138.9139.5140.0140.4140.8141.0141.1141.1141.6141.8142.3142.5142.526.228.328.829.029.229.129.630.531.431.632.232.532.833.333.734.235.236.337.739.441.343.144.447.251.956.259.463.267.574.082.390.195.699.6103.9107.6109.6113.6118.3124.0130.7136.2140.3144.51 CPI-U-X1 is a rental equivalence approach to homeowners' costs for <strong>the</strong> consumer price index for years prior to 1983, <strong>the</strong> firstyear for which <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficial index (CPI-U) incorporates such a measure. CPI-U-X1 is rebased to <strong>the</strong> December 1982 value <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> CPI-U(1982-84 = 100); thus it is identical with CPI-U data for December 1982 and all subsequent periods. Data prior to 1967 estimated bymoving <strong>the</strong> series at <strong>the</strong> same rate as <strong>the</strong> CPI-U for each year.Note.—See Note, Table B-59.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Labor, Bureau <strong>of</strong> Labor Statistics.338


TABLE B-62.—Changes in special consumer price indexes, 1958-93[For all urban consumers; percent change]Year or month1958. .195919601961196219631964196519661967.19681969197019711972197319741975197619771978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921993Dec.toDec 1 181.714.7131.61.0193.5304.76.25.6333.48.712.36.9496.79013.312 58.93.83.83.93.81.14.4444.66.13.1292.7All items(CPI-U)Yeartoyear28.71 71.01 0131.3162.9314.25.55.7443.26.211.09.1586.57611.313 510.36.23.24.33.61.93.6414.85.44.2303.0All items lessfoodDec.toDec 1 1 82.1101.310161.01635335.05.66.6302.95.612.27.3616.48314.013 09.84.14.13.94.1.54.6424.56.33.3322.7Yeartoyear2 12.1171.010131.3162.2344.55.46.0462.94.09.89.4676.47211.414 510.96.53.54.33.81.73.5414.65.34.53 53.1All items lessenergyDec.toDec 1 2 11.31.313191.31 934324.96.55.4343.58.211.766486.79 111.11178.54.24.54.44.03.84.1474.65.23.9303.1Yeartoyear28.7171.013131.61631274.45.86.1423.36.29.88.9566.47810.011 610.06.73.64.73.93.94.1444.75.24.6323.2All items less foodand energyDec.toDec 1 1 72.0101.31 3161.21 533385.16.26.63 13.04.711.167616.58511.312 29.54.54.84.74.33.84.2474.45.24.4333.2Yeartoyear242.0131.31 3131.61224364.65.86.3473.03.68.39.1656.3749.812 410.47.44.05.04.34.04.1444.55.04.9373.3All items lessmedical careDec.toDec. 1 171.413.313161.0193.4274.76.15.2323.49.112.26.7456.79113.412 58.83.63.63.93.5.74.3424.55.92.7272.6Yeartoyear2.81.0131.01.01.01.31.63.12.14.25.45.9413.26.411.29.05.36.37.611.513.610.45.92.94.13.41.53.53.94.65.23.92.82.7Percent change from preceding periodUnadjustedSeasonallyadjustedUnadjustedSeasonallyadjustedUnadjustedSeasonallyadjustedUnadjustedSeasonallyadjustedUnadjustedSeasonallyadjusted1992-JanFebMarAorMayJuneJulyAugSeptOctNovDec1993:JanFebMarAprMayJJuneJulyAugSeptOctNovDec0.1.4.51.1.4.23.3.4.1_.l.5.4.3.31.10.3.2.4.100.3.2.4.3.1.2.32.1.4.2.1.5.3.1.4.10.1.30.4.2.201.4.51.3.4.32.3.4.2-.1.4.4.3.3.1.2.1.3.2.3.1-.10.3.2.4.3.3.3.31.1.5.3.1.4.4.2.3.1.1.1.30.4.1.104.5.5.10.1.23.3.5.10.5.5.3.3.10.1.4.2.4.2.10.3.3.3.2.1.2.23.1.4.2.2.5.4.1.4.2.1.1.30.3.3.303.5.5.1.1.1.3.3.3.6.2-.1.5.6.4.20.1.1.4.2.4.300.4.3.3.3.3.1.3.2.1.5.3.2.5.5 .1.4.2.1.1.3.1.3.3.30.1.3.4.1.1.4.1.3.3.3.1-.1.4.4.3.3.1.10.4.1.4.100.2.2.4.2.1.2.2.2.1.4.2.1.4.4.1.4.1-.1.1.20.4.2.11 Changes from December to December are based on unadjusted indexes.Note.—See Note, Table B-59.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Labor, Bureau <strong>of</strong> Labor Statistics.339


TABLE B-63.—Changes in consumer price indexes for commodities and services, 1929-93[For all urban consumers; percent change]YearAll items(CPI-U)Dec.toDec 1YeartoyearCommoditiesTotalDec.toDec. 1YeartoyearFoodDec.toDec 1YeartoyearServicesTotalDectoDec 1YeartoyearMedical careDec.toDec 1YeartoyearMedicalcare 2Dec.toDec 1YeartoyearEnergy3Dec.toDec 1Yeartoyear1929 ...1933....1939....1940....1941....1942...1943....1944....0.6-5.12.56.91.2-2.8194519461947194819491950...1951...1952...1953...1954...195519561957195819591960196119621963196419651966196719681969197019711972197319741975197619771978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921993.79.99.03.02.32.218.18.83.0-2.15.96.0.8.7-.7.43.02.91.81.71.4.71.31.61.01.93.53.04.76.25.63.33.48.712.36.94.96.79.013.312.58.93.83.83.93.81.14.44.44.66.13.12.92.7-1.4.75.010.96.11.72.38.314.48.1-1.21.37.91.9.8.7— 41.53.32.8.71.71.01.01.31.31.62.93.14.25.55.74.43.26.211.09.15.86.57.611.313.510.36.23.24.33.61.93.64.14.85.44.23.03.0-0.71.413.312.94.22.02.924.810.31.7-4.17.85.9_ 9-.32.62.81.2.61.20.91.5.91.42.52.54.05.43.92.83.410.412.86.23.36.18.813.011.06.03.62.92.72.5-2.04.63.84.16.61.22.01.5-2.0.76.714.59.31.03.010.620.57.2-2.7.79.01.3-.3-.9-.91.03.22.10.9.6.9.91.21.12.61.93.54.74.53.63.07.411.98.84.35.87.211.312.38.44.12.93.42.1_ g3^23.54.75.23.12.01.9-2.52.515.717.93.003.531.311.3-.8-3.99.87.1-1.0-1.1-1.8-.72.92.82.4-1.03.1-.71.32.01.33.54.01.24.47.02.34.34.620.312.06.6.58.111.810.210.24.33.12.73.82.63.83.55.25.65.31.91.52.9-2.51.79.217.611.0-1.22.414.521.78.3-4.21.611.01.8-1.4-.4-1.4.73.24.5-1.71.01.3.71.61.32.25.0.93.55.15.73.14.214.514.38.53.06.39.911.08.67.84.12.13.82.33.24.14.15.85.82.91.22.22.42.32.32.2.73.65.65.93.73.65.24.44.22.02.03.44.22.73.92.52.11.62.41.62.74.84.35.87.78.14.13.46.211.48.27.28.09.313.614.213.04.34.85.45.14.54.34.85.15.74.63.63.83.12.32.21.51.44.36.15.13.05.34.54.33.12.02.54.33.73.13.41.72.02.02.02.33.84.35.26.98.05.73.84.49.29.68.37.78.611.015.413.19.03.55.25.15.04.24.64.95.55.13.93.91.201.23.55.63.23.19.06.46.91.64.05.35.83.42.63.23.84.84.64.93.73.52.92.82.33.68.38.07.17.38.15.43.76.013.210.310.89.09.310.510.112.611.26.25.86.87.95.66.98.69.98.07.05.91.2003.54.54.33.15.18.77.13.32.44.76.73.53.42.63.84.35.34.54.33.63.52.92.33.25.38.87.38.27.07.43.54.510.412.610.19.98.59.811.310.711.88.76.06.17.76.66.47.79.38.97.66.51.001.03.84.62.62.68.36.95.81.43.45.84.33.52.33.33.24.74.53.83.23.12.22.52.12.86.76.36.26.27.44.63.35.312.69.810.08.98.810.19.912.511.06.46.16.87.75.86.98.59.67.96.65.41.002.94.73.62.65.08.06.72.82.05.35.03.62.92.23.84.24.64.43.72.72.62.62.12.44.47.26.06.76.66.23.34.09.312.09.59.68.49.211.010.711.68.86.26.37.56.66.57.79.08.77.45.9-0.94.71.3-1.32.2-.901.81.71.71.72.94.83.12.617.021.611.47.17.27.937.518.011.91.3.21.8-19.78.218.1-7.42.0-1.401.92.3.4.40-.41.81.72.11.72.52.83.92.68.129.610.57.19.56.325.130.913.61.5.71.0.7-13.25.68.3.4.51.21 Changes from December to December are based on unadjusted indexes.2 Commodities and services.3 Household fuels—gas (piped), electricity, fuel oil, etc.—and motor fuel. Motor oil, coolant, etc. also included through 1982.Note.—See Note, Table B-59.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Labor, Bureau <strong>of</strong> Labor Statistics.340


TABLE B-64.—Producer price indexes by stage <strong>of</strong> processing, 1947-93[1982 = 100]Finished goodsYear or monthTotalfinishedgoodsTotalConsumer foodsCrudeTotalFinished goods excluding consumer foodsTotalConsumer goodsDurableProcessedNondurableCapitalequipmentTntalfinishedconsumergoods194726.4 31.9 39.3 31.127.4 32.9 24.2 19.8 28.6194828 5 34 9 42 4 34 029 2 35 2 25 7 21.6 30.8194927.7 32.1 40.1 31.128.6 36.1 24.7 22.7 29.4195028.2 32.7 36.5 32.429.0 36.5 25.1 23.2 29.9195130.8 36.7 41.9 36.231.1 38.9 27.0 25.5 32.7195230.6 36.4 44.6 35.430.7 39.2 26.3 25.9 32.3195330.3 34.5 41.6 33.631.0 39.5 26.6 26.3 31.7195430 4 34 2 37 5 34 0311 39 8 26 7 26 7 31.7195530.5 33.4 39.1 32.731.3 40.2 26.8 27.4 31.51956313 33 3 391 32 7321 416 27.3 29 5 32.0195732.5 34.4 38.5 34.132.9 42.8 27.9 31.3 32.9195833 2 36 5 410 36132 9 43 4 27.8 32 1 33.6195933.1 34.8 37.3 34.733.3 43.9 28.2 32.7 33.3196033.4 35.5 39.8 35.233.5 43.8 28.4 32.8 33.6196133.4 35.4 38.0 35.333.4 43.6 28.4 32.9 33.6196233.5 35.7 38.4 35.633.4 43.4 28.4 33.0 33.71963 .. ..33.4 35.3 37.8 35.233.4 43.1 28.5 33.1 33.5196433 5 35 4 38 9 35 233 3 43 3 28 4 33 4 33.6196534.1 36.8 39.0 36.833.6 43.2 28.8 33.8 34.2196635 2 39 2 415 39 234 1 43 4 29.3 34 6 35.4196735.6 38.5 39.6 38.8 35.0 34.7 44.1 30.0 35.8 35.6196836.6 40.0 42.5 40.0 35.9 35.5 45.1 30.6 37.0 36.5196938.0 42.4 45.9 42.3 36.9 36.3 45.9 31.5 38.3 37.9197039.3 43.8 46.0 43.9 38.2 37.4 47.2 32.5 40.1 39.1197140.5 44.5 45.8 44.7 39.6 38.7 48.9 33.5 41.7 40.2197241.8 46.9 48.0 47.2 40.4 39.4 50.0 34.1 42.8 41.5197345.6 56.5 63.6 55.8 42.0 41.2 50.9 36.1 44.2 46.0197452 6 64 4 716 63 9 48 8 48 2 55 5 44.0 50 5 53.1197558.2 69.8 71.7 70.3 54.7 53.2 61.0 48.9 58.2 58.2197660.8 69.6 76.7 69.0 58.1 56.5 63.7 52.4 62.1 60.4197764.7 73.3 79.5 12.1 62.2 60.6 67.4 56.8 66.1 64.3197869 8 79 9 85 8 79 4 66 7 64 9 73 6 60.0 71.3 69.4197977.6 87.3 92.3 86.8 74.6 73.5 80.8 69.3 77.5 77.5198088 0 92 4 93 9 92 3 86 7 87 1 910 85.1 85.8 88.6198196.1 97.8 104.4 97.2 95.6 96.1 96.4 95.8 94.6 96.61982 . ..100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.01983101.6 101.0 102.4 100.9 101.8 101.2 102.8 100.5 102.8 101.31984103.7 105.4 111.4 104.9 103.2 102.2 104.5 101.1 105.2 103.31985104.7 104.6 102.9 104.8 104.6 103.3 106.5 101.7 107.5 103.81986103.2 107.3 105.6 107.4 101.9 98.5 108.9 93.3 109.7 101.41987105.4 109.5 107.1 109.6 104.0 100.7 111.5 94.9 111.7 103.61988108.0 112.6 109.8 112.7 106.5 103.1 113.8 97.3 114.3 106.21989113.6 118.7 . 119.6 118.6 111.8 108.9 117.6 103.8 118.8 112.11990119.2 124.4 123.0 124.4 117.4 115.3 120.4 111.5 122.9 118.219911217 124 1 119 3 124 4 120 9 118.7 123.9 115.0 126.7 120.51992123 2 123 3 107 6 124 4 1231 120 8 125.7 117.3 129.1 121.71993124.7 125.7 114.3 126.5 124.4 121.7 128.1 117.6 131.4 123.01992-Jan121.8 122.5 109.7 123.4 121.5 118.8 125.8 114.4 128.6 120.0Feb122 1 123 4 118 7 123 7 1216 118.8 125.5 114.6 128.7 120.3Mar122.2 123.3 115.8 123.8 121.8 119.0 125.8 114.8 128.9 120.4Apr122.4 122.8 105.2 124.0 122.3 119.6 125.6 115.7 129.1 120.7May .. .123.2 123.1 98.6 124.8 123.1 120.9 125.6 117.5 129.0 121.7June123 9 123 1 96 3 125 1 124 0 1221 125.2 119.5 128.9 122.6July123.7 122.8 97.3 124.7 123.8 122.0 125.4 119.2 128.8 122.4Aug123.6 123.4 104.5 124.8 123.5 121.5 125.1 118.6 128.9 122.2Sept123 3 123.3 104 6 124 7 123 2 121.4 123.4 119.3 128.1 122.2Oct124.4 123.8 113.0 124.6 124.5 122.3 127.1 118.9 130.2 122.9Nov124.0 123.4 110.4 124.3 124.1 121.7 127.1 118.1 130.2 122.4Dec123.8 124.2 117.4 124.7 123.6 121.1 126.9 117.2 130.2 122.21993-Jan124 2 124 3 114 8 125 0 124 0 1214 127.2 117.6 130.8 122.5Feb124.5 124.5 114.5 125.2 124.4 121.8 127.6 117.9 131.1 122.8Mar124.7 124.8 113.8 125.6 124.6 122.1 127.6 118.4 131.2 123.1Apr .125.5 126.5 126.5 126.5 125.1 122.7 127.9 119.1 131.2 124.0May125.8 126.9 125.2 127.0 125.4 123.3 127.8 119.9 131.2 124.5June125.5 125.4 102.3 127.1 125.5 123.4 127.7 120.1 131.0 124.1July125.3 125.0 100.7 126.8 125.3 123.0 127.9 119.5 131.3 123.8Aug 1124 2 125 4 107 4 126 7 123 8 120.9 127.9 116.6 131.2 122.4Sept123.9 125.6 107.9 126.9 123.3 120.6 126.4 116.8 130.3 122.2Oct124 7 125 5 105 6 126 9 124 3 1212 129.2 116.5 132.4 122.6Nov124.4 126.7 123.0 127.0 123.7 120.3 129.7 114.9 132.5 122.3Dec124.1 127.2 129.7 126.9 123.1 119.4 129.7 113.6 132.7 121.8Ii1 Data have been revised through August 1993 to reflect <strong>the</strong> availability <strong>of</strong> late reports and corrections by respondents. All data aresubject to revision 4 months after original publication.See next page for continuation <strong>of</strong> table.341


TABLE B-64.—Producer price indexes by stage <strong>of</strong> processing,1947-93—Continued[1982 = 100]Intermediate materials, supplies, and componentsCrude materials for fur<strong>the</strong>r processingYear or monthTotalFoodsandfeeds 2O<strong>the</strong>rMaterials andcomponentsFormanufacturingForconstructionProcessedfuelsandlubricantsSuppliesTotalToncontainersFoodstuffsandfeedstuffsTotalO<strong>the</strong>rFuelO<strong>the</strong>r19471948194919501951195219531954 . .19551956. . .19571958 .. .195919601961196219631964196519661967196819691970197119721973197419751976.1977197819791980198119821983198419851986198719881989 . . .19901991199219931992: JanFebMarMay""'.""-JuneJulyAugSeptOctNovDec1993: JanFebMarfc=JuneJulyAug 1SeptOctNovDec23 325.224.225.328.427 527.727 928.429 630.330.430.830 830.630 630.730 831.232 032.233 034.135 436.838 242.452.558.060.964.969.578.490.398.6100 0100.6103.1102.79911015107.1112.0114.5114.4114.7116.2113.2113.5113.6113.8114.5115.4115.5115.5115.8115.4115.0114.8115.2115.6116.0116.3116.2116.7116.6116.6116.8116.6116.2115.9••"41.8"41542.945 646.749 570.383.681.677.479.684.894.5105.5104 6100.0103.6105.797.396.299 2109.5113.8113.3111.1110.7112.7110.7110.7110.7110.4111.5112.3111.2110.3111.0109.7109.6110.7110.9109.8109.9111.2111.8111.1114.0114.3113.9113.8115.0117.022 224.123.524.627.626.727.027.228.029.330.130.130.530 730.330 230.130 330.731331.732 533.634 836.237 740.650 556.660.064.168.677.489.498.2100.0100.5103.0103.099.31017106.9111.9114.5114.6114.9116.4113.3113.6113.7114.0114.7115.6115.7115.8116.1115.7115.2115.1115.4115.9116.3116.6116.5117.0116.7116.7117.0116.8116.3115.824 926.825.726.930.529 329.729 830.532 032.732 833.333 332.932 732.733133.634 334.535 336.538 038.940 444.156 061.764.067.472.080.991798.7100 0101.2104.1103.3102 2105 3113.2118.1118.7118.1117.9118.9117.2117.4117.5117.6117.9118.2118.3118.3118.4118.1118.0118.0118.4118.7118.8119.1118.9118.8118.9119.0119.0119.0119.1119.222 524.924.926.228 728 529 029130 331832 032 032.932 732.232 132.232 532.833 634.035 737.738 340.843 046.555 060.164169.376.584.291.397 9100 0102.8105.6107 3108.1109 8116.1121.3122.9124.5126.5132.0124.9125.9126.6126.8126.8126.5126.3126.4126.8126.7126.9127.8129.1130.9132.5132.8132.0131.3131.1131.6132.4132.7133.4134.114 416.414.915.215.915 715.815 815.816 317.216 216.216 616.816 716.616 216.516 816.916 516.617 719.520 122.233 639.442 347.749.961.685.0100 6100 095.495.792 872.773 371.276.485.985.384.584.780.280.680.080.783.688.188.288.089.087.285.083.583.283.383.884.385.288.187.186.387.185.782.879.523 424.424.525.229.628 028.028 528.931032.433 233.033 433.233 633.232 933.534 535.035 937.239 040.842 745.253 360.063.165.971.079.489196.7100.0100.4105.9109.01103114 5120.1125.4127.7128.1127.7126.4127.6127.7127.7127.8127.7127.6127.7127.6127.7127.8127.8127.7126.7126.8126.7126.5126.5126.5126.4126.1126.0126.1126.1126.528 529.828.029.032.632.631.031731.232 032.333.133.533 333.734 535.034 735.036 536.837 137.839 740.842 551.756 861.865 869.372.980.289 996.9100 0101.8104.1104.4105 6107 7113.7118.1119.4121.4122.7125.0122.0122.1122.4122.4122.7122.7122.7122.7123.0123.2123.3123.6124.2124.3124.3124.8124.7124.7125.2125.5125.4125.5125.7126.131 734.730.132.737.634.531.931630.430 631.231.931.130 430.230 529.929 631.133131.331833.935 236.039 954.561.461.663 465.573.485.995.3103.0100.0101.3103.595.887.793 796.0103.1108.9101.2100.4102.496.998.697.998.8101.2102.1101.7100.6102.4101.9101.8100.9101.4101.4102.6103.9106.5104.2101.5100.6101.0102.2102.5100.445 148.840.543.450.247.342.342 338.437.639.241.638.838 437.938 637.536 639.242 740.340 944.145 246.151572.676 477.476.877.587.3100.0104.6103.9100.0101.8104.794.893.296 2106.1111.2113.1105.5105.1108.3103.7106.0107.2105.5108.4107.4105.0103.7102.9103.7102.8104.6105.6106.0108.3110.4112.2107.2107.5108.0107.5105.6109.5111.521.121622.523 824.727 034.344 143.748.251.757.569.684.6101.8100.0100.7102.296.981.687 985.593.4101.594.693.594.788.890.188.290.792.894.895.794.898.096.897.294.694.894.695.095.898.898.393.992.192.996.194.189.5758.98.88.89.09.09.38.98.99.510.110.210.410 510.510 410.510 510.610 911.311512.013 815.716.818.624.830.634.542.048.257.369.484.8100.0105.1105.1102.792.284.182.185.384.882.984.087.083.582.679.178.579.878.583.782.888.385.894.190.790.683.481.482.489.494.985.584.488.189.889.585.224 026.724.327.832.027.826.626.127.528.628.227.128.126 927.227 126.727 227.728 326.527.128.429.129.432.342.954.550.054.956.361.975.591.8109.8100.098.8101.094.376.088.585.995.8107.397.594.294.187.289.788.893.095.399.197.696.898.698.194.092.092.496.197.998.599.195.393.891.790.994.791.987.42 Intermediate materials for food manufacturing and feeds.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Labor, Bureau <strong>of</strong> Labor Statistics.342


TABLE B-65.—Producer price indexes by stage <strong>of</strong> processing, special groups, 1974-93[1982=100]FinishedgoodsIntermediate materials, supplies,and componentsCrude materials for fur<strong>the</strong>rprocessingExcluding foods andenergyYear or monthTotalFoodsEnergyTotalCapitalequipmentConsumergoodsexcludingfoodsandenergyTotalFoodsandfeeds 1EnergyO<strong>the</strong>rTotalFoodstuffsandfeedstuffsEnergyO<strong>the</strong>r1974197519761977197819791980198119821983 .19841985198619871988198919901991199219931992:JanFebMarAprMayJune.........JulyAugSeptOctNovDec1993:JanFebMarMay'!'.!!!!!'.!JuneJulyAug 2SeptOctNovDec52.658.260.864 769.877.688.096.1100.01016103.7104.7103 2105.4108 0113.6119.21217123.2124.7121.8122.1122.2122.4123.2123.9123.7123.6123.3124.4124.0123.8124.2124.5124.7125.5125.8125.5125.3124.2123.9124.7124.4124.164.469.869.673 379.987.392.497.8100.01010105.4104.6107 3109.5112 6118.7124.4124 1123.3125.7122.5123.4123.3122.8123.1123.1122.8123.4123.3123.8123.4124.2124.3124.5124.8126.5126.9125.4125.0125.4125.6125.5126.7127.226.230.734.339 742.357.185 2101.5100 095 291.287.663 061.859 865.775.078177.878.074.374.374.475.477.881.080.480.280.880.078.476.476.676.977.578.379.680.579.679.179.578.976.273.553.659 763.166 971.978.387 194.6100.0103 0105.5108.1110 6113.3117 0122.1126.61311134.2135.8133.4133.5133.7134.0134.2134.1134.2133.8133.2135.2135.2135.4135.9136.2136.3136.7136.6136.3136.4134.6133.8135.4135.6135.950.558 262.166 17L377.585 894.6100.0102 8105.2107.5109 7111.7114 3118.8122.9126 7129.1131.4128.6128.7128.9129.1129.0128.9128.8128.9128.1130.2130.2130.2130.8131.1131.2131.2131.2131.0131.3131.2130.3132.4132.5132.755.560 663.767 312278.887 894.6100 01031105.7108.4111 1114.2118 5124.0128.8133 7137.3138.5136.4136.4136.6137.0137.5137.3137.5136.8136.4138.2138.3138.6139.0139.4139.5140.0140.0139.552.558 060.964 969!578.490 398.6100.0100 6103.1102.799 1101.5107 1112.0114.5114 4114.7116.2113.2113.5113.6113.8114.5115.4115.5115.5115.8115.4115.0114.8115.2115.6116.0116.3116.2116.7139.5 116.6136.7 116.6136.0 • 116.8137.3 116.6137.5 116.2137.8 115.983.681677.479.684!894.5105 5104.6100.0103 6105.797.396 299.2109 5113.8113.3111 1110.7112.7110.7110.7110.7110.4111.5112.3111.2110.3111.0109.7109.6110.7110.9109.8109.9111.2111.8111.1114.0114.3113.9113.8115.0117.033.138 741.546.849! 161.184 9100.5100.095 395.592.672 673.070 976.185.585184.384.680.180.479.980.683.487.888.087.888.787.084.983.483.183.283.784.285.187.987.086.186.985.682.779.454.060 263.867 67?580.790 397.7100 01016104.7105.2104 9107:81152120.2120.9121 4122.0123.8121.1121.4121.6121.8121.9122.0122.1122.2122.4122.3122.3122.4122.9123.5123.9124.1123.8123.7123.6123.8124.0124.0124.1124.461.461.663.465 573.485.995 3103.0100.0101 3103.595.887 793.796 0103.1108.91012100.4102.496.998.697.998.8101.2102.1101.7100.6102.4101.9101.8100.9101.4101.4102.6103.9106.5104.2101.5100.6101.0102.2102.5100.476.477.476.877 587.3100.0104.6103.9100 01018104.794.893 296.2106 1111.2113.1105 5105.1108.3103.7106.0107.2105.5108.4107.4105.0103.7102.9103.7102.8104.6105.6106.0108.3110.4112.2107.2107.5108.0107.5105.6109.5111.527.833.335.340 445.254.973.197.7100.098 798.093.371875.067 775.985.980 478.876.774.475.572.275.077.480.181.079.783.882.983.879.878.677.577.778.081.380.975.073.674.978.675.668.983.369.380.279 887.8106.2113.1111.7100.0105 3111.7104.91031115.7133.0137.9136.3128.2128.4140.1123.0125.2128.1129.1129.7129.2130.0130.8130.4128.2127.1129.7134.3137.4138.2140.7142.2141.7142.6139.8138.9139.6141.4144.81 Intermediate materials for food manufacturing and feeds.2 Data have been revised through August 1993 to reflect <strong>the</strong> availability <strong>of</strong> late reports and corrections by respondents. All data aresubject to revision 4 months after original publication.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Labor, Bureau <strong>of</strong> Labor Statistics.343


TABLE B-66.—Producer price indexes for major commodity groups, 1930-93[1982 = 100]Farm products and processedfoods and feedsIndustrial commoditiesYear or monthTotalFarmproductsProcessedfoods andfeedsTotalTextileproductsandapparelHides,skins,lea<strong>the</strong>r,andrelatedproductsFuels andrelatedproductsandpower 1Chemicalsand alliedproducts*195019511952195319541955195619571958195919601961196219631964196519661967196819691970197119721973197419751976197719781979198019811982198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931992: Jan....Feb....Mar....Apr....May...June..July....Aug...Sept..Oct...Nov...Dec...1993: Jan...Feb...Mar...May"June.July...Aug 2Sept..Oct...Nov...Dec...37.743.041.338.638.536.636.437.739.437.637.737.738.137.737.539.041.640.241.143.444.945.849.263.971.374.073.675.983.092.398.3101.1100.0102.0105.5100.7101.2103.7110.0115.4118.6116.4115.9118.4115.2116.3116.7115.8117.0116.9115.8115.4115.3115.4115.0116.2116.6116.6117.5119.1119.8117.5118.0118.4118.3117.8119.8121.244.051.248.443.843.240.540.041.142.940.240.139.740.439.639.040.743.741.342.345.045.846.651.672.777.477.078.879.487.799.6102.9105.2100.0102.4105.595.192.995.5104.9110.9112.2105.7103.6107.0102.8105.5106.4103.2105.8104.7102.5102.2101.6102.7101.8103.7104.3104.4106.4109.7111.0104.3105.4106.6106.1104.1109.3112.433.236.936.434.835.433.833.834.836.535.635.636.236.536.836.738.040.239.840.642.744.645.548.058.968.072.670.874.080.688.595.998.9100.0101.8105.4103.5105.4107.9112.7117.8121.9121.9122.1124.0121.3121.7121.8122.0122.5123.0122.4122.1122.1121.8121.6122.4122.7122.7122.9123.7124.2124.0124.3124.3124.3124.6125.0125.525.027.626.927.227.227.829.129.930.030.530.530.430.430.330.530.931.532.032.833.935.236.537.840.349.254.958.462.567.075.788.097.4100.0101.1103.3103.7100.0102.6106.3111.6115.8116.5117.4119.0115.7116.0115.9116.4117.3118.2118.3118.1118.5118.6118.3117.9118.3118.7119.0119.4119.7119.9119.4118.8118.8119.4118.8117.950.256.050.549.348.248.248.248.347.448.148.647.848.248.248.548.848.948.950.751.852.453.355.560.568.067.472.475.378.182.589.797.6100.0100.3102.7102.9103.2105.1109.2112.3115.0116.3117.8118.1117.4117.6117.7117.8117.7117.9117.8117.8118.0118.1118.0118.0118.0117.9117.9118.1118.0118.0118.2118.3118.2118.2118.1117.832.937.730.531.029.529.431.231.231.635.934.634.935.334.334.435.939.438.139.341.542.043.450.054.555.256.563.968.376.196.194.799.3100.0103.2109.0108.9113.0120.4131.4136.3141.7138.9140.4143.6138.6139.0139.8139.9140.7140.8140.1140.8140.9141.0140.6142.0143.6142.5142.9143.6143.8143.7143.5143.9144.1143.7143.9144.312.613.013.013.413.213.213.614.313.713.713.914.014.013.913.513.814.114.414.314.615.316.617.119.430.135.438.343.646.558.982.8100.2100.095.994.891.469.870.266.772.982.381.280.480.076.376.875.877.179.783.283.382.884.482.282.179.779.479.279.780.381.983.281.080.280.981.278.374.430.434.833.033.433.833.733.934.634.934.834.834.533.933.533.633.934.034.234.134.235.035.635.637.650.262.064.065.968.076.089.098.4100.0100.3102.9103.7102.6106.4116.3123.0123.6125.6125.9128.2124.6124.5124.4124.8125.2126.0126.4126.7127.0127.1127.5127.0127.6128.1127.8128.6128.2128.5128.2128.3128.2128.3128.5128.01 Prices for some items in this grouping are lagged and refer to 1 month earlier than <strong>the</strong> index month.2 Data have been revised through August 1993 to reflect <strong>the</strong> availability <strong>of</strong> late reports and corrections by respondents. All data aresubject to revision 4 months after original publication.344


TABLE B-66.—Producer price indexes for major commodity groups,1950-93—Continued[1982=100]Year or monthIndustrial commodities—ContinuedRubberandplasticproducts35.643.739 636.937.542.443.042.842.842.642.741139.940.139.639.740 541442.843.644.945.245.346.656.462.266.069.472.480.590.196.4100.0100.8102.3101.9101.9103.0109.3112.6113.6115.1115.1116.0114.7114.3114.3114.6114.9115.0115.2115.3115.5115.7115.8115.7115.7115.7115.6116.0115.8115.9115.9116.0116.5116.5116.4116.5Lumberandwoodproducts31.434.133 233.132.534.134.632.832.534.733.532.032.232.833.533.735 235139.844.039.944.750.762.264.562.172.283.096.9105.5101.5102.8100.0107.9108.0106.6107.2112.8118.9126.7129.7132.1146.6174.0137.6142.9145.7147.5147.6146.3145.3145.4148.7148.7149.5154.4160.2169.3176.9181.2179.8174.1171.7171.1173.0173.1177.0180.9Pulp,paper,andalliedproducts25.730 529 729.629.630.432.433.033.433.734.033.033.433.133.033 334.234.635.036.037.538.139.342.352.559.062.164.667.775.986.394.8100.0103.3110.3113.3116.1121.8130.4137.8141.2142.9145.2147.3144.1144.2144.4144.9145.2145.1145.2145.4145.8146.1145.9145.9147.0147.1147.3147.7147.7147.1147.1147.1147.2147.4147.4147.6Metalsandmetalproducts22.024.524 525.325.527.229.630.230.030.630.630.530.230.331.132.032.833.234.036.038.739.440.944.057.061.565.069.375.386.095.099.6100.0101.8104.8104.4103.2107.1118.7124.1122.9120.2119.2119.2118.2118.9119.4119.6119.5119.6120.0120.2119.6118.8118.2118.5118.9119.2119.0118.7118.4118.9119.5119.5119.5119.4119.5120.2Machineryandequipment22.625 325 325.926.327.229.331.432.132.833.033.033.033.133.333 734 735 937.038.240.041.442.343.750.057.961.365.270.376.786.094.4100.0102.7105.1107.2108.8110.4113.2117.4120.7123.0123.4124.0123.3123.5123.6123.4123.4123.2123.1123.2123.2123.3123.4123.5123.9123.9123.9124.0123.9124.0124.0124.0124.1124.1124.1124.2Furnitureandhouseholddurables40.944 443.544.444.945.146.347.547.948.047.847.547.246.947.146.847.448 349.750.751.953.153.855.761.867.570.373.277.582.890.795.9100.0103.4105.7107.1108.2109.9113.1116.9119.2121.2122.2123.6121.8121.8121.9122.0122.1122.2122.2122.2122.4122.3122.6122.6122.6122.9123.0123.2123.4123.6123.8124.0124.0124.2124.4124.5Nonmetallicmineralproducts23.525.025 026.026.627.328.529.629.930.330 430 530.530.330.430.430.731232.433.635.338.239.440.747.854.458.262.669.677.688.496.7100.0101.6105.4108.6110.0110.0111.2112.6114.7117.2117.3120.0117.2117.1117.3116.9116.9117.0117.1117.4117.4117.4117.7117.8118.4118.6118.9119.6119.7120.0120.2120.5120.7121.3121.4121.3TransportationequipmentTotal40.441.944.245.546.150.356.760.564.669.575.382.994.3100.0102.8105.2107.9110.5112.5114.3117.7121.5126.4130.4133.7129.8129.7130.0130.2130.2130.1130.2130.0128.5132.3132.2132.1132.7133.1133.3133.4133.3133.3133.6133.5131.6135.3135.3135.5Motorvehiclesandequipment30.031.633 433.333.434.336.337.939.039.939 339 239.238.939.139.239.239 840.941.743.345.747.047.451.457.661.265.270.075.883.194.6100.0102.2104.1106.4109.1111.7113.1116.2118.2122.1124.9128.0124.8124.6124.9124.8124.7124.3124.4123.9121.3127.1127.1126.9127.1127.8127.8127.7127.6127.7127.8127.7125.0129.7129.9130.0Miscellaneousproducts28.630.330.231.031.331.331.732.633.333.433.633.733.934.234.434.735.336.237.038.139.840.841.543.348.153.455.659.466.775.593.696.1100.0104.8107.0109.4111.6114.9120.2126.5134.2140.8145.3145.5143.9143.9144.0144.8146.4146.2146.3143.8145.3145.5145.8147.3148.6149.4149.4150.4150.7149.6149.6138.9139.3139.2139.5141.0195019511952195319541955195619571958195919601961196219631964196519661967196819691970197119721973197419751976197719781979198019811982198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931992: Jan...Feb...Mar...Apr...May..June.July...Aug...Sept.Oct...Nov...Dec...1993: Jan...Feb...Mar...Apr...May..June.July...Aug 2Sept,Oct..Nov..Dec.Source-. Department <strong>of</strong> Labor, Bureau <strong>of</strong> Labor Statistics.345


TABLE B-67.—Changes in producer price indexes for finished goods, 1955-93[Percent change]Year ormonth19551956.....1957.. .19581959196019611962196319641965196619671968196919701971197219731974197519761977.1978197919801981 .198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921993..TotalfinishedgoodsDec toDec 11.04.2343-.3186336332.01 7314.92.13.33911.718.36.63.86.79312.811.8713.6.61 71.82 32^2404^95.7-.11.6.2Year toyear0.3263822-.3903331 83.211283.83.431329115.410.64.56.47911.213.4924.11.62 11.01 42.125524.92.11.21.2FinishedconsumerfoodsDec. toDec 1-3.037516-3.7531961469 11.33468.1-2.3587922 712.85.6-2.56.911 77.47.5152.02.335.628-.2575.22.6-1.51.62.4Year toyear-2.3_ 3336 1-4.72038113406.51 839603.3165420 514.08.4-.35.3909.35.8582.21.044-.8262.128544.8-.2-.61.9Finished goods excluding consumer foodsTotalDec. toDec 1 253.34.320236621.17.26.26.88314.813.4874.20112.24 03.232486.9.31.6-.4Year toyear26283.537204016.212.16.27.17211.816.210 34.61.8141.42 62.124505.03.01.81.1ConsumergoodsDec. toDec 1 1.6251 53.9330o 391.820202.83.8212 17520.36.86.06.78517.614.1864.2— .982.1664.13 1538.7-.71.6-1.4.71.7 1.91.9 1.8CapitalequipmentDec. to Year toDec 1 year0.6 5.6 2.626 81 7725 46 6 1o 1 2 261.2 .9 1.96 3 33o30 3 36o33 9 99 1 5 121.51 823233.0351 84617.010.46.27.37 113.318.510 34.11.2101.14 62.224565.92.91.83.83 130484.8242 15122.78.1657.2808.811.4923.92.01 82.72 11.336383.42.52.435343.54.740263314.315.26.76.47 98.710.710 35.72.8232.22 01.823393.53.1Year toyearFinishedenergygoodsDecDec 116.311.612.08558.127.914 1-.1-9.242-.238 111.2369530.7-9.6-.3-3.8Yearyear17.211.715.76535.049.219 1-1.5-4.842-3.928 1-1.9329.914.24.1_ 4.2Finished goodsexcluding foodsand energyDec toDec. 117.76.05.76.2849.410.87.74.91.9202.7272.1434.23.53.12.0.4Year toyear11.411.45.76.0758.911.28.65.73.0242.5232.4334.43.73.62.41.2Percent change from preceding monthjustedUnadjustedSeasonallyadjustedUnadjustedSeasonallyadjustedUnadjustedSeasonallyadjustedUnadjustedSeasonallyadjustedUnadjustedSeasonallyadjustedUnadjustedSeaallyUnadjustedSeasonallyadjusted1992: JanFebMarAprMayJuneJulyAugSeptOct.NovDec1993: JanFebMarJuneJulyAug 2 ...SeptOctNovDec-0.1.2.1.2.7.6-.2-.1-.2.9-.3-.2.3.2.2.6.2-.2-.2-.9-.2.6-.2-.20.2.2.2.3.20.1.2.1-.20.3.4.3.60-.60-.6.2-.20-.10.2.7-.1_ 4.20-.2.5_ i.4-.3.6.1.2.21.4.3-1.2-.3.3.2-.11.0.4-0.4.4-.1-.3.2_ i.7.4.1-.61.3-.60.21.40-1.0-.2.5.7-.5.81.1-0.2.1.2.4.7.7-.2-.2-.21.1-.3-.4.3.3.2.4.2.1-.2-1.2_ 4.8_ 5-.50.1.2.3.3.4.3.1-.2.2.1-.1-.3.6.5.3.40-.40-1.0.1-.2-.2-.4-0.30.2.51.11.0-.1-.4-.1.7-.5-.5.2.3.2.5.5.1— 3-1.7-.2.5-.7_ 7-0.1.3.3.4.6.4.1-.3.2.2-.2-.6.6.6.5.40-.6-.1-1.5.1-.1-.4-.70.5.1.2.2-.1-.1-.1.1-.61.600.5.2.100-.2.2-.1-.71.6.1.20.5.1.3.2.1-.1.1.20-.2.2.2.5.3.2.2.1-.2.4.20-.4.2.3-3.00.11.33.24.1-.7-.2.7-1.0-2.0-2.6.3.4.81.01.71.1-1.1-.6.5-.8-3.4-3.5-2.01.3.4.7.82.4— 4-.6.11.0-1.3-2.41.01.71.1.3-.5-.5-.9-1.001.3-2.7-3.50.5.1.1.2.1-.1.1-.3-.41.50.1.4.2.1.3-.1-.2.1-1.3-.61.2.1.20.5.1.3.3.4-.2.10.1-.1.2.1.4.2.2.4.1-.4.2-1.0.1-.5.4.21 Changes from December to December are based on unadjusted indexes.2 Data have been revised through August 1993 to reflect <strong>the</strong> availability <strong>of</strong> late reports and corrections by respondents. All data aresubject to revision 4 months after original publication.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Labor, Bureau <strong>of</strong> Labor Statistics.346


MONEY STOCK, CREDIT, AND FINANCETABLE B-68.—Money stock, liquid assets, and debt measures, 1959-93[Averages <strong>of</strong> daily figures; billions <strong>of</strong> dollars, seasonally adjusted]YearyearandmonthMlSum <strong>of</strong>currency,demanddeposits,travelerschecks, ando<strong>the</strong>rcheckabledeposits(OCDs)M2Ml plusovernightRPs andEurodollars,MMMFbalances(generalpurpose andbroker/dealer),MMDAs, andsavings andsmall timedepositsM3M2 pluslarge timedeposits,term RPs,termEurodollars,andinstitutiononlyMMMFbalancesLMO n|.,c(VIo piUSo<strong>the</strong>r liquidassetsDebt 1Debt <strong>of</strong>domesticnonfinancialsectors(monthlyaverage)Percent change from year or 6months earlier 2Ml M2 M3 DebtDecember:195919601961 ... .19621963196419651966196719681969197019711972 .1973197419751976197719781979198019811982198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931992:JanFebMarAprMayJuneJulyAugSeptOctNovDec1993: JanFebMarAprMayJuneJulyAugSeptOctNovDec140.0140.7145 2147.8153 3160.3167 9172.0183 3197.4203.9214.4228.3249.2262.8274.3287.5306 3331.1358.2382.5408.5436.3474 4521.2552 4620.1724 5750.0787.1794.6827.2899.31,026.61,131.2911.5926.2935.1941.2952.2952.5963 2975.5990.11,006.01,019.11,026.61,033.21,033.01,035.21,043.01,066.91,073.31,085 31,094.41,106 81,116.41,125.91,131.2297.8312.3335 5362.7393 2424.8459 3480.0524 3566.3589.5628.0712.6805.1860.9908 41,023.11163 51,286.41,388.51,496.41,629.21,792.61952 72,186.52 376 02,572.42 81612,917.23,078.23,233.33 345 53,445.83,494.83,551.73^451.03,467.73,467 83,464.83,467.83,464.23 465 43,473.63,481.03,491 53,496.23,494.83,485.73,474.13,471.63,473.83,503.03,509.63,515.73,518.93 53103,533.23,545.03,551.7299.8315.33410371.4406 0442.5482 2505.1557 1606.2615.0677.3776.1886 0984.91,070 31,172.1131161,472.31,646.21,802.61,986.82,233.42 440 62,693.12 988 23,203.63 49173,674.83,915.44,056.14 116 74,168.14,163.44,207.74J72.24,189.04 184 84,177.94,180.14,172.5417124,180.64,184.54,180.64,176.64,163.44,138.14,131.84,127.24,137.74,165.44,164.14,162.24,164.34,177.74,184.84,197.84,207.7388.6403 6430 8466.1503 8540.4584 4614.7666 5728.9763.5816.2902.91,022 91,142.51250 21,366.91516 41,705.01,910.32,115.62,323.52,596.02 850 33,154.43 529 53,830.94 13194,333.54,669.44,886.14 966 64,982.35,040.44,978.34,999.15 010.05,009.05,011.45,017.25 014 751027.85,038.95 041.35,049.05,040.45,015.85,011.85,011.05,027.05,065.25,066.75,064.15,075.55,066.25,076.55,093.4687.2723.6766 5819.4874 5938.1100511,072.31 146 61,238.11,329.31,419.61,552.01,707.51,894.12,067.02,251.42 496 32,813.73,192.23,568.23,896.84,278.74 69165,257.56 00616,901.17 778 68,543.39,306.110,030.710,670.111,145.511,721.111,189.911,235.011,284.911,335.611,381.711,434.811494 111,553.411,597.811,625.711,665.611,721.111,757.811,781.611,821.311,867.411,912.711,976.112,033.412,088.312,141.912,179.212,241.80.5321.8374.6472.4667.73.35.16.5925.5444.8658.18.26.86.86.8879.96012.316 83.54.91.04 18.714.210.211.513.414.414.013.711.811.310.611.813.814.115.614.511.89.17.49.49.110.111.913.814.111.110.84.9748.1848.0814.5928.04.16.513.513.06.95.512.613 710.67.97.88.910.08912.037839.53.65.55.03.53.01.41.62.13.02.92.51.91.1.8.3.81.51.61.81.2.0-.5-1.0.4.81.72.63.43.42.42.45.28.28.9939.0904.710.38.81.510.114.614.211.28.79.511.912.311.89.510.212.49.310.311.07.29.05.26.53.61.51.2-.11.1.61.61.71.1.8.2-.0-.4-.0.1-.2-.4-1.6-2.3-2.7-2.1-.5.01.21.62.42.31.62.17.55.35.96.96.77.37.16.76.98.07.46.89.310.010.99.18.910.912.713.511.89.29.89.712.114.214.912.79.88.97.86.44.55.24.24.24.54.54.85.25.45.75.55.15.05.04.64.03.94.24.24.44.75.25.45.35.51 Consists <strong>of</strong> outstanding credit market debt <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> U.S. Government, State and local governments, and private nonfinancial sectors;data derived from flow <strong>of</strong> funds accounts.2 Annual changes are from December to December; monthly changes are from 6 months earlier at a simple annual rate.Note.—See Table B-69 for components.Data do not reflect revisions <strong>of</strong> February 3, <strong>1994</strong>.Source: Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Federal Reserve System.347


TABLE B-69.—Components <strong>of</strong> money stock measures and liquid assets, 1959-93[Averages <strong>of</strong> daily figures; billions <strong>of</strong> dollars, seasonally adjusted, except as noted]December:195919601961196219631964196519661967196819691970197119721973197419751976197719781979198019811982198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931992: JanFebMarAprMayJuneJulyAugSeptOctNovDec1993:JanFebMarAprMayJuneJulyAugSeptOctNovDecYearandmonthCurrency28.828.729.330.332.233.936.038.040.043.045.748.652.056.260.867.072.879.587.496.0104.8115.4122.6132.5146.2156.1167.9180.8196.9212.3222.7246.7267.2292.3321.5269.0270.8271.9273.6275.1276.6279.5282.4286.3288.0289.8292.3294.8296.9299.0301.4304.0306.8309.6312.6316.4318.2320.0321.5Travelerschecks0.3.3.4.4.4.5.5.6.6.7.8.91.01.21.41.72.12.62.93.33.63.94.14.14.75.05.66.16.67.06.97.87.88.18.07.77.77.77.77.77.77.77.88.18.38.28.18.08.08.08.18.28.07.97.87.87.98.08.0Demanddeposits110.8111.6115.5117.1120.6125.8131.3133.4142.5153.6157.3164.7175.1191.6200.3205.1211.6221.5236.7250.4257.4261.2231.2234.0238.5244.0266.9302.3287.1287.1279.8278.2290.5340.8386.1296.3303.3308.0310.8314.6312.3317.5322.5329.0336.0339.5340.8341.9341.8341.9347.3359.2360.7365.9370.9376.6380.2385.5386.1O<strong>the</strong>rcheckabledeposits(OCDs)0.0.0.0.0.1.1.1.1.1.1.2.1.2.2.3.4.92.74.28.416.828.078.4103.8131.9147.3179.7235.3259.3280.7285.3294.5333.8385.2415.7338.6344.3347.5349.0354.7355.9358.6362.8366.7373.7381.6385.2388.6386.4386.3386.2395.5397.8401.9403.1406.0410.1412.5415.7Overnightrepurchaseagreements(RPs)net, plusovernightEurodollars»NSA0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.02.21.32.32.85.35.75.910.714.920.721.728.836.639.955.660.673.582.384.183.277.674.776.374.784.777.977.974.772.869.874.675.278.776.277.175.874.773.374.074.572.870.073.677.278.381.984.384.884.7Money market mutualfund (MMMF)balancesGeneralpurposeandbroker/dealer 20.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.01.72.72.42.46.433.461.6150.6185.6139.1168.0177.2209.0222.6242.9317.4350.5363.9342.3336.4360.3362.3358.0354.5354.9353.5350.4348.9343.9346.3343.7342.3340.0333.2332.7331.7335.5334.3333.2331.5329.4330.0333.5336.4Institutiononly 2 0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.4.6.93.19.515.238.050.041.963.265.586.192.792.0108.8135.9182.1202.3198.8186.1192.0192.2195.9202.2206.3212.5220.9220.7210.9209.2202.3197.7201.9200.9200.4202.8198.1195.0193.3194.1196.6196.7198.8Savingsdeposits,includingmoneymarketdepositaccounts(MMDAs) 3146.5159.1175.5194.7214.4235.3256.9253.2263.7268.9263.6260.9292.2321.4326.8338.4388.8453.0492.1481.7423.6400.1343.9400.0685.0704.7815.1940.9937.6926.6891.0920.81,042.51,186.01,218.61,060.31,080.71,094.31,107.51,119.61,126.01,134.51,145.71,158.91,170.51,180.41,186.01,184.41,182.41,178.81,181.61,193.71,198.81,200.11,205.11,208.71,209.61,214.51,218.61 Includes continuing contract RPs.2 Data prior to 1983 are not seasonally adjusted.3 Data prior to 1982 are savings deposits only; MMDA data begin December 1982.See next page for continuation <strong>of</strong> table.348


TABLE B-69.—Components <strong>of</strong> money stock measures and liquid assets, 1959-93—Continued[Averages <strong>of</strong> daily figures; billions <strong>of</strong> dollars, seasonally adjusted, except as noted]YearandmonthSmalldenominationtimedeposits 4Largedenominationtimedeposits 4Termrepurchaseagreements(RPs)NSANSASavingsbondsTermEurodollarsShorttermTreasurysecuritiesBankersacceptancesCommercialpaperDecember:19591960196119621963....19641965.19661967.196819691970197119721973197419751976197719781979198019811982 ..1983198419851986 .198719881989199019911992 ..19931992-JanFebMarAprMayJuneJulyAugSept ....OctNovDec1993- JanFebMarAprMayJuneJulyAugSeptOctNovDec11.412.514.820.125.629.234 555.077 8100.6120 4151.1189.7231.6265 8287.9337 9390.8445 5521.0634.4728 7823.2851.0784.1888.9885.5858.9922.81038 31,152.71,172.31,064.7867.3783.51,043.01,021.51,004.0986.1969.6955 7941.0925.7911.0894 4879.3867.3858.3853 1848.1841.2834.4826.9817.8810.3803.7796.1788.8783.51.22.03.97.010.815.221223.130 937.420 445.257.773.4111 1144.8129 7118.1145 2195.7223.3260.5303.1327.2327.6416.5434.1431.3475.4525 4548.8489.6424.7356.1331.5418.9413.6407.4402.2396.0389.4382.7378.5374.3367 3360.8356.1348.8344 3338.4343.5343.4340.0335.6336.1334.8335.6333.0331.50.0.0.0.0.0.00.00.0271.62.73.5677.88113.918 926.229.133.535.333.449.957.662.480.6106.0121899.089.672.581.195.371.072.674.374.176.476 475.276.077.879 981.881.180.182.386.088.989.892.896.596.596.495.194.595.30.7.81.51.61.92.4182.2222.9272.22.73.65.58.19.814.820.231.844.750.367.581.791.582.976.583.891.0105.779.568.757.645.647.855.756.158.054.952.851.951.151.449.448.147.245.643.546.749.848.748.745.541.944.145.245.450.047.846.145.746.546.948.149.049 650.251.251.851.752.054.357.660.463.367.271.876.480.379.672.367.868.071.174.279.591.8100.6109.4117.6126.1138.0156.8139.0140.2141.3142.4143.5144.6145.8147.4149.3151.9154.7156.8158.9161.1162.7163.9164.8165.7166.8167.8168.8169.8170.938.636.737.039.840.738.540 743.238.746.159.548.836.040.749.352.868.469.878.181.1107.8133.5149.4183.6211.9260.9298.2280.0253.1269.2324.9331.1315.0331.4311.9320.0325.1326.0329.4330.1324.9322.9321.0320.2325.1331.4337.5342.9341.6340.7347.1349.1348.5345.7323.8317.6322.30.6.91.11.11.21.31.61.81.82.33.33.53.83.55.012.610.710.814.122.027.232.140.044.545.045.442.037.044.339.940.235.523.420.422.922.622.221.822.022.021.721.120.720.520.320.420.620.119.219.219.418.717.516.416.316.316.23.65.15.26.87.79.110.214.417.822.534.034.532.735.242.851.248.552.564.180.798.498.8105.3113.7133.2160.8207.6231.4260.7335.5347.3357.1337.7368.4332.3327.3336.7341.0336.4348.1351.2355.7363.4368.0372.4368.4360.7355.9360.3365.5368.4369.1369.1381.3379.6388.0386.24 Small denomination and large denomination deposits are those issued in amounts <strong>of</strong> less than $100,000 and more than $100,000,respectively.Note.—NSA indicates data are not seasonally adjusted.See also Table 6-68.Data do not reflect revisions <strong>of</strong> February 3, <strong>1994</strong>.Source: Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Federal Reserve System.151-444 0 - 9 4 - 1 2349


TABLE B-70.—Aggregate reserves <strong>of</strong> depository institutions and monetary base, 1939-93[Averages <strong>of</strong> daily figures l ; millions <strong>of</strong> dollars; seasonally adjusted, except as noted]Adjusted for changes in reserve requirements 2Reserves <strong>of</strong> depository institutionsBorrowings <strong>of</strong> depositoryinstitutions from <strong>the</strong> FederalReserve, NSAYear and monthTotalNonborrowedNonborrowedplusextendedcreditRequiredMonetarybaseTotalSeasonalExtendedcreditDecember:195911,10910,16810,16810,60340,8809411960196119621963196411,24711,49911,60411,73012,01111,17211,36611,34411,39711,74711,17211,36611,34411,39711,74710,50310,91511,03311,23911,60540,97741,85342,95745,00347,161741332603322641965....1966....1967....1968....1969....12,31612,22313,18013,76714,16811,87211,69012,95213,02113,04911,87211,69012,95213,02113,04911,89211,88412,80513,34113,88249,62051,56554,57958,35761,5694445322287461,1191970197119721973197414,55815,23016,64517,02117,55014,22515,10415,59515,72316,82314,22515,10415,59515,72316,97014,30915,04916,36116,71717,29265,01369,10875,16781,07387,5353321261,0501,298727413214719751976197719781979198019811982198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931992: JanFebMarAprMayJune17,82218,38818,99019,75320,72022,01522,44323,60025,36726,84531,44838,94338,86240,39840,49241,76745,53354,35160,53646,22747,79548,50948,99249,49649,31617,69218,33518,42018,88519,24820,32521,80722,96624,59323,65930,12938,11638,08538,68340,22741,44145,34154,22860,45445,99447,71748,41848,90249,34149,08717,70418,33518,42018,88519,24820,32821,95623,15224,59526,26330,62838,41938,56839,92740,24741,46445,34254,22860,45445,99547,71948,42048,90449,34149,08717,55618,11518,80019,52120,27921,50122,12423,10024,80625,99030,41137,57337,81639,35139,57040,10244,55553,19659,47445,22446,73047,48147,85548,49548,40393,887101,515110,323120,445131,143142,004149,021160,127175,467187,237203,585223,667239,872256,932267,734293,185317,169350,798386,072319,385322,849324,655326,691328,863330,228130535698681,4731,6906366347743,1861,3188277771,716265326192124822337791901552291413551358211654339611356389313076381831172232479814912314818622,6044993034831,2442023110122200JulyAugSeptOctNovDec1993: JanFebMarAprMayJune49,62950,34151,27452,83653,81554,35154,66554,92255,16655,19756,87757,11949,34550,09150,98752,69353,71154,22854,50054,87655,07455,12456,75656,93849,34550,09150,98752,69353,71154,22854,50154,87755,07455,12456,75656,93848,66449,40750,28051,76352,77253,19653,40553,81853,95354,10155,88156,209333,177336,844341,585344,849347,832350,798353,224355,734358,374360,634364,769368,06928425128714310412416545917312118120322319311440181118264184142000001100000JulyAugSeptOctNovDec57,56758,03358,83759,81960,45960,53657,32357,68058,41059,53460,37060,45457,32357,68058,41059,53460,37060,45456,47857,08057,74758,73059,35959,474370,978374,532379,261381,765384,580386,072244352428285898221023423619275310000001 Data are prorated averages <strong>of</strong> biweekly (maintenance period) averages <strong>of</strong> daily figures.2 Aggregate reserves incorporate adjustments for discontinuities associated with regulatory changes to reserve requirements. Fordetails on aggregate reserves series see Federal Reserve Bulletin.Note.—NSA indicates data are not seasonally adjusted.Monetary base data do not reflect revisions released on February 3, <strong>1994</strong>.Source: Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Federal Reserve System.350


TABLE B-71.—Commercial bank loans and securities, 1972-93[Monthly average; billions <strong>of</strong> dollars, seasonally adjusted ']Year and monthTotalloansandsecurities2U.S.Govern-O<strong>the</strong>rTotal 2RealestateLoans and leasessecuri-tiesCommercialandindustrialIndividualSecurityNonbankfinancialinstitutionsAgriculturalStateandpoliticalsubdivisionsForeignbanksForeign<strong>of</strong>ficialinstitutionsLeasefinancing.O<strong>the</strong>rreceivablesDecember:1972...1973...1974...1975...1976...1977...1978...1979....1980....1981....1982....1983....1984...1985....1986...1987...1988...1989...1990...1991....1992...1993...1992:JanFebMarAprMayJune....JulyAugSept....OctNovDec1993:JanFebMarJuneJulyAugSeptOctNovDec572.5647.8713.7745.1804.6891.51,013.91,135.61,238.61,307.01,400.41,552.21,722.91,910.42,093.72,241.22,422.92,590.82,732.42,836.92,937.63,087.22,846.02,855.42,862.72,874.32,875.32,882.82,886.92,902.22,917.42,926.02,932.42,937.62,935.32,943.92,960.22,970.92,991.23,014.13,037.43,046.63,057"3,056.63,072.63,087.289.088.286.3116.7136.3136.6137.6144.3170.6179.3201.7259.2259.8270.8310.1335.8362.7397.0452.1559.3657.1727.2564.2570.9579.6590.8600.2610.7619.2632.6640.6647.3651.4657.1656.5666.2680.2691.0693.5704.3708.2714.8720.6718.4720.0727.293.499.4107.5111.2113.5122.7129.2141.9154.4160.5164.8169.1140.9179.0193.9195.8193.7182.4178.8179.9176.0181.9179.6180.3178.5178.5176.9175.8177.9178.2178.2178.8177.3176.0174.5176.4179.0181.0181.2179.6181.5182.4182.6180.7180.9181.9390.1460.2519.9517.2554.8632.3747.1849.4913.5967.31,033.91,123.91,322.21,460.61,589.71,709.61,866.52,011.42,101.42,097.82,104.62,178.22,102.22,104.32.104.52,104.92,098.22,096.22,089.82,091.42,098.62,099.82,103.82,104.62,104.42,101.32,101.02,098.92,116."2,130.32,147.82,149.42,153.92,157.52,171.72,178.2137.1165.0196.6189.3190.9211.0•246.2291.4325.7355.4392.5414.2473.2500.2536.7566.4605.3638.4642.6617.0597.6584.2615.4613.5610.8609.0607.6604.6602.5601.4601.2600.8600.5597.6598.0596.7593.1587.5589.9590.9590.2589.6586.2585.7585.4584.298.1117.3130.1134.4148.8175.2210.5241.9262.6284.1299.9331.0376.3425.8494.1587.2670.1760.1843.4871.8892.4927.2873.2876.7879.1881.8883.3881.8881.5883.1886.8890.7892.5892.4890.8890.1891.9892.2898.0904.0907.7910.8914.6918.1921.8927.286.398.6102.4104.9116.3138.3164.7184.5179.2182.5188.2212.9254.2295.0315.4328.2354.8375.2380.3363.9355.5385.6363.4363.8362.3360.8359.2359.0358.6357.4357.0355.8355.4355.5358.4361.9362.3364.4367.5368.8372.5374.7376.0380.3383.2385.615.612.912.713.517.721.019.718.718.021.425.328.035.043.340.334.540.941.344.754.364.886.058.058.960.763.460.963.360.561.664.064.764.264.863.562.864.262.368.671.481.679.982.779.587.086.021.728.534.528.926.425.826.229.329.329.931.230.431.632.835.332.132.534.435.941.443.643.242.143.043.643.243.342.441.542.044.043.944.743.645.144.644.245.045.946.046.546.846.144.944.243.214.317.218.320.123.225.828.231.131.633.136.239.240.136.131.629.429.030.132.334.235.035.434.134.134.334.334.334.634.935.335.235.135.235.034.534.334.034.134.334.334.734.834.835.035.535.446.156.858.452.545.340.034.029.024.821.628.628.328.027.627.326.826.225.925.825.425.124.824.223.823.623.123.022.822.822.722.422.221.821.63.96.28.39.011.713.721.518.623.818.114.713.411.49.710.17.77.68.27.77.37.77.71.62.12.22.42.82.74.96.911.57.25.99.48.46.36.35.15.03.52.92.42.83.32.32.22.12.02.02.02.22.32.52.42.82.82.93.23.23.23.13.23.23.13.43.3.33.31.42.13.24.05.15.77.49.310.912.713.313.716.119.122.524.729.431.932.931.730.932.831.431.531.431.130.931.030.830.831.030.830.930.930.430.630.630.730.931.331.631.731.832.132.532.810.110.211.510.711.913.017.817.821.122.926.831.829.935.539.041.746.548.144.944.749.551.146.545.545.545.142.443.343.244.343.242.645.049.548.844.545.348.046.849.047.946.047.347.349.151.11 Data are prorated averages <strong>of</strong> Wednesday figures for domestically chartered banks and for foreign-related institutions beginning July1981. Prior to July 1981, data for foreign-related institutions are averages <strong>of</strong> current and previous month-end data.2 Excludes loans to commercial banks in <strong>the</strong> United States.Note.—Data are not strictly comparable because <strong>of</strong> breaks in <strong>the</strong> series.Source.- Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Federal Reserve System.351


TABLE B-72.—Bond yields and interest rates, 1929-93[Percent per annum]Year andmonthU.S. Treasury securitiesBills(new issues) x3-month6-monthConstant maturities 23-year10-year30-yearCorporatebonds(Nloody's)AaaBaaHighgrademunicipalbonds(Standard&Poor's)Newhomemortgageyields 3Commercialpaper,6months 4Primeratechargedbybanks 5Discountrate,FederalReserveBank<strong>of</strong> NewYork 5Federalfundsrate 61929...1933...1939...0.515.0234.734.493.015.907.764.964.274.712.765.851.73.595.50-6.001.50-4.001.505.162.561.001940...1941...1942...1943...1944....014.103.326.373.3752.842.772.832.732.724.754.334.283.913.612.502.102.362.061.86.56.53.66.69.731.501.501.501.501.501.001.007 1.007 1.007 1.001945...1946...1947...1948...1949....375.375.5941.0401.1022.622.532.612.822.663.293.053.243.473.421.671.642.012.402.21.75.811.031.441.491.501.501.50-1.751.75-2.002.007 1.007 1.001.001.341.501950...1951...1952...1953...1954...1.2181.5521.7661.931.9532.471.632.852.402.622.862.963.202.903.243.413.523.743.511.982.002.192.722.371.452.162.332.521.582.072.563.003.173.051.591.751.751.991.601955...1956...1957...1958...1959...1.7532.6583.2671.8393.4053.8322.473.193.982.844.462.823.183.653.324.333.063.363.893.794.383.533.884.714.735.052.532.933.603.563.952.183.313.812.463.973.163.774.203.834.481.892.773.122.153.361.782.733.111.573.301960...1961...1962..1963...1964...1965...1966...1967..1968...1969..2.9282.3782.7783.1573.5493.9544.8814.3215.3396.6773.2472.6052.9083.2533.6864.0555.0824.6305.4706.8533.983.543.473.674.034.225.235.035.687.024.123.883.954.004.194.284.925.075.656.674.414.354.334.264.404.495.135.516.187.035.195.085.024.864.834.875.676.236.947.813.733.463.183.233.223.273.823.984.515.815.895.835.816.256.466.977.813.852.973.263.553.974.385.555.105.907.834.824.504.504.504.504.545.635.616.307.963.533.003.003.233.554.044.504.195.165.873.221.962.683.183.504.075.114.225.668.201970...1971...1972...1973...1974...6.4584.3484.0717.0417.8866.5624.5114.4667.1787.9267.295.655.726.957.827.356.166.216.847.568.047.397.217.448.579.118.568.168.249.506.515.705.275.186.098.457.747.607.968.927.715.114.738.159.847.915.725.258.0310.815.954.884.506.447.837.184.664.438.7310.501975..1976..1977..1978..1979..5.8384.9895.2657.22110.0416.1225.2665.5107.57210.0177.496.776.698.299.717.997.617.428.419.447.758.499.288.838.438.028.739.6310.619.758.979.4910.696.896.495.565.906.399.009.009.029.5610.786.325.345.617.9910.917.866.846.839.0612.676.255.505.467.4610.285.825.045.547.9311.191980..1981..1982..1983..1984..11.50614.02910.6868.639.5811.37413.77611.0848.759.8011.5514.4412.9210.4511.8911.4613.9113.0011.1012.4411.2713.4512.7611.1812.4111.9414.1713.7912.0412.7113.6716.0416.1113.5514.198.5111.2311.579.4710.1512.6614.7015.1412.5712.3812.2914.7611.898.8910.1615.2718.8714.8610.7912.0411.7713.4211.028.508.8013.3616.3812.269.0910.231985..1986..1987..1988..1989..7.485.985.826.698.127.666.036.056.928.049.647.067.688.268.5510.627.688.398.858.4910.797.788.598.968.4511.379.029.389.719.2612.7210.3910.5810.8310.189.187.387.737.767.2411.5510.179.319.1910.138.016.396.857.688.809.938.338.219.3210.877.696.335.666.206.938.106.816.667.579.211990..1991..1992..1993..7.515.423.453.027.475.493.573.148.266.825.304.448.557.867.015.878.618.147.676.599.328.778.147.2210.369.808.987.937.256.896.415.6310.059.328.247.207.955.853.803.3010.018.466.256.006.985.453.253.008.105.693.523.021 Rate on new issues within period; bank-discount basis.2 Yields on <strong>the</strong> more actively traded issues adjusted to constant maturities by <strong>the</strong> Treasury Department.3 Effective rate (in <strong>the</strong> primary market) on conventional mortgages, reflecting fees and charges as well as contract rate andassuming, on <strong>the</strong> average, repayment at end <strong>of</strong> 10 years. Rates beginning January 1973 not strictly comparable with prior rates.4 Bank-discount basis; prior to November 1979, data are for 4-6 months paper.5 For monthly data, high and low for <strong>the</strong> period. Prime rate for 1929-33 and 1947-48 are ranges <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> rate in effect during <strong>the</strong>period.6 Since July 19, 1975, <strong>the</strong> daily effective rate is an average <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> rates on a given day weighted by <strong>the</strong> volume <strong>of</strong> transactions at<strong>the</strong>se rates. Prior to that date, <strong>the</strong> daily effective rate was <strong>the</strong> rate considered most representative <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> day's transactions, usually<strong>the</strong> one at which most transactions occurred.7 From October 30, 1942, to April 24, 1946, a preferential rate <strong>of</strong> 0.50 percent was in effect for advances secured by Governmentsecurities maturing in 1 year or less.See next page for continuation <strong>of</strong> table.352


TABLE B-72.—Bond yields and interest rates, 1929-93—Continued[Percent per annum]Year andmonthBills(new issues) l3-monthJ.S. Treasury securities6-monthConstant maturities 23-year10-year30-yearCorporatebonds(Moody's)AaaBaaHighgrademunicipalbonds(Standard&Poor's)Newhomemortgageyields 3Commercialpaper,6months 4Primeratechargedbybanks 5Discountrate,FederalReserveBank<strong>of</strong> NewYork 5Federalfundsrate 6High-lowHigh-low1989:JanFebMarJay!!!!!!!!!!!!JuneJulyAugSeptOctNovDec1990:JanFebMarAprMayJuneJulyAugSeptOctNovDec1991:JanFebMarAprMayJuneJulyAugSeptOctNovDec1992:JanFebMarAprMayJuneJulyAugSeptOctNovDec1993:JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAug&:::::::::::NovDec8.298.488.838.708.408.227.927.911117.637 657.647 647.767.877.787.787.747 667.447.387.197 076.816.305.955.915 675.515.605.585.395.255 034.604.123.843.844.053.813.663.703.283 142.972.843.143.253.062.952.972.892.963.103.053.052.963.043.123.088.388.498.878.738.398.007.631117 747.617 467.457 521117.837.827.827.647 577.367.337.207 046.766.345.935.915 735.655.765.715.475.295 084.664.163.883.944.193.933.783.813.363 233.012.983.353.393.173.083.083.003.073.233.153.173.063.133.273.259.209.329.619.408.988.377.838.138 268.027 801118 138.398.638.788.698.408 268.228.278.077 747.477.387.087.357 237.127.397.386.806.506 235.905.395.405.726.185.935.815.604.914 724.424.645.145.214.934.584.404.304.404.534.434.364.174.184.504.549.099.179.369.188.868.288.028.118 198.011 SI7.848 218.478.598.798.768.488 478.758.898.728 398.088.097.858.118 048.078.288.277.907.657 537.427.097.037.347.547.487.397.266.846 596.426.596.876.776.606.265.985.976.045.965.815.685.365.335.725.778.939.019.179.038.838.278.088.128158.007 907.908 268.508.568.768.738.468 508.869.038.868 548.248.278.038.298 218.278.478.458.147.957 937.927.707.587.857.977.967.897.847.607 397.347.537.617.447.347.096.826.856.926.816.636.326.005.946.216.259.629.649.809.799.579.108.938.969 018.928 898!868 999.229.379.469.479.269 249.419.569.539 309.059.048.838.938 868.869.019.008.758.618 558.488.318.208.298.358.338.288.228.077 957.927.998.107.987.917.717.587.467.437.337.176.856.666.676.936.9310.6510.6110.6710.6110.4610.039.879.889 919.819 819.829 9410.1410.2110.3010.4110.2210 2010.4110.6410.7410 6210.4310.4510.0710.099 949.869.969.899.659.519 499.459.269.139.239.259.219.139.058.848 658.628.848.968.818.678.398.158.148.218.077.937.607.347.317.667.697.417.477.617.497.256.976.977.081111.111137.017 137.217.297.367.347.227 157.317.407.407 107.047.056.907.077 056.957.097.036.896.806 596.646.636.416.676.696.646.576.506.126 086.246.386.356.246.185.875.655.785.815.735.605.505.315.295.475.359.529.829.9910.1710.1810.4210.4810.2210 2410.1110 0910.079 919.8810.0310.1710.2810.1310 0810.119.909.989 909.769.659.579.439 609.529.469.439.489.309 048.648.538.498.658.518.588.598.438.008 007.937.908.077.887.827.777.467.467.377.237.207.056.956.806.806.929.02 10.50-10.509.35 11.50-10.509.97 11.50-11.509.78 11.50-11.509.29 11.50-11.508.80 11.50-11.008.35 11.00-10.508.32 10.50-10.508 50 10 50-10 508.24 10.50-10.508 00 10 50-10 507.93 10.50-10.507 96 10 50-10 008.04 10.00-10.008.23 10.00-10.008.29 10.00-10.008.23 10.00-10.008.06 10.00-10.007 90 10 00-10 00111 10.00-10.007.83 10.00-10.007.81 10.00-10.007 74 10 00-10 007.49 10.00-10.007.026.416.366 075.946.166.145.765.595 334.934.494.064.134.384.133.973.993.533 443.263.333.673.703.353.273.243.193.203.383.353.333.253.273.433.4010.00- 9.509.50- 9.009.00- 9.009 00- 9 009.00- 8.508.50- 8.508.50- 8.508.50- 8.508.50- 8.008 00- 8 008.00- 7.507.50- 6.506.50-6.506.50-6.506.50-6.506.50-6.506.50-6.506.50-6.506.50-6.006 00-6 006.00-6.006.00-6.006.00-6.006.00-6.006.00-6.006.00-6.006.00-6.006.00-6.006.00-6.006.00-6.006.00-6.006.00-6.006.00-6.006.00-6.006.00-6.006.00-6.006.50-6.507.00-6.507.00-7.007.00-7.007.00-7.007.00-7.007.00-7.007.00-7.007 00-7 007.00-7.007 00-7 007.00-7.007 00-7 007.00-7.007.00-7.007.00-7.007.00-7.007.00-7.007 00-7 007.00-7.007.00-7.007.00-7.007 00-7 007.00-6.506.50-6.506.50-6.006.00-6.006 00-5 505.50-5.505.50-5.505.50-5.505.50-5.505.50-5.005 00-5 005.00-4.504.50-3.503.50-3.503.50-3.503.50-3.503.50-3.503.50-3.503.50-3.503.50-3.003 00-3 003.00-3.003.00-3.003.00-3.003.00-3.003.00-3.003.00-3.003.00-3.003.00-3.003.00-3.003.00-3.003.00-3.003.00-3.003.00-3.003.00-3.003.00-3.003.00-3.009.129.369.859.849.819.539.248.999 028.848 558.458 238.248.288.268.188.298158.138.208.117 817.316.916.256.125 915.785.905.825.665.455 214.814.434.034.063.983.733.823.763.253 303.223.103.092.923.023.033.072.963.003.043.063.033.092.993.022.96Sources: Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Treasury, Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Federal Reserve System, Federal Housing Finance Board, Moody'sInvestors Service, and Standard & Poor's Corporation.353


TABLE B-73.—Total funds raised in credit markets by nonfinancial sectors, 1984-93[Billions <strong>of</strong> dollars; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]Item 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992Net credit market borrowing by nonfinancial sectorsTotal net borrowing by domestic nonfinancial sectors764.6934.6855.8739.9752.6723.0631.0475.5582.4U.S. Government197.2225.7216.0143.9155.1146.4246.9278.2304.0Treasury issuesAgency issues and mortgages..197.4-.2225.8-.1215.6.4142.41.5137.717.4144.71.6238.78.2292.0-13.8303.8.2Private domestic nonfinancial sectors-567.4708.9639.9596.0597.5576.6384.1197.3278.4Debt capital instruments329.2523.4478.4497.9436.4408.3293.1313.4254.0Tax-exempt obligations...Corporate bondsMortgages58.748.1222.4178.683.2261.745.7127.1305.683.578.8335.753.7103.1279.665.373.8269.157.347.1188.769.678.8165.165.767.3121.1Home mortgagesMulti-family residential..CommercialFarm136.225.162.3-1.2172.330.365.6-6.6204.236.475.1-10.1241.624.976.2-6.9219.616.148.5-4.6212.512.047.3-2.7177.23.48.9-.8166.0-2.5.9.7176.0-11.1-45.51.6O<strong>the</strong>r debt instruments-238.3185.5161.598.1161.0168.391.0-116.124.4Consumer creditBank loans n.e.cOpen-market paper...O<strong>the</strong>r81.764.021.770.982.343.814.644.857.558.9-9.354.332.914.71.648.950.144.711.954.349.536.421.461.013.44.29.763.6-13.1-46.8-18.4-37.89.3-5.68.612.0By borrowing sector-567.4708.9639.9596.0597.5576.6384.1197.3278.4State and local governmentsHouseholdsNonfinancial business35.7221.2310.5134.0295.6279.359.2266.2314.583.0307.5205.548.9300.1248.463.5276.7236.354.5207.7121.962.3168.4-33.459.4215.04.0FarmNonfarm noncorporate..Corporate-.4123.3187.6-14.5133.2160.6-16.9106.1225.3-11.176.0140.7-10.057.2201.3.549.4186.51.819.4100.72.4-24.5-11.31.5-39.441.8Foreign net borrowing in United States..8.41.29.76.26.410.223.913.924.2BondsBank loans n.e.cOpen-market paperU.S. Government and o<strong>the</strong>r loans..3.8-6.66.25.03.8-2.86.2-6.03.1-1.011.5-3.97.4-3.63.8-1.46.9-1.88.7-7.54.9-.113.1-7.621.4-2.912.3-7.014.13.16.4-9.817.32.35.2-.6Total domestic plus foreign773.0935.8865.6746.2758.9733.1654.9489.4606.6Direct and indirect supply <strong>of</strong> funds to credit marketsTotal funds supplied to domestic nonfinancial sectors764.6934.6855.8739.9752.6723.0631.0475.5582.4Private domestic nonfinancial sectors-446.7487.2329.9405.0421.8285.4259.7-38.467.8Deposits and currency310.1204.0273.0163.3225.7162.896.9-22.3-11.2Checkable deposits and currencyTime and savings depositsMoney market fund sharesSecurity repurchase agreementsForeign deposits37.0221.248.79.8-6.556.9122.62.117.74.7114.186.241.820.010.818.199.425.221.5-1.029.1139.716.932.97.19.670.185.6-2.1-.321.928.454.9-22.113.970.1-104.929.8-14.5-2.8131.0-133.4.8-.5-9.1Credit market instruments-136.6283.256.9241.7196.1122.6162.8-16.179.0Foreign funds76.086.1115.7107.9117.974.8105.92.8149.6At banksCredit market instruments9.067.119.666.512.9102.843.764.29.3108.6-9.584.423.882.1-22.825.648.9100.7U.S. Government and related loans, net..U.S. Government cash balancesPrivate insurance and pension reserves..O<strong>the</strong>r sources16.04.0139.981.937.410.3215.798.017.01.7233.7157.85.6-5.8184.842.4-18.27.3127.796.1-49.9-3.4293.7122.317.35.3146.896.032.85.5297.9175.020.5-5.9167.3183.0354


TABLE B-73.—Total funds raised in credit markets by nonfinancial sectors, 1984-93—Continued[Billions <strong>of</strong> dollars; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]Item1991 1992 1993Net credit market borrowing by nonfinancial sectorsTotal net borrowing by domestic nonfinancialsectors425.5565.4500.0411.4603.3586.2610.8529.1399.3667.5579.7U.S. Government...191.7269.3379.5272.5323.8352.9299.1240.1229.6348.2177.2Treasury issuesAgency issues and mortgagesPrivate domestic nonfinancial sectors...Debt capital instrumentsTax-exempt obligationsCorporate bondsMortgages215.7-24.0233.8371.162.376.7232.2275.5-6.2296.1376.669.696.5210.5408.2-28.8120.5222.868.881.672.3268.73.8138.9283.177.660.2145.2335.0-11.2279.5329.768.076.3185.4352.5.4233.4224.176.677.869.8290.19.0311.7272.275.861.3135.1237.42.7289.0190.142.453.793.9226.43.2169.7237.562.475.0100.2344.14.1319.2266.767.264.9134.5160.916.2402.5317.338.955.2223.2Home mortgagesMulti-family residential..CommercialFarmO<strong>the</strong>r debt instruments167.112.147.75.2160.211.740.1-1.5160.1-34.2-55.62.1176.5.2-28.6-2.9216.511.6-46.94.2-137.3 -80.5 -102.2 -144.2 -50.2111.6-16.9-25.7.89.3203.3-11.2-57.7.839.4172.8-27.9-51.6.6128.4-6.6-21.799.0 -67.7176.2-12.8-29.1.252.5229.7.2-6.985.2Consumer creditBank loans n.e.cOpen-market paperO<strong>the</strong>r-16.1-59.5-25.1-36.7-5.1-30.2-16.5-28.8-20.4-44.0-26.9-10.9-10.7-53.7-5.0-74.9-9.8-47.32.54.5-14.727.7-2.6-1.113.5-24.19.340.848.221.425.43.919.2-39.7-24.2-23.022.931.834.8-37.060.88.124.2-8.0By borrowing sector:233.8296.1120.5138.9279.5233.4311.7289.0169.7319.2402.5State and local governments..HouseholdsNonfinancial businessFarmNonfarm noncorporate...CorporateForeign net borrowing in United States..62.6130.141.09.821.210.059.7195.141.3.220.220.957.8 -60.452.8 74.0154.5 193.8-86.8 -129.04.3-81.5-9.623.8-4.6-57.9-66.534.362.1199.218.24.3-21.835.71.966.9176.5-10.13.6-47.433.757.773.5217.720.5-.1-37.357.937.835.1266.6-12.7-1.6-51.039.9-.671.2137.4-38.9-2.5-36.7.350.368.9215.834.53.4-31.462.526.843.7322.436.44.6-14.146.078.5BondsBank loans n.e.cOpen-market paperU.S. Government and o<strong>the</strong>r loans....11.38.146.7-8.410.9-3.5-51.9-15.915.61.416.0-9.218.56.514.9-5.64.91.5-8.03.621.914.127.8-6.120.33.913.1.522.2-10.3-12.1-.475.61.6-21.7-5.330.46.5-.6-9.585.51.0-1.6-6.4Total domestic plus foreign483.3504.9523.7445.6605.3644.0648.7528.5449.5694.2658.2Direct and indirect supply <strong>of</strong> funds to credit marketsTotal funds supplied to domestic nonfinancialsectors425.5565.4500.0411.4603.3586.2610.8529.1399.3667.5579.7Private domestic nonfinancial sectors38.5133.1 -157.0 -168.2206.659.4-54.159.4382.135.4 -101.5Deposits and currency60.85.4-57.9-97.571.2-91.58.2-32.7-241.3153.553.7Checkable deposits and currencyTime and savings depositsMoney market fund sharesSecurity repurchase agreementsForeign depositsCredit market instrumentsForeign fundsAt banksCredit market instruments..70.9-34.3115.4-47.4-43.9-22.31.5-.537.2-50.3-2.2.7135.5-174.3-13.5-17.137.0-160.819.25.91.219.9 11.6-70.7127.8 -99.133.9-64.2-98.334.240.513.127.4-7.341.3147.9-86.139.3-8.7-21.376.6-175.323.112.9163.9-143.8-23.7-12.424.1-28.8135.5 -62.3150.990.8 158.9219.1-5.796.578.4140.780.778.1135.5-128.6-35.46.2-10.315.7-202.7-45.12.7122.7-30.765.2-4.7126.7-127.051.7-2.2-11.9 .9 4.492.1-140.8 -118.1 -155.2129.754.4 158.1 141.642.287.5-18.873.268.689.5-2.3144.0U.S. Government and related loans, netU.S. Government cash balancesPrivate insurance and pension reservesO<strong>the</strong>r sources46.331.3396.7-88.396.6-23.2117.9305.133.15.2371.3206.9-44.98.7305.5276.4122.9-30.149.8163.2-71.515.7170.8192.7-43.54.4225.8319.474.0-13.5222.956.6-47.51.3359.9413.353.49.0180.6231.0-70.83.6286.6320.3Source: Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Federal Reserve System.355


TABLE B-74.—Mortgage debt outstanding by type <strong>of</strong> property and <strong>of</strong> financing, 1940-93[Billions <strong>of</strong> dollars]End <strong>of</strong> yearor quarterAllpropertiesFarmpropertiesNonfarm propertiesTotal1- to 4-familyhousesMultifamilypropertiesCommercialpropertiesNonfarm properties by type <strong>of</strong> mortgageGovernment underwrittenTotal J1- to 4-family housesTotalFHAinsuredVAguaranteedConventional 2Total1- to 4-familyhouses194019411942194319441945194619471948194919501951195219531954195519561957195819591960196119621963196419651966196719681969197019711972197319741975197619771978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921991: I...II.IllIV1992: I..IV..1993: I....II...III..36.537.636.735.334.735.541.848.956.262.772.882.391.4101.3113.7129.9144.5156.5171.8190.8207.5228.0251.4278.5305.9333.3356.5381.2411.1441.6473.7524.2597.4672.6732.5791.9878.61,010.31,163.01,328.41,460.41,566.71,641.11,828.82,054.62,312.82,615.42,963.23,248.63,549.63,761.53,923.44,042.93,812.03,874.23,874.63,923.43,959.73,982.94,020.64,042.94,059.24,099.64,160.26.56.46.05.44.94.84.95.15.35.66.16.77.27.78.29.09.810.411.112.112.813.915.216.818.921.223.125.127.529.430.532.435.439.844.949.955.463.972.886.897.5107.2111.3113.7112.4105.995.287.783.080.578.479.180.779.779.379.979.180.280.480.680.780.880.880.930.031.230.829.929.730.836.943.950.957.166.775.684.293.6105.4120.9134.6146.1160.7178.7194.7214.1236.2261.7287.0312.1333.4356.1383.5412.2443.2491.8562.0632.8687.5742.0823.2946.41,090.21,241.71,362.91,459.51,529.81,715.11,942.22,206.92,520.22,875.53,165.73,469.13,683.13,844.23,962.23,732.33,794.93,794.83,844.23,879.53,902.53,940.03,962.23,978.44,018.84,079.317.418.418.217.817.918.623.028.233.337.645.251.758.566.175.788.299.0107.6117.7130.9141.9154.6169.3186.4203.4220.5232.9247.3264.8283.2297.4325.9366.5407.9440.7482.1546.3642.7753.5870.5965.11,039.81,081.71,199.41,335.11,504.71,707.11,936.12,169.32,408.42,615.42,778.82,953.52,649.92,700.12,722.82,778.82,823.12,856.72,911.42,953.52,976.83,026.93,088.55.75.95.85.85.65.76.16.67.58.610.111.512.312.913.514.314.915.316.818.720.323.025.829.033.637.240.343.947.352.260.170.182.893.1100.0100.6105.7114.0124.9134.9142.3142.1145.8160.9185.7215.6251.8276.0293.7306.5309.4306.4295.0312.3314.8305.9306.4309.0304.8302.0295.0293.6290.6290.96.97.06.76.36.26.47.79.110.210.811.512.513.414.516.318.320.723.226.129.232.436.541.146.250.054.560.164.871.476.985.695.9112.7131.7146.9159.3171.2189.7211.8236.3255.5277.5302.2354.8421.4486.6561.3663.4702.7754.2758.3759.0713.7770.1779.9766.0759.0747.4741.0726.6713.7708.1701.3699.92.33.03.74.14.24.36.39.813.617.122.126.629.332.136.242.947.851.655.259.362.365.669.473.477.281.284.188.293.4100.2109.2120.7131.1135.0140.2147.0154.1161.7176.4199.0225.1238.9248.9279.8294.8328.3370.5431.4459.7486.8517.9537.2533.3525.3545.7535.3537.2538.1536.1537.5533.3530.5522.6517.92.33.03.74.14.24.36.19.312.515.018.822.925.428.132.138.943.947.250.153.856.459.162.265.969.273.176.179.984.490.297.3105.2113.0116.2121.3127.7133.5141.6153.4172.9195.2207.6217.9248.8265.9288.8328.6387.9414.2440.1470.9493.3489.8478.0497.3491.4493.3494.3492.4493.9489.8487.0479.0474.22.33.03.74.14.24.13.73.85.36.98.59.710.812.012.814.315.516.519.723.826.729.532.335.038.342.044.847.450.654.559.965.768.266.265.166.166.568.071.481.093.6101.3108.0127.4136.7153.0185.5235.5258.8282.8310.9330.6326.0317.0334.1329.1330.6330.6328.8329.5326.0323.4315.2310.50.22.45.57.28.110.313.214.616.119.324.628.430.730.430.029.729.629.930.930.931.131.332.533.835.737.339.544.750.056.261.667.073.682.092.0101.6106.2109.9121.4129.1135.8143.1152.4155.4157.3160.0162.7163.8161.0163.2162.2162.7163.7163.6164.4163.8163.6163.8163.727.728.227.125.825.526.530.634.137.340.044.749.154.961.569.378.086.894.6105.5119.4132.3148.5166.9188.2209.8231.0249.3267.9290.1312.0333.9371.1430.9497.7547.3595.0669.0784.6913.91,042.71,137.81,220.61,280.91,435.31,647.31,878.62,149.72,444.12,706.02,982.23,165.23,307.03,428.93,206.93,249.23,259.43,307.03,341.53,366.43,402.53,428.93,447.93,496.23,561.415.115.414.513.713.714.316.918.920.822.626.328.933.238.043.649.355.160.467.677.085.595.5107.1120.5134.1147.4156.9167.4180.4193.0200.2220.7253.5291.7319.4354.3412.8501.0600.2697.6769.9832.2863.9950.61,069.21,215.91,378.51,548.21,755.11,968.32,144.52,285.52,463.82,171.92,202.82,231.52,285.52,328.72,364.32,417.62,463.82,489.82,548.02,614.31 Includes FHA insured multifamily properties, not shown separately.2 Derived figures. Total includes multifamily and commercial properties, not shown separately.Source: Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Federal Reserve System, based on data from various Government and private organizations.356


TABLE B-75.—Mortgage debt outstanding by holder, 1940-93[Billions <strong>of</strong> dollars]Major financial institutionsO<strong>the</strong>r holders1940194119421943194419451946194719481949End <strong>of</strong> yearor quarter195019511952195319541955.19561957195819591960.1961196219631964196519661967 .. .19681969197019711972197319741975197619771978 .. . .197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921991: 1IIIIIIV1992- 1IIIllIV1993- 1IIIllTotal36.537.636.735.334.735.541.848.956.262.772.882 391.4101.3113.7129 9144.5156.51718190.8207.5228.0251.4278 5305.9333.3356.5381.2411.1441.6473.7524.2597 4672.6732 5791.9 •878 61,010.31,163.01,328.41,460.41,566.71,641.11 828 82,054.62,312.82,615.42 963 23 248 63,549.63,761.53,923.44,042.93,812.03,874.23,874.63,923.43,959.73,982.94,020.64,042.94 059 24,099.64,160.2Total19.520.720.720.220.221.026.031.837.842.951.759 566.975.185.799 3111.2119.71315145.5157.6172.6192.5217 1241.0264.6280.8298.8319.9339.1355.9394.2450 0505.4542 6581.2647 5745.2848.2938.2996.81,040.51,021.31 108 21,245.91,361.51,474.31 665 31 831 51,931.51,914.31,846.71,769.21,902.91,899.41,860.81,846.71,826.71,803.81,793.51,769.21753 01,765.11,770.3Savingsinstitutions*9.09.49.29.09.19.611.513.816.118.321.925 529.834.941.148 955.561.268 978.187.098.0111.1127 2141.9154.9161.8172.3184.3196.4208.3236.2273 7305.0324 2355.8404.6469.4528.0574.6603.1618.5578.1626 7709.7760.5778.0860 5924 6910.3801.6705.4628.0776.5755.4719.7705.4682.3659.6648.2628.0617.2612.4610.1Commercialbanks 24.64.94.74.54.44.87.29.410.911.613.714 715.916.918.621022.723.325 528.128.830.434.539 444.049.754.459.065.770.773.382.599 3119.11321136.21513179.0214.0245.2262.7284.2301.3330 5379.5429.2502.5592 4674 0767.1844.8876.1894.5857.4872.4871.0876.1881.0885.0891.4894.5891.8910.9922.4Lifeinsurancecompanies6.06.46.76.76.76.67.28.710.812.916.119 321.323.326.029 433.035.237 139.241.844.246.950.555.260.064.667.570.072.074.475.576 981.486 289.291696.8106.2118.4131.1137.7142.01510156.7171.8193.8212.4232 9254.2267.9265.3246.7269.0271.7270.1265.3263.3259.3253.9246.7244.1241.7237.8Federalandrelatedagencies3 4.94.74.33.63.02.42.01.81.82.32.8354.14.64.85.36.27.78010.211.512.212.611.812.213.517.520.925.131.138.346.454.664.882 2101.1116.7140.5170.6216.0256.8289.4355.4433.4490.6581.9733.7858.9937.81,067.31,258.91,422.61,558.31,302.31,351.71,389.51,422.61,458.11,497.11,521.51,558.31,587.01,600.51,637.9Individualsando<strong>the</strong>rs 412.012.211.711.511.512.113.815.316.617.518.419 320.421.723.225.327.129.132 335.138.443.146.349.552.755.258.261.466.171.479.483.692.8102.4107.7109.6114.4124.6144.3174.3206.8236.8264.4287.2318.1369.4407.3439.0479.4550.7588.3654.0715.4606.8623.0624.3654.0674.9681.9705.6715.4719.2734.0752.01 Includes savings banks and savings and loan associations. Data reported by Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation-insuredinstitutions include loans in process for 1987 and exclude loans in process beginning 1988.2 Includes loans held by nondeposit trust companies, but not by bank trust departments.3 Includes Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA), Federal Housing Administration, Veterans Administration, Farmers HomeAdministration (FmHA), and in earlier years Reconstruction Finance Corporation, Homeowners Loan Corporation, Federal Farm MortgageCorporation, and Public Housing Administration. Also includes U.S.-sponsored agencies such as Federal National Mortgage Association(FNMA), Federal Land Banks, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLNIC), and mortgage pass-through securities issued orguaranteed by GNMA, FHLMC, FNMA or FmHA. O<strong>the</strong>r U.S. agencies (amounts small or current separate data not readily available)included with "individuals and o<strong>the</strong>rs."4 Includes private mortgage pools.Source: Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Federal Reserve System, based on data from various Government and private organizations.357


TABLE B-76.—Consumer credit outstanding, 1952-93[Amount outstanding (end <strong>of</strong> month); millions <strong>of</strong> dollars, seasonally adjusted]Year and monthTotalconsumercreditInstallment credit lNoninstallmentTotal Automobile Revolving 2 O<strong>the</strong>r 3 credit 4December-.1952195319541955195619571958195919601961196219631964196519661967196819691970197119721973197419751976197719781979198019811982198319841985198619871988 519891990199119921992:JanFebMarMay!"!!!'.!'.'.!'.'.!JuneJulyAugSeptOctNovDec1993:JanFebMarAprMayJuneJulyAugSeptOctNov "29,76633,76935,02741,88545,50348,13248,35655,87860,03562,34068,23176,60685,98995,948101,839106,716117,231126,928131,600147,058166,009190,601199,365204,963228,162263,808308,272347,507350,269366,869383,132431,170511,314591,291647,982680,036729,121786,732798,274784,061793,175786,081784,884784,676780,983780,283780,163779,563781,043782,778784,113787,521793,175797,126799,251800,930804,514804,406805,691810,546813,472820,017827,318833,43720,12123,87024,47029,80932,66034,91434,73640,42144,33545,43850,37557,05664,67472,81478,16281,78390,11299,381103,905116,434131,258152,910162,203167,043187,782221,475261,976296,483298,154311,259325,805368,966442,602517,660572,006608,675662,553724,353738,765733,510741,093735,406734,225734,434731,736730,612730,866730,496731,023733,023734,195736,023741,093743,583747,228750,131752,193750,293752,428757,465762,503768,573776,234783,1157,6519,7029,75513,48514,49915,49314,26716,64118,10817,65620,00122,89125,86529,37831,02431,13634,35236,94636,34840,52247,83553,74054,24156,98966,82180,94898,739112,475111,991119,008125,945143,560173,564210,238247,772266,295285,364292,536284,739260,898259,627261,553260,666262,087260,746259,844257,989258,259258,827259,433258,208258,860259,627258,737261,434262,313262,463264,007265,388267,468268,784270,650274,600277,5762,0223,5634,9008,2529,39111,31813,23214,507,16,59536,68945,20253,35755,11161,07066,45479,088100,280121,758135,825153,064174,269198,544222,552243,564254,299245,609246,474246,324246,987247,205248,795248,980249,384250,456251,806252,086254,299255,984258,384259,661261,450262,690263,338266,938270,753273,703277,125279,27312,47014,16814,71516,32418,16119,42120,46923,78026,22727,78230,37434,16538,80943,43647,13850,64753,73858,87262,65767,66074,03287,85294,73095,547104,366103,838118,035130,651131,053131,182133,406146,318168,758185,664188,408189,316202,921233,273231,474229,048227,167228,243227,085226,023224,002223,562224,081223,257222,812223,135224,181225,077227,167228,862227,410228,157228,280223,596223,701223,058222,967224,220224,509226,2669,6459,89910,55712,07612,84313,21813,62015,45715,70016,90217,85619,55021,31523,13423,67724,93327,11927,54727,69530,62434,75137,69137,16237,92040,38042,33346,29651,02452,11555,61057,32762,20468,71373,63175,97671,36266,56862,37959,50950,55152,08250,67650,65950,24249,24749,67149,29749,06750,02049,75549,91951,49752,08253,54352,02350,79952,32154,11353,26353,08150,96951,44451,08450,3221 Installment credit covers most short- and intermediate-term credit extended to individuals through regular business channels,usually to finance <strong>the</strong> purchase <strong>of</strong> consumer goods and services or to refinance debts incurred for such purposes, and scheduled to berepaid (or with <strong>the</strong> option <strong>of</strong> repayment) in two or more installments. Credit secured by real estate is excluded.2 Consists <strong>of</strong> credit cards at retailers, gasoline companies, and commercial banks, and check credit at commercial banks. Excludes 30-day charge credit held by travel and entertainment companies. Prior to 1968, included in "o<strong>the</strong>r," except gasoline companies included innoninstallment credit prior to 1971. Beginning 1977, includes open-end credit at retailers, previously included in "o<strong>the</strong>r." Also beginning1977, some retail credit was reclassified from commercial into consumer credit.3 Includes mobile home loans and all o<strong>the</strong>r installment loans not included in autombile or revolving credit, such as loans foreducation, boats, trailers, or vacations. <strong>The</strong>se loans may be secured or unsecured.4 Noninstallment credit is credit scheduled to be repaid in a lump sum, including single-payment loans, charge accounts, and servicecredit. Because <strong>of</strong> inconsistencies in <strong>the</strong> data and infrequent benchmarking, series is no longer published by <strong>the</strong> Federal Reserve Boardon a regular basis. Data are shown here as a general indication <strong>of</strong> trends.5 Data newly available in January 1989 result in breaks in many series between December 1988 and subsequent months.Source: Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Federal Reserve System.358


GOVERNMENT FINANCETABLE B-77.—Federal receipts, outlays, surplus or deficit, and debt, selected fiscal years, 1929-95[Billions <strong>of</strong> dollars; fiscal years]Surplusordeficit07-2.6-2.8-2.9-4.9-20.5-54.6-47.6-47 6-15.94011.8.6-3.16.1-1.5-6.5-1.2-3.03.93.4-2.8-12.83-3.3-7.1-4.8-5.9-1.4-37-8.6-25.23.2-28-23.0-23 4-14.9-6.1-53.2-73.7-14.7-53.7-59.2-40.2-73.8-79.0-128.0-207.8-185.4-212.3-221.2-149.8-155.2-152.5-221.4-269.5-290.4-254.7-234.8-165.15.8"6.08.013.722.942.543 838.137 139.937.737.348.562.665.565.160.468.273.271.671.081982.387.492.496.2100.1111 7124.4128.1157.9159 3151.3167 4184.7209.3216.6231.763.2278.7314.2365.3403.9469.1474.3453.2500.4547.9568.9640.7667.5727.0749.7760.4788.0841.6912.9998.6On-budgeOutlays9.2"9.513.635.178.591.292 655^034 229.438.442.044.266.073.867.964.565.770.674.983.181.393J96.4102.8101.7114 8137.0155.8158.4168 0177.3193 8200.1217.3271.9302.276.6328.5369.1403.5476.6543.1594.4661.3686.0"769.6806.8810.1861.4932.31,027.61,082.11,128.51,141.61,203.01,223.6Surplusordeficit-3.4-3.5-5.6-21.3-55.6-48.7-48 7-17.02910.5— 7-4.74.3-3.4-8.3-2.8-4.12.52.6-3.3-12.15-3.8-5.9-4.0-6.5-1.6-3 1-12.6-27.7-.5-87-26.1-26 4-15.4-8.0-55.3-70.5-13.3-49.8-54.9-38.2-72.7-74.0-120.1-208.0-185.7-221.7-238.0-169.3-194.0-205.2-278.0-321.7-340.5-300.0-290.1-225.00.5.6.7.91.11.3131.21 51.61.72.13.13.64.14.65.16.46.88.08.310 612.112.314.216.416.719 124.424.929.033 535.839 946.153.962.566.418.076.885.498.0113.2130.2143.5147.3166.1186.2200.2213.4241.5263.7281.7293.9302.4311.9336.2355.2Off-budge tOutlays-0.0-.0.0.1.1.11.2.3.4,4.51.31.72.32.94.05.06.07.59.010 911.713.515.015.716.519 720.422.325.227 632.836 945.652.160.469.619.480.789.7100.0114.3135.2151.4147.1165.8176.8183.5193.8202.7210.9225.1241.7252.3266.6280.9295.4Surplusordeficit0.5.6.7.81.01.21 21.01 21.21.31.61.81.91.81.71.11.5.8.5-.7_ 2.4-1.3-.8.6.2- 64.02.63.7593.03 1.51.82.0-3.2-1.4-3.9-4.3-2.0-1.1-5.0-7.9.2.39.416.719.638.852.856.652.250.145.355.359.9Gross Federal debt/pn/j nf narinfi\Total1 16 91 22.548.250.757.579.2142.6204.1260 1271.0257 1252.0252.6256.9255.3259.1266.0270.8274.4272.7272.3279.7287.5290 5292.6302.9310.3316.1322.3328 5340.4368.7365.8380 9408.2435 9466.3483.9541.9629.0643.6706.4776.6828.9908.5994.31,136.81,371.21,564.11,817.02,120.12,345.62,600.82,867.53,206.23,598.34,001.94,351.24,676.04,960.1Held by<strong>the</strong>public41.442.848.267.8127.8184.8235 2241.9224 3216.3214.3219.0214.3214.8218.4224.5226.6222.2219.3226.3234.7236 8238.4248.0254.0256.8260.8263 7266.6289.5278.1283 2303.0322 4340.9343.7394.7477.4495.5549.1607.1639.8709.3784.8919.21,131.01,300.01,499.41,736.21,888.12,050.32,189.32,410.42,687.92,998.63,247.23,472.43,646.11,353.8 1,518.9TotalFiscal yearor period ReceiptsOutlays1929 39 311933 2.0 4.61939 6.3 9.11940194119421943194419451946194719481949195019511952195319541955195619571958195919601961196219631964196519661967196819691970197119721973197419751976Transitionquarter...19771978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921993<strong>1994</strong> 21995 2 6.58.714.624.043.745 239.338 541.639.439.451.666.269.669.765.574.680.079.679.292 594.499.7106.6112.6116.8130 8148.8153.0186.9192 8187.1207 3230.8263.2279.1298.181.2355.6399.6463.3517.1599.3617.8600.6666.5734.1769.1854.1909.0990.71,031.31,054.31,090.51,153.51,249.19.513.735.178.691.392 755.234 529.838.842.645.567.776.170.968.470.676.682.492.192 297.7106.8111.3118.5118.2134 5157.5178.1183.6195 6. 210.2230 7245.7269.4332.3371.896.0409.2458.7503 5590.9678.2745.8808.4851.8946.4990.31,003.91,064.11,143.21,252.71,323.81,380.91,408.21,483.8ReceiptsReceiptsAdden-Grossdomesticproduct87.895.4112.5141.8175.4201.7212 0212.5222 9246.7262.7265.8313.5340.5363.8368.0384.7416.3438.3448.1480.2504 6517.0555.2584.5625.3671.0735 4793.3847.2925.7985 41,050.91 147 81,274.01,403.61,509.81,684.2445.01,917.22,155.02,429.52,644.12,964.43,122.23,316.53,695.03,967.74,219.04,452.44,808.45,173.35,481.55,673.35,937.26,294.86,641.27,022.01 Not strictly comparable with later data.2 Estimates.Note.—Through fiscal year 1976, <strong>the</strong> fiscal year was on a July 1-June 30 basis; beginning October 1976 (fiscal year 1977), <strong>the</strong> fiscalyear is on an October l-September 30 basis. <strong>The</strong> 3-month period from July 1, 1976 through September 30, 1976 is a separate fiscalperiod known as <strong>the</strong> transition quarter.Refunds <strong>of</strong> receipts are excluded from receipts and outlays.See Budget <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> United States Government, Fiscal Year 1995, February <strong>1994</strong>, for additional information.Sources: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce (Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Analysis), Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Treasury, and Office <strong>of</strong> Management and359


TABLE B-78.—Federal receipts, outlays, and debt, fiscal years 1982-95[Millions <strong>of</strong> dollars; fiscal years]DescriptionActual1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988RECEIPTS AND OUTLAYS:Total receiptsTotal outlaysTotal surplus or deficit (-)...On-budget receiptsOn-budget outlaysOn-budget surplus or deficit (-)Off-budget receiptsOff-budget outlaysOff-budget surplus or deficit (-)OUTSTANDING DEBT, END OF PERIOD:Gross Federal debtHeld by Government accountsHeld by <strong>the</strong> publicFederal Reserve SystemO<strong>the</strong>rRECEIPTS: ON-BUDGET AND OFF-BUDGETIndividual income taxesCorporation income taxesSocial insurance taxes and contributions....On-budget....Off-budget...Excise taxesEstate and gift taxesCustoms duties and feesMiscellaneous receipts:Deposits <strong>of</strong> earnings by FederalReserve SystemAll o<strong>the</strong>rOUTLAYS: ON-PUDGET AND OFF-BUDGETNational defenseInternational affairsGeneral science, space, and technologyEnergyNatural resources and environmentAgricultureCommerce and housing creditOn-budgetOff-budget....TransportationCommunity and regional developmentEducation, training, employment, andsocial servicesHealthMedicareIncome securitySocial securityOn-budgetOff-budgetVeterans benefits and services-Administration <strong>of</strong> justiceGeneral governmentNet interestOn-budgetOff-budgetAllowancesUndistributed <strong>of</strong>fsetting receiptsOn-budgetOff-budget617,766745,755-127,989474,299594,351-120,052143,467151,404-7,9371,136,798217,560919,238134,497784,741617,766297,74449,207201,49858,031143,46736,3117,9918,85415,186975745,755185,30912,3007,20013,52712,99815,9446,2566,25620,6258,34727,02927,44546,567107,717155,964844155,12023,9584,71210,91485,04487,114-2,071-26,099-24,453-1,646600,562808,380-207,818453,242661,272-208,030147,320147,1082121,371,164240,1141,131,049155,527975,522600,562288,93837,022208,99461,674147,32035,3006,0538,65514,4921,108808,380209,90311,8487,9359,35312,67222,9016,6816,68121,3347,56026,60628,64152,588122,598170,72419,993150,73124,8465,10511,23589,82891,673-1,845-33,976-32,198-1,778666,457851,846-185,388500,382686,032-185,650166,075165,8132621,564,110264,1591,299,951155,1221,144,829666,457298,41556,893239,37673,301166,07537,3616,01011,37015,6841,347851,846227,41315,8768,3177,08612,59313,6136,9176,91723,6697,67327,57930,41757,540112,668178,2237,056171,16725,6145,66311,817111,123114,432-3,310-31,957-29,913-2,044734,057946,391-212,334547,886769,584-221,698186,171176,8079,3631,816,974317,6121,499,362169,8061,329,556734,057334,53161,331265,16378,992186,17135,9926,42212,07917,0591,480946,391252,74816,1768,6275,68513,35725,5654,2294,22925,8387,68029,34233,54265,822128,200188,6235,189183,43426,2926,27011,588129,504133,622-4,118-32,698-30,189-2,509769,091990,336-221,245568,862806,838-237,976200,228183,49816,7312,120,082383,9191,736,163190,8551,545,308769,091348,95963,143283,90183,673200,22832,9196,95813,32718,3741,510990,336273,37514,152.8,9764,73513,63931,4494,8904,89028,1177,23330,58535,93670,164119,796198,7578,072190,68426,3566,57212,564136,047140,377-4,329-33,007-30,150-2,857854,1431,003,911-149,769640,741810,079-169,339213,402193,83219,5702,345,578457,4441,888,134212,0401,676,094854,143392,55783,926303,31889,916213,40232,4577,49315,08516,8172,4901,003,911281,99911,6499,2164,11513,36326,6066,1826,18226,2225,05129,72439,96775,120123,250207,3534,930202,42226,7827,5537,565138,652143,942-5,290-36,455-33,155-3,300908,9541,064,140-155,187667,463861,449-193,986241,491202,69138,8002,600,760550,5072,050,252229,2181,821,034908,954401,18194,508334,33592,845241,49135,2277,59416,19817,1632,7471,064,140290,36110,47110,8412,29714,60617,21018,81518,81527,2725,29431,93844,48778,878129,332219,3414,852214,48929,4289,2369,464151,838159,253-7,416-36,967-32,585-4,382Note.—Through fiscal year 1976, <strong>the</strong> fiscal year was on a July 1-June 30 basis; beginning October 1976 (fiscal year 1977), <strong>the</strong> fiscalyear is on an October 1-September 30 basis. <strong>The</strong> 3-month period from July 1, 1976 through September 30, 1976 is a separate fiscalperiod known as <strong>the</strong> transition quarter.Refunds <strong>of</strong> receipts are excluded from receipts and outlays.See next page for continuation <strong>of</strong> table.360


TABLE B-78.—Federal receipts, outlays, and debt, fiscal years 1982-95—Continued[Millions <strong>of</strong> dollars; fiscal years]DescriptionActual1989 1990 1991 1992 1993Estimates<strong>1994</strong> 1995RECEIPTS AND OUTLAYS:Total receiptsTotal outlaysTotal surplus or deficit (-)..On-budget receiptsOn-budget outlaysOn-budget surplus or deficit (-)....Off-budget receipts..Off-budget outlays....Off-budget surplus or deficit (-) ..OUTSTANDING DEBT, END OF PERIOD:Gross Federal debtHeld by Government accounts..Held by <strong>the</strong> publicFederal Reserve SystemO<strong>the</strong>rRECEIPTS. ON-BUDGET AND OFF-BUDGET..Individual income taxesCorporation income taxesSocial insurance taxes and contributions..On-budgetOff-budgetExcise taxesEstate and gift taxesCustoms duties and feesMiscellaneous receipts:Deposits <strong>of</strong> earnings by FederalReserve SystemAll o<strong>the</strong>rOUTLAYS: ON-BUDGET AND OFF-BUDGET..National defenseInternational affairsGeneral science, space, and technology..EnergyNatural resources and environmentAgricultureCommerce and housing creditOn-budgetOff-budgetTransportationCommunity and regional developmentEducation, training, employment, and socialservicesHealthMedicareIncome securitySocial securityOn-budgetOff-budgetVeterans benefits and servicesAdministration <strong>of</strong> justiceGeneral governmentNet interestOn-budgetOff-budgetAllowancesUndistributed <strong>of</strong>fsetting receiptsOn-budgetOff-budget990,6911,143,172-152,481727,026932,261-205,235263,666210,91152,7542,867,493678,1572,189,336220,0881,969,248990,691445,690103,291359,41695,751263,66634,3868,74516,33419,6043,2251,143,172303,5599,57312,8382,70616,18216,91929,21129,520-31027,6085,36236,67448,39084,964136,031232,5425,069227,47330,0669,4749,017169,266180,661-11,395-37,212-32,354-4,858See Budget <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> United States Government, Fiscal Year 1995,1,031,3211,252,705-221,384749,6661,027,640-277,974281,656225,06556,5903,206,207795,8412,410,366234,4102,175,9561,031,321466,88493,507380,04798,392281,65635,34511,50016,70724,3193,0111,252,705299,33113,76414,4443,34117,08011,95867,14265,5161,62629,4858,49838,75557,71698,102147,019248,6233,625244,99829,1129,99510,734184,221200,212-15,991-36,615-31,048-5,567Sources: Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Treasury and Office <strong>of</strong> Management and Budget.1,054,2721,323,793-269,521760,3881,082,106-321,719293,885241,68752,1983,598,303910,3622,687,942258,5912,429,3511,054,272467,82798,086396,016102,131293,88542,40211,13815,94919,1583,6961,323,793273,29215,85116,1112,43618,55915,18375,63974,3211,31731,0996,81143,35471,183104,489170,301269,0152,619266,39531,34912,27611,661194,541214,763-20,222-39,356-33,553-5,8041,090,4531,380,856-290,403788,0271,128,518-340,490302,426252,33950,0874,001,9411,003,3022,998,639296,3972,702,2431,090,453475,964100,270413,689111,263302,42645,56911,14317,35922,9203,5381,380,856298,35016,10716,4094,50020,02515,20510,0839,42465933,3336,83845,24889,497119,024196,958287,5856,166281,41834,13814,42612,990199,421223,059-23,637-39,280-33,179-6,101February <strong>1994</strong>, for additional information.1,153,5351,408,205-254,670841,6011,141,618-300,017311,934266,58745,3474,351,2231,104,0453,247,178325,6532,921,5261,153,535509,680117,520428,300116,366311,93448,05712,57718,80214,9083,6911,408,205291,08616,82617,0304,31920,23920,443-22,725-24,1661,44135,0049,05150,01299,415130,552207,257304,5856,236298,34935,72014,95513,009198,811225,599-26,788-37,386-30,970-6,4161,249,0711,483,829-234,758912,8921,202,953-290,061336,179280,87655,3034,676,0291,203,6173,472,4121,249,071549,901130,719461,923125,744336,17954,55012,74919,19815,8474,1841,483,829279,82418,96817,2794,98822,28516,868504-1,2451,74837,5829,28250,793112,252143,651214,626320,4605,796314,66338,12916,47914,299203,448232,521-29,073-37,887-31,425-6,4631,353,8151,518,945-165,130998,5941,223,582-224,987355,221295,36459,8574,960,1281,314,0013,646,1271,353,815595,048140,437490,393135,172355,22171,88813,88520,85616,6044,7051,518,945270,72517,79816,9414,56421,81712,795-5,482-8,7413,25938,3689,15453,524123,077156,228221,440337,1686,639330,52939,24717,33113,807212,835244,504-31,669205-42,597-35,841-6,756361


TABLE B-79.—Federal budget receipts, outlays, surplus or deficit, and debt, as percentages oj gross domesticproduct, 1934-93[Percent; fiscal years]Fiscal yearReceipts1934 .19351936 .1937193819391940194119421943 . .194419451946 . .194719481949 .1950195119521953195419551956195719581959 .19601961196219631964196519661967196819691970197119721973197419751976Transition quarter19771978 . .197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921993<strong>1994</strong> l1995 14.95.35.16.27.77.26.97710.313.721.721.318.517.316.815.014.816.519.419.118.917.017.918.317.816.518.318.318.018 218.017.417.818.818.120.219.617.818.118.118.818.517.718.318.518.519.119.620.219 818.118.018 518.219.218 919.218.818.618.418 318.819.3TotalOutlays10.89.310.68.77.810.49.912 124.844.845.343.726.015.512.114.816.014.519.920.919.317.817.017.518.419.218.318.919.219 019.017.618.319.821.019.819.920.020.119.319.222.022.121.621.321.320.722.322.923 924.423.123 923.522.522 122.122.923.323.322 422.321.6Nationaldefense1.75718.138.039.239.120.15.73.75.05.27.513.514.513.411.110.210.410.410.29.59.69.4918.87.57.99.09.78.98.37.56.96.05.75.75.35.05.14.84.85.15.35.96.36.26.46.56.36.05.95.54.85.04.64.23.9Surplus ordeficit ( )-5.9-4.1-5.6-2.5— 1-3^2-3.1-44-14.5-31.1-23.6-22.4-7.51.84.8.2-1.21.9-.4-1.8-.3-.8.9.8-.6-2.7.1-.6-1.3- 8-.9-.2-.5-1.1-3.0.4-.3-2.2-2.0-1.2-.4-3.5-4.4-3.3-2.8-2.7-1.7-2.8-2.7-4.1-6.3-5.0-5.4-5.2-3.4-3.2-2.9-4.0-4.8-4.9-4.0-3.5-2.4Gross Federal debt (period)Total53.151.155.981.3101.2122.7127.5115.4102.296.296.681.476.173.173.671.365.562.162.459.957.656.654.653.150.548.044.742.943.539.538.738.838.036.634.535.937.336.236.836.034.134.433.536.441.342.345.850.352.754.155.458.563.467.469.170.470.6end <strong>of</strong>Held by public44.842.947.872.891.6110.9113.8100.687.781.682.468.463.160.061.058.953.450.050.548.946.946.144.743.541.138.935.933.634.230.028.728.828.126.824.526.128.327.828.628.226.326.826.529.434.135.237.841.242.442.642.344.047.450.551.652.351.91 Estimates.Note.—Through fiscal year 1976, <strong>the</strong> fiscal year was on a July 1-June 30 basis; beginning October 1976 (fiscal year 1977), <strong>the</strong>fiscal year is on an October 1-September 30 basis. <strong>The</strong> 3-month period from July 1, 1976 through September 30, 1976 is a separatefiscal period known as <strong>the</strong> transition quarter.See Budget <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> United States Government, Fiscal Year 1995, February <strong>1994</strong>, for additional information.Sources-. Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Treasury and Office <strong>of</strong> Management and Budget.362


TABLE B-80.—Federal and State and local government receipts and expenditures, national income andproduct accou nts, 195 9-93[Biiiions <strong>of</strong> dollars; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]Total governmentFederal GovernmentState and local governmentYearorquarterReceiptsSurplus ordeficit(-),nationalincomeandproductaccountsReceiptsSurplus ordeficitnationalincomeandproductaccountsReceiptsExpendituresExpendituresExpendituresSurplus ordeficit(-).nationalincomeandproductaccounts1959128.8131.9-3.190.693.2-2.645.045.5-0.519601961196219631964196519661967196819691970197119721973197419751976197719781979138.8144.1155.8167.5172.9187.0210.7226.4260.9294.0299.8318.9364.2408.5450.7465.8532.6598.4673.2754.7135.2147.1158.7165.9174.5185.8211.6240.2265.5284.0311.2338.1368.1401.6455.2530.6570.9615.2670.3745.33.6-3.0-2.91.6-1.61.2-1.0-13.7-4.610.0-11.5-19.2-3.96.9-4.5-64.8-38.3-16.82.99.497.099.0107.2115.5116.2125.8143.5152.6176.8199.6195.2202.6232.0263.7294.0294.8339.9384.0441.2504.793.4101.7110.6114.4118.8124.6144.9165.2181.5191.0208.5224.3249.3270.3305.6364.2392.7426.4469.3520.33.5-2.6-3.41.1-2.61.3-1.4-12.7-4.78.5-13.3-21.7-17.3-6.6-11.6-69.4-52.9-42.4-28.1-15.748.352.456.661.167.172.381.589.8102.7114.8129.0145.3169.7185.3200.6225.6253.9281.9309.3330.648.352.756.160.666.172.381.190.9102.6113.3127.2142.8156.3171.9193.5221.0239.3256.3278.2305.4.0-.4.5.41.0.0.5-1.1.11.51.82.513.413.47.14.614.625.631.125.119801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921993"1982: IV...1983: IV...1984: IV...1985: IV...1986: IV...1987: IV...1988: IV1989: IV1990:1..IIIllIV1991:1IIIV825.7941.9960.51,016.41,123.61,217.01,290.81,405.21,492.41,622.61,709.11,755.21,849.41,969.1965.91,043.71,147.11,243.81,335.41,445.71,535.81,644.11,676.11,705.11,728.71,726.51,728.11,740.91,765.01,786.8861.0972.31,069.11,156.21,232.41,342.21,437.51,516.91,590.71,700.11,847.51,951.32,118.52,192.71,122.81,180.01,274.91,374.71,461.61,561.51,630.51,744.31,808.01,827.71,848.61,905.81,867.21,941.61,977.22,019.4-35.3-30.3-108.6-139.8-108.8-125.3-146.8-111.7-98.3-77.5-138.4-196.2-269.1-223.7-156.9-136.3-127.8-130.9-126.2-115.8-94.7-100.2-131.9-122.7-119.9-179.3-139.1-200.7-212.2-232.6553.0639.0635.4660.0725.8788.6827.2913.8972.31,059.31,111.41,127.81,183.01,267.6632.3671.1739.8803.6856.8943.51,000.61,068.31,091.31,114.51,123.71,115.81,115.81,120.31,132.61,142.5613.1697.8770.9840.0892.7969.91,028.21,065.61,109.01,181.61,274.91,331.21,459.31,493.4815.7855.7926.6990.81,034.31,096.31,135.51,209.81,257.81,266.51,268.31,306.91,261.01,326.51,350.21,387.2-60.1-58.8-135.5-180.1-166.9-181.4-201.0-151.8-136.6-122.3-163.5-203.4-276.3-225.8-183.4-184.6-186.8-187.2-177.5-152.7-134.9-141.5-166.4-152.0-144.6-191.0-145.2-206.2-217.7-244.7361.4390.8409.0443.4492.2528.7571.2594.3631.3681.5730.0780.5837.8887.3417.9459.5505.1544.8582.4605.1648.2697.7712.5722.4736.9748.3756.2772.0787.0806.6336.6362.3382.1403.2434.1472.6517.0554.2593.0636.7704.9773.2830.6885.2391.4411.1446.1488.4531.1568.1607.9656.4677.9693.1712.2736.5750.1766.5781.5794.524.828.526.940.358.156.154.340.138.444.825.17.37.22.126.548.359.056.351.237.040.241.334.529.324.711.76.15.55.512.11992:1..1993:1..IllIV P1,819.71,837.61,834.41,906.01,902.51,966.31,981.42,083.92,109.72,123.82,156.62,165.32,187.92,195.82,222.1-264.2-272.2-289.5-250.6-262.8-221.5-214.41,165.91,176.11,169.11,221.11,218.41,268.01,275.91,436.11,456.01,459.81,485.31,481.91,490.61,488.51,512.5-270.2-279.9-290.7-264.2-263.5-222.6-212.7817.2833.2839.0861.6860.2881.0894.2811.2825.5837.8848.0859.4880.0895.9905.56.17.81.213.51.1-1.7Note.—Federal grants-in-aid to State and local governments are reflected in Federal expenditures and State and local receipts. Totalgovernment receipts and expenditures have been adjusted to eliminate this duplication.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Analysis.363


TABLE B-81.—Federal and State and local government receipts and expenditures, national income andproduct accounts, by major type, 1959-93[Billions <strong>of</strong> dollars; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]Year orquarter19591960196119621963196419651966196719681969197019711972197319741975197619771978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921993 >>1982: IV1983: IV1984: IV1985: IV1986: IV1987: IV1988: IV1989: IV1990:1IIIllIV1991:1IIIllIV1992:1IIIllIV1993:1IIIllIV "....ReceiptsTotal128.8138.8144.1155.8167.5172.9187.0210.7226.4260.9294.0299.8318.9364.2408.5450.7465.8532.6598.4673.2754.7825.7941.9960.51,016.41,123.61,217.01,290.81,405.21,492.41,622.61,709.11,755.21,849.41,969.1965.91,043.71,147.11,243.81,335.41,445.71,535.81,644.11,676.11,705.11.728.71,726.51,728.11,740.91,765.01,786.81.819.71,837.61,834.41,906.01,902.51,966.31,981.4Parpersonaltaxandnontaxreceipts44.548.750.354.858.056.061.971.077.992.1109.9109.0108.7132.0140.6159.1156.4182.3210.0240.1280.2312.4360.2371.4368.8395.1436.8459.0512.5527.7593.3623.3620.4644.8681.6372.1371.6413.4448.8478.5528.6542.0605.1611.9627.4628.5625.2616.4616.6619.7628.8630.9634.6642.8670.7657.1681.0689.0699.1Corporatepr<strong>of</strong>itstax accruals23.622.722.824.026.228.030.933.732.739.439.734.437.741.949.351.850.964.273.083.588.084.881.163.177.294.096.5106.5127.1137.0141.3138.7129.8146.3171.758.782.283.897.6116.6135.2146.2134.2132.0139.8145.7137.0125.4128.0132.5133.4147.0153.0130.1155.0160.9173.3169.5Indirectbusinesstaxandnontaxaccruals41.945.548.151.754.758.862.765.470.479.086.694.3103.6111.4121.0129.3140.0151.6165.5177.8188.7212.0249.3256.4280.1309.5329.9345.5365.0385.3414.7444.0476.6502.8530 5262.3291.7317.7335.1351.6372.3394.2424.4436.2437.2448.0454.8465.6470.5481.3488.9493.4497.3504.8515.7515.6526.2532.4547.9Contributionsforsocialinsurance18.821.922.925.428.530.131.640.645.550.457.962.268.979.097.6110.5118.5134.5149.8171.8197.8216.6251.3269.6290.2325.0353.8379.8400.7442.3473.2503.1528.4555.6585.3272.8298.3332.2362.3388.7409.6453.5480.4495.9500.7506.4509.5520.7525.7531.5535.7548.5552.7556.6564.6568.9585.9590.5596.0ExpendituresTotal»131.9135.2147.1158.7165.9174.5185.8211.6240.2265.5284.0311.2338.1368.1401.6455.2530.6570.9615.2670.3745.3861.0972.31,069.11,156.21,232.41,342.21,437.51,516.91,590.71,700.11,847.51,951.32,118.52,192.71,122.81,180.01,274.91,374.71,461.61,561.51,630.51,744.31,808.01,827.71,848.61,905.81,867.21,941.61,977.22,019.42,083.92,109.72,123.8.2,156.62,165.32,187.92,195.82,222.1Purchases99.099.8107.0116.8122.3128.3136.3155.9175.6191.5201.8212.7224.3241.5257.7288.3321.4341.3368.0403.6448.5507.1561.1607.6652.3700.8772.3833.0881.5918.7975.21,047.41,099.31,131.81,157.1631.6657.6727.0799.2849.7901.4937.6994.51,027.71,037.31,048.31,076.51,093.01,099.91,104.01,100.21,118.51,125.81,139.11,143.81,139.71,158.61,164.81,165.3Transferpayments27.529.333.634.736.638.141.145.854.562.669.383.899.4110.9126.6150.5189.2206.5220.9238.6266.9317.6360.7402.7433.4447.2479.5509.4531.8566.2615.1679.5721.3853.1903.9428.1439.1456.2488.3518.6542.6578.6639.0660.6671.4682.6703.3647.4708.9749.8779.0829.2845.9857.1880.1886.2896.6910.1922.8Net interest paidTotal6.36.96.46.97.47.98.18.58.910.311.512.412.512.915.216.318.522.824.426.528.733.448.155.561.879.188.390.695.4101.8112.4125.2140.5141.1135.356.667.786.789.290.5101.3105.0114.8118.4124.9132.4125.1134.6141.1140.9145.5143.0144.4141.6135.6132.8137.2137.0134.3Interestpaid10.19.910.811.612.513.214.515.718.119.822.323.124.829.633.637.743.647.956.868.683.9110.2130.6146.6174.6195.9207.9215.9229.9251.0269.6284.4286.1286.2135.6156.1186.5201.6208.7222.9236.0256.0260.0266.1274.1278.3280.3284.2285.2287.8285.4287.8287.6283.5281.8287.4288.9286.8Less:Interestreceivedbygovernment23.33.53.94.24.65.16.06.87.78.39.910.611.914.417.319.220.923.530.339.950.562.175.084.895.6107.6117.3120.5128.1138.6144.5143.9144.9150.979.088.499.8112.3118.2121.6131.0141.2141.6141.2141.7153.2145.7143.1144.3142.3142.4143.4146.0147.9149.0150.2151.9152.5Less:Dividendsreceivedbygovernment2b'i*.2.2.3.3.5.9.9.91.31.72.01.92.32.93.43.94.55.15.96.98.19.09.510.21073.13.54.14.75.46.17.28.58.79.09.09.39.39.59.59.79.810.210.310.510.510.710.810.9Subsi-Hiocoieslocclesscurrentsurplus<strong>of</strong>governmententerprises-0.9-.8.2.3-.3.1.31.41.21.21.52.62.43.42.6.42.61.43.33.62.94.84.76.211.79.56.49.714.110.95.44.5-.32.77.29.619.29.72.68.222.016.54.49.93.0-5.610.41.8.8-8.04.33.03.9-3.77.717.16.1-5.310.7SurplusorH<strong>of</strong>iritOcllCIl( —)>nationalincomeandproductaccounts-3.13.6-3.0-2.91.6-1.61.2-1.0-13.7-4.610.0-11.5-19.2-3.96.9-4.5-64.8-38.3-16.82.99.4-35.3-30.3-108.6-139.8-108.8-125.3-146.8-111.7-98.3-77.5-138.4-196.2-269.1-223.7-156.9-136.3-127.8-130.9-126.2-115.8-94.7-100.2-131.9-122.7-119,9-179.3-139.1-200.7-212.2-232.6-264.2-272.2-289.5-250.6-262.8-221.5-214.4Addendum:Grantsin-aidtoStateandlocalgovernments6.86.57.28.09.110.411.114.415.918.620.324.429.03*7.540.643.954.661.167.577.380.588.787.983.987.094.4100.3107.6102.8111.3118.2132.3153.0171.4185.884.386.997.7104.5103.8102.9113.0121.9127.7131.9131.9137.6143.8151.5154.6162.3163.4171.8173.7176.7176.1182.8188.6195.81Includes an item for <strong>the</strong> difference between wage accruals and disbursements, not shown separately.2Prior to 1968, dividends received is included in interest received.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Analysis.364


TABLE B-82.—Federal Government receipts and expenditures, national income and product accounts,1976-93[Billions <strong>of</strong> dollars; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]Year or quarterTotalPersonaltax andnontaxreceiptsReceiptsCorporatepr<strong>of</strong>itstaxaccrualsIndirectbusinesstax andnontaxaccrualsTotal»PurchasesTotalContributionsforsocialinsuranceNationaldefenseExpendituresTransferpaymentsTo rest<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>world(net)TopersonsGrantsin-aidtoStateandlocalgovernmentsNetinterestpaidSubsidieslesscurrentsurplus<strong>of</strong>governmententerprisesSurplusordeficit(-),nationalincomeandproductaccountsFiscal: 2197619771978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921993Calendar:197619771978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921993 P1982: IV1983: IV1984.1V1985: IV1986.1V1987: IV1988: IV1989: IV1990: IIIIIIIV1991: IIIIllIV1992:1IIIllIV1993:1IIIllIV "322 0375 4423 8490 5538.1623.0642.7646.47117777.0813.8899.1955.11,050.11,092.01,121.41,165.61,249.3339.9384.0441.2504.7553.0639.0635.4660.0725.8788.6827.2913.8972.31,059.31,111.41 127 81,183.01,267.6632.3671.1739.8803.6856.8943.51,000.61,068.31,091.31,114.51,123.71,115.81,115.81,120.31,132.61,142.51,165.91,176.11,169.11,221.11,218.41,268.01,275.9136.5165.2185 5221.6249.1287.9308.4290.7300.4337.0353.1396.3403.8456.9475.2475.7484.0511.7146.6169.1193.8229.7256 2297.2302 9292.6308.0342.8357.4400.6410.1461.9484.3474 9490.8521.2301.6290.5323.5351.8371.7414.8420.0470.1476.0489.5487.9483.9474.1472.4474.5478,5479.7482.0489.5511.8502.1520.7527.1535.051759 867 475 370.469.351.656.475175.080.499.4107.6119.2115 4108.4116.3135.654.661.671.474.470.365.749 061.375.276.383.8103.2111.0117.1116.4107 1120.2141.145.565.467.077.091.4109.7118.5111.3110.8117.2122.3115.1103.7105.7109.2109.8121.1125.8107.0127.1132.4142.4139.324 625 027 929 936.254.351.552.057 059.153.857.859.662.263.176.780.886.023.825.628.930.139.657.349 753.557.858.653.558.460.961.965.879181.387.449.255.458.256.854.859.561.462.265.364.965.967.177.777.979.581.380.480.281.183.581.586.286.795.2109 2125 4143 0163 7182.3211.5231.2247.3279 3305.9326.5345.5384.1411.8438.3460.6484.5516.0115.0127.7147.1170.4186.8218.8233 8252.6284.8310.9332.5351.5390.4418.5444.8466 7490.7517.9235.9259.8291.1318.0338.8359.4400.7424.7439.2442.9447.6449.7460.3464.4469.4472.8484.7488.1491.4498.7502.3518.7522.8527.6379 0417 1458 0505 4587.1679.9747.6829.2875.3952^91,017.61,051.01,098.51,164.51,250.01,309.21,436.01,484.5392.7426.4469.3520.36131697 8770 9840.0892.7969.91,028.21,065.61,109.01,181.61,274.9133121,459.31,493.4815.7855.7926.6990.81,034.31,096.31,135.51,209.81,257.81,266.51,268.31,306.91,261.01,326.51,350.21,387.21,436.11,456.01,459.81,485.31,481.91,490.61,488.51,512.5132 6144 71581174 5201.0232.9259.5289.8302.2335.2363.7379.9386.3399.4418.1446.0444.9445.0135.8147.9162.2179.3209.1240.8266 6292.0310.9344.3367.8384.9387.0401.6426.5445 9448.8443.4281.4289.7324.7356.9373.1392.5392.0405.1422.7423.6423.2436.5450.2449.4446.8437.4445.5444.6452.8452.4442.7447.5443.6439.791.599.2106.3117 7136.9160.9187.3210.2228.2251.7274.3287.6295.1299.5309.0325.8311.7306.893.4100.9108.9121.9142.7167.5193 8214.4233.1258.6276.7292.1295.6299.9314.0322 5313.8303.6205.5222.8242.9268.6278.6295.8296.8302.5312.1312.5309.1322.5331.4326.3321.2311.2312.3310.4316.7315.7304.8307.6301.9300.0154.3167.1179.3198 5235.4274.6305.6339.8342.4360.7380.6399.4420.7449.6491.3535.9595.8630.2159.3170.1182.4205.7247.0282.1316 4340.2344.3366.8386.2401.8425.9460.2500.9550 0608.2635.8337.8340.0346.2370.3391.4405.1429.4473.7493.6494.9501.1514.1537.5545.6551.3565.4598.4605.8611.6617.1628.9632.7639.1642.53.13.43.5404.35.25.86.58.711.512.59.910.211.614.4-26.111.516.23.73.43.84.15.05.0647.39.411.412.310.410.411.313.2-27 916.314.28.211.013.913.512.814.615.115.111.615 313.412.4-76.9-32.0-5.12.212.615.012.824.613.112.913.717.257.566.374.779186.790.183.486.291.598.6108.3103.4108.4115.8128.3147.0167.4182.161.167.577.380.588.787.983 987.094.4100.3107.6102.8111.3118.2132.3153.0171.4185.884.386.997.7104.5103.8102.9113.0121.9127.7131.9131.9137.6143.8151.5154.6162.3163.4171.8173.7176.7176.1182.8188.6195.825.128.533.140 250.166.181.889.6107.5125.2130.5133.6143.8160.5175.1183.2189.7181.326.829.134.642.152.771.784 492.7113.1127.0131.0136.6146.0164.8176.5187 6187.1180.686.899.2122.3129.2131.1143.1151.2168.9171.5176.9183.1174.4182.6188.3187.6191.9189.3190.4187.4181.3178.3182.5182.2179.36.5 -57.07.2 -41.79.4 -34.191 -14 99.6 -49.011.0 -56.911.5 -105.016.8 -182.823 0 163 621.6 -175.922.1 -203.924.9 -151.928.9 -143.327.6 -114.322.8 -157.923.3 -187.826.7 -270.429.7 -235.26.2 -52.98.4 -42.49.2 -28.18.7 -15.710.6 -60110.3 -58.813 3 -135 520.4 -180.120.8 -166.919.9 -181.423.4 -201.029.1 -151.828.4 -136.625.5 -122.325.6 -163.522 6 -203 427.5 -276.333.6 -225.817.3 -183.428.8 -184.622.2 -186.816.4 -187.222.1 -177.537.8 -152.734.9 -134.925.0 -141.530.7 -166.423.9 -152.015.7 -144.632.0 -191.023.9 -145.223.4 -206.215.1 -217.727.9 -244.727.0 -270.228.5 -279.921.4 -290.733.2 -264.242.9 -263.532.3 -222.621.4 -212.738.01 Includes an item for <strong>the</strong> difference between wage accruals and disbursements, not shown separately.2 Through fiscal year 1976, <strong>the</strong> fiscal year was on a July 1-June 30 basis; beginning October 1976 (fiscal year 1977), <strong>the</strong> fiscal yearis on an October 1-September 30 basis. <strong>The</strong> 3-month period from July 1, 1976 through September 30, 1976 is a separate fiscal periodknown as <strong>the</strong> transition quarter. Data are not seasonally adjusted.Sources: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce (Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Analysis) and Office <strong>of</strong> Management and Budget.365


TABLE B-83.—State and local government receipts and expenditures, national income and product accounts,1959-93[Billions <strong>of</strong> dollars; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]YearorquarterReceiptsTotalPersonaltax andnontaxreceiptsCorporatepr<strong>of</strong>itstaxaccrualsIndirectbusinesstax andnontaxaccrualsContributionsforsocialinsuranceFederalgrants-inaidExpendituresTotal 1PurchasesTransferpaymentstopersonsNetinterestpaidlessdividendsreceivedSubsidieslesscurrentsurplus<strong>of</strong>governmententerprisesSurplusordeficit(-),nationalincomeandproductaccounts19591960196119621963196419651966196719681969197019711972197319741975197619771978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921993 p1982: IV1983: IV1984: IV1985: IV1986: IV1987: IV1988: IV1989: IV1990:1II1991: I..IIIllIV1992:1...IIIllIV1993:1..IIIllIV "45.048.352.456.661.167.172.381.589.8102.7114.8129.0145.3169.7185.3200.6225.6253.9281.9309.3330.6361.4390.8409.0443.4492.2528.7571.2594.3631.3681.5730.0780.5837.8887.3417.9459.5505.1544.8582.4605.1648.2697.7712.5722.4736.9748.3756.2772.0787.0806.6817.2833.2839.0861.6860.2881.0894.24.65.25.76.36.77.58.19.510.612.715.216.718.724.226.328.231.035.841.046.350.556.263.068.576.287.194.0101.6111.8117.6131.4138.9145.5154.0160.370.581.189.997.0106.8113.8122.0135.0135.9137.8140.6141.3142.3144.2145.2150.2151.2152.6153.3158.8155.0160.3162.0164.11.21.21.31.51.71.82.02.22.63.33.63.74.35.36.06.77.39.611.412.113.614.515.414.015.918.820.222.723.926.024.222.322.726.030.513.116.816.820.625.225.527.722.821.222.623.421.921.722.423.323.625.927.223.127.928.530.830.129.332.034.437.039.442.646.149.753.960.867.474.883.191.299.5107.2115.8127.8139.9148.9158.6172.3192.0206.8226.6251.7271.4292.0306.5324.5352.8378.2397.5421.5443.1213.1236.3259.6278.3296.8312.8332.7362.2370.9372.3382.1387.7387.9392.6401.8407.5413.0417.1423.7432.2434.1440.0445.7452.63.13.43.73.94.24.75.05.76.77.28.39.210.211.513.014.616.819.522.124.727.429.732.535.837.740.242.847.349.251.954.858.361.764.967.436.838.441.144.349.850.252.855.856.757.858.959.760.561.462.162.963.864.665.265.966.567.267.768.36.86.57.28.09.110.411.114.415.918.620.324.429.037.540.643.954.661.167.577.380.588.787.983.987.094.4100.3107.6102.8111.3118.2132.3153.0171.4185.884.386.997.7104.5103.8102.9113.0121.9127.7131.9131.9137.6143.8151.5154.6162.3163.4171.8173.7176.7176.1182.8188.6195.845.548.352.756.160.666.172.381.190.9102.6113.3127.2142.8156.3171.9193.5221.0239.3256.3278.2305.4336.6362.3382.1403.2434.1472.6517.0554.2593.0636.7704.9773.2830.6885.2391.4411.1446.1488.4531.1568.1607.9656.4677.9693.1712.2736.5750.1766.5781.5794.5811.2825.5837.8848.0859.4880.0895.9905.541.844.548.451.455.860.966.874.682.792.3101.3112.6124.3134.7149.2170.7192.0205.5220.1241.4269.2298.0320.3341.1360.3389.9428.1465.3496.6531.7573.6620.9653.4683.0713.7350.3367.9402.2442.4476.6509.0545.7589.3605.0613.7625.1640.0642.9650.5657.3662.8673.0681.2686.2691.4697.0711.1721.2725.65.65.96.57.07.58.210.112.114.516.720.124.027.530.432.338.943.647.452.457.265.773.679.985.993.5101.2110.9119.6130.0143.6165.4199.2228.6253.982.188.096.1104.5114.4122.9134.2150.2155.4161.3168.1176.8186.7195.3203.5211.4218.3225.1232.8238.4244.1251.0257.2263.1-.3-.6-.9-1.1-1.3-2.0-1.6-1.8-3.3-5.2-5.4-5.0-6.0-9.8-15.3-21.2-25.9-31.8-34.3-37.9-43.2-45.6-47.0-51.1-60.4-60.3-56.5-56.2-56.0-33.2-35.1-39.7-44.7-45.9-48.0-53.4-62.6-61.8-61.0-59.7-58.7-57.3-56.6-56.2-56.0-56.1-56.2-56.1-56.2-56.0-56.0-55.9-56.0-2.0-2.2-2.3-2.5-2.8-2.8-3.0-3.0-3.1-3.2-3.3-3.6-3.7-4.2-4.3-4.4-4.5-4.8-5.1-5.6-5.7-5.8-5.6-7.1-8.7-11.4-13.5-13.7-14.9-17.5-20.1-21.1-22.9-24.8-26.5-7.7-9.6-12.5-13.8-13.9-15.8-18.5-20.6-20.7-20.9-21.2-21.6-22.1-22.6-23.1-23.6-24.0-24.6-25.1-25.5-25.8-26.2-26.7-27.3-0.5.0-.4.5.41.0.0.5-1.1.11.51.82.513.413.47.14.614.625.631.125.124.828.526.940.358.156.154.340.138.444.825.17.37.22.126.548.359.056.351.237.040.241.334.529.324.711.76.15.55.512.16.17.81.213.51.1-1.71 Includes an item for <strong>the</strong> difference between wage accruals and disbursements, not shown separately.Source-. Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Analysis.366


TABLE B-84.—State and local government revenues and expenditures, selected fiscal years, 1927-91[Millions <strong>of</strong> dollars]Fiscal year l General revenues by source 2TotalPropertytaxesSalesandgrossreceiptstaxesIndividualincometaxesCorporationnetincometaxesRevenuefromFederalGovernmentGeneral expenditures by function 2AllEducatiowayswelfare o<strong>the</strong>rHigh-Public Allo<strong>the</strong>r 3 Total4192719321934193619381940194219441946194819501952195319541955195619571958195919601961196219631962-63.1963-64.1964-65.1965-66.1966-67.1967-68.1968-69.1969-70.1970-71.1971-72.1972-73.1973-74.1974-75.1975-76.1976-77.1977-78.1978-79.1979-80.1980-81.1981-82.1982-83.1983-84.1984-85.1985-86.1986-87.1987-88.1988-89.1989-90.1990-91.7,2717,2677,6788,3959,2289,60910,41810,90812,35617,25020,91125,18127,30729,01231,07334,66738,16441,21945,30650,50554,03758,25262,89062,26968,44374,00083,03691,197101,264114,550130,756144,927167,541190,222207,670228,171256,176285,157315,960343,236382,322423,404457,654486,753542,730598,121641,486686,860726,762786,129849,502902,2074,7304,4874,0764,0934,4404,4304,5374,6044,9866,1267,3498,6529,3759,96710,73511,74912,86414,04714,98316,40518,00219,05420,08919,83321,24122,58324,67026,04727,74730,67334,05437,85242,87745,28347,70551,49157,00162,52766,42264,94468,49974,96982,06789,10596,457103,757111,709121,203132,212142,400155,613167,9994707521,0081,4841,7941,9822,3512,2892,9864,4425,1546,3576,9277,2767,6438,6919,4679,82910,43711,84912,46313,49414,45614,44615,76217,11819,08520,53022,91126,51930,32233,23337,51842,04746,09849,81554,54760,64167,59674,24779,92785,97193,613100,247114,097126,376135,005144,091156,452166,336177,8857074801532182242763424225437889981.0651,1271,2371,5381,7541,7591,9942,4632,6133,0373,2693,2673,7914,0904,7605,8257,3088,90810,81211,90015,22717,99419,49121,45424,57529,24633,17636,93242,08046,42650,73855,12964,52970,36174,36583,93588,35097,806105,6409279491131651562724514475925938468177787448909841,0181,0011,1801,2661,3081,5051,5051,6951,9292,0382,2272,5183,1803,7383,4244,4165,4256,0156,6427,2739,17410,73812,12813,32114,14315,02814,25817,14119,15219,99422,42523,66325,92623,5661162321,0169488009458589548551,8612,4862,5662,8702,9663,1313,3353,8434,8656,3776,9747,1317,8718,7228,66310,00211,02913,21415,37017,18119,15321,85726,14631,34239,26441,82047,03455,58962,44469,59275,16483,02990,29487,28290,00796,935106,158113,099114,857117,602125,824136,8021,7931,6431,4491,6041,8111,8722,1232,2692,6613,6854,5415,7636,2526,8977,5848,4659,2529,69910,51611,63412,56313,48914,85014,55615,95117,25019,26921,19723,59826,11829,97132,37436,16240,21046,54151,73557,19161,12468,43679,82195,466111,599128,926138,008153,570172,317187,314200,350208,482227,838249,9967,2107,7657,1817,6448,7579,2299,1908,86311,02817,68422,78726,09827,91030,70133,72436,71140,37544,85148,88751,87656,20160,20664,81663,97769,30274,67882,84393,350102,411116,728131,332150,674168,549181,357198,959230,721256,731274,215296,984327,517369,086407,449436,733466,516505,008553,899605,623657,134704,921762,360834,8182,2352,3111,8312,1772,4912,6382,5862,7933,3565,3797,1778,3189,39010,55711,90713,22014,13415,91917,28318,71920,57422,21623,77623,72926,28628,56333,28737,91941,15847,23852,71859,41365,81469,71475,83387,85897,216102,780110,758119,448133,211145,784154,282163,876176,108192,686210,819226,619242,683263,898288,148185,570 109,341 22,242 154,099 262,956 908,108 309,3021,8091,7411,5091,4251,6501,5731,4901,2001,6723,0363,8034,6504,9875,5276,4526,9537,8168,5679,5929,4289,84410,35711,13611,15011,66412,22112,77013,93214,48115,41716,42718,09519,02118,61519,94622,52823,90723,05824,60928,44033,31134,60334,52036,65539,41944,98949,36852,35555,62158,10561,05764,9371514448898271,0691,1561,2251,1331,4092,0992,9402,7882,9143,0603,1683,1393,4853,8184,1364,4044,7205,0845,4815,4205,7666,3156,7578,2189,85712,11014,67918,22621,11723,58225,08528,15532,60435,90639,14041,89847,28854,10557,99660,90666,41471,47975,86882,65089,09097,879110,518130,4023,0153,2692,9523,2153,5473,8623,8893,7374,5917,1708,86710,34210,61911,55712,19713,39914,94016,54717,87619,32521,06322,54924,42323,67825,58627,57930,02933,28136,91541,96347,50854,94062,59769,44678,09692,180103,004112,472122,477137,731155,277172,957189,935205,079223,068244,745269,568295,510317,528342,479375,095403,4671 Fiscal years not <strong>the</strong> same for all governments. See Note.2 Excludes revenues or expenditures <strong>of</strong> publicly owned utilities and liquor stores, and <strong>of</strong> insurance-trust activities. Intergovernmentalreceipts and payments between State and local governments are also excluded.3 Includes o<strong>the</strong>r taxes and charges and miscellaneous revenues.4 Includes expenditures for libraries, hospitals, health, employment security administration, veterans' services, air transportation,water transport and terminals, parking facilities, and transit subsidies, police protection, fire protection, correction, protective inspectionand regulation, sewerage, natural resources, parks and recreation, housing and community development, solid waste management,financial administration, judicial and legal, general public buildings, o<strong>the</strong>r government administration, interest on general debt, andgeneral expenditures, n.e.c.Note.—Data for fiscal years listed from 1962-63 to 1990-91 are <strong>the</strong> aggregations <strong>of</strong> data for government fiscal years that ended in<strong>the</strong> 12-month period from July 1 to June 30 <strong>of</strong> those years. Data for 1963 and earlier years include data for government fiscal yearsending during that particular calendar year.Data are not available for intervening years.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Census.367


TABLE B-85.—Interest-bearing public debt securities by kind <strong>of</strong> obligation, 7967-93[Millions <strong>of</strong> dollars]End <strong>of</strong> yearor monthTotalinterestbearingpublicdebtsecuritiesTotal >MarketableTreasurybillsTreasurynotesTreasurybondsTotalU.S.savingsbondsNonmarketableForeigngovernmentandpublicseries 2GovernmentaccountseriesO<strong>the</strong>r =Fiscal year:1967196819691970197119721973197419751976197719781979322,286344,401351,729369,026396,289425,360456,353473,238532,122619,254697,629766,971819,0074 210,672226,592226,107232,599245,473257,202262,971266,575315,606392,581443,508485,155506,69358,53564,44068,35676,15486,67794,648100,061105,019128,569161,198156,091160,936161,37849,10871,07378,94693,489104,807113,419117,840128,419150,257191,758241,692267,865274,24297,41891,07978,80562,95653,98949,13545,07133,13736,77939,62645,72456,35571,073111,614117,808125,623136,426150,816168,158193,382206,663216,516226,673254,121281,816312,31451,21351,71251,71151,28153,00355,92159,41861,92165,48269,73375,41179,79880,4401,5143,7414,0704,7559,27018,98528,52425,01123,21621,50021,79921,68028,11556,15559,52666,79076,32382,78489,598101,738115,442124,173130,557140,113153,271176,3602,7312,8283,0514,0685,7593,6543,7014,2893,6444,88316,79727,06727,40019801981198219831984198519861987198819891990..1991..1992..1993..1992: JanFebMar....AprMay....June...July....Aug....Sept...OctNov....Dec...1993:JanFebMar...AlfayZJune..July...Aug....Sept..Oct....Nov...Dec...906,402996,4951,140,8831,375,7511,559,5701,821,0102,122,6842,347,7502,599,8772,836,3093,210,9433,662,7594,061,8014,408,5673,806,5263,814,1473,878,4943,889,2113,919,0963,981,7914,007,7784,046,0654,061,8014,050,8144,130,0344,173,8854,150,0594,180,2544,227,6284,251,1644,279,2214,349,0114,333,5074,400,3134,408,5674,403,7594,490,6394,532,325594,506683,209824,4221,024,0001,176,5561,360,1791 1,564,3291 1,675,9801 1,802,9051 1,892,7631 2,092,7591 2,390,6601 2,677,4761 2,904,9101 2,486,0971 2,493,4161 2,552,2611 2,554,1751 2,572,9611 2,605,0581 2,637,9181 2,672,2251 2,677,4761 2,661,3741 2,734,6421 2,754,1131 2,732,9621 2,760,5331 2,807,0921 2,808,8591 2,821,9331 2,860,6221 2,852,0731 2,917,1961 2,904,9101 2,892,5211 2,977,8231 2,989,475199,832223,388277,900340,733356,798384,220410,730378,263398,451406,597482,454564,589634,287658,381586,759591,223615,818598,383620,107618,218632,322637,025634,287627,762644,964657,661647,041648,459659,877642,189657,491659,280671,190677,030658,381668,723709,212714,631310,903363,643442,890557,525661,687776,449896,8841,005,1271,089,5781,133,1931,218,0811,387,7171,566,3491,734,1611,448,8691,443,4001,477,6531,497,0031,483,5591,517,5481,536,3061,558,3591,566,3491,556,7851,602,1531,608,9291,598,3981,616,9231,652,0681,671,5221,661,8341,698,7361,678,2771,727,7991,734,1611,711,4321,757,7551,763,98983,77296,178103,631125,742158,070199,510241,716277,590299,875337,974377,224423,354461,840497,367435,470443,793443,791443,789454,295454,292454,289461,841461,840461,827472,525472,524472,523480,151480,148480,147487,608487,606487,606497,368497,367497,366495,856495,855311,896313,286316,461351,751383,015460,831558,355671,769796,972943,5461,118,1841,272,0991,384,3251,503,6571,320,4291,320,7311,326,2331,335,0361,346,1351,376,7331,369,8611,373,8401,384,3251,389,4411,395,3921,419,7721,417,0981,419,7221,420,5361,442,3061,457,2881,488,3891,481,4341,483,1161,503,6571,511,2391,512,8171,542,85072,72768,01767,27470,02472,83277,01185,55197,004106,176114,025122,152133,512148,266167,024137,293138,656139,924141,320142,217143,215144,503146,083148,266151,147153,528154,955157,647159,888161,441162,644163,550164,424165,319166,181167,024168,155168,993169,42525,15820,49914,64111,4508,8066,6384,1284,3506,3206,81836,04141,63937,03942,45942,02541,97141,96642,16442,25938,69838,45637,02337,03936,52637,37037,34837,16737,00637,03843,79143,22142,96443,00742,49642,45943,77743,59643,480189,848201,052210,462234,684259,534313,928365,872440,658536,455663,677779,412908,4061,011,0201,114,289954,823952,963956,123961,491970,9571,002,534999,9571,002,9691,011,0201,016,3801,019,9791,043,5081,043,0621,042,7601,039,9951,053,0801,066,3941,097,7511,094,8151,095,5481,114,2891,120,8221,120,3451,150,04124,16423,71824,08535,59341,84363,255102,804129,758148,023159,025180,581188,541188,000179,886186,287187,140188,219190,060190,702192,285186,945187,765188,000185,388184,516183,960179,222180,066182,062182,791184,123183,251178,293178,892179,886178,485179,883179,9041 Includes Federal Financing Bank securities, not shown separately, in <strong>the</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> 15,000 million dollars.2 Nonmarketable certificates <strong>of</strong> indebtedness, notes, bonds, and bills in <strong>the</strong> Treasury foreign series <strong>of</strong> dollar-denominated and foreigncurrencydenominated issues.3 Includes depository bonds, retirement plan bonds, Rural Electrification Administration bonds, State and local bonds, and specialissues held only by U.S. Government agencies and trust funds and <strong>the</strong> Federal home loan banks.4 Includes $5,610 million in certificates not shown separately.Note.—Through fiscal year 1976, <strong>the</strong> fiscal year was on a July 1-June 30 basis; beginning October 1976 (fiscal year 1977), <strong>the</strong> fiscalyear is on an October 1-September 30 basis.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Treasury.368


TABLE B-86.—Maturity distribution and average length <strong>of</strong> marketable interest-bearing public debt securitiesheld by private investors, 1967-93End <strong>of</strong> year or monthAmountoutstanding,privatelyheldWithinlyearIto5yearsMaturity class5 to 10years10 to 20years20 yearsand overAverage lengthMillions <strong>of</strong> dollarsYearsMonthsFiscal year:196719681969150,321159,671156,00856,56166,74669,31153,58452,29550,18221,05721,85018,0786,1536,1106,09712,96812,67012,33754419701971197219731974157,910161,863165,978167,869164,86276,44374,80379,50984,04187,15057,03558,55757,15754,13950,1038,28614,50316,03316,38514,1977,8766,3576,3588,7419,9308,2727,6456,9224,5643,4813333222233343444555666555655655555555555555555551 5286311975...1976...1977...1978...1979...210,382279,782326,674356,501380,530115,677150,296161,329163,819181,88365,85290,578113,319132,993127,57415,38524,16933,06733,50032,2798,8578,0878,42811,38318,4894,6116,65210,53114,80520,3041187113790111619801981198219831984463,717549,863682,043862,6311,017,488220,084256,187314,436379,579437,941156,244182,237221,783294,955332,80838,80948,74375,74999,174130,41725,90132,56933,01740,82649,66422,67930,12737,05848,09766,6581985....1986....1987....1988....1989....1,185,6751,354,2751,445,3661,555,2081,654,660472,661506,903483,582524,201546,751402,766467,348526,746552,993578,333159,383189,995209,160232,453247,42862,85370,66472,86274,18680,61688,012119,365153,016171,375201,53211399010111019901991199219931,841,9032,113,7992,363,8022,562,336626,297713,778808,705858,135630,144761,243866,329978,714267,573280,574295,921306,66382,71384,90084,70694,346235,176273,304308,141324,4791992:JanFebMarAprMayJuneJulyAugSeptOctNovDec1993: Jan....Feb...Mar...Apr...,May..June.JulyAugSeptOctNovDec2,201,6422,211,9632,266,8062,268,3752,284,8662,310,3212,344,0942,372,7642,363,8022,362,0752,425,5502,434,3332,419,5612,443,0202,484,6282,486,2312,496,6152,515,5012,521,2492,578,5012,562,3362,552,8802,626,0852,628,352749,495758,592786,988769,874786,584784,194800,084811,729808,705806,345825,445843,416832,988833,583849,766833,935854,658849,639864,355874,599858,135866,988898,241905,311806,162785,152812,043828,118816,200845,264861,247868,080866,329860,918893,133890,778881,132894,130922,468937,347919,114949,127940,460976,547978,714968,7941,008,4681,011,213278,275291,657291,507293,819295,318294,745296,644297,830295,921299,422303,863301,395303,279308,058306,175308.094313,037309,295304,447308,413306,663298,460308,219304,86387,29785,79885,70885,79885,78885,79385,79385,57284,70685,52992,79891,44192,35689,37688,62688,83485,27384,23785,70894,48794,34694,43687,13186,143280,413290,764290,559290,766300,976300,326300,326309,553308,141309,861310,312307,304309,807317,874317,593318,022324,532323,204326,279324,455324,479324,203324,025320,82211111110111011111111101011101010101010101098Note.—All issues classified to final maturity.Through fiscal year 1976, <strong>the</strong> fiscal year was on a July 1-June 30 basis; beginning October 1976 (fiscal year 1977), <strong>the</strong> fiscal year ison an October 1-September 30 basis.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Treasury.369


TABLE B-87.—Estimated ownership <strong>of</strong> public debt securities by private investors, 7976-93[Par values; l billions <strong>of</strong> dollars]Held by private investorsNonbank investorsEnd <strong>of</strong> monthTotalCommercialbanks 2TotalTotalIndividuals 3Savingsbonds 4MoneymarketfundsO<strong>the</strong>rsecuritiesInsurancecompaniesCorporations5State andlocalgovernments6Foreignandinternational7O<strong>the</strong>rinvestors81976: JuneDec376.4409.592.5103.8283.9305.796.1101.669.672.026.529.610.712.70.81.123.323.532.739.369.878.150.549.41977: JuneDec421.0461.3102.9102.0318.1359.3104.9107.874.476.730.531.113.015.1.8.922.118.249.659.187.9109.639.848.61978: JuneDec477.8508.699.695.3378.2413.3109.0114.079.180.729.933.314.215.31.31.517.317.369.681.1119.5133.147.351.01979-. JuneDec516.6540.594.695.6422.0444.9115.5118.080.679.934.938.116.015.63.85.618.617.086.286.2114.9119.067.083.51980: JuneDec1981: JuneDec558.2616.4651.2694.598.5111.5115.0113.8459.7504.9536.2580.7116.5117.1107.4110.873.472.569.268.143.144.638.242.715.318.119.921.65.33.59.021.514.019.319.917.9•85.190.395.999.9118.2129.7136.6136.6105.3126.9147.5172.41982: JuneDec740.9848.4114.7134.0626.2714.4114.1116.567.468.346.748.224.430.622.442.617.624.5106.0118.6137.2149.5204.5232.11983: JuneDec948.61,022.6167.4179.5781.2843.1121.3133.469.771.551.661.937.846.028.322.832.839.7138.1153.0160.1166.3262.8281.91984: JuneDec1,102.21,212.5180.6181.5921.61,031.0142.2143.872.974.569.369.351.264.514.925.945.350.1168.5188.4171.6205.9327.9352.41985: JuneDec1,292.01,417.2195.6189.41,096.41,227.8148.7154.876.779.872.075.069.180.524.825.154.959.0213.4303.6213.8224.8371.7380.01986: JuneDec1987: JuneDec1988: MarJuneSeptDec1989: MarJuneSeptDec1990: MarJuneSeptDec1,502.71,602.01,658.11,731.41,779.61,786.71,821.21,858.51,903.41,909.11,958.32,015.82,115.12,141.82,207.32,288.3194.3197.5192.3194.2195.6190.7191.2184.9192.0178.0166.6164.9178.4176.9179.5171.51,308.41,404.51,465.81,537.21,584.01,596.01,630.01,673.61,711.41,731.11,791.71,850.91,936.71,964.92,027.82,116.8159.5162.7165.6172.4178.1182.0186.8190.4204.2211.7213.5216.4222.8229.6232.5233.883.892.396.8101.1104.0106.2107.8109.6112.2114.0115.7117.7119.9121.9123.9126.275.770.468.871.374.175.879.080.892.097.797.898.7102.9107.7108.6107.687.9101.6104.7108.1110.2111.0115.9118.6119.7120.3121.4125.1134.9137.6141.2142.022.828.620.614.615.213.411.111.813.011.312.914.931.328.034.045.561.268.879.784.686.387.685.986.089.491.090.993.494.996.9102.0108.9319.5346.6383.9418.4432.5446.9457.7471.6477 9483.5487.1487.5493.8494.5492.1490.4250.9263.4281.1299.7332.5345.4345.9362.2376.6369.1394.9429.6421.8427.3440.3458.4406.6432.8430.2439.4429.2409.7426.7433.0430.6444.2471.0484.0537.2551.0585.7637.71991: MarJuneSeptDec2,360.62,397.92,489.42,563.2188.5197.3218.6233.42,172.12,200.62,270.82,329.8238.3243.5257.5263.9129.7133.2135.4138.1108.6110.3122.1125.8147.2156.7171.2181.865.455.464.580.0114.9130.8142.0150.8510.4510.8512.9520.3464.3473.6477.3491.7631.6629.8645.5641.31992: MarJuneSeptDec2,664.02,712.42,765.52,839.9256.6267.3287.4294.02,407.42,445.12,478.12,545.9268.1275.1281.2289.2142.0145.4150.3157.3126.1129.7130.9131.9187.4190.9194.9197.584.879.479.479.7166.0175.0180.8192.5521.8528.5529.5534.8507.9529.6535.2549.7671.5666.7677.0702.41993-. MarJuneSept2,895.02,938.42,983.0310.0305.9306.02,585.02,632.52,677.0297.7303.0305.8163.6166.5169.1134.1136.4136.7205.0208.1210.077.776.275.2199.3206.1215.6541.0553.9558.0565.5568.2592.3698.8717.0720.01 U.S. savings bonds, series A-F and J, are included at current redemption value.2 Includes domestically chartered banks, U.S. branches and agencies <strong>of</strong> foreign banks, New York investment companies majority owned by foreign banks,and Edge Act corporations owned by domestically chartered and foreign banks.3 Includes partnerships and personal trust accounts.4 Includes U.S. savings notes. Sales began May 1, 1967, and were discontinued June 30, 1970.5 Exclusive <strong>of</strong> banks and insurance companies.6 Includes State and local government series (SLGs) as well as State and local pension funds.7 Consists <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> investments <strong>of</strong> foreign and international accounts (both <strong>of</strong>ficial and private) in U.S. public debt issues. Reflects 1978 benchmark throughDecember 1984 and 1984 benchmark to date.8 Includes savings and loan associations, credit unions, nonpr<strong>of</strong>it institutions, mutual savings banks, corporate pension trust funds, dealers and brokers,certain Government deposit accounts, and Government-sponsored enterprises.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Treasury.370


CORPORATE PROFITS AND FINANCETABLE B-88.—Corporate pr<strong>of</strong>its with inventory valuation and capital consumption adjustments, 1959-93[Billions <strong>of</strong> dollars; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]Year or quarterCorporatepr<strong>of</strong>its withinventoryvaluationand capitalconsumptionadjustmentsCorporatepr<strong>of</strong>its taxliabilityCorporate pr<strong>of</strong>its after tax with inventoryvaluation and capital consumption adjustmentsTotallendsUndistributedpr<strong>of</strong>its withinventoryvaluationand capitalconsumptionadjustments195952.323.628.612.715.9196019611962196319641965196619671968196950.751.659.665.172.182.988.686.092.689.622.722.824.026.228.030.933.732.739.439.728.028.835.638.944.152.054.953.353.249.913.414.015.016.118.020.220.922.124.625.214.614.820.622.826.131.834.031.228.624.7197019711972197319741975197619771978197977.590.3103.2116.4104.5121.9147.1175.7199.7202.534.437.741.949.351.850.964.273.083.588.043.152.661.367.152.771.082.8102.6116.2114.523.723.725.828.130.430.135.640.745.952.419.428.835.539.022.340.947.261.970.362.119801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921993 ".1982: IV1983: IV1984: IV1985: IV1986: IV1987: IV1988: IV1989: IV177.7182.0151.5212.7264.2280.8271.6319.8365.0362.8380.6369.5407.2150.3229.1261.3284.9264.6343.3378.3354.584.881.163.177.294.096.5106.5127.1137.0141.3138.7129.8146.358.782.283.897.6116.6135.2146.2134.292.9100.988.4135.4170.2184.2165.1192.8228.0221.5241.9239.7260.991.7146.9177.5187.2148.1208.1232.2220.359.069.270.081.282.792.4109.8106.2115.3134.6153.5137.4150.5169.072.584.283.497.4111.0106.3121.0141.333.931.718.454.287.591.955.486.5112.686.988.5102.3110.419.262.794.189.937.1101.8111.279.01990:1IIIllIV382.6409.3367.5362.8132.0139.8145.7137.0250.6269.5221.8225.8149.9154.6155.7153.7100.7115.066.172.11991:1....IV..369.3370.8359.0378.8125.4128.0132.5133.4243.9242.8226.5245.4145.9136.2133.4133.998.0106.693.1111.51992:1..IIIllIV409.9411.7367.5439.5147.0153.0130.1155.0262.9258.7237.4284.5138.0146.1155.2162.9124.9112.682.3121.71993:1IIIllIV "...432.1458.1468.5160.9173.3169.5271.2284.8299.1167.5168.5169.7170.4103.7116.3129.3Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Analysis.371


TABLE B-89.—Corporate pr<strong>of</strong>its by industry, 1959-93[Billions <strong>of</strong> dollars; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]Corporate pr<strong>of</strong>its with inventory valuation adjustment and without capital consumption adjustmentDomestic industriesYear orquarterTotalTotalTotalFinancial 1FederalReservebanksO<strong>the</strong>rTotalManufacturing2NonfinancialTransportationand publicutilitiesWholesaleand retailtradeO<strong>the</strong>rRest<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>world195953.150.47.00.76.343.426.57.16.23.62.71960196119621963196451.051.356.461.267 547.848.052.657.163 07.77.57.67.375.9.8.91.01 16.76.86.86.46440.240.445.049.855 523.823.426.329.632 47.57.98.59.510 25.25.56.36.4793.63.63.94.45 13.13.33.84.1451965196619671968196977.683.080.386.983.272.978.575.581.376.67.99.29.510.911.61.31.72.02.53.16.57.57.68.48565.069.366.070.465.039.742.439.041.737.011.011.910.911.010.68.68.89.710.911.25.66.26.46.86.24.74.54.85.66.61970197119721973197471.885.597.9110.9103 464.777.788.496.085 913.115.216.417.516 23.53.33.34.5579.611.913.113.010 551.662.572.078.569 727.134.841.446.740 78.28.99.49.07610.312.314.114.613 75.96.67.18.2777.17.99.514.917 519751976197719781979129.4158.8186.7212.8219 8114.8142.3167.7190.2185 615.919.925.731.831 65.65.96.17.69410.314.019.624.122 298.9122.4142.0158.4153 954.570.778.589.688 310.915.318.521.716 921.923.127.827.728 311.613.317.119.420 514.616.518.922.634.319801981198219831984197.8203.2166.4202.2236.4162.9174.0138.6171.9205.224.318.715.624.520.311.814.415.214.616.412.64.3.49.93.9138.5155.3123.0147.4185.075.887.463.171.486.718.320.120.828.939.922.831.631.938.749.721.616.27.28.48.735.029.227.830.431.219851986198719881989225.3227.6273.4320.3325 4194.5194.6233.9271.2266 028.735.836.441.850 616.315.515.717.620 112.420.320.724.230 5165.8158.9197.5229.4215 380.159.087.0117.5108 034.136.543.447.542 143.146.339.937.139 78.517.127.227.325 530.832.939.549.159.41990199119921993 "354.7367.3390.1286.7300.4327.8377 765.780.778.198 721.420.217.816 144.360.460.382 5221.1219.7249.8279 0109.189.8115.5128 544.054.452.057 337.247.446.353 430.828.236.039 867.966.962.31982- IV1983: IV1984: IV1985- IV1986: IV1987: IV1988: IV1989: IV160.0216.2223.6228.0225.0293.4340.5320.6130.8182.6192.9193.5192.5246.3285.9254.823.022.120.329.034.739.446.152.514.615.217.216.015.216.118.920.48.36.93.213.019.523.327.232.1107.8160.5172.6164.5157.8207.0239.7202.350.190.579.283.363.998.7129.394.518.219.133.531.334.243.147.638.833.840.750.839.043.139.339.339.25.710.29.011.016.625.823.529.829.233.630.734.532.647.054.665.81990: 1IIIllIV346.8377.9344.7349.3282.2310.1280.9273.860.967.367.866.620.721.322.221.440.246.145.645.2221.3242.8213.1207.2108.3117.4112.398.545.049.742.538.738.444.929.436.229.730.828.833.864.667.863.875.51991:1IIIllIV364.6370.1359.0375.4291.9303.6299.3306.875.981.084.281.621.020.220.019.754.860.864.261.9216.0222.6215.1225.291.589.689.388.950.057.153.157.446.549.645.647.828.026.327.231.172.866.559.768.51992: 1IIIllIV399.7395.7350.1414.8328.5334.2288.6360.197.987.744.682.018.818.317.116.779.169.427.565.3230.5246.5244.0278.198.9115.7119.3128.057.651.348.750.440.046.041.357.734.033.434.642.071.261.561.554.71993: 1IIIll407.0433.4444.8348.0375.3382.192.396.499.316.616.216.075.780.283.3255.7278.9282.8118.9132.5126.753.353.959.046.055.455.137.537.242.159.058.162.71 Consists <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> following industries: Depository institutions; nondepository credit institutions; security and commodity brokers-,insurance carriers; regulated investment companies; small business investment companies; and real estate investment trusts.2 See Table B-90 for industry detail.N Ote.—<strong>The</strong> industry classification is on a company basis and is based on <strong>the</strong> 1987 Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) beginning1987, and on <strong>the</strong> 1972 SIC for earlier years shown.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Analysis.372


TABLE B-90.—Corporate pr<strong>of</strong>its <strong>of</strong> manufacturing industries, 1959-93[Billions <strong>of</strong> dollars; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]Corporate pr<strong>of</strong>its with inventory valuation adjustment and without capital consumption adjustmentDurable goodsNondurable goodsYear or quarterTotalTotalmanufacturingPrimarymetalindustriesFabricatedmetalproductsIndustrialmachineryandequipmentElectronicando<strong>the</strong>relectricequipmentMotorvehiclesandequipmentO<strong>the</strong>rTotalFoodandKindredproductsChemicalsandalliedproductsPetroleumandcoalproductsO<strong>the</strong>r195926.513.72.31.12.21.73.03.512.82.53.52.64.31960196119621963196423.823.426.329.632.411.711.414.116.418.02.01.61.62.02.51.01.21.31.41.81.92.42.53.31.31.31.51.61.73.02.54.04.94.62.83.13.54.04.512.112.012.213.214.42.22.42.42.72.73.13.33.23.74.12.62.22.22.22.34.24.24.44.75.31965196619671968196939.742.439.041.737.023.223.921.222.419.03.13.62.71.91.42.12.42.52.32.04.04.54.14.13.72.73.03.02.92.36.25.14.05.54.85.25.35.05.74.916.418.417.819.218.02.83.33.23.23.04.64.94.35.24.62.93.43.93.73.36.16.86.47.07.01970197119721973197427.134.841.446.740.710.416.622.625.015.11.62.35.01.11.52.22.61.83.03.04.34.73.11.31.92.83.21.35.15.95.93.04.25.76.34.116.818.218.821.725.73.23.52.92.52.63.94.55.26.15.23.63.73.25.210.76.16.57.57.97.21975197619771978197954.570.778.589.688.320.331.237.645.036.52.72.11.03.63.53.23.94.55.05.24.86.78.310.49.12.63.85.86.65.42.27.49.38.94.64.87.48.610.58.634.139.541.044.651.88.67.16.86.15.86.38.27.78.27.19.813.312.915.524.59.411.013.614.814.61980198119821983198475.887.463.171.486.717.918.14.818.437.22.63.0-4.7-4.9-.44.34.42.63.14.57.58.23.44.46.35.04.91.33.44.8-4.3.2— 45^28.92.8-2.72.67.213.157.869.358.353.049.56.09.07.25.87.35.57.64.76.87.333.638.631.622.115.912.914.214.818.319.11985198619871988198980.159.087.0117.5108.029.030.042.252.249.3-.9.92.65.96.14.75.35.26.46.65.33.27.310.510.32.42.66.27.69.37.34.43.75.72.310.113.717.316.114.651.129.044.865.358.88.47.511.411.810.76.08.015.119.318.517.1-8.5-3.610.45.719.721.921.923.823.91990199119921993 »1982: IV1983: IV1984: IV1985: IV1986: IV1987: IV1988: IV1989: IV109.189.8115.5128.550.190.579.283.363.998.7129.394.539.230.948.358.0-5.333.434.228.834.235.256.443.03.31.2.61.2-5.2-3.7-1.0-1.31.73.36.54.16.15.67.46.41.14.95.24.04.76.06.45.39.65.26.67.51.06.55.07.02.66.38.012.67.98.612.114.3-1.06.64.12.03.32.99.710.9-2.2-5.63.57.6-2.99.48.57.34.5.69.6-3.114.615.918.121.11.79.712.49.717.416.216.213.269.959.067.270.555.557.145.054.529.763.472.951.614.016.617.015.66.76.17.37.88.213.412.39.816.214.515.716.23.17.76.03.59.518.524.015.017.35.86.111.129.024.113.024.1-13.37.414.24.622.522.128.527.616.619.218.619.225.324.122.422.21990:1IIIllIV108.3117.4112.398.544.342.440.529.54.73.42.13.07.66.35.45.011.29.79.87.69.68.77.85.4-4.1-.3.7-5.315.314.614.513.864.074.971.969.19.114.915.716.217.319.915.612.013.716.217.322.023.923.923.218.91991:1IIIllIV91.589.689.388.924.832.431.534.71.51.1.21.93.96.06.06.57.15.82.06.07.58.57.810.4-9.6-6.4-2.8-3.714.417.418.313.566.757.257.854.216.816.518.814.412.812.514.817.817.15.9-.2.419.922.324.421.71992:1IIIllIV98.9115.7119.3128.039.445.849.958.0.91.0.3.06.88.18.06.65.56.66.57.810.08.712.217.61.94.82.44.914.416.620.521.059.669.969.470.014.519.618.515.215.314.815.017.74.97.76.75.024.927.829.232.11993:1118.9132.5126.748.058.459.9-.52.51.15.56.96.35.76.28.814.912.114.43.110.08.119.420.721.370.974.266.818.014.814.618.416.314.67.213.512.027.329.525.6Note.—<strong>The</strong> industry classification is on a company basis and is based on <strong>the</strong> 1987 Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) beginning1987 and on <strong>the</strong> 1972 SIC for earlier years shown. In <strong>the</strong> 1972 SIC, <strong>the</strong> categories shown here as "industrial machinery and equipmentand "electronic and o<strong>the</strong>r electric equipment" were identified as "machinery, except electrical" and "electric and electronic equipment,"respectively.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Analysis.151-444 0 - 9 4 - 1 3373


TABLE B-91.—Sales, pr<strong>of</strong>its, and stockholders' equity, all manufacturing corporations, 1952-93[Billions <strong>of</strong> dollars]All manufacturing corporationsDurable goods industriesNondurable goods industriesYear orquarterSales(nat\Beforeincometaxes*Pr<strong>of</strong>itsAfterincometaxesMOCKholders'equity 2Sales(net)Beforeincometaxes lPr<strong>of</strong>itsAfterincometaxesQtnrkMOCKholders'equity 2Sales(net)Beforeincometaxes»Pr<strong>of</strong>itsAfterincometaxesMOCKholders'equity 21952195319541955195619571958195919601961196219631964196519661967196819691970197119721973250.2265.9248 5278.4307.3320.0305.3338.0345.7356 4389.4412 7443.1492 2554.2575 4631.9694.6708 8751.1849 51,017.222.924.420 928.629.828.222.729.727.527 531.934 939.646 551.847 855.458.148152.963 281.410.711.311215.116.215.412.716.315.215 317.719 523.227 530.929 032.133.228 631.036 548.1103.7108.2113 1120.1131.6141.1147.4157.1165.4172 6181.4189 7199.8211 7230.3247 6265.9289.9306 8320.8343 4374.1122.0137.9122 8142.1159.5166.0148.6169.4173.9175 2195.3209 0226.3257 0291.7300 6335.5366.5363 1381.8435 8527.312.914.011416.516.515.811.415.814.013 616.818 521.226 229.225 730.631.523 026.533 643.65.55.8568.18.37.95.88.17.0698.69511.614 516.414 616.516.912 914.518 424.849.852.454 958.865.270.572.877.982.384 989.193 398.5105 4115.2125 0135.6147.61551160.41714188.7128.0128.0125 7136.3147.8154.1156.7168.5171.81812194.1203 6216.8235 2262.4274 8296.4328.1345 7369.3413 7489.910.010.49612.113.212.411.313.913.513 915.116 418.320 322.622 024.826.625 226.529 637.85.25.5567.07.87.56.98.38.2859.210 011.613 014.614 415.516.415 716.518 023.353.955.758 261.366.470.674.679.283.187 792.396 3101.3106 3115.1122 6130.3142.31517160.5172 0185.41973: IV275.121.413.0386.4140.110.86.3194.7135.010.66.7191.7New series:1973: IV236.620.613.2368.0122.710.16.2185.8113.910.57.0182.119741975197619771978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921991:1IIIllIV1992: I 3IIIllIV1993: IIIIll1,060.61,065.21,203.21,328.11496 41,741.81912 82,144.72,039.42,114.32 335 02 33142,220.92,378.22 596.22,745.12,810.72,761.12,890.3655.1698.8698.7708.4679.6733.6729.9747.2717.7766.5752.592.179 9104.9115.1132 5154.2145 8158.6108.2133.1165.6137 0129.3173 02161188.8159.699.833.427.032.827.812.2-65.142.237.318.916.637.737.758.749164.570.481198.792 6101.370.985.8107.687 683.1115 6154 6136.3111.667.524.018.323.117.68.5-44.230.027.710.414.025.325.1395.0423.4462.7496.7540 5600.56681743.4770.2812.8864.2866 2874.7900 9957 6999.01,043.81,064.11,036.81,050.41,057.61,069.11,079.41,015.01,035.41,056.81,039.81,031.51,047.61,056.1529.0521 1589.6657.3760 7865.7889 1979.5913.1973.51,107.61 142 61,125.51,178 01,284.71,356.61,357.21,304.01,389.9303.9335.3328.0336.7325.4355.9346.2362.4349.5380.8368.341.135.350.757.969 672.457 467.234 748.775.561 552.178 091775.257.614.1-33.23.410.73.2-3.2-59.015.310.9-.5-1.915.716.124.721430.834.841845.235 641.621.730.048.938 632.653 067155.740.97.4-23.51.47.61.1-2.8-40.211.28.9-3.4.39.311.5196.02081224.3239.9262 6292.5317 7350.4355.5372.4395.6420 9436.3444 3468 7501.3515.0506.8473.9503.5507.8505.9509.8462.0475.5487.4470.9467.7483.1492.9531.6544.1613.7670.8735 7876.11023 71,165.21,126.41,140.81,227.51188 81,095.41,200.31,311.51,388.51,453.51,457.11,500.4351.2363.5370.7371.7354.2377.7383.7384.8368.3385.8384.251.044 654.357.262 981.888 491.373.684.490 075 677.295.1124 4113.5102.085.766.623.622.124.615.3-6.126.926.519.418.522.021.634.111133.735.539 353.556 959.649.355.858 849150.562.687 580.670.660.147.516.815.416.511.3-4.018.918.813.813.715.913.6199.0215.3238.4256.8277 9308.0350 4393.0414.7440.4468 5445 3438.4456.6488 9497.7528.9557.4562.8546.8549.8563.2569.6553.0560.0569.4568.9563.7564.5563.1Addendum: Impact <strong>of</strong> Accounting Change 3 —First quarter 19921992:I -99.2 -68.9 -69.2 -69.9 -48.0 -48.1 -29.3 -21.0 -21.11 In <strong>the</strong> old series, "income taxes" refers to Federal income taxes only, as State and local income taxes had already been deducted.In <strong>the</strong> new series, no income taxes have been deducted.2 Annual data are average equity for <strong>the</strong> year (using four end-<strong>of</strong>-quarter figures).3 Data for <strong>the</strong> first quarter <strong>of</strong> 1992 were revised significantly as a result <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> early adoption <strong>of</strong> Financial Accounting StandardsBoard Statement 106 (Employer's Accounting for Post-Retirement Benefits O<strong>the</strong>r Than Pensions) by a large number <strong>of</strong> companies during<strong>the</strong> fourth quarter <strong>of</strong> 1992. Corporations must show <strong>the</strong> cumulative effect <strong>of</strong> a change in accounting principle in <strong>the</strong> first quarter <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>year in which <strong>the</strong> change is adopted.Note.—Data are not necessarily comparable from one period to ano<strong>the</strong>r due to changes in accounting principles, industryclassifications, sampling procedures, etc. For explanatory notes concerning compilation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> series, see "Quarterly Financial <strong>Report</strong> forManufacturing, Mining, and Trade Corporations,' Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Census.Source-. Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Census.374


TABLE B-92.—Relation <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>its after taxes to stockholders' equity and to sales, all manufacturingcorporations, 1947-93Year or quarterRatio <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>its after income taxes (annualrate) to stockholders' equity—percent xAllmanufacturingcorporationsDurablegoodsindustriesNondurablegoodsindustriesPr<strong>of</strong>its after income taxes per dollar <strong>of</strong>sales—centsAllmanufacturingcorporationsDurablegoodsindustriesNondurablegoodsindustries1947194819491950 .1951195219531954 .1955195619571958 ..195919601961196219631964196519661967.. .19681969 . ..1970 . .1971197219731973: IVNew series:1973: IV19741975197619771978197919801981198219831984 . .198519861987198819891990 .. . . .199119921991: I . .||IIIIV1992-1 2IIIllIV1993:1II . . . . .Ill15.616.011.615 412.110.310.59912.612 310.98610.49.2899.810 311.613 013.411712.111.5939.710 612.813.414.314.911.613 914.215.016.413.913.69.210.612 51019.512.816113.610.7632.37.0876.632-17 411.610 54.05.4979.514.415.712.116913.011.111.110 313.812 811.38010.48.5819.610111.713 814.211712.211.4839.010.813.112.913.312.610.313 714.516.015.411.211.96.18.112.4927.511.914.311.18.01.5-5.01.26.0.9-2.2-34.89.47.3-2.9.37.79.31 Annual ratios based on average equity for <strong>the</strong> year (using four end-<strong>of</strong>-quarter figures). Quarterly ratios based on equity at end <strong>of</strong>quarter only.2 See footnote 3, Table B-91.Note.—Based on data in millions <strong>of</strong> dollars.See Note, Table B-91.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Census.16.616.211.214 111.29.79.99611.411810.69210.49.8969.910 411.512 212.711811.911.510 310.310.512.614.015.317.112.914 213.814.217.416.315.211.912.712.511.011.513.717.916.213.410.88.412.311.211.78.0-2.913.513.29.79.711.39.66.77.05.8714.94.34.3455.4534.8424.84.44.34.54.75.25.65.65.05.14.84.04.14.34.74.75.65.54.65.45.35.45.74.84.73.54.14.63.83.74.96.05.04.02.4.82.83.32.51.2-6.54.13.81.42.03.33.36.77.16.4775.34.54.24.65.75.24.83.94.84.03.94.44.55.15.75.64.84.94.63.53.84.24.74.55.04.74.15.25.35.55.24.04.22.43.14.43.42.94.55.24.13.0.6-1.7.52.3.3-.8-12.43.12.6.9.12.53.16.76.85.46.54.54.14.34.45.15.34.94.44.94.84.74.74.95.45.55.65.35.25.04.54.54.44.85.06.16.45.15.55.35.36.15.65.14.44.94.84.14.65.26.75.84.94.13.24.84.24.43.0-1.15.04.93.63.74.13.5375


TABLE B-93.—Sources and uses <strong>of</strong> funds, nonfarm nonfinancial corporate business, 1947-93[Billions <strong>of</strong> dollars; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]Yearortprlei1947....1948....1949....1950....1951 ...1952....1953....1954....1955....1956....1957....1958....1959....I960....1961....1962....1963....1964....1965....1966....1967....1968....1969....1970....1971....1972....1973....1974....1975....1976....1977....1978....1979....1980....1981....1982....1983....1984....1985...1986....1987....1988....1989....1990 ....1991...1992....1991:1IIIII....IV....1992:1IIIII....IV....1993:1 IIIII....SourcesTotal27.329.721.342.937.331.129.330.353.746.744.843.557.250.456.262.270.476.394.8101.197.0115.6122.9107.5131.8160.2222.8190.6157.3210.8260.1319.3336.5334.7390.7330.8439.8501.0486.3531.9540.5610.9562.3522.8473.2586.6450.9473.4480.9487.4560.4600.8588.2597.0468.3593.6611.4InternalTotal13.319.720.018.520.822.722.624.730.330.532.431.237.036.437.544.047.853.060.164.365.366.766.564.076.188.195.591.0125.0140.5162.7183.6198.5199.7238.9247.5292.3336.3351.9336.7375.9404.3399.9409.4437.8462.7433.0440.9426.9450.5454.6452.2468.5475.4460.6471.4485.8II


TABLE B-94.—Common stock prices and yields, 1955-93Year or monthCommon stock prices *New York Stock Exchange indexes (Dec. 31, 1965=50) 2CompositeIndustrialTransportationUtility 3FinanceDowJonesindustrialaverage 2Common stock yields(S&P) (percent) 4Standard& Poor'scompositeindex(1941-Dividendpriceratio 5Earningspriceratio 61955195619571958195919601961196219631964196519661967196819691970197119721973197419751976197719781979198019811982198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931992:JanFebMarAprMayJuneJulyAugSeptOctNovDec1993: JanFebMarAprMayJuneJulyAugSeptOctNovDec21.5424.4023.6724.5630.7330.0135.3733.4937.5143.7647.3946.1550.7755.3754.6745.7254.2260.2957.4243.8445.7354.4653.6953.7058.3268.1074.0268.9392.6392.46108.09136.00161.70149.91180.02183.46206.33229.01249.58229.34228.12225.21224.55228.61224.68228.17230.07230.13226.97232.84239.47239.67243.41248.12244.72246.02247.16247.85251.93254.86257.53255.93257.7346.1851.9758.0057.4448.0357.9265.7363.0848.0850.5260.4457.8658.2364.7678.7085.4478.18107.45108.01123.79155.85195.31180.95216.23225.78258.14284.62299.99286.62286.09282.36281.60285.25279.54281.90284.44285.76279.70287.30294.86292.11294.40298.75292.19297.83298.78295.34298.83300.92306.61310.84313.2250.2653.5150.5846.9632.1444.3550.1737.7431.8931.1039.5741.0943.5047.3460.6172.6160.4189.3685.63104.11119.87140.39134.12175.28158.62173.99201.09242.49201.55205.53204.07201.28207.93202.02198.36191.31191.61192.30204.78212.35221.00226.96229.42237.97237.80234.30238.30250.82248.15254.04262.96268.1190.8190.8688.3885.6074.4779.0576.9575.3859.5863.0073.9481.8478.4476.4174.6977.8179.4993.9992.89113.49142.72148.57143.53174.87181.20185.32198.91228.90198.61192.35188.31189.83196.52194.46202.35206.83204.52203.24202.26207.69211.04218.89225.07227.56222.41226.53232.55237.44244.21240.97230.12229.9544.4549.8265.8570.4960.0070.3878.3570.1249.6747.1452.9455.2556.6561.4264.2573.5271.9995.3489.28114.21147.20146.48127.26151.88133.26150.82179.26216.42174.50174.08173.49171.10175.90174.82181.00180.47178.27181.36189.27196.87203.38209.93217.01216.02209.40209.75218.94224.96229.35228.18214.08216.00442.72493.01475.71491.66632.12618.04691.55639.76714.81834.05910.88873.60879.12906.00876.72753.19884.76950.71923.88759.37802.49974.92894.63820.23844.40891.41932.92884.361,190.341,178.481,328.231,792.762,275.992,060.822,508.912,678.942,929.333,284.293,522.063,227.063,257.273,247.423,294.083,376.793,337.793,329.413,307.453,293.923,198.703,238.493,303.153,277.723,367.263,440,743,423.633,478.173,513.813,529.433,597.013,592.293,625.813,674.703,744.1040.4946.6244.3846.2457.3855.8566.2762.3869.8781.3788.1785.2691.9398.7097.8483.2298.29109.20107.4382.8586.16102.0198.2096.02103.01118.78128.05119.71160.41160.46186.84236.34286.83265.79322.84334.59376.18415.74451.41416.08412.56407.36407.41414.81408.27415.05417.93418.48412.50422.84435.64435.23441.70450.16443.08445.25448.06447.29454.13459.24463.90462.89465.954.084.094.353.973.233.472.983.373.173.013.003.403.203.073.243.833.142.843.064.474.313.774.625.285.475.265.205.814.404.644.253.493.083.643.453.613.242.992.782.902.943.013.022.993.063.002.973.003.072.982.902.882.812.762.822.802.812.812.762.732.722.722.727.957.557.896.235.785.904.625.825.505.325.596.635.735.676.086.455.415.507.1211.599.158.9010.7912.0313.4612.6611.9611.608.0310.028.126.095.488.017.416.474.814.224.01Tl84.38"4"39"4.29"4.461 Averages <strong>of</strong> daily closing prices, except NYSE data through May 1964 are averages <strong>of</strong> weekly closing prices.2 Includes stocks as follows: for NYSE, all stocks listed (more than 2,000); for Dow-Jones industrial average, 30 stocks; and for S&Pcomposite index, 500 stocks.3 Effective April 1993, <strong>the</strong> NYSE doubled <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> utility index to facilitate trading <strong>of</strong> options and futures on <strong>the</strong> index. Allindexes shown here reflect <strong>the</strong> doubling.4 Based on 500 stocks in <strong>the</strong> S&P composite index.5 Aggregate cash dividends (based on latest known annual rate) divided by aggregate market value based on Wednesday closingprices. Monthly data are averages <strong>of</strong> weekly figures; annual data are averages <strong>of</strong> monthly figures.6 Quarterly data are ratio <strong>of</strong> earnings (after taxes) for 4 quarters ending with particular quarter to price index for last day <strong>of</strong> thatquarter. Annual data are averages <strong>of</strong> quarterly ratios.Note.—All data relate to stocks listed on <strong>the</strong> New York Stock Exchange.Sources: New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), Dow Jones & Co., Inc., and Standard & Poor's Corporation (S&P).377


TABLE B-95.—Business formation and business failures, 7930-93Year or monthIndexnt notOT netbusiness(°1967= n100)Newbusinessincorporations(number)Businessfailurerate 2TotalNumber <strong>of</strong>failuresBisiness failures'Liability size classUnder$100,000$100,000and overAmount <strong>of</strong> current liabilities(millions <strong>of</strong> dollars)TotalLiability size classUnder$100,000$100,000and over195019511952195319541955195619571958195919601961196219631964196519661967196819691970197119721973197419751976197719781979198019811982198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931992: JanFebMarMay!!!!!!!.!!!!!!JuneJulyAugSeptOctNovDec1993: JanFeb. .MarMay'!!!!!!!!!!!!!!JuneJulyAugSeptOctNovDec87.786.790.889.788.896.694.690.390.297.994.590.892.694.498.299.899.3100.0108.3115.8108.8111.1119.3119.1113.2109.9120.4130.8138.1138.3129.9124.8116.4117.5121.3120.9120.4121.2124.1124.8120.7115.2116.393,09283,77892,946102,706117,411139,915141,163137,112150,781193,067182,713181,535182,057186,404197,724203,897200,010206,569233,635274,267264,209287,577316,601329,358319,149326,345375,766436,170478,019524,565533,520581,242566,942600,400634,991662,047702,738685,572685,095676,565647,366628,604666,800Seasonally adjusted117.2116.0116.4115.4113.2117.4116 6114.1118 5116.41153119.0119.3121.1121.8120.8117.5120.6122.5123.1120 9121.4123 758,14155,09257,44954,47448,68858,73056 94251,2455917952,49255 39261,69555,68959,69161,00259,64851,76560,42258,34157,90934.330.728.733.242.041.648.051.755.951.857.064.460.856.353.253.351.649.038.637.343.841.738.336.438.442.634.828.423.927.842.161.388.4109.7107.0115.0120.0102.098.065.074.0107.0110.09,1628,0587,6118,86211,08610,96912,68613,73914,96414,05315,44517,07515,78214,37413,50113,51413,06112,3649,6369,15410,74810,3269,5669,3459,91511,4329,6287,9196,6197,56411,74216,79424,90831,33452,07857,25361,61661,11157,09750,36160,74788,14097,06985,5658,5888,0939,1438,7047,8038,4628 6377,9817 5988,0147 1676,8797,6547,0628,4227,8277,5307,1316,7667 1097 5106,5706 2005,7848,7467,6267,0818,07510,22610,11311,61512,54713,49912,70713,65015,00613,77212,19211,34611,34010,83310,1447,8297,1928,0197,6117,0406,6276,7337,5046,1764,8613,7123,9305,6828,23311,50915,57233,52736,55138,90838,94938,30033,31240,83360,61268,26461,0916,0405,6976,3656,0595,4196,05061375,5875 3925,6215 0924,8055,39851035,9555,5045,2925,0854,83151735 5554,7194 4284,0484164325307878608561,0711,1921,4651,3461,7952,0692,0102,1822,1552,1742,2282,2201,8071,9622,7292,7152,5262,7183,1823,9283,4523,0582,9073,6346,0608,56113,39915,76218,55120,70222,70822,16218,79717,04919,91427,52828,80524,4742,5482,3962,7782,6452,3842,4122 5002,3942 2062,3932 0752,0742,2561,9592,4672,3232,2382,0461,9351,93619551,85117721,736248.3259.5283.3394.2462.6449.4562.7615.3728.3692.8938.61,090.11,213.61,352.61,329.21,321.71,385.71,265.2941.01,142.11,887.81,916.92,000.22,298.63,053.14,380.23,011.33,095.32,656.02,667.44,635.16,955.215,610.816,072.929,268.636,937.444,724.034,723.839,573.042,328.856,130.196,825.394,317.548,914.16,356.09,857.86,322.27,907.013,842.413,665.13 272 09,056.23 220 78,383.63 98418,450.56,174.92 406.74,343.02,973.46,634.42,675.45,496.47 382.03 062 62,222.12 99102,552.3151.2131.6131.9167.5211.4206.4239.8267.1297.6278.9327.2370.1346.5321.0313.6321.7321.5297.9241.1231.3269.3271.3258.8235.6256.9298.6257.8208.3164.7179.9272.5405.8541.7635.1409.8423.9838.3746.0686.9670.5735.61,044.91,096.7941.693.194.7106.697.288 697.297 289.487 787.984173.080.376 890.994.584.379.676.478.874 972.467 864.997.1128.0151.4226.6251.2243.0322.9348.2430.7413.9611.4720.0867.11,031.61,015.61,000.01,064.1967.3699.9910.81,618.41,645.61,741.52,063.02,796.34,081.62,753.42,887.02,491.32,487.54,362.66,549.315,069.115,437.828,858.836,513.543,885.733,977.838,886.141,658.255,394.595,780.493,220.847,972.56,263.09,763.16,215.67,809.713,753.813,567.83174 88,966.83132 98,295.73 900 08,377.56,094.62,329.94,252.12,878.96,550.12,595.85,420.07,303.22 987 62,149.82 923 22,487.41 Commercial and industrial failures only through 1983, excluding failures <strong>of</strong> banks, railroads, real estate, insurance, holding, andfinancial companies, steamship lines, travel agencies, etc.Data beginning 1984 are based on expanded coverage and new methodology and are <strong>the</strong>refore not generally comparable with earlierdata. Data for 1992 and 1993 are subject to revision due to amended court filings.2 Failure rate per 10,000 listed enterprises.Sources: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce (Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Analysis) and <strong>The</strong> Dun & Bradstreet Corporation.378


AGRICULTURETABLE B-96.—Farm income, 1940-93[Billions <strong>of</strong> dollars; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]Income <strong>of</strong> farm operators fromarmingGross farm incomeNet farm incomeYear or quarterTotal»TotalCash marketing receiptsLivestockandproductsCropsValue <strong>of</strong>inventorychanges 2ProductionexpensesCurrentdollars1987dollars 3194019411942194319441945 . .1946 .. ..1947194819491950195119521953195419551956195719581959 .1960 .. .1961196219631964196519661967 . .1968196919701971197219731974 . .197519761977 .1978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921991-1II . ...IllIV1992:1II.. .IllIV1993-1 ||III"..11.314.319.923.324.025.429.632.436.530.833138 337.834.434.233.534.034.839.037.938.640.542.343.442 346.550.550 551.856.458.862171.198.998 2100.6102.9108.8128.4150.7149.3166 3164.1153 9168.01612156.1168 5175.8190.9196.4190.3197.7190 5191.2186.8192.7199.6202 8197.3191.3197.0203 7188.18.411.115.619.620.521.724.829.630.227.828 532 932.531.029.829.530.429.733.533.634.035.236.537.537 339.443.442 844.248.250.552 761.186.992 488.995.496.2112.4131.5139.71416142.6136 8142.81441135.41418151.2161.2170.0168.7171.2166.5166.8172.2169.4167.1174 2178.9164.5169.9180 5175.44.96.59.011.511.412.013.816.517.115.416119 618.216.916.316.016.417.419.218.919.019.520.220.019 921.925.024 425.528.629.530 535.645.841343.146.347.659.269.268.069 270.369 672.969 871.676 079.484.189.886.886.489 687.684.985.084.286 085.389.986.292 290.73.54.66.58.19.29.711.013.113.112.412 413 214.314.113.613.514.012.314.214.715.015.716.317.417 417.518.418 418.719.621.022 325.541.151145.849.048.653.262.371.772 572.367 269.974 363.865 971.777.080.181.984.876 979.287.384.482.988.193.674.683.788 284.70.3.41.1-.1-.4-.4.0-1.81.7-.9812.9-.6.5.2-.5.6.8.0.4.3.6.681.0— 17.1.1.014.93.41 63.4-1.51.11.95.0-6.365-1.410 96.0-23-2.2-23-3.44.83.433.81.2.6.1-3.14.74.33.52.536-34-2.76.97.810.011.612.313.114.517.018.818.019 522 322.821.521.822.222.723.725.827.227.428.630.331.631833.636.538 239.542.144.547 151.764.671075.082.788.9103.3123.3133.1139 4140.3139 6141.9132 4125.1128 8137.0144.0149.9150.3149.1147.5149.8151.7152.2146.3148.6150.4151.0148.2150.5152.44.56.59.911.711.712.315.115.417.712.813 615 915.013.012.411.311.311.113.210.711.212.012.111.810 512.914.012 312.314.314.415.019.534.427 325.520.219.925.227.416.126.923.814.226.128.831.139.738.846.946.540.048.643.041.435.240.553.354.246.840.348.853.235.740.755.580.193.992.992.690.282.188.364.267.674.869.659.055.749.447.745.452.941.943.145.544.843.337.945.447.540.738.842.840.840.550.183.260.751.938.635.641.841.922.534.128.416.328.730.532.039.737.343.241.034.040.237.035.329.834.144.444.838.633.039.542.928.7'Cash marketing receipts and inventory changes plus Government payments, o<strong>the</strong>r farm cash income, and nonmoney incomefurnished by farms.2 Physical changes in end-<strong>of</strong>-period inventory <strong>of</strong> crop and livestock commodities valued at average prices during <strong>the</strong> period.3 Income in current dollars divided by <strong>the</strong> GDP implicit price deflator (Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce).Note.—Data include net Commodity Credit Corporation loans and operator households.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, except as noted.379


19481949195019511952195319541955195619571958195919601961196219631964196519661967196819691970197119721973197419751976197719781979198019811982198319841985198619871988198919901991YearTABLE B-97.—Farm output and productivity indexes, 1948-91Total»48474749515151545452555859606263636665696971717676797580828686928798100829810410010295105112110Livestockandproducts2 3 545760636465687071707276757879818382838686869091929392879193939399101100102100103103105108110112114[1982 = 100]Total 4 46403939424239434240444648475051495652575761586564706576758281917896100679510495978399111106FarmoutputFeedcropsCrops 23317222022222830283736344437384234524460545749776771537875899195641021003110812511910163117114114Foodgrains403432324236343435304638464240404746485457545058576366797774677986102100849387777770779915141715151416192221272425293031323640434850535256675467587886104808910075879688887187879276Oil cropsProductivityindicators 5Farmperoutputunit<strong>of</strong> totalfactorinput5251505153535454555459596063656767717174757777818386788484908588829510086100110109114109120126124Farmoutputperunit <strong>of</strong>farmlabor1 Farm output measures <strong>the</strong> annual volume <strong>of</strong> net farm production available for eventual human use through sales from farms orconsumption in farm households.2 Gross production.3 Horses and mules excluded.4 Includes items not included in groups shown.8 See Table B-98 for farm inputs.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture.1919202123232426272932333637384143475055555860646568667074808086819310086101117115121111127128125380


TABLE B-98.—Farm input use, selected inputs, 1948-92YearFarm population,April xNumber(thousands)Aspercent<strong>of</strong> totalpopulation2TotalFarm employment(thousands) 3FamilyworkersHiredworkersCropsharvested(millions<strong>of</strong>acres) 4TotalFarmlaborSelected indexes<strong>of</strong> input use (1982 = 100)FarmrealestateDurableequipmentEnergyAgriculturalchemicals5Feed,seed,andlivestockpurchases6O<strong>the</strong>rpurchasedinputs1948..1949..1950..1951..1952..1953..1954..1955..1956..1957..1958..1959..1960...1961...1962...1963...1964...1965...1966...1967...1968...1969...1970...1971...1972..1973..1974..1975..1976..1977...1978..1979..1980..1981..1982..1983..1984..1985..1986..1987..1988..1989..1990..1991..1992..24,38324,19423,04821,89021,74819,87419,01919,07818,71217,65617,12816,59215,63514,80314,31313,36712,95412,36311,59510,87510,45410,3079,7129,4259,6109,4729,2648,2537 6,1947 6,5017 6,2417 6,0517 5,8507 5,6287 5,7875,7545,3555,2264,9864,9514,8014,5914,63216.616.215.214.213.912.511.711.511.110.39.89.38.78.17.77.16.76.45.95.55.25.14.74.54.64.54.34.13.87 2.87 2.97 2.87 2.77 2.57 2.47 2.52.42.22.22.12.12.01.91.910,3639,96419,9269,546 j9,149!8,8648,65118,3817,8527,6007,5037,3427,0576,9196,7006,5186,1105,6105,2144,9034,7494,5964,5234,4364,3734,3374,3894,3314,3634,1433,9373,7653,6998 3,5828 3,4668 3,3498 3,2333,1162,9122,8972,9542,8632,8912,8752,8108,0267,7127,5977,3107,0056,7756,5706,3455,9005,6605,5215,3905,1725,0294,8734,7384,5064,1283,8543,6503,5353,4193,3483,2753,2283,1693,0753,0212,9922,8522,6802,4952,4018 2,3248 2,2488 2,1718 2,0952,0181,8731,8461,9671,9352,0001,9641,9442,3372,2522,3292,2362,1442,0892,0812,0361,9521,9401,9821,9521,8851,8901,8271,7801,6041,4821,3601,2531,2131,1761,1751,1611,1461,1681,3141,3101,3711,2911,2561,2701,2988 1,2588 1,2188 1,17881,1381,0981,0391,0511,037928892911356360345344349348346340324324324324324302295298298298294306300290293305294321328336337345338348352366362306348342325302297318322318320939796949493939293929393939192979697961011041061031009698959289878789251-241237228222220216211197183176173163161159153145141128124125123119118117117115114111107107107108105100959789878486828738455290 5892 6395 6696 6998 7099 7199 6999 6899 6899 6997 6895 6796 6795 6795 6994 7197 7395 7694 7894 7896 7994 7998 8199 8598 8999 9199 9498 9699 99101 102101 102100 10092 95918680747066646334364342434243455049495682 5884 6185 5586 6188 6889 7390 8390 8090 6892 7392 7690 8089 8590 9486 99101 91113 100119 98125 108113 118110 131106 122100 10097 93100 10690 10184 11193 10093 9091 9390 9089 948477919710298100991011061051019899105104747778808382818381858199999810010097969697979390878591979499100118127116111100107108998992909697100J Farm population as defined by Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture and Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, i.e., civilian population living on farms inrural areas, regardless <strong>of</strong> occupation. See also footnote 7. Series discontinued in 1992.2 Total population <strong>of</strong> United States including Armed Forces overseas, as <strong>of</strong> July 1.3 Includes persons doing farmwork on all farms. <strong>The</strong>se data, published by <strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, differ from those onagricultural employment by <strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Labor (see Table B-33) because <strong>of</strong> differences in <strong>the</strong> method <strong>of</strong> approach, in concepts <strong>of</strong>employment, and in time <strong>of</strong> month for which <strong>the</strong> data are collected.4 Acreage harvested plus acreages in fruits, tree nuts, and farm gardens.5 Fertilizer, lime, and pesticides.6 Nonfarm constant dollar value <strong>of</strong> feed, seed, and livestock purchases.7 Based on new definition <strong>of</strong> a farm. Under old definition <strong>of</strong> a farm, farm population (in thousands and as percent <strong>of</strong> totalpopulation) for 1977, 1978, 1979, 1980, 1981, 1982, and 1983 is 7,806 and 3.6; 8,005 and 3.6; 7,553 and 3.4; 7,241 and 3.2; 7,014and 3.1; 6,880 and 3.0; 7,029 and 3.0, respectively.8 Basis for farm employment series was discontinued for 1981 through 1984. Employment is estimated for <strong>the</strong>se years.Note.—Population includes Alaska and Hawaii beginning 1960.Sources-. Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture and Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce (Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Census).381


TABLE B-99.—Indexes <strong>of</strong> prices received and prices paid by jarmers, 1930-93[1977 = 100]Year or monthPrices received by farmersCropsAllfarmproductsLivestockandproductsAllcommodities,services,interest,taxes,andwagerates»Total 2Prices paid by farmersProduction itemsFuelsandenergyWageratesTractorsandselfpropelledmachineryFertilizerAddendum-.Averagefarmrealestatevalueperacre 319501951195219531954195519561957195819591960196119621963196419651966196719681969197019711972197319741975197619771978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921993 *1992: Jan..Feb..Mar..Apr..May.June.July..Aug..Sept.Oct..Nov..Dec.1993: Jan..Feb..Mar..fcJune.July.Aug.SeptOct.Nov.Dec.5666635654515051555352535353525458555659606269981051011021001151321341391331351421281231271381471491461391431381431441411411401381381381381361371381401411461441401411441451451441455461625556535452525151525455555355525250525660911171051021001051161251341211281381201071061261341271291211231241291321261231211171161161161151171171181161251201131211251281301281335870645652494751575353525351495460576067676777104949810110012414714414314514114613613814615016017016115716215215615515615815715816015815815615615916216616716816616116216015915815637414240404040424343444445454547494951535558627181899510010812313815015916116416215916216917718318718919518818919019019219619519642474744444343444646464647474748505050525457617383919710010812513814815315215515114414815716517117317417917117417517517618017918139404244474951545868829110010912213615216517418117817417418119320221121922721654575959595857585857575858575757565552484851525692120102100100108134144144137143135124118130136131134131128132494950505152535357798893100105137188213210202201201162164167180204203199201192217 132 194217 132 206224 128 205224 128 199223 129 201223"237129 199•"204222526272727282930323333343536384144485357606369798593100107118127138144148152154160166171186192201210217216212212201217223221••2061416181818191921222324252627293133353840424347536675861001091251451581571481461281121031061111121151151171151171 Includes items used for family living, not shown separately.2 Includes o<strong>the</strong>r production items not shown separately.3 Average for 48 States. Annual data are for March 1 <strong>of</strong> each year through 1975, February 1 for 1976-81, April 1 for 1982-85,February 1 for 1986-89, and January 1 for 1990-93.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture.382


TABLE B-100-—U.S. exports and imports <strong>of</strong> agricultural commodities, 1940-93[Billions <strong>of</strong> dollars]ExportsImportsYearTotal»FeedgrainsFoodgrains 2Cot-OilseedsandproductsTo-AnimalsandproductsTotal»Crops,fruits,andvegetables3AnimalsandproductsC<strong>of</strong>feeCocoabeansandproductsAgriculturaltradebalance19401941194219431944194519461947194819491950195119521953195419551956195719581959196019611962196319641965196619671968196919701971197219731974197519761977197819791980198119821983198419851986198719881989199019911992Jan-Nov:199219930.5.71.22.12.12.33.14.03.53.62.94.03.42.83.13.24.24.53.94.04.85.05.05.66.36.26.96.46.36.07.37.79.417.721.921.923.023.629.434.741.243.336.636.137.829.026.228.737.139.939.439.242.939.138.51.11.31.1.9.91.11.01.53.54.65.26.04.95.97.79.89.46.47.38.16.03.13.85.97.77.05.75.75.24.51.21.41.31.51.71.41.81.51.41.21.41.31.84.75.46.24.73.65.56.37.99.67.97.47.54.53.83.85.97.14.84.25.44.95.1().2.3.2.3.2.2.3.4.5.4.6.6.6.7.81.01.21.21.31.31.31.92.22.44.35.74.55.16.68.28.99.49.69.18.78.45.86.56.47.76.35.76.47.26.56.50.2.1.1.2.1.3.5.4.5.91.01.1.9!8.5.71.0.7.41.0.9.5.6.7.5.4.5.5.3.4.6.5.91.31.01.01.51.72.22.92.32.01.82.41.6.81.62.02.32.82.52.01.81.4.2.1.2.4.3.2.3.3.3.2.3.3.4.3.4.4.3.4.4.4.4.4.4.5.5.5.6.5.5.7.7.8.9.91.11.41.21.31.51.51.51.51.51.21.11.31.31.41.41.71.51.20.1.3.81.21.3.9.9.7.5.4.3.5.3.4.5.6.7.7.5.6.6.6.6.7.8.7.7.7.8.91.01.11.61.81.72.42.73.03.83.84.23.93.84.24.14.55.26.46.46.77.07.97.37.21.31.71.31.51.81.72.32.83.12.94.05.24.54.24.04.04.04.03.94.13.83.73.94.04.14.14.54.55.05.05.85.86.58.410.29.311.013.414.816.717.416.915.316.519.320.021.520.421.021.722.822.724.622.622.6.91.21.51.71.72.02.32.33.13.53.63.63.84.24.94.84.94.44.50.2.3.5.4.3.4.4.4.6.4.71.1.7.6.5.5.4.5.7.8.6.7.9.9.8.91.21.11.31.41.61.51.82.62.21.82.32.33.13.93.83.53.73.84.14.24.54.95.25.15.65.55.75.25.40.1.2.2.3.3.6.7.81.11.41.41.51.51.41.41.41.21.11.01.01.01.01.21.11.11.01.2.91.21.21.31.71.61.72.94.24.04.24.22.92.92.83.33.34.62.92.52.41.91.91.71.51.4-0.8-1.0_ j.6.3.5.8.2 1.2.2 .3.1 .7.2 -1.1.2 -1.1.2 -1.1.2 -1.3.3 -.9.2 -.8.2 .2.2 .6.2.2.2 1.0.2 1.3.2 1.2.2 1.6.2 2.3.1 2.1.1 2.4.2 1.9.2 1.3.2 1.1.3 1.5.2 1.9.2 2.9.3 9.311.7.5 12.6.6 12.01.0 10.21.4 14.61.2 18.0.9 23.8.9 26.4.7 21.3.8 19.61.1 18.51.4 9.11.1 4.71.2 8.31.0 16.11.0 18.21.1 16.61.1 16.51.1 18.31.0 16.5.9 15.91 Total includes items not shown separately.2 Rice, wheat, and wheat flour.3 Includes nuts, fruits, and vegetable preparations.Hess than $50 million.Note.—Data derived from <strong>of</strong>ficial estimates released by <strong>the</strong> Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Census, Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce. Agricultural commoditiesare defined as (1) nonmarine food products and (2) o<strong>the</strong>r products <strong>of</strong> agriculture which have not passed through complex processes <strong>of</strong>manufacture. Export value, at U.S. port <strong>of</strong> exportation, is based on <strong>the</strong> selling price and includes inland freight, insurance, and o<strong>the</strong>rcharges to <strong>the</strong> port. Import value, defined generally as <strong>the</strong> market value in <strong>the</strong> foreign country, excludes import duties, ocean freight,and marine insurance.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture.383


TABLE B-101.— Farm business balance sheet, 1950-92[Billions <strong>of</strong> dollars]AssetsClaimsPhysical assetsFinancial assetsEnd <strong>of</strong> yearTotalassetsestateNonreal estateLivestockandpoultry»MachineryandmotorCrops :vehiclesPurchasedinputs3O<strong>the</strong>r *TotalclaimsRealestatedebt 5InvestmentsincooperativesNonrealestatedebt 6Proprietors'equity195019511952195319541955195619571958 .1959196019611962196319641965196619671968196919701971197219731974'197519761977197819791980198119821983198419851986198719881989199019911992121.6136.1133.0128.7132.6137.0145.7154.5168.7173.0174.2181.4188.7196.5204.0220.6233.8245.8257.0267.3278.7301.5339.7418.3449.2510.7590.7651.5767.3898.1983.2982.3944.5943.3857.0772.7724.4772.6801.1829.7848.3842.2861.575.483.885.184.387.893.0100.3106.4114.6121.2123.3129.1134.6142.4150.5161.5171.2180.9189.4195.3202.4217.6243.0298.3335.6383.6456.5509.3601.8706.1782.8785.6750.0753.4661.8586.2542.3578.9595.5615.7628.2623.2633.117.119.514.811.711.210.611.013.917.715.215.616.417.315.914.417.619.018.820.222.523.727.333.742.424.629.429.031.950.161.460.653.553.049.549.546.347.858.062.266.270.968.171.312.314.315.015.615.716.316.917.018.119.319.119.319.920.421.222.424.126.327.728.630.432.434.639.748.557.463.369.368.575.480.385.586.085.885.082.981.580.081.285.185.485.885.67.18.27.96.87.56.56.86.46.96.26.26.36.37.26.87.77.97.77.28.18.59.712.721.222.520.520.620.523.829.932.729.525.823.626.122.916.317.523.323.422.822.024.12.01.22.13.23.52.62.82.63.92.72.93.23.33.53.74.04.24.54.84.24.54.65.05.25.45.75.86.16.47.27.98.79.711.213.014.313.516.118.119.320.621.922.824.324.324.425.325.126.327.528.729.77.07.37.17.06.96.96.76.66.96.25.85.95.95.75.86.06.06.16.36.46.56.76.97.16.96.96.97.07.17.37.47.67.88.18.39.010.09.910.310.510.911.813.6121.6136.1133.0128.7132.6137.0145.7154.5168.7173.0174.2181.4188.7196.5204.0220.6233.8245.8257.0267.3278.7301.5339.7418.3449.2510.7590.7651.5767.3898.1983.2982.3944.5943.3857.0772.7724.4772.6801.1829.7848.3842.2861.55.25.76.26.67.17.88.59.09.710.611.312.313.515.016.918.920.722.624.726.427.529.332.036.140.845.350.558.466.779.789.798.8101.8103.2106.7100.190.482.477.675.474.174.575.05.76.97.16.36.77.37.48.29.410.711.111.813.214.615.316.918.519.619.220.021.224.026.731.635.139.745.652.460.771.877.183.687.087.987.177.566.662.061.761.963.264.363.6110.7123.7119.7115.7118.9121.9129.8137.3149.7151.7151.7157.3162.0166.9171.8184.8194.6203.6213.0220.8229.9248.3281.0350.7373.3425.7494.7540.7639.9746.6816.4799.9755.7752.2663.3595.1567.5628.2661.7692.4710.9703.5722.91 Excludes commercial broilers; excludes horses and mules beginning 1959; excludes turkeys beginning 1986.2 Non-Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) crops held on farms plus value above loan rate for crops held under CCC.3 Includes fertilizer, chemicals, fuels, parts, feed, seed, and o<strong>the</strong>r supplies.4 Sum <strong>of</strong> currency, demand deposits, time deposits, and U.S. savings bonds.5 Includes CCC storage and drying facilities loans.6 Does not include CCC crop loans.7 Beginning 1974, data are for farms included in <strong>the</strong> new farm definition, that is, places with sales <strong>of</strong> $1,000 or more annually.Note.—Data exclude operator households.Beginning 1959, data include Alaska and Hawaii.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture.384


INTERNATIONAL STATISTICSTABLE B-102.—International investment position <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> United States at year-end, 1984-92[Billions <strong>of</strong> dollars]Type <strong>of</strong>investment1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992NET INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT POSITION OF THEUNITED STATES:With direct investment at current costWith direct investment at market value234.2177.3139.1142.319.2109.7-34.046.8-140.35.4-288.5-128.9-291.9-269.7-364.9-396.4-521.3-611.5U.S. ASSETS ABROAD:With direct investment at current costWith direct investment at market value1,178.91,083.11,252.61,244.61,410.71,508.21,557.31,641.01,698.01,860.91,857.02,114.71,924.82.018.41,998.42,152.62,003.42,113.3U.S. <strong>of</strong>ficial reserve assetsGold 1Special drawing rightsReserve position in <strong>the</strong> International MonetaryFundForeign currencies105.081.25.611.56.7117.985.87.311.912.9139.9102.48.411.717.3162.4127.610.311.313.1144.2107.49.69.717.4168.7105.210.09.044.6174.7102.411.09.152.2159.292.611.29.545.9150.390.08.511.840.0U.S. Government assets o<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>of</strong>ficial reservesU.S. credits and o<strong>the</strong>r long-term assetsRepayable in dollarsO<strong>the</strong>rU.S. foreign currency holdings and U.S. shorttermassets85.082.981.11.82.187.885.884.11.71.989.688.787.11.688.988.186.51.686.185.483.91.5.784.583.982.41.5.682.281.580.11.3.779.177.576.31.21.680.879.177.71.41.7U.S. private assets:With direct investment at current costWith direct investment at market value988.9893.11,047.01,038.91,181.21,278.71,306.11,389.71,467.71,630.61,603.81,861.51,668.01,761.61,760.01,914.21,772.31,882.3Direct investment abroad:At current costAt market valueForeign securitiesBondsCorporate stocksU.S. claims on unaffiliated foreignersreported by U.S. nonbanking concernsU.S. claims reported by U.S. banks,not included elsewhere361.6265.888.862.826.092.9445.6387.2379.1112.871.841.099.6447.4421.2518.7142.079.063.0110.7507.3493.3577.0153.784.169.6109.6549.5515.7678.6176.690.686.0122.2653.2560.0817.8216.096.2119.9113.9713.8622.7716.3229.3119.2110.0120.3695.7655.3809.6294.2135.4158.8118.6691.9666.3776.3327.4149.5178.0111.7666.9FOREIGN ASSETS IN THE UNITED STATES:With direct investment at current costWith direct investment at market value944.7905.91,113.61,102.31,391.51,398.61,591.41,594.11,838.31,855.52,145.52,243.62,216.72,288.02,363.22,549.02,524.72,724.8Foreign <strong>of</strong>ficial assets in <strong>the</strong> United StatesU.S. Government securitiesU.S. Treasury securitiesO<strong>the</strong>rO<strong>the</strong>r U.S. Government liabilitiesU.S. liabilities reported by U.S. banks, notincluded elsewhereO<strong>the</strong>r foreign <strong>of</strong>ficial assets199.7144.7138.26.515.026.114.0202.5145.1138.46.615.826.714.9241.2178.9173.35.618.027.916.4283.1220.5213.76.815.731.815.0322.0260.9253.08.015.231.514.4341.9263.7257.36.415.436.526.3375.6295.0287.97.117.539.923.2402.1315.9307.18.819.138.428.7443.4335.7323.012.721.654.831.3O<strong>the</strong>r foreign assets in <strong>the</strong> United States:With direct investment at current costWith direct investment at market value745.0706.2911.1899.81,150.21,157.41,308.31,311.11,516.31,533.41,803.61,901.81,841.11,912.41,961.12,146.92,081.42,281.5Direct investment in <strong>the</strong> United States:At current costAt market valueU.S. Treasury securitiesU.S. securities o<strong>the</strong>r than U.S. Treasury securitiesCorporate and o<strong>the</strong>r bondsCorporate stocksU.S. liabilities to unaffiliated foreigners reportedby U.S. nonbanking concernsU.S. liabilities reported by U.S. banks, not includedelsewhere211.2172.462.1128.532.496.131.0312.2231.3220.088.0207.982.3125.629.5354.5265.8273.096.1309.8140.9168.926.9451.6313.5316.282.6341.7166.1175.629.8540.7374.3391.5100.9392.3191.3201.035.0613.7436.6534.7166.5482.9231.7251.240.5677.1468.2539.6162.4469.0247.2221.748.0693.4487.2673.0189.5556.3284.4271.946.1682.1492.3692.3224.9617.3317.2300.246.3700.71 Valued at market price.Note.—For details regarding <strong>the</strong>se data, see Survey <strong>of</strong> Current Business, June 1991, June 1992, and June 1993.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Analysis.385


TABLE B-103.—U.S. international transactions, 1946-93[Millions <strong>of</strong> dollars-, quarterly data seasonally adjusted, except as noted. Credits ( + ), debits (-)]Year orquarter194619471948194919501951195219531954195519561957195819591960196119621963196419651966196719681969197019711972197319741975197619771978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921991:1IIIllIV1992:1 IIIllIV1993:1 IIIll p. Merchandise 1Exports11,76416,09713,26512,21310,20314,24313,44912,41212,92914,42417,55619,56216,41416,45819,65020,10820,78122,27225,50126,46129,31030,66633,62636,41442,46943,31949,38171,41098,306107,088114,745120,816142,075184,439224,250237,044211,157201,799219,926215,915223,344250,208320,230362,116389,303416,937440,138101,333104,206103,764107,634108,347108,306109,493113,992111,530113,118111,912Imports-5,067-5,973-7,557-6,874-9,081-11,176-10,838-10,975-10,353-11,527-12,803-13,291-12,952-15,310-14,758-14,537-16,260-17,048-18,700-21,510-25,493-26,866-32,991-35,807-39,866-45,579-55,797-70,499-103,811-98,185-124,228-151,907-176,002-212,007-249,750-265,067-247,642-268,901-332,418-338,088-368,425-409,765-447,189-477,365-498,336-490,739-536,276-120,123-120,525-123,404-126,687-126,110-133,107-137,105-139,954-140,839-147,502-148,1912Net6,69710,1245,7085,3391,1223,0672,6111,4372,5762,8974,7536,2713,4621,1484,8925,5714,5215,2246,8014,9513,8173,8006356072,603-2,260-6,416911-5,5058,903-9,483-31,091-33,927-27,568-25,500-28,023-36,485-67,102-112,492-122,173-145,081-159,557-126,959-115,249-109,033-73,802-96,138-18,790-16,319-19,640-19,053-17,763-24,801-27,612-25,962-29,309-34,384-36,279Netmilitarytransactions3 4-424-358-351-410-561695281,753902-113-221-423-849-831-1,057-1,131-912-742-794-487-1,043-1,187-596-718-6416531,0727401651,4619311,731857-1,313-1,822-844112-563-2,547-4,390-5,181-3,844-6,315-6,726-7,833-5,851-2,751-2,532-1,402-1,164-755-571-727-617-836-145-226-341ServicesNettravelandransportationreceipts733946374230-12029883-238-269-297-361-189-633-821-964-978-1,152-1,309-1,146-1,280-1,331-1,750-1,548-1,763-2,038-2,345-3,063-3,158-3,184-2,812-2,558-3,565-3,573-2,935-997144-992-4,227-8,438-9,798-7,382-6,481-1,5115,0718,97917,93319,7182,9264,2995,2285,4815,0115,2014,8824,6245,0145,3725,279O<strong>the</strong>rservices,net3101451752082422543093073052994474824865736397329121,0361,1611,4801,4971,7421,7591,9642,3302,6492,9653,4064,2314,8545,0275,6806,8797,2518,91212,55213,20914,09514,27714,26618,85517,90019,96126,55829,50533,79939,4447,9358,3978,6608,8099,6089,17711,0169,6419,7559,3139,169Investment incomeReceiptson U.S.assetsabroad7721,1021,9211,8312,0682,6332,7512,7362,9293,4063,8374,1803,7904,1324,6164,9995,6186,1576,8247,4377,5288,0219,36710,91311,74812,70714,76521,80827,58725,35129,37532,35442,08863,83472,60686,52986,20084,77899,05689,48987,49795,129122,275144,904151,201127,292110,61236,01832,05730,07429,14429,02828,64127,19525,74926,07827,87628,695Paymentsonforeignassets inU.S.-212-245-437-476-559-583-555-624-582-676-735-796-825-1,061-1,238-1,245-1,324-1,560-1,783-2,088-2,481-2,747-3,378-4,869-5,515-5,435-6,572-9,655-12,084-12,564-13,311-14,217-21,680-32,961-42,532-53,626-56,412-53,700-69,572-68,314-74,736-87,403-109,653-130,091-130,853-114,272-104,391-30,247-29.147-28,447-26,431-24,609-27,734-25,492-26,555-26,115-27,829-26,947Net5608571,4841,3551,5092,0502,1962,1122,3472,7303,1023,3842,9653,0713,3793,7554,2944,5965,0415,3505,0475,2745,9906,0446,2337,2728,19212,15315,50312,78716,06318,13720,40830,87330,07332,90329,78831,07829,48321,17512,7617,72612,62114,81320,34813,0216,2225,7712,9101,6272,7134,4199071,703-806-37471,748Balanceon goods,services,andincome7,87611,7147,3906,7222,6975,8385,7275,3715,8615,5167,7209,5255,4313,1406,8867,9497,6648,80611,06310,0147,9877,8786,2406,1358,4865,9692,74914,05311,21025,1919,982-9,109-9,3556,30810,66616,7325,632-26,719-79,716-100,920-126,028-144,256-102,203-75,532-58,034-14,899-33,505-4,690-2,115-5,289-2,805704-10,243-10,628-13,339-14,722-19,878-20,424Unilateraltransfers,net 4-2,991-2,722-4,973-5,849-4,537-4,954-5,113-6,657-5,642-5,086-4,990-4,763-4,647-4,422-4,062-4,127-4,277-4,392-4,240-4,583-4,955-5,294-5,629-5,735-6,156-7,402-8,544-6,9135 -9,249-7,075-5,686-5,226-5,788-6,593-8,349-11,702-17,075-17,741-20,612-22,950-24,176-23,052-24,965-26,092-33,8276,575-32,89514,0963,884-6,564-4,839-7,389-8,010-7,147-10,348-7,586-7,294-7,562Balanceoncurrentaccount4,8858,9922,417873-1,840884614-1,2862194302,7304,762784-1,2822,8243,8223,3874,4146,8235,4313,0312,5836113992,331-1,433-5,7957,1401,96218,1164,295-14,335-15,143-2852,3175,030-11,443-44,460-100,328-123,870-150,203-167,308-127,168-101,624-91,861-8,324-66,4009,4061,769-11,853-7,644-6,685-18,253-17,775-23,687-22,308-27,172-27,9861 Excludes military.2 Adjusted from Census data for differences in valuation, coverage, and timing.3 Quarterly data are not seasonally adjusted.4 Includes transfers <strong>of</strong> goods and services under U.S. military grant programs.See next page for continuation <strong>of</strong> table.386


TABLE B-103.—U.S. international transactions, 1946-93—Continued[Millions <strong>of</strong> dollars; quarterly data seasonally adjusted, except as noted]Year or quarterTotalU.S. assets abroad, net[increase/capital outflow (-)]U.S.<strong>of</strong>ficialreserveassets 36O<strong>the</strong>rU.S.GovernmentassetsU.S.privateassetsForeign assets in <strong>the</strong> U.S., net[increase/capital inflow ( + )]TotalForeign<strong>of</strong>ficialassets 3O<strong>the</strong>rforeignassetsAllocations<strong>of</strong>specialdrawingrights(SDRs)StatisticaldiscrepancyTotal(sum <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong>itemswith signreversed)Ofwhich:Seasonaladjustmentdiscrepancy1946194719481949. .1950195119521953195419551956195719581959196019611962196319641965196619671968196919701971197219731974197519761977197819791980198119821983198419851986 ..1987198819891990199119921991:1IIIllIV1992:IIIIll .IV1993:1 ..IIIll >>-4,099-5,538-4,174-7,270-9,560-5,716-7,321-9,757-10,977-11,585-9,337-12,475-14,497-22,874-34,745-39,703-51,269-34,785-61,130-66,054-86,967-114,147122,335-58,735-29,654-34,687-91,260-61,254-91,423-129,33144,132-59,974-50,961-5,555-875-15,672-37,870-1,029-8,695-10,798-30,438-12,358-29,34143,961-623-3315-1,736-2661,758-33-4151,256480182-869-1,1652,2921,0352,1456071,5353781711,22557053-870-1,1792,4812,349-4158-1,467-849-2,558-375732-1,133-8,155-5,1754,965-1,196-3,131-3,8583129,149-3,912-25,2932,1585,7633,901-3531,0143,8771,225-1,0571,4641,9521,542-983822-545-1,100-910-1,085-1,662-1,680-1,605-1,543-2,423-2,274-2,200-1,589-1,884-1,568-2,6445 366-3,474-4,214-3,693-4,660-3,746-5,162-5,0976,131-5,006-5,489-2,821-2,0221,0062,9671,2592,3072,905-1,609559-4193,224-459-275293-305737535-275-86-5,144-5,235-4,623-5,986-8,050-5,336-6,347-7,386-7,833-8,206-10,229-12,940-12,925-20,388-33,643-35,380-44,498-30,717-57,202-61,176-73,651-103,875-111,239-52,533-21,035-28,00989,551-71,408-90,477-105,29744,280-68,643-53,253-5,761-1,470-22,11*-38,6373039,866-12,44531,243-11,91029,888-43,3312,2942,7051,9113,2173,6437423,6617,3799,92812,7026,35922,97021,46118,38834,24115,67036,51851,31964,03638,75258,11283,03292,41883,380102,010130,966223,191229,972219,489213,571105,17383,439129,579-207,12023,51452,82619,83444,45026,45038,84525,71842,38066,4521,4737651,2701,9861,660134-6723,451-774-1,3016,90826,87910,4756,02610,5467,02717,69336,81633,678-13,66515,4974,9603,5935,8453,140-1,11935,64845,38739,7588,50334,19817,56440,6845,604-4,9243,85513,02921,12421,008-7,3785,93110,92917,69919,6468211,9396411,2311,9836074,3333,92810,70314,002-550-3,90910,98612,36223,6968,64318,82614,50330,35852,41642,61578,07288,82677,53498,870132,084187,543184,585179,731205,06870,97565,87588,895-5,62412,04419,65939,798-1,29023,44233,82832,91414,78924,68146,806867717710U39"1,1521,093-1,019-989-1,124-360907-457629-205438-1,516-219-9,779-1,879-2,654-1,4585 91710,455-219912,23626,44925,38624,99241,35919,81527,97227,59218,272-1,41089917,38430,820-15,140-12,218-3,831-8,0144,011-7,312-12,12017,5022,12315,2808,94814,1335,4954,710-120-6,5061,9114,878653-6,7541,2225,814681-7,6055 Includes extraordinary U.S. Government transactions with India.6 Consists <strong>of</strong> gold, special drawing rights, foreign currencies, and <strong>the</strong> U.S. reserve position in <strong>the</strong> International Monetary Fund (IMF).Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Analysis.387


TABLE B-104.—U.S. merchandise exports and imports by principal end-use category, 1963-93[Billions <strong>of</strong> dollars; quarterly data seasonally adjusted]ExportsImportsYear orquarterTotalTotalNonagricultural productsAgriculturalproductsIndustrialsuppliesandmaterialsO<strong>the</strong>rTotalTotalNonpetroleum productsCapitalgoodsexceptautomotiveAutomotivePetroleumandproductsIndustrialsuppliesandmaterialsCapitalgoodsexceptautomotiveAutomotiveO<strong>the</strong>r1965196619671968196926.529.330.733.636.46.36.96.56.36.120.222.424.227.330.37.68.28.59.610.38.18.99.911.112.41.92.42.83.53.92.62.93.03.23.721.525.526.933.035.82.02.12.12.42.619.523.424.830.633.29.110.210.012.011.81.52.22.52.83.40.91.82.44.04.98.09.29.911.813.01970197119721973197442.543.349.471.498.37.47.89.518.022.435.135.539.953.475.912.310.911.917.026.314.715.416.922.030.93.94.75.56.98.64.34.55.67.610.039.945.655.870.5103.82.93.74.78.426.636.941.951.162.177.212.413.816.319.627.84.04.35.98.39.85.57.48.710.312.015.016.420.223.927.51975197619771978 »1979107.1114.7120.8142.1184.422.223.424.329.935.584.891.496.5112.2149.026.828.429.834.252.236.639.139.847.560.210.612.113.415.217.910.811.713.515.318.798.2124.2151.9176.0212.027.034.645.042.660.471.289.7106.9133.4151.624.029.835.740.747.510.212.314.019.324.611.716.218.625.026.625.331.438.648.452.819801981198219831984224.3237.0211.2201.8219.942.044.137.337.138.4182.2193.0173.9164.7181.565.163.657.752.756.876.384.276.571.777.017.419.717.218.522.423.425.522.421.825.3249.8265.1247.6268.9332.479.578.462.055.158.1170.2186.7185.7213.8274.453.056.148.653.766.131.637.138.443.760.428.331.034.343.056.557.462.464.373.391.419851986198719881989215.9223.3250.2320.2362.129.627.229.838.842.2186.3196.2220.4281.4319.954.859.463.782.691.979.382.892.7119.1139.624.925.127.633.434.927.228.936.446.353.5338.1368.4409.8447.2477.451.434.342.939.650.9286.7334.1366.8407.6426.462.669.970.883.184.261.372.085.1102.2112.564.978.185.287.987.497.9114.2125.7134.4142.4199019911992389.3416.9440.140.240.144.0349.1376.8396.197.1101.8101.8153.3167.0176.936.540.047.162.367.970.3498.3490.7536.362.351.851.6436.0439.0484.782.580.988.6116.0120.7134.288.585.791.8149.0151.7170.11991: IIIIllIV101.3104.2103.8107.69.99.69.910.791.594.693.896.926.325.425.125.039.142.541.743.89.09.910.610.517.016.716.517.7120.1120.5123.4126.713.113.113.212.3107.0107.5110.2114.320.120.019.920.829.930.130.230.520.720.222.322.436.437.137.740.61992: IIIIllIV108.3108.3109.5114.010.810.711.211.497.597.798.3102.624.925.225.626.144.343.743.345.510.811.612.012.717.517.117.518.3126.1133.1137.1140.010.513.114.313.7115.6120.0122.8126.221.222.022.123.431.432.934.535.422.322.822.923.840.842.343.343.71993: I....II...III..111.5113.1111.910.810.810.6100.7102.3101.325.625.926.144.545.844.712.812.812.117.817.818.4140.8147.5148.212.814.312.6128.1133.2135.623.524.725.935.737.738.225.125.525.043.845.346.51 End-use categories beginning 1978 are not strictly comparable with data for earlier periods. See Survey <strong>of</strong> Current Business, June 1988.Note.—Data are on an international transactions basis and exclude military.In June 1990, end-use categories for merchandise exports were redefined to include reexports; beginning with data for 1978,reexports (exports <strong>of</strong> foreign merchandise) are assigned to detailed end-use categories in <strong>the</strong> same manner as exports <strong>of</strong> domesticmerchandise.Source-. Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Analysts.388


TABLE B-105.—U.S. merchandise exports and imports by area, 1984-93[Billions <strong>of</strong> dollars]Item1984198519861987198819891990199119921993 first3 quartersat annualrate 1Exports219 9215.9223 3250 2320 23621389 3416 94401448.7Industrial countriesCanada .JapanWestern Europe 2Australia, New Zealand,and South Africa141.053.023.256.97.8140.555.422.156.07.0150.356.526.460.47.1165.662.027.668.67.4207 374.337.286.49.4234.281.143.998.410.9253.883.547.8111.411.2261.385.947.2116.811.4264.991.146.9114.512.4267.299.447.2109.211.4Australia495 15 153688 183838780O<strong>the</strong>r countries, exceptEastern EuropeOPEC 3O<strong>the</strong>r 4 .74.613.860 871.911.460 571.010.460 682.310.7716109.113.895 3122.213.3108 9130.613.4117 2150.418.51319169.520.7148 8175.818.7157.1Eastern Europe 2 ;4.33.22.12.33.85.54.34.85.65.7Internationalorganizations andunallocated0212641Imports332 43381368 4409 8447 2477 4498 3490 7536 3582.0Industrial countries205.5219.0245.4259.7283.2292.5299.9294.2316.2342.2CanadaJapan....Western Europe 2Australia, New Zealand,and South Africa67.660.272.15.670.265.777.55.669.780.889.05.973.684.696.15.484.689.8102.66.289.993.5102.46.693.190.4109.27.393.092.3101.97.0100.997.4111.36.6112.5105.2118.06.5Australia282726303539444 13733O<strong>the</strong>r countries, exceptEastern Europe124 7117 31211148 21618182 8196 1194 82181236 6OPEC 3O<strong>the</strong>r 426.997 822.894 518.9102 224.4123 823.0138 830.7152 138.2157 933.4161433.7184 435.02017Eastern Europe 22.21.82.01.92.22.12.31.82.03.2Internationalorganizations andunallocatedBalance (excess <strong>of</strong>exports -+-)-112.5-122.2-145.1-159.6-127.0-115.2-109.073.8-96.1-133.3Industrial countries-64.5-78.4-95.1-94.1-75.9-58.3-46.1-32.8-51.3-75.0CanadaJapanWestern Europe 2Australia, New Zealand,and South Africa-14.6-37.0-15.22.2-14.8-43.5—21.41.4-13.2-54.4-28.61.1-11.6-56.9-27.52.0-10.3-52.6-16.23.2-8.9-49.7-4.04.2-9.6-42.62.23.9-7.1-45.014.94.4-9.7-50.53.25.8-13.0-58.0-8.94.9Australia2.12.42.52.33.34.23.94.25.04.7O<strong>the</strong>r countries, exceptEastern Europe-50.1-45.350.165.8-52.7-60.6-65.6-44.4-48.6-60.9OPEC 3O<strong>the</strong>r 4Eastern Europe 2-13.1-37 02.1-11.4-33.91.4-8.5-41.6.1-13.7-52.1.3-9.2-43.51.6-17.4-43.23.5-24.840.72.1-15.0-29.43.0-13.0-35.63.7-16.3-44.52.6Internationalorganizations andunallocated.0.2.1.2.6.4.11 Preliminary; seasonally adjusted.2 <strong>The</strong> former German Democratic Republic (East Germany) included in Western Europe beginning fourth quarter 1990 and in EasternEurope prior to that time.3 Organization <strong>of</strong> Petroleum Exporting Countries, consisting <strong>of</strong> Algeria, Ecuador (through 1992), Gabon, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait,Libya, Nigeria, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, and Venezuela.4 Latin America, o<strong>the</strong>r Western Hemisphere, and o<strong>the</strong>r countries in Asia and Africa, less members <strong>of</strong> OPEC.Note.—Data are on an international transactions basis and exclude military.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Analysis.389


TABLE B-106.—U.S. merchandise exports, imports, and trade balance, 1972-93[Billions <strong>of</strong> dollars; monthly data seasonally adjusted]Year ormonthTotal 2IMerchandise exports (f.a.s. /alue)'Principal end-use commodity categoryFoods,feeds,beveragesIndustrialsuppliesandmaterialsCapitalgoodsceptautomotiveAutomotivevehicles,parts,andenginesConsumergoods(nonfood)O<strong>the</strong>r 2exceptautomotiveGenera merchandise imports (customs value) 3TotalPrincipal end-use commodity categoryFoods,feeds,beveragesIndustrialsuppliesandmaterialsCapitalgoodsceptautomo-ii veAutomotivevehicles,parts,andenginesConsumergoods(nonfood)O<strong>the</strong>rexceptautomotivePeneralmerchandiseimports(ci.f.value) 4Trade balanceEx-•ip\(f.a.s.)lessim-(customsval-Exports(f.a.s.)lessimports(ci.f.)197219731974197519761977 ....1978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921992:JanFebMarAprMayJuneJulyAugSeptOctNovDec1993:JanFebMarAprMayJuneJulyAugSeptOctNov49.971.999.4108 9116.8123.2145 8186 4225.6238 7216.4205.6224.07 218.87 227.2254.1322.4363.8393.6421.7448.235.637.637.236.436.038.037.436.437.738.937.839.237.536.938.938.538.937.637.138.138.940.140.131.330.931.524.022.324.332.337.235.135.740.23.13.63.33.43.03.13.43.33.53.63.43.43.33.43.53.43.33.23.23.13.43.53.461.756.761.758.557.366.785.199.3104.4109.7109.3F.a.s. value 59.28.98.88.89.09.49.68.99.09.69.09.29.48.79.29.19.78.89.39.09.69.99.67?.767.272.073.975.886.2109.2138.8152.7166.7176.714.015.215.114.413.915.414.414.014.815.314.515.814.514.315.615.215.315.314.315.315.015.615.515.716.820.622.921.724.629.334.837.440.047.13.43.83.73.93.93.83.94.14.03.84.44.64.14.44.34.44.34.13.84.24.14.54.714.313.413.312.614.217.723.136.443.345.950.43.94.14.13.94.14.24.24.14.44.54.54.34.34.24.44.24.54.34.44.54.64.64.820.720.524.027.335.934.643.417.220.723.724.52.02.12.22.02.12.22.02.02.02.12.01.92.01.92.02.11.92.02.02.12.22.02.055 669.5103 399 3124 61515176 1210 3245.3261 0244.0258.06 330.76 336.5365.4406.2441.0473.2495.3488.5532.741.641.042.743.443.644.944.945.146.046.145.646.145.244.849.348.747.349.747.548.149.551.050.217.118.221.021.924.424.824.825.126.626.527.92.32.22.32.42.32.52.52.32.22.32.22.32.32.22.42.22.32.32.32.32.42.62.3Customs valueF.a.s. value 5Customs value112.0107.0123.7113.9101.3111.0118.3132.3143.2131.6138.310.610.310.611.211.512.012.011.912.012.511.811.511.611.112.612.612.312.812.111.712.212.512.235.440.959.865.171.884.5101.4113.3116.4120.7134.210.310.310.610.910.911.111.311.411.611.811.611.911.711.712.412.412.313.112.812.513.013.713.733.3 39.740.8 44.953.5 60.066.8 68.378.2 79.485.2 88.787.7 95.986.1 102.987.3 105.785.7 108.091.8 123.07.57.17.67.67.67.67.47.77.87.58.08.27.98.38.88.88.28.67.88.58.79.08.89.59.710.09.910.110.110.310.310.910.510.310.710.310.311.511.110.711.311.011.711.611.711.56.56.37.89.410.412.112.813.616.115.917.61.31.51.51.41.41.51.51.31.41.51.71.51.41.31.61.51.61.61.51.41.51.51.758 973.2110.9105 9132.5160.4186 0222 2257.0273 4254.9269.9346.4352.5382.3424.4459.5493.2517.0508.4554.043.442.744.545.245.446.646.746.847.847.947.447.947.046.651.350.649.151.649.450.051.553.052.2-572.4-3996-7.8-28.4-30 223 9-19.7-22 3-27.5-52.4-106.7-6.0-3.4-5.5-7.0-7.7-6.8-7.5-8.7-8.3-7.2-7.8-7.0-7.7-7.9-10.5-10.2-8.4-12.1-10.4-10.0-10.6-10.9-10.2-90-1.3-11430-15.7-37 2-40 235 9-31.434 6-38.4-64.2-122.4-117.7 -133.6-138.3 -155.1-152.1 -170.3-118.5 -137.1-109.4 -129.4-101.7 -123.4-66.7 -86.6-84.5 -105.9-7.8-5.1-7.3-8.8-9.4-8.6-9.3-10.5-10.1-9.1-9.6-8.8-9.5-9.6-12.4-12.1-10.2-14.0-12.3-11.9-12.6-12.S-12.21 Department <strong>of</strong> Defense shipments <strong>of</strong> grant-aid military supplies and equipment under <strong>the</strong> Military Assistance Program are excludedfrom total exports through 1985 and included beginning 1986.2 Includes undocumented exports to Canada through 1988. Beginning 1989, undocumented exports to Canada are included in <strong>the</strong>appropriate end-use category.3 Total arrivals <strong>of</strong> imported goods o<strong>the</strong>r than intransit shipments.4 Ci.f. (cost, insurance, and freight) import value at first port <strong>of</strong> entry into United States. Data for 1967-73 are estimates.5 F.a.s. (free alongside ship) value basis at U.S. port <strong>of</strong> exportation for exports and at foreign port <strong>of</strong> exportation for imports.6 Total includes revisions not reflected in detail.7 Total exports are on a revised statistical month basis; end-use categories are on a statistical month basis.Note.—Data are as reported by <strong>the</strong> Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Census adjusted to include silver ore and bullion reported separately prior to 1969.Trade in gold is included beginning 1974. Export statistics cover all merchandise shipped from <strong>the</strong> U.S. customs area, except suppliesfor <strong>the</strong> U.S.- Armed Forces. Exports include shipments under Agency for International Development and Food for Peace programs as wellas o<strong>the</strong>r private relief shipments.Data beginning 1974 include trade <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> U.S. Virgin Islands.Source.- Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Census.390


TABLE B-107.—International reserves, selected years, 1952-93[Millions <strong>of</strong> SDRs; end <strong>of</strong> period]Area and country 1952 1962 1972 1982 1990 1991 1992Oct1993NovAll countries49,38862,851146,658361,253670,678704,672725,652760,728765,608Industrial countries *39,28053,502113,362214,014441,946428,438424,229439,197442,458United StatesCanadaAustraliaJapanNew ZealandAustriaBelgiumDenmarkFinlandFrance24,7141,9449201,1011831161,13315013268617,2202,5611,1682,0212511,0811,7532562374,04912,1125,5725,65616,9167672,5053,5647876649,22429,9183,4286,05322,0015775,5444,7572,1111,42017,85059,95813,06011,71056,0272,9027,3059,5997,5026,84928,71655,76911,81611,83751,2242,0627,9249,5735,2345,38924,73552,9958,6628,42952,9372,2399,70310,9148,0903,86222,52254,7479,2568,31871,3462,52510,0668,8436,4483,47254,6798,7298,34110,3819,0056,4563,650GermanyGreeceIcelandIrelandItalyNe<strong>the</strong>rlands9609483187229536,958287323594,0681,94321,908950781,0385,6054,40743,9099161332,39015,10810,72351,0602,5173083,68446,56513,82747,3753,7473164,02636,36513,98069,4893,3693642,51422,43817,49259,0114,4763214,68523,00124,08960,1102884,69323,73524,072NorwayPortugalSpainSwedenSwitzerlandUnited Kingdom1646031345041,6671,9563046801,0458022,9193,3081,2202,1294,6181,4536,9615,2016,2721,1797,4503,39716,93011,90410,81910,73636,55512,85623,45625,8649,29214,97746,56213,02823,19129,9488,72514,47433,64016,66727,10027,30014,28430,14214,39925,18614,44830i22525,463Developing countries: Total 29,6489,34933,295147,239228,732276,234301,423321,531323,149By area:AfricaAsia 2EuropeMiddle EastWestern Hemisphere1,7863,7932691,1832,6162,1102,7723811,8052,2823,9628,1292,6809,4369,0897,73444,4905,35964,09425,56312,053128,82615,53537,95634,36114,587157,53515,82341,77746,51213,095164,41715,17143,87764,86113,452175,19116,32145,15571,41213,230176,55716,37145,29671,696Memo:Oil-exporting countriesNon-oil developing countries1,6997,9492,0307,3199,95623,33967,16380,07643,875184,85748,883227,35145,871255,55245,534275,99745,280277,8691 Includes data for Luxembourg.2 Includes data for Taiwan Province <strong>of</strong> China.Note.—International reserves is comprised <strong>of</strong> monetary authorities' holdings <strong>of</strong> gold (at SDR 35 per ounce), special drawing rights(SDRs), reserve positions in <strong>the</strong> International Monetary Fund, and foreign exchange. Data exclude U.S.S.R., o<strong>the</strong>r Eastern Europeancountries, and Cuba (after 1960).U.S. dollars per SDR (end <strong>of</strong> period) are: 1952 and 1962—1.00000; 1972—1.08571; 1982—1.10311; 1990—1.42266; 1991—1.43043; 1992—1.37500; October 1993—1.39293; and November 1993—1.38389.Source: International Monetary Fund, International Financial Statistics.391


TABLE B-108.—Industrial production and consumer prices, major industrial countries, 1967-93Year or quarterUnitedStatesCanadaJapanEuropeanCommunity1FranceGermany 2ItalyUnitedKingdomIndustrial production (1987= LOO)^19671968196919701971197219731974197519761977 .. . .19781979 .. .1980..19811982198319841985198619871988198919901991 . .19921993" .. ..1992:1II . .IlIV ..1993:1 ||IIV57.560.763.561.462.268.373.872.766.372.478.282.685.784.185 781.984992.894 495.3100.0104.4106.0106.01041106.5111.0105.1106 3106.5108 3109.7110 4111.1113.151.154.358.158.862.066.773.876.171.676.079.382.186.182.884576.281291.096195.4100 0105.3105.2101.898198.597.598 098.5100 0101.8102 6103.636.241.748.355.056.559.667.966.459.466.068.673.078.181.782 682.985 593.496 896.6100 0109.3115.9121.4123 7116.5119.7116 9116.5113 5114.1112 2112.059.363.769.673.174.778.083.784.378.784.586.695.493.192.891 189.990 892.895 898.0100 0104.2108.2110.31102108.9106.8109 5108.6106 6105.16162697277818790839092949998.998.397.396.597.197.298.0100.0104.6108.9111.0110.9109.8110.41104110.3107.3104.8104 9Consumer prices (1982-84=100)57.662.970.975.577.079.985.084.879.686.888.090.494.795.093 290.390.993.597.799.6100.0103.9108.8114.1117.4116.0119.2117.3115.7110.3106.9106.9106.958.561.964.268.368.070.877.781.273.782.983.885.491.196.294 791.788 991.892.996.2100.0105.9109.2109.4107.1106.5110.3107.2104.7104.0105.2102.0103.070.575.978.578.978.579.987.085.480 883.487.690.193.686.984 185.788 989.093.996.2100.0104.8107.0106.7102.5102.0101.4101.3102.5103.1103.2104.3105.31967 . ...196819691970197119721973197419751976197719781979198019811982 . .. .19831984 .. .1985198619871988198919901991199219931992-1 ||IlIV1993-1IIIll.IV33.434.836.738.840.541.844 449.353.856.960.665.272.682 490.996 599.6103 9107.6109 61136118.3124.0130.7136.2140 3144.5138 7139.8140 9141.9143.1144.2144.8145.831.332.534.035.136.137.940 745.250.153.858.163.369.176185.694 9100.4104 8108.9113.4118 4123.2129.3135.5143.1145.2147.9144 2144.9145 6146.1147.2147.5148.1148.832.234.035.838.540.942.947 959.065.972.278.181.484.491095.398 099.81021104.1104.8104 9105.7108.0111.4115.0116.91159117.51170117.4117.4118.5119.123.524.325.326.628.330.132 737.442.847.953.858.765.174 083.292 2100.2107.4114.0118.2122 2126.7133.3140.8147.9154.31521154.0154 8156.2157.5159.2160.124.625.727.428.730.332.234 539.343.948.152.757.563.672.382.091.6100.5107.9114.2117.2120.9124.2128.6133.0137.2140.6139 5140.6140 6141.3142.5143.4143.749.350.151.052.955.658.762.867.271.274.276.979.082.386.892.297.0100.3102.7104.8104.7104.9106.3109.2112.1116.0120.6125.51191120.4121.0122.1124.2125.5126.0126.616.016.216.616.817.618.720.624.628.833.640.145.152.163.275.487.7100.8111.5121.1128.5134 4141.1150.4159 6169.8178 9186.4175 9178.2179.4181.7183.5185.5187.3189.218.519.420.421.823.825.527.932.340.246.854.258.766.678.587.995.499.8104.8111.1114.9119 7125.6135.4148.2156.9162.7165.3160 0163.5163.4164.0162.9165.6166.0166.61 Consists <strong>of</strong> Belgium-Luxembourg, Denmark, France, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands, United Kingdom, Germany, Portugal, andSpain. Industrial production prior to July 1981 excludes data for Greece, which joined <strong>the</strong> EC in 1981. Data for Portugal and Spain,which became members on January 1, 1986 are excluded prior to 1982.2 Former West Germany.3 All data exclude construction. Quarterly data are seasonally adjusted.Sources: National sources as reported by Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce (International Trade Administration, Office <strong>of</strong> Trade and <strong>Economic</strong>Analysis, Trade and Industry Statistics Division), Department <strong>of</strong> Labor (Bureau <strong>of</strong> Labor Statistics), and Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>Federal Reserve System.


TABLE B-109.—Civilian unemployment rate, and hourly compensation, major industrial countries,1967-93[Quarterly data seasonally adjusted]Year or quarterUnitedStates Canada Japan FranceGermany*ItalyUnitedKingdom1967196819691970197119721973197419751976197719781979198019811982198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931992:1....II...III..IV..1993:1....II...IV..1967..1968..1969..1970..1971..1972..1973..1974..1975..1976..1977..1978..1979..1980..1981..1982..1983..1984..1985..1986..1987..1988..1989..1990..1991..1992..3.83.63.54.95.95.64.95.68.57.77.16.15.87.17.69.79.67.57.2.7.06.25.55.35.56.77.46.87.37.57.57.37.07.06.76.562.867.974.483.391.5100.0102.7105.9111.2115.8118.4123.0127.9134.7141.9148.13.84.54.45.76.26.25.55.36.97.18.18.37.47.57.511.011.811.210.59.58.87.87.58.110.311.311.210.711.311.511.511.011.411.411.1Civilian unemployment rate (percent) 21.31.21.11.21.31.41.31.41.92.02.02.32.12.02.22.42.72.82.62.82.92.52.32.12.12.22.12.12.22.32.32.42.62.12.72.32.52.82.92.82.94.24.65.25.46.16.57.68.38.610.010.510.610.810.39.69.19.6"10.410.210.210.310.610.811.211.51.31.1.6.5.6.7.71.63.43.43.43.32.92.84.05.63 6.97.17.26.66.36.35.7"5.0"4.4"4.74.44.64.85.05.45.86.13.43.53.53.23.33.83.73.13.43.94.14.14.44.44.95.45.95.96.037.57.97.97.8"7.03 "6.9"7.36.97.07.08.339.410.810.6Manufacturing hourly compensation in U.S. dollars (1982=100) 426.128.230.433.937.741.344.352.257.367.769.569.874.883.093.1100.0106.2105.9105.6107.8116.3130.9143.2155.5167.8165.710.512.214.617.420.727.337.445.652.156.268.694.095.598.3107.6100.0107.7111.0115.0171.2204.2234.4231.2237.5270.8300.617.920.220.521.624.429.438.442.158.259.966.181.497.5113.3101.8100.095.390.295.0128.4153.4160.6158.1192.4193.5213.515.216.318.122.927.032.544.251.659.762.974.592.8109.1119.3102.2100.099.993.996.0135.6171.4182.1178.4222.2230.6260.017.718.920.625.129.434.941.248.160.559.065.778.897.4111.1100.9100.0104.3103.5107.0142.7173.3179.9188.5241.0257.5277.13.33.23.13.13.94.23.23.14.65.96.46.35.47.010.511.311.811.811.211.210.38.67.36.9"8.8"10.0"10.49.69.810.210.510.610.410.410.116.915.817.219.923.527.731.035.644.942.346.259.277.9103.7104.8100.093.288.894.7113.7138.9158.6167.3191.4210.8228.41 Former West Germany.2 Civilian unemployment rates, approximating U.S. concepts. Quarterly data for France, Germany, and United Kingdom should beviewed as less precise indicators <strong>of</strong> unemployment under U.S. concepts than <strong>the</strong> annual data. Many Italians reported as unemployed didnot actively seek work in <strong>the</strong> past 30 days, and <strong>the</strong>y have been excluded for comparability with U.S. concepts. Inclusion <strong>of</strong> such personswould about double <strong>the</strong> unemployment rate for Italy through 1985, and increase it to 11-12 percent for 1986-92 and 13 percent in1993.3 <strong>The</strong>re are breaks in <strong>the</strong> series for Germany (1983) and Italy (1986, 1991, and 1993). Based on <strong>the</strong> prior series, <strong>the</strong> rate forGermany was 7.2 percent in 1983, and <strong>the</strong> rate for Italy was 6.3 percent in 1986 and 6.6 in 1991. <strong>The</strong> break in 1993 raised Italy's rateby approximately 1.1 percentage points.4 Hourly compensation in manufacturing, U.S. dollar basis. Data relate to all employed persons (wage and salary earners and <strong>the</strong> selfemployed)in <strong>the</strong> United States and Canada, and to all employees (wage and salary earners) in <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r countries. For France andUnited Kingdom, compensation adjusted to include changes in employment taxes that are not compensation to employees, but are laborcosts to employers.Source.- Department <strong>of</strong> Labor, Bureau <strong>of</strong> Labor Statistics.393


TABLE B-110.—Foreign exchange rates, 1969-93[Currency units per U.S. dollar, except as noted]PeriodMarch 197319691970197119721973197419751976197719781979198019811982198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931992: 1IIIllIV1993:1 IIIllIVMarch 197319691970197119721973197419751976197719781979198019811982198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931992:1IIIllIV1993:1IIIllIVBelgium(franc)39.40850.14249.65648.59844.02038.95538.95936.80038.60935.84931.49529.34229.23837.19545.78151.12357.75259.33744.66437.35836.78539.40933.42434.19532.14834.58133.34733.22030.17031.91533.68633.31135.44735.857Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands(guilder)2.87143.62403.61663.49533.20982.79462.68792.52932.64492.45482.16432.00731.98752.49992.67192.85443.20853.31852.44852.02641.97782.12191.82151.87201.75871.85851.82431.81821.65061.74481.83871.81801.88611.8907Canada(dollar)0.99671.07691.04441.0099.99071.0002.97801.0175.98631.06331.14051.17131.16931.19901.23441.23251.29521.36591.38961.32591.23061.18421.16681.14601.20851.29021.17751.19401.20161.26171.26081.27031.30391.3251Sweden(krona)4.42945.17015.18625.10514.75714.36194.43874.15314.35804.48024.52074.28934.23105.06606.28397.67188.27088.60327.12736.34696.13706.45595.92316.05215.82587.79565.88545.83025.35236.25817.52997.41308.01518.2185France(franc)4.51565.19995.52885.51005.04444.45354.81074.28774.78254.91614.50914.25674.22515.43976.57947.62048.73568.98006.92576.01225.95956.38025.44675.64685.29355.66695.51375.44164.96285.26715.54635.46355.81805.8368Switzerland(franc)3.21714.31314.31064.11713.81863.16882.98052.58392.50022.40651.79071.66441.67721.96752.03272.10072.35002.45521.79791.49181.46431.63691.39011.43561.40641.47811.45731.47801.30411.38881.50631.46281.47681.4676Germany(mark)2.81323.92513.64653.48303.18862.67152.58682.46142.51852.32362.00971.83431.81752.26322.42812.55392.84552.94202.17051.79811.75701.88081.61661.66101.56181.65451.62041.61461.46431.55091.63491.61981.67761.6851United Kingdom(pound) 12.47242.39012.39592.44422.50342.45252.34032.22171.80481.74491.91842.12242.32462.02431.74801.51591.33681.29741.46771.63981.78131.63821.78411.76741.76631.50161.76921.80701.90301.57811.47691.53311.50371.4914Italy(lira)568.17627.32627.12618.34583.70582.41650.81653.10833.58882.78849.13831.11856.211138.581354.001519.321756.111908.881491.161297.031302.391372.281198.271241.281232.171573.411218.541217.231135.181362.891547.371506.551586.561653.17Japan(yen)261.90358.36358.16347.79303.13271.31291.84296.78296.45268.62210.39219.02226.63220.63249.06237.55237.46238.47168.35144.60128.17138.07145.00134.59126.78111.08128.77130.37124.93123.02120.67110.05105.65108.35Multilateral trade-weighted value <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> U.S. dollar (March 1973=100)Nominal100.0122.4121.1117.8109.199.1101.498.5105.7103.492.488.187.4103.4116.6125.3138.2143.0112.296.992.798.689.189.886.693.288.288.081.988.593.390.993.794.9Real 2 100.098.999.494.197.693.384.483.284.9100.9111.8117.3128.8132.4103.690.988.294.486.086.583.489.984.884.478.985.490.087.690.291.71 Value is U.S. dollars per pound.2 Adjusted by changes in consumer prices.Source-. Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Federal Reserve System.394


TABLE B —111.— Growth rates in real gross domestic product, 1975-93[Percent change]Area and country 1975-84 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 *World3.3Industrial countries-2.5United States2.5Canada3.2Japan4.0European Community2.0France2.1Germany 21.8Italy2.5United Kingdom 31.5Developing countries4.5Africa2.3Asia6.3Middle East and Europe3.6Western Hemisphere3.2Countries in transition 43.9Central Europe3.3Former Soviet Union 5 4.13.73.33.24.85.02.51.91.92.63.85.23.77.32.93.52.13.11.73.62.92.93.32.62.92.52.22.94.34.91.97.02.44.03.63.73.63.93.23.14.24.12.92.31.43.14.85.71.38.15.93.22.61.92.84.64.33.95.06.24.24.53.74.15.05.33.99.0.71.14.31.55.33.43.22.52.44.73.54.33.62.92.24.13.65.53.61.62.3.23.02.22.31.2-.24.83.02.55.72.1.43.71.95.74.2.3-3.5-7.1-2.30.6.5-.7-1.74.0.71.71.3-2.24.51.66.12.43.3-12.0-12.6-11.81.72.6.71.31.11.41.9.9-.55.8.47.87.82.5-15.4-9.1-17.82.21.12.72.6-.2-1.0-1.6.01.86.11.68.73.43.4-10.2-1.8-13.71 All figures are forecasts except data for United States.2 Through 1990 for West Germany only.3 Average <strong>of</strong> expenditure, income, and output estimates <strong>of</strong> GDP at market prices.4 For most countries included in <strong>the</strong> group, total output is measured by real net material product (NMP) or by NMP-based estimates<strong>of</strong> GDP.5 Data beginning 1990 are weighted averages <strong>of</strong> separate estimates for <strong>the</strong> 15 states <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> former U.S.S.R.Sources: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce (Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Analysis) and International Monetary Fund.395


NATIONAL WEALTHTABLE B-l 12.—National wealth, 1946-92[Billions <strong>of</strong> dollars]End <strong>of</strong> yearPrivate net worth 2Tangible wealth 3Totalnetworth lTotalTotal *OwneroccupiedrealestateConsumerdurablesTotal 5Financial wealthCorporateequity 6NoncorporateequityGovernment net financial assetsTotal 7FederalStateandlocal1946194719481949533.7624.1673.9706.8755.5831.6872.9909.6220.1260.7294.7323.5149.6175.5197.1214.753.265.176.386.6535.4570.9578.2586.1102.6100.299.0108.1200.1236.1245.1244.6-221.8-207.5-199.0-202.8-221.6-207.4-198.8-202.4-0.6-.1-.919501951195219531954816.9918.8954.5979.01,076.51,015.41,112.91,167.61,204.51,311.2373.1419.1455.2486.3514.4239.7266.8291.6312.6335.4108.2124.4134.0143.0147.1642.3693.8712.4718.2796.8132.0154.6156.3150.2218.9276.3297.3299.6301.2303.3-198.5-194.1-213.1-225.5-234.7-195.1-189.7-203.2-212.1-217.5-3.9-5.0-10.5-14.0-17.9195519561957195819591,186.21,282.21,302.41,452.61,526.91,421.71,515.01,537.01,702.51,784.0557.9603.2634.3664.1699.1364.8391.9416.3438.8464.4157.3171.9176.2182.0189.0863.8911.8902.71,038.41,084.9268.2288.4254.3358.0385.4312.0327.4337.7351.1354.5-235.5-232.8-234.6-249.9-257.1-215.1-209.4-206.7-216.5-219.4-21.1-24.1-28.7-34.2-38.6196019611962196319641,570.91,727.51,715.01,855.52,010.11,828.91,995.31,990.62,135.82,297.3730.0761.2794.5833.0874.9488.2512.5535.9559.2584.6193.7196.8202.3212.8223.71,098.91,234.11,196.11,302.81,422.4381.5487.8423.0497.3572.2356.4365.0374.1383.6396.1-258.0-267.8-275.6-280.3-287.2-217.0-223.1-227.8-229.9-233.8-41.9-45.7-48.8-51.5-54.5196519661967196819692,182.82,239.02,513.82,847.82,891.42,474.22,537.62,825.23,172.03,216.7919.2991.81,059.41,182.01,282.8609.6651.9688.2768.7826.7236.1258.5283.2314.2343.71,550.01,545.81,765.81,990.01,933.9649.8581.7724.2863.8655.5417.8441.3460.6496.5524.1-291.4-298.6-311.4-324.2-325.3-235.7-239.0-247.0-255.5-249.2-57.0-60.9-66.0-70.5-78.2197019711972197319743,018.43,331.33,762.93,942.44,090.13,364.03,706.94,153.74,333.84,493.61,363.91,478.11,667.71,887.82,146.8867.4945.71,085.51,234.91,395.2372.4393.7424.7470.5544.22,000.12,228.82,486.02,446.02,346.8638.6730.1810.5607.0387.8546.2592.8666.2799.9877.6-345.6-375.6-390.8-391.4-403.5-260.7-282.3-298.9-305.2-316.2-87.3-96.2-95.1-90.6-93.91975..1976..1977..1978..1979..4,636.05,328.15,784.46,615.97,734.55,119.45,871.76,396.67,232.68,365.62,391.12,683.83,088.33,601.34,178.71,572.11,790.42,094.72,478.22,897.2595.7652.8725.5815.2924.42,728.33,187.93,281.33,631.34,186.9515.6721.1620.4631.4764.3958.61,071.41,195.11,398.61,632.0-483.4-543.6-585.2-616.7-631.1-392.9-452.9-507.7-545.3-566.5-99.0-100.8-88.1-83.0-77.31980..1981..1982..1983..1984..8,958.99,531.110,099.510,860.811,421.59,650.610,307.611,021.411,961.812,697.74,703.05,096.55,358.55,672.86,160.03,289.43,572.63,758.43,983.94,349.41,014.31,086.21,133.71,193.81,281.54,947.65,211.15,662.96,289.06,537.71,021.0926.1999.11,158.71,099.81,863.62,016.22,015.12,059.12,026.8-691.7-776.5-921.9-1,101.0-1,276.2-626.7-702.8-848.3-1,041.7-1,223.9-79.2-89.3-90.9-77.8-73.61985..1986..1987..1988..1989..12.474.013,468.614,249.315,146.616,683.513,942.315,158.516,122.717,216.218,955.66,603.27,100.47,656.18,102.88,708.64,650.14,978.25,368.95,619.66,058.51,391.11,527.51,659.51,808.41,929.67,339.18,058.18,466.69,113.410,247.01,453.51,754.81,757.01,900.02,264.92,049.62,107.22,224.62,353.02,508.1-1,468.3-1,689.9-1,873.4-2,069.6-2,272.1-1,429.8-1,663.7-1,845.4-2,037.8-2,212.9-59.3-48.1-51.8-59.1-90.21990..1991..1992..16,425.217,949.818,569.318,933.120,731.821,749.98,738.39,248.39,534.15,979.06,440.76,671.72,047.12,141.92,232.110,194.811,483.512,215.82,190.43,073.43,665.52,440.62,344.62,266.6-2,507.9-2,782.0-3,180.6-2,406.0-2,646.5-2,998.2-136.6-173.2-226.01 Sum <strong>of</strong> private net worth and government net financial assets.2 Referred to as household net worth in <strong>the</strong> Balance Sheets.3 Held by households and nonpr<strong>of</strong>it organizations.4 Also includes nonpr<strong>of</strong>it organizations real estate.5 Also includes credit market instruments, life insurance and pension reserves, security credit, and miscellaneous assets, and is net <strong>of</strong>liabilities.6 Includes households and nonpr<strong>of</strong>it organizations' direct (or through mutual funds) holdings <strong>of</strong> corporate equity. Equity held throughpension and life insurance reserves is not included.7 Also includes sponsored credit agencies and <strong>the</strong> Federal Reserve. Some tangible wealth is included for <strong>the</strong>se agencies.Note.—Data are from Balance Sheets for <strong>the</strong> U.S. Economy, 1945-92, September 1993, with updates for recent years from Flow <strong>of</strong> FundsAccounts, Flows and Outstanding, December 1993.Data are measured at market value where available. For example, corporate equity and land are measured at market value, but bondsare measured at par value.Source: Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Federal Reserve System.396


TABLE B-113.—National wealth in 1987 dollars, 1946-92[Billions <strong>of</strong> 1987 dollars]End <strong>of</strong> yearPrivate net worth 2Tangible wealth sTotalnetworth 1TotalTotal 4OwneroccupiedrealestateConsumerdurablesTotal 5Financial wealthCorporateequity 6NoncorporateequityGovernment net financial assetsTotal 7FederalStateandlocal1946..1947..1948194919501951195219531954195519561957.1958.1959.1960.19611962.1963.1964.19651966196719681969197019711972197319741975197619771978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119923,195.83,200.53,336.13,551.83,871.64,313.64,358.44,450.04,805.85,091.05,320.35,294.35,741.55,895.46,018.86,494.46,328.46,747.37,153.47,552.97,463.38.109.08,735.68,429.78,361.28,766.69,430.89,168.48,647.19,108.19,866.910,007.610,518.111,307.711,866.111,637.511,812.312,189.512,307.713,020.913,687.614,011.114,262.315,057.314,196.415,020.815,121.64,524.04,264.64,321.34,570.94,812.35,224.95,331.55,475.05,853.66,101.76,286.36,248.06,729.26,888.07,007.37,501.17,345.47,766.58,175.48,561.28,458.79,113.59,730.19,378.19,318.69,755.010,410.310,078.69,500.210,057.810,873.511,020.111,498.612,230.412,782.312,585.612,890.513,425.113,682.914,553.515,405.015,853.216,211.117,107.916,364.017,348.817,711.61,318.01,336.91,458.91,625.61,768.21,967.62,078.52,210.52,296.42,394.42,502.92,578.52,624.92,699.22,796.92,861.72,931.73,029.13,113.53,180.63,306.03,417.43,625.83,739.93,778.13,889.74,179.74,390.24,538.74,697.64,970.05,343.15,725.46,109.26,229.16,222.86,267.36,366.86,637.96,892.77,215.97,528.17,629.87,859.77,552.57,739.27,763.9895.8900.0975.71,078.91,136.01,252.61,331.51,420.91,497.31,565.71,626.11,692.31,734.41,793.11,870.51,926.71,977.52,033.52,080.42,109.32,173.02,220.02,358.02,410.22,402.82,488.72,720.62,871.92,949.73,088.63,315.63,624.03,939.94,235.74,356.84,362.14,395.84,471.34,686.94,854.05,059.15,279.25,291.55,468.05,167.75,389.75,433.0318.6333.8377.7435.2512.8584.0611.9650,0656.7675.1713.3716.3719.4729.7742.1739.8746.5773.8796.1817.0861.7913.5963.81,002.01,031.61,036.11,064.41,094.21,150.51,170.31,208.91,255.21,296.01,351.51,343.41,326.31,326.01,339.81,380.91,452.11,552.31,631.81,702.81,741.51,769.31,792.41,817.73,206.02,927.72,862.42,945.23,044.13,257.33,253.03,264.53,557.13,707.33,783.43,669.54,104.34,188.84,210.34,639.54,413.74,737.55,061.95,380.65,152.75,696.16,104.35,638.25,540.45,865.36,230.65,688.44,961.55,360.15,903.55,677.05,773.16,121.26,553.16,362.86,623.37,058.47,044.97,660.98,189.18,325.18,581.49,248.28,811.49,609.69,947.7614.4513.8490.1543.2625.6725.8713.7682.7977.21,151.11,196.71,033.71,415.01,488.01,461.71,833.81,560.91,808.42,036.32,248.41,939.02,336.12,649.71,911.11,769.01,921.32,031.31,411.6819.91,013.01,335.41,073.41,003.81,117.41,352.31,130.81,168.51,300.41,185.11,517.21,783.31,727.61,789.12,044.11,893.22,571.92,984.91,198.21,210.81,213.41,229.11,309.51,395.81,368.01,369.11,354.01,339.11,358.51,372.81,387.71,368.71,365.51,372.21,380.41,394.91,409.61,445.71,471.01,485.81,523.01,528.01,513.01,560.01,669.71,860.21,855.41,883.31,984.12,067.62,223.52,386.02,468.32,461.82,356.82,311.02,184.12,139.52,141.52,187.42,215.62,263.62,109.41,962.01,845.8-1,328.1-1,064.1-985.1-1,019.1-940.8-911.3-973.1-1,025.0-1,047.8-1,010.7-966.0-953.7-987.7-992.7-988.5-1,006.8-1,017.0-1,019.3-1,022.1-1,008.3-995.3-1,004.5-994.5-948.4-957.3-988.4-979.4-910.2-853.1-949.7-1,006.7-1,012.5-980.4-922.7-916.2-948.1-1,078.2-1,235.7-1,375.2-1,532.7-1,717.4-1,842.1-1,948.8-2,050.6-2,167.6-2,328.0-2,590.1-1,326.9-1,063.6-984.2-1,017.1-924.6-890.6-927.9-964.1-971.0-923.2-868.9-840.2-855.7847.1-831.4-838.7-840.6-836.0-832.0-815.6-796.7-796.8-783.7-726.5-722.2-742.9-749.1-709.8-668.5-771.9-838.7-878.4-866.9-828.2-830.1-858.1-992.2-1,169.1-1,318.9-1,492.5-1,690.8-1,814.6-1,918.8-1,997.2-2,079.5-2,214.6-2,441.5-3.6-2.6-3.5-4.5-18.5-23.5-47.9-63.6-79.9-90.6-100.0-116.7-135.2-149.0-160.5-171.8-180.1-187.3-194.0-197.2-203.0-212.9-216.3-228.0-241.8-253.2-238.3-210.7-198.5-194.5-186.7-152.4-132.0-113.0-104.9-109.0-106.3-87.3-79.3-61.9-48.9-50.9-55.6-81.4-118.1-144.9-184.01 Sum <strong>of</strong> private net worth and government net financial assets.2 Referred to as household net worth in <strong>the</strong> Balance Sheets.3 Held by households and nonpr<strong>of</strong>it organizations.4 Also includes nonpr<strong>of</strong>it organizations real estate.5 Also includes credit market instruments, life insurance and pension reserves, security credit, and miscellaneous assets, and is net <strong>of</strong>liabilities.6 Includes households and nonpr<strong>of</strong>it organizations' direct (or through mutual funds) holdings <strong>of</strong> corporate equity. Equity held throughpension and life insurance reserves is not included.7 Also includes sponsored credit agencies and <strong>the</strong> Federal Reserve. Some tangible wealth is included for <strong>the</strong>se agencies.Note.—See Note, Table B-112.Deflated by <strong>the</strong> GDP implicit price deflator. (<strong>The</strong> deflator was averaged for fourth quarter <strong>of</strong> year shown and first quarter <strong>of</strong> followingyear.)Sources: Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Federal Reserve System and Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Analysis.397


SUPPLEMENTARY TABLETABLE B-114.—Selected historical series on gross domestic product and related series, 1929-58[Billions <strong>of</strong> dollars; except as noted]Year1987dollarsGross domestic productImplicitpricedeflator(1987 =100)Percent change frompreceding periodCurrentdollars1987dollarsCurrentdollarsImplicitpricedeflatorPersonalconsumptionexpendituresConstant (1987) dollarsNetexportsGrossprivatedomesticinvestmentGovermentpurchasesDisposablepersonalincomeTotalPercapita(dollars)Savingaspercent<strong>of</strong>disposablepersonalincome1Population(thousands)21929103.1821.812.5554.5152.81.9112.6585.84,8073.0121,8781930193119321933193490.475.858.055.665.1748.9691.3599.7587.1632.612.111.09.79.510.3-12.4-16.2-23.5-4.117.1-8.9 -3.2-7.7 -9.1-13.3 -11.8-2.1 -2.17.7 8.4520.0501.0456.6447.4461.1107.267.225.026.641.1-.3-2.3-2.4-3.0-1.0122.0125.5120.5116.1131.4542.2519.7449.8437.0462.04,4024,1863,6003,4773,6522.52.1-3.1-3.9-1.1123,188124,149124,949125,690126,4851935193619371938193972.382.790.884.990.8681.3777.9811.4778.9840.710.610.611.210.910.811.114.49.8-6.57.07.714.24.3-4.07.92.9.05.7-2.7-.9487.6534.4554.6542.2568.765.289.9106.469.993.4-7.2-5.1-1.94.24.6135.7158.6152.2162.5174.0505.2565.9585.5547.6590.33,9674,4154,5404,2134,5052.34.44.0-.32.4127,362128,181128,961129,969131,02819401941194219431944100.0125.0158.5192.4211.0906.01,070.61,284.91,540.51,670.011.011.712.312.512.610.225.026.821.39.77.818.220.019.98.41.96.45.11.6.8595.2629.3628.7647.3671.2121.8149.481.453.559.88.22.8-11.1-28.1-29.0180.7289.1586.0867.7968.0627.2713.9824.7863.8901.84,7475,3526,1156,3176,5163.810.723.124.525.0132,122133,402134,860136,739138,39719451946194719481949213.1211.9234.3260.3259.31,602.61,272.11,252.81,300.01,305.513.316.718.720.019.91.0-.610.611.1-.4-4.0-20.6-1.53.8.45.625.612.07.0-.5714.6779.1793.3813.0831.482.6195.5198.8229.8187.4-23.926.541.916.617.3829.4271.0218.8240.6269.3890.9860.0826.1872.9874.56,3676,0835,7325,9535,86219.28.53.05.83.7139,928141,389144,126146,631149,188195019511952195319541955195619571958287.0331.6349.7370.0370.9404.3426.2448.6454.71,418.51,558.41,624.91,685.51,673.81,768.31,803.61,838.21,829.120.221.321.522.022.222.923.624.424.910.715.55.45.8.29.05.45.21.48.79.94.33.7-.75.62.01.9-.51.55.4.92.3.93.23.13.42.0874.3894.7923.4962.5987.31,047.01,078.71,104.41,122.2256.4255.6231.6240.3234.1284.8282.2266.9245.73.211.12.3-7.1-2.3-5.2-1.21.6-14.9284.5397.0467.6489.8454.7441.7444.0465.3476.0942.5978.21,009.71,053.51,071.51,130.81,185.21,214.61,236.06,2146,3406,4336,6036,5986,8427,0467,0917,0985.97.37.27.06.25.77.17.27.4151,684154,287156,954159,565162,391165,275168,221171,274174,1411 Percents based on data in millions <strong>of</strong> dollars.2 Population <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> United States including Armed Forces overseas; does not include data for Alaska and Hawaii.Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Analysis.O398


ISBN 0-16-043028-390 00078C 43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!